10-K 1 draft10k122204.htm SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORP. FORM 10-K 12-31-2004

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

    [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

OR

    [   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM __________________ TO __________________

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-26497

SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

     
DELAWARE
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)
77-0121400
(I.R.S. EMPLOYER
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)

4880 SANTA ROSA ROAD
CAMARILLO, CALIFORNIA

(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

93012
(ZIP CODE)

REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (805) 987-0400

      Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

      Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [   ]


      Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). YES [X] NO [   ]

      The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Class A common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $171,512,143 computed by reference to the closing sales price of the Registrant’s Class A common stock as reported on the NASDAQ National Market System as of June 30, 2004. All of the Registrant’s Class B common stock is held by affiliates.

      As of March 11, 2005, there were 20,409,992 shares of the Registrant’s Class A common stock and 5,553,696 shares of Registrant’s Class B common stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

         
PAGE

PART I
Item 1.
Business
3
Item 2.
Properties
24
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
24
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
24
 
PART II
 
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
25
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
26
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
31
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
49
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
51
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
89
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
89
Item 9B.
Other Information
89
 
PART III
 
Item 10.
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
90
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
97
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
108
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
108
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
112
 
PART IV
 
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
113
Signatures
II-1
Exhibit Index
II-3


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

      From time to time, in both written reports (such as this report) and oral statements, Salem Communications Corporation (“Salem” or the “company,” including references to Salem by “we,” “us” and “our”) makes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of federal and state securities laws. Disclosures that use words such as the company “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “will,” “may” or “plans” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, as defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements reflect the company’s current expectations and are based upon data available to the company at the time the statements are made. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. These risks as well as other risks and uncertainties are detailed below at “CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING SALEM” and from time to time in Salem’s periodic reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements made in this report speak as of the date hereof. The company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements made in this report. Any such forward-looking statements, whether made in this report or elsewhere, should be considered in context with the various disclosures made by Salem about its business. These projections or forward-looking statements fall under the safe harbors of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

      All metropolitan statistical area (“MSA”) rank information used in this report, excluding information concerning The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, is from the Fall 2004 Radio Market Survey Schedule & Population Rankings published by The Arbitron Company. According to the Radio Market Survey, the population estimates used were based upon 2000 U.S. Bureau Census estimates updated and projected to January 1, 2004 by Claritas, Inc.

2


PART I

ITEM 1.      BUSINESS.

GENERAL

      We believe that we are the largest commercial U.S. radio broadcasting company, measured by number of stations and audience coverage, providing programming targeted at audiences interested in Christian and family theme radio programming. Our core business is the ownership and operation of radio stations in large metropolitan markets. Upon completion of all announced transactions, we will own a national portfolio of 105 radio stations in 40 markets, including 68 stations in 24 of the top 25 markets, which consists of 33 FM stations and 72 AM stations. We are one of only four commercial radio broadcasters with radio stations in all of the top 10 markets. We are the sixth largest operator measured by number of stations overall and the third largest operator measured by number of stations in the top 25 markets.

       We also own Salem Radio Network® (“SRN”), which is a developer, producer and syndicator of Christian and family themed talk, news and music programming (but not of general broadcast programming), with approximately 1,900 affiliated radio stations. In addition, we own complementary Internet and publishing businesses which target our radio audiences.

      Our business strategy is to expand and improve our national radio platform in order to deliver compelling content to audiences interested in Christian and family themes. We program 44 of our stations with our Christian Teaching & Talk format, which is talk programming with Christian and family themes. We also program 31 News Talk and 15 contemporary Christian music stations. SRN supports our strategy by allowing us to reach listeners in markets where we do not own or operate stations.

      Both our chief executive officer and our chairman are career radio broadcasters who have owned and operated radio stations for more than 30 years.

GROWTH AND OPERATING STRATEGIES

      Continue to Focus on and Serve Targeted Audiences. A key attribute of our success is our consistent focus on reaching the audiences interested in Christian and family themes. We have demonstrated a long-term commitment to these audiences by operating radio stations with formats directed to our listeners’ specific needs and interests. This consistent emphasis and commitment builds loyalty and trust from our listening audiences, block programming purchasers and advertisers.

      Emphasize Compelling Content. As more listening, reading and viewing options become available, compelling content is a key to expanding our listening audiences and increasing audience response to our advertisers.

3


      Christian Teaching & Talk. Christian Teaching & Talk is our foundational format. This format serves as both a learning resource and personal support for listeners nationwide. We continually look for new block programming producers for this format. In addition, we believe that the listening audiences for our radio stations programmed in this format are responsive to affinity advertisers that promote products targeted to audiences interested in Christian and family issues and are receptive to direct response appeals such as those offered through infomercials. These audiences provide the financial support for producers of block programming that is purchased on these radio stations. All of our stations utilizing this format have affinity advertising customers in their respective markets. Local church groups and many community organizations such as rescue missions and family crisis support services can often effectively reach their natural constituencies by advertising on religious format stations. Advertising is also purchased by local and national affiliated religious bookstores, publishers specializing in inspirational and religious literature and other businesses that wish to reach audiences interested in religious and family issues, and general market advertisers.

        The Fish®Contemporary Christian Music. Through our contemporary Christian music format, branded as The Fish®, we are able to bring our listeners the words of inspirational recording artists with upbeat contemporary music. Salem uses the trademarked tag-line “Safe for the Whole Family™” for these music stations to highlight for our listeners the fact that Salem provides stations with sounds that everyone enjoys and lyrics that parents can appreciate. Our stations utilizing this format generate spot advertising revenue from religious and general market advertisers.

        News Talk. Our News Talk stations specifically target the listener who supports conservative views and family values and is complementary with our Christian Teaching & Talk format. This format also provides us with an opportunity to use syndicated talk programming of SRN. Our stations utilizing this format generate spot advertising revenue primarily from general market advertisers.

      Each of our primary formats enhances our strategy of delivering compelling programming content and enables us to broaden our appeal to our target audiences. Our national radio network will continue to look for new block programming, compete aggressively for talk show talent, expand and refine our music networks, and develop compelling news and public affairs features.

      Build Awareness. We seek to build local awareness for each of our radio stations in order to retain and increase our listening audiences, expand our base of advertisers and provide increased audience response to our block programming clients. We emphasize the development of a radio station’s identity to allow each radio station to better compete by developing local on-air personalities, improving production quality and technical facilities, and increasing promotional activities. Due to our programming strategy, we must almost always reformat each acquired station, which means we must market and promote the new format to develop listenership and cultivate a customer base to increase revenues. It can take five to six years of development for an acquired radio station to reach maturity.

      Consider Strategic Diversification. In addition to our national network of terrestrial radio stations, Salem currently provides programming to three channels on XM Satellite Radio. We will continue to consider additional diversification into other forms of media that complement our primary radio formats. This strategy will allow us to build upon our expertise in serving the audiences interested in Christian and family themes programming and content.

      Build Radio Station Clusters. By operating clusters of stations within the same market, we are able to broaden our appeal to our target audiences by broadcasting a range of formats, offer customers multiple programming options to advertise their products, and achieve cost savings by integrating our operations.

      Pursue Strategic Radio Acquisitions in Large Metropolitan Markets. We continue to pursue acquisitions of radio stations in both new and existing markets, particularly in large metropolitan areas. Upon the completion of all announced transactions, we will own stations in 32 of the top 50 markets. Through our acquisition strategy, we reach a greater number and broader range of listeners. This enables us to increase audience response for block programming clients and expand our advertising revenue base.

4


      Utilize Market Research, Targeted Programming and Marketing. We use market research to tailor the programming, marketing and promotion of our music and News Talk stations to maximize audience share for these markets. This research helps us identify underserved markets and underserved or unserved segments of the audiences interested in Christian and family themes in both current and new markets. It also enables us to provide programming that more directly addresses the preferences of our listening audiences in markets where research is conducted. We also desire to reinforce our primary formats by creating a distinct and marketable identity for each of our radio stations. To achieve this objective, we employ and promote distinct, high-profile on-air personalities at many of our stations, many of whom have strong ties to the Christian and family themes community.

      Pursue Excellence in Operations. We focus on hiring highly motivated and talented individuals in each area of our company who will assist us in successfully implementing our growth and operating strategies. Each of the radio markets in which we own stations has a general manager who is responsible for day-to-day operations, local spot advertising sales and, where applicable, local program sales for all of our stations in the market. To enhance the quality of our management in these areas, we pay our general managers and our operations vice presidents a base salary plus a percentage of the respective station’s or cluster of stations’ operating income. By adding a performance goal element to management compensation, we believe we are creating an incentive for management to focus upon both sales growth and expense control. We pay our sales staff on a commission basis.

      We have decentralized the management of our operations. Our operations vice presidents, some of whom are also station general managers, oversee several markets on a regional basis. Our operations vice presidents are experienced radio broadcasters with expertise in sales, programming, marketing and production. We anticipate continuing to rely on this strategy of decentralization and encourage operations vice presidents to apply innovative techniques to the operations they oversee which, if successful, can be implemented at our other stations.

      Our corporate headquarters personnel oversee the placement and rate negotiation for all national block programs. Centralized oversight of this component of our revenue is necessary because our key block program customers purchase time in many of our markets. Corporate headquarters personnel also are responsible for centralized accounting and finance functions, human resources, engineering, real estate and other support functions designed to provide resources to local management.

CORPORATE INFORMATION

      We maintain a website at http://www.salem.cc. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports are electronically filed or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

      Salem Communications Corporation was formed in 1986 as a California corporation and was reincorporated in Delaware in 1999. Salem Communications Holding Corporation (“Salem Holding”) was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Salem Communications Corporation in May 2000. In May 2000, Salem Communications Corporation formed an additional wholly-owned subsidiary, Salem Communications Acquisition Corporation (“AcquisitionCo”), which has since acquired nine radio stations through its wholly-owned subsidiary SCA License Corporation. In August 2000, Salem Communications Corporation assigned substantially all of its assets and liabilities (other than stock of Salem Holding and AcquisitionCo) to Salem Holding.

      In June 2001, Salem Holding effected a dividend to Salem Communications Corporation of Salem Holding’s publishing and Internet businesses. This transaction was effected as a dividend of the capital stock and membership interests, respectively, of Salem Holding’s wholly-owned subsidiaries CCM Communications, Inc. (“CCM”) and OnePlace, LLC (“OnePlace”). As a result, CCM and OnePlace became direct subsidiaries of Salem Communications Corporation. Subsequently, the membership interests of OnePlace were contributed to SCA License Corporation, and OnePlace became an indirect subsidiary of Salem. Salem Communications Corporation and all of its subsidiaries (other than Salem Holding) are guarantors of the borrowings under Salem Holding’s credit facility and Salem Holding’s $94.4 million 9% senior subordinated notes due 2011 (“9% Notes”) and $100.0 million 7¾% senior subordinated notes due 2010 (“7¾% Notes”).

5


DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS

      In 2004, we completed the purchase of selected assets of the following radio stations:

                   
MSA Purchase
Date Market Station Rank (1) Price





(Dollars in thousands)
May 28, 2004
Honolulu, HI
KJPN-AM
61
$ 500
June 28, 2004
Atlanta, GA
WAFS-AM (now WGKA-AM)
11
16,545
August 13, 2004
Honolulu, HI
KPOI-FM (now KHNR-FM)
61
1,850
August 13, 2004
Honolulu, HI
KHUI-FM
61
1,850
September 30, 2004
Detroit, MI
WQBH-AM (now WDTK-AM)
10
4,750
November 2, 2004
Oxnard-Ventura, CA
KIIS-AM
119
800


$ 26,295


      (1) “MSA” means metropolitan statistical area per the Fall 2004 Radio Market Survey Schedule and Population Rankings published by the Arbitron Company, excluding The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

      On July 30, 2004, we acquired selected assets of the Internet portal Christianjobs.com for $0.4 million.

6


RADIO STATIONS

      Upon the close of all announced transactions, the company will own and/or operate a national portfolio of 105 radio stations in 40 markets, including 33 FM stations and 72 AM stations. The following table sets forth information about each of Salem’s stations, in order of market size:

                 
MSA Station Year
Market (1) Rank (2) Call Letters Acquired Format





New York, NY
1, 17 (3)
WMCA-AM
1989
Christian Teaching and Talk
WWDJ-AM
1994
Christian Teaching and Talk
Los Angeles, CA
2
KKLA-FM
1985
Christian Teaching and Talk
KRLA-AM
1998
News Talk
KFSH-FM
2000
Contemporary Christian Music
KXMX-AM
2000
Ethnic Brokered Programming
Chicago, IL
3
WYLL-AM
2001
Christian Teaching and Talk
WIND-AM
2005
News Talk
San Francisco, CA
4, 32 (4)
KFAX-AM
1984
Christian Teaching and Talk
KNTS-AM
2001
News Talk
Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
5
KLTY-FM
1996
Contemporary Christian Music
KWRD-FM (5)
2000
Christian Teaching and Talk
KSKY-AM
2000
News Talk
KHCK-AM
2005
Southern Gospel
Philadelphia, PA
6
WFIL-AM
1993
Christian Teaching and Talk
WNTP-AM
1994
News Talk
Houston-Galveston, TX
7
KNTH-AM
1995
News Talk
KTEK-AM
1998
Christian Teaching and Talk
KKHT-FM
2005
Christian Teaching and Talk
Washington, D.C.
8
WAVA-FM
1992
Christian Teaching and Talk
WABS-AM
2000
Christian Teaching and Talk
Boston, MA
9
WEZE-AM
1997
Christian Teaching and Talk
WROL-AM
2001
Christian Teaching and Talk
WTTT-AM
2003
News Talk
Detroit, MI
10
WDTK-AM (formerly WQBH-AM)
2004
News Talk
Atlanta, GA
11
WNIV-AM
2000
Christian Teaching and Talk
WLTA-AM
2000
Christian Teaching and Talk
WAFS-AM (formerly WGKA-AM)
2000
Southern Gospel
WFSH-FM
2000
Contemporary Christian Music
WGKA-AM (formerly WAFS-AM)
2004
News Talk
Miami, FL
12
WKAT-AM
2004
News Talk
Seattle-Tacoma, WA
13
KGNW-AM
1986
Christian Teaching and Talk
KLFE-AM
1994
Christian Teaching and Talk
KTFH-AM (6)
1997
Ethnic Brokered Programming
KKMO-AM
1998
Spanish
KKOL-AM
1999
News Talk
KIKN-AM
2002
News Talk
Phoenix, AZ
14
KKNT-AM
1996
News Talk
KPXQ-AM
1999
Christian Teaching and Talk
Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN
15
KKMS-AM
1996
Christian Teaching and Talk
KYCR-AM
1998
News Talk
WWTC-AM
2001
News Talk
San Diego, CA
16
KPRZ-AM
1987
Christian Teaching and Talk
KCBQ-AM
2000
News Talk
Baltimore, MD
19
WITH-AM
1997
News Talk

7


RADIO STATIONS, CONT.

