-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
J5Xin2A4zAdVaSshEaVfVmx/w1kLE5Y4eMxpkRNjVpQEpY5PE+7hWPgY1gz6/4Qj
o3IAC389L2Yi4H94fgTr+Q==
<SEC-DOCUMENT>0000950130-02-001967.txt : 20020415
<SEC-HEADER>0000950130-02-001967.hdr.sgml : 20020415
ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950130-02-001967
CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K405
PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3
CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20011231
FILED AS OF DATE: 20020326
FILER:
COMPANY DATA:
COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC
CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001137774
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: LIFE INSURANCE [6311]
IRS NUMBER: 223703799
STATE OF INCORPORATION: NJ
FISCAL YEAR END: 1231
FILING VALUES:
FORM TYPE: 10-K405
SEC ACT: 1934 Act
SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-16707
FILM NUMBER: 02586218
BUSINESS ADDRESS:
STREET 1: 751 BROAD ST
CITY: NEWARK
STATE: NJ
ZIP: 07102
BUSINESS PHONE: 9738026000
MAIL ADDRESS:
STREET 1: 751 BROAD ST
CITY: NEWARK
STATE: NJ
ZIP: 07102
</SEC-HEADER>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>10-K405
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>d10k405.txt
<DESCRIPTION>FORM 10-K
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
================================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
-----------------
FORM 10-K
(MARK ONE)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
OR
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-16707
-----------------
Prudential Financial, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
New Jersey 22-3703799
(State or Other (I.R.S. Employer
Jurisdiction Identification Number)
of Incorporation or
Organization)
751 Broad Street
Newark, New Jersey
(973) 802-6000
(Address and Telephone Number of Registrant's Principal Executive Offices)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
------------------- -----------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Common Stock, Par Value $.01 New York Stock Exchange
(including Shareholder Protection Rights)
6.75% Equity Security Units New York Stock Exchange
</TABLE>
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: NONE
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
As of March 21, 2002, the aggregate market value of the registrant's Common
Stock (par value $0.01) held by non-affiliates of the registrant was
$18,259,703,719 and 584,310,519 shares of the Common Stock were outstanding. In
addition, 2,000,000 shares of the registrant's Class B Stock, for which there
is no established public trading market, were outstanding and held by
non-affiliates of the registrant.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
THE INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE FURNISHED PURSUANT TO PART III OF THIS FORM
10-K IS SET FORTH IN, AND IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE HEREIN FROM, THE
REGISTRANT'S DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 11, 2002, TO BE FILED BY THE REGISTRANT WITH THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO REGULATION 14A NOT LATER THAN 120 DAYS
AFTER THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001.
================================================================================
<PAGE>
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
Number
------
<C> <C> <S> <C>
PART I Item 1. Business.................................................................. 1
Item 1A. Executive Officers........................................................ 55
Item 2. Properties................................................................ 56
Item 3. Legal Proceedings......................................................... 57
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders....................... 62
PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters..... 63
Item 6. Selected Financial Data................................................... 66
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.............................................................. 72
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk................ 136
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data............................... 141
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.................................................... 217
PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant........................ 217
Item 11. Executive Compensation.................................................... 217
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management............ 217
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions............................ 217
PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.......... 218
SIGNATURES.................................................................................. S-1
EXHIBIT INDEX............................................................................... E-1
</TABLE>
Certain of the statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
including but not limited to those in the Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Words such as "expects," "believes," "anticipates," "includes,"
"plans," "assumes," "estimates," "projects," "intends" or variations of such
words are generally part of forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements are made based on management's current expectations and beliefs
concerning future developments and their potential effects upon Prudential
Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries. There can be no assurance that future
developments affecting Prudential Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries will be
those anticipated by management. These forward-looking statements are not a
guarantee of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and there
are certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ,
possibly materially, from expectations or estimates reflected in such
forward-looking statements, including without limitation: general economic,
market and political conditions, including the performance of financial
markets, interest rate fluctuations and the continuing impact of the events of
September 11, 2001; volatility in the securities markets; reestimates of our
reserves for future policy benefits and claims; changes in our assumptions
related to deferred policy acquisition costs; our exposure to contingent
liabilities; catastrophe losses; investment losses and defaults; changes in our
claims-paying or credit ratings; competition in our product lines and for
personnel; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and foreign
securities markets; risks to our international operations; the impact of
changing regulation or accounting practices; Prudential Financial, Inc.'s
primary reliance, as a holding company, on dividends from its subsidiaries to
meet debt payment obligations and the applicable regulatory restrictions on the
ability of the subsidiaries to pay such dividends; adverse litigation results;
and changes in tax law. Prudential Financial, Inc. does not intend, and is
under no obligation, to update any particular forward-looking statement
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, "Prudential Financial" and the
"Registrant" refer to Prudential Financial, Inc., the ultimate holding company
for all of our companies. "Prudential Insurance" refers to The Prudential
Insurance Company of America, before and after its demutualization on December
18, 2001 (the "date of demutualization"). "Prudential," the "Company," "we" and
"our" refer to our consolidated operations before and after demutualization.
The "Plan of Reorganization" refers to Prudential Insurance's Plan of
Reorganization, dated as of December 15, 2000 and as amended from time to time
thereafter, relating to Prudential Insurance's demutualization.
i
<PAGE>
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
We are one of the largest financial services institutions in the United
States. We provide a wide range of insurance, investment management, securities
and other financial products and services and have more than 15 million
individual and institutional customers in the United States and over 30 other
countries. We have one of the largest distribution forces in the financial
services industry, with approximately 20,800 sales people worldwide at December
31, 2001, including approximately:
. 4,400 Prudential Agents, who are insurance agents in our insurance
operations in the United States;
. 4,100 international Life Planners and 6,100 Gibraltar Life Advisors, who
are insurance agents in our insurance operations outside the United
States; and
. 6,200 domestic and international Financial Advisors, who are financial
advisors and securities brokers in our Prudential Securities operations.
We also distribute our retail products through a number of alternative
channels. We have a leading or significant market presence in most of the
markets we serve.
Demutualization and Related Transactions
General
On the date of demutualization, Prudential Insurance converted from a mutual
life insurance company owned by its policyholders to a stock life insurance
company and became an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential
Financial. On that date, eligible policyholders, as defined in the Plan of
Reorganization, received shares of Prudential Financial's Common Stock or the
right to receive cash or policy credits, which are increases in policy values
or increases in other policy benefits, upon the extinguishment of all
membership interests in Prudential Insurance. In the aggregate, eligible
policyholders received 457.1 million shares of Common Stock, the right to
receive cash totaling $3,487 million, including $340 million to certain former
Canadian branch policyholders, and policy credits totaling $1,042 million in
the demutualization. In addition, two closed blocks, as discussed below, were
established for the benefit of certain participating individual life insurance
policies and annuities issued by Prudential Insurance and its Canadian branch.
On the date of demutualization, Prudential Financial completed an initial
public offering of 110.0 million shares of its Common Stock at an initial
public offering price of $27.50 per share, and on December 21, 2001, Prudential
Financial issued an additional 16.5 million shares of Common Stock as a result
of the exercise of the over-allotment option granted to underwriters in the
initial public offering. Also on the date of demutualization, Prudential
Financial completed the sale, through a private placement, of 2.0 million
shares of Class B Stock, a separate class of common stock, at a price of $87.50
per share. The Common Stock reflects the performance of the Financial Services
Businesses, and the Class B Stock reflects the performance of the Closed Block
Business. Collectively, the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block
Business are referred to as the "Businesses." In addition, on the date of
demutualization, Prudential Financial issued 13.8 million 6.75% equity security
units for gross proceeds of $690 million, including as a component thereof
redeemable capital securities of Prudential Financial Capital Trust I, a
statutory business trust that is consolidated in our financial statements.
Furthermore, Prudential Holdings, LLC ("PHLCC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of
Prudential Financial that owns the capital stock of Prudential Insurance,
issued $1.75 billion in senior secured notes (the "IHC debt"), a portion of
which were insured by a bond insurer, as discussed below.
On the date of demutualization, we also "destacked" or reorganized the
ownership of various subsidiaries of Prudential Insurance so they became direct
or indirect subsidiaries of Prudential Financial.
1
<PAGE>
The Closed Blocks
Under the Plan of Reorganization, Prudential Insurance's liabilities for
certain participating individual life insurance policies and annuities issued
in the United States were segregated, together with assets which will be used
exclusively for the payment of benefits and policyholder dividends and taxes
with respect to these products, in a regulatory mechanism referred to as the
"Closed Block." The policies that are included in the Closed Block (the "Closed
Block Policies") are specified participating individual life insurance policies
and individual annuity contracts that were in force on the date of
demutualization and on which we were paying or expected to pay experience-based
policy dividends. The purpose of the Closed Block is to provide for the
reasonable expectations for future policy dividends after demutualization of
the holders of the Closed Block Policies. The operation of the Closed Block is
subject to ongoing review by the New Jersey Department of Banking and
Insurance. The Closed Block will continue in effect until the date that none of
the Closed Block Policies are in force unless the Commissioner of the New
Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance consents to an earlier termination.
We also established a separate closed block for the benefit of the owners of
participating individual life insurance policies issued by our Canadian branch
that we did not transfer to London Life Insurance Company in 1996 in connection
with the sale of most of the Canadian branch operations. Our objective in
establishing a separate closed block for these Canadian policies is to maintain
consistency with the way we managed the U.S. and Canadian blocks of business in
the past for pricing and dividend purposes and to simplify the implementation
details related to the funding calculations and cash flow tracking of the
respective groups of policies. We operate this closed block, which, because of
the substantially smaller number of outstanding Canadian policies, is
insignificant in size, in a similar manner to the Closed Block and reflect it
in our Corporate and Other operations of our Financial Services Businesses; it
is not included in the Closed Block Business.
The Plan of Reorganization provides that we may, with the prior consent of
the Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance, enter
into agreements to transfer to a third party all or any part of the risks under
the Closed Block Policies.
See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for financial
information relating to the Closed Block.
The Destacking
In connection with the demutualization, Prudential Financial became the
ultimate holding company for all of our companies. The destacking established
Prudential Financial's ownership of Prudential Insurance and the destacked
subsidiaries in parallel ownership chains, rather than "stacked" ownership
through Prudential Insurance. The destacking was accomplished as an
extraordinary dividend concurrently with the demutualization. To effect the
destacking, Prudential Insurance distributed to Prudential Financial, directly
or indirectly, the following subsidiaries, together with certain related assets
and liabilities:
. our property and casualty insurance companies;
. our principal securities brokerage companies;
. our international insurance companies;
. our principal asset management operations; and
. our international securities and investments, domestic banking, and
residential real estate brokerage franchise and relocation services
operations.
2
<PAGE>
The following chart illustrates the principal elements of our organization
after the demutualization and the destacking.
[FLOW CHART]
[FLOW CHART]
Separate "Businesses" and Capital Structure
General
The Common Stock reflects the performance of our post-demutualization
Financial Services Businesses. The Class B Stock reflects the performance of
the Closed Block Business, including the Closed Block Assets and Closed Block
Liabilities and the Surplus and Related Assets, each as defined below, as well
as other related assets and liabilities noted below, including the IHC debt.
Separation of Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block Business
In order to separately reflect the financial performance of the Financial
Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business since the date of
demutualization, we have allocated all our assets and liabilities and earnings
between the two Businesses, and we account for them as if they were separate
legal entities. All assets and liabilities of Prudential Financial and its
subsidiaries not included in the Closed Block Business constitute the Financial
Services Businesses. Assets and liabilities allocated to the Closed Block
Business are those that we consider appropriate to operate that business. The
Closed Block Business consists principally of:
. within Prudential Insurance, the Closed Block Assets, Surplus and Related
Assets and deferred policy acquisition costs and other assets and, with
respect to liabilities, the Closed Block Liabilities;
. within PHLLC, the principal amount of the IHC debt, the related
unamortized debt issuance costs and hedging activities and a guaranteed
investment contract; and
. within Prudential Financial, dividends received from PHLLC, and
reinvestment thereof, and other liabilities of Prudential Financial, in
each case as attributable to the Closed Block Business.
The Closed Block Assets consist of (i) those assets allocated to the Closed
Block as of July 1, 2000, (ii) cash flows from such assets, (iii) assets
resulting from the reinvestment of such cash flows, (iv) cash flows from the
Closed Block Policies, and (v) assets resulting from the investment of such
cash flows. The Closed Block Assets include policy loans, accrued interest on
any of the foregoing assets and due premiums on the Closed Block Policies. The
Closed Block Assets do not include assets included in the Canadian closed
block. The Closed Block Liabilities are Closed Block Policies and other
liabilities of the Closed Block associated with the Closed Block Assets. The
Closed Block Assets and Closed Block Liabilities are supported by additional
assets outside the Closed Block that Prudential Insurance needs to hold to meet
capital requirements related to the Closed Block
3
<PAGE>
Policies (the "Surplus Assets"), as well as invested assets held outside the
Closed Block that represent the difference between the Closed Block Assets and
the sum of the Closed Block Liabilities and the interest maintenance reserve
(the "Related Assets" or, together with the Surplus Assets, the "Surplus and
Related Assets"). The interest maintenance reserve, recorded under statutory
accounting principles, captures realized capital gains and losses resulting
from changes in the general level of interest rates. These gains and losses are
to be amortized into investment income over the expected remaining life of the
investments sold.
On the date of demutualization, the majority of the net proceeds from the
issuances of the Class B Stock and the IHC debt was allocated to our Financial
Services Businesses. On the date of demutualization, PHLLC distributed $1,218
million of the net proceeds of the IHC debt to Prudential Financial to use for
general corporate purposes in the Financial Services Businesses. PHLLC
deposited $437 million of the net proceeds of the IHC debt in a debt service
coverage account maintained in the Financial Services Businesses which,
together with reinvested earnings thereon, constitutes a source of payment and
security for the IHC debt. The remainder of the net proceeds, or $72 million,
was used to purchase a guaranteed investment contract to fund a portion of the
bond insurance related to the IHC debt. To the extent we use the debt service
coverage account to service payments with respect to the IHC debt or to pay
dividends to Prudential Financial for purposes of the Closed Block Business, a
loan from the Financial Services Businesses to the Closed Block Business would
be established. Such inter-business loan would be repaid by the Closed Block
Business to the Financial Services Businesses when earnings from the Closed
Block Business replenish funds in the debt service coverage account to a
specified level.
We believe that the proceeds from the issuances of the Class B Stock and IHC
debt allocated to the Financial Services Businesses reflected capital in excess
of that necessary to support the Closed Block Business and that the Closed
Block Business as established has sufficient assets and cash flows to service
the IHC debt. The investors in the Class B Stock and the bond insurer agreed to
this allocation and usage of issuance proceeds. The Closed Block Business was
financially leveraged through the issuance of the IHC debt, and dividends on
the Class B Stock are subject to prior servicing of the IHC debt. It is
expected that any inter-business loan referred to above will be repaid in full
out of the Surplus and Related Assets, but not the Closed Block Assets. Such
loan will be subordinate to the IHC debt.
The Financial Services Businesses will bear any expenses and liabilities
from litigation affecting the Closed Block Policies and, as discussed below,
the consequences of certain adverse tax determinations. In addition, prior to
demutualization, a reserve of $144 million was recorded for death and other
benefits due and related expenses with respect to traditional participating
policies for which we have not received a death claim but where death has
occurred. Upon demutualization, $134 million of this reserve became a liability
of the Financial Services Businesses and any subsequent reestimation of this
liability (upward or downward) will be included in the results of the Financial
Service Businesses. The foregoing items would therefore be reflected in the
Financial Services Businesses, and not in the Closed Block Business. In
connection with the sale of the Class B Stock and IHC debt, we have agreed to
indemnify the investors therein with respect to certain matters, and such
indemnification will be borne by the Financial Services Businesses.
Within the Closed Block Business, the assets and cash flows attributable to
the Closed Block inure solely to the benefit of the Closed Block policyholders
through policyholder dividends after payment of benefits, expenses and taxes.
The Surplus and Related Assets inure to the benefit of the holders of Class B
Stock. The earnings on, and distribution of, the Surplus and Related Assets
over time will be the source or measure of payment of the interest and
principal of the IHC debt and of dividends on the Class B Stock. The earnings
of the Closed Block are reported as part of the Closed Block Business, although
no cash flows or assets of the Closed Block inure to the benefit of the holders
of Common Stock or Class B Stock. The Closed Block Assets are not available to
service interest and principal of the IHC debt or dividends on the Class B
Stock.
4
<PAGE>
The following diagram reflects the allocation of Prudential Financial's
consolidated assets and liabilities between the Financial Services Businesses
and the Closed Block Business:
[FLOW CHART]
You should understand that there is no legal separation of the two
Businesses. The foregoing allocation of assets and liabilities did not and does
not require Prudential Financial, Prudential Insurance, any of their
subsidiaries, or the Closed Block to transfer any specific assets or
liabilities to a new legal entity.
Common Stock and Class B Stock
The Common Stock and the Class B Stock are separate classes of common stock
under New Jersey corporate law.
Holders of Common Stock and Class B Stock will be entitled to dividends if
and when declared by Prudential Financial's Board of Directors out of funds
legally available to pay those dividends. To the extent dividends are paid on
the Class B Stock, shares of Class B Stock are repurchased or the Closed Block
Business has net losses, the amount legally available for dividends on the
Common Stock will be reduced. In addition, payment of dividends will be subject
to the following additional conditions:
. Common Stock will be entitled to receive dividends, if and when declared
by Prudential Financial's Board of Directors, only out of assets of the
Financial Services Businesses legally available for the payment of
dividends under the New Jersey Business Corporation Act as if the
Financial Services Businesses were a separate New Jersey corporation; and
. Class B Stock will be entitled to receive dividends, if and when declared
by Prudential Financial's Board of Directors, only out of assets of the
Closed Block Business legally available for the payment of dividends under
the New Jersey Business Corporation Act as if the Closed Block Business
were a separate New Jersey corporation.
Dividends declared and paid on the Common Stock will depend upon the
financial performance of the Financial Services Businesses. Dividends declared
and paid on the Common Stock will not depend upon or be affected by the
financial performance of the Closed Block Business, unless the Closed Block
Business is in financial distress. Dividends declared and paid on the Common
Stock also will not be affected by decisions with respect to dividend payments
on the Class B Stock except as indicated in the following paragraph.
Dividends declared and paid on the Class B Stock will depend upon the
financial performance of the Closed Block Business and, as the Closed Block
matures, the holders of the Class B Stock will receive the surplus of the
Closed Block Business no longer required to support the Closed Block Business
for regulatory purposes.
5
<PAGE>
Dividends on the Class B Stock will be payable in an aggregate amount per year
at least equal to the lesser of (i) a "Target Dividend Amount" of $19.25
million or (ii) the "CB Distributable Cash Flow" for such year, which is a
measure of the net cash flows of the Closed Block Business. Notwithstanding
this formula, as with any common stock, we will retain the flexibility to
suspend dividends on the Class B Stock; however, if CB Distributable Cash Flow
exists for any period and Prudential Financial chooses not to pay dividends on
the Class B Stock in an aggregate amount at least equal to the lesser of the CB
Distributable Cash Flow or the Target Dividend Amount for that period, then
cash dividends cannot be paid on the Common Stock with respect to such period.
The principal component of "CB Distributable Cash Flow" will be the amount by
which Surplus and Related Assets, determined according to statutory accounting
principles, exceed surplus that would be required for the Closed Block Business
considered as a separate insurer; provided, however, that "CB Distributable
Cash Flow" counts such excess only to the extent distributable as a dividend by
Prudential Insurance under specified (but not all) provisions of New Jersey
insurance law. See "Market for Prudential Financial Common Stock and Related
Stockholder Matters" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the definition of
"CB Distributable Cash Flow." Subject to the discretion of the Board of
Directors of Prudential Financial, we currently anticipate paying dividends on
the Class B Stock at the Target Dividend Amount for the foreseeable future.
The shares of Common Stock will vote together with the shares of Class B
Stock on all matters (one share, one vote) except as otherwise required by law
and except that holders of the Class B Stock will have class voting or consent
rights with respect to specified matters directly affecting the Class B Stock.
If shares of Class B Stock are outstanding at the time of a liquidation,
dissolution or winding-up of Prudential Financial, each share of Common Stock
and Class B Stock will be entitled to a share of net liquidation proceeds in
proportion to the respective liquidation units of such class. Each share of
Common Stock will have one liquidation unit, and each share of Class B Stock
will have 2.83215 liquidation units.
On December 18, 2001, Prudential Financial's shareholder rights agreement
became effective. Under the shareholder rights agreement, one shareholder
protection right is attached to each share of Common Stock but not to any share
of Class B Stock. Each right initially entitles the holder to purchase one
one-thousandth of a share of a series of Prudential Financial preferred stock
upon payment of the exercise price. At the time of the demutualization, the
Board of Directors of Prudential Financial determined that the initial exercise
price per right is $110, subject to adjustment from time to time as provided in
the shareholder rights agreement.
The Class B Stock is exchangeable for or convertible into shares of Common
Stock at any time at our discretion, at the discretion of the holders of Class
B Stock in the event of certain regulatory events or mandatorily in the event
of a change of control of Prudential Financial or a sale of all or
substantially all of the Closed Block Business. Commencing in 2016, the Class B
Stock will be convertible at the discretion of the holders of the Class B
Stock. Upon exchange or conversion of the Class B Stock, the Businesses would
cease to be separated, and the effects of the separation noted above would also
cease.
Absence of Legal Separation of Businesses
Even though we allocate all of our consolidated assets, liabilities,
revenues, expenses and cash flows between the Financial Services Businesses and
the Closed Block Business, there is no legal separation of the two Businesses,
and holders of Common Stock and holders of Class B Stock are common
stockholders of Prudential Financial and, as such, are subject to all risks
associated with an investment in Prudential Financial and all of its
businesses, assets and liabilities. This means that:
. holders of Common Stock have no equity interest in a legal entity
representing the Financial Services Businesses;
. holders of Class B Stock have no equity interest in a legal entity
representing the Closed Block Business; and
. holders of each class of common stock are subject to all of the risks
associated with an investment in Prudential Financial and all of our
businesses, assets and liabilities.
The Closed Block Policies will continue to be the obligation of Prudential
Insurance, and Prudential Insurance will remain obligated to pay guaranteed
policy benefits on these policies in accordance with their terms
6
<PAGE>
should the Closed Block Assets be insufficient to satisfy the claims. If we
were to make substantial payments for the benefit of Closed Block Policies from
outside the Closed Block Business, whether in support of the payment of
policyholder dividends or to satisfy claims, a lower amount of assets and net
income would be available to the Financial Services Businesses, and the holders
of Common Stock could be adversely affected.
Financial results of the Closed Block Business, including debt service on
the IHC debt, will affect Prudential Financial's consolidated results of
operations, financial position and borrowing costs. PHLLC's assets, including
the net proceeds of the IHC debt initially deposited in the debt service
coverage account established for the security of the holders of the IHC debt,
and any reinvested earnings thereon, and any other assets of PHLLC allocated to
the Financial Services Businesses, could be used to satisfy such debt service.
This could affect the results of operations, financial position or borrowing
costs of the Financial Services Businesses or the market price of the Common
Stock. Repayment to the Financial Services Businesses of any inter-business
loan created upon use of the debt service coverage account to service the IHC
debt or to pay dividends to Prudential Financial for purposes of the Closed
Block Business will be subordinate to repayment of the IHC debt. In addition,
any net losses of the Closed Block Business, and any dividends or distributions
on, or repurchases of, the Class B Stock, will reduce the assets of Prudential
Financial legally available for dividends on the Common Stock. Accordingly, you
should read financial information for the Financial Services Businesses
together with the consolidated financial information of Prudential Financial.
There can be no assurance that the market value of our Common Stock will
reflect solely the performance of the Financial Services Businesses.
Financial Reporting
Commencing with periods ended after the date of demutualization, Prudential
Financial's GAAP financial statements are prepared as follows:
. audited annual consolidated financial statements and unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements of Prudential Financial as would
otherwise be prepared regardless of the issuance of the Class B Stock; and
. audited supplemental combining financial information on an annual basis
and unaudited supplemental combining financial information on an interim
basis, which separately reports the financial position and results of
operations of the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block
Business.
Prior to the date of demutualization, our Closed Block Policies were
included in our Traditional Participating Products segment. Upon the
establishment of the Closed Block Business, we transferred $5.6 billion of net
assets previously associated with the Traditional Participating Products
segment, including the majority of the net proceeds of the Class B Stock and
IHC debt issuances, to the Financial Services Businesses, representing capital
in excess of the amount we believe necessary to support the Closed Block
Business. This capital was initially allocated to our Corporate and Other
operations in our Financial Services Businesses as of the date of
demutualization. As a consequence, results of the Closed Block Business do not
include returns on this capital, which was historically included in the results
of the Traditional Participating Products segment. To a minor extent, the
Traditional Participating Products segment included other traditional insurance
policies that were not placed in the Closed Block and that are now included in
the Individual Life Insurance segment in our Financial Services Businesses.
Inter-Business Transfers and Allocation Policies
While all our assets and liabilities are allocated between the Businesses,
we are permitted to make transfers of assets and liabilities between the
Businesses in order to accomplish cash management objectives, to fund, if
necessary, unsatisfied liabilities of one business with the assets of the
other, to pay taxes and to achieve other objectives which we may deem
appropriate, subject to regulatory oversight. In addition, we retain discretion
over accounting policies and the appropriate allocation of earnings between the
two Businesses.
Prudential Financial's Board of Directors has adopted certain policies with
respect to inter-business transfers and accounting and tax matters, including
the allocation of earnings. Such policies are summarized
7
<PAGE>
below. In the future, the Board of Directors may modify, rescind or add to any
of these policies. However, the decision of the Board of Directors to modify,
rescind or add to any of these policies is subject to the Board of Directors'
general fiduciary duties. In addition, we have agreed with the investors in the
Class B Stock and the insurer of the IHC debt that, in most instances, the
Board of Directors may not change these policies without their consent.
Inter-Business Transactions and Transfers
The transactions permitted between the Financial Services Businesses and the
Closed Block Business, subject to any required regulatory approvals and the
contractual limitations noted above, include the following:
. The Closed Block Business may lend to the Financial Services Businesses,
and the Financial Services Businesses may lend to the Closed Block
Business, in either case on terms no less favorable to the Closed Block
Business than comparable internal loans and only for cash management
purposes in the ordinary course of business and on market terms pursuant
to our internal short-term cash management facility.
. Other transactions between the Closed Block and businesses outside of the
Closed Block, including the Financial Services Businesses, are permitted
if, among other things, such transactions benefit the Closed Block, are at
fair market value and do not exceed, in any calendar year, a specified
formulaic amount.
. Capital contributions to Prudential Insurance may be for the benefit of
either the Financial Services Businesses or the Closed Block Business and
assets of the Financial Services Businesses within Prudential Insurance
may be transferred to the Closed Block Business within Prudential
Insurance in the form of a loan which is subordinated to all existing
obligations of the Closed Block Business on market terms.
. An inter-business loan from the Financial Services Businesses to the
Closed Block Business may be established to reflect usage of the net
proceeds of the IHC debt initially deposited in the debt service coverage
account, and any reinvested earnings thereon, to pay debt service on the
IHC debt or dividends to Prudential Financial for purposes of the Closed
Block Business.
. In addition to the foregoing, the Financial Services Businesses may lend
to the Closed Block Business, on either a subordinated or non-subordinated
basis, on market terms as may be approved by Prudential Financial.
. The Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business may engage
in such other transactions on market terms as may be approved by
Prudential Financial and, if applicable, Prudential Insurance.
. The Board of Directors has discretion to transfer assets of the Financial
Services Businesses to the Closed Block, or use such assets for the
benefit of Closed Block policyholders, if it believes such transfer or
usage is in the best interests of the Financial Services Businesses, and
such transfer or usage may be made without requiring any repayment of the
amounts transferred or used or the payment of any other consideration from
the Closed Block Business.
. Cash payments for administrative purposes from the Closed Block Business
to the Financial Services Businesses are based on formulas that initially
approximate the actual expenses incurred by the Financial Services
Businesses to provide such services. Administrative expenses recorded by
the Closed Block Business, and the related income tax effect, are based
upon actual expenses incurred under generally accepted accounting
principles ("GAAP"). Any difference in the cash amount transferred and
actual expenses incurred as reported under GAAP will be recorded, on an
after-tax basis at the applicable current rate, as direct adjustments to
the respective equity balances of the Closed Block Business and the
Financial Services Businesses, without the issuance of shares of either
Business to the other Business. Internal investment expenses recorded and
paid by the Closed Block Business, and the related income tax effect, are
based upon actual expenses incurred under GAAP and in accordance with
internal arrangements governing record keeping, bank fees, accounting and
reporting, asset allocation, investment policy and planning and analysis.
Accounting Policies
Accounting policies relating to the allocation of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses between the two Businesses include:
. All our assets, liabilities, equity and earnings are allocated between the
two Businesses and accounted for as if the Businesses were separate legal
entities. Assets and liabilities allocated to the Closed Block
8
<PAGE>
Business are those that we consider appropriate to operate that business.
All remaining assets and liabilities of Prudential Financial and its
subsidiaries constitute the Financial Services Businesses.
. For financial reporting purposes, revenues, administrative, overhead and
investment expenses, taxes other than federal income taxes, and certain
commissions and commission-related expenses associated with the Closed
Block Business are allocated between the Closed Block Business and the
Financial Services Businesses in accordance with GAAP. Interest expense
and routine maintenance and administrative costs generated by the IHC debt
are considered directly attributable to the Closed Block Business and are
therefore allocated to the Closed Block Business except as indicated below.
. Any transfers of funds between the Closed Block Business and the Financial
Services Businesses will typically be accounted for as either
reimbursement of expense, investment income, return of principal or a
subordinated loan, except as contemplated under "--Inter-Business
Transactions and Transfers" above.
. The Financial Services Businesses will bear any expenses and liabilities
from litigation affecting the Closed Block Policies, subsequent reserve
reestimations (if any) with respect to specified incurred but not reported
death claims recorded as of demutualization as noted above and the
consequences of certain adverse tax determinations noted below. In
connection with the sale of the Class B Stock and IHC debt, we have agreed
to indemnify the investors with respect to certain matters, and such
indemnification will be borne by the Financial Services Businesses.
Tax Allocation and Tax Treatment
The Closed Block Business within each legal entity is treated as if it were
a consolidated subsidiary of Prudential Financial. Accordingly, if the Closed
Block Business has taxable income, it recognizes its share of income tax as if
it were a consolidated subsidiary of Prudential Financial. If the Closed Block
Business has losses or credits, it recognizes a current income tax benefit.
If the Closed Block Business within any legal entity has taxable income, it
pays its share of income tax in cash to the Financial Services Businesses. If
it has losses or credits, it receives its benefit in cash from the Financial
Services Businesses. If the losses or credits cannot be currently utilized in
the consolidated federal income tax return of Prudential Financial for the year
in which such losses or credits arise, the Closed Block Business will receive
the full benefit in cash, and the Financial Services Businesses will
subsequently recover the payment for itself at the time the losses or credits
are actually utilized in computing estimated payments or in the consolidated
federal income tax return of Prudential Financial. Certain tax costs and
benefits are determined under the Plan of Reorganization with respect to the
Closed Block using statutory accounting rules that may give rise to tax costs
or tax benefits prior to the time that those costs or benefits are actually
realized for tax purposes. If at any time the Closed Block Business is
allocated any such tax cost or a tax benefit under the Plan of Reorganization
that is not realized at that same time under the relevant tax rules but will be
realized in the future, the Closed Block Business will pay such tax cost or
receive such tax benefit at that time, but it shall be paid to or paid by the
Financial Services Businesses. When such tax cost or tax benefit is
subsequently realized under the relevant tax rules, the tax cost or tax benefit
shall be allocated to the Financial Services Businesses. The foregoing
principles will be applied so as to prevent any item of income, deduction,
gain, loss, credit, tax cost or tax benefit being taken into account more than
once by the Closed Block Business (including the Closed Block) or the Financial
Services Businesses. For this purpose, items determined under the Plan of
Reorganization with respect to any period prior to the date of demutualization
("Pre-Closing Tax Attributes") shall be taken into account with any such
Pre-Closing Tax Attributes relating to the Closed Block being attributed to the
Closed Block Business and all other Pre-Closing Tax Attributes being attributed
to the Financial Services Businesses. The Closed Block Business will also pay
or receive its appropriate share of tax or interest resulting from adjustments
attributable to the settlement of tax controversies or the filing of amended
tax returns to the extent such tax or interest relates to controversies or
amended returns arising with respect to the Closed Block Business and
attributable to tax periods after the date of demutualization, except to the
extent that such tax is directly attributable to the characterization of the
IHC debt for tax purposes, in which case the tax shall be borne by the
Financial Services Businesses. In particular (and without limitation of the
foregoing) if a change of tax law after the date of demutualization, including
any change in the interpretation of any tax law, results in the
recharacterization of all or part of the IHC debt for tax purposes or a
significant reduction in the income tax benefit associated with the interest
expense on all or part of the IHC debt, the Financial Services Businesses will
continue to pay the foregone income tax benefit to the Closed Block Business
until the IHC debt has been repaid or PHLLC has been released from its
obligations to the bond insurer and under the IHC debt as if such
recharacterization or reduction of actual benefit had not occurred.
9
<PAGE>
Financial Services Businesses
The following table shows the primary products, primary sales channels and
other sales channels for each of the segments in our Financial Services
Businesses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL SERVICES BUSINESSES Primary Products Primary Sales Channels Other Sales Channels
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. Consumer Division
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual Life Insurance . Variable life . Prudential Agents . PruSelect
. Term life . Financial Advisors
. Universal life
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Private Client Group . Financial advisory and . Financial Advisors . Internet (securities
brokerage services transactions only)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Consumer banking . Direct sales . Telemarketing
. Internet
. Financial Advisors
. Prudential Agents
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retail Investments . Mutual funds . Financial Advisors . Independent financial
. Wrap-fee products . Prudential Agents advisors
. Variable annuities . Independent registered
. Fixed annuities representatives
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Property and Casualty Insurance . Automobile . Prudential Agents . Independent agents
. Homeowners . Workplace marketing
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Employee Benefits Division
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group Insurance . Group term life . Institutional sales force . Prudential Agents
. Group disability . Independent benefits
brokers and consultants
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Employee Benefits . Retirement plans, incl. . Financial Advisors . Prudential Agents
defined contribution plans . Institutional sales forces . Independent benefits
. Guaranteed products brokers and consultants
. Direct distribution
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Real estate brokerage . Institutional sales forces
franchises and relocation
services
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Division
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Insurance . Traditional whole life . Life Planners
. Term life . Gibraltar Life Advisors
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Securities and Investments . International securities . Financial Advisors . Internet
sales and trading . Institutional sales force (securities transactions
only)
. International asset . Third-party distribution
management
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asset Management Division
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investment Management and Advisory . Institutional asset . Institutional sales force
Services management
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Asset Management . Proprietary activities . Institutional sales force
</TABLE>
10
<PAGE>
U.S. Consumer Division
The U.S. Consumer division conducts its operations through four segments:
Individual Life Insurance, Private Client Group, Retail Investments and
Property and Casualty Insurance.
. Individual Life Insurance manufactures and distributes individual variable
life, term life, universal life, and other non-participating life
insurance products to the U.S. retail market and distributes investment
and protection products with proprietary and non-proprietary investment
options for our other segments as well as selected insurance products
manufactured by others.
. Private Client Group offers full service securities brokerage and
financial advisory services to U.S. retail customers.
. Retail Investments manufactures, distributes and services mutual funds,
variable and fixed annuities and wrap-fee products, utilizing proprietary
and non-proprietary asset management expertise, to U.S. retail customers.
. Property and Casualty Insurance manufactures and distributes personal
lines property and casualty insurance products, principally automobile and
homeowners insurance, to the U.S. retail market.
Division Strategy
In our U.S. Consumer division, we have aligned our strategies around two
distinct customer markets: the mass affluent market and the mass market. In
general, we define households with income or investable assets between $100,000
and $250,000 as mass affluent and households with income and investable assets
of less than $100,000 as mass market. Our strategy includes the following
components:
. Grow our U.S. retail mass affluent customer base. Our domestic customer
base includes approximately 3.6 million U.S. retail households with
incomes or investable assets in excess of $100,000. We believe that the
mass affluent market offers the best opportunity for growth in revenues
and profit margins, and we seek to expand our presence in the mass
affluent market as well as in the emerging affluent and pre-retirement
markets.
. Improve the profitability of our existing U.S. consumer franchise. In
addition to our affluent and mass affluent customers, we have an existing
customer base of nearly eight million U.S. households which we refer to as
the mass market. We seek to improve the profitability of this customer
base by reducing the cost of our operations infrastructure.
. Expand distribution channels to meet customer needs. In addition to our
Prudential sales forces, we are expanding our distribution channels to
allow U.S. retail customers to access us through the distribution methods
of their choice. Our distribution platform now includes multiple points of
access including PruSelect, which is our third-party life distribution
channel, independent financial advisors, affinity programs, workplace
marketing, and the Internet.
. Reposition Prudential Securities' domestic businesses to focus on
investors rather than issuers. In the fourth quarter of 2000, we exited
Prudential Securities' lead-managed equity underwriting for corporate
issuers and institutional fixed income businesses. We continue to provide
fixed income products and services. We also continue to act as a
co-manager for equity new issues and engage in underwritings led by
investment banks to generate new issue market products for our investor
clients. Our equity research group, which previously focused on supporting
our investment bank, has been refocused to provide objective investment
advice to both our individual and institutional investor clients.
. Reduce operating cost structures and overhead levels. We have taken
actions to reduce the operating cost structures and overhead levels of the
businesses of the U.S. Consumer division. In the Individual Life Insurance
segment, a program to restructure our field management and agency
structure resulted in a reduction in the number of sales territories,
establishing a smaller number of larger field offices, and eliminating
approximately 1,700 management and non-agent positions. In the Private
Client Group segment, we have taken actions in 2001 to reduce staffing
levels, occupancy costs, and other overhead costs. We have also taken
actions in the Retail Investments and Property and Casualty Insurance
segments to reduce staffing levels and overhead costs.
11
<PAGE>
. Improve retention and persistency. We have undertaken a number of
initiatives to improve retention and persistency. We seek to contact
policyholders in our Individual Life Insurance segment who wish to
terminate a policy and offer alternate solutions to meet their needs. In
1997 we implemented our Client Acquisition Process, which requires a life
insurance underwriter to contact the purchaser to confirm the purpose of
the life insurance purchase, verify the initial and ongoing source of
payment and complete the medical portion of the application.
Individual Life Insurance
Our Individual Life Insurance segment manufactures and distributes
individual variable life, term life, universal life and other non-participating
individual life insurance products primarily to the U.S. mass affluent market
and mass market through Prudential Agents and increasingly to the mass affluent
market through PruSelect.
Operating Data
The following table sets forth premium, product mix and other information
for Individual Life Insurance as of and for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of or for the Year Ended
December 31,
----------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Statutory first year premiums and deposits (in millions)(1)............. $ 470 $ 387 $ 375
Average face amount per policy sold..................................... $234,642 $230,529 $205,563
Average annual premium per policy sold.................................. $ 4,352 $ 3,146 $ 2,467
New policies (in thousands)............................................. 108 123 152
Product mix by percentage of statutory first year premiums and deposits:
Variable and universal life........................................... 49% 74% 80%
Corporate-owned life insurance........................................ 42% 11% --
Term life.............................................................. 9% 15% 20%
In force face amount (in billions)...................................... $ 240 $ 236 224
Statutory in force premiums (in millions)(2)............................ $ 2,152 $ 1,999 $ 1,897
Total policies in force (in thousands).................................. 2,022 2,064 2,070
Number of Prudential Agents............................................. 4,387 6,086 7,818
Prudential Agent termination or loss.................................... 2,337 4,018 4,049
New hires............................................................... 638 2,286 2,999
-------- -------- --------
Net change in Prudential Agents......................................... (1,699) (1,732) (1,050)
Base force retention(3)................................................. 64% 63% 63%
Prudential Agent productivity(4)........................................ $ 35,000 $ 34,700 31,300
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Excludes life insurance issued with respect to Prudential employees of $277
million for the year ended December 31, 1999.
(2) Total statutory first year and renewal premiums and deposits collected.
(3) The percentage of full-time Prudential Agents remaining with us at December
31 who were under contract as of January 1 of that year.
(4) Average commissions on new sales of all products by surviving base force
Prudential Agents. Excludes commissions on new sales by Prudential Agents
hired or departed during the period.
Products
Individual Life Insurance's principal products are:
Variable Life Insurance. We offer a number of individual variable life
insurance products that provide a return linked to an underlying investment
portfolio designated by the policyholder while providing the policyholder the
flexibility to change both the death benefit and premium payments. Each product
provides for the deduction of charges and expenses from the customer's
investment account. We also offer variable life products targeted to the estate
planning and corporate-owned life insurance markets. As of December 31, 2001,
our statutory in force premium for variable life insurance was approximately
$1.91 billion.
Term Life Insurance. We offer a variety of term life insurance products.
Some term products include a conversion feature that allows the policyholder to
convert the policy into a whole life policy. In November 2001, we repriced our
term insurance portfolio. As of December 31, 2001, our statutory in force
premium for term life insurance was $238 million.
12
<PAGE>
Universal Life Insurance. In late 2001, we introduced two new universal
life insurance products. Universal life insurance features a market rate fixed
interest investment account and flexible premiums.
Marketing and Distribution
Prudential Agents
Our Prudential Agents distribute variable, universal and term life,
investment and protection products with proprietary and non-proprietary
investment options as well as selected insurance products manufactured by
others.
Prudential Agents accounted for 46% of individual life insurance 2001 sales,
based on statutory first year premiums and deposits, down from 75% in 1999. The
decrease in 2001 is primarily the result of a greater contribution to overall
sales by our PruSelect third party distribution channel, reflecting a single
large sale in 2001. The following table sets forth the number of Prudential
Agents, field managers, home office and field staff and field offices as of the
dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
------------------
2001 2000 1999
----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Prudential Agents.......... 4,387 6,086 7,818
Field management........... 416 542 811
Home office and field staff 1,202 1,173 2,051
Prudential field offices... 79 79 150
</TABLE>
Prudential Agents historically have sold life insurance products primarily
to customers in households with income ranging from about $20,000 to $80,000
per year and, to a lesser but increasing extent, to mass affluent individuals
as well as small business owners.
The majority of Prudential Agents are multi-line traditional agents. Other
than certain training allowances or salary paid at the beginning of their
employment, we pay traditional Prudential Agents on a commission basis for the
products they sell. In addition to commissions, traditional Prudential Agents
receive the employee benefits we provide to other Prudential employees
generally, including medical and disability insurance, an employee savings
program and qualified retirement plans.
