THE TIMKEN COMPANY 10-K

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K


þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission file number: 1-1169

THE TIMKEN COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Ohio (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		34-0577130 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1835 Dueber Avenue, S.W., Canton, Ohio (Address of principal executive offices)		44706 (Zip Code)

(330) 438-3000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class Common Stock, without par value		Name of each exchange on which registered New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,836,362,258 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class Common Shares, without par value		Outstanding at January 31, 2007 94,174,971 shares

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Document Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 1, 2007 (Proxy Statement)		Parts Into Which Incorporated Part III

PART I.

Item 1. Business

General

As used herein, the term “Timken” or the “company” refers to The Timken Company and its subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires. Timken, an outgrowth of a business originally founded in 1899, was incorporated under the laws of the state of Ohio in 1904.

Timken is a leading global manufacturer of highly engineered bearings, alloy and specialty steel and related components. The company is the world’s largest manufacturer of tapered roller bearings and alloy seamless mechanical steel tubing and the largest North American-based bearings manufacturer. Timken had facilities in 27 countries on six continents and employed approximately 25,000 people as of December 31, 2006.

Products

The Timken Company manufactures two basic product lines: anti-friction bearings and steel products. Differentiation in these two product lines comes in two different ways: (1) differentiation by bearing type or steel type, and (2) differentiation in the applications of bearings and steel.

Tapered Roller Bearings. In the bearing industry, Timken is best known for the tapered roller bearing, which was originally patented by the company founder, Henry Timken. The tapered roller bearing is Timken’s principal product in the anti-friction industry segment. It consists of four components: (1) the cone or inner race, (2) the cup or outer race, (3) the tapered rollers, which roll between the cup and cone, and (4) the cage, which serves as a retainer and maintains proper spacing between the rollers. Timken manufactures or purchases these four components and then sells them in a wide variety of configurations and sizes.

The tapered rollers permit ready absorption of both radial and axial load combinations. For this reason, tapered roller bearings are particularly well-adapted to reducing friction where shafts, gears or wheels are used. The uses for tapered roller bearings are diverse and include applications on passenger cars, light and heavy trucks and trains, as well as a wide variety of industrial applications, ranging from very small gear drives to bearings over two meters in diameter for wind energy machines. A number of applications utilize bearings with sensors to measure parameters such as speed, load, temperature or overall bearing condition.

Matching bearings to the specific requirements of customers’ applications requires engineering and often sophisticated analytical techniques. The design of Timken’s tapered roller bearing permits distribution of unit pressures over the full length of the roller. This design, combined with high precision tolerances, proprietary internal geometry and premium quality material, provides Timken bearings with high load-carrying capacity, excellent friction-reducing qualities and long life.

Precision Cylindrical and Ball Bearings. Timken’s aerospace and super precision facilities produce high-performance ball and cylindrical bearings for ultra high-speed and/or high-accuracy applications in the aerospace, medical and dental, computer and other industries. These bearings utilize ball and straight rolling elements and are in the super precision end of the general ball and straight roller bearing product range in the bearing industry. A majority of Timken’s aerospace and super precision bearings products are custom-designed bearings and spindle assemblies. They often involve specialized materials and coatings for use in applications that subject the bearings to extreme operating conditions of speed and temperature.

Spherical and Cylindrical Bearings. Timken produces spherical and cylindrical roller bearings for large gear drives, rolling mills and other process industry and infrastructure development applications. Timken’s cylindrical and spherical roller bearing capability was significantly enhanced with the acquisition of Torrington’s broad range of spherical and heavy-duty cylindrical roller bearings for standard industrial and specialized applications. These products are sold worldwide to original equipment manufacturers and industrial distributors serving major industries, including construction and mining, natural resources, defense, pulp and paper production, rolling mills and general industrial goods.

Needle Bearings. With the acquisition of the Engineered Solutions business of Ingersol-Rand Company Limited (referred to as “Torrington”) in February 2003, the company became a leading global manufacturer of highly engineered needle roller bearings. Timken produces a broad range of radial and thrust needle roller bearings, as well as bearing assemblies, which are sold to original equipment manufacturers and industrial distributors worldwide. Major applications include automotive, consumer, construction, agriculture and general industrial.

Bearing Reconditioning. A small part of the business involves providing bearing reconditioning services for industrial and railroad customers, both internationally and domestically. These services accounted for less than 5% of the company’s net sales for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Aerospace Aftermarket Products and Services. Through strategic acquisitions and ongoing product development, Timken continues to expand its portfolio of replacement parts and services for the aerospace aftermarket, where they are used in both civil and military aircraft. In addition to a wide variety of power transmission and drive train components and modules, Timken supplies comprehensive maintenance, repair and overhaul services for gas turbine engines, gearboxes and accessory systems in rotary- and fixed-wing aircraft. Specific parts in addition to bearings include airfoils (such as blades, vanes, rotors and diffusers), nozzles, gears, and oil coolers. Services range from aerospace bearing repair and component reconditioning to the complete overhaul of engines, transmissions and fuel controls.

Steel. Steel products include steels of low and intermediate alloy, as well as some carbon grades. These products are available in a wide range of solid and tubular sections with a variety of lengths and finishes. These steel products are used in a wide array of applications, including bearings, automotive transmissions, engine crankshafts, oil drilling components, aerospace parts and other similarly demanding applications.

Timken also produces custom-made steel products, including steel components for automotive and industrial customers. This steel components business has provided the company with the opportunity to further expand its market for tubing and capture higher value-added steel sales. It also enables Timken’s traditional tubing customers in the automotive and bearing industries to take advantage of higher-performing components that cost less than current alternative products. Customizing of products is an important portion of the company’s steel business.

Geographical Financial Information


Geographic Financial Information	United States		Europe		Other Countries		Consolidated

(Dollars in thousands)

2006
Net sales	$	3,370,244	$	849,915	$	753,206	$	4,973,365
Non-current assets		1,578,856		285,840		266,557		2,131,253


2005
Net sales	$	3,295,171	$	812,960	$	715,036	$	4,823,167
Non-current assets		1,413,575		337,657		177,988		1,929,220


2004
Net sales	$	2,900,749	$	779,478	$	606,970	$	4,287,197
Non-current assets		1,399,155		398,925		221,112		2,019,192

Industry Segments

The company has three reportable segments: Industrial Group, Automotive Group and Steel Group. Financial information for the segments is discussed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Description of types of products and services from which each reportable segment derives its revenues

The company’s reportable segments are business units that target different industry segments or types of product. Each reportable segment is managed separately because of the need to specifically address customer needs in these different industries.

The Automotive Group includes sales of bearings and other products and services (other than steel) to automotive original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, for passenger cars, trucks and trailers. The Industrial Group includes sales of bearings and other products and services (other than steel) to a diverse customer base, including industrial equipment, off-highway, rail and aerospace and defense customers. The Industrial Group also includes aftermarket distribution operations, including automotive applications, for products other than steel. The company’s bearing products are used in a variety of products and applications, including passenger cars, trucks, locomotive and railroad cars, machine tools, rolling mills and farm and construction equipment, aircraft, missile guidance systems, computer peripherals and medical instruments.

The Steel Group includes sales of low and intermediate alloy and carbon grade steel. These are available in a wide range of solid and tubular sections with a variety of lengths and finishes. The company also manufactures custom-made steel products, including precision steel components. Approximately 10% of the company’s steel is consumed in its bearing operations. In addition, sales are made to other anti-friction bearing companies and to the automotive and truck, forging, construction, industrial equipment, oil and gas drilling and aircraft industries and to steel service centers. In 2006, the company sold its Latrobe Steel subsidiary. This business was part of the Steel Group for segment reporting purposes. This business has been treated as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Measurement of segment profit or loss and segment assets

The company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on return on capital and profitable growth. The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment is adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding special items such as impairment and restructuring charges, rationalization and integration costs, one-time gains or losses on sales of assets, allocated receipts received or payments made under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA), loss on dissolution of subsidiary, acquisition-related currency exchange gains, and other items similar in nature). The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Intersegment sales and transfers are recorded at values based on market prices, which creates intercompany profit on intersegment sales or transfers that is eliminated in consolidation.

Factors used by management to identify the enterprise’s reportable segments

The company reports net sales by geographic area in a manner that is more reflective of how the company operates its segments, which is by the destination of net sales. Non-current assets by geographic area are reported by the location of the subsidiary.

Export sales from the U.S. and Canada are less than 10% of revenue. The company’s Automotive and Industrial Groups have historically participated in the global bearing industry, while the Steel Group has concentrated primarily on U.S. customers.

Timken’s non-U.S. operations are subject to normal international business risks not generally applicable to domestic business. These risks include currency fluctuation, changes in tariff restrictions, difficulties in establishing and maintaining relationships with local distributors and dealers, import and export licensing requirements, difficulties in staffing and managing geographically diverse operations, and restrictive regulations by foreign governments, including price and exchange controls.

Sales and Distribution

Timken’s products in the Automotive Group and Industrial Group are sold principally by their own internal sales organizations. A portion of the Industrial Group’s sales are made through authorized distributors.

Traditionally, a main focus of the company’s sales strategy has consisted of collaborative projects with customers. For this reason, the company’s sales forces are primarily located in close proximity to its customers rather than at production sites. In some instances, the sales forces are located inside customer facilities. The company’s sales force is highly trained and knowledgeable regarding all bearings products, and associates assist customers during the development and implementation phases and provide ongoing support.

The company has a joint venture in North America focused on joint logistics and e-business services. This alliance is called CoLinx, LLC and was founded by Timken, SKF, INA and Rockwell Automation. The e-business service was launched in April 2001 and is focused on information and business services for authorized distributors in the Industrial Group. The company also has another e-business joint venture which focuses on information and business services for authorized industrial distributors in Europe, Latin America and Asia. This alliance, which Timken founded with SKF, Sandvik AB, INA and Reliance, is called Endorsia.com International AB.

Timken’s steel products are sold principally by its own sales organization. Most orders are customized to satisfy customer-specific applications and are shipped directly to customers from Timken’s steel manufacturing plants. Approximately 10% of Timken’s Steel Group net sales are intersegment sales. In addition, sales are made to other anti-friction bearing companies and to the automotive and truck, forging, construction, industrial equipment, oil and gas drilling and aircraft industries and to steel service centers.

Timken has entered into individually negotiated contracts with some of its customers in its Automotive Group, Industrial Group and Steel Group. These contracts may extend for one or more years and, if a price is fixed for any period extending beyond current shipments, customarily include a commitment by the customer to purchase a designated percentage of its requirements from Timken. Contracts extending beyond one year that are not subject to price adjustment provisions do not represent a material portion of Timken’s sales. Timken does not believe that there is any significant loss of earnings risk associated with any given contract.

Competition

The anti-friction bearing business is highly competitive in every country in which Timken sells products. Timken competes primarily based on price, quality, timeliness of delivery, product design and the ability to provide engineering support and service on a global basis. The company competes with domestic manufacturers and many foreign manufacturers of anti-friction bearings, including SKF, INA, NTN Corporation, Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and NSK Ltd.

Competition within the steel industry, both domestically and globally, is intense and is expected to remain so. However, the recent combination of a weakened U.S. dollar, worldwide rationalization of uncompetitive capacity, raw material cost increases and North American and global market strength have allowed steel industry prices to increase and margins to improve. Timken’s worldwide competitors for steel bar products include North American producers such as Republic, Mac Steel, Mittal, Steel Dynamics, Nucor and a wide variety of offshore steel producers who export into North America. Competitors for seamless mechanical tubing include Dofasco, Plymouth Tube, Michigan Seamless Tube, V & M Tube, Sanyo Special Steel, Ovako and Tenaris. Competitors in the precision steel components sector include Formtec, Linamar, Jernberg and overseas companies such as Tenaris, Ovako, Stackpole and FormFlo.

Maintaining high standards of product quality and reliability while keeping production costs competitive is essential to Timken’s ability to compete with domestic and foreign manufacturers in both the anti-friction bearing and steel businesses.

Trade Law Enforcement

The U.S. government has six antidumping duty orders in effect covering ball bearings from five countries and tapered roller bearings from China. The five countries covered by the ball bearing orders are France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United Kingdom. The company is a producer of these products in the United States. The U.S. government determined in August 2006 that each of these six antidumping duty orders should remain in effect for an additional five years.

Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA)

The amount for 2004 was net of the amount that Timken delivered to the seller of the Torrington business, pursuant to the terms of the agreement under which the company purchased Torrington. In 2004, Timken delivered to the seller of the Torrington business 80% of the CDSOA payments received in 2004 for Torrington’s bearing business.

In September 2002, the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled that CDSOA payments are not consistent with international trade rules. In February 2006, U.S. legislation was enacted that would end CDSOA distributions for imports covered by antidumping duty orders entering the U.S. after September 30, 2007. Instead, any such antidumping duties collected would remain with the U.S. Treasury. This legislation is not expected to have a significant effect on potential CDSOA distributions in 2007, but would be expected to reduce likely distributions in years beyond 2007, with distributions eventually ceasing.

In separate cases in July and September 2006, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled that the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is unconstitutional. The CIT has not ruled on other matters, including any remedy as a result of its ruling. The company expects that these rulings of the CIT will be appealed. The company is unable to determine, at this time, if these rulings will have a material adverse impact on the company’s financial results.

In addition to the CIT rulings, there are a number of factors that can affect whether the company receives any CDSOA distributions and the amount of such distributions in any year. These factors include, among other things, potential additional changes in the law, ongoing and potential additional legal challenges to the law and the administrative operation of the law. Accordingly, the company cannot reasonably estimate the amount of CDSOA distributions it will receive in future years, if any. If the company does receive CDSOA distributions in 2007, they likely will be received in the fourth quarter.