                 
MSA Station Year
Market (1) Rank (2) Call Letters Acquired Format





Tampa, FL
20
WTWD-AM (7)
2000
Christian Teaching and Talk
WTBN-AM (7)
2001
Christian Teaching and Talk
WYGL-AM
2005
News Talk
Denver-Boulder, CO
21
KRKS-FM
1993
Christian Teaching and Talk
KRKS-AM
1994
Christian Teaching and Talk
KNUS-AM
1996
News Talk
KBJD-AM (8)
1999
News Talk
Pittsburgh, PA
22
WORD-FM
1993
Christian Teaching and Talk
WPIT-AM
1993
Christian Teaching and Talk
Portland, OR
23
KPDQ-FM
1986
Christian Teaching and Talk
KPDQ-AM
1986
Christian Teaching and Talk
KFIS-FM
2002
Contemporary Christian Music
KAST-FM (8)
2005
Soft Adult/Contemporary
Cleveland, OH
24
WCCD-AM
1997
Christian Teaching and Talk
WHK-AM
2000
Christian Teaching and Talk
WKNR-AM
2000
Sports/Talk
WFHM-FM
2001
Contemporary Christian Music
WRMR-AM
2005
News Talk
Sacramento, CA
25
KFIA-AM
1995
Christian Teaching and Talk
KTKZ-AM
1997
News Talk
KKFS-FM
2002
Contemporary Christian Music
KCEE-FM
2003
News Talk
KOSL-FM
2005
Contemporary Christian Music
Cincinnati, OH
26
WTSJ-AM
1997
Christian Teaching and Talk
WBOB-AM
2000
News Talk
Riverside-San Bernardino, CA
27
KTIE-AM
2001
News Talk
San Antonio, TX
29
KSLR-AM
1994
Christian Teaching and Talk
KLUP-AM
2000
News Talk
Milwaukee-Racine, WI
31
WRRD-AM
2001
Christian Teaching and Talk
WFZH-FM
2001
Contemporary Christian Music
Columbus, OH
34
WRFD-AM
1987
Christian Teaching and Talk
Nashville, TN
43
WBOZ-FM (9)
2000
Southern Gospel
WVRY-FM (9)
2000
Southern Gospel
WFFH-FM (10)
2002
Contemporary Christian Music
WFFI-FM (10)
2002
Contemporary Christian Music
Jacksonville, FL
48
WBGB-FM
2003
Contemporary Christian Music
WZNZ-AM
2003
Sports/Talk
WZAZ-AM
2003
Southern Gospel
WJGR-AM
2003
News Talk

8


RADIO STATIONS, CONT.

                 
MSA Station Year
Market (1) Rank (2) Call Letters Acquired Format





Louisville, KY
54
WFIA-FM
1999
Christian Teaching and Talk
WRVI-FM
1999
Contemporary Christian Music
WGTK-AM
2000
News Talk
WFIA-AM
2001
Christian Teaching and Talk
Richmond, VA
55
WBTK-AM
2001
Christian Teaching and Talk
Honolulu, HI
61
KAIM-AM
2000
Country
KAIM-FM
2000
Contemporary Christian Music
KGU-AM
2000
Christian Teaching and Talk
KHCM-AM
2004
Country Music
KHNR-FM
2004
News Talk
KHUI-FM
2004
Traditional Hawaiian Music
KGMZ-FM
2005
Adult Nostalgia
Omaha, NE
72
KBGI-FM
2005
Contemporary Christian Music
KCRO-AM
2005
Christian Teaching and Talk
Sarasota-Bradenton, FL
75
WLSS-AM
2005
News Talk
Colorado Springs, CO
96
KGFT-FM
1996
Christian Teaching and Talk
KBIQ-FM
1996
Contemporary Christian Music
KZNT-AM
2003
News Talk
Youngstown-Warren, OH
118
WHKW-AM
2001
Christian Teaching and Talk
Oxnard-Ventura, CA
119
KDAR-FM
1974
Christian Teaching and Talk
Tyler-Longview, TX
147
KPXI-FM (4)
2000
Christian Teaching and Talk

      (1) Actual city of license may differ from metropolitan market served.

      (2) “MSA” means metropolitan statistical area per the Fall 2004 Radio Market Survey Schedule and Population Rankings published by the Arbitron Company, excluding the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

      (3) This market includes the Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metro market which independently has a MSA rank of 17.

      (4) This market includes the San Jose, CA market which independently has a MSA rank of 32.

      (5) KPXI-FM is simulcast with KWRD-FM, Dallas-Fort Worth, TX.

      (6) KTFH-AM is an expanded band AM station. Under current Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) rules, we will be required to surrender to the FCC the license for either KTFH-AM or KLFE-AM on July 14, 2009.

      (7) WTBN-AM is simulcast with WTWD-AM, Tampa, FL.

      (8) The FCC has adopted an order in a rulemaking proceeding which, among other things, orders the relocation of radio station KAST-FM from Astoria, Oregon to the Portland, Oregon MSA. The station is currently operating from its preexisting Astoria transmitter site pending FCC authorization to construct the new Portland MSA transmitter site, and is programmed by New Northwest Broadcasters, LLC. pursuant to a local marketing agreement that can be terminated by Salem on thirty days notice.

      (9) KBJD-AM is an expanded band AM station. Under current FCC rules, we will be required to surrender to the FCC the license for either KBJD-AM or KRKS-AM on February 20, 2006.

      (10) WBOZ-FM is simulcast with WVRY-FM, Nashville, TN.

      (11) WFFH-FM is simulcast with WFFI-FM, Nashville, TN.

9


      PROGRAM REVENUE. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we derived 20.0% and 12.5% of our gross revenue, or $41.0 million and $25.5 million, respectively, from the sale of nationally syndicated and local block program time. We derive nationally syndicated program revenue from a programming customer base consisting primarily of geographically diverse, well-established non-profit religious and educational organizations that purchase time on stations in a large number of markets in the United States. Nationally syndicated program producers typically purchase 13, 26 or 52 minute blocks on a Monday through Friday basis and may offer supplemental programming for weekend release. We obtain local program revenue from community organizations and churches that typically purchase time primarily for weekend release and from local speakers who purchase daily releases. We believe our management has been successful in assisting quality local programs expand into national syndication.

      ADVERTISING REVENUE. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we derived 45.6% of our gross revenue, or $93.2 million from the sale of local spot advertising and 8.3% of our gross revenue, or $17.1 million from the sale of national spot advertising.

10


SALEM RADIO NETWORK® AND SALEM RADIO REPRESENTATIVES

      In 1993, we established SRN. Establishment of SRN was a part of our overall business strategy to develop a national network of affiliated radio stations anchored by our owned and operated radio stations in major markets. SRN, which is headquartered in Dallas, Texas, develops, produces and syndicates a broad range of programming specifically targeted to Christian and family issues talk and music stations as well as general market News Talk stations. Currently, we have rights to several full-time satellite channels and all SRN product is delivered to affiliates via satellite.

      SRN has approximately 1,900 affiliate stations, including our owned and operated stations, that broadcast one or more of the offered programming options. These programming options feature talk shows, news and music. The principal source of network revenue is from the sale of advertising time. Network operations also include commission revenue of Salem Radio Representatives from unaffiliated customers.

      We established Salem Radio Representatives in 1992 as a sales representation company specializing in placing national advertising on religious format radio stations. SRN and our radio stations each have exclusive relationships with Salem Radio Representatives for the sale of available SRN spot advertising. Salem Radio Representatives receives a commission on all SRN sales. Salem Radio Representatives also contracts with individual radio stations to sell air time to national advertisers desiring to include selected company stations in national buys covering multiple markets.

      We recognize our advertising and commission revenue from the sale of advertising and from the placement of advertising on radio stations as the spots are aired. SRN’s gross revenue, including commission revenue for Salem Radio Representatives, for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $15.4 million.

OTHER MEDIA

      INTERNET. In 1999, we established an Internet business, OnePlace.com, in connection with our purchase of the assets of OnePlace, LLC, AudioCentral, GospelMedia Network (which was sold in 2000) and Involved Christian Radio Network. In October 2002, we acquired the assets of and re-launched Crosswalk.com, an Internet portal that offers Christian-based content including bible studies, devotionals, family issues material and music. In January 2003, we renamed our Internet division “Salem Web Network™.” The division’s activities enhance and support our core radio strategy by providing on-demand audio streaming for Salem’s program producers. In July 2004, we acquired selected assets of Christianjobs.com, an Internet portal that offers Christian-based content catering to individuals searching for a job or career. The Salem Web Network™ business model mirrors our radio station business model, which is a focus on revenue from ministries and advertising (banners and sponsorships). In January 2005, we acquired selected assets of Christianity.com, an Internet site providing compelling Christian content and ministry resources.

      PUBLISHING. In 1999, we purchased CCM. Based in Nashville, Tennessee, CCM has published magazines since 1978 which follow the contemporary Christian music industry. In January 2003, we renamed this division “Salem Publishing™”. Salem Publishing™’s flagship publication, CCM Magazine®, is a monthly music magazine offering interviews with artists, issue-oriented features, album reviews and concert schedules. Through Salem Publishing™’s trade publications, we are uniquely positioned to track contemporary Christian music audience trends. In February 2003, we launched Homecoming® Magazine. Homecoming® Magazine contains a wide variety of features and regular columns focusing on such topics as relationships, spirituality and health and fitness.

      SATELLITE RADIO. In August 1998, we expanded our media presence by entering into an exclusive agreement with XM Satellite Radio, Inc. to develop, produce, supply and market Christian and family issues audio programming which is distributed by a subscriber-based satellite digital audio radio service. XM Satellite Radio, Inc. is one of two Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licensees for this service and it has the capability of providing up to 125 channels of audio programming. We provide Christian and family themes talk programming on one channel and youth and adult Christian music programming on two additional channels.

11


COMPETITION

      RADIO. The radio broadcasting industry, including the segment of this industry that focuses on Christian and family themes, is a highly competitive business. The financial success of each of our radio stations that focuses on Christian teaching and talk is dependent, to a significant degree, upon its ability to generate revenue from the sale of block program time to national and local religious and educational organizations. We compete for this program revenue with a number of different commercial and noncommercial radio station licensees. While no group owner in the United States specializing in Christian and family themes approaches Salem in size of potential listening audience and presence in major markets, religious radio stations exist and enjoy varying degrees of prominence and success in all markets.

      We also compete for revenue in the spot advertising market with other commercial religious format and general format radio station licensees. We compete in the spot advertising market with other media as well, including broadcast television, cable television, newspapers, magazines, direct mail, Internet and billboard advertising, some of which may be controlled by horizontally-integrated companies.

      Competition may also come from new media technologies and services that are being developed or introduced. These include delivery of audio programming by cable television and satellite systems, digital audio radio services, personal communications services and the service of low powered, limited coverage FM radio stations authorized by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). Digital audio broadcasting will deliver multiformat digital radio services by satellite to national and regional audiences. The quality of programming delivered by digital audio broadcasting would be equivalent to compact disc. The delivery of live and stored audio programming through the Internet has also created new competition. In addition, commencement of satellite delivered digital audio radio services, which delivers multiple audio programming formats to local and national audiences, has created competition. We have attempted to address these existing and potential competitive threats through Salem Web Network™ and through our exclusive arrangement to provide Christian and family issues talk and music formats on one of the two FCC licensees of satellite digital audio radio services.

      NETWORK. Salem Radio Network® competes with other commercial radio networks that offer news and talk programming to religious and general format stations and two noncommercial networks that offer Christian music formats. SRN also competes with other radio networks for the services of talk show personalities.

      OTHER MEDIA. Our magazines compete for readers and advertisers with other publications that follow the Christian music industry and publications that address themes of interest to church leadership. Our Internet business competes with other companies that deliver on-line audio programming and Christian family themed Internet content.

EMPLOYEES

      On February 28, 2005, Salem employed 1,023 full-time and 350 part-time employees. None of Salem’s employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, and we consider our relations with our employees to be good.

12


CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING SALEM

We may choose not to pursue potentially more profitable business opportunities outside of our Christian and family themes formats, or not to broadcast programming that violates our programming standards, either of which may have a material adverse effect on our business.

      We are fundamentally committed to broadcasting formats and programming emphasizing Christian and family themes. We may choose not to switch to other formats or pursue potentially more profitable business opportunities in response to changing audience preferences. We do not intend to pursue business opportunities or air programming that would conflict with our core commitment to Christian and family themes formats or that would violate our programming standards, even if such opportunities or programming would be more profitable. Our decision not to pursue other formats or air programming inconsistent with our programming standards might result in lower operating revenues and profits than we might otherwise achieve.

We Must Respond To The Rapid Changes In Technology, Services And Standards Of Our Industry In Order To Remain Competitive

      The radio broadcasting industries are subject to rapid technological change, evolving industry standards and the emergence of competition from new media technologies and services. We cannot assure you that we will have the resources to acquire new technologies or to introduce new services that could compete with these new technologies. Various new media technologies and services are being developed or introduced, including:

  • satellite-delivered digital audio radio service, which has resulted in the introduction of new subscriber-based satellite radio services with numerous niche formats;
  • audio programming by cable systems, direct-broadcast satellite systems, personal communications systems, content available over the Internet and other digital audio broadcast formats;
  • in-band on-channel digital radio, which provides multi-channel, multi-format digital radio services in the same bandwidth currently occupied by traditional AM and FM radio services; and
  • low-power FM radio, which could result in additional FM radio broadcast outlets.

      We currently program three channels on a satellite digital audio radio service. However, we cannot assure you that these arrangements will continue, will be successful or enable us to adapt effectively to these new media technologies. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that competition arising from new technologies or regulatory change may have on the radio broadcasting industry or on our financial condition and results of operations.

13


If We Are Unable To Execute Our Acquisition Strategy Successfully, Our Business May Not Continue To Grow

      We intend to continue to acquire radio stations as well as other complementary media businesses. Our acquisition strategy has been, and will continue to focus on, the acquisition of radio stations in the top 50 markets. However, we may not be able to identify and consummate future acquisitions successfully, and stations that we do acquire may not increase our station operating income or yield other anticipated benefits. Acquisitions in markets in which we already own stations may not increase our station operating income due to saturation of audience demand. Acquisitions in smaller markets may have less potential to increase operating revenues. Our failure to execute our acquisition strategy successfully in the future could limit our ability to continue to grow in terms of number of stations or profitability.

We May Be Unable To Integrate The Operations And Management Of Acquired Stations Or Businesses, Which Could Have A Material Adverse Effect On Our Business And Operating Results

      Since January 1, 2003, we have acquired the assets of 13 radio stations and one Internet business, and we expect to make acquisitions of other stations and related businesses in the future. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully integrate the operations or management of acquired stations and businesses, or the operations or management of stations and businesses that might be acquired in the future. Continued acquisitions of stations will require us to manage a larger and likely more geographically diverse radio station portfolio than historically has been the case. Our inability to integrate and manage newly acquired stations or businesses successfully could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

If We Are Unable To Implement Our Cluster Strategy, We May Not Realize Anticipated Operating Efficiencies

      As part of our operating strategy, we attempt to realize efficiencies in operating costs and cross-selling of advertising by clustering the operations of two or more radio stations in a single market. However, there can be no assurance that this operating strategy will be successful. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that the clustering of radio stations in one market will not result in downward pressure on advertising rates at one or more of the existing or new radio stations within the cluster. There can be no assurance that any of our stations will be able to maintain or increase its current listening audiences and operating revenue in circumstances where we implement our clustering strategy.

      Additionally, FCC rules and policies allow a broadcaster to own a number of radio stations in a given market and permit, within limits, joint arrangements with other stations in a market relating to programming, advertising sales and station operations. We believe that radio stations that elect to take advantage of these clustering opportunities may, in certain circumstances, have lower operating costs and may be able to offer advertisers more attractive rates and services. The future development of our business in new markets, as well as the maintenance of our business growth in those markets in which we do not currently have radio station clusters, may be negatively impacted by competitors who are taking advantage of these clustering opportunities by operating multiple radio stations within markets.

14


The restrictions on ownership of multiple stations in each market may prevent us from implementing our cluster strategy.

