The following is the unedited transcript of the news release from the Federal Open Market Committee.


PRESENT:

Mr. Bernanke, Chairman
Mr. Geithner, Vice Chairman
Mr. Evans
Mr. Hoenig
Mr. Kohn
Mr. Kroszner
Mr. Mishkin
Mr. Poole
Mr. Rosengren
Mr. Warsh
Ms. Cumming, Mr. Fisher, Ms. Pianalto, and Messrs. Plosser and Stern, Alternate Members of the Federal Open Market Committee
Messrs. Lacker and Lockhart, and Ms. Yellen, Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of Richmond, Atlanta, and San Francisco, respec-tively
Mr. Madigan, Secretary and Economist
Ms. Danker, Deputy Secretary
Ms. Smith, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Skidmore, Assistant Secretary
Mr. Alvarez, General Counsel
Mr. Baxter, Deputy General Counsel
Mr. Sheets, Economist
Mr. Stockton, Economist
Messrs. Clouse, Connors, Fuhrer, Kamin, Rasche, Slifman, Sullivan, and Wilcox, Associate Economists
Mr. Dudley, Manager, System Open Market Ac-count
Mr. Struckmeyer, Deputy Staff Director, Office of Staff Director for Management
Mr. English, Senior Associate Director, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Messrs. Reifschneider 1/ and Wascher, Associate Directors, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors
Mr. Wright, Deputy Associate Director, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Zakrajšek, Assistant Director, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Blanchard, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members, Board of Governors
Ms. K. Johnson, Senior Adviser, Division of Inter-national Finance, Board of Governors
Mr. Oliner, Senior Adviser, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors
Mr. Dale, 1/ Senior Adviser, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Gross,1/ Special Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members, Board of Governors
Mr. Small, Project Manager, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Messrs. Kumasaka 2/ and Luecke, 3/ Senior Fi-nancial Analysts, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Ms. Judson, Economist, Division of Monetary Af-fairs, Board of Governors
Ms. Low, Open Market Secretariat Specialist, Divi-sion of Monetary Affairs, Board of Governors
Mr. Lyon, First Vice President, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

1/ Attended portion of meeting relating to the discussion of communication issues.
2/ Attended Tuesday session.
3/ Attended Wednesday session. Messrs. Judd and Sniderman, Executive Vice Presidents, Federal Reserve Banks of San Francisco and Cleveland, respectively
Mr. Altig and Ms. Mester, Senior Vice Presidents, Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta and Phila-delphia, respectively
Mr. Hakkio, Special Adviser, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Messrs. Hilton, Koenig, and Potter, Vice Presi-dents, Federal Reserve Banks of New York, Dallas, and New York, respectively
Mr. Weber, Senior Research Officer, Federal Re-serve Bank of Minneapolis
Mr. Hetzel, Senior Economist, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
By unanimous vote, the Federal Open Market Commit-tee selected D. Nathan Sheets to serve as Economist until the selection of his successor at the first regularly scheduled meeting of the Committee in 2008.

The Manager of the System Open Market Account reported on recent developments in foreign exchange markets. There were no open market operations in foreign currencies for the System’s account in the pe-riod since the previous meeting. The Manager also reported on developments in domestic financial mar-kets and on System open market operations in gov-ernment securities and federal agency obligations dur-ing the period since the previous meeting. By unani-mous vote, the Committee ratified these transactions.