Joint Ventures

The balances related to investments accounted for under the equity method are reported in other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, which were approximately $12.1 million and $19.9 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

During 2002, the company’s Automotive Group formed a joint venture, Advanced Green Components, LLC (AGC), with Sanyo Special Steel Co., Ltd. (Sanyo) and Showa Seiko Co., Ltd. (Showa). AGC is engaged in the business of converting steel to machined rings for tapered bearings and other related products. The company had been accounting for its investment in AGC under the equity method since AGC’s inception. During the third quarter of 2006, AGC refinanced its long-term debt of $12.2 million. The company guaranteed half of this obligation. The company concluded the refinancing represented a reconsideration event to evaluate whether AGC was a variable interest entity under FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003). The company concluded that AGC was a variable interest entity and the company was the primary beneficiary. Therefore, the company consolidated AGC, effective September 30, 2006. As of September 30, 2006, the net assets of AGC were $9.0 million, primarily consisting of the following: inventory of $5.7 million; property, plant and equipment of $27.2 million; goodwill of $9.6 milion; short-term and long-term debt of $20.3 million; and other non-current liabilities of $7.4 million. The $9.6 million of goodwill was subsequently written-off as part of the annual test for impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142. All of AGC’s assets are collateral for its obligations. Except for AGC’s indebtedness for which the company is a guarantor, AGC’s creditors have no recourse to the assets of the company.

Backlog

The backlog of orders of Timken’s domestic and overseas operations is estimated to have been $1.96 billion at December 31, 2006 and $1.98 billion at December 31, 2005. Actual shipments are dependent upon ever-changing production schedules of the customer. Accordingly, Timken does not believe that its backlog data and comparisons thereof, as of different dates, are reliable indicators of future sales or shipments.

Raw Materials

The principal raw materials used by Timken in its North American bearing plants to manufacture bearings are its own steel tubing and bars, purchased strip steel and energy resources. Outside North America, the company purchases raw materials from local sources with whom it has worked closely to ensure steel quality, according to its demanding specifications.

The principal raw materials used by Timken in steel manufacturing are scrap metal, nickel and other alloys. The availability and prices of raw materials and energy resources are subject to curtailment or change due to, among other things, new laws or regulations, changes in demand levels, suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers, interruptions in production by suppliers, changes in exchange rates and prevailing price levels. For example, the weighted average price of scrap metal increased 87.1% from 2003 to 2004, decreased 7.7% from 2004 to 2005 and increased 7.9% from 2005 to 2006. Prices for raw materials and energy resources continue to remain high compared to historical levels.

The company continues to expect that it will be able to pass a significant portion of these increased costs through to customers in the form of price increases or raw material surcharges.

Disruptions in the supply of raw materials or energy resources could temporarily impair the company’s ability to manufacture its products for its customers or require the company to pay higher prices in order to obtain these raw materials or energy resources from other sources, which could affect the company’s sales and profitability. Any increase in the prices for such raw materials or energy resources could materially affect the company’s costs and its earnings.

Timken believes that the availability of raw materials and alloys is adequate for its needs, and, in general, it is not dependent on any single source of supply.

Research

Timken has developed a significant global footprint of technology centers.

The company operates four corporate innovation and development centers. The largest technical center is located in North Canton, Ohio, near Timken’s world headquarters, and it supports innovation and know-how for friction management product lines, such as tapered roller bearings and needle bearings. In 2006, Timken opened a new technical center in Greenville, South Carolina, to support innovation and know–how for power transmission product lines. The company also supports related technical capabilities with facilities in Bangalore, India and Brno, Czech Republic.

In addition, Timken’s business groups operate several technology centers for product excellence within the United States in Mesa, Arizona, and Keene and Lebanon, New Hampshire. Within Europe, technology is developed in Ploiesti, Romania; Colmar, France; and Halle-Westfallen, Germany.

The company’s technology commitment is to develop new and improved friction management and power transmission product designs, such as tapered roller bearings and needle bearings, with a heavy influence in related steel materials and lean manufacturing processes.

Expenditures for research, development and application amounted to approximately $67.9 million, $60.1 million, and $56.7 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Of these amounts, $8.0 million, $7.2 million and $6.7 million, respectively, were funded by others.

Environmental Matters

The company believes it has established adequate reserves to cover its environmental expenses and has a well-established environmental compliance audit program, which includes a proactive approach to bringing its domestic and international units to higher standards of environmental performance. This program measures performance against applicable laws, as well as standards that have been established for all units worldwide. It is difficult to assess the possible effect of compliance with future requirements that differ from existing ones. As previously reported, the company is unsure of the future financial impact to the company that could result from the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) final rules to tighten the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate and ozone. The company is also unsure of potential future financial impacts to the company that could result from possible future legislation regulating emissions of greenhouse gases.

The company and certain U.S. subsidiaries have been designated as potentially responsible parties by the EPA for site investigation and remediation at certain sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), known as the Superfund, or state laws similar to CERCLA. The claims for remediation have been asserted against numerous other entities, which are believed to be financially solvent and are expected to fulfill their proportionate share of the obligation.

Management believes any ultimate liability with respect to pending actions will not materially affect the company’s operations, cash flows or consolidated financial position. The company is also conducting voluntary environmental investigations and/or remediations at a number of current or former operating sites. Any liability with respect to such investigations and remediations, in the aggregate, is not expected to be material to the operations or financial position of the company.

New laws and regulations, stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations, the discovery of previously unknown contamination or the imposition of new clean-up requirements may require the company to incur costs or become the basis for new or increased liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on Timken’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Patents, Trademarks and Licenses

Timken owns a number of U.S. and foreign patents, trademarks and licenses relating to certain products. While Timken regards these as important, it does not deem its business as a whole, or any industry segment, to be materially dependent upon any one item or group of items.

Employment

At December 31, 2006, Timken had 25,418 associates. Approximately 17% of Timken’s U.S. associates are covered under collective bargaining agreements.

Available Information

Timken’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available, free of charge, on Timken’s website at www.timken.com as soon as reasonably practical after electronically filing or furnishing such material with the SEC.

Item 1A: Risk Factors

The following are certain risk factors that could affect our business, financial condition and result of operations. The risks that are highlighted below are not the only ones that we face. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because these factors could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected.

The bearing industry is highly competitive, and this competition results in significant pricing pressure for our products that could affect our revenues and profitability.

The global bearing industry is highly competitive. We compete with domestic manufacturers and many foreign manufacturers of anti-friction bearings, including SKF, INA, NTN, Koyo and NSK. The bearing industry is also capital-intensive and profitability is dependent on factors such as labor compensation and productivity and inventory management, which are subject to risks that we may not be able to control. Due to the competitiveness within the bearing industry, we may not be able to increase prices for our products to cover increases in our costs and, in many cases, we may face pressure from our customers to reduce prices, which could adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

Competition and consolidation in the steel industry, together with potential global overcapacity, could result in significant pricing pressure for our products.

Competition within the steel industry, both domestically and worldwide, is intense and is expected to remain so. Global production overcapacity has occurred in the past and may reoccur in the future, which, when combined with high levels of steel imports into the United States, may exert downward pressure on domestic steel prices and result in, at times, a dramatic narrowing, or with many companies the elimination, of gross margins. In addition, many of our competitors are continuously exploring and implementing strategies, including acquisitions, which focus on manufacturing higher margin products that compete more directly with our steel products. These factors could lead to significant downward pressure on prices for our steel products, which could have a materially adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.

We may not be able to realize the anticipated benefits from, or successfully execute, Project O.N.E.

During 2005, we began implementing Project O.N.E., a multi-year program designed to improve business processes and systems to deliver enhanced customer service and financial performance. During 2007, we expect the first major U.S. implementation of Project O.N.E. We may not be able to realize the anticipated benefits from or successfully execute this program. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to improve our business processes and systems. We may not be able to successfully do so without substantial costs, delays or other difficulties. We may face significant challenges in improving our processes and systems in a timely and efficient manner.

Implementing Project O.N.E. will be complex and time-consuming, may be distracting to management and disruptive to our businesses, and may cause an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, our businesses as a result of a number of obstacles, such as:

	•		the loss of key associates or customers,

	•		the failure to maintain the quality of customer service that we have historically provided;

	•		the need to coordinate geographically diverse organizations; and

	•		the resulting diversion of management’s attention from our day-to-day business and the need to dedicate additional management personnel to address obstacles to the implementation of Project O.N.E.

If we are not successful in executing Project O.N.E., or if it fails to achieve the anticipated results, then our operations, margins, sales and reputation could be adversely affected.

Any change in the operation of our raw material surcharge mechanisms or the availability or cost of raw materials and energy resources could materially affect our earnings.

We require substantial amounts of raw materials, including scrap metal and alloys and natural gas to operate our business. Many of our customer contracts contain surcharge pricing provisions. The surcharges are tied to a widely-available market index for that specific raw material. Any change in the relationship between the market indices and our underlying costs could materially affect our earnings.

Moreover, future disruptions in the supply of our raw materials or energy resources could impair our ability to manufacture our products for our customers or require us to pay higher prices in order to obtain these raw materials or energy resources from other sources, and could thereby affect our sales and profitability. Any increase in the prices for such raw materials or energy resources could materially affect our costs and therefore our earnings.

Warranty, recall or product liability claims could materially adversely affect our earnings.

In our business, we are exposed to warranty and product liability claims. In addition, we may be required to participate in the recall of a product. A successful warranty or product liability claim against us, or a requirement that we participate in a product recall, could have a materially adverse effect on our earnings.

The failure to achieve the anticipated results of our Automotive Group initiatives could materially affect our earnings.

During 2005, we began restructuring our Automotive Group operations to address challenges in the automotive markets. We expect that this restructuring will cost approximately $80 million to $90 million (pretax) and we are targeting annual pretax savings of approximately $40 million by 2008. In response to reduced production demand from North American automotive manufacturers, in September 2006, we announced further planned reductions in our Automotive Group workforce of approximately 700 associates. We expect that this workforce reduction will cost approximately $25 million (pretax) and we are targeting annual pretax savings of approximately $35 million by 2008. The failure to achieve the anticipated results of our Automotive Group restructuring and workforce reduction initiatives, including our targeted annual savings, could adversely affect our earnings.

The failure to achieve the anticipated results of our Canton bearing operation rationalization initiative could materially adversely affect our earnings.

After reaching a new four-year agreement with the union representing employees in the Canton, Ohio bearing and steel plants in 2005, we refined our plans to rationalize our Canton bearing operations. We expect that this rationalization initiative will cost approximately $35 million to $40 million (pretax) over the next three years and we are targeting annual pretax savings of approximately $25 million. The failure to achieve the anticipated results of this initiative, including our targeted annual savings, could adversely affect our earnings.

We may incur further impairment and restructuring charges that could materially affect our profitability.

We have taken approximately $82.6 million in impairment and restructuring charges for our Automotive Group restructuring and workforce reduction and the rationalization of our Canton bearing operations during 2006 and 2005 and expect to take additional charges in connection with these initiatives. Changes in business or economic conditions, or our business strategy may result in additional restructuring programs and may require us to take additional charges in the future, which could have a materially adverse effect on our earnings.

Any reduction of CDSOA distributions in the future would reduce our earnings and cash flows.

The CDSOA provides for distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic producers where the domestic producers have continued to invest in their technology, equipment and people. The company reported CDSOA receipts, net of expenses, of $87.9 million, $77.1 million and $44.4 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In February 2006, U.S. legislation was enacted that would end CDSOA distributions for imports covered by antidumping duty orders entering the United States after September 30, 2007. Instead, any such antidumping duties collected would remain with the U.S. Treasury. This legislation is not expected to have a significant effect on potential CDSOA distributions in 2007, but would be expected to reduce any distributions in years beyond 2007, with distributions eventually ceasing.

In separate cases in July and September 2006, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled that the procedure for determining recipients eligible to receive CDSOA distributions is unconstitutional. The CIT has not finally ruled on other matters, including any remedy as a result of its ruling. The company expects that the ruling of the CIT will be appealed. The company is unable to determine, at this time, if these rulings will have a material adverse impact on the company’s financial results.

In addition to the CIT ruling, there are a number of other factors that can affect whether the company receives any CDSOA distributions and the amount of such distributions in any year. These factors include, among other things, potential additional changes in the law, other ongoing and potential additional legal challenges to the law, and the administrative operation of the law. It is possible that CIT rulings might prevent us from receiving any CDSOA distributions in 2007. Any reduction of CDSOA distributions would reduce our earnings and cash flow.

Weakness in any of the industries in which our customers operate, as well as the cyclical nature of our customers’ businesses generally, could adversely impact our revenues and profitability by reducing demand and margins.

Our revenues may be negatively affected by changes in customer demand, changes in the product mix and negative pricing pressure in the industries in which we operate. Many of the industries in which our end customers operate are cyclical. Margins in those industries are highly sensitive to demand cycles, and our customers in those industries historically have tended to delay large capital projects, including expensive maintenance and upgrades, during economic downturns. As a result, our business is also cyclical and our revenues and earnings are impacted by overall levels of industrial production.

Certain automotive industry companies have recently experienced significant financial downturns. In 2005, we increased our reserve for accounts receivable relating to our automotive industry customers. If any of our automotive industry customers becomes insolvent or files for bankruptcy, our ability to recover accounts receivable from that customer would be adversely affected and any payment we received in the preference period prior to a bankruptcy filing may be potentially recoverable. In addition, financial instability of certain companies that participate in the automotive industry supply chain could disrupt production in the industry. A disruption of production in the automotive industry could have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition and earnings.

Environmental regulations impose substantial costs and limitations on our operations and environmental compliance may be more costly than we expect.

We are subject to the risk of substantial environmental liability and limitations on our operations due to environmental laws and regulations. We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental, health and safety laws and regulations concerning issues such as air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid and hazardous waste handling and disposal and the investigation and remediation of contamination. The risks of substantial costs and liabilities related to compliance with these laws and regulations are an inherent part of our business, and future conditions may develop, arise or be discovered that create substantial environmental compliance or remediation liabilities and costs.

Compliance with environmental legislation and regulatory requirements may prove to be more limiting and costly than we anticipate. New laws and regulations, including those which may relate to emissions of greenhouse gases, stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations, the discovery of previously unknown contamination or the imposition of new clean-up requirements could require us to incur costs or become the basis for new or increased liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We may also be subject from time to time to legal proceedings brought by private parties or governmental authorities with respect to environmental matters, including matters involving alleged property damage or personal injury.

Unexpected equipment failures or other disruptions of our operations may increase our costs and reduce our sales and earnings due to production curtailments or shutdowns.

Interruptions in production capabilities, especially in our Steel Group, would inevitably increase our production costs and reduce sales and earnings for the affected period. In addition to equipment failures, our facilities are also subject to the risk of catastrophic loss due to unanticipated events such as fires, explosions or violent weather conditions. Our manufacturing processes are dependent upon critical pieces of equipment, such as furnaces, continuous casters and rolling equipment, as well as electrical equipment, such as transformers, and this equipment may, on occasion, be out of service as a result of unanticipated failures. In the future, we may experience material plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production as a result of these types of equipment failures.