      As part of our growth strategy, we seek to acquire additional radio stations in markets in which we already have existing stations. However, our ability to acquire, operate and integrate any such future acquisition as part of a cluster may be limited by antitrust laws, FCC regulations, the amendment of the Federal Communications Act of 1934 (the “Communications Act”) through congressional action or other applicable laws and regulations. Such changes may affect our ability to acquire additional stations in local radio markets where we already own one or more radio stations.

      In 2003, the FCC modified its definition of the term “market” for purposes of its local radio multiple ownership rules. The text of the new radio multiple ownership rule, and the related text of the FCC order adopting the new market definition, has become effective by order of the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals; however, review by the U.S. Supreme Court of the FCC order adopting the new radio multiple ownership rule and market definition has been requested. That request is pending. Based solely on the current effective FCC rule, which may be modified or eliminated as a result of pending legal and legislative action (the “Effective Rule”), it appears that, in other than smaller radio markets, the FCC has replaced its “signal contour method” of defining local radio markets with the use of “geographic markets” delineated by The Arbitron Company (“Arbitron”), which is a commercial radio ratings service. In smaller radio markets for which Arbitron has not delineated geographic markets, the FCC is conducting a rulemaking to establish “defined markets” comparable to the geographic markets delineated by Arbitron in larger markets. The modified market definition rule remains subject to judicial review.

      Based solely on the Effective Rule, the modified market definition is expected to more severely limit the number of radio stations we may acquire in many markets and to more severely limit the buyers to whom we may sell stations in the future and therefore adversely affect our ability to build or enhance our radio station clusters.

      Based solely on the Effective Rule, it appears that the FCC will not apply the modified market definition retroactively and instead will grandfather currently owned, operated, and controlled clusters of radio stations which otherwise do not comply with the modified market definition. Thus, it appears that the grandfathering provision of the modified market definition will not require a change in our current ownership of radio broadcast stations.

      We cannot predict whether the Effective Rule will become final (no longer subject to judicial review) in its current form (i.e., a “Final Rule”) or whether it will vary materially from this summary as a Final Rule. For this reason, we cannot predict the impact of the Final Rule on our business operations.

      In addition, interest has been expressed by members of Congress to further limit the level of ownership concentration in local radio markets. We cannot predict whether there will be a change in the Communications Act or other federal law governing ownership of radio stations, or whether the FCC, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) or the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) will modify their rules and policies restricting the acquisition of additional stations in a local radio market. In addition, we cannot predict whether a private party will challenge acquisitions we may propose in the future. These events could adversely affect our ability to implement our cluster acquisition strategy.

15


Government Regulation Of The Broadcasting Industry By The FTC, DOJ And FCC May Limit Our Ability To Acquire Or Dispose Of Radio Stations And Enter Into Certain Agreements

      The Communications Act and FCC rules and policies require prior FCC approval for transfers of control of, and assignments of, FCC licenses. The FTC and the DOJ evaluate transactions to determine whether those transactions should be challenged under federal antitrust laws. Over the past eight years, the FTC and the DOJ have been increasingly active in their review of radio station acquisitions. This is particularly the case when a radio broadcast company proposes to acquire an additional station in an existing market. As we have gained a presence in a greater number of markets and percentage of the top 50 markets, our future proposed transactions may be subject to more frequent and aggressive review by the FTC or the DOJ due to market concentration concerns. This increased level of review may be accentuated in instances where we propose to engage in a transaction with parties who themselves have multiple stations in the relevant market. The FCC might not approve a proposed radio station acquisition or disposition when the DOJ has expressed market concentration concerns with respect to the buy or sell side of a given transaction, even if the proposed transaction would otherwise comply with the FCC’s numerical limits on in-market ownership. We cannot be sure that the DOJ or the FTC will not seek to prohibit or require the restructuring of our future acquisitions or dispositions on these or other bases.

      As noted in the immediately preceding risk factor, the FCC modified its definition of the term “market” for purposes of its local radio multiple ownership rules. The new radio multiple ownership rule, and the related text of the FCC order adopting the new market definition, is effective, but is not final because of pending requests for review by the U.S. Supreme Court. Moreover, legislative action may further modify the definition of a radio “market” or otherwise further limit the number of stations we may own in a market. Based solely on the Effective Rule, it appears that the change will further limit our ability to make future radio station acquisitions and will further limit any agreements whereby we provide programming to or sell advertising on radio stations that we do not own. Based solely on the Effective Rule, it appears that the FCC will prohibit the sale to one entity of an intact, grandfathered cluster of radio stations unless the entity is a small business as defined by the FCC. Were a complaint to be filed against us or other FCC licensees involved in a transaction with us, the FCC could delay the grant of, or refuse to grant, its consent to an assignment or transfer of control of licenses and effectively prohibit a proposed acquisition or disposition.

16


Capital Requirements Necessary to Implement Acquisitions Could Pose Risks

      We face stiff competition from other broadcasting companies for acquisition opportunities. If the prices sought by sellers of these companies were to rise, we may find fewer acceptable acquisition opportunities. In addition, the purchase price of possible acquisitions could require additional debt or equity financing on our part. Since the terms and availability of this financing depend to a large degree upon general economic conditions and third parties over which we have no control, we can give no assurance that we will obtain the needed financing or that we will obtain such financing on attractive terms. In addition, our ability to obtain financing depends on a number of other factors, many of which are also beyond our control, such as interest rates and national and local business conditions. If the cost of obtaining needed financing is too high or the terms of such financing are otherwise unacceptable in relation to the acquisition opportunity we are presented with, we may decide to forego that opportunity. Additional indebtedness could increase our leverage and make us more vulnerable to economic downturns and may limit our ability to withstand competitive pressures. Additional equity financing could result in dilution to our shareholders.

The Accounting Treatment Of Goodwill And FCC Licenses Could Cause Future Losses Due To Asset Impairment

      Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 142, goodwill and some indefinite-lived intangibles, including FCC licenses, are not amortized into results of operations, but instead are tested for impairment at least annually, with impairment being measured as the excess of the carrying value of the goodwill or intangible over its fair value. In addition, goodwill and intangible assets are tested more often for impairment as circumstances warrant. Intangible assets that have finite useful lives continue to be amortized over their useful lives and are measured for impairment in accordance with SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” Any impairment losses under SFAS No. 142 or SFAS No. 144 will be recorded as operating expenses. Our future impairment reviews could result in asset write-downs.

Because Of Our Holding Company Structure, We Depend On Our Subsidiaries For Cash Flow, And Our Access To This Cash Flow Is Restricted

      We operate as a holding company. All of our radio stations are currently owned and operated by our subsidiaries. Salem Holding, our wholly owned subsidiary, is the borrower under our credit facilities and our senior subordinated debt. All of our station-operating subsidiaries are subsidiaries of Salem Communications Corporation. Further, we guaranteed Salem Holding’s obligations under the credit facilities and under the senior subordinated notes.

      As a holding company, our only source of cash to pay our obligations, including corporate overhead and other trade payables, are distributions from our subsidiaries of their net earnings and cash flow. We currently expect that the net earnings and cash flow of our subsidiaries will be retained and used by them in their operations, including servicing their debt obligations, before distributions are made to us. Even if our subsidiaries elect to make distributions to us, we cannot assure you that applicable state law and contractual restrictions, including the dividend covenants contained in our credit facilities and senior subordinated notes, would permit such dividends or distributions.

17


Our Business is Dependent Upon the Performance of Key Employees, On-Air Talent and Program Hosts

      Our business is dependent upon the performance and continued efforts of certain key individuals, particularly Edward G. Atsinger III, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Stuart W. Epperson, our Chairman of the Board. The loss of the services of either of Messrs. Atsinger or Epperson could have a material adverse effect upon us. We have entered into employment agreements with each of Messrs. Atsinger and Epperson. Both agreements expire in June 2007. Mr. Epperson has radio interests unrelated to Salem’s operations that will continue to impose demands on his time. Mr. Atsinger has an interest in an aviation business unrelated to Salem’s operations that will continue to impose demands on his time.

      We also employ or independently contract with several on-air personalities and hosts of syndicated radio programs with significant loyal audiences both on a national level and in their respective markets. Although we have entered into long-term agreements with some of our executive officers, key on-air talent and program hosts to protect our interests in those relationships, we can give no assurance that all or any of these key employees will remain with us or will retain their audiences. Competition for these individuals is intense and many of our key employees are at-will employees who are under no legal obligation to remain with us. Our competitors may choose to extend offers to any of these individuals on terms, which we may be unwilling to meet. In addition, any or all of our key employees may decide to leave for a variety of personal or other reasons beyond our control. Furthermore, the popularity and audience loyalty of our key on-air talent and program hosts is highly sensitive to rapidly changing public tastes. A loss of such popularity or audience loyalty is beyond our control and could limit our ability to generate revenues.

We May Be Adversely Affected By New Statutes Dealing With Indecency

      Congress currently has under consideration legislation that addresses the FCC’s enforcement of its rules concerning the broadcast of obscene, indecent, or profane material. Potential changes to enhance the FCC’s authority in this area include the ability to impose substantially higher monetary forfeiture penalties, consider violations to be “serious” offenses in the context of license renewal applications, and, under certain circumstances, designate a license for hearing to determine whether such license should be revoked. While we do not anticipate these regulations to impact us as significantly as some of our competitors given the nature of our programming, in the event that this or similar legislation is ultimately enacted into law, we could face increased costs in the form of fines and a greater risk that we could lose one or more of our broadcasting licenses.

If We Are Not Able To Obtain Financing Or Generate Sufficient Cash Flows From Operations, We May Be Unable To Fund Future Acquisitions

      We may require significant financing to fund our acquisition strategy. This financing may not be available to us. The availability of funds under the credit facility at any time will be dependent upon, among other factors, our ability to satisfy financial covenants. Our future operating performance will be subject to financial, economic, business, competitive, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that our future cash flows or borrowing capacity will be sufficient to allow us to complete future acquisitions or implement our business plan, which could have a material negative impact on our business and results of operations.

18


      We may require significant financing to fund our acquisition strategy. This financing may not be available to us. The availability of funds under the credit facility at any time will be dependent upon, among other factors, our ability to satisfy financial covenants. Our future operating performance will be subject to financial, economic, business, competitive, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that our future cash flows or borrowing capacity will be sufficient to allow us to complete future acquisitions or implement our business plan, which could have a material negative impact on our business and results of operations.

Our Substantial Indebtedness And Our Ability To Incur More Indebtedness Could Adversely Affect Our Financial Condition

      We currently have a significant amount of indebtedness. At December 31, 2004, our total consolidated indebtedness was $278.4 million. Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences to owners of our Class A common stock, including:

  • making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to borrowings under the credit facility and the subordinated notes;
  • limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate requirements;
  • requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate requirements;
  • placing us at a competitive disadvantage relative to those of our competitors that have less indebtedness;
  • limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry that could make us more vulnerable to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulations; and
  • subjecting us to higher interest expense in the event of increases in interest rates because some of our indebtedness is at variable rates of interest.

      We may incur additional indebtedness to fund future acquisitions and for other corporate purposes. If new indebtedness is added to our and our subsidiaries’ current indebtedness levels, the related risks that we and they now face could intensify.

To Service Our Indebtedness And Other Obligations, We Will Require A Significant Amount Of Cash. Our Ability To Generate Cash Depends On Many Factors Beyond Our Control

      Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, to pay dividends and to fund capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. This ability to generate cash, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. Our businesses might not generate sufficient cash flow from operations. We might not be able to complete future offerings, and future borrowings might not be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

19


If We Cannot Attract The Anticipated Listener, Programmer And Advertiser Base For Our Newly Acquired Radio Stations, We May Not Recoup Associated Promotional Costs Or Achieve Profitability For These Radio Stations

      We frequently acquire new radio stations that previously broadcast in formats other than our primary formats. We continue to program some of these recently acquired stations in non-primary formats and we re-program others to one of our primary formats. During, and for a period after, the conversion of a radio station’s format, the radio station typically generates operating losses. The magnitude and duration of these losses depends on a number of factors, including the promotional and marketing costs associated with attracting listeners and advertisers to our radio station’s new format and the success of these efforts. There is no guarantee that the operation of these newly acquired stations or our operations in new formats will attract a sufficient listener and advertiser base. If we are not successful in attracting the listener and advertiser base we anticipate, we may not recoup associated promotional costs or achieve profitability for these radio stations.

If We Do Not Maintain Or Increase Our Block Programming Revenues, Our Business And Operating Results May Be Adversely Affected

      The financial success of each of our radio stations that features Christian Teaching and Talk programming is dependent, to a significant degree, upon our ability to generate revenue from the sale of block programming time to national and local religious organizations, which accounted for 35.3% and 32.5% of our gross broadcasting revenue during the years ended December 31, 2003, and 2004, respectively. We compete for this program revenue with a number of commercial and non-commercial radio stations. Due to the significant competition for this block programming, we may not be able to maintain or increase our current block programming revenue.

If We Are Unable To Maintain Or Grow Our Advertising Revenues, Our Business And Operating Results May Be Adversely Affected

      Our radio stations with our Christian Teaching and Talk, contemporary Christian music and News Talk formats are substantially dependent upon advertising for their revenues. In the advertising market, we compete for revenue with other commercial religious format and general format radio stations, as well as with other media, including broadcast and cable television, newspapers, magazines, direct mail, Internet and billboard advertising. Due to this significant competition, we may not be able to maintain or increase our current advertising revenue.

A Sustained Economic Downturn In Key Salem Markets Could Negatively Impact Our Ability To Generate Broadcasting Revenues

      We derive a substantial part of our revenues from the sale of advertising on our radio stations. For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, 50.3%, 52.2%, and 53.9% of our broadcasting revenues, respectively, were generated from the sale of advertising. We are particularly dependent on advertising revenue from stations in the Los Angeles and Dallas markets, which generated 8.9% and 10.2%, respectively, of our gross broadcasting revenues in 2004. Because substantial portions of our revenues are derived from local advertisers in these key markets, our ability to generate advertising revenues in those markets could be adversely affected by local or regional economic downturns.

20


Environmental, Health, Safety and Land Use Laws and Regulations May Limit or Restrict Some of Our Operations

      As the owner or operator of various real properties and facilities, we must comply with various federal, state and local environmental, health, safety and land use laws and regulations. We and our properties are subject to such laws and regulations relating to the use, storage, disposal, emission and release of hazardous and non-hazardous substances and employee health and safety, as well as zoning restrictions which may affect, among other things, the ability for us to improve or relocate our radio broadcasting facilities. Historically, we have not incurred significant expenditures to comply with these laws. However, additional laws, which may be passed in the future, or a finding of a violation of or liability under existing laws, could require us to make significant expenditures and otherwise limit or restrict some of our operations.

Acts Of War And Terrorism May Reduce Our Revenue And Have Other Negative Effects On Our Business

      In response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C., we increased our news and community service programming, which decreased the amount of broadcast time available for commercial advertising and block programming. In addition, these events caused advertisers to cancel advertisements on our stations. Continued acts of war and terrorism against the United States, and the country’s response thereto, including the current military actions in Iraq, may also cause a general slowdown in the U.S. advertising market, which could cause our revenues to decline due to advertising and/or programming cancellations, delays or defaults in payment, and other factors. In addition, these events may have other negative effects on our business, the nature and duration of which we cannot predict. If these acts of war or terrorism or weak economic conditions continue or worsen, our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Our Controlling Stockholders May Cause Us To Act, Or Refrain From Acting, In A Way That Minority Stockholders Do Not Believe Is In Their Best Interest

      As of December 31, 2004, Edward G. Atsinger III, Stuart W. Epperson, Nancy A. Epperson and Edward C. Atsinger controlled approximately 80.1% of the voting power of our capital stock. These four stockholders thus have the ability to control fundamental corporate transactions requiring stockholder approval, including but not limited to, the election of all of our directors, except for two directors elected by holders of our Class A common stock, approval of merger transactions involving Salem and the sale of all or substantially all of Salem’s assets. The interests of any of these controlling stockholders may differ from the interests of our other stockholders and one or more of the controlling stockholders could take action or make decisions (or block action or decisions) that are not in the minority stockholders’ best interest.

