Common Stock, $0.0005 par value, per share
Preferred Share Rights (currently attached to and trading only with Common Stock)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by a check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ý No o

As of June 28, 2002, the last business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, there were 99,915,907 shares of the Registrant's common stock outstanding and the aggregate market value of such shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based on the closing sale price of such shares on the Nasdaq National Market on June 28, 2002, was approximately $1,195,783,599. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person who beneficially owns more than 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may under certain circumstances be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of executive officer or affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

99,099,250 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock were outstanding as of February 28, 2003.

Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such Proxy Statement will be filed within 120 days of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Some of the statements under the sections entitled "Business," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and "Other Factors Affecting Future Operations," and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in the documents incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, constitute forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as "may," "could," "would," "might," "will," "should," "expect," "plan," "intend," "forecast," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "potential," "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and situations, including those disclosed in "Other Factors Affecting Future Operations" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, that may cause our or our industry's actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

We develop, manufacture, market and service a comprehensive line of high-quality, easy-to-use communications equipment that enables enterprise users to more effectively conduct video, voice, data and web communications. We provide an end-to-end solution that includes enterprise video and voice communications end-points, network infrastructure and management products and product maintenance and other professional services. Our enterprise video and voice communications products enable businesses and other organizations to easily communicate with employees, customers, and partners, regardless of location. Our network infrastructure and management products include bridges, gateways, network management software and call processing servers that enable communications across and between different types of networks and end-points. The breadth of our product offering enables us to provide our customers with a comprehensive, end-to-end communications solution, which spans the desktop, meeting room and enterprise or service provider network. As described more fully below in "Recent Developments", we sold our network access product line to Verilink Corporation in January 2003.

Our products are unified under The Polycom Accelerated Communications Architecture, a framework of common technology principles and objectives for intelligent, standards-based communications. This architecture is designed to facilitate interoperability among systems in a multi-vendor environment, leverage common features across a variety of products and streamline management processes. Because it is based on open standards and supports a wide range of communications protocols, the architecture helps our customers protect their existing and future investments in a converged communications infrastructure. The Polycom Accelerated Communications Architecture serves as the enabling platform for The Polycom Office, our corporate vision of a unified communications environment for employees, customers and partners to communicate in a dispersed workplace.

Our business has two operating segments, Communications and Network Systems. In 2002, we had a third segment, Network Access, which we sold in January 2003. Our Communications segment includes videoconferencing collaboration products and network management software, voice communications products, and a wide range of service and support offerings to our resellers and directly to some end-user customers. Our Network Systems segment includes our MGC series of media servers, GW series of network gateways, PathNavigator call processing server, WebOffice

webconferencing software application, and portfolio of professional and maintenance services. Our Network Access products included our NetEngine family of integrated access devices ("IADs") and routers that enabled enterprise customers to access broadband and VoB services. See Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

We have established partnerships with leading communications and technology firms to assist us in developing, marketing, distributing and manufacturing our products. For example, we have agreements with Alcatel, Cisco Systems and 3Com to develop and market voice-over-IP, or VoIP, communications products and have formed other strategic relationships with leading companies such as Avaya and Nortel Networks. We sell our products through a broad network of channel partners, including leading communications service providers, value-added resellers, distributors and retailers. In addition, we plan to continue to implement changes to our channel partner strategy which will result in a smaller number of channel partners, a change in the mix of our channel partners and a shift to a model with more direct interaction between us and our direct end-user customers. We manufacture our products through a low-cost, outsourced model optimized for quality, reliability and fulfillment agility.

We were incorporated in December 1990 in Delaware. Our principal executive offices are located at 4750 Willow Road, Pleasanton, California 94588, and our telephone number at this location is (925) 924-6000. Our Internet Website address is www.polycom.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to such reports are available, free of charge, on our Internet website under "Investor Relations—Financial and SEC Filings," as soon as reasonably practicable after we file electronically such material with, or furnish it to, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Information on our website does not constitute a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Polycom and the Polycom logo are registered trademarks of Polycom, Inc. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also includes other trade names, trademarks and service marks of ours and of other companies.

Enterprises are increasingly seeking technologies to facilitate more natural and effective one-on-one and group communications among people separated by distance. Several trends are driving the need for improved collaboration, including the following:

Video communication has rapidly emerged as a preferred method of collaboration among individuals separated by distance. However, the ability to conduct successful video communication in the past has been hindered by low bandwidth connections and equipment that was difficult to use, unreliable, expensive or otherwise ineffective. With the increasing availability of broadband services, enterprise migration to IP networks and advances in video communications technology, many enterprises are now seeking communications equipment capable of utilizing available bandwidth to enable real-time and on-demand video communications.