The global nature of our business exposes us to foreign currency fluctuations that may affect our asset values, results of operations and competitiveness.

We are exposed to the risks of currency exchange rate fluctuations because a significant portion of our net sales, costs, assets and liabilities, are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. These risks include a reduction in our asset values, net sales, operating income and competitiveness.

For those countries outside the United States where we have significant sales, devaluation in the local currency would reduce the value of our local inventory as presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, a stronger U.S. dollar would result in reduced revenue, operating profit and shareholders’ equity due to the impact of foreign exchange translation on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may make our products more expensive for others to purchase or increase our operating costs, affecting our competitiveness and our profitability.

Changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies and volatile economic, political and market conditions in emerging market countries have in the past adversely affected our financial performance and may in the future adversely affect the value of our assets located outside the United States, our gross profit and our results of operations.

Global political instability and other risks of international operations may adversely affect our operating costs, revenues and the price of our products.

Our international operations expose us to risks not present in a purely domestic business, including primarily:

	•		changes in tariff regulations, which may make our products more costly to export or import;

	•		difficulties establishing and maintaining relationships with local OEMs, distributors and dealers;

	•		import and export licensing requirements;

	•		compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations, including unexpected changes in taxation and environmental or other regulatory requirements, which could increase our operating and other expenses and limit our operations; and

	•		difficulty in staffing and managing geographically diverse operations.

These and other risks may also increase the relative price of our products compared to those manufactured in other countries, reducing the demand for our products in the markets in which we operate, which could have a materially adverse effect on our revenues and earnings.

Underfunding of our defined benefit and other postretirement plans has caused and may continue to cause a significant reduction in our shareholders’ equity.

As a result of recent accounting standards, the underfunded status of our pension fund assets and our postretirement health care obligations, we were required to take a total net reduction of $276 million, net of income taxes, against our shareholders’ equity in 2006. We may be required to take further charges related to pension and other postretirement liabilities in the future and these charges may be significant.

The underfunded status of our pension fund assets will cause us to prepay the funding of our pension obligations which may divert funds from other uses.

The increase in our defined benefit pension obligations, as well as our ongoing practice of managing our funding obligations over time, have led us to prepay a portion of our funding obligations under our pension plans. We made cash contributions of $243 million, $226 million and $185 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, to our U.S.-based pension plans and currently expect to make cash contributions of $80 million in 2007 to such plans. However, we cannot predict whether changing economic conditions or other factors will lead us or require us to make contributions in excess of our current expectations, diverting funds we would otherwise apply to other uses.

Work stoppages or similar difficulties could significantly disrupt our operations, reduce our revenues and materially affect our earnings.

A work stoppage at one or more of our facilities could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, if one or more of our customers were to experience a work stoppage, that customer would likely halt or limit purchases of our products, which could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Timken has Automotive Group, Industrial Group and Steel Group manufacturing facilities at multiple locations in the United States and in a number of countries outside the United States. The aggregate floor area of these facilities worldwide is approximately 16,669,000 square feet, all of which, except for approximately 1,619,000 square feet, is owned in fee. The facilities not owned in fee are leased. The buildings occupied by Timken are principally made of brick, steel, reinforced concrete and concrete block construction. All buildings are in satisfactory operating condition in which to conduct business.

Timken’s Automotive and Industrial Groups’ manufacturing facilities in the United States are located in Bucyrus, Canton, New Philadelphia, and Niles, Ohio; Altavista, Virginia; Randleman, Iron Station and Rutherfordton, North Carolina; Carlyle, Illinois; South Bend, Indiana; Gaffney, Clinton, Union, Honea Path and Walhalla, South Carolina; Cairo, Norcross, Sylvania, Ball Ground and Dahlonega, Georgia; Pulaski and Mascot, Tennessee; Keene and Lebanon, New Hampshire; Lenexa, Kansas; Ogden, Utah; Mesa, Arizona; and Los Alamitos, California. These facilities, including the research facility in Canton, Ohio, and warehouses at plant locations, have an aggregate floor area of approximately 7,193,000 square feet. The company’s Watertown, Connecticut facility was sold on December 18, 2006.

Timken’s Automotive and Industrial Groups’ manufacturing plants outside the United States are located in Benoni, South Africa; Brescia, Italy; Colmar, Vierzon, Maromme and Moult, France; Northampton and Wolverhampton, England; Medemblik, The Netherlands; Bilbao, Spain; Halle-Westfallen, Germany; Olomouc, Czech Republic; Ploiesti, Romania; Mexico City, Mexico; Sao Paulo, Brazil; Singapore, Singapore; Jamshedpur, India; Sosnowiec, Poland; St. Thomas and Bedford, Canada; and Yantai and Wuxi, China. The facilities, including warehouses at plant locations, have an aggregate floor area of approximately 5,199,000 square feet. The company’s Nova Friburgo, Brazil facility was sold on December 18, 2006.

Timken’s Steel Group’s manufacturing facilities in the United States are located in Canton and Eaton, Ohio; and Columbus, North Carolina. These facilities have an aggregate floor area of approximately 3,624,000 square feet. The company’s Wauseon and Vienna, Ohio; Franklin and Latrobe, Pennsylvania; and White House, Tennessee facilities were sold on December 8, 2006.

Timken’s Steel Group’s manufacturing facilities outside the United States are located in Leicester and Sheffield, England. These facilities have an aggregate floor area of approximately 653,000 square feet. The company’s Fougeres and Marnaz, France facilities were sold on June 30, 2006.

In addition to the manufacturing and distribution facilities discussed above, Timken owns warehouses and steel distribution facilities in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Singapore, Mexico, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Germany and China, and leases several relatively small warehouse facilities in cities throughout the world.

During 2006, the utilization by plant varied significantly due to decreasing demand across all automotive markets, and decreasing demand in industrial sectors served by Automotive Group plants. The overall Automotive Group plant utilization was between approximately 75% and 85%, lower than 2005. In 2006, as a result of the higher industrial global demand, Industrial Group plant utilization was between 85% and 90%, which was the same as 2005. Also, in 2006, Steel Group plants operated at near capacity, which was similar to 2005.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

The company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a materially adverse effect on the company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In July 2006, the company entered into a settlement agreement with the State of Ohio concerning both a violation of Ohio air pollution control laws, which was discovered by the company and voluntarily disclosed to the State of Ohio more than ten years ago, as well as a failed grinder bag house stack test, which was corrected within three days. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, the company has agreed to pay $200,000. The company will receive a credit of $22,500 of the total settlement amount due to the company’s investments in approved supplemental environmental projects. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, the company also conducted additional testing of certain equipment.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Item 4A. Executive Officers of the Registrant

The executive officers are elected by the Board of Directors normally for a term of one year and until the election of their successors. All executive officers, except for three, have been employed by Timken or by a subsidiary of the company during the past five-year period. The executive officers of the company as of February 28, 2007 are as follows:


Name	Age	Current Position and Previous Positions During Last Five Years

Ward J. Timken, Jr.	39	2000	Corporate Vice President — Office of the Chairman
		2002	Corporate Vice President — Office of the Chairman; Director
		2003	Executive Vice President and President — Steel Group; Director
		2005	Chairman of the Board

James W. Griffith	53	1999	President and Chief Operating Officer; Director
		2002	President and Chief Executive Officer; Director

Michael C. Arnold	50	2000	President — Industrial Group

William R. Burkhart	41	2000	Senior Vice President and General Counsel

Alastair R. Deane	45	2000	Senior Vice President of Engineering, Automotive Driveline
			Driveshaft business group of GKN Automotive, Incorporated, a global
			supplier of driveline components and systems.
		2005	Senior Vice President — Technology, The Timken Company

Jacqueline A. Dedo	45	2000	Vice President and General Manager Worldwide Market
			Operations, Motorola, Inc., a global communications company
		2004	President — Automotive Group, The Timken Company

Glenn A. Eisenberg	45	1999	President and Chief Operating Officer, United Dominion
			Industries, an international manufacturing, construction and
			engineering firm
		2002	Executive Vice President — Finance and Administration,
			The Timken Company

J. Ted Mihaila	52	2001	Controller, Industrial Group
		2006	Senior Vice President and Controller

Salvatore J. Miraglia, Jr.	56	1999	Senior Vice President — Technology
		2005	President — Steel Group


*		Total return assumes reinvestment of dividends.

**		Fiscal years ending December 31.

Assumes $100 invested on January 1, 2002, in Timken Company common stock, S&P 500 Index and Peer Index.


	2002		2003		2004		2005		2006
Timken Company	$	121.35	$	131.59	$	174.59	$	219.56	$	204.14
S&P 500		77.90		100.24		111.15		116.61		135.02
80% Bearing/20% Steel ***		99.31		142.89		182.83		274.99		366.39


*******		Effective in 2003, the weighting of the peer index was revised from 70% Bearing/30% Steel to more accurately reflect the company’s post-Torrington acquisition.

The line graph compares the cumulative total shareholder returns over five years for The Timken Company, the S&P 500 Stock Index, and a peer index that proportionally reflects The Timken Company’s two businesses. The S&P Steel Index comprises the steel portion of the peer index. This index was comprised of seven steel companies in 1996 and is now three (Allegheny Technologies, Nucor and US Steel Corp.), as industry consolidation and bankruptcy have reduced the number of companies in the index. The remaining portion of the peer index is a self-constructed bearing index that consists of six companies. These six companies are Kaydon, FAG, JTETK (formerly Koyo Seiko), NSK, NTN and SKF. The last five are non-US bearing companies that are based in Germany (FAG), Japan (JTETK, NSK, NTN), and Sweden (SKF). FAG was eliminated from the bearing index in 2003 when its minority interests were acquired and its shares delisted.

Issuer Purchases of Common Stock:

The following table provides information about purchases by the company during the quarter ended December 31, 2006 of its common stock.


					Total Number of		Maximum Number of
					Shares Purchased as		Shares That May Yet
	Total Number				Part of Publicly		be Purchased Under
	of Shares		Average Price Paid		Announced Plans or		the Plans or
Period	Purchased (1)		per Share (2)		Programs (3)		Programs (3)

10/1/06 — 10/31/06		—	$	—		—		3,793,700
11/1/06 — 11/30/06		1,942		30.77		—		3,793,700
12/1/06 — 12/31/06		6,850		30.71		—		3,793,700

Total		8,792	$	30.72		—		3,793,700


(1)		Consists solely of company repurchases of shares of its common stock that are owned and tendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted shares and the exercise of stock options.

(2)		The average price paid per share is calculated using the daily high and low sales prices of the company’s common stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange at the time the employee tenders the shares.

(3)		Pursuant to the company’s 2000 common stock purchase plan, the company may purchase up to four million shares of common stock at an amount not to exceed $180 million in the aggregate. The company was authorized to purchase shares under its 2000 common stock purchase plan until December 31, 2006. The company did not purchase any shares under its 2000 common stock purchase plan during the periods listed above. On November 3, 2006, the company adopted its 2006 common stock purchase plan, effective as of January 1, 2007. Pursuant to the 2006 common stock purchase plan, the company may purchase up to four million shares of common stock at an amount not to exceed $180 million, in the aggregate, until December 31, 2012.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Summary of Operations and Other Comparative Data



	2006			2005			2004			2003			2002

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Statements of Income
Net Sales
Industrial	$	2,072,495		$	1,925,211		$	1,709,770		$	1,498,832		$	971,534
Automotive		1,573,034			1,661,048			1,582,226			1,396,104			752,763
Steel		1,327,836			1,236,908			995,201			731,554			659,780

Total net sales		4,973,365			4,823,167			4,287,197			3,626,490			2,384,077

Gross profit		1,005,844			999,957			824,376			632,082			462,749
Selling, administrative and general expenses		677,342			646,904			575,910			511,053			345,240
Impairment and restructuring charges		44,881			26,093			13,538			19,154			31,852
Loss on divestitures		64,271			—			—			—			—
Operating income		219,350			326,960			234,928			101,875			85,657
Other income (expense) — net		79,666			67,726			12,100			9,903			36,326
Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) ⁽¹⁾		299,016			394,686			247,028			111,778			121,983
Interest expense		49,387			51,585			50,834			48,401			31,540
Income from continuing operations		176,439			233,656			134,046			38,940			55,385
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		46,088			26,625			1,610			(2,459	)		(16,636	)
Net income	$	222,527		$	260,281		$	135,656		$	36,481		$	38,749

Balance Sheets
Inventories — net	$	952,310		$	900,294		$	799,717		$	634,906		$	425,003
Property, plant and equipment — net		1,601,559			1,474,074			1,508,598			1,531,423			1,142,056
Total assets		4,031,533			3,993,734			3,942,909			3,689,789			2,748,356
Total debt:
Commercial paper		—			—			—			—			8,999
Short-term debt		40,217			63,437			157,417			114,469			78,354
Current portion of long-term debt		10,236			95,842			1,273			6,725			23,781
Long-term debt		547,390			561,747			620,634			613,446			350,085

Total debt:		597,843			721,026			779,324			734,640			461,219
Net debt:
Total debt		597,843			721,026			779,324			734,640			461,219
Less: cash and cash equivalents		(101,072	)		(65,417	)		(50,967	)		(28,626	)		(82,050	)

Net debt: ⁽²⁾		496,771			655,609			728,357			706,014			379,169
Total liabilities		2,555,353			2,496,667			2,673,061			2,600,162			2,139,270
Shareholders’ equity	$	1,476,180		$	1,497,067		$	1,269,848		$	1,089,627		$	609,086
Capital:
Net debt		496,771			655,609			728,357			706,014			379,169
Shareholders’ equity		1,476,180			1,497,067			1,269,848			1,089,627			609,086

Net debt + shareholders’ equity (capital)		1,972,951			2,152,676			1,998,205			1,795,641			988,255

Other Comparative Data
Income from continuing operations/Net sales		3.5	%		4.8	%		3.1	%		1.1	%		2.3	%
EBIT /Net sales		6.0	%		8.2	%		5.8	%		3.1	%		5.1	%
Return on equity ⁽³⁾		12.0	%		15.6	%		10.6	%		3.6	%		9.1	%
Net sales per associate ⁽⁴⁾	$	191.5		$	186.7		$	170.0		$	170.6		$	135.8
Capital expenditures	$	296,093		$	217,411		$	143,781		$	125,596		$	87,869
Depreciation and amortization	$	196,592		$	209,656		$	201,173		$	200,548		$	137,451
Capital expenditures /Net sales		6.0	%		4.5	%		3.4	%		3.5	%		3.7	%
Dividends per share	$	0.62		$	0.60		$	0.52		$	0.52		$	0.52
Earnings per share ⁽⁵⁾	$	2.38		$	2.84		$	1.51		$	0.44		$	0.63
Earnings per share — assuming dilution ⁽⁵⁾	$	2.36		$	2.81		$	1.49		$	0.44		$	0.62
Net debt to capital ⁽²⁾		25.2	%		30.5	%		36.5	%		39.3	%		38.4	%
Number of associates at year-end ⁽⁶⁾		25,418			26,528			25,128			25,299			17,226
Number of shareholders ⁽⁷⁾		42,608			54,514			42,484			42,184			44,057


⁽¹⁾		EBIT is defined as operating income plus other income (expense) — net.