21


If We Fail To Maintain Our Licenses With The FCC, We Would Be Prevented From Operating Affected Radio Stations

      We operate each of our radio stations pursuant to one or more FCC broadcasting licenses. As each license expires, we apply for renewal of the license. However, we cannot be sure that any of our licenses will be renewed, and renewal is subject to challenge by third-parties or to denial by the FCC. The Communications Act and FCC rules and policies require prior FCC approval for transfers of control of, and assignments of, FCC licenses. Were a complaint to be filed against us or other FCC licensees involved in a transaction with us, the FCC could delay the grant of, or refuse to grant, its consent to an assignment or transfer of control of licenses and effectively prohibit a proposed acquisition or disposition. The failure to renew any of our licenses would prevent us from operating the affected station and generating revenue from it. If the FCC decides to include conditions or qualifications in any of our licenses, we may be limited in the manner in which we may operate the affected station.

Covenant Restrictions Under Salem Holding’s Credit Facility And Its Indentures Governing Its Outstanding Senior Subordinated Notes May Limit Our Ability To Operate Our Business

      Salem Holding’s credit facility and the indentures governing its notes contain, among other things, covenants that restrict Salem’s, Salem Holding’s and their subsidiaries’ ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage in other business activities. The credit facility and each of such indentures restrict, among other things, their ability to:

  • incur additional debt;
  • pay dividends or make distributions;
  • purchase or redeem stock;
  • make investments and extend credit;
  • engage in transactions with affiliates;
  • create liens on assets;
  • transfer and sell assets; and
  • effect a consolidation or merger or sell, transfer, lease, or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of their assets.

      These restrictions on management’s ability to operate Salem’s and Salem Holding’s business in accordance with their discretion could have a material adverse effect on our business. The covenants in each indenture of Salem Holding are subject to a number of important limitations and exceptions. These limitations and exceptions will, for example, allow Salem Holding to make certain restricted payments to, and investments in, Salem, subject to specified limitations.

      In addition, Salem Holding’s credit facility requires us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy certain financial condition tests which may require that we take action to reduce our debt or to act in a manner contrary to our business objectives. Events beyond our control, including changes in general economic and business conditions, may affect our ability to meet those financial ratios and financial condition tests. We cannot assure you that we will meet those tests or that the lenders will waive any failure to meet those tests. A breach of any of these covenants would result in a default under Salem Holding’s credit facility and its existing indentures. If an event of default occurs under any of these agreements, the lenders could, under the credit facility, elect to declare all amounts outstanding thereunder, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable.

      If we are unable to pay our obligations to the lenders under the credit facility or other future senior debt instruments, the lenders could proceed against any or all of the collateral securing the indebtedness to them. The collateral under the credit facility consists of substantially all of our existing assets. In addition, a breach of certain of the restrictions or covenants in these agreements, or an acceleration by these lenders of the obligations to them, would cause a default under Salem Holding’s notes. We may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make accelerated payments, including payments on the notes, or to repay the notes in full after we pay the senior secured lenders to the extent of their collateral.

22


We May be Adversely Affected by a General Deterioration in Economic Conditions

      The risks associated with our businesses become more acute in periods of a slowing economy or recession, which may be accompanied by a decrease in advertising and in attendance at live entertainment events. A decline in the level of business activity of our advertisers or a decline in attendance at live entertainment events could have an adverse effect on our revenues and profit margins. During the recent economic slowdown in the United States, many advertisers reduced their advertising expenditures. The impact of slowdowns on our business is difficult to predict, but they may result in reductions in purchases of advertising and attendance at live entertainment events.

Our Broadcasts Often Rely on Content Owned by Third Parties; Obtaining Such Content Could Be Costly And Require Us To Enter Into Disadvantageous License Or Royalty Arrangements

      We rely heavily upon content and software owned by third parties in order to provide programming for our broadcasts. The cost of obtaining all necessary licenses and permission to use this third party content and software continues to increase. Although we attempt to avoid infringing known proprietary rights of third parties in our broadcasting efforts, we expect that we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims for alleged infringement from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Any claims relating to the infringement of third-party proprietary rights, even if not meritorious, could result in costly litigation, divert management’s attention and resources, or require us require us to enter into royalty or license agreements which are not advantageous to us. In addition, parties making claims may be able to obtain an injunction, which could prevent us from broadcasting all or certain portions of individual radio broadcasts containing content owned by third parties. We also rely on software that we license from third parties, including software that is integrated with internally developed software and used to perform key broadcasting and accounting functions. We could lose the right to use this software or it could be made available to us only on commercially unreasonable terms. Although we believe that alternative software is available from other third-party suppliers or internal developments, the loss of or inability to maintain any of these software licenses or the inability of the third parties to enhance in a timely and cost-effective manner their products in response to changing customer needs, industry standards or technological developments could result in limitations or delays in broadcasting or accounting for programming by us until equivalent software could be developed internally or identified, licensed and integrated, which would harm our business.

23


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

      The types of properties required to support our radio stations include offices, studios and tower and antenna sites. A station’s studios are generally located in an office in a downtown or business district. We generally select our tower and antenna sites to provide maximum market coverage. Our network operations are supported by offices and studios from which its programming originates or is relayed from a remote point of origination. The operations of our other media businesses are supported by office facilities.

      Our radio stations’ studios and offices and the operations of our other media businesses are located in leased facilities. Our network leases satellite transponders used for delivery of its programming. We either own or lease our radio station tower and antenna sites. We believe we will be able to renew any such leases that expire within the next several years or obtain other arrangements, as necessary. We own our corporate office building, located in Camarillo, California, and the headquarters of SRN and Salem Radio Representatives, located in the Dallas, Texas area. In January 2004, we purchased the property upon which our studio and office facilities for our Tampa, Florida stations are located. In October 2004, we purchased the property upon which our studio and office facilities for our Honolulu, Hawaii stations will be located once construction is complete.

      We lease certain property from our principal stockholders or trusts and partnerships created for the benefit of the principal stockholders and their families. These leases are described in “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS” in Part III, Item 13 and in Note 8 of our consolidated financial statements. All such leases have cost of living adjustments. Based upon our management’s assessment and analysis of local market conditions for comparable properties, we believe such leases have terms that that are as favorable or more favorable to the company than those that would have been available from unaffiliated parties.

      No one physical property is material to our overall operations. We believe that our properties are in good condition and suitable for our operations; however, we continually evaluate opportunities to upgrade our properties.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

      On March 9, 2005, Pipefitters, Locals 522 & 633 Pension Trust Fund filed a Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws in the Superior Court of California for the County of Ventura against the company, its directors, certain of its officers and certain underwriters of the company’s April 2004 public offering of Class A common stock. In the purported class action, the plaintiff asserts claims under the Securities Act on behalf of a putative class of all persons who purchased the company’s equity securities pursuant or traceable to that offering. The complaint alleges that the offering documents failed to disclose that the company’s financial statements overstated its fixed assets and that the company’s internal controls were flawed with respect to its ability to value fixed assets and, that the offering documents contained misstatements regarding the company’s fixed assets and internal controls. The complaint seeks rescission or damages in excess of $5 million, interest, attorneys fees and other costs, as well as equitable and injunctive relief. The complaint was served on the company on March 15, 2005.

      Incident to our business activities, we are a party to a number of legal proceedings, lawsuits, arbitration and other claims including the purported class action described above. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable with assurance. Also, we maintain insurance which may provide coverage for such matters. Consequently, our management is unable to ascertain the ultimate aggregate amount of monetary liability or the financial impact with respect to these matters. Except with respect to the purported class action described above which has not yet been assessed due to its recent commencement, our management believes, at this time, that the final resolution of these matters, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect upon our annual consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

      No matters were submitted to a vote of stockholders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.

24


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY; RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

      The company’s Class A common stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market® (“NASDAQ-NMS”) under the symbol SALM. At March 2, 2005, the company had approximately 50 stockholders of record (not including the number of persons or entities holding stock in nominee or street name through various brokerage firms) and 20,409,992 outstanding shares of its Class A common stock and two stockholders of record and 5,553,696 outstanding shares of its Class B common stock. The following table sets forth for the fiscal quarters indicated the range of high and low trade price information per share of the Class A common stock of the company as reported on the NASDAQ-NMS.

                                                                 
2003 2004


1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr








High (mid-day) $ 26.20 $ 26.45 $ 24.37 $ 28.20 $ 28.37 $ 33.65 $ 29.40 $ 27.46
Low (mid-day) $ 15.00 $ 16.30 $ 19.09 $ 19.12 $ 23.08 $ 27.13 $ 24.18 $ 24.10

      There is no established public trading market for the company’s Class B common stock.

DIVIDEND POLICY

      Historically, the company has not paid a dividend on either class of its common stock. The company has historically retained earnings for use in its business and will continue to do so unless its board of directors makes a determination to declare and pay dividends on its common stock in light of and after consideration of its earnings, financial position, capital requirements, its bank credit facility, the indentures governing its senior subordinated notes and such other factors as the board of directors deems relevant. The company’s sole source of cash available for making dividend payments will be dividends paid to the company or payments made to the company by its subsidiaries. The ability of subsidiaries of the company to make such payments may be restricted by applicable state laws or terms of agreements to which they are or may become a party; the company’s credit facility and the terms of the indentures governing its outstanding senior subordinated notes restrict the payment of dividends on its common stock unless certain specified conditions are satisfied.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

      The following table provides information as of December 31, 2004 with respect to shares of our Class A common stock that may be issued under the Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, our only existing equity compensation plan. The Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan was adopted by our board of directors and approved by our stockholders on May 25, 1999. On March 20, 2003, the board of directors approved an amendment to the Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan to reserve an additional 600,000 shares of the company's Class A common stock for issuance under the plan. The amendment was approved by a vote of the stockholders at the company’s 2003 annual meeting of stockholders held on June 11, 2003. On November 10, 2004 the Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan to reserve an additional 1,800,000 shares of the company’s Class A common stock for issuance under the plan. It is contemplated that the amendment will be voted upon by the stockholders at the company’s 2005 annual meeting of the stockholders to be held on May 18, 2005.

25


                           
Equity Compensation Plan Information

Number of Securities
Number of securities remaining available for
to be issued Weighted-average future issuance under
upon exercise of exercise price of equity compensation plans
outstanding options, outstanding options, (excluding securities
Plan Category warrants and rights warrants and rights reflected in column (a))




(a) (b) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1,467,966 $ 25.53 684
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 




Total 1,467,966 $ 25.53 684




ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

      The following table sets forth selected financial data and other operating information of Salem. The selected financial data in the table are derived from the consolidated financial statements of Salem. The data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, related notes, and other financial information included (incorporated by reference) herein. The data below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by reference to, our consolidated financial statements and related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and specifically the disclosure concerning a reconciliation for historical Non-GAAP measures presented in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included in Item 7 of this report.

26


                                           
Year Ended December 31,

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004





(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Statement of Operations Data:
Net broadcasting revenue
$ 113,010 $ 136,106 $ 156,216 $ 170,483 $ 187,543
Other media revenue
7,916 8,016 8,054 7,865 9,342





Total revenue
120,926 144,122 164,270 178,348 196,885
 
Operating expenses:
Broadcasting operating expenses
63,187 87,772 103,809 109,043 115,896
Cost of denied / abandoned tower site and license upgrade
2,202 746
Other media operating expenses
14,863 9,282 7,709 7,942 8,600
Legal settlement
2,300
Corporate expenses
10,457 13,774 14,387 16,091 17,480
Cost of terminated offering
651
Depreciation and amortization
25,065 30,026 11,446 12,291 12,433
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets
(773 ) (26,276 ) 567 214 3,266
Gain on sale of assets to related parties
(28,794 ) (3,560 )





Total operating expenses
84,005 111,018 140,218 148,434 158,421





Operating income
36,921 33,104 24,052 29,914 38,464
 
Other income (expense):
Interest income
534 1,994 255 212 171
Interest expense
(17,452 ) (26,542 ) (27,162 ) (23,474 ) (19,931 )
Loss on early retirement of debt
(1,849 ) (6,440 ) (6,588 )
Other expense
(857 ) (573 ) (458 ) (410 ) (116 )





Total other income (expense)
(19,624 ) (25,121 ) (27,365 ) (30,112 ) (26,464 )
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations
17,297 7,983 (3,313 ) (198 ) 12,000
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
6,675 2,442 (1,323 ) 479 4,576





Income (loss) before discontinued operations
10,622 5,541 (1,990 ) (677 ) 7,424
Discontinued operations, net of tax
(513 ) (1,154 ) 15,995 (91 )





Net income (loss) (1)
$ 10,109 $ 4,387 $ 14,005 $ (677 ) $ 7,333





27


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (CONTINUED).

                                           
Year Ended December 31,

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004





(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
Basic earnings (loss) per share data:
     Earnings (loss) per share before discontinued operations
$ 0.45 $ 0.24 $ (0.08 ) $ (0.03 ) $ 0.29
     Income (loss) from discontinued operations 
(0.02 ) (0.05 ) 0.68
     Earnings (loss) per share
0.43 0.19 0.60 (0.03 ) 0.29
 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share data:
    Income (loss) per share before discontinued operations
$ 0.45 $ 0.24 $ (0.08 ) $ (0.03 ) $ 0.29
     Income (loss) from discontinued operations 
(0.02 ) (0.05 ) 0.68
     Earnings (loss) per share
0.43 0.19 0.59 (0.03 ) 0.29
 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding 
23,456,088 23,456,828 23,473,821 23,488,898 25,220,678





Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 
23,466,849 23,518,747 23,582,906 23,488,898 25,371,649





28


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (CONTINUED).

                                           
Year Ended December 31,

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004





(Dollars in thousands)
 
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents
$ 3,928 $ 23,921 $ 26,325 $ 5,620 $ 10,994
Restricted cash
107,661
Broadcast licenses
340,201 323,848 363,203 381,740 406,290
Other intangible assets including goodwill, net
18,281 20,211 17,305 15,391 14,176
Total assets
470,668 507,254 672,209 560,011 585,784
Long-term debt, less current portion
286,050 311,621 350,908 336,091 281,024
Stockholders’ equity
152,948 157,370 171,928 171,822 247,637
 
Cash flows related to:
Operating activities
$ 10,712 $ 11,633 $ 6,814 $ 24,034 $ 39,306
Investing activities
(219,848 ) (10,070 ) (27,018 ) (29,688 ) (44,359 )
Financing activities
178,940 18,430 22,608 (15,051 ) 10,427
 
Other Data:
 
Station operating income (2)
$ 49,823 $ 48,334 $ 52,407 $ 61,440 $ 71,647
Station operating income margin (3)
44.1% 35.5% 33.5% 36.0% 38.2%
 
 

(1)     Had SFAS No. 142 been applied as of January 1, 2000, we would have reported net income for the two years ended December 31, 2001 as follows:

                 
Year Ended December 31,

2000 2001


(Dollars in thousands,
except per share data)
 
Reported net income
$ 10,109 $ 4,387
     Add back goodwill and broadcast licenses
     amortization, net of tax
10,687 13,547


Adjusted net income
$ 20,796 $ 17,934


Basic and diluted earnings per share
     As reported
$ 0.43 $ 0.19
     Goodwill and broadcast licenses
     amortization, net of tax
0.46 0.58


Adjusted earnings per share
$ 0.89 $ 0.76


      Had SFAS No. 142 been applied as of January 1, 2000, income before operations would have been $21.3 million ($0.91 per share) and $19.1 million ($0.81 per share) for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001, respectively.