The information provided to the Committee on the first day of the meeting, prior to the release of the ad-vance estimates of the third-quarter national income and product accounts, indicated that economic activity expanded at a solid pace in the third quarter. Con-sumer spending rose more strongly after a tepid in-crease in the second quarter, and the pace of expansion of business outlays for equipment and structures re-mained reasonably solid. Manufacturing posted a siz-able gain for the third quarter as a whole. In contrast, the slump in residential investment intensified during the third quarter, at least partly because of ongoing dis-ruptions in the markets for nonconforming mortgages. The average monthly gain in private employment also slowed significantly. Headline inflation eased during the third quarter, reflecting a decline in energy prices; core inflation continued to be moderate. Employment increased more slowly in the third quarter than in the first half of the year. Private payroll em-ployment registered a considerably smaller average monthly gain; employment in residential construction, manufacturing, and industries related to mortgage lend-ing continued to decline, but most service-producing industries added jobs at a moderate pace. With gains in employment smaller and the workweek flat, the growth of aggregate hours of private production or nonsuper-visory workers stepped down from its second-quarter pace. The labor force participation rate was un-changed, on average, in the third quarter, and the un-employment rate ticked up to 4.7 percent in September. Industrial production changed little in August and Sep-tember after having posted solid advances in June and July. Manufacturing output expanded in the third quar-ter overall at about the same pace as in the second quarter but declined modestly on net in August and September. During those two months, production was damped by declines in the output of motor vehicles and parts. In addition, output of construction supplies and products fell, likely reflecting the ongoing decline in residential investment. Meanwhile, production in the high-tech sector rose at a moderate rate.

Consumer spending was well maintained in August and September. Motor vehicle sales improved, and real spending on other goods posted solid gains in both months. Real outlays on consumer services were strong in August because of a weather-induced jump in energy services. Solid increases in nominal wages and salaries and lower headline inflation led to robust gains in real income over the summer. However, other fac-tors affecting consumer spending were mixed. Short-term interest rates dropped and stock prices rose, on balance, after August. By contrast, house prices con-tinued to decelerate, standards on consumer and mort-gage credit tightened after mid-summer, and the tur-moil in financial markets that started in the summer likely exerted some restraint on consumer spending. Moreover, measures of consumer confidence had de-clined in recent months. The housing downturn deepened as sales of new and existing single-family homes continued to fall. Deterio-ration in nonprime mortgage markets as well as higher mortgage interest rates and tighter lending conditions for prime jumbo loans since earlier in the year appeared to be restraining housing demand. Forward-looking indicators, including an index of pending home sales and adjusted single-family permit issuance, continued to point to a further slowing in housing activity over the near term. Single-family housing starts declined significantly over August and September. Nonetheless, with single-family home sales continuing to sag, inven-tories of unsold homes remained quite elevated. In the multifamily sector, starts declined sharply in September; however, the third-quarter reading remained within the fairly narrow range observed over the past decade. Orders and shipments of nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft rose on average over August and September. In the high-tech category, orders and shipments of computers and peripherals posted robust gains over the same period. Shipments of communica-tion equipment also rose in August and September, but orders were little changed on balance over the same period. Outside the technology sector, shipments of nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft increased at a solid rate over August and September but orders de-clined in August and were flat in September. Sales of medium and heavy trucks leveled off in the third quar-ter after a sharp drop in the first half of the year. Do-mestic outlays for aircraft likely stepped down some-what in the third quarter. Nonresidential building ac-tivity remained vigorous through August after having posted very strong gains in the second quarter; anecdo-tal evidence through early October indicated that the recent turbulence in commercial credit markets had done little to slow the pace of commercial construction. More generally, surveys of business conditions contin-ued to point to further near-term gains in spending, although reports from business contacts indicated that some firms had marked down their capital spending plans. Data on the book value of business inventories through August suggested that real nonfarm inventory invest-ment excluding motor vehicles moved down in the third quarter after having risen at a moderate pace in the second quarter. The ratio of book-value invento-ries to sales in the manufacturing and trade sector ex-cluding motor vehicles, which was available through August, remained well below the elevated values seen around the turn of the year. Purchasing managers, on average, viewed the level of their customers’ invento-ries as about right in September.