⁽²⁾		The company presents net debt because it believes net debt is more representative of the company’s indicative financial position due to temporary changes in cash and cash equivalents.

⁽³⁾		Return on equity is defined as income from continuing operations divided by ending shareholders’ equity.

⁽⁴⁾		Based on average number of associates employed during the year.

⁽⁵⁾		Based on average number of shares outstanding during the year and includes discontinued operations for all periods presented.

⁽⁶⁾		Adjusted to exclude Latrobe Steel for all periods.

⁽⁷⁾		Includes an estimated count of shareholders having common stock held for their accounts by banks, brokers and trustees for benefit plans.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

Introduction

The Timken Company is a leading global manufacturer of highly engineered anti-friction bearings and alloy steels and a provider of related products and services. Timken operates under three segments: Industrial Group, Automotive Group and Steel Group.

The Industrial and Automotive Groups design, manufacture and distribute a range of bearings and related products and services. Industrial Group customers include both original equipment manufacturers and distributors for agriculture, construction, mining, energy, mill, machine tool, aerospace and rail applications. Automotive Group customers include original equipment manufacturers and suppliers for passenger cars, light trucks, and medium- to heavy-duty trucks. Steel Group products include steels of low and intermediate alloy and carbon grades, in both solid and tubular sections, as well as custom-made steel products for both industrial and automotive applications, including bearings.

Financial Overview

2006 compared to 2005

Overview:



	2006		2005		$Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions, except earnings per share)
Net sales	$	4,973.4	$	4,823.2	$	150.2			3.1	%
Income from continuing operations		176.4		233.7		(57.3	)		(24.5	)%
Income from discontinued operations		46.1		26.6		19.5			73.3	%
Net income		222.5		260.3		(37.8	)		(14.5	)%
Diluted earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	1.87	$	2.52	$	(0.65	)		(25.8	)%
Discontinued operations		0.49		0.29		0.20			69.0	%
Net income per share	$	2.36	$	2.81	$	(0.45	)		(16.0	)%
Average number of shares — diluted		94,294,716		92,537,529		—			1.9	%

The Timken Company reported net sales for 2006 of approximately $5.0 billion, compared to $4.8 billion in 2005, an increase of 3.1%. Sales were higher across the Industrial and Steel Groups, offset by lower sales in the Automotive Group. In December 2006, the company completed the divestiture of its Latrobe Steel subsidiary. Discontinued operations represent the operating results and related gain on sale, net of tax, of this business. For 2006, earnings per diluted share were $2.36, compared to $2.81 per diluted share for 2005. Income from continuing operations per diluted share was $1.87, compared to $2.52 per diluted share for 2005.

The ongoing strength of global industrial markets drove the increase in Industrial and Steel Group sales, while the declines in North American automotive demand during the second half of 2006 constrained results. The company’s growth initiatives, loss on divestitures and restructuring the company’s operations, also constrained overall results. The company continued its focus on increasing production capacity in targeted areas, including major capacity expansions for industrial products at several manufacturing locations around the world. The company expects the strength in industrial markets will continue in 2007 and drive year-over-year sales increases in both the Industrial and Steel Groups.

While global industrial markets are expected to remain strong, the improvements in the company’s operating performance will be partially constrained by investments, including Project O.N.E. and Asian growth initiatives. Project O.N.E. is a program designed to improve the company’s business processes and systems. In 2006, the company successfully completed a pilot program of Project O.N.E. in Canada. The objective of Asian growth initiatives is to increase market share, influence major design centers and expand the company’s network of sources of globally competitive friction management products.

The company’s strategy for the Industrial Group is to pursue growth in selected industrial markets and achieve a leadership position in targeted Asian markets. In 2006, the company invested in three new plants in Asia to build the infrastructure to support its Asian growth initiative. The company also expanded its capacity in aerospace products by investing in a new aerospace aftermarket facility in Mesa, Arizona and through the acquisition of the assets of Turbo Engines, Inc. in December 2006. The new facility in Mesa, which will include manufacturing and engineering functions, more than doubles the capacity of the company’s previous aerospace aftermarket operations in Gilbert, Arizona. In addition, the company is increasing large-bore bearing capacity in Romania, China and the United States to serve heavy industrial markets. The company is also expanding its line of industrial seals to include large-bore seals to provide a more complete line of friction management products to distribution channels.

The company’s strategy for the Automotive Group is to make structural changes to its business to improve its financial performance. In 2005, the company disclosed plans for its Automotive Group to restructure its business. These plans included the closure of its automotive engineering center in Torrington, Connecticut and its manufacturing engineering center in Norcross, Georgia. These facilities were consolidated into a new technology facility in Greenville, South Carolina. Additionally, the company announced the closure of its manufacturing facility in Clinton, South Carolina. In February 2006, the company announced plans to downsize its manufacturing facility in Vierzon, France.

In September 2006, the company announced further planned reductions in its Automotive Group workforce of approximately 700 associates. These plans are targeted to deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $35 million by 2008, with pretax costs of approximately $25 million.

In December 2006, the company completed the divestiture of its Steering business located in Watertown, Connecticut and Nova Friburgo, Brazil, resulting in a loss on divestiture of $54.3 million. The Steering business employed approximately 900 associates.

The company’s strategy for the Steel Group is to focus on opportunities where the company can offer differentiated capabilities while driving profitable growth. In 2006, the company announced plans to invest in a new induction heat-treat line in Canton, Ohio, which will increase capacity and the ability to provide differentiated product to more customers in its global energy markets. In January 2007, the company announced plans to invest approximately $60 million to enable the company to competitively produce steel bars down to 1-inch diameter for use in power transmission and friction management applications for a variety of customers, including the rapidly growing automotive transplants. In 2006, the company also completed the divestiture of its Latrobe Steel subsidiary and its Timken Precision Steel Components — Europe business. In addition, the company announced plans to exit its seamless steel tube manufacturing operations located in Desford, England.

The Statement of Income

Sales by Segment:



	2006		2005		$Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions, and exclude intersegment sales)
Industrial Group	$	2,072.5	$	1,925.2	$	147.3			7.7	%
Automotive Group		1,573.0		1,661.1		(88.1	)		(5.3	)%
Steel Group		1,327.9		1,236.9		91.0			7.4	%

Total Company	$	4,973.4	$	4,823.2	$	150.2			3.1	%

The Industrial Group’s net sales in 2006 increased from 2005 primarily due to higher demand across most end markets, with the highest growth in aerospace, heavy industry and industrial distribution. The Automotive Group’s net sales in 2006 decreased from 2005 primarily due to significantly lower volume, driven by reductions in vehicle production by North American original equipment manufacturers, partially offset by improved pricing. The Steel Group’s net sales in 2006 increased from 2005 primarily due to increased pricing and surcharges to recover high raw material and energy costs, as well as strong demand in industrial and energy market sectors, partially offset by lower sales to automotive customers.

Gross Profit:



	2006			2005			$Change		Change

(Dollars in millions)
Gross profit	$	1,005.8		$	1,000.0		$	5.8		0.6	%
Gross profit % to net sales		20.2	%		20.7	%		—	(50		)bps
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold	$	18.5		$	14.5		$	4.0		27.6	%

Gross profit margin decreased in 2006 compared to 2005, primarily due to the impact of lower volume in the Automotive Group, driven by reductions in vehicle production by North American original equipment manufacturers, leading to underutilization of manufacturing capacity, as well as an increase in product warranty reserves. The impact of lower volumes and the increase in product warranty reserves in the Automotive Group more than offset favorable sales volume from the Industrial and Steel businesses, price increases, and increased productivity in the company’s other businesses.

In 2006, rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold related to the company’s Canton, Ohio Industrial Group bearing facilities, certain Automotive Group domestic manufacturing facilities, certain facilities in Torrington, Connecticut and the closure of the company’s seamless steel tube manufacturing operations located in Desford, England. In 2005, rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold related to the rationalization of the company’s Canton, Ohio bearing facilities and costs for certain facilities in Torrington, Connecticut.

Selling, Administrative and General Expenses:



	2006			2005			$Change		Change

(Dollars in millions)
Selling, administrative and general expenses	$	677.3		$	646.9		$	30.4		4.7	%
Selling, administrative and general expenses % to net sales		13.6	%		13.4	%		—	20		bps
Rationalization expenses included in selling, administrative and general expenses	$	5.9		$	2.8		$	3.1		110.7	%

The increase in selling, administrative and general expenses in 2006 compared to 2005 was primarily due to higher costs associated with investments in the Asian growth initiative and Project O.N.E. and higher rationalization expenses, partially offset by lower bad debt expense.

In 2006, the rationalization expenses included in selling, administrative and general expenses primarily related to Automotive Group manufacturing and engineering facilities. In 2005, the rationalization expenses included in selling, administrative and general expenses primarily related to the company’s Canton, Ohio bearing facilities and costs associated with the Torrington acquisition.

Impairment and Restructuring Charges:



	2006		2005		$Change

(Dollars in millions)
Impairment charges	$	15.3	$	0.8	$	14.5
Severance and related benefit costs		25.8		20.3		5.5
Exit costs		3.8		5.0		(1.2	)

Total	$	44.9	$	26.1	$	18.8

Industrial

In May 2004, the company announced plans to rationalize the company’s three bearing plants in Canton, Ohio within the Industrial Group. On September 15, 2005, the company reached a new four-year agreement with the United Steelworkers of America, which went into effect on September 26, 2005, when the prior contract expired. This rationalization initiative is expected to deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $25 million through streamlining operations and workforce reductions, with pretax costs of approximately $35 to $40 million over the next three years.

In 2006, the company recorded $1.0 million of impairment charges and $0.6 million of exit costs associated with the Industrial Group’s rationalization plans. In 2005, the company recorded $0.8 million of impairment charges and environmental exit costs of $2.2 million associated with the Industrial Group’s rationalization plans.

In November 2006, the company announced plans to vacate its Torrington, Connecticut office complex. In 2006, the company recorded $1.5 million of severance and related benefit costs and $0.1 million of impairment charges associated with the Industrial Group vacating the Torrington complex.

In addition, the company recorded $1.4 million of environmental exit costs in 2006 related to a former plant in Columbus, Ohio and $0.1 million of severance and related benefit costs related to other company initiatives.

Automotive

In 2005, the company disclosed detailed plans for its Automotive Group to restructure its business and improve performance. These plans included the closure of a manufacturing facility in Clinton, South Carolina and engineering facilities in Torrington, Connecticut and Norcross, Georgia. In February 2006, the company announced additional plans to rationalize production capacity at its Vierzon, France bearing manufacturing facility in response to changes in customer demand for its products. These restructuring efforts, along with other future actions, are targeted to deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $40 million by 2008, with expected net workforce reductions of approximately 400 to 500 positions and pretax costs of approximately $80 million to $90 million.

In September 2006, the company announced further planned reductions in its workforce of approximately 700 associates. These additional plans are targeted to deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $35 million by 2008, with expected pretax costs of approximately $25 million.

In 2006, the company recorded $16.5 million of severance and related benefit costs, $1.5 million of exit costs and $1.6 million of impairment charges associated with the Automotive Group’s restructuring plans. In 2005, the company recorded approximately $20.3 million of severance and related benefit costs and $2.8 million of exit costs as a result of environmental charges related to the closure of a manufacturing facility in Clinton, South Carolina, and administrative facilities in Torrington, Connecticut and Norcross, Georgia.

In 2006, the company recorded an additional $0.7 million of severance and related benefit costs and $0.3 million of impairment charges for the Automotive Group related to the announced plans to vacate its Torrington campus office complex and $0.1 million of severance and related benefit costs related to other company initiatives.

In addition, the company recorded impairment charges of $11.9 million in 2006 representing the write-off of goodwill associated with the Automotive Group in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS No. 142), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Refer to Note 8 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.

Steel

In October 2006, the company announced its intention to exit during 2007 its European seamless steel tube manufacturing operations located in Desford, England. The company recorded approximately $6.9 million of severance and related benefit costs in 2006 related to this action. In addition, the company recorded an impairment charge and removal costs of $0.6 million related to the write-down of property, plant and equipment at one of the Steel Group’s facilities.

Rollforward of Restructuring Accruals:



	2006			2005

(Dollars in millions)
Beginning balance, January 1	$	18.1		$	4.1
Expense		29.6			17.5
Payments		(15.7	)		(3.5	)

Ending balance, December 31	$	32.0		$	18.1

The restructuring accrual for 2006 and 2005 was included in accounts payable and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The restructuring accrual at December 31, 2005 excludes costs related to curtailment of pension and postretirement benefit plans.

Loss on Divestitures



	2006			2005		$Change

(Dollars in millions)
(Loss) on Divestitures	$	(64.3	)	$	—	$	(64.3	)

In June 2006, the company completed the divestiture of its Timken Precision Steel Components — Europe business and recorded a loss on disposal of $10.0 million. In December 2006, the company completed the divestiture of the Automotive Group’s steering business located in Watertown, Connecticut and Nova Friburgo, Brazil and recorded a loss on disposal of $54.3 million.