29


(2)      We define station operating income as net broadcasting revenue less broadcasting operating expenses.

      Station operating income is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Therefore it should be viewed as a supplement to and not a substitute for results of operations presented on the basis of GAAP. Management believes that station operating income is useful, when considered in conjunction with operating income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it is generally recognized by the radio broadcasting industry as a tool in measuring performance and in applying valuation methodologies for companies in the media, entertainment and communications industries. This measure is used by investors and by analysts who report on the industry to provide comparisons between broadcast groups. Additionally, we use station operating income as one of our key measures of operating efficiency and profitability. Station operating income does not purport to represent cash provided by operating activities. Our statement of cash flows presents our cash flow activity and our income statement presents our historical performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our station operating income is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.

RECONCILIATION OF STATION OPERATING INCOME TO OPERATING INCOME

                                           
Year Ended December 31,

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004





(Dollars in thousands)
 
Station operating income
$ 49,823 $ 48,334 $ 52,407 $ 61,440 $ 71,647
Plus other media revenue
7,916 8,016 8,054 7,865 9,342
Less cost of denied tower site and license upgrade
(2,202 ) (746 )
Less other media operating expenses
(14,863 ) (9,282 ) (7,709 ) (7,942 ) (8,600 )
Less depreciation and amortization
(25,065 ) (30,026 ) (11,446 ) (12,291 ) (12,433 )
Less gain (loss) on disposal of assets
773 26,276 (567 ) (214 ) (3,266 )
Less gain on sale of assets to related parties
28,794 3,560
Less corporate expenses
(10,457 ) (13,774 ) (14,387 ) (16,091 ) (17,480 )
Less cost of terminated offering
(651 )
Less legal settlement
(2,300 )










Operating income
$ 36,921 $ 33,104 $ 24,052 $ 29,914 $ 38,464










(3)     Station operating income margin is station operating income as a percentage of net broadcasting revenue.

30


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

GENERAL

      The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. Our consolidated financial statements are not directly comparable from period to period because of our acquisition and disposition of selected assets of radio stations and our acquisition of selected assets of other media businesses. See note 2 to our consolidated financial statements under Item 8 for additional information.

OVERVIEW

      As a radio broadcasting company with a national radio network, we derive our revenue primarily from the sale of broadcast time and radio advertising on a national and local basis.

      Historically, our principal sources of revenue have been:
 
   •   the sale of block program time, both to national and local program producers,
   •   the sale of advertising time on our radio stations, both to national and local advertisers, and
   •   the sale of advertising time on our national radio network.

      The rates we are able to charge for broadcast time and advertising time are dependent upon several factors, including:
 
   •   audience share,
   •   how well our stations perform for our clients,
   •   the size of the market,
   •   the number of stations in the market as well as the number of stations in the market in our format that are competing for the same listeners,
   •   the general economic conditions in each market, and
   •   supply and demand on both a local and national level.

      Our sources of revenue and product offerings also include other media businesses, including the Internet and magazine publishing.

31


      The following table shows gross broadcasting revenue, the percentage of gross broadcasting revenue for each broadcasting revenue source and net broadcasting revenue.

                                           
Year Ended December 31,

2002 2003 2004



(Dollars in thousands)
Block program time:
National
  $ 40,447 23.8 %   $ 41,033 22.1 %   $ 40,901 20.0 %
Local
21,503 12.6 24,420 13.2 25,532 12.5






61,950 36.4 65,453 35.3 66,433 32.5
Advertising:
National
10,684 6.3 12,922 7.0 17,068 8.3
Local
74,928 44.0 83,987 45.2 93,184 45.6






85,612 50.3 96,909 52.2 110,252 53.9
Infomercials
6,114 3.6 6,639 3.6 8,924 4.4
SRN
13,524 7.9 13,375 7.2 15,399 7.5
Other
3,110 1.8 3,279 1.7 3,539 1.7






Gross broadcasting revenue
170,310 100.0 % 185,655 100.0 % 204,547 100.0 %






Less agency commissions
14,094 15,172 17,004



Net broadcasting revenue
$ 156,216 $ 170,483 $ 187,543



32


      Our broadcasting revenue is affected primarily by the program rates our radio stations charge and by the advertising rates our radio stations and networks charge. The rates for block programming time are based upon our stations’ ability to attract audiences that will support the program producers through contributions and purchases of their products. Advertising rates are based upon the demand for advertising time, which in turn is based on our stations’ and networks’ ability to produce results for their advertisers. Historically we have not subscribed to traditional audience measuring services. Instead, we have marketed ourselves to advertisers based upon the responsiveness of our audiences. In selected markets we subscribe to Arbitron, which develops quarterly reports to measure a radio station’s audience share in the demographic groups targeted by advertisers. Each of our radio stations and our network has a general pre-determined level of time that they make available for block programming and/or advertising, which may vary at different times of the day.

      As is typical in the radio broadcasting industry, our second and fourth quarter advertising revenue generally exceeds our first and third quarter advertising revenue. This seasonal fluctuation in advertising revenue corresponds generally with quarterly fluctuations in the retail advertising industry. Quarterly revenue from the sale of block programming time does not tend to vary significantly, however, because program rates are generally set annually.

      Our cash flow is affected by a transition period experienced by radio stations when, due to the nature of the radio station, our plans for the market and other circumstances, we find it beneficial to change its format. This transition period is when we develop a radio station’s customer and listener base. During this period, a station may generate negative or insignificant cash flow.

      In the broadcasting industry, radio stations often utilize trade or barter agreements to exchange advertising time for goods or services (such as other media advertising, travel or lodging) in lieu of cash. In order to preserve the sale of our advertising time for cash, we generally enter into trade agreements only if the goods or services bartered to us will be used in our business. We have minimized our use of trade agreements and have generally sold most of our advertising time for cash. In 2004, we sold 95% of our advertising time for cash. In addition, it is our general policy not to preempt advertising paid for in cash with advertising paid for in trade.

      The primary operating expenses incurred in the ownership and operation of our radio stations include: (i) employee salaries, commissions and related employee benefits and taxes, (ii) facility expenses such as rent and utilities, (iii) promotional expenses and (iv) music license fees. In addition to these expenses, our network incurs programming costs and lease expenses for satellite communication facilities. We also incur and will continue to incur significant depreciation, amortization and interest expense as a result of completed and future acquisitions of radio stations and existing and future borrowings.

      Salem Web Network™, our Internet business, earns its revenue from sales of streaming services, sales of banner advertising and sponsorships on the Internet, and, to a lesser extent, sales of software and software support contracts. Salem Publishing™, our publishing business, earns its revenue by selling advertising in and subscriptions to its publications. The revenue and related operating expenses of these businesses are reported as “other media” on our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

SAME STATION DEFINITION

      In the discussion of our results of operations below, we compare our results between periods on an as reported basis (that is, the results of operations of all radio stations and network formats owned or operated at any time during either period) and on a “same station” basis. With regard to fiscal quarters, we include in our same station comparisons the results of operations of radio stations and networks that we own or operate in the same format during the quarter, as well as the corresponding quarter of the prior year. Same station results for a full year are based on the sum of the same station results for the four quarters of that year.

33


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We have reclassified our statements of operations data for all periods presented to reflect our sale on September 30, 2002, of the assets of radio station WYGY-FM, which has been accounted for as a discontinued operation.

      The following table sets forth certain statements of operations data as a percentage of net revenue for the periods indicated:

                                       
Year Ended December 31,

2002 2003 2004 2003 over 2002 2004 over 2003





(in thousands) % change


Net broadcasting revenue
$ 156,216 $ 170,483 $ 187,543 9.1 % 10.0 %
Other media revenue
8,054 7,865 9,342 (2.3 )% 18.8 %





Total revenue
164,270 178,348 196,885 8.6 % 10.4 %
Operating expenses:
Broadcasting operating expenses
103,809 109,043 115,896 5.0 % 6.3 %
Cost of denied / abandoned tower site and license upgrade
2,202 746 (66.1 )%
Other media operating expenses
7,709 7,942 8,600 3.0 % 8.3 %
Legal settlement
2,300 (100.0 )%
Corporate expenses
14,387 16,091 17,480 11.8 % 8.6 %
Cost of terminated offering
651 (100.0 )%
Depreciation
9,537 10,703 10,900 12.2 % 1.8 %
Amortization
1,909 1,588 1,533 (16.9 )% (3.5 )%
Loss on disposal of assets
567 214 3,266 (62.3 )% 1,426.2 %





Total operating expenses
140,219 148,434 158,421 5.9 % 6.7 %





Operating income
24,051 29,914 38,464 24.4 % 28.6 %
Other income (expense):
Interest income
212 171 (16.9 )% (19.3 )%
Interest expense
(27,162 ) (23,474 ) (19,931 ) (13.6 )% (15.1 )%
Loss on early retirement of debt
(6,440 ) (6,588 ) % 2.3 %
Other expense, net
(458 ) (410 ) (116 ) (9.8 )% (71.7 )%





Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations
(3,314 ) (198 ) 12,000 (94.0 )% (6,160.6 )%
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(1,323 ) 479 4,576 (136.2 )% 855.3 %





Income (loss) before discontinued operations
(1,991 ) (677 ) 7,424 (66.0 )% (1,196.6 )%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
15,995 (91 ) (100.0 )%





Net income (loss)
$ 14,004 $ (677 ) $ 7,333 (104.8 )% (1,183.2 )%





34


The following table presents selected financial data for the periods indicated as a percentage of total revenue

                                 
Year Ended
December 31,

2002 2003 2004



 
Net broadcasting revenue
95 % 96 % 95 %
Other media revenue
5 % 4 % 5 %



Total revenue
100 % 100 % 100 %
Operating expenses:
Broadcasting operating expenses
63 % 61 % 59 %
Cost of denied/abandoned tower site and license upgrade
% 1 % %
Other media operating expenses
5 % 5 % 4 %
Legal settlement
1 % % %
Corporate expenses
9 % 9 % 9 %
Cost of terminated offering
% % %
Depreciation
6 % 6 % 6 %
Amortization
1 % 1 % 1 %
Loss on disposal of assets
% % 1 %



Total operating expenses
85 % 83 % 80 %



Operating income
15 % 17 % 20 %
Other income (expense):
Interest income
% % %
Interest expense
(17 ) % (13 ) % (10 ) %
Loss on early retirement of debt
% (4 ) % (4 ) %
Other expense, net
% % %



Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations
(2 ) % % 6 %
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(1 ) % % 2 %



Income (loss) before discontinued operations
(1 ) % % 4 %
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
10 % % %
Net income (loss)
9 % % 4 %



Year ended December 31, 2004 compared to year ended December 31, 2003

      NET BROADCASTING REVENUE.      Net broadcasting revenue increased $17.0 million or 10.0% to $187.5 million in 2004 from $170.5 million in 2003. On a same station basis, net revenue improved $15.9 million or 9.8% to $177.7 million in 2004 from $161.8 million in 2003. The growth is primarily attributable to an increase in net broadcasting revenue from our music stations acquired since the middle of 2000, the development of our News Talk platform and increases in national spot revenue and network revenue. Revenue from advertising as a percentage of our gross broadcasting revenue increased to 53.9% in 2004 from 52.2% in 2003. Revenue from block program time as a percentage of our gross broadcasting revenue decreased to 32.5% in 2004 from 35.3% in 2003. This change in our revenue mix was primarily due to the growth of advertising revenues at our contemporary Christian music and News Talk radio stations and our continued efforts to develop more advertising revenue in all of our markets.

35


      OTHER MEDIA REVENUE.       Other media revenue increased $1.4 million or 18.8% to $9.3 million in 2004 from $7.9 million in 2003. This increase was due primarily to increased Internet display advertising, print pages and custom print sold, as well as our acquisition of the assets of the Internet portal operations of Christianjobs.com in the third quarter of 2004.

      BROADCASTING OPERATING EXPENSES.       Broadcasting operating expenses increased $6.9 million or 6.3% to $115.9 million in 2004 from $109.0 million in 2003. On a same station basis, broadcasting operating expenses increased $3.1 million or 3.1% to $106.7 million in 2004 from $103.6 million in 2003. The increase is primarily due to incremental selling expenses incurred to produce the increased revenue in the period and increased promotional expenses related to the rollout of our News Talk format in new markets, partially offset by reduced bad debt expense as a result of improved collections.

      OTHER MEDIA OPERATING EXPENSES.       Other media operating expenses increased $0.7 million or 8.3% to $8.6 million in 2004 from $7.9 million in 2003. The increase is attributable primarily to costs associated with our acquisition of the assets of the Internet portal operations of Christianjobs.com in the third quarter of 2004, the early termination of a lease of one of our Salem Web Network™ offices and increased circulation costs due to additional production at Salem Publishing™.

      CORPORATE EXPENSES.      Corporate expenses increased $1.4 million or 8.6% to $17.5 million in 2004 from $16.1 million in 2003, primarily due to: (a) additional overhead costs incurred for all of 2004 as compared to a portion of 2003 in connection with the acquisitions of the assets of radio stations during 2003, (b) an increase in salaries and accrued executive bonuses in 2004,(c) additional overhead costs associated with the acquisitions of the assets of radio stations and an Internet business during 2004, and (d) costs associated with the implementation of the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

      COST OF TERMINATED OFFERING.       During the third quarter of 2003, Salem incurred a one-time charge of $0.7 million to write-off costs associated with a contemplated debt offering that was terminated during that quarter. This charge is identified in Salem's Statement of Operations as “Cost of Terminated Offering.”

      DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION.       Depreciation expense increased $0.2 million or 1.8% to $10.9 million in 2004 from $10.7 million in 2003. The increase was due to: (a) the additional depreciation expense incurred for all of 2004 as compared to a portion of 2003 in connection with our acquisitions of the assets of radio stations during 2003, and (b) additional depreciation expenses associated with the acquisition of the assets of radio stations and an Internet portal operation during 2004. Amortization expense decreased $0.1 million or 3.5% to $1.5 in 2004 from $1.6 million in 2003.

      LOSS ON DISPOSAL OF ASSETS.       Loss on disposal of assets of $3.3 million in 2004 was primarily due to the write-off of various fixed assets and equipment as a result of a comprehensive physical inventory of our property, plant and equipment. Loss on disposal of assets of $0.2 million in 2003 was primarily due to the disposition of certain property, plant and equipment, partially offset by the recovery of a bad debt related to a note acquired in the sale of property, plant, equipment and intangible assets.

36


      OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE).       Interest income of $0.2 million in 2004 was primarily from interest earned on excess cash. Interest income of $0.2 million in 2003 was primarily from interest earned on the cash which was held in a trust account that was used to redeem all of our $100.0 million 9½% senior subordinated notes due 2007 (“9½% Notes”) and from interest earned on excess cash. Interest expense decreased $3.6 million or 15.1% to $19.9 million in 2004 from $23.5 million in 2003. The decrease is primarily due to savings of approximately $2.6 million in interest due to a combination of redemptions and open market repurchases (the “Redemption”) of $55.6 million of the 9% Notes, as well as savings resulting from the refinancing of our 9½% Notes. Additionally, as part of the refinancing of our 9½% Notes, both the 9½% Notes and the 7¾% Notes were outstanding until January 22, 2003, resulting in an additional $0.6 million of interest expense in the prior year (see “ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK - Derivative Instruments”). Loss on early retirement of debt of $6.4 million in 2003 relates to the early retirement of our 9½% Notes on January 22, 2003. Other expense, net decreased to $0.1 million in 2004 from $0.4 million in 2003, due primarily to an increase in bank commitment fees partially offset by a brokerage fee earned from the sale of WGST-FM, Atlanta, Georgia.

      PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES.      Provision for income taxes was $4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Provision for income taxes as a percentage of income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations (that is, the effective tax rate) was 38.1% in 2004 and 241.9% in 2003. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, the effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory income rate of 34.0% primarily due to the effect of state income taxes and certain expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes and changes in the valuation allowance from the use of certain state net operating loss carryforwards.

      LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX. Loss from discontinued operations was approximately $0.1 million net of income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2004. This amount relates to an increase in a liability, which has been resolved, arising from the sale of WYGY-FM, Cincinnati, Ohio, which was sold on September 30, 2002.

      NET INCOME (LOSS). We recognized net income of $7.3 million in 2004 as compared to a net loss of $0.7 million in 2003. The change is primarily due to an increase in operating income of $8.4 million in 2004 over 2003 and a reduction in interest expense of $3.6 million in 2004 over 2003, partially offset by an increase in the provision for income taxes of $4.1 million in 2004 over 2003.

37


Year ended December 31, 2003 compared to year ended December 31, 2002

      NET BROADCASTING REVENUE.      Net broadcasting revenue increased $14.3 million or 9.1% to $170.5 million in 2003 from $156.2 million in 2002. The growth was attributable to an increase in net revenue from our music stations acquired since the middle of 2000, an increase in program rates and the acquisitions of the assets of radio stations during 2002 and 2003. On a same station basis, net revenue improved $13.0 million or 8.3% to $169.2 million in 2003 from $156.2 million in 2002. The improvement was primarily due to an increase in program rates and the acquisitions of the assets of radio stations during 2002 and 2001. Revenue from advertising as a percentage of our gross broadcasting revenue increased to 52.2% in 2003 from 50.3% in 2002. Revenue from block program time as a percentage of our gross broadcasting revenue decreased to 35.3% in 2003 from 36.4% in 2002. This change in our revenue mix was primarily due to the launch of our contemporary Christian music format in several of our markets and our continued efforts to develop more advertising revenue in all of our markets.

      OTHER MEDIA REVENUE.       Other media revenue decreased $0.2 million or 2.3% to $7.9 million in 2003 from $8.1 million in 2002. This decrease was due primarily to decreased subscription and advertising revenue from our publishing business partially offset by increased banner advertisements and sponsorships from our Internet business.

      BROADCASTING OPERATING EXPENSES.       Broadcasting operating expenses increased $5.2 million or 5.0% to $109.0 million in 2003 from $103.8 million in 2002. On a same station basis, broadcasting operating expenses increased $4.0 million or 3.8% to $107.7 million in 2003 from $103.7 million in 2002. The increase was primarily due to incremental selling expenses incurred to produce the increased revenue, partially offset by the impact of cost containment initiatives initiated during the first quarter of 2003.

      OTHER MEDIA OPERATING EXPENSES.       Other media operating expenses increased $0.2 million or 3.0% to $7.9 million in 2003 from $7.7 million in 2002. The increase was attributable primarily to an increase in selling and editorial costs associated with the integration of our Internet portal Crosswalk.com, which was acquired in October 2002, offset by a reduction in costs associated with our publishing business, reduced audio streaming costs for our Internet business and reduced overhead costs.

      CORPORATE EXPENSES.      Corporate expenses increased $1.7 million or 11.8% to $16.1 million in 2003 from $14.4 million in 2002, primarily due to: (a) additional overhead costs incurred for all of 2003 as compared to a portion of 2002 in connection with the acquisitions of the assets of radio stations and an Internet business during 2002 and 2003, (b) additional overhead costs associated with the acquisitions of the assets of radio stations during 2003, and (c) an increase in management bonuses in 2003.

      COST OF TERMINATED OFFERING.       During the third quarter of 2003, Salem incurred a one-time charge of $0.7 million to write–off costs associated with a contemplated debt offering that was terminated during that quarter. This charge is identified in Salem's Statement of Operations as “Cost of Terminated Offering.”

      LEGAL SETTLEMENT.       On December 6, 2000, Gospel Communications International (“GCI”) made a demand for arbitration upon us, as disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002. On July 15, 2002, we reached a settlement with GCI for $2.3 million. As a result of this settlement, we recorded a one-time charge of approximately $2.3 million in the second quarter of 2002.

      DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION.       Depreciation expense increased $1.2 million or 12.2% to $10.7 million in 2003 from $9.5 million in 2002. The increase was due to: (a) the additional depreciation expense incurred for all of 2003 as compared to a portion of 2002 in connection with our acquisitions of the assets of radio stations and an Internet business during 2002, and (b) additional depreciation expenses associated with the acquisition of the assets of radio stations during 2003. Amortization expense decreased $0.3 million or 16.9% to $1.6 in 2003 from $1.9 million in 2002. The decrease was primarily due to a network affiliation contract becoming fully amortized during 2002.

      LOSS ON DISPOSAL OF ASSETS       Loss on sale of assets of $0.2 million in 2003 was primarily due to the disposition of certain property, plant and equipment, partially offset by the recovery of a bad debt related to a note acquired in the sale of property, plant, equipment and intangible assets.

38


      OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE).       Interest income decreased $0.1 million to $0.2 million in 2003 from $0.3 million in 2002. Interest income was primarily from interest earned on the cash which was held in a trust account from December 23, 2002, until January 22, 2003, that was used to redeem all of our 9½% Notes and from interest earned on excess cash. Interest expense decreased $3.7 million or 13.6% to $23.5 million in 2003 from $27.2 million in 2002. The decrease was due to savings of $3.3 million in interest related to our interest rate swap agreements entered into in April 2002 and July 2003, compared to savings of $1.8 million in the prior year and a reduction in the balance of long-term debt. Additionally, we refinanced our 9½% Notes with our 7¾% Notes, further reducing annual interest expense by $1.8 million in 2003 (See “ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK – Derivative Instruments”). Loss on early retirement of debt of $6.4 million in 2003 relates to the early retirement of our 9½% Notes on January 22, 2003. Other expense, net decreased to $0.4 million in 2003 from $0.5 million in 2002, due primarily to a decrease in bank commitment fees.

      PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES.      Provision for income taxes was $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to a benefit for income taxes of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. Provision (benefit) for income taxes as a percentage of income (loss) before income taxes, discontinued operations and extraordinary item (that is, the effective tax rate) was 241.9% in 2003 and (39.9)% in 2002. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, the effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory income rate of 34.0% primarily due to the effect of state income taxes and certain expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes and changes in the valuation allowance from the use of certain state net operating loss carryforwards.

      INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX. Income from discontinued operations was $16.0 million net of income tax expense of $12.0 million for 2002. Discontinued operations relate to the operations of WYGY–FM, Cincinnati, Ohio, which was sold on September 30, 2002, for $45.0 million and includes a gain on the sale of the assets of the radio station of $15.9 million net of income tax expense of $12.0 million.

      NET INCOME (LOSS). We recognized a net loss of $0.7 million in 2003 as compared to net income of $14.0 million in 2002. The variance is primarily due to the recognition of income from discontinued operations, net of taxes, of $16.0 million in 2002, an increase in the provision for income taxes of $1.8 million in 2003 over 2002 and a loss on early retirement of debt of $6.4 million in 2003, partially offset by an increase in operating income of $5.9 million in 2003 over 2002 and a reduction in interest expense of $3.7 million in 2003 over 2004.

39


NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

      The performance of a radio broadcasting company is customarily measured by the ability of its stations to generate station operating income. We define station operating income (“SOI”) as net broadcasting revenue less broadcasting operating expenses.

      SOI is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP; as a result it should be viewed as a supplement to and not a substitute for our results of operations presented on the basis of GAAP. Management believes that SOI is a useful non-GAAP financial measure to investors, when considered in conjunction with operating income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it is generally recognized by the radio broadcasting industry as a tool in measuring performance and in applying valuation methodologies for companies in the media, entertainment and communications industries. This measure is used by investors and analysts who report on the industry to provide comparisons between broadcasting groups. Additionally, our management uses SOI as one of the key measures of operating efficiency and profitability. SOI does not purport to represent cash provided by operating activities. Our statement of cash flows presents our cash flow activity and our income statement presents our historical performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our SOI is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies.

Year ended December 31, 2004 compared to year ended December 31, 2003

      STATION OPERATING INCOME.       SOI increased $10.2 million or 16.6% to $71.6 million in 2004 from $61.4 million in 2003. As a percentage of net broadcasting revenue, SOI increased to 38.2% in 2004 from 36.0% in 2003. The increase was primarily attributable to the effect of radio stations acquired during 2003 and 2004 that previously operated with formats other than their current format and the effect of the growth of our contemporary Christian music format. Acquired and reformatted radio stations typically produce low margins during the first few years following conversion. SOI margins improve as we implement scheduled program rate increases, sell more of the available inventory on the station, and increase advertising revenue on our stations. On a same station basis, SOI improved $12.7 million or 21.8% to $70.9 million in 2004 from $58.2 million in 2003. As a percentage of same station net broadcasting revenue, same station SOI increased to 39.9% in 2004 from 36.0% in 2003.

      The following table provides a reconciliation of SOI (a non-GAAP financial measure) to operating income (as presented in our financial statements) for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 and 2004:

                                   
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)

2003 2004


Station operating income
  $ 61,440 $ 71,647
Plus other media revenue
7,865 9,342
Less cost of denied / abandoned tower site and license upgrade
(2,202 ) (746 )
Less other media operating expenses
(7,942 ) (8,600 )
Less depreciation and amortization
(12,291 ) (12,433 )
Less loss on disposal of assets
(214 ) (3,266 )
Less corporate expenses
(16,091 ) (17,480 )
Less cost of terminated offering
(651 )


Operating income
$ 29,914 $ 38,464


40


Year ended December 31, 2003 compared to year ended December 31, 2002

      STATION OPERATING INCOME.       SOI increased $9.0 million or 17.2% to $61.4 million in 2003 from $52.4 million in 2002. As a percentage of net broadcasting revenue, SOI increased to 36.0% in 2003 from 33.5% in 2002. The increase was primarily attributable to the effect of radio stations acquired during 2002 and 2003 that previously operated with formats other than their current format and the effect of the growth of our contemporary Christian music format. Acquired and reformatted radio stations typically produce low margins during the first few years following conversion. SOI margins improve as we implement scheduled program rate increases, sell more of the available inventory on the station, and increase advertising revenue on our stations. On a same station basis, SOI improved $9.0 million or 17.3% to $61.5 million in 2003 from $52.5 million in 2002. As a percentage of same station net broadcasting revenue, same station SOI increased to 36.4% in 2003 from 33.6% in 2002.

      The following table provides a reconciliation of SOI (a non-GAAP financial measure) to operating income (as presented in our financial statements) for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002 and 2003:

                                   
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)

2002 2003


Station operating income
  $ 52,407 $ 61,440
Plus other media revenue
8,054 7,865
Less cost of denied tower site and license upgrade
(2,202 )
Less other media operating expenses
(7,709 ) (7,942 )
Less depreciation and amortization
(11,446 ) (12,291 )
Less loss on disposal of assets
(567 ) (214 )
Less corporate expenses
(14,387 ) (16,091 )
Less cost of terminated offering
(651 )
Less legal settlement
(2,300 )


Operating income
$ 24,052 $ 29,914


41


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES, JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES

      The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to allowance for doubtful accounts, acquisitions and upgrades of radio station and network assets, goodwill and other intangible assets, income taxes, and long-term debt and debt covenant compliance. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

      We believe the following accounting policies and the related judgments and estimates are critical accounting policies which affect the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Accounting for acquisitions and upgrades of radio station and network assets

      Most of our radio station acquisitions have been acquisitions of selected assets and not of businesses. Such asset acquisitions have consisted primarily of the FCC licenses to broadcast in a particular market. We often do not acquire the existing format, or we change the format upon acquisition when we find it beneficial. As a result, a substantial portion of the purchase price for the assets of a radio station is allocated to the FCC license. It is our policy to retain third-party appraisers to value radio stations, networks or other media properties under consideration for acquisition. The allocations assigned to acquired FCC licenses and other assets are subjective by their nature and require our careful consideration and judgment. We believe the allocations represent appropriate estimates of the fair value of the assets acquired. As part of the valuation and appraisal process, the third-party appraisers prepare reports which assign values to the various asset categories in our financial statements. Our management reviews these reports and determines the reasonableness of the assigned values used to record the acquisition of the radio station, network or other media properties at the close of the transaction.

      From time to time we undertake projects to upgrade our radio station technical facilities and/or FCC licenses. Our policy is to capitalize costs up to the point where the project is complete, at which point we transfer the costs to the appropriate fixed asset and/or intangible asset categories. In certain cases where a project’s completion is contingent upon FCC or other regulatory approval, we assess the probable future benefit of the asset at the time that it is recorded and monitor it through the FCC or other regulatory approval process. In the event the required approval is not considered probable, we write-off the capitalized costs of the project.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

      We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. An analysis is performed by applying various percentages based on the age of the receivable and other subjective and historical analysis. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing the likelihood of ultimate realization of these receivables including the current creditworthiness of each customer. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

42


Intangible assets

      Under the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s rules, SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”, and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, we no longer amortize goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives, but perform annual impairment tests in accordance with these statements. We believe our FCC licenses have indefinite lives and accordingly amortization expense is no longer recorded for our FCC licenses as well as our goodwill. Other intangible assets continue to be amortized over their useful lives.

      We perform an annual test of impairment on our FCC licenses and our goodwill. These tests include comparing the recorded values to the appraised values, calculations of discounted cash flows, operating income and other analyses. As of December 31, 2004, based on our application of the impairment rules, no impairment was recorded. The assessment of the fair values of these assets and the underlying businesses are estimates which require careful consideration and judgments by our management. If conditions in the markets in which that our stations and other media businesses operate or if the operating results of our stations and other media businesses change or fail to develop as anticipated, our estimates of the fair values may change in the future and result in impairment charges.

Valuation allowance (deferred taxes)

      For financial reporting purposes, the company has recorded a valuation allowance of $3.1 million as of December 31, 2004, to offset a portion of the deferred tax assets related to the state net operating loss carryforwards. Management regularly reviews our financial forecasts in an effort to determine our ability to utilize the net operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes. Accordingly, the valuation allowance is adjusted periodically based on management’s estimate of the benefit the company will receive from such carryforwards.

Long-term debt and debt covenant compliance

      Our classification of our borrowings under our credit facility as long-term debt on our balance sheet is based on our assessment that, under the borrowing restrictions and covenants in our credit facility and after considering our projected operating results and cash flows for the coming year, no principal payments will be required pursuant to the credit agreement. These projections are estimates dependent upon a number of factors including developments in the markets in which we are operating in and economic and political factors, among other factors. Accordingly, these projections are inherently uncertain and our actual results could differ from these estimates. Should our actual results differ materially from these estimates, payments may become due under our credit facility or it may become necessary to seek an amendment to our credit facility. Based on our management’s current assessment, we do not anticipate principal payments becoming due under our credit facility or a further amendment of our credit facility becoming necessary.