We offer a family of videoconferencing collaboration products and network management software that facilitate high-quality video communications. Our ViewStation product family is comprised of high-performance, cost-effective and easy-to-use group videoconferencing systems. Our iPower products utilize a PC-based architecture, optimized for intensive collaboration in conjunction with videoconferencing. Our ViaVideo desktop video communications appliance integrates a multimedia processor, camera and our patented full-duplex Acoustic Clarity Technology for two-way video, voice and data transmission in a single, low-cost device. Our Visual Concert family of peripherals allows users of our ViewStation products to more easily incorporate data, documents and audiovisual effects into their videoconferencing sessions. Our Global Management System provides users of our video communications products with a globally-accessible address book, real-time system monitoring and other asset management features. All of our video communications products are compatible with international standards and are in use in more than 30 countries.

To assist our end-user customers in implementing and managing their video communications applications on a global basis, we offer a portfolio of additional professional and maintenance services. Our training program provides our resellers and end-user customers with educational services to ensure effective operation of our products. For the on-going support of our end-user customers' video communication systems, we provide maintenance services, including telephone support, parts exchange,

on-site assistance and direct access to our support engineers for real-time troubleshooting of our products. Our services are sold both directly to end-user customers and through our resellers.

From desktop to large integrated auditorium systems, or from analog to digital to IP networks with multiple protocols, our voice communications products enhance business communication needs. A majority of Polycom's voice products feature our patented Acoustic Clarity Technology which allows simultaneous conversations (full duplex) and minimizes background noise, echoes, word clipping and distortion. We recently introduced the SoundStation VTX 1000™, which automatically adapts to each meeting environment, providing high fidelity voice quality for all participants whether they are 2-feet or 20-feet away from the microphone. This wideband conference phone delivers twice the bandwidth of a normal telephone over an ordinary telephone line for life-like sound quality.

Our Vortex series of rack-mounted voice conferencing products provide solutions for larger, high-end conference rooms, training rooms, courtrooms, classrooms and other permanent installations. These solutions can be used as a stand alone audio system or can be used in combination with a video system to significantly enhance the audio quality and microphone pick up. Our Vortex systems feature advanced acoustics technologies, including multi-channel full-duplex acoustic echo cancellation, noise reduction, automatic gain control, automatic microphone mixing, matrix mixing, room equalization and telephony interfaces. All of our voice end-points are compatible with international standards and are in use in more than 30 countries.

The convergence of voice and data networks is allowing VoIP telephony systems to address many needs of today's enterprises, including reducing costs, new productivity enhancing applications, simplifying network management and converging voice and data networks. VoIP telephony systems enable corporations to distribute a single network across multiple offices or remote locations, and reduce the cost of managing communications networks by allowing remote modification. These converged systems also provide a platform for enterprises to rapidly build applications to meet specific business demands. In response to these trends, we have leveraged our acoustic experience to offer our SoundStation IP and SoundPoint IP products for applications in the conference room and on the desktop for IP technology solutions. We have established relationships with Alcatel, Broadsoft, Cisco Systems, 3Com, Shoreline Communications, Sphere Communications, Sylantro, Vertical Networks and Vocal Data to collaborate in the development, marketing and distribution of our VoIP conferencing and handset products.

To assist our end-user customers in implementing and managing their voice communication products, we offer a portfolio of additional professional and maintenance services. For the on-going support of our end-user customers' voice systems, we provide maintenance services, including telephone support, parts exchange, on-site assistance and direct access to our support engineers for real-time

troubleshooting of our products. Our services are sold both directly to end-user customers and through our resellers.

As enterprises, educational institutions, government agencies and organizations and service providers look to provide video and voice applications to their customers and users, they face the challenge of interconnecting various network types, network protocols, transmission speeds and end-points in a secure reliable and high quality environment. These customers require network systems designed to resolve these complex interoperability, multipoint connectivity and security issues. Network systems must also ensure a consistent level of high quality service by intelligently matching end-user applications to available network resources. Further, network systems must satisfy end-users who demand video, voice, data and web communications sessions that are easy to establish and manage.

Our network systems products provide a broad range of video, voice, data and web communication capabilities to businesses, telecommunications service providers, and governmental and educational institutions. Our recently introduced MGC-25 and our existing MGC-50 and MGC-100 media servers provide seamless network connectivity across packet-based broadband networks and traditional circuit-switched networks for both video and voice multipoint conferencing. The advanced transcoding capabilities of our MGC systems enable reliable and optimal communication among end-points with different video, voice and data parameters and bandwidth capabilities. In addition, the MGC products combine fully featured voice conferencing and fully featured video conferencing on the same platform supported by a common management system.

Our GW-25 and GW-45 gateways move and translate traffic effectively and securely from one network type to another and also include a Checkmark registered firewall capability for secure video communications across IP networks.

Our line of network systems products also includes the PathNavigator call processing server and WebOffice, a web-conferencing software application. PathNavigator offers powerful network management capabilities that simplify the use of enterprise video throughout a converged network, ensures reliability and security and effectively manages network bandwidth. WebOffice provides a web-based virtual office, enabling users to conduct online meetings, or share documents, applications or desktops in a secure, interactive environment on an ad-hoc or scheduled basis. WebOffice users can also conduct Instant Message sessions with colleagues and launch voice and video conferencing from their WebOffice browser.