Interest Expense and Income:



	2006		2005		$Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Interest expense	$	49.4	$	51.6	$	(2.2	)		(4.3	)%
Interest income	$	4.6	$	3.4	$	1.2			35.3	%

Interest expense for 2006 decreased slightly compared to 2005 due to lower average debt outstanding in 2006 compared to 2005, partially offset by higher interest rates. Interest income increased for 2006 compared to 2005 due to higher invested cash balances and higher interest rates.

Other Income and Expense:



	2006			2005			$Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)
CDSOA receipts, net of expenses	$	87.9		$	77.1		$	10.8			14.0	%

Other expense — net:
Gain on sale of non-strategic assets	$	7.1		$	8.9		$	(1.8	)		(20.2	)%
Gain (loss) on dissolution of subsidiaries		0.9			(0.6	)		1.5		NM
Other		(16.2	)		(17.7	)		1.5			8.5	%

Other expense — net	$	(8.2	)	$	(9.4	)	$	1.2			12.8	%

The U.S. Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) receipts are reported net of applicable expenses. CDSOA provides for distribution of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic producers where the domestic producers have continued to invest in their technology, equipment and people. In 2006, the company received CDSOA receipts, net of expenses, of $87.9 million. In 2005, the company received CDSOA receipts, net of expenses, of $77.1 million. In September 2002, the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled that such payments are inconsistent with international trade rules. In February 2006, U.S. legislation was signed into law that would end CDSOA distributions for imports covered by antidumping duty orders entering the U.S. after September 30, 2007. Instead, any such antidumping duties collected would remain with the U.S. Treasury. This legislation by itself is not expected to have a significant effect on potential CDSOA distributions in 2007, but would be expected to reduce any distributions in years beyond 2007, with distributions eventually ceasing altogether. There are a number of factors that can affect whether the company receives any CDSOA distributions and the amount of such distributions in any year. These factors include, among other things, potential additional changes in the law, ongoing and potential additional legal challenges to the law, the administrative operation of the law and the status of the underlying antidumping orders. Accordingly, the company cannot reasonably estimate the amount of CDSOA distributions it will receive in future years, if any. If the company does receive CDSOA distributions in 2007, they will most likely be received in the fourth quarter.

In 2006, the gain on sale of non-strategic assets primarily related to the sale of assets of PEL Technologies (PEL). In 2000, the company’s Steel Group invested in PEL, a joint venture to commercialize a proprietary technology that converted iron units into engineered iron oxide for use in pigments, coatings and abrasives. The company consolidated PEL effective March 31, 2004 in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46). In 2006, the company liquidated the joint venture. Refer to Note 12 — Equity Investments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.

In 2005, the gain on sale of non-strategic assets of $8.9 million related to the sale of certain non-strategic assets, including NRB Bearings, a joint venture based in India, and the Industrial Group’s Linear Motion Systems business, based in Europe.

For 2006, other expense primarily included losses from equity investments, donations, minority interests, and losses on the disposal of assets. For 2005, other expense primarily included losses on the disposal of assets, losses from equity investments, donations, minority interests and foreign currency exchange losses.

Income Tax Expense:



	2006			2005			$Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Income tax expense	$	77.8		$	112.9		$	(35.1	)		(31.1	)%
Effective tax rate		30.6	%		32.6	%		—		(200		)bps

The effective tax rate for 2006 was less than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate due to the favorable impact of taxes on foreign income, including earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries being taxed at a rate less than 35%, the extraterritorial income exclusion on U.S. exports, and tax holidays in China and the Czech Republic. In addition, the effective tax rate was favorably impacted by certain U.S. tax benefits, including a net reduction in our tax reserves related primarily to the settlement of certain prior year tax matters with the Internal Revenue Service during the year, accrual of the tax-free Medicare prescription drug subsidy, deductible dividends paid to the company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), and the U.S. domestic manufacturing deduction provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the AJCA). These benefits were offset partially by the inability to record tax benefits for losses at certain foreign subsidiaries, taxes on foreign remittances, the impairment of non-deductible goodwill recorded in the fourth quarter of 2006, U.S. state and local income taxes, and the aggregate impact of other U.S. tax items.

The effective tax rate for 2005 was less than the U.S. statutory tax rate due to tax benefits on foreign income, including the extraterritorial income exclusion on U.S. exports, tax holidays in China and the Czech Republic, and earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries being taxed at a rate less than 35%, as well as the aggregate tax benefit of other U.S. tax items. These benefits were offset partially by taxes incurred on foreign remittances, including a remittance during the fourth quarter of 2005 pursuant to the AJCA, U.S. state and local income taxes and the inability to record a tax benefit for losses at certain foreign subsidiaries.

In October 2004, the AJCA was signed into law. The AJCA contains a provision that eliminates the benefits of the extraterritorial income exclusion for U.S. exports after 2006. The company recognized tax benefits of $5.3 million related to the extraterritorial income exclusion in 2006. Additionally, the AJCA contains a provision that enables companies to deduct a percentage (3% in 2005 and 2006; 6% in 2007 through 2009; and 9% in 2010 and later years) of taxable income derived from qualified domestic manufacturing operations. The company recognized tax benefits of approximately $1.6 million related to the manufacturing deduction in 2006.

In December 2006, the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 (the TRHCA) was signed into law. The TRHCA extends the U.S. federal income tax credit for qualified research and development activities (the R&D credit), which had expired on December 31, 2005, through December 31, 2007. The TRHCA also provides an alternative simplified method for calculating the R&D credit for 2007. The company expects the alternative simplified method to result in an increased R&D credit for 2007, versus prior years.

Discontinued Operations



	2006		2005		$Change		% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Operating results, net of tax	$	33.2	$	26.6	$	6.6		24.8	%
Gain on disposal, net of tax		12.9		—		12.9	NM

Total	$	46.1	$	26.6	$	19.5		73.3	%

In December 2006, the company completed the divestiture of its Latrobe Steel subsidiary. Latrobe Steel is a global producer and distributor of high-quality, vacuum melted specialty steels and alloys. Discontinued operations represent the operating results and related gain on sale, net of tax, of this business. Refer to Note 2 — Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.

Business Segments:

The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment is adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding the effect of amounts related to certain items that management considers not representative of ongoing operations such as impairment and restructuring, rationalization and integration charges, one-time gains or losses on sales of non-strategic assets, allocated receipts received or payments made under the CDSOA and loss on the dissolution of subsidiary). Refer to Note 14 — Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the reconciliation of adjusted EBIT by Group to consolidated income before income taxes.

Industrial Group:



	2006			2005			$Change		Change

(Dollars in millions)
Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	2,074.5		$	1,927.1		$	147.4		7.6	%
Adjusted EBIT	$	201.3		$	199.9		$	1.4		0.7	%
Adjusted EBIT margin		9.7	%		10.4	%		—	(70		)bps

Sales by the Industrial Group include global sales of bearings and other products and services (other than steel) to a diverse customer base, including: industrial equipment; construction and agriculture; rail; and aerospace and defense customers. The Industrial Group also includes aftermarket distribution operations, including automotive applications, for products other than steel.

The Industrial Group’s net sales for 2006 compared to 2005 increased primarily due to higher demand across most end markets, particularly aerospace, heavy industry and industrial distribution markets. While sales increased in 2006, adjusted EBIT margin was lower compared to 2005 primarily due to higher manufacturing costs associated with ramping up new facilities to meet customer demand and investments in the Asian growth initiative and Project O.N.E., mostly offset by higher volume and increased pricing. The company expects the Industrial Group to benefit from continued strength in most industrial segments in 2007. The Industrial Group is also expected to benefit from additional supply capacity in constrained products throughout 2007.

Automotive Group:



	2006			2005			$Change			Change

(Dollars in millions)
Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	1,573.0		$	1,661.1		$	(88.1	)		(5.3	)%
Adjusted EBIT (loss)	$	(73.7	)	$	(19.9	)	$	(53.8	)	NM
Adjusted EBIT (loss) margin		(4.7	)%		(1.2	)%		—		(350		)bps

The Automotive Group includes sales of bearings and other products and services (other than steel) to automotive original equipment manufacturers and suppliers. The Automotive Group’s net sales in 2006 compared to 2005 decreased primarily due to lower volume, driven by reductions in vehicle production by North American original equipment manufacturers, partially offset by improved pricing. Profitability for 2006 compared to 2005 decreased primarily due to lower volume, leading to the underutilization of manufacturing capacity, and an increase of $18.8 million in warranty reserves, partially offset by improved pricing and a decrease in allowances for automotive industry credit exposure. The Automotive Group’s sales are expected to stabilize in 2007 compared to the second half of 2006, and the Automotive Group is expected to deliver improved margins due to its restructuring initiatives.

During 2006, the company recorded $16.5 million of severance and related benefit costs, $1.5 million of exit costs and $1.6 million of impairment charges associated with the Automotive Group’s restructuring plans. In 2005, the company recorded approximately $20.3 million of severance and related benefit costs and $2.8 million of exit costs as a result of environmental charges related to the closure of a manufacturing facility in Clinton, South Carolina, and administrative facilities in Torrington, Connecticut and Norcross, Georgia. The Automotive Group’s adjusted EBIT (loss) excludes these restructuring costs, as they are not representative of ongoing operations.

Steel Group:



	2006			2005			$Change		% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	1,472.3		$	1,415.1		$	57.2		4.0	%
Adjusted EBIT	$	206.7		$	175.8		$	30.9		17.6	%
Adjusted EBIT margin		14.0	%		12.4	%		—	160		bps

The Steel Group sells steel of low and intermediate alloy and carbon grades in both solid and tubular sections, as well as custom-made steel products for both automotive and industrial applications, including bearings.

In December 2006, the company completed the sale of its Latrobe Steel subsidiary. Sales and Adjusted EBIT from these operations are included in discontinued operations. Previously reported amounts for the Steel Group have been adjusted to remove the Latrobe Steel operations. The Steel Group’s 2006 net sales increased over 2005 primarily due to increased pricing and surcharges to recover high raw material and energy costs, as well as strong demand in industrial and energy market sectors, partially offset by lower automotive demand. The increase in the Steel Group’s profitability in 2006 compared to 2005 was primarily due to a favorable sales mix, improved manufacturing productivity and increased pricing. The company expects the Steel Group to continue to benefit from strong demand in industrial and energy market sectors. The company also expects the Steel Group’s Adjusted EBIT to be slightly higher in 2007 primarily due to price increases and higher manufacturing productivity. Scrap costs are expected to decline from their current level, while alloy and energy costs are expected to remain at high levels. However, these costs are expected to be recovered through surcharges and price increases.

2005 compared to 2004

Overview:



	2005		2004		$Change		% Change

(Dollars in millions, except earnings per share)
Net sales	$	4,823.2	$	4,287.2	$	536.0		12.5	%
Income from continuing operations		233.7		134.1		99.6		74.3	%
Income from discontinuted operations		26.6		1.6		25.0	NM
Net income		260.3		135.7		124.6		91.8	%
Diluted earnings per share:
Continuing operations	$	2.52	$	1.48	$	1.04		70.3	%
Discontinued operations		0.29		0.01		0.28	NM
Net income per share	$	2.81	$	1.49	$	1.32		88.6	%
Average number of shares — diluted		92,537,529		90,759,571		—		2.0	%

The Statement of Income

Sales by Segment:



	2005		2004		$Change		% Change

(Dollars in millions, and exclude intersegment sales)
Industrial Group	$	1,925.2	$	1,709.8	$	215.4		12.6	%
Automotive Group		1,661.1		1,582.2		78.9		5.0	%
Steel Group		1,236.9		995.2		241.7		24.3	%

Total Company	$	4,823.2	$	4,287.2	$	536.0		12.5	%

The Industrial Group’s net sales increased from 2004 to 2005 due to higher volume and improved product mix. Many end markets were strong, especially mining, metals, rail, aerospace and oil and gas, which also drove strong distribution sales. The Automotive Group’s net sales increased from 2004 to 2005 due to improved pricing and growth in medium- and heavy-truck markets. The Steel Group’s net sales increased from 2004 to 2005 due to strong industrial, aerospace and energy sector demand, as well as increased pricing and surcharges to recover high raw material and energy costs.

Gross Profit:



	2005			2004			$Change		Change

(Dollars in millions)
Gross profit	$	1,000.0		$	824.4		$	175.6		21.3	%
Gross profit % to net sales		20.7	%		19.2	%		—	150		bps
Rationalization and integration charges included in cost of products sold	$	14.5		$	4.5		$	10.0	NM

Gross profit benefited from price increases and surcharges, favorable sales volume and mix. In 2005, manufacturing rationalization and integration charges related to the rationalization of the company’s Canton, Ohio bearing facilities and costs for certain facilities in Torrington, Connecticut. In 2004, manufacturing rationalization and integration charges related primarily to expenses associated with the integration of Torrington.

Selling, Administrative and General Expenses:



	2005			2004			$Change			Change

(Dollars in millions)
Selling, administrative and general expenses	$	646.9		$	575.9		$	71.0			12.3	%
Selling, administrative and general expenses % to net sales		13.4	%		13.4	%		—		0		bps
Rationalization expenses included in selling, administrative and general expenses	$	2.8		$	22.5		$	(19.7	)		(87.6	)%

The increase in selling, administrative and general expenses in 2005 compared to 2004 was primarily due to higher costs associated with performance-based compensation and growth initiatives, partially offset by lower rationalization and integration charges. Growth initiatives included investments in Project O.N.E., as well as targeted geographic growth in Asia.

In 2005, the rationalization and integration charges primarily related to the rationalization of the company’s Canton, Ohio bearing facilities and costs associated with the Torrington acquisition. In 2004, the manufacturing rationalization and integration charges related primarily to expenses associated with the integration of Torrington, mostly for information technology and purchasing initiatives.

Impairment and Restructuring Charges:



	2005		2004		$Change

(Dollars in millions)
Impairment charges	$	0.8	$	8.5	$	(7.7	)
Severance and related benefit costs		20.3		4.3		16.0
Exit costs		5.0		0.7		4.3

Total	$	26.1	$	13.5	$	12.6

In 2005, the company recorded approximately $20.3 million of severance and related benefit costs and $2.8 million of exit costs as a result of environmental charges related to the closure of manufacturing facilities in Clinton, South Carolina, and administrative facilities in Torrington, Connecticut and Norcross, Georgia. These closures are part of the restructuring plans for the Automotive Group announced in July 2005.

Asset impairment charges of $0.8 million and exit costs of $2.2 million related to environmental charges were recorded in 2005 as a result of the rationalization of the company’s three bearing plants in Canton, Ohio within the Industrial Group.