43


RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

      FASB Interpretation No. 46 - “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”

      In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which establishes criteria to identify variable interest entities and the primary beneficiary of such entities. An entity that qualifies as a variable interest entity must be consolidated by its primary beneficiary. All other holders of interests in a variable interest entity must disclose the nature, purpose, size and activity of the variable interest entity as well as their maximum exposure to losses as a result of involvement with the variable interest entity. We do not have any special-purpose entities, as defined. We adopted Interpretation No. 46 on January 1, 2004. The adoption of Interpretation No. 46 did not have a material effect on our financial statements.

      Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145

      In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.” This statement rescinds SFAS No. 4, “Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt,” and an amendment of that statement, SFAS Statement No. 64, “Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements.” In addition, SFAS No. 145 amends FASB Statement No. 13, “Accounting for Leases.” Salem adopted this statement on January 1, 2003 and its adoption resulted in the classification of any loss on early retirement of debt in other income and expense rather than as an extraordinary item under the prior rules.

      Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R

      On October 13, 2004, the FASB reached a conclusion on Statement 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” The Statement would require all public companies accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments to account for these types of transactions using a fair-value-based method. The Statement would eliminate the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The company will be required to apply Statement 123R beginning July 1, 2005 and it applies to unvested options granted prior to that date in addition to any new option grants. The Statement offers the company alternative methods of adopting this final rule. At the present time, the company has not yet determined which method it will use nor has it determined the financial statement impact.

      Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148

      In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123.” This statement amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirement of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. Salem adopted this statement and its adoption did not have a material impact on Salem’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. As permitted under the statement, Salem continues to measure any expense related to stock options under the intrinsic value method and provides the required disclosures under the fair value method in Note 1 of its consolidated financial statements.

44


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

      We have historically financed acquisitions through borrowings, including borrowings under credit facilities and, to a lesser extent, from operating cash flow and selected asset dispositions. We expect to fund future acquisitions from cash on hand, proceeds from our debt and equity offerings, borrowings under the credit facility and operating cash flow. We have historically funded, and will continue to fund, expenditures for operations, administrative expenses, capital expenditures and debt service required by our credit facility and our senior subordinated notes from operating cash flow and borrowings under our credit facility. We believe that cash on hand, cash flow from operations, and borrowings under the credit facility will be sufficient to permit us to meet our financial obligations, fund pending acquisitions and fund operations for at least the next twelve months.

      On May 5, 2004, we completed a follow-on public offering of our Class A common stock. We used the net proceeds of $65.7 million from this offering for working capital and general corporate purposes, including the Redemption of $55.6 million of our 9% Notes.

      Cash. Cash and cash equivalents were $11.0 million on December 31, 2004. Working capital was $28.9 million on December 31, 2004. Cash and cash equivalents were $5.6 million on December 31, 2003. Working capital was $27.8 million on December 31, 2003. The increase in cash and cash equivalents is primarily due to cash provided by operating activities of $39.3 million and the proceeds of our follow-on offering of $65.7 million during 2004, which was substantially offset by the Redemption of $55.6 million of our 9% Notes and capital expenditures of $17.9 million. In addition, $26.5 million in cash was used to acquire selected assets of six radio stations and the assets of an Internet portal operation during 2004. During 2004 we had borrowings of $24.0 million from our credit facilities which were offset by payments of $20.0 million against our credit facilities.

      Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $39.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $24.0 million in 2003, primarily due to an increase in station operating income, a $2.2 million write-off during 2003 of costs of denied / abandoned tower site and license upgrade as compared to a $0.7 million write-off during 2004, a $0.7 million write-off of costs of a terminated offering in 2003, lower interest expense in 2004 and improved accounts receivable collections and an increase in accrued expenses partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable and an increase in prepaid expenses.

      Net cash used by investing activities increased to $44.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to $29.7 million in 2003. The increase is due to cash used for acquisitions ($26.5 million cash used to purchase selected assets of six radio stations and selected assets of an Internet business during 2004 as compared to $19.7 million cash used to purchase selected assets of seven radio stations during 2003) and capital expenditures of $17.9 million in 2004 compared to $9.0 million in 2003.

      Net cash provided by financing activities was $10.4 million in 2004, compared to net cash used by financing activities of $15.1 million for 2003. The decrease was primarily due to the proceeds of $65.7 million from our follow-on offering of our Class A common stock offset by the Redemption of $55.6 million of our 9% Notes, net borrowings under our credit facilities of $4.0 million in 2004 as compared to net repayments of $13.1 million in 2003, proceeds of $2.3 million from the exercises of stock options in 2004 as compared to proceeds of $0.4 million in 2003, partially offset by a payment of $5.0 million for a bond premium in 2004.

45


      Credit Facilities.  Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Salem Holding, is the borrower under our credit facilities. The credit facilities were amended and restated as of September 25, 2003 and amended in May 2004 and include a $75.0 million senior secured reducing revolving credit facility (“revolving credit facility”) as well as a $75.0 million term loan facility (“term loan facility”). The description of the credit facilities as set forth below reflects the terms of the amendment and restatement. As of December 31, 2004, the borrowing capacity and aggregate commitments under our revolving credit facility was $75.0 and under our term loan facility was $75.0 million. The amount we can borrow, however, is subject to certain restrictions as described below. At December 31, 2004, $75.0 million was outstanding under the term loan facility and $9.0 million was outstanding under our revolving credit facility. The borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility steps down in three 10% increments commencing June 30, 2007, and matures on March 25, 2009. The borrowing capacity under the term loan facility steps down 0.5% each December 31 and June 30, commencing December 31, 2004. The term loan facility matures on the earlier of March 25, 2010, or the date that is six months prior to the maturity of any subordinated indebtedness of Salem or Salem Holding. The credit facilities require us, under certain circumstances, to prepay borrowings under the credit facilities with excess cash flow and the net proceeds from the sale of assets, the issuance of equity interests and the issuance of subordinated notes. If we are required to make these prepayments, our borrowing capacity and the aggregate commitments under the facilities will be reduced, but such reduction shall not, in any event, reduce the borrowing capacity and aggregate commitments under the facilitates below $50.0 million.

      Amounts outstanding under the credit facilities bear interest at a rate based on, at Salem Holding’s option, the bank’s prime rate or LIBOR, in each case plus a spread. For purposes of determining the interest rate under our revolving credit facility, the prime rate spread ranges from 0.25% to 1.75%, and the LIBOR spread ranges from 1.5% to 3.0%. For the term loan, the prime rate spread ranges from 0.5% to 1.0%, and the LIBOR spread ranges from 1.75% to 2.25%. In each case, the spread is based on the total leverage ratio on the date of determination. At December 31, 2004, the blended interest rate on amounts outstanding under the credit facilities was 4.38%. If an event of default occurs, the rate may increase by 2.0%.

      The maximum amount that Salem Holding may borrow under our credit facilities is limited by a ratio of our consolidated existing total adjusted funded debt to pro forma twelve-month cash flow (the “Total Leverage Ratio”). Our credit facilities will allow us to adjust our total debt as used in such calculation by the lesser of (i) 50% of the aggregate purchase price of acquisitions of newly acquired non-Christian formatted radio stations that we reformat to a Christian talk, conservative talk or Christian music format or (ii) $45.0 million, and the cash flow from such stations will not be considered in the calculation of the ratio during the period in which such acquisition gives rise to an adjustment to total debt. The Total Leverage Ratio allowed under the credit facilities was 6.75 to 1 as of December 31, 2004. The ratio will decline periodically until December 31, 2006, at which point it will remain at 5.5 to 1 through March 2009. The Total Leverage Ratio under our credit facilities at December 31, 2004, on a pro forma basis, was 4.49 to 1, resulting in a borrowing availability of approximately $65.6 million.

      Our credit facilities contain additional restrictive covenants customary for facilities of their size, type and purpose which, with specified exceptions, limits our ability to incur debt, have liens, enter into affiliate transactions, pay dividends, consolidate, merge or effect certain asset sales, make specified investments, acquisitions and loans and change the nature of our business. Our credit facilities also require us to satisfy specified financial covenants, which covenants require us on a consolidated basis to maintain specified financial ratios and comply with certain financial tests, including ratios for maximum leverage as described above, minimum interest coverage (not less than 1.5 to 1 through June 29, 2005 increasing in increments to 2.5 to 1 after June 30, 2008), minimum debt service coverage (a static ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1), a maximum consolidated senior leverage ratio (a static ratio of 3.0 to 1 prior to the issuance of $50.0 million in new subordinated notes, after any such issuance the ratio shall not exceed 2.5 to 1), and minimum fixed charge coverage (a static ratio of not less than 1.1 to 1). Salem and all of its subsidiaries, except for Salem Holding, are guarantors of borrowings under the credit facilities. The credit facilities are secured by liens on all of our and our subsidiaries’ assets and pledges of all of the capital stock of our subsidiaries.

46


      As of December 31, 2004, management believes we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our terms of the credit facilities.

      9½% Notes. In September 1997, we issued $150.0 million principal amount of 9½% Notes. In July 1999, we repurchased $50.0 million in principal amount of those notes with a portion of the net proceeds of our initial public offering. In January 2003, we redeemed the remaining $100.0 million in principal amount of the 9½% Notes from the proceeds of the issuance of $100.0 million principal amount of 7¾% Notes. As a result of this redemption, we incurred a non-cash charge in the first quarter of 2003 of approximately $1.7 million for the write-off of unamortized bond issue costs. This was in addition to the $4.8 million premium paid in connection with this redemption.

      9% Notes. In September 2001, Salem Holding issued $150.0 million principal amount of 9% Notes. The indenture for the 9% Notes contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the incurrence of debt by Salem Holding and its subsidiaries, the payment of dividends, the use of proceeds of specified asset sales and transactions with affiliates. During the second quarter of 2004, Salem completed the Redemption of $55.6 million of the 9% Notes, leaving $94.4 million outstanding. After giving effect to the Redemption, Salem Holding is required to pay $8.5 million per year in interest on the outstanding 9% Notes. We and all of our subsidiaries (other than Salem Holding) are guarantors of the 9% Notes.

      As a result of the Redemption of $55.6 million of 9% Notes, we incurred a non-cash charge in the second quarter of 2004 of approximately $1.6 million for the write-off of unamortized bond issue costs in addition the $5.0 million premium paid in connection with the Redemption. The $6.6 million was reported as loss on early redemption of long-term debt in the Statements of Operations.

      As of December 31, 2004, management believes we were in compliance with all of the covenants under the indenture for the 9% Notes.

      7¾% Notes. In December 2002, Salem Holding issued $100.0 million principal amount of 7¾% Notes. Salem Holding used the net proceeds to redeem the $100.0 million 9½% Notes on January 22, 2003. The indenture for the 7¾% Notes contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit the incurrence of debt by Salem Holding and its subsidiaries, the payment of dividends, the use of proceeds of specified asset sales and transactions with affiliates. Salem Holding is required to pay $7.8 million per year in interest on the 7¾% Notes. We and all of our subsidiaries (other than Salem Holding) are guarantors of the 7¾% Notes.

      As of December 31, 2004, management believes we were in compliance with all of the covenants under the indenture for the 7¾% Notes.

47


             
Summary of Long-Term Debt Obligations
As of December 31, 2004

(Dollars in thousands)
 
Term loan under credit facility
$ 75,000
Revolving line of credit under credit facility
9,000
9% senior subordinated notes due 2011
94,370
7¾% senior subordinated notes due 2010
100,000
Fair market value of interest swap agreement
3,732
Capital leases and other loans
67

282,169
Less current portion
1,145

$ 281,024



OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

      At December 31, 2004 and 2003, Salem did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, Salem is not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if Salem had engaged in such relationships.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

      Future minimum contractual obligations, including capital and operating leases, revolving bank and bond issue debt, excluding associated interest costs, as well as other long-term obligations as of December 31, 2004, are as follows:

                                 
Payments Due by Period

Less
Contractual than 1 1-3 3-5 More Than 5
Obligations Total year years years years






(Dollars in thousands)
 
Long-term debt
$ 278,370 $ 1,125 $ 1,500 $ 10,500 $ 265,245
Capital lease obligations and other loans
67 20 40 7
Operating leases
60,836 8,516 13,503 9,062 29,755










Total contractual cash obligations
$ 339,273 $ 9,661 $ 15,043 $ 19,569 $ 295,000










48


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

      We are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates. We actively monitor these fluctuations and use derivative instruments from time to time to manage the related risk. In accordance with our risk management strategy, we use derivative instruments only for the purpose of managing risk associated with an asset, liability, committed transaction, or probable forecasted transaction that is identified by management. Our use of derivative instruments may result in short-term gains or losses and may increase volatility in our earnings.

      At December 31, 2004, an interest rate swap agreement with a notional principal amount of $66.0 million was outstanding. This agreement related to our $94.4 million 9% Notes. This agreement was scheduled to expire in 2011 when the 9% Notes mature, and effectively swapped the 9.0% fixed interest rate on $66.0 million of the 9% Notes for a floating rate equal to the LIBOR rate plus 3.09%. The estimated fair value of this swap agreement and the excess of fair value over the book value of the debt hedged by the swap, based on current market rates, were each $3.7 million at December 31, 2004. Changes in the fair value of the swap and the changes in the fair value of debt being hedged are recorded as part of interest expense. The fair value of the swap agreement is included with long-term assets, and the fair value of the debt hedged by the swap is recorded in long-term debt consistent with the maturity date of the swap and related debt. Because this fair value hedge was effective (that is, the change in the fair value of the hedge instrument was designed to be equal to the change in the fair value of the item being hedged), there was no income statement effect relative to the change in the fair value of the swap agreement. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was reduced by $2.8 million as a result of the difference between the 9.0% fixed interest rate on the 9% hedged debt and the floating interest rate under the swap agreement, which was 4.31% for the six month period ended June 30, 2004 and was 5.03% for the six month period ending December 31, 2004. On February 18, 2005, we sold our entire interest in this swap and received a payment of approximately $3.7 million, which will be amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining life of the 9% Notes.

      We had a second interest rate swap agreement with a notional principal amount of $24.0 million. This agreement also related to our 9% Notes. This agreement was to expire in 2011 when the 9% Notes mature, and effectively swapped the 9.0% fixed interest rate on $24.0 million of the 9% Notes for a floating rate equal to the LIBOR rate plus 4.86%. On August 20, 2004, we sold our interest in $14.0 million of this swap. As a result of this transaction, we paid and capitalized $0.3 million in buyout premium which will be amortized into interest expense over the remaining life of the 9% Notes. On October 22, 2004, we sold our remaining $10.0 million interest in this swap. As a result of this second transaction, we paid and capitalized $0.1 million in buyout premium which will be amortized into interest expense over the remaining life of the 9% Notes. We recognized approximately $25,000 in interest expense related to the amortization of capitalized buyout premium for the year ended December 31, 2004. Because this fair value hedge was effective (that is, the change in the fair value of the hedge instrument was designed to be equal to the change in the fair value of the item being hedged), there was no income statement effect relative to the change in the fair value of the swap agreement. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 was reduced by $0.5 million as a result of the difference between the 9.0% fixed interest rate on our debt and the floating interest rate under the swap agreement, which was 6.08% for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and was 6.80% for the six month period ending December 31, 2004.

49


MARKET RISK

     In addition to the interest rate swap agreements discussed above under “Derivative Instruments,” borrowings under the credit facilities are subject to market risk exposure, specifically to changes in LIBOR and in the prime rate in the United States. As of September 30, 2004, we had borrowed $84.0 million under the credit facilities. As of December 31, 2004, we could borrow up to an additional $65.6 million under the credit facilities. Amounts outstanding under the credit facilities bear interest at a base rate, at our option, of the banks prime rate or LIBOR, plus a spread. For purposes of determining the interest rate under the revolving credit facilities, the prime rate spread ranges from 0.25% to 1.75%, and the LIBOR spread ranges from 1.5% to 3.0%. As of December 31, 2004, the blended interest rate on amounts outstanding under the credit facilities was 4.38%. At December 31, 2004, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in the prime rate or LIBOR, as applicable, would result in additional interest expense of $0.8 million on an annualized basis.

     In addition to the variable rate debt disclosed above, we have fixed rate debt with a carrying value of $194.4 million (relating to the outstanding 9% Notes and the 7¾% Notes) as of December 31, 2004, with an aggregate fair value of $211.7 million. We are exposed to changes in the fair value of these financial instruments based on changes in the market rate of interest on this debt. The ultimate value of these notes will be determined by actual market prices, as all of these notes are tradable. We estimate that a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would result in a decrease in the aggregate fair value of the notes to approximately $201.8 million and a hypothetical 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates would result in the increase of the fair value of the notes to approximately $222.2 million.

50


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

     
 
 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     
PAGE

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
52
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2004
53
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
54
 
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
56
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
57
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
58

51


           REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Salem Communications Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Salem Communications Corporation as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of Salem Communications Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Salem Communications Corporation at December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
  /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

      Los Angeles, California
      March 11, 2005

52


                     
                      SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
                      CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                     (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)
December 31,

2003 2004
                      ASSETS


Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$ 5,620 $ 10,994
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $9,423 in 2003 and $8,109 in 2004)
31,509 29,535
Other receivables
3,071 1,629
Prepaid expenses
1,747 2,083
Due from stockholders
83
Deferred income taxes
4,754 4,683


Total current assets
46,784 48,924
Property, plant and equipment, net
97,393 102,987
Broadcast licenses
381,740 406,290
Goodwill
11,129 11,419
Amortizable intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $4,736 in 2003 and $6,269 in 2004
4,262 2,757
Bond issue costs
5,631 3,342
Bank loan fees
3,988 3,710
Fair value of interest rate swap
6,045 4,142
Other assets
3,039 2,213


Total assets
$ 560,011 $ 585,784


                      LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
$ 535 $ 581
Accrued expenses
5,454 6,471
Accrued compensation and related
4,661 5,310
Accrued interest
7,127 5,136
Deferred revenue
1,163 1,402
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
15 1,145


Total current liabilities
18,955 20,045
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, less current portion
330,046 277,292
Fair value in excess of book value of debt hedged with interest rate swap
6,045 3,732
Deferred income taxes
28,999 32,715
Deferred revenue
3,472 3,364
Other liabilities
672 999
Commitments and contingencies
   
Stockholders’ equity:
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 80,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 17,956,567 shares and 20,408,742 in 2003 and 2004, respectively
180 204
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 5,553,696 shares
56 56
Additional paid-in capital
148,538 216,996
Retained earnings
23,048 30,381


Total stockholders’ equity
171,822 247,637


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$ 560,011 $ 585,784
                      See accompanying notes


                      
                      53


SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

                           
Year Ended December 31,

2002 2003 2004



Net broadcasting revenue
$ 156,216 $ 170,483 $ 187,543
Other media revenue
8,054 7,865 9,342



Total revenue
164,270 178,348 196,885
Operating expenses:
Broadcasting operating expenses (including $1,146, $1,191 and $1,101 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, paid to related parties)
103,809 109,043 115,896
Cost of denied / abandoned tower site and license upgrade
2,202 746
Other media operating expenses
7,709 7,942 8,600
Legal settlement
2,300
Corporate expenses (including $307, $277 and $342 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, paid to related parties)
14,387 16,091 17,480
Cost of terminated offering
651
Depreciation (including $429, $515 and $414 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, for other media businesses)
9,537 10,703 10,900
Amortization (including $286, $644 and $620 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, for other media businesses)
1,909 1,588 1,533
Loss on disposal of assets
567 214 3,266



Total operating expenses
140,218 148,434 158,421



Operating income
24,052 29,914 38,464
Other income (expense):
Interest income
255 212 171
Interest expense
(27,162 ) (23,474 ) (19,931 )
Loss on early retirement of debt
(6,440 ) (6,588 )
Other expense, net
(458 ) (410 ) (116 )



Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations
(3,313 ) (198 ) 12,000
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(1,323 ) 479 4,576



Income (loss) before discontinued operations
(1,990 ) (677 ) 7,424
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (including gain on sale of $15,909 net of taxes of $11,967 for the year ended December 31, 2002)
15,995 (91 )



Net income (loss)
$ 14,005 $ (677 ) $ 7,333



54


SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)

                           
Year Ended December 31,

2002 2003 2004



Basic earnings (loss) per share data:
     Earnings (loss) before discontinued operations
$ (0.08 ) $ (0.03 ) $ 0.29
     Income (loss) from discontinued operations
0.68
     Net earnings (loss) per share
0.60 (0.03 ) 0.29
 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share data:
     Earnings (loss) before discontinued operations
$ (0.08 ) $ (0.03 ) $ 0.29
     Income (loss) from discontinued operations
0.68
     Net earnings (loss) per share
0.59 (0.03 ) 0.29
 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
23,473,821 23,488,898 25,220,678



Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
23,582,906 23,488,898 25,371,649



 
 
 

See accompanying notes

55


SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

                                           
Class A Class B
Common Stock Common Stock Additional


Paid-In Retained
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Earnings Total







Stockholders’ equity, January 1, 2002 17,904,942 $ 179 5,553,696 $ 56 $ 147,415 $ 9,720 $ 157,370
Options exercised 25,475 553 553
Net income 14,005 14,005







Stockholders’ equity, December 31, 2002 17,930,417 179 5,553,696 56 147,968 23,725 171,928
Options exercised 26,150 1 402 403
Tax benefit related to stock options exercised 168 168
Net loss (677 ) (677 )







Stockholders’ equity, December 31, 2003 17,956,567 180 5,553,696 56 148,538 23,048 171,822
Public issuance of class A common stock 2,325,000 23 65,691 65,714
Options exercised 127,175 1 2,272 2,273
Tax benefit related to stock options exercised 495 495
Net income 7,333 7,333













Stockholders' equity, December 31, 2004 20,408,742 $ 204 5,553,696 $ 56 $ 216,996 $ 30,381 $ 247,637













See accompanying notes

56


                                     
SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,

2002 2003 2004
OPERATING ACTIVITIES



Net income (loss)
$ 14,005 $ (677 ) $ 7,333
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
(Gain) loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
(15,909 ) 91
Depreciation and amortization
11,446 12,291 12,433
Amortization of bank loan fees
633 853 775
Amortization of bond issue costs
976 761 711
Provision for bad debts
4,237 6,136 3,821
Deferred income taxes
(2,123 ) 80 3,787
Loss on disposal of assets
567 214 3,266
Tax benefit related to stock options exercised
168 496
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, before taxes
6,440 6,588
Costs of denied tower site and license upgrade
2,202 746
Cost of terminated offering
651
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
(7,238 ) (6,949 ) (1,847 )
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
(992 ) (1,042 ) 1,189
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
982 1,075 (370 )
Deferred revenue
(221 ) 2,580 131
Other liabilities
(117 ) (137 ) 156
Income taxes
568 (612 )



Net cash provided by operating activities
6,814 24,034 39,306
 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
(15,320 ) (8,978 ) (17,869 )
Deposits on acquisitions of radio station assets
(100 ) (125 ) (425 )
Purchases of radio station assets
(55,215 ) (19,816 ) (26,460 )
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and broadcast licenses
45,000 406 1
Other assets
(1,383 ) (1,175 ) 394



Net cash used in investing activities
(27,018 ) (29,688 ) (44,359 )
 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
65,714
Payments for redemption of 9% Notes
(55,630 )
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
99,750
Proceeds of long-term debt and notes payable
48,450 95,400 24,000
Payments of long-term debt and notes payable
(17,000 ) (108,450 ) (20,000 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
553 403 2,272
Issuance of loans and capital lease obligations
24
Payments on capital lease obligations
(589 ) (36 ) (18 )
Payments for interest rate swap
(440 )
Payments of costs related to bank credit facility
(1,517 ) (497 )
Payments of bond issue costs
(895 ) (851 )
Payment of bond premium
(4,998 )
Deposit to redeem long-term debt
(107,661 )



Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
22,608 (15,051 ) 10,427



Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
2,404 (20,705 ) 5,374
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
23,921 26,325 5,620



Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 26,325 $ 5,620 $ 10,994
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:



Cash paid during the period for:
Interest
$ 26,854 $ 28,115 $ 23,627
Income taxes
368 1,225 300
 
See accompanying notes
 
57


SALEM COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Reorganization

      The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Salem Communications Corporation (“Salem” or the “Company”) include the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

      The Company is a holding company with substantially no assets, operations or cash flows other than its investments in subsidiaries. The Company excluding its subsidiaries is herein referred to as Parent. In May 2000, the Company formed two new wholly-owned subsidiaries, Salem Communications Holding Corporation (“HoldCo”) and Salem Communications Acquisition Corporation (“AcquisitionCo”), each a Delaware corporation. HoldCo is the issuer of the 9% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (“9% Notes”) and the 7¾% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2010 (“7¾% Notes”). HoldCo is a holding company with substantially no assets, operations or cash flows other than its investments in subsidiaries. In July 2000, the Company formed SCA License Corporation (“SCA”), a Delaware corporation. HoldCo and AcquisitionCo are direct subsidiaries of the Company; SCA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AcquisitionCo. Parent, AcquisitionCo and all of its subsidiaries and all of the subsidiaries of HoldCo are Guarantors of the 9% Notes and the 7¾% Notes discussed in Note 5. The Guarantors (i) are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, (ii) comprise substantially all the Company’s direct and indirect subsidiaries and (iii) have fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis, the 9% Notes and the 7¾% Notes. SCA owns the assets of nine radio stations as of December 31, 2004. See Note 12 for certain consolidating information with respect to the Company.

Description of Business

      Salem is a domestic U.S. radio broadcast company, which has traditionally provided talk and music programming targeted at audiences interested in Christian and family issues. Salem operated 98 and 92 radio stations across the United States at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company also owns and operates Salem Radio Network® (“SRN”), SRN News Network (“SNN”), Salem Music Network (“SMN”), Reach Satellite Network (“RSN”) and Salem Radio Representatives (“SRR”). SRN, SNN, SMN and RSN are radio networks, which produce and distribute talk, news and music programming to radio stations in the U.S., including some of Salem’s stations. SRR sells commercial air time to national advertisers for Salem’s radio stations and networks, and for independent radio station affiliates.

      Salem also owns and operates Salem Web Network (“SWN”) and Salem Publishing. SWN provides on-demand audio streaming and related services. Salem Publishing publishes magazines that follow the Christian music industry. The revenue and related operating expenses of these businesses are reported as “other media” on the consolidated Statements of Operations.

58


Cash and Cash Equivalents

      The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments, purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less, to be cash equivalents. The carrying value of the Company’s cash equivalents approximated fair value at each balance sheet date.

Revenue Recognition

      Revenues are recognized when pervasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or the service has been rendered, the price to the customer is fixed or determinable and collection of the arrangement fee is reasonably assured.

      Revenue from radio programs and commercial advertising is recognized when broadcast. Salem’s broadcasting customers principally include not-for-profit charitable organizations and commercial advertisers.

      Revenue from the sale of products and services from the Company’s other media businesses is recognized when the products are shipped and the services are rendered. Revenue from the sale of advertising in Salem Publishing’s publications is recognized upon publication. Revenue from the sale of subscriptions to Salem Publishing’s publications is recognized over the life of the subscription.

      Advertising by the radio stations exchanged for goods and services is recorded as the advertising is broadcast and is valued at the estimated value of goods or services received or to be received. The value of the goods and services received in such barter transactions is charged to expense when used. Barter advertising revenue included in broadcasting revenue for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 was approximately $4.6 million, $5.5 million and $5.4 million, respectively, and barter expenses were approximately the same as barter revenue for each period. The Company records its broadcast advertising provided in exchange for goods and services as broadcasting revenue and the goods or services received in exchange for such advertising as broadcasting operating expenses.

Accounting For Stock Based Compensation

      Employee stock options are accounted for under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” which requires the recognition of expense when the option price is less than the fair value of the stock at the date of grant.

      The Company generally awards options for a fixed number of shares at an option price equal to the fair value at the date of grant. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation–Transition and Disclosure.” See Note 7.

      SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, permits companies to recognize, as expense over the vesting period, the fair value of all stock-based awards on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Because the Company’s stock-based compensation plans have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, management believes that the existing option valuation models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of awards from the plan. Therefore, as permitted, the Company applies the existing accounting rules under APB No. 25 and provides pro forma net income (loss) and pro forma income (loss) per share disclosures for stock-based awards made during the year as if the fair value method defined in SFAS No. 123, as amended, had been applied. Net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 would have changed to the following pro forma amounts:

59


                         
Year Ended December 31,

2002 2003 2004



Net income (loss), as reported
$ 14,005 $ (677 ) $ 7,333
Add: Stock-based compensation, as reported
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax
586 790 4,920



Pro forma net income (loss)
$ 13,419 $ (1,467 ) $ 2,413



 
Income (loss) per share:
Basic income (loss) per share - as reported
$ 0.60 $ (0.03 ) $ 0.29
Basic income (loss) per share - pro forma
$ 0.57 $ (0.06 ) $ 0.10
Diluted income (loss) per share - as reported
$ 0.59 $ (0.03 ) $ 0.29
Diluted income (loss) per share - pro forma
$ 0.57 $ (0.06 ) $ 0.10

      Using the Black-Scholes valuation model, the per share weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 was $13.21, $9.25, and $14.64, respectively. The pro forma effect on the Company’s net income (loss) and basic and diluted income (loss) per share for 2002, 2003 and 2004 is not representative of the pro forma effect in future years. The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions were used for grants made in 2002: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 55.9%; risk-free interest rate of 4.5%; expected life of 4 years. The following assumptions were used for grants made in 2003: dividend yield of 0%; expected volatility of 132.8%; risk-free interest rate of 4.35%; expected life of 4 years. The following assumptions were used for grants made in 2004: dividend yield of 0% expected volatility with a range of 134.3% to 138.1%; risk-free interest rate of 4.61%; expected life of 4 years.

60


Accounting for upgrades of radio station and network assets

      From time to time the Company undertakes projects to upgrade its radio station technical facilities and/or FCC licenses. The Company’s policy is to capitalize costs up to the point where the project is complete, at which point the Company transfers the costs to the appropriate fixed asset and/or intangible asset categories. In certain cases where a project’s completion is contingent upon FCC or other regulatory approval, the Company will assess the probable future benefit of the asset at the time that it is recorded and monitor it through the FCC or other regulatory approval process. If the required approval is not considered probable, the Company will write-off the capitalized costs of the project. The write-offs are included in “Cost of denied / abandoned tower site and license upgrade” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

      In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which establishes criteria to identify variable interest entities and the primary beneficiary of such entities. An entity that qualifies as a variable interest entity must be consolidated by its primary beneficiary. All other holders of interests in a variable interest entity must disclose the nature, purpose, size and activity of the variable interest entity as well as their maximum exposure to losses as a result of involvement with the variable interest entity. The Company does not have any special-purpose entities, as defined. The Company adopted Interpretation No. 46 on January 1, 2004. The adoption of