10-K 1 d10k.htm FORM 10-K Form 10-K
Table of Contents

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

x   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003

 

¨   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                                          to                                         

 

Commission File Number: 000-26579

 


 

TIBCO SOFTWARE INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware   77-0449727

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

3303 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

(650) 846-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share

(Title of Class)

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based upon the closing sale price of such shares on the Nasdaq National Market on May 30, 2003) was approximately $438,828,204. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each entity that owns 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

 

As of January 14, 2004, there were 213,809,794 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 15, 2004 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent stated herein.

 



Table of Contents

TIBCO SOFTWARE INC. FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2003

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

          Page

PART I     

ITEM 1.

   BUSINESS    3

ITEM 2.

   PROPERTIES    9

ITEM 3.

   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS    10

ITEM 4.

   SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS    10
PART II     

ITEM 5.

   MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS    11

ITEM 6.

   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA    13

ITEM 7.

   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS    15

ITEM 7A.

   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK    39

ITEM 8.

   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA    40

ITEM 9.

   CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE    40

ITEM 9A.

   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES    40
PART III     

ITEM 10.

   DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT    41

ITEM 11.

   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION    42

ITEM 12.

   SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS    42

ITEM 13.

   CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS    42

ITEM 14.

   PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES    43
PART IV     

ITEM 15.

   EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K    44
     SIGNATURES    II-1

 

2


Table of Contents

Forward Looking Statements

 

This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations concerning matters that are not historical facts. Words such as “projects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “intends” and similar words and expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable but we cannot assure you that those expectations will prove to be correct. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expectations are disclosed in this report, including, without limitation, in the “Factors That May Affect Operating Results” described in Item 7. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by these factors and all related cautionary statements. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

 

Trademarks

 

TIBCO, TIBCO Software, TIBCO ActiveEnterprise, TIBCO Rendezvous, TIBCO SmartSockets, TIBCO BusinessWorks, TIBCO ActiveExchange, TIBCO ActivePortal and TIBCO BusinessFactor are the trademarks or registered trademarks of TIBCO Software Inc. in the United States and other countries. This report also refers to the trademarks of other companies.

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

 

Overview

 

Our suite of business integration software solutions makes us a leading enabler of real-time business. We use the term “real-time business” to refer to those companies that use current information in their businesses to execute their critical business processes. Our business integration solutions include products that provide business process visualization and management, and application integration capability, giving businesses the ability to connect and coordinate their applications, employees, partners and customers and automate their business processes from end-to-end within the enterprise. This allows our customers to better automate, monitor, analyze, understand, and modify the business activities that span those systems and people so they can better respond to problems and opportunities. Our products do this by enabling computer systems to interact with each other in real-time, automating processes that span those systems, and by giving people the ability to monitor and interact with information and processes.

 

Our products can make corporate assets such as applications and databases more effective and valuable by tying them together with a common framework and coordinating the interactions between them. Our products can lower IT costs by enabling companies to more quickly and easily create, manage and modify interactions. Our products can make companies more efficient by automating routine processes to allow their employees to focus their efforts on managing exceptional problems and opportunities. Our products can give managers and executives the information they need to identify and understand both the strengths and weaknesses of their business and external factors that shape their business, along with the ability to quickly reallocate their assets or adapt their operations to fix the problem or capitalize on the opportunity.

 

Our products are currently licensed by approximately 2,100 companies worldwide in diverse industries such as telecommunications, retail, healthcare, manufacturing, energy, transportation, logistics, financial services, government and insurance. We sell our products through a direct sales force and through alliances with leading software vendors and systems integrators.

 

Our objective is to establish TIBCO Software as the leading provider of business optimization, business integration and enterprise backbone software. The core elements of our strategy include providing our customers with a comprehensive suite of products and services, promoting the widespread adoption of our technology, leveraging our vertical market expertise, expanding our business in the financial services industry and pursuing strategic acquisitions to expand and strengthen our offerings. We believe we are the market leader among independent integration software companies. See “—Competition.”

 

3


Table of Contents

We operate through subsidiaries and offices throughout North America, Europe and the Pacific Rim. Where advantageous to us for business or other reasons, we conduct our business through wholly owned subsidiaries of TIBCO Software Inc. No individual subsidiary is material to our business as a whole.

 

Relationship with Reuters

 

We are the successor to a portion of the business of Teknekron Software Systems, Inc. Teknekron was acquired by Reuters Group PLC, a global information company (“Reuters”), in 1994. In January 1997, we were established as an entity separate from Teknekron. In connection with our establishment as a separate entity, Reuters transferred to us certain assets and liabilities related to its business and granted to us a royalty-free license to the intellectual property from which some of our products originated. Reuters also assigned to us at that time certain related license and service contracts.

 

As of November 30, 2003, Reuters owned approximately 49% of our outstanding capital stock and nominated one member of our Board of Directors. Through the third quarter of fiscal 2003, we had a license, distribution and maintenance agreement with Reuters pursuant to which Reuters was paying us certain minimum guaranteed distribution fees related to sales of our products to financial services market customers. Reuters’ obligations with respect to these minimum guaranteed distribution fees were to expire at the end of calendar 2003. Under our previous commercial agreement with Reuters, we were restricted from selling our products and providing consulting services directly to companies in the financial services market, except in limited circumstances. Accordingly, to date we have relied on Reuters and, to a lesser extent, other third-party resellers and distributors to sell our products to financial services market customers. In the past, when we did sell our products to financial services market customers other than through Reuters or when we resold Reuters’ products and services, we were required to pay certain fees to Reuters.

 

In October 2003, we entered into a new commercial agreement with Reuters relating to the licensing, distribution and maintenance of our products that replaced our original agreement with Reuters. This new agreement was the result of lengthy negotiations between Reuters and us and, because of Reuters’ relationship with us and its influence over our business, was approved by a special committee of our Board of Directors comprised solely of independent and disinterested directors.

 

Pursuant to this new agreement, Reuters will continue to act as a non-exclusive reseller of our products to certain specified customers in the financial services market until March 2005 and will pay us a distribution license fee equal to 60% of license revenue it receives from sales to such customers. Reuters may also continue to use our products internally and embed them into its solutions. We have agreed to provide certain fee-based support services to Reuters for TIBCO products Reuters uses internally and may provide additional support services if purchased by Reuters. We will now have the right to market and sell our products, other than risk management and market data distribution products, directly and through third party resellers (other than four specified resellers) to customers in the financial services market. The limitations on our ability to sell risk management and market data distribution products and to resell through the specified resellers will expire in May 2008. Reuters has agreed to continue to pay us minimum guaranteed fees in the amount of $5 million per quarter through March 2005. The quarterly minimum guaranteed fees will be reduced by an amount equal to 10% of the license and maintenance revenues from our sales to financial services companies (or, in the case of customers transitioned to us by Reuters, 40% of our maintenance revenue from such customers for up to one year after effectiveness of the agreement). Furthermore, Reuters began transitioning maintenance and support of our products for its customers, as well as associated revenue, upon entering into the new agreement. As a result, we began providing maintenance and support services directly to customers transitioned from Reuters in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. In addition to acting as a reseller of our products in the financial services market, Reuters will be eligible to receive a fee of between 5% and 20% of revenue from sales to approved customers referred to us by Reuters, depending upon the level of assistance Reuters provides in supporting the sale.

 

We are also party to a stockholders agreement with Reuters, Cisco Systems, Mayfield and Vivek Ranadivé, our President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which Reuters has a consent right with respect to certain

 

4


Table of Contents

fundamental decisions, including issuances by us of specified amounts of stock, acquisitions and other significant transactions, has additional rights with respect to board representation and registration of certain TIBCO shares, and has certain financial information and inspection rights. Specifically, Reuters has the right to nominate three directors for election to our board of directors; however, today only one member of our board is a Reuters’ representative. Reuters’ consent right with respect to fundamental decisions will terminate at such time as Reuters ownership interest in TIBCO falls below 30%. Reuters’ board representation rights and information and inspection rights also terminate at various times when Reuters’ ownership interest falls below certain levels.

 

In October 2003, we entered into a Registration and Repurchase Agreement with Reuters. Pursuant to the terms of that agreement, we filed a registration statement during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, which was declared effective in January 2004, to register a portion of the common stock held by Reuters for resale to the public market. Pursuant to the agreement, if Reuters sells more than $100 million of our common stock held by it in a single transaction, we have agreed to repurchase an equal amount of common stock at the same price which the shares are sold to the public, up to a maximum of $115 million. Reuters has agreed to pay certain expenses incurred in connection with the registration and repurchase. Reuters’ additional rights with respect to registration of its shares of our common stock, board representation and approval rights with respect to certain fundamental corporate decisions by us remain unchanged.

 

TIBCO® Products

 

We sell a wide range of products that address different elements of business integration and optimization. All of our products can be sold individually to solve specific technical challenges, but the emphasis of our product development and sales efforts is to create products that interoperate seamlessly and that can be sold together as a complete solution to business problems.

 

Our products are marketed and sold as part of our TIBCO ActiveEnterprise standards-based platform for real-time business. TIBCO ActiveEnterprise is a comprehensive set of solutions comprised of three categories of software: business optimization software, business integration software and enterprise backbone software.

 

    Business Optimization Software: Our business optimization software automatically routes information to appropriate recipients, lets users access up-to-date information whenever they need it, and provides users with the ability to analyze and act on information. This helps line-level employees perform their jobs, helps managers identify and analyze problems and opportunities, and gives customers the ability to get accurate and consistent information directly or through salespeople, service personnel or customer care representatives.

 

    Business Integration Software: We provide complete business integration capabilities that enable companies to connect any number or variety of endpoints, coordinate processes of any level of complexity, and streamline activities across technological, organizational, and geographical boundaries. TIBCO ActiveEnterprise gives companies the flexibility to do these things using whatever standards or technologies best meet their needs in specific situations (such as HTTP, e-mail, J2EE, EDI, Messaging, .Net, or Web Services) without replacing existing technologies or committing to any one technology across their enterprise.

 

    Enterprise Backbone Software: Our enterprise backbone solution lets businesses establish and manage a flow of real-time event-driven information across their enterprise, allowing the guaranteed delivery of data, the ability to deliver information to very large numbers of recipients or the ability to quickly and easily add or modify senders and receivers of data. Our enterprise backbone solution complements standards and technologies with the ability to deliver information across businesses with superior performance and flexibility.

 

5


Table of Contents

Services

 

Professional Services

 

Our professional services offerings include a wide range of consulting services such as systems planning and design, custom development and systems integration for the rapid deployment of TIBCO products. We offer our professional services with the initial deployment of our products as well as on an ongoing basis to address the continuing needs of our customers. Our professional services staff is located throughout North America, Europe and the Pacific Rim, enabling us to perform installations and respond to customer demands rapidly across our global customer base. Many of our professional services employees have advanced degrees, substantial TIBCO experience and industry expertise in systems architecture and design and also have domain expertise in manufacturing, telecommunications, energy, logistics, healthcare, financial services and other industries.

 

We also have relationships with resellers, professional service organizations and system integrators including Accenture, Cap Gemini/Ernst & Young, Deloitte Consulting and BearingPoint, to cooperate in the deployment of our products to customers. These relationships help promote TIBCO products and provide additional technical expertise to enable us to provide the full range of professional services our customers require to deploy our products.

 

Maintenance and Support

 

We offer a suite of software support and maintenance options that are designed to meet the needs of our diverse customer base. These support options include twenty-four hour coverage that is available seven days a week, 365 days a year, to meet the needs of our global customers. To accomplish this level of support we have established a worldwide support organization with major support centers in Palo Alto, California; London, England; and Sydney, Australia. These centers, working in conjunction with several smaller support offices located throughout the United States, Japan and India, provide seamless support using a “follow-the-sun” support model. In addition to support teams around the globe, we have a Customer Support Website that provides our customers with the ability to submit service requests, receive confirmation that a service request has been opened and to obtain current status on these requests. Additionally, the Customer Support Website provides access to our support procedures, escalation numbers and late breaking news (LBN). LBN is used to provide updates and new information about our products.