In 2004, the impairment charges related primarily to the write-down of property, plant and equipment at one of the Steel Group’s facilities, based on the company’s estimate of its fair value. The severance and related benefit costs related to associates who exited the company as a result of the integration of Torrington. The exit costs related primarily to domestic facilities.

Interest Expense and Income:



	2005		2004		$Change		% Change
(Dollars in millions)
Interest expense	$	51.6	$	50.8	$	0.8		1.6	%
Interest income	$	3.4	$	1.4	$	2.0		142.9	%

Interest expense in 2005 compared to 2004 increased slightly due to higher effective interest rates. Interest income increased due to higher cash balances and interest rates.

Other Income and Expense:



	2005			2004			$Change			% Change
(Dollars in millions)
CDSOA receipts, net of expenses	$	77.1		$	44.4		$	32.7			73.6	%


Other expense — net:
Gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets	$	8.9		$	16.4		$	(7.5	)		(45.7	)%
Loss on dissolution of subsidiary		(0.6	)		(16.2	)		15.6			96.3	%
Other		(17.7	)		(32.5	)		14.8			45.5	%

Other expense — net	$	(9.4	)	$	(32.3	)	$	22.9			70.9	%

CDSOA receipts are reported net of applicable expenses. In 2005, the company received CDSOA receipts, net of expenses, of $77.1 million. In 2004, the CDSOA receipts of $44.4 million were net of the amounts that Timken delivered to the seller of the Torrington business, pursuant to the terms of the agreement under which the company purchased Torrington. In 2004, Timken delivered to the seller of the Torrington business 80% of the CDSOA payments received for Torrington’s bearing business.

In 2005, the gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets of $8.9 million related to the sale of certain non-strategic assets, which included NRB Bearings, a joint venture based in India, and the Industrial Group’s Linear Motion Systems business, based in Europe. In 2004, the $16.4 million gain included the sale of real estate at a facility in Duston, England, which ceased operations in 2002, offset by a loss on the sale of the company’s Kilian bearing business, which was acquired in the Torrington acquisition.

In 2004, the company began the process of liquidating one of its inactive subsidiaries, British Timken Ltd., located in Duston, England. The company recorded non-cash charges on dissolution of $0.6 million and $16.2 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively, which related primarily to the transfer of cumulative foreign currency translation losses to the Statement of Income.

For 2005, other expense included losses on the disposal of assets, losses from equity investments, donations, minority interests and foreign currency exchange losses. For 2004, other expense included losses from equity investments, losses on the disposal of assets, foreign currency exchange losses, donations, minority interests, and a non-cash charge for the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51” (FIN 46). During 2004, the company consolidated its investment in its joint venture, PEL, in accordance with FIN 46. The company previously accounted for its investment in PEL using the equity method. Refer to Note 12 — Equity Investments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.

Income Tax Expense:



	2005			2004			$Change		% Change
(Dollars in millions)
Income tax expense	$	112.9		$	63.5		$	49.4		77.8	%
Effective tax rate		32.6	%		32.2	%		—	40		bps

The effective tax rate for 2004 was less than the U.S. statutory tax rate due to benefits from the settlement of prior years’ liabilities, the changes in the tax status of certain foreign subsidiaries, benefits of tax holidays in China and the Czech Republic, earnings of certain subsidiaries being taxed at a rate less than 35% and the aggregate impact of certain other items. These benefits were partially offset by the establishment of a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets associated with loss carryforwards attributable to a subsidiary that was in the process of liquidation, U.S. state and local income taxes, taxes incurred on foreign remittances and the inability to record a tax benefit for losses at certain foreign subsidiaries.

Discontinued Operations:



	2005		2004		$Change		% Change
(Dollars in millions)
Operating results, net of tax	$	26.6	$	1.6	$	25.0	NM

In December 2006, the company completed the divestiture of its Latrobe Steel subsidiary. Discontinued operations represent the operating results, net of tax, of this business in 2005 and 2004.

Business Segments:

Industrial Group:



	2005			2004			$Change		Change
(Dollars in millions)
Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	1,927.1		$	1,711.2		$	215.9		12.6	%
Adjusted EBIT	$	199.9		$	177.9		$	22.0		12.4	%
Adjusted EBIT margin		10.4	%		10.4	%		—	0		bps

The Industrial Group’s net sales increased in 2005 due to higher volume and improved product mix. Many end markets were strong, especially mining, metals, rail, aerospace and oil and gas, which also drove strong distribution sales. While sales increased in 2005, adjusted EBIT margin was comparable to 2004, as volume growth and pricing were partially offset by higher manufacturing costs associated with ramping up of capacity to meet customer demand, investments in the Asia growth initiative and Project O.N.E., and write-offs of obsolete and slow-moving inventory. During 2005, operations were expanded in Wuxi, China to serve industrial customers. The company also increased capacity at two large-bore bearings operations located in Ploiesti, Romania and Randleman (Asheboro), North Carolina.

Automotive Group:



	2005			2004			$Change			Change
(Dollars in millions)
Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	1,661.1		$	1,582.2		$	78.9			5.0	%
Adjusted EBIT (loss)	$	(19.9	)	$	15.9		$	(35.8	)	NM
Adjusted EBIT (loss) margin		(1.2	)%		1.0	%		—		(220		)bps

The Automotive Group’s net sales increased in 2005 due to improved pricing and increased demand for heavy truck products, partially offset by reduced volume for light vehicle products. While the Automotive Group’s improved sales favorably impacted profitability, it was more than offset by the higher manufacturing costs associated with ramping up plants serving industrial customers and from reduced unit volume from light vehicle customers. Automotive results were also impacted by investments in Project O.N.E. and an increase in the accounts receivable reserve.

During 2005, the company announced a restructuring plan as part of its effort to improve Automotive Group performance and address challenges in the automotive markets. The company recorded approximately $20.3 million of severance and related benefit costs and $2.8 million of exit costs as a result of environmental and curtailment charges related to the closure of manufacturing facilities in Clinton, South Carolina and administrative facilities in Torrington, Connecticut and Norcross, Georgia.

Steel Group:



	2005			2004			$Change		Change
(Dollars in millions)
Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	1,415.1		$	1,157.1		$	258.0		22.3	%
Adjusted EBIT	$	175.8		$	52.7		$	123.1	NM
Adjusted EBIT margin		12.4	%		4.6	%		—	780		bps

The Steel Group’s 2005 net sales increased over 2004 due to strong demand in industrial and energy market sectors, as well as increased pricing and surcharges to recover high raw material and energy costs. The Steel Group’s improved profitability reflected price increases and surcharges to recover high raw material costs, improved volume and mix, as well as continued high labor productivity.

The Balance Sheet

Total assets, as shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2006, increased by $37.8 million from December 31, 2005. This increase was primarily due to increased property, plant and equipment — net, and working capital from continuing operations required to support higher sales, partially offset by the decrease in assets of discontinued operations that were part of the sale of Latrobe Steel.

Current Assets:



	12/31/2006		12/31/2005		$Change			% Change
(Dollars in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	101.1	$	65.4	$	35.7			54.6	%
Accounts receivable, net		673.4		657.3		16.1			2.4	%
Inventories, net		952.3		900.3		52.0			5.8	%
Deferred income taxes		85.6		97.7		(12.1	)		(12.4	)%
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses		11.1		17.9		(6.8	)		(38.0	)%
Current assets of discontinued operations		—		162.2		(162.2	)		(100.0	)%
Other current assets		76.8		82.5		(5.7	)		(6.9	)%

Total current assets	$	1,900.3	$	1,983.3	$	(83.0	)		(4.2	)%

The increase in cash and cash equivalents in 2006 was primarily due to proceeds from the sale of Latrobe Steel, offset by the payment of debt. Refer to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for further explanation. Net accounts receivable increased primarily due to the impact of foreign currency translation and higher sales in the fourth quarter of 2006 as compared to 2005. The increase in inventories was primarily due to the impact of foreign currency translation, higher volume and increased raw material costs. The decrease in deferred income taxes was the result of the utilization of certain loss carryforwards and tax credits in 2006. Current assets of discontinued operations at December 31, 2005 reflect the total current assets of Latrobe Steel.

Property, Plant and Equipment — Net:



	12/31/2006			12/31/2005			$Change			% Change
(Dollars in millions)
Property, plant and equipment	$	3,664.8		$	3,441.6		$	223.2			6.5	%
Less: allowances for depreciation		(2,063.3	)		(1,967.5	)		(95.8	)		4.9	%

Property, plant and equipment — net	$	1,601.5		$	1,474.1		$	127.4			8.6	%

The increase in property, plant and equipment — net was primarily due to capital expenditures exceeding depreciation expense and the impact of foreign currency translation.

Other Assets:



	12/31/2006		12/31/2005		$Change			% Change
(Dollars in millions)
Goodwill	$	201.9	$	204.1	$	(2.2	)		(1.1	)%
Other intangible assets		104.1		179.0		(74.9	)		(41.8	)%
Deferred income taxes		169.4		1.9		167.5			NM
Non-current assets of discontinued operations		—		81.2		(81.2	)		(100.0	)%
Other non-current assets		54.3		70.1		(15.8	)		(22.5	)%

Total other assets	$	529.7	$	536.3	$	(6.6	)		(1.2	)%

The decrease in goodwill in 2006 was primarily due to the impairment loss recorded on Automotive Group goodwill of $11.9 million in accordance with SFAS No. 142, mostly offset by acquisitions. Other intangible assets decreased primarily due to adoption of SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R),” which eliminates the pension intangible asset. The increase in deferred income taxes was primarily due to deferred tax assets recorded in conjunction with the adoption of SFAS No. 158. Non-current assets of discontinued operations at December 31, 2005 reflect the total non-current assets, including property, plant and equipment, of Latrobe Steel.

Current Liabilities:



	12/31/2006		12/31/2005		$Change			% Change
(Dollars in millions)
Short-term debt	$	40.2	$	63.4	$	(23.2	)		(36.6	)%
Accounts payable and other liabilities		506.3		471.0		35.3			7.5	%
Salaries, wages and benefits		225.4		364.0		(138.6	)		(38.1	)%
Income taxes payable		52.8		30.5		22.3			73.1	%
Deferred income taxes		0.6		4.9		(4.3	)		(87.8	)%
Current liabilities of discontinued operations		—		41.7		(41.7	)		(100.0	)%
Current portion of long-term debt		10.2		95.8		(85.6	)		(89.4	)%

Total current liabilities	$	835.5	$	1,071.3	$	(235.8	)		(22.0	)%

The decrease in short-term debt was the result of the repayment of debt held by PEL, an equity investment of the company. The increase in accounts payable and other liabilities was primarily due to an increase in severance accruals and foreign currency translation. The decrease in salaries, wages and benefits was primarily due to a decrease in the current portion of accrued pension cost. At December 31, 2006, the current portion of accrued pension costs and accrued postretirement costs relate to unfunded plans and represent the actuarial present value of expected payments related to these plans to be made over the next twelve months pursuant to SFAS No. 158. At December 31, 2005, the current portion of accrued pension costs was based upon the company’s estimate of contributions to its pension plans in the next twelve months. The increase in income taxes payable was primarily due to the full utilization of U.S. tax loss carryforwards and the impact of a tax audit settlement in 2006. The current liabilities of discontinued operations at December 31, 2005 reflect the total current liabilities of Latrobe Steel. The current portion of long-term debt decreased primarily due to the payment of debt, partially offset by the reclassification of debt maturing within the next twelve months to current.

Non-Current Liabilities:



	12/31/2006		12/31/2005		$Change			% Change
(Dollars in millions)
Long-term debt	$	547.4	$	561.7	$	(14.3	)		(2.5	)%
Accrued pension cost		410.4		242.4		168.0			69.3	%
Accrued postretirement benefits cost		682.9		488.5		194.4			39.8	%
Deferred income taxes		6.7		36.6		(29.9	)		(81.7	)%
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations		—		35.9		(35.9	)		(100.0	)%
Other non-current liabilities		72.4		60.2		12.2			20.3	%

Total non-current liabilities	$	1,719.8	$	1,425.3	$	294.5			20.7	%

The decrease in long-term debt was primarily due to the reclassification of long-term debt to current for debt maturing within the next twelve months, partially offset by debt assumed in the consolidation of a joint venture. The increase in accrued pension cost and accrued postretirement benefits cost increase as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 158. The amounts at December 31, 2006 for both accrued pension cost and accrued postretirement benefits cost reflect the funded status of the company’s defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans. In 2005, the net unrecognized actuarial losses, unrecognized prior service costs and unrecognized transition obligation remaining from the initial adoption of SFAS No. 87 and SFAS No. 106 were netted against the funded status. Refer to Note 13 — Retirement and Postretirement Benefit Plans in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The non-current liabilities of discontinued operations at December 31, 2005 reflect the total non-current liabilities of Latrobe Steel. The decrease in deferred income taxes was primarily due to an adjustment to reflect a tax audit settlement in 2006 and the classification of the year-end net asset balance to non-current deferred tax assets.