The U.S. international trade deficit narrowed in August as exports increased and imports decreased. Goods exports were boosted by a jump in exports of agricul-tural products and of gold, which more than offset a decline in exports of other goods. Exports of automo-tive products fell back sharply after a surge in July. Exports of capital goods contracted slightly, led by a drop in aircraft exports. Exports of semiconductors declined, while exports of computers were about flat. On the import side, the decline was concentrated in goods; service imports were flat. Higher imports of oil and of capital goods, particularly computers and semi-conductors, were more than offset by lower imports of automotive products, consumer goods, and industrial supplies excluding oil. Indicators of economic activity in the third quarter for advanced foreign economies were solid on balance. In the euro area, production and sales picked up in the third quarter from their second-quarter levels. How-ever, recent survey data, including the purchasing man-agers’ index for the service sector in the euro area, pointed to a possible slowing in the pace of growth. Likewise, notwithstanding a strong preliminary estimate of third-quarter GDP growth in the United Kingdom, more recent surveys pointed to some softening. Re-cent Canadian data were mixed, with relatively strong employment growth and some weakness in retail sales. In contrast, Japan’s retail sales and exports rebounded in August, and the October Tankan survey seemed to suggest that the second quarter’s sharp contraction in investment was temporary.

In emerging-market economies, recent information, mostly through August, gave no signs that the turmoil in financial markets was having a significant negative effect on real economic activity. In emerging Asia, ac-tivity appeared to have remained robust, although growth slowed from its elevated second-quarter pace. Economic indicators for Mexico pointed to moderate growth in the third quarter. In South America, activity was strong, boosted by high prices for commodities and, in Argentina and Venezuela, by expansionary mac-roeconomic policies. Food prices continued to be a major source of inflationary pressures in emerging-market economies, and Chinese authorities took several steps aimed at quelling rising prices.
After having risen rapidly in the first half of the year, headline consumer prices decelerated considerably over the summer, largely because of a fall in energy prices. Over September and October, gasoline prices appeared to have risen only moderately despite a jump in crude oil costs. Consumer food prices posted further sizable increases in August and September and continued to run well above the change in core prices. Core con-sumer price inflation remained moderate in August and September and, on a twelve-month change basis, was down noticeably from a year earlier. Core goods prices fell over the year ending in September after having risen little over the preceding year; noticeable decelera-tions occurred in the prices of apparel, prescription drugs, and motor vehicles. In addition, increases in owners’ equivalent rent slowed noticeably, while rent inflation remained about the same as a year earlier. The producer price index for core intermediate materials edged up in September. The twelve-month change in that index stepped down considerably from last year, in part because of softer prices for a variety of energy-intensive and construction-related items. Household surveys indicated that median year-ahead inflation ex-pectations inched down in September and October to about the level observed in the first quarter, and longer-term inflation expectations slipped to their low-est level in two years. Average hourly earnings posted a moderate increase over the twelve months ending in September.

At its September meeting, the FOMC lowered its target for the federal funds rate 50 basis points, to 4.75%. The Board of Governors also approved a 50 basis point decrease in the discount rate, to 5.25%, leaving the gap between the federal funds rate target and the discount rate at 50 basis points. The Commit-tee’s statement noted that, while economic growth had been moderate during the first half of the year, the tightening of credit conditions had the potential to in-tensify the housing correction and to restrain economic growth more generally. The Committee indicated that its action was intended to help forestall some of the adverse effects on the broader economy that could otherwise arise from the disruptions in financial mar-kets and to promote moderate growth over time. Readings on core inflation had improved modestly dur-ing the year, but the Committee judged that some infla-tion risks remained, and the Committee planned to continue to monitor inflation developments carefully. The Committee further noted that developments in financial markets since the last regular FOMC meeting had increased the uncertainty surrounding the eco-nomic outlook. Accordingly, the Committee would continue to assess the effects of these and other devel-opments on economic prospects and remained ready to act as needed to foster price stability and sustainable economic growth.

The expected path for monetary policy as inferred from futures markets declined in the wake of the September policy action, as many investors were surprised by the magnitude of the reduction in the target rate. Over the intermeeting period, many investors came to expect that the Committee would reduce the target federal funds rate at its October meeting; in addition, the an-ticipated policy path further ahead moved down a bit more, on net, over the remainder of the intermeeting period, apparently in response to heightened concerns among investors about economic growth.

Early in the intermeeting period, the functioning of short-term funding markets improved somewhat, but conditions in these markets remained strained. The effective federal funds rate was very close to the target, on average, but the average absolute daily deviation of the effective rate from the target and the intraday stan-dard deviation remained elevated. Credit spreads de-clined in the commercial paper and term interbank funding markets but stayed well above longer-term norms. Liquidity in the Treasury bill market was poor at times. Corporate bond spreads narrowed somewhat, leaving private yields a little lower. Nonfinancial bond issuance was robust; speculative-grade offerings in-creased markedly. The credit quality of most house-holds remained strong, but delinquency rates on sub-prime mortgages climbed further. Securitization of nonconforming mortgages remained limited, and spreads on jumbo mortgages relative to conforming mortgages stayed high. Two-year Treasury yields de-clined roughly in line with the lower expected policy path, while yields on ten-year Treasuries were little changed, on net. TIPS-based inflation compensation was about unchanged on balance over the intermeeting period despite a sharp rise in spot oil prices. Stock prices jumped early in the intermeeting period in re-sponse to the cut in the target federal funds rate and some favorable economic news but later dropped back, leaving broad indexes up only a bit on net. The foreign exchange value of the dollar against other major cur-rencies declined notably. Debt of the domestic nonfinancial sectors was esti-mated to have expanded slightly more quickly in the third quarter than in the previous quarter. Despite evi-dence that bank lending standards and terms had tight-ened over the previous three months, business debt was still rising strongly, reflecting a continued surge in commercial and industrial (C&I) lending by banks and robust issuance of investment-grade bonds. The ex-pansion of business loans was apparently due in part to financings for leveraged buyouts that underwriters could not syndicate to institutional investors. House-hold mortgage borrowing was estimated to have decel-erated again in the third quarter. M2 increased signifi-cantly more slowly in September and October than the rapid pace observed in August, when the financial mar-ket turmoil apparently drove investors to the safety of M2 assets. Inflows to retail money market funds and small time deposits were especially strong in September and October; small time deposits were apparently boosted by the attractive rates that banks were offering in order to help fund their expanding loan portfolios.

In the forecast prepared for this meeting, which was formulated prior to the release of the advance estimates of the third-quarter national income and product ac-counts, the staff revised up its estimate of aggregate economic activity in the third quarter from its forecast presented at the September meeting in light of available indicators that suggested that consumer spending, business investment, and exports were stronger than previously expected. Nonetheless, the staff expected real GDP growth to be considerably slower in the fourth quarter, reflecting steepening declines in residen-tial construction, reductions in the pace of motor vehi-cle production, and a smaller contribution from net exports. Looking forward, the staff expected residen-tial investment to remain weak in 2008 with modest declines in house prices. In addition, the staff contin-ued to expect the stress in credit markets and the ap-preciably higher oil prices indicated by futures markets to restrain spending by businesses and consumers, al-though the lower foreign exchange value of the dollar suggested some boost to net exports. On balance, real GDP growth for 2008 was projected to slow to a pace a bit below that of its potential, and unemployment was expected to creep up slightly. For 2009, the forecast called for real output growth to step up to a pace slightly above potential as the drags on economic activ-ity exerted by the contraction in residential investment and financial strains were expected to abate. The staff’s forecast for core PCE inflation was little changed from that presented at the September meeting because fa-vorable incoming figures on core PCE inflation were offset by expectations for some limited feed-through into retail prices of recent increases in energy prices and for slightly less easing in resource utilization. The forecast for headline inflation was in the same range as that for core inflation in 2008 and 2009, reflecting ex-pectations that energy prices would level off and then turn down and that increases in food prices would slow to a pace more in line with core inflation. The advance data on the national income and product accounts for the third quarter, which were released on the morning of the second day of the FOMC meeting, indicated a stronger increase in real GDP than the staff had forecast, mostly because inventory investment was estimated to be higher than projected by the staff. The staff interpreted this information as suggesting some upward revision to its estimate of output growth in the third quarter, a small downward revision to its forecast of growth in the current quarter, and no significant change to its forecast for coming quarters.

In conjunction with the FOMC meeting in October, all meeting participants (Federal Reserve Board members and Reserve Bank presidents) provided annual projec-tions for economic growth, unemployment, and infla-tion for the period 2007 through 2010. The projec-tions are described in the Summary of Economic Projections, which is attached as an addendum to these minutes.In their discussion of the economic outlook and situa-tion, and in the projections that they had submitted for this meeting, participants noted that economic activity had expanded at a somewhat faster pace in the third quarter than previously anticipated and that there was scant evidence of negative spillovers from the ongoing housing correction to other sectors of the economy. Conditions in financial markets had improved since the September FOMC meeting, but functioning in a num-ber of markets remained strained. Even with some further easing of monetary policy, participants expected economic growth to slow over the next few quarters, reflecting continued sharp declines in the housing sec-tor and tighter lending standards and terms across a broad range of credit products. The slowing of growth was likely to produce a modest increase in the unem-ployment rate from its recent levels, leading to the emergence of a little slack in labor markets. Looking further ahead, participants noted that economic growth should increase gradually to around its trend rate by 2009 as weakness in the housing sector abated and stresses in financial markets subsided. With aggregate demand showing somewhat greater than expected strength in the third quarter and little evidence of sig-nificant spillovers from the housing sector to other components of spending, participants viewed the downside risks to growth as somewhat smaller than at the time of the September meeting, but those risks were still seen as significant. Participants generally ex-pected that inflation would edge down over the next few years, a projection consistent with the recent string of encouraging releases on core consumer prices, futures prices pointing to a flattening of energy costs, and the anticipated easing of pressures on resources. Nonetheless, some upside risks to inflation remained, reflecting in part the potential feed-through to inflation expectations of increases in energy and import prices.

Financial market functioning was judged to have im-proved somewhat since the previous FOMC meeting, but the situation in a number of markets remained strained, and credit market conditions were thought likely to weigh on economic growth over coming quar-ters. In light of some improvement in the commercial paper and leveraged loan markets over the intermeeting period, participants were somewhat less concerned that banks would not have sufficient balance-sheet capacity to absorb large volumes of assets. Conditions in cor-porate credit markets also had improved in recent weeks, and most businesses were apparently having little difficulty raising external funds, as evidenced by strong issuance of investment-grade corporate bonds, a pickup in speculative-grade issuance, and surging C&I loans. Markets for nonconforming mortgages, by con-trast, remained disrupted. Meeting participants also mentioned that while financial market conditions had improved, the functioning of some markets remained somewhat impaired. Indeed, several participants noted some relapse in financial conditions late in the inter-meeting period. Moreover, unusual pressures in fund-ing markets persisted. Participants generally viewed financial markets as still fragile and were concerned that an adverse shock—such as a sharp deterioration in credit quality or disclosure of unusually large and unan-ticipated losses—could further dent investor confi-dence and significantly increase the downside risks to the economy. Participants were also concerned about a potential scenario in which unexpected economic weakness could cause a further tightening of credit conditions that could in turn reinforce weakness in ag-gregate demand.

In their discussion of individual sectors of the econ-omy, participants noted that the recent declines in housing activity—while substantial—had largely been anticipated. Nonetheless, the potential for significant further weakening in housing activity and home prices represented a downside risk to the economic outlook. Most participants pointed to the deterioration in non-prime mortgage markets as well as higher interest rates and tighter credit standards for prime nonconforming mortgages as factors that had exacerbated the deterio-ration in housing markets, and they noted that these developments could further limit the availability of mortgage credit and depress the demand for housing. Some participants also pointed to downside risks to the housing market stemming from the large volume of substantial upward interest-rate resets that were likely on subprime mortgages in coming quarters, which could lead to a faster pace of foreclosures in the near term, thereby intensifying the downward pressure on house prices.

Participants generally agreed that the available data suggested that consumer spending had been well main-tained over the past several months and that spillovers from the strains in the housing market had apparently been quite limited to date. Nevertheless, a number of participants cited notable declines in survey measures of consumer confidence since the onset of financial turbulence in mid-summer, along with sharply higher oil prices, declines in house prices, and tighter under-writing standards for home equity loans and some types of consumer loans, as factors likely to restrain con-sumer spending going forward. Moreover, anecdotal reports by business contacts suggested a softening in retail sales in some regions of the country. Participants expressed a concern that larger-than-expected declines in house prices could further sap consumer confidence as well as net worth, causing a pullback in consumer spending. All told, however, participants envisioned that the most likely scenario was for consumer spend-ing to continue to advance at a moderate rate in com-ing quarters, supported by the generally strong labor market and further gains in real personal income.
Meeting participants noted that capital expenditures had grown at a solid pace in recent months and that the financial turmoil generally appeared to have had a lim-ited effect on business capital spending plans to date. Nevertheless, business sentiment appeared to have eroded somewhat amid heightened economic and fi-nancial uncertainty, potentially restraining investment outlays in some industries. However, participants noted that conditions in corporate bond markets had improved since the September FOMC meeting, and that credit availability generally appeared to be ample, albeit on somewhat tighter terms. Participants judged that moderate growth of investment outlays going for-ward was the most likely outcome. A number of par-ticipants saw downside risk to the outlook for nonresi-dential building activity, reflecting elevated spreads on commercial-mortgage-backed securities and a further tightening of banks’ lending standards for commercial real estate loans. Data on economic growth outside the United States indicated that the global expansion, though likely to slow somewhat in coming quarters, was nevertheless on a firm footing. The continued strength of global growth and the recent decline in the foreign exchange value of the dollar were seen as likely to support U.S. exports going forward.

Readings on core inflation received during the inter-meeting period continued to be generally favorable, and meeting participants agreed that the recent moderation in core inflation would likely be sustained. The slower pace of economic expansion anticipated for the next few quarters would help ease inflationary pressures. Nonetheless, participants expressed concern about the upside risks to the outlook for inflation. The recent increases in the prices of energy and other commodi-ties, along with the significant decline in the foreign exchange value of the dollar, were cited as factors that could exert upward pressure on prices of some core goods and services in the near term. Increases in unit labor costs also could add to inflationary pressures. Moreover, participants expressed concern that some measures of inflation compensation calculated from TIPS securities had risen this year, although they viewed inflation expectations generally as remaining contained. Participants were concerned that if headline inflation remained above core measures for a sustained period, then longer-term inflation expectations could move higher, a development that could lead to greater inflation pressures over the longer term and be costly to reverse.

In the Committee’s discussion of policy for the inter-meeting period, members discussed the relative merits of lowering the target federal funds rate 25 basis points, to 4½ percent, at this meeting or awaiting additional information on prospects for economic activity and inflation before assessing whether a further adjustment in the stance of monetary policy was necessary. Many members noted that this policy decision was a close call. However, on balance, nearly all members sup-ported a 25 basis point reduction in the target federal funds rate. The stance of monetary policy appeared still to be somewhat restrictive, partly because of the effects of tighter credit conditions on aggregate de-mand. Moreover, most members saw substantial downside risks to the economic outlook and judged that a rate reduction at this meeting would provide valuable additional insurance against an unexpectedly severe weakening in economic activity. Many members were concerned about the still-sensitive state of finan-cial markets and thought that an easing of policy would help to support improvements in market functioning, thereby mitigating some of the downside risks to eco-nomic growth. With real GDP likely to expand below its potential over coming quarters, recent price trends favorable, and inflation expectations appearing rea-sonably well anchored, the easing of policy at this meet-ing seemed unlikely to affect adversely the outlook for inflation. A number of members noted that the recent policy moves could readily be reversed if circumstances evolved in a manner that would warrant such action.