PruSelect
Our PruSelect distribution channel accounted for 54% of individual life
insurance sales in 2001, based on statutory first year premiums and deposits,
an increase from 25% in 1999. PruSelect sales in 2001 included a single large
sale as noted above. PruSelect sells products through a variety of channels,
including independent brokers, general agencies, producer groups and
broker-dealers. PruSelect has historically focused on serving the
intermediaries who provide insurance solutions in support of estate and wealth
transfer planning for affluent individuals and corporate-owned life insurance
for businesses. During 2001, PruSelect began to expand its target market to
include mass affluent individuals in addition to affluent individuals. The life
insurance products offered by PruSelect are generally the same as those
available through Prudential Agents. PruSelect has its own dedicated management
and underwriting, case management and post-issuance support staff.
PruSelect is organized into a network of 17 regional brokerage directors who
make sales through independent brokers and smaller general agencies. It
directly manages relationships with larger wholesalers, such as producer
groups, broker-dealers and national general agencies.
Underwriting and Pricing
Our underwriters follow detailed and uniform policies and procedures to
assess and quantify risk of our individual life insurance products. If the
policy amount exceeds a specified amount, we require the applicant to take a
variety of underwriting tests, such as medical examinations,
electrocardiograms, blood tests, urine tests, chest x-rays and consumer
investigative reports.
13
<PAGE>
Reinsurance
We reinsure portions of the risks we assume under our individual life
insurance products. Historically, the maximum amount of individual life
insurance we may retain on any life is $30 million under an individual policy
and $50 million under a second-to-die life policy. At December 31, 2001, we had
reinsured $49.9 billion, or 21%, of the total face amount of our individual
life insurance in force. In 2000, we began to reinsure substantially all of the
mortality risk associated with our newly introduced insurance products, and for
new business in 2001, we reduced the maximum amount of individual life
insurance we may retain on any life to $10 million.
Reserves
We establish reserve and policyholder fund liabilities to recognize our
future benefit obligations for our in force life policies. For variable and
interest-sensitive life insurance contracts, we establish policyholders'
account balances that represent cumulative gross premium payments plus credited
interest and/or fund performance, less withdrawals, expenses and mortality
charges.
Private Client Group
The Private Client Group provides full service securities brokerage and
financial advisory services to individuals and businesses. At December 31,
2001, the Private Client Group served approximately 1.1 million households in
the United States through our domestic Prudential Securities Financial Advisor
force and network of branch offices. The foundation of our business strategy is
to provide sound investment and securities advice to affluent clients and to
achieve the highest level of client satisfaction. The Private Client Group
segment also includes our consumer banking operations.
Products and Services
Most of the client assets in our Private Client Group are held in Command
accounts or basic brokerage accounts. The Command account, our primary retail
client account, helps clients manage their assets and is the cornerstone of our
asset gathering strategy. Through a Command account, clients can consolidate
their financial assets, obtain a range of financial services and invest in a
wide variety of investment products. Total Private Client Group client assets
in Command accounts were approximately $151 billion as of December 31, 2001,
representing 60% of Private Client Group client assets. Private Client Group
clients also can access account information, our research, market news and
other information and execute transactions through our on-line service,
PruFn.com.
Through Prudential Advisor, we offer a sliding scale asset-based fee for
advice with a fixed fee for transaction execution. Clients have the choice of
executing transactions directly through PruFn.com or through their Financial
Advisor. Prudential Securities also offers clients two fee-based programs
providing for full-time discretionary management by the client's Financial
Advisor in addition to the wrap-fee products that our Retail Investments
segment manufactures.
Clients may borrow from us to fund the purchase of securities using the
securities purchased or other securities in the account as collateral. As a
matter of credit policy, we generally require our clients to maintain higher
percentages of collateral values than the minimum percentages required by the
applicable federal and stock exchange margin rules. Interest on margin loans is
an important component of our revenue and is subject to change based on market
trading volume and volatility.
In addition, this segment engages in sales and trading of government,
corporate, agency, municipal and mortgage-backed fixed income securities and
related products, primarily for retail customers. Finally, it provides domestic
securities clearing services to other brokers. Providing these clearing
services to unaffiliated correspondent brokers offsets overhead costs for all
businesses within the Prudential Securities legal entity, primarily benefiting
this segment.
Marketing and Distribution
As of December 31, 2001, we had approximately 5,400 retail Financial
Advisors in our 271 U.S. branch offices. Our Financial Advisor force is the
primary sales channel for our mutual funds and wrap-fee products, and
14
<PAGE>
accordingly, the profitability of our Retail Investments business and the
Private Client Group is dependent on our ability to hire, train and retain
these Financial Advisors. Most Financial Advisors are licensed to sell our
annuity and insurance products. We compensate Financial Advisors with a
percentage of the commissions and fees they generate, supplemented by a
voluntary equity-market-linked, long-term deferred compensation plan introduced
in January 2000.
The following table sets forth information about our domestic Financial
Advisor force and branch office network as of the dates or for the periods
indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of or for the Year
Ended December 31,
---------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Financial Advisors (end of period).................................... 5,383 5,906 6,072
Financial Advisors trained(1)......................................... 307 652 1,202
Financial Advisor average client assets (in millions)(2).............. $ 45 $ 46 $ 48
Average annual retail Financial Advisor productivity (in thousands)(3) $ 336 $ 401 $ 367
Branches.............................................................. 271 295 275
Client accounts (in millions)......................................... 2.1 2.2 2.1
Client assets, including managed assets (in billions)................. $ 251 $ 272 $ 288
</TABLE>
- --------
(1)Number of Financial Advisors that completed the retail Financial Advisor
training program in the year.
(2)Private Client Group client assets at year-end divided by average number of
domestic Financial Advisors for the year.
(3)Private Client Group total non-interest revenues, excluding revenues
generated by the consumer bank and the segment's retail fixed income trading
operations, divided by average number of domestic Financial Advisors for the
period.
Consumer Banking
We conduct consumer banking activities primarily on a direct-response basis
through two subsidiaries, The Prudential Bank and Trust Company, a state
chartered bank, and The Prudential Savings Bank, F.S.B., a federally chartered
savings bank. Our principal products are home equity loans and lines of credit,
secured lending products, personal trust services and deposits, including money
market deposit accounts and certificates of deposit. We have no branches for
our consumer banking operations. Our vision for our consumer banking activities
is to provide banking products and services that supplement other Prudential
offerings and facilitate asset retention and asset growth. At December 31,
2001, our banking operations had approximately $850 million of home equity and
other loan receivables and $600 million of deposits.
Retail Investments
We manufacture, distribute and service investment management products
utilizing proprietary and non-proprietary asset management expertise in the
U.S. retail market. Our products are designed to be sold by Financial Advisors,
Prudential Agents and third-party financial professionals. We also provide
private label products for other financial services firms. We offer a family of
retail investment products consisting of 65 mutual funds, seven annuity
products, four wrap-fee products and over one hundred unit investment trusts as
of December 31, 2001. These products cover a wide array of investment styles
and objectives designed to attract and retain assets of individuals with
varying objectives and to accommodate investors' changing financial needs.
Operating Data
The following table sets forth the account values of the Retail Investments
segment's products as of the dates indicated. Annuity account values represent
the amounts held for the benefit of policyholders or contractholders. For
mutual funds and wrap-fee products, account value is equal to fair market value.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
------------------
2001 2000 1999
----- ----- -----
(in billions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Retail Investments:
Mutual funds(1).......... $57.8 $57.8 $55.2
Wrap-fee products(2)..... 17.9 19.6 16.7
Variable annuities....... 18.7 21.1 22.6
Fixed annuities.......... 3.0 2.9 3.0
Unit investment trusts... 1.2 1.6 3.2
</TABLE>
15
<PAGE>
- --------
(1) Mutual funds includes only those sold as retail investment products. Also
includes balances from sub-advised funds of $1.5 billion at December 31,
2001 and $0.4 billion at December 31, 2000.
(2) Wrap-fee product assets include $3.1 billion, $3.4 billion and $3.5 billion
of proprietary assets at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Since the 1990s, there has been an industry trend for products such as
variable annuities and wrap-fee products to include investment alternatives
that are managed by asset managers other than the product sponsor. Over the
last several years, we have been building investment management choice into
most of our variable annuity and wrap-fee products. We are able to offer
customers investment alternatives in some of our products that may be advised
by third parties with asset management styles that we may or may not offer.
Products
Mutual Funds
The following table sets forth the net sales (redemptions) of our retail
mutual funds, which include funds that we manage in third-party products
("sub-advised funds"), by asset class for the periods indicated. Net sales
(redemptions) are equal to gross sales minus redemptions. This data excludes
mutual funds sold through defined contribution plan products.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------- -------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Equity.................................................................. $ 642 $ 985 $ (349)
Fixed income............................................................ (66) (1,168) (750)
------ ------- -------
Total mutual funds net sales (redemptions) other than money market... 576 (183) (1,099)
Money market............................................................ 1,363 1,976 (812)
------ ------- -------
Total net sales (redemptions)(1)..................................... $1,939 $ 1,793 $(1,911)
====== ======= =======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Includes net sales, commencing in 2000, from sub-advised funds of $1,187
million in 2001 and $472 million in 2000.
The following table sets forth our retail mutual fund assets, including
sub-advised funds, under management by asset class at fair market value as of
the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
------------------
2001 2000 1999
----- ----- -----
(in billions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Equity............................. $17.7 $20.8 $20.0
Fixed income....................... 7.0 7.1 8.8
Money market....................... 33.1 29.9 26.4
----- ----- -----
Total assets under management... $57.8 $57.8 $55.2
===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
We offer our mutual funds with a variety of sales charges or "loads." We do
not generally offer "no-load" funds. We generally do not charge a load for our
mutual funds purchased through wrap-fee programs offered by us or third
parties, our defined contribution products and in certain other circumstances.
In addition, most of our mutual funds charge ongoing fees for servicing and
distribution-related expenses as permissible under SEC and NASD rules.
We earn investment management fees from our mutual funds based on average
daily net assets. Our mutual funds bear the expenses associated with their
operations as well as the issuance and redemption of their shares. These
expenses include those related to investment management, distribution, legal,
accounting and auditing
16
<PAGE>
expenses, transfer agent expenses, custodian expenses, the expenses of printing
and mailing prospectuses and reports to shareholders and independent directors'
expenses. We bear advertising, promotion and selling expenses, including sales
commissions, of our Private Client Group and Individual Life Insurance segments
and of our third-party distributors.
Wrap-Fee Products
We offer several wrap-fee products that provide access to mutual funds and
separate account products with the payment of fees based on the market value of
assets under management. Our wrap-fee products have higher minimum investment
levels than our mutual funds and variable annuities, and offer a choice of both
proprietary and non-proprietary investment management. Net sales of our
wrap-fee products were $1.4 billion in 2001, $4.8 billion in 2000 and $3.0
billion in 1999.
Annuities
We have a number of variable and fixed annuities with different options. Our
variable annuities provide customers the opportunity to invest in proprietary
and non-proprietary mutual funds and fixed-rate options. Our fixed annuities
provide a guarantee of principal and a guarantee of the interest rate to be
credited to the principal amount for a specified period of time.
The following table sets forth our net sales (redemptions) of our variable
and fixed annuities for the periods indicated. Net sales are equal to gross
sales minus surrenders, withdrawals and exchanges.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------- ----- -----
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Variable annuities.................... $(1,085) $(699) $ (5)
Fixed annuities....................... (96) (140) (265)
------- ----- -----
Total net sales (redemptions)...... $(1,181) $(839) $(270)
======= ===== =====
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth the gross sales of our variable and fixed
annuities by distribution channel for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Variable and fixed annuities:
Prudential Agents............. $1,144 $2,086 $2,907
Financial Advisors............ 230 421 678
Third-party distributors...... 17 4 2
------ ------ ------
Total gross sales.......... $1,391 $2,511 $3,587
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
The following table sets forth the total account values of our variable and
fixed annuities as of the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000 1999
----- ----- -----
(in billions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Variable annuities:
Proprietary separate account...... $11.1 $15.1 $17.0
General account(1)................ 3.2 2.8 2.8
Non-proprietary................... 4.4 3.2 2.8
----- ----- -----
Total variable annuities.......... $18.7 $21.1 $22.6
===== ===== =====
Fixed annuities...................... $ 3.0 $ 2.9 $ 3.0
===== ===== =====
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Represents amounts invested in the fixed-rate options of our variable
annuities.
17
<PAGE>
We earn fees from the mutual funds in our variable annuity products based on
average daily net assets. We price our fixed annuities as well as the
fixed-rate options of our variable annuities based on assumptions as to
investment returns, expenses and persistency. Competition also influences our
pricing. We seek to maintain a spread between the return on our general account
invested assets and the interest we credit on our fixed annuities.
To encourage persistency, all of our variable and fixed annuities, other
than our single premium fixed annuities, have withdrawal restrictions and
declining surrender or withdrawal charges for a specified number of years.
Marketing and Distribution
To better meet the needs of the mass affluent market, Prudential Agents are
being transitioned to focus on offering advice on an array of proprietary and
non-proprietary products. Similarly, Financial Advisors are being transitioned
to focus on fee-based financial advisory services. To support these
transitions, we have instituted a research-driven approach to money management
across our mutual funds, annuities, managed accounts and wrap-fee programs.
Investment manager research and monitoring supports our Financial Advisors and
Prudential Agents positioning them as advisors and providing them with a wide
range of selected investment alternatives. We call this strategy "Advised
Choice" and believe it fills a need for many customers--better enabling them to
make more informed decisions about investment and insurance choices.
In mid-1998, the Retail Investments segment began to develop and implement
plans for sales through third parties. Such sales were responsible for
approximately 22% of the segment's 2001 overall gross sales, excluding money
market funds. Net sales of mutual funds, other than money market funds, through
third-party channels totaled $2.3 billion in 2001 and represent the fastest
growing sales channel in this segment on a net basis. We have also launched an
initiative under which outside asset-gathering companies add our investment
options to their products.
Property and Casualty Insurance
Our Property and Casualty Insurance segment manufactures and distributes
personal lines property and casualty insurance products, principally automobile
and homeowners coverages, to the U.S. retail market. We distribute our products
through Prudential Agents, workplace and affinity marketing, and independent
agents. We also distribute certain specialty coverages written by other
insurers through brokerage arrangements.
Operating Data
The following table sets forth net written premiums and other operating data
for Property and Casualty Insurance as of the dates and for the periods
indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of and for the Year Ended
December 31,
- - ----------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
($ in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net written premiums(1):
Automobile.......................................................................... $1,441.2 $1,149.8 $1,031.2
Homeowners.......................................................................... 450.8 414.6 436.1
Other............................................................................... 33.5 32.7 33.0
-------- -------- --------
Total............................................................................. $1,925.5 $1,597.1 $1,500.3
======== ======== ========
Number of Prudential Agents authorized to sell Property and Casualty Insurance policies 4,023 4,705 6,106
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Premiums written for the period, including assumed premiums and net of
ceded and returned premiums.
Historically, a significant portion of our property and casualty insurance
business has been concentrated in New Jersey. Our New Jersey automobile
coverages accounted for 24% of our property and casualty automobile net written
premiums in 2001. New Jersey law requires an insurance company to provide
automobile insurance to every applicant that meets certain minimum eligibility
criteria. New Jersey law caps profits on automobile coverages under an excess
profits law and also imposes limitations on the rates that may be charged in
certain territories regardless of loss experience. We refunded $25.2 million in
2001 to our policyholders as a result of the excess profits law based on our
experience for the years 1998 through 2000.
18
<PAGE>
Products
Our primary property and casualty products are automobile and homeowners
insurance. We also offer watercraft, dwelling, fire and personal umbrella
policies.
We segment our automobile customers based on their respective driving and
loss histories into preferred, standard and non-standard segments. In May 2000,
we purchased the specialty automobile insurance business of the St. Paul
Companies, THI Holdings, Inc., which writes policies in the non-standard
segment.
We offer four main homeowners products: standard and premier policies for
owner-occupied houses, a policy for owner-occupied condominiums and a tenant
policy for renters. These policies all include coverage for personal property,
loss of use, personal liability and medical payments to others. Our
owner-occupied policies also include coverage for the dwelling and other
structures. To limit our catastrophe exposure we offer special deductibles in
certain states for hurricane, windstorm, hail and earthquake, when earthquake
coverage is purchased by the insured. We generally do not write coverage for
homes with replacement values of greater than $950,000.
Marketing and Distribution
In 1996, we adopted a geographic market segmentation strategy that targets
various states for growth based on our assessment of the potential for
catastrophic loss, the regulatory environment and underwriting experience. At
that time, we shifted our focus to automobile coverage, which, over the last
decade, has generally produced more stable results than homeowner coverages.
Historically, we relied primarily on Prudential Agents to distribute our
property and casualty products to the mass market. In 2001, Prudential Agents
accounted for 27% of first year direct written premiums, which represent total
annual premiums on new sales of our own property and casualty insurance
products before consideration of reinsurance assumed or ceded, and 73% of total
direct written premiums of the Property and Casualty Insurance segment.
To supplement sales growth, we have developed other distribution channels,
including a career agent channel, workplace and affinity marketing, independent
agents and direct distribution. In 2001 and 2000, our alternative distribution
channels accounted for 73% and 62% of first year direct written premiums,
respectively. In October 2001, we announced we would no longer write business
through our property and casualty career agency channel except in a few
selected markets and suspended our direct distribution mailings. In 1998, we
acquired Merastar Insurance Company. Merastar offers individual property and
casualty policies to workplace groups and professional work-related
associations, a payroll deduction capability for the sale of its products and
pricing that reflects a group discount. In 1999, we also began offering
products through small- to medium-sized independent insurance agencies. Our
acquisition of THI in May 2000, which sells non-standard automobile policies
through independent agents and on a direct basis, has broadened the scope of
our mass market.
Underwriting and Pricing
Our agents are responsible for field underwriting, and they must adhere to
risk selection guidelines developed by the underwriting department. The
underwriting department performs a final review of all applications other than
applications processed through an on-line automated underwriting system that is
now in place in many states.
We seek to price our products to produce an adequate return on capital over
time, subject to adjustments reflecting our market segmentation strategy. Our
pricing considers the expected frequency and severity of losses and the costs
of providing the necessary coverage, including the cost of administering policy
benefits, sales and other administrative costs. State rate regulation
significantly affects pricing. Our property and casualty operations are subject
to rate and other laws and regulations covering a range of trade and claim
settlement practices. State insurance regulatory authorities have broad
discretion in approving an insurer's proposed rates. A significant portion of
our automobile insurance is written in the state of New Jersey. Under certain
circumstances New Jersey insurance laws require an insurer to provide a refund
or credit to policyholders based upon the profits earned on automobile
insurance.
Catastrophe Exposure Risk Management Program and Reinsurance
Our personal lines property and casualty insurance operations expose us to
claims arising out of catastrophes, principally under our homeowners insurance
policies. Hurricanes, earthquakes, tornados, wind,
19
<PAGE>
hail, fires, explosions and other events may cause catastrophes, and the
occurrence and severity of catastrophes are inherently unpredictable.
We have taken significant steps to reduce our exposure to catastrophic
losses since Hurricane Andrew in 1992, including:
. reducing the number of homes insured against wind in southern Florida by
over 70%;
. increasing deductibles on homeowners' policies and offering separate
deductibles for hurricane, windstorm, hail and earthquake in some states;
. participating in the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund;
. withdrawing from business in Hawaii; and
. transferring our California earthquake exposure to the California
Earthquake Authority.
These activities have reduced our catastrophe exposure and the number of our
homeowners' policies in force. In addition to these risk management actions, we
rely substantially on catastrophe reinsurance and other reinsurance to limit
our catastrophe exposure.
Our greatest exposure to catastrophe loss is during hurricane season, from
June to November of each year. Based on our policies in force as of December
31, 2001, we believe we have limited our pre-tax catastrophe exposure from a
single one-in-250 year catastrophe to approximately $400 million, or
approximately $260 million on an after-tax basis representing approximately
1.3% of our consolidated equity as of December 31, 2001. This limitation relies
significantly on our catastrophe protection reinsurance program. Catastrophes
are inherently uncertain, however, and the loss or losses from a single or
multiple catastrophes could exceed the foregoing amount, perhaps materially. It
is possible that catastrophes could materially negatively affect our results of
operations or cash flow in particular quarterly or annual periods. We believe,
however, that, based on our current estimated exposures, losses from
catastrophes, net of reinsurance, should not have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition.
We periodically revise our reinsurance program to reflect what we believe
are our reinsurance needs. Our current catastrophe protection reinsurance
program, in effect until June 30, 2002, consists of an excess of loss
reinsurance contract with a a consortium of U.S. and international reinsurers,
including Lloyds of London syndicates.
Future changes in our reinsurance programs will likely affect our assessment
of our exposure to a major catastrophe loss. There have been, and in the future
may be, periods when reinsurance is not available or at least not at acceptable
rates and levels. The loss of all or portions of our reinsurance program could
subject us to increased exposure, which could be material. We are also subject
to credit risk with respect to our reinsurers and other risk bearers, such as
the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, because the ceding of risk to them does
not relieve us of our liability to insureds. Our recovery of less than
contracted amounts from our reinsurers and other risk bearers could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations. We seek to mitigate this
risk through diversification of reinsurers as well as maintenance of minimum
financial standards for their participation in our reinsurance programs.
See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations--Results of Operations for Financial Services Businesses by
Division and Closed Block Business--U.S. Consumer Division--Property and
Casualty Insurance" for a discussion of the impact of these agreements on our
earnings.
Claims
We staff our property and casualty claims department with approximately
1,400 claims associates based in 15 offices throughout the United States. We
generally specialize our claims handling by type of claim, and our home office
claims staff is responsible for setting policies and procedures and overseeing
field claim operations. Whenever possible, we use our own staff to conduct
claim inspections. We use independent claims adjusters when necessary to handle
claims in remote areas and to handle overflow during catastrophes.
Reserves
We establish reserves for payment of loss and loss adjustment expenses in
accordance with applicable regulations. Consistent with industry accounting
practice, we do not establish loss reserves until a loss, including a loss from
a catastrophe, has occurred. The following table sets forth a summary
reconciliation of our property
20
<PAGE>
and casualty beginning and ending reserves, determined on the basis of
statutory accounting principles for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses, beginning of the year $1,240 $1,439 $1,622
Loss and loss adjustment expenses:
Provision attributable to the current year........................ 1,440 1,271 1,249
Increase (decrease) in provision attributable to prior years...... (113) (165) (150)
------ ------ ------
Total loss and loss adjustment expenses......................... 1,327 1,106 1,099
------ ------ ------
Payments:
Loss and loss adjustment expenses attributable to current year.... 932 841 700
Loss and loss adjustment expenses attributable to prior years..... 553 583 582
------ ------ ------
Total payments.................................................. 1,485 1,424 1,282
------ ------ ------
Acquisition of THI Holdings.......................................... -- 119 --
------ ------ ------
Reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses, end of year(1)(2)..... $1,082 $1,240 $1,439
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Total reserves are net of reinsurance recoverables of $671 million at
December 31, 2001, $608 million at December 31, 2000 and $330 million at
December 31, 1999.
(2) Our Property and Casualty Insurance segment has limited exposure to
pre-1986 mass tort claims as a result of its former interest in
Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance Company, which we purchased in 1986 and
sold in 1992. Our total reserves held for these contracts, which we
included in the reserve table above, aggregated $29 million as of December
31, 2001, on both a net and gross basis. Based on currently available
information, we believe approximately 80% of the liabilities on these
contracts, representing $23 million or less than 3% of Property and
Casualty Insurance's total reserves for loss and adjustment expenses, may
be related to asbestos or environmental exposures. Reported claims activity
levels to date for these asbestos and environmental exposures do not appear
to be material. Estimation of ultimate liabilities for these claims is
unusually difficult, however, due to outstanding issues such as the
existence of coverage, the definition of an occurrence, the determination
of ultimate damages and allocation of damages to financially responsible
parties. It is possible that these claims might become material in the
future.
Our net reserves have declined over the past three years primarily due to
the net reduction in policies in force and the release of reserves from prior
years of $113 million in 2001 (including $7 million for the release of reserves
for prior years for group personal catastrophe coverage, which are reflected
only for purposes of results determined on the basis of statutory accounting
principles), $165 million in 2000 and $150 million in 1999.
We establish loss reserves to recognize the estimated amount necessary to
bring all pending reported, and incurred but not reported, claims to final
settlement. Many factors can influence the amount of loss reserves required,
such as changes in laws and regulations, judicial decisions, litigation and
settlements, medical care costs, rehabilitation costs, the costs of automobile
and home repair materials and labor rates, and other factors. We review our
loss reserves quarterly. We record our loss reserves at their full undiscounted
value. We do not make an explicit provision for the effects of inflation on
loss and loss adjustment expense reserve calculations. The establishment of
loss reserves is an inherently uncertain process, and we cannot assure that
ultimate losses will not exceed the Property and Casualty Insurance segment's
reserves.
Employee Benefits Division
Our Employee Benefits division consists of two segments: Group Insurance and
Other Employee Benefits.
. Group Insurance manufactures and distributes a full range of group life,
disability and related insurance products through employers and other
groups in connection with employee and member benefit plans.
. Other Employee Benefits manufactures, services and delivers products and
services to meet the retirement needs of employers of all sizes. These
products and services include full service defined contribution plans and
various guaranteed products. We distribute these products through a direct
sales force, third parties and Financial Advisors. As part of our employee
benefits business, we also offer real estate brokerage and relocation
services and workplace marketing services.
Division Strategy
The Employee Benefits division, currently known in the marketplace as
Prudential Institutional, seeks to be a leading non-medical employee benefits
provider to companies throughout the United States. Our goal is to help
21
<PAGE>
employers attract and retain employees by providing a competitive array of both
employer-paid benefits and employee-paid voluntary benefits and services. We
help companies and their employees grow and protect retirement plan assets by
providing a broad array of qualified and non-qualified retirement vehicles.
Currently, we do business with over 24,000 institutional clients of all sizes,
including 83 of the Fortune 100 firms, representing over 30 million employees
and members with over 12 million participants.
We offer WorkingSolutionsSM, a web-based platform, to deliver a broad array
of proprietary and non-proprietary voluntary benefits to help employers meet
the diverse needs of their employees. This platform is designed to extend our
relationship beyond the institutional client directly to their employees. We
have also established a relationship with Rewards Plus of America Corporation,
an Internet-based employee benefits service provider, through which we plan to
broaden our distribution of Prudential products and services.
Group Insurance
Our Group Insurance segment manufactures and distributes a full range of
group life insurance, long-term and short-term group disability insurance,
long-term care insurance and corporate- and trust-owned life insurance in the
United States to institutional clients primarily for use in connection with
employee and membership benefits plans. Group Insurance also sells accidental
death and dismemberment and other ancillary coverages and provides plan
administrative services in connection with its insurance coverages. Group
Insurance has its own dedicated sales force that distributes through the broker
and consultant market. Group Insurance also uses the Prudential Agent
distribution channel and third-party general agencies to sell group life
products to smaller clients.
In 1997, we separated our group life and disability products from our
healthcare business. We recruited experienced personnel to build a dedicated
sales force with members who have a record of sales success and established
relationships with brokers and consultants. In addition, we have refocused
group life on improved persistency and refocused group disability on improved
risk selection and reduced benefits ratios. We have commenced pricing
adjustments in 2001, when contractually permitted, effective in 2002, to
improve the benefit ratios for group life products. We expect that the
implementation of those adjustments, given the competitive marketplace for our
products, may result in a decline in persistency and some slowing of our sales.
Operating Data
The following table sets forth certain operating data for Group Insurance
for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Group Life Insurance:
Gross premiums(1)(2)....... $2,284 $1,913 $1,872
New annualized premiums(3). $ 483 $ 321 $ 262
Group Disability Insurance:
Gross premiums(1)(4)....... $ 534 $ 472 $ 413
New annualized premiums.... $ 147 $ 162 $ 105
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Insurance premium before returns to participating policyholders for
favorable claims experience. Group disability amounts include long-term
care products.
(2) Includes $23 million in 2001, $23 million in 2000 and $24 million in 1999
from Prudential employee benefit plans. Also includes $ 198 million in
2001, $136 million in 2000 and $165 million in 1999 from the Serviceman's
Group Life insurance program, which is available to members of the U.S.
armed forces through a contract with the U.S. Veterans Administration. We
reinsure all but approximately 20% of our premiums and risk exposure from
this program to a voluntary reinsurance pool comprised of other U.S. life
insurers, which participate in accordance with their market shares. While
this business produces substantial premiums, the Veterans Administration
limits profitability to 0.2625% of premium.
(3) Amounts do not include excess premiums, which are premiums that build cash
value but do not purchase face amounts of group universal life insurance.
(4) Includes $ 21 million in 2001, $23 million in 2000 and $28 million in 1999
from Prudential employee benefit plans.
22
<PAGE>
Products
Group Life Insurance. We offer group life insurance products including
basic, supplemental or optional, and dependent term and universal life
insurance. Commencing in 1998, we also began offering group variable universal
life insurance and supplemental accidental death and dismemberment insurance.
Many of our employee-pay coverages include a portability feature, allowing
employees to retain their coverage when they change employers or retire. We
also offer a living benefits option which allows insureds who are diagnosed
with a terminal illness to receive up to 50% of their life insurance benefit
upon diagnosis, in advance of death, to use as needed.
Group Disability Insurance. We offer short- and long-term group disability
insurance, which protects against loss of wages due to illness or injury.
Short-term disability generally provides coverage for three to six months, and
long-term disability covers the period after short-term disability ends.
Other. We offer individual and group long-term care insurance and group
corporate- and trust-owned life insurance. Long-term care insurance protects
the insured from the costs of care in the community, at an adult day care
center, a nursing home or similar live-in care situation or at home by
providing a home health or a personal care aide. Group corporate- and
trust-owned life insurance are group variable life insurance contracts
typically used by large corporations to fund benefit plans for retired
employees. These latter products also may be used as vehicles to deliver
deferred compensation or non-qualified benefits to active employees.
Marketing and Distribution
Group Insurance's dedicated sales force is organized around products and
market segments and distributes primarily through employee benefits brokers and
consultants. In 1997, we established our Group Life Sales Director force to
sell our group life products in the large and jumbo case markets (2,000 or more
employees) and our Life and Disability Sales Manager force to sell our group
life and disability products in the small and medium case markets. Group
Insurance also distributes group life products through Prudential Agents,
primarily to the small case market (less than 250 employees), and individual
long-term care products through Prudential Agents as well as third-party
brokers and agents. At December 31, 2001, Group Insurance had field sales
offices in 36 major metropolitan areas.
Underwriting and Pricing
Group Insurance's product underwriting and pricing is centralized. We have
developed standard rating systems for each product line based on our past
experience and relevant industry experience. We are not obligated to accept any
application for a policy or group of policies from any distributor. We follow
uniform underwriting practices and procedures. If the coverage amount exceeds
certain prescribed age and amount limits, we may require a prospective insured
to submit to paramedical examinations.
We determine premiums on some of our policies on a retrospective experience
rated basis, in which case the policyholder bears some of the risk associated
with claim experience fluctuations during the policy period. At December 31,
2001, approximately 59% of our group life insurance premiums and 18% of our
group disability insurance premiums were attributable to retrospective
experience rated policies. We base product pricing of group insurance products
on the expected pay-out of benefits that we calculate using assumptions for
mortality, morbidity, interest, expenses and persistency, depending upon the
specific product features.
Our other policies are not eligible to receive experience based refunds. The
adequacy of our initial pricing of these policies determines their
profitability. Long-term disability, in particular, involves a commitment to
insure disability that continues potentially over a person's lifetime and,
accordingly, contains the risk that loss experience is affected by
circumstances we did not expect when we issued a policy and substantially
exceeds pricing assumptions. In addition, the trend towards multiple year rate
guarantees for new policies, which are typically three years for life insurance
and two years for disability insurance, further increases the adverse
consequences of mispricing coverage and lengthens the time it takes to reduce
loss ratios.
23
<PAGE>
Reserves and Reinsurance
We establish and carry as liabilities actuarially determined reserves that
we believe will meet our future obligations. We base these reserves on
actuarially recognized methods using prescribed morbidity and mortality tables
in general use in the United States, which we modify to reflect our actual
experience when appropriate. We calculate our reserves to equal the amounts
that we expect will be sufficient to meet our policy obligations. Reserves also
include claims reported but not yet paid, claims incurred but not reported and
claims in the process of settlement.
We reinsure portions of the risk we assume under our group accidental death
and dismemberment policies that are not eligible to receive experience based
refunds. In addition, we have catastrophic reinsurance on our group life and
accidental death and dismemberment products, with stated deductible amounts and
subject to contractual limits. We reinsure portions of our disability insurance
risks with third-party reinsurers. As of December 31, 2001, the amount of ceded
in force disability insurance premiums totaled $8.0 million, representing less
than 2% of our gross disability insurance in force.
Other Employee Benefits
Retirement Services
Our Retirement Services unit distributes and services defined contribution
products for companies of all sizes. We offer products and services across the
defined contribution market--for example, the 401(a), 401(k), 403(b), 457 and
Taft-Hartley markets. We also offer products in the non-qualified retirement
market. Our flagship PruArray product includes proprietary and non-proprietary
investments. We also manufacture, distribute and administer guaranteed products
such as guaranteed investment contracts ("GIC"), funding agreements and group
annuities for defined contribution plans, defined benefit pension plans and
non-qualified entities.
The following table sets forth the account values of Retirement Services'
products and the number of defined contribution plans and plan participants as
of the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
---------- ---------- --------
($ in billions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Defined contribution products account value(1):
Proprietary.................................. $ 17.6 $ 19.1 $ 20.5
Non-proprietary.............................. 7.0 6.9 5.3
---------- ---------- --------
Total account value........................ $ 24.6 $ 26.0 $ 25.8
========== ========== ========
Number of defined contribution plans............ 7,842 8,127 7,868
Number of defined contribution plan participants 1,001,860 1,027,948 939,579
Guaranteed products total account value(2)(3):
Spread-based products........................ $ 18.9 $ 19.2 $ 20.0
Fee-based products........................... 20.9 22.4 21.8
---------- ---------- --------
Total account value........................ $ 39.8 $ 41.6 $ 41.8
========== ========== ========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1)Includes mutual fund investments through defined contribution plan products.
(2)Includes $2.6 billion in 2001, $4.7 billion in 2000 and $4.6 billion in 1999
of externally managed separate accounts.
(3)Includes $9.1 billion at December 31, 2001, $8.2 billion at December 31,
2000 and $8.2 billion at December 31, 1999 of Prudential's retirement plan
assets.
Products
Our primary defined contribution product, PruArray, offers plan sponsors
access to more than 500 mutual funds, 45 of which are sponsored by Prudential,
with the balance sponsored by more than 25 other mutual fund companies.
PruArray also offers stable value investment options. We tailor PruArray to the
various defined contribution product markets, as appropriate, and to suit
retirement plans of different sizes.
We offer general account GICs and funding agreements, through which
customers deposit funds with us under contracts that typically provide for a
specified rate of interest on the amount invested through the maturity of the
contract. We are obligated to pay principal and interest according to the
contracts' terms. This obligation is
24
<PAGE>
backed by our general account assets, and we bear all of the investment and
asset/liability management risk on these contracts. As spread products, general
account GICs and funding agreements make a profit to the extent that the rate
of return on the investments we make with the invested funds exceeds the
promised interest rate and our expenses. Since 1998, we have offered our
credit-enhanced GIC, which has a triple-A rating, the highest rating possible,
as a result of a guarantee from a financial insurer. We also offer separate
account and synthetic GICs, through which we hold customers' funds either in a
separate account or in trust outside of our general account for the benefit of
the customer. We pass all of the investment results through to the customer,
subject to a minimum interest rate, and we do not earn spread income. As
fee-based products, separate account and synthetic GICs are less capital
intensive and produce lower levels of income than spread products. To the
extent that Prudential's asset management units are selected to manage client
assets associated with fee-based products, those units also earn investment
management fees from those relationships. A limited amount, $257 million, of
our in force GIC business at December 31, 2001 is putable to us at the option
of the holder prior to the applicable termination dates.
We offer group annuities primarily to defined benefit plans to provide fixed
lifetime benefits for a specified group of plan participants. These annuities
are generally single premium annuities that provide for either immediate or
deferred payments. We offer fixed payment annuities backed by our general
account (spread products) as well as separate account annuities (fee products)
that permit a plan sponsor to realize the benefit of investment and actuarial
results while receiving a general account guarantee of minimum benefits. We
also offer group fixed and variable annuities to individuals taking lump sum
distributions from defined contribution plans.
Finally, we offer structured settlement products, which are customized
annuities used to provide ongoing periodic payments to a claimant in
malpractice or personal injury lawsuits instead of a lump sum settlement.
We set our rates for guaranteed products using a proprietary pricing model
that considers the investment environment and our risk, expense and
profitability assumptions. Upon sale of a product, we adjust the duration of
our asset portfolio and lock in the prevailing interest rates. We continuously
monitor cash flow experience and work closely with our Portfolio Management
Group to review performance and ensure compliance with our investment policy.
We perform cash flow testing on an annual basis using various interest rate
scenarios to determine the adequacy of our reserves for future benefit
obligations.
Marketing and Distribution
Historically, defined contribution plans have been sold through Financial
Advisors and, to a lesser extent, Prudential Agents. A high concentration of
these plans have been in the core and small plan markets, with less than $50
million in plan assets. To increase our market share, we created a distribution
network to include over 50 third-party distributors including brokers, regional
broker-dealers and others. In addition, in 1999 we created a small direct sales
force to develop sales among plans with greater than $50 million in plan assets.
Because of downgrades of our claims-paying ratings in the mid-1990s,
including as recently as 1998, our ability to sell traditional guaranteed
products has been very limited, and we have focused our efforts on our
credit-enhanced GICs. Using a small direct sales force, we place most of our
traditional, separate account and credit-enhanced GIC business with clients
with whom we have an existing relationship.
Residential Real Estate Brokerage Franchise and Relocation Services
Prudential Real Estate and Relocation Services is our integrated real estate
brokerage franchise and relocation services business. The real estate group
markets franchises primarily to existing real estate companies. As of December
31, 2001, there were approximately 1,571 franchise offices and approximately
43,000 sales associates in the franchise network.
Our franchise agreements grant the franchisee the right to use the
Prudential name and real estate service marks in return for royalty payments on
gross commissions generated by the franchisees. The franchises generally are
independently owned and operated.
25
<PAGE>
Our relocation group offers institutional clients a variety of services in
connection with the relocation of their employees. These services include
coordination of appraisal, inspection and sale of relocating employees' homes,
equity advances to relocating employees, assistance in locating homes at the
relocating employee's destination, household goods moving services, client
cost-tracking and a variety of relocation policy and group move consulting
services.
International Division
Our International division offers its services through two segments:
International Insurance and International Securities and Investments.
. International Insurance manufactures and distributes principally individual
life insurance products to the affluent retail market in Japan, as well as
Korea and Taiwan, and has commenced operations in selected Asian, Latin
American and European countries. In April 2001, we acquired Kyoei Life
Insurance Co., Ltd., now renamed Gibraltar Life Insurance Company, Ltd.
("Gibraltar Life"), which marketed four types of insurance products to the
broad middle and upper middle market in Japan: individual life and indemnity
health coverage; individual annuities; group life insurance; and group
annuities. Gibraltar Life's primary business consists of individual
protection products.
. International Securities and Investments offers brokerage services,
primarily in U.S. securities, asset management and financial advisory
services to retail and institutional clients outside the United States.
International Investments offers domestic and foreign proprietary and
non-proprietary asset management services to mass affluent clients outside
the United States, marketed through proprietary and non-proprietary
distribution channels in selected international markets.
Division Strategy
Our strategy is to grow our businesses in key international markets by
focusing on providing wealth growth and protection services for the affluent
and, in Japan, to the broad middle market. In executing this strategy, we
target those countries that we believe offer the opportunity and potential for
scale operations that will generate attractive financial returns.
In International Insurance, our strategy has been to provide life insurance
products to affluent customers through a career agency force of well-trained,
motivated and predominantly university-educated professional representatives
known as Life Planners, using a needs analysis based sales process. We seek to
grow our established operations and to expand in selected international markets.
With the acquisition of Gibraltar Life, we have expanded our International
Insurance strategy to provide life insurance products to the broad middle
market in Japan through a large contingent of Life Advisors increasingly
focused on needs analysis and customer service. Gibraltar Life has business
relationships with a number of affinity groups or "associations" that provide
us access to their members or employees.
In our international securities business, we focus on delivering quality
investment advice and a wide breadth of product choice through highly trained
Financial Advisors to affluent individuals globally.
In our international investments business we seek to expand our affluent
customer base outside the United States by increasing our global assets under
management, primarily by investing in asset management businesses around the
world.
International Insurance
Our International Insurance segment manufactures and distributes individual
life insurance products to the affluent market in Japan and other foreign
markets through Life Planners. In addition, as a result of our acquisition of
Gibraltar Life, we now offer similar products to the broad middle market across
Japan through Life Advisors, which distribution channel we intend to operate
separately from our Life Planners. We commenced sales in foreign markets as
follows: Japan, 1988; Taiwan, 1990; Italy, 1990; Korea, 1991; Brazil, 1998;
Argentina, 1999; the Philippines, 1999; and Poland, 2000. We also have a
representative office in China.
26
<PAGE>
We run each country operation on a stand-alone basis with local management
and sales teams initially supported by senior International Insurance staff
based in Asia and Newark. Each operation has its own marketing, underwriting
and claims and investment management functions. Each operation invests
predominantly in local currency securities, typically bonds issued by the local
government or its agencies. In our larger operations, we have more diversified
portfolios.