Shareholders’ Equity:



	12/31/2006			12/31/2005			$Change			% Change
(Dollars in millions)
Common stock	$	806.2		$	772.1		$	34.1			4.4	%
Earnings invested in the business		1,217.2			1,052.9			164.3			15.6	%
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(544.6	)		(323.5	)		(221.1	)		68.3	%
Treasury shares		(2.6	)		(4.4	)		1.8			(40.9	)%

Total shareholders’ equity	$	1,476.2		$	1,497.1		$	(20.9	)		(1.4	)%

The increase in common stock in 2006 related to stock option exercises by employees and the related income tax benefits. Earnings invested in the business were increased in 2006 by net income, partially reduced by dividends declared. The increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss was primarily due to the amounts recorded in conjunction with the adoption of SFAS No. 158, partially offset by the increase in the foreign currency translation adjustment. The increase in the foreign currency translation adjustment was due to weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies, such as the Romanian lei, the Brazilian real and the Euro. For discussion regarding the impact of foreign currency translation, refer to Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Cash Flows:



	12/31/2006			12/31/2005			$Change
(Dollars in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	336.9		$	318.7		$	18.2
Net cash used by investing activities		(130.9	)		(242.8	)		111.9
Net cash used by financing activities		(176.7	)		(56.3	)		(120.4	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		6.3			(5.2	)		11.5

Increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	35.6		$	14.4		$	21.2

The net cash provided by operating activities of $336.9 million for 2006 increased from 2005 with operating cash flows from discontinued operations increasing $42.6 million, partially offset by operating cash flows from continuing operations decreasing $24.4 million. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was primarily the result of lower income from continuing operations of $176.4 million, adjusted for non-cash items of $266.5 million in 2006, compared to income from continuing operations of $233.7 million, adjusted for non-cash items of $301.3 million, in 2005. The decrease in non-cash items was driven by a deferred tax benefit in 2006 compared to expense in 2005, partially offset by higher impairment and restructuring charges and losses on the sale of non-strategic assets. The lower net income from continuing operations, adjusted for non-cash items, was partially offset by the reduction in the use of cash for working capital requirements, primarily inventories, partially offset by accounts payable and accrued expenses. Inventory was a use of cash of $6.7 million in 2006 compared to a use of cash of $137.3 million in 2005. Excluding cash contributions to the company’s U.S.-based pension plans, accounts payable and accrued expenses were a source of cash of $120.3 million in 2006, compared to a source of cash of $175.7 million in 2005. The company made cash contributions to its U.S.-based pension plans in 2006 of $242.6 million, compared to $226.2 million in 2005. The increase in operating cash flows from discontinued operations was primarily due to working capital items, primarily inventory.

The decrease in net cash used by investing activities in 2006 compared to 2005 was primarily due to higher cash proceeds from divestitures and lower acquisition activity, partially offset by higher capital expenditures. The cash proceeds from divestitures increased $181.5 million primarily due to the sale of the company’s Latrobe Steel subsidiary. Capital expenditures increased $78.7 million in 2006 compared to 2005 primarily to fund Industrial Group growth initiatives and Project O.N.E. In addition, cash used by investing activities of discontinued operations increased $18.3 million in 2006 primarily due to the buyout of a rolling mill operating lease in conjunction with the sale of Latrobe Steel.

The increase in net cash used by financing activities was primarily due to the company decreasing its net borrowings $141.4 million in 2006 after decreasing its net borrowings $40.9 million in 2005. In addition, proceeds from the exercise of stock options decreased during 2006 compared to 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Total debt was $597.8 million at December 31, 2006 compared to $720.9 million at December 31, 2005. Net debt was $496.7 million at December 31, 2006 compared to $655.5 million at December 31, 2005. The net debt to capital ratio was 25.2% at December 31, 2006 compared to 30.5% at December 31, 2005.

Reconciliation of total debt to net debt and the ratio of net debt to capital:

Net Debt:



	12/31/2006			12/31/2005
(Dollars in millions)
Short-term debt	$	40.2		$	63.4
Current portion of long-term debt		10.2			95.8
Long-term debt		547.4			561.7

Total debt		597.8			720.9
Less: cash and cash equivalents		(101.1	)		(65.4	)

Net debt	$	496.7		$	655.5

Ratio of Net Debt to Capital:



	12/31/2006			12/31/2005
(Dollars in millions)
Net debt	$	496.7		$	655.5
Shareholders’ equity		1,476.2			1,497.1

Net debt + shareholders’ equity (capital)	$	1,972.9		$	2,152.6

Ratio of net debt to capital		25.2	%		30.5	%

The company presents net debt because it believes net debt is more representative of the company’s indicative financial position.

At December 31, 2006, the company had no outstanding borrowings under its $500 million Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Senior Credit Facility), and letters of credit outstanding totaling $33.8 million, which reduced the availability under the Senior Credit Facility to $466.2 million. The Senior Credit Facility matures on June 30, 2010. Under the Senior Credit Facility, the company has two financial covenants: a consolidated leverage ratio and a consolidated interest coverage ratio. At December 31, 2006, the company was in full compliance with the covenants under the Senior Credit Facility and its other debt agreements. Refer to Note 5 — Financing Arrangements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

At December 31, 2006, the company had no outstanding borrowings under the company’s Asset Securitization, which provides for borrowings up to $200 million, limited to certain borrowing base calculations, and is secured by certain domestic trade receivables of the company. As of December 31, 2006, there were letters of credit outstanding totaling $16.7 million, which reduced the availability under the Asset Securitization to $183.3 million.

The company expects that any cash requirements in excess of cash generated from operating activities will be met by the availability under its Asset Securitization and Senior Credit Facility. The company believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations through 2010.

Financing Obligations and Other Commitments

The company’s contractual debt obligations and contractual commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2006 are as follows:

Payments due by Period:



			Less than						More than
Contractual Obligations	Total		1 Year		1–3 Years		3–5 Years		5 Years
(Dollars in millions)
Interest payments	$	336.6	$	33.9	$	62.0	$	35.8	$	204.9
Long-term debt, including current portion		557.6		10.2		34.0		299.9		213.5
Short-term debt		40.2		40.2		—		—		—
Operating leases		133.8		28.7		38.9		24.1		42.1

Total	$	1,068.2	$	113.0	$	134.9	$	359.8	$	460.5

The interest payments are primarily related to medium-term notes that mature over the next twenty-eight years.

The company expects to make cash contributions of $100.0 million to its global defined benefit pension plans in 2007. Refer to Note 13 — Retirement and Postretirement Benefit Plans in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

During 2006, the company did not purchase any shares of its common stock as authorized under the company’s 2000 common stock purchase plan. This plan authorized the company to buy in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions up to four million shares of common stock, which are to be held as treasury shares and used for specified purposes, and authorized purchases up to an aggregate of $180 million. This plan expired on December 31, 2006. On November 3, 2006 the company adopted its 2006 common stock purchase plan, effective January 1, 2007. The 2006 common stock purchase plan authorizes the company to buy in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions up to four million shares of common stock. This plan authorizes purchases up to an aggregate of $180 million. The company may exercise this authorization until December 31, 2012. The company does not expect to be active in repurchasing its shares under the plan in the near-term.

The company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or other persons.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements:

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), (SFAS No. 123(R)) “Share-Based Payment,” which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense based on estimated fair value for all share-based payment awards including grants of employee stock options. The company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method beginning January 1, 2006. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the company previously accounted for stock-based payment awards in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” In accordance with the transition method, the company did not restate prior periods for the effect of compensation expense calculated under SFAS No. 123(R). The company selected the Black-Scholes option-pricing model as the most appropriate method for determining the estimated fair value of all of its awards. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) reduced income before income taxes for 2006 by $6.0 million and reduced net income for 2006 by $3.8 million ($0.04 per diluted share). The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) had no material effect on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for 2006. See Note 9 — Stock-Based Compensation in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the impact of this new standard.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,” which changes the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. This statement also carries forward the guidance from APB No. 20 regarding the correction of an error and changes in accounting estimates. This statement requires retrospective application to prior period financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impractical to determine either the period-specific or cumulative effects of the change. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on the company’s results of operations or financial condition.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).” SFAS No. 158 requires a company to (a) recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a plan’s over funded status or a liability for a plan’s under funded status, (b) measure a plan’s assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year, and (c) recognize changes in the funded status of a defined postretirement plan in the year in which the changes occur (reported in comprehensive income). The requirement to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan and the disclosure requirements were adopted by the company effective December 31, 2006 and reduced stockholders’ equity by $332.4 million. Refer to Note 13 — Retirement and Postretirement Benefit Plans for additional discussion on the impact of adopting SFAS No. 158.

In September 2006, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” SAB 108 requires that public companies utilize a “dual-approach” to assessing the quantitative effects of financial misstatements. This dual approach includes both an income statement focused assessment and a balance sheet focused assessment. The guidance in SAB 108 was adopted by the company effective December 31, 2006, and the guidance did not have a material effect on the company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:

In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax positions recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 prescribes requirements and other guidance for financial statement recognition and measurement of positions taken or expected to be taken on tax returns. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 is recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The company will adopt FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007. Management is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of FIN 48 on the company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value that is based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information to develop those assumptions. Additionally, the standard expands the disclosures about fair value measurements to include separately disclosing the fair value measurements of assets or liabilities within each level of the fair value hierarchy. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157 on the company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates:

The company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. The following paragraphs include a discussion of some critical areas that require a higher degree of judgment, estimates and complexity.

Revenue recognition:

The company’s revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenue when title passes to the customer. This occurs at the shipping point, except for certain exported goods and certain foreign entities, for which it occurs when the goods reach their destination. Selling prices are fixed based on purchase orders or contractual arrangements.

Goodwill:

SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets be tested for impairment at least annually. Furthermore, goodwill is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The company engages an independent valuation firm and performs its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter after the annual forecasting process is completed. In 2006, the carrying value of the company’s Automotive reporting units exceeded their fair value. As a result, an impairment loss of $11.9 million was recognized. Refer to Note 8 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. In 2005 and 2004, the fair values of the company’s reporting units exceeded their carrying values, and no impairment losses were recognized.

Restructuring costs:

The company’s policy is to recognize restructuring costs in accordance with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” and SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Postemployment Benefits—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 43.” Detailed contemporaneous documentation is maintained and updated to ensure that accruals are properly supported. If management determines that there is a change in estimate, the accruals are adjusted to reflect this change.

Benefit plans:

The company sponsors a number of defined benefit pension plans, which cover eligible associates. The company also sponsors several unfunded postretirement plans that provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees and dependents. The measurement of liabilities related to these plans is based on management’s assumptions related to future events, including discount rate, return on pension plan assets, rate of compensation increases and health care cost trend rates. The discount rate is determined using a model that matches corporate bond securities against projected future pension and postretirement disbursements. Actual pension plan asset performance either reduces or increases net actuarial gains or losses in the current year, which ultimately affects net income in subsequent years.

For expense purposes in 2006 and 2005, the company applied a discount rate of 5.875% and an expected rate of return of 8.75% for the company’s pension plan assets. The assumption for expected rate of return on plan assets was not changed from 8.75% for 2007. A 0.25 percentage point reduction in the discount rate would increase pension expense by approximately $5.0 million for 2007. A 0.25 percentage point reduction in the expected rate of return would increase pension expense by approximately $4.7 million for 2007.

For measurement purposes for postretirement benefits, the company assumed a weighted-average annual rate of increase in the per capita cost (health care cost trend rate) for medical benefits of 8.0% for 2007, declining gradually to 5.0% in 2010 and thereafter; and 11.25% for 2007, declining gradually to 5.0% in 2014 and thereafter for prescription drug benefits. The assumed health care cost trend rate may have a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one percentage point increase in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have increased the 2006 total service and interest components by $1.2 million and would have increased the postretirement obligation by $20.9 million. A one percentage point decrease would provide corresponding reductions of $1.2 million and $20.0 million, respectively.

The U.S. Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Medicare Act) was signed into law on December 8, 2003. The Medicare Act provides for prescription drug benefits under Medicare Part D and contains a subsidy to plan sponsors who provide “actuarially equivalent” prescription plans. In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” (FSP 106-2). During 2005, the company’s actuary determined that the prescription drug benefit provided by the company’s postretirement plan is considered to be actuarially equivalent to the benefit provided under the Medicare Act. The effects of the Medicare Act are reductions to the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net periodic postretirement benefit cost of $53.3 million and $7.8 million, respectively. The 2006 expected Medicare subsidy was $3.1 million, of which $1.0 million was received in 2006.

Income taxes:

Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of the company’s assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. The company estimates current tax due and temporary differences, resulting from the different treatment of items for tax and financial reporting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are included within the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Based on known and projected earnings information and prudent tax planning strategies, the company then assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized. If the company determines it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized, a charge is recorded to establish a valuation allowance against it, which increases income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made. In the event that the company later determines that realization of the deferred tax asset is more likely than not, a reduction in the valuation allowance is recorded, which reduces income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made. Net deferred tax assets relate primarily to pension and postretirement benefits, which the company believes are more likely than not to result in future tax benefits. Significant management judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. Historically, actual results have not differed significantly from those used in determining the estimates described above.

Other loss reserves:

The company has a number of loss exposures incurred in the ordinary course of business such as environmental claims, product liability, product warranty, litigation and accounts receivable reserves. Establishing loss reserves for these matters requires management’s estimate and judgment with regards to risk exposure and ultimate liability or realization. These loss reserves are reviewed periodically and adjustments are made to reflect the most recent facts and circumstances.

Other Matters:

ISO 14001

The company continues its efforts to protect the environment and comply with environmental protection laws. Additionally, it has invested in pollution control equipment and updated plant operational practices. The company is committed to implementing a documented environmental management system worldwide and to becoming certified under the ISO 14001 standard to meet or exceed customer requirements. As of the end of 2006, 30 of the company’s plants had ISO 14001 certification. The company believes it has established adequate reserves to cover its environmental expenses and has a well-established environmental compliance audit program, which includes a proactive approach to bringing its domestic and international units to higher standards of environmental performance. This program measures performance against local laws, as well as standards that have been established for all units worldwide. It is difficult to assess the possible effect of compliance with future requirements that differ from existing ones. As previously reported, the company is unsure of the future financial impact to the company that could result from the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) final rules to tighten the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate and ozone.

The company and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries have been designated as potentially responsible parties by the EPA for site investigation and remediation at certain sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund). The claims for remediation have been asserted against numerous other entities, which are believed to be financially solvent and are expected to fulfill their proportionate share of the obligation. Management believes any ultimate liability with respect to all pending actions will not materially affect the company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Trade Law Enforcement

The U.S. government previously had eight antidumping duty orders in effect covering ball bearings from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore and the United Kingdom, tapered roller bearings from China and spherical plain bearings from France. The company is a producer of all of these products in the United States. The U.S. government conducted five-year sunset reviews on each of these eight antidumping duty orders in order to determine whether or not each should remain in effect. On August 3, 2006, the U.S. International Trade Commission continued six of the eight antidumping orders under review. Two antidumping orders, relating to spherical plain bearings from France and ball bearings from Singapore, are no longer in effect. The other six orders, covering ball bearings from France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United Kingdom and tapered roller bearings from China, will remain in effect for an additional five years, when another sunset review process will take place. The non-renewal of the two antidumping orders is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the company’s revenues or profitability.

Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA)

In September 2002, the WTO ruled that such payments are not consistent with international trade rules. In February 2006, U.S. legislation was enacted that would end CDSOA distributions for imports covered by antidumping duty orders entering the U.S. after September 30, 2007. Instead, any such antidumping duties collected would remain with the U.S. Treasury. This legislation is not expected to have a significant effect on potential CDSOA distributions in 2007, but would be expected to reduce any distributions in years beyond 2007, with distributions eventually ceasing.

In addition to the CIT rulings, there are a number of other factors that can affect whether the company receives any CDSOA distributions and the amount of such distributions in any year. These factors include, among other things, potential additional changes in the law, ongoing and potential additional legal challenges to the law and the administrative operation of the law. Accordingly, the company cannot reasonably estimate the amount of CDSOA distributions it will receive in future years, if any.

Quarterly Dividend

On February 6, 2007, the company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per share. The dividend will be paid on March 2, 2007 to shareholders of record as of February 16, 2007. This will be the 339th consecutive dividend paid on the common stock of the company.

Forward — Looking Statements

Certain statements set forth in this document and in the company’s 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders (including the company’s forecasts, beliefs and expectations) that are not historical in nature are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, Management’s Discussion and Analysis on pages 19 through 39 contain numerous forward-looking statements. The company cautions readers that actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the company due to a variety of important factors, such as:

a)		changes in world economic conditions, including additional adverse effects from terrorism or hostilities. This includes, but is not limited to, political risks associated with the potential instability of governments and legal systems in countries in which the company or its customers conduct business and significant changes in currency valuations;

b)		the effects of fluctuations in customer demand on sales, product mix and prices in the industries in which the company operates. This includes the ability of the company to respond to the rapid changes in customer demand, the effects of customer strikes, the impact of changes in industrial business cycles and whether conditions of fair trade continue in the U.S. market;

c)		competitive factors, including changes in market penetration, increasing price competition by existing or new foreign and domestic competitors, the introduction of new products by existing and new competitors and new technology that may impact the way the company’s products are sold or distributed;

d)		changes in operating costs. This includes: the effect of changes in the company’s manufacturing processes; changes in costs associated with varying levels of operations and manufacturing capacity; higher cost and availability of raw materials and energy; the company’s ability to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in raw materials and energy costs and the operation of the company’s surcharge mechanism; changes in the expected costs associated with product warranty claims; changes resulting from inventory management and cost reduction initiatives and different levels of customer demands; the effects of unplanned work stoppages; and changes in the cost of labor and benefits;

e)		the success of the company’s operating plans, including its ability to achieve the benefits from its ongoing continuous improvement and rationalization programs; the ability of acquired companies to achieve satisfactory operating results; and the company’s ability to maintain appropriate relations with unions that represent company associates in certain locations in order to avoid disruptions of business;

f)		unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments. This includes, but is not limited to, claims or problems related to intellectual property, product liability or warranty and environmental issues;

g)		changes in worldwide financial markets, including interest rates to the extent they affect the company’s ability to raise capital or increase the company’s cost of funds, have an impact on the overall performance of the company’s pension fund investments and/or cause changes in the economy which affect customer demand; and

h)		those items identified under Item 1A. Risk Factors on pages 8 through 12.

Additional risks relating to the company’s business, the industries in which the company operates or the company’s common stock may be described from time to time in the company’s filings with the SEC. All of these risk factors are difficult to predict, are subject to material uncertainties that may affect actual results and may be beyond the company’s control.

Except as required by the federal securities laws, the company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Changes in short-term interest rates related to several separate funding sources impact the company’s earnings. These sources are borrowings under an Asset Securitization, borrowings under the $500 million Senior Credit Facility, floating rate tax-exempt U.S. municipal bonds with a weekly reset mode and short-term bank borrowings at international subsidiaries. The company is also sensitive to market risk for changes in interest rates, as they influence $80 million of debt that is subject to interest rate swaps. The company has interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $80 million to hedge a portion of its fixed-rate debt. Under the terms of the interest rate swaps, the company receives interest at fixed rates and pays interest at variable rates. The maturity dates of the interest rate swaps are January 15, 2008 and February 15, 2010. If the market rates for short-term borrowings increased by one-percentage-point around the globe, the impact would be an increase in interest expense of $2.3 million with a corresponding decrease in income before income taxes of the same amount. The amount was determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on the company’s borrowing cost, year-end debt balances by category and an estimated impact on the tax-exempt municipal bonds’ interest rates.

Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies, predominately in European countries, also impact the company’s earnings. The greatest risk relates to products shipped between the company’s European operations and the United States. Foreign currency forward contracts are used to hedge these intercompany transactions. Additionally, hedges are used to cover third-party purchases of product and equipment. As of December 31, 2006, there were $247.6 million of hedges in place. A uniform 10% weakening of the U.S. dollar against all currencies would have resulted in a charge of $20.4 million for these hedges. In addition to the direct impact of the hedged amounts, changes in exchange rates also affect the volume of sales or foreign currency sales price as competitors’ products become more or less attractive.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Consolidated Statement of Income


	Year Ended December 31,

	2006			2005			2004

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net sales	$	4,973,365		$	4,823,167		$	4,287,197
Cost of products sold		3,967,521			3,823,210			3,462,821

Gross Profit		1,005,844			999,957			824,376

Selling, administrative and general expenses		677,342			646,904			575,910
Impairment and restructuring charges		44,881			26,093			13,538
Loss on divestitures		64,271			—			—

Operating Income		219,350			326,960			234,928

Interest expense		(49,387	)		(51,585	)		(50,834	)
Interest income		4,605			3,437			1,397
Receipt of Continued Dumping & Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) payment, net of expenses		87,907			77,069			44,429
Other expense — net		(8,241	)		(9,343	)		(32,329	)

Income Before Income Taxes	$	254,234		$	346,538		$	197,591
Provision for income taxes		77,795			112,882			63,545

Income from continuing operations	$	176,439		$	233,656		$	134,046
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		46,088			26,625			1,610

Net Income	$	222,527		$	260,281		$	135,656


Earnings Per Share:
Basic earnings per share
Continuing operations	$	1.89		$	2.55		$	1.49
Discontinued operations		0.49			0.29			0.02

Net income per share	$	2.38		$	2.84		$	1.51


Diluted earnings per share
Continuing operations	$	1.87		$	2.52		$	1.48
Discontinued operations		0.49			0.29			0.01

Net income per share	$	2.36		$	2.81		$	1.49

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Balance Sheet


	December 31,

	2006			2005

(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	101,072		$	65,417
Accounts receivable, less allowances: 2006 - $36,673; 2005 - $37,473		673,428			657,237
Inventories, net		952,310			900,294
Deferred income taxes		85,576			97,712
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses		11,083			17,926
Current assets of discontinued operations		—			162,237
Other current assets		76,811			82,486

Total Current Assets		1,900,280			1,983,309

Property, Plant and Equipment-Net		1,601,559			1,474,074

Other Assets
Goodwill		201,899			204,129
Other intangible assets		104,070			179,043
Deferred income taxes		169,417			1,918
Non-current assets of discontinued operations		—			81,205
Other non-current assets		54,308			70,056

Total Other Assets		529,694			536,351

Total Assets	$	4,031,533		$	3,993,734


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Short-term debt	$	40,217		$	63,437
Accounts payable and other liabilities		506,301			470,966
Salaries, wages and benefits		225,409			364,028
Income taxes payable		52,768			30,497
Deferred income taxes		638			4,880
Current liabilities of discontinued operations		—			41,676
Current portion of long-term debt		10,236			95,842

Total Current Liabilities		835,569			1,071,326

Non-Current Liabilities
Long-term debt		547,390			561,747
Accrued pension cost		410,438			242,414
Accrued postretirement benefits cost		682,934			488,506
Deferred income taxes		6,659			36,556
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations		—			35,878
Other non-current liabilities		72,363			60,240

Total Non-Current Liabilities		1,719,784			1,425,341

Shareholders’ Equity
Class I and II Serial Preferred Stock without par value:
Authorized - 10,000,000 shares each class, none issued		—			—
Common stock without par value:
Authorized - 200,000,000 shares Issued (including shares in treasury) (2006 - 94,244,407 shares; 2005 - 93,160,285 shares)
Stated capital		53,064			53,064
Other paid-in capital		753,095			719,001
Earnings invested in the business		1,217,167			1,052,871
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(544,562	)		(323,449	)
Treasury shares at cost (2006 - 80,005 shares; 2005 - 154,374 shares)		(2,584	)		(4,420	)

Total Shareholders’ Equity		1,476,180			1,497,067

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	4,031,533		$	3,993,734

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows


	Year Ended December 31,
	2006			2005			2004
(Dollars in Thousands)
CASH PROVIDED (USED)

Operating Activities
Net income	$	222,527		$	260,281		$	135,656
Net (income) from discontinued operations		(46,088	)		(26,625	)		(1,610	)
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		196,592			209,656			201,173
Impairment and restructuring charges		15,267			770			10,154
Loss on sale of assets		65,405			211			6,062
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision		(26,395	)		81,393			56,859
Stock-based compensation expense		15,594			9,293			2,775
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(5,987	)		(12,399	)		(102,848	)
Inventories		(6,743	)		(137,329	)		(116,332	)
Other assets		4,098			(22,888	)		7,107
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(122,326	)		(50,533	)		(59,201	)
Foreign currency translation (gain) loss		(19,319	)		5,157			2,690

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities — Continuing Operations		292,625			316,987			142,485
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities — Discontinued Operations		44,303			1,714			(21,956	)

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities		336,928			318,701			120,529

Investing Activities
Capital expenditures		(296,093	)		(217,411	)		(143,781	)
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment		9,207			5,271			5,223
Divestitures		203,316			21,838			50,690
Acquisitions		(17,953	)		(48,996	)		(9,359	)
Other		(2,922	)		4,622			(7,626	)

Net Cash Used by Investing Activities — Continuing Operations		(104,445	)		(234,676	)		(104,853	)
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities — Discontinued Operations		(26,423	)		(8,126	)		(3,728	)

Net Cash Used by Investing Activities		(130,868	)		(242,802	)		(108,581	)

Financing Activities
Cash dividends paid to shareholders		(58,231	)		(55,148	)		(46,767	)
Net proceeds from common share activity		22,963			39,793			17,628
Accounts receivable securitization financing borrowings		170,000			231,500			198,000
Accounts receivable securitization financing payments		(170,000	)		(231,500	)		(198,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		272,549			346,454			335,068
Payments on long-term debt		(392,100	)		(308,233	)		(328,651	)
Short-term debt activity — net		(21,891	)		(79,160	)		20,860

Net Cash Used by Financing Activities		(176,710	)		(56,294	)		(1,862	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		6,305			(5,155	)		12,255

Increase In Cash and Cash Equivalents		35,655			14,450			22,341
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		65,417			50,967			28,626

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year	$	101,072		$	65,417		$	50,967

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity


				Common Stock					Earnings			Accumulated
						Other			Invested			Other
				Stated		Paid-In			in the			Comprehensive			Treasury
	Total			Capital		Capital			Business			Loss			Stock
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Year Ended December 31, 2004
Balance at January 1, 2004	$	1,089,627		$	53,064	$	636,272		$	758,849		$	(358,382	)	$	(176	)
Net income		135,656								135,656
Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of income tax of $18,766)		105,736											105,736
Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of income tax of $18,391)		(36,468	)										(36,468	)
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments, net of reclassifications		(372	)										(372	)

Total comprehensive income		204,552
Dividends — $0.52 per share		(46,767	)							(46,767	)
Tax benefit from stock compensation		3,068					3,068
Issuance (net) of 3,100 shares from treasury(1)		(1,067	)				(1,045	)								(22	)
Issuance of 1,435,719 shares from authorized(1)		20,435					20,435

Balance at December 31, 2004	$	1,269,848		$	53,064	$	658,730		$	847,738		$	(289,486	)	$	(198	)

Year Ended December 31, 2005
Net income		260,281								260,281
Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of income tax of $1,720)		(49,940	)										(49,940	)
Minimum pension liability adjustment (net of income tax of $24,716)		13,395											13,395
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments, net of reclassifications		2,582											2,582

Total comprehensive income		226,318
Dividends — $0.60 per share		(55,148	)							(55,148	)
Tax benefit from stock compensation		8,151					8,151
Issuance (net) of 146,873 shares from treasury(1)		(5,831	)				(1,609	)								(4,222	)
Issuance of 2,648,452 shares from authorized(1)		53,729					53,729

Balance at December 31, 2005	$	1,497,067		$	53,064	$	719,001		$	1,052,871		$	(323,449	)	$	(4,420	)

Year Ended December 31, 2006
Net income		222,527								222,527
Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of income tax of $386)		56,293											56,293
Minimum pension liability adjustment prior to adoption of SFAS No. 158 (net of income tax of $31,723)		56,411											56,411
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments, net of reclassifications		(1,451	)										(1,451	)

Total comprehensive income		333,780	&nbs


	2006						2005
	Stock prices				Dividends		Stock prices				Dividends
	High		Low		per share		High		Low		per share
First quarter	$	36.58	$	26.57	$	0.15	$	29.50	$	22.73	$	0.15
Second quarter	$	36.25	$	27.68	$	0.15	$	27.68	$	22.80	$	0.15
Third quarter	$	34.99	$	29.05	$	0.16	$	30.06	$	22.90	$	0.15
Fourth quarter	$	31.89	$	27.60	$	0.16	$	32.84	$	25.25	$	0.15


			PAGE
I.	PART I.

	Item 1.	Business	1
		General	1
		Products	1
		Geographical Financial Information	2
		Industry Segments	3
		Sales and Distribution	4
		Competition	4
		Trade Law Enforcement	5
		Joint Ventures	6
		Backlog	6
		Raw Materials	6
		Research	7
		Environmental Matters	7
		Patents, Trademarks and Licenses	8
		Employment	8
		Available Information	8
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	8
	Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	12
	Item 2.	Properties	13
	Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	13
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	13
	Item 4A.	Executive Officers of the Registrant	14
II.	PART II.

	Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder
		Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	15
	Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	18
	Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
		Condition and Results of Operations	19
	Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	41
	Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	42
	Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
		and Financial Disclosure	73
	Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	73
	Item 9B.	Other Information	75
III.	Part III.

	Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	75
	Item 11.	Executive Compensation	75
	Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
		Management and Related Stockholder Matters	75
	Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and
		Director Independence	75
	Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	75
IV.	Part IV.

	Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	76
EX-12
EX-21
EX-23
EX-24
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32