 

Training

 

We provide a comprehensive and global training program for customers and partners. Training is available at our main office in Palo Alto and at major training centers in Cambridge, Massachusetts; Houston, Texas; Munich, Germany; and Tokyo, Japan. We also deliver training on-site at customer locations. We provide specialized training for our professional services partners to enhance their effectiveness in integrating our products. Our Educational Services group has the capability to develop solutions to address the specific needs of individual customers and partners. Our curriculum leads to an industry recognized technical certification in high visibility TIBCO technologies.

 

Sales and Marketing

 

Sales

 

We currently market our software and services primarily through a direct sales organization complemented by indirect sales channels. Our direct sales force is located in nineteen U.S. cities and in twenty-one locations internationally across North America, Europe and the Pacific Rim and operates globally through our foreign subsidiaries. We have established distribution and licensing relationships with several strategic hardware vendors, database providers, software and toolset developers and systems integrators. We have also developed alliances with key solution providers to target vertical industry sectors, including energy, telecommunications and manufacturing.

 

6


Table of Contents

Under the terms of our original commercial agreement with Reuters, we were restricted from selling our products to customers in the financial services market. Pursuant to the terms of the new agreement with Reuters, we are now permitted to market and sell our products, other than risk management and market data distribution products, directly and through third party resellers (other than four specified resellers) to customers in the financial services market. Reuters will continue to act as a non-exclusive reseller of our products to certain specified customers through March 2005, and will pay us a distribution license fee equal to 60% of license revenue it receives from sales to such customers. Reuters may continue to internally use and embed our products in its solutions. The limitations on our ability to sell risk management and market data distribution products and to resell through the specified resellers will expire in May 2008. The distribution relationship with Reuters accounted for 12%, 9% and 8% of our total revenue in each of fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

 

Our revenue consists primarily of license and maintenance fees from our customers and distributors, including fees from Reuters pursuant to our license agreement, both of which were primarily attributable to sales of our TIBCO ActiveEnterprise product suite. License fees represented approximately 53%, 58% and 67% of our total revenue in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Revenue from services and maintenance represented approximately 47%, 42% and 33% of our total revenues in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

 

Sales to customers outside North America totaled $126.5 million for the year ended November 30, 2003. For a geographic breakdown of our revenue and long-lived assets, see note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

 

Marketing

 

We use a mix of market research, analyst updates, seminars, direct mail, print advertising, trade shows, speaking engagements, public relations, customer newsletters and web marketing in order to achieve our marketing goals. Our marketing department also produces collateral material for distribution to potential customers including presentation materials, white papers, brochures and fact sheets. We also host annual user conferences for our customers and provide support to our channel partners with a variety of programs, training and product marketing support materials.

 

Product Development

 

Reuters has granted us a perpetual, royalty-free license to The Information Bus (TIB) messaging technology as it existed on December 31, 1996. We have concentrated our product development efforts since then on further developing this technology and on developing new products. We expect that most of our enhancements to existing products and new products will be developed internally. However, we will evaluate on an ongoing basis the acquisition of externally developed technologies for integration into our product lines.

 

We expect that a majority of our research and development activities will focus on enhancing and extending our TIBCO products. In fiscal 2003, we continued our development focus on creating products that interoperate seamlessly. We expect that we will continue to commit significant resources to product development in the future. Product development costs are recorded as research and development expenses. Our research and development expenses were $64.6 million, $72.3 million and $91.0 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. To date, all product development costs have been expensed as incurred.

 

Competition

 

The market for our products and services is extremely competitive, continually evolving and subject to rapid change. While we offer a comprehensive suite of integration solutions and believe we are the market leader among independent integration software companies, we compete with various providers of integration products including BEA, IBM, Microsoft, SeeBeyond, Vitria and webMethods. We believe that none of these companies has a suite of integration products as complete as ours, but IBM, Microsoft and BEA offer products outside our

 

7


Table of Contents

segment and routinely bundle their broader set of products. We expect additional competition from other established and emerging companies. In addition, we may face pricing pressures from our current competitors and new market entrants in the future. We believe that the competitive factors affecting the market for our products and services include product functionality and features, quality of professional services offerings, performance and price, ease of product implementation, quality of customer support services, customer training and documentation, and vendor and product reputation. The relative importance of each of these factors depends upon the specific customer environment. We believe that our products and services currently compete favorably with respect to such factors. However, we may not be able to maintain our competitive position against current and potential competitors.

 

Some of our current competitors have, and some of our potential customers may have, longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, product development and marketing resources, greater name recognition and larger customer bases than we do. Our present or future competitors may be able to develop products comparable or superior to those we offer, adapt more quickly than we do to new technologies, evolving industry trends or customer requirements, or devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we do. Accordingly, we may not be able to compete effectively in our markets, or competition may intensify and harm our business and operating results. If we are not successful in developing new products and enhancements to our existing products or achieving customer acceptance, our gross margins may decline, and our business and operating results may suffer.

 

Our license agreement with Reuters does not prohibit Reuters from providing enterprise infrastructure software products and services in competition with us. Under the terms of our new license agreement with Reuters, we have the right to market and sell our products, other than risk management and market data distribution products, directly and through third party resellers (other than four specified resellers) to customers in the financial services market. The limitations on our ability to sell risk management and market data distribution products to financial services customers and to resell through the four specified resellers will expire in May 2008. Reuters may continue to sell our products to certain financial services companies until March 2005. In addition, pursuant to the license agreement, Reuters will continue to have access to the source code for TIBCO Rendezvous® through 2011 and to TIBCO SmartSockets until March 2005. Although Reuters currently does not create TIB-based products designed for general use in all markets, if Reuters were to decide to begin providing information integration products and services in our markets, we would face additional competition for customers in these markets.

 

Proprietary Technology

 

Our success is dependent upon our proprietary software technology. We license the patents relating to some of the technology underlying some of our software, including TIBCO Rendezvous, from Reuters on a royalty-free basis. Consequently, we can assert infringement of these patents only through Reuters or with the consent of Reuters. We have several pending patent applications and four issued patents, although we rely principally on trade secret, copyright and trademark laws, and nondisclosure and other contractual agreements to protect our technology. We also believe that factors such as the technological and creative skills of our personnel, product enhancements and new product developments are essential to establishing and maintaining a technology leadership position. We enter into confidentiality and/or license agreements with our employees, distributors and customers, and limit access to and distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information. Nevertheless, the steps we have taken may fail to prevent misappropriation of our technology, and the protections we have may not prevent our competitors from developing products with functionality or features similar to our products.

 

Furthermore, third parties might independently develop competing technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies. In addition, effective patent, copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries where we operate. If we fail to protect our proprietary technology, our business could be seriously harmed.

 

8


Table of Contents

Although we do not believe our products infringe the proprietary rights of any third parties, third parties may nevertheless assert infringement claims against our customers or us in the future. Furthermore, we may initiate claims or litigation against third parties for infringement of our proprietary rights or to establish the validity of our proprietary rights. Litigation, whether resolved in our favor or not, would cause us to incur substantial costs and divert our management resources from productive tasks, which would harm our business. Parties making claims against us could secure substantial damages, as well as injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to sell our products in the United States or abroad. Such a judgment could seriously harm our business. If it appears necessary or desirable, we may seek licenses to intellectual property if we believe that our technology potentially infringes on such intellectual property. We may not, however, be able to obtain such licenses on commercially reasonable terms or at all, and the terms of any offered licenses might not be acceptable to us. The failure to obtain necessary licenses or other rights could seriously harm our business. As the number of software products in our industry increases and the functionality of those products further overlaps, we believe that software developers may become increasingly subject to infringement claims.

 

Employees

 

As of November 30, 2003, we employed 895 persons, including 295 in sales and marketing, 214 in research and development, 144 in finance and administration and 242 in professional services and technical support. Of our 895 employees, 150 were located in Europe, 61 in the Pacific Rim and the balance in North America. Our success is highly dependent on our ability to attract and retain qualified employees. Competition for employees is intense in the software industry. To date, we believe we have been successful in our efforts to recruit qualified employees, but there is no assurance that we will continue to be as successful in the future. None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. We believe that our relationship with our employees is good.

 

Available Information

 

Our principal Internet address is www.tibco.com. We make available free of charge on www.tibco.com our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Information contained or referenced on our website is not incorporated by reference in and does not form a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

 

Our principal administrative, sales, marketing, service and research and development facilities are located in a four building campus totaling approximately 292,000 square feet in Palo Alto, California. We purchased these buildings in June 2003. In connection with the purchase, we entered into a 51-year lease of the land upon which the buildings are located. Further information on the terms of the building acquisition can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and note 5 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

 

In addition, we lease field support offices in 40 cities throughout the world. The field offices range from small executive offices to a 13,820 square foot facility. Lease terms range from month-to-month on certain executive offices to seven and a half years on certain direct leases. Because our professional services are generally performed at the client site, field facilities are generally small. Field facilities are generally used for periodic meetings, training, and administration and by account managers. Our principal field facilities are in Atlanta, Georgia; Beijing, China; Shanghai, China; Bethesda, Maryland; Brussels, Belgium; Calgary, Canada; Cambridge, Massachusetts; Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Chicago, Illinois; Columbus, Ohio; Dallas, Texas; Denver, Colorado; Falls Church, Virginia; Houston, Texas; Iselin, New Jersey; Lisbon, Portugal; London, England; Madrid, Spain; Melbourne, Australia; Milan, Italy; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Montreal, Canada;

 

9


Table of Contents

Munich, Germany; New York, New York; Newport Beach, California; Oslo, Norway; Paris, France; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Rome, Italy; Rotterdam, Netherlands; Seattle, Washington; Singapore; Seoul, Korea; Stockholm, Sweden; Sydney, Australia; Taipei, Taiwan; Tokyo, Japan; Toronto, Canada; Warrenville, Illinois and Woy Woy, Australia. We are continually evaluating the adequacy of existing facilities and additional facilities in new cities and we believe that suitable additional space will be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms as needed.

 

We have approximately 127,000 square feet under lease that is in excess of our requirements and we no longer occupy, do not intend to occupy, and plan to sublease. The estimated loss on subleases has been included in the excess facilities charges recorded in 2001 and 2002.

 

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

We, certain of our directors and officers and certain investment bank underwriters have been named in a putative class action for violation of the federal securities laws in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned “In re TIBCO Software Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.” This is one of a number of cases challenging underwriting practices in the initial public offerings (IPOs) of more than 300 companies, which have been coordinated for pretrial proceedings as “In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.” Plaintiffs generally allege that the underwriters engaged in undisclosed and improper underwriting activities, namely the receipt of excessive brokerage commissions and customer agreements regarding post-offering purchases of stock in exchange for allocations of IPO shares. Plaintiffs also allege that various investment bank securities analysts issued false and misleading analyst reports. The complaint against us claims that the purported improper underwriting activities were not disclosed in the registration statements for our IPO and secondary public offering and seeks unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class of persons who purchased our securities or sold put options during the time period from July 13, 1999 to December 6, 2000.

 

A lawsuit with similar allegations of undisclosed improper underwriting practices, and part of the same coordinated proceedings, is pending against Talarian Corporation (“Talarian”), which we acquired in 2002. That action is captioned “In re Talarian Corp. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.” The complaint against Talarian, certain of its underwriters, and certain of its former directors and officers claims that the purported improper underwriting activities were not disclosed in the registration statement for Talarian’s IPO and seeks unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class of persons who purchased Talarian securities during the time period from July 20, 2000 to December 6, 2000.