To assist our end-user customers in implementing and managing their network systems products, we offer a portfolio of additional professional and maintenance services. For the on-going support of our end-user customers' network systems, we provide maintenance services, including telephone support, parts exchange, on-site assistance and direct access to our support engineers for real-time troubleshooting of our products. Our services are sold both directly to end-user customers and through our resellers.

In January 2003, we sold our network access product line to Verilink (See "Recent Developments" below). In 2002, our network access products consisted of our NetEngine family of integrated access devices ("IADs") and routers that enabled enterprise customers to access broadband and VoB services. Compact, cost-effective and highly-integrated, our NetEngine products were suited for small and medium-sized businesses and remote office locations. Our network access products supported a wide range of broadband transmission standards and end-user requirements. All of our network access products were interoperable with the products of leading broadband equipment vendors.

We face significant competition in the communications industry, which is subject to rapid technological change. In video communications, our major competitors include Tandberg and a number

of other companies including Aethra, ClearOne, Huawei, NEC, Panasonic, Philips, Sony, VCON and VTEL, as well as various smaller or new industry entrants. Some of these companies have substantial financial resources and production, marketing, engineering and other capabilities with which to develop, manufacture, market and sell their products. In addition, with advances in telecommunications standards, connectivity and video processing technology and the increasing market acceptance of video communications, other established or new companies may develop or market products competitive with our video communications products. We believe we will face increasing competition from alternative video communications solutions that employ new technologies or new combinations of technologies from companies such as 3Com, Cisco Systems, Hewlett-Packard, Dell, Microsoft, Nortel Networks, RealNetworks and WebEx, that enable web-based or network-based video and collaboration communications. The market for voice communications equipment, including voice conferencing and desktop equipment, is highly competitive and also subject to rapid technological change, regulatory developments and emerging industry standards. We expect competition to persist and increase in the future in this area. In voice communications, our major competitors include Aethra, Cisco Systems, ClearOne Communications, Konftel, Mitel, Soundgear and other companies that have in the past offered lower cost, full-duplex speakerphones. In the VoIP desktop space, there are several emerging low cost manufacturers in Asia and Europe. In addition, there are notable PBX and IP Call Manager manufacturers that compete on the standards-based IP space including Cisco, Mitel and Siemens. Furthermore, all major telephony manufacturers produce hands-free speakerphone units that are lower cost than our voice communications products. Our network systems business has significant competition from RADVISION and a number of other companies including Avaya, Cisco Systems, First Virtual and Tandberg.

We believe our ability to compete depends on such factors as reputation, quality, customer support and service, price, features and functions of products, ease of use, reliability, and marketing and distribution channels. We believe we compete favorably with respect to each of these factors. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully in the future with respect to any of the above factors. We expect our competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and to introduce new products or new technologies that provide improved performance characteristics. New product introductions by our competitors could cause a significant decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of our existing products and future products. We believe that the possible effects from ongoing competition may be the reduction in the prices of our products and our competitors' products or the introduction of additional lower priced competitive products. We expect this increased competitive pressure may lead to intensified price-based competition, resulting in lower prices and gross margins which would significantly harm our results of operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against our current or future competitors.

We intend to continue to invest in and leverage our core technologies to develop and market our video communication, network systems and voice communication products and product enhancements. Our core technologies include the following:

Wideband Audio. We have made significant investments in the development of key audio technologies to provide improved fidelity in conferencing and point-to-point environments, because of the importance of speech in communications. We currently provide wideband audio, using our industry-developed standard, G.722.1, in our video and MGC products. Most recently, our continued investment in audio technology has yielded key elements of our new VTX technology, which makes this quality available over the telephone network.

IP Protocols and Telephony. We are investing heavily in the technologies that enable IP communications and telephony. The multiple protocols, applications, feature sets, and environments of IP telephony all require significant attention and innovative new solutions to operate flawlessly with a

communications link that is fundamentally different than the traditional analog telephone line. Commonly experienced IP issues such as lost data, erratic transmission times, incompatible compression algorithms, and unreliable connections each require explicit attention to produce a speech channel with smooth, reliable operation.

Multimedia Bridging. By developing new architectures, algorithms and techniques, we are extending our base of bridging products. Our focus on a strong basic architecture continues to reap rewards in configuration flexibility, product function, cost, and the applicability of design elements in multiple products and environments.

Web Collaboration Technology. We continue to extend our rich tool set for exchange of visual images in multiple environments as web collaboration and application sharing become more important to conferencing abilities. This technology provides a versatile and growing set of features for the developing web collaboration market, while multiple solutions are available to match almost any environment for graphics presentation in our video systems.

Industry Standards Leadership. Polycom continues our role in industry leadership in numerous standards activities. Our technical expertise and management contributions are exemplary in our roles as editor, contributor and other capacities in world and regional standards committees. These include ITU-T Study Group 16, Internet Engineering Task Force, International Multimedia Telecommunications Consortium and Telecommunications Industry Association, and cover emerging technology areas such as media coding, communications protocols, endpoint requirements, and industry interoperation. Among its activities, Polycom has been instrumental in the development of the H.264 next-generation video compression standard and the G.722.1 audio compression standard.