Operating Data
The following table sets forth certain operating data for International
Insurance for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Japan
---------------------------------------
Excluding Gibraltar Life Gibraltar Life
------------------------ --------------
As of or for Year As of or for
Ended December 31, Year Ended
------------------------ December 31,
2001 2000 1999 2001(3)
------ ------ ------ --------------
($ in millions unless otherwise noted)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
GAAP exchange rate basis(1):
Net premiums, policy charges and fee income............................ $1,526 $1,485 $1,244 $1,710
Annualized new business premiums....................................... $ 370 $ 359 $ 302 $ 110
Constant exchange rate basis(2):
Net premiums, policy charges and fee income............................ $1,526 $1,318 $1,160 $1,719
Annualized new business premiums....................................... $ 370 $ 319 $ 282 $ 110
Face amount of individual policies in force at year end ($ in billions) $ 127 $ 112 $ 98 $ 232
Average policy size ($ in thousands)................................... $ 134 $ 139 $ 140 $ 56
Number of individual policies in force (in thousands).................. 946 805 701 4,911
Number of Life Planners/Life Advisors.................................. 1,992 1,811 1,681 6,121
Number of field managers............................................... 299 286 225 753
Number of agencies..................................................... 46 41 37 66
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
All Other Countries Total
-------------------- ---------------------
As of or for Year As of or for Year
Ended December 31, Ended December 31,
-------------------- ---------------------
2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------ ------- ------ ------
($ in millions unless otherwise noted)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
GAAP exchange rate basis(1):
Net premiums, policy charges and fee income............................ $ 408 $ 287 $ 178 $ 3,644 $1,772 $1,422
Annualized new business premiums....................................... $ 212 $ 150 $ 96 $ 692 $ 509 $ 398
Constant exchange rate basis(2):
Net premiums, policy charges and fee income............................ $ 408 $ 256 $ 166 $ 3,653 $1,574 $1,326
Annualized new business premiums....................................... $ 212 $ 133 $ 88 $ 692 $ 452 $ 370
Face amount of individual policies in force at year end ($ in billions) $ 38 $ 26 $ 16 $ 397 $ 138 $ 114
Average policy size ($ in thousands)................................... $ 68 $ 66 $ 62 $ 69 $ 116 $ 119
Number of individual policies in force (in thousands).................. 536 376 261 6,393 1,181 962
Number of Life Planners/Life Advisors.................................. 2,112 1,684 1,203 10,225 3,495 2,884
Number of field managers............................................... 491 448 364 1,543 734 589
Number of agencies..................................................... 105 88 68 217 129 105
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) When we show GAAP exchange rate information, we translate based on the
applicable average exchange rate for the period shown.
(2) When we show constant exchange rate information, we translate based on the
applicable average exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 2001.
(3) Amounts for Gibraltar Life are for the period April 2, 2001, the date of
the reorganization, through November 30, 2001.
Products
We currently offer various traditional whole life, term life and endowment
policies, which provide for payment on the earlier of death or maturity, in all
of the countries in which we operate. We also offer variable and
interest-sensitive life products and underwrite life reinsurance in Japan and
offer interest-sensitive products in Argentina. Generally, our international
insurance products are non-participating and denominated in local currency,
with the exception of products in Argentina, which are U.S. dollar denominated,
and some policies in Japan for which premiums and benefits are payable in U.S.
dollars.
27
<PAGE>
Marketing and Distribution
Our Life Planner model is significantly different from the way traditional
industry participants offer life insurance in Japan and in some of the other
countries where we do business. It is different from the way in which we market
through the Life Advisors of Gibraltar Life as well. We believe that our
recruitment standards, training, motivation and compensation package are key to
the Life Planner model and have helped our International Insurance segment
achieve higher rates of agent retention, agent productivity and policy
persistency than our local competitors. In general, we recruit Life Planners
with:
. university degrees, so that the Life Planner will have the same
educational background and outlook as the target customer,
. a minimum of two to three years sales or sales management experience,
. no life insurance sales experience, and
. a pattern of job stability and success.
The Life Planner's objective is to sell protection-oriented life insurance
products on a needs basis to upper middle and upper income customers.
The following table sets forth Life Planner retention, Life Planner
productivity and policy persistency information for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Japan
(excluding Gibraltar Life) All Other Countries Total
------------------------- ------------------ -------------
2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Life Planner Retention:
12 Month................. 90% 92% 91% 58% 66% 72% 66% 75% 79%
24 Month................. 84% 83% 84% 49% 54% 60% 61% 65% 72%
Life Planner Productivity(1) 7.0 6.7 7.0 9.2 8.4 8.3 8.1 7.5 7.5
Policy Persistency(2):
13 Months................ 95% 95% 95% 90% 90% 87% 93% 94% 94%
25 Months................ 89% 90% 89% 84% 82% 74% 88% 88% 86%
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Average number of policies issued per Life Planner each month.
(2) The percentage of policies issued that are still in force at the beginning
of their second policy year or third policy year.
Due to the recent acquisition and reorganization of Gibraltar Life, data as
to retention and productivity of its Life Advisors and policy persistency data
for 13 and 25 month periods would not be meaningful. In addition, a new
compensation plan was introduced in July 2001. It is designed to improve
productivity and persistency and is similar to compensation plans in our other
International Insurance operations. Life Advisor compensation, which was based
on a high fixed salary component in the past, has been changed to a variable
compensation structure. We have a transition plan in place that will last, for
some agents, until June 2003.
Underwriting and Pricing
Our International Insurance segment is subject to substantial local
regulation that is generally more restrictive for product offerings, pricing
and structure than U.S. insurance regulation. Each International Insurance
country operation has its own underwriting department that employs variations
of our domestic practices in underwriting individual policy risks designed to
assess and quantify risks. In setting underwriting limits, we consider local
industry standards to prevent adverse selection and to stay abreast of industry
trends. We also set underwriting limits together with each operation's
reinsurers.
Pricing of individual life insurance products, particularly in Japan and
Korea, is more regulated than in the United States. In Japan, premiums are
different for participating and non-participating products, but within each
product type they are generally uniform for all companies. The mortality and
morbidity rates and interest rates that we use to calculate premiums are
restricted by regulation on the basis of product type. The interest rates do
not always reflect the market rates we earn on our investments, and, as a
result, there have been periods when we have experienced negative spreads
between the rate we were required to pay and the rate we earned on investments.
28
<PAGE>
Reserves and Reinsurance
We establish and carry as liabilities actuarially determined reserves, which
we believe will meet our future obligations. In Japan, we set reserves for
variable and interest-sensitive life products according to premiums collected
plus investment results credited less charges. We base other fixed death
benefit reserves on appropriate assumptions for investment yield, persistency,
mortality and morbidity rates, expenses and margins for adverse deviation.
International Insurance reinsures portions of its insurance risks with both
selected third-party reinsurers and Prudential Insurance under reinsurance
agreements primarily on a yearly renewable term basis. International Insurance
also buys catastrophe reinsurance that covers multiple deaths from a single
occurrence in Japan and Taiwan and has a coinsurance agreement with Prudential
Insurance for U.S. dollar denominated business in Japan. The catastrophe
reinsurance market has tightened considerably since September 11, 2001,
resulting in significant increases in premium and additional exclusions from
coverage. As of December 31, 2001, the amount of ceded business in force
including Gibraltar Life totaled $15.8 billion to third-party reinsurers and
$46.7 billion to Prudential Insurance, representing 3.7% and 10.9% of
International Insurance's gross life insurance in force.
International Securities and Investments
Our International Securities and Investments segment provides advice and
investment product choice to retail and institutional clients in selected
international markets. Our securities business offers financial advisory,
private banking and brokerage services, primarily in U.S. securities, as well
as sales and trading for a wide range of futures and forward contracts, on a
global basis, for retail and institutional customers. Our investments business
includes manufacturing of proprietary products and distribution of both
proprietary and non-proprietary products, all tailored to meet client needs in
the target countries.
We conduct our securities operations through a network of 29 branch offices
in Europe, Asia and Latin America. At December 31, 2001, we had 633
international Financial Advisors and $20.2 billion of client assets under
management and administration. Our international operations also include a
private bank based in London with an office in Luxembourg and a private trust
company based in the Cayman Islands.
We offer our international retail clients products and services similar to
the products we offer to domestic clients, including the Command account and
access to Prudential-Bache.com. In the United Kingdom and Hong Kong, we are
full service broker-dealers in local equities, supported by research and
securities clearing operations. We also provide our U.S. equity research
coverage and execution services to institutional clients.
We manage our international Financial Advisors in a manner similar to our
domestic Financial Advisor force and compensate them using commission and
bonus. We generally recruit and train our own new Financial Advisors in our
international operations; however, our strategy of selectively entering local
markets through acquisitions also allows us to add Financial Advisors. In
September 1999, we acquired BH Matheson Holdings Limited, now named Prudential
Bache Holdings Limited, a London-based stockbroker, investment advisor and
asset manager with approximately $3.2 billion in institutional and retail
client assets at that time.
Our futures operations provide advice, sales and trading on a global basis
covering a wide variety of commodity, financial and foreign exchange futures
and forward contracts, including agricultural commodities, base and precious
metals, major currencies, interest rate and stock indices. We conduct these
operations through offices in the United States, Europe and Asia, and we are
members of most major futures exchanges. We transact most of our business with
institutions. We conduct futures transactions on margin according to the
regulations of the different futures exchanges. As with any margin transaction,
the risk of credit loss is greater than in cash transactions.
In our international investments business, we invest in asset management
businesses in targeted countries around the world in order to expand our mass
affluent customer base outside the United States and to increase our global
assets under management.
29
<PAGE>
Asset Management Division
Our Asset Management division consists of two segments: Investment
Management and Advisory Services and Other Asset Management.
. Investment Management and Advisory Services provides investment management
and advisory services primarily for the U.S. Consumer and Employee
Benefits divisions of the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed
Block Business. It also provides these services and related products
across a broad range of asset classes directly to institutional clients,
to whom it markets through its own sales force. This segment also engages
in proprietary investments and syndications.
. Other Asset Management engages in equity securities sales and trading and
investment research, and seeks to participate in securities underwritings,
as a co-manager or other participant, where our research efforts are
attractive to issuers and investment banks. This segment also includes
commercial mortgage securitization operations and hedge portfolio
investing.
Division Strategy
Our Asset Management business strategy is to increase assets under
management and profitability by providing clients with consistently strong
investment performance, excellent service and a choice of quality products in a
way that uses our scale and breadth to their advantage. In addition, we seek to
earn incremental returns by extending our investment capabilities into
proprietary trading and investing in selected areas.
Investment Management and Advisory Services
Operating Data
The following tables set forth the Investment Management and Advisory
Services segment's assets under management at fair market value by asset class
and source as of the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 2001
---------------------------------
Fixed Real
Equity(1) Income(2) Estate Total
--------- --------- ------ ------
(in billions)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Retail customers(3).... $ 44.2 $ 52.3 $ -- $ 96.5
Institutional customers 39.6 39.5 10.0 89.1
General account........ 1.9 110.5 1.4 113.8
------ ------ ----- ------
Total.................. $ 85.7 $202.3 $11.4 $299.4
====== ====== ===== ======
December 31, 2000
---------------------------------
Fixed Real
Equity(1) Income(2) Estate Total
--------- --------- ------ ------
(in billions)
Retail customers(3).... $ 58.7 $ 48.7 $ -- $107.4
Institutional customers 46.4 38.7 10.0 95.1
General account........ 2.2 105.6 2.2 110.0
------ ------ ----- ------
Total.................. $107.3 $193.0 $12.2 $312.5
====== ====== ===== ======
December 31, 1999
---------------------------------
Fixed Real
Equity(1) Income(2) Estate Total
--------- --------- ------ ------
(in billions)
Retail customers(3).... $ 60.2 $ 48.3 $ -- $108.5
Institutional customers 52.9 35.3 8.6 96.8
General account........ 3.1 102.8 2.0 107.9
------ ------ ----- ------
Total.................. $116.2 $186.4 $10.6 $313.2
====== ====== ===== ======
</TABLE>
30
<PAGE>
- --------
(1) Includes private equity investments of institutional customers of $0.6
billion as of December 31, 2001, $0.6 billion as of December 31, 2000 and
$1.2 billion as of December 31, 1999, and private equity assets in our
general account of $1.4 billion, $1.3 billion, and $1.2 billion as of those
dates, respectively.
(2) Includes private fixed income assets of institutional customers of $4.1
billion as of December 31, 2001, $4.2 billion as of December 31, 2000, and
$3.4 billion as of December 31, 1999, and private fixed income assets in
our general account of $45.1 billion, $45.9 billion, and $46.1 billion, as
of those dates. Included in these private fixed income assets are
commercial and agricultural mortgages for institutional customers of $2.6
billion as of December 31, 2001, $3.0 billion as of December 31, 2000, and
$2.1 billion as of December 31, 1999, and commercial and agricultural
mortgages for our general account of $16.9 billion, $17.0 billion, and
$16.6 billion as of those dates, respectively.
(3) Consists of individual mutual funds and both variable annuities and
variable life insurance in our separate accounts. Fixed annuities and the
fixed-rate option of both variable annuities and variable life insurance
are included in our general account.
Most of the retail customer assets reflected in the foregoing tables are
invested through our mutual funds and variable annuities described above under
"--U.S. Consumer Division--Retail Investments--Products," and the remainder is
invested through our variable life insurance products described above under
"--U.S. Consumer Division--Individual Life Insurance--Products.'' These assets
under management are gathered by the U.S. Consumer division. In addition, we
use the platforms that provide asset management for the institutional products
and services described below to provide asset management for our retail
customers' assets within this segment and for our general account. We discuss
our general account below under "--General Account Investments."
The following is a description of Investment Management and Advisory
Services' institutional products and services.
Products and Services
Institutional Public Equity and Fixed Income Asset Management
Our institutional public equity and fixed income units provide discretionary
and non-discretionary asset management services to a broad array of
institutional clients. These units managed $74.4 billion of our $89.1 billion
and $80.3 billion of our $95.1 billion of institutional assets under management
as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000. Of the $74.4 billion, $53.2
billion was gathered by the Asset Management division's sales force, and $21.2
billion was acquired by the sales forces of the Employee Benefits division and,
commencing in the fourth quarter, the International division. Of the $80.3
billion, $59.7 billion was gathered by the Asset Management division's sales
force and $20.6 billion was gathered by the Employee Benefits division's sales
forces. We manage a broad array of publicly traded equity and debt asset
classes using various investment styles. In 2000, substantially all of our
public equity asset management capabilities were consolidated into our
wholly-owned subsidiary, Jennison Associates, LLC ("Jennison"). Jennison is a
widely recognized manager of institutional assets and is a leading subadvisor
for mutual fund assets.
Institutional Real Estate and Private Equity Asset Management
Our real estate unit provides asset management services for single-client
and commingled real estate portfolios and manufactures and manages a variety of
real estate investment vehicles for institutional clients. These operations
accounted for $10.0 billion of our assets under management as of December 31,
2001 and December 31, 2000. Our real estate investment vehicles range from
fully diversified funds to specialized funds that invest in specific types of
properties or specific geographic regions or follow other specific investment
strategies.
Our private equity asset management unit includes venture capital, leveraged
buyouts, development capital, mezzanine debt and special situation subclasses.
Recently, we have decided to divest certain of these activities, and to
integrate the activities that remain into the rest of our investment management
business.
Commercial Mortgage Origination and Servicing
Our commercial mortgage banking business provides mortgage origination and
servicing for our general account and institutional clients. The unit also
originates and purchases commercial mortgages for sale in securitization
transactions. Origination and servicing activity is included in this segment.
Securitization activity
31
<PAGE>
is included in the Other Asset Management segment, as described below under
"--Other Asset Management--Commercial Mortgage Securitization."
In May 2000, we acquired The WMF Group, Ltd., a leading originator and
servicer of multi-family and commercial mortgage loans, which was combined with
the rest of our commercial mortgage banking activities. The WMF businesses that
were acquired include Fannie Mae loan origination and servicing, FHA loan
origination and servicing and a high-yield real estate funds management company.
At December 31, 2001, we serviced commercial mortgage loans of $14.5 billion
for third parties, and we serviced and managed $16.9 billion of commercial
mortgage loans owned by Prudential and $2.6 billion owned by institutional
investors. At December 31, 2000, we serviced commercial mortgage loans of $13.6
billion for third parties, and we serviced and managed $17.0 billion of
commercial mortgage loans owned by Prudential and $3.0 billion owned by
institutional investors.
Proprietary Investments and Syndications
We also make proprietary investments in public and private debt and equity
securities, including controlling interests, with the intention to sell or
syndicate to investors, including our general account. As of December 31, 2001,
we had invested approximately $161 million in this portfolio. After sale or
syndication, these assets are managed by our Investment Management and Advisory
Services segment.
Other Asset Management
Equity Securities Sales and Trading
We engage in equity securities sales and trading, and pursue co-manager
positions and participations in underwritings where our research efforts are
attractive to issuers and lead underwriters. We execute client transactions in
equity securities on both an agency and a principal basis in listed and NASDAQ
equities and equity options and make a market in 468 NASDAQ securities.
Investment Research
Our analysts, who numbered 54 as of December 31, 2001, produce reports and
studies on the economy; the equity markets; industries and specific companies;
investment and portfolio strategies; and regulatory, political, legislative and
tax issues. In the past we focused our research on many of the same industries
and market segments that were covered by our former lead-managed equity
underwriting for corporate issuers and institutional fixed income businesses.
We are now focusing our research on companies of interest to our retail and
institutional customers, as our research is intended to provide information and
advice to investor clients.
Commercial Mortgage Securitization
We sell commercial mortgages originated by the Investment Management and
Advisory Services segment, together with other commercial mortgages we may
purchase for this purpose, in securitization transactions. We also make interim
loans when we expect the loan to lead to a securitization opportunity. As of
December 31, 2001, our warehouse balance of mortgages pending securitization
and interim loans totaled approximately $1.1 billion.
Hedge Portfolios
In 1998, we started a hedge portfolio that holds principal positions in U.S.
government and agency securities and hedges them with short positions in
similar securities in order to utilize our general account investment
management strengths. We currently have authorized a maximum aggregate
principal position limit of $10 billion and associated asset-based financing
for this hedge portfolio. In December 1999, we began operating a second hedge
portfolio, that involves a wider range of security types, including domestic
and foreign investment grade corporate bonds, foreign sovereign debt and
currency forward contracts and has an authorized maximum aggregate principal
position limit of $2 billion and associated asset-based financing. As of
December 31, 2001, the hedge portfolios had a total carrying value of
approximately $3.9 billion, reflecting both principal positions and securities
financing positions.
32
<PAGE>
Corporate and Other Operations
Our Corporate and Other operations include corporate-level activities and
international ventures that we do not allocate to our business segments.
Corporate-level activities consist primarily of corporate-level income and
expenses not allocated to any of our business segments, including costs for
company-wide initiatives such as enhancement of our Internet capabilities and
income from our own qualified pension plans, as well as investment returns on
our capital that is not deployed in any of our business segments. Our Corporate
and Other operations also include returns from investments that we do not
allocate to any of our business segments. These investments, including cash and
cash equivalents, totaled $18.3 billion and $9.1 billion as of December 31,
2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively. Historically, as part of our
corporate investment activities, we borrowed funds and used our asset/liability
management skills to earn additional spread income on the borrowed funds. These
activities were substantially curtailed in 2001. During the last five years, we
have divested or stopped pursuing a number of under-performing businesses, most
of which were incurring losses. Corporate and Other operations include these
divested and wind-down businesses, except for our divested healthcare business,
which is treated as a discontinued operation.
Wind-down Businesses
Group Credit Insurance
We ceased issuing new group policies in our group credit insurance
operations in 1996. We ceded through assumption reinsurance a significant
portion of the business pursuant to which the reinsurer assumes the role of the
insurer, or terminated substantially all of our outstanding balance business in
1997 and 1998. We estimate that a substantial majority of our remaining group
credit insurance business will expire by 2006, although the latest policy
expiration date is in 2027. As of December 31, 2001, our reserves for future
policy benefits and claims for the remaining in force group credit insurance
business total approximately $17.5 million.
Individual Health
In 1992, we ceased writing individual disability income policies and a year
later ceased writing hospital expense and major medical policies due to
declining sales and poor financial results. Most of our disability income
policies are noncancelable, which means that we can neither change the premium
nor cancel the coverage. The 1997 Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act guarantees renewal of all health policies. Under certain
circumstances, we are permitted to change the premiums charged for individual
health coverage if we can demonstrate that the premiums have not been
sufficient to pay claims and expenses. As of December 31, 2001, we had reserves
of $81 million for approximately 44,000 individual health policies and reserves
of $49 million for approximately 29,500 individual disability income policies
in effect at that date. As of July 1, 1999, we reinsured all the disability
income policies.
Canadian Operations
We have retained and continue to service several blocks of insurance not
sold with our divested Canadian businesses described under "--Divested
Businesses--Divested Canadian Businesses" below. These blocks represent
approximately $118 million of policy liabilities at December 31, 2001. These
blocks of insurance include the policies that are included in the Canadian
closed block described above under "--Demutualization and Related
Transactions--The Closed Blocks." A significant portion of the retained
business constitutes paid-up individual life insurance.
Divested Businesses
The following operations are businesses that we previously divested but that
do not qualify for "discontinued operations" accounting treatment under GAAP.
We include the results of these divested businesses in our income from
continuing operations before income taxes, but we exclude these results from
our adjusted operating income. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Consolidated Results of
Operations--Adjusted Operating Income" for an explanation of adjusted operating
income.
33
<PAGE>
Lead-Managed Equity Underwriting for Corporate Issuers and Institutional Fixed
Income Activities of Prudential Securities
In the fourth quarter of 2000, we announced a restructuring of Prudential
Securities' activities to implement a fundamental shift in our business
strategy. We have exited the lead-managed equity underwriting for corporate
issuers and institutional fixed income businesses. The total reduction in
staffing from the former lead-managed underwriting and institutional fixed
income businesses of Prudential Securities involved approximately 700 positions.
Gibraltar Casualty
On September 19, 2000, we sold all of the stock of Gibraltar Casualty
Company, our commercial property and casualty insurer that we had placed in
wind-down status in 1985. Gibraltar Casualty's business consisted
primarily of surplus and excess lines insurance, including property, casualty,
professional liability and product liability, underwritten for medium to large
corporations. As of the date of sale, Gibraltar Casualty's largest continuing
exposures were potential liabilities for asbestos and environmental damages.
The ultimate liability for asbestos and environmental claims cannot be
estimated using traditional reserving techniques due to significant
uncertainties. In addition, Gibraltar Casualty faced potential liability
arising from claims for latent injury product exposures involving silicone
implants, HIV-contaminated blood products and pharmaceutical products. Upon
closing of the sale, we entered into a stop-loss agreement with the purchaser
under which we will reinsure the purchaser for up to 80% of the first $200
million of any adverse loss development in excess of Gibraltar Casualty's
carried reserves as of the closing date of the transaction. We believe that any
payments ultimately made pursuant to the stop-loss agreement will not have a
material adverse effect on our financial position.
Divested Canadian Businesses
We previously sold individual and group life insurance, annuities and group
health insurance in Canada through a Canadian branch of Prudential Insurance
and through Prudential of America Life Insurance Company, as well as property
and casualty insurance through Prudential of America General Insurance Company
(Canada) and OTIP/RAEO Benefits Incorporated. In 1996, except as noted above,
we sold substantially all of the Canadian branch's operations and policies in
force and all of our Canadian property and casualty operations. Also, in 2000,
we sold our interest in Prudential of America Life Insurance Company.
In the sale of the life insurance operations, the purchaser assumed through
assumption reinsurance, pursuant to which it assumed our role as insurer,
approximately $3 billion of our insurance and annuity liabilities, received an
equal amount of investment assets to support the assumed liabilities and
purchased substantially all of the Canadian branch's operating assets. We have
indemnified the purchaser for damages with respect to any claims related to
sales practices or market conduct issues arising from the Canadian branch's
operations prior to the sale. We retained no policy liabilities with respect to
the property and casualty insurance business following that company's sale.
While there can be no assurance, we believe we have reserved in all material
respects for any contingent liabilities arising from these divested Canadian
businesses prior to sale. In connection with the sales, we agreed to refrain
from conducting new individual and group life and health insurance, annuity,
property and casualty insurance and mutual funds business in Canada for five
years from the applicable sale date.
Residential First Mortgage Banking
Prior to May 1996, we conducted substantial residential first mortgage
banking and related operations through The Prudential Home Mortgage Company,
Inc. and its affiliates. Prudential Home Mortgage originated and purchased
residential first mortgage loans and generally sold the loans it originated and
purchased, through both direct sales and securitizations, while retaining the
servicing rights and ongoing servicing fees. We decided to sell Prudential Home
Mortgage in 1995 and sold substantially all of the business operations and
mortgage loan inventory and approximately two-thirds of the loan servicing
rights in 1996. In 1997, we sold substantially all of the remaining loan
servicing rights and, since 1996, have sold most of its remaining first
mortgage loans, foreclosed properties and other assets.
We remain liable with respect to claims concerning these operations prior to
sale, including claims made by borrowers under the loans Prudential Home
Mortgage originated or serviced, purchasers of the loans Prudential Home
Mortgage sold, investors in the mortgage-backed securities issued in the
securitizations and purchasers of
34
<PAGE>
the operations and servicing rights. Since the sale of the operations, we have
been involved in a number of class action lawsuits relating to Prudential Home
Mortgage's operations prior to sale that remain pending. These class action
lawsuits primarily allege that certain of Prudential Home Mortgage's loan
origination or servicing practices violated applicable federal or state
consumer protection laws. While we believe that as of December 31, 2001 we had
adequately reserved in all material respects for the remaining liabilities
associated with Prudential Home Mortgage, we may be required to take additional
charges that could be material to our results of operations.
Closed Block Business
As a mutual insurance company, we issued most of our individual life
insurance products on a "participating" basis, whereby policyholders are
eligible to receive policyholder dividends reflecting experience. These life
insurance products were historically included in our Traditional Participating
Products segment. In connection with the demutualization, we ceased offering
domestic participating products. The liabilities for our individual in force
participating products were segregated, together with assets that will be used
exclusively for the payment of benefits and policyholder dividends, expenses
and taxes with respect to these products, in the Closed Block. We selected the
amount and type of Closed Block Assets and Closed Block Liabilities included in
the Closed Block so that the Closed Block Assets initially had a lower book
value than the Closed Block Liabilities. We expect that the Closed Block Assets
will generate sufficient cash flow, together with anticipated revenues from the
Closed Block Policies, over the life of the Closed Block to fund payments of
all policyholder benefits to be paid to, and the reasonable dividend
expectations of, policyholders of the Closed Block Policies. We also segregated
for accounting purposes the Surplus and Related Assets that we need to hold
outside the Closed Block to meet capital requirements related to the products
included within the Closed Block. No policies sold after demutualization will
be added to the Closed Block and its in force business is expected to
ultimately decline as we pay policyholder benefits in full. We expect the
proportion of our business represented by the Closed Block to decline as we
grow other businesses. A minor portion of our Traditional Participating
Products segment consisted of other traditional insurance products that are not
included in the Closed Block.
Historically, the participating products included in the Closed Block have
yielded lower returns on capital invested than many of our other businesses.
The separation for reporting purposes of the Closed Block Business from our
Financial Services Businesses permits us to better identify the results of
these businesses. However, the relatively lower returns on traditional
participating products will continue to affect our consolidated results of
operations for many years.
Our strategy for the Closed Block Business is to maintain the Closed Block
as required by our Plan of Reorganization over the time period of its gradual
diminishment as policyholder benefits are paid in full. As discussed in Note 9
to the Consolidated Financial Statements, if performance of the Closed Block is
more favorable than we originally assumed in funding, we will pay the excess to
Closed Block policyholders as additional policyholder dividends, and it will
not be available to shareholders. For discussion of the Closed Block Business,
see "--Demutualization and Related Transactions."
Discontinued Operations--Healthcare
Overview and Principal Sale Transaction
We sold substantially all of the assets and liabilities of our group managed
and indemnity healthcare business to Aetna Inc. in a transaction that closed on
August 6, 1999.
We agreed not to re-enter, directly or through acquisitions, the group
managed or indemnity healthcare business until August 6, 2004. We also entered
into a trademark license agreement that granted Aetna a non-exclusive license
to use certain Prudential trademarks in connection with the disposed healthcare
business until January 31, 2002, subject to extension in certain circumstances.
Aetna has requested an extension of this agreement.
35
<PAGE>
The sale to Aetna did not include our 50% interest in Rush Prudential Health
Plans, a joint venture with Rush-Presbyterian--St. Luke's Medical Center of
Chicago that provided managed and indemnity health care coverages. On March 1,
2000, we and our joint venture partner completed the sale of this joint venture
to WellPoint Health Networks, Inc.
We retained all liabilities associated with litigation that existed at the
closing date or commenced within two years of that date (i.e., August 6, 2001)
with respect to claims relating to events that occurred prior to the closing
date. While we believe that at December 31, 2001 we had adequately reserved in
all material respects for remaining costs and liabilities associated with the
healthcare business, taking into account amounts paid and received to date, we
may be required to take additional charges that could be material to our
results of operations.
Intangible and Intellectual Property
We use numerous federal, state and foreign service and trademarks. We
believe that the goodwill associated with many of our marks, particularly the
word marks "Prudential," "Prudential Insurance," "Prudential Securities,"
"Prudential Investments" and "Prudential Real Estate" and our "Rock" logo, are
significant competitive assets in the United States. In a number of countries
outside North and South America, primarily the United Kingdom, western Europe,
Hong Kong and Singapore, we are unable to use the "Prudential" name. Where
these limitations apply, we combine our "Rock" logo with alternative word
marks. We believe that these limitations do not materially affect our ability
to operate or expand internationally.
General Account Investments
We maintain a diversified investment portfolio in our insurance companies to
support our liabilities to customers in our Financial Services Businesses,
including the U.S. Consumer, Employee Benefits and International divisions and
certain of our Corporate and Other operations, and the Closed Block Business,
as well as our other general liabilities. Our general account does not include
assets of our securities brokerage, securities trading, banking operations,
assets of our asset management operations managed for third parties, and
separate account assets for which the customer assumes risks of ownership.
Management of Investments
We design asset mix strategies for our general account to match the
characteristics of our products and other obligations and seek to closely
approximate the interest rate sensitivity of the assets with the estimated
interest rate sensitivity of the product liabilities. We achieve income
objectives through asset/liability management and strategic and tactical asset
allocations within a disciplined risk management framework. Our asset
allocation also reflects our desire for broad diversification across asset
classes, sectors and issuers.
The Investment Committee of our Board of Directors oversees our proprietary
investments. It also reviews performance and risk positions quarterly. Our
Senior Vice President, Asset Liability and Risk Management approves the
investment policy for the general account assets of our insurance subsidiaries
and oversees the investment process for our general account. Under his
direction, the Asset Liability and Risk Management Group develops investment
objectives, performance factors and measurement and asset allocation ranges.
The Asset Liability and Risk Management Group works closely with each of our
business units to ensure that the specific characteristics of our products are
incorporated into its processes. The Asset Liability and Risk Management Group
has the authority to initiate tactical shifts within exposure ranges approved
annually by the Investment Committee. The Investment Management and Advisory
Services segment manages virtually all of
36
<PAGE>
our investments, other than those of our International Insurance operations,
under the Asset Liability and Risk Management Group's direction. Our
International Insurance operations manage the majority of their investments
locally.
Asset/Liability Management
The Asset Liability and Risk Management Group uses a disciplined,
risk-controlled approach to asset/liability management. The methodology focuses
on aligning assets to the effective sensitivity of the cash flow and return
requirements of our liabilities. The Asset Liability and Risk Management Group
consults with the product experts in the business units on an ongoing basis to
arrive at asset/liability matching policies and decisions. We adjust this
dynamic process as products change, as we develop new products and as changes
in the market environment occur.
We develop asset strategies for specific classes of product liabilities and
attributed or accumulated surplus, each with distinct risk characteristics. We
categorize products in the following four classes:
. interest-crediting products, for which the rates credited to customers are
periodically adjusted to reflect market and competitive forces and actual
investment experience, such as fixed annuities;
. participating individual and experience rated group products, in which
customers participate in actual investment and business results through
annual dividends, interest or return of premium;
. guaranteed products, for which there are price or rate guarantees for the
life of the contract, such as GICs; and
. other products, such as automobile and homeowners insurance.
We determine a target asset mix for each product class that we reflect in
our investment policies. Our asset/liability management process has permitted
us to manage interest-sensitive products successfully through several market
cycles.
Summary of Investments
Since the date of demutalization, we have allocated our investments between
the Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block Business. Accordingly, the
following tables provide investment information allocated between the Financial
Services Businesses and Closed Block Business as of December 31, 2001.
The following table sets forth the composition of the investments of our
general account as of the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
--------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
---------------------------------- --------------
Financial Closed
Services Block % of % of
Businesses Business Total Total Total Total
---------- -------- -------- ----- -------- -----
($ in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fixed maturities:
Public available for sale, at fair value...... $51,173 $26,634 $ 77,807 51.8% $ 62,454 47.6%
Public held to maturity, at amortized cost.... 318 -- 318 0.2 757 0.6
Private available for sale, at fair value..... 17,612 14,428 32,040 21.3 21,294 16.2
Private held to maturity, at amortized cost... 53 -- 53 0.0 11,686 8.9
Trading account assets, at fair value............ 112 -- 112 0.1 3 0.0
Equity securities, at fair value................. 1,675 584 2,259 1.5 2,315 1.8
Commercial loans, at book value.................. 13,070 6,106 19,176 12.8 15,418 11.8
Other long-term investments(1)................... 4,013 1,082 5,095 3.4 4,259 3.2
Policy loans, at outstanding balance............. 2,812 5,758 8,570 5.7 8,046 6.1
Short-term investments, at amortized cost........ 2,972 1,882 4,854 3.2 4,963 3.8
------- ------- -------- ----- -------- -----
Total investments............................. $93,810 $56,474 $150,284 100.0% $131,195 100.0%
======= ======= ======== ===== ======== =====
</TABLE>
- --------
(1)Other long-term investments consist of real estate and non-real estate
related investments in joint ventures and partnerships, investment real
estate held through direct ownership, our interest in separate account
investments and other miscellaneous investments.
The overall income yield on our general account invested assets after
investment expenses, but excluding realized investment gains (losses), was
5.58% for the year ended December 31, 2001, 6.85% for 2000 and 6.97% for 1999.
The decline in yield on the portfolio in 2001 from 2000 reflects the addition
of lower-yielding
37
<PAGE>
investments due to the acquisition of Gibraltar Life in April 2001. The
annualized yield on the investment portfolio of our Japanese insurance
operations, including Gibraltar Life, for the year ended December 31, 2001 was
1.52%. In addition, reinvestment at lower interest rates during 2001 reduced
the yield on our domestic asset base.
The following table sets forth the income yield and investment income,
excluding realized investment gains/losses, for each major asset category of
our general account for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------
Financial Services Businesses Closed Block Business Combined Combined
----------------------------- --------------------- ------------ ------------
Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Total Yield Total
----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------
($ in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fixed maturities..................... 5.60% $3,820 7.62% $3,013 6.37% $6,833 7.54% $6,958
Equity securities.................... 0.78 19 2.76 26 1.30 45 2.42 67
Commercial loans..................... 6.40 761 8.80 634 7.27 1,395 8.23 1,255
Policy loans......................... 5.81 164 6.44 358 6.22 522 6.34 478
Short-term investments and cash
equivalents......................... 2.32 251 4.62 202 2.98 453 7.58 683
Other investments.................... 7.27 252 5.69 76 6.96 328 9.54 420
---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ------
Total before investment expenses.. 5.28% $5,267 7.32% $4,309 6.06% $9,576 7.54% $9,861
Total after investment expenses... 4.93% $4,938 6.62% $3,897 5.58% $8,835 6.85% $8,990
</TABLE>
Portfolio composition is a critical element of the investment management
process. The composition of our general account reflects, within the discipline
provided by our risk management approach, our need for competitive results and
the diverse selection of investment alternatives available through our
Investment Management and Advisory Services segment. The size of our portfolio
enables us to invest in asset classes that may be unavailable to the typical
investor.
Fixed Maturity Securities
We held approximately 73% of general account assets in fixed maturity
securities at December 31, 2001, unchanged from 73% at December 31, 2000. These
securities include both publicly traded and privately placed debt securities.
In our international portfolios, our investments are predominantly foreign
government securities.
Subject to our adjusted operating income objectives, we manage our public
portfolio to a risk profile directed by the Asset Liability and Risk Management
Group and in the case of our international insurance subsidiaries, to a profile
that reflects local market regulations and our investment competencies in these
markets. We seek to employ relative value analysis both in credit selection and
in purchasing and selling securities. To the extent that we actively purchase
and sell securities as part of portfolio selection and portfolio rebalancing,
the total return that we earn on the portfolio will be reflected both as
investment income and also as realized gains or losses on investments. We
expect that using this strategy in a declining interest rate environment will
result in lower investment income partially offset by realized investment gains
and that using this strategy when rates are rising will result in increased
investment income partially offset by realized investment losses.
We use our private placement and asset-backed portfolios to enhance the
diversification and yield of our overall fixed maturity portfolio. Within our
domestic portfolios, we maintain a private fixed income portfolio that is
larger than the industry average as a percentage of total fixed income
holdings, according to A.M. Best. Our investment staff directly originates
approximately half of all of our private placements. Our origination capability
offers the opportunity to lead transactions and gives us the opportunity for
better terms, including covenants and call protection, and to take advantage of
innovative deal structures.
Our credit and portfolio management processes help ensure prudent controls
over valuation and management of the private portfolio. We have separate
pricing and authorization processes to establish "checks and balances" for new
investments. We apply consistent standards of credit analysis and due diligence
for all transactions, whether they originate through our own in-house
origination staff or through agents. Our regional offices closely monitor the
portfolios in their regions. We set all valuation standards centrally, and we
assess the fair value of all investments quarterly.
38
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the composition of our fixed maturity
portfolio by industry category as of the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
2001
-------------------------------------------------------
Financial Services Businessess Closed Block Business
------------------------------ ------------------------
% of % of
Amortized Total Fair Amortized Total Fair
Cost Cost Value Cost Cost Value
--------- ----- ------- --------- ----- -------
($ in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. Government........ $ 5,274 7.8% $ 5,382 $ 4,563 11.4% $ 4,666
Manufacturing.......... 11,418 16.9 11,684 7,742 19.3 7,834
Utilities.............. 7,531 11.1 7,883 6,316 15.7 6,494
Finance................ 7,661 11.3 7,918 4,268 10.6 4,402
Services............... 6,652 9.8 6,774 5,078 12.6 5,176
Mortgage-backed........ 1,788 2.7 1,868 3,381 8.4 3,446
Foreign government..... 16,486 24.4 16,698 942 2.3 1,006
Retail and wholesale... 2,265 3.4 2,321 2,399 6.0 2,449
Asset-backed securities 5,175 7.7 5,281 2,356 5.9 2,399
Transportation......... 1,795 2.7 1,779 1,275 3.2 1,268
Energy................. 773 1.1 809 799 2.0 819
Other.................. 753 1.1 780 1,052 2.6 1,103
------- ----- ------- ------- ----- -------
Total................ $67,571 100.0% $69,177 $40,171 100.0% $41,062
======= ===== ======= ======= ===== =======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
-------------------------- --------------------------
Total Total
-------------------------- --------------------------
% of Estimated % of Estimated
Amortized Total Fair Amortized Total Fair
Cost Cost Value Cost Cost Value
--------- ----- --------- --------- ----- ---------
($ in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. Government........ $ 9,837 9.1% $ 10,048 $10,109 10.6% $10,639
Manufacturing.......... 19,160 17.7 19,518 18,864 19.7 18,689
Utilities.............. 13,847 12.9 14,377 15,688 16.4 15,771
Finance................ 11,929 11.1 12,320 11,792 12.3 11,931
Services............... 11,730 10.9 11,950 11,264 11.8 11,204
Mortgage-backed........ 5,169 4.8 5,314 6,495 6.8 6,669
Foreign government..... 17,428 16.2 17,704 4,650 4.9 4,853
Retail and wholesale... 4,664 4.3 4,770 4,022 4.2 4,005
Asset-backed securities 7,531 7.0 7,680 6,063 6.4 6,068
Transportation......... 3,070 2.8 3,047 3,233 3.4 3,199
Energy................. 1,572 1.5 1,628 937 1.0 947
Other.................. 1,805 1.7 1,883 2,361 2.5 2,382
-------- ----- -------- ------- ----- -------
Total............... $107,742 100.0% $110,239 $95,478 100.0% $96,357
======== ===== ======== ======= ===== =======
</TABLE>
At December 31, 2001, securities backed by residential mortgage loans made
up less than 5% of our fixed maturity investments. Nearly 95% of the
mortgage-backed securities in the general account were publicly traded agency
pass-through securities. Collateralized mortgage obligations represented only
5% of our total mortgage-backed securities, and less than 0.2% of fixed
maturities. The primary risk of these mortgage-backed securities is the rate at
which the loans are prepaid. The loans can generally be prepaid at any time
without penalty. As a general rule, when the interest rates on the loans
underlying the securities are significantly higher than prevailing interest
rates on similar loans, borrowers are more likely to prepay their loans, and we
would likely reinvest the prepayment proceeds in lower interest rate
obligations, with a resulting net reduction of our future investment income.
The amortized cost of our below-investment grade fixed maturities as of
December 31, 2001 totaled $10.2 billion, or 9.5%, of total fixed maturities on
that date, compared to $10.2 billion, or 10.7%, as of December 31, 2000. The
decrease in the percentage of below-investment grade fixed maturities at
December 31, 2001 from a year earlier came primarily from the addition of
Gibraltar Life's investment portfolio in April 2001.
39
<PAGE>
The NAIC evaluates the investments of insurers for regulatory reporting
purposes and assigns fixed maturity securities to one of six categories called
"NAIC Designations." NAIC designations of "1" or "2" include fixed maturities
considered investment grade, which include securities rated Baa3 or higher by
Moody's or BBB- or higher by S&P. NAIC Designations of "3" through "6" are
referred to as below investment grade, which include securities rated Ba1 or
lower by Moody's and BB+ or lower by S&P. The fixed maturity securities
designated as NAIC 6 include securities that are not rated. The following
tables set forth our public and private fixed maturity portfolios by NAIC
rating as of the dates indicated.
Public Fixed Maturities by Credit Quality
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------
2001
--------------------------------------------------------
Financial Services Businesses Closed Block Business
----------------------------- --------------------------
% of Estimated % of Estimated
NAIC Amortized Total Fair Amortized Total Fair
Rating Rating Agency Equivalent Cost Cost Value Cost Cost Value
- ------ ------------------------ --------- ----- --------- --------- ----- ---------
($ in millions)
<C> <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1 Aaa, Aa, A........... $36,706 72.6% $37,502 $17,514 67.2% $17,993
2 Baa.................. 11,286 22.3 11,484 6,257 24.0 6,348
3 Ba................... 1,501 3.0 1,518 1,392 5.3 1,419
4 B.................... 683 1.4 646 753 2.9 739
5 C and lower.......... 112 0.2 116 122 0.5 122
6 In or near default... 246 0.5 241 12 0.1 13
------- ----- ------- ------- ----- -------
Total................ $50,534 100.0% $51,507 $26,050 100.0% $26,634
======= ===== ======= ======= ===== =======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
-------------------------- --------------------------
Total Total
-------------------------- --------------------------
% of Estimated % of Estimated
NAIC Amortized Total Fair Amortized Total Fair
Rating Rating Agency Equivalent Cost Cost Value Cost Cost Value
- ------ ------------------------ --------- ----- --------- --------- ----- ---------
($ in millions)
<C> <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1 Aaa, Aa, A........... $54,220 70.8% $55,495 $42,311 67.6% $43,208
2 Baa.................. 17,543 22.9 17,832 15,346 24.5 15,273
3 Ba................... 2,893 3.8 2,937 2,427 3.9 2,401
4 B.................... 1,436 1.9 1,385 2,125 3.4 2,004
5 C and lower.......... 234 0.3 238 369 0.6 331
6 In or near default... 258 0.3 254 12 0.0 11
------- ----- ------- ------- ----- -------
Total................ $76,584 100.0% $78,141 $62,590 100.0% $63,228
======= ===== ======= ======= ===== =======
</TABLE>
40
<PAGE>
Private Fixed Maturities by Credit Quality
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------
2001
--------------------------------------------------------
Financial Services Businesses Closed Block Business
----------------------------- --------------------------
% of Estimated % of Estimated
NAIC Amortized Total Fair Amortized Total Fair
Rating Rating Agency Equivalent Cost Cost Value Cost Cost Value
- ------ ------------------------ --------- ----- --------- --------- ----- ---------
($ in millions)
<C> <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1 Aaa, Aa, A........... $ 5,982 35.1% $ 6,337 $ 4,091 29.0% $ 4,231
2 Baa.................. 8,148 47.8 8,399 7,543 53.4 7,751
3 Ba................... 1,487 8.7 1,529 1,419 10.1 1,415
4 B.................... 917 5.4 883 674 4.8 642
5 C and lower.......... 390 2.3 401 344 2.4 338
6 In or near default... 112 0.7 121 50 0.3 51
------- ----- ------- ------- ----- -------
Total................ $17,036 100.0% $17,670 $14,121 100.0% $14,428
======= ===== ======= ======= ===== =======
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
-------------------------- --------------------------
Total Total
-------------------------- --------------------------
% of Estimated % of Estimated
NAIC Amortized Total Fair Amortized Total Fair
Rating Rating Agency Equivalent Cost Cost Value Cost Cost Value
- ------ ------------------------ --------- ----- --------- --------- ----- ---------
($ in millions)
<C> <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1 Aaa, Aa, A........... $10,073 32.3% $10,568 $11,379 34.6% $11,631
2 Baa.................. 15,691 50.4 16,150 16,122 49.0 16,253
3 Ba................... 2,906 9.3 2,944 2,897 8.8 2,843
4 B.................... 1,591 5.1 1,525 1,893 5.8 1,792
5 C and lower.......... 734 2.4 739 405 1.2 382
6 In or near default... 162 0.5 172 192 0.6 228
------- ----- ------- ------- ----- -------
Total................ $31,157 100.0% $32,098 $32,888 100.0% $33,129
======= ===== ======= ======= ===== =======
</TABLE>
We maintain separate monitoring processes for domestic public and private
fixed maturities and create watch lists to highlight securities which require
special scrutiny and management. Our domestic public fixed maturity asset
managers formally review all public fixed maturity holdings on a monthly basis
and more frequently when necessary to identify potential credit deterioration
whether due to ratings downgrades, unexpected price variances, and/or industry
specific concerns. We classify public fixed maturity securities of issuers that
have defaulted as loans not in good standing and all other public watch list
assets as closely monitored.
Included in the above tables are investments of our Japanese insurance
companies, which comprise substantially all of our international general
account investments. The investments of our Japanese insurance companies are
not subject to NAIC guidelines; however, they are regulated locally by the
Financial Services Agency, an agency of the Japanese government. The Financial
Services Agency has its own investment quality criteria and risk control
standards. Our Japanese insurance companies comply with all of the Financial
Services Agency's credit quality review and risk monitoring guidelines.
However, the credit quality ratings of the investments of our Japanese
insurance companies included in the tables above are based on ratings assigned
by Moody's.
Our private fixed maturity asset managers conduct specific servicing tests
on each investment on an ongoing basis to determine whether the investment is
in compliance or should be placed on the watch list or assigned an early
warning classification. We assign early warning classifications to those
issuers that have failed a servicing test or experienced a minor covenant
default, and we continue to monitor them for
41
<PAGE>
improvement or deterioration. In certain situations, the general account
benefits from negotiated rate increases or fees resulting from a covenant
breach. We assign closely monitored status to those investments that have been
recently restructured or for which restructuring is a possibility due to
substantial credit deterioration or material covenant defaults. We classify as
not in good standing securities of issuers that are in more severe conditions,
for example, bankruptcy or payment default.
When a decline in value of a security is deemed to be other than temporary,
we record an impairment loss in our Consolidated Statements of Operations
within "Realized investment gains (losses), net."
Factors we consider in evaluating whether a decline in value is other than
temporary are: (1) whether this decline is substantial; (2) our ability and
intent to retain our investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for an
anticipated recovery in value; (3) the duration and extent to which the market
value has been less than cost; and (4) the financial condition and near-term
prospects of the issuer.
The following table sets forth the book value of our domestic public and
private fixed maturity portfolio watch list as of the dates indicated.
Fixed Maturities--Watch List
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
------------------------------------------- -----------
Financial Services Closed Block
Businesses Business Total Total
----------------- ----------- ----------- -----------
% of Book % of Book % of Book % of
Book Value Total Value Total Value Total Value Total
---------- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
($ in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Closely monitored............ $644 1.0% $484 1.2% $1,128 1.1% $1,147 1.2%
Not in good standing......... 335 0.5 40 0.1 375 0.3 209 0.2
---- --- ---- --- ------ --- ------ ---
Total..................... $979 1.5% $524 1.3% $1,503 1.4% $1,356 1.4%
==== === ==== === ====== === ====== ===
</TABLE>
Commercial Loans
As of December 31, 2001, we held approximately 13% of our general account
portfolio in commercial loans, essentially unchanged from December 31, 2000.
The portfolio as of December 31, 2001, consisted of $13.1 billion of commercial
mortgage loans, $3.5 billion of residential and agricultural loans and $3.1
billion of consumer loans. These values are gross of a $535 million allowance
for losses.
We originate commercial mortgages through two sources, both managed out of
three regional offices in Atlanta, Chicago and San Francisco. The direct
channel, staffed by Prudential investment personnel, originates loans with
principal amounts of $20 million and higher. The Pru Express channel uses a
network of independent companies to originate loans in the $2 million to $20
million range. All loans are underwritten consistently to Prudential standards
using our proprietary rating system that was developed using our experience in
real estate and mortgage lending.
Consumer loans are loans extended by Gibraltar Life to individuals for
financing purchases of consumer goods and services and are guaranteed by third
party guarantor companies.
Our loan portfolio strategy emphasizes diversification by property type and
geographic location. The following tables set forth the breakdown of the
carrying values of our commercial loan portfolio by geographic region and
property type as of the dates indicated.
42
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
------------------------------------------------- --------------
Financial Services Closed Block
Businesses Business Total Total
----------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of Carrying % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total Value Total Value Total
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Commercial loans by region ($ in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. Regions
Pacific.......................... $ 2,670 19.7% $2,364 38.2% $ 5,034 25.5% $ 4,969 31.8%
South Atlantic................... 1,768 13.1 1,139 18.4 2,907 14.8 2,922 18.7
Middle Atlantic.................. 1,509 11.2 938 15.2 2,447 12.4 2,583 16.5
East North Central............... 954 7.1 437 7.1 1,391 7.1 1,591 10.2
Mountain......................... 420 3.1 432 7.0 852 4.3 921 5.9
West South Central............... 594 4.4 349 5.6 943 4.8 944 6.0
West North Central............... 389 2.9 239 3.9 628 3.2 733 4.7
New England...................... 385 2.8 146 2.4 531 2.7 519 3.3
East South Central............... 208 1.5 137 2.2 345 1.7 393 2.5
Other............................ 33 0.2 -- -- 33 0.2 55 0.3
------- ----- ------ ----- ------- ----- ------- -----
Subtotal--United States........ $ 8,930 66.0% $6,181 100.0% $15,111 76.7% $15,630 99.9%
------- ----- ------ ----- ------- ----- ------- -----
Asia.............................. 4,596 34.0 -- -- 4,596 23.3 9 0.1
------- ----- ------ ----- ------- ----- ------- -----
Total commercial loans......... $13,526 100.0% $6,181 100.0% $19,707 100.0% $15,639 100.0%
======= ===== ====== ===== ======= ===== ======= =====
</TABLE>
Commercial loans in Japan and California accounted for $4.5 billion and $4.1
billion, respectively, of the foregoing as of December 31, 2001.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
------------------------------------------------- --------------
Financial Services Closed Block
Businesses Business Total Total
----------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of Carrring % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total Value Total Value Total
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
($ in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Collateralized loans by property type
Apartment complexes.................. $ 2,839 21.0% $1,370 22.2% $ 4,209 21.4% 4,455 28.5%
Office buildings..................... 2,120 15.7 1,432 23.1 3,552 18.0 3,719 23.8
Retail stores........................ 1,162 8.6 894 14.5 2,056 10.4 2,465 15.8
Industrial buildings................. 1,351 10.0 1,335 21.6 2,686 13.6 2,331 14.9
Residential properties............... 1,615 11.9 14 0.2 1,629 8.3 215 1.4
Agricultural properties.............. 1,037 7.7 871 14.1 1,908 9.7 1,857 11.8
Other................................ 304 2.2 265 4.3 569 2.9 597 3.8
------- ----- ------ ----- ------- ----- ------- -----
Subtotal of collateralized loans.. $10,428 77.1% $6,181 100.0% $16,609 84.3% $15,639 100.0%
Uncollateralized loans
Gibraltar Life uncollateralized loans 3,098 22.9 -- -- 3,098 15.7 -- --
------- ----- ------ ----- ------- ----- ------- -----
Total commercial loans............ $13,526 100.0% $6,181 100.0% $19,707 100.0% $15,639 100.0%
======= ===== ====== ===== ======= ===== ======= =====
</TABLE>
43
<PAGE>
The following table sets forth the distribution of principal maturities of
our commercial loan portfolio.
Commercial Loan Maturities
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
--------------------------------------------------- ---------------
Financial Services Closed Block
Businesses Business Total Total
----------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Principal Principal Principal Principal
Balance % of Balance %of Balance % of Balance % of
Maturing Total Maturing Total Maturing Total Maturing Total
--------- ----- --------- ----- --------- ----- --------- -----
($ in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Due in one year or less.... $ 2,888 21.3% $ 112 1.8% $ 3,000 15.2% $ 557 3.6%
Due in two to three years.. 918 6.8 346 5.6 1,264 6.5 945 6.0
Due in three to four years. 1,474 10.9 604 9.8 2,078 10.6 830 5.3
Due in four to five years.. 1,121 8.3 421 6.8 1,542 7.8 1,545 9.9
Due in five to six years... 838 6.2 366 5.9 1,204 6.1 1,396 8.9
Due in six to seven years.. 945 7.0 626 10.1 1,571 8.0 1,014 6.5
Due in seven to eight years 1,080 8.0 703 11.4 1,783 9.0 1,376 8.8
Due in eight to nine years. 1,231 9.1 545 8.8 1,776 9.0 1,561 10.0
Due in nine to ten years... 607 4.5 321 5.2 928 4.7 1,673 10.7
Due in more than ten years. 2,424 17.9 2,137 34.6 4,561 23.1 4,742 30.3
------- ----- ------- ----- ------- ----- ------- -----
Total................... $13,526 100.0% $6,181 100.0% $19,707 100.0% $15,639 100.0%
======= ===== ======= ===== ======= ===== ======= =====
</TABLE>
We evaluate our commercial loans on a quarterly basis for watch list status
based on compliance with various financial ratios and other covenants set forth
in the loan agreements, borrower credit quality, property condition and other
factors. We may place loans on early warning status in cases where we detect
that the physical condition of the property, the financial situation of the
borrower or tenant, or other factors could lead to a loss of principal or
interest. We classify as closely monitored those loans that have experienced
material covenant defaults or substantial credit or collateral deterioration.
Not in good standing loans are those for which there is a high probability of
loss of principal, such as when the borrower is in bankruptcy or the loan is in
foreclosure. In our domestic operations, an experienced staff of workout
professionals actively manages the loans in the closely monitored and not in
good standing categories. In our international portfolios, we monitor
delinquency in consumer loans on a pool basis and evaluate any servicing
relationship and guarantees, the same way we do for commercial loans.
The following table shows the percentages of our mortgage loan portfolio
that are delinquent but not in foreclosure, delinquent and in foreclosure,
restructured and foreclosed as well as the industry averages.
Mortgage Loan Comparisons
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
----------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
----------------------------------- ---------------
Financial Closed
Services Block ACLI ACLI
Businesses Business Total Average(1) Total Average(1)
---------- -------- ----- ---------- ----- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Delinquent, not in foreclosure 0.47% -- % 0.28% 0.05% 0.13% 0.28%
Delinquent, in foreclosure.... 0.10 -- 0.06 0.07 -- 0.15
Restructured.................. 2.05 0.47 1.41 0.98 1.45 1.50
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Subtotal................... 2.62 0.47 1.75 1.10 1.58 1.93
Loans foreclosed during period 0.06 0.53 0.25 0.24 0.38 0.22
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Total mortgage loans....... 2.68% 1.00% 2.00% 1.34% 1.96% 2.15%
==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Represents the average for the U.S. life insurance industry according to
The American Council of Life Insurers.
The low level of delinquencies and loans in process of foreclosure is
primarily attributable to the strong commercial real estate market in the
United States during the above periods.
44
<PAGE>
Equity Securities
We held approximately 2% of general account assets in equity securities as
of December 31, 2001, essentially unchanged from December 31, 2000. These
securities consist of investments in common stock, including shares of real
estate investment trusts. Approximately 88% of our equity securities are
publicly traded on national securities exchanges. For the years ended December
31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, net realized investment gains (losses) from sales and
impairments of equity securities were $(245) million, $450 million and $223
million, respectively.
Other Long-Term Investments
The general account's "Other long-term investments" include investments in
joint ventures and limited partnerships of $2.1 billion and $2.4 billion as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. These investments include $1.0
billion and $1.4 billion in real estate related interests and $1.1 billion and
$1.0 billion in non-real estate related interests as of December 31, 2001 and
2000, respectively.
"Other long-term investments" also includes the general account's interests
in separate accounts of $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion, investment real estate
held through direct ownership of $1.1 billion and $0.2 billion and other
miscellaneous investments of $0.8 billion and $0.6 billion as of December 31,
2001 and 2000, respectively.
Ratings
Claims-paying and credit ratings are important factors affecting public
confidence in an insurer and its competitive position in marketing products.
Rating organizations continually review the financial performance and condition
of insurers, including Prudential Insurance and our other insurance company
subsidiaries. Our credit ratings are also important to our ability to raise
capital through the issuance of debt and to the cost of such financing.
The following table summarizes the current ratings from S&P, Moody's, A.M.
Best and Fitch for our rated U.S. insurance companies, Prudential Insurance's
outstanding rated debt securities, the indebtedness issued through Prudential
Financial and Prudential Funding, LLC and the long-term counterparty rating of
Prudential Securities Group Inc. ("PSGI"). Claims-paying ratings represent the
opinions of rating agencies regarding the financial ability of an insurance
company to meet its obligations under an insurance policy. Credit ratings
represent the opinions of rating agencies regarding an entity's ability to
repay its indebtedness.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
A.M.
S&P(1) Moody's(2) Best(3) Fitch(4)
------ ---------- ------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Insurance Claims-Paying Ratings:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America....................... A+ A1 A AA-
PRUCO Life Insurance Company...................................... A+ A1 A NR*
PRUCO Life Insurance Company of New Jersey........................ A+ A1 A NR
Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company.................. A A1 A- NR
The Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company of New Jersey NR A1 A- NR
The Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (Prudential of Japan)...... AA- NR A+ NR
Gibraltar Life Insurance Company, Ltd............................. A A2 NR NR
Credit Ratings:
Prudential Financial, Inc.:
Short-term borrowings.......................................... A2 P2 AMB-1 F1
Long-term senior debt.......................................... A- A3 a- A
Redeemable Capital Securities.................................. A- A3 a- A
The Prudential Insurance Company of America:
Capital and surplus notes, due 2001-2005....................... A- A3 a- NR
Prudential Funding, LLC:
Commercial paper............................................... A1 P1 AMB-1 NR
Long-term senior debt.......................................... A+ A2 a NR
Prudential Securities Group Inc................................... BBB NR NR NR
</TABLE>
- --------
* "NR" indicates not rated.
45
<PAGE>
(1) Standard & Poor's Ratings Group's ("S&P") claims-paying ratings currently
range from "AAA (superior)" to "CCC (extremely vulnerable)." These ratings
reflect S&P's opinion of an operating insurance company's financial
capacity to meet the obligations of its insurance policies in accordance
with their terms. According to S&P's publications, "A+" rated insurance
companies have strong financial security characteristics, but are somewhat
more likely to be affected by adverse business conditions than insurers
with higher ratings. The symbol (+) following "A" shows a company's
relative standing within the "A" rating category. An insurer rated "AA" has
very strong financial security characteristics, differing only slightly
from those rated higher. A "+" or "-" indicates relative strength within a
category.
An S&P credit rating is a current opinion of the creditworthiness of an
obligor with respect to a specific financial obligation, a specific class of
financial obligations or a specific financial program. S&P's long-term issue
credit ratings range from "AAA (highest rating)" to "D (payment default)."
S&P publications indicate that an "A+" rated issue is somewhat more
susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic
condition than obligations in higher rated categories; however, the
obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitment to the obligation is
still strong. S&P short-term ratings range from "A-1 (highest category)" to
"D (payment default)." Within the A-1 category some obligations are
designated with a plus sign (+) indicating that the obligor's capacity to
meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong.
(2) Moody's Investors Service, Inc.'s ("Moody's") insurance claims-paying
ratings (sometimes referred to as "financial strength" ratings) currently
range from "Aaa (exceptional)" to "C (lowest rated)." Moody's insurance
ratings reflect the ability of insurance companies to repay punctually
senior policy-holder claims and obligations. Moody's indicates that "A1"
rated insurance companies offer good financial security, but elements may
be present which suggest a susceptibility to impairment sometimes in the
future. Numeric modifiers are used to refer to the ranking within the
group--with 1 being the highest and 3 being the lowest. However, the
financial strength of companies within a generic rating symbol ("A" for
example) is broadly the same.
Moody's credit ratings currently range from "Aaa (best quality)" to "C
(lowest rated)." Moody's credit ratings grade debt according to its
investment quality. Moody's considers "A2" and "A3" rated debt to be upper
medium grade obligations, and that while factors giving security to
principal and interest are considered adequate, elements may be present that
suggest a susceptibility to impairment sometime in the future.
Moody's short-term ratings are opinions of the ability of issuers to honor
senior financial obligations and contracts. Prime ratings range from
"Prime-1" (P-1), which represents a superior ability for repayment of senior
short-term debt obligations, to "Prime-1" (P-3), which represents an
acceptable ability for repayment of such obligations. Issuers rated "Not
Prime" do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.
(3) A.M. Best Company's ("A.M. Best") claims-paying ratings for insurance
companies currently range from "A++ (superior)" to "F (in liquidation)."
A.M. Best's ratings reflect its opinion of an insurance company's financial
strength, operating performance and ability to meet its obligations to
policyholders. A.M. Best considers "A" and "A-" rated companies to have a
strong ability to meet their ongoing obligations to policyholders.
An A.M. Best long-term credit rating is an opinion of the capacity and
willingness of an obligor to pay interest and principal in accordance with
the terms of the obligation. A.M. Best long-term credit ratings range from
"aaa (exceptional)" to "d (in default)," with ratings from "aaa" to "bbb"
considered as investment grade. A rating of "a" is assigned to issuers that
possess a low level of credit risk and a strong capacity to meet the terms
of the obligation.
An A.M. Best short-term credit rating reflects an opinion of the issuer's
fundamental credit quality. Ratings range from "AMB-1+," which represents an
exceptional ability to repay short-term debt obligations, to "AMB-4," which
correlates with a speculative ("bb") long-term rating.
(4) Fitch Ratings' ("Fitch") claims-paying ratings (sometimes referred to as
"financial strength" ratings) currently range from "AAA (negligible risk
factors)" to "DD (company is under an order of liquidation)." Fitch's
ratings reflect its assessment of the likelihood of timely payment of
policyholder and contractholder obligations. According to Fitch, "AA-"
companies have very high claims-paying ability, strong protection factors
and modest risk which may vary slightly over time due to economic and/or
underwriting conditions.
Fitch long-term ratings currently range from "AAA (highest credit quality),"
which denotes exceptionally strong capacity for timely payment of financial
commitments, to "D (default)." Investment grade ratings range between "AAA"
and "BBB." Short-term ratings range from "F1 (highest credit quality)" to "C
(high default risk)." Within long-term and short-term ratings, a "+" or a
"-" may be appended to a rating to denote relative status with major rating
categories.
The ratings set forth above with respect to Prudential Financial, Prudential
Insurance and our other insurance and financing subsidiaries reflect current
opinions of each rating organization with respect to claims-paying ability,
financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet obligations to
policyholders or debt holders, as the case may be. These ratings are of concern
to policyholders, agents and intermediaries. They are not directed toward
stockholders and do not in any way reflect evaluations of the safety and
security of the Common Stock. A downgrade in our claims-paying or credit
ratings could limit our ability to market products, increase the number or
value of policies being surrendered and/or hurt our relationships with
creditors or trading counterparties. Our claims-paying ratings are an important
factor affecting public confidence in most of our products and, as a result,
our competitiveness. The interest rates we pay on our borrowings are largely
dependent on our credit ratings.
46
<PAGE>
On February 7, 2002, S&P affirmed the ratings of PSGI and its subsidiary,
Prudential Securities Incorporated, but revised its outlook to negative, which
reflects the continued weak results at PSGI in 2001. Ratings could be lowered
if meaningful improvement in PSGI's core profitability is not forthcoming.
Competition
In each of our businesses we face intense competition from domestic and
foreign insurance companies, asset managers, investment banks and diversified
financial institutions. Many of our competitors are large and well-capitalized
and some have higher claims-paying or credit ratings than we do. We compete in
our businesses generally on the basis of price, quality of service, scope of
distribution, quality of products and brand recognition. The relative
importance of these factors depends on the particular product in question.
In recent years, there has been substantial consolidation and convergence
among companies in the financial services industry, particularly as the U.S.
laws separating banking and insurance have been relaxed, resulting in increased
competition from large, well-capitalized financial services firms. In
particular, a number of large commercial banks, insurance companies and other
broad-based financial services firms have established or acquired other
financial services businesses such as a broker-dealer or an insurance company.
Many of these firms also have been able to increase their distribution systems
through mergers or contractual arrangements. We expect consolidation to
continue and perhaps accelerate. We expect that the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act,
which was adopted on November 11, 1999, will contribute to consolidation by
liberalizing restrictions on affiliation of banks with insurance companies and
other financial institutions and on activities of bank affiliates with respect
to mutual funds, private equity investments and other activities. While we are
among the largest competitors in terms of market share in many of our business
lines, in some cases there are one or more dominant market players in a
particular line of business. The trend toward consolidation in the financial
services industry may result in competitors with increased market shares, or
the introduction of larger or financially stronger competitors through
acquisitions or otherwise, in those or other lines of business in which we
compete.
Our investment-linked insurance products and our Investment Management and
Advisory Services and Retail Investments segments also compete on the basis of
investment performance. A material decline in the investment performance of our
variable life, mutual fund, variable annuity or defined contribution products
could have an adverse effect on our sales. Rankings and ratings of investment
performance have a significant effect on our ability to increase our assets
under management.
In recent years our rankings against competitors in sales of certain
investment and insurance products have declined. We continue our efforts to
strengthen and broaden both our distribution channels and our product offerings
but we cannot assure they will be successful. In particular, the marketplace
may make a more significant or rapid shift to non-affiliated and direct
distribution alternatives than we anticipate or are able to achieve ourselves.
If this happens, our market share and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
Competition for personnel in all of our businesses is intense, including for
Prudential Agents, Financial Advisors and other captive sales personnel, and
our investment managers. In the ordinary course of business, we lose from time
to time personnel in whom we have invested significant training, and in the
recent past we have in particular lost some of our most experienced Financial
Advisors. We are focusing substantial efforts on refocusing our Prudential
Agents, on increasing productivity requirements for Prudential Agents and on
reducing turnover among Financial Advisors. The loss of key investment managers
could have a material adverse effect on our Investment Management and Advisory
Services segment. Our decision to exit the lead-managed equity underwriting for
corporate issuers and institutional fixed income businesses of Prudential
Securities, and to pursue our strategy of providing research of interest to our
investor clients is new, and its effect on our ability to attract and retain
Financial Advisors and research analysts is uncertain.
Many of our businesses are in industries where access to multiple sales
channels may be a competitive advantage. We believe that insurance and
investment products will continue to be sold primarily through face-to-face
sales channels, although customers' desire for objective and not
product-related advice will, over time, increase the amount of insurance and
investment products sold through non-affiliated distributors such as
independent agents, insurance brokers and investment advisors. In addition, we
expect that insurance and investment products will increasingly be sold through
direct marketing, including through electronic commerce.
47
<PAGE>
The proliferation and growth of multiple sales channels puts pressure on our
face-to-face sales channels to either increase their productivity or reduce
their costs. We continue our efforts to strengthen and broaden our sales
channels, but we cannot assure they will be successful. We run the risk that
the marketplace will make a more significant or rapid shift to non-affiliated
and direct distribution alternatives than we anticipate or are able to achieve
ourselves. If this happens, our market share and results of operations could be
adversely affected.
Our current claims-paying ratings have substantially reduced our ability to
sell traditional guaranteed products. A downgrade in our claims-paying ratings
could adversely affect our ability to sell our insurance products and reduce
our profitability.
Our international life insurance business, other than Gibraltar Life,
competes by focusing on a limited market using our Life Planner model to offer
high quality service and needs-based protection products. Certain competitors,
including Sony Life in Japan, employ or seek to employ versions of the Life
Planner model.
Regulation
Overview
Our businesses are subject to comprehensive regulation and supervision
primarily as follows:
Insurance Operations
State insurance laws regulate all aspects of our insurance businesses and
state insurance departments in the fifty states, the District of Columbia and
various U.S. territories and possessions supervise our insurance operations.
Prudential Insurance is organized in New Jersey and its principal insurance
regulatory authority is the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance. Our
other insurance companies are principally regulated by the insurance
departments of the states in which they are organized. Our international
insurance operations are principally regulated by non-U.S. insurance regulatory
authorities in the jurisdiction in which they operate, including the Japanese
Ministry of Finance and Financial Services Agency. Our insurance products are
substantially affected by federal, state and non-U.S. tax laws. Products that
also constitute "securities", such as variable life insurance and variable
annuities, are also subject to federal and state securities laws and
regulations. The SEC, the NASD, state securities commissions and non-U.S.
authorities regulate and supervise these products.
Asset Management Operations
Our investment products and services, including mutual funds and private
banking activities, are subject to federal, state and non-U.S. securities,
fiduciary, including ERISA, and other laws and regulations. The SEC, the NASD,
state securities commissions, the Department of Labor and similar non-U.S.
authorities, including the United Kingdom's Financial Services Authority
("FSA"), are the principal regulators that regulate our asset management
operations. Federal, state and non-U.S. tax laws also substantially affect our
investment products and services.
Securities Operations
Our securities operations, principally conducted by Prudential Securities
Incorporated and a number of other SEC-registered broker-dealers and non-U.S.
broker-dealers, are subject to federal, state and non-U.S. securities,
commodities and related laws. The SEC, the CFTC, state securities authorities,
the NYSE, the NASD and similar U.S. and non-U.S. authorities, including the
FSA, are the principal regulators of our securities operations.
The purpose of these regulations is primarily to protect our customers and
not our shareholders. Many of the laws and regulations to which we are subject
are regularly re-examined, and existing or future laws and regulations may
become more restrictive or otherwise adversely affect our operations. U.S. law
and regulation of our international business, particularly as it relates to
monitoring customer activities, is likely to increase as a result of the recent
terrorist activity in the U.S. and abroad and may affect our ability to attract
and retain customers. The summary below is of U.S. regulation. Our
international operations are subject to similar types of regulation in the
jurisdictions in which they operate.
Our international operations face political, legal, operational and other
risks that we do not face in our U.S. operations, including the risk of
discriminatory regulation, nationalization or expropriation of assets, price
controls and exchange controls or other restrictions that prevent us from
transferring funds from these operations out of the countries in which they
operate or converting local currencies we hold into U.S. dollars or other
currencies.
48
<PAGE>
Regulation Affecting Prudential Financial
Prudential Financial is the holding company for all of our operations.
Prudential Financial itself is not licensed as an insurer, investment advisor,
broker-dealer, bank or other regulated entity. However, because it owns
regulated entities, Prudential Financial is subject to regulation as an
insurance holding company and a savings and loan holding company.
Insurance Holding Company Regulation
Prudential Financial is subject to the insurance holding company laws in the
states where our insurance subsidiaries are, or are treated as, organized,
which currently include New Jersey, Arizona, Delaware, Indiana, Michigan,
Minnesota, New York, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and others. These laws
generally require the insurance holding company and each insurance company
directly or indirectly owned by the holding company to register with the
insurance department in the insurance company's state of domicile and to
furnish annually financial and other information about the operations of
companies within the holding company system. Generally, all transactions
affecting the insurers in the holding company system must be fair and, if
material, require prior notice and approval or non-disapproval by the state's
insurance department.
Acquisition of Control
Under the New Jersey statute governing the demutualization and the Plan of
Reorganization, for the three years after the date of demutualization, no
person, other than Prudential Financial, its subsidiaries or any employee
benefit plans or trusts sponsored by us, may offer to acquire 5% or more of
Prudential Financial's Common Stock or total voting power without the prior
approval of the New Jersey insurance regulator. Under this statute, the New
Jersey insurance regulator may not approve the acquisition unless he or she
determines, among other things, that:
. the acquisition would not frustrate the Plan of Reorganization;
. either Prudential Financial's Board of Directors has approved the
acquisition or extraordinary circumstances that the Plan of Reorganization
did not contemplate have arisen that justify their approval of the
acquisition; and
. the acquisition would be in the interests of our policyholders.
The New Jersey statute governing the demutualization provides that any
security that is subject to an agreement regarding acquisition or that is
acquired or to be acquired in violation of the statute or in violation of an
order of the New Jersey insurance regulator may not be voted at any
shareholders' meeting, and any action of shareholders requiring the affirmative
vote of a percentage of shares may be taken as though these securities were not
issued and outstanding. If these securities are voted, however, any action
taken at a shareholders' meeting will be valid unless it materially affects
control of Prudential Financial or unless a New Jersey court has otherwise
ordered.
Most states, including the states in which our insurance companies are
domiciled, have insurance laws that require regulatory approval of a change of
control of an insurer or an insurer's holding company. Laws such as these that
apply to us prevent any person from acquiring control of Prudential Financial
or of our insurance subsidiaries unless that person has filed a statement with
specified information with the insurance regulators and has obtained their
prior approval. Under most states' statutes, acquiring 10% or more of the
voting stock of an insurance company or its parent company is presumptively
considered a change of control, although such presumption may be rebutted.
Accordingly, any person who acquires 10% or more of the voting securities of
Prudential Financial without the prior approval of the insurance regulators of
the states in which our insurance companies are domiciled will be in violation
of these states' laws and may be subject to injunctive action requiring the
disposition or seizure of those securities by the relevant insurance regulator
or prohibiting the voting of those securities and to other actions determined
by the relevant insurance regulator.
In addition, many state insurance laws require prior notification of state
insurance departments of a change in control of a non-domiciliary insurance
company doing business in that state. While these prenotification statutes do
not authorize the state insurance departments to disapprove the change in
control, they authorize regulatory action in the affected state if particular
conditions exist such as undue market concentration. Any future transactions
that would constitute a change in control of Prudential Financial may require
prior notification in those states that have adopted preacquisition
notification laws.
49
<PAGE>
These laws may discourage potential acquisition proposals and may delay,
deter or prevent a change of control of Prudential Financial, including through
transactions, and in particular unsolicited transactions, that some or all of
the stockholders of Prudential Financial might consider to be desirable.
Bank and Savings and Loan Holding Company Regulation
Although The Prudential Bank and Trust Company is a "bank" as defined in the
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, Prudential Financial is exempted from
regulation as a bank holding company under federal law as long as we continue
to comply with certain restrictions. As a result of its ownership of The
Prudential Savings Bank, F.S.B., Prudential Financial is a savings and loan
holding company. Federal and state banking laws generally provide that no
person may acquire control of Prudential Financial, and gain indirect control
of The Prudential Bank and Trust Company, The Prudential Savings Bank, F.S.B.
or Prudential Trust Company, without prior regulatory approval. Generally,
beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the voting securities of Prudential
Financial would be presumed to constitute control.
Insurance Operations
State Insurance Regulation
State insurance authorities have broad administrative powers with respect to
all aspects of the insurance business including:
. licensing to transact business,
. licensing agents,
. admittance of assets to statutory surplus,
. regulating premium rates,
. approving policy forms,
. regulating unfair trade and claims practices,
. establishing reserve requirements and solvency standards,
. fixing maximum interest rates on life insurance policy loans and minimum
accumulation or surrender values, and
. regulating the type, amounts and valuations of investments permitted and
other matters.
State insurance laws and regulations require our insurance companies to file
financial statements with insurance departments everywhere they do business,
and the operations of our insurance companies and accounts are subject to
examination by those departments at any time. Our insurance companies prepare
statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices and
procedures prescribed or permitted by these departments.
State insurance departments conduct periodic examinations of the books and
records, financial reporting, policy filings and market conduct of insurance
companies domiciled in their states, generally once every three to five years.
Examinations are generally carried out in cooperation with the insurance
departments of other states under guidelines promulgated by the NAIC. The New
Jersey insurance regulator completed a financial examination of Prudential
Insurance and its indirect insurance subsidiary, PRUCO Life Insurance Company
of New Jersey, for each of the previous five years for the period ended
December 31, 1996, and found no material deficiencies.
Financial Regulation
Dividend Payment Limitations. The New Jersey insurance law and the
insurance laws of the other states in which our insurance companies are
domiciled regulate the amount of dividends that may be paid by Prudential
Insurance and our other insurance companies. See "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and
Capital Resources--Prudential Financial" for more detail.
Risk-Based Capital. In order to enhance the regulation of insurers'
solvency, the NAIC adopted a model law to implement risk-based capital
requirements for life, health and property and casualty insurance companies.
All states have adopted the NAIC's model law or a substantially similar law.
The RBC calculation, which regulators use to assess the sufficiency of an
insurer's capital, measures the risk characteristics of a company's assets,
liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items. RBC is calculated by applying
factors to various asset, premium and liability items. Within a given risk
category, these factors are higher for those items with greater underlying risk
and lower for items with lower underlying risk. Insurers that have less
statutory capital than the
50
<PAGE>
RBC calculation requires are considered to have inadequate capital and are
subject to varying degrees of regulatory action depending upon the level of
capital inadequacy. The RBC ratios for each of our insurance companies
currently are well above the ranges that would require any regulatory or
corrective action.
The NAIC approved a series of statutory accounting principles which have
been adopted, in some cases with modifications, by all state insurance
regulators, other than New York, effective as of January 1, 2001. The
measurement of statutory capital under these principles has resulted in an
increase in our RBC ratios.
IRIS Tests. The NAIC has developed a set of financial relationships or
tests known as the Insurance Regulatory Information System to assist state
regulators in monitoring the financial condition of insurance companies and
identifying companies that require special attention or action by insurance
regulatory authorities. Insurance companies generally submit data annually to
the NAIC, which in turn analyzes the data using prescribed financial data
ratios, each with defined "usual ranges." Generally, regulators will begin to
investigate or monitor an insurance company if its ratios fall outside the
usual ranges for four or more of the ratios. If an insurance company has
insufficient capital, regulators may act to reduce the amount of insurance it
can issue. None of our insurance companies is currently subject to regulatory
scrutiny based on these ratios.
Insurance Reserves. State insurance laws require us to analyze the adequacy
of our reserves annually. Our actuary must submit an opinion that our reserves,
when considered in light of the assets we hold with respect to those reserves,
make adequate provision for our contractual obligations and related expenses.
The NAIC has adopted a model regulation called "Valuation of Life Insurance
Policies Model Regulation" that establishes new minimum statutory reserve
requirements for individual life insurance policies written after the effective
date of the regulation. These reserve standards have been enacted by most of
the states, generally with a January 1, 2000 effective date. As a result,
insurers selling some individual life insurance products such as term life
insurance with guaranteed premium periods have adjusted reserves and/or
shortened guarantee periods. While the model regulation has been enacted by the
states in which we have domestic companies, the enactment of the regulation has
not had a material impact on us. The NAIC is currently considering revisions to
this regulation, but we do not expect the revisions to have a material impact
on us.
Market Conduct Regulation
State insurance laws and regulations include numerous provisions governing
the marketplace activities of insurers, including provisions governing the form
and content of disclosure to consumers, illustrations, advertising, sales
practices and complaint handling. State regulatory authorities generally
enforce these provisions through periodic market conduct examinations.
Property and Casualty Regulation
Our property and casualty operations are subject to rate and other laws and
regulations covering a range of trade and claim settlement practices. State
insurance regulatory authorities have broad discretion in approving an
insurer's proposed rates. When a state restricts underwriting, pricing and
profits, as is the case for automobile insurance in New Jersey, an insurer's
ability to operate profitably on a consistent basis may be affected. In New
Jersey, if the profit earned on automobile insurance over a three-year period
exceeds the amount determined under insurance regulations, the insurer must
provide a refund or credit to policyholders.
State insurance laws and regulations require us to participate in mandatory
property-liability "shared market," "pooling" or similar arrangements that
provide insurance coverage to individuals or others who otherwise are unable to
purchase coverage voluntarily provided by private insurers. Shared market
mechanisms include assigned risk plans; fair access to insurance requirement or
"FAIR" plans; and reinsurance facilities, such as the New Jersey Unsatisfied
Claim and Judgment Fund, the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund, and the
California Earthquake Authority. In addition, some states require insurers to
participate in reinsurance pools for claims that exceed specified amounts. Our
participation in these mandatory shared market or pooling mechanisms generally
is related to the amounts of our direct writings for the type of coverage
written by the specific arrangement in the applicable state. We cannot predict
the financial impact of our participation in these arrangements.
Insurance Guaranty Association Assessments
Each state has insurance guaranty association laws under which life and
property and casualty insurers doing business in the state may be assessed by
state insurance guaranty associations for certain obligations of insolvent
insurance companies to policyholders and claimants. Typically, states assess
each member insurer in an
51
<PAGE>
amount related to the member insurer's proportionate share of the business
written by all member insurers in the state. For the years ended December 31,
2001 and 2000, we paid approximately $2.1 million and $8.5 million,
respectively, in assessments pursuant to state insurance guaranty association
laws. For the year ended December 31, 1999, we received approximately $0.5
million in refunds pursuant to these laws. While we cannot predict the amount
and timing of any future assessments on our insurance companies under these
laws, we have established reserves that we believe are adequate for assessments
relating to insurance companies that are currently subject to insolvency
proceedings.
Federal Regulation
Our variable life insurance products, as well as our variable annuity and
mutual fund products, generally are securities within the meaning of federal
and state securities laws, are registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and
are subject to regulation by the SEC, the NASD and state securities
commissions. Federal and state securities regulation similar to that discussed
below under "--Asset Management Operations" and "--Securities Operations"
affect investment advice, sales and related activities with respect to these
products. In addition, although the federal government does not comprehensively
regulate the business of insurance, federal legislation and administrative
policies in several areas, including taxation, financial services regulation
and pension and welfare benefits regulation, can significantly affect the
insurance industry. Congress also periodically considers and is considering
laws affecting privacy of information and genetic testing that could
significantly and adversely affect the insurance industry.
Tax Legislation
Current federal income tax laws generally permit certain holders to defer
taxation on the build-up of value of annuities and life insurance products
until payments are actually made to the policyholder or other beneficiary and
to exclude the build-up of value which is paid as a death benefit under a life
insurance contract. Congress from time to time considers legislation that could
make our products less attractive to consumers, including legislation that
would reduce or eliminate the benefit of this deferral on some annuities and
insurance products, as well as other types of changes that could reduce or
eliminate the attractiveness of annuities and life insurance products to
consumers.
In June 2001, the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001
(the "2001 Act") was enacted. The 2001 Act contains provisions that will, over
time, significantly lower individual tax rates. This will have the effect of
reducing the benefits of tax deferral on the build-up of value of annuities and
life insurance products. The 2001 Act also includes provisions that will
eliminate, over time, the estate, gift and generation-skipping taxes and
partially eliminates the step-up in basis rule applicable to property held in a
decedent's estate. Some of these changes might hinder our sales and result in
the increased surrender of insurance products.
ERISA
ERISA is a comprehensive federal statute that applies to employee benefit
plans sponsored by private employers and labor unions. Plans subject to ERISA
include pension and profit sharing plans and welfare plans (including health,
life and disability plans). ERISA provisions include reporting and disclosure
rules, standards of conduct that apply to plan fiduciaries, prohibitions on
conflict-of-interest transactions and certain transactions between a benefit
plan and a party in interest ("prohibited transactions"), and a scheme of civil
and criminal penalties and enforcement. Our insurance, asset management, plan
administrative services, brokerage and other businesses provide services to
employee benefit plans subject to ERISA, including services where we may act as
an ERISA fiduciary. In addition to ERISA regulation of those businesses in the
sales of products to and provisions of services to ERISA plans, we become
parties in interest to those plans and subject to ERISA's prohibited
transaction rules for transactions with those plans, which may affect our
ability to enter transactions, or the terms on which transactions may be
entered, with those plans, even in businesses unrelated to those giving rise to
party in interest status.
52
<PAGE>
Asset Management Operations
Some of our separate accounts, mutual funds and other pooled investments, in
addition to being registered under the Securities Act of 1933, are registered
as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, and the
shares of certain of these entities are qualified for sale in some states and
the District of Columbia. We also have several subsidiaries that are registered
as broker-dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act")
and are subject to federal and state regulation, including but not limited to
the SEC's net capital rules. In addition, we have several subsidiaries that are
investment advisors registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Our
Prudential Agents and other employees, insofar as they sell products that are
securities, as well as our Financial Advisors, are subject to the Exchange Act
and to examination requirements and regulation by the SEC, the NASD and state
securities commissioners. Regulation also extends to various Prudential
entities that employ or control those individuals.
For a discussion of potential federal tax legislation and other federal
regulation affecting our variable annuity products, see "--Insurance
Operations--Federal Regulation" above.
Securities Operations
Prudential Securities Incorporated and a number of our other subsidiaries
are registered as broker-dealers with the SEC and with some or all of the 50
states and the District of Columbia. Prudential Securities and a number of our
other subsidiaries are also registered as investment advisors with the SEC.
Prudential Securities and its broker-dealer affiliates are members of, and are
subject to regulation by "self-regulatory organizations," including the NASD
and the NYSE. Many of these self-regulatory organizations conduct examinations
of and have adopted rules governing their member broker-dealers. In addition,
state securities and certain other regulators have regulatory and oversight
authority over our registered broker-dealers. We are also subject to the rules
of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board in our municipal activities. Our
Financial Advisors are also subject to regulation under the Exchange Act as
described above under "--Asset Management Operations."
Broker-dealers and their sales forces are subject to regulations that cover
many aspects of the securities business, including sales methods and trading
practices. The regulations cover the suitability of investments for individual
customers, use and safekeeping of customers' funds and securities, capital
adequacy, record-keeping, financial reporting and the conduct of directors,
officers and employees.
The commodity futures and commodity options industry in the United States is
subject to regulation under the Commodity Exchange Act. The CFTC is the federal
agency charged with the administration of the Commodity Exchange Act and the
regulations adopted under the act. Prudential Securities Incorporated and a
number of our other subsidiaries are registered with the CFTC as futures
commission merchants, commodity pool operators or commodity trading advisors.
Our futures business is also regulated in the United States by the National
Futures Association.
The SEC and other governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations,
as well as state securities commissions in the United States, have the power to
conduct administrative proceedings that can result in censure, fine, the
issuance of cease-and-desist orders or suspension, termination or limitation of
the activities of a broker-dealer or an investment advisor or its employees.
As registered broker-dealers and members of various self-regulatory
organizations, Prudential Securities Incorporated and our U.S. other registered
broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to the SEC's Uniform Net Capital Rule.
The Uniform Net Capital Rule sets the minimum level of net capital a
broker-dealer must maintain and also requires that at least a minimum part of a
broker-dealer's assets be kept in relatively liquid form. These net capital
requirements are designed to measure the financial soundness and liquidity of
broker-dealers. Prudential Securities Incorporated is also subject to the net
capital requirements of the CFTC and the various securities and commodities
exchanges of which it is a member. Compliance with the net capital requirements
could limit those operations that require the intensive use of capital, such as
underwriting and trading activities, and may limit the ability of these
subsidiaries to pay dividends to Prudential Financial. As of December 31, 2001,
Prudential Securities Incorporated's regulatory net capital was well in excess
of the required amount.
Margin lending by certain of our broker-dealer subsidiaries is subject to
the margin rules of the Federal Reserve Board, which limit the amount they may
lend when customers are buying securities. These subsidiaries
53
<PAGE>
are also required by NYSE rules to impose maintenance requirements on the
values of securities contained in margin accounts.
Other Businesses
Our domestic banking operations are subject to extensive federal and state
regulation, including examination and review by state authorities of consumer
finance offices. Prudential provides trust services through Prudential Trust
Company, a state-chartered trust company incorporated under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, The Prudential Bank and Trust Company, and The
Prudential Savings Bank, F.S.B. Our non-U.S. banking operations are subject to
banking and securities regulation in the jurisdictions in which they are doing
business. The sale of real estate franchises by our real estate brokerage
franchise operation is regulated by various state laws and the FTC. The federal
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and state real estate brokerage and
unfair trade practice laws regulate payments among participants in the sale or
financing of residences or the provision of settlement services such as
mortgages, homeowners insurance and title insurance.
Privacy of Customer Information
Federal law and regulation requires financial institutions to protect the
security and confidentiality of customer information and to notify customers
about their policies and practices relating to their collection and disclosure
of customer information and their policies relating to protecting the security
and confidentiality of that information. Federal and state laws also regulate
disclosures of customer information. Congress and state legislatures are
expected to consider additional regulation relating to privacy and other
aspects of customer information.
Environmental Considerations
Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations apply to our
ownership and operation of real property. Inherent in owning and operating real
property is the risk of hidden environmental liabilities and the costs of any
required clean-up. As to our commercial mortgage lending, under the laws of
certain states, contamination of a property may give rise to a lien on the
property to secure recovery of the costs of clean-up. In several states, this
lien has priority over the lien of an existing mortgage against such property.
In addition, in some states and under the federal Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), we may be liable,
as an "owner" or "operator," for costs of cleaning-up releases or threatened
releases of hazardous substances at a property mortgaged to us. We also risk
environmental liability when we foreclose on a property mortgaged to us. Recent
legislation provides for a safe harbor from CERCLA liability for secured
lenders that foreclose and sell the mortgaged real estate, provided that
certain requirements are met. However, there are circumstances in which actions
taken could still expose us to CERCLA liability. Application of various other
federal and state environmental laws could also result in the imposition of
liability on us for costs associated with environmental hazards.
We routinely conduct environmental assessments for real estate we acquire
for investment and before taking title through foreclosure to real property
collateralizing mortgages that we hold. Although unexpected environmental
liabilities can always arise, based on these environmental assessments and
compliance with our internal procedures, we believe that any costs associated
with compliance with environmental laws and regulations or any clean-up of
properties would not have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations.
Employees
As of December 31, 2001, we employed approximately 60,792 employees. We
believe our relations with our employees are satisfactory. On January 30, 2002,
the Office and Professional Employees International Union, Local 153, AFL-CIO,
filed petitions with the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") seeking
representation of approximately 2,000 Prudential Agents who had formerly been
covered by the terms of now expired collective bargaining agreements. An
election to determine whether this union will represent these Agents,
administered by the NLRB, will commence on April 5, 2002.
54
<PAGE>
ITEM 1A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The names of the executive officers of Prudential Financial and their
respective ages and positions, as of March 8, 2002, were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name Age Title Other Directorships
---- --- ----- -------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Arthur F. Ryan......... 59 Chairman, Chief Executive None
Officer and President
Vivian L. Banta........ 51 Executive Vice President None
Michele S. Darling..... 48 Executive Vice President None
Robert Charles Golden.. 55 Executive Vice President None
Mark B. Grier.......... 49 Executive Vice President . RGS Energy Group
Incorporated
. Annuity and Life
Re (Holding), Ltd.
Jean D. Hamilton....... 55 Executive Vice President None
Rodger A. Lawson....... 55 Executive Vice President None
John R. Strangfeld, Jr. 48 Executive Vice President None
Richard J. Carbone..... 54 Senior Vice President and Chief None
Financial Officer
John M. Liftin......... 58 Senior Vice President and None
General Counsel
</TABLE>
Biographical information about Prudential Financial executive officers is as
follows:
Arthur F. Ryan was elected Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
of Prudential Financial in December 2000, and served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Prudential Financial from January 2000 to December 2000.
He joined Prudential Insurance as the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President in December 1994. Mr. Ryan was with Chase Manhattan Bank
from 1972 to 1994, serving in various executive positions including President
and Chief Operating Officer from 1990 to 1994 and Vice Chairman from 1985 to
1990. Mr. Ryan was elected a Director of Prudential Financial in December 1999
and has been a director of Prudential Insurance since December 1994.
Vivian L. Banta was elected Executive Vice President of Prudential Financial
in February 2001. Since January 2000, she variously served as Senior Vice
President, Individual Financial Services, Executive Vice President, Individual
Financial Services and Executive Vice President, U.S. Consumer Group, of
Prudential Insurance, a position she also holds at this time. Prior to joining
Prudential she was an independent consultant from 1997 to 1999 and served as
Executive Vice President, Global Investor Services, Group Executive for Chase
Manhattan Bank from 1991 to 1997.
Michele S. Darling was elected Executive Vice President of Prudential
Financial in February 2001. Since February 1997, she has variously served as
Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Executive Vice President, Human
Resources and Corporate Governance and Executive Vice President, Corporate
Governance, Human Resources and Community Resources of Prudential Insurance, a
position she also holds at this time. Prior to joining Prudential she was the
Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
from 1990 to 1997.
Robert Charles Golden was elected Executive Vice President of Prudential
Financial in February 2001 and was elected Executive Vice President, Operations
and Systems of Prudential Insurance in June 1997. Previously, he served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer for Prudential
Securities.
55
<PAGE>
Mark B. Grier was elected Executive Vice President of Prudential Financial
in December 2000. He served as a director of Prudential Financial from December
1999 to January 2001 and as Vice President of Prudential Financial from January
2000 to December 2000. He was elected Executive Vice President of Prudential
Insurance in May 1995. Since May 1995 he has variously served as Chief
Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Corporate Governance and Executive
Vice President, Financial Management, the position he holds at this time. Prior
to joining Prudential, Mr. Grier was an executive with Chase Manhattan
Corporation.
Jean D. Hamilton was elected Executive Vice President of Prudential
Financial in February 2001 and was elected Executive Vice President, Prudential
Institutional of Prudential Insurance in October 1998. She was the President of
the Prudential Diversified Group from February 1995 to October 1998 and has
held several other senior management positions since joining Prudential in
1988. Previously, Ms. Hamilton was an executive with First National Bank of
Chicago.
Rodger A. Lawson was elected Executive Vice President of Prudential
Financial in February 2001 and was elected Executive Vice President,
International Investments and Global Marketing Communications of Prudential
Insurance in October 1998. He was Executive Vice President, Marketing and
Planning of Prudential Insurance from June 1996 to October 1998. Prior to
joining Prudential, Mr. Lawson was the President and Chief Executive Officer of
VanEck Global (investment management) from April 1994 to June 1996; Managing
Director and Partner, President and Chief Executive Officer of Global Private
Banking and Mutual Funds, Bankers Trust Company from January 1992 to April
1994; Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Fidelity
Investments--Retail from May 1985 to May 1991 and President and Chief Executive
Officer of Dreyfus Service Corporation from March 1982 to May 1985.
John R. Strangfeld, Jr. was elected Executive Vice President of Prudential
Financial in February 2001. He was elected Executive Vice President, Prudential
Investment Management of Prudential Insurance in February, 2001 and Chairman
and CEO of Prudential Securities in October 2000. He has been with Prudential
since July 1977, serving in various management positions, including the
executive in charge of Prudential's Asset Management Group since 1996; Senior
Managing Director, The Private Asset Management Group from 1995 to 1996; and
Chairman, PRICOA Europe from 1989 to 1995.
Richard J. Carbone was elected Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice
President of Prudential Financial in December 2000 and November 2001,
respectively, and was elected Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Prudential Insurance in July 1997. Prior to that, Mr. Carbone was the Global
Controller and a Managing Director of Salomon, Inc. from July 1995 to June
1997, and Controller of Bankers Trust New York Corporation and a Managing
Director and Controller of Bankers Trust Company from April 1988 to March 1993.
From March 1993 to July 1995, Mr. Carbone was a Managing Director and Chief
Administrative Officer of the Private Client Group at Bankers Trust Company.
John M. Liftin was elected Senior Vice President and General Counsel of
Prudential Financial in December 2000. He served as a director of Prudential
Financial from December 1999 to January 2001 and as Vice President of
Prudential Financial from January 2000 to December 2000. He was elected Senior
Vice President and General Counsel of Prudential Insurance in April 1998. Prior
to that, Mr. Liftin was an independent consultant from 1997 to 1998 and the
Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Kidder, Peabody Group Inc. from
1987 to 1996.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We own our headquarters building located at 751 Broad Street, Newark, New
Jersey. Our headquarters is approximately one half million square feet. In
addition, we own other properties that we use for home office functions.
Excluding properties used for the International division and Prudential
Securities' operations, we own 14 and lease 21 properties. Our insurance
operations use approximately 500 other locations throughout the United States,
most of which are leased.
For our International Insurance operations, we lease nine home offices
located in Argentina, Brazil, China, Italy, Japan, The Philippines, Poland and
Taiwan and own a home office in Korea. In addition, we have purchased an 80%
beneficial interest in a 38-story office, residential and retail development
that is currently
56
<PAGE>
under construction in central Tokyo and that will become the home office of our
Japan operations when completed, which is expected late in 2002. In connection
with the development of this property, we have paid approximately (Yen)42.3
billion (approximately $323 million at an exchange rate on December 31, 2001 of
$1=(Yen)131.06) through December 31, 2001. On completion of the building and
full occupancy, we expect that the major portion of our total acquisition and
development costs, estimated at (Yen)55.4 billion (approximately $423 million),
will be financed through non-recourse borrowings and that our equity investment
in this property will be approximately (Yen)17.4 billion (approximately $133
million). We also own 327 field offices and lease approximately 279 other field
offices throughout Argentina, Brazil, Italy, Japan, Korea, The Philippines,
Poland and Taiwan. For our International Securities and Investments operations,
we own one branch office and lease approximately 17 other branch offices
throughout Japan, Mexico and Taiwan.
For our securities operations we lease two home offices in New York City,
which total approximately 1.8 million square feet. These leases are linked to
benefit agreements with the New York City Industrial Development Agency. In
addition, we lease approximately 310 other locations throughout the United
States and approximately 30 locations outside of the United States for our
securities operations.
We believe our properties are adequate and suitable for our business as
currently conducted and are adequately maintained. The above properties do not
include properties we own for investment only.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are subject to legal and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of our
businesses, including class action lawsuits. Our pending legal and regulatory
actions include proceedings specific to us and proceedings generally applicable
to business practices in the industries in which we operate. In our insurance
operations, we are subject to class action lawsuits and individual lawsuits
involving a variety of issues, including sales practices, underwriting
practices, claims payment and procedures, additional premium charges for
premiums paid on a periodic basis, denial or delay of benefits, return of
premiums or excessive premium charges and breaching fiduciary duties to
customers. In addition to the types of claims generally affecting our insurance
operations, with respect to our automobile and homeowners insurance products,
we are also subject to individual and class action lawsuits involving a variety
of issues including allegations of "redlining" or impermissible discrimination
among customers, diminution of automobile value following a casualty loss,
improper adjustment of earthquake claims, and challenges to the method of
calculating replacement cost value for homes, the deduction of depreciation for
certain types of property losses, the amount of and changes to policy
deductibles, and other coverage and claims payment disputes. In our
investment-related operations, we are subject to litigation involving
commercial disputes with counterparties or partners and class action lawsuits
and other litigation alleging, among other things, that we made improper or
inadequate disclosures in connection with the sale of assets and annuity and
investment products or charged excessive or impermissible fees on these
products, recommended unsuitable products to customers, mishandled customer
accounts or breached fiduciary duties to customers. In our securities
operations, we are subject to class action lawsuits, arbitrations and other
actions arising out of our retail securities brokerage, account management,
underwriting, former investment banking and other activities, including claims
of improper or inadequate disclosure regarding investments or charges,
recommending unsuitable investments or products that were unsuitable for tax
advantaged accounts, assessing impermissible fees or charges, engaging in
excessive or unauthorized trading, making improper underwriting allocations,
breaching alleged duties to non-customer third parties and breaching fiduciary
duties to customers. We may be a defendant in, or be contractually responsible
to third parties for, class action lawsuits and individual litigation arising
from our other operations, including claims for breach of contract and payment
of real estate taxes on transfer of equitable interests in residential
properties in our relocation businesses, or the businesses we are winding down
or have divested, including claims under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures
Act, in connection with our divested residential first mortgage operations and
claims related to our discontinued healthcare operations. We are also subject
to litigation arising out of our general business activities, such as our
investments, contracts, leases and labor and employment relationships,
including claims of discrimination and harassment.
In some of our pending legal and regulatory actions, parties are seeking
large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages.
The following is a summary of certain pending proceedings.
57
<PAGE>
Insurance
Life Insurance Sales Practices Issues
We have been subject to substantial regulatory actions and civil litigation
involving individual life insurance sales practices. These proceedings alleged
principally that we made misrepresentations concerning the use of existing life
insurance policies to fund additional policies, the number of annual
out-of-pocket cash premium payments required to fund life insurance policies
and the characterization of policies as investments rather than life insurance
policies.
In 1996, we entered into settlement agreements with the insurance regulatory
authorities of all 50 states and the District of Columbia and with the
plaintiffs in the principal life insurance sales practices class action lawsuit
brought by owners of individual permanent life insurance policies issued in the
United States from 1982 to 1995. Pursuant to the settlement agreements, we
agreed to various changes to our sales and business practices controls, to pay
a series of fines, penalties and related payments totaling approximately $65
million, and to provide specific forms of relief to eligible class members
pursuant to a remediation program. Ultimately, approximately 565,000 claims
submitted pursuant to the remediation program were determined to warrant claim
relief, out of a total class of owners of approximately 10.7 million policies.
As of December 31, 2001, virtually all claims by class members filed in
connection with the settlements have been resolved and virtually all aspects of
the remediation program have been satisfied.
In 1999, our individual life insurance broker-dealer, Pruco Securities
Corporation ("Pruco Securities"), entered into a settlement agreement with the
NASD through which we were censured, fined a total of $20 million, and required
to retain an independent consultant to review Pruco Securities' policies and
procedures related to supervision and sales practices controls. The settlement
did not change our remediation program.
While the approval of the class action settlement is now final, Prudential
Insurance remains subject to oversight and review by insurance regulators and
other regulatory authorities with respect to its sales practices and the
conduct of the remediation program. The United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey, which approved the class action settlement, has also
retained jurisdiction as to all matters relating to its administration,
consummation, enforcement and interpretation.
The class action settlement does not cover:
. policies other than individual permanent life insurance policies issued in
the United States;
. any type of policy issued prior to 1982 or after 1995;
. the policyholders who opted out of participation in the settlement, some
of whom are proceeding with their own individual actions; and
. other individual actions that are not barred by the class action
settlement.
As of February 28, 2002, we remained a party to approximately 44 individual
sales practices actions filed by policyholders who "opted out" of the class
action settlement related to permanent life insurance policies we issued in the
United States between 1982 and 1995. In addition, there were 20 sales practices
actions pending that were filed by policyholders who were members of the class
and who failed to "opt out" of the class action settlement. We believe that
those actions are governed by the class settlement release and expect them to
be enjoined and/or dismissed. Some of these cases seek substantial damages
while others seek unspecified compensatory, punitive or treble damages. It is
possible that substantial punitive damages might be awarded in one or more of
these cases. Six of these cases pending in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Florida were consolidated for trial under the caption
Cruz, et al. v. Prudential Insurance. Trial of these consolidated actions began
on December 3, 2001, and ended on February 1, 2002, with a jury verdict
awarding approximately $66,000 to certain of the plaintiffs, but finding no
fraudulent conduct by us with respect to any of the plaintiffs, and awarding no
punitive damages against us. Plaintiffs subsequently filed post-trial motions,
including a motion for a new trial, and these motions are currently pending.
Plaintiffs also filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals
for the Seventh Circuit. Ten other cases are pending in Palm Beach County,
Florida, Circuit Court and have been consolidated for trial in Ribarich v.
Prudential Insurance. No trial dates have been set in these cases. While the
number of new lawsuits filed has been diminishing over time, we anticipate that
additional suits may be filed by other policyholders who "opted out" of the
class action settlement or who failed to "opt out" but nevertheless seek to
proceed against us. We intend to defend these cases vigorously.
58
<PAGE>
While we believe we have adequately reserved in all material respects based
on information currently available, as with any litigation, the litigation by
policyholders who "opted out" of the class action settlement is subject to many
uncertainties, and, given the complexity and scope of these suits, we cannot
predict their outcome. For a discussion of charges and reserves relating to
these matters, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations--Consolidated Results of Operations--Sales Practices
Remedies and Costs."
Sales practices litigation has been filed in Canada against a number of
insurance companies, including Prudential Insurance and London Life Insurance
Company, to whom we sold most of our Canadian life insurance policies in 1996.
As we discuss above under "Business--Corporate and Other Operations--Divested
Businesses--Divested Canadian Businesses," we agreed to indemnify London Life
against damages relating to our pre-sale market conduct activities. To date, we
have not been made a party to any London Life class action lawsuits, although
we indemnify London Life on an ongoing basis with respect to individual
actions. We also are party to one purported Canadian sales practice class
action lawsuit involving policies sold by National Life Insurance Company of
Canada which were jointly issued under a reinsurance agreement with Prudential
Insurance. There has been no significant activity in this case since the filing
of the complaint in 1997. While there can be no assurance, we currently believe
our potential Canadian exposure, if any, is covered by the foregoing sales
practice reserves.
Other
On August 13, 2000, plaintiffs filed a purported national class action
against us in the District Court of Valencia County, New Mexico, Azar, et al.
v. Prudential Insurance, based upon the alleged failure to adequately disclose
the increased costs associated with payment of life insurance premiums on a
"modal" basis, i.e., more frequently than once a year. Similar actions have
been filed in New Mexico against over a dozen other insurance companies. The
complaint includes allegations that we should have disclosed to each
policyholder who paid for coverage on a modal basis the dollar cost difference
between the modal premium and the annual premium required for the policy, as
well as the effective annual percentage rate of interest of such difference.
Based on these allegations, plaintiffs assert statutory claims including
violation of the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act, and common law claims for
breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of
fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and fraudulent concealment. The complaint
seeks injunctive relief, compensatory and punitive damages, both in unspecified
amounts, restitution, treble damages, pre-judgment interest, costs and
attorneys' fees. We filed an answer denying the claims. Thereafter, both we and
the plaintiffs filed separate motions for summary judgment. On March 9, 2001,
the court entered an order granting partial summary judgment to plaintiffs as
to liability, permitting us to appeal the order and staying the case pending
completion of the appeal proceeding. Oral argument on the appeal was heard on
February 21, 2002.
Securities
In November 1998, plaintiffs filed a purported class action lawsuit in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Gillet v.
Goldman, Sachs & Co., et al., against over two dozen underwriters of initial
public offering securities, including Prudential Securities. A number of
similar actions brought on behalf of purported classes of both IPO purchasers
and IPO issuers were consolidated under the name In re Public Offering Fee
Antitrust Litigation. The amended complaint alleges that the defendants
conspired to fix at 7% the spread that underwriting syndicates receive from
issuers of securities in certain offerings in violation of the federal
antitrust laws, and seeks treble damages and injunctive relief. On February 9,
2001, the court dismissed the purchaser cases for lack of antitrust standing,
without leave to replead. Plaintiffs appealed that dismissal to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and the court established a
briefing schedule. In July 2001, a consolidated class action complaint was
filed in the issuer cases, and, in September 2001, defendants filed a motion to
dismiss that complaint.
Since June 1999, news organizations have widely reported that Martin R.
Frankel, a Connecticut businessman, is under indictment for allegedly
misappropriating several hundred million dollars of assets of several insurance
companies. Mr. Frankel controlled or was otherwise affiliated with accounts
held at numerous broker-dealers, including Prudential Securities. Prudential
Securities has received requests for information and documents regarding
accounts and transactions related to Mr. Frankel from various governmental
authorities and private parties. Prudential Securities has complied with these
requests and is cooperating with the government
59
<PAGE>
investigations. In June 2001, an action was commenced in Circuit Court, Cole
County, Missouri, Lakin et al. v. Prudential Securities Inc. et al., against
Prudential Securities, Prudential Investments and Prudential Savings Bank by
the insurance commissioners for Missouri, Mississippi, Tennessee and Oklahoma
in their capacities as liquidators of six insurance companies previously
controlled by Mr. Frankel. The complaint alleges that, in connection with
accounts maintained by the insurance companies at Prudential, the Prudential
defendants allowed Mr. Frankel and his associates to transfer funds without
proper authority and failed to detect and stop their looting activities. The
complaint asserts causes of action for negligence, breach of contract and
breach of fiduciary duty, and seeks compensatory damages in an amount to be
proved at trial. In August 2001, we removed the case to the United States
District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Central Division.
Prudential Securities answered the complaint, and Prudential Savings Bank filed
a motion to dismiss based on lack of personal jurisdiction. In December 2001,
plaintiff moved for leave to file an amended complaint that contains
substantially the same allegations as its original complaint. In March 2002,
the court granted Prudential Savings Bank's motion to dismiss it from the
action.
In September 2001, an amended complaint was filed by a plan participant in a
purported class action lawsuit, Kolar v. Rite Aid, et al., pending against Rite
Aid Corporation ("Rite Aid") and individual trustees of a Rite Aid-sponsored
401(k) plan (the "Plan") in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania naming Prudential Insurance, Prudential Securities,
Prudential Retirement Services, Inc., Prudential Investment Management
Services, LLC and the Rohrbaugh Group as defendants. The amended complaint
alleges that the Prudential defendants, which provide record keeping and other
services to the Plan, acted as ERISA fiduciaries and breached fiduciary duties
to the Plan by (1) failing to disclose to Plan participants Rite Aid's failure
to register its common stock offered under the Plan, (2) allowing Plan
participants to purchase unregistered Rite Aid stock, and (3) failing to seek
remedies on their behalf. The amended complaint also alleges that, under ERISA,
the Prudential defendants are liable as co-fiduciaries with Rite Aid or by
knowingly participating in Rite Aid's breaches of its fiduciary duties to the
Plan. The amended complaint seeks damages of $100 million against all
defendants plus interest, attorneys' fees and costs and, as to the Prudential
defendants, the equitable remedy of rescission with respect to purchases of
Rite Aid stock by the Plan participants. The time to answer the complaint has
not yet expired.
Corporate and Other Operations
In July 2001, a purported national class action was filed against Prudential
Insurance and its Board of Directors in the Superior Court of Essex County, New
Jersey, Hutcheson v. Prudential Insurance, et al., challenging Prudential
Insurance's Plan of Reorganization. The complaint alleges that, pursuant to the
Plan of Reorganization, non-participating policyholders would be paid
demutualization compensation at the expense of participating policyholders and
purports to assert causes of action for violation of New Jersey's
demutualization law, breach and anticipatory breach of contract, and breach of
fiduciary duty. The complaint also seeks to enjoin implementation of the Plan
of Reorganization, to set aside the results of any vote to approve the Plan of
Reorganization, and compensatory damages.
After Hutcheson was filed, two other similar lawsuits, containing
allegations relating to the payment of demutualization compensation to
non-participating policyholders, were filed in the Superior Court of New
Jersey, Essex County, i.e., Denenberg v. Prudential Insurance and Scala v.
Prudential Insurance. The Scala complaint also contains allegations concerning
the creation of the "Closed Block" and raises issues pertaining to voting on
the Plan of Reorganization, including disclosures to policyholders. We have
filed motions to dismiss all three actions. By agreement of the parties, the
motions to dismiss Hutcheson and Scala were stayed pending the resolution of
the appeals described below. The Denenberg plaintiffs amended the complaint
twice, first, to focus on the payment of demutualization compensation to
policyholders of subsidiaries and, second, to add claims that New Jersey's
demutualization law is unconstitutional under the New Jersey Constitution and
the demutualization is fundamentally unfair. We have filed a motion to dismiss
the second amended complaint.
The New Jersey law governing the demutualization provides that a
Commissioner's order approving or disapproving a plan of reorganization shall
be a final agency decision subject to appeal in accordance with, and within the
time period specified by, the rules governing the courts of the state of New
Jersey. In October and November, 2001, policyholders, including certain of the
plaintiffs in the lawsuits described in the preceding paragraph, filed notices
of appeal with the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division that
challenge the Commissioner's approval of the Plan of Reorganization, including
its provision for distribution of consideration to non-participating
policyholders. In November 2001, an appeal challenging the Commissioner's
approval to the
60
<PAGE>
extent it allows the distribution of demutualization compensation to persons
who are not policyholders of the mutual company was also filed by the
policyholders who are plaintiffs in the Denenberg action. The appeals have been
consolidated.
A successful challenge to the Plan of Reorganization or the Commissioner's
Decision and Order (and the demutualization) could result in monetary damages,
a modification of the Plan of Reorganization, or the Commissioner's approval
being set aside. A successful challenge would likely result in substantial
uncertainty relating to the terms and effectiveness of the Plan of
Reorganization, and a substantial period of time might be required to reach a
final determination. Such an outcome would likely negatively affect holders of
Common Stock and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
In November 1996, plaintiffs filed a purported class action lawsuit against
Prudential Insurance, The Prudential Home Mortgage Company, Inc. and several
other subsidiaries in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County, Capitol
Life Insurance Company v. Prudential Insurance, et al., in connection with the
sale of certain subordinated mortgage securities sold by a subsidiary of
Prudential Home Mortgage. In February 1999, the court entered an order
dismissing all counts without prejudice with leave to refile after limited
discovery. In May 2000, plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint that
alleges violations of the New Jersey securities and RICO statutes, fraud,
conspiracy and negligent misrepresentation, and seeks compensatory as well as
treble and punitive damages. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss that was
denied in October 2001. Defendants answered the second amended complaint in
November 2001. See "Business--Corporate and Other Operations--Divested
Businesses--Residential First Mortgage Banking" for a discussion of other
litigation relating to our divested residential mortgage banking operations.
In August 1999, a Prudential Insurance employee and several Prudential
Insurance retirees filed an action in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida, Dupree, et al., v. Prudential Insurance, et al.,
against Prudential Insurance and its Board of Directors in connection with a
group annuity contract entered into in 1989 between the Prudential Retirement
Plan and Prudential Insurance. The suit alleges that the annuitization of
certain retirement benefits violates ERISA and that, in the event of
demutualization, Prudential Insurance will retain shares distributed under the
annuity contract in violation of ERISA's fiduciary duty requirements. In July
2001, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint dropping three counts, and we filed
an answer denying the essential allegations of the complaint. In March 2002,
the court dismissed certain of the claims against the individual defendants.
In September 2001, plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint in a
purported national class action lawsuit against Prudential entities and over
two dozen other mutual fund companies in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Illinois, Nelson, et al. v. Aim Advisors, et al.,
alleging that distribution and advisory fees paid by numerous mutual funds were
unlawful. The complaint alleges that the statutorily independent directors for
each fund complex were, in fact, controlled by the advisor and, therefore, the
fees were not properly approved. The complaint further alleges that the fees
were, in any event, excessive in relation to the services rendered. The
complaint alleges that defendants' actions violated the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as well as the fiduciary duties owed under common law, and seeks
actual and punitive damages and declaratory relief. In October 2001, we filed a
motion to sever, which would require plaintiffs to re-plead their claims
against us in a separate action, and a motion to transfer the case to the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. In March 2002, the
trial court severed the actions and transferred our action to the District of
New Jersey. An earlier case filed in the United States District Court for the
District of New Jersey, Krantz v. Prudential Investments Fund Management LLC
and Prudential Investment Management Services LLC, contains similar challenges
to the validity of the investment advisory and distribution agreements with one
of our mutual funds. In 1999, the court dismissed the case and an appeal to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is pending.
Discontinued Operations
As discussed under "Business--Discontinued Operations--Healthcare," we have
agreed to indemnify Aetna for certain litigation involving the disposed
healthcare operations, and we have been sued directly for certain alleged
actions occurring before the disposition of those operations. This litigation
includes class action lawsuits and individual suits involving various issues,
including payment of claims, denial of benefits, vicarious liability for
malpractice claims, contract disputes with provider groups and former
policyholders, purported class action lawsuits challenging practices of our
former managed care operations, including the class action lawsuits described
below, and coordination of benefits with other carriers.
61
<PAGE>
Nationwide class action lawsuits were filed against us in 1999-2000 in
several United States District Courts on behalf of participants in our managed
health care plans. On October 23, 2000, by Order of the Judicial Panel on
Multi-District Litigation, these actions were consolidated for pre-trial
purposes, along with lawsuits pending against other managed health care
companies, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida, in a consolidated proceeding captioned In re Managed Care Litigation.
The consolidated participant complaint, Williamson v. Prudential Insurance,
alleges violations of RICO and ERISA through alleged misrepresentations of the
level of health care services provided, failure to disclose financial incentive
agreements with physicians, interference with the physician-patient
relationship, breach of fiduciary duty, and deprivation of plaintiffs' rights
to the receipt of honest medical services. It also alleges that we and other
major health care organizations engaged in an industry-wide conspiracy to
defraud subscribers as to the level of services and quality of care. The
complaint seeks compensatory damages, restitution and treble damages, all in
unspecified amounts, the imposition of an equitable trust for any wrongful
revenues and attorneys' fees. Our motion to dismiss the complaint for failure
to state a claim was granted and the case dismissed with leave to amend. An
amended complaint filed in June 2001 asserts substantially the same claims. On
February 20, 2002, the court granted our motion to dismiss the RICO, conspiracy
and unjust enrichment claims but not the ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claim.
The court granted leave to plaintiffs to amend the ERISA claim. Plaintiffs'
motion for class certification is pending. We joined the other defendants in
filing a motion for reconsideration of the February 20, 2002 dismissal order to
the extent that it did not dismiss the ERISA fiduciary duty claims. We also
joined the other defendants in filing a petition requesting that the order be
certified for appellate review. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for
reconsideration of the dismissal of the RICO claims.
In Batas and Vogel v. Prudential Insurance, a case filed in a New York state
court in 1997 based on allegations similar to those in Williamson, an
intermediate appeals court held that claims alleging breach of contract, fraud,
tortious interference with contractual relations and violations of the New York
deceptive acts and practices statute may be brought against managed care
organizations. The court affirmed the dismissal of claims for breach of
fiduciary duty, breach of the covenant of good faith and for injunctive and
declaratory relief. Plaintiffs' motion to certify a nationwide class of
non-ERISA plan participants is pending.
We have also been sued in Shane v. Humana, et al., a purported nationwide
class action lawsuit brought on behalf of provider physicians and physician
groups against Prudential and other health care companies in the consolidated
proceeding in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida. That case alleges that the defendants engaged in an industry-wide
conspiracy to defraud physicians by failing to pay under provider agreements
and by unlawfully coercing providers to enter into agreements with unfair and
unreasonable terms. The original complaint asserted various claims for relief
based on these allegations, several of which the court, in response to our
motion, held were subject to mandatory arbitration. The court subsequently
granted our motion to dismiss the remaining claims, including RICO conspiracy
and aiding and abetting claims, but allowed plaintiffs the opportunity to amend
the complaint. We appealed the district court's decision to the United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to the extent it failed to require
the plaintiff to arbitrate all claims against us. On March 14, 2002, the Court
of Appeals affirmed the District Court's arbitration order in all respects. An
amended complaint, naming additional plaintiffs, including three state medical
associations, and an additional defendant, was filed in March 2001. Like the
original complaint, it alleges claims of breach of contract, quantum meruit,
unjust enrichment, violations of RICO, conspiracy to violate RICO, aiding and
abetting RICO violations, and violations of state prompt pay statutes and the
California unfair business practices statute. The amended complaint seeks
compensatory and punitive damages in unspecified amounts, treble damages
pursuant to RICO, and attorneys' fees. Our motion to dismiss the amended
complaint and plaintiffs' motion for class certification are pending. The case
remains stayed pending final disposition of the appeal.
Summary
Our litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and given their complexity
and scope, the outcomes cannot be predicted. It is possible that our results of
operations or cash flow in a particular quarterly or annual period could be
materially affected by an ultimate unfavorable resolution of pending litigation
and regulatory matters depending, in part, upon the results of operations or
cash flow for such period. Management believes, however, that the ultimate
outcome of all pending litigation and regulatory matters, after consideration
of applicable reserves, should not have a material adverse effect on our
financial position.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders of Prudential
Financial during the period from the date of demutualization through December
31, 2001.
62
<PAGE>
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
General
Prudential Financial has outstanding two separate classes of common stock.
The Common Stock, which reflects the performance of our Financial Services
Businesses, was issued to eligible policyholders in Prudential Insurance's
demutualization (457.1 million shares) and sold to investors in Prudential
Financial's initial public offering (126.5 million shares). The Common Stock
began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "PRU" on December
13, 2001. The Class B Stock, which reflects the performance of the Closed Block
Business, was issued (2.0 million shares) to institutional investors (two
subsidiaries of American International Group, Inc. and Pacific Life Corp.) in a
private placement pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 on the
date of demutualization. There is no established public trading market for the
Class B Stock.
The high and low closing prices for the Common Stock on the New York Stock
Exchange during the period from December 13, 2001 through December 31, 2001
were $33.19 and $29.30. On March 21, 2002, there were 4,675,234 registered
holders of record for the Common Stock and 584.3 million shares outstanding,
and the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange was
$31.25. On March 21, 2002, there were 3 holders of record for the Class B Stock
and 2.0 million shares outstanding.
In addition, on the date of demutualization, Prudential Financial issued
13.8 million 6.75% equity security units (the "Units"). Each Unit has a stated
amount of $50 and initially consists of a contract requiring the holder to
purchase, for $50, shares of Prudential Financial's Common Stock on November
15, 2004, and a redeemable capital security of Prudential Financial Capital
Trust I, a statutory business trust that is consolidated in our financial
statements, with a stated liquidation amount of $50.
The distribution of Common Stock to eligible policyholders in the
demutualization was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933
pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) based on the Commissioner of the New Jersey
Department of Banking and Insurance's approval of the Plan of Reorganization.
On December 12, 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective
(i) the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-58524) of
Prudential Financial with respect to the 126.5 million shares of Common Stock
offered in Prudential Financial's initial public offering and (ii) the
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration Nos. 333-70888 and
333-70888-01) of Prudential Financial and Prudential Financial Capital Trust I
with respect to the 13.8 million Units.
The lead managing underwriter for the U.S. offerings of the Common Stock and
the Units was Goldman Sachs & Co. The lead managing underwriter for the
international offering of the Common Stock was Goldman Sachs International.
Each of these offerings commenced on December 12, 2001. The offerings of the
Common Stock terminated upon the sale of all the 126.5 million shares of Common
Stock (including 16.5 million sold pursuant to the underwriters' over-allotment
option). The offering of the Units terminated upon the sale of all of the 13.8
million Units (including 1.8 million Units sold pursuant to the underwriters'
over-allotment option).
Net Proceeds
The aggregate offering price of the Common Stock sold was $3,479 million
(including $454 million of gross proceeds attributable to the shares of Common
Stock sold pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment
option). Prudential Financial incurred expenses of $142 million in connection
with the offering of Common Stock including underwriting discounts and
commissions of $133 million and other expenses of $9 million. Other expenses
include legal and accounting fees and expenses, printing and engraving
expenses, filing and listing fees, registrar and transfer agent fees and
miscellaneous items. The net proceeds to Prudential Financial from the offering
of the Common Stock, after deducting the foregoing expenses, were $3,337
million.
The aggregate offering price of the Units sold was $690 million (including
$90 million of gross proceeds attributable to the Units sold pursuant to the
exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option). Prudential Financial
incurred expenses of $27 million in connection with the offering of the Units
including underwriting discounts and commissions of $24 million and other
expenses of $3 million. Other expenses include legal and accounting fees and
expenses, printing and engraving expenses, filing and listing fees, registrar
and transfer agent fees and miscellaneous items. The net proceeds to Prudential
Financial from the offering of the Units, after deducting the foregoing
expenses, were $663 million.
63
<PAGE>
For a description of the use of proceeds from these offerings, see
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations--Liquidity and Capital Resources" included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Convertibility
The Common Stock is not convertible.
Prudential Financial may, at its option, at any time, exchange all
outstanding shares of Class B Stock into such number of shares of Common Stock
as have an aggregate average market value (discussed below) equal to 120% of
the appraised "Fair Market Value" (discussed below) of the outstanding shares
of Class B Stock.
In addition, if (1) Prudential Financial sells or otherwise disposes of all
or substantially all of the Closed Block Business or (2) a "change of control"
of Prudential Financial occurs, Prudential Financial must exchange all
outstanding shares of Class B Stock into such number of shares of Common Stock
as have an aggregate average market value of 120% of the appraised Fair Market
Value of such shares of Class B Stock. For this purpose, "change of control"
means the occurrence of any of the following events (whether or not approved by
the Board of Directors of Prudential Financial): (a)(i) any person(s) (as
defined) (excluding Prudential Financial and specified related entities) is or
becomes the beneficial owner (as defined), directly or indirectly, of more than
50% of the total voting power of the then outstanding equity securities of
Prudential Financial; or (ii) Prudential Financial merges with, or consolidates
with, another person or disposes of all or substantially all of its assets to
any person, other than, in the case of either clause (i) or (ii), any
transaction where immediately after such transaction the persons that
beneficially owned immediately prior to the transaction the then outstanding
voting equity securities of Prudential Financial beneficially own more than 50%
of the total voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the
surviving person; or (b) during any year or any period of two consecutive
years, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board of
Directors of Prudential Financial (together with any new directors whose
election by such Board of Directors or whose nomination for election by the
shareholders of Prudential Financial was approved by a vote of a majority of
the directors of Prudential Financial then still in office who were either
directors at the beginning of such period or whose election or nomination for
election was previously so approved) cease for any reason, other than pursuant
to (x) a proposal or request that the Board of Directors be changed as to which
the holder of the Class B Stock seeking the conversion has participated or
assisted or is participating or assisting or (y) retirements in the ordinary
course (as defined), to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors then in
office.
Holders of Class B Stock will be permitted to convert their shares of Class
B Stock into such number of shares of Common Stock as have an aggregate average
market value equal to 100% of the appraised Fair Market Value of the
outstanding shares of Class B Stock (1) in the holder's sole discretion, in the
year 2016 or at any time thereafter, and (2) at any time in the event that (a)
the Class B Stock will no longer be treated as equity of Prudential Financial
for federal income tax purposes or (b) the New Jersey Department of Banking and
Insurance amends, alters, changes or modifies the regulation of the Closed
Block, the Closed Block Business, the Class B Stock or the IHC debt in a manner
that materially adversely affects the CB Distributable Cash Flow (as defined
below); provided, however, that in no event may a holder of Class B Stock
convert shares of Class B Stock to the extent such holder immediately upon such
conversion, together with its affiliates, would be the "beneficial owner" (as
defined under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of in excess of 9.9% of the
total outstanding voting power of Prudential Financial's voting securities. In
the event a holder of shares of Class B Stock requests to convert shares
pursuant to clause (2)(a) in the preceding sentence, Prudential Financial may
elect, instead of effecting such conversion, to increase the Target Dividend
Amount to $12.6875 per share per annum retroactively from the time of issuance
of the Class B Stock.
"CB Distributable Cash Flow" means, for any quarterly or annual period, the
sum of (i) the excess of (a) the Surplus and Related Assets over (b) the
"Required Surplus" applicable to the Closed Block Business within Prudential
Insurance, to the extent that Prudential Insurance is able to distribute such
excess as a dividend to PHLLC under New Jersey law without giving effect,
directly or indirectly, to the "earned surplus" requirement of Section
17:27A-4c.(3) of the New Jersey Insurance Holding Company Systems Law, plus
(ii) any amount held by PHLLC allocated to the Closed Block Business in excess
of remaining debt service payments on the IHC debt. For purposes of the
foregoing, "Required Surplus" means the amount of surplus applicable to the
Closed
64
<PAGE>
Block Business within Prudential Insurance that would be required to maintain a
quotient (expressed as a percentage) of (i) the "Total Adjusted Capital"
applicable to the Closed Block Business within Prudential Insurance (including
any applicable dividend reserves) divided by (ii) the "Company Action Level
RBC" applicable to the Closed Block Business within Prudential Insurance, equal
to 100%, where "Total Adjusted Capital" and "Company Action Level RBC" are as
defined in the regulations promulgated under the New Jersey Dynamic Capital and
Surplus Act of 1993. These amounts are determined according to statutory
accounting principles.
In the event of any reclassification, recapitalization or exchange of, or
any tender offer or exchange offer for, the outstanding shares of Common Stock,
including by merger, consolidation or other business combination, as a result
of which shares of Common Stock are exchanged for or converted into another
security which is both registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
publicly traded, then the Class B Stock will remain outstanding (unless
exchanged by virtue of a "change of control" occurring or otherwise, or
otherwise converted) and, in the event 50% or more of the outstanding shares of
Common Stock are so exchanged or converted, holders of outstanding Class B
Stock will be entitled to receive, in the event of any subsequent exchange or
conversion, the securities into which the Common Stock has been exchanged or
converted by virtue of such reclassification, recapitalization, merger,
consolidation, tender offer, exchange offer or other business combination. If,
in the event of any reclassification, recapitalization or exchange, or any
tender or exchange offer for, the outstanding shares of Common Stock, including
by merger, consolidation or other business combination, as a result of which a
majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock are converted into or
exchanged or purchased for either cash or securities which are not public
securities, or a combination thereof, the Class B Stock will be entitled to
receive cash and/or securities of the type and in the proportion that such
holders of Class B Stock would have received if an exchange or conversion of
the Class B Stock had occurred immediately prior to the conversion, exchange or
purchase of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock and the
holders of Class B Stock had participated as holders of Common Stock in such
conversion, exchange or purchase. The amount of cash and/or securities payable
upon such exchange or conversion will be calculated based upon the Fair Market
Value of the Class B Stock as of the date on which the Common Stock was
exchanged, converted or purchased and will be multiplied by 120%.
For purposes of all exchanges and conversions, the "average market value" of
the Common Stock will be determined during a specified 20 trading day period
preceding the time of the exchange or conversion. "Fair Market Value" of the
Class B Stock means the fair market value of all of the outstanding shares of
Class B Stock as determined by appraisal by a nationally recognized actuarial
or other competent firm independent of and selected by the Board of Directors
of Prudential Financial and approved by the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of Class B Stock. Fair Market Value will be the present
value of expected future cash flows to holders of the Class B Stock, reduced by
any payables to the Financial Services Businesses. Future cash flows will be
projected consistent with the policy, as described in the plan of
reorganization, for the Board of Directors of Prudential Insurance to declare
policyholder dividends based on actual experience in the Closed Block.
Following the repayment in full of the IHC debt, these cash flows shall be the
excess of statutory surplus applicable to the Closed Block Business over
Required Surplus (as defined in the definition of "CB Distributable Cash Flow")
for each period that would be distributable as a dividend under New Jersey law
if the Closed Block Business were a separate insurer. These cash flows will be
discounted at an equity rate of return, to be estimated as a risk-free rate
plus an equity risk premium. The risk-free rate will be an appropriate ten-year
U.S. Treasury rate reported by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The equity
risk premium will be eight and one quarter percent initially, declining evenly
to four percent over the following 21 years and remaining constant thereafter.
Fair Market Value will be determined by appraisal as of a specified date
preceding the time of the exchange or conversion.
Any exchange or conversion of Class B Stock into Common Stock could occur at
a time when either or both of the Common Stock and Class B Stock may be
considered to be overvalued or undervalued. In the future, if the Class B Stock
is exchanged for or converted into Common Stock, the number of shares of Common
Stock then obtainable by the Class B Stockholders might constitute a higher
proportion of the total shares of Common Stock then outstanding than the
proportion represented by (x) the number of shares of Class B Stock initially
issued divided by (y) the total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding
upon completion of the demutualization. The degree of any such proportionate
increase would depend principally on: the performance of the Closed Block
Business over time and the valuation of the Closed Block Business at the time
of exchange or conversion; whether the exchange or conversion implemented
involves a premium; the number of any new shares of
65
<PAGE>
Common Stock we issue after the demutualization for financing, acquisition or
other purposes or any repurchases of Common Stock that we may make; and the
market value of our Common Stock at the time of exchange or conversion.
Dividends
There were no dividends declared or paid on either of the classes of common
stock during the period from the date of demutualization through December 31,
2001. Future dividend decisions will be based on, and affected by, a number of
factors including the impact of regulatory restrictions and the financial
performance of the Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block Business for
the Common Stock and Class B Stock, respectively. For a discussion of dividends
and related regulatory restrictions, see "Business," "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and
Capital Resources" and Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the section entitled
"Description of Capital Stock" in Prudential Financial's Prospectus dated
December 12, 2001, filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act of
1933.
Prudential Financial's Board of Directors currently intends to declare
dividends on the Common Stock, payable once annually, and expects that the
first annual dividend will be $0.30 per share, which will be declared in the
fourth quarter of 2002. The declaration of dividends is subject to the
discretion of Prudential Financial's Board of Directors and will depend on our
financial condition, results of operations, cash requirements, future
prospects, regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by Prudential
Financial subsidiaries and such other factors as the Board of Directors may
deem relevant. Dividends payable by Prudential Financial are limited to the
amount that would be legally available for payment under New Jersey corporate
law.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
We derived the selected consolidated income statement data and division and
segment operating results for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2001 and
2000 from our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein. We
derived the selected consolidated income statement data for the years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as
of December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 from consolidated financial statements not
included herein.
In April 2001, we completed the acquisition of Gibraltar Life, which has
adopted a November 30 fiscal year end. Consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2001 includes Gibraltar Life assets and liabilities as of November
30, 2001, and consolidated income statement data includes Gibraltar Life
results for the period April 2, 2001 through November 30, 2001. Statistics
reported for Gibraltar Life are based on these dates as well.
We have made several dispositions that materially affect the comparability
of the data presented below. In the fourth quarter of 2000, we restructured the
capital markets activities of Prudential Securities, exiting its lead-managed
equity underwriting for corporate issuers and institutional fixed income
businesses. These businesses incurred a pre-tax loss of $159 million in 2001, a
pre-tax loss of $620 million in 2000, pre-tax income of $23 million in 1999, a
pre-tax loss of $73 million in 1998 and pre-tax income of $55 million in 1997.
The loss from these operations in 2000 included charges of $476 million
associated with our termination and wind-down of these businesses. In 2000, we
sold Gibraltar Casualty Company, a commercial property and casualty insurer
that we placed in wind-down status in 1985. Gibraltar Casualty had no impact on
results in 2001 and incurred pre-tax losses of $7 million in 2000, $72 million
in 1999, $76 million in 1998 and $24 million in 1997. Residual activity from
the residential first mortgage banking business that we sold in a prior period
resulted in a pre-tax loss of $41 million in 1998 and a pre-tax profit of $9
million in 1997, primarily related to our remaining obligations with respect to
this business.
On December 18, 2001, Prudential Insurance converted from a mutual life
insurance company owned by its policyholders to a stock life insurance company
and became an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial. For a
discussion of these transactions, see "Business--Demutualization and Related
Transactions" included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
"Demutualization costs and expenses" amounted to $588 million in 2001, $143
million in 2000, $75 million in 1999 and $24 million in 1998. "Demutualization
costs and expenses" in 2001 include $340 million of demutualization
consideration payable to former Canadian branch policyholders as more fully
described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
66
<PAGE>
You should read this selected consolidated financial and other information
in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations" and our Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere herein.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of or for the Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Income Statement Data:
Revenues:
Premiums........................... $ 12,477 $ 10,181 $ 9,528 $ 9,048 $ 9,043
Policy charges and fee income...... 1,803 1,639 1,516 1,465 1,423
Net investment income.............. 9,151 9,497 9,367 9,454 9,458
Realized investment gains
(losses), net...................... (705) (288) 924 2,641 2,168
Commissions and other income....... 4,451 5,475 5,233 4,416 4,381
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total revenues.................... 27,177 26,504 26,568 27,024 26,473
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Benefits and expenses:
Policyholders' benefits............ 12,752 10,640 10,226 9,786 9,956
Interest credited to
policyholders' account balances.... 1,804 1,751 1,811 1,953 2,170
Dividends to policyholders......... 2,722 2,724 2,571 2,477 2,422
General and administrative
expenses........................... 9,538 10,043 9,530 9,037 8,525
Capital markets restructuring...... -- 476 -- -- --
Sales practices remedies and
costs.............................. -- -- 100 1,150 2,030
Demutualization costs and
expenses........................... 588 143 75 24 --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total benefits and expenses....... 27,404 25,777 24,313 24,427 25,103
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes........ (227) 727 2,255 2,597 1,370
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income tax expense (benefit).......... (57) 406 1,042 970 407
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) from continuing
operations............................ (170) 321 1,213 1,627 963
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Discontinued operations:
Loss from healthcare
operations, net of taxes........... -- -- -- (298) (353)
Gain (loss) on disposal of
healthcare operations, net of
taxes.............................. 16 77 (400) (223) --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net gain (loss) from
discontinued operations, net
of taxes.......................... 16 77 (400) (521) (353)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss)..................... $ (154) $ 398 $ 813 $ 1,106 $ 610
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Basic and diluted earnings per
share--Common Stock(1)............ $ 0.07
Basic and diluted earnings per
share--Class B Stock(1)........... $ 1.50
Division and Segment Data:
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes(2):
Individual Life Insurance.......... $ 228 $ 108 $ 94 $ 196
Private Client Group............... (239) 237 224 114
Retail Investments................. 130 233 180 343
Property and Casualty Insurance.... 91 166 161 327
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total U.S. Consumer............... 210 744 659 980
-------- -------- -------- --------
Group Insurance.................... (2) 156 143 221
Other Employee Benefits............ 27 113 342 715
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total Employee Benefits........... 25 269 485 936
-------- -------- -------- --------
International Insurance............ 554 281 227 153
International Securities and
Investments........................ (88) 26 15 13
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total International............... 466 307 242 166
-------- -------- -------- --------
Investment Management and
Advisory Services.................. 97 155 156 145
Other Asset Management............. 114 122 97 22
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total Asset Management............ 211 277 253 167
-------- -------- -------- --------
Corporate and Other................ (520) (1,063) 272 (1,319)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total--Financial Services
Businesses........................ 392 534 1,911 930
-------- -------- -------- --------
Closed Block Business.............. (619) 193 344 1,667
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total............................. $ (227) $ 727 $ 2,255 $ 2,597
======== ======== ======== ========
Balance Sheet Data:
Total investments excluding policy
loans................................. $157,264 $140,469 $151,338 $148,837 $146,594
Separate account assets............... 77,158 82,217 82,131 80,931 73,451
Total assets.......................... 293,030 272,753 285,094 279,422 259,571
Future policy benefits,
policyholders' account balances
and unpaid claims and claim
adjustment expenses.................. 133,732 104,130 102,887 104,301 105,615
Separate account liabilities.......... 77,158 82,217 82,131 80,931 73,451
Short-term debt....................... 5,405 11,131 10,858 10,082 6,774
Long-term debt........................ 5,304 2,502 5,513 4,734 4,273
Total liabilities..................... 271,887 252,145 265,803 259,027 239,853
Guaranteed minority interest in
Trust holding solely debentures of
Parent................................ 690 -- -- -- --
Equity................................ 20,453 20,608 19,291 20,395 19,718
Equity excluding net unrealized
investment gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities........ 19,225 20,249 19,951 19,123 17,966
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Earnings per share data reflects earnings for the period from December 18,
2001, the date of demutualization, through December 31, 2001 only. Net
income during this period was $38 million and $3 million for the Financial
Services Businesses and Closed Block Business, respectively.
(2) Prepared in accordance with GAAP. Operating results by division and segment
for 1997 are neither readily available nor practicable to obtain.
67
<PAGE>
In managing our business, we analyze our operating performance by separately
considering our Financial Services Businesses and our Closed Block Business. In
addition, within the Financial Services Businesses we analyze our operating
performance using a non-GAAP measure we call "adjusted operating income." Prior
to the date of demutualization, we also analyzed results of our Traditional
Participating Products segment based on this non-GAAP measure. We calculate
adjusted operating income by adjusting our income from continuing operations
before income taxes shown above to exclude certain items. The items we exclude
are:
. realized investment gains, net of losses and related charges;
. sales practices remedies and costs;
. the gains, losses and contribution to income/loss of divested businesses
that we have sold but that do not qualify for "discontinued operations"
accounting treatment under GAAP; and
. demutualization costs and expenses.
Wind-down businesses that we have not divested remain in adjusted operating
income. We exclude our discontinued healthcare operations from income from
continuing operations before income taxes, as shown above.
The excluded items are important to an understanding of our overall results
of operations. You should not view adjusted operating income as a substitute
for net income determined in accordance with GAAP and you should note that our
definition of adjusted operating income may differ from that used by other
companies. However, we believe that the presentation of adjusted operating
income as we measure it for management purposes enhances the understanding of
our results of operations by highlighting the results from ongoing operations
and the underlying profitability factors of our business. We exclude realized
investment gains, net of losses and related charges, from adjusted operating
income because the timing of transactions resulting in recognition of gains or
losses is largely at our discretion and the amount of these gains or losses is
heavily influenced by and fluctuates in part according to the availability of
market opportunities. Including the fluctuating effects of these transactions
could distort trends in the underlying profitability of our businesses. We
exclude sales practices remedies and costs because they relate to a substantial
and identifiable non-recurring event. We exclude the gains and losses and
contribution to income/loss of divested businesses because, as a result of our
decision to dispose of these businesses, these results are not relevant to the
profitability of our ongoing operations and could distort the trends associated
with our ongoing businesses. We also exclude demutualization costs and expenses
because they are directly related to our demutualization and could distort the
trends associated with our business operations.
68
<PAGE>
We show our revenues and adjusted operating income by division and segment,
as well as a reconciliation of both measures on a consolidated basis to their
corresponding GAAP amounts, below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------- ------- -------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Division and Segment Operating Results:
Financial Services Businesses:
Revenues(1):
Individual Life Insurance........................................................ $ 1,919 $ 1,828 $ 1,703
Private Client Group............................................................. 2,216 2,767 2,562
Retail Investments............................................................... 1,458 1,631 1,551
Property and Casualty Insurance.................................................. 2,051 1,800 1,747
------- ------- -------
Total U.S. Consumer.......................................................... 7,644 8,026 7,563
------- ------- -------
Group Insurance.................................................................. 3,248 2,801 2,428
Other Employee Benefits.......................................................... 2,664 2,885 3,014
------- ------- -------
Total Employee Benefits...................................................... 5,912 5,686 5,442
------- ------- -------
International Insurance.......................................................... 4,146 1,920 1,522
International Securities and Investments......................................... 548 704 580
------- ------- -------
Total International.......................................................... 4,694 2,624 2,102
------- ------- -------
Investment Management and Advisory Services...................................... 835 874 768
Other Asset Management........................................................... 437 470 373
------- ------- -------
Total Asset Management....................................................... 1,272 1,344 1,141
------- ------- -------
Corporate and Other.............................................................. 103 205 509
------- ------- -------
Total........................................................................ 19,625 17,885 16,757
------- ------- -------
Other amounts included in consolidated revenues:
Realized investment gains (losses), net.......................................... (162) (379) 586
Revenues from divested businesses................................................ (14) 269 511
------- ------- -------
Total revenues--Financial Services Businesses................................ 19,449 17,775 17,854
------- ------- -------
Closed Block Business:
Revenues(1)......................................................................... 8,271 8,638 8,376
Other amounts included in consolidated revenues:
Realized investment gains (losses), net.......................................... (543) 91 338
------- ------- -------
Total revenues--Closed Block Business........................................ 7,728 8,729 8,714
------- ------- -------
Total consolidated revenues.................................................. $27,177 $26,504 $26,568
======= ======= =======
Financial Services Businesses:
Adjusted operating income (loss) (2):
Individual Life Insurance........................................................ $ 273 $ 114 $ 117
Private Client Group............................................................. (239) 237 224
Retail Investments............................................................... 181 239 174
Property and Casualty Insurance.................................................. 95 150 152
------- ------- -------
Total U.S. Consumer.......................................................... 310 740 667
------- ------- -------
Group Insurance.................................................................. 70 158 128
Other Employee Benefits.......................................................... 113 229 272
------- ------- -------
Total Employee Benefits...................................................... 183 387 400
------- ------- -------
International Insurance.......................................................... 611 296 218
International Securities and Investments......................................... (88) 26 15
------- ------- -------
Total International.......................................................... 523 322 233
------- ------- -------
Investment Management and Advisory Services...................................... 105 154 155
Other Asset Management........................................................... 114 122 97
------- ------- -------
Total Asset Management....................................................... 219 276 252
------- ------- -------
Corporate and Other.............................................................. 28 (4) 137
------- ------- -------
Total........................................................................ 1,263 1,721 1,689
------- ------- -------
Items excluded from adjusted operating income:
Realized investment gains, net of losses and related charges:
Realized investment gains (losses), net.......................................... (162) (379) 586
Related charges(3)............................................................... 26 (29) (142)
------- ------- -------
Total realized investment gains, net of losses and related charges........... (136) (408) 444
------- ------- -------
Sales practices remedies and costs............................................... -- -- (100)
Divested businesses.............................................................. (147) (636) (47)
Demutualization costs and expenses............................................... (588) (143) (75)
------- ------- -------
Income from continuing operations before income taxes--Financial Services Businesses 392 534 1,911
------- ------- -------
Closed Block Business:
Adjusted operating income(2)........................................................ 436 547 316
Items excluded from adjusted operating income:
Realized investment gains, net of losses and related charges:
Realized investment gains (losses), net.......................................... (543) 91 338
Dividends to policyholders(4).................................................... (512) (445) (310)
------- ------- -------
Total realized investment gains, net of losses and related charges........... (1,055) (354) 28
------- ------- -------
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes--Closed Block Business. (619) 193 344
------- ------- -------
Consolidated income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes........... $ (227) $ 727 $ 2,255
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
69
<PAGE>
- --------
(1)Revenues by segment exclude (i) realized investment gains, net and (ii)
revenues from divested businesses. Revenues for the Closed Block Business
exclude realized investment gains, net.
(2)Adjusted operating income equals revenues as defined above in footnote (1)
less benefits and expenses excluding (i) the impact of net realized
investment gains on deferred acquisition cost amortization, reserves and
dividends to policyholders; (ii) sales practices remedies and costs; (iii)
the benefits and expenses of divested businesses; and (iv) demutualization
costs and expenses.
(3)Net realized investment gains impact our reserves for future policy
benefits, our deferred policy acquisition costs, and our policyholder
dividends. We refer to these impacts collectively as the "related charges."
Related charges for the Financial Services Businesses consist of the
following:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended
December 31,
----------------
2001 2000 1999
---- ---- -----
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Reserves for future policy benefits.............. $ 6 $(36) $(147)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs 20 7 5
--- ---- -----
Total......................................... $26 $(29) $(142)
=== ==== =====
</TABLE>
We adjust the reserves for some of our policies when cash flows related to
these policies are affected by net realized investment gains and the related
charge for reserves for future policy benefits represents that adjustment.
We amortize deferred policy acquisition costs for certain investment-type
products based on estimated gross profits, which include net realized
investment gains on the underlying invested assets, and the related charge
for amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs represents the
amortization related to net realized investment gains. As part of our
acquisition of Gibraltar Life, we are obligated to pay pre-acquisition
Gibraltar Life policyholders a dividend generally equal to 70% of any net
realized investment gains from the collection or disposition of loans and
investment real estate in excess of the value of such assets included in the
Reorganization Plan. The related charge for dividends to policyholders
represents the portion of our expense charge for policyholder dividends
attributable to net realized investment gains on these assets during the
period.
(4)Net realized investment gains is one of the elements that we consider in
establishing the dividend scale, and the related charge for dividends to
policyholders represents the estimated portion of our expense charge for
policyholder dividends that is attributable to net realized investment gains
that we consider in determining our dividend scale. These gains are
reflected in the dividend scale over a number of years.
Other Data:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
--------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in billions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Assets Under Management and Administration (at fair market value):
Managed by Asset Management division:.............................
Retail customers(1).............................................. $ 96.5 $107.4 $108.5
Institutional customers(2)....................................... 89.1 95.1 96.8
General account.................................................. 113.8 110.0 107.9
------ ------ ------
Total proprietary.............................................. 299.4 312.5 313.2
Managed by Retail Investments or Private Client Group segments:
Non-proprietary wrap-fee and other assets under management(3).... 49.3 50.5 44.8
International(4).................................................. 39.3 8.1 5.3
------ ------ ------
Total assets under management.................................. 388.0 371.1 363.3
Client assets under administration................................ 201.6 221.8 232.9
------ ------ ------
Total assets under management and administration............... $589.6 $592.9 $596.2
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Consists of individual mutual funds, including investments in our mutual
funds through wrap-fee products, and both variable annuities and variable
life insurance assets in our separate accounts. Fixed annuities and the
fixed rate options of both variable annuities and variable life insurance
are included in general account.
(2) Consists of third-party institutional assets and group insurance contracts.
(3) Consists of wrap-fee assets gathered by the Private Client Group and Retail
Investments segments and funds invested in the non-proprietary options of
our investment products other than wrap-fee products.
(4) Consists primarily of general account assets supporting our International
Insurance segment, assets gathered by the International Securities and
Investments segment, and wind-down Canadian operations. December 31, 2001
includes assets of $29.2 billion for Gibraltar Life, which was acquired in
April 2001.
70
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of December 31,
--------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
--- ------ ------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Employees and Representatives:
Prudential Agents................................ 4,387 6,086 7,818 8,868 10,115
Life Planners.................................... 4,104 3,495 2,884 2,332 1,908
Gibraltar Life Advisors (as of November 30, 2001) 6,121 -- -- -- --
Financial Advisors............................... 6,159 6,676 6,898 6,820 6,613
Total employees(1)............................... 60,792 56,925 59,530 61,793 60,777
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) All periods exclude employees of our discontinued healthcare operations.
71
<PAGE>
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following analysis of our consolidated financial
condition and results of operations in connection with the "Selected Financial
Data" and the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. Effective on the date of demutualization, the consolidated
financial statements of Prudential Insurance for financial statement periods as
of and ended prior to the demutualization became the historical Consolidated
Financial Statements of Prudential Financial.
Demutualization and Related Transactions
On the date of demutualization, Prudential Insurance converted from a mutual
life insurance company owned by its policyholders to a stock life insurance
company and became an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential
Financial. On that date, eligible policyholders, as defined in the Plan of
Reorganization, received shares of Prudential Financial's Common Stock or the
right to receive cash or policy credits, which are increases in policy values
or increases in other policy benefits, upon the extinguishment of all
membership interests in Prudential Insurance. In the aggregate, eligible
policyholders received 457.1 million shares of Common Stock, the right to
receive cash totaling $3,487 million, including $340 million to former Canadian
branch policyholders, and policy credits totaling $1,042 million in the
demutualization. In addition, two closed blocks, as discussed below, were
established for the benefit of certain participating individual life insurance
policies and annuities issued by Prudential Insurance and its Canadian branch.
On the date of demutualization, Prudential Financial completed an initial
public offering of 110.0 million shares of its Common Stock at an initial
public offering price of $27.50 per share, and on December 21, 2001, Prudential
Financial issued an additional 16.5 million shares of Common Stock as a result
of the exercise of the over-allotment option granted to underwriters in the
initial public offering. Also on the date of demutualization, Prudential
Financial completed the sale, through a private placement, of 2.0 million
shares of Class B Stock, a separate class of common stock, at a price of $87.50
per share. The Common Stock reflects the performance of the Financial Services
Businesses, and the Class B Stock reflects the performance of the Closed Block
Business. Collectively, the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block
Business are referred to as the "Businesses." In addition, on the date of
demutualization, Prudential Financial issued 13.8 million 6.75% equity security
units for gross proceeds of $690 million, including as a component thereof
redeemable capital securities of Prudential Financial Capital Trust I, a
statutory business trust that is consolidated in our financial statements.
Furthermore, Prudential Holdings, LLC ("PHLCC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of
Prudential Financial that owns the capital stock of Prudential Insurance,
issued $1.75 billion in senior secured notes (the "IHC debt"), a portion of
which were insured by a bond insurer, as discussed below.
Concurrent with the demutualization, Prudential Insurance completed a
corporate reorganization whereby various subsidiaries (and certain related
assets and liabilities) of Prudential Insurance were dividended (or
"destacked") so that they became wholly owned subsidiaries of Prudential
Financial rather than of Prudential Insurance. The subsidiaries distributed by
Prudential Insurance to Prudential Financial included its property and casualty
insurance companies, its principal securities brokerage companies, its
international insurance companies, its principal asset management operations,
its international securities and investments operations, its domestic banking
operations and its residential real estate brokerage franchise and relocation
services operations.
The Plan of Reorganization required us to establish and operate a mechanism
known as the Closed Block. The Closed Block is designed generally to provide
for the reasonable expectations for future policy dividends after
demutualization of holders of policies included in the Closed Block by
allocating assets that will be used for payment of benefits, including
policyholder dividends, on these policies. See Note 9 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for more information on the Closed Block.
On January 22, 2002, Prudential Financial's Board of Directors authorized
the repurchase of up to $1 billion of its Common Stock. The timing and amount
of any purchases of Common Stock under this authorization will be determined by
management based on market conditions and other considerations, and such
purchases may be effected by market or negotiated transactions, including
programs adopted under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
72
<PAGE>
Overview
Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block Business
Financial Services Businesses
We refer to the businesses in our four operating divisions and our Corporate
and Other operations, collectively, as our Financial Services Businesses. The
U.S. Consumer division consists of our Individual Life Insurance, Private
Client Group, Retail Investments and Property and Casualty Insurance segments.
The Employee Benefits division consists of our Group Insurance and Other
Employee Benefits segments. The International division consists of our
International Insurance and International Securities and Investments segments.
The Asset Management division consists of our Investment Management and
Advisory Services and Other Asset Management segments. We also have Corporate
and Other operations, which contain corporate items and initiatives that are
not allocated to the business segments. Corporate and Other operations also
include businesses that we have divested or placed in wind-down status (other
than our divested healthcare business, which is treated as a discontinued
operation). The principal corporate items are the expense of corporate
management and earnings on equity not allocated to our businesses.
We attribute financing costs to each segment based on its use of financing
and reflect financing costs in each segment's results. The net investment
income of each segment includes earnings on the amount of equity which
management believes is necessary to support the risks of that segment.
Closed Block Business
Effective with the date of demutualization, we established the Closed Block
Business. For periods prior to the date of demutualization, the results of the
Closed Block Business are those of our former Traditional Participating
Products segment. Upon the establishment of the Closed Block Business, we
transferred $5.6 billion of net assets previously associated with the
Traditional Participating Products segment, including the majority of the net
proceeds of the Class B Stock and the IHC debt issuances, to the Financial
Services Businesses. This capital was initially allocated to our Corporate and
Other operations as of the date of demutualization. As a result, adjusted
operating income of the Closed Block Business does not include returns on these
net assets, which were historically included in adjusted operating income of
the Traditional Participating Products segment.
In connection with the demutualization, we ceased offering domestic
participating products. The liabilities for our individual in force
participating products were segregated, together with assets which will be used
exclusively for the payment of benefits and policyholder dividends, expenses
and taxes with respect to these products, in a regulatory mechanism referred to
as the "Closed Block." We selected the amount and type of Closed Block assets
and Closed Block liabilities included in the Closed Block so that the Closed
Block assets initially had a lower book value than the Closed Block
liabilities. We expect that the Closed Block assets will generate sufficient
cash flow, together with anticipated revenues from the Closed Block policies,
over the life of the Closed Block to fund payments of all expenses, taxes and
policyholder benefits to be paid to, and the reasonable dividend expectations
of, policyholders of the Closed Block policies. We also segregated for
accounting purposes the assets that we need to hold outside the Closed Block to
meet capital requirements related to the policies included within the Closed
Block. No policies sold after demutualization will be added to the Closed Block
and its in force business is expected to ultimately decline as we pay
policyholder benefits in full. We expect the proportion of our business
represented by the Closed Block to decline as we grow other businesses. A minor
portion of our former Traditional Participating Products segment, which
included the policies now included in the Closed Block Business prior to our
demutualization, consisted of other traditional insurance products that were
not included in the Closed Block.
The Closed Block Business consists principally of the Closed Block as well
as the Surplus and Related Assets, deferred policy acquisition costs, other
assets and the IHC debt. We allocated the net proceeds from the issuance of the
Class B Stock and IHC debt, except for $72 million used to purchase a
guaranteed investment
73
<PAGE>
contract to fund a portion of the bond insurance cost associated with that
debt, to the Financial Services Businesses. However, we expect that the IHC
debt will be serviced by the net cash flows of the Closed Block Business over
time, and we report results of the Closed Block Business, including interest
expenses associated with the IHC debt.
Revenues and Expenses
We earn our revenues principally from insurance premiums; mortality,
expense, and asset management fees from insurance and investment products;
commissions and other revenues from securities brokerage transactions; and
investment of general account and other funds. We earn premiums primarily from
the sale of individual life insurance, group life and disability insurance and
automobile and homeowners insurance. We earn mortality, expense, and asset
management fees from the sale and servicing of separate account products
including variable life insurance and variable annuities. We also earn asset
management and administrative fees from the sale and servicing of mutual funds,
retirement products and other asset management products and services. Our
operating expenses principally consist of insurance benefits provided, general
business expenses, dividends to policyholders, commissions and other costs of
selling and servicing the various products we sell and interest credited on
general account liabilities.
Profitability
Our profitability depends principally on our ability to price and manage
risk on insurance products, our ability to attract and retain customer assets,
and our ability to manage expenses. Specific drivers of our profitability
include:
. our ability to manufacture and distribute products and services and to
introduce new products gaining market acceptance on a timely basis;
. our ability to price our insurance products at a level that enables us to
earn a margin over the cost of providing benefits and the expense of
acquiring customers and administering those products;
. our mortality and morbidity experience on individual and group life
insurance, annuity and group disability insurance products;
. our persistency experience, which affects our ability to recover the cost
of acquiring new business over the lives of the contracts;
. our management of our exposure to catastrophic and other losses on our
property and casualty insurance products;
. our cost of administering insurance contracts and providing asset
management products and services;
. our returns on invested assets, net of the amounts we credit to
policyholders' accounts;
. our ability to earn commissions and fees from the sale and servicing of
mutual funds, annuities, defined contribution and other investment
products at a level that enables us to earn a margin over the expense of
providing such services;
. the amount of our assets under management and changes in their fair value,
which affect the amount of asset management fees we receive;
. our ability to generate commissions and fees from securities activities at
a level that enables us to earn a margin over the expenses of providing
such services; and
. our ability to generate favorable investment results through
asset-liability management and strategic and tactical asset allocation.
In addition, factors such as regulation, competition, interest rates, taxes,
foreign exchange rates, securities market conditions and general economic
conditions affect our profitability. In some of our product lines, particularly
those in the Closed Block Business, we share experience on mortality,
morbidity, persistency and investment results with our customers, which can
offset the impact of these factors on our profitability from those products.
74
<PAGE>
Historically, the participating products included in the Closed Block have
yielded lower returns on capital invested than many of our other businesses.
Following the demutualization, we expect that the proportion of the traditional
participating products in our in force business will gradually diminish as
these older policies age and we grow other businesses. However, the relatively
lower returns to us on this existing block of business will continue to affect
our consolidated results of operations for many years. Our Common Stock
reflects the performance of our Financial Services Businesses, but there can be
no assurance that the market value of the Common Stock will reflect solely the
performance of these businesses. The Financial Services Businesses include the
capital previously included in the Traditional Participating Products segment
in excess of the amount necessary to support the Closed Block Business. The
Financial Services Businesses also includes other traditional insurance
products previously included in the Traditional Participating Products segment
but which are not included in the Closed Block. The Class B Stock reflects the
financial performance of our Closed Block Business.
In February 1998, we announced our intention to seek legislation that would
permit our demutualization. The publicity about our possible demutualization
may have contributed to improvements in our sales, our persistency experience
or both in a number of product lines since that time, although we cannot be
certain of this.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires the application of accounting
policies that often involve a significant degree of judgment. Management, on an
ongoing basis, reviews estimates and assumptions. If management determines, as
a result of its consideration of facts and circumstances, that modifications in
assumptions and estimates are appropriate, results of operations and financial
position as reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements may change
significantly.
The following sections discuss accounting policies applied in preparing our
financial statements that management believes are most dependent on the
application of estimates and assumptions.
Valuation of Investments
The major portion of our investments are recorded at fair value in the
statements of financial position. Fair values are based on quoted market prices
or estimates from independent pricing services, when available. However, when
such information is not available, for example, with respect to private
placement fixed maturity securities, fair value is estimated, typically by
using a discounted cash flow model, which considers current market credit
spreads for publicly traded issues with similar terms by companies of
comparable credit quality. Consequently, changes in estimated future cash flows
or in our assessment of the issuer's credit quality will result in changes in
carrying value. For fixed maturities and equity securities classified as
available for sale, the impact of such changes is recorded in "Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)," a separate component of equity. However,
the carrying value of these securities is written down to estimated fair value
when a decline in value is considered to be other than temporary, and we record
the corresponding impairment loss in "Realized investment gains (losses), net"
in the statements of operations. The factors we consider to determine if an
impairment loss is warranted are discussed more fully in Note 2 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. The level of impairment losses can be
expected to increase when economic conditions worsen and decrease when economic
conditions improve.
"Commercial loans" are carried at unpaid principal balances, net of
unamortized discounts and an allowance for losses. This allowance includes a
loan specific portion as well as a portfolio reserve for incurred but not
specifically identified losses. The loan specific portion is based on
management's judgment as to ultimate collectibility of loan principal. The
portfolio reserve is based on a number of factors, such as historical
experience and portfolio diversification. Similar to impairment losses
discussed above, the allowance for losses can be expected to increase when
economic conditions worsen and decrease when economic conditions improve.
Policyholder Liabilities and Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
The liability for "Future policy benefits" is the largest liability included
in our statements of financial position. This liability is primarily comprised
of the present value of estimated future payments to holders of life insurance
and annuity products where the timing and amount of payment depends on
policyholder mortality, surrender or retirement experience. For traditional
participating life insurance products of our Closed Block
75
<PAGE>
Business, the mortality and interest rate assumptions we apply are those used
to calculate the policies' guaranteed cash surrender values. For life insurance
and annuity products of our Financial Services Businesses, expected mortality
is generally based on the Company's historical experience or standard industry
tables. Interest rate assumptions are based on factors such as market
conditions and expected investment returns. Although mortality and interest
rate assumptions are "locked-in" upon the issuance of new insurance or annuity
business with fixed and guaranteed terms, significant changes in experience or
assumptions may require us to provide for expected future losses on a product
by establishing premium deficiency reserves. For example, in 2000 we
restructured the portfolio that supports the structured settlement products
within our Other Employee Benefits segment to reduce the emphasis on equity
investments, which in turn lowered our expected future investment returns. As a
result, we recorded a charge to establish a premium deficiency reserve for
these products.
Our liability for "Unpaid claims and claim adjustment expenses" includes
estimates of claims that we believe have been incurred, but have not yet been
reported ("IBNR") as of the balance sheet date, primarily attributable to our
Property and Casualty Insurance segment and the group disability products
within our Group Insurance segment. These estimates, and estimates of the
amounts of loss we will ultimately incur on reported claims, which are based in
part on our historical experience, are regularly adjusted to reflect actual
claims experience. When actual experience differs from our previous estimate,
the resulting difference will be included in our reported results for the
period of the change in estimate. On an ongoing basis, trends in actual
experience are a significant factor in the determination of claim reserve
levels. In recent years, actual claims experience with respect to our
automobile insurance business within our Property and Casualty Insurance
segment has been more favorable than the assumptions we used in originally
establishing the reserves for these claims, which resulted in a benefit to
adjusted operating income for these years due to reserve releases, although we
do not anticipate a comparable benefit in 2002. Actual claims experience can
also be less favorable than that assumed in establishing reserves, which can
require a charge to earnings to increase reserves. For example, we recorded a
charge in 1999 with respect to our discontinued healthcare business, increasing
the loss we had initially recorded in 1998 in connection with the sale of the
business, as a result of adverse claims experience subsequent to our initial
estimate of the required reserves.
For most life insurance and annuity products that we sell, we defer costs
that vary with and are related primarily to the production of new business to
the extent these costs are deemed recoverable from future profits, and we
record these costs as an asset known as "Deferred policy acquisition costs" or
"DAC" in the statements of financial position. We amortize this DAC asset over
the expected lives of the contracts, based on the level and timing of either
estimated profits or premiums, depending on the type of contract. For products
with amortization based on future premiums, the amortization rate is locked-in
when the product is sold. However, for products with amortization based on
estimated profits, the amortization rate is periodically updated to reflect
current period experience or changes in assumptions that affect future
profitability, such as lapse rates, investment returns, mortality experience,
expense margins and surrender charges. These changes result in adjustments to
DAC balances in the period that we change our assumptions as well as changes in
prospective DAC amortization. For example, adverse market conditions in 2001
resulted in declines in the market values of assets supporting our variable
life insurance and annuity products, which in turn resulted in lower
expectations regarding our estimated future gross profits from fee-based
income. As a result, we recorded a higher level of DAC amortization in 2001 for
these products. DAC is also subject to periodic recoverability testing.
Reserves For Contingencies
A contingency is an existing condition that involves a degree of uncertainty
that will ultimately be resolved upon the occurrence of future events. Under
GAAP, reserves for contingencies are required to be established when the future
event is probable and its impact can be reasonably estimated. An example is the
establishment of a reserve for losses in connection with an unresolved legal
matter. The initial reserve reflects management's best estimate of the probable
cost of ultimate resolution of the matter and is revised accordingly as facts
and circumstances change and, ultimately, when the matter is brought to
closure. Another example is the actual execution of a definitive management
commitment to exit or restructure a business. When management formally commits
to such an action, reserves are established based on the estimated cost of
executing the action. These would typically include severance and employee
benefit costs, facilities closure costs, and certain other direct incremental
costs. For example, we established such reserves in connection with our
disposition of our former healthcare business (see Note 3 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements) and the restructuring of the capital markets business of
Prudential Securities (see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
The initial
76
<PAGE>
establishment of these reserves reflected management's best estimate of the
ultimate costs. Our results for subsequent periods reflected changes in these
estimates to the extent that the actual costs of carrying out the plans were
different from our original estimates.
Other Significant Estimates
In addition to the items discussed above, the application of GAAP requires
management to make other estimates and assumptions. For example, accounting for
pension and other postretirement and postemployment benefits requires estimates
of future returns on plan assets, expected increases in compensation levels and
trends in health care costs. These are discussed in Note 16 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements. Another example is the recognition of deferred tax
assets, which depends on management's assumption that future earnings will be
sufficient to realize the deferred benefit. This is discussed in Note 17 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Consolidated Results of Operations
In managing our business, we analyze our operating performance by separately
considering our Financial Services Businesses and our Closed Block Business. In
addition, within the Financial Services Businesses, we analyze our operating
performance using a non-GAAP measure we call "adjusted operating income". Prior
to the date of demutualization, we also analyzed results of our Traditional
Participating Products segment based on this non-GAAP measure. We calculate
adjusted operating income by adjusting our income from continuing operations
before income taxes to exclude certain items. The items excluded are:
. realized investment gains, net of losses and related charges;
. sales practices remedies and costs;
. the gains, losses and contribution to income/loss of divested businesses
that we have sold but that do not qualify for "discontinued operations"
accounting treatment under GAAP; and
. demutualization costs and expenses.
Wind-down businesses that we have not divested remain in adjusted operating
income. We exclude our discontinued healthcare operations from income from
continuing operations before income taxes.
The excluded items are important to an understanding of our overall results
of operations. You should not view adjusted operating income as a substitute
for net income determined in accordance with GAAP, and you should note that our
definition of adjusted operating income may differ from that used by other
companies. However, we believe that the presentation of adjusted operating
income as we measure it for management purposes enhances the understanding of
our results of operations by highlighting the results from ongoing operations
and the underlying profitability of our businesses. We exclude realized
investment gains, net of losses
and related charges, from adjusted operating income, because the timing of
transactions resulting in recognition of gains or losses is largely at our
discretion and the amount of these gains or losses is heavily influenced by and
fluctuates in part according to the availability of market opportunities.
Including the fluctuating effects of these transactions could distort trends in
the underlying profitability of our businesses. We exclude sales practices
remedies and costs because they relate to a substantial and identifiable
non-recurring event. We exclude the gains and losses and contribution to
income/loss of divested businesses because, as a result of our decision to
dispose of these businesses, these results are not relevant to the
profitability of our ongoing operations and could distort the trends associated
with our ongoing operations. We also exclude demutualization costs and expenses
because they are directly related to our demutualization and could distort the
trends associated with our business operations.
In the discussion below of our consolidated results of operations, we
separately discuss income from continuing operations before income taxes and
adjusted operating income for the Financial Services Businesses, as well as the
divisions thereof and Corporate and Other operations, and the Closed Block
Business. We also discuss the items excluded from adjusted operating income,
i.e., realized investment gains, sales practices remedies and costs,
demutualization costs and expenses and divested businesses, as well as items
not included in income from continuing operations before taxes, i.e., taxes and
discontinued operations. Realized investment gains and losses are allocated
between the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business. Sales
practices remedies and costs and divested businesses are allocated entirely to
the Financial Services Businesses. For purposes of analyzing our results, taxes
and discontinued operations are not allocated to our segments or divisions.
Following this consolidated discussion, you will find a detailed discussion of
our results of operations by division and by the segments of each division, as
well as the Closed Block Business.
77
<PAGE>
Net Income
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. On a consolidated basis net income
decreased $552 million from income of $398 million in 2000 to a loss of $154
million in 2001. The decrease reflects a $954 million decrease in income from
continuing operations before income taxes, partially offset by a $463 million
decrease in the related provision for income taxes as discussed below under
"--Taxes." Our $154 million net loss in 2001 included a net loss of $506
million for the fourth quarter of 2001. The $506 million net loss reflects a
loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $609 million, including
net realized investment losses of $435 million, demutualization costs and
expenses of $389 million, and adjusted operating income of $320 million.
The $954 million decrease in income from continuing operations before income
taxes resulted from a $142 million decrease from the Financial Services
Businesses and a $812 million decrease from the Closed Block Business. The $142
million decrease from the Financial Services Businesses came primarily from a
$534 million decline from our U.S. Consumer division, a $244 million decline
from our Employee Benefits division, and an $66 million decline from our Asset
Management division, partially offset by an increase of $159 million from our
International division and a $543 million reduction in losses from Corporate
and Other operations.
The $534 million decline from our U.S. Consumer division, the $244 million
decline from our Employee Benefits division and the $66 million decline from
our Asset Management division came primarily from decreases in adjusted
operating income. The $159 million increase from our International division
came from an increase in adjusted operating income. Results for our
International division include the results of Gibraltar Life Insurance Company,
Ltd. ("Gibraltar Life"), which we acquired in April 2001, from April 2, 2001
through November 30, 2001. The $543 million reduction in losses from Corporate
and Other operations came primarily from a $467 million increase in realized
investment gains, net of losses, and a $489 million decrease in losses from
divested businesses which were partially offset by a $445 million increase in
demutualization costs and expenses and a $32 million improvement in adjusted
operating income.
Net income on an equivalent share basis assumes that shares issued in the
demutualization and the initial public offering were outstanding for all
periods and does not reflect adjustments to earnings for demutualization or
related transactions. Net income per equivalent share of Common Stock, which
reflects the performance of the Financial Services Businesses, decreased to 52
cents per equivalent Common Share for the year ended December 31, 2001, from 53
cents per equivalent Common Share for the year ended December 31, 2000. Also on
an equivalent share basis, net income per equivalent share of the Class B
Stock, which reflects the performance of the Closed Block Business, decreased
to a loss of $228.00 per equivalent share of Class B Stock for the year ended
December 31, 2001, from income of $43.50 per equivalent share of Class B Stock
for the year ended December 31, 2000. The decrease in net income per equivalent
share of the Common Stock and Class B Stock from 2000 to 2001 reflects the
decline in net income of the Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block
Business as discussed above.
See "--Adjusted Operating Income" below for a discussion of the adjusted
operating income results of our divisions, Corporate and Other operations and
our Closed Block Business.
See "--Realized Investment Gains" below for a discussion of realized
investment gains, net of losses, and charges related to net realized investment
gains.
Terrorist Attacks on the United States
Our losses from insurance claims arising in connection with the September
11, 2001 terrorist attacks, after release of existing reserves and reinsurance
recoveries, had a negative effect on adjusted operating income and income from
continuing operations before income taxes of approximately $37 million, and on
net income of approximately $23 million, for 2001. These insurance losses are
based on gross losses of approximately $172 million from group life, individual
life, and property and casualty insurance claims. Approximately $27 million of
the negative impact on adjusted operating income and income from continuing
operations before income taxes related to the Financial Services Businesses,
primarily in the Individual Life Insurance segment. The remainder of the losses
related to the Closed Block Business.
We suffered no material injury to our personnel or properties used in our
business operations from the attacks.
78
<PAGE>
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Net income decreased $415 million, or 51%,
from $813 million in 1999 to $398 million in 2000. This decrease reflects a
$1.528 billion decrease in income from continuing operations before income
taxes, partially offset by a $636 million decrease in the related provision for
income taxes as discussed below under "--Taxes." Additionally, net income for
2000 included $77 million of income resulting from a reduction in our loss on
disposal of our discontinued healthcare operations, while 1999 net income
included a $400 million increase in our loss on disposal of these operations,
as discussed below under "--Discontinued Operations."
The $1.528 billion decrease in income from continuing operations before
income taxes resulted from a $1.377 billion decrease from the Financial
Services Businesses and a $151 million decrease from the Closed Block Business.
The $1.377 billion decrease from the Financial Services Businesses came
primarily from a $1.335 billion decline from Corporate and Other operations and
a $216 million decline from our Employee Benefits division, partially offset by
an $85 million increase from our U.S. Consumer division and a $65 million
increase from our International division. The $1.335 billion decline from
Corporate and Other operations came primarily from a $637 million decline in
realized investment gains, net of losses, and from a $643 million decline from
the former lead-managed underwriting and institutional fixed income businesses
of Prudential Securities, which we include in "divested businesses." The $216
million decline from our Employee Benefits division came primarily from a $203
million decline in realized investment gains, net of losses and related
charges. The $85 million increase from our U.S. Consumer division came
primarily from a $73 million increase in adjusted operating income. The $65
million increase from our International division reflected an $89 million
increase in adjusted operating income.
Adjusted Operating Income
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. On a consolidated basis, adjusted operating
income decreased $569 million, or 25%, from $2.268 billion for 2000 to $1.699
billion for 2001. Our adjusted operating income for the fourth quarter of 2001
was $320 million, reflecting adjusted operating income of $173 million for the
Financial Services Businesses and $147 million for the Closed Block Business.
Adjusted operating income in the Financial Services Businesses for the fourth
quarter of 2001 reflected declines in results in the U.S. Consumer and Employee
Benefits divisions compared to prior periods of 2001. The decrease for the year
ended December 31, 2001 came from a $458 million decrease from the Financial
Services Businesses, and a $111 million decrease from the Closed Block
Business. Adjusted operating income of our Financial Services Businesses for
2001 includes $262 million, which represents Gibraltar Life's results from
April 2, 2001 through November 30, 2001.
Adjusted operating income of our Financial Services Businesses decreased
$458 million, or 27%, from 2000 to 2001. The decrease came primarily from
decreases of $430 million from our U.S. Consumer division and $204 million from
our Employee Benefits division, partially offset by a $201 million increase in
adjusted operating income from our International division, including the $262
million contribution of Gibraltar Life in 2001.
The $430 million decrease in adjusted operating income from our U.S.
Consumer division came primarily from a $476 million decrease from the Private
Client Group segment. The $204 million decrease in adjusted operating income
from our Employee Benefits division came from declines in both segments in the
division.
Adjusted operating income of the Closed Block Business decreased $111
million, or 20%, from 2000 to 2001, primarily from a $144 million reserve for
unreported death claims and related expenses and a decline in net investment
income resulting from the transfer of assets previously associated with our
Traditional Participating Products segment to the Financial Services Businesses
in connection with the establishment of the Closed Block Business on the date
of demutualization. These declines were partially offset by a reduction in the
charge for policyholder dividends, which excludes the portion of the dividend
related to net realized investment gains, a reduction in amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs and a decline in operating expenses.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. On a consolidated basis, adjusted operating
income increased $263 million, or 13%, from 1999 to 2000. The increase came
from a $231 million increase from the Closed Block Business and a $32 million
increase from the Financial Services Businesses.
79
<PAGE>
Adjusted operating income of our Financial Services Businesses increased $32
million, or 2%, from 1999 to 2000. The increase came primarily from increases
of $89 million from our International division and $73 million from our U.S.
Consumer division, partially offset by a $141 million decrease from Corporate
and Other operations.
The $89 million increase in adjusted operating income from our International
division came primarily from a $78 million increase from the International
Insurance segment. The $73 million increase in adjusted operating income from
our U.S. Consumer division came primarily from an increase of $65 million from
the Retail Investments segment. The $141 million decrease from Corporate and
Other operations came primarily from corporate-level activities, which included
a one-time benefit of $114 million recognized in 1999 as a result of a
reduction of recorded liabilities for our own employee benefits.
Adjusted operating income of the Closed Block Business increased $231
million, or 73%, from 1999 to 2000, primarily as a result of an increase in
investment income net of interest expense and a decline in operating expenses.
Realized Investment Gains
We have frequently used an active management strategy for a significant
portion of our public fixed maturity investment portfolio to maximize the
overall return on our investments, subject to our adjusted operating income
objectives. The implementation of this strategy resulted in significant
realized investment losses in 2000 and 1999. When applied during a period of
generally declining interest rates, we expect that using this strategy will
result in lower investment income partially offset by realized investment
gains. Conversely, when applied during a period of generally rising interest
rates, we expect that using this strategy will result in increased investment
income offset by realized investment losses. The amount of our gains or losses
also depends on relative value opportunities and other variables. In
consideration of our adjusted operating income objectives, and other factors,
we may choose, at times, to constrain our active management and, therefore, the
magnitude of realized investment gains or losses.
In addition, we require most issuers of private fixed maturity securities to
pay us make-whole yield maintenance payments when they prepay the securities.
Prepayment levels are also driven by the interest rate environment and other
factors not within our control. The prepayment of private fixed maturities we
held contributed realized investment gains of $155 million in the year ended
December 31, 2001, $74 million in 2000 and $155 million in 1999.
Realized investment gains, net of losses, also includes impairments on fixed
income and equity assets, which we recognize on an ongoing basis. The level of
impairments generally reflects economic conditions, and is expected to increase
when economic conditions worsen and to decrease when economic conditions
improve.
We use derivative contracts to hedge the risk that changes in interest rates
or foreign currency exchange rates will affect the market value of certain
investments. The vast majority of these derivative contracts do not qualify for
hedge accounting and, consequently, we recognize the changes in fair value of
such contracts from period to period in current earnings, although we do not
necessarily treat the underlying assets the same way. Accordingly, our hedging
activities contribute significantly to fluctuations in realized investment
gains and losses.
The comparisons below discuss realized investment gains net of losses and
related charges. These charges relate to policyholder dividends, DAC, and
reserves for future policy benefits. Net realized investment gains is one of
the elements that we consider in establishing the domestic dividend scale and
in providing for dividends to Gibraltar Life policyholders, and the related
charge for dividends to policyholders represents the estimated portion of our
expense charge for policyholder dividends that is attributable to net realized
investment gains that we consider in determining our dividend scale and the
Gibraltar Life dividends. See "--Results of Operations for Financial Services
Businesses by Division and Closed Block Business" below. We amortize deferred
policy acquisition costs for interest sensitive products based on estimated
gross profits, which include net realized investment gains on the underlying
invested assets, and the related charge for amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs represents the amortization related to net realized
investment gains. We adjust the reserves for some of our policies when cash
flows related to these policies are affected by net realized investment gains,
and the related charge for reserves for future policy benefits represents that
adjustment. The changes in these related charges from one period to another may
be disproportionate to the changes in realized investment gains, net of
80
<PAGE>
losses, because the indicated reserve adjustments relate to realized investment
gains, but not losses, evaluated over several periods, and because realized
investment gains and losses are reflected in the dividend scale over a number
of years.
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. For the Financial Services Businesses,
realized investment gains, net of losses and related charges, increased $272
million, from a net loss of $408 million in 2000 to a net loss of $136 million
in 2001. The net realized investment loss of the Financial Services Businesses
for 2001 reflected impairments recognized of $557 million, and $196 million of
losses on disposal of substantially all of the Enron holdings of the Financial
Services Businesses. For the Closed Block Business, realized investment gains,
net of losses and related charges, declined $701 million, from a net loss of
$354 million in 2000 to a net loss of $1.055 billion in 2001. The net realized
investment loss of the Closed Block Business for 2001 reflected impairments
recognized of $475 million, and $160 million of losses on disposal of
substantially all of the Enron holdings of the Closed Block Business.
On a consolidated basis, realized investment gains, net of losses and
related charges, declined $429 million, from a net loss of $762 million in 2000
to a net loss of $1.191 billion in 2001. Realized investment losses, net of
gains but excluding related charges, declined $417 million, from a net loss of
$288 million in 2000 to a net loss of $705 million in 2001. Charges related to
net realized investment gains and losses amounted to $474 million in 2000 and
$486 million in 2001. These charges did not change proportionately with the
change in realized investment gains, net of losses, from 2000 to 2001 for the
reasons described above.
On a consolidated basis, we realized net losses of $639 million on fixed
maturity investments in 2001, compared to net losses of $ 1.066 billion in
2000. During 2001, we recognized impairments on fixed maturities totaling $777
million and realized additional losses of $356 million on the sale of
substantially all of our Enron holdings. These impairments and losses were
partially offset by realized gains of $494 million primarily from sales and
prepayments of fixed maturities in an environment of lower interest rates than
when the securities were purchased. The net losses in 2000 came primarily from
fixed maturity investment sales in an environment of higher interest rates than
those when the securities were purchased as well as impairments we recorded on
fixed maturity investments totaling $540 million. The effect of economic and
market conditions is uncertain and could result in additional impairments. We
realized net losses on equity securities of $245 million in 2001, compared to
net gains of $450 million in 2000, as we benefited in 2000 from more favorable
equity market conditions, particularly during the early part of the year, and
we disposed of appreciated equity securities as part of a portfolio rebalancing
program. We recorded net investment gains on derivatives of $126 million in
2001 and $165 million in 2000.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. For the Financial Services Businesses,
realized investment gains, net of losses and related charges, declined $852
million from a net gain of $444 million in 1999 to a net loss of $408 million
in 2000. For the Closed Block Business, realized investment gains, net of
losses and related charges, declined $382 million, from a net gain of $28
million in 1999 to a net loss of $354 million in 2000.
On a consolidated basis, realized investment gains, net of losses and
related charges, declined $1.234 billion, from a net gain of $472 million in
1999 to a net loss of $762 million in 2000. Realized investment gains, net of
losses but excluding related charges, declined $1.212 billion, from a net gain
of $924 million in 1999 to a net loss of $288 million in 2000. Charges related
to net realized investment gains and losses were essentially unchanged,
amounting to $452 million in 1999 and $474 million in 2000. These charges did
not change proportionately with the change in realized investment gains, net of
losses, in 2000 from 1999 for the reasons described above.
We realized losses of $1.066 billion on fixed maturity investments in 2000
and $557 million in 1999. These net realized losses reflected the impact of
fixed maturity investment sales in environments of higher interest rates than
those when the securities were purchased. The $509 million increase in fixed
maturity realized losses in 2000 from 1999 came primarily from a portfolio
strategy we implemented to sell securities with lower investment income yields
underlying some of our long-duration products in the Other Employee Benefits
segment and in our debt-financed corporate investment portfolio, reinvesting
the proceeds in higher yielding securities, and from increased impairments in
2000. We recognized impairments on fixed maturity investments
81
<PAGE>
of $540 million in 2000, primarily on publicly traded high yield and other
corporate bonds, compared to $266 million in 1999. We realized net gains on
sales of equity securities of $450 million in 2000, compared to $223 million in
1999. We realized net gains from disposals of direct real estate and real
estate related joint ventures of $149 million in 2000 compared to $703 million
in 1999, reflecting several major transactions that closed in 1999. We recorded
net investment gains of $165 million on derivatives during 2000, compared to
net gains of $305 million in 1999.
Sales Practices Remedies and Costs
As of December 31, 2001, we have provided $4.405 billion before tax,
equivalent to $2.850 billion after tax, for both the cost of remedies to be
provided to life insurance policyholders under the remediation process required
under the principal sales practices class action settlement to which we are a
party and additional sales practices costs and expenses. We believe we are
fully reserved and we have not recorded any incremental charges since 1999.
These costs include estimated administrative costs related to the remediation
program and its accompanying alternative dispute resolution process, regulatory
fines, penalties and related payments, litigation costs and settlements,
including settlements associated with the resolution of claims of deceptive
sales practices asserted by policyholders who elected to "opt-out" of the class
action settlement and litigate their claims against us separately, as well as
other associated fees and expenses, which we refer to in the aggregate as
additional sales practices costs.
Charges associated with the cost of remedying policyholder claims and
additional sales practices costs have been adjusted from year to year,
beginning in 1996. No additional net charges have been recorded since 1999. The
charges from year to year primarily reflected the increased availability over
time of more specific information about the number of policyholder claims
received and remedied, the accrued interest associated with claim relief, other
factors affecting both the cost of remedies and the cost to us of administering
the remediation program, and the cost of resolving "opt out" litigation as
described above. See Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a
further description of these charges.
The charges related to our estimated costs of sales practices remedies and
additional sales practices costs and the related liability balances at the
dates indicated are shown below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Liability balance at beginning of period $253 $891 $3,058 $2,553 $ 963 $ --
Charges to expense, pre-tax:
Remedy costs......................... -- (54) (99) 510 1,640 410
Additional sales practices costs..... -- 54 199 640 390 715
---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------
Total charges to expense............. -- -- 100 1,150 2,030 1,125
Amounts paid or credited:
Remedy costs......................... 71 448 1,708 147 -- --
Additional sales practices costs..... 130 190 559 498 440 162
---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------
Total amount paid or credited........ 201 638 2,267 645 440 162
---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------
Liability balance at end of period...... $ 52 $253 $ 891 $3,058 $2,553 $ 963
==== ==== ====== ====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
See Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of
the life insurance sales practices litigation.
While a portion of the sales practices remedies have been in the form of
policy credits or enhancements, the major portion of the total cost for sales
practices remedies and additional sales practices costs have resulted in cash
disbursements. The cash outflows from these disbursements have reduced our
invested assets and consequently have reduced our investment income. We
included the investment income from the assets used to satisfy the sales
practices remedies and additional sales practices costs prior to their
disbursement in our adjusted operating income for Corporate and Other
operations. The $4.4 billion of cash disbursements do not include the cash flow
from surrenders associated with the implementation of the sales practices
remediation program, which are discussed under "--Results of Operations for
Financial Services Businesses by Division and Closed Block Business--Closed
Block Business--Policy Surrender Experience."
82
<PAGE>
Divested Businesses
Our income from continuing operations includes results from several
businesses that we have divested but that under generally accepted accounting
principles do not qualify for "discontinued operations" treatment in our income
statement. Our results from divested businesses primarily relate to the former
lead-managed equity underwriting for corporate issuers and institutional fixed
income businesses of Prudential Securities and the operations of Gibraltar
Casualty Company, a commercial property and casualty insurer that we sold in
September 2000, as well as obligations we retained or agreed to in the
transactions to sell our other divested businesses. The lead-managed equity
underwriting for corporate issuers and institutional fixed income businesses of
Prudential Securities recorded pre-tax losses of $159 million in the year ended
December 31, 2001, and $620 million in 2000, and pre-tax income of $23 million
in 1999. The losses in 2001 came primarily from deterioration in the value of
collateralized receivables that we are in the process of liquidating, which are
related to these businesses, and wind-down costs. The losses from these
operations in 2000 came primarily from charges of $476 million associated with
our termination and wind-down of these activities. Gibraltar Casualty recorded
pre-tax losses of $7 million in 2000 and $72 million in 1999. The 1999 losses
are attributable to increased reserves for environmental and asbestos-related
claims resulting primarily from an increase in the number of lawsuits being
filed against manufacturers of asbestos-related products. The remainder of our
results from divested businesses are attributable to our remaining obligations
with respect to our divested residential mortgage banking business, a benefits
plan administration business we sold in 1998, and a Canadian life insurance
subsidiary that we sold in May 2000.
Demutualization Costs and Expenses
We incurred costs and expenses related to demutualization totaling $588
million in the year ended December 31, 2001, including $340 million of
demutualization consideration paid to our former Canadian branch policyholders,
$143 million in 2000, and $75 million in 1999. These costs and expenses are
reported separately in our consolidated income statements within income from
continuing operations before income taxes. Demutualization expenses consist
primarily of the costs of engaging independent accounting, actuarial,
investment banking, legal and other consultants to advise us and insurance
regulators in the demutualization process and related matters as well as
printing and postage for communication with policyholders.
Taxes
A provision of federal tax law applicable to mutual life insurance companies
has resulted in significant fluctuations in our effective tax rate. This tax
law requires adjustment to the deductible portion of policyholder dividends
based on a complex multi-year formula that compares the financial accounting
earnings rates of mutual life insurance companies with those of stock life
insurers. The actual rate to be applied to a particular tax year is determined
by the IRS up to two years after the end of the tax year. Accordingly, for
periods prior to our demutualization, we were required to estimate the current
year's rate in determining our tax provision for the current year for
accounting purposes. When the actual rate was announced by the IRS, we
recognized any difference between our estimated rate and the IRS's actual rate
in that year. We are no longer subject to this tax after the demutualization.
The impact of this tax law as reflected in reported results, including the
current year estimate and adjustment of prior year estimates, constitutes the
primary reason for the difference between our reported effective tax rates and
the statutory rate of 35%. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We recorded a net income tax benefit of $57 million in 2001 and an income
tax provision of $406 million in 2000. The income tax benefit in 2001
represented 25% of our loss from continuing operations before income taxes,
while the income tax provision in 2000 represented 56% of that year's income
from continuing operations before income taxes. The net income tax benefit in
2001 was primarily due to a $200 million reduction of the estimated liability
for the mutual life insurance company tax, while the income tax provision in
2000 reflected a $100 million provision for this tax. The disparity between our
effective tax rates in 2001 and 2000 and the application of the corporate
income tax rate of 35% to our income or loss from continuing operations before
income taxes is primarily a result of the mutual life insurance company tax and
the inclusion of demutualization costs and expenses within income or loss from
continuing operations before income taxes.
Our income tax provisions amounted to $406 million for 2000 and $1.042
billion for 1999. The income tax provisions represented 56% of income from
continuing operations before income taxes in 2000 and 46% of income from
continuing operations before income taxes in 1999. This increase in the
effective rate was due primarily to the mutual life insurance company tax
discussed above and an increase in demutualization expenses.
83
<PAGE>
Discontinued Operations
In December 1998, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our
healthcare operations as described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. The sale was completed in August 1999. Net losses from these
operations, after related income tax benefits, were $521 million in 1998,
including a $223 million loss on disposal. We recognized an additional loss on
disposal of these operations during 1999 amounting to $400 million after
related tax benefits. Higher than anticipated operating losses prior to the
closing date, resulting principally from adverse claims experience, and the
impact of this experience on our evaluation of our obligations under our
agreement to make payments to the purchaser of our healthcare operations if the
medical loss ratio exceeds specified levels, caused the additional loss. In
2000, upon completion of the period covered by that agreement and comparing
other costs we incurred related to the healthcare disposal to those estimated
in 1998 and 1999, we reduced the loss on disposal by $77 million, after related
income taxes. In 2001, we further reduced the loss on disposal by $16 million,
after related income taxes, upon completing the negotiation of the final
medical loss ratio settlement in December 2001. While we believe that, as of
December 31, 2001, we have adequately reserved in all material respects for
remaining costs and liabilities associated with our healthcare business, we
might incur additional charges that might be material to our results of
operations.
84
<PAGE>
Results of Operations for Financial Services Businesses by Division and
Closed Block Business
In managing our business, we analyze our operating performance using
"adjusted operating income," which is a non-GAAP measure that excludes certain
items as described above under "--Consolidated Results of Operations." The
following table, prepared on that basis, sets forth the revenues, adjusted
operating income and income from continuing operations before income taxes for
each of our four divisions and for Corporate and Other operations, including
consolidating adjustments, which together comprise our Financial Services
Businesses, and for our Closed Block Business, for the years ended December 31,
2001, 2000 and 1999, as well as their assets as of those dates.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
As of or for
Year Ended December 31,
- - ----------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues(1):
Financial Services Businesses:
U.S. Consumer............................................. $ 7,644 $ 8,026 $ 7,563
Employee Benefits......................................... 5,912 5,686 5,442
International............................................. 4,694 2,624 2,102
Asset Management.......................................... 1,272 1,344 1,141
Corporate and Other....................................... 103 205 509
-------- -------- --------
Total Financial Services Businesses..................... 19,625 17,885 16,757
Closed Block Business (2).................................... 8,271 8,638 8,376
-------- -------- --------
Total................................................... $ 27,896 $ 26,523 $ 25,133
======== ======== ========
Adjusted operating income(3):
Financial Services Businesses:
U.S. Consumer............................................. $ 310 $ 740 $ 667
Employee Benefits......................................... 183 387 400
International............................................. 523 322 233
Asset Management.......................................... 219 276 252
Corporate and Other....................................... 28 (4) 137
-------- -------- --------
Total Financial Services Businesses..................... 1,263 1,721 1,689
Closed Block Business (2).................................... 436 547 316
-------- -------- --------
Total................................................... $ 1,699 $ 2,268 $ 2,005
======== ======== ========
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes:
Financial Services Businesses:
U.S. Consumer............................................. $ 210 $ 744 $ 659
Employee Benefits......................................... 25 269 485
International............................................. 466 307 242
Asset Management.......................................... 211 277 253
Corporate and Other....................................... (520) (1,063) 272
-------- -------- --------
Total Financial Services Businesses..................... 392 534 1,911
Closed Block Business (2).................................... (619) 193 344
-------- -------- --------
Total................................................... $ (227) $ 727 $ 2,255
======== ======== ========
Assets:
Financial Services Businesses:
U.S. Consumer............................................. $ 71,231 $ 73,223 $ 78,235
Employee Benefits......................................... 72,767 75,817 73,955
International(4).......................................... 41,401 10,370 9,275
Asset Management.......................................... 28,357 30,602 25,558
Corporate and Other....................................... 17,549 12,814 29,498
-------- -------- --------
Total Financial Services Businesses..................... 231,305 202,826 216,521
Closed Block Business (2).................................... 61,725 69,927 68,573
-------- -------- --------
Total................................................... $293,030 $272,753 $285,094
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Revenues exclude realized investment gains, net of losses, and revenues
from divested businesses.
(2) Amounts shown for the Closed Block Business represent results of the
Traditional Participating Products segment for periods prior to the date of
demutualization.
(3) Adjusted operating income equals revenues as defined above in footnote (1)
less benefits and expenses excluding (i) the impact of net realized
investment gains on deferred acquisition cost amortization, reserves and
dividends to policyholders; (ii) sales practices remedies and costs; (iii)
the benefits and expenses from divested businesses; and (iv)
demutualization costs and expenses.
(4) Assets of our International division at December 31, 2001 include assets of
Gibraltar Life, which we acquired in April 2001, amounting to $30.238
billion.
85
<PAGE>
U.S. Consumer Division
The U.S. Consumer division generates income from premiums, as well as
fee-based revenues and spread income, through the Individual Life Insurance,
Retail Investments and Property and Casualty Insurance segments. Premiums and
investment income are received by the Individual Life Insurance and Property
and Casualty Insurance segments on insurance products and by the Retail
Investments segment on some of its annuity products. Products and services that
generate fee-based revenue include mutual funds, variable annuities, variable
life insurance and wrap-fee products. The latter fee-based revenues consist
primarily of asset management fees, account servicing fees and risk charges.
The Retail Investments segment receives fees and investment income from retail
investment products. Additionally, the securities brokerage operations that
account for the major portion of revenues of the Private Client Group segment
generate revenues from client commissions, asset management and portfolio
service fees, and net interest revenues derived primarily from margin lending
to customers, as well as sales credits related to transactions with retail
customers associated with equity and fixed income sales and trading operations.
We also earn trading revenues from our fixed income trading operations which
are incidental to our retail operations. We include fee-based revenues in the
line captioned "Commissions and other income" or "Policy charges and fee
income" in our consolidated statements of operations. The Private Client Group
segment also includes our consumer banking operations.
We seek to earn spread income in our general account on various products.
Spread income is the difference between our return on the investments
supporting the products net of expenses and the amounts we credit to our
contractholders. Products that generate spread income primarily include the
general account insurance products of the Individual Life Insurance segment,
and fixed annuities and the fixed-rate option of variable annuities of the
Retail Investments segment. We include revenues from these products, other than
premiums received from policyholders, primarily in the line captioned "Net
investment income" in our consolidated statements of operations.
The Individual Life Insurance and Private Client Group segments pay the
expenses of their own proprietary sales forces for distribution of products.
Additionally, the Retail Investments segment pays the Individual Life Insurance
and Private Client Group segments for distribution of its products by
Prudential Agents and Financial Advisors. The Individual Life Insurance, Retail
Investments and Property and Casualty Insurance segments also pay our
Investment Management and Advisory Services segment for management of
proprietary assets which include the general account investments that support
our Individual Life Insurance, Retail Investments and Property and Casualty
Insurance segments, as well as most of the assets supporting our separate
account life insurance and annuity products such as variable life insurance and
annuities. These fees result in expenses to the segments of the U.S. Consumer
division and revenues to the Asset Management division. We reflect all of the
intra-company asset management services at rates that we determine with
reference to market rates.
In recent years, sales in our individual life insurance business, as
measured by both number of policies and premiums, have generally declined or
not grown significantly. This trend is due in part to a continuing decline in
the number of Prudential Agents. We believe that the decline in Prudential
Agents results, in part, from our implementation of higher productivity
standards associated with measures we have taken to reduce the cost structure
of our proprietary distribution channel. This trend in sales has had an adverse
impact on premiums, primarily from new business, and adjusted operating income.
We are seeking to improve performance by taking steps to refocus the Prudential
Agent sales force on the mass affluent market and to continue to improve
productivity of the proprietary distribution channel, and to expand third-party
distribution of our products. However, we cannot predict whether these steps
will succeed or have the desired effects.
Prior to 2001, we experienced net redemptions in our proprietary retail
investment products due in substantial part to turnover among experienced
Financial Advisors and our focus on the value style of investment management in
our equity mutual funds. The impact of these outflows was partially offset by
higher revenues resulting from market appreciation of remaining assets, which
produced increases in assets under management in 1999 and 2000. Over the last
several years, we began to diversify the focus of our investment products and
we have been building investment manager choice into most of our Retail
Investments products. This advised choice approach allows us to offer customers
investment alternatives advised by third parties in our products and asset
management styles that we might not otherwise offer. Our Retail Investments
wrap-fee assets increased to $19.6 billion at December 31, 2000, from $16.7
billion a year earlier and $11.5 billion at December 31, 1998. We believe these
increases reflect increased marketplace emphasis on products that provide
customers a broader
86
<PAGE>
choice of investments. At December 31, 2001, wrap-fee assets decreased to $18.0
billion, reflecting market value declines during 2001. We believe the
continuing turnover among domestic Financial Advisors is due in part to the
lack of a stock-based compensation program. In 1999 this turnover increased due
in part to greater industry competition for productive Financial Advisors. We
have taken actions to stabilize the Financial Advisor force, including our
implementation, effective January 1, 2000, of an equity-market-linked,
voluntary long-term deferred compensation plan, and our introduction of an
aggressive recruiting effort targeting experienced Financial Advisors,
including recruiting and retention incentives. We expect that these programs
will contribute to improvement of our turnover rates over time, although there
can be no assurance of this.
We have taken actions to reduce the operating cost structures and overhead
levels of the businesses of the U.S. Consumer division. In the Individual Life
Insurance segment, a program to restructure our field management and agency
structure resulted in a reduction in the number of sales territories,
establishing a smaller number of larger field offices, and eliminated
approximately 1,700 management and non-agent positions. In the Private Client
Group segment, we have taken actions in 2001 to reduce staffing levels,
occupancy costs, and other overhead costs. We have also taken actions in the
Property and Casualty Insurance segment to reduce staffing levels and overhead
costs. While there can be no assurance that our anticipated cost reductions
will be fully achieved, we believe that these initiatives will reduce operating
expenses, excluding certain non-interest expenses in the Private Client Group
segment, below 2000 levels by more than $320 million on an annual basis in
2002, and that reduced expenses resulting from these initiatives will benefit
results thereafter. Adjusted operating income of the U.S. Consumer division
benefited in 2001 from a reduction in operating expenses, associated with these
initiatives, of approximately $170 million as compared to 2000, primarily in
the Individual Life Insurance segment. We believe that the remainder of the
anticipated reduction in operating expenses will benefit adjusted operating
income of the U.S. Consumer division in 2002 as compared to 2001. Expenses
incurred to achieve these reductions were about $175 million in 2001.
Most of our variable life insurance, variable annuity and wrap-fee products
include investment alternatives that are managed by third parties. The
Individual Life Insurance and Retail Investments segments pay investment
management fees to the third-party managers for the funds invested through
these non-proprietary options. We also sponsor mutual funds that have
third-party advisors. Because of these arrangements, our assets under
management and administration that are invested through non-proprietary options
and our proprietary funds that are managed by third parties may offer lower
profitability than the assets we manage directly.
87
<PAGE>
Division Results
The following table and discussion present the U.S. Consumer division's
results based on our definition of adjusted operating income, which is a
non-GAAP measure, as well as income from continuing operations before income
taxes, which is prepared in accordance with GAAP. As shown below, adjusted
operating income excludes realized investment gains, net of losses and related
charges. The excluded items are important to an understanding of our overall
results of operations. You should not view adjusted operating income as a
substitute for income from continuing operations determined in accordance with
GAAP, and you should note that our definition of adjusted operating income may
differ from that used by other companies. However, we believe that the
presentation of adjusted operating income as we measure it for management
purposes enhances the understanding of our results of operations by
highlighting the results from ongoing operations and the underlying
profitability factors of our businesses. We exclude realized investment gains,
net of losses and related charges, from adjusted operating income because the
timing of transactions resulting in recognition of gains or losses is largely
at our discretion and the amount of these gains or losses is heavily influenced
by and fluctuates in part according to the availability of market
opportunities. Including the fluctuating effects of these transactions could
distort trends in the underlying profitability of our businesses.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Division
operating
results:
Revenues(1)...... $7,644 $8,026 $7,563
Benefits
and
expenses(2)...... 7,334 7,286 6,896
------ ------ ------
Adjusted
operating
income........... $ 310 $ 740 $ 667
====== ====== ======
Adjusted
operating
income by
segment:
Individual
Life
Insurance........ $ 273 $ 114 $ 117
Private
Client Group..... (239) 237 224
Retail
Investments...... 181 239 174
Property
and
Casualty
Insurance........ 95 150 152
------ ------ ------
Total.......... 310 740 667
Items excluded
from adjusted
operating
income:
Realized
investment
gains, net of
losses and
related
charges:
Realized
investment
gains
(losses),
net.............. (112) 2 (9)
Related
charges(3)....... 12 2 1
------ ------ ------
Total
realized
investment
gains,
net of
losses
and
related
charges........ (100) 4 (8)
------ ------ ------
Income from
continuing
operations
before income
taxes............... $ 210 $ 744 $ 659
====== ====== ======
- --------
(1) Revenues
exclude
realized
investment
gains, net
of losses.
(2) Benefits
and
expenses
exclude
the impact
of net
realized
investment
gains on
deferred
acquisition
cost
amortization
and
reserves.
(3) Related
charges
consist of
the
following:
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
Reserves for
future policy
benefits............ $ (1) $ (4) $ --
Amortization
of deferred
policy
acquisition
costs............... 13 6 1
------ ------ ------
Total............ $ 12 $ 2 $ 1
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income of our U.S.
Consumer division decreased $430 million, or 58%, in 2001 from 2000. The
decline resulted primarily from a decrease in adjusted operating income in our
Private Client Group segment. Income from continuing operations before income
taxes decreased $534 million, or 72%, primarily as a result of the decrease in
adjusted operating income.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income of our U.S.
Consumer division increased $73 million, or 11%, in 2000 from 1999. The
increase came primarily from an increase in adjusted operating income from our
Retail Investments segment. Income from continuing operations before income
taxes increased $85 million, or 13%, primarily as a result of the increase in
adjusted operating income.
88
<PAGE>
Individual Life Insurance
Operating Results
The following table sets forth the Individual Life Insurance segment's
operating results for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating results:
Revenues(1)................. $1,919 $1,828 $1,703
Benefits and expenses....... 1,646 1,714 1,586
------ ------ ------
Adjusted operating income... $ 273 $ 114 $ 117
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Revenues exclude realized investment gains, net of losses.
Adjusted Operating Income
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income increased $159
million in 2001 from 2000. The increase came primarily from a $183 million
decrease in operating expenses. The decrease in operating expenses came
primarily from savings that we have begun to realize from our field management
and agency restructuring program as described above and lower program
implementation costs, which amounted to $90 million in 2001 and $107 million in
2000. Implementation costs for this program were substantially completed in
2001. Additionally, in 2000 we recorded a $23 million one-time increase in
reserves related to a portion of our variable life insurance business in force.
However, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased $60
million in 2001 from 2000, and we recorded net losses of $25 million from
insurance claims arising from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the
United States.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income was essentially
unchanged in 2000 from 1999. Growth in our base of term products in force
resulted in an increase in premium revenues, and investment income increased
due to the larger base of general account assets and an increased investment
yield. However, these increases were essentially offset by a one-time increase
in reserves related to a portion of our variable life insurance business in
force.
Revenues
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Revenues, as shown in the table above under
"--Operating Results," increased $91 million, or 5%, in 2001 from 2000.
Premiums increased $117 million, or 43%, from $270 million in 2000 to $387
million in 2001, due to increased premiums on term insurance we issued, under
policy provisions, to customers who previously had lapsing variable life
insurance with us.
Policy charges and fees amounted to $1.017 billion in 2001, essentially
unchanged from $1.023 billion in 2000.
Net investment income increased $17 million, or 5%, from $374 million in
2000 to $391 million in 2001, primarily from an increase in the base of general
account invested assets.
Other income decreased $37 million, or 23%, from $161 million in 2000 to
$124 million in 2001, primarily as a result of a decline in sales of
non-Prudential products by our agents.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Revenues increased $125 million, or 7%, in
2000 from 1999. The increase came primarily from a $58 million increase in net
investment income and a $28 million increase in premiums.
Premiums increased $28 million, or 12%, from $242 million in 1999 to $270
million in 2000. The increase came primarily from an increase in renewal
premiums for our term products, reflecting the increased base of business in
force.
89
<PAGE>
Policy charges and fees amounted to $1.023 billion for 2000, relatively
unchanged from $1.030 billion in 1999.
Net investment income increased $58 million, or 18%, from $316 million in
1999 to $374 million in 2000. The increase resulted from an increase in the
base of general account invested assets and a slight increase in investment
yield.
Benefits and Expenses
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Benefits and expenses, as shown in the
table above under "--Operating Results," decreased $68 million, or 4%, in 2001
from 2000. A decrease of $183 million in operating expenses, including
distribution costs that we charge to expense, was partially offset by a $60
million increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and a $60
million increase in policyholder benefits and related changes in reserves.
Operating expenses decreased $183 million, from $761 million in 2000 to $578
million in 2001, primarily as a result of savings we began to realize from our
program to restructure our field management and agency structure as described
above and lower program implementation costs which amounted to $90 million in
2001 and $107 million in 2000. The implementation costs for this program were
substantially completed in 2001. While there can be no assurance, based on our
evaluation of results through 2001 we believe that these initiatives will
reduce operating expenses below 2000 levels by approximately $120 million on an
annual basis in 2002, including a reduction of about $30 million below the
level of 2001, and that reduced expenses resulting from these initiatives will
benefit results thereafter. In addition, we expect these initiatives to
eliminate approximately $50 million of costs that would have been capitalized.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased $60 million,
from $172 million in 2000 to $232 million in 2001, primarily due to declines in
market values of the underlying assets on which our fees are based.
Policyholder benefits and related changes in reserves increased $60 million,
from $628 million in 2000 to $688 million in 2001, primarily as a result of
term insurance we issued under policy provisions to customers who previously
had lapsing variable life insurance with us and insurance claims arising from
the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States. In 2000,
policyholder benefits and the related changes in reserves included a reserve
increase related to a portion of our variable life insurance business as noted
above amounting to $23 million.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Benefits and expenses increased $128
million, or 8%, in 2000 from 1999. The increase came primarily from an increase
in policyholder benefits and related changes in reserves of $121 million, from
$507 million in 1999 to $628 million in 2000, as a result of growth in the base
of term insurance in force and aging of policies in force as well as the
reserve increase related to a portion of our variable
life insurance business as noted above amounting to $23 million. Operating
expenses, including distribution costs that we charge to expense, were
essentially unchanged in 2000 from 1999.
Operating expenses included severance, termination benefits, facilities
closure and other costs that we incurred largely in connection with the
implementation of the program to restructure our field management and agency
structure described above. The expenses related to this program amounted to
$107 million in 2000 and $116 million in 1999.
Sales Results
The following table sets forth the Individual Life Insurance segment's
sales, as measured by statutory first year premiums and deposits for the
periods indicated. These amounts do not correspond to revenues under GAAP. In
managing our individual life insurance business, we analyze statutory first
year premiums and deposits as well as revenues because statutory first year
premiums and deposits measure the current sales performance of
90
<PAGE>
the business unit, while revenues reflect, predominantly in our case, the
renewal persistency and aging of in force policies written in prior years and
net investment income, as well as current sales.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
- -----------------------
2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ----
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales(1):
Variable life(2)..................... $427 $328 $301
Term life............................ 43 59 74
---- ---- ----
Total.............................. $470 $387 $375
==== ==== ====
Sales by distribution channel(1):
Prudential Agents.................... $218 $259 $287
Third-party and other distributors... 252 128 88
---- ---- ----
Total.............................. $470 $387 $375
==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
- --------
(1)Statutory first year premiums and deposits.
(2)Includes universal life insurance products.
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Sales of new life insurance, as measured by
statutory first year premiums, increased $83 million, or 21%, in 2001 from
2000. The increase came from a $157 million increase in the segment's sales of
corporate-owned life insurance products, substantially all of which is sold by
the PruSelect third-party distribution channel. Inclusive of these
corporate-owned life insurance sales, which totaled $199 million for 2001
including a single $100 million sale, PruSelect accounted for 54% of the
Individual Life Insurance segment's sales in 2001, compared to 33% in 2000.
Sales by the PruSelect channel, other than corporate-owned life insurance,
decreased $33 million, or 38%, in 2001 from 2000. We have begun to expand the
focus of PruSelect, which has historically served intermediaries who provide
insurance solutions in support of estate and wealth transfer planning for
affluent individuals and corporate-owned life insurance for businesses, toward
the mass affluent market. We believe the 2001 sales results for the PruSelect
channel for products other than corporate-owned life insurance reflected both a
reduced level of market demand for individual variable life insurance products
during 2001 and our transition to the new focus, which included changes in our
underwriting classifications and a reduction in our maximum insurance coverage
on a single life. Additionally, we repriced certain term insurance products and
introduced two new universal life insurance products in late 2001 to be offered
by both the PruSelect distribution channel and Prudential Agents. While there
can be no assurance, we believe these actions will result in more favorable
risk adjusted return on business written and an opportunity to enhance sales in
our selected markets.
The increase in sales through PruSelect was partially offset by a decline in
sales from Prudential Agents. The number of Prudential Agents declined to
approximately 4,400 at December 31, 2001, from 6,100 at December 31, 2000, as
we continued to take actions to increase the productivity standards required to
continue agency contracts. Prudential Agent productivity increased slightly to
$35,000 in 2001 from $34,700 in 2000. We have not implemented further increases
in these productivity standards for periods subsequent to 2001. While there can
be no assurance, we believe that maintenance of these standards at their
current level will contribute to stabilization in the number of Prudential
Agents. We measure Prudential Agent productivity as commissions on new sales of
all products, not only life insurance, by Prudential Agents with us for the
entire period, divided by the number of those Prudential Agents.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Sales of new life insurance, as measured by
statutory first year premiums, increased $12 million, or 3%, in 2000 from 1999.
The increase came from greater unscheduled premiums on variable life insurance
products in 2000 and reflected a higher level of third-party sales through our
PruSelect third-party distribution channel, which grew by $40 million, or 45%,
in 2000 from 1999. PruSelect accounted for 33% of the Individual Life Insurance
segment's sales in 2000, compared to 23% of its sales in 1999. The increase in
sales through PruSelect was partially offset by a decline in sales from
Prudential Agents. We continued to take actions to improve Prudential Agent
productivity. The number of Prudential Agents declined to approximately 6,100
at December 31, 2000 compared to approximately 7,800 one year earlier. However,
Prudential Agent productivity increased 11%, from $31,300 for 1999 to $34,700
in 2000.
91
<PAGE>
Policy Surrender Experience
The following table sets forth the Individual Life Insurance segment's
policy surrender experience for variable life insurance, measured by cash value
of surrenders, for the periods indicated. These amounts do not correspond to
expenses under GAAP. In managing this business, we analyze the cash value of
surrenders because it is a measure of the degree to which policyholders are
maintaining their in force business with us, a driver of future profitability.
Our term life insurance products do not provide for cash surrender values.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ----
($ in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash value of surrenders................................................. $637 $641 $597
==== ==== ====
Cash value of surrenders as a percentage of mean future policy benefit
reserves, policyholders' account balances, and separate account balances 3.8% 3.7% 3.7%
==== ==== ====
</TABLE>
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. The total cash value of surrenders and the
level of surrenders as a percentage of mean future policy benefit reserves,
policyholders' account balances and separate account balances were relatively
constant from 2000 to 2001.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. The total cash value of surrenders
increased $44 million, or 7%, in 2000 from 1999. The level of surrenders as a
percentage of mean future policy benefits, policyholders' account balances and
separate account balances remained constant from 1999 to 2000.
Private Client Group
Operating Results
The following table sets forth the Private Client Group segment's operating
results for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating results:
Non-interest revenues......................... $1,973 $2,468 $2,293
Net interest revenues......................... 243 299 269
------ ------ ------
Total revenues, net of interest expense..... 2,216 2,767 2,562
Total non-interest expenses................... 2,455 2,530 2,338
------ ------ ------
Adjusted operating income..................... $ (239) $ 237 $ 224
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Adjusted Operating Income
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. The Private Client Group segment reported a
pre-tax loss of $239 million, on an adjusted operating income basis, for 2001
compared to adjusted operating income of $237 million for 2000. The $476
million decline came primarily from a $433 million decrease from our domestic
securities brokerage operations, which reported a loss of $243 million for 2001
compared to adjusted operating income of $190 million in 2000. These operations
were adversely affected in 2001 by a decline in individual investor transaction
volume and margin loan balances, which resulted in decreased commission and net
interest revenues. These revenue declines were coupled with increased costs of
recruiting and retaining Financial Advisors, including increased expenses
relating to recruiting and retention incentives extended to some recently
recruited experienced Financial Advisors. Additionally, we incurred costs of
$65 million in 2001 from employee terminations associated with staff
reductions, as well as branch closings and facilities consolidations. The
remaining $43 million decrease in the segment's adjusted operating income came
from our consumer banking operations, which benefited in 2000 from the sale of
a major portion of the consumer bank's credit card receivables. The Private
Client Group segment had a loss of $79 million, on an adjusted operating income
basis, for the fourth quarter of 2001.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income increased $13
million, or 6%, from 1999 to 2000. Adjusted operating income from our consumer
banking operations increased $27 million, primarily as a
92
<PAGE>
result of the sale of a major portion of the consumer bank's credit card
receivables in 2000. Adjusted operating income from our domestic securities
brokerage operations decreased $14 million, from $204 million in 1999 to $190
million in 2000.
Revenues
The following table sets forth the Private Client Group segment's revenues,
as shown in the table above under "--Operating Results," by source for the
periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
- - -----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Commissions.............................. $1,155 $1,561 $1,554
Fees..................................... 684 748 571
Other.................................... 134 159 168
------ ------ ------
Total non-interest revenues............. 1,973 2,468 2,293
Net interest revenues.................... 243 299 269
------ ------ ------
Total revenues, net of interest expense. $2,216 $2,767 $2,562
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Total revenues, net of interest expense, as
shown in the table above under "--Operating Results," decreased $551 million,
or 20%, from 2000 to 2001. The decrease came primarily from a $498 million
decline in revenues from our domestic securities brokerage operations, from
$2.675 billion in 2000 to $2.177 billion in 2001.
Commission revenues decreased $406 million, or 26%, from 2000 to 2001. The
decrease came primarily from a $375 million decline in commissions from
over-the-counter and listed equity securities transactions. Commission revenues
were negatively affected in 2001 by less active securities markets and reduced
retail transaction volume, and benefited in 2000 from exceptionally active
over-the-counter equity markets and related retail transaction volume in the
first four months of the year. Commission revenues accounted for 59% of total
segment non-interest revenues for 2001. Accordingly, we expect that a
continuation of the level of securities market activity experienced in 2001, or
a further downtrend in this activity, would continue to have a negative impact
on our revenues and on the segment's adjusted operating income, partially
offset by planned expense reductions.
Fee revenues, which include asset management and account service fees,
declined $64 million, or 9%, from 2000 to 2001. The decline came from a
decrease in revenues from wrap-fee products, reflecting competitive pricing
pressures as well as the negative impact of market value declines. The negative
impact of market value declines on wrap-fee and managed account assets under
management essentially offset the impact of new assets gathered in these
accounts. Additionally, the negative impact of market value declines on
clients' mutual funds, on which a portion of our fees are based, contributed to
the decline in fee revenues. Fee revenues accounted for 35% of total
non-interest revenues of the domestic securities operations in 2001, compared
to 31% in 2000, reflecting actions we have taken to increase the contribution
of recurring revenues. These actions included enhanced marketing of fee-based
products and compensation incentives to Financial Advisors for sales of these
products, as well as emphasis on financial planning in recruiting and training
of Financial Advisors.
Other revenues decreased $25 million, or 16%, from 2000 to 2001, primarily
due to the sale of a major portion of the consumer bank's credit card
receivables in 2000.
Net interest revenues decreased $56 million, or 19%, from 2000 to 2001,
primarily as a result of a decrease in average customer margin lending balances
of our domestic securities brokerage operations, related to the reduced level
of individual investor activity. Average customer margin lending balances were
$4.30 billion in 2001 compared to $6.54 billion in 2000 and amounted to $3.40
billion at December 31, 2001. Increased investment income on greater attributed
capital partially offset the impact of lower average customer margin lending
balances.
The number of domestic retail Financial Advisors was 5,383 at December 31,
2001, a decrease of 9% from 5,906 at December 31, 2000. Approximately 90% of
the decline came from Financial Advisors with less than 4
93
<PAGE>
years' industry experience with us, and reflected a decrease in our recruiting
of inexperienced Financial Advisors to be trained by us. In response to
recruiting efforts by our competitors, we introduced an aggressive recruiting
effort targeting experienced Financial Advisors, including recruiting and
retention incentives, and, as discussed above, an equity-market-linked
voluntary long-term deferred compensation plan to seek to enhance our Financial
Advisor recruitment and retention efforts.
Assets under management and client assets decreased $21 billion to $251
billion at December 31, 2001 from $272 billion at December 31, 2000, primarily
as a result of overall market value declines.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Total revenues, net of interest expense,
increased $205 million, or 8%, from 1999 to 2000. The increase came primarily
from our domestic securities brokerage operations, which recorded an increase
of $202 million, or 8%, from $2.473 billion in 1999 to $2.675 billion in 2000.
Commission revenues increased slightly in 2000 from 1999, as increases of
$17 million from mutual funds and $13 million from equity securities
transactions were partially offset by a decline in commissions from fixed
income products and commodity transactions. While commission revenues from our
securities brokerage operations benefited from active over-the-counter equity
markets and increased transaction volume during the first four months of the
year, commission revenues declined slightly during the May through December
period of 2000 versus the same period of 1999, reflecting less active
securities markets and reduced transaction volume.
Fee revenues, comprised of asset management and account service fees,
increased $177 million, or 31%, from 1999 to 2000. This increase resulted
primarily from a $5.2 billion increase in wrap-fee and managed account assets
under management to $31.9 billion at December 31, 2000 from $26.7 billion a
year earlier.
Net interest revenues increased $30 million, or 11%, from 1999 to 2000.
Substantially all of the increase came from our domestic securities brokerage
operations, primarily from higher average customer margin lending balances,
which increased from $5.06 billion in 1999 to $6.54 billion in 2000. Partially
offsetting the increase in average customer margin lending balances was a
decrease in the spread earned on these balances, reflecting competitive
pressures on the rates charged to clients who buy securities on margin.
The number of domestic Financial Advisors was 5,906 at December 31, 2000, a
decrease of 3% from 6,072 a year earlier.
Assets under management and client assets decreased $16 billion to $272
billion at December 31, 2000 from $288 billion a year earlier, primarily as a
result of overall market value declines.
Non-Interest Expenses
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Total non-interest expenses, as shown in
the table above under "--Operating Results," decreased $75 million from 2000 to
2001. Employee compensation and benefits at our domestic securities brokerage
operation decreased due to the lower level of revenues and earnings in 2001,
but the decrease was not proportional to the revenue decline largely due to the
recruiting and retention incentives as described above as well as $41 million
in employee termination costs associated with staff reductions in 2001. These
recruiting and retention incentives will continue to be applicable and to
adversely affect expense levels in future periods. The decrease in employee
compensation and benefits was further offset by $24 million of costs we
incurred to consolidate and close several retail branch and other locations
during 2001.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Total non-interest expenses increased $192
million, or 8%, from 1999 to 2000. The increase came primarily from employee
compensation and benefits at our retail securities brokerage operations, which
increased by $108 million, or 8%, due to higher commissions paid to Financial
Advisors on higher fee and commission revenues, and higher incentive and other
compensation, as well as higher costs to recruit and retain Financial Advisors.
Additionally, other non-interest expenses at the domestic securities brokerage
operations increased $108 million, or 12%, primarily as a result of higher
operations and administrative support costs, higher equity research costs, and
increased investment in our branch office technology platform.
94
<PAGE>
Retail Investments
Operating Results
The following table sets forth the Retail Investments segment's operating
results for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating results:
Revenues(1)............... $1,458 $1,631 $1,551
Benefits and expenses(2).. 1,277 1,392 1,377
------ ------ ------
Adjusted operating income. $ 181 $ 239 $ 174
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Revenues exclude realized investment gains, net of losses.
(2) Benefits and expenses exclude the impact of net realized investment gains
on deferred acquisition cost amortization and reserves.
Adjusted Operating Income
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income decreased $58
million, or 24%, from 2000 to 2001. Adjusted operating income for 2000
benefited $21 million from refinements in our calculations of deferred policy
acquisition costs. Excluding this change, adjusted operating income decreased
$37 million, or 17%. Approximately $23 million of the $37 million decrease came
from our mutual funds and wrap-fee products business, primarily due to lower
asset-based distribution revenues as well as a lower level of fee-producing
redemptions. The remainder of the decrease came from our annuity business,
primarily due to lower fee revenues.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income increased by $65
million, or 37%, from 1999 to 2000. Adjusted operating income for 2000
benefited $21 million from refinements in our calculations of deferred policy
acquisition costs. Excluding this change, adjusted operating income increased
$44 million, or 25%. Approximately $26 million of the $44 million increase came
from our annuity business. This increase was primarily due to greater fee
revenues from variable annuities, and resulted from an increase in average
account values. A decrease in administrative expenses, primarily the result of
expense management efforts, also contributed to the increase in adjusted
operating income.
The remainder of the increase in adjusted operating income came from our
mutual funds and wrap-fee products business. Asset-based and transaction-based
fees increased as a result of continued growth in our proprietary mutual fund
assets under management and expansion of our wrap-fee products.
Revenues
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Revenues, as shown in the table above under
"--Operating Results," decreased $173 million, or 11%, from 2000 to 2001.
Fee-based revenue decreased $112 million, from $1.081 million in 2000 to $969
million in 2001. The decrease came primarily from our mutual funds and wrap-fee
products, reflecting lower asset-based distribution revenues as well as a lower
level of fee-producing redemptions, and from our variable annuity products,
reflecting a decline in the average market value of customer accounts on which
our fees are based. The remainder of the decrease came primarily from lower
investment income in 2001 and a reduction in premiums we recognized on
conversion of deferred annuities by customers to income-paying status.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Revenues increased $80 million, or 5%, from
1999 to 2000. Fee-based revenues increased $74 million, from $1.007 billion in
1999 to $1.081 billion in 2000. The increase came primarily from our mutual
funds and wrap-fee products, as well as our variable annuity products,
reflecting growth in our average assets under management for these products. In
addition, premiums increased by $19 million as a result of increased
conversions of deferred annuities by our customers to income-paying status. Net
investment income declined $13 million, from $491 million in 1999 to $478
million in 2000, as a result of reductions in our base of fixed annuity
business due to withdrawals and scheduled benefit payments.
95
<PAGE>
Benefits and Expenses
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Benefits and expenses, as shown in the
table above under "--Operating Results," decreased $115 million, or 8%, from
2000 to 2001. Benefits and expenses for 2000 includes a $21 million reduction
in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs from the refinements noted
above. Excluding the impact of this change, benefits and expenses decreased
$136 million, or 10%. Commissions and other general expenses decreased $71
million, or 9%, from $762 million in 2000 to $691 million 2001, primarily due
to a decrease in general and administrative expenses reflecting our expense
management efforts and lower sales-based and asset-based commission expense on
our mutual fund products. Policyholder benefits and related changes in reserves
decreased $43 million, from $152 million in 2000 to $109 million in 2001,
primarily as a result of the reduction in premiums noted above and a $12
million charge we recorded in 2000 to increase annuity reserves due to
investment portfolio restructuring to reduce the emphasis on equity
investments. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, excluding the
refinements noted above, decreased $23 million, from $233 million in 2000 to
$210 million in 2001, primarily as a result of decreased amortization
associated with lower fee income. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs included $17 million in 2001 and $20 million in 2000 to reflect decreases
in expected future gross profits on our annuity products primarily due to
declines in market values of the underlying assets on which our fees are based.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Benefits and expenses remained relatively
unchanged from 1999 to 2000. Benefits and expenses for 2000 includes a $21
million reduction in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs from the
refinements noted above. Excluding the impact of this change, benefits and
expenses increased $36 million, or 3%. Changes in reserves, net of benefit
payments, increased $34 million, from $118 million in 1999 to $152 million in
2000, as a result of customers converting deferred annuities to income-paying
status and a $12 million charge to increase annuity reserves due to investment
portfolio restructuring as noted above. During 2000, we recorded $20 million of
additional amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, to reflect a
decrease in expected future gross profits on our annuity products primarily due
to declines in market values of the underlying assets on which our fees are
based. However, this increased charge was essentially offset by reduced
amortization resulting from our termination, in the second quarter of 2000, of
the annuity exchange program we commenced in 1997. Other general expenses were
flat in 2000 from 1999, as a decrease in administrative expenses reflecting our
expense management efforts was largely offset by a $30 million increase in
sub-advisory expense resulting from growth in assets under management of our
mutual funds and wrap-fee products and our variable annuity products.
96
<PAGE>
Sales Results and Assets Under Management
The following table sets forth the changes in the total mutual fund assets,
excluding wrap-fee products, and the balance of wrap-fee product assets and
annuities, at fair market value for mutual funds and account value for
annuities, and net sales of our Retail Investments mutual fund and annuity
products for the periods indicated. Net sales (redemptions) are gross sales
minus redemptions or surrenders and withdrawals, as applicable. Neither sales
nor net sales are revenues under GAAP; they are, however, relevant measures of
sales and business activity. Revenues are derived from fees and spread income
as discussed above.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------- ------- -------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Mutual Funds(1) and Wrap-fee Products(2):
Mutual fund assets, excluding wrap-fee products:
Beginning total mutual fund assets.................................. $57,764 $55,245 $53,412
Sales (other than money market)..................................... 5,273 5,378 3,773
Redemptions (other than money market)............................... (4,697) (5,561) (4,872)
Reinvestment of distributions and change in market value............ (1,894) 726 3,744
Net money market sales.............................................. 1,363 1,976 (812)
------- ------- -------
Ending total mutual fund assets................................... 57,809 57,764 55,245
Wrap-fee product assets at end of period............................... 17,955 19,621 16,723
------- ------- -------
Total mutual fund and wrap-fee product assets at end of period......... $75,764 $77,385 $71,968
======= ======= =======
Net mutual fund sales (redemptions) other than money market(3)......... $ 576 $ (183) $(1,099)
======= ======= =======
Variable Annuities(1):
Beginning total account value....................................... $21,059 $22,614 $19,919
Sales, excluding exchanges.......................................... 1,271 1,809 2,025
Exchanges sales..................................................... -- 481 1,402
Surrenders, withdrawals and exchange redemptions.................... (2,356) (2,989) (3,432)
Change in market value, interest credited and other activity(4)(5).. (1,285) (856) 2,700
------- ------- -------
Ending total account value........................................ $18,689 $21,059 $22,614
======= ======= =======
Net sales (redemptions)................................................ $(1,085) $ (699) $ (5)
======= ======= =======
Fixed Annuities:
Beginning total account value....................................... $ 2,926 $ 3,020 $ 3,249
Sales............................................................... 120 221 160
Surrenders, withdrawals and exchange redemptions.................... (216) (361) (425)
Interest credited and other activity(4)(5).......................... 145 46 36
------- ------- -------
Ending total account value........................................ $ 2,975 $ 2,926 $ 3,020
======= ======= =======
Net sales (redemptions)................................................ $ (96) $ (140) $ (265)
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Mutual funds and variable annuities include only those sold as retail
investment products. Investments through defined contribution plan products
are included with such products.
(2) Wrap-fee product assets include proprietary assets of $3.1 billion at
December 31, 2001, $3.4 billion at December 31, 2000, and $3.5 billion at
December 31, 1999.
(3) Excludes wrap-fee products.
(4) Includes maintenance and insurance charges assessed, net bonus payments
credited to contract holder accounts, annuity benefits and other
adjustments.
(5) Includes increases to policyholder account values as a result of
policyholder credits issued in 2001 in connection with Prudential's
demutalization, amounting to $429 million for variable annuities and $157
million for fixed annuities.
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Mutual fund and wrap-fee product assets
under management amounted to $75.8 billion at December 31, 2001, a decrease of
$1.6 billion, or 2%, from December 31, 2000. Mutual fund assets under
management at December 31, 2001 amounted to $57.8 billion, essentially
unchanged from December 31, 2000. Wrap-fee assets declined $1.7 billion, to
$18.0 billion at December 31, 2001.
Mutual fund assets under management were essentially unchanged at December
31, 2001 from a year earlier, as declines in market values of existing customer
accounts were essentially offset by our $1.4 billion net money market sales and
net mutual fund sales, other than money market funds, of $576 million. We
believe our
97
<PAGE>
net money market sales, both in 2001 and 2000, reflect customer response to the
unfavorable performance of the equity securities markets subsequent to the
early part of 2000. The $759 million increase in net mutual fund sales other
than money market funds reflected increased gross sales that came primarily
from third-party distribution of our mutual funds resulting from our
participation in competitors' products and distribution and a lower level of
redemptions than that of 2000. Net sales of mutual funds from sub-advised
relationships, which commenced in 2000, amounted to $1.2 billion in 2001 and
$472 million in 2000.
The decrease in wrap-fee assets during 2001 came primarily from declines in
the market values of customers' accounts. Net sales of wrap-fee products, which
are distributed primarily by our Financial Advisors, decreased to $1.4 billion
in 2001 from $4.8 billion in 2000 as a result of lower gross sales and
increased redemptions. We believe that this experience reflects customer
response to recent securities market conditions, as well as the continued
attrition of Financial Advisors.
Total account values for fixed and variable annuities amounted to $21.7
billion as of December 31, 2001, a decrease of $2.3 billion from December 31,
2000. This decrease resulted primarily from declines in the market value of
customers' variable annuities as well as net redemptions, which increased from
$839 million in 2000 to $1.2 billion in 2001. The increase in net redemptions
in 2001 came primarily from lower sales, which we believe reflects customer
response to recent securities market conditions as well as the decreased number
of Prudential Agents. Furthermore, fixed annuity sales in 2000 benefited from a
promotional campaign we offered. The net redemptions of fixed and variable
annuities in 2001 were partially offset by policy credits we issued in
connection with our demutualization, which increased policyholders' account
values by $586 million.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Mutual funds and wrap-fee product assets
under management amounted to $77.4 billion at December 31, 2000, an increase of
$5.4 billion, or 8%, from December 31, 1999. Mutual fund assets under
management at December 31, 2000 amounted to $57.8 billion, an increase of $2.5
billion, or 5%, from December 31, 1999. Excluding money market funds, net
mutual fund redemptions for 2000 were $183 million, which included $359 million
of gross sales from our purchases of stock index shares for a long-term
deferred compensation program for our own Financial Advisors. Gross sales
increased $1.2 billion, or 33%, from 1999 to 2000 excluding the latter
purchases of stock index shares, which was partially offset by an increase of
$689 million, or 14%, in redemptions. Redemptions, other than money market
funds, increased $689 million, from $4.9 billion in 1999 to $5.6 billion in
2000. The increase in gross sales was a result of strong sales of
growth-oriented mutual funds, primarily products managed by our Jennison unit.
Net money market sales increased by $2.8 billion for 2000 compared to 1999,
reflecting customer response to volatile securities market conditions during
2000.
Wrap-fee assets increased $2.9 billion, or 17%, from $16.7 billion at
December 31, 1999 to $19.6 billion at December 31, 2000. The increase came from
net sales during 2000 of $4.8 billion of wrap-fee products, in which we offer
customers a choice of proprietary and non-proprietary mutual funds as well as
managed accounts, which was partially offset by declines in market values. We
believe these net sales reflect increased marketplace emphasis on products that
provide customers with a broader choice of investment options.
Total account values for fixed and variable annuities amounted to $24.0
billion at December 31, 2000, a decrease of $1.6 billion, or 6%, from December
31, 1999. The decrease resulted from market value declines and greater net
redemptions. Net redemptions of variable annuities were $699 million for 2000,
an increase of $694 million compared to 1999. This increase resulted from an
increase in surrenders, other than those related to exchange activity,
consistent with maturation of the business, as a larger percentage of the
business is no longer subject to surrender charges.
Our withdrawals of variable and fixed annuities include exchanges of $481
million in 2000 and $1.4 billion in 1999. The discontinuance, during the second
quarter of 2000, of the annuity exchange program referred to below did not
appear to have a material impact on net variable annuity redemptions during
that period or thereafter.
Fixed annuity net redemptions of $140 million in 2000 were $125 million, or
47%, lower than the comparable net outflows for 1999. The decrease in net
redemptions was attributable to an increase in new sales of our Discovery
Classic annuity product.
98
<PAGE>
Property and Casualty Insurance
Operating Results
The following table sets forth the Property and Casualty Insurance segment's
operating results for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating results:
Revenues(1)................. $2,051 $1,800 $1,747
Benefits and expenses....... 1,956 1,650 1,595
------ ------ ------
Adjusted operating income... $ 95 $ 150 $ 152
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Revenues exclude realized investment gains, net of losses.
Adjusted Operating Income
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income decreased $55
million, or 37%, from 2000 to 2001. Results for 2001 reflected a $59 million
lower benefit from prior accident-year development. Adjusted operating income
in 2000 reflected the negative impact of $40 million that we provided for
premium refunds or credits to certain New Jersey automobile policyholders under
that state's excess profits regulations. Partially offsetting this was a $35
million decrease in net investment income in 2001 from 2000.
We released reserves of $106 million in 2001 and $165 million in 2000
because our automobile casualty claims experience for prior years was more
favorable than we previously estimated in establishing reserves for these
accident years. Additionally, we benefited $80 million in each of the years
2001 and 2000 under stop-loss reinsurance contracts, which are based on current
accident-year results. However, we do not expect our 2002 adjusted operating
income to include a comparable benefit from prior accident-year development,
and any stop-loss recoveries for that year are contractually limited to less
than half of the benefit we realized in 2001. Consequently, if the
accident-year experience of 2001 continues, we would anticipate a continuing
decline in results in 2002. As discussed under "--Benefits and Expenses," we
have commenced re-underwriting and non-renewal of business that has produced
adverse loss experience. While there can be no assurance, we believe that these
actions, together with our cost reduction measures, will contribute to
improvement of accident-year experience.
In May 2000, we completed the acquisition of the specialty automobile
business of the St. Paul Companies, which writes in the non-standard automobile
insurance business. While, as discussed under "--Revenues" below, this
acquisition had an effect on the comparison of revenues for 2001 to 2000, it
did not have a material impact on adjusted operating income.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income was essentially
unchanged from 1999 to 2000. Results in 2000 reflect an $80 million recovery
from a stop-loss reinsurance contract based on current accident-year results
during that year and a $15 million greater benefit from prior accident year
development. We released reserves of $165 million in 2000 and $150 million in
1999 because our automobile casualty claims experience for prior accident years
was more favorable than we previously estimated in establishing reserves for
these accident years. However, these favorable developments were largely offset
by a $53 million increase in operating expenses, other than expenses of the
specialty automobile business we acquired in 2000 as discussed below. The
increase in operating expenses was primarily due to increases in expenses to
expand our distribution capabilities in direct, affinity group, property and
casualty agent and independent agent channels, and a provision for refunds or
credits to certain New Jersey automobile policyholders under insurance
regulations based on profits generated from that business, as noted above.
While, as discussed under "--Revenues" below, our acquisition in May 2000 of
a business which writes non-standard automobile insurance had an effect on the
comparison of revenues for 2000 to 1999, it did not have a material impact on
adjusted operating income.
99
<PAGE>
Revenues
The following table sets forth the Property and Casualty Insurance segment's
earned premiums, which are net of reinsurance ceded, for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Automobile................. $1,403 $1,153 $1,069
Homeowners................. 448 413 447
Other...................... 33 33 32
------ ------ ------
Total earned premiums... $1,884 $1,599 $1,548
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Revenues, as shown in the table above under
"--Operating Results," increased $251 million, or 14%, from 2000 to 2001. The
$251 million increase included an increase of $96 million in revenues from the
subsidiary we acquired in May 2000 that specializes in non-standard automobile
business, which is included in 2000 results only from the date of acquisition.
The remaining revenue increase of $155 million, from our existing business,
came primarily from a $196 million increase in earned premiums from automobile
and homeowners' insurance, partially offset by a $41 million decline in
investment income.
Total earned premiums, as shown in the immediately preceding table,
increased by $285 million, or 18%, from 2000 to 2001. Excluding the impact of
the acquisition mentioned above, earned premiums increased by $196 million,
including the effect of a $40 million reduction in 2000 premiums from the
provision for premium refunds or credits to certain New Jersey automobile
policyholders, as noted above.
Automobile earned premiums increased by $250 million, or 22%, from 2000 to
2001, including $89 million from the non-standard automobile business and the
effect of the $40 million reduction in 2000 premiums mentioned above. The
remaining $121 million increase came primarily from new distribution channels
we implemented during 1999 and 2000, including career agents focused on selling
property and casualty insurance, workplace and affinity marketing, direct
distribution, and independent agents, many of whom were producers for the
acquired subsidiary. As discussed below under "--Benefits and Expenses,"
commencing in the second half of 2001 we have suspended our mailing
solicitations for the direct distribution channel and limited the growth of new
business from some of these other distribution channels, based on our
evaluation of the quality of the business. In October 2001, we announced that
we would no longer write business through our property and casualty insurance
career agency channel except in a few selected markets. We have also commenced
re-underwriting and non-renewal of business that has produced adverse loss
experience, to the extent permitted contractually and by state insurance
regulations. Improved persistency in 2001 also contributed to the growth in
earned premiums.
Homeowners earned premiums increased $35 million, or 8%, from 2000 to 2001
due to lower reinsurance premiums ceded, as the number of policies in force was
relatively unchanged. This stabilization of our policies in force represents an
improvement compared with declines in prior years, which reflects intense rate
competition that attracted customers to other companies.
Net investment income decreased by $35 million, or 18%, from $193 million in
2000 to $158 million in 2001, and decreased by $41 million excluding the impact
of the acquisition mentioned above. This decrease was primarily a result of a
lower average base of invested assets, reflecting lower attributed capital, and
a decline in investment yield.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Revenues increased $53 million, or 3%, from
1999 to 2000. Total revenues of $1.800 billion for 2000 include revenues of
$178 million from the subsidiary we acquired in May 2000 that specializes in
the non-standard automobile business. Excluding the impact on revenues from
this newly-acquired subsidiary, revenues declined by $125 million, or 7%, from
$1.747 billion in 1999 to $1.622 billion in 2000, due principally to a $117
million decrease in earned premiums on our existing automobile and homeowners
business. The $117 million decline in earned premiums resulted in part from the
$40 million reduction in 2000 premiums mentioned above, and a $30 million
increase in reinsurance premiums ceded due to our purchase of additional
reinsurance coverage in 2000.
100
<PAGE>
Automobile earned premiums increased $84 million, or 8%, from 1999 to 2000.
Excluding the impact of the acquisition and provision for premium refunds or
credits mentioned above, automobile earned premiums declined by $44 million, or
4%, from $1.069 billion in 1999 to $1.025 billion in 2000 primarily as a result
of a decline in average premium, due in part to the continued phase-in of a 15%
rate reduction for New Jersey policyholders mandated by New Jersey law that
came into effect in March 1999. As of December 31, 2000, this premium reduction
was entirely reflected in our earned premiums. Our policies in force from our
existing automobile business, excluding the newly acquired subsidiary,
increased 2% at December 31, 2000 from a year earlier. The increase reflected
improved persistency in 2000 as compared to 1999 as well as an increase in new
policies sold, representing an improvement from prior year declines.
Homeowners earned premiums decreased $34 million, or 8%, from 1999 to 2000.
Excluding the impact of reinsurance premiums ceded, which increased in 2000
from 1999, homeowners earned premiums were flat as the number of policies in
force was relatively unchanged.
Net investment income was $193 million for 2000, relatively unchanged from
$197 million in 1999.
Benefits and Expenses
The following table shows our calendar year loss, expense and combined
ratios, the impact on these calendar year ratios of catastrophic losses and our
accident year combined ratios based on loss experience for the periods
indicated (all based on statutory accounting principles).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000 1999
----- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Loss ratio(1):
Automobile............................................... 70.6% 64.0% 71.1%
Homeowners............................................... 76.5 72.4 70.7
Overall................................................ 70.8 65.8 71.1
Expense ratio(2):
Automobile............................................... 30.8 35.3 30.5
Homeowners............................................... 36.6 45.3 39.1
Overall................................................ 32.1 37.8 33.1
Combined ratio(3):
Automobile............................................... 101.4 99.3 101.6
Homeowners............................................... 113.1 117.7 109.8
Overall................................................ 102.9 103.6 104.2
Effect of catastrophic losses included in combined ratio(4): 2.2 2.7 3.3
Accident year combined ratio(5):............................ 107.0 114.6 107.5
</TABLE>
- --------
(1)Represents ratio of incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses to earned
premium. Ratios reflect the favorable development in the calendar period
from prior accident year reserves of $106 million in the year ended December
31, 2001, $165 million in 2000, and $150 million in 1999. Ratios also
reflect recoveries from current accident year stop-loss reinsurance
contracts of $80 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2001 and
2000.
(2)Represents ratio of operating expenses to net written premium.
(3)Represents the sum of (1) and (2).
(4)Represents losses and loss adjustment expenses attributable to catastrophes
that are included in the combined ratio. Our calendar year catastrophe
losses include both current and prior accident year losses. We classify as
catastrophes those events that are declared catastrophes by Property Claims
Services, which is an industry organization that declares and tracks all
property-related catastrophes causing insured property damage in the United
States. Property Claims Services declares an event a catastrophe if it
causes in excess of a specified dollar amount of insured property damage,
which was $25 million throughout the periods presented, and affects a
significant number of policyholders and insurance companies.
(5)Accident year combined ratios for annual periods reflect the combined ratios
for accidents that occur in the indicated calendar year, restated to reflect
subsequent changes in loss estimates for those claims based on cumulative
loss data through December 31, 2001. These ratios reflect the recoveries
from stop-loss reinsurance contracts as noted above. We analyze
accident-year combined ratios because they reflect the actual loss
experience of accidents that occur in a given period excluding the effect of
accidents that occur in other periods.
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Our automobile loss ratio, as shown in the
table immediately above, increased from 2000 to 2001 primarily due to the lower
net benefit from prior accident-year reserve development in 2001. The impact of
experience on new automobile business also contributed to the increase in this
ratio, since the experience on our seasoned automobile business was relatively
consistent. We added significant new
101
<PAGE>
automobile business during 2001, primarily in the first half of the year, which
we expected would produce less favorable experience in its initial year than
similarly priced seasoned business. However, based on our evaluation of the
quality of the new business produced, particularly the major portion of the
business which was sold through the new distribution channels we implemented in
1999 and 2000 as noted above, we have suspended our mailing solicitations for
the direct distribution channel and limited the growth of business from some of
our distribution channels, other than Prudential Agents, commencing in the
third quarter of 2001. In October 2001, we announced that we would no longer
write business through our property and casualty insurance career agency
channel except in a few selected markets. We have also commenced
re-underwriting and non-renewal of business that has produced adverse loss
experience, to the extent permitted contractually and by state insurance
regulations. The increase in the homeowners' loss ratio came from a 16%
increase in claim severity and a 3% increase in claim frequency. Our stop-loss
reinsurance recoveries resulted in decreases in the homeowners' combined ratio
of 5.4 percentage points in 2001 and had no impact in 2000.
Our calendar year catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance, amounted to $42
million for 2001 compared to $45 million for 2000.
Losses that we ceded through reinsurance, including stop-loss reinsurance,
resulted in decreases in the total combined ratio of 7.3 percentage points for
2001 and 8.3 percentage points for 2000.
Our overall expense ratio for 2001 decreased from 2000, as we incurred costs
in 2000 to develop our distribution channels and benefited in 2001 from staff
reductions and the favorable impact of the increased premium base.
The decrease in the accident year combined ratio resulted from the decline
in the expense ratio. Recoveries from stop-loss reinsurance resulted in
decreases in the accident year combined ratio of 4.3 percentage points in 2001
and 4.8 percentage points in 2000.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Our automobile and total combined ratios,
as shown in the table immediately above, improved in 2000 from 1999 primarily
as a result of the $80 million recovery from a stop-loss reinsurance contract
during 2000 and the $15 million greater benefit from prior accident year
reserve development. The decrease in the automobile loss ratio came primarily
from our recovery from a stop-loss reinsurance contract as noted above, and the
greater benefit from release of prior accident year reserves in 2000 as well as
our efforts to limit loss severity, partially offset by a slight increase in
claim frequency. The increase in the homeowners' loss ratio primarily came from
a 13% increase in claim severity, partially offset by a 9% decrease in claim
frequency.
Our catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance, amounted to $45 million for 2000
compared to $51 million for 1999.
Losses that we ceded through reinsurance resulted in a decrease in the total
combined ratio of 8.3 percentage points for 2000 and, as a result of changes in
recoverable amounts previously recorded, an increase of 2.6 percentage points
for 1999.
Our overall expense ratio for 2000 increased in comparison to 1999 mainly
because of the impact of increased operating expenses as discussed above.
Employee Benefits Division
The Employee Benefits division generates income from premiums, as well as
fee-based revenues and spread income, through the Group Insurance and Other
Employee Benefits segments. Premiums and investment income from group life and
disability insurance, as well as fee-based revenues from products like group
variable universal life insurance, are the primary sources of revenues for the
Group Insurance segment. The Other Employee Benefits segment also receives
premiums and investment income, as well as fee-based revenues. Products and
services for defined contribution and defined benefit retirement plans, as well
as real estate and relocation services, generate the major portion of the Other
Employee Benefits segment's fee-based revenues. We include these fee-based
revenues in the line captioned "Commissions and other income" or "Policy
charges and fee income" in our consolidated statements of operations.
102
<PAGE>
We seek to earn spread income in our general account on various products,
which is the difference between our return on the investments supporting the
products net of expenses and the amounts we credit to our contractholders.
These products primarily include the general account insurance group life and
disability products of the Group Insurance segment as well as guaranteed
investment contracts and certain group annuity products of the Other Employee
Benefits segment. We include revenues from these products, other than premiums
received from policyholders, primarily in the line captioned "Net investment
income" in our consolidated statements of operations.
The Group Insurance and Other Employee Benefits segments pay the expenses of
their own proprietary sales forces for distribution of products, and pay the
Individual Life Insurance and Private Client Group segments within the U.S.
Consumer division for distribution of their products through Prudential Agents
and Financial Advisors. These segments also pay our Investment Management and
Advisory Services segment for management of proprietary assets. These fees
result in expenses to the segments of the Employee Benefits division and
revenues to the Asset Management division. We reflect all of the intra-company
services at rates that we determined with reference to market rates. The Other
Employee Benefits segment also pays third-party managers for management of
non-proprietary assets that support some of its defined contribution retirement
products.
Division Results
The following table and discussion present the Employee Benefits division's
results based on our definition of adjusted operating income, which is a
non-GAAP measure, as well as income from continuing operations before income
taxes, which is prepared in accordance with GAAP. As shown below, adjusted
operating income excludes realized investment gains, net of losses and related
charges. The excluded items are important to an understanding of our overall
results of operations. You should not view adjusted operating income as a
substitute for income from continuing operations determined in accordance with
GAAP, and you should note that our definition of adjusted operating income may
differ from that used by other companies. However, we believe that the
presentation of adjusted operating income as we measure it for management
purposes enhances the understanding of our results of operations by
highlighting the results from ongoing operations and the underlying
profitability factors of our businesses. We exclude realized investment gains,
net of losses and related charges, from adjusted operating income because the
timing of transactions resulting in recognition of gains or losses is largely
at our discretion and the amount of these gains or losses is heavily influenced
by and fluctuates in part according to the availability of market
opportunities. Including the fluctuating effects of these transactions could
distort trends in the underlying profitability of our business.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Division operating results:
Revenues(1).............................................................. $5,912 $5,686 $5,442
Benefits and expenses(2)................................................. 5,729 5,299 5,042
------ ------ ------
Adjusted operating income................................................ $ 183 $ 387 $ 400
====== ====== ======
Adjusted operating income by segment:
Group Insurance.......................................................... $ 70 $ 158 $ 128
Other Employee Benefits.................................................. 113 229 272
------ ------ ------
Total.................................................................. 183 387 400
Items excluded from adjusted operating income:
Realized investment gains, net of losses and related charges:
Realized investment gains (losses), net................................ (172) (87) 228
Related charges(3)..................................................... 14 (31) (143)
------ ------ ------
Total realized investment gains, net of losses and related charges..... (158) (118) 85
------ ------ ------
Income from continuing operations before income taxes....................... $ 25 $ 269 $ 485
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Revenues exclude realized investment gains, net of losses.
(2)Benefits and expenses exclude the impact of net realized investment gains on
reserves and deferred acquisition cost amortization.
(3)Related charges consist of the following:
103
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000 1999
---- ---- -----
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Reserves for future policy benefits................. $ 7 $(32) $(147)
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs... 7 1 4
--- ---- -----
Total............................................. $14 $(31) $(143)
=== ==== =====
</TABLE>
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income of our Employee
Benefits division decreased $204 million, or 53%, from 2000 to 2001 as a result
of a $116 million decrease in adjusted operating income from our Other Employee
Benefits segment and an $88 million decrease from our Group Insurance segment.
Income from continuing operations before income taxes decreased $244 million,
or 91%, from 2000 to 2001, reflecting the decrease in adjusted operating income
as well as a $40 million increase in realized investment losses, net of related
charges. For a discussion of realized investment gains and losses and charges
related to realized investment gains and losses, see "--Consolidated Results of
Operations--Realized Investment Gains."
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income of our Employee
Benefits division decreased $13 million, or 3%, from 1999 to 2000 as a result
of a $43 million decrease in adjusted operating income from our Other Employee
Benefits segment which was partially offset by a $30 million increase from our
Group Insurance segment. Income from continuing operations before income taxes
decreased $216 million, from $485 million in 1999 to $269 million in 2000. This
decline resulted primarily from realized investment losses, net of related
charges, of $118 million in 2000 compared to realized investment gains, net of
related charges, of $85 million in 1999.
Group Insurance
Operating Results
The following table sets forth the Group Insurance segment's operating
results for the periods indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating results:
Revenues(1)............... $3,248 $2,801 $2,428
Benefits and expenses..... 3,178 2,643 2,300
------ ------ ------
Adjusted operating income. $ 70 $ 158 $ 128
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Revenues exclude realized investment gains, net of losses.
Adjusted Operating Income
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income decreased $88
million, or 56%, from 2000 to 2001. The decrease came primarily from less
favorable mortality experience on group life insurance in 2001, which included
an increase in our estimate of incurred but not reported claims. This increase
in estimate had a negative impact of approximately $36 million on our adjusted
operating income for 2001. The mortality experience on group life insurance was
partially offset by earned premium growth and improved morbidity on group
disability products. In addition, adjusted operating income benefited $32
million in 2000 from refinements in our calculations of reserves and return
premiums for waiver of premium features. However, about half of this benefit
was offset during 2000, primarily by a charge to increase the allowance for
receivables. An increase in operating expenses, including $12 million of
consulting costs in 2001, also contributed to the decrease in adjusted
operating income.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Adjusted operating income increased $30
million, or 23%, from 1999 to 2000. Approximately half of the increase came
from growth in earned premiums on both group life and disability products,
reflecting increased sales and strong persistency, as well as improved
mortality and morbidity on group life and disability products in 2000. Adjusted
operating income benefited $32 million in 2000 from refinements in our
calculations of reserves and return premiums for waiver of premium features.
However, about half of this benefit was offset during 2000, primarily by a
charge to increase the allowance for receivables.
104
<PAGE>
Revenues
2001 to 2000 Annual Comparison. Revenues, as shown in the table above under
"--Operating Results," increased by $447 million, or 16%, from 2000 to 2001.
Group life insurance premiums increased by $350 million, or 21%, to $2.005
billion primarily due to growth in business in force resulting from new sales,
as described below, and continued strong persistency, which increased from 95%
in 2000 to 97% in 2001. Group disability premiums, which include long-term care
products, increased by $43 million, also reflecting the growth in business in
force. Persistency decreased from 91% in 2000 to 89% in 2001, primarily due to
the cancellation of a large case. Net investment income increased $62 million,
or 13%, primarily due to a larger base of invested assets.
2000 to 1999 Annual Comparison. Revenues increased by $373 million, or 15%,
from 1999 to 2000. Group life insurance premiums increased by $189 million, or
13%, to $1.655 billion primarily due to growth in business in force resulting
from new sales, which increased in 2000. Persistency increased from 94% in 1999
to 95% in 2000. Group disability premiums, which include long-term care
products, increased by $71 million, or 18%, also reflecting the growth in
business in force resulting from new sales, which increased in 2000.
Persistency increased from 88% in 1999 to 91% in 2000. The remainder of the
increase in revenues came primarily from higher fees on products sold to
employers for funding of employee benefit programs and retirement arrangements,
reflecting growth of this business in 2000. Net investment income was $