10-K 1 a2127941z10-k.htm FORM 10-K
QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)


ý

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

OR


o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                               to                             

Commission File No. 1-15371


iSTAR FINANCIAL INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland   95-6881527
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

1114 Avenue of the Americas, 27th Floor
New York, NY

 

10036
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 930-9400


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class: Name of Exchange on which registered:   Name of Exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value   New York Stock Exchange
9.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value
  New York Stock Exchange
9.200% Series C Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value
  New York Stock Exchange
8.000% Series D Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value
  New York Stock Exchange
7.875% Series E Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value
  New York Stock Exchange
7.800% Series F Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value
  New York Stock Exchange
7.650% Series G Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value
  New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12-b-2). Yes ý No o

        As of June 30, 2003 the aggregate market value of the common stock, $0.001 par value per share of iStar Financial Inc. ("Common Stock"), held by non-affiliates(1) of the registrant was approximately $3.8 billion, based upon the closing price of $36.50 on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape on such date.

        As of March 1, 2004, there were 107,393,300 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

(1)
For purposes of this Annual Report only, includes all outstanding Common Stock other than Common Stock held directly by the registrant's directors and executive officers.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

1.
Portions of the registrant's definitive proxy statement for the registrant's 2004 Annual Meeting, to be filed within 120 days after the close of the registrant's fiscal year, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  Page
PART I    
Item 1. Business   2
Item 2. Properties   19
Item 3. Legal Proceedings   19
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders   19

PART II

 

 
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Equity and Related Share Matters   20
Item 6. Selected Financial Data   22
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   25
Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk   47
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplemental Data   50
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   106
Item 9a. Controls and Procedures   106

PART III

 

 
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant   106
Item 11. Executive Compensation   106
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management   106
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions   106
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services   106

PART IV

 

 
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K   107

SIGNATURES

 

111


PART I

Item 1. Business

Explanatory Note for Purposes of the "Safe Harbor Provisions" of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

        This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which involve certain risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are included with respect to, among other things, iStar Financial Inc.'s (the "Company's") current business plan, business strategy and portfolio management. The Company's actual results or outcomes may differ materially from those anticipated. Important factors that the Company believes might cause such differences are discussed in the cautionary statements presented under the caption "Factors That May Affect the Company's Business Strategy" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K or otherwise accompany the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K. In assessing all forward-looking statements, readers are urged to read carefully all cautionary statements contained in this Form 10-K.

Code of Conduct

        The Company has adopted a code of business conduct for all of its employees and directors, including the Company's chief executive officer, chief financial officer, other executive officers and personnel. A copy of the Company's code of conduct is attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 10.7 and is also available on the Company's website at www.istarfinancial.com. The Company intends to post on its website material changes to, or waivers from, its code of conduct, if any, within two days of any such event. As of December 31, 2003, there were no such changes or waivers.

Overview

        The Company is the leading publicly-traded finance company focused on the commercial real estate industry. The Company provides custom-tailored financing to private and corporate owners of real estate nationwide, including senior and junior mortgage debt, senior, mezzanine and subordinated corporate capital, and corporate net lease financing. The Company, which is taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT"), seeks to deliver strong dividends and superior risk-adjusted returns on equity to shareholders by providing innovative and value-added financing solutions to its customers.

        The Company's primary product lines include:

    Structured Finance. The Company provides senior and subordinated loans that typically range in size from $20 million to $100 million. These loans may be either fixed or variable rate and are structured to meet the specific financing needs of the borrowers, including the acquisition or financing of large, quality real estate. The Company offers borrowers a wide range of structured finance options, including first mortgages, second mortgages, partnership loans, participating debt and interim facilities. The Company's structured finance transactions have maturities generally ranging from three to ten years. As of December 31, 2003, based on gross carrying values, the Company's structured finance assets represented 25.97% of its assets.

    Portfolio Finance. The Company provides funding to regional and national borrowers who own multiple facilities in geographically diverse portfolios. Loans are cross-collateralized to give the Company the benefit of all available collateral and underwritten to recognize inherent portfolio diversification. Property types include multifamily, suburban office, hotels and other property types where individual property values are less than $20 million on average. Loan terms are structured to meet the specific requirements of the borrower and typically range in size from $25 million to $150 million. The Company's portfolio finance transactions have maturities generally ranging from

2


      three to ten years. As of December 31, 2003, based on gross carrying values, the Company's portfolio finance assets represented 15.49% of its assets.

    Corporate Finance. The Company provides senior and subordinated capital to corporations engaged in real estate or real estate-related businesses. Financings may be either secured or unsecured and typically range in size from $20 million to $150 million. The Company's corporate finance transactions have maturities generally ranging from five to ten years. As of December 31, 2003, based on gross carrying values, the Company's corporate finance assets represented 8.29% of its assets.

    Loan Acquisition. The Company acquires whole loans and loan participations which present attractive risk-reward opportunities. Loans are generally acquired at a small discount to the principal balance outstanding. Loan acquisitions typically range in size from $5 million to $100 million and are collateralized by all major property types. The Company's loan acquisition transactions have maturities generally ranging from three to ten years. As of December 31, 2003, based on gross carrying values, the Company's loan acquisition assets represented 6.34% of its assets.

    Corporate Tenant Leasing. The Company provides capital to corporations and borrowers who control facilities leased to single creditworthy tenants. The Company's net leased assets are generally mission-critical headquarters or distribution facilities that are subject to long-term leases with rated corporate credit tenants, and which provide for all expenses at the property to be paid by the corporate tenant on a triple net lease basis. Corporate tenant lease, or CTL, transactions have terms generally ranging from ten to 20 years and typically range in size from $20 million to $150 million. As of December 31, 2003, based on gross carrying values, the Company's CTL assets (including investments in and advances to joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries and assets held for sale) represented 41.89% of its assets.

        As more fully discussed in Note 1 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company began its business in 1993 through private investment funds formed to capitalize on inefficiencies in the real estate finance market. In March 1998, these funds contributed their approximately $1.1 billion of assets to the Company's predecessor in exchange for a controlling interest in that company. Since that time, the Company has grown by originating new lending and leasing transactions, as well as through corporate acquisitions.

        Specifically, in September 1998, the Company acquired the loan origination and servicing business of a major insurance company, and in December 1998, the Company acquired the mortgage and mezzanine loan portfolio of its largest private competitor. Additionally, in November 1999, the Company acquired TriNet Corporate Realty Trust, Inc., then the largest publicly-traded company specializing in corporate sale/leaseback transactions for office and industrial facilities. The acquisition of TriNet was structured as a stock-for-stock merger of TriNet with a subsidiary of the Company. Throughout this Report, the Company refers to TriNet as TriNet or the Leasing Subsidiary and refers to the acquisition of TriNet as the TriNet Acquisition.

        Concurrent with the TriNet Acquisition, the Company also acquired its former external advisor in exchange for shares of the Company's Common Stock and converted its organizational form to a Maryland corporation. As part of the conversion to a Maryland corporation, the Company replaced its former dual class common share structure with a single class of Common Stock. The Company's Common Stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on November 4, 1999. Prior to this date, the Company's common shares were traded on the American Stock Exchange.

3


Investment Strategy

        The Company's investment strategy targets specific sectors of the real estate credit markets in which it believes it can deliver value-added, flexible financial solutions to its customers, thereby differentiating its financial products from those offered by other capital providers.

        The Company has implemented its investment strategy by:

    Focusing on the origination of large, structured mortgage, corporate and lease financings where customers require flexible financial solutions and "one-call" responsiveness post-closing.

    Avoiding commodity businesses in which there is significant direct competition from other providers of capital such as conduit lending and investment in commercial or residential mortgage-backed securities.

    Developing direct relationships with borrowers and corporate customers as opposed to sourcing transactions solely through intermediaries.

    Adding value beyond simply providing capital by offering borrowers and corporate customers specific lending expertise, flexibility, certainty and continuing relationships beyond the closing of a particular financing transaction.

    Taking advantage of market anomalies in the real estate financing markets when the Company believes credit is mispriced by other providers of capital, such as the spread between lease yields and the yields on corporate customers' underlying credit obligations.

        The Company intends to continue to emphasize a mix of portfolio financing transactions to create asset diversification and single-asset financings for properties with strong, long-term competitive market positions. The Company's credit process will continue to focus on:

    Building diversification by asset type, property type, obligor, loan/lease maturity and geography.

    Financing commercial real estate assets in major metropolitan markets.

    Underwriting assets using conservative assumptions regarding collateral value and future property performance.

    Requiring adequate cash flow coverage on its investments.

    Stress testing potential investments for adverse economic and real estate market conditions.

        As of December 31, 2003, based on current gross carrying values, the Company's business consists of the following product lines:


Product Line

         GRAPHIC

4


        The Company seeks to maintain an investment portfolio which is diversified by asset type, underlying property type and geography. As of December 31, 2003, based on current gross carrying values, the Company's total investment portfolio has the following characteristics:


Asset Type

 
   
GRAPHIC

Property Type

         GRAPHIC

Geography

GRAPHIC
        

5


The Company's Underwriting Process

        The Company discusses and analyzes investment opportunities during regular weekly meetings which are attended by all of its investment professionals, as well as representatives from its legal, risk management and capital markets areas. The Company has developed a process for screening potential investments called the Six Point Methodologysm. Through this process the Company evaluates an investment opportunity prior to beginning its formal commitment process by: (1) evaluating the source of the opportunity; (2) evaluating the quality of the collateral or corporate credit, as well as its market or industry dynamics; (3) evaluating the equity or corporate sponsor; (4) determining whether it can implement an appropriate legal and financial structure for the transaction given its risk profile; (5) performing an alternative investment test; and (6) evaluating the liquidity of the investment and its ability to match fund the asset.

        The Company has an intensive underwriting process in place for all potential investments. This process provides for comprehensive feedback and review by all disciplines within the Company, including investments, credit, risk management, legal/structuring and capital markets. Participation is encouraged from all professionals throughout the entire origination process, from the initial consideration of the opportunity, through the Six Point Methodologysm and into the preparation and distribution of a comprehensive memorandum for the Company's internal and Board of Directors investment committees.

        Commitments of less than $40.0 million require the unanimous consent of the Company's internal investment committee, consisting of senior management representatives from each of the Company's key disciplines. For commitments between $40.0 million and $75.0 million, the further approval of the Company's Board of Directors' investment committee is also required. All commitments of $75.0 million or more must be approved by the Company's full Board of Directors.

Financing Strategy

        The Company has access to a wide range of debt and equity capital resources to finance its investment and growth strategies. At December 31, 2003, the Company had over $2.4 billion of tangible book equity capital and a total market capitalization of approximately $8.7 billion. The Company believes that its size, diversification, investor sponsorship and track record are competitive advantages in obtaining attractive financing for its businesses.

        The Company seeks to maximize risk-adjusted returns on equity and financial flexibility by accessing a variety of public and private debt and equity capital sources, including:

    Long-term, unsecured corporate debt.

    iStar Asset Receivables ("STARs"), the Company's proprietary match-funded, securitized debt program.

    A combined $2.7 billion of capacity under its unsecured and secured revolving credit facilities at year end.

        The Company's business model is premised on significantly lower leverage than many other commercial finance companies. In this regard, the Company seeks to:

    Maintain a prudent corporate leverage level based upon the Company's mix of business and appropriate leverage levels for each of its primary business lines.

    Maintain a large tangible equity base and conservative credit statistics.

    Match fund assets and liabilities.

        The Company has not historically utilized, and does not currently plan to utilize, "off-balance sheet" financing vehicles other than normal corporate tenant leasing joint ventures with unrelated third parties,

6


which may be accounted for under the equity method due to the existence of provisions providing for a sharing of control with the venture partners. Detailed information on the Company's three remaining joint ventures in which the Company currently has investments/operations, which totaled approximately $25.0 million at December 31, 2003, including information on the Company's share of the joint ventures' non-recourse debt, is provided in Item 7–"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Liquidity and Capital Resources," and in Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        A more detailed discussion of the Company's current capital resources is provided in Item 7–"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Liquidity and Capital Resources."

Hedging Strategy

        The Company has variable-rate lending assets and variable-rate debt obligations. These assets and liabilities create a natural hedge against changes in variable interest rates. This means that as interest rates increase, the Company earns more on its variable-rate lending assets and pays more on its variable-rate debt obligations and, conversely, as interest rates decrease, the Company earns less on its variable-rate lending assets and pays less on its variable-rate debt obligations. When the Company's variable-rate debt obligations exceed its variable-rate lending assets, the Company utilizes derivative instruments to limit the impact of changing interest rates on its net income. The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge assets or for speculative purposes. The derivative instruments the Company uses are typically in the form of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps. Interest rate swaps effectively change variable-rate debt obligations to fixed-rate debt obligations. Interest rate caps effectively limit the maximum interest rate on variable-rate debt obligations.

        In addition, when appropriate the Company enters into interest rate swaps that convert fixed-rate debt to variable rate in order to mitigate the risk of changes in fair value of the fixed-rate debt obligations.

        The primary risks from the Company's use of derivative instruments is the risk that a counterparty to a hedging arrangement could default on its obligation and the risk that the Company may have to pay certain costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs, if a hedging arrangement is terminated by it. As a matter of policy, the Company enters into hedging arrangements with counterparties that are large, creditworthy financial institutions typically rated at least "A/A2" by Standard & Poor's and Moody's Investors Service, respectively. The Company's hedging strategy is monitored by its Audit Committee on behalf of its Board of Directors and may be changed by the Board of Directors without stockholder approval.

        Developing an effective strategy for dealing with movements in interest rates is complex and no strategy can completely insulate the Company from risks associated with such fluctuations. There can be no assurance that the Company's hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on its results of operations or financial condition.


Business

Real Estate Lending:

        The Company provides structured financing to private and corporate owners of real estate nationwide, including senior and junior mortgage debt, senior mezzanine and subordinated corporate capital.

7



        Set forth below is information regarding the Company's primary real estate lending product lines as of December 31, 2003:

 
  Current
Carrying
Value

  %
of Total

 
 
  (In thousands)

   
 
Structured finance   $ 1,729,765   46.30 %
Portfolio finance     1,031,538   27.61 %
Corporate finance     552,443   14.79 %
Loan acquisition     422,364   11.30 %
   
 
 
  Gross carrying value   $ 3,736,110   100.00 %
         
 
  Provision for loan losses     (33,436 )    
   
     
  Total carrying value, net   $ 3,702,674      
   
     

        As more fully discussed in Note 3 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company continually monitors borrower performance and completes a detailed, loan-by-loan formal credit review on a quarterly basis. After having originated or acquired over $9 billion of investment transactions, the Company and its private investment fund predecessors have experienced minimal actual losses on their lending investments.

        Despite the Company's historical track record of having minimal credit losses and loans on non-accrual status, the Company considers it prudent to reflect provisions for loan losses on a portfolio basis based upon the Company's assessment of general market conditions, the Company's internal risk management policies and credit risk rating system, industry loss experience, the Company's assessment of the likelihood of delinquencies or defaults, and the value of the collateral underlying its investments. Accordingly, since its first full quarter operating its current business as a public company (the quarter ended June 30, 1998), management has reflected quarterly provisions for loan losses in its operating results.

8


Summary of Interest Characteristics

        As more fully discussed in Item 7–"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Liquidity and Capital Resources" as well as in Item 7a.–"Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk," the Company utilizes certain interest rate risk management techniques, including both asset/liability matching and certain other hedging techniques, in order to mitigate the Company's exposure to interest rate risks.

        As of December 31, 2003, the Company's Lending Business portfolio has the following interest rate characteristics:

 
  Current
Carrying
Value

  %
of Total

 
 
  (In thousands)

   
 
Fixed-rate loans   $ 1,450,534   38.82 %
Variable-rate loans     2,285,576   61.18 %
   
 
 
Gross carrying value   $ 3,736,110   100.00 %
   
 
 

Summary of Prepayment Terms

        The Company is exposed to risks of prepayment on its loan assets, and generally seeks to protect itself from such risks by structuring its loans with prepayment restrictions and/or penalties.