Digital Acoustic Processing. Polycom has been enhancing and developing our advanced acoustic processing technologies since the 1992 introduction of the industry-defining SoundStation voice conferencing system. At our facilities, we are extending the state-of-the-art in these critical areas and creating a powerful mechanism to facilitate the incorporation of these technologies into all of our products. We are also continuing to develop audio compression technologies to deliver sound of even higher fidelity for new products, as well as to provide improved performance in our existing ones.

PC Based Video/Data/Voice Communications. We are making a significant investment in architectures that will deliver on the promise of a converged PC and communication/collaboration solution, based upon our iPower architecture. This technology provides seamless integration of the applications found on personal computers with the tools required for individual and team conferencing, communication, and collaboration.

Diverse Room Configurations. We are developing and extending robust algorithms and techniques to broaden our coverage to additional room environments. These range from the local, personal environment of the desktop, through the medium-sized conference rooms that work well with tabletop terminals, to the large, versatile spaces that are best served by integrated room systems.

Conferencing Integration and Management. As systems become more capable and complex, the need for enhanced tools to manage multiple endpoints and sessions becomes more keenly felt. Polycom is investing in developing a generation of integrated system management tools that increase the security, reliability, and ease of operation of the elements of its systems. Our Global Management System, or GMS, is a versatile client/server system for meeting and device coordination and management via integrated network control. This improves the reliability and accessibility of network systems and helps assure completeness and uniformity among users, which is especially useful to corporate users and IT organizations.

Video System Architectures. We continue to exploit the advantages of our flexible iPower and ViewStation system architectures, which allow for a complete spectrum of video communication products ranging from high-end large room systems to compact video appliances.

Multimedia Teleconferencing. We have developed a series of algorithms and techniques for the integration of graphical and other web-based content with living video and voice across a seamlessly integrated product architecture. Our Dual Stream protocols, which enable the simultaneous display of video and graphical elements is one successful implementation of this advanced technology.

Network/Internet Connectivity. We continue to extend our teleconferencing products to operate over local and extended networks utilizing standard networking and Internet protocols, such as Mbps networks, ATM, frame relay, and TCP/IP. Within the next several years, industry analysts believe that a significant percentage of business communication, video and voice as well as data, will take place over packet-switched rather than circuit-switched networks (i.e., internal and external networks rather than the public telephone network). Some of the advantages to this approach are greater bandwidth availability, lower transmission costs, expandability, and the ability to operate by managing only one network instead of several.

We market and sell our products through a broad worldwide network of channel partners, which includes leading communications service providers, value-added resellers, distributors and retailers. Our channel partners include Avaya, Cisco, Daito Electronics, Digital China Technology, France Telecom GBH, Genedis, Hello Direct, Hitachi High Technology, Ingram Micro, Jenne, Nanjing Southern, Princeton, Review Video, SBC, Siemens, Sprint, T2 Supply, Tech Data and Wire One Technologies. Many of these resellers sell a variety of communication products and/or services and, with our products, offer a complete product portfolio. We believe that it is important to maintain a close working relationship with these customers in order to meet their demands for sales and support on a multinational basis. We plan to continue to focus on the federal, state and local government opportunities working with new and existing channel partners. To complement our sales efforts, we advertise in trade and general business print media, participate in a wide array of trade shows and public relations activities and lease sales offices in strategic metropolitan areas on a worldwide basis.

In 2002, we began to implement a new direct-touch strategy in concert with a realignment of our channel partner strategy. This strategy shift includes channel certifications for certain network systems and video products which we believe will yield a higher level of end-user customer satisfaction. As part of this new channel partner strategy, the channel inventory model is changing to reduce channel inventories to a more optimal level or to a drop shipment method to certain channel partners' end user customers. We believe this inventory model improvement, along with our increased staff of direct-touch sales force that sells hand-in-hand with our channel partners, enables Polycom to better sell the benefits of Polycom's end-to-end video, voice, data, and web collaboration solutions.

We have historically focused our sales efforts in regions of the world where we believe customers have begun to invest significantly in conferencing equipment and services. These regions currently include North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and the Caribbean and Latin America. See Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for selected financial information by geography. The principal international resellers of our products currently include Adcom, Daito Electronics, Digital China Technology, France Telecom, Genedis, Giro, Hitachi High Technology, Latin Telecom, Nanjing Southern, Siemens and Telindus. If we are not successful in expanding internationally or if the anticipated growth in Europe or Asia does not materialize, it could harm our business.