 

A proposal to settle the claims against all of the issuers and individual defendants in the coordinated litigation was conditionally accepted by us and Talarian on June 20, 2003. The completion of the settlement is subject to a number of conditions, including Court approval. Under the settlement, the plaintiffs will dismiss and release all claims against participating defendants in exchange for a contingent payment guaranty by the insurance companies collectively responsible for insuring the issuers in the action, and the assignment or surrender to the plaintiffs of certain claims the issuer defendants may have against the underwriters. Under the guaranty, the insurers will be required to pay an amount equal to $1.0 billion less any amounts ultimately collected by the plaintiffs from the underwriter defendants in all the cases. Unlike most of the defendant issuers’ insurance policies, including ours, Talarian’s policy contains a specific self-insured retention in the amount of $500,000 for IPO “laddering” claims, including those alleged in this matter. Thus, under the proposed settlement, if any payment is required under the insurers’ guaranty, Talarian would be responsible for paying its pro rata share of the shortfall, up to $500,000 of the self-insured retention remaining under its policy.

 

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.

 

10


Table of Contents

PART II

 

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

Market Information

 

Our common stock has been quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol TIBX since July 1999. The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the high and low intra-day sale prices per share of our common stock during the quarters indicated, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.

 

Fiscal 2002


   High

   Low

First Quarter (from December 1, 2001 to March 1, 2002)

   $ 16.90    $ 9.77

Second Quarter (from March 2, 2002 to May 31, 2002)

   $ 15.05    $ 5.70

Third Quarter (from June 1, 2002 to August 30, 2002)

   $ 6.62    $ 4.13

Fourth Quarter (from August 31, 2002 to November 30, 2002)

   $ 7.40    $ 3.28

Fiscal 2003


   High

   Low

First Quarter (from December 1, 2002 to February 28, 2003)

   $ 8.10    $ 4.51

Second Quarter (from March 1, 2003 to May 30, 2003)

   $ 5.60    $ 3.92

Third Quarter (from May 31, 2003 to August 29, 2003)

   $ 6.25    $ 4.39

Fourth Quarter (from August 30, 2003 to November 30, 2003)

   $ 6.80    $ 5.14

 

Holders of Record

 

We had 608 stockholders of record as of November 30, 2003.

 

Dividends

 

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table provides information as of November 30, 2003 about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our existing equity compensation plans, including the 1996 Stock Option Plan and the 1998 Director Option Plan.

 

The Extensibility Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, Talarian Corporation 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, Talarian Corporation 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, Talarian Corporation 1991 Stock Option Plan, White Barn, Inc. Stock Option Plan and White Barn, Inc. 2000 Equity Incentive Plans, under which we do not intend to grant any new options, were assumed upon our acquisition of other companies.

 

Plan Category


   Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)


  

Weighted-Average Exercise

Price of Outstanding Options,

Warrants and Rights

(b)


   Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities Reflected
in Column (a))
(c)


 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

   42,329,244    $ 7.18    19,359,366 (3)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(2)

   1,167    $ 17.35    389  
    
  

  

Total

   42,330,411    $ 7.18    19,359,755 (3)
    
  

  

 

11


Table of Contents

(1)   Our 1996 Stock Option Plan, which is included herein, provides for an annual increase in the number of shares available for issuance thereunder, on the first day of each fiscal year, equal to the least of (i) 60,000,000 shares, (ii) 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock on such date, or (iii) an amount determined by our board of directors.
(2)   Consists of options granted by Talarian Corporation (“Talarian”) to seven of its employees from November 1999 through March 2000 which we assumed in connection with our acquisition of Talarian in April 2002. Each option has a per share exercise price equal to the fair market value of a share of Talarian’s common stock on the date of grant (as determined by Talarian’s board of directors) and a term of ten years, and vests, contingent upon the continued employment of the optionee, as to 12.5% of the underlying shares six months after the date of grant and as to an additional 2.0833% of the underlying shares each month thereafter. We do not intend to grant any additional options or other equity awards under any assumed plans.
(3)   Includes 19,212,815 shares available for future issuance under our equity compensation plans and 146,551 shares available for future issuance under equity compensation plans we assumed in connection with our acquisitions of Extensibility Inc. and Talarian. We do not intend to grant any additional options or other equity awards under any assumed plans.

 

12


Table of Contents

ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

The selected consolidated financial data below have been derived from our audited financial statements. You should read the following table in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K. The historical results presented below are not indicative of any future results.

 

     Year Ended November 30,

 
     2003

   2002

    2001

    2000

    1999

 
     (in thousands, except per share amounts)  

Statement of Operations:

                                       

Revenue:

                                       

License revenue

   $ 140,509    $ 159,114     $ 216,757     $ 181,601     $ 56,916  

Service and maintenance revenue

     121,129      111,851       102,494       70,196       37,803  

Reimbursable expenses

     2,572      2,428       2,840       2,292       1,721  
    

  


 


 


 


Total revenue

     264,210      273,393       322,091       254,089       96,440  

Cost of revenue:

                                       

Stock-based compensation(1)

     201      527       977       3,025       1,113  

Other cost of revenue

     63,284      65,145       70,035       66,727       36,845  
    

  


 


 


 


Gross profit

     200,725      207,721       251,079       184,337       58,482  
    

  


 


 


 


Operating expenses:

                                       

Research and development:

                                       

Stock-based compensation(1)

     513      1,318       12,109       18,525       2,707  

Other research and development

     64,075      71,026       78,878       57,861       27,478  

Sales and marketing:

                                       

Stock-based compensation(1)

     276      1,286       10,128       33,637       4,281  

Other sales and marketing

     109,954      126,467       136,818       92,228       33,130  

General and administrative:

                                       

Stock-based compensation(1)

     73      919       3,751       1,729       1,151  

Other general and administrative

     20,261      21,406       22,799       18,489       8,229  

Acquired in-process research and development(2)

     —        2,400       —         2,260       2,800  

Restructuring charges(3)

     1,100      49,336       21,197       —         —    

Amortization of acquired intangibles(2)

     1,997      20,245       20,150       7,537       288  
    

  


 


 


 


Total operating expenses

     198,249      294,403       305,830       232,266       80,064  
    

  


 


 


 


Income (loss) from operations

     2,476      (86,682 )     (54,751 )     (47,929 )     (21,582 )

Interest income and other, net

     15,007      16,264       31,040       24,866       2,101  
    

  


 


 


 


Income (loss) before income taxes

     17,483      (70,418 )     (23,711 )     (23,063 )     (19,481 )

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes(4)

     6,043      24,162       (10,469 )     1,888       —    
    

  


 


 


 


Net income (loss)

   $ 11,440    $ (94,580 )   $ (13,242 )   $ (24,951 )   $ (19,481 )
    

  


 


 


 


Net income (loss) per share:

                                       

Basic

   $ 0.05    $ (0.46 )   $ (0.07 )   $ (0.14 )   $ (0.19 )
    

  


 


 


 


Weighted average common shares outstanding(5)

     211,555      205,821       195,001       184,177       104,112  
    

  


 


 


 


Net income (loss) per share:

                                       

Diluted

   $ 0.05    $ (0.46 )   $ (0.07 )   $ (0.14 )   $ (0.19 )
    

  


 


 


 


Weighted average common shares outstanding(5)

     222,519      205,821       195,001       184,177       104,112  
    

  


 


 


 


 

13


Table of Contents
     November 30,

     2003

   2002

   2001

   2000

   1999

     (in thousands)

Balance Sheet Data:

                                  

Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments

   $ 604,669    $ 637,853    $ 677,340    $ 582,900    $ 89,807

Working capital

     549,719      563,732      638,803      596,303      95,603

Total assets

     943,259      894,588      892,127      829,215      179,638

Long-term debt, less current portion

     51,853      —        —        —        —  

Stockholders’ equity

     762,794      744,727      771,279      729,535      137,918

(1)   See Notes 2 and 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an explanation of stock-based compensation.
(2)   See Notes 2 and 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an explanation of acquired in-process research and development and amortization of goodwill and acquired intangibles.
(3)   See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an explanation of restructuring charges.
(4)   See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an explanation of significant components of the benefit (provision) for income taxes.
(5)   See Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an explanation of shares used to compute net income (loss) per share.

 

14


Table of Contents
ITEM 7.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include those set forth in the following discussion, and, in particular, the risks discussed below under the subheading “Factors that May Affect Operating Results” and in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Unless required by law we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements.

 

Overview

 

Our suite of business integration software solutions makes us a leading enabler of real-time business. We use the term “real-time business” to refer to those companies that use current information in their businesses to execute their critical business processes. We are the successor to a portion of the business of Teknekron Software Systems, Inc. Teknekron developed software, known as the TIB technology, for the integration and delivery of market data, such as stock quotes, news and other financial information, in trading rooms of large banks and financial services institutions. In 1992, Teknekron expanded its development efforts to include solutions designed to enable complex and disparate manufacturing equipment and software applications—primarily in the semiconductor fabrication market—to communicate within the factory environment. Teknekron was acquired by Reuters Group PLC, the global information company, in 1994. Following the acquisition, continued development of the TIB technology was undertaken to expand its use in the financial services markets.

 

In January 1997, our company, TIBCO Software Inc., was established as an entity separate from Teknekron. We were formed to create and market software solutions for use in the integration of business information, processes and applications in diverse markets and industries outside the financial services sector. In connection with our establishment as a separate entity, Reuters transferred to us certain assets and liabilities related to our business and granted to us a royalty-free license to the intellectual property from which some of our messaging software products originated. Reuters also assigned to us at that time license and service contracts primarily within the high-tech manufacturing and energy markets, including contracts with NEC, Motorola, Mobil and Chevron.

 

Our products are currently licensed by approximately 2,100 companies worldwide in diverse industries such as telecommunications, retail, healthcare, manufacturing, energy, transportation, logistics, financial services, government and insurance. We sell our products through a direct sales force and through alliances with leading software vendors and systems integrators.

 

Our revenue in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001 consisted primarily of license and maintenance fees from our customers and distributors, including fees from Reuters pursuant to our license agreement, both of which were primarily attributable to sales of our TIBCO ActiveEnterprise product suite. In addition, we receive fees from our customers for providing project integration services. We also receive revenue from our strategic relationships with business partners who embed our products in their hardware and networking systems as well as from systems integrators who resell our products.

 

First-year maintenance typically is sold with the related software license and renewed on an annual basis thereafter. Maintenance revenue is determined based on vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value and amortized over the term of the maintenance contract, typically 12 months. Consulting and training revenues are recognized as the services are performed and are usually on a time and materials basis. Such services primarily consist of implementation services related to the installation of our products and generally do not include significant customization to or development of the underlying software code.

 

15


Table of Contents

Our revenue is derived from a diverse customer base, and no single customer represented greater than 10% of total revenue during fiscal 2002 or 2001. During fiscal 2003, Reuters represented 12% of total revenue. One customer, Federal Express, had a balance in excess of 10% of net accounts receivable at November 30, 2002. There were no customers with a balance in excess of 10% of net accounts receivable at November 30, 2001 or 2003. We establish allowances for doubtful accounts based on our evaluation of collectibility and an allowance for returns and discounts based on specifically identified credits and historical experience.

 

Since the first quarter of fiscal 2001, adverse general economic conditions and conditions in the enterprise software industry have impacted purchases of our products and services as uncertainty in our potential customers’ businesses increased. These conditions have caused our sales cycle to lengthen, customer budgets for research and development to decrease and customer purchases to be delayed or decreased in size. We expect these conditions in the general economy and in our industry to continue to adversely impact our customers’ ability to purchase our products and services for the foreseeable future. In response to these adverse business conditions, we initiated cost containment actions that included headcount reductions, abandonment of excess facilities and other cost reductions.

 

Relationship with Reuters

 

Reuters had been the primary distributor of our products to customers in the financial services segment since 1997. As of November 30, 2003, Reuters owned approximately 49% of our outstanding capital stock and nominated one member of our Board of Directors. Through the third quarter of fiscal 2003, we had a license, maintenance and distribution agreement with Reuters pursuant to which Reuters was paying us certain minimum guaranteed distribution fees related to sales of our products to financial services customers. Reuters’ obligations with respect to these minimum guaranteed distribution fees were to expire at the end of calendar 2003. Reuters’ guaranteed minimum distribution fees were $20.0 million for each of the calendar years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. These fees were recognized ratably in the period earned as related party revenue. In addition, our previous agreement with Reuters required us to provide Reuters with internal maintenance and support for a fee of $2.0 million per year plus an annual CPI-based increase. To date, this amount has been recognized ratably over the corresponding period as related party service and maintenance revenue.