        As of December 31, 2003, the Company's Lending Business portfolio has the following call protection characteristics:

 
  Current
Carrying
Value

  %
of Total

 
 
  (In thousands)

   
 
Fixed prepayment penalties   $ 1,262,420   33.79 %
Substantial lock-out for original term     1,134,223   30.36 %
Currently open to prepayment with no penalty     890,100   23.82 %
Yield maintenance     256,701   6.87 %
Other     192,666   5.16 %
   
 
 
Gross carrying value   $ 3,736,110   100.00 %
   
 
 

9


Summary of Lending Business Maturities

        As of December 31, 2003, the Company's Lending Business portfolio has the following maturity characteristics:

Year of Maturity

  Number of
Transactions
Maturing

  Current
Carrying
Value

  %
of Total

 
 
  (In thousands)

 
2004   16   $ 352,267   9.43 %
2005   29     1,008,448   26.99 %
2006   21     757,524   20.28 %
2007   11     353,896   9.47 %
2008   15     420,419   11.25 %
2009   8     305,569   8.18 %
2010   2     37,334   1.00 %
2011   7     222,337   5.95 %
2012   1     7,800   0.21 %
2013   8     155,736   4.17 %
2014 and thereafter   7     114,780   3.07 %
       
 
 
Gross carrying value       $ 3,736,110   100.00 %
       
 
 
Weighted average maturity         3.72 years      
       
     

Structured Finance

        The Company provides custom-tailored senior and subordinated loans that typically range in size from $20 million to $100 million. These loans may be either fixed or variable rate and are structured to meet the specific financing needs of the borrowers, including the acquisition or financing of large, quality real estate. The Company offers borrowers a wide range of structured finance options, including first mortgages, second mortgages, partnership loans, participating debt and interim facilities. The Company's structured finance transactions have maturities generally ranging from three to ten years.

        As of December 31, 2003, the Company's structured finance investments have the following characteristics:

Investment Class

  Collateral Types
  # of
Loans
In Class

  Current
Carrying
Value(1)

  Current
Principal
Balance
Outstanding

  Weighted
Average
Stated
Pay Rate(2)

  Weighted
Average First
Dollar
Current
Loan-to-
Value(3)

  Weighted
Average Last
Dollar
Current
Loan-to-
Value(4)

 
First Mortgages   Office/Residential/
Industrial, R&D/Conference
Center/Mixed Use/
Hotel/Entertainment,
Leisure
  33   $ 1,262,732   $ 1,269,024   5.88 % 0 % 64 %
Junior First Mortgages(5)   Office/Residential/Mixed
Use/Hotel
  10     200,943     207,088   9.76 % 61 % 78 %
Second Mortgages   Office/Mixed Use/Hotel   7     122,139     117,963   9.88 % 47 % 66 %
Corporate Loans/Other   Office/Residential/Industrial,
R&D/Mixed
Use/Hotel
  13     143,951     143,506   10.84 % 58 % 73 %
       
 
 
             
Total       63   $ 1,729,765   $ 1,737,581              
       
 
 
             

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
Where Current Carrying Value differs from Current Principal Balance Outstanding, the difference represents unamortized amount of acquired premiums, discounts or deferred loan fees.

(2)
All variable-rate loans assume a one-month LIBOR rate of 1.12% (the actual one-month LIBOR rate at December 31, 2003). As of December 31, 2003, five loans with a combined carrying value of $95.9 million have a stated accrual rate that exceeds the stated pay rate.

10


(3)
Weighted average ratio of first dollar current loan carrying value to underlying collateral value using third-party appraisal or the Company's internal valuation.

(4)
Weighted average ratio of last dollar current loan carrying value to underlying collateral value using third-party appraisal or the Company's internal valuation.

(5)
Junior first mortgages represent promissory notes secured by first mortgages which are junior to other promissory notes secured by the same first mortgage.

Portfolio Finance

        The Company provides funding to regional and national borrowers who own multiple facilities in geographically diverse portfolios. Loans are cross-collateralized to give the Company the benefit of all available collateral and underwritten to recognize inherent portfolio diversification. Property types include multifamily, suburban office, hotels and other property types where individual property values are less than $20 million on average. Loan terms are structured to meet the specific requirements of the borrower and typically range in size from $25 million to $150 million. The Company's portfolio finance transactions have maturities generally ranging from three to ten years.

        As of December 31, 2003, the Company's portfolio finance investments have the following characteristics:

Investment Class

  Collateral Types
  # of
Loans
In Class

  Current
Carrying
Value(1)

  Current
Principal
Balance
Outstanding

  Weighted
Average
Stated
Pay Rate(2)

  Weighted
Average First
Dollar
Current
Loan-to-
Value(3)

  Weighted
Average Last
Dollar
Current
Loan-to-
Value(4)

 
First Mortgages   Residential/Mixed
Use/Hotel/
Entertainment, Leisure
  8   $ 399,418   $ 402,056   7.04 % 0 % 63 %
Junior First Mortgages(5)   Office/Hotel
Entertainment, Leisure
  5     167,811     168,532   6.79 % 55 % 64 %
Second Mortgages   Hotel   1     29,955     29,294   12.22 % 74 % 94 %
Corporate Loans/Other   Office/Residential/Mixed
Use/Hotel/
Entertainment, Leisure
  13     434,354     441,078   9.32 % 55 % 70 %
       
 
 
             
Total       27   $ 1,031,538   $ 1,040,960              
       
 
 
             

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
Where Current Carrying Value differs from Current Principal Balance Outstanding, the difference represents unamortized amount of acquired premiums, discounts or deferred loan fees.

(2)
All variable-rate loans assume a one-month LIBOR rate of 1.12% (the actual one-month LIBOR rate at December 31, 2003).

(3)
Weighted average ratio of first dollar current loan carrying value to underlying collateral value using third-party appraisal or the Company's internal valuation.

(4)
Weighted average ratio of last dollar current loan carrying value to underlying collateral value using third-party appraisal or the Company's internal valuation.

(5)
Junior first mortgages represent promissory notes secured by first mortgages which are junior to other promissory notes secured by the same first mortgage.

11


Corporate Finance

        The Company provides senior and subordinated capital to corporations engaged in real estate or real estate-related businesses. Financings may be either secured or unsecured and typically range in size from $20 million to $150 million. The Company's corporate finance transactions have maturities generally ranging from five to ten years.

        As of December 31, 2003, the Company's corporate finance investments have the following characteristics:

Investment Class

  Collateral Types
  # of
Loans
In Class

  Current
Carrying
Value(1)

  Current
Principal
Balance
Outstanding

  Weighted
Average
Stated
Pay Rate(2)

  Weighted
Average First
Dollar
Current
Loan-to-
Value(3)

  Weighted
Average Last
Dollar
Current
Loan-to-
Value(4)

 
First Mortgages   Industrial, R&D/Hotel/
Entertainment, Leisure
  7   $ 196,532   $ 210,579   7.44 % 11 % 60 %
Junior First Mortgages(5)   Office/Retail/Hotel
Entertainment, Leisure/Other
  6     127,753     127,481   7.37 % 49 % 63 %
Corporate Loans/Other   Office/Residential/Retail/Industrial, R&D/Other   10     228,158     242,702   8.56 % 62 % 72 %
       
 
 
             
Total       23   $ 552,443   $ 580,762              
       
 
 
             

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
Where Current Carrying Value differs from Current Principal Balance Outstanding, the difference represents unamortized amount of acquired premiums, discounts or deferred loan fees.

(2)
All variable-rate loans assume a one-month LIBOR rate of 1.12% (the actual one-month LIBOR rate at December 31, 2003).

(3)
Weighted average ratio of first dollar current loan carrying value to underlying collateral value using third-party appraisal or the Company's internal valuation.

(4)
Weighted average ratio of last dollar current loan carrying value to underlying collateral value using third-party appraisal or the Company's internal valuation.

(5)
Junior first mortgages represent promissory notes secured by first mortgages which are junior to other promissory notes secured by the same first mortgage.

Loan Acquisition

        The Company acquires whole loans and loan participations which represent attractive risk-reward opportunities. Loans are generally acquired at a small discount to the principal balance outstanding. Loan acquisitions typically range in size from $5 million to $100 million and are collateralized by all major property types. The Company's loan acquisition transactions have maturities generally ranging from three to ten years.

        For accounting purposes, these loans are initially reflected at the Company's acquisition cost which represents the outstanding balance net of the acquisition discount or premium. The Company amortizes such discounts or premiums as an adjustment to increase or decrease the yield, respectively, realized on these loans using the effective interest method. As such, differences between carrying value and principal balances outstanding do not represent embedded losses or gains as the Company generally plans to hold such loans to maturity.

12



        As of December 31, 2003, the Company's loan acquisition investments have the following characteristics:

Investment Class

  Collateral Types
  # of
Loans
In Class

  Current
Carrying
Value(1)

  Current
Principal
Balance
Outstanding

  Weighted
Average
Stated
Pay Rate(2)

  Weighted
Average First
Dollar
Current
Loan-to-
Value(3)

  Weighted
Average Last
Dollar
Current
Loan-to-
Value(4)

 
First Mortgages   Office/Retail/Other   4   $ 314,098   $ 327,658   7.98 % 0 % 82 %
Second Mortgages   Other   3     18,848     25,905   6.75 % 59 % 66 %
Corporate Loans/Other   Hotel   5     89,418     112,769   7.54 % 64 % 81 %
       
 
 
             
Total       12   $ 422,364   $ 466,332              
       
 
 
             

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
Where Current Carrying Value differs from Current Principal Balance Outstanding, the difference represents unamortized amount of acquired premiums, discounts or deferred loan fees.

(2)
All variable-rate loans assume a one-month LIBOR rate of 1.12% (the actual one-month LIBOR rate at December 31, 2003).

(3)
Weighted average ratio of first dollar current loan carrying value to underlying collateral value using third-party appraisal or the Company's internal valuation.

(4)
Weighted average ratio of last dollar current loan carrying value to underlying collateral value using third-party appraisal or the Company's internal valuation.

Corporate Tenant Leasing:

        The Company, directly and through its Leasing Subsidiary, provides capital to corporations and borrowers who control facilities leased to single creditworthy tenants. The Company's net leased assets are generally mission-critical headquarters or distribution facilities that are subject to long-term leases with rated corporate credit tenants, and which provide for all expenses at the property to be paid by the corporate tenant on a triple net lease basis. CTL transactions have terms generally ranging from ten to 20 years and typically range in size from $20 million to $150 million.

        The Company pursues the origination of CTL transactions by structuring purchase/leasebacks and by acquiring facilities subject to existing long-term net leases. In a typical purchase/leaseback transaction, the Company purchases a corporation's facility and leases it back to that corporation subject to a long-term net lease. This structure allows the corporate customer to reinvest the proceeds from the sale of its facilities into its core business, while the Company capitalizes on its structured financing expertise.

        The Company generally intends to hold its CTL assets for long-term investment. However, subject to certain tax restrictions, the Company may dispose of an asset if it deems the disposition to be in the Company's best interests and may either reinvest the disposition proceeds, use the proceeds to reduce debt, or distribute the proceeds to shareholders.

        The Company's CTL investments primarily represent a diversified portfolio of mission-critical headquarters or distribution facilities subject to net lease agreements with creditworthy corporate tenants. The Company generally seeks general-purpose real estate with residual values that represent a discount to current market values and replacement costs. Under a typical net lease agreement, the corporate customer agrees to pay a base monthly operating lease payment and all facility operating expenses (including taxes, maintenance and insurance).

        The Company generally seeks corporate tenants with the following characteristics:

    Established companies with stable core businesses or market leaders in growing industries.

    Investment-grade credit strength or appropriate credit enhancements if corporate credit strength is not sufficient on a stand-alone basis.

    Commitment to the facility as a mission-critical asset to their on-going businesses.

13


        As of December 31, 2003, the Company had 160 corporate customers operating in more than 23 major industry sectors, including aerospace, energy, finance, healthcare, manufacturing, technology and telecommunications. The majority of these customers represent well-recognized national and international companies, such as Federal Express, IBM, Nike, Nokia, the U.S. Government and Verizon.

        As of December 31, 2003, the Company's CTL portfolio has the following tenant credit characteristics:

 
  Annualized In-Place
Operating
Lease Income(3)

  % of In-Place
Operating
Lease Income

 
 
  (In thousands)

   
 
Investment grade(1)   $ 124,140   42.27 %
Implied investment grade(2)     41,847   14.25 %
Non-investment grade     43,215   14.71 %
Unrated     84,504   28.77 %
   
 
 
    $ 293,706   100.00 %
   
 
 

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
A customer's credit rating is considered "Investment Grade" if the tenants' or its guarantor has a published senior unsecured credit rating of Baa3/BBB- or above by one or more of the three national rating agencies. Where a customer's credit is rated investment grade by one agency and non-investment grade by another, the Company only classifies the credit "Investment Grade" if the agency rating the credit investment grade is Standard & Poor's or Moody's Investors Service.

(2)
A customer's credit rating is considered "Implied Investment Grade" if it is 100.00% owned by an investment-grade parent or it has no published ratings, but has credit characteristics that the Company believes warrant an investment grade senior unsecured credit rating. Examples at December 31, 2003 include Cisco Systems Inc., Northrop Grumman Information and Volkswagen of America, Inc.

(3)
Reflects annualized GAAP operating lease income for leases in place at December 31, 2003. The operating lease income includes the Company's pro rata share from facilities owned by the Company's joint ventures.

        Risk Management Strategies.    The Company believes that diligent risk management of its CTL assets is an essential component of its long-term strategy. There are several ways to optimize the performance and maximize the value of CTL assets. The Company monitors its portfolio for changes that could affect the performance of the markets, credits and industries in which it has invested. As part of this monitoring, the Company's risk management group reviews market, customer and industry data and frequently inspects its facilities. In addition, the Company attempts to develop strong relationships with its large corporate customers, which provide a source of information concerning the customers' facilities needs. These relationships allow the Company to be proactive in obtaining early lease renewals and in conducting early marketing of assets where the customer has decided not to renew.

14



        As of December 31, 2003, the Company owned 162 office and industrial facilities principally subject to net leases to 159 customers, comprising 26.3 million square feet in 28 states. The Company also has a portfolio of 17 hotels under a long-term master lease with a single customer. Information regarding the Company's CTL assets as of December 31, 2003 is set forth below:

SIC Code

  # of
Leases

  % of In-Place
Operating
Lease Income(1)

  % of Total
Revenue(2)

73   Business Services   20   14.82 % 6.63%
48   Communications   24   8.93 % 3.99%
70   Hotels, Rooming, Housing & Lodging   3   8.73 % 3.90%
35   Industrial/Commercial Machinery, incl. Computers   17   8.64 % 3.86%
62   Security and Commodity Brokers   5   7.37 % 3.30%
37   Transportation Equipment   7   6.83 % 3.05%
36   Electronic & Other Elec. Equipment   16   6.13 % 2.74%
30   Rubber and Misc. Plastics Products   2   5.96 % 2.66%
49   Electric, Gas and Sanitary Services   3   2.96 % 1.33%
64   Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service   5   2.48 % 1.11%
63   Insurance Carriers   7   2.38 % 1.06%
50   Wholesale Trade-Durable Goods   7   2.30 % 1.03%
91   Executive, Legislative and General Gov't.   5   2.09 % 0.93%
42   Motor Freight Transp. & Warehousing   2   2.05 % 0.92%
58   Eating and Drinking Places   13   2.02 % 0.90%
79   Amusement and Recreation Services   2   1.50 % 0.67%
60   Depository Institutions   3   1.46 % 0.65%
87   Engineering, Accounting & Research Services   7   1.46 % 0.65%
38   Measuring & Analyzing Instruments   5   1.33 % 0.60%
51   Wholesale Trade-Non-Durable Goods   4   1.24 % 0.55%
45   Airports, Flying Fields & Terminal Services   1   1.18 % 0.53%
29   Petroleum Refining   1   1.14 % 0.51%
23   Apparel and Other Finished Products   2   1.07 % 0.48%
    Various   28   5.93 %  
       
 
   
    Total   189   100.00 %  
       
 
   

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
Reflects annualized GAAP operating lease income for leases in place at December 31, 2003. The operating lease income includes the Company's pro rata share from facilities owned by the Company's joint ventures.

(2)
Reflects annualized GAAP operating lease income for leases in place at December 31, 2003 as a percentage of annualized total revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2003.

15


        As of December 31, 2003, lease expirations on the Company's CTL assets, including facilities owned by the Company's joint ventures, are as follows:

Year of Lease Expiration

  Number of Leases Expiring
  Annualized In-Place Operating
Lease Income(1)

  % of In-Place Operating Lease Income
  % of Total
Revenue(2)

 
 
   
  (In thousands)

   
   
 
2004   20   $ 19,599   6.67 % 2.98 %
2005   16     10,723   3.65 % 1.63 %
2006   27     30,073   10.24 % 4.58 %
2007   23     18,448   6.28 % 2.81 %
2008   17     13,714   4.67 % 2.09 %
2009   12     13,478   4.59 % 2.05 %
2010   6     8,557   2.91 % 1.30 %
2011   7     6,131   2.09 % 0.93 %
2012   11     17,367   5.91 % 2.64 %
2013   5     6,816   2.32 % 1.04 %
2014 and thereafter   45     148,800   50.67 % 22.65 %
   
 
 
     
  Total   189   $ 293,706   100.00 %    
   
 
 
     

Weighted average remaining lease term

 

 

 

 

9.93 years

 

 

 

 

 
       
         

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
Reflects annualized GAAP operating lease income for leases in place at December 31, 2003. The operating lease income includes the Company's pro rata share from facilities owned by the Company's joint ventures.