We have established product distribution centers in the European and Asian markets in order to better serve our international customers, which have increased the costs associated with our international operations. International sales are subject to a number of risks including potential

economic weakness in international markets, political instability, any adverse economic impact of terrorist attacks and incidents and any military response to those attacks, war or other hostilities, changes in foreign government regulations and telecommunications standards, export license requirements, tariffs and taxes, other trade barriers, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, difficulty in staffing and managing foreign operations, longer payment cycles, and difficulty in collecting accounts receivable. Our sales to international resellers are usually made in U.S. dollars in order to minimize the risks associated with fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates. To date, a substantial majority of our international sales have been denominated in U.S. currency; however, we expect that in the future more of our international sales could be denominated in some non U.S. dollar currencies. Significant adverse changes in currency exchange rates, as happened in the European market in 2000 and in the Asian market in late 1997, could cause our products to become relatively more expensive to customers in a particular country, leading to a reduction in revenue or profitability in that country. In addition, the costs associated with developing international sales may not be offset by increased sales in the short term, or at all.

A majority of our revenues are from value-added resellers, distributors, service providers and retailers. In 2002, 2001 and 2000, we derived a substantial majority of our net revenues from sales of our video communication, voice communication and network systems products. See Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. No customer accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 or 2000. For the year ended December 31, 2002, our network systems segment had two channel partners that represented approximately 20% of Network Systems Segment revenues. We believe it is unlikely that the loss of one or both of these channel partners would have a material adverse affect on the net revenues of this segment as we believe end-users would likely purchase our network systems products from a different channel partner. In 2001, the amount of orders we received from Lucent dropped significantly which had a negative effect on our revenue and profitability. In 2002, our resellers reduced the purchases of our products as a result of the economic downturn. If major resellers continue to limit or reduce their purchases of our products as a consequence of a continued economic downturn or for any other reason, it would harm our business. We have historically shipped orders soon after they are received from customers so backlog typically has not been significant.

Resellers generally offer products of several different companies, including products that compete with our products. Accordingly, these resellers may give higher priority to products of other suppliers, thus reducing their efforts to sell our products. Agreements with resellers may be terminated at any time. A reduction in sales effort or termination of a distribution relationship by one or more of our resellers could harm our operating results. Use of resellers also entails the risk that resellers will build up inventories in anticipation of a growth in sales. If such sales growth does not occur as anticipated by these resellers for numerous reasons, including the continuation of the economic downturn in 2003, these resellers may substantially decrease the amount of product ordered in subsequent quarters, which could harm our business and results of operations, as happened in the last three quarters of 2002.

The video and voice communications and network systems distribution industries have historically been characterized by rapid change, including consolidations and the emergence of alternative distribution channels. In addition, there are an increasing number of companies competing for access to these channels. The loss or ineffectiveness of any of our major resellers could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. We cannot assure you that our existing reseller channels will continue to successfully sell our products, or that we will be able to successfully sell our products through any new channels that we may attempt to develop as a result of adverse changes in our existing reseller channels. Further, we believe that our channel partner strategy, which will result in further reductions in our channel partner inventories to a more optimal level, may limit revenue growth and may cause a decrease in revenue in the near term, as it did in the fourth quarter of 2002. In addition, we plan to continue to implement changes to our channel partner strategy which will result in a smaller number of

channel partners, a change in the mix of our channel partners and a shift to a model with more direct interaction between us and our direct end-user customers. These changes may cause additional disruptions in our channels and negatively impact revenue growth in the near term.

Some of our product lines have experienced seasonal fluctuations, which have affected sequential growth rates for these products, particularly in the third and first quarters of our fiscal year. For example, there is typically a slowdown in orders in the third quarter for our products in the European region. In addition, sales of our video communications products have typically declined in the first quarter of the year compared to the previous quarter. These fluctuations negatively affect our business during those quarters, which could cause our operating results to fall short of anticipated results for such quarters.

We believe that service and support are critical components of customer satisfaction. Although our resellers maintain and provide technical support to their end-user customers, we provide a wide range of service and support offerings to our resellers and directly to some end-user customers.

Our service offerings include: integration services consisting of consulting, education, design and project management services; consulting services consisting of planning and needs analysis for end-users; design services, such as room design and custom solutions, providing customized videoconferencing solutions to meet each end-user's unique requirements; and project management, installation and training which provide end-users with effective implementation of videoconferencing systems. All services are sold both directly to end-user customers and through our resellers. Service programs for local and international resellers range from reselling our service offerings to providing back-end support for servicing end-users. All maintenance services are delivered on a worldwide basis from several integrated support centers located in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Singapore and Japan. Spare parts are stocked around the world to meet response time commitments to customers and resellers. We utilize direct field service staff as well as resellers and third-party service providers to perform installation and on-site repairs. We deliver integration services and training through engineers, consultants, project managers and instructors. In addition, a Technical Service Center hotline provides a full range of telephone support to our resellers and to end-user customers and we offer electronic support via the World Wide Web. We maintain contracts with a number of different vendors throughout the world to provide certain services, including front line technical telephone support in North America, on-site field support and logistics.

We provide warranty support for our hardware products, software media and repaired parts. The warranty period is generally one to three years for hardware products, ninety days for software media, and ninety days for repaired parts.