 

Under our previous agreement with Reuters, we were restricted from selling our products and providing consulting services directly to companies in the financial services market, except in limited circumstances. Accordingly, to date we have relied on Reuters and, to a lesser extent, other third-party resellers and distributors to sell our products to financial services market customers. In the past, when we did sell our products to financial services market customers other than through Reuters or when we resold Reuters’ products and services, we were required to pay certain fees to Reuters, which were recorded as related party cost of revenue.

 

In October 2003, we entered into a new agreement with Reuters relating to the licensing, distribution and maintenance of our products that replaced our original agreement with Reuters. Pursuant to the terms of this new agreement, Reuters will continue to act as a non-exclusive reseller of our products to certain specified customers in the financial services market until March 2005 and will pay us a distribution license fee equal to 60% of license revenue it receives from sales to such customers. Reuters may also continue to use our products internally and embed them into its solutions. We have agreed to provide certain fee-based support services to Reuters for TIBCO products Reuters uses internally and may provide additional support services if purchased by Reuters. We will now have the right to market and sell our products, other than risk management and market data distribution products, directly and through third party resellers (other than four specified resellers) to customers in the financial services market. The limitations on our ability to sell risk management and market data distribution products and to resell through the specified resellers will expire in May 2008. Reuters has agreed to continue to pay us minimum guaranteed fees in the amount of $5.0 million per quarter through March 2005. The quarterly minimum guaranteed fees will be reduced by an amount equal to 10% of the license and maintenance revenues from our sales to financial services companies (or, in the case of customers transitioned to us by Reuters, 40% of our maintenance revenue from such customers for up to one year after effectiveness of the agreement).

 

16


Table of Contents

Reuters began transitioning maintenance and support of our products for its customers, as well as associated revenue, upon entering into the new agreement. As a result, we began providing maintenance and support services directly to customers transitioned from Reuters in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. Consequently, service and maintenance revenue and associated costs increased as a result of our assumption of Reuters’ contracts in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and we expect these increases to continue through at least fiscal 2004. To the extent, as a result of our increased service and maintenance obligations, our cost of revenue increases faster than our service and maintenance revenue, our gross margins will be adversely affected.

 

In addition to acting as a reseller of our products in the financial services market, Reuters will be eligible to receive a fee of between 5% and 20% of revenue from sales to approved customers referred to us by Reuters, depending upon the level of assistance Reuters provides in supporting the sale.

 

Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates

 

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the annual consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended November 30, 2003. We believe our most critical accounting policies and estimates include the following:

 

    revenue recognition;

 

    allowance for doubtful accounts, returns and discounts;

 

    accrued restructuring costs;

 

    accounting for income taxes;

 

    valuation of long-lived and intangible assets; and

 

    accounting for investments.

 

Revenue Recognition.    We recognize license revenue when a signed contract or other persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the software has been shipped or electronically delivered, the license fee is fixed or determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. When contracts contain multiple elements wherein vendor specific objective evidence exists for all undelivered elements, we account for the delivered elements in accordance with the “Residual Method” prescribed by AICPA Statement of Position 98-9. Revenue from subscription license agreements, which include software, rights to future products and maintenance, is recognized ratably over the term of the subscription period. Revenue on shipments to resellers, when subject to certain rights of return and price protection, is recognized when the products are sold by the resellers to the end-user customer.

 

We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured at the time of the transaction. In determining whether the fee is fixed or determinable we compare the payment terms of the transaction to our normal payment terms. If a significant portion of a fee is due after our normal payment terms, we account for the fee as not being fixed or determinable and recognize revenue as the payments become due. We assess whether collection is reasonably assured based on a number of factors, including the customer’s past transaction history and credit-worthiness. Generally, we do not request collateral from our customers. If we determine that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, we defer the fee and recognize revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash.

 

17


Table of Contents

First-year maintenance typically is sold with the related software license and renewed on an annual basis thereafter. For such arrangements with multiple obligations, we allocate revenue to each component of the arrangement based on the fair value of the undelivered elements. Fair values of ongoing maintenance and support obligations are based on separate sales of renewals to other customers or upon renewal rates quoted in the contracts when the quoted renewal rates are deemed to be substantive. Maintenance revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance and support period. Fair value of services, such as consulting or training, is based upon separate sales of these services. Consulting and training services are generally billed based on hourly rates and revenues are generally recognized as the services are performed. Consulting services primarily consist of implementation services related to the installation of our products and generally do not include significant customization to or development of the underlying software code. The determination as to whether services involve significant production, modification or customization of the underlying software code is a matter of judgment and can materially impact the timing of revenue recognition.

 

Significant management judgments and estimates must be made in connection with determination of the revenue to be recognized in any accounting period. If we made different judgments or utilized different estimates for any period, material differences in the amount and timing of revenue recognized could result.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Returns and Discounts.    We establish allowances for doubtful accounts, returns and discounts based on our review of credit profiles of our customers, contractual terms and conditions, current economic trends and historical payment, return and discount experience. We reassess the allowances for doubtful accounts, returns and discounts each period. Historically our actual losses and credits have been consistent with these provisions. However, unexpected events or significant future changes in trends could result in a material impact to our future statements of operations and of cash flows. If we made different judgments or utilized different estimates for any period, material differences in the amount and timing of revenue or bad debt expense recognized could result. Our allowances for doubtful accounts, returns and discounts as a percentage of net revenues were 0.8%, 1.2% and 1.1% in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Based on our results for the year ended November 30, 2003, a one-percentage point deviation in our allowances for doubtful accounts, returns and discounts as a percentage of net revenues would have resulted in an increase or decrease in revenue and/or expense of approximately $2.6 million.

 

Accrued Restructuring Costs.    During fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2002, we recorded restructuring charges to align our cost structure with changing market conditions. Our restructuring plan resulted in a reduction in headcount and the consolidation of facilities through the closing of excess field offices and relocation of corporate offices into one campus. Our restructuring charges included accruals for the estimated loss on facilities that we intend to sublease based on estimates of the timing and amount of sublease income and the non-cash write-down of leasehold improvements. We reassess this liability each period based on market conditions. Revisions to our estimates of this liability could materially impact our operating results and financial position in future periods if anticipated events and key assumptions, such as the timing and amounts of sublease rental income, either change or do not materialize. As of November 30, 2003, a $0.50 square-foot per month change in our estimate of sublease income for space not yet sublet would have resulted in an increase or decrease in our accruals for excess facilities of approximately $2.0 million. Vacancy rates for commercial properties in the San Francisco Bay Area remain at high levels and there can be no assurance we will be successful in securing sublease income currently anticipated in our accrual for excess facilities.

 

Accounting for Income Taxes.    As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves us estimating our current tax exposure under currently enacted tax laws and assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheet. We must also assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and, to the extent we believe that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change the allowance

 

18


Table of Contents

in a period, we must reflect the corresponding increase or decrease within the tax provision in the statement of operations. A full valuation allowance is currently held against our net deferred tax assets because management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized through the generation of future taxable income. Our deferred tax assets include net operating losses relating to acquired businesses and the exercise of employee stock-options for which any change in associated valuation allowance will be recorded as an adjustment to goodwill and a credit to additional paid-in-capital, respectively. We also do not provide for taxes on undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, as it is our intention to reinvest undistributed earnings indefinitely.

 

Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and our future taxable income for purposes of assessing our ability to realize any future benefit from our deferred tax assets. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, our operating results and financial position could be materially affected. Due to our history of losses, as of November 30, 2003, we hold a full valuation allowance in the amount of $237.8 million against our net deferred tax assets. If we were to fully release our valuation allowance, we estimate that approximately $33.9 million of the change would result in an income tax benefit, approximately $11.2 million would be credited to goodwill and approximately $192.7 million relating to stock option exercises and related tax credits would be credited directly to additional paid-in capital. The following analysis demonstrates the potential effect the full release of our valuation allowance would have upon our consolidated financial statements and is not intended to provide a range of exposure or expected deviation (in thousands, except per share data):

 

    

Management’s

2003

Estimate


  

100%

Release of

Valuation

Allowance


 

Valuation allowance

   $ 237,834      —    

Income before income taxes

   $ 17,483    $ 17,483  

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

   $ 6,043    $ (27,857 )

Net income

   $ 11,440    $ 45,340  

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 0.05    $ 0.21  

 

Valuation of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets.    We assess long-lived and other intangible assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the assets. If we determine that the carrying value of long-lived and other intangible assets may not be recoverable we measure impairment by using the projected discounted cash-flow method. As of November 30, 2003, we have not recorded an impairment charge against our long-lived or other intangible assets.

 

On December 1, 2002 we adopted the remaining provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” as related to goodwill and intangibles acquired prior to July 1, 2002. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are no longer amortized but, instead, tested for impairment annually or sooner if circumstances indicate that it might not be recoverable. Additionally, workforce no longer qualifies as a separately identifiable intangible and was reclassified as goodwill. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 resulted in the cessation of approximately $4.7 million in goodwill amortization per quarter including reclassified amounts at the time of implementation. In conjunction with adopting SFAS No. 142, we have determined that based on our current operations we operate in a single reporting unit. Accordingly we have performed the impairment assessment required under SFAS No. 142 at the enterprise level. We have used the market approach to assess the fair value of the enterprise. As of November 30, 2003, we have $103.0 million of goodwill and have not recorded any goodwill impairment charges. If our estimates or the related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of these assets. Changes in the valuation of goodwill could be substantial.

 

19


Table of Contents

Accounting for Investments.    We determine the appropriate classification of marketable securities at the time of purchase and evaluate such designation as of each balance sheet date. As of November 30, 2003, $521.4 million of marketable securities have been classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, if any, included as a component of “accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” in stockholders’ equity. Marketable securities are presented as current assets as we expect to use them within one year in current operations even though some have scheduled maturities of greater than one year. Realized gains and losses are recognized based on the “specific identification method”.

 

Our investments also include minority equity investments in privately held companies that are generally carried at cost basis and included in other assets on the balance sheet. The fair value of these investments are dependent on the performance of the companies in which we invested, as well as the volatility inherent in external markets for these investments. In assessing potential impairment, we consider these factors as well as each of the companies’ cash position, earnings/revenue outlook, stock price performance, liquidity and management/ownership. If we believe that an other-than-temporary decline exists, we write down the investment to market value and record the related write-down as a loss on investments in our consolidated statement of operations. During fiscal 2003 and 2002, we recognized impairment losses of $0.3 million and $11.4 million, respectively, relating to the other-than-temporary decline in value of certain equity investments. As of November 30, 2003, minority equity investments totaled $1.5 million.

 

Significant management judgment is required in determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in the value of our investments exists. Estimating the fair value of non-marketable equity investments in early-stage technology companies is inherently subjective. Changes in our assessment of the valuation of our investments could materially impact our operating results and financial position in future periods if anticipated events and key assumptions do not materialize or change.

 

20


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain financial information as a percentage of total revenue:

 

     Year Ended November 30,

 
     2003

    2002

    2001

 

Revenue:

                  

License revenue:

                  

Non-related parties

   46 %   53 %   61 %

Related parties

   7     5     6  
    

 

 

Total license revenue

   53     58     67  
    

 

 

Software and maintenance revenue:

                  

Non-related parties

   40     36     29  

Related parties

   6     5     3  

Reimbursable expenses

   1     1     1  
    

 

 

Total software and maintenance revenue

   47     42     33  
    

 

 

Total revenue

   100     100     100  
    

 

 

Cost of revenue:

                  

Stock-based compensation

   —       —       —    

Other cost of revenue non-related parties

   23     23     21  

Other cost of revenue related parties

   1     1     1  
    

 

 

Total cost of revenue

   24     24     22  
    

 

 

Gross profit

   76     76     78  
    

 

 

Operating expenses:

                  

Research and development:

                  

Stock-based compensation

   —       —       4  

Other research and development

   24     26     25  

Sales and marketing:

                  

Stock-based compensation

   —       —       3  

Other sales and marketing

   42     47     42  

General and administrative:

                  

Stock-based compensation

   —       —       1  

Other general and administrative

   8     8     7  

Acquired in-process research and development

   —       1     —    

Restructuring charge

   —       18     7  

Amortization of goodwill and acquired intangibles

   1     7     6  
    

 

 

Total operating expenses

   75     107     95  
    

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

   1     (31 )   (17 )

Interest and other income, net

   5     5     10  
    

 

 

Net income (loss) before income taxes

   6     (26 )   (7 )

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

   2     9     (3 )
    

 

 

Net income (loss)

   4 %   (35 )%   (4 )%
    

 

 

 

21


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

 

Total Revenue

 

     November 30,

 
    

2003


    Change

   

2002


    Change

   

2001


 
       $

    %

      $

    %

   
     (in thousands, except percentages)  

Total revenue

   $ 264,210     $ (9,183 )   (3.4 )%   $ 273,393     $ (48,698 )   (15.1 )%   $ 322,091  

As percent of total revenue

     100 %     —       —         100 %     —       —         100 %

 

Total revenue decreased 3.4% for the year ended November 30, 2003 compared to the prior year and 15.1% for the year ended November 30, 2002 compared to the year ended November 30, 2001. This decrease in total revenue was due primarily to the global economic slowdown and a reduction in information technology spending in general. Revenue from Reuters accounted for 12%, 9% and 8% of our total revenue in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. In fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, revenue from Reuters was $30.7 million, $25.3 million and $25.6 million, respectively, consisting primarily of fees under our license agreement with Reuters. Revenue from Reuters includes minimum guaranteed fees of $5.0 million per quarter, which Reuters has agreed to continue to pay through March 2005, as discussed in “—Relationship with Reuters.”

 

License Revenue

 

     November 30,

 
    

2003


    Change

   

2002


    Change

   

2001


 
       $

    %

      $

    %

   
     (in thousands, except percentages)  

License revenue

   $ 140,509     $ (18,605 )   (11.7 )%   $ 159,114     $ (57,643 )   (26.6 )%   $ 216,757  

As percent of total revenue

     53.2 %     —       (5.0 )%     58.2 %     —       (9.1 )%     67.3 %

 

License revenue decreased 11.7% for the year ended November 30, 2003 compared to the prior year. This decrease was due primarily to the global economic slowdown and a reduction in information technology spending in general. In particular, many telecommunication customers have reduced spending on deployments of our technology from 2002 levels. While the total number of license revenue transactions over $100,000 has increased from 206 to 225, the average deal size has decreased from approximately $604,000 in 2002 to approximately $440,000 in 2003.

 

License revenue decreased 26.6% for the year ended November 30, 2002 compared to the prior year. The decrease in license revenue was due to slowing sales in a weakened global economy. The total number of license revenue transactions over $100,000 has decreased from 234 in fiscal 2001 to 206 in fiscal 2002, and there was a corresponding decrease in average deal size from approximately $790,000 to $604,000.

 

We expect that license revenues will remain relatively constant as a percentage of total revenue in fiscal 2004.

 

Service and Maintenance Revenue

 

     November 30,

 
    

2003


    Change

   

2002


    Change

   

2001


 
       $

   %

      $

   %

   
     (in thousands, except percentages)  

Service and maintenance revenue

   $ 123,701     $ 9,422    8.2 %   $ 114,279     $ 8,945    8.5 %   $ 105,334  

As percent of total revenue

     46.8 %     —      5.0 %     41.8 %     —      9.1 %     32.7 %

 

Service and maintenance revenue increased for the year ended November 30, 2003 compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily due to an increased installed software base, which resulted in increase

 

22


Table of Contents

maintenance revenue. During the year ended November 30, 2003, we added approximately 259 new customers to our customer base as existing at November 30, 2002.

 

Reuters began transitioning maintenance and support of our products for its customers, as well as associated revenue, to us upon entering into the new agreement. As a result, we began providing maintenance and support services directly to customers transitioned from Reuters in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. Consequently, service and maintenance revenue and associated costs increased as a result of our assumption of Reuters’ contracts in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and we expect these increases to continue through at least fiscal 2004.

 

Service and maintenance revenue increased for the year ended November 30, 2002 compared to the prior year. This increase was primarily the result of additional maintenance revenue related to the growth in our installed software base, partially offset by a $1.3 million decrease in service revenue.

 

We expect that service and maintenance revenue will grow in absolute dollars and will remain relatively consistent as a percentage of total revenue in fiscal 2004.

 

Cost of Revenue, Excluding Stock-Based Compensation

 

Cost of revenue consists primarily of salaries, third party contractor and associated expenses related to providing project integration services, the cost of providing maintenance and customer support services, royalties and product fees as well as the amortization of technologies acquired through corporate acquisitions. The majority of our cost of revenue is directly related to our service revenue.

 

     November 30,

 
    

2003


    Change

   

2002


    Change

   

2001


 
       $

    %

      $

    %

   
     (in thousands, except percentages)  

Cost of revenue, excluding stock-based compensation

   $ 63,284     $ (1,861 )   (2.9 )%   $ 65,145     $ (4,890 )   (7.0 )%   $ 70,035  

As percent of total revenue

     24.0 %     —       0.2 %     23.8 %     —       2.1 %     21.7 %

 

The decrease in absolute dollars in fiscal 2003 as compared to the prior year resulted primarily from lower compensation, royalties, and travel costs, which were partially offset by increased internal consulting costs. Compensation expenses decreased by $2.6 million as a result of a reduction in services and customer support staff. A decreased level of travel in addition to renegotiated arrangements with travel providers resulted in a savings of approximately $1.2 million in travel costs. The purchase of our corporate facilities resulted in a net savings of approximately $1.1 million. Royalty payments for licensed technologies embedded in our products decreased approximately $1.1 million primarily due to the mix of products sold during the period and renegotiated agreements with these suppliers. We periodically deploy consulting engineers for certain sales and marketing activities, the costs for which we then classify as sales and marketing expense. We utilized fewer engineers on sales and marketing activities, which offset the cost of revenue savings in fiscal 2003 by $4.9 million.

 

The decrease in cost of revenue in fiscal 2002 as compared to the prior year resulted primarily from a decrease in the use of third party contractors and lower commissions partially offset by an increase in internal consulting activities. Termination or renegotiation of agreements with third party contractors resulted in savings of approximately $4.1 million. Commissions decreased by approximately 3.7 million due to an overall lower level of sales upon which fees were payable. In 2002, certain development personnel were deployed to assist on consulting projects. The costs for these personnel were classified as cost of revenue and resulted in an offsetting $1.3 million increase in cost of revenue as compared to 2001.

 

We expect that cost of revenue will grow in absolute dollars and will remain relatively consistent as a percentage of total revenue in fiscal 2004.

 

23


Table of Contents

Research and Development Expenses, Excluding Stock-Based Compensation

 

Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel, third party contractors and related costs associated with the development and enhancement of our suite of products.

 

     November 30,

 
    

2003


    Change

   

2002


    Change

   

2001


 
       $

    %

      $

    %

   
     (in thousands, except percentages)  

Research and development expenses, excluding stock-based compensation

   $ 64,075     $ (6,951 )   (9.8 )%   $ 71,026     $ (7,852 )   (10.0 )%   $ 78,878  

As percent of total revenue

     24.3 %     —       (1.7 )%     26.0 %     —       (1.5 )%     24.5 %

 

The decrease in fiscal 2003 compared to the prior year was due primarily to a reduction in the cost of third-party contractors in the amount of $4.0 million and lower compensation costs of $1.4 million. In addition, the purchase of our corporate facilities resulted in a net savings of approximately $2.4 million for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003.

 

The decrease in fiscal year 2002 compared to the prior year was primarily due to the termination or renegotiation of agreements with many of our third party contractors resulting in a savings of approximately $9.2 million.

 

We believe that continued investment in research and development is critical to attaining our strategic objectives and, as a result, expect that spending on research and development will remain relatively stable in absolute dollars in fiscal 2004.

 

Sales and Marketing Expenses, Excluding Stock-Based Compensation

 

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel and related costs of our direct sales force and marketing staff and the cost of marketing programs, including customer conferences, promotional materials, trade shows and advertising.

 

     November 30,

 
    

2003


    Change

   

2002


    Change

   

2001


 
       $

    %

      $

    %

   
     (in thousands, except percentages)  

Sales and marketing expenses, excluding stock-based compensation

   $ 109,954     $ (16,513 )   (13.1 )   $ 126,467     $ (10,351 )   (7.6 )%   $ 136,818  

As percent of total revenue

     41.6 %     —       (4.7 )%     46.3 %     —       3.8 %     42.5 %

 

The decrease in fiscal 2003 as compared to the prior year resulted primarily from lower internal consulting, travel, commission and promotion costs and referral payments to our integration partners. Several of our consulting engineers were utilized for sales and marketing activities in fiscal 2002, which was not repeated in fiscal 2003 resulting in approximately $4.1 million of cost savings. An increased emphasis on internally generated sales resulted in a decrease in referral fees to integration partners of $1.3 million. A $2.4 million decrease in commissions expense is mainly attributable to lower commissionable sales. A decreased level of travel in addition to renegotiated arrangements with travel providers resulted in a savings of approximately $2.8 million in travel costs. In addition, promotion costs decreased by approximately $2.4 million due to efficiencies gained from more specific and targeted advertising campaigns.

 

The decrease in fiscal 2002 as compared to the prior year was primarily due to decreases in sales commissions, travel and compensation costs. Sales commissions decreased approximately $7.3 million due to

 

24


Table of Contents

lower commissionable revenue. A decreased level of travel in addition to renegotiated arrangements with travel providers resulted in a savings of approximately $1.9 million in travel costs. In addition, compensation costs decreased by $1.7 million due to lower head count.

 

We intend to selectively increase staff in our direct sales organization and to create select product marketing programs and, accordingly, expect that sales and marketing expenditures will increase modestly in absolute dollars in fiscal 2004.

 

General and Administrative Expenses, Excluding Stock-Based Compensation

 

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and related costs for general corporate functions, including executive, legal, finance, accounting and human resources.

 

     November 30,

 
    

2003


    Change

   

2002


    Change

   

2001


 
       $

    %

      $

    %

   
     (in thousands, except percentages)  

General and administrative expenses, excluding stock-based compensation

   $ 20,261     $ (1,145 )   (5.4 )%   $ 21,406     $ (1,393 )   (6.1 )%   $ 22,799  

As percent of total revenue

     7.7 %     —       (0.1 )%     7.8 %     —       0.7 %     7.1 %

 

The decrease in fiscal 2003 as compared to the prior year was primarily due to approximately $3.1 million in savings from the purchase of our corporate facilities partially offset by increased compensation in the amount of $2.3 million.

 

The decrease in fiscal 2002 as compared to the prior year was primarily due to a decrease in bad debt and compensation expense of approximately $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

 

We believe that general and administrative expenses, exclusive of bad debt charges, will remain relatively stable in absolute dollars in fiscal 2004.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

Stock-based compensation expense principally relates to stock options assumed in acquisitions, stock options granted to consultants and the employer portion of payroll taxes due as a result of employee exercises of stock options. We account for employee stock-based compensation as discussed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options granted to consultants is recognized as earned using the multiple option method and is shown by expense category. At each reporting date, we re-value consultant stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. As a result, stock-based compensation expense will fluctuate as the fair market value of our common stock fluctuates. The employer portion of payroll taxes due as a result of employee exercises of stock options is included as a part of stock-based compensation expense in the period the option is exercised.

 

     November 30,

 
    

2003


    Change

   

2002


    Change

   

2001


 
       $

    %

      $

    %

   
     (in thousands, except percentages)  

Stock-based compensation expense

   $ 1,063     $ (2,987 )   (73.8 )%   $ 4,050     $ (22,915 )   (85.0 )%   $ 26,965  

As percent of total revenue

     0.4 %     —       (1.1 )%     1.5 %     —       (6.9 )%     8.4 %

 

 

The decrease in stock-based compensation in fiscal 2003 as compared to the prior year is primarily due to a $2.1 million decrease in employee- and acquisition-related stock-based compensation and a $1.3 million decrease in employer-required payroll taxes for stock option exercises.

 

25


Table of Contents

The decrease in stock-based compensation in fiscal 2002 as compared to the prior year is primarily due to a $23.2 million decrease in employee- and acquisition- related stock-based compensation.

 

Acquired In-Process Research and Development

 

     November 30,

 
    

2003


    Change

   

2002


    Change

   

2001


 
       $

    %

      $

   %

   
     (in thousands, except percentages)  

Acquired in-process research and development expense

   $ —       $ (2,400 )   (100.0 )%   $ 2,400     $ 2,400    100.0 %   $ —    

As percent of total revenue

     —   %     —       (0.9 )%     0.9 %     —      0.9 %     —   %

 

We estimated that $2.4 million of the purchase price of Talarian in fiscal 2002 represented acquired in-process research and development (“IPRD”) that had not yet reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use. Accordingly, this amount was immediately charged to expense upon consummation of the acquisition. We calculated the value of IPRD by estimating the expected cash flows from the projects once commercially viable, discounting the net cash flows back to their present value and then applying a percentage of completion. In determining the value ultimately assigned to IPRD we considered the stage of completion, complexity of work to date, difficulty of completing the remaining development, costs already incurred and the expected cost to complete the project. The projects have subsequently been completed within management’s estimates.

 

Restructuring Charge

 

During fiscal 2002 and 2001, we recorded restructuring charges totaling $70.5 million, consisting of $4.5 million for headcount reductions, $54.3 million for consolidation of facilities, $11.1 million for related write-down of leasehold improvements and $0.6 million of other related restructuring charges. These restructuring charges were recorded to align our cost structure with changing market conditions. We expect to benefit from a decrease in operating costs of approximately $9 million annually through 2010 as a result of rent expense savings from the consolidation of our facilities. The severance related actions are expected to decrease our salaries and benefits expenses by approximately $30 million annually. We recorded an additional accrual of $7.4 million in fiscal 2002 for the estimated losses on facilities acquired in connection with the acquisition of Talarian as acquisition integration costs, which were included in the purchase price. We are currently working with corporate real estate brokers to sublease unoccupied facilities.

 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2003, we recorded a restructuring charge of $1.1 million related to a reduction in headcount to further align our cost structure with changing market conditions. This reduction of approximately 44 employees was comprised of 60% sales and marketing staff, 5% general and administrative staff, and 35% research and development staff. This severance action is expected to reduce our salaries and benefits expenses by approximately $6 million annually. We do not expect the staff reductions, particularly those related to sales and marketing, to have an adverse impact on future sales. All severance related actions were completed by August 31, 2003.

 

26


Table of Contents

The following sets forth our accrued excess facilities costs as of November 30, 2003. These costs represent our estimated loss on abandoned facilities, net of sublease income, which we expect to pay over the next seven years. See Notes 9 and 12 of our notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

     Excess
Facilities


    Severance and
Other*


    Total

 

Fiscal 2001 charges

   $ 17,800     $ 3,388     $ 21,188  

Cash utilized in fiscal 2001

     —         (3,388 )     (3,388 )
    


 


 


Balance at November 30, 2001

     17,800       —         17,800  

Fiscal 2002 charges

     47,614       1,722       49,336  

Acquisition integration costs

     7,410       1,031       8,441  

Cash utilized in fiscal 2002

     (10,421 )     (2,555 )     (12,976 )

Non-cash write-down of leasehold improvements in fiscal 2002

     (11,092 )     —         (11,092 )
    


 


 


Balance at November 30, 2002

     51,311       198       51,509  

Fiscal 2003 charges

     —         1,100       1,100  

Cash utilized in fiscal 2003

     (8,404 )     (1,298 )     (9,702 )

Non-cash write-down of furniture and fixtures in fiscal 2003

     (385 )     —         (385 )
    


 


 


Balance at November 30, 2003

   $ 42,522     $ —       $ 42,522  
    


 


 



*   Included in consolidated balance sheet as a component of accrued liabilities.

 

Amortization of Acquired Intangibles

 

Intangible assets are comprised of trademarks and established customer bases, as well as non-compete, maintenance and OEM customer royalty agreements.

 

     November 30,

 
    

2003


    Change

   

2002


    Change

   

2001


 
       $

    %

      $

   %

   
     (in thousands, except percentages)  

Amortization of acquired intangibles

   $ 1,997     $ (18,248 )   (90.1 )%   $ 20,245     $ 95    0.1 %   $ 20,150  

As percent of total revenue

     0.8 %     —       (6.6 )%     7.4 %     —      1.1 %     6.3 %

 

In fiscal 2002 and 2001, we amortized goodwill, however, effective December 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangibles” which requires that goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives not be amortized but, instead, subject to impairment tests at least annually. Further, we reclassified $1.2 million of intangible assets representing acquired workforce to goodwill as of December 1, 2002, and, therefore, this amount is no longer amortized. Amortization of goodwill and acquired workforce was $18.5 million and $18.7 million for fiscal 2002 and 2001 respectively.

 

The decrease in amortization of acquired intangibles in fiscal 2003 as compared to fiscal 2002 is principally due to the cessation of amortization of goodwill.

 

27


Table of Contents

Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net

 

Interest and other income (expense), net, includes interest, realized gains and losses on investments, long-term debt interest expense and other miscellaneous income and expense items.

 

     November 30,

 
    

2003


    Change

   

2002


    Change

   

2001


 
       $

    %

      $

    %

   
     (in thousands, except percentages)  

Interest and other income (expense), net

   $ 15,007     $ (1,257 )   (7.7 )%   $ 16,264     $ (14,776 )   (47.6 )%   $ 31,040  

As percent of total revenue

     5.7 %     —       (0.2 )%     5.9 %     —       (3.7 )%     9.6 %

 

The decrease in fiscal 2003 compared to the prior year was primarily due to approximately $11.6 million decrease in net interest income and a $1.6 million decrease in net gain on sale of investments partially offset by a $11.1 million decrease in impairment charges on private equity investments. Net interest income decreased primarily due to lower average investment account balances as a result of the purchase of our corporate facilities along with continued declines in interest rates as investments matured and were reinvested in lower interest rate securities. Impairment charges on private equity investments were $0.3 million in fiscal 2003 as compared to $11.4 million in fiscal 2002. The global economic slowdown and reduction in technology spending in general during fiscal 2002 had, and continues to have, a negative impact on these development stage companies in which we have invested.

 

The decrease in fiscal 2002 compared to the prior year was primarily due to an approximately $10.9 million decrease in interest income (expense) as a result of lower interest rates combined with a $6.4 million increase in impairment charge on private equity investment in 2002. There were no impairment charges recognized in fiscal 2001.

 

Income Taxes

 

Management believes that, based on a number of factors, it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized; and accordingly, a full valuation allowance has been recorded for the year ended November 30, 2003. During the next fiscal year, management will reassess the appropriateness of the valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized in the foreseeable future.

 

Our income taxes payable for federal purposes has been reduced by the tax benefits associated with exercise of employee stock options. These benefits were credited directly to stockholders’ equity and amounted to $0.6 million for fiscal 2003.

 

As of November 30, 2003, our federal and state net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes were $516 million and $207 million, respectively, which expire through 2023. As of November 30, 2003, our federal and state tax credit carryforwards for income tax purposes were $5.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively, which expire through 2023. These net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards were recorded as deferred tax assets with a full valuation allowance reserved against them.

 

In the event of a change in ownership, as defined under federal and state tax laws, our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards may be subject to annual limitation. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of the net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards before realization.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

At November 30, 2003, we had cash and cash equivalents of $83.2 million, representing an increase of $26.0 million from November 30, 2002.

 

28


Table of Contents

Net cash used for operating activities in fiscal 2003 was $12.5 million resulting from our net income of $11.4 million combined with non-cash charges of $22.8 million offset by the $28.0 million advance payment of our property lease and a net change in assets and liabilities of $18.8 million. Net cash used for operating activities in fiscal 2002 was $1.8 million resulting from our net loss of $94.6 million being offset by non-cash charges of $80.4 million and a net change in assets and liabilities of $12.3 million. Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2001 was $103.0 million resulting from positive cash flows as our net loss of $13.2 million was more than offset by non-cash charges of $51.7 million and by a net reduction of $64.5 million in assets and liabilities.

 

In June 2003, we entered into a 51-year lease of the land upon which our corporate headquarters is located. The lease was paid in advance for a total of $28.0 million, but is subject to adjustments every ten years based upon changes in fair market value. Should it become necessary, we have the option to prepay any rent increases due as a result of a change in fair market value.

 

To the extent that non-cash items increase or decrease our future operating results, there will be no corresponding impact on our cash flows. After excluding the effects of these non-cash charges, the primary changes in cash flows relating to operating activities result from changes in working capital. Our primary source of operating cash flows is the collection of accounts receivable from our customers. Our operating cash flows are also impacted by the timing of payments to our vendors for accounts payable. We generally pay our vendors and service providers in accordance with the invoice terms and conditions. The timing of cash payments in future periods will be impacted by the terms of accounts payable arrangements and management’s assessment of our cash inflows.

 

Net cash used in investing activities was $22.1 million, $56.8 million and $186.7 million in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2003 related primarily to the purchase of our corporate headquarters in the amount of $78.0 million partially offset by net sales of short-term investments of $58.3 million. Net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2002 related primarily to costs incurred in connection with the build-out of our new corporate headquarters, cash used for acquisitions, purchase of short-term investments and costs incurred in connection with the implementation of our enterprise resource planning system. Net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2001 related primarily to the purchase of short-term investments.

 

Net cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, was $60.6 million, $15.5 million and $11.7 million. In fiscal 2003, net cash provided by financing activities resulted primarily from the proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $54.0 million and $7.9 million from the exercise of stock options and stock purchases under our Employee Stock Purchase Program. Net cash provided by financing activities for fiscal 2002 and 2001 resulted from the exercise of stock options and the sale of stock under our Employee Stock Purchase Program.

 

In June 2003, we obtained a $54.0 million mortgage note to purchase our corporate headquarters to lower our operating costs. The note is collateralized by the commercial real property acquired. The principal balance remaining at the end of the 10-year term of $33.9 million is due as a final balloon payment on July 1, 2013. We are prohibited from acquiring another company without prior consent from the lender unless we maintain between $100.0 million and $300.0 million of cash and cash equivalents, depending on various other non-financial terms as defined in the agreements. In addition we are subject to certain non-financial covenants as defined in the agreements. We are in compliance with all covenants at November 30, 2003.

 

At November 30, 2003 and 2002, we had $604.7 million and $637.9 million in cash, cash equivalents and investments, respectively. We anticipate our operating expenses to remain relatively stable for the foreseeable future and as a result we intend to fund our operating expenses through cash flows from operations. We expect to use our cash resources to fund capital expenditures as well as acquisitions or investments in complementary businesses, technologies or product lines. We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents and investments and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months.

 

29


Table of Contents

In October 2003, we entered into a Registration and Repurchase Agreement with Reuters. Pursuant to the agreement, if Reuters sells more than $100 million of our common stock held by it in a single transaction, we have agreed to repurchase an equal amount of common stock at the same price which the shares are sold to the public, up to a maximum of $115 million. We filed a registration statement on Form S-3 in November 2003, which was declared effective by the SEC in January 2004, pursuant to which Reuters may sell up to an aggregate of 60 million shares of our common stock.

 

As of November 30, 2003, our contractual commitments associated with indebtedness, lease obligations and operational restructuring are as follows, (in thousands):

 

     2004

    2005

    2006

    2007

    2008

    Thereafter

    Total

 

Operating commitments:

                                                        

Debt principal

   $ 1,624     $ 1,709     $ 1,798     $ 1,892     $ 1,990     $ 44,463     $ 53,476  

Debt interest

     2,684       2,600       2,511       2,417       2,318       9,358       21,888  

Operating leases

     3,092       1,578       1,279       864       846       1,966       9,625  
    


 


 


 


 


 


 


Total operating commitments

     7,400       5,887       5,588       5,173       5,154       55,787       84,989  

Restructuring-related commitments:

                                                        

Operating leases

     9,939       9,632       8,021       8,378       8,599       19,580       64,149  

Sublease income

     (2,503 )     (2,411 )     (1,296 )     (1,295 )     (1,324 )     (2,079 )     (10,908 )
    


 


 


 


 


 


 


Total restructuring-related commitments

     7,436       7,221       6,725       7,083       7,275       17,501       53,241  
    


 


 


 


 


 


 


Total commitments

   $ 14,836     $ 13,108     $ 12,313     $ 12,256     $ 12,429     $ 73,288     $ 138,230  
    


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

As of November 30, 2003, future minimum lease payments under restructured non-cancelable operating leases include $38.4 million provided for as accrued restructuring costs and $4.1 million for acquisition integration liabilities. These amounts are included in Accrued Excess Facilities Costs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

In connection with the mortgage note payable, we entered into a one-year $20.0 million revolving line of credit that matures on June 23, 2004. As of November 30, 2003, no amounts were drawn on this line of credit. We are required to maintain a minimum unrestricted cash, cash equivalent, and short term investment balance of $150.0 million as well as other non-financial covenants defined in the agreement. We are in compliance with all covenants at November 30, 2003.

 

As of November 30, 2003, we had a $13.0 million irrevocable standby letter of credit in connection with the mortgage note payable. This letter of credit automatically renews for successive one-year periods, until the mortgage note payable has been satisfied in full. The letter of credit is secured by the revolving line of credit described above.

 

As of November 30, 2003, we had a $5.0 million irrevocable standby letter of credit outstanding in connection with a facility lease. The letter of credit automatically renews annually for the duration of the lease term, which expires in December 2010. The investments pledged for security of the letter of credit are presented as restricted cash and included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

As of November 30, 2003, we had a $0.9 million irrevocable standby letter of credit outstanding in connection with a facility surrender agreement. The letter of credit automatically renews annually for the duration of the letter of credit requirement of the surrender agreement, which expires in June 2006. The investments pledged for security of the letter of credit are presented as restricted cash and included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

30


Table of Contents

Our software license agreements typically provide for indemnification of customers for intellectual property infringement claims. To date, no such claims have been filed against us. We also warrant to customers that software products operate substantially in accordance with specifications. Historically, minimal costs have been incurred related to product warranties, and as such no accruals for warranty costs have been made. In addition, we indemnify our officers and directors under the terms of indemnity agreements entered into with them, as well as pursuant to our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, and applicable provisions of Delaware law. To date, we have not incurred any costs related to these indemnification arrangements.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity and is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003. We adopted SFAS No. 150 on June 1, 2003. The adoption did not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

 

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” This interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities that possess certain characteristics. FIN 46 requires that if a business enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (“VIE”), the assets, liabilities, and results of the activities of the variable interest entity must be included in the consolidated financial statements with those of the business enterprise. The consolidation requirements of FIN 46 are effective immediately for VIE’s created after January 31, 2003. The consolidation requirements for older VIE’s are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2003, however in October of 2003 the FASB deferred the effective date of FIN 46 for older VIE’s to the end of the first interim or annual period ending after December 15, 2003. Certain disclosure requirements are effective for all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the VIE was established. We do not have any ownership in any variable interest entities as of November 30, 2003. We will apply the consolidation requirements of FIN 46 in future periods should an interest in a variable interest entity be acquired.

 

Factors That May Affect Operating Results

 

The following risk factors could materially and adversely affect our future operating results and could cause actual events to differ materially from those predicted in the forward-looking statements we make about our business.

 

We have a history of losses, we may incur future losses, and if we are unable to sustain profitability our business will suffer and our stock price may decline.

 

We may not be able to achieve revenue or earnings growth or obtain sufficient revenue to sustain profitability. While we achieved a modest profit of $11.4 million for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003, we incurred net losses of $94.6 million and $13.2 million in fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. As of November 30, 2003, we had an accumulated deficit of $158.4 million.

 

We have invested significantly in building our sales and marketing organization and in our technology research and development. We expect to continue to spend financial and other resources on developing and introducing enhancements to our existing and new software products and our direct sales and marketing activities. As a result, we need to generate significant revenue to maintain profitability. In addition, we believe that we must continue to dedicate a significant amount of our resources to our research and development efforts to maintain our competitive position. However, we do not expect to receive significant revenues from these investments for several years.

 

31


Table of Contents

Our future revenue is unpredictable and we expect our quarterly operating results to fluctuate, which may cause our stock price to decline.

 

Period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be a good indication of our future performance. Moreover, our operating results in some quarters have not in the past, and may not in the future, meet the expectations of stock market analysts and investors. This has in the past and may in the future cause our stock price to decline. As a result of our limited operating history and the evolving nature of the markets in which we compete, we have difficulty accurately forecasting our revenue in any given period. In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this section, a number of factors may cause our revenue to fall short of our expectations or cause fluctuations in our operating results, including:

 

    the announcement or introduction of new or enhanced products or services by our competitors;

 

    the relatively long sales cycles for many of our products;

 

    the tendency of some of our customers to wait until the end of a fiscal quarter or our fiscal year in the hope of obtaining more favorable terms;

 

    the timing of our new products or product enhancements or any delays in such introductions;

 

    the delay or deferral of customer implementations of our products;

 

    changes in customer budgets and decision making process that could affect both the timing and size of any transaction;

 

    the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to the expansion of our operations; and

 

    changes in local, national and international regulatory requirements.

 

Our business is subject to seasonal variations which make quarter-to-quarter comparisons difficult.

 

Our business is subject to variations throughout the year due to seasonal factors in the U.S. and worldwide. These factors include fewer selling days in Europe during the summer vacation season and the impact of the holidays and a slow down in capital expenditures by our customers during our first fiscal quarter. These factors typically result in lower sales activity in our first and third fiscal quarters compared to the rest of the year and make quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results less meaningful.

 

The loss of any current customer, including Reuters which accounted for 12% of our revenues in fiscal 2003, could harm our business and cause our stock price to decline.

 

We do not have long-term sales contracts with any of our customers. There can be no assurance that any of our customers, including Reuters, will continue to purchase our products in the future. As a result, a customer that generates substantial revenue for us in one period may not be a source of revenue in subsequent periods. Sales to Reuters, a related party, accounted for 9% of our total revenue in fiscal 2002 and 12% of our total revenue in fiscal 2003.

 

Our new licensing, distribution and maintenance agreement with Reuters more fully described below places certain limitations on our ability to conduct our business and involves various execution risks to our business.

 

In October 2003, we entered into a new agreement with Reuters relating to the licensing, distribution and maintenance of Reuters’ products. Prior to such time, we were restricted from selling our products to customers in the financial services market. Pursuant to the terms of the new agreement with Reuters, we are now permitted to market and sell our products, other than risk management and market data distribution products, directly and through third party resellers (other than four specified resellers) to customers in the financial services market. Reuters is phasing-out its role as a general reseller of our products through March 2005, at which time Reuters’ distribution rights will terminate. Between now and March 2005, Reuters will continue to have a non-exclusive

 

32


Table of Contents

right to distribute our products in connection with certain project implementations for a limited number of its existing customers and for pre-existing customer leads. After such time, Reuters may continue to internally use and embed our products in its solutions. Consequently, our revenue from the financial services market will be dependent upon our ability to directly market and sell our products in such market or indirectly with resellers other than Reuters.

 

Reuters’ obligation to pay us minimum guaranteed distribution fees terminates in March 2005. Any distribution fees from Reuters beyond these guaranteed minimums would be dependent on Reuters’ success in marketing and selling our products in the financial services market. We believe that Reuters may choose to devote their sales and marketing resources toward developing other aspects of their business and accordingly may not devote sufficient resources to effectively market and sell our products. There can be no assurances that we will be successful in generating enough revenue from financial services market customers to replace these minimum guaranteed payments after such time. Any inability on our part to replace the minimum guaranteed revenue from Reuters would adversely affect our business and operating results.

 

Neither Reuters nor any third-party reseller or distributor has any contractual obligation to distribute minimum quantities of our products. Reuters and other distributors may choose not to market and sell our products or may elect to sell competitive third-party products, either of which may adversely affect our market share and revenue.

 

Pursuant to the new agreement with Reuters, Reuters began transitioning maintenance and support of our products for its customers, as well as the associated revenue, to us upon entering into the new agreement. As a result, we began providing maintenance and support services directly to customers transitioned from Reuters in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. If our support organization experiences an unexpected burden as a result of this transition, we may be unable to provide maintenance and support services in accordance with our current plans or customer expectations, which could have a negative impact on our customer relationships. While we have no current plans to significantly expand our support organization, we may be compelled to do so to maintain these customer relationships. Moreover, we expect service and maintenance revenue and associated costs to increase as a result of our assumption of Reuters’ contracts and the development of our direct sales organization for the financial services market in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 and through at least fiscal 2004. To the extent, as a result of our increased service and maintenance obligations, our cost of revenue increases faster than our service and maintenance revenue, our gross margins will be adversely affected.

 

Under our new agreement with Reuters, we are no longer prohibited from selling our products and providing consulting services directly to companies in the financial services market, however we are restricted from directly selling risk management and market data distribution products in such markets through May 2008. While we currently do not offer any risk management and market data distribution solutions as part of our product offerings, if we were to develop any such products, we would have to rely on Reuters to sell those products in the financial services market until these restrictions end. Reuters is not required to help us sell any of these products in those markets and there can be no assurance that Reuters would choose to sell our products over products of our competitors.

 

Our license agreement with Reuters also imposes certain practical restrictions on our ability to acquire companies in certain business segments. The license agreement places no specific restrictions on our ability to acquire companies with less than half of their business in the sale of risk management and market data distribution products into the financial services market and to continue such business. However, under the terms of the license agreement, if we acquire companies which derive more than half of their revenue from the sale of risk management and market data distribution products into the financial services market, or if we combine our technology with any acquired company’s risk management or market data distribution products and services for the financial services market, then the acquired company’s risk management or market data distribution solutions would become subject to our restrictions on selling risk management and market data distribution solutions to the financial services market until May 2008. This prohibition could prevent us from realizing potential synergies with companies we acquire or from pursuing acquisitions that could benefit our business.

 

33


Table of Contents

Our business may be harmed if Reuters uses the technology we license from it to compete with us or grants licenses to such technology to others who use it to compete with us.

 

We license from Reuters the intellectual property that was incorporated into early versions of some of our software products. We do not own this licensed technology. Because Reuters has access to intellectual property used in our products, it could use this intellectual property to compete with us. Reuters is not restricted from using the licensed technology it has licensed to us to produce products that compete with our products, and it can grant limited licenses to the licensed technology to others who may compete with us. In addition, we must license to Reuters all of the products, and the source code for certain products, we create through December 2011. This may place Reuters in a position to more easily develop products that compete with ours.

 

Reuters’ ownership of approximately 49% of our stock and the terms of our stockholders agreement with Reuters give Reuters significant control over our business, and their actions may not necessarily be in the best interests of all of our stockholders.

 

Pursuant to the terms of our stockholders agreement with Reuters and certain other stockholders, Reuters has a consent right with respect to certain fundamental decisions, including issuances by us of specified amounts of stock, acquisitions and other significant transactions, has additional rights with respect to board representation and registration of its TIBCO shares, and has certain financial information and inspection rights. Accordingly, Reuters is able to exert a substantial amount of control over certain of our business activities. The size of our board is currently set at nine members. As of November 30, 2003, we had five directors serving on our board. Reuters has the right to nominate three directors for election to our board until such time as its stock ownership drops below 40%; however, today, only one member of our board is a Reuters’ representative. If Reuters’ stock ownership drops below 40%, Reuters will have the right to nominate two directors to our board until such time as its stock ownership is less than 25% and will have the right to nominate one director until its stock ownership is less than 10%. In addition, if Reuters’ stock ownership drops below 30%, Reuters’ consent right with respect to certain fundamental decisions will terminate.

 

The slowdown in the growth of the market for infrastructure software has caused our revenue to decline in recent periods and could cause our revenue or results of operations to fall below expectations in the future.

 

The market for infrastructure software is relatively new and evolving. We earn a substantial portion of our revenue from sales of our infrastructure software, including application integration software and related services. We expect to earn substantially all of our revenue in the foreseeable future from sales of these products and services. Our future financial performance will depend on continued growth in the number of organizations demanding software and services for application integration and information delivery and companies seeking outside vendors to develop, manage and maintain this software for their critical applications. A weakening United States and global economy, which has had a disproportionate impact on information technology spending by businesses, has led to a reduction in sales in a number of recent quarters and may continue to do so in the future. Many of our potential customers have made significant investments in internally developed systems and would incur significant costs in switching to third-party products, which may substantially inhibit the growth of the market for infrastructure software. If the market fails to grow, or grows more slowly than we expect, our sales will be adversely affected. There can be no assurance that when the economy revives and companies begin to make investments in information technology and infrastructure software that revenue will grow at the same pace.

 

Any losses we incur as a result of our exposure to the credit risk of our customers could harm our results of operations.

 

Most of our licenses are on an “open credit” basis, with payment terms generally of 30 days in the United States, and, because of local customs or conditions, longer in some markets outside the United States. We monitor individual customer payment capability in granting such open credit arrangements, seek to limit credit to amounts we believe the customers can pay, and maintain reserves we believe are adequate to cover exposure for doubtful accounts.

 

Because of the current slowdown in the global economy, our exposure to credit risks has increased. There can be no assurance that, should economic conditions not improve, additional losses will not be incurred and that

 

34


Table of Contents

such losses will not be material or exceed our reserves. Although these losses have not been material to date, future losses, if incurred, could harm our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

 

Our past or future acquisitions may result in us incurring unanticipated expenses, encountering difficulty in integrating our operations, diluting our stockholders or incurring additional debt.

 

Our success depends on our ability to continually enhance and broaden our product offerings in response to changing technologies, customer demands, and competitive pressures. We have in the past and may in the future acquire complementary businesses, products or technologies. In this regard, we acquired the businesses of Talarian Corporation in 2002, Praja, Inc. in 2002, Extensibility, Inc. in 2000 and InConcert, Inc. in 1999. We do not know if we will be able to complete any acquisition or that we will be able to successfully integrate any acquired business, operate it profitably, or retain its key employees. Integrating any newly acquired business, product or technology could be expensive and time-consuming, could disrupt our ongoing business and could distract our management. For example, in connection with our largest acquisition (Talarian), we incurred acquisition liabilities of $8.4 million related to severance and facilities restructuring. We may face competition for acquisition targets from larger and more established companies with greater financial resources. In addition, in order to finance any acquisition, we might need to raise additional funds through public or private financings. In that event, we could be forced to obtain equity or debt financing on terms that are not favorable to us and, in the case of equity financing, that results in dilution to our stockholders. Moreover, the terms of existing loan agreements may prohibit certain acquisitions or may place limits on our ability to incur additional indebtedness or issue additional equity securities to finance acquisitions. If we are unable to integrate any newly acquired entity, products or technology effectively, our business, financial condition and operating results would suffer. In addition, any amortization or impairment of acquired intangible assets, stock-based compensation or other charges resulting from the costs of acquisitions could harm our operating results.

 

Our stock price may be volatile, which could cause investors to lose all or part of their investments in our stock.

 

The stock market in general, and the stock prices of technology companies in particular, have experienced volatility which has often been unrelated to the operating performance of any particular company or companies. During fiscal 2003, for example, our stock price fluctuated between a high of $8.10 and a low of $3.92. If market or industry-based fluctuations continue, our stock price could decline in the future regardless of our actual operating performance and investors could lose all or part of their investments.

 

Sales of our stock by Reuters could negatively impact our stock price and may expose us to other risks and uncertainties.

 

Sales of substantial amounts of common stock by Reuters pursuant to the registration statement on Form S-3 filed in November 2003, and declared effective in January 2004, or otherwise, or by persons currently holding shares of our common stock that have not been previously sold to the public, could cause our stock price to decline. In this regard, Reuters and certain other stockholders who held in the aggregate approximately 54% of our outstanding common stock as of November 30, 2003 have certain rights to require us to register for resale on the public markets their shares of common stock. In addition, sales of a substantial amount of our stock to a single purchaser or group of purchasers, or the reduction in concentration of ownership resulting from any sales by Reuters, may make us more vulnerable to an unsolicited takeover attempt.

 

We have in the past incurred significant expenses in both hiring new employees and reducing our headcount in response to changing market conditions, and the volatile nature of our industry makes it likely that we will continue to expend significant resources in managing our operations.

 

Our ability to successfully offer products and services and implement our business plan in a rapidly evolving market requires an effective planning and management process. We have increased the scope of our

 

35


Table of Contents

operations both domestically and internationally. We must successfully integrate new employees into our operations and generate sufficient revenues to justify the costs associated with these employees. If we fail to successfully integrate employees or to generate the revenue necessary to offset employee-related expenses, we may be forced to reduce our headcount, which would force us to incur significant expenses and would harm our business and operating results. For example, in response to changing market conditions, in fiscal 2001 and 2002, we recorded restructuring charges totaling $70.5 million, including $66.0 million related to abandoned and other facilities and $4.5 million related to a reduction of our headcount by approximately 235 employees. During the fiscal 2003, we recorded an additional restructuring charge of $1.1 million related to a reduction of our headcount by approximately 44 employees. We expect that we will need to continue to improve our financial and managerial controls, reporting systems and procedures and continue to train and manage our workforce worldwide. Furthermore, we expect that we will be required to manage an increasing number of relationships with various customers and other third parties. Failure to control costs in any of the foregoing areas efficiently and effectively could interfere with the growth of our business as a whole.

 

The outcome of litigation pending against us could require us to expend significant resources and could harm our business and financial resources.

 

We, certain of our directors and officers and certain investment bank underwriters have been named in a putative class action for violation of the federal securities laws in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned “In re TIBCO Software Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.” This is one of the number of cases challenging underwriting practices in the initial public offerings (IPOs) of more than 300 companies, which have been coordinated for pretrial proceedings as “In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.” Plaintiffs generally allege that the underwriters engaged in undisclosed and improper underwriting activities, namely the receipt of excessive brokerage commissions and customer agreements regarding post-offering purchases of stock in exchange for allocations of IPO shares. Plaintiffs also allege that various investment bank securities analysts issued false and misleading analyst reports. The complaint against us claims that the purported improper underwriting activities were not disclosed in the registration statements for our IPO and secondary public offering and seeks unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class of persons who purchased our securities or sold put options during the time period from July 13, 1999 to December 6, 2000.

 

A lawsuit with similar allegations of undisclosed improper underwriting practices, and part of the same coordinated proceedings, is pending against Talarian Corporation (“Talarian”), which we acquired in 2002. That action is captioned “In re Talarian Corp. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation.” The complaint against Talarian, certain of its underwriters, and certain of its former directors and officers claims that the purported improper underwriting activities were not disclosed in the registration statement for Talarian’s IPO and seeks unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class of persons who purchased Talarian securities during the time period from July 20, 2000 to December 6, 2000.

 

A proposal to settle the claims against all of the issuers and individual defendants in the coordinated litigation was conditionally accepted by us and Talarian on June 20, 2003. The completion of the settlement is subject to a number of conditions, including Court approval. Under the settlement, the plaintiffs will dismiss and release all claims against participating defendants in exchange for a contingent payment guaranty by the insurance companies collectively responsible for insuring the issuers in the action, and the assignment or surrender to the plaintiffs of certain claims the issuer defendants may have against the underwriters. Under the guaranty, the insurers will be required to pay an amount equal to $1.0 billion less any amounts ultimately collected by the plaintiffs from the underwriter defendants in all the cases. Unlike most of the defendant issuers’ insurance policies, including ours, Talarian’s policy contains a specific self-insured retention in the amount of $500,000 for IPO “laddering” claims, including those alleged in this matter. Thus, under the proposed settlement, if any payment is required under the insurers’ guaranty, Talarian would be responsible for paying its pro rata share of the shortfall, up to $500,000 of the self-insured retention remaining under its policy.

 

The uncertainty associated with substantial unresolved lawsuits could harm our business, financial condition and reputation. The defense of the lawsuits could result in the diversion of our management’s time and attention

 

36


Table of Contents

away from business operations, which could harm our business. Negative developments with respect to the lawsuits could cause our stock price to decline. In addition, although we are unable to determine the amount, if any, that we may be required to pay in connection with the resolution of the lawsuits by settlement or otherwise, any such payment could seriously harm our financial condition and liquidity.

 

If we do not retain our key management personnel and attract and retain other highly skilled employees, we may not be able to execute our business strategy effectively.

 

If we fail to retain and recruit key management and other skilled employees, our business and our ability to obtain new customers, develop new products and provide acceptable levels of customer service could suffer. The success of our business is heavily dependent on the leadership of our key management personnel, including Vivek Ranadivé, our President and Chief Executive Officer. All of our executive officers and key personnel are employees at-will. The loss of one or more key employees could adversely affect our continued operations. Uncertainty created by turnover of key employees could also result in reduced confidence in our financial performance which could cause fluctuations in our stock price and result in further turnover of our employees. We have experienced changes in our management organization over the past several years. If we are unsuccessful in implementing our new management organization, our business would be harmed. In addition, provisions of the recently enacted Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules proposed by the SEC and Nasdaq impose heightened personal liability on some of our key management personnel. The threat of such liability could make it more difficult to identify and hire highly-skilled management personnel.

 

Our success also depends on our ability to recruit, retain and motivate highly skilled sales, marketing and engineering personnel. Competition for these people in the software industries is intense, and we may not be able to successfully recruit, train or retain qualified personnel. In addition, we have experienced turnover in our marketing and sales management. Although we have recently recruited a new Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in our retention and training efforts.

 

Our products may infringe the intellectual property rights of others, which may cause us to incur unexpected costs or prevent us from selling our products.

 

We cannot be certain that our products do not infringe issued patents or other intellectual property rights of others. In addition, because patent applications in the United States are not publicly disclosed until a patent is issued, applications covering technology used in our software products may have been filed without our knowledge. We may be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time, including claims of alleged infringement of the patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third parties by us or our licensees in connection with their use of our products. Intellectual property litigation is expensive and time-consuming and could divert our management’s attention away from running our business and seriously harm our business. If we were to discover that our products violated the intellectual property rights of others, we would have to obtain licenses from these parties in order to continue marketing our products without substantial reengineering. We might not be able to obtain the necessary licenses on acceptable terms or at all, and if we could not obtain such licenses, we might not be able to reengineer our products successfully or in a timely fashion. If we fail to address any infringement issues successfully, we would be forced to incur significant costs, including damages and potentially satisfying indemnification obligations that we have with our customers, and we could be prevented from selling certain of our products.

 

Our intellectual property or proprietary rights could be misappropriated, which could force us to become involved in expensive and time-consuming litigation.

 

We regard our copyrights, service marks, trademarks, trade secrets, patents (licensed or others) and similar intellectual property as critical to our success. Any misappropriation of our proprietary information by third parties could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, the laws of some countries do not provide the same level of protection of our proprietary information as do the laws of the United States. If

 

37


Table of Contents

our proprietary information were misappropriated, we might have to engage in litigation to protect it. In this regard, we have recently initiated a lawsuit against a third party seeking to prevent such third party from continuing certain practices we believe violate our intellectual property rights. We might not succeed in protecting our proprietary information in any pending lawsuit or if we initiate additional intellectual property litigation, and, in any event, such litigation is expensive and time-consuming, could divert our management’s attention away from running our business and could seriously harm our business.

 

We must overcome significant competition in order to succeed.

 

The market for our products and services is extremely competitive and subject to rapid change. We compete with various providers of enterprise application integration solutions, including webMethods and SeeBeyond. We also