(2)
Reflects annualized GAAP operating lease income for leases in place at December 31, 2003 as a percentage of annualized total revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2003.

Policies with Respect to Other Activities

        The Company's investment, financing and conflicts of interests policies are managed under the ultimate supervision of the Company's Board of Directors. The Board can amend, revise or eliminate these policies at any time without a vote of shareholders. At all times, the Company intends to make investments in a manner consistent with the requirements of the Code for the Company to qualify as a REIT.

Investment Restrictions or Limitations

        The Company does not have any prescribed allocation among investments or product lines. Instead, the Company focuses on corporate and real estate credit underwriting to develop an in-depth analysis of the risk/reward ratios in determining the pricing and advisability of each particular transaction.

        The Company believes that it is not, and intends to conduct its operations so as not to become, regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. The Investment Company Act generally exempts entities that are "primarily engaged in purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate" (collectively, "Qualifying Interests"). The Company intends to rely on current interpretations of the Securities and Exchange Commission in an effort to qualify for this exemption. Based on these interpretations, the Company, among other things, must maintain at least 55.00% of its assets in Qualifying Interests and at least 25.00% of its assets in real estate-related assets (subject to reduction to the extent the Company invests more than 55.00% of its assets in Qualifying Interests). Generally, the Company's senior mortgages, CTL assets and certain of its subordinated mortgages constitute Qualifying Interests.

16



        Subject to the limitations on ownership of certain types of assets and the gross income tests imposed by the Code, the Company also may invest in the securities of other REITs, other entities engaged in real estate activities or other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities.

Competition

        The Company is engaged in a competitive business. In originating and acquiring assets, the Company competes with public and private companies, including other finance companies, mortgage banks, pension funds, savings and loan associations, insurance companies, institutional investors, investment banking firms and other lenders and industry participants, as well as individual investors. Existing industry participants and potential new entrants compete with the Company for the available supply of investments suitable for origination or acquisition, as well as for debt and equity capital. Certain of the Company's competitors are larger than the Company, have longer operating histories, may have access to greater capital and other resources, may have management personnel with more experience than the officers of the Company, and may have other advantages over the Company in conducting certain businesses and providing certain services.

Regulation

        The operations of the Company are subject, in certain instances, to supervision and regulation by state and federal governmental authorities and may be subject to various laws and judicial and administrative decisions imposing various requirements and restrictions, which, among other things: (1) regulate credit granting activities; (2) establish maximum interest rates, finance charges and other charges; (3) require disclosures to customers; (4) govern secured transactions; and (5) set collection, foreclosure, repossession and claims-handling procedures and other trade practices. Although most states do not regulate commercial finance, certain states impose limitations on interest rates and other charges and on certain collection practices and creditor remedies and require licensing of lenders and financiers and adequate disclosure of certain contract terms. The Company is also required to comply with certain provisions of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act that are applicable to commercial loans.

        In the judgment of management, existing statutes and regulations have not had a material adverse effect on the business conducted by the Company. However, it is not possible to forecast the nature of future legislation, regulations, judicial decisions, orders or interpretations, nor their impact upon the future business, financial condition or results of operations or prospects of the Company.

        The Company has elected and expects to continue to make an election to be taxed as a REIT under Section 856 through 860 of the Code. As a REIT, the Company must currently distribute, at a minimum, an amount equal to 90.00% of its taxable income and must distribute 100.00% of its taxable income to avoid paying corporate federal income taxes. REITs are also subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements in order to elect and maintain REIT status. These requirements include specific share ownership tests and assets and gross income composition tests. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to state and local income taxes and to federal income tax and excise tax on its undistributed income.

Factors That May Affect the Company's Business Strategy

        The implementation of the Company's business strategy and investment policies are subject to certain risks, including the effect of economic and other conditions in the United States generally and in markets where the Companys' customers, collateral and corporate facilities are located. In addition, the following factors may affect the Company's financial condition and results of operations:

    The Company may suffer a loss if a borrower defaults on a non-recourse loan or an unsecured loan.

17


    The Company may suffer a loss in the event of a bankruptcy of a borrower, particularly if the borrower has incurred debt that is senior to its loan.

    The Company is subject to the risk that provisions of its loan agreements may be unenforceable or that it may experience delays in enforcing remedies.

    Lease expirations, defaults and terminations will adversely affect its revenue if the Company cannot replace the leases on advantageous terms.

    The Company may not be able to redeploy capital from loans that have been repaid on terms as attractive as the loans being repaid, which may adversely impact its earnings.

    The Company's ownership interests in corporate facilities may be illiquid, hindering its ability to mitigate a loss.

    The Company needs continued access to significant capital, including debt, in order to grow. Increased leverage magnifies changes in its net worth and creates the risk that it might not be able to service its debt obligations.

    As an owner of real estate, the Company faces risks of liability under environmental laws.

    The Company will suffer adverse consequences if it fails to qualify as a REIT.

Environmental Matters

        Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner of real estate (including, in certain circumstances, a secured lender that succeeds to ownership or control of a property) may become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, under or in its property. Those laws typically impose cleanup responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or control party knew of or was responsible for the release or presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of investigation, remediation or removal of those substances may be substantial. The owner or control party of a site may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from a site. Certain environmental laws also impose liability in connection with the handling of or exposure to asbestos-containing materials, pursuant to which third parties may seek recovery from owners of real properties for personal injuries associated with asbestos-containing materials. Absent succeeding to ownership or control of real property, a secured lender is not likely to be subject to any of these forms of environmental liability. The Company is not currently aware of any environmental issues which could materially affect the Company.

Employees

        As of March 1, 2004, the Company had 155 employees and believes its relationships with its employees to be good. The Company's employees are not represented by a collective bargaining agreement.

Website Access to Reports

        The Company maintains a website at www.istarfinancial.com. Effective as of January 1, 2003, through the Company's website, the Company makes available free of charge its annual proxy statement, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those Reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC.

18



Item 2.    Properties

        The Company's principal executive and administrative offices are located at 1114 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036. Its telephone number, general facsimile number and web address are (212) 930-9400, (212) 930-9494 and www.istarfinancial.com, respectively. The lease for the Company's primary corporate office space expires in February 2010. The Company believes that this office space is suitable for its operations for the foreseeable future. The Company also maintains super-regional offices in Atlanta, Georgia; Hartford, Connecticut; and San Francisco, California, as well as regional offices in Boston, Massachusetts; Dallas, Texas; and Denver, Colorado.

        See Item 1—"Corporate Tenant Leasing" for a discussion of CTL facilities held by the Company and its Leasing Subsidiary for investment purposes and Item 8—"Schedule III—Corporate Tenant Lease Assets and Accumulated Depreciation" for a detailed listing of such facilities.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

        The Company is not a party to any material litigation or legal proceedings, or to the best of its knowledge, any threatened litigation or legal proceedings which, in the opinion of management, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2003.

19



PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant's Equity and Related Share Matters

        The Company's Common Stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "SFI."

        The high and low sales prices per share of Common Stock are set forth below for the periods indicated.

Quarter Ended

  High
  Low
2002            
March 31, 2002   $ 28.90   $ 24.59
June 30, 2002   $ 31.45   $ 28.50
September 30, 2002   $ 29.55   $ 25.30
December 31, 2002   $ 28.40   $ 25.90

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 
March 31, 2003   $ 29.90   $ 27.05
June 30, 2003   $ 36.60   $ 29.68
September 30, 2003   $ 38.95   $ 35.00
December 31, 2003   $ 40.00   $ 37.25

        On March 1, 2004, the closing sale price of the Common Stock as reported by the NYSE was $42.50. The Company had 2,980 holders of record of Common Stock as of March 1, 2004.

        At December 31, 2003, the Company had six series of preferred stock outstanding: 9.375% Series B Preferred Stock, 9.200% Series C Preferred Stock, 8.000% Series D Preferred Stock, 7.875% Series E Preferred Stock, 7.800% Series F Preferred Stock and 7.650% Series G Preferred Stock. Each of the Series B, C, D, E, F and G preferred stock is publicly traded.

Dividends

        The Company's management expects that any taxable income remaining after the distribution of preferred dividends and the regular quarterly or other dividends on its Common Stock will be distributed annually to the holders of the Common Stock on or prior to the date of the first regular quarterly dividend payment date of the following taxable year. The dividend policy with respect to the Common Stock is subject to revision by the Board of Directors. All distributions in excess of dividends on preferred stock or those required for the Company to maintain its REIT status will be made by the Company at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the taxable earnings of the Company, the financial condition of the Company, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. The Board of Directors has not established any minimum distribution level. In order to maintain its qualifications as a REIT, the Company intends to make regular quarterly dividends to its shareholders that, on an annual basis, will represent at least 90.00% of its taxable income (which may not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP), determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding any net capital gains.

        Holders of Common Stock will be entitled to receive distributions if, as and when the Board of Directors authorizes and declares distributions. However, rights to distributions may be subordinated to the rights of holders of preferred stock, when preferred stock is issued and outstanding. In addition, most of the Company's borrowings contain covenants that limit the Company's ability to pay distributions on its capital stock based upon the Company's adjusted earnings provided however, that these borrowings generally permit the Company to pay the minimum amount of distributions necessary to maintain the Company's REIT status.In any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, each outstanding share of Common Stock will entitle its holder to a proportionate share of the assets that remain after the Company pays its liabilities and any preferential distributions owed to preferred shareholders.

20


        The following table sets forth the dividends paid or declared by the Company on its Common Stock:

Quarter Ended

  Shareholder
Record Date

  Dividend/
Share

2002(1)          
March 31, 2002   April 15, 2002   $ 0.6300
June 30, 2002   July 15, 2002   $ 0.6300
September 30, 2002   October 15, 2002   $ 0.6300
December 31, 2002   December 16, 2002   $ 0.6300

2003(2)

 

 

 

 

 
March 31, 2003   April 15, 2003   $ 0.6625
June 30, 2003   July 15, 2003   $ 0.6625
September 30, 2003   October 15, 2003   $ 0.6625
December 31, 2003   December 15, 2003   $ 0.6625

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
For tax reporting purposes, the 2002 dividends were classified as 87.61% ($2.2078) ordinary income, 1.80% ($0.0454) 20.00% capital gain and 10.59% ($0.2668) return of capital for those shareholders who held shares of the Company for the entire year.

(2)
For tax reporting purposes, the 2003 dividends were classified as 68.90% ($1.8258) ordinary income, 2.46% ($0.0651) 20.00% capital gain, 1.90% ($0.0503) 15.00% capital gain (post May 5, 2003), 2.67% ($0.0709) 25.00% Section 1250 capital gain and 24.08% ($0.6380) return of capital for those shareholders who held shares of the Company for the entire year.

        The Company declared dividends aggregating $14.3 million, $4.7 million, $3.0 million, $8.0 million $4.9 million, $1.7 million, and $170,000, respectively, on its Series A, B, C, D, E, F and G preferred stock, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2003. There are no dividend arrearages on any of the preferred shares currently outstanding.

        Distributions to shareholders will generally be taxable as ordinary income, although a portion of such dividends may be designated by the Company as capital gain or may constitute a tax-free return of capital. The Company annually furnishes to each of its shareholders a statement setting forth the distributions paid during the preceding year and their characterization as ordinary income, capital gain or return of capital.

        The Company intends to continue to declare quarterly distributions on its Common Stock. No assurance, however, can be given as to the amounts or timing of future distributions, as such distributions are subject to the Company's earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, debt covenants and such other factors as the Company's Board of Directors deems relevant. On February 11, 2004, the Company announced that, effective April 1, 2004, its Board of Directors approved an increase in the regular quarterly dividend on its Common Stock for 2004 to $0.6975 per share, representing $2.79 per share on an annualized basis.

21


Disclosure of Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan category

  (a)
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

  (b)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

  (c)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders-stock options(1)   2,870,138   $ 18.59   1,880,530
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders-restricted stock awards(2)   2,422,037     N/A   N/A
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders-high performance units(3)       N/A   N/A
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders        
   
 
 
Total   5,292,175   $ 18.59   1,880,530
   
 
 

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
Stock Options—As more fully discussed in Note 10 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, there were approximately 2.9 million stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2003. These 2.9 million options, together with their weighted-average exercise price, have been included in columns (a) and (b), above. The 1.9 million figure in column (c) represents the aggregate amount of stock options or restricted stock awards that could be granted under compensation plans approved by the Company's security holders after giving effect to previously issued awards of stock options, shares of restricted stock and other performance awards.

(2)
Restricted Stock—As of December 31, 2003, the Company has issued 933,475 shares of restricted stock. The restrictions on 422,037 of such shares primarily relate to the passage of time for vesting periods which have not lapsed, and are thus not included in the Company's outstanding share balance. These shares have been included in column (a), above.

Phantom Shares—As more fully discussed in Note 10 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has granted 2.0 million unvested phantom shares, each of which represents one share of the Company's Common Stock. As of December 31, 2003, all of these shares have contingently vested. These shares have been included in column (a), above. Shares that have contingently vested generally are not expected to become fully vested until March 30, 2004.

(3)
High Performance Unit Program—In May 2002, the Company's shareholders approved the iStar Financial High Performance Unit Program. The Program is more fully described in the Company's proxy statement dated April 8, 2002 and in Note 10 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. The program entitles the employee participants to receive cash distributions in the nature of common stock dividends if the total rate of return on the Company's Common Stock exceeds certain performance levels. The first and second tranches of the program were completed on December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively. As a result of the Company's superior performance during the valuation period for both tranches, the program participants are entitled to share in cash distributions equivalent to dividends payable on 819,254 shares and 987,149 shares of the Company's Common Stock, in the aggregate, as and when such dividends are paid by the Company for the 2002 and the 2003 plan, respectively. Such dividend payments for the first tranche began with the first quarter 2003 dividend and those for the second tranche will begin with the first quarter 2004 dividend and will reduce net income allocable to common stockholders when paid. No shares of the Company's Common Stock will be issued in connection with this program and thus no effect has been reflected in the above table.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

        The following table sets forth selected financial data on a consolidated historical basis for the Company. On November 4, 1999, the Company acquired TriNet, which increased the size of the Company's operations, and also acquired its former external advisor. Operating results for the year ended December 31, 1999 reflect only the effects of these transactions subsequent to their consummation.

22


        Accordingly, the results of operations for the Company for the year ended December 31, 1999, does not reflect the current operations of the Company as a well capitalized, internally-managed finance company operating in the commercial real estate industry. For these reasons, the Company believes that the information should be read in conjunction with the discussions set forth in Item 7—"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2003 presentation.

 
  For the Years Ended December 31,

 
 
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
  1999
 
 
  (In thousands, except per share data and ratios)

 
OPERATING DATA:                                
Interest income   $ 304,394   $ 255,631   $ 254,119   $ 268,011   $ 209,848  
Operating lease income     265,478     236,643     179,279     171,247     40,633  
Other income     36,677     27,993     31,000     17,902     12,900  
   
 
 
 
 
 
    Total revenue     606,549     520,267     464,398     457,160     263,381  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense     194,999     185,375     169,974     173,549     91,112  
Operating costs-corporate tenant lease assets     17,371     13,202     12,029     12,230     2,111  
Depreciation and amortization     55,286     46,948     34,573     33,529     10,219  
General and administrative     38,153     30,449     24,151     25,706     6,269  
General and administrative-stock-based compensation     3,633     17,998     3,574     2,864     412  
Provision for loan losses     7,500     8,250     7,000     6,500     4,750  
Loss on early extinguishment of debt         12,166     1,620     705      
Advisory fees                     16,193  
Costs incurred in acquiring former external advisor(1)                     94,476  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Total costs and expenses     316,942     314,388     252,921     255,083     225,542  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Income before equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries, minority interest and other items     289,607     205,879     211,477     202,077     37,839  
Equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries     (4,284 )   1,222     7,361     4,796     235  
Minority interest in consolidated entities     (249 )   (162 )   (218 )   (195 )   (41 )
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(2)             (282 )        
   
 
 
 
 
 
Net income from continuing operations     285,074     206,939     218,338     206,678     38,033  
Income from discontinued operations     1,916     7,614     10,429     7,960     853  
Gain from discontinued operations     5,167     717     1,145     2,948      
   
 
 
 
 
 
Net income   $ 292,157   $ 215,270   $ 229,912   $ 217,586   $ 38,886  
Preferred dividend requirements     (36,908 )   (36,908 )   (36,908 )   (36,908 )   (23,843 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
Net income allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders(3)   $ 255,249   $ 178,362   $ 193,004   $ 180,678   $ 15,043  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Basic earning per common share(4)(5)   $ 2.52   $ 1.98   $ 2.24   $ 2.11   $ 0.25  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per common share(5)(6)   $ 2.43   $ 1.93   $ 2.19   $ 2.10   $ 0.25  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends declared per common share(7)   $ 2.65   $ 2.52   $ 2.45   $ 2.40   $ 1.86  
   
 
 
 
 
 

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Adjusted diluted earnings allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders(8)(10)   $ 341,177   $ 277,736   $ 254,095   $ 230,371   $ 127,798  
EBITDA(9)(10)   $ 535,608   $ 439,424   $ 423,385   $ 413,951   $ 233,881  
Ratio of EBITDA to interest expense(11)     2.75x     2.37x     2.49x     2.39x     2.57x  
Ratio of EBITDA to combined fixed charges(12)     2.31x     1.98x     2.05x     1.97x     2.03x  
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(13)     2.49x     2.14x     2.25x     2.18x     2.45x  
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends(13)     2.10x     1.78x     1.86x     1.80x     1.94x  
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic     100,314     89,886     86,349     85,441     57,749  
Weighted average common shares outstanding-diluted     104,101     92,649     88,234     86,151     60,393  
Cash flows from:                                
  Operating activities   $ 338,262   $ 348,793   $ 293,260   $ 219,868   $ 119,625  
  Investing activities     (974,354 )   (1,149,070 )   (349,525 )   (193,805 )   (143,911 )
  Financing activities     700,248     800,541     49,183     (37,719 )   48,584  

BALANCE SHEET DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Loans and other lending investments, net     3,702,674     3,050,342     2,377,763     2,227,083     2,003,506  
Corporate tenant lease assets, net     2,535,885     2,291,805     1,781,565     1,592,087     1,654,300  
Total assets     6,660,590     5,611,697     4,380,640     4,034,775     3,813,552  
Debt obligations     4,113,732     3,461,590     2,495,369     2,131,967     1,901,204  
Minority interest in consolidated entities     5,106     2,581     2,650     6,224     2,565  
Shareholders' equity     2,415,228     2,025,300     1,787,778     1,787,885     1,801,343  

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Total debt to shareholders' equity     1.7x     1.7x     1.4x     1.2x     1.1x  

23


Explanatory Notes:


(1)
This amount represents a non-recurring, non-cash charge of approximately $94.5 million relating to the acquisition of the Company's formal external advisor in November 1999.

(2)
Represents one-time effect of adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" as of January 1, 2001.

(3)
HPU holders are Company employees who purchased high performance common stock units under the Company's High Performance Unit Program.

(4)
Prior to November 1999, earnings per common share excludes 1.00% of net income allocable to the Company's former class B shares. The former class B shares were exchanged for Common Stock in connection with the acquisition of TriNet and other related transactions on November 4, 1999. As a result, the Company now has a single class of Common Stock outstanding.

(5)
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, net income used to calculate earnings per basic and diluted common share excludes $2,006 and $1,994 of net income allocable to HPU holders, respectively.

(6)
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, net income used to calculate earnings per diluted common share includes joint venture income of $167.

(7)
The Company generally declares common and preferred dividends in the month subsequent to the end of the quarter.

(8)
Adjusted earnings represents net income to common shareholders and HPU holders computed in accordance with GAAP, before depreciation, amortization, gain from discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. For the year ended December 31, 2002, adjusted earnings excludes the $15.0 million charge related to the performance based vesting of restricted shares granted under the Company's long-term incentive plan and includes $3.9 million of cash paid for prepayment penalties associated with early extinguishment of debt. For the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, adjusted earnings includes $1.0 million and $317,000 of cash paid for prepayment penalties associated with early extinguishment of debt. For the year ended December 31, 1999, adjusted earnings excludes the non-recurring, non-cash cost incurred in acquiring the Company's former external advisor. (See reconciliation in Item 7—"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations").

(9)
EBITDA is calculated as net income plus the sum of interest expense, depreciation and amortization, minority interest in consolidated entities, cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and costs incurred in acquiring former advisor minus income from discontinued operations and gain from discontinued operations.

 
  For the Years Ended December 31,

 
 
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
  1999
 
 
  (In thousands)

 
Net income   $ 292,157   $ 215,270   $ 229,912   $ 217,586   $ 38,886  
Add: Interest expense     194,999     185,375     169,974     173,549     91,112  
Add: Depreciation and amortization     55,286     46,948     34,573     33,529     10,219  
Add: Minority interest in consolidated entities     249     162     218     195     41  
Add: Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle             282          
Add: Costs incurred in acquiring former advisor                     94,476  
Less: Income from discontinued operations     (1,916 )   (7,614 )   (10,429 )   (7,960 )   (853 )
Less: Gain from discontinued operations     (5,167 )   (717 )   (1,145 )   (2,948 )    
   
 
 
 
 
 
EBITDA   $ 535,608   $ 439,424   $ 423,385   $ 413,951   $ 233,881  
   
 
 
 
 
 
(10)
Each of adjusted earnings and EBITDA should be examined in conjunction with net income as shown in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Neither adjusted earnings nor EBITDA should be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of the Company's performance, or to cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of the Company's liquidity, nor is either measure indicative of funds available to fund the Company's cash needs or available for distribution to shareholders. The Company's management believes that adjusted earnings and EBITDA more closely approximate operating cash flow and are useful measures for investors to consider, in conjunction with net income and other GAAP measures. This is because, as a commercial finance company that focuses on real estate lending and corporate tenant leasing; therefore, the Company's net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) reflects significant non-cash depreciation expense on CTL assets and significant deferred financing costs. Several of the Company's material borrowing arrangements contain covenants based on adjusted earnings, therefore, the Company must monitor adjusted earnings in order to ensure compliance with these covenants. It should be noted that the Company's manner of calculating adjusted earnings and EBITDA may differ from the calculations of similarly-titled measures by other companies.

(11)
The 1999 EBITDA to interest expense ratio on a pro forma basis would have been 2.83x.

(12)
Combined fixed charges are comprised of interest expense, capitalized interest, amortization of loan costs and preferred stock dividend requirements. The 1999 EBITDA to combined fixed charges ratio on a pro forma basis would have been 2.23x.

(13)
For the purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, "earnings" consist of income from continuing operations before adjustment for minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries, or income or loss from equity investees, income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle plus "fixed charges" and certain other adjustments. "Fixed charges" consist of interest incurred on all indebtedness related to continuing operations (including amortization of original issue discount) and the implied interest component of the Company's rent obligations in the years presented. For 1999, these ratios exclude the effect of a non-recurring, non-cash charge in the amount of approximately $94.5 million relating to the November 1999 acquisition of the former external advisor to the Company. Including the effect of this non-recurring, non-cash charge, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges for that period would have been 1.4x and the Company's ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends would have been 1.1x.

24


Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

        The Company is in the business of providing custom-tailored financing solutions to private and corporate owners of real estate nationwide. Depending upon market conditions and the Company's views about the United States economy generally and the real estate markets specifically, the Company will adjust its investment focus from time to time and emphasize certain products, industries and geographic markets over others.

        The Company began its business in 1993 through private investment funds formed to take advantage of the lack of well-capitalized lenders capable of servicing the needs of customers in its markets. In March 1998, the private investment funds contributed their approximately $1.1 billion of assets to the Company's predecessor in exchange for a controlling interest in that public company. In November 1999, the Company acquired its leasing subsidiary, TriNet Corporate Realty Trust, Inc. ("TriNet" or the "Leasing Subsidiary"), which was then the largest publicly-traded company specializing in corporate sale/leaseback for office and industrial facilities (the "TriNet Acquisition"). Concurrent with the TriNet Acquisition, the Company also acquired its former external advisor in exchange for shares of its Common Stock and converted its organizational form to a Maryland corporation. The Company's Common Stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "SFI" in November 1999.

        The Company has experienced significant growth since its first quarter as a public company in 1998. Transaction volume for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 was $2.2 billion, compared to $1.7 billion in 2002 and $1.1 billion in 2001. The Company completed 60 financing commitments in 2003, compared to 41 in 2002 and 35 in 2001. Repeat customer business has become a key source of transaction volume for the Company, accounting for approximately 55.00% of the Company's cumulative volume through the end of 2003. Based upon feedback from its customers, the Company believes that greater recognition of the Company and its reputation for completing highly structured transactions in an efficient manner have also contributed to increases in its transaction volume. The benefits of higher investment volumes were mitigated to an extent by the extremely low interest rate environment in 2002 and 2003. Low interest rates benefit the Company in that its borrowing costs decrease, but similarly, earnings on its variable-rate lending investments also decrease.

        During the difficult economic and real estate market conditions of 2002 and 2003, the Company focused its investment activity on lower risk investments such as first mortgages and corporate tenant lease transactions that met its risk adjusted return standards. The Company has experienced minimal losses on its lending investments. In 2003, the Company also focused on re-leasing space at its corporate tenant lease facilities under longer term leases in an effort to reduce the impact of lease expirations on the Company's earnings.

        The Company has continued to broaden its sources of capital and was particularly active in the capital markets in 2003. The Company's strong performance and the low interest rate environment enabled the Company to issue equity and debt securities in 2003 (and in early 2004) on attractive pricing terms. The Company used the proceeds from the issuances to repay secured indebtedness and to refinance higher cost capital. The Company made significant progress in 2003 in migrating its debt obligations from secured debt towards unsecured debt. While the Company considers it prudent to have a broad array of sources of capital, including secured financing arrangements, the Company will continue to seek to reduce its use of secured debt and increase its use of unsecured debt.

25



Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002

        Interest income—Interest income increased by $48.8 million to $304.4 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2003 from $255.6 million for the same period in 2002. This increase was primarily due to $102.3 million of interest income on new originations or additional fundings, offset by a $51.2 million decrease from the repayment of loans and other lending investments. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in interest income on the Company's variable-rate lending investments as a result of lower average one-month LIBOR rates of 1.21% in 2003, compared to 1.77% in 2002.

        Operating lease income—Operating lease income increased by $28.9 million to $265.5 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2003 from $236.6 million for the same period in 2002. Of this increase, $36.6 million was attributable to new CTL investments. This increase was partially offset by $7.0 million of lower operating lease income due to vacancies on certain CTL assets.

        Other income—Other income generally consists of prepayment penalties and realized gains from the early repayment of loans and other lending investments, financial advisory and asset management fees, lease termination fees, mortgage servicing fees, loan participation payments and dividends on certain investments. During the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, other income included realized gains on sale of lending investments of $16.3 million, income from loan repayments and prepayment penalties of $17.3 million, asset management, mortgage servicing and other fees of approximately $2.6 million and other miscellaneous income such as dividend payments of $489,000.

        During the 12 months ended December 31, 2002, other income included prepayment penalties and realized gains on loan repayments of $12.6 million, asset management, mortgage servicing, and other fees of approximately $9.0 million, lease termination fees of $2.9 million, loan participation payments of $3.3 million and other miscellaneous income such as dividend payments and insurance claims of $994,000.

        Interest expense—For the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, interest expense increased by $9.6 million to $195.0 million from $185.4 million for the same period in 2002. This increase was primarily due to higher average borrowings on the Company's debt obligations, term loans and secured notes. This increase was partially offset by lower average one-month LIBOR rates, which averaged 1.21% in 2003 compared to 1.77% in 2002 on the unhedged portion of the Company's variable-rate debt and by a $4.5 million decrease in amortization of deferred financing costs on the Company's debt obligations in 2003 compared to the same period in 2002.

        Operating costs—corporate tenant lease assets—For the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, operating costs increased by approximately $4.2 million from $13.2 million to $17.4 million for the same period in 2002. This increase is primarily related to new CTL investments and higher unrecoverable operating costs due to vacancies on certain CTL assets.

        Depreciation and amortization—Depreciation and amortization increased by $8.4 million to $55.3 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2003 from $46.9 million for the same period in 2002. This increase is primarily due to depreciation on new CTL investments.

        General and administrative—For the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, general and administrative expenses increased by $7.8 million to $38.2 million, compared to $30.4 million for the same period in 2002. This increase is primarily due to the consolidation of iStar Operating and the result of compensation expense recognized for dividends paid on the Chief Executive Officer's contingently vested phantom shares (see Note 10 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements).

26



        General and administrative—stock-based compensation—General and administrative-stock-based compensation decreased by $14.4 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. In 2002, the Company recognized a charge of approximately $15.0 million related to the performance-based vesting of 500,000 restricted shares granted under the Company's long-term incentive plan in 2002 (see Note 10 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements).

        Provision for loan losses—The Company's charge for provision for loan losses decreased to $7.5 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2003 compared to $8.3 million in the same period in 2002. As more fully discussed in Note 4 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has experienced minimal actual losses on its loan investments to date. The Company considers it prudent to reflect provisions for loan losses on a portfolio basis based upon the Company's assessment of general market conditions, the Company's internal risk management policies and credit risk rating system, industry loss experience, the Company's assessment of the likelihood of delinquencies or defaults, and the value of the collateral underlying its investments. Accordingly, since its first full quarter operating its current business as a public company (the quarter ended June 30, 1998), management has reflected quarterly provisions for loan losses in its operating results.

        Loss on early extinguishment of debt—During the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, the Company had no losses on early extinguishment of debt.

        During the 12 months ended December 31, 2002, the Company had $12.2 million of losses on early extinguishment of debt associated with the prepayment penalties and amortization of deferred financing fess related to the repayment of the STARs, Series 2000-1 bonds. This loss of $12.2 million represented approximately $8.2 million in unamortized deferred financing costs and approximately $4.0 million in prepayment penalties. In accordance with SFAS No. 145 these costs were reclassified from "Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt" into continuing operations for comparative purposes for financial statements for periods after January 1, 2003.

        Equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries—For the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries decreased by $5.5 million to $(4.3) million from $1.2 million for the same period in 2002. This decrease is primarily due to certain lease terminations in one of the Company's CTL joint venture investments. (see Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements).

        Income from discontinued operations—For the 12 months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, operating income earned by the Company on CTL assets sold (prior to their sale) and assets held for sale of approximately $1.9 million and $7.6 million, respectively, is classified as "discontinued operations," even though such income was recognized by the Company prior to the asset dispositions or classification as "Assets held for sale" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

        Gain from discontinued operations—During 2003, the Company disposed of nine CTL assets for net proceeds of $47.6 million, and recognized a gain of approximately $5.2 million.

        During 2002, the Company disposed of one CTL asset for net proceeds of $3.7 million, and recognized a gain of approximately $595,000. In addition, one of the Company's customers exercised an option to terminate its lease on 50.00% of the land leased from the Company. In connection with this termination, the Company realized $17.5 million in cash lease termination payments, offset by a $17.4 million impairment change in connection with the termination, resulting in a net gain of approximately $123,000.

27



Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001

        Interest income—Interest income increased by $1.5 million to $255.6 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2002 from $254.1 million for the same period in 2001. This increase was primarily due to $72.5 million of interest income on new originations or additional fundings, offset by a $50.5 million decrease from the repayment of loans and other lending investments. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in interest income on the Company's variable-rate lending investments as the result of lower average one-month LIBOR rates of 1.77% in 2002, compared to 3.88% in 2001.

        Operating lease income—Operating lease income increased by $57.3 million to $236.6 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2002 from $179.3 million for the same period in 2001. Of this increase, $59.6 million was attributable to new CTL investments. This increase was partially offset by CTL dispositions and lower operating lease income due to vacancies on certain CTL assets.

        Other income—Other income generally consists of prepayment penalties and realized gains from the early repayment of loans and other lending investments, financial advisory and asset management fees, lease termination fees, mortgage servicing fees, loan participation payments and dividends on certain investments. During the 12 months ended December 31, 2002, other income included prepayment penalties and realized gains on loan repayments of $12.6 million, asset management, mortgage servicing and other fees of approximately $9.0 million, lease termination fees of $2.9 million, loan participation payments of $3.3 million, and other miscellaneous income such as dividend payments and insurance claims of $994,000.

        During the 12 months ended December 30, 2001, other income included loan participation payments of $13.1 million, prepayment penalties and gains on loan repayments of $13.0 million and financial advisory, lease termination, asset management and mortgage servicing fees of $5.3 million.

        Interest expense—For the 12 months ended December 31, 2002, interest expense increased by $15.4 million to $185.4 million from $170.0 million for the same period in 2001. This increase was primarily due to the higher average borrowings on the Company's debt obligations, term loans and secured notes, and by approximately $2.7 million due to additional amortization of deferred financing costs on the Company's debt obligations in 2002 compared to the same period in 2001. This increase was partially offset by lower average one-month LIBOR rates on the Company's variable-rate debt of 1.77% in 2002, compared to 3.88% in 2001.

        Operating costs—corporate tenant lease assets—For the 12 months ended December 31, 2002, operating costs increased by approximately $1.2 million from $12.0 million to $13.2 million for the same period in 2001. This increase is primarily related to new CTL investments and higher operating costs on certain CTL assets, partially offset by CTL dispositions.

        Depreciation and amortization—Depreciation and amortization increased by $12.3 million to $46.9 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2002 from $34.6 million for the same period in 2001. This increase is primarily due to new CTL investments.

        General and administrative—For the 12 months ended December 31, 2002, general and administrative expenses increased by $6.2 million to $30.4 million, compared to $24.2 million for the same period in 2001. This increase is primarily the result of an increase in personnel and related costs.

        General and administrative—stock-based compensation—General and administrative-stock-based compensation increased by $14.4 million primarily due to a charge related to the performance-based vesting of 500,000 restricted shares granted under the Company's long-term incentive plan and tied to overall shareholder performance (see Note 10 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements).

28



        Provision for loan losses—The Company's charge for provision for loan losses increased to $8.3 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2002 compared to $7.0 million for the same period in 2001. As more fully discussed in Note 4 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has experienced minimal actual losses on its loan investments to date. The Company considers it prudent to reflect provisions for loan losses on a portfolio basis based upon the Company's assessment of general market conditions, the Company's internal risk management policies and credit risk rating system, industry loss experience, the Company's assessment of the likelihood of delinquencies or defaults, and the value of the collateral underlying its investments. Accordingly, since its first full quarter operating its current business as a public company (the quarter ended June 30, 1998), management has reflected quarterly provisions for loan losses in its operating results.

        Loss on early extinguishment of debt—During the 12 months ended December 31, 2002, the Company had $12.2 million of losses on early extinguishment of debt associated with the prepayment penalties and amortization of deferred financing fess related to the repayment of the STARs, Series 2000-1 bonds. This loss of $12.2 million, represented approximately $8.2 million in unamortized deferred financing costs and approximately $4.0 million in prepayment penalties. In accordance with SFAS No. 145 these costs were reclassified from "Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt" into continuing operations for comparative purposes for financial statements for periods after January 1, 2003.

        During the 12 months ended December 31, 2001, the Company repaid a secured term loan, which had an original maturity date of December 2004. In addition, the Company prepaid an unsecured revolving credit facility, which had an original maturity date of May 2002. In connection with these prepayments, the Company expensed the remaining unamortized deferred financing costs and incurred certain prepayment penalties, which resulted in a loss of approximately $1.6 million. In accordance with SFAS No. 145 these costs were reclassified from "Extraordinary loss on early extinguishment of debt" into continuing operations for comparative purposes for financial statements for periods after January 1, 2003.

        Equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries—During the 12 months ended December 31, 2002, equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries decreased by approximately $6.2 million to $1.2 million from $7.4 million for the same period in 2001. This decrease is primarily due to the consolidation of one of the Company's CTL joint venture investments (see Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements).

        Income from discontinued operations—For the 12 months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, operating income earned by the Company on CTL assets sold (prior to their sale) and assets held for sale of approximately $7.6 million and $10.4 million, respectively, is classified as "discontinued operations," even though such income was recognized by the Company prior to the asset dispositions or classification as "Assets held for sale" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

        Gain from discontinued operations—During 2002, the Company disposed of one CTL asset for net proceeds of $3.7 million, and recognized a gain of approximately $595,000. In addition, one of the Company's customers exercised an option to terminate its lease on 50.00% of the land leased from the Company. In connection with this termination, the Company realized $17.5 million in cash lease termination payments, offset by a $17.4 million impairment change in connection with the termination, resulting in a net gain of approximately $123,000.

        During 2001, the Company disposed of four CTL assets for net proceeds of $26.3 million, and recognized net gains of $1.1 million.

29


Adjusted Earnings

        Adjusted earnings represents net income allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders computed in accordance with GAAP, before depreciation, amortization, gain from discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures reflect the Company's share of adjusted earnings calculated on the same basis.

        The Company believes that to facilitate a clear understanding of the historical operating results of the Company, adjusted earnings should be examined in conjunction with net income as shown in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. Adjusted earnings should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of the Company's performance, or to cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of the Company's liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund the Company's cash needs or available for distribution to the Company's shareholders. The Company's management believes that adjusted earnings more closely approximates operating cash flow and is a useful measure for investors to consider, in conjunction with net income and other GAAP measures, in evaluating the Company's financial performance. This is primarily because the Company is a commercial finance company that focuses on real estate lending and corporate tenant leasing; therefore, the Company's net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) reflects significant non-cash depreciation expense on CTL assets and significant deferred financing costs. In addition, several of the Company's material borrowing arrangements contain covenants based on adjusted earnings, therefore, the Company must monitor adjusted earnings in order to ensure compliance with these covenants. It should be noted that the Company's manner of calculating adjusted earnings may differ from the calculation of similarly-titled measures by other companies.

30


 
  For the Years Ended December 31,
 
 
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
  1999
 
 
  (In thousands)
(Unaudited)

 
Adjusted earnings:                                
  Net income allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders   $ 255,249   $ 178,362   $ 193,004   $ 180,678   $ 15,043  
  Add: Joint venture income     593     991     965     937     1,603  
  Add: Depreciation     55,905     48,041     35,642     34,514     11,016  
  Add: Joint venture depreciation and amortization     7,417     4,433     4,044     3,662     365  
  Add: Amortization of deferred financing costs     27,180     31,676     21,303     13,528     6,121  
  Less: Gains from discontinued operations     (5,167 )   (717 )   (1,145 )   (2,948 )    
  Add: Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(1)             282          
  Less: Net income allocable to class B shares(2)                     (826 )
  Add: Cost incurred in acquiring former external advisor                     94,476  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Adjusted diluted earnings allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders(3)(4)(5)   $ 341,177   $ 262,786   $ 254,095   $ 230,371   $ 127,798  
   
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding(6)     104,248     93,020     88,606     86,523     61,750  
   
 
 
 
 
 

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
Represents one-time effect of adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" as of January 1, 2001.

(2)
Prior to November 1999, adjusted earnings per common share excludes 1.00% of net income allocable to the Company's former class B shares. The former class B shares were exchanged for Common Stock in connection with the acquisition of TriNet and other related transactions on November 4, 1999. As a result, the Company now has a single class of Common Stock outstanding.

(3)
For the year ended December 31, 2003, adjusted diluted earnings allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders includes $2,659 of adjusted earnings allocable to HPU holders.

(4)
For years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, adjusted diluted earnings allocable to common shareholders includes $3,950, $1,037 and $317 of cash paid for prepayment penalties associated with early extinguishment of debt.

(5)
Includes a $15.0 million charge related to performance-based vesting of restricted shares granted under the Company's long-term incentive plan for the 12 months ended December 31, 2002.

(6)
In addition to the GAAP defined weighted average diluted shares outstanding these balances include an additional 147,000 shares, 371,000 shares, 372,000 shares, 372,000 shares and 1.4 million shares for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, relating to the additional dilution of joint venture shares.

Risk Management

        First Dollar and Last Dollar Exposure—One component of the Company's risk management assessment is an analysis of the Company's first and last dollar loan-to-value percentage with respect to the facilities or companies the Company finances. First dollar loan-to-value represents the weighted average beginning point for the Company's lending exposure in the aggregate capitalization of the underlying facilities or companies it finances. Last dollar loan-to-value represents the weighted average ending point for the Company's lending exposure in the aggregate capitalization of the underlying facilities or companies it finances.

31



        Non-Accrual Loans—The Company transfers loans to non-accrual status at such time as: (1) management believes that the potential risk exists that scheduled debt service payments will not be met within the coming 12 months; (2) the loan becomes 90 days delinquent; (3) management determines the borrower is incapable of, or ceased efforts toward, curing the cause of an impairment; or (4) the net realizable value of the loan's underlying collateral approximates the Company's carrying value of such loan. Interest income is recognized only upon actual cash receipt for loans on non-accrual status. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had three assets on non-accrual status with an aggregate carrying value of $40.3 million, or 0.62% of the gross book value of the Company's investments. Management believes there is adequate collateral to support the book values of the assets.

        The first non-accrual loan is a $12.8 million junior participation in a first mortgage loan secured by a hotel facility in New York, New York. This loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 7.91% and matures in June 2006. The borrower remains current on all of its debt service payments to the Company and has continued to invest additional equity to fund on-going capital improvements at the facility. Management believes there is adequate collateral to support the book value of the asset. However, due to poor operating performance, this loan was transferred to non-accrual effective July 1, 2003.

        The second non-accrual loan is a partnership loan with a balance of $349,000 as of December 31, 2003. The loan is presently secured by a partnership interest in a partnership owning facilities in Colorado leased to the U.S. Government. The loan bears interest at LIBOR + 3.50%, with a LIBOR floor of 3.00%. The loan matured on March 29, 2003 and therefore is currently in default. In April 2003 and November 2003, the Company received $1.2 million and $4.2 million of principal repayments, respectively. The borrower remains current on its regular interest obligations to the Company. However, as a result of the maturity default and the uncertainty surrounding the timing of the completion, sale or refinancing of the facilities, the loan remains on non-accrual status.

        The third non-accrual loan is a $27.1 million, 90.00% participating interest in a loan secured by a class A office building located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The loan was acquired at a premium to its principal balance as a part of the Company's acquisition of Lazard Freres' structured finance portfolio in 1998. Lazard continues to retain a 10.00% interest in the loan. The loan matures in March 2008 and bears interest at 17.50%, 11.00% of which is due currently and 6.50% of which is accrued. In August 2003 the borrower stopped making debt service payments due to insufficient cash flow caused by vacancies at the facility. Management believes the underlying collateral value supports its basis in the outstanding principal balance of the loan. During the third quarter of 2003, management determined that an acquisition premium on the loan with an unamortized balance of $3.3 million was impaired. As a result in the third quarter of 2003, the Company took a $3.3 million impairment charge against its loan loss reserve, bringing the carrying value of the loan to $27.1 million.

        Watch List Assets—The Company conducts a quarterly comprehensive credit review, resulting in an individual risk rating being assigned to each asset. This review is designed to enable management to evaluate and proactively manage asset-specific credit issues and identify credit trends on a portfolio-wide basis as an "early warning system." As of December 31, 2003, the Company has five loans that are on its credit watch list, including the three non-accrual loans mentioned above.

        One of the watch list loans not on non-accrual is a $35.8 million junior interest in a $103.1 million first mortgage loan secured by a super regional mall in Chicago, Illinois. The whole loan bears interest at 8.88%. Cash flow at the mall has been negatively impacted by the departure of an anchor tenant; however, mall management has been actively negotiating to reconfigure the space for an existing anchor. To provide for the repositioning of the center and ultimate refinancing of the loan, the maturity of the loan was extended for two years to January 1, 2006. The loan is not open for prepayment until January 1, 2005, at which time it may be repaid in full at a 3.00% premium for six months and then may be repaid at par for the six months prior to maturity. The borrower has made significant equity investments in the facility, with over $19.0 million invested in the past three years. The borrower remains current on all of its debt service

32



payments. Management believes the collateral value remains adequate to support the book value of the asset.

        The other watch list loan not on non-accrual is a $27.2 million first mortgage secured by an office facility in Louisville, Kentucky. The whole loan bears interest at LIBOR + 4.50% and matures in April, 2004. On October 14, 2003, the Company acquired the senior trust certificate from a financial institution. The facility is experiencing near-term tenant rollover in a soft local real estate market; however, management believes its last dollar exposure is below replacement cost, and the loan remains current through December 31, 2003. Management believes that there is adequate collateral to support the book value of the asset.

        The table below summarizes the Company's loans and other lending investments that are more than 60-days past due in scheduled payments and details the provision for loan losses associated with the Company's lending investments for the 12 months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):

 
  As of December 31,
 
 
  2003
  2002
 
 
  $
  %
  $
  %
 
Carrying value of loans past due 60 days or more/
As a percentage of loans and other lending investments
  $ 27,480   0.74 % $    

Provision for loan losses/
As a percentage of loans and other lending investments

 

 

33,436

 

0.89

%

 

29,250

 

0.95

%

Net charge-offs/
As a percentage of loans and other lending investments

 

 

3,314

 

0.09

%

 


 


 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        The Company requires significant capital to fund its investment activities and operating expenses. The Company has sufficient access to capital resources to fund its existing business plan, which includes the expansion of its real estate lending and corporate tenant leasing businesses. The Company's capital sources include cash flow from operations, borrowings under lines of credit, additional term borrowings, long-term financing secured by the Company's assets, unsecured financing and the issuance of common, convertible and/or preferred equity securities. Further, the Company may acquire other businesses or assets using its capital stock, cash or a combination thereof.

        The distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code limit the Company's ability to retain earnings and thereby replenish or increase capital committed to its operations. However, the Company believes that its access to significant capital resources and financing will enable the Company to meet current and anticipated capital requirements.

        The Company believes that its existing sources of funds will be adequate for purposes of meeting its short- and long-term liquidity needs. The Company's ability to meet its long-term (i.e., beyond one year) liquidity requirements is subject to obtaining additional debt and equity financing. Any decision by the Company's lenders and investors to provide the Company with financing will depend upon a number of factors, such as the Company's compliance with the terms of its existing credit arrangements, the Company's financial performance, industry or market trends, the general availability of and rates applicable to financing transactions, such lenders' and investors' resources and policies concerning the terms under which they make capital commitments and the relative attractiveness of alternative investment or lending opportunities.

33



        The following table outlines the contractual obligations related to the Company's long-term debt agreements and operating lease obligations. There are no other long-term liabilities of the Company that would constitute a contractual obligation.

 
   
  Principal Payments Due By Period(1)
 
  Total
  Less Than
1 Year

  2 - 3
Years

  4 - 5
Years

  6 - 10
Years

  After 10
Years

 
   
  (In thousands)

Long-Term Debt Obligations:                                    
Secured revolving credit facilities   $ 696,591   $   $ 386,227   $ 310,364   $   $
Unsecured revolving credit facilities     130,000     130,000                
Secured term loans     808,128     60,000     273,805     185,852     236,847     51,624
iStar Asset Receivables secured notes(2)     1,311,314     40,010     235,808         1,035,496    
Unsecured notes     1,185,000         50,000     535,000     500,000     100,000
Other debt obligations     34,148     34,148                
   
 
 
 
 
 
Total     4,165,181     264,158     945,840     1,031,216     1,772,343     151,624
Operating Lease Obligations:(3)     16,067     2,879     5,878     4,761     2,549    
   
 
 
 
 
 
  Total   $ 4,181,248   $ 267,037   $ 951,718   $ 1,035,977   $ 1,774,892   $ 151,624
   
 
 
 
 
 

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
Assumes exercise of extensions on the Company's long-term debt obligations to the extent such extensions are at the Company's option.

(2)
Based on expected proceeds from principal payments received on loan assets collateralizing such notes.

(3)
The Company also has a $1.0 million letter of credit outstanding as security for its primary corporate office lease.

        The Company has four LIBOR-based secured revolving credit facilities with an aggregate maximum capacity of $2.4 billion, of which $696.6 million was drawn as of December 31, 2003 (see Note 7 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements). Availability under these facilities is based on collateral provided under a borrowing base calculation. At December 31, 2003, the Company also had an unsecured credit facility totaling $300.0 million which bears interest at LIBOR + 2.125% per annum and matures in July 2004. At December 31, 2003, the Company had drawn $130.0 million under this facility.

        Unencumbered Assets/Unsecured Debt—The Company has made and will continue to make progress in migrating its balance sheet towards more unsecured debt, which results in a corresponding reduction of secured debt and an increase in unencumbered assets. The exact timing in which the Company will issue or borrow unsecured debt will be subject to market conditions. The following table shows the ratio of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt at December 31, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):

 
  As of December 31,
 
  2003
  2002
Total Unencumbered Assets   $ 2,167,388   $ 1,366,909
Total Unsecured Debt(1)   $ 1,315,000   $ 625,000
Unencumbered Assets/Unsecured Debt(2)     165%     219%

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
See Note 7 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed description of the Company's unsecured debt.

(2)
At December 31, 2003, the Company had assets with an aggregate book value of $346.6 million pledged as collateral to its secured revolving credit facilities for which there were no amounts drawn. If these assets had been released from the credit facilities, unencumbered assets/unsecured debt would have been 191% at December 31, 2003.

        Capital Markets Financings—The Company was an active issuer in the capital markets in 2003 and the beginning of 2004. The continued strength of the Company's stock price and the low interest rate environment provided the Company with the opportunity to issue equity and debt securities on attractive pricing terms. In 2003 and through March 15, 2004, the Company issued $1,285.0 million aggregate principal amount of fixed-rate Senior Notes bearing interest at annual rates ranging from 4.875% to 7.00%

34



and maturing between 2008 and 2014 and $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of floating-rate Senior Notes bearing interest at annual rates of three-month LIBOR+1.25% and maturing in 2007. The Company issued 21.1 million shares of preferred stock in five series with cumulative annual dividend rates ranging from 7.50% to 7.875%. All of the shares of preferred stock have a liquidation preference of $25.00 per share. The Company also issued 5.0 million shares of Common Stock in 2003 at a price to the public of $38.50 per share.

        The Company primarily used the proceeds from the issuances of securities described above to repay secured indebtedness as it migrates its balance sheet towards more unsecured debt and to refinance higher yielding obligations. In 2003 and January 2004, the Company retired all of its 4.0 million shares of 9.50% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, its 3.3 million shares of Series H Variable Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and the 6.75% Dealer Remarketable Securities of its Leasing Subsidiary. The Company called for redemption all of its 2.0 million shares of 9.375% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and all of its 1.3 million shares of 9.20% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

        On November 14, 2002, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 8.0 million primary shares of the Company's Common Stock. The Company received approximately $202.9 million from the offering and used these proceeds to repay a portion of its secured debt.

        On August 9, 2001, the Company issued $350.0 million of 8.75% Senior Notes due in 2008. The Notes are unsecured senior obligations of the Company. The Company used the net proceeds to partially repay outstanding borrowings under its secured credit facilities.

        Other Financing Activities—Subsequent to year-end, on January 13, 2004, the Company closed $200.0 million of term financing with a leading financial institution that is secured by certain corporate bond investments and other lending securities. A number of these investments were previously financed under existing credit facilities. The new facility bears interest at LIBOR + 1.05%–1.50% and has a final maturity date of January 2006.

        On November 4, 2003, one of the Company's $500.0 million secured facilities was amended to include subordinate and mezzanine lending investments as collateral at stated interest rates of LIBOR + 2.15%–2.25%.

        On October 31, 2003, the Company's $50.0 million term loan bearing interest at LIBOR + 0.60% matured and was repaid.

        On September 29, 2003, the Company closed a $135.0 million term loan secured by a CTL asset it acquired the same day. The loan has a five-year term and bears interest at LIBOR + 1.75%.

        On July 24, 2003, the Company closed a $48.0 million term loan secured by a corporate lending investment it originated in the third quarter of 2003. The loan has a three-year primary term and two one-year extension options, and bears interest at LIBOR + 2.125%.

        On May 21, 2003, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company issued iStar Asset Receivables ("STARs"), Series 2003-1, the Company's proprietary match funding program, consisting of $645.8 million of investment-grade bonds secured by the subsidiary's structured finance and CTL assets, which had an aggregate carrying value of approximately $738.1 million at inception. Principal payments received on the assets will be utilized to repay the most senior class of the bonds then outstanding. The maturity of the bonds match funds the maturity of the underlying assets financed under the program. The weighted average interest rate on the bonds, on an all-floating rate basis, was approximately LIBOR + 0.47% at inception. For accounting purposes, this transaction was treated as a secured financing: the underlying assets and STARs liabilities remained on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, and no gain on sale was recognized.

        On May 14, 2003, the Company extended the maturity on its $300.0 million unsecured facility to July 2004.

35



        On May 8, 2003, the Company extended the maturity on its $60.0 million term loan to June 2004.

        On April 9, 2003, the Company repaid the existing term loan financing a $75.0 million term preferred investment in a publicly-traded real estate company and simultaneously entered into another $50.0 million term loan with a leading financial institution. The new term loan bears interest at LIBOR + 0.60% and has a final maturity date of October 2003 with amortization payments in July 2003 and October 2003.

        On January 27, 2003, the Company extended the maturity on one of its $700.0 million secured facilities to January 2007, which includes a one-year "term-out" at the Company's option.

        On December 11, 2002, the Company closed a $61.5 million term loan financing with a leading financial institution. The proceeds were used to fund a portion of an $82.1 million CTL investment. The non-recourse loan is fixed rate and bears interest at 6.412%, has a maturity date of December 2012 and amortizes over a 30-year schedule.

        On September 30, 2002, the Company closed a $500.0 million secured revolving credit facility with a leading financial institution. The facility has a three-year term and bears interest at LIBOR + 1.50% to 2.25%, depending upon the collateral contributed to the borrowing base. The facility accepts a broad range of structured finance and corporate tenant assets and has a final maturity date of September 2005.

        On July 2, 2002, the Company purchased the remaining interest in the Milpitas joint venture from the former Milpitas external member for $27.9 million. Upon purchase of the interest, the Milpitas joint venture became fully consolidated for accounting purposes and approximately $79.1 million of secured term debt is reflected on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

        On May 28, 2002, the Company repaid the then remaining $446.2 million of bonds outstanding under its STARs, Series 2000-1 financing. Simultaneously, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company issued STARs, Series 2002-1, consisting of $885.1 million of investment-grade bonds secured by the subsidiary's structured finance and CTL assets, which had an aggregate outstanding carrying value of approximately $1.1 billion at inception. Principal payments received on the assets will be utilized to repay the most senior class of the bonds then outstanding. The maturity of the bonds match funds the maturity of the underlying assets financed under the program. The weighted average interest rate on the bonds, on an all-floating rate basis, is approximately LIBOR + 0.56% at inception. For accounting purposes, this transaction was treated as a secured financing: the underlying assets and STARs liabilities remained on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, and no gain on sale was recognized.

        On March 29, 2002, the Company extended the maturity of its $500.0 million secured facility to August 2005, which includes a one-year "term-out" extension at the Company's option.

        On July 27, 2001, the Company completed a $300.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of leading financial institutions. The facility has an initial maturity of July 2003, with a one-year extension at the Company's option and another one-year extension at the lenders' option. This facility replaces two prior credit facilities maturing in 2002 and 2003, and bears interest at LIBOR + 2.125%. On May 14, 2003, the Company extended the maturity of this facility to July 2004.

        On July 6, 2001, the Company financed a $75.0 million structured finance asset with a $50.0 million term loan bearing interest at LIBOR + 2.50%. The loan has a maturity of July 2006, including a one-year extension at the Company's option. This investment is a $75.0 million term preferred investment in a publicly-traded real estate company. The Company's investment carries an initial current yield of 10.50%, with annual increases of 0.50% in each of the next two years. In addition, the Company's investment is convertible into the customer's common stock at a strike price of $25.00 per share. The investment is callable by the customer between months 13 and 30 of the term at a yield maintenance premium, and after month 30, at a premium sufficient to generate a 14.62% internal rate of return on the Company's investment. The investment is putable by the Company to the customer for cash after five years. On April 9, 2003, the Company repaid this term loan and simultaneously entered into another $50.0 million term loan bearing interest at LIBOR + 0.60% and with a final maturity of October 2003.

36



        On June 14, 2001, the Company closed $193.0 million of term loan financing secured by 15 CTL assets. The variable-rate loan bears interest at LIBOR + 1.85% (not to exceed 10.00% in aggregate) and has two one-year extensions at the Company's option. The Company used these proceeds to repay a $77.8 million secured term loan maturing in June 2001 and to pay down a portion of its revolving credit facilities. In addition, the Company extended the maturity of its $500.0 million secured revolving credit facility to August 2003. On March 29, 2002, the Company again extended the final maturity of this facility to August 2005, which includes a one-year "term-out" extension at the Company's option.

        On May 15, 2001, the Company repaid its $100.0 million 7.30% unsecured notes. These notes were senior unsecured obligations of the Leasing Subsidiary and ranked equally with the Leasing Subsidiary's other senior unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness.

        On February 22, 2001, the Company extended the maturity of its $350.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility to May 2002. On July 27, 2001, the Company repaid this facility and replaced it with a new $300.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility.

        On January 11, 2001, the Company closed a $700.0 million secured revolving credit facility which is led by a major commercial bank. The facility has a three-year primary term and one-year "term-out" extension option, and bears interest at LIBOR + 1.40% to 2.15%, depending upon the collateral contributed to the borrowing base. This facility accepts a broad range of structured finance assets and has a final maturity of January 2005. On January 27, 2003, the Company extended the final maturity on this facility to January 2007.

        Hedging Activities—The Company has variable-rate lending assets and variable-rate debt obligations. These assets and liabilities create a natural hedge against changes in variable interest rates. This means that as interest rates increase, the Company earns more on its variable-rate lending assets and pays more on its variable-rate debt obligations and, conversely, as interest rates decrease, the Company earns less on its variable-rate lending assets and pays less on its variable-rate debt obligations. When the amount of the Company's variable-rate debt obligations exceeds the amount of its variable-rate lending assets, the Company utilizes derivative instruments to limit the impact of changing interest rates on its net income. The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge assets or for speculative purposes. The derivative instruments the Company uses are typically in the form of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps. Interest rate swaps effectively change variable-rate debt obligations to fixed-rate debt obligations. Interest rate caps effectively limit the maximum interest rate on variable-rate debt obligations.

        In addition, when appropriate the Company enters into interest rate swaps that convert fixed-rate debt to variable rate in order to mitigate the risk of changes in fair value of the fixed-rate debt obligations.

        The primary risks from the Company's use of derivative instruments is the risk that a counterparty to a hedging arrangement could default on its obligation and the risk that the Company may have to pay certain costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs, if a hedging arrangement is terminated by the Company. As a matter of policy, the Company enters into hedging arrangements with counterparties that are large, creditworthy financial institutions typically rated at least "A" by Standard & Poor's ("S&P") and "A2" by Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's"). The Company's hedging strategy is approved and monitored by the Company's Audit Committee on behalf of its Board of Directors and may be changed by the Board of Directors without stockholder approval.

37



        The Company has entered into the following cash flow and fair value hedges that are outstanding as of December 31, 2003. The net value (liability) associated with these hedges is reflected on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands).

Type of
Hedge

  Notional
Amount

  Strike
Price or
Swap Rate

  Trade
Date

  Maturity
Date

  Estimated
Value at
December 31, 2003

 
Pay-Fixed Swap   $ 125,000   2.885 % 1/23/03   6/25/06   $ (1,632 )
Pay-Fixed Swap     125,000   2.838 % 2/11/03   6/25/06     (1,486 )
Pay-Fixed Swap     75,000   5.580 % 11/4/99 (1) 12/1/04     (3,227 )
Pay-Floating Swap     200,000   4.381 % 12/17/03   12/15/10     (1,472 )
Pay-Floating Swap     100,000   4.345 % 12/17/03   12/15/10     (958 )
Pay-Floating Swap     100,000   3.878 % 11/27/02   8/15/08     2,681  
Pay-Floating Swap     50,000   3.810 % 11/27/02   8/15/08     1,183  
Pay-Floating Swap     50,000   4.290 % 12/17/03   12/15/10     (649 )
LIBOR Cap     345,000   8.000 % 5/22/02   5/28/14     11,648  
LIBOR Cap     135,000   6.000 % 9/29/03   10/15/06     418  
LIBOR Cap     75,000   7.750 % 11/4/99 (1) 12/1/04      
LIBOR Cap     35,000   7.750 % 11/4/99 (1) 12/1/04  
 
Total Estimated Value   6,506
 

Explanatory Note:


(1)
Acquired in connection with the TriNet Acquisition (see Note 1 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements).

        Between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2003, the Company also had outstanding the following cash flow hedges that have expired or been settled (in thousands):

Type of
Hedge

  Notional
Amount

  Strike
Price or
Swap Rate

  Trade
Date

  Maturity
Date

Pay-Fixed Swap   $ 125,000   7.058 % 6/15/00   6/25/03
Pay-Fixed Swap     125,000   7.055 % 6/15/00   6/25/03
Pay-Fixed Swap     100,000   4.139 % 9/29/03   1/2/11
Pay-Fixed Swap     100,000   4.643 % 9/29/03   1/2/14

        During 2003, the Company entered into two 90-day forward starting swaps each having a $100.0 million notional amount. These pay-fixed swaps which were effective in September 2003, had rates of 4.139% and 4.643%, had seven-year and 10-year terms, respectively, and were used to lock-in swap rates related to a portion of planned future corporate unsecured fixed-rate bond issuances. These two swaps were settled in connection with the Company's issuance of $350.0 million of seven-year Senior Notes and $150.0 million of 10-year Senior Notes. In addition, effective in September 2003, the Company entered into a $135.0 million cap with a rate of 6.00% to hedge the Company's current outstanding floating-rate debt. This cap has a three-year term. Further, the Company entered into two $125.0 million forward starting swaps. These pay-fixed swaps were effective in June 2003 and replaced the two $125.0 million pay-fixed swaps mentioned above. The two new pay-fixed swaps have a three-year term and expire on June 25, 2006.

        In addition, in connection with a portion of the Company's fixed-rate corporate bonds, the Company entered into three pay-floating interest rate swaps in December 2003 struck at 4.381%, 4.345% and 4.29% with notional amounts of $200.0 million, $100.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively, and maturing on December 15, 2010 and entered into two pay-floating interest rate swaps in November 2002 struck at 3.8775% and 3.81% with notional amounts of $100.0 million and $50.0 million, respectively, and maturing on August 15, 2008. The Company pays six-month LIBOR on the swaps entered into in December 2003 and one-month LIBOR on the swaps entered into in November 2002 and receives the stated fixed rate in return. These swaps mitigate the risk of changes in the fair value of $350.0 million of seven-year Senior

38



Notes and $150.0 million of 10-year Senior Notes attributable to changes in LIBOR. For accounting purposes, the difference between the fixed rate received and the LIBOR rate paid on the notional amount of the swap is recorded as "Interest expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, the Company adjusts the value of the swap to its fair value and adjusts the carrying amount of the hedged liability by an offsetting amount on a quarterly basis.

        In connection with STARs, Series 2003-1 in May 2003, the Company entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap struck at 6.95% in the notional amount of $270.6 million, and simultaneously sold a LIBOR interest rate cap with the same terms. Since these instruments do not change the Company's net interest rate risk exposure, they do not qualify as hedges and changes in their respective values are charged to earnings. As the terms of these arrangements are substantially the same, the effects of a revaluation of these two instruments substantially offset one another.

        In connection with STARs, Series 2002-1 in May 2002, the Company entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap struck at 8.00% in the notional amount of $345.0 million. The Company utilizes the provisions of SFAS No. 133 with respect to such instruments. SFAS No. 133 provides that the up-front fees paid on option-based products such as caps should be expensed into earnings based on the allocation of the premium to the affected periods as if the agreement were a series of "caplets." These allocated premiums are then reflected as a charge to income (as part of interest expense) in the affected period. On May 28, 2002, in connection with the STARs, Series 2002-1 transaction, the Company paid a premium of $13.7 million for this interest rate cap. Using the "caplet" methodology discussed above, amortization of the cap premium is dependent upon the actual value of the caplets at inception.

        During the year ended December 31, 1999, the Company refinanced its $125.0 million term loan maturing March 15, 1999 with a $155.4 million term loan maturing March 5, 2009. The term loan bears interest at 7.44% per annum, payable monthly, and amortizes over an approximately 22-year schedule. The term loan represented forecasted transactions for which the Company had previously entered into U.S. Treasury-based hedging transactions. The net $3.4 million cost of the settlement of such hedges has been deferred and is being amortized as an increase to the effective financing cost of the term loan over its effective ten-year term.

        Certain of the Company's CTL joint ventures, have hedging activities which are more fully described in Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        Off-Balance Sheet Transactions—The Company is not dependent on the use of any off-balance sheet financing arrangements for liquidity. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had investments in three CTL joint ventures accounted for under the equity method, which had total debt obligations outstanding of approximately $175.3 million. The Company's pro rata share of the ventures' third-party debt was approximately $76.7 million (see Note 6 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements). These ventures were formed for the purpose of operating, acquiring and in certain cases, developing CTL facilities. The debt obligations of these joint ventures are non-recourse to the ventures and the Company, and mature between fiscal years 2004 and 2011. As of December 31, 2003, the debt obligations consisted of six term loans bearing fixed rates per annum ranging from 7.61% to 8.43% and one variable-rate term loan with a rate of LIBOR + 1.25% per annum.

        The Company's STARs securitizations are all on-balance sheet financings.

        The Company has certain discretionary and non-discretionary unfunded commitments related to its loans and other lending investments that it may need to, or choose to, fund in the future. Discretionary commitments are those under which the Company has sole discretion with respect to future funding. Non-discretionary commitments are those under which the Company is generally obligated to fund at the request of the borrower or upon the occurrence of events outside of the Company's direct control. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had 18 loans with unfunded commitments totaling $208.6 million, of which $80.2 million was discretionary and $128.4 million was non-discretionary.

39



        Ratings Triggers—On July 27, 2001, the Company completed a $300.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of leading financial institutions. The facility has an initial maturity of July 2003 with a one-year extension at the Company's option and another one-year extension at the lenders' option. On May 14, 2003, the Company extended the final maturity to July 2004. This facility replaces two prior credit facilities maturing in 2002 and 2003, and bears interest at LIBOR + 2.125% per annum based on the Company's senior unsecured credit ratings of BB+ from S&P, Ba1 from Moody's and BBB- from Fitch Ratings. If the Company achieves a higher rating from either S&P or Moody's, the facility's interest rate will improve to LIBOR + 2.00% per annum. If the Company's credit rating is downgraded by any of the rating agencies (regardless of how far), the facility's interest rate will increase to LIBOR + 2.25% per annum. In the event the Company receives two credit ratings that are not equivalent, the spread over LIBOR shall be determined by the lower of the two such ratings. As of December 31, 2003, $130.0 million was outstanding on this facility. Accordingly, management does not believe any rating changes would have a material adverse impact on the Company's results of operations. There are no other ratings triggers in any of the Company's debt instruments or other operating or financial agreements.

        On July 30, 2002, the Company's senior unsecured credit rating was upgraded to an investment grade rating of BBB- from BB+ by Fitch Ratings. In addition, Moody's and S&P raised their ratings outlook for the Company's senior unsecured credit rating to "positive." On October 22, 2003, Moody's confirmed its rating of Ba1 and its ratings outlook of "positive" for the Company. On November 20, 2003, S&P also reaffirmed its rating of BB+ and its ratings outlook of "positive" for the Company.

        Transactions with Related Parties—The Company has an investment in iStar Operating Inc. ("iStar Operating"), a taxable subsidiary that, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, services the Company's loans and certain loan portfolios owned by third parties. The Company owns all of the non-voting preferred stock and a 95.00% economic interest in iStar Operating. The common shareholder, an entity controlled by a former director of the Company, is the owner of all the voting common stock and a 5.00% economic interest in iStar Operating. As of December 31, 2003, there have never been any distributions to the common shareholder, nor does the Company expect to make any in the future. At any time, the Company has the right to acquire all of the common stock of iStar Operating at fair market value, which the Company believes to be nominal.

        iStar Operating has elected to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary for purposes of maintaining compliance with the REIT provisions of the Code and prior to July 1, 2003 was accounted for under the equity method for financial statement reporting purposes and was presented in "Investments in and advances to joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of July 1, 2003, the Company consolidates this entity as a VIE (see Note 3 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements) with no material impact. Prior to its consolidation, the Company charged an allocated portion of its general overhead expenses to iStar Operating based on the number of employees at iStar Operating as a percentage of the Company's total employees. These general overhead expenses were in addition to the direct general and administrative costs of iStar Operating. As of December 31, 2003, iStar Operating had no debt obligations.

        In addition, the Company had an investment in TriNet Management Operating Company, Inc. ("TMOC"), an entity originally formed to make a $2.0 million investment in the convertible debt securities of a real estate company which trades on the Mexican Stock Exchange. This investment was made by TriNet prior to its acquisition by the Company in 1999. Prior to March 29, 2003, the Company owned 95.00% of the outstanding voting and non-voting common stock (representing 1.00% voting power and 95.00% of the economic interest) in TMOC. The owners of the remaining TMOC stock were two executives of the Company. On March 29, 2003, the Company purchased the remaining 5.00% interest from the executives for approximately $2,000, an amount that was equal to the carrying value, which was less than their original investment. Following this purchase, the Company owned 100.00% of TMOC and therefore consolidated the entity for accounting purposes. On June 30, 2003, the $2.0 million investment was fully repaid and prior to December 31, 2003, the entity was liquidated.

40



        The Company entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer as of March 31, 2001. In addition to the salary and bonus provisions of the agreement, the agreement provides for an award of 2.0 million phantom units to the executive, each of which notionally represents one share of the Company's Common Stock. Portions of these phantom units will vest on a contingent basis if the average closing price of the Company's Common Stock achieves certain levels (ranging from $25.00 to $37.00 per share) for 60 consecutive calendar days. The total rate of return (share price appreciation plus the reinvestment of dividends at market price on the date of distribution) from December 31, 2000 through December 31, 2003 was 155.10%. Contingently vested units will become fully vested, meaning that they are no longer subject to forfeiture, if the executive remains employed through March 30, 2004, or earlier upon certain change of control and termination events. When and if contingently vested phantom units become fully vested units, the Company must deliver to the executive either a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the number of fully vested units or an amount of cash equal to the then fair market value of that number of shares of Common Stock. If shares were unavailable under the Company's then long-term incentive plans, this obligation could require the Company to make a substantial cash payment to the executive. See "Critical Accounting Policies-Executive Compensation" below for a discussion of the accounting treatment applicable to the compensation awarded to the Chief Executive Officer under this agreement.

        As more fully described in Note 10 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements certain affiliates of SOF IV and the Company's Executive Officer have agreed to reimburse the Company for the value of restricted shares awarded to the former President in excess of 350,000 shares.

        DRIP/Stock Purchase Plan—The Company maintains a dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan. Under the dividend reinvestment component of the plan, the Company's shareholders may purchase additional shares of Common Stock without payment of brokerage commissions or service charges by automatically reinvesting all or a portion of their Common Stock cash dividends. Under the direct stock purchase component of the plan, the Company's shareholders and new investors may purchase shares of Common Stock directly from the Company without payment of brokerage commissions or service charges. All purchases of shares in excess of $10,000 per month pursuant to the direct purchase component are at the Company's sole discretion. Shares issued under the plan may reflect a discount of up to 3.00% from the prevailing market price of the Company's Common Stock. The Company is authorized to issue up to 8.0 million shares of Common Stock pursuant to the dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan. During the 12 months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company issued a total of approximately 2.6 million and 1.6 million shares of its Common Stock, respectively, through the direct stock purchase component of the plan. Net proceeds during the 12 months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 were approximately $89.1 million and $44.4 million, respectively. There are approximately 3.6 million shares available for issuance under the plan as of December 31, 2003.

        Stock Repurchase Program—The Board of Directors approved, and the Company has implemented, a stock repurchase program under which the Company is authorized to repurchase up to 5.0 million shares of its Common Stock from time to time, primarily using proceeds from the disposition of assets or loan repayments and excess cash flow from operations, but also using borrowings under its credit facilities if the Company determines that it is advantageous to do so. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had repurchased a total of approximately 2.3 million shares at an aggregate cost of approximately $40.7 million. The Company has not repurchased any shares under the stock repurchase program since November 2000.

Critical Accounting Policies

        The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and all majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In preparing these financial statements, management has made its best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the

41



financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. The Company does not believe that there is a great likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported related to the accounting policies described below. However, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

        Management has the obligation to ensure that its policies and methodologies are in accordance with GAAP. During 2003, management reviewed and evaluated its critical accounting policies and believes them to be appropriate. The Company's accounting policies are described in Note 3 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. Management believes the more significant of these to be as follows:

        Revenue Recognition—The most significant sources of the Company's revenue come from its lending operations and its CTL operations. For its lending operations, the Company reflects income using the effective yield method, which recognizes periodic income over the expected term of the investment on a constant yield basis. For CTL assets, the Company recognizes income on the straight-line method, which effectively recognizes contractual lease payments to be received by the Company evenly over the term of the lease. Management believes the Company's revenue recognition policies are appropriate to reflect the substance of the underlying transactions.

        Provision for Loan Losses—The Company's accounting policies require that an allowance for estimated credit losses be reflected in the financial statements based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risks in its private lending assets. While the Company and its private predecessors have experienced minimal actual losses on their lending investments, management considers it prudent to reflect provisions for loan losses on a portfolio basis based upon the Company's assessment of general market conditions, the Company's internal risk management policies and credit risk rating system, industry loss experience, the Company's assessment of the likelihood of delinquencies or defaults, and the value of the collateral underlying its investments. Actual losses, if any, could ultimately differ from these estimates.

        Allowance for doubtful accounts—The Company's accounting policy requires a reserve on the Company's accrued operating lease income receivable balances and on the deferred operating lease income receivable balances. The reserve covers asset specific problems (e.g., bankruptcy) as they arise, as well as, a portfolio reserve based on management's evaluation of the credit risks associated with these receivables.

        Impairment of Long-Lived Assets—CTL assets represent "long-lived" assets for accounting purposes. The Company periodically reviews long-lived assets to be held and used in its leasing operations for impairment in value whenever any events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. In management's opinion, based on this analysis, CTL assets to be held and used are not carried at amounts in excess of their estimated recoverable amounts.

        Risk Management and Financial Instrument—The Company has historically utilized derivative financial instruments only as a means to help to manage its interest rate risk exposure on a portion of its variable-rate debt obligations (i.e., as cash flow hedges). The instruments utilized are generally either pay-fixed swaps or LIBOR-based interest rate caps which are widely used in the industry and typically with major financial institutions. The Company's accounting policies generally reflect these instruments at their fair value with unrealized changes in fair value reflected in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (losses)" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized effects on the Company's cash flows are generally recognized currently in income.

        However, when appropriate the Company enters into interest rate swaps that convert fixed-rate debt to variable rate in order to mitigate the risk of changes in fair value of its fixed-rate debt obligations. The Company reflects these instruments at their fair value and adjusts the carrying amount of the hedged liability by an offsetting amount.

        Income Taxes—The Company's financial results generally do not reflect provisions for current or deferred income taxes. Management believes that the Company has and intends to continue to operate in a

42



manner that will continue to allow it to be taxed as a REIT and, as a result, does not expect to pay substantial corporate-level taxes. Many of these requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. If the Company were to fail to meet these requirements, the Company would be subject to Federal income tax.

        Executive Compensation—The Company's accounting policies generally provide cash compensation to be estimated and recognized over the period of service. With respect to stock-based compensation arrangements, as of July 1, 2002 (with retroactive application to the beginning of the calendar year), the Company has adopted the fair value method allowed under SFAS No. 123 on a prospective basis, which values options on the date of grant and recognizes an expense equal to the fair value of the option multiplied by the number of options granted over the related service period. Prior to the third quarter 2002, the Company elected to use APB 25 accounting, which measured the compensation charges based on the intrinsic value of such securities when they become fixed and determinable, and recognized such expense over the related service period. These arrangements are often complex and generally structured to align the interests of management with those of the Company's shareholders. See Note 10 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed discussion of such arrangements and the related accounting effects.

        During 2001, the Company entered into three-year employment agreements with its Chief Executive Officer and its former President. In addition, during 2002 the Company entered into a three-year employment agreement with its Chief Financial Officer. See Note 10 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed description of these employment agreements.

        The following is a hypothetical illustration of the effects on the Company's net income and adjusted earnings of the full vesting of phantom units under the employment agreement with the Chief Executive Officer. During the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, 2.0 million of the phantom shares awarded to the Chief Executive Officer were contingently vested. Absent an earlier change of control or termination of employment, these 2.0 million shares will not become fully vested until March 30, 2004. Assuming that the market price of the Common Stock on March 30, 2004 is $38.90 (which was the market price of the Common Stock on December 31, 2003), the Company would incur a one-time charge to earnings at that time of approximately $77.8 million (the fair market value of the 2.0 million shares at $38.90 per share) subject to the availability of 2.0 million shares under the Company's 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

        On April 29, 2002, the 500,000 unvested restricted shares awarded to the President became contingently vested as the total shareholder return exceeded 60.00% and became fully vested on September 30, 2002 as all employment contingencies were met. The Company incurred a charge of approximately $15.0 million related to these vested shares, recognized ratably over the service period from the date of contingent vesting through September 30, 2002.

        New CEO Employment Agreement—The March 2001 employment agreement with the Company's Chief Executive Officer expires on March 30, 2004. Subsequent to December 31, 2003, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer which will take effect upon the expiration of the old agreement. The new agreement has an initial term of three years and provides for the following compensation:

    an annual salary of $1.0 million;

    a potential annual cash incentive award of up to $5.0 million if performance goals set by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer are met; and

    a one-time award of Common Stock with a value of $10.0 million at March 31, 2004 (based upon the trailing 20-day average closing price of the Common Stock); the award will be fully vested when granted and dividends will be paid on the shares from the date of grant, but the shares cannot be sold for five years unless the price of the Common Stock during the 12 months ending March 31 of

43


      each year increases by at least 15.00%, in which case the sale restrictions on 25.00% of the shares awarded will lapse in respect of each 12-month period.

        In addition, the Chief Executive Officer will purchase an 80.00% interest in the Company's 2006 High Performance Unit Program for directors and executive officers. This performance program was approved by the Company's shareholders in 2003 and is described in detail in the Company's 2003 annual proxy statement. The purchase price to be paid by the Chief Executive Officer will be based upon a valuation prepared by an independent investment-banking firm. The interests purchased by the Chief Executive Officer will only have nominal value to him unless the Company achieves total shareholder returns in excess of those achieved by peer group indices, all as more fully described in the Company's 2003 annual proxy statement.

New Accounting Standards

        In December 2003, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 ("SAB 104"), "Revenue Recognition" which supercedes SAB 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements." SAB 104's primary purpose is to rescind the accounting guidance contained in SAB 101 related to multiple element revenue arrangements, superceded as a result of the issuance of EITF 00-21. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement immediately, as required, and it did not have a significant impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        EITF 00-21, "Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables," issued during the third quarter of 2003, provides guidance on revenue recognition for revenues derived from a single contract that contain multiple products or services. EITF 00-21 also provides additional requirements to determine when these revenues may be recorded separately for accounting purposes. The Company adopted EITF 00-21 on July 1, 2003, as required, and it did not have a significant impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150 ("SFAS No. 150"), "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments With Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity." This standard requires issuers to classify as liabilities the following three types of freestanding financial instruments: (1) mandatorily redeemable financial instruments, (2) obligations to repurchase the issuer's equity shares by transferring assets; and (3) certain obligations to issue a variable number of shares. The FASB recently issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") 150-3, which defers the provisions of paragraphs 9 and 10 of SFAS No. 150 indefinitely as they apply to mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests associated with finite-lived entities. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement, as required, on July 1, 2003, and it did not have a significant financial impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," an interpretation of ARB 51. FIN 46 provides guidance on identifying entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (a "variable interest entity" or "VIE"), and how to determine when and which business enterprise should consolidate a VIE. In addition, FIN 46 requires that both the primary beneficiary and all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a VIE make additional disclosures. The transitional disclosure requirements took effect immediately and were required for all financial statements initially issued or modified after January 31, 2003. Immediate consolidation is required for VIEs entered into or modified after February 1, 2003 in which the Company is deemed the primary beneficiary. For VIEs in which the Company entered into prior to February 1, 2003 the FASB recently issued FSP to defer FIN 46 for those older entities to the reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. The adoption of the additional consolidation provisions of FIN 46 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 ("SFAS No. 148"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure," an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123 ("SFAS No. 123"). This statement provides alternative transition

44



methods for a voluntary change to the fair value basis of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. However, this Statement does not permit the use of the original SFAS No. 123 prospective method of transition for changes to the fair value based method made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2003. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation, description of transition method utilized and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company adopted SFAS No. 148 with retroactive application to grants made subsequent to January 1, 2002 with no material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN 45"), "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others," an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5 ("SFAS No. 5"), "Accounting for Contingencies," Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 57, "Related Party Disclosures," Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments" and rescinds FASB Interpretation No. 34, "Disclosure of Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an Interpretation of SFAS No. 5." It requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee regardless if the Company receives separately identifiable consideration (e.g., a premium). The disclosure requirements are effective December 31, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 did not have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, nor is it expected to have a material impact in the future.

        In September 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 147 ("SFAS No. 147"), "Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions," an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9. SFAS No. 147 provides guidance on the accounting for the acquisitions of financial institutions, except those acquisitions between two or more mutual enterprises. SFAS No. 147 removes acquisitions of financial institutions from the scope of both FASB No. 72, "Accounting for Certain Acquisitions of Banking or Thrift Institutions," and FASB Interpretation No. 9, Applying APB Opinions No. 16 and 17, "When a Savings and Loan Association or a Similar Institution is Acquired in a Business Combination Accounted for by the Purchase Method," and requires that those transactions be accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 147 also amends SFAS No. 144 to include in its scope long-term, customer-relationship intangible assets of financial institutions such as depositor-relationship and borrower-relationship intangible assets and credit cardholder intangible assets. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement, as required, on October 1, 2002, and it did not have a significant financial impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146 ("SFAS No. 146"), "Accounting for Exit or Disposal Activities," to address significant issues regarding the recognition, measurement, and reporting of costs that are associated with exit and disposal activities, including restructuring activities that are currently accounted for pursuant to the guidance that the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") has set forth in EITF Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." The scope of SFAS No. 146 also includes: (1) costs related to terminating a contract that is not a capital lease; and (2) termination benefits received by employees involuntarily terminated under the terms of a one-time benefit arrangement that is not an on-going benefit arrangement or an individual deferred-compensation contract. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 146 on December 31, 2002, as required, and it did not have a material effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

45


        In April 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145 ("SFAS No. 145"), "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." SFAS No. 145 rescinds both FASB Statements No. 4 ("SFAS No. 4"), "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt," and the amendment to SFAS No. 4, FASB Statement No. 64 ("SFAS No. 64"), "Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements." Through this rescission, SFAS No. 145 eliminates the requirement (in both SFAS No. 4 and SFAS No. 64) that gains and losses from the extinguishment of debt be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of the related income tax effect. An entity is not prohibited from classifying such gains and losses as extraordinary items, so long as they meet the criteria in paragraph 20 of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 ("APB 30"), "Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions"; however, due to the nature of the Company's operations, such treatment may not be available to the Company. Any gains or losses on extinguishments of debt that were previously classified as extraordinary items in prior periods presented that do not meet the criteria in APB 30 for classification as an extraordinary item will be reclassified to income from continuing operations. The provisions of SFAS No. 145 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement, as required, on January 1, 2003. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company reclassified $12.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively from "Extraordinary loss from early extinguishment of debt" into "Loss on early extinguishment of debt" in income from continuing operations on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        In October 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 ("SFAS No. 144"), "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 provides guidance on the recognition of impairment losses on long-lived assets to be held and used or to be disposed of, and also broadens the definition of what constitutes a discontinued operation and how the results of a discontinued operation are to be measured and presented. SFAS No. 144 requires that current operations prior to the disposition of CTL assets and prior period results of such operations be presented in discontinued operations in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. The provisions of SFAS No. 144 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, and must be applied at the beginning of a fiscal year. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement on January 1, 2002, as required, and it did not have a significant financial impact on the Company.

        In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 ("SFAS No. 141"), "Business Combinations" and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 ("SFAS No. 142"), "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." SFAS No. 141 requires the purchase method of accounting to be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 141 also addresses the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in business combinations and requires intangible assets to be recognized apart from goodwill if certain tests are met. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill not be amortized but instead be measured for impairment at least annually, or when events indicate that there may be an impairment. The Company adopted the provisions of both statements for transactions initiated after June 30, 2001, as required, and the adoption did not have a significant impact on the Company.

        In July 2001, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 102 ("SAB 102"), "Selected Loan Loss Allowance and Documentation Issues." SAB 102 summarizes certain of the SEC's views on the development, documentation and application of a systematic methodology for determining allowances for loan and lease losses. Adoption of SAB 102 by the Company did not have a significant impact on the Company.

        In September 2000, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 ("SFAS No. 140"), "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities."

46



This statement is applicable for transfers of assets and extinguishments of liabilities occurring after June 30, 2001. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement as required for all transactions entered into on or after April 1, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 140 did not have a significant impact on the Company.

Item 7a.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market Risks

        Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. In pursuing its business plan, the primary market risk to which the Company is exposed is interest rate risk. Consistent with its liability management objectives, the Company has implemented an interest rate risk management policy based on match funding, with the objective that variable-rate assets be primarily financed by variable-rate liabilities and fixed-rate assets be primarily financed by fixed-rate liabilities.

        The Company's operating results will depend in part on the difference between the interest and related income earned on its assets and the interest expense incurred in connection with its interest-bearing liabilities. Competition from other providers of real estate financing may lead to a decrease in the interest rate earned on the Company's interest-bearing assets, which the Company may not be able to offset by obtaining lower interest costs on its borrowings. Changes in the general level of interest rates prevailing in the financial markets may affect the spread (the difference in the principal amount outstanding) between the Company's interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Any significant compression of the spreads between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, an increase in interest rates could, among other things, reduce the value of the Company's interest-bearing assets and its ability to realize gains from the sale of such assets, and a decrease in interest rates could reduce the average life of the Company's interest-earning assets.

        A substantial portion of the Company's loan investments are subject to significant prepayment protection in the form of lock-outs, yield maintenance provisions or other prepayment premiums which provide substantial yield protection to the Company. Those assets generally not subject to prepayment penalties include: (1) variable-rate loans based on LIBOR, originated or acquired at par, which would not result in any gain or loss upon repayment; and (2) discount loans and loan participations acquired at discounts to face values, which would result in gains upon repayment. Further, while the Company generally seeks to enter into loan investments which provide for substantial prepayment protection, in the event of declining interest rates, the Company could receive such prepayments and may not be able to reinvest such proceeds at favorable returns. Such prepayments could have an adverse effect on the spreads between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

        While the Company has not experienced any significant credit losses, in the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or economic downturn, defaults could increase and result in credit losses to the Company which adversely affect its liquidity and operating results. Further, such delinquencies or defaults could have an adverse effect on the spreads between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

        Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions, and other factors beyond the control of the Company. As more fully discussed in Note 9 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company employs match funding-based hedging strategies to limit the effects of changes in interest rates on its operations, including engaging in interest rate caps, floors, swaps, futures and other interest rate-related derivative contracts. These strategies are specifically designed to reduce the Company's exposure, on specific transactions or on a portfolio basis, to changes in cash flows as a result of interest rate

47



movements in the market. The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes nor as a hedge against changes in credit risk of its borrowers or of the Company itself.

        Each interest rate cap or floor agreement is a legal contract between the Company and a third party (the "counterparty"). When the Company purchases a cap or floor contract, the Company makes an up-front payment to the counterparty and the counterparty agrees to make payments to the Company in the future should the reference rate (typically one- or three-month LIBOR) rise above (cap agreements) or fall below (floor agreements) the "strike" rate specified in the contract. Each contract has a notional face amount. Should the reference rate rise above the contractual strike rate in a cap, the Company will earn cap income. Should the reference rate fall below the contractual strike rate in a floor, the Company will earn floor income. Payments on an annualized basis will equal the contractual notional face amount multiplied by the difference between the actual reference rate and the contracted strike rate. The Company utilizes the provisions of SFAS No. 133 with respect to such instruments. SFAS No. 133 provides that the up-front fees paid on option-based products such as caps be expensed into earnings based on the allocation of the premium to the affected periods as if the agreement were a series of "caplets." These allocated premiums are then reflected as a charge to income and are included in "Interest expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations in the affected period.

        Interest rate swaps are agreements in which a series of interest rate flows are exchanged over a prescribed period. The notional amount on which swaps are based is not exchanged. In general, the Company's swaps are "pay fixed" swaps involving the exchange of variable-rate interest payments from the counterparty for fixed interest payments from the Company. However, when appropriate the Company enters into "pay floating" swaps involving the exchange of fixed-rate interest payments from the counterparty for variable-rate interest payments from the Company, which mitigates the risk of changes in fair value of the Company's fixed-rate debt obligations.

        Interest rate futures are contracts, generally settled in cash, in which the seller agrees to deliver on a specified future date the cash equivalent of the difference between the specified price or yield indicated in the contract and the value of the specified instrument (i.e., U.S. Treasury securities) upon settlement. Under these agreements, the Company would generally receive additional cash flow at settlement if interest rates rise and pay cash if interest rates fall. The effects of such receipts or payments would be deferred and amortized over the term of the specific related fixed-rate borrowings. In the event that, in the opinion of management, it is no longer probable that a forecasted transaction will occur under terms substantially equivalent to those projected, the Company would cease recognizing such transactions as hedges and immediately recognize related gains or losses based on actual settlement or estimated settlement value.

        While a REIT may freely utilize derivative instruments to hedge interest rate risk on its liabilities, the use of derivatives for other purposes, including hedging asset-related risks such as credit, prepayment or interest rate exposure on the Company's loan assets, could generate income which is not qualified income for purposes of maintaining REIT status. As a consequence, the Company may only engage in such instruments to hedge such risks on a limited basis.

        There can be no assurance that the Company's profitability will not be adversely affected during any period as a result of changing interest rates. In addition, hedging transactions using derivative instruments involve certain additional risks such as counterparty credit risk, legal enforceability of hedging contracts and the risk that unanticipated and significant changes in interest rates will cause a significant loss of basis in the contract. With regard to loss of basis in a hedging contract, indices upon which contracts are based may be more or less variable than the indices upon which the hedged assets or liabilities are based, thereby making the hedge less effective. The counterparties to these contractual arrangements are major financial institutions with which the Company and its affiliates may also have other financial relationships. The Company is potentially exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. However, because of their high credit ratings, the Company does not anticipate that any of the counterparties will fail to meet their obligations. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able

48



to adequately protect against the foregoing risks and that the Company will ultimately realize an economic benefit from any hedging contract it enters into which exceeds the related costs incurred in connection with engaging in such hedges.

        The following table quantifies the potential changes in net investment income and net fair value of financial instruments should interest rates increase or decrease 25, 50, 100 or 200 basis points, assuming no change in the shape of the yield curve (i.e., relative interest rates). Net investment income is calculated as revenue from loans and other lending investments and operating leases (as of December 31, 2003), less related interest expense and operating costs on CTL assets, for the year ended December 31, 2003. Net fair value of financial instruments is calculated as the sum of the value of derivative instruments and the present value of cash in-flows generated from interest-earning assets, less cash out-flows in respect of interest-bearing liabilities as of December 31, 2003. The cash flows associated with the Company's assets are calculated based on management's best estimate of expected payments for each loan based on loan characteristics such as loan-to-value ratio, interest rate, credit history, prepayment penalty, term and collateral type. Most of the Company's loans are protected from prepayment as a result of prepayment penalties and contractual terms which prohibit prepayments during specified periods. However, for those loans where prepayments are not currently precluded by contract, declines in interest rates may increase prepayment speeds. The base interest rate scenario assumes the one-month LIBOR rate of 1.12% as of December 31, 2003. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimated in the table.


Estimated Percentage Change In

Change in Interest Rates

  Net Investment Income(1)
  Net Fair Value of
Financial Instruments(2)

 
-50 Basis Points   2.37 % 2.53 %
-25 Basis Points   1.19 % 1.23 %
Base Interest Rate   0.00 % 0.00 %
+100 Basis Points   (3.81 )% (1.58 )%
+200 Basis Points   (5.52 )% 7.43 %

Explanatory Note:


(1)
At December 31, 2003, the pro forma estimated percentage changes in net investment income for a decrease of 25 and 50 basis points and an increase of 100 and 200 basis points, giving effect to the $635.0 million pay-fixed swaps entered into in March 2004, are 0.74%, 1.48%, (2.03)% and (1.97)%, respectively (see Note 17 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements).

(2)
Amounts exclude fair values of non-financial investments, primarily CTL assets and certain forms of corporate finance investments.

49


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplemental Data

Index to Financial Statements

 
  Page
Financial Statements:    
 
Report of Independent Auditors

 

51
  Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2003 and 2002   52
  Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003   53
  Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003   54
  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003   55
  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements   56

Financial Statement Schedules:

 

 

For the period ended December 31, 2003:

 

 
  Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves   98
  Schedule III-Corporate Tenant Lease Assets and Accumulated Depreciation   99
  Schedule IV-Loans and Other Lending Investments   105

        All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

        Financial statements of five owned companies or joint ventures accounted for under the equity method have been omitted because the Company's proportionate share of the income from continuing operations before income taxes is less than 20.00% of the respective consolidated amount and the investments in and advances to each company are less than 20.00% of consolidated total assets.

50



Report of Independent Auditors

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of iStar Financial Inc.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of iStar Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, NY
February 20, 2004, except for Note 17, which is as of March 12, 2004

51



iStar Financial Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share data)

 
  As of December 31,
 
 
  2003
  2002
 
                            ASSETS              
Loans and other lending investments, net   $ 3,702,674   $ 3,050,342  
Corporate tenant lease assets, net     2,535,885     2,291,805  
Investments in and advances to joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries     25,019     30,611  
Assets held for sale     24,800     28,501  
Cash and cash equivalents     80,090     15,934  
Restricted cash     57,665     40,211  
Accrued interest and operating lease income receivable     26,076     26,804  
Deferred operating lease income receivable     51,447     36,739  
Deferred expenses and other assets     156,934     90,750  
   
 
 
  Total assets   $ 6,660,590   $ 5,611,697  
   
 
 

                            
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Liabilities:              
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities   $ 126,524   $ 117,001  
Dividends payable         5,225  
Debt obligations     4,113,732     3,461,590  
   
 
 
  Total liabilities     4,240,256     3,583,816  
   
 
 
Commitments and contingencies          

Minority interest in consolidated entities

 

 

5,106

 

 

2,581

 

Shareholders' equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Series A Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, liquidation preference $50.00 per share, 0 and 4,400 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively         4  
Series B Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, 2,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002     2     2  
Series C Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, 1,300 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002     1     1  
Series D Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, 4,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002     4     4  
Series E Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, 5,600 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively     6      
Series F Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, 4,000 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively     4      
Series G Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, 3,200 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively     3      
High Performance Units     5,131     1,359  
Common Stock, $0.001 par value, 200,000 shares authorized, 107,215 and 98,114 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively     107     98  
Warrants and options     20,695     20,322  
Additional paid-in capital     2,678,772     2,281,636  
Retained earnings (deficit)     (242,449 )   (227,769 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income (losses) (See Note 12)     1,008     (2,301 )
Treasury stock (at cost)     (48,056 )   (48,056 )
   
 
 
  Total shareholders' equity     2,415,228     2,025,300  
   
 
 
  Total liabilities and shareholders' equity   $ 6,660,590   $ 5,611,697  
   
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

52



iStar Financial Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)

 
  For the Year Ended December 31,
 
 
  2003
  2002*
  2001*
 
Revenue:                    
  Interest income   $ 304,394   $ 255,631   $ 254,119  
  Operating lease income     265,478     236,643     179,279  
  Other income     36,677     27,993     31,000  
   
 
 
 
    Total revenue     606,549     520,267     464,398  
   
 
 
 
Costs and expenses:                    
  Interest expense     194,999     185,375     169,974  
  Operating costs—corporate tenant lease assets     17,371     13,202     12,029  
  Depreciation and amortization     55,286     46,948     34,573  
  General and administrative     38,153     30,449     24,151  
  General and administrative—stock-based compensation expense     3,633     17,998     3,574  
  Provision for loan losses     7,500     8,250     7,000  
  Loss on early extinguishment of debt         12,166     1,620  
   
 
 
 
    Total costs and expenses     316,942     314,388     252,921  
   
 
 
 
Net income before equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries, minority interest and other items     289,607     205,879     211,477  
Equity in (loss) earnings from joint ventures and unconsolidated subsidiaries     (4,284 )   1,222     7,361  
Minority interest in consolidated entities     (249 )   (162 )   (218 )
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (See Note 3)             (282 )
   
 
 
 
Net income from continuing operations     285,074     206,939     218,338  
Income from discontinued operations     1,916     7,614     10,429  
Gain from discontinued operations     5,167     717     1,145  
   
 
 
 
Net income     292,157     215,270     229,912  
Preferred dividend requirements     (36,908 )   (36,908 )   (36,908 )
   
 
 
 
Net income allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders(1)   $ 255,249   $ 178,362   $ 193,004  
   
 
 
 
Basic earnings per common share(2)   $ 2.52   $ 1.98   $ 2.24  
   
 
 
 
Diluted earnings per common share(2)(3)   $ 2.43   $ 1.93   $ 2.19  
   
 
 
 

*
Reclassified to conform to 2003 presentation.

Explanatory Notes:


(1)
HPU holders are Company employees who purchased high performance common stock units under the Company's High Performance Unit Program.

(2)
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, net income used to calculate earnings per basic and diluted common share excludes $2,066 and $1,994 of net income allocable to HPU holders, respectively.

(3)
For the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, net income used to calculate earnings per diluted common share includes joint venture income of $167.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

53


iStar Financial Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(In thousands)

 
  Series A Preferred Stock
  Series B Preferred Stock
  Series C Preferred Stock
  Series D Preferred Stock
  Series E Preferred Stock
  Series F Preferred Stock
  Series G Preferred Stock
  High Performance Units
  Common Stock at Par
  Warrants and Options
  Additional Paid-In Capital
  Retained Earnings (Deficit)
  Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Losses)
  Treasury Stock
  Total
 
Balance at December 31, 2000   $ 4   $ 2   $ 1   $ 4   $   $   $   $   $ 85   $ 16,943   $ 1,966,396   $ (154,789 ) $ (20 ) $ (40,741 ) $ 1,787,885  
Exercise of options                                     2     (835 )   22,550                 21,717  
Dividends declared-preferred                                             330     (36,908 )           (36,578 )
Dividends declared-common                                                 (213,089 )           (213,089 )
Acquisition of ACRE Partners                                             1,219                 1,219  
Restricted stock units issued to employees in lieu of cash bonuses                                             1,478                 1,478  
Restricted stock units granted to employees                                             1,250                 1,250  
Options granted to employees                                         4,348                     4,348  
Issuance of stock-DRIP plan                                             4,708                 4,708  
Net income for the period                                                 229,912             229,912  
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle                                                     (9,445 )       (9,445 )
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income                                                     (5,627 )       (5,627 )
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2001   $ 4   $ 2   $ 1   $ 4   $   $   $   $   $