We believe that our future success depends in part on our ability to continue to enhance existing products and to develop new products that maintain technological competitiveness. Our current development efforts focus principally on the video communications, network systems, and voice communications product families. We intend to expand upon these product platforms through the development of options, upgrades and future product generations. However, we cannot assure you that these products will be made commercially available as expected or otherwise on a timely and cost-effective basis or that, if introduced, these products will achieve market acceptance. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that these products will not be rendered obsolete by changing technology or new product announcements by other companies.

Research and development expenses were approximately $76.8 million in 2002, $59.4 million in 2001 and $43.6 million in 2000. We believe that significant investments in research and development

are required to remain competitive since technological competitiveness is key to our future success. We intend to continue to make substantial investments in product and technology development. We also intend to continue to participate in the development of various teleconferencing industry standards, which are or may be incorporated into our products.

The video and voice communications and network systems markets are subject to rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions and enhancements, changes in end-user requirements and evolving industry standards. Our ability to remain competitive in these markets will depend in significant part upon our ability to successfully develop, introduce and sell new products and enhancements on a timely and cost-effective basis. Our success in developing new and enhanced products depends upon a variety of factors, including new product selection, timely and efficient completion of product design, timely and efficient implementation of manufacturing, assembly and test processes, product performance at customer locations and development of competitive products and enhancements by competitors. We are currently engaged in the development of a number of new products and extensions of our video communications, network systems and voice communications product families. We expect to continue to invest significant resources in new product development and enhancements to current and future products. In addition, our introduction of new products could result in higher warranty claims, product returns and manufacturing, sales and marketing and other expenses that could harm our business. Our business may also be harmed if we are unable to introduce new products or enhancements on a timely and cost-effective basis that maintain or enhance our competitive position and contribute significantly to net revenues. In the past, we have experienced delays from time to time in the introduction and in the continued production of certain of our products. For example, the year 2000 introduction of our ViewStation FX and ViaVideo desktop products were delayed from the originally anticipated dates of introduction because of unforeseen technical challenges. These delays likely created confusion in the market which hurt our business. In addition, new product or technology introductions by our competitors could cause a decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of our existing products or new products. Further, from time to time, we may announce new products, capabilities or technologies that have the potential to replace our existing products or future products. Announcements of product enhancements or new product offerings by us or our competitors could cause customers to defer or stop purchasing our products which would harm our business.

We subcontract the manufacture of our voice and video products to Celestica, a third-party contract manufacturer. We use Celestica's Thailand facilities, and should there be any disruption in services due to natural disaster or economic or political difficulties in Thailand or Asia or any other reason, such disruption would harm our business and results of operations. Also, Celestica's Thailand facility is currently the sole source manufacturer of these products, and if Celestica experiences an interruption in operations or otherwise suffers from capacity constraints, we would experience a delay in shipping these products. As a result, we may not be able to meet demand for our products, which could negatively affect revenues in the quarter of the disruption and harm our reputation. In addition, operating in the international environment exposes us to certain inherent risks, including unexpected changes in regulatory requirements and tariffs, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations and potentially adverse tax consequences, all of which could harm our business and results of operations.

Further, our network systems products are manufactured in Israel, which is currently experiencing internal and external conflicts that include terrorist and military action. We could experience a manufacturing disruption due to terrorist attacks and incidents and any military response to those attacks, war or other hostilities which could harm our business. In addition, certain technology used in our network systems products was developed through grants from the Office of the Chief Scientist in

Israel. Under Israeli law, it is prohibited to transfer technology developed pursuant to these grants to any person without the prior written consent of the Office of the Chief Scientist. The grants also contain restrictions on the ability to manufacture products developed with these grants outside of Israel. Approval to manufacture such products outside of Israel, if granted, is generally subject to an increase in the total amount to be repaid to the Office of the Chief Scientist of between 120% to 300% of the amount granted, depending on the extent of the manufacturing to be conducted outside of Israel. These restrictions on the ability to transfer technology to third parties or manufacture products outside Israel may adversely affect our operating results and significantly reduce the value of the technology developed under these grants.

Our operations are vulnerable to interruption by fire, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failure, national catastrophe, such as the terrorist attacks which occurred on September 11, 2001, and other events beyond our control. We do not have a fully implemented disaster recovery plan. In addition, we do not carry sufficient business interruption insurance to compensate us for losses that may occur and any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business. In the event that we or our contract manufacturers were to experience financial or operational difficulties that are not covered by insurance, it would adversely affect our results of operations until we could establish sufficient manufacturing supply through an alternative source. The effect of reduction or interruption in supply on results of operations would be material. We believe that there are a number of alternative contract manufacturers that could produce our products, but in the event of a reduction or interruption of supply, for any reason, it would take a significant period of time to qualify an alternative subcontractor and commence manufacturing, which would harm our business and results of operations.

Some key components used in our products are currently available from only one source and others are available from only a limited number of sources, including some key integrated circuits and optical elements. We also obtain certain plastic housings, metal castings and other components from suppliers located in China and certain Southeast Asia countries, and any political or economic instability in that region in the future, or future import restrictions, may cause delays or an inability to obtain these supplies. We have no raw material supply commitments from our suppliers and generally purchase components on a purchase order basis either directly or through our contract manufacturers. We have had limited experience purchasing volume supplies of various components for our products, and some of the components included in our products, such as microprocessors and other integrated circuits, have from time to time been subject to limited allocations by suppliers. In addition, companies with limited or uncertain financial resources manufacture some of these components. In the event that we, or our contract manufacturers, are unable to obtain sufficient supplies of components, develop alternative sources as needed, or companies with limited or uncertain financial resources go out of business, our operating results could be seriously harmed. Moreover, our operating results would be seriously harmed by receipt of a significant number of defective components, an increase in component prices or our inability to obtain lower component prices in response to competitive price reductions. Additionally, our video communications products are designed based on integrated circuits produced by Philips Semiconductor, or Philips, and cameras produced by Sony. If we could no longer obtain integrated circuits or cameras from these suppliers, we would incur substantial expense and take substantial time in redesigning our products to be compatible with components from other manufacturers, and we cannot assure you that we would be successful in obtaining these components from alternative sources in a timely or cost-effective manner. Additionally, both Sony and Philips compete with us in the video communications industry, which may adversely affect our ability to obtain necessary components. The failure to obtain adequate supplies of vital components could prevent or delay product shipments, which could harm our business. We also rely on the introduction schedules of some key components in the development or launch of new products. Any delays in the availability of these key components could harm our business.

While we rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and confidentiality procedures to protect our proprietary rights, we believe that factors such as technological and creative skills of our personnel, new product developments, frequent product enhancements, name recognition and reliable product maintenance are more essential to establishing and maintaining a technology leadership position. We currently have seventy United States patents issued covering our conferencing products. The expiration of these patents range from 2004 to 2018. In addition, we currently have one hundred fourteen foreign patents issued whose expirations range from 2003 to 2020. Further, we have eighty-six United States patents pending covering our conferencing and our network systems products and ninety-three foreign patent applications pending. Polycom, Polyspan, SoundStation Premier, ShowStation, SoundPoint, SoundStation, ViewStation, Polycom logos and others are registered trademarks of Polycom, and, WebStation, MeetingSite, ViaVideo, iPower, VoiceStation, SoundStation Premier Satellite, iPriority, Clarity by Polycom and others are trademarks of Polycom in the U.S. and various countries. According to federal and state law, Polycom's trademark protection will continue for as long as we continue to use our trademarks in connection with the products and services of Polycom. We seek to protect our software, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws, which only afford limited protection. Others may independently develop similar proprietary information and techniques or gain access to Polycom's intellectual property rights or disclose such technology. In addition, we cannot assure you that any patent or registered trademark owned by Polycom will not be invalidated, circumvented or challenged in the U.S. or foreign countries, that the rights granted thereunder will provide competitive advantages to us or that any of our pending or future patent applications will be issued with the scope of the claims sought by Polycom, if at all. Furthermore, others may develop similar products, duplicate our products or design around the patents owned by Polycom. In addition, foreign intellectual property laws may not protect our intellectual property rights.

Litigation may be necessary to enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity of and scope of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could have a material adverse effect on our business. We cannot assure you that infringement or invalidity claims by third parties or claims for indemnification resulting from infringement claims will not be asserted in the future or that such assertions, if proven to be true, will not harm our business and results of operations.

In March 2000, Polycom and VTEL Corporation, or VTEL, entered into a cross license agreement pursuant to which we obtained non-exclusive license rights under three VTEL patents, and VTEL obtained non-exclusive license rights to a patent for our videoconferencing technology. These licenses were written off in 2001 with the acquisition of PictureTel as the technology was deemed to have no future benefit. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

On September 23, 2002, a suit captioned Collaboration Properties, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc. was filed in the United States Court in the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges that our ViewStation, ViaVideo, iPower, WebOffice and Path Navigator products infringe 4 U.S. Patents owned by plaintiff. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory and exemplary damages for past and present infringement and to permanently enjoin us from infringing on the patents in the future, On November 14, 2002 we filed an answer asserting, among other things, no infringement and that plaintiff's patents are invalid and unenforceable. We believe that we have meritorious defenses and counterclaims, and intend to vigorously defend this action.

From time to time, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business activities. In addition, from time to time, third parties assert patent or trademark infringement claims against the Company in the form of letters and other forms of communication.

We have licensing agreements with various suppliers for software incorporated into our products. For example, we license video communications source code from ADTRAN, EBSNet, Omnitel, RADVISION and Telesoft, video algorithm protocols from Ezenia! and Real Networks, development source code from Cisco Systems and Philips Semiconductor, audio algorithms from Lucent Technologies, Nortel Networks and Texas Instruments, communication software from DataBeam and Windows software from Microsoft. These third-party software licenses may not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The termination or impairment of these licenses could result in delays or reductions in new product introductions or current product shipments until equivalent software could be developed, licensed and integrated, if at all possible, which would harm our business.

As of December 31, 2002, we employed a total of 1,271 persons, including 529 in sales, marketing and customer support, 418 in product development, 250 in manufacturing and 74 in finance and administration. Of these, 410 were outside of North America. We have experienced no work stoppages and believe our relationship with our employees is good.

We believe that our future success will depend in part on our continued ability to hire, assimilate and retain qualified personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting or retaining such personnel. The loss of any key employee, the failure of any key employee to perform in his or her current position or our inability to attract and retain skilled employees, particularly technical and management, as needed, could harm our business. The loss of the services of any executive officer or other key technical or management personnel could harm our business.

In January 2003, we sold to Verilink Corporation ("Verilink") certain fixed assets and intellectual property rights relating to the network access product line, including our line of NetEngine integrated devices, for a total of up to $3.0 million in cash, of which (i) $1.0 million was paid to us at closing, (ii) $0.25 million will be paid to us on the first anniversary of the closing, and (iii) up to $1.75 million will be paid to us quarterly based on ten percent of Verilink's revenues related to the sale of NetEngine products. The purchase price and the other terms of the asset sale were determined in arms-length negotiations between the parties. Concurrent with the closing, certain of our employees joined Verilink. Verilink has also agreed to purchase our existing NetEngine-related inventories, with a book value of approximately $1.9 million as of the closing date, on an as needed basis. Additionally, in connection with the sale, we entered into a license agreement with Verilink pursuant to which Verilink granted us a license to use and further develop the network access technology related to the NetEngine product line. We have agreed not to compete with Verilink in the network access market for a period of three years.

Our executive officers and their ages and positions as of February 15, 2003, are as follows:

Name	Age	Position(s)
Robert C. Hagerty*	51	Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President
Michael R. Kourey*	43	Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
Sunil K. Bhalla	46	Senior Vice President and General Manager, Voice Communications
Pierre-Francois Catte	46	Senior Vice President, Corporate Operations
Kathleen M. Crusco	38	Vice President, Worldwide Controller
James E. Ellett	43	Senior Vice President and General Manager, Video Communications
Philip B. Keenan	40	Senior Vice President and General Manager, Network Systems
Kim Niederman	51	Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales

Mr. Hagerty joined us in January 1997 as our President and Chief Operating Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors. In July 1998, Mr. Hagerty was named Chief Executive Officer. In March 2000, Mr. Hagerty was named Chairman of our Board of Directors. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hagerty served as President of Stylus Assets, Ltd., a developer of software and hardware products for fax, document management and Internet communications. He also held several key management positions with Logitech, Inc., including Operating Committee Member to the Office of the President, and Senior Vice President/General Manager of Logitech's retail division and worldwide operations. In addition, Mr. Hagerty's career history includes positions as Vice President, High Performance Products for Conner Peripherals, Director of Manufacturing Operations and General Manager for Signal Corporation, and Operations Manager for Digital Equipment Corporation. Mr. Hagerty holds a B.S. in Operations Research and Industrial Engineering from the University of Massachusetts, and an M.A. in Management from St. Mary's College of California.

Mr. Kourey has been one of our directors since January 1999. Mr. Kourey has served as our Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration since January 1999 and as our Chief Financial Officer since January 1995. Mr. Kourey has served as our Secretary since June 1993. He also served as Vice President, Finance and Administration from January 1995 to January 1999, Vice President, Finance and Operations from July 1991 to January 1995 and as our Treasurer from June 1993 to March 1997. Mr. Kourey currently serves on the Advisory Board of the Business School at Santa Clara University. Prior to joining us, he was Vice President, Operations of Verilink Corporation. Mr. Kourey holds a B.S. in Managerial Economics from the University of California, Davis, and an M.B.A. from Santa Clara University.

Mr. Bhalla joined us in February 2000 as our Senior Vice President, Voice Communications. Before joining us, Mr. Bhalla served as Vice President and General Manager of Polaroid Corporation's Internet Business and also served as Polaroid's Vice President and General Manager, Worldwide Digital Imaging Business. Previously, Mr. Bhalla also held posts as Director of Strategic Marketing at Computervision Corporation, as well as senior management positions with Digital Equipment Corporation. Mr. Bhalla holds a M.S. in Mechanical/Systems Engineering and CAD/CAM from Lehigh University.

Mr. Catte joined us in November 2001 as our Senior Vice President, Corporate Operations. Prior to joining us, Mr. Catte worked at Hewlett-Packard Company, where he had been since 1980. He served as the Vice President and General Manager of Hewlett-Packard's VeriFone Division from December 1997 to November 2001 and as General Manager of Hewlett-Packard's CONVEX Division from March 1996 to December 1997. Prior to that, Mr. Catte held several positions within Hewlett-Packard, including General Manager, Systems Manufacturing and Delