S-11 1 a98479orsv11.htm FORM S-11 BioMed Property Trust, Inc.
Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2004
Registration No. 333-          


UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


Form S-11

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


BioMed Property Trust, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Governing Instruments)

17140 Bernardo Center Drive, Suite 195

San Diego, California 92128
(858) 485-9840
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

Alan D. Gold

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
BioMed Property Trust, Inc.
17140 Bernardo Center Drive, Suite 195
San Diego, California 92128
(858) 485-9840
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)


Copies to:

     
Scott N. Wolfe, Esq.
Craig M. Garner, Esq.
Latham & Watkins LLP
12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
San Diego, California 92130
(858) 523-5400
  Brad S. Markoff, Esq.
Alston & Bird LLP
3201 Beechleaf Court, Suite 600
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1062
(919) 862-2200


      Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective.

      If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.     o            

      If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.     o            

      If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.     o            

      If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box.     o


CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

         


Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Amount of
Title of Securities Being Registered Offering Price(1) Registration Fee

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
  $225,000,000   $28,508


(1)  Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.


      The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until this registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.




Table of Contents

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission becomes effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Subject to Completion, dated May 5, 2004

PROSPECTUS

[                              ] Shares

BioMed Property Trust, Inc.
Common Stock


      BioMed Property Trust, Inc. is a self-advised real estate investment trust, or REIT, formed in April 2004 to succeed to the business of Bernardo Property Advisors, Inc. and its affiliates. We focus on acquiring, owning, leasing, managing and selectively developing office and laboratory space for lease to life science tenants, including biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, scientific research institutions, government agencies and other entities involved in the life science industry. We target facilities located in markets containing centers of medical research and biotechnology development, including San Diego, the San Francisco Bay area, the Greater Seattle area, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York/ New Jersey, the Greater Boston area and other select markets in the U.S. and Canada. The members of our senior management team have an average of over 15 years of experience in the real estate industry, principally focusing on properties designed for life science tenants. Upon completion of this offering, our management team will own approximately [          ]% of our fully diluted common stock.

     This is our initial public offering, and no public market currently exists for our shares. We are selling all of the shares of our common stock offered by this prospectus.

     We expect that the initial public offering price will be between $[                    ] and $[                    ] per share. We intend to apply to have our common stock listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BMP.”

You should consider the risks that we have described in “Risk Factors” beginning on page 20 before buying shares of our common stock.


                 
Per
Share Total


Public offering price
  $       $    
Underwriting discount
  $       $    
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
  $       $    


      The underwriters may purchase up to an additional [                     ] shares from us at the public offering price, less the underwriting discount, within 30 days from the date of this prospectus, to cover over-allotments.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

     The underwriters expect to deliver the shares to purchasers on or before [                    ], 2004.


RAYMOND JAMES

The date of this prospectus is [                    ], 2004


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

           
Page

    1  
 
BioMed Property Trust, Inc. 
    1  
 
Investment Highlights
    3  
 
Summary Risk Factors
    4  
 
Our Business Strategy
    5  
 
Properties
    7  
 
Structure and Formation of Our Company
    9  
 
Conflicts of Interest
    13  
 
Restrictions on Ownership of Our Capital Stock
    14  
 
The Offering
    15  
 
Distribution Policy
    16  
 
Our Tax Status
    16  
    17  
    20  
 
Risks Related to Our Properties, Our Business and Our Growth Strategy
    20  
 
Risks Related to the Real Estate Industry
    25  
 
Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure
    28  
 
Risks Related to Our Capital Structure
    31  
 
Risks Related to Our REIT Status
    32  
 
Risks Related to This Offering
    34  
    37  
    38  
    40  
    41  
    42  
    43  
    46  
 
Overview
    46  
 
Critical Accounting Policies
    47  
 
Results of Operations of Our Initial Properties
    49  
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
    50  
 
Commitments and Contingencies
    52  
 
Cash Distribution Policy
    52  
 
Funds From Operations
    52  
 
Inflation
    53  
 
New Accounting Pronouncements
    53  
 
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
    53  
    55  
 
Business Overview
    55  
 
Industry Overview
    56  
 
Life Science Property Characteristics
    59  
 
Target Markets
    60  
 
Our Business Strategy
    61  
 
Initial Properties
    64  
 
Acquisition Properties
    67  
 
Tenants
    67  
 
Property Improvements
    67  
 
Depreciation
    68  
 
Real Estate Taxes
    68  
 
Regulation
    69  
 
Insurance
    70  
 
Competition
    71  
 
Employees
    71  
 
Offices
    71  
 
Legal Proceedings
    71  
    72  
 
Executive Officers and Directors
    72  
 
Board Committees
    73  
 
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
    74  
 
Compensation of Directors
    74  
 
Executive Officer Compensation
    74  
 
401(k) Plan
    75  
 
Incentive Bonus Plan
    75  
 
2004 Equity Incentive Award Plan
    75  
 
Employment Agreements
    77  
 
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification
    77  
 
Indemnification Agreements
    78  
    79  
 
Investment Policies
    79  
 
Dispositions
    80  
 
Financing Policies
    80  
 
Conflict of Interest Policies
    80  
 
Interested Director and Officer Transactions
    80  
 
Policies with Respect to Other Activities
    81  
    82  

i


Table of Contents

           
Page

 
Formation Transactions and Contribution of Initial Properties
    82  
 
Contribution Agreements
    83  
 
Conversion of the Limited Partnership Units in our Operating Partnership
    84  
 
Benefits to Related Parties
    84  
 
Conflicts of Interest
    85  
    87  
 
Our Operating Partnership
    87  
 
Consequences of this Offering and the Formation Transactions
    87  
    88  
 
Management of Our Operating Partnership
    88  
 
Transferability of Interests
    88  
 
Capital Contributions
    89  
 
Amendments of the Partnership Agreement
    89  
 
Redemption/ Exchange Rights
    90  
 
Issuance of Additional Units, Common Stock or Convertible Securities
    90  
 
Tax Matters
    91  
 
Allocations of Net Income and Net Losses to Partners
    91  
 
Operations and Distributions
    91  
 
Termination Transactions
    91  
 
Term
    92  
 
Indemnification and Limitation of Liability
    92  
    93  
    94  
 
General
    94  
 
Common Stock
    94  
 
Power to Reclassify Shares of Our Stock
    94  
 
Power to Increase Authorized Stock and Issue Additional Shares of our Common Stock and Preferred Stock
    95  
 
Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer
    95  
 
Transfer Agent and Registrar
    97  
    98  
 
Our Board of Directors
    98  
 
Removal of Directors
    98  
 
Business Combinations
    98  
 
Control Share Acquisitions
    99  
 
Other Anti-Takeover Provisions of Maryland Law
    100  
 
Amendment to Our Charter and Bylaws
    100  
 
Advance Notice of Director Nominations and New Business
    100  
 
Anti-takeover Effect of Certain Provisions of Maryland Law and of Our Charter and Bylaws
    101  
 
Ownership Limit
    101  
    102  
 
General
    102  
 
Rule 144
    102  
 
Redemption/Exchange Rights
    102  
 
Registration Rights
    102  
 
Equity Incentive Award Plan
    103  
 
Lock-up Agreements and Other Contractual Restrictions on Resale
    103  
    104  
 
Taxation of Our Company
    104  
 
Failure To Qualify
    111  
 
Tax Aspects of Our Operating Partnership, the Subsidiary Partnerships and the Limited Liability Companies
    111  
 
Federal Income Tax Considerations for Holders of Our Common Stock
    113  
 
Taxation of Taxable U.S. Stockholders Generally
    114  
 
Backup Withholding
    115  
 
Taxation of Tax-Exempt Stockholders
    116  
 
Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders
    116  
 
Other Tax Consequences
    119  
 
Proposed Legislation
    119  
    120  
 
ERISA Considerations
    120  
 
Employee Benefit Plans, Tax-Qualified Retirement Plans and IRAs
    120  
 
Our Status Under ERISA
    121  
    123  
    127  
    127  
    127  
    F-1  
 EXHIBIT 23.3
 EXHIBIT 99.1
 EXHIBIT 99.2

ii


Table of Contents

      You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus. We are offering to sell shares of common stock and seeking offers to buy shares of common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of the common stock.


Dealer Prospectus Delivery Requirement

      Until [                    ], 2004 (25 days after the date of this prospectus), all dealers effecting transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to a dealer’s obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.


iii


Table of Contents

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

      You should read the following summary together with the more detailed information regarding our company and the historical and pro forma financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, including under the caption “Risk Factors.” References in this prospectus to “BPA” refer to Bernardo Property Advisors, Inc. and its affiliated entities, which will contribute the initial properties to our operating partnership. References in this prospectus to “we,” “our,” “us” and “our company” refer to BioMed Property Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, BioMed Property, L.P., and any of our other subsidiaries, as well as BPA (as our predecessor), as the context may indicate. BioMed Property, L.P. is a Maryland limited partnership of which we are the sole general partner and to which we refer in this prospectus as our operating partnership. Unless otherwise indicated, the information contained in this prospectus is as of December 31, 2003 and assumes that the underwriters’ over-allotment option is not exercised and the units of limited partnership in our operating partnership, or units, issued in the formation transactions are valued at $[          ] per unit.

BioMed Property Trust, Inc.

      We are a Maryland corporation formed in April 2004 to succeed to the business of BPA. We focus on acquiring, owning, leasing, managing and selectively developing office and laboratory space for lease to life science tenants, including biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, scientific research institutions, government agencies and other entities involved in the life science industry.

      Immediately before our formation, our senior executive officers were principals or consultants of Bernardo Property Advisors, Inc., a private real estate company, where they were responsible for sourcing, underwriting, managing, repositioning, developing and financing properties suitable for tenants operating in the life science industry. The members of our senior management team have an average of over 15 years of experience in the real estate industry, principally focusing on properties designed for life science tenants. In particular, our Chief Executive Officer, Alan D. Gold, and Executive Vice President, Gary A. Kreitzer, were among the founders of a publicly traded REIT, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc., which specializes in investing in properties suitable for life science tenants. Mr. Gold served as President and a director, and Mr. Kreitzer served as Senior Vice President and In-House Counsel, of Alexandria until late 1998. During their tenure at Alexandria, that company acquired over 40 life science properties, representing more than $385 million in asset value and approximately 3.0 million rentable square feet, completed an initial public offering in 1997, resulting in a market capitalization of approximately $200 million, and saw its market capitalization increase to over $375 million at June 30, 1998. Before his affiliation with Alexandria, Mr. Gold was engaged in sourcing and underwriting commercial real estate mortgages, participating mortgages and joint ventures involving office, research and development, industrial and apartment properties while working with John Burnham & Co., Northland Financial Company and as a founder and senior principal of GoldStone Real Estate Finance.

      In late 1998, Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer began making real estate investments through Bernardo Property Advisors. Our Chief Financial Officer, John F. Wilson, II, an experienced financial executive, joined Bernardo Property Advisors in late 1998. Together, Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson focused their attention on acquiring, developing and managing well-located life science and medical office facilities in the San Diego and San Francisco markets. Matthew G. McDevitt, our Vice President, Acquisitions, recently joined our management team with over 15 years of experience in the life science real estate industry on the East Coast, including seven years as President of McDevitt Real Estate Services, Inc. We believe that our management team has broad-based experience with the full spectrum of issues that affect the real estate market for life science tenants in both growth and recessionary cycles.

      The life science industry represents one of the largest and fastest growing segments of the U.S. economy. In 2003, according to the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, or CMS, health care spending grew 7.8% to an estimated $1.7 trillion, and represented more than 15% of U.S. gross domestic product. CMS projects that annual health care spending will grow faster than the broader

1


Table of Contents

economy for the next 10 years and reach $3.4 trillion, or more than 18% of U.S. gross domestic product, in 2013. Currently, according to a study by Research!America, it is estimated that for every dollar spent on health care $0.06 is spent on research, which would represent approximately $100 billion in 2003. Research and development spending in the life science industry is a significant driver of demand for our space.

      Within the life science industry, we primarily focus on tenants in the following sectors:

  •  Biotechnology Companies. Biotechnology is a large and growing, well-financed segment of total health care spending and employment. The 2003 Ernst & Young Americas Biotechnology Report issued in July 2003, or E&Y Report, estimates that the biotechnology industry spent $20.5 billion on research and development in 2002, representing a 31% increase over 2001 spending.
 
  •  Pharmaceutical Companies. Pharmaceutical companies are a key driver of research and development spending. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA, estimates that the domestic pharmaceutical industry spent approximately $26.4 billion on research and development in 2002, an increase of 183% since 1992, and has increased this spending every year since 1970.
 
  •  Scientific Research Institutions. Demand for our space also is driven by university and non-profit research institute spending. These institutions directly drive the demand for laboratory space through their own research efforts and indirectly through funding private sector research and supplying access to their research facilities and equipment.
 
  •  Government Agencies. A fourth major tenant type for us is federal and state government agencies. Government agencies drive the need for space directly through their research and development programs and indirectly through research funding provided to university, not-for-profit research institutes and for-profit life science entities. The National Institutes of Health alone has an approved budget of $26.9 billion for research and development spending for 2004.

Life science entities have unique and strategic location and facility needs with respect to office and laboratory space. Specifically, many of these entities need properties that are strategically located near leading academic and research institutions and that have unique design and construction elements necessary to accommodate their mission-critical research, product development, clinical testing and manufacturing activities.

      We target facilities located in markets containing mature and established centers of medical research and biotechnology development, including San Diego, the San Francisco Bay area, the Greater Seattle area, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York/ New Jersey, the Greater Boston area and other select markets in the U.S. and Canada. These target markets contain highly respected public and private scientific research and medical institutions, which create significant demand for life science office, laboratory and medical office space. Established and newly formed life science entities are attracted to these major life science markets due to the synergies created by the proximity to the university and not-for-profit research institutes. These entities also seek the benefits of being located in markets that offer a high quality of life and provide skilled employees, high quality research and laboratory facilities and ancillary services necessary for their operations.

      When we complete this offering, the formation transactions and the property acquisitions currently under contract, we will own [     ] properties with an aggregate of approximately [          ] rentable square feet of life science office and laboratory space, which were approximately [     ]% leased as of December 31, 2003. These properties include an aggregate of 394,258 rentable square feet relating to our five initial properties, which were approximately 88% leased as of December 31, 2003, with a 100% occupancy rate for finished space, and an aggregate of approximately [                    ] rentable square feet relating to our [          ] properties currently under contract, which were approximately [     ]% leased as of December 31, 2003.

2


Table of Contents

      We expect to operate as a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed REIT, providing management, leasing, development and administrative services to our properties. Our executive offices are located at 17140 Bernardo Center Drive, Suite 195, San Diego, California 92128, and our telephone number is (858) 485-9840.

Investment Highlights

      We believe that life science tenants have been underserved by commercial property investors and lenders, creating a unique market for us with significant investment opportunities. Upon completion of this offering, we will be one of only two publicly traded real estate companies primarily focused on investing in properties suitable for life science tenants. We believe that the following factors distinguish our business model from other owner/ operators of real estate:

  •  Experienced management team with demonstrated track record. Our senior executive officers have worked together for a number of years focused on investing in properties for lease to tenants in the life science industry. Furthermore, two of our senior executive officers have experience and a demonstrated track record as part of the management team of a public REIT focused on life science properties.
 
  •  Differentiated business strategy. Our business strategy is to acquire properties designed for life science tenants located in our target markets which provide stable in-place cash flows and the potential for growth through contractual rent increases, opportunistic laboratory space conversions and re-leasing space to new tenants at higher rates.
 
  •  Positive life science industry trends. Based on the long-term trends and projections for the life science industry, we expect to see growth in revenues and research and development spending from biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, scientific research institutions, government agencies and other entities involved in the life science industry over the foreseeable future, which should lead to increasing demand for our properties.
 
  •  Industry relationships. As a result of our extensive experience in the life science industry, we have developed relationships with numerous members of the scientific community, life science investors and current and prospective life science industry tenants. We believe that these relationships enhance our ability to underwrite tenants in the life science industry. In addition, we also have relationships with many brokers, lenders, consultants, architects, developers and owners of properties designed for life science tenants. We believe that this extensive network will better enable us to identify and evaluate acquisition and investment opportunities.
 
  •  High quality portfolio in high barrier-to-entry markets. Upon completion of this offering and the associated formation transactions, we expect to have ownership interests in [          ] properties, well-located in several of our target markets, including San Diego, San Francisco, [                    ] and Pennsylvania. The properties we expect to own after completion of the offering include approximately [          ] rentable square feet and were approximately [          ]% leased as of December 31, 2003. We consider these properties to be high quality based on their strategic location in our target markets and significant level of improvements.
 
  •  Highly scalable business model. We typically utilize a triple-net lease structure for our investments, which enables us to manage a large portfolio of assets with a cost-effective management infrastructure.
 
  •  Attractive investment return potential. We believe that investments in properties designed for life science tenants can provide favorable risk-adjusted returns for the limited number of property owners with the requisite skills and experience to properly underwrite acquisitions and effectively manage such properties.

3


Table of Contents

Summary Risk Factors

      You should carefully consider the matters discussed in the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 20 before you decide whether to invest in our common stock. Some of the risks include:

  •  Life science entities will comprise the vast majority of our tenant base. Because of our dependence on a single industry, adverse conditions affecting that industry will more adversely affect our business, and thus our ability to make distributions to you, than if our business strategy included a more diverse tenant base.
 
  •  Because of the unique and specific improvements required for our life science tenants, we may be required to incur substantial renovation costs to make our properties suitable for other life science tenants or other office tenants.
 
  •  Upon completion of this offering and the formation transactions, [          ] of our properties will be located in California, with [          ] in San Diego and [          ] in the San Francisco Bay area. Because of our concentration in these geographic regions, we are particularly vulnerable to adverse conditions affecting these areas. In addition, we cannot assure you that these markets will continue to grow or will remain favorable to the life science industry.
 
  •  As of December 31, 2003, BPA had six tenants in five properties, four of which are single-tenant properties. To the extent we are dependent on rental payments from a limited number of tenants, the inability of any single tenant to make its lease payments could adversely affect us and our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
 
  •  We have not obtained any recent appraisals for the properties we will acquire in the formation transactions, and the consideration we pay for them may exceed their aggregate fair market value.
 
  •  Our tax indemnification obligations require us to make payments if we sell certain properties, which could limit our operating flexibility. In addition, our operating flexibility also may be limited because of our obligation to use reasonable best efforts consistent with our fiduciary duties to maintain at least $8.0 million of debt on our initial properties to enable the contributors of these properties to guarantee such debt in order to defer any taxable gain they may incur if our operating partnership repays existing debt.
 
  •  Conflicts of interest exist between us and certain of our officers and directors. Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt have entered into contribution agreements, under which they will contribute to our operating partnership ownership interests in our initial properties and one of our acquisition properties. They also will enter into employment agreements with us. We may choose not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights under these contribution and employment agreements because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationship with them. In addition, they may suffer different and more adverse tax consequences than our common stockholders if we sell or refinance certain properties they contributed to our operating partnership. Therefore, they may have different objectives regarding the appropriate pricing, timing and other material terms of any sale or refinancing of those properties.
 
  •  Upon completion of this offering, we will experience a capital infusion from the net offering proceeds, which we intend to use to acquire properties and repay indebtedness. We may be unable to complete the acquisitions we are currently negotiating or acquire other properties on acceptable terms or timeframes, which may harm our cash flow and ability to pay dividends.
 
  •  We expect to experience rapid growth and may not be able to adapt our management and operational systems to respond to the acquisition and integration of additional properties without unanticipated disruption or expense.
 
  •  If we experience an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those

4


Table of Contents

  properties. In addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged.
 
  •  We use debt to finance our property acquisitions. After completing this offering and applying the net proceeds as described under “Use of Proceeds,” we will have outstanding mortgage indebtedness of approximately $[          ] million, secured by [          ] properties. We also may incur additional debt in connection with future acquisitions and may borrow under a credit facility that we intend to obtain. Our use of debt may cause a material decrease in cash available for distributions.
 
  •  We face significant competition, which may decrease or prevent increases in our properties’ occupancy and rental rates and may reduce our investment opportunities.
 
  •  If you purchase our common stock in this offering, you will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $[          ] per share in the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common stock.
 
  •  Our charter, the Maryland General Corporation Law, or MGCL, and the partnership agreement of our operating partnership contain provisions, including a 9.8% limit on ownership of our common stock, that may delay or prevent a change of control transaction or limit the opportunity for stockholders to receive a premium for their common stock in such a transaction.
 
  •  If at any time we fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we will be taxed as a corporation, and our liability for certain federal, state and local income taxes would significantly increase. This would result in a material decrease in cash available for distribution.

Our Business Strategy

      Our objective is to be the real estate provider to the life science industry. Our business strategy is to own, acquire, lease, manage and selectively develop office and laboratory space for lease to life science tenants in our target markets. This highly focused business strategy, coupled with our management expertise, provides significant internal and external growth opportunities. We believe that we are uniquely positioned to capitalize on strong life science industry trends and improving real estate market fundamentals.

Internal growth

      Our internal growth strategy is designed to maximize distributions to our stockholders by capitalizing on our significant management expertise through the following means:

  •  Maximize occupancy. We believe our access to cost-effective capital will enable us to finance tenant improvements and attract high quality tenants. This should maximize occupancy and drive revenue growth.
 
  •  Contractual rental rate increases. Our leases generally include annual rent escalations, which provide predictable and consistent earnings growth.
 
  •  Tenant monitoring. We closely monitor changes in our existing tenants’ financial position, prospects and creditworthiness in order to identify and address opportunities to renew, extend or modify existing leases and find additional expansion opportunities.
 
  •  Opportunistic laboratory space conversions. We continually evaluate opportunities to convert existing office and industrial space into laboratory space and significantly increase our return on invested capital.
 
  •  Tenant financed improvements. Our tenants generally contribute tenant improvements necessary to conform a property to their specific needs. These upfront costs and the requirement that many of these improvements remain with the property upon lease termination afford us the opportunity to

5


Table of Contents

  substantially increase rental rates at the end of the lease, provide built-in growth above contractual rent increases and serve as a significant incentive for the tenant to renew its lease.

External growth

      Based on our management team’s extensive acquisition experience and its established network of strong relationships with existing and potential life science tenants, property owners and real estate brokers, we believe that we are well-positioned to be a significant acquirer in a fragmented niche of the real estate industry. We estimate that the aggregate size of the life science real estate market in our target markets is in excess of [          ] million rentable square feet, and we are currently in various stages of negotiations to acquire [                    ] square feet valued in excess of $[                    ]. Our acquisition focus is to buy properties leased to high quality life science tenants at attractive cash-on-cash yields with potential upside through lease-up, redevelopment or additional development. Our acquisition strategy is a real estate-based formulation, combining extensive tenant analysis and risk-based underwriting. Our acquisition strategy includes:

  •  Real Estate Underwriting. Our primary consideration is the location of a property in relation to academic and research institutions and other demand generators in our target markets, a critical factor in determining long-term value. In addition, we assess the property’s suitability for life science tenants and the amount of generic laboratory space in order to maximize the flexibility to attract new or replacement tenants. We also focus on the building improvements financed by the tenant, which provide significant downside protection to our investment while increasing tenant retention and providing future rental increases.
 
  •  Tenant Credit Analysis. Our tenant credit analysis considers three key elements in evaluating prospective tenants: (1) financial condition, (2) management team and (3) scientific focus. We perform a thorough review of the prospective tenant’s financial statements, considering the current liquidity and cash resources as well as the tenant’s prospects for raising additional capital. We meet with the prospective tenant’s senior management team in order to evaluate the quality of the management team, their scientific focus and their ability to raise capital. In addition, we review the prospective tenant’s investors and/or venture capital partners in order to obtain further validation of the tenant’s prospects.
 
  •  Lease Structuring. After careful consideration of the subject property and the prospective tenant, we analyze our leases to provide the appropriate economic return based on our risk assessment. Depending on the business plan for each individual property, our leases generally range from five to 20 years, with extension options, and include a fixed rental rate with scheduled annual escalations. The leases typically are triple-net, meaning the tenant is responsible for the payment of all operating costs of the property, including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and utilities. In addition, our tenants typically are responsible for capital improvements necessary to maintain the property in its original condition.

6


Table of Contents

Properties

Initial Properties

      Presented below is an overview of our initial properties as of December 31, 2003:

                                                         
Approximate
Rentable Percentage
Year Built/ Square Lab Percent Annualized Lease Lease
Property Location Renovated(1) Feet Space(2) Leased Base Rent(3) Expiration Type(4)








San Diego
                                                       
McKellar Court
    1988       72,863       50 %     100 %   $ 1,744,000       Dec. 2014       Triple-Net  
Bernardo Center Drive
    1974/1992       61,286       10 %     100 %   $ 1,858,000       Apr. 2007       Triple-Net  
Science Center Drive
    1995       52,800       80 %     100 %   $ 1,686,000       Aug. 2015       Triple-Net  
Balboa Avenue
    1968/2000       35,344       0 %     100 %   $ 645,000       (5)       (5)  
San Francisco Bay Area
                                                       
Industrial Road
    2001 (6)     171,965       50 %(7)     73 %(8)   $ 6,275,000       Oct. 2016       Triple-Net  
             
     
     
     
                 
Portfolio Total/ Weighted Average:
            394,258       43 %     88 %   $ 12,208,000                  
             
     
     
     
                 


(1)  Includes year in which construction was completed and, where applicable, year of most recent major renovation.
 
(2)  Approximate percentage laboratory space, in this table and other tables throughout this prospectus, is based on management’s estimates.
 
(3)  Annualized base rent means, in this table and other tables throughout this prospectus, the annualized fixed base rental amount in effect under existing leases as of December 31, 2003, using rental revenue calculated on a straight-line basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. In the case of triple-net leases, annualized base rent does not include real estate taxes and insurance, common area and other operating expenses, substantially all of which are borne by the tenants.
 
(4)  “Triple-Net” refers to, in this table and other tables throughout this prospectus, leases where the tenant is responsible for the payment of substantially all operating costs of the property, including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and utilities. Under some of the triple-net leases, we may remain responsible for maintenance of the foundation, exterior walls, roof and/or other structural components of the building.
 
(5)  Modified gross lease covering 15,955 square feet expires in November 2009, with an early termination option exercisable no earlier than November 2005 upon one year’s advance notice, and a modified gross lease covering 19,389 square feet expires in April 2010, with a one-time early termination option in April 2007 requiring a lump sum payment equal to 70% of remaining base rental payments for the term of the lease, subject to a minimum six month advance notice period.
 
(6)  Developed by BPA in two phases in 2000 and 2001. The tenant owns a 49% limited partnership interest in the entity that owns the property.
 
(7)  Represents the percentage of built-out, leased spaced that is considered laboratory space.
 
(8)  The remaining approximately 27% of the property is currently vacant and unimproved; 100% of the finished space is leased and occupied.

7


Table of Contents

Acquisition Properties

      As of [               ], 2004, we have entered into contracts to acquire the following properties:

                                                                 
Rentable Approximate
Purchase Year Built/ Square Percentage Percent Annualized Lease
Property Location Price(1) Renovated(2) Feet Lab Space Leased Base Rent Expiration Lease Type









Pennsylvania
                                                               
Eisenhower Road
  $ [    ]       1973/2000       27,750       20 %     100 %   $ 373,000       Feb. 2006       Triple-Net  
                     
     
     
     
                 
 
[Additional Acquisition Properties TBD]
 
Portfolio Total/ Weighted Average:
                                                               


(1)  The purchase price will be paid through the issuance of 88,200 operating partnership units (valued at $[               ] million, based on a value per unit equal to the initial public offering price of our common stock), plus the assumption of debt (estimated at June 30, 2004 to be $2.3 million).
 
(2)  Includes year in which construction was completed and, where applicable, year of most recent major renovation.

      While we believe that we will consummate these acquisitions, we cannot guarantee that they will close because they remain subject to the completion of our due diligence and satisfaction of customary closing conditions.

8


Table of Contents

Structure and Formation of Our Company

Formation Transactions

      We refer to the following series of transactions as our formation transactions:

  •  BioMed Property Trust, Inc. was formed as a Maryland corporation on April 30, 2004.
 
  •  BioMed Property, L.P., our operating partnership, was organized as a Maryland limited partnership on April 30, 2004.
 
  •  We will sell [                     ] shares of our common stock in this offering, and an additional [                    ] shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, and we will contribute the net proceeds of this offering to our operating partnership. In return for our capital contribution, we will receive limited partnership units in our operating partnership and initially will own an approximate [                     ]% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership, or [                    ]% if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full.
 
  •  Our operating partnership will use approximately $[                    ] million of the net proceeds of this offering to purchase [                    ] acquisition properties from unaffiliated third parties, and will assume approximately $[                    ] million of existing mortgage debt associated with [                    ] of these properties, $[                    ] of which will be repaid with the proceeds of this offering. The consideration to be paid for these contributed property interests was negotiated between us and the ultimate owners of the property interests.
 
  •  Persons or entities that own all of the ownership interests of three limited partnerships and one limited liability company, each of which owns one of our initial properties, will contribute to us all of their interests in the limited partnerships or limited liability company. In addition, entities which own a 50% limited partnership interest and a 1.0% general partnership in an entity which owns one of our initial properties will contribute to us all of their interests in that entity. In exchange for ownership of these entities, we will:

  •  issue an aggregate of 2,250,815 limited partnership units (having an aggregate value of approximately $[                     ] million, based on a value per unit equal to the initial public offering price of our common stock) to Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson in the following amounts: Alan D. Gold, 1,157,138; Gary A. Kreitzer, 734,059; and John F. Wilson, II, 359,618.
 
  •  issue a total of [                     ] limited partnership units having a fixed aggregate value of approximately $3.1 million, based on a value per unit equal to the initial public offering price of our common stock, including units valued at $103,125 payable to Mr. Wilson’s spouse.
 
  •  make cash payments totaling approximately $4.7 million to certain contributors and owners of our initial properties, including approximately $3.8 million payable to Quidel Corporation, one of our tenants, and $103,125 payable to Mr. Gold’s parents.
 
  •  assume approximately $78.5 million of debt, approximately $19.1 million of which will be repaid with the proceeds of this offering, including approximately $14.1 million secured by our Bernardo Center Drive property and approximately $5.0 million secured by our Balboa Avenue property. As of June 30, 2004, we also expect to pay to the lenders an aggregate of approximately $325,000 in prepayment penalties in connection with these loan repayments.

  •  Following the formation transactions, a tenant in our Industrial Road property will continue to hold a 49% limited partnership interest in the entity that owns the property. The limited partnership agreement related to this property includes a provision that enables the tenant to purchase the property under certain circumstances. We are currently negotiating with the tenant to modify or eliminate this provision.

9


Table of Contents

  •  Persons and entities affiliated with Mr. McDevitt (including his spouse) who own all of the ownership interests of a limited partnership which owns our acquisition property located in Pennsylvania will contribute their limited partnership interests in that entity in exchange for 88,200 limited partnership units in our operating partnership valued at approximately $[                    ] million based on a value per unit equal to the initial public offering price of our common stock. These units will initially represent [                    ]% of the interests in our operating partnership. The value of the units to be issued in exchange for the contributed property interests was determined in the same manner described above. We also will assume approximately $2.3 million of mortgage debt secured by this property.

      The value of the units to be issued in exchange for the contributed property interests was determined by our executive officers, in consultation with our underwriters, based on the costs incurred to acquire and improve the properties, a discounted cash flow analysis and internal rate of return analysis and an assessment of the fair market value of the properties. No single factor was given greater weight than any other in valuing the properties and the values attributed to the properties do not necessarily bear any relationship to the book value for the applicable property. We did not obtain any recent third-party appraisals of the properties to be contributed to our operating partnership in the formation transactions, or any other independent third party valuations or fairness opinions in connection with the formation transactions. As a result, the consideration to be given by us for these properties and other assets in the formation transactions may exceed their fair market value.

Benefits to Related Parties

      Three of our officers, Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson, collectively own a significant percentage of the ownership interests of the entities that own our initial properties, and another officer, Mr. McDevitt, owns one of our acquisition properties. In exchange for these properties, we will pay to Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt total consideration valued at $[                    ] million based on the initial public offering price of our common stock in the form of (1) the issuance of 2,339,015 limited partnership units in our operating partnership, valued at $[                    ] million, (2) the assumption of $80.8 million in debt ($19.1 million of which will be repaid with the proceeds of this offering) and (3) $[                    ] of cash.

      The following chart reflects the value of consideration to be received by each of our affiliates in connection with the formation transactions:

                         
Limited Partnership Total Value of
Contributor Units to be Received Cash Payments(1) Consideration(2)




Alan D. Gold
    1,157,138                  
Gary A. Kreitzer
    734,059                  
John F. Wilson, II
    359,618                  
Matthew G. McDevitt
    88,200                  


(1)  Cash payments to acquire furniture and equipment owned by BPA prior to this offering and as reimbursement for certain offering expenses.
 
(2)  Based on the expected initial public offering price for our common stock in the offering of $[                    ], the mid-point of the price range on the front cover of this prospectus. Does not include payments made to family members of our executive officers in the formation transactions in connection with the purchase of these family members’ ownership interests in our initial properties and acquisition properties and the repayment of debt owed to these family members, including $103,125 payable in units to Mr. Wilson’s spouse, $178,125 payable in cash to Mr. Gold’s parents and $25,000 payable in cash to Mr. Kreitzer’s parents. Mr. McDevitt shares ownership of his units with his spouse.

      In connection with the completion of this offering and the formation transactions, Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt will receive the direct and indirect benefits described in this prospectus,

10


Table of Contents

including the consideration described in the immediately preceding paragraph, an aggregate of [                    ] shares of restricted stock and the registration rights and tax indemnification and debt maintenance obligations described below. See “Conflicts of Interest.”

      Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson have agreed to indemnify the lenders of some of the debt that we will assume in the formation transactions against certain losses, including losses resulting from environmental hazards found on or in our initial properties. In connection with the completion of this offering, we will indemnify Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson against any payments they may be required to make under such indemnification agreements, except that our indemnification obligation will not be effective with respect to losses relating to a breach of the environmental representations and warranties made to our operating partnership by Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson in their respective contribution agreements, for which Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson have agreed to indemnify our operating partnership.

      We will provide registration rights covering common stock we may issue upon redemption of the units in our operating partnership that were issued in connection with this offering.

11


Table of Contents

Our Structure

      The following diagram depicts our ownership structure upon completion of this offering. Our operating partnership will directly or indirectly own the various properties depicted below.

(BioMed Property Trust, Inc. Structure)


(1)  An aggregate of [          ]% of the limited partnership units will be held by our executive officers and directors.

12


Table of Contents

Conflicts of Interest

      Following the completion of this offering, there will exist conflicts of interest with respect to certain transactions between the unit holders, including some of our executive officers, on the one hand, and us and our stockholders, on the other. In particular, the consummation of certain business combinations, the sale of our properties or a reduction or refinancing of indebtedness could have adverse tax consequences to certain unit holders, which would make the transactions less desirable to them.

      Under the tax indemnity provisions of the contributors’ contribution agreements, we agreed to indemnify these contributors against adverse tax consequences if we directly or indirectly sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of the properties contributed under such agreements in a taxable transaction before the tenth anniversary of the completion of this offering. These tax indemnities may affect the way we conduct our business, including when and under what circumstances we sell these properties or interests therein during the indemnification period. While we do not intend to sell any of these properties in transactions that would trigger these tax indemnification obligations, if we were to trigger any tax indemnification obligations under the contribution agreements, we would be liable for damages. If we, immediately after we close this offering and the formation transactions, were to sell in a taxable transaction all of the properties contributed to us in exchange for limited partnership units in our operating partnership, our estimated total tax indemnification obligation to our indemnified contributors, including a gross-up payment we would make, would be approximately $12.5 million. We have also agreed for a period of 10 years following the date of this offering to use reasonable best efforts consistent with our fiduciary duties to maintain at least $8.0 million of debt on our initial properties to enable the contributors of these properties to guarantee such debt in order to defer any taxable gain they may incur if our operating partnership repays existing debt.

      Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt also will have conflicts of interest with us because they and entities affiliated with them are parties to contribution agreements entered into in connection with the formation transactions, and they will be parties to employment agreements, which we may not seek to enforce vigorously because of our desire to maintain our relationship with them.

      Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer collectively own all of the ownership interests of Bernardo Property Advisors, which provides management services to all of our initial properties. Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer benefit from the management fees paid to Bernardo Property Advisors. In connection with this offering, Bernardo Property Advisors will cease providing management services to these properties, and we will assume the management of all of our initial properties. Also, Mr. McDevitt owns an entity that provides management services to one of our acquisition properties. In connection with this offering, this entity will cease providing management services to this property, and we will assume the management of the property.

      Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson collectively own a minority limited partnership interest in an entity that owns one real estate property located in San Diego, California that offers office and laboratory space for lease to life science entities. This property is competitive to our properties. Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson will maintain their ownership in this property following this offering and will benefit from the revenues generated by this property. Bernardo Property Advisors also provides management services for this property. The management services Bernardo Property Advisors provides for this property will be terminated in connection with this offering.

      All future investments in properties suitable for life science tenants by Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt will be completed through our operating partnership.

      We have adopted policies that are designed to eliminate or minimize certain potential conflicts of interest, and the limited partners of our operating partnership have agreed that if there is a conflict in the duties we owe to our stockholders and, in our capacity as general partner of our operating partnership, to such limited partners, we will fulfill our duties to such limited partners by acting in the best interests of our stockholders. See “Policies with Respect to Certain Activities — Conflict of Interest Policies” and “Description of the Partnership Agreement of BioMed Property, L.P.” In addition, our initial board of

13


Table of Contents

directors will consist of three independent directors, out of a total of five, and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, require that a majority of our board of directors be independent directors. Our directors also are subject to provisions of Maryland law that address transactions between Maryland corporations and our directors or other entities in which our directors have a material financial interest. We cannot assure you that these policies and protections always will be successful in eliminating the influence of such conflicts. If they are not successful, decisions could be made that might not fully reflect the interests of all of our stockholders.

Restrictions on Ownership of Our Capital Stock

      Due to limitations on the concentration of ownership of REIT stock imposed by the Code, our charter generally prohibits any person from actually or constructively owning more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Our charter, however, does permit our board of directors to make exceptions for stockholders if our board of directors determines such exceptions will not jeopardize our tax status as a REIT.

14


Table of Contents

The Offering

 
Common stock offered by us [          ] shares
 
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering [          ] shares(1)
 
Use of proceeds We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering, which we estimate will be approximately $[          ], as follows:
 
          • approximately $[                     ] million to fund the property acquisitions currently under contract,
 
          • approximately $19.1 million to repay indebtedness related to our initial properties,
 
          • approximately $4.7 million to acquire the interests of some of the contributors of our initial properties, and
 
          • any remaining net proceeds will be used to acquire properties and for general corporate and working capital purposes. See “Use of Proceeds.”
 
Proposed New York Stock Exchange symbol “BMP”


(1)  Includes [          ] shares of restricted stock to be issued to our executive officers and directors, and excludes (a) [          ] shares issuable upon exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option, (b) [          ] shares issuable upon conversion of outstanding units of our operating partnership, (c) [          ] shares available for future issuance under our incentive award plan and (d) [          ] shares issuable upon exercise of the warrant we will issue to Raymond James & Associates, Inc. upon closing of this offering.

      A tabular presentation of our estimated use of proceeds follows:

                 
Percentage
of Gross
Dollar Amount Proceeds


(in thousands)
Gross offering proceeds
  $         100.00%  
Underwriting discounts and commissions
               
Other expenses of offering
               
     
     
 
Net offering proceeds
               
     
     
 
Estimated amount of net proceeds used to repay indebtedness related to our initial properties and acquisition properties
  $            
Estimated amount to pay cash portion of the purchase price of our initial properties
               
Estimated amount to pay cash portion of the purchase price of our acquisition properties
               
Estimated amount allocated to fund future acquisitions and for general corporate purposes
               
     
     
 
Total net offering proceeds used
  $            
Total underwriting discounts, commissions and other expenses
               
Total application of gross offering proceeds
  $         100.00%  
     
     
 
Pending these uses, we intend to make temporary investments in money market funds.

15


Table of Contents

Distribution Policy

      To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required and intend to make annual distributions to our stockholders of at least 90% of our taxable income (which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). Distributions will be authorized by our board of directors and declared by us based upon a variety of factors our directors deem relevant, and we cannot assure you that our distribution policy will not change in the future. Our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders will depend, in part, upon our receipt of distributions from our operating partnership, which we control, and will be based on revenues we derive from our rental properties. Distributions to our stockholders generally will be taxable as ordinary income to our stockholders and will not, in most cases, be eligible for the recently enacted 15% federal tax rate on certain corporate dividends.

      Our charter allows us to issue preferred stock with a preference on distributions. We currently have no intention to issue any preferred stock, but if we do, the dividend preference on the preferred stock could limit our ability to make a dividend distribution to our common stockholders.

Our Tax Status

      We intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2004. We believe that our organization and proposed method of operation will enable us to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. To maintain REIT status, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we annually distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on REIT taxable income we currently distribute to our stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax, including alternative minimum tax, at regular corporate rates. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to some federal, state and local taxes on our income or property. See “Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

16


Table of Contents

SUMMARY SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

      The following table sets forth selected financial and operating data on a pro forma basis for BioMed Property Trust, Inc., and on a historical combined basis for the BioMed Property Trust Predecessor. The BioMed Property Trust Predecessor is comprised of Bernardo Property Advisors, Inc. and its affiliates. We have not presented historical information for BioMed Property Trust, Inc. because we have not had any corporate activity since our formation other than the issuance of 1,000 shares of common stock in connection with the initial capitalization of our company and because we believe that a discussion of the results of BioMed Property Trust, Inc. would not be meaningful.

      The following pro forma and historical information should be read in conjunction with our pro forma consolidated financial statements and historical combined financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our selected historical combined balance sheet information at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the historical combined statement of operations and other data for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, has been derived from our historical combined financial statements audited by KPMG LLP, independent auditors, whose report with respect thereto is included elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical combined balance sheet information at December 31, 2001, has been derived from the unaudited historical combined financial statements of the BioMed Property Trust Predecessor.

      The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet data is presented as if the offering, the formation transactions and the acquisitions all had occurred on December 31, 2003, and the unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations and other data for the year ended December 31, 2003, is presented as if this offering, the formation transactions and the acquisitions all had occurred on the first day of the period presented. The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what our actual financial position or results of operations would have been as of or for the period indicated, nor does it purport to represent our future financial position or results of operations.

17


Table of Contents

BioMed Property Trust, Inc. (Pro Forma) and

BioMed Property Trust Predecessor (Historical)
                                   
Year Ended December 31,

Pro Forma
Consolidated Historical Combined


2003 2003 2002 2001




(Unaudited) (Unaudited)
Statement Of Operations Data:
Revenues:
                               
 
Rental
  $       $ 12,208,000     $ 11,802,000     $ 10,354,000  
 
Tenant recoveries
            1,335,000       1,317,000       835,000  
 
Management fees
            161,000       154,000       108,000  
     
     
     
     
 
              13,704,000       13,273,000       11,297,000  
     
     
     
     
 
Expenses:
                               
 
Rental operations
            1,396,000       1,375,000       817,000  
 
Depreciation and amortization
            2,129,000       2,136,000       1,794,000  
 
General and administrative
            275,000       295,000       256,000  
     
     
     
     
 
              3,800,000       3,806,000       2,867,000  
     
     
     
     
 
Income from operations
            9,904,000       9,467,000       8,430,000  
 
Interest income
            36,000       62,000       94,000  
 
Interest expense
            (6,314,000 )     (6,705,000 )     (6,791,000 )
     
     
     
     
 
Income before minority interests
            3,626,000       2,824,000       1,733,000  
 
Minority interests
            (1,955,000 )     (1,527,000 )     (1,005,000 )
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
  $       $ 1,671,000     $ 1,297,000     $ 728,000  
     
     
     
     
 
Pro forma basic earnings per share(1)
  $                      
Pro forma diluted earnings per share(2)
  $                      
Pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding — basic
                         
Pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted
                         
                                     
As of December 31,

Pro Forma Historical Combined
Consolidated
2003 2003 2002 2001




(Unaudited) (Unaudited)
Balance Sheet Data:
Rental properties, net
          $ 93,261,000     $ 95,248,000     $ 97,181,000  
Total assets
            100,434,000       102,313,000       103,082,000  
Mortgages and other secured loans
            76,187,000       77,598,000       77,475,000  
Total liabilities
            81,352,000       83,226,000       83,349,000  
Minority interest
            17,927,000       18,000,000       18,413,000  
Owners’ equity
            1,155,000       1,087,000       1,320,000  
Total liabilities and owners’ equity
            100,434,000       102,313,000       103,082,000  
Other Data:
                               
 
Funds from operations(3)
                         
 
Cash flows from:
                               
   
Operating activities
          5,047,000       3,957,000       2,981,000  
   
Investing activities
          (105,000 )     (159,000 )     (17,703,000 )
   
Financing activities
          (5,129,000 )     (3,391,000 )     14,890,000  

18


Table of Contents

             
Pro Forma
Year Ended
December 31,
2003

Reconciliation of Pro Forma Funds from Operations
       
 
Pro forma income before minority interests
  $    
   
Plus: pro forma real estate depreciation and amortization
       
     
 
 
Pro forma funds from operations
  $    
     
 


(1)  Pro forma basic earnings per share is computed assuming this offering was consummated as of the first day of the period presented and equals pro forma net income divided by the number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this offering excluding the weighted average of the number of unvested shares of restricted stock.
 
(2)  Pro forma diluted earnings per share is computed assuming this offering was consummated as of the first day of the period presented. Pro forma diluted earnings per share equals pro forma net income divided by the sum of the number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this offering excluding the weighted average number of unvested shares of restricted stock, plus an amount computed using the treasury stock method with respect to the unvested shares of our restricted stock.
 
(3)  As defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) funds from operations represents income (loss) before minority interest (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management considers funds from operations a helpful additional measure of performance for an equity REIT because it is predicated on operating funds flow analysis and is widely used by industry analysts as a measure of operating performance for equity REITs. We compute funds from operations in accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in its March 1995 White Paper (as amended in November 1999 and April 2002), which may differ from the methodology for calculating funds from operations utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs. Further, funds from operations does not represent amounts available for management’s discretionary use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations, or other commitments and uncertainties. Funds from operations should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or make distributions.

19


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

      An investment in our common stock involves risks. In addition to other information contained in this prospectus, you should carefully consider the following factors before acquiring shares of our common stock offered by this prospectus. The occurrence of any of the following risks might cause you to lose all or a part of your investment. Some statements in this prospectus, including statements in the following risk factors, constitute forward-looking statements. Please refer to the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements.”

Risks Related to Our Properties, Our Business and Our Growth Strategy

      Tenants in the life science industry face high levels of regulation, expense and uncertainty that may adversely affect their ability to pay us rent.

      Life science entities will comprise the vast majority of our tenant base. Because of our dependence on a single industry, adverse conditions affecting that industry will more adversely affect our business, and thus our ability to make distributions to you, than if our business strategy included a more diverse tenant base. Life science industry tenants, particularly those involved in developing and marketing drugs and drug delivery technologies, fail from time to time as a result of various factors. Many of these factors are particular to the life science industry. For example:

  •  Our tenants require significant outlays of funds for the research and development and clinical testing of their products and technologies. If private investors, the government or other sources of funding are unavailable to support such development, a tenant’s business may fail.
 
  •  The research and development, clinical testing, manufacture and marketing of some of our tenants’ products require federal, state and foreign regulatory approvals. The approval process is typically long, expensive and uncertain. Even if our tenants have sufficient funds to seek approvals, one or all of their products may fail to obtain the required regulatory approvals on a timely basis or at all. Furthermore, our tenants may only have a small number of products under development. If one product fails to receive the required approvals at any stage of development, it could significantly adversely affect our tenant’s entire business and its ability to pay rent.
 
  •  Our tenants with marketable products may be adversely affected by health care reform efforts and the reimbursement policies of government or private health care payors.
 
  •  Our tenants may be unable to protect adequately their intellectual property under patent, copyright or trade secret laws. Failure to do so could jeopardize their ability to profit from their efforts and to protect their products from competition.
 
  •  Collaborative relationships with other life science entities may be crucial to the development, manufacturing, distribution or marketing of our tenants’ products. If these other entities fail to fulfill their obligations under these collaborative arrangements, our tenants’ businesses will suffer.

      We cannot assure you that our tenants in the life science industry will be successful in their businesses. If our tenants’ businesses are adversely affected, they may have difficulty paying us rent.

      Because particular upgrades are required for our life science tenants, improvements to our properties involve greater expenditures than traditional office space.

      The improvements generally required for our properties’ infrastructure are more costly than for other property types. Typical infrastructural improvements include the following:

  •  reinforced concrete floors,
 
  •  upgraded roof structures for greater load capacity,
 
  •  increased floor-to-ceiling clear heights,
 
  •  heavy-duty HVAC systems,

20


Table of Contents

  •  enhanced environmental control technology,
 
  •  significantly upgraded electrical, gas and plumbing infrastructure, and
 
  •  laboratory benchwork.

      Our tenants generally pay higher rent on our properties than tenants in traditional office space. However, we cannot assure you that our tenants will continue to do so in the future or that the rents paid will cover the additional costs of upgrading the properties.

      We may be required to incur substantial renovation costs to make our properties suitable for our tenants.

      We acquire or develop properties that include laboratory space and other features that we believe are generally desirable for life science industry tenants. However, different life science industry tenants may require different features in their properties, depending on each tenant’s particular focus within the life science industry. If a current tenant is unable to pay rent, we may incur substantial expenditures to modify the property before we are able to re-lease the space to another life science industry tenant. This could hurt our operating performance and the value of your investment. Also, if the property needs to be renovated to accommodate multiple tenants, we may incur substantial expenditures before we are able to re-lease the space.

      Additionally, our properties may not be suitable for lease to traditional office tenants without significant expenditures on renovations. Accordingly, any downturn in the life science industry may have a substantial negative impact on our properties’ values.

      We depend on a limited number of tenants.

      As of December 31, 2003, BPA had six tenants in five properties, four of which are single-tenant properties. Default by the sole tenant is likely to cause significant or complete reduction in the operating cash flow generated by the property. As of December 31, 2003, two of our tenants, Nektar Therapeutics and The Regents of the University of California, represented approximately 51.4% and 15.2%, respectively, of our total annualized base rent, and 31.8% and 15.5%, respectively, of our total leased rentable square footage. The lease with The Regents of the University of California for the Bernardo Center Drive property expires in April 2007. While we evaluate the creditworthiness of our tenants by reviewing available financial and other pertinent information, there can be no assurance that any tenant will be able to make timely rental payments or avoid defaulting under its lease. If a tenant defaults, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment. Because we depend on rental payments from a limited number of tenants, the inability of any single tenant to make its lease payments could adversely affect us and our ability to make distributions to you.

      The bankruptcy of a tenant may adversely affect the value of our properties.

      The bankruptcy or insolvency of a tenant may adversely affect the income produced by our properties. If any tenant becomes a debtor in a case under the Bankruptcy Code, we cannot evict the tenant solely because of the bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court also might authorize the tenant to reject and terminate its lease with us, which would generally result in any unpaid, pre-bankruptcy rent being treated as an unsecured claim. In addition, our claim against the tenant for unpaid, future rent would be subject to a statutory cap equal to the greater of (1) one year of rent or (2) 15% of the remaining rent on the lease (not to exceed three years of rent). This cap might be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed under the lease. Furthermore, our claim for unpaid, pre-bankruptcy rent and our lease termination damages would likely not be paid in full.

      Our initial properties are all located in California.

      Our initial properties are all located in California, with four in San Diego and one in the San Francisco Bay area. Because of this concentration in one geographic region, we are particularly vulnerable to adverse conditions affecting that area, including general economic conditions, increased competition, a downturn in the local life science industry, real estate conditions, terrorist attacks,

21


Table of Contents

earthquakes and other natural disasters occurring in the region. In addition, we cannot assure you that these markets will continue to grow or will remain favorable to the life science industry. The performance of the life science industry and the economy in general in these geographic markets may affect occupancy, market rental rates and expenses, and thus may affect our performance and the value of our properties. We are also subject to greater loss from earthquakes because of our properties’ concentration in California. Our largest initial property is in the San Francisco Bay area. That property’s close proximity to a fault line makes it more vulnerable to earthquakes than properties in many other parts of the country.

      Our expansion strategy contains inherent risks.

      In addition to our existing California markets, we intend to expand our operations into the Greater Seattle area, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York/ New Jersey and the Greater Boston area, each of which is currently a leading market in the United States for the life science industry. We cannot assure you that these markets will remain favorable to the life science industry. These markets also may prove to be less stable than our current markets, and we may incur delays, problems and expenses not typically encountered in our current markets. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that these markets will continue to grow or that we will be successful entering these markets.

      We expect to expand rapidly after we complete this offering, including the acquisition of [          ] properties currently under contract. This anticipated rapid growth will require substantial attention from our existing management team, which may divert management’s attention from our current properties. Implementing our growth plan also will require that we expand our management and staff with qualified and experienced personnel and that we implement administrative, accounting and operational systems sufficient to integrate new properties into our portfolio. We also must manage future property acquisitions without incurring unanticipated costs or disrupting the operations at our existing properties. Managing new properties requires a focus on leasing and retaining tenants. If we fail to successfully integrate future acquisitions into our portfolio, or if newly acquired properties fail to perform as we expect, our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay dividends could suffer.

      Our planned property acquisitions are subject to conditions that may prevent us from acquiring those properties.

      As of [                    ], 2004, we were under contract to acquire [               ] new properties, totaling approximately [               ] rentable square feet, for an aggregate price of approximately $[                ] million. Our ability to complete these acquisitions depends on many factors, including the completion of our due diligence and satisfaction of customary closing conditions. The inability to complete any of these acquisitions within our anticipated time frames may harm our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay distributions to you.

      We may be unable to acquire, develop or operate new properties successfully.

      We continue to evaluate the market for available properties and may acquire office properties, laboratory space and other properties when opportunities exist. We also may develop or substantially renovate office and other properties. Acquisition, development and renovation activities are subject to significant risks, including:

  •  changing market conditions, including competition from others, may diminish our opportunities for acquiring a desired property on favorable terms or at all. Even if we enter into agreements for the acquisition of properties, these agreements are subject to customary conditions to closing, including completion of due diligence investigations to our satisfaction,
 
  •  we may be unable to obtain financing on favorable terms (or at all),
 
  •  we may spend more time or money than we budget to improve or renovate acquired properties or to develop new properties,
 
  •  we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new properties, particularly if we acquire portfolios of properties, into our existing operations,

22


Table of Contents

  •  market conditions may result in higher than expected vacancy rates and lower than expected rental rates,
 
  •  if we develop properties, we may encounter delays or refusals in obtaining all necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations,
 
  •  we are less familiar with the development of properties in markets outside of California,
 
  •  acquired and developed properties may have defects we do not discover through our inspection processes, including latent defects that may not reveal themselves until many years after we put a property in service, and
 
  •  we may acquire land, properties or entities owning properties which are subject to liabilities and for which, in the case of unknown liabilities, we may have limited or no recourse. See also “— We may assume unknown liabilities in connection with the formation transactions.”

      The realization of any of the above risks could significantly and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common stock, ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and ability to pay distributions to you.

      We may be unable to invest the proceeds of this offering on acceptable terms, which may harm our financial condition and operating results.

      Until we are able to acquire the properties we have under contract and to identify and purchase additional properties, we intend to invest temporarily the net proceeds remaining after the uses described under “Use of Proceeds” in interest-bearing accounts and short-term, interest-bearing securities. We do not have any policies that limit the duration of these temporary investments or the amount of the offering proceeds that may be invested in those securities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to acquire the properties we have under contract or to identify and purchase additional properties that meet our investment criteria in sufficient time or on acceptable terms to produce an acceptable return on our investment.

      We have not obtained any recent appraisals for the properties we will acquire in the formation transactions, and the consideration we pay for them may exceed their aggregate fair market value.

      We have not obtained any recent third-party appraisals of the properties to be contributed to our operating partnership in the formation transactions, nor have we obtained any independent third-party valuations or fairness opinions in connection with the formation transactions. The terms of the contribution and sale agreements relating to these properties were not negotiated in an arm’s length transaction but were determined by our management team. In connection with the formation transactions, Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt received limited partnership units in our operating partnership that are convertible into shares of our common stock. As a result, the consideration we gave in exchange for the properties we acquired in the formation transactions may have exceeded the fair market value of these properties. The aggregate historical combined net tangible book value of the interests contributed to us was approximately $18.9 million as of December 31, 2003.

      Our tax indemnification and debt maintenance obligations require us to make payments if we sell certain properties or repay certain debt, which could limit our operating flexibility.

      In the formation transactions, Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt and certain other individuals will contribute assets to our operating partnership. In connection with those transactions, we agreed to indemnify, during a defined indemnification period, those contributors with respect to certain adverse tax consequences they could suffer if we dispose of the contributed assets in a taxable transaction. We agreed to these provisions in order to assist those contributors in preserving their tax positions after their contributions. We have also agreed to use reasonable best efforts consistent with our fiduciary duties to maintain at least $8.0 million of debt on our initial properties to enable the contributors of these properties to guarantee such debt in order to defer any taxable gain they may incur if our operating partnership repays existing debt. These tax indemnification and debt maintenance obligations may affect

23


Table of Contents

the way in which we conduct our business, including influencing during the indemnification period when and under what circumstances we sell the contributed properties or interests in entities holding the properties. While we may seek to enter into tax-efficient joint ventures with third party investors, we currently have no intention of disposing of these properties or interests in entities holding the properties in transactions that would trigger our tax indemnification obligations. The involuntary condemnation of one or more of these properties during the indemnification period could, however, trigger the tax indemnification obligations described in this paragraph. If our tax indemnification obligations are triggered, we would be required to indemnify Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt and certain other contributors for all or a portion of the taxes they incur as a result of the taxable disposition of the property or interest in the entity holding that property. Some members of our management team are potential recipients of the indemnification payments described in this paragraph, which may cause their personal interests to diverge from those of our stockholders. See “Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure — Conflicts of interest could result in our management acting other than in our stockholders’ best interests.”

      We have a limited operating history.

      We were formed in April 2004, and have no operating history as a REIT or a public company. Our board of directors and executive officers will have overall responsibility for our management and, while certain of our officers and directors have extensive experience in real estate marketing, development, management, finance and law, only our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President have prior experience in operating a business in accordance with the Code requirements for maintaining qualification as a REIT. We cannot assure you that our management team’s past experience will be sufficient to operate our company successfully as a REIT or a public company. Failure to maintain REIT status would have an adverse effect on our cash available for distribution to stockholders. See “Risks Related to Our REIT Status — Our failure to qualify as a REIT under the Code would result in significant adverse consequences to us and the value of our stock.”

      We may assume unknown liabilities in connection with the formation transactions.

      As part of the formation transactions, certain assets of BPA will be contributed to us (through our operating partnership). These assets are subject to existing liabilities, some of which may be unknown at the time this offering is consummated. Unknown liabilities might include liabilities for cleanup or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions; claims of tenants, vendors or other persons dealing with the entities prior to this offering (that had not been asserted or threatened prior to this offering); tax liabilities and accrued but unpaid liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business.

      We may be unable to make or sustain distributions.

      Our board of directors will determine the level of distributions, if any, that we make to you as a stockholder. The board will base that determination on a number of factors, including the following:

  •  cash available for distribution,
 
  •  operational results,
 
  •  our financial condition, especially in relation to our anticipated future capital needs,
 
  •  then current expansion plans,
 
  •  the distribution requirements for REITs under the Code,
 
  •  the realization of any of the other risk factors presented in this prospectus, and
 
  •  other factors our board deems relevant.

24


Table of Contents

      Our success depends on key personnel with extensive experience dealing with the real estate needs of life science tenants, and the loss of these key personnel could threaten our ability to operate our business successfully.

      Our future success depends, to a significant extent, on the continued services of our management team. In particular, we depend on the efforts of Mr. Gold, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Kreitzer, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Mr. Wilson, our Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. McDevitt, our Vice President, Acquisitions. Among the reasons that Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt are important to our success is that each has a national or regional reputation in the life science industry. We expect that their reputations will attract business and investment opportunities before the active marketing of properties and will assist us in negotiations with lenders, existing and potential tenants, and industry personnel. If we lost their services, our relationships with such lenders, existing and prospective tenants, and industry personnel could suffer. We have entered into employment agreements with each of Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt, but we cannot guarantee that they will not terminate their employment prior to the end of the term. See “Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure — Conflicts of interest could result in our management acting other than in our stockholders’ best interests” and “Management — Employment Agreements.”

Risks Related to the Real Estate Industry

      Our performance and value are subject to risks associated with real estate assets and with the real estate industry.

      Our ability to make expected distributions to our stockholders depends on our ability to generate revenues in excess of expenses, our scheduled principal payments on debt and our capital expenditure requirements. Events and conditions that are beyond our control may decrease the value of our properties and cash available for distribution. These events include:

  •  local oversupply, increased competition or reduced demand for life science office and laboratory space,
 
  •  inability to collect rent from tenants,
 
  •  vacancies or our inability to rent space on favorable terms,
 
  •  increased operating costs, including insurance premiums, utilities and real estate taxes,
 
  •  the ongoing need for capital improvements, particularly in older structures,
 
  •  costs of complying with changes in governmental regulations, including tax laws,
 
  •  the relative illiquidity of real estate investments,
 
  •  changing submarket demographics, and
 
  •  civil unrest, acts of war and natural disasters, including earthquakes, floods and fires, which may result in uninsured and underinsured losses.

      In addition, we could experience a general decline in rents or an increased incidence of defaults under existing leases if any of the following occur:

  •  periods of economic slowdown or recession,
 
  •  rising interest rates,
 
  •  declining demand for real estate, or
 
  •  the public perception that any of these events may occur.

      Any of these events could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common stock, ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and ability to pay distributions to you.

25


Table of Contents

      Illiquidity of real estate investments may make it difficult for us to sell properties in response to market conditions.

      Equity real estate investments are relatively illiquid and therefore will tend to limit our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to changing economic or other conditions. To the extent the properties are not subject to triple-net leases, some significant expenditures such as real estate taxes and maintenance costs are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investment. Should these events occur, our income and funds available for distribution could be adversely affected. In addition, REIT requirements may subject us to confiscatory taxes on gain recognized from the sale of property if the property is considered to be held primarily for sale in the ordinary course of our business. To prevent these taxes, we may comply with safe harbor rules relating to the number of properties sold in a year, how long we owned the properties, their tax bases and the cost of improvements made to those properties. However, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to successfully comply with these safe harbors. If compliance is possible, the safe harbor rules may restrict our ability to sell assets in the future.

      Significant competition may decrease or prevent increases in our properties’ occupancy and rental rates and may reduce our investment opportunities.

      We believe we will be one of only two U.S. publicly traded entities focusing primarily on the acquisition, management, expansion and selective development of life science properties. However, various entities, including other REITs, such as health care REITs and suburban office property REITs, pension funds, insurance companies, investment funds and companies, partnerships, and developers invest in life science properties and therefore compete for investment opportunities with us. Many of these entities have substantially greater financial resources than we do and may be able to accept more risk than we can prudently manage, including risks with respect to the creditworthiness of a tenant or the geographic proximity of its investments. In the future, competition from these entities may reduce the number of suitable investment opportunities offered to us or increase the bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell. Further, as a result of their greater resources, those entities may have more flexibility than we do in their ability to offer rental concessions to attract tenants. This could put pressure on our ability to maintain or raise rents and could adversely affect our ability to attract or retain tenants. As a result, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common stock, ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and ability to pay distributions to you may be adversely affected.

      Potential losses may not be covered by insurance.

      We carry comprehensive liability, fire, workers’ compensation, extended coverage, terrorism and rental loss insurance covering all of our properties under a blanket policy, except with respect to property and fire insurance on our McKeller Court and Science Center Drive properties, which is carried directly by the tenant. We believe the policy specifications and insured limits are appropriate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice. We do not carry insurance for generally uninsured losses such as loss from riots or acts of God. We also intend to obtain environmental remediation insurance for our properties. This insurance, subject to certain exclusions and deductibles, covers the cost to remediate environmental damage caused by unintentional future spills or the historic presence of previously undiscovered hazardous substances. We intend to carry similar insurance with respect to future acquisitions as appropriate. All of our current properties are located in San Diego and the San Francisco Bay Area, areas especially subject to earthquakes. We presently carry earthquake insurance on our San Francisco Bay Area property but do not carry earthquake insurance on our San Diego properties. The amount of earthquake insurance coverage we do carry may not be sufficient to fully cover losses from earthquakes. In addition, we may discontinue earthquake, terrorism or other insurance on some or all of our properties in the future if the cost of premiums for any of these policies exceeds, in our judgment, the value of the coverage discounted for the risk of loss.

      If we experience a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from those properties. In

26


Table of Contents

addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged.

      We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or re-lease space as leases expire.

      If we cannot renew leases, we may be unable to re-lease our properties at rates equal to or above the current rate. Even if we can renew leases, tenants may be able to negotiate lower rates as a result of market conditions. Market conditions may also hinder our ability to lease vacant space in newly developed properties. In addition, we may enter into or acquire leases for properties that are specially suited to the needs of a particular tenant. Such properties may require renovations, tenant improvements or other concessions in order to lease it to another tenant if the initial lease terminates. Any of these factors could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common stock, our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and our ability to pay distributions to you.

      We could incur significant costs related to government regulation and private litigation over environmental matters.

      Our properties may be subject to environmental liabilities. Under various federal, state and local laws, a current or previous owner, operator or tenant of real estate can face liability for environmental contamination created by the presence, discharge or threat of discharge of hazardous or toxic substances. Liabilities can include the cost to investigate, clean up and monitor the actual or threatened contamination and damages caused by the contamination (or threatened contamination). Environmental laws typically impose such liability regardless of:

  •  our knowledge of the contamination,
 
  •  the timing of the contamination,
 
  •  the cause of the contamination, or
 
  •  the party responsible for the contamination of the property.

      The liability under such laws may be strict, joint and several. Liabilities associated with environmental conditions may be significant and can sometimes exceed the value of the affected property. The presence of hazardous substances on a property may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent that property or to borrow using that property as collateral.

      Some of our properties have had contamination in the past that required cleanup. We believe the contamination has been effectively removed. However, we cannot guarantee that such contamination does not continue to pose a threat to the environment or that we will not have continued liability in connection with such prior contamination.

      Environmental laws also govern the presence, maintenance and removal of asbestos-containing materials, or ACMs, and may impose fines and penalties if we fail to comply with these requirements. Failure to comply with these laws, or even the presence of ACMs, may expose us to third-party liability. Some of our properties may contain ACMs, and we could be liable for such fines or penalties, as described below in “Business and Properties — Regulation — Environmental Matters.”

      Environmental laws also:

  •  may require the removal or upgrade of underground storage tanks,
 
  •  regulate storm water, wastewater and water pollutant discharge,
 
  •  regulate air pollutant emissions,
 
  •  regulate hazardous materials generation, management and disposal, and
 
  •  regulate workplace health and safety.

      Life science industry tenants, our primary tenant industry focus, frequently use hazardous materials, chemicals and biological and radioactive compounds. Our tenants’ controlled use of these materials

27


Table of Contents

subjects us and our tenants to laws that govern using, manufacturing, storing, handling and disposing of such materials and certain byproducts of those materials. We are unaware of any of our existing tenants violating applicable laws and regulations, but we and our tenants cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. If our properties become contaminated, or if a party is injured, we could be held liable for any damages that result. Such liability could exceed our resources and any environmental remediation insurance coverage we have.

      Our properties may contain or develop harmful mold, which could lead to liability for adverse health effects and costs of remediating the problem.

      When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants. Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been increasing as exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse health effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As a result, the presence of significant mold at any of our properties could require us to undertake a costly remediation program to contain or remove the mold from the affected property. In addition, the presence of significant mold could expose us to liability from our tenants, their or our employees, and others if property damage or health concerns arise.

      Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and similar laws may require us to make significant unanticipated expenditures.

      All of our properties are required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or the ADA. The ADA requires that all public accommodations must meet federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Although we believe that our properties substantially comply with present requirements of the ADA, we have not conducted an audit or investigation of all of our properties to determine our compliance. If one or more of our properties is not in compliance with the ADA, then we would be required to bring our properties into compliance. Compliance with the ADA could require removing access barriers. Non-compliance could result in imposition of fines by the U.S. government or an award of damages to private litigants, or both. Additional federal, state and local laws also may require us to modify our properties or could restrict our ability to renovate our properties. Complying with the ADA or other legislation could be very expensive. If we incur substantial costs to comply with such laws, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common stock, our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and our ability to pay distributions to you could be adversely affected.

      We may incur significant costs complying with other regulations.

      Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and safety requirements, building codes and land use regulations. Failure to comply with these requirements could subject us to governmental fines or private litigant damage awards. We believe that our properties are currently in material compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements. However, we do not know whether existing requirements will change or whether future requirements will require us to make significant unanticipated expenditures that will adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, the per share trading price of our common stock, our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and our ability to pay distributions to you.

Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure

      Conflicts of interest could result in our management acting other than in our stockholders’ best interests.

      We may pursue less vigorous enforcement of terms of contribution and other agreements because of conflicts of interest with certain of our officers. Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt and certain other contributors have ownership interests in the properties to be contributed to our operating partnership in the formation transactions. Following the completion of this offering and the formation transactions, we, under the agreements relating to the contribution of those interests, will be entitled to indemnification and

28


Table of Contents

damages in the event of breaches of representations or warranties made by Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt and other contributors. In addition, Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt will enter into employment agreements with us pursuant to which they will devote substantially full-time attention to our affairs. See “Management — Employment Agreements.” None of these contribution and employment agreements were negotiated on an arm’s-length basis. We may choose not to enforce, or to enforce less vigorously, our rights under these contribution and employment agreements because of our desire to maintain our ongoing relationship with the individuals involved.

      Tax consequences upon sale or refinancing. Some holders of units, including Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt, may suffer different and more adverse tax consequences than our common stockholders if we sell or refinance certain properties our operating partnership will own. Therefore, these holders may have different objectives regarding the appropriate pricing, timing and other material terms of any sale or refinancing of those properties.

      Our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer has substantial influence over our affairs. Upon completion of this offering, Mr. Gold, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, will beneficially own units exchangeable for an aggregate of 1,157,138 shares of our common stock and [               ] shares of restricted common stock, representing a total of approximately [               ]% of the total outstanding shares of our common stock on a fully diluted basis (having a value of $[               ] million based on the initial public offering price of our common stock). Consequently, Mr. Gold has substantial influence over us and could exercise his influence in a manner that is not in the best interests of our stockholders.

      Our charter and Maryland law contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control transaction.

      Our charter contains a 9.8% ownership limit. Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted by our board of directors, no person may own more than 9.8% of the value of our outstanding shares of stock or more than 9.8% in value or number (whichever is more restrictive) of our outstanding shares of our common stock. The board may not grant such an exemption to any proposed transferee whose ownership of in excess of 9.8% of the value of our outstanding shares would result in the termination of our status as a REIT. These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if our board of directors determines that it is no longer in our best interests to attempt to qualify as a REIT. The ownership limit may delay or impede a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders. See “Description of Securities — Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer.”

      We could authorize and issue stock without stockholder approval. Our charter authorizes us to issue additional authorized but unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock. In addition, our board of directors may classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our common stock or preferred stock and may set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares. The board may also, without stockholder approval, amend our charter to increase the authorized number of shares of our common stock or our preferred stock that may be issued. See “Description of Securities — Common Stock” and “— Preferred Stock.” Although our board of directors has no intention to do so at the present time, it could establish a series of common stock or preferred stock that could, depending on the terms of such series, delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.

      Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes in control. Certain provisions of the MGCL may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to acquire us or of impeding a change of control. In some cases, such an acquisition or change of control could provide you

29


Table of Contents

with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of such shares. These MGCL provisions include:

  •  “business combination” provisions that, subject to limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us and an “interested stockholder” for certain periods. An “interested stockholder” is generally any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our shares or an affiliate thereof. The business combinations are prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. After that period, the MGCL imposes special appraisal rights and special stockholder voting requirements on such combinations, and
 
  •  “control share” provisions that provide that “control shares” of our company acquired in a “control share acquisition” have no voting rights unless holders of two-thirds of our voting stock (excluding interested shares) consent. “Control shares” are shares that, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the stockholder, entitle the stockholder to exercise one of three increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors. A “control share acquisition” is the direct or indirect acquisition of ownership or control of “control shares.”

      We have opted out of these provisions of the MGCL, in the case of the business combination provisions of the MGCL by resolution of our board of directors with respect to any business combination between us and any person provided such business combination is first approved by our board of directors (including a majority of directors who are not affiliates or associates of such person), and in the case of the control share provisions of the MGCL pursuant to a provision in our bylaws. However, our board of directors may by resolution elect to opt in to the business combination provisions of the MGCL and we may, by amendment to our bylaws, opt in to the control share provisions of the MGCL in the future.

      The partnership agreement, Maryland law, and our charter and bylaws also contain other provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders. See “Certain Provisions of Maryland Law and of Our Charter and Bylaws — Removal of Directors,” “— Control Share Acquisitions,” “— Advance Notice of Director Nominations and New Business,” “— Other Anti-Takeover Provisions of Maryland Law” and “Description of the Partnership Agreement of BioMed Property, L.P.”

      Our board of directors may amend our investing and financing policies without stockholder approval, and accordingly, you would have limited control over changes in our policies that could increase the risk we default under our debt obligations or that could harm our business, results of operations and share price.

      Our board of directors has adopted a policy of limiting our indebtedness to approximately 60% of our total market capitalization. Total market capitalization is defined as the sum of the market value of our outstanding common stock (which may decrease, thereby increasing our debt to total capitalization ratio), plus the aggregate value of operating partnership units we do not own, plus the book value of our total consolidated indebtedness. However, our organizational documents do not limit the amount or percentage of debt that we may incur, nor do they limit the types of properties we may acquire or develop. Our board of directors may alter or eliminate our current policy on borrowing or investing at any time without stockholder approval. Changes in our strategy or in our investment or leverage policies could expose us to greater credit risk and interest rate risk and could also result in a more leveraged balance sheet. These factors could result in an increase in our debt service and could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to make expected distributions to you. Higher leverage also increases the risk we would default on our debt.

      Our lack of sole decision-making authority or reliance on a co-venturer’s financial condition could make joint venture investments risky.

      We may co-invest in the future with third parties through partnerships, joint ventures or other entities. We may acquire non-controlling interests or share responsibility for managing the affairs of a property, partnership, joint venture or other entity. In such events, we would not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority regarding the property or entity. Investments in entities may, under certain

30


Table of Contents

circumstances, involve risks not present were a third party not involved. These risks include the possibility that partners or co-venturers:

  •  might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions,
 
  •  may have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals, and
 
  •  may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives.

      Such investments may also have the potential risk of impasses on decisions, such as a sale, because neither we nor the partner or co-venturer would have full control over the partnership or joint venture. Disputes between us and partners or co-venturers may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and/or directors from focusing their time and effort on our business. In addition, we may in certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our third-party partners or co-venturers.

Risks Related to Our Capital Structure

      Our debt obligations expose us to increased risk of property losses and may have adverse consequences on our business operations and our ability to make distributions.

      We use debt to finance our property acquisitions. Our use of debt may have adverse consequences, including the following:

  •  Required payments of principal and interest may be greater than our cash flow from operations.
 
  •  We may be forced to dispose of one or more of our properties, possibly on disadvantageous terms, to make payments on our debt.
 
  •  If we default on our debt obligations, the lenders or mortgagees may foreclose on our properties that secure those loans. Further, if we default under a mortgage loan, we will automatically be in default on any other loan that has cross default provisions, and we may lose the properties securing all of these loans.
 
  •  A foreclosure on one of our properties will be treated as a sale of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding balance of the secured debt. If the outstanding balance of the secured debt exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would recognize taxable income on foreclosure without any accompanying cash proceeds to pay the tax.
 
  •  We may not be able to refinance or extend our existing debt. If we cannot repay, refinance or extend our debt at maturity, in addition to our failure to repay our debt, we may be unable to make distributions to our stockholders at expected levels or at all.
 
  •  Even if we are able to refinance or extend our existing debt, the terms of any refinancing or extension may not be as favorable as the terms of our existing debt. If the refinancing involves a higher interest rate, it could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions to stockholders.

      After completing this offering and applying the net proceeds as described under “Use of Proceeds,” we will have outstanding mortgage indebtedness of approximately $[                    ] million, secured by [                    ] properties. We also may incur additional debt in connection with future acquisitions and may borrow under a credit facility that we intend to obtain.

      Lenders may require us to enter into restrictive covenants relating to our operations, which could limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

      When providing financing, a lender may impose restrictions on us that affect our distribution and operating policies and our ability to incur additional debt. Loan documents we enter into may contain

31


Table of Contents

covenants that limit our ability to further mortgage the property or reduce insurance coverage. These or other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and our ability to achieve our operating plans.

      Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.

      Interest we pay could reduce cash available for distributions. Additionally, if we incur variable rate debt, increases in interest rates would increase our interest costs, which would reduce our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to you. In addition, if we need to repay existing debt during a period of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments in properties at times which may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments.

      Our growth depends on our successfully obtaining external sources of capital, which are outside of our control.

      In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required to distribute annually at least 90% of our net taxable income, excluding any net capital gain. In addition, we will be subject to income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income, including any net capital gains. Because of these distribution requirements, we may not be able to fund future capital needs, including any necessary acquisition financing, from operating cash flow. Consequently, we rely on third-party sources to fund our capital needs. We may not be able to obtain financings on favorable terms or at all. Our access to third-party sources of capital depends, in part, on:

  •  general market conditions,
 
  •  the market’s perception of our growth potential,
 
  •  our current debt levels,
 
  •  our current and expected future earnings,
 
  •  our cash flow and cash distributions, and
 
  •  the market price per share of our common stock.

      Our inability to obtain capital from third-party sources will adversely affect our business and limit our growth. Without sufficient capital, we may not be able to acquire or develop properties when strategic opportunities exist, satisfy our debt service obligations or make the cash distributions to our stockholders necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT.

Risks Related to Our REIT Status

      Our failure to qualify as a REIT under the Code would result in significant adverse consequences to us and the value of our stock.

      We intend to operate in a manner that will allow us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes under the Code. However, the REIT qualification requirements under the Code are complex and technical, and the judicial and administrative interpretations of these Code provisions are limited. The fact that we hold substantially all of our assets through a partnership further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Even a seemingly minor technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. Our REIT status depends upon various factual matters and circumstances that may not be entirely within our control. In addition, new legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions, each of which could have retroactive effect, may make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT, or could reduce the desirability of an investment in a REIT relative to other investments. We have not requested and do not plan to request a ruling from the IRS that we qualify as a REIT, and the statements in this prospectus are not binding on the IRS or any court. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we will be successful in qualifying as a REIT.

32


Table of Contents

      If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, we will face serious adverse tax consequences that would substantially reduce the funds available for distribution to you for each of the years involved because:

  •  we would not be allowed to deduct distributions to stockholders in computing our taxable income and would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates,
 
  •  we could also be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes, and
 
  •  unless we are entitled to relief under applicable statutory provisions, we could not elect to be taxed as a REIT for four taxable years following the year in which we were disqualified.

      In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will not be required to make distributions to stockholders, and all distributions to stockholders will be subject to tax as ordinary corporate distributions. As a result of all these factors, our failure to qualify as a REIT could impair our ability to expand our business and raise capital and would adversely affect the value of our common stock.

      Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we may be subject to other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow.

      Even if we remain qualified as a REIT for tax purposes, we may be subject to some federal, state and local taxes on our income or property. For example:

  •  In order to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on the undistributed amount.
 
  •  We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which distributions we pay in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years.
 
  •  If we have net income from the sale or other disposition of “foreclosure property” that we hold primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property, we must pay tax on that income at the highest corporate rate.
 
  •  If we sell a property in a “prohibited transaction,” our gain from the sale would be subject to a 100% penalty tax. A “prohibited transaction” is, in general, a sale or other disposition of property, other than foreclosure property, held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.

      To maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to borrow funds during unfavorable market conditions.

      To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our stockholders certain amounts each year based on our income as described above. At times, we may not have sufficient funds to satisfy these distribution requirements and may need to borrow funds to maintain our REIT status and avoid the payment of income and excise taxes. These borrowing needs could result from:

  •  differences in timing between the actual receipt of cash and inclusion of income for federal income tax purposes,
 
  •  the effect of non-deductible capital expenditures,
 
  •  the creation of reserves, or
 
  •  required debt or amortization payments.

33


Table of Contents

We may need to borrow funds at times when the then-prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings. These borrowings could increase our costs or reduce our equity and adversely affect the value of our common stock.

      To maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to forego otherwise attractive opportunities.

      To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy tests concerning, among other things, the sources of our income, the nature and diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our stock. We may be required to make distributions to stockholders at times when it would be more advantageous to reinvest cash in our business or when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.

      Our ownership limitations may restrict or prevent you from engaging in certain transfers of our stock.

      Our charter contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer of our capital stock that are intended to assist us in complying with the requirements imposed on REITs by the Code. The ownership limits contained in our charter provide that, subject to certain specified exceptions, no person or entity may own more than 9.8% of the value of our outstanding shares of capital stock, and no person or entity may own more than 9.8% (by number or value, whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Our charter also (1) prohibits any person from actually or constructively owning shares of our capital stock that would cause us to be “closely held” under Section 856(h) of the Code or would otherwise cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT and (2) voids any transfer that would result in shares of our capital stock being owned by fewer than 100 persons. The constructive ownership rules of the Code are complex, and may cause shares of our capital stock owned actually or constructively by a group of related individuals and/or entities to be constructively owned by one individual or entity. As a result, acquisition of less than 9.8% of the shares of our capital stock (or the acquisition of an interest in equity and/or certain affiliates or subsidiaries of an entity that owns, actually or constructively, our capital stock) by an individual or entity, could cause that individual or entity, or another individual or entity, to own constructively shares in a manner that would violate the 9.8% ownership limits or such other limit as provided in our charter or permitted by our board of directors. Our board of directors may, but in no event will be required to, waive the 9.8% ownership limit with respect to a particular stockholder if it determines that the ownership will not jeopardize our status as a REIT. As a condition of granting such a waiver, our board of directors may require a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or an opinion of counsel satisfactory to our board and will obtain undertakings or representations from the applicant with respect to preserving our status as a REIT. Pursuant to our charter, if any purported transfer of our capital stock or any other event would result in any person violating the ownership limits set forth in our charter or otherwise permitted by our board of directors, then the transfer will be void and of no force or effect as to that number of shares in excess of the applicable limit. Such excess shares will be automatically transferred, pursuant to our charter, to a trust, the beneficiary of which will be a qualified charitable organization we select.

Risks Related to This Offering

      There is currently no public market for our common stock. An active trading market for our common stock may not develop following this offering.

      There has not been any public market for our common stock prior to this offering. We intend to apply to have our common stock listed on the NYSE following the completion of this offering. We cannot assure you, however, that an active trading market for our common stock will develop after this offering or, if one develops, that it will be sustained. In the absence of a public market, you may be unable to liquidate an investment in our common stock. We and our underwriters have determined the initial public offering price. The price at which shares of our common stock trade after the completion of this offering may be lower than the price at which the underwriters sell them in this offering.

34


Table of Contents

      The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile following this offering.

      Even if an active trading market develops for our common stock, the market price of our common stock may be volatile. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of our common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your shares at or above the public offering price. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future.

      Some of the factors that could negatively affect our share price or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our common stock include:

  •  actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results or dividends,
 
  •  changes in our funds from operations or earnings estimates,
 
  •  publication of research reports about us or the real estate industry,
 
  •  increases in market interest rates that lead purchasers of our shares to demand a higher yield,
 
  •  changes in market valuations of similar companies,
 
  •  adverse market reaction to any additional debt we incur in the future,
 
  •  additions or departures of key management personnel,
 
  •  actions by institutional stockholders,
 
  •  speculation in the press or investment community,
 
  •  the realization of any of the other risk factors presented in this prospectus, and
 
  •  general market and economic conditions.

      Market interest rates may impact the value of our common stock.

      Changes in market interest rates have historically affected the trading prices of equity securities issued by REITs. One of the factors that will influence the price of our common stock will be the dividend yield on the common stock (as a percentage of the price of our common stock) relative to market interest rates. An increase in market interest rates, which are currently at low levels relative to historical rates, may lead prospective purchasers of our common stock to expect a higher dividend yield. Further, higher interest rates would likely increase our borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for distribution. Thus, higher market interest rates could harm our financial condition and results of operations and could cause the market price of our common stock to fall.

      Broad market fluctuations could negatively impact the market price of our common stock.

      The stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many companies in industries similar or related to ours and that have been unrelated to these companies’ operating performances. These broad market fluctuations could reduce the market price of our common stock. Furthermore, our operating results and prospects may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors or may be lower than those of companies with comparable market capitalizations. Either of these factors could lead to a material decline in the market price of our common stock.

      Investors in this offering will experience an immediate and material dilution of the book value of our common stock.

      The initial public offering price of our common stock is substantially higher than what our net tangible book value per share will be immediately after this offering. As of December 31, 2003, the aggregate historical combined net tangible book value of the interests and assets to be transferred to our operating partnership was approximately $[          ] million, or $[          ] per share of our common stock held by continuing investors, assuming the exchange of operating partnership units into shares of our common

35


Table of Contents

stock on a one-for-one basis. As a result, the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common stock after the completion of this offering and the formation transactions will be less than the initial public offering price. If you purchase our common stock in this offering, you will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $[          ] per share in the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common stock.

      The number of shares available for future sale could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

      We cannot predict whether future issuances of shares of our common stock or the availability of shares for resale in the open market will decrease the market price per share of our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock in the public market, or upon exchange of operating partnership units, or the perception that such sales might occur, could adversely affect the market price of the shares of our common stock.

      Any of the following could have an adverse effect on the market price of the shares of our common stock:

  •  the exercise of the underwriter’s over-allotment option,
 
  •  the exchange of operating partnership units for common stock,
 
  •  the exercise of any options granted to certain directors, executive officers and other employees under our incentive award plan,
 
  •  issuances of preferred stock with liquidation or distribution preferences, and
 
  •  other issuances of our common stock.

      Additionally, the existence of operating partnership units, options and shares of our common stock reserved for issuance upon exchange of operating partnership units may adversely affect the terms upon which we may be able to obtain additional capital through the sale of equity securities. In addition, future sales of shares of our common stock may be dilutive to existing stockholders.

      Each of our directors and executive officers have entered into lock-up agreements restricting the sale of his shares for up to one year. The underwriters, at any time, may release all or a portion of the common stock subject to the foregoing lock-up provisions. If the restrictions under such agreements are waived, the affected common stock may be available for sale into the market, which could reduce the market price for our common stock.

      From time to time we also may issue shares of our common stock or operating partnership units in connection with property, portfolio or business acquisitions. We may grant additional demand or piggyback registration rights in connection with these issuances. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock or the perception that these sales could occur may adversely affect the prevailing market price for our common stock or may adversely affect the terms upon which we may be able to obtain additional capital through the sale of equity securities.

36


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

      We make statements in this prospectus that are forward-looking statements. In particular, statements pertaining to our capital resources, portfolio performance and results of operations contain forward-looking statements. Likewise, our pro forma financial statements and our statements regarding anticipated growth in our funds from operations and anticipated market conditions, demographics and results of operations are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or imprecise, and we may not be able to realize them. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “pro forma,” “estimates” or “anticipates” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements:

  •  adverse economic or real estate developments in the life science industry or the California region,
 
  •  general economic conditions,
 
  •  our ability to compete effectively,
 
  •  defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants,
 
  •  increased interest rates and operating costs,
 
  •  our failure to obtain necessary outside financing,
 
  •  our ability to successfully complete real estate acquisitions, developments and dispositions,
 
  •  our failure to successfully operate acquired properties and operations,
 
  •  our failure to maintain our status as a REIT,
 
  •  government approvals, actions and initiatives, including the need for compliance with environmental requirements,
 
  •  financial market fluctuations, and
 
  •  changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates.

      For a further discussion of these and other factors that could impact our future results, performance or transactions, see the section above entitled “Risk Factors.”

37


Table of Contents

USE OF PROCEEDS

      Our net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $[          ] million, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses we will pay. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, our net proceeds will be approximately $[          ] million.

      We will contribute the net proceeds of this offering to our operating partnership. Our operating partnership will subsequently use the proceeds received from us as follows:

  •  approximately $[          ] million to fund the equity portion and $[          ] million to repay debt related to the purchase of our acquisition properties,
 
  •  approximately $4.7 million to acquire the interests of some of the contributors of our initial properties,
 
  •  approximately $19.1 million to repay the following debt related to our initial properties,

  •  a loan secured by our Bernardo Center Drive property with an expected principal amount outstanding as of June 30, 2004 of $13.8 million, a fixed interest rate of 7.75% per annum, a maturity date of November 1, 2007 and a prepayment fee of approximately $[                     ] as of [                    ], 2004,
 
  •  additional loans incurred by the entity that owns our Bernardo Center Drive property, including (1) a loan with a principal amount outstanding of $268,000, an adjustable interest rate of prime plus 1.25% (an effective rate of 5.25% as of December 31, 2003) per annum and a maturity date of January 7, 2009 and (2) loans with an aggregate principal amount outstanding of $100,000, fixed interest rates of 11% per annum and maturity dates of January 14, 2005,
 
  •  two loans secured by our Balboa Avenue property: (1) a loan with a principal amount outstanding of $4.7 million, an adjustable interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 2.75%, subject to a floor of 6.25% (an effective rate of 6.25% as of December 31, 2003) per annum, a maturity date of November 1, 2007 and a prepayment fee of approximately $[          ] as of [                    ], 2004 and (2) a loan with a principal amount outstanding of $60,000, an adjustable interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 2.75%, subject to a floor of 6.25% (an effective rate of 6.25% as of December 31, 2003) per annum and a maturity date of November 1, 2004, and
 
  •  an additional loan incurred by the entity that owns our Balboa Avenue property with a principal amount outstanding of $175,000, a fixed interest rate of 8.75% per annum and a maturity date of August 19, 2004.

      Any net proceeds remaining after the uses described above, including the proceeds intended for any of the acquisitions described below that are not consummated, will be used to acquire properties and for general corporate and working capital purposes. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, we expect to use the additional net proceeds, which will be approximately $[                     ] million, to acquire additional properties and for general corporate and working capital purposes.

      Pending application of cash proceeds, we will invest such portion of the net proceeds in interest-bearing accounts and short-term, interest-bearing securities, which are consistent with our intention to qualify for taxation as a REIT.

38


Table of Contents

      A tabular presentation of our estimated use of proceeds follows:

                 
Percentage
of Gross
Dollar Amount Proceeds


(in thousands)
Gross offering proceeds
  $         100.00%  
Underwriting discounts and commissions
               
Other expenses of offering
               
     
     
 
Net offering proceeds
               
     
     
 
Estimated amount of net proceeds used to repay indebtedness related to our initial properties and acquisition properties
  $            
Estimated amount to pay cash portion of the purchase price of our initial properties
               
Estimated amount to pay cash portion of the purchase price of our acquisition properties
               
Estimated amount allocated to fund future acquisitions and for general corporate purposes
               
     
     
 
Total net offering proceeds used
  $            
Total underwriting discounts, commissions and other expenses
               
Total application of gross offering proceeds
  $         100.00%  
     
     
 
Pending these uses, we intend to make temporary investments in money market funds.

39


Table of Contents

DISTRIBUTION POLICY

      We intend to make regular quarterly distributions to our stockholders. To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our stockholders an amount at least equal to:

        (1) 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined before the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gain (which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP), plus
 
        (2) 90% of the excess of our net income from foreclosure property over the tax imposed on such income by the Code, less
 
        (3) any excess non-cash income (as determined under the Code). See “Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

      Distributions will be authorized by our board of directors and declared by us based upon a number of factors, including actual results of operations, the timing of the investment of the net proceeds of this offering, the amount of funds from operations, our financial condition, debt service requirements, capital expenditure requirements for our properties, our taxable income, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code, our operating expenses and other factors our directors deem relevant. Our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders will depend, in part, upon our receipt of distributions from our operating partnership, which we control, and will be based on revenues we derive from our rental properties. Distributions to stockholders generally will be taxable to our stockholders as ordinary income. We cannot assure you that we will be able to generate sufficient revenue from operations to pay dividends to our stockholders or that our directors will not change our distribution policy in the future. See “Risk Factors.”

      Our charter allows us to issue preferred stock that could have a preference on distributions, including dividends. We currently have no intention to issue any preferred stock, but if we do, the dividend preference on the preferred stock could limit our ability to make a dividend distribution to our common stockholders.

40


Table of Contents

CAPITALIZATION

      The following table sets forth the historical combined capitalization of BPA as of December 31, 2003 and our pro forma consolidated capitalization as of December 31, 2003, adjusted to give effect to the formation transactions, this offering and use of the net proceeds from this offering as set forth in “Use of Proceeds” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Formation Transactions and Contribution of Initial Properties.” You should read this table in conjunction with “Use of Proceeds,” “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Formation Transactions and Contribution of Initial Properties,” “Selected Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our combined financial statements and the notes to our financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

                   
Historical Pro-forma
Combined Consolidated


Mortgages and other secured loans
    76,187,000       [      ]  
Minority interest in our operating partnership
           
Stockholders’ equity:
               
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding on a pro forma basis
           
 
Additional paid in capital
               
Owners’ equity
    1,155,000       [      ]  
     
     
 
 
Total stockholders’ equity (owners’ equity)
    1,155,000       [      ]  
     
     
 
Total capitalization
    77,342,000       [      ]  
     
     
 

41


Table of Contents

DILUTION

      Purchasers of our common stock offered in this prospectus will experience an immediate and substantial dilution of the net tangible book value of their common stock from the initial public offering price. At December 31, 2003, we had a combined net tangible book value of approximately $18.9 million, or $[          ] per share of our common stock held by continuing investors, assuming the exchange of units into shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis. After giving effect to the sale of the shares of our common stock offered hereby, the deduction of underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering and formation expenses, the receipt by us of the net proceeds from this offering and the use of these funds by our operating partnership as described in “Use of Proceeds,” “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Formation Transactions and Contribution of Initial Properties” and our pro forma financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, the pro forma net tangible book value at December 31, 2003 attributable to the common stockholders would have been $[                    ] million, or $[                    ] per share of our common stock. This amount represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $[                    ] per unit to continuing investors and an immediate dilution in pro forma net tangible book value of $[                    ] per share from the public offering price of $[                    ] per share of our common stock to new public investors. The following table illustrates this per share dilution:

                         
Initial public offering price per share
                  $ [     ]  
Net tangible book value per share before the formation transactions and this offering(1)
            ([     ] )        
Decrease in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributable to the formation transactions, but before this offering(2)
    ([     ] )                
Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributable to this offering(3)
    ([     ] )                
Net increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributable to the formation transactions and this offering
            ([     ] )        
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after the formation transactions and this offering(4)
                    [     ]  
Dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to new investors(5)
                  $ [     ]  


(1)  Net tangible book value per share of our common stock before the formation transactions and this offering is determined by dividing net tangible book value based on December 31, 2003 net book value of the tangible assets (consisting of [                     ]) of BPA by the number of shares of our common stock held by continuing investors after this offering, assuming the exchange of all of the units to be issued to the continuing investors.
 
(2)  Decrease in net tangible book value per share of our common stock attributable to the formation transactions, but before this offering, is determined by dividing the difference between the December 31, 2003 pro forma net tangible book value, excluding net offering proceeds, and the December 31, 2003 net tangible book value of BPA by the number of shares of our common stock held by continuing investors after this offering, assuming the exchange of all of the units to be issued to the continuing investors.
 
(3)  Represents increase in net tangible book value per share of our common stock attributable to this offering, adjusted to spread the negative net tangible book value existing before this offering among investors in this offering. This amount is calculated after deducting underwriters’ discounts and commissions and estimated expenses of this offering.
 
(4)  Based on pro forma net tangible book value of approximately $[                    ] million divided by the sum of [                     ] shares of our common stock to be outstanding following the completion of this offering. There is no further impact on book value dilution attributable to the exchange of units to be issued to the continuing investors in the formation transactions due to the effect of minority interest.
 
(5)  Dilution is determined by subtracting pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common stock after giving effect to the formation transactions and this offering from the initial public offering price paid by a new investor for a share of our common stock.

42


Table of Contents

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

      The following table sets forth selected financial and operating data on a pro forma basis for BioMed Property Trust, Inc., and on a historical combined basis for the BioMed Property Trust Predecessor. The BioMed Property Trust Predecessor is comprised of Bernardo Property Advisors, Inc. and its affiliates. We have not presented historical information for BioMed Property Trust, Inc. because we have not had any corporate activity since our formation other than the issuance of 1,000 shares of common stock in connection with the initial capitalization of our company and because we believe that a discussion of the results of BioMed Property Trust, Inc. would not be meaningful.

      The following pro forma and historical information should be read in conjunction with our pro forma consolidated financial statements and historical combined financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our selected historical combined balance sheet information at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the historical combined statement of operations and other data for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, has been derived from our historical combined financial statements audited by KPMG LLP, independent auditors, whose report with respect thereto is included elsewhere in this prospectus. The historical combined balance sheet information at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, and the historical combined statement of operations and other data for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, have been derived from the unaudited historical combined financial statements of the BioMed Property Trust Predecessor.

      The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet data is presented as if the offering, the formation transactions and the acquisitions all had occurred on December 31, 2003, and the unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations and other data for the year ended December 31, 2003, is presented as if this offering, the formation transactions and the acquisitions all had occurred on the first day of the period presented. The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what our actual financial position or results of operations would have been as of or for the period indicated, nor does it purport to represent our future financial position or results of operations.

43


Table of Contents

BioMed Property Trust, Inc. (Pro Forma) and

BioMed Property Trust Predecessor (Historical)
                                                   
Year Ended December 31,

Pro Forma
Consolidated Historical Combined


2003 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999






(Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited)
Statement Of Operations Data:
Revenues:
                                               
 
Rental
  $       $ 12,208,000     $ 11,802,000     $ 10,354,000     $ 6,806,000     $ 2,807,000  
 
Tenant recoveries
            1,335,000       1,317,000       835,000       589,000       405,000  
 
Management fees
            161,000       154,000       108,000       101,000       55,000  
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
              13,704,000       13,273,000       11,297,000       7,496,000       3,267,000  
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Expenses:
                                               
 
Rental operations
            1,396,000       1,375,000       817,000       611,000       609,000  
 
Depreciation and amortization
            2,129,000       2,136,000       1,794,000       1,297,000       603,000  
 
General and administrative
            275,000       295,000       256,000       219,000       298,000  
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
              3,800,000       3,806,000       2,867,000       2,127,000       1,510,000  
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from operations
            9,904,000       9,467,000       8,430,000       5,369,000       1,757,000  
 
Interest income
            36,000       62,000       94,000       116,000       23,000  
 
Interest expense
            (6,314,000 )     (6,705,000 )     (6,791,000 )     (4,076,000 )     (1,830,000 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income before minority interests
            3,626,000       2,824,000       1,733,000       1,409,000       (50,000 )
 
Minority interests
            (1,955,000 )     (1,527,000 )     (1,005,000 )     (916,000 )     (74,000 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
  $       $ 1,671,000     $ 1,297,000     $ 728,000     $ 493,000     $ (124,000 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Pro forma basic earnings per share(1)
  $                                  
Pro forma diluted earnings per share(2)
  $                                  
Pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding — basic
                                     
Pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted
                                     
                                                     
As of December 31,

Pro Forma Historical Combined
Consolidated
2003 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999






(Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited)
Balance Sheet Data:
Rental properties, net
          $ 93,261,000     $ 95,248,000     $ 97,181,000     $ 85,993,000     $ 50,364,000  
Total assets
            100,434,000       102,313,000       103,082,000       91,181,000       52,484,000  
Mortgages and other secured loans
            76,187,000       77,598,000       77,475,000       59,801,000       42,615,000  
Total liabilities
            81,352,000       83,226,000       83,349,000       70,539,000       44,280,000  
Minority interest
            17,927,000       18,000,000       18,413,000       18,882,000       6,877,000  
Owners’ equity
            1,155,000       1,087,000       1,320,000       1,760,000       1,327,000  
Total liabilities and owners’ equity
            100,434,000       102,313,000       103,082,000       91,181,000       52,484,000  
Other Data:
                                               
 
Funds from operations(3)
                                     
 
Cash flows from:
                                               
   
Operating activities
          5,047,000       3,957,000       2,981,000       1,244,000       389,000  
   
Investing activities
          (105,000 )     (159,000 )     (17,703,000 )     (31,295,000 )     (33,304,000 )
   
Financing activities
          (5,129,000 )     (3,391,000 )     14,890,000       30,167,000       32,986,000  

44


Table of Contents

             
Pro Forma
Year Ended
December 31,
2003

Reconciliation of Pro Forma Funds from Operations
       
 
Pro forma income before minority interests
  $    
   
Plus: pro forma real estate depreciation and amortization
       
     
 
 
Pro forma funds from operations
  $    
     
 


(1)  Pro forma basic earnings per share is computed assuming this offering was consummated as of the first day of the period presented and equals pro forma net income divided by the number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this offering excluding the weighted average of the number of unvested shares of restricted stock.
 
(2)  Pro forma diluted earnings per share is computed assuming this offering was consummated as of the first day of the period presented. Pro forma diluted earnings per share equals pro forma net income divided by the sum of the number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this offering excluding the weighted average number of unvested shares of restricted stock, plus an amount computed using the treasury stock method with respect to the unvested shares of our restricted stock.
 
(3)  As defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) funds from operations represents income (loss) before minority interest (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management considers funds from operations a helpful additional measure of performance for an equity REIT because it is predicated on operating funds flow analysis and is widely used by industry analysts as a measure of operating performance for equity REITs. We compute funds from operations in accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in its March 1995 White Paper (as amended in November 1999 and April 2002), which may differ from the methodology for calculating funds from operations utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs. Further, funds from operations does not represent amounts available for management’s discretionary use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations, or other commitments and uncertainties. Funds from operations should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or make distributions.

45


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

      You should read the following discussion in conjunction with “Selected Financial Data,” our audited financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. “BioMed Property Trust Predecessor” refers to Bernardo Property Advisors, Inc. and its affiliated entities, which previously owned our initial properties. Where appropriate, the following discussion includes analysis of the historical combined accounts of BioMed Property Trust Predecessor, the effects of this offering, the formation transactions and the completion of our acquisitions under contract. These effects are reflected in the pro forma consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. References to “we,” “us” and “our” refer to BioMed Property Trust, Inc. or to BioMed Property Trust Predecessor, as applicable.

Overview

      BioMed Property Trust, Inc. is a Maryland corporation formed in April 2004 to succeed to the business of BioMed Property Trust Predecessor. We focus on acquiring, owning, leasing, managing and selectively developing office and laboratory space for lease to life science tenants, including biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, scientific research institutions and government agencies and other entities involved in the life science industry.

      Our business consists of acquiring and managing office and laboratory properties primarily leased on a triple-net basis to life science tenants. We acquired our existing portfolio over the last six years using our focused acquisition strategy. This strategy emphasizes a critical review of each property’s location, design elements and suitability for alternative tenants. In most cases, we negotiated and structured the lease in connection with the acquisition. Accordingly, we performed a thorough review of the financial position of the tenant and its needs as part of this process. For properties with leases in place when we acquired them, we structured our acquisition based on our careful consideration of the financial position and prospects of the tenants, as well as the lease structure and remaining term of the lease. See “Business and Properties — Our Business Strategy.”

      Our tenant focus is on entities in the life science industry. Compared to more generic office and industrial properties, properties suitable for use by life science tenants often have enhanced structural floor rigidity and loadbearing capacities, higher floor-to-ceiling clear heights, enhanced electrical, plumbing and HVAC systems and other improved infrastructure. These characteristics make these properties critical to tenants’ operations.

      We believe that properties suitable for tenants in the life science industry will provide a favorable risk-adjusted rate of return. This belief is based on a number of factors, including:

  •  High demand for this property type due to overall growth in the life science industry and the mission-critical nature of these properties to tenants in that industry,
 
  •  Restricted supply of this property type resulting from:

  •  lack of familiarity with the investment merits of the life science industry by the real estate market in general,
 
  •  the unique construction and design elements for this property type, which keep many landlords focused on lower-cost office space, warehouse space and other types of real estate investments, and
 
  •  low availability of suitable financing for properties containing life science tenants.

      Leases for life science tenants typically include net leases but also include gross leases and modified gross leases. Net leases require the tenant to pay all property operating expenses, including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and utilities. Gross leases require the landlord to pay all property operating expenses, and modified gross leases require the landlord and the tenant each to pay a portion of the property operating expenses. Currently our entire portfolio consists of triple-net leases where the tenants

46


Table of Contents

reimburse us for substantially all of the properties’ operating expenses or modified gross leases where tenants reimburse us for a portion of the properties’ operating expenses. Our leases include annual rent escalations, typically ranging from 2% to 7% annually. The weighted-average remaining lease term for our leases is approximately 10 years.

      Consistent with life science industry practices with respect to triple-net leases, our tenants are generally responsible for capital expenditures and maintenance necessary to maintain the condition of the property. The shifting of all or a large portion of operating and capital expenditures to tenants under triple-net or modified gross leases results in a business opportunity with low overhead and that, as a consequence, is highly scalable. Furthermore, our tenants typically make significant expenditures for tenant improvements. Many of these improvements become our property at the conclusion of the lease. This investment serves as a barrier to exit for our current tenants and as an inducement for prospective tenants if we need to re-tenant the space.

      At December 31, 2003, our portfolio consisted of five properties with 394,258 rentable square feet. These properties had an overall occupancy rate of approximately 88% and an occupancy rate for finished space of 100%.

      When we complete this offering and the formation transactions and close on our [          ] acquisition properties, we will have total assets with a value of approximately $[                    ] million, including real estate assets with a value of approximately $[                    ] million. These real estate assets will comprise [          ] rentable square feet and will be [          ]% occupied. They will all be located within our target markets, which we believe are rapidly growing markets for tenants in the life science industry.

      Our objective is to use debt to finance, on average, approximately 50% of the acquisition cost of the properties that we buy. We intend to leverage the equity we raise in this offering by financing our future acquisitions with a combination of equity, long-term fixed or floating-rate debt as well as floating-rate credit facilities. We are currently in discussions with a number of lenders to provide us with a credit facility and intend to use the facility to finance acquisitions and deposits on a short-term basis. Our objective is to finance each property with long-term fixed-rate debt with a maturity matching or exceeding, to the extent possible, the remaining term of the lease. This strategy minimizes interest rate risk and should result in more consistent and reliable cash flows. As a result of the formation transactions, our planned acquisitions, and our leverage capacity, we expect to have $[          ] of debt and the capability to acquire an additional $[          ] of properties, assuming a leverage ratio of approximately [          ]%. We believe that our financing plan will enable us to execute on our acquisition strategy as detailed in “Business and Properties — Our Growth Strategy.”

      The following non-recurring items associated with the formation transactions will affect future results of operations:

  •  The repayment of existing debt will reduce interest expense.
 
  •  The acquisition of rental properties will increase rental revenues and depreciation and amortization. Depending on the structure of our leases, tenant recoveries and rental operations expense may also increase.
 
  •  The additional debt we incur to finance acquisitions will increase interest expense.
 
  •  The additional personnel needed to expand our acquisition efforts, the additional personnel necessary to operate a public company and the increased legal, accounting, administrative and other costs associated with operating a public company will increase general and administrative expenses.

Critical Accounting Policies

      Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our combined financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to our combined financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements

47


Table of Contents

in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base these estimates, judgments and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 
REIT Compliance

      We intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT under the Code. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Code to our operations and financial results and the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. We believe that our current organization and method of operation comply with the rules and regulations promulgated under the Code to enable us to qualify, and continue to qualify, as a REIT. However, it is possible that we have been organized or have operated in a manner that would not allow us to qualify as a REIT, or that our future operations could cause us to fail to qualify.

      If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, then we will be required to pay federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. If we lose our REIT status, then our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders would be significantly reduced for each of the years involved, and we would no longer be required to make distributions to our stockholders.

 
Rental Properties

      We are required to make subjective assessments as to the fair value of assets and liabilities in connection with purchase accounting adjustments recorded related to rental properties acquired by us. For rental properties acquired prior to June 30, 2001, the effective date of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations, this includes allocating the value of real estate acquired among the building, land, improvements and the fair value (or negative value) of above-market or below-market values of in-place leases. We did not acquire rental properties subsequent to June 30, 2001.

      We estimate the fair value of rental properties utilizing a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained when we acquire a property. In estimating a property’s fair value, management also considers information obtained as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities.

      Subsequent to June 30, 2001, when determining the allocation of the purchase price of our rental properties, we estimate the value of the rental properties as of the acquisition date on an “as if vacant” basis; allocate the “as if vacant” value among land, land improvements, buildings, building improvements, tenant improvements and equipment; calculate the value of the intangibles as the difference between the “as if vacant” value and the purchase price; and allocate the intangible value to above-, below- and at-market leases, costs associated with in-place leases, tenant relationships and other intangible assets.

      We depreciate the values allocated to buildings and improvements on a straight-line basis using an estimated life of 40 years. The values of above-and below-market leases are amortized over the remaining life of the related lease and recorded as either an increase (for below-market leases) or a decrease (for above-market leases) to rental revenue. We amortize the values of other intangible assets over their estimated useful lives. Changes in these estimates would directly impact our results of operations.

      We individually evaluate rental properties for impairment when conditions exist that may indicate that it is probable that the sum of expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than its carrying amount. If we determine that an impairment has occurred, we record a write-down to reduce the carrying amount of the property to its estimated fair value, if lower. We are required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the values of our rental properties, which has a direct impact on our results of operations.

48


Table of Contents

 
Recognition of Rental Revenue

      Rental revenue from leases with scheduled rent increases, free rent and other rent adjustments that are determinable at lease inception are recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective lease terms. The amounts currently recognized as revenue and expected to be received in later years are included in accrued rent in our combined balance sheets.

      Certain lease agreements also contain provisions that require tenants to reimburse us for real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance costs. We include such amounts in both revenue and operating expenses when we are the primary obligor for these expenses and assume the risks and rewards of a principal under these arrangements. However, under leases where the tenant pays these expenses directly, such amounts are not included in revenues or expenses.

      We must make estimates related to the collectibility of our tenant receivables, due from affiliates, accrued rent and other receivables. We specifically analyze tenant creditworthiness to assess recoverability of these amounts, which has a direct impact on our results of operations.

Results of Operations of Our Initial Properties

      Following is a comparison of our operating results for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001.

 
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2003 to Year Ended December 31, 2002

      Rental revenue increased by $406,000, or 3.4%, to $12.2 million for 2003 compared to $11.8 million for 2002. The increase resulted from reduced rental rates charged during the build-out period for a portion of the 201 Industrial Road property. Specifically, the tenant received a temporary rent reduction of $531,000 from October 2001 to October 2002, based on a pre-established formula as defined in the lease agreement.

      Tenant recoveries, which includes insurance, property taxes and other operating expenses paid by the tenants remained consistent at approximately $1.3 million for 2003 and 2002.

      Management fees are primarily comprised of fees paid by the tenant to the property owner pursuant to the lease. These management fees were $161,000 for 2003 compared to $154,000 for 2002. The increase in 2003 was due to contractual increases as defined in the lease agreements. We will continue to collect and earn these management fees following the formation transactions.

      Rental operations expenses remained consistent at approximately $1.4 million for 2003 and 2002. These expenses include insurance, property taxes and other operating expenses and were substantially recovered from the tenants. Certain costs of earthquake insurance totaling $56,000 in 2003 and $62,000 in 2002 were paid by the limited partnership owning the 201 Industrial Road property which were not recoverable from the tenant.

      Depreciation and amortization remained consistent at approximately $2.1 million for 2003 and 2002.

      General and administrative expenses decreased by $20,000, or 6.8%, to $275,000 for 2003 compared to $295,000 for 2002. This decrease was due primarily to one time professional fees of $17,000 incurred in 2002.

      Interest income was $36,000 for 2003 compared to $62,000 for 2002. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in an amount due from a tenant for tenant improvements at 8808 Balboa Avenue. Additionally, we earned lower interest rates on cash balances in 2003 compared to 2002.

      Interest expense decreased by $391,000, or 5.8%, to $6.3 million for 2003 compared to $6.7 million for 2002. This decrease resulted from reductions in the principal balances outstanding and a decrease in the interest rate floor (minimum contractual rate) on one of our variable-rate loans in August 2002. The weighted-average effective interest rate on our borrowings remained constant at 7.42% from December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2003.

49


Table of Contents

      Minority interest increased $428,000, or 28.0%, to $2.0 million for 2003 compared to $1.5 million in 2002. The increase in minority interest is a result of the consistent percentage allocation to non-controlling interests of income before minority interest, which increased as a result of the changes discussed above.

 
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2002 to Year Ended December 31, 2001

      Rental revenue increased by $1.4 million, or 14.0%, to $11.8 million for 2002 compared to $10.4 million for 2001. The increase resulted primarily from the tenant at 201 Industrial Road leasing approximately 46,000 square feet of additional space beginning in October 2001. As a result, we do not believe that our period-to-period financial data are comparable.

      Tenant recoveries increased by $482,000, or 57.7%, to $1.3 million for 2002 compared to $835,000 for 2001. The increase resulted primarily from increases in property taxes, insurance and other operating expenses at 201 Industrial Road as a result of the completion of construction of the second phase of the project in October 2001 that were reimbursed by the tenant. Tenant recoveries are recoverable operating expenses pursuant to our leases with certain of our tenants.

      Management fees were $154,000 for 2002 compared to $108,000 for 2001. The increase was primarily due to increased contractual amounts and increased fees earned on the 201 Industrial Road property.

      Rental operations expenses increased by $558,000, or 68.3%, to $1.4 million for 2002 compared to $817,000 for 2001. These operating expenses, which were substantially recovered from the tenants through tenant recoveries, increased primarily as a result of increased property taxes, insurance and other operating costs following the build-out of the 201 Industrial Road property. We incurred the costs of earthquake insurance (totaling $62,000 in 2002) which were not recoverable from the tenant. There was no earthquake insurance in 2001.

      Depreciation and amortization increased by $342,000, or 19.1%, to $2.1 million for 2002 compared to $1.8 million for 2001. The increase resulted from the completion of the second phase of the 201 Industrial Road property in October 2001. Additionally, certain building costs on the first phase of property totaling $4.7 million were completed and placed in service in April 2001.

      General and administrative expenses increased by $39,000, or 15.2%, to $295,000 for 2002 compared to $256,000 for 2001, primarily due to increased general and administrative expenses at Bernardo Property Advisors whereby general office expense costs increased by $23,000. Additionally, the 8808 Balboa Avenue property incurred $17,000 of one time professional fees in 2002.

      Interest income was $62,000 for 2002 compared to $94,000 for 2001. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in an amount due from a tenant for tenant improvements at 8808 Balboa Avenue. Additionally, we earned lower interest rates on cash balances in 2002 compared to 2001.

      Interest expense decreased by $86,000, or 1.3%, to $6.7 million for 2002 compared to $6.8 million for 2001. The decrease resulted primarily from decreased indebtedness and a decrease in the floating interest rate on our variable-rate loans. The weighted-average effective interest rate on our borrowings decreased from 7.58% as of December 31, 2001 to 7.42% as of December 31, 2002.

      Minority interest increased $522,000, or 51.9%, to $1.5 million for 2003 compared to $1.0 million in 2002. The increase in minority interest is a result of the consistent percentage allocation to non-controlling interests of income before minority interest, which increased as a result of the changes discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds to pay for operating expenses and other expenditures directly associated with our properties, including:

  •  interest expense and scheduled principal payments on outstanding indebtedness,
 
  •  general and administrative expenses,

50


Table of Contents

  •  future distributions expected to be paid to our stockholders, and
 
  •  unanticipated capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions.

      We historically have satisfied our short-term liquidity requirements through our existing working capital and cash provided by our operations. Our rental revenue, provided by our triple-net leases, and minimal unreimbursed operating expenses generally provide cash inflows to meet our debt service obligations, pay general and administrative expenses, and fund regular distributions.

      We are seeking to obtain an approximate $[     ] million revolving credit facility which we anticipate having in place at the time of the offering. We are currently in negotiations with several potential lenders. No assurances can be given that we will be able to obtain a credit facility on terms favorable to us or at all. We expect to use this credit line, if available, to meet any short-term liquidity needs that cannot be funded through operating cash flows. We may also use this credit facility for interim acquisition financing.

      Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds to pay for scheduled debt maturities, renovations, expansions and other non-recurring capital expenditures that need to be made periodically and the costs associated with acquisitions of properties that we pursue. Historically, we have satisfied our long-term liquidity requirements through various sources of capital, including our existing working capital, cash provided by operations, equity contributions from investors, and long-term mortgage debt. As a public company, we expect to have increased access to cost effective capital, including existing sources, as well as public and private debt and equity offerings.

      As of [                    ], 2004, the aggregate purchase price of our acquisition properties (including closing costs) was expected to be approximately $[                     ] million. We intend to finance these acquisitions with a portion of the net proceeds of this offering and the assumption of approximately $[          ] debt.

      We expect our debt to contain customary restrictive covenants, including provisions that may limit our ability, without the prior consent of the lender, to incur additional indebtedness, further mortgage or transfer the applicable property, purchase or acquire additional property, discontinue insurance coverage, change the conduct of our business or make loans or advances to, enter into any merger or consolidation with, or acquire the business, assets or equity of, any third party.

      We will have increased general and administrative expenses, including salaries, rent, professional fees and other corporate level activity associated with operating a public company. We anticipate that our staffing levels will increase from our current level of four to between 10 and 12 corporate staff during the next 12 months. We also expect to enter into an agreement to rent additional office space to facilitate our growth, and to incur additional professional fees to meet the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a result, we expect our general and administrative costs to increase during our first full year of operations as a public company to between $[       ] million and $[       ] million. The timing and level of these costs and our ability to pay these costs with cash flow from our operations depends on our execution of our business plan, the number of properties we ultimately acquire and our ability to attract qualified individuals to fill these new positions. We believe that our existing cash, together with the net proceeds from this offering, will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months.

51


Table of Contents

Commitments and Contingencies

      The following table outlines the timing of required payments related to our commitments as of December 31, 2003:

                                         
Payments by Period

Total 2004 2005-2006 2007-2008 Thereafter





Secured notes payable
  $ 76,187,000     $ 1,022,000     $ 36,551,000     $ 16,981,000     $ 21,633,000  
Related party loans
    3,100,000             3,100,000              
Unsecured term loan
    175,000       175,000                    
Tenant improvements
    4,600,000                               4,600,000 (1)
Lease commitment
    108,000       52,000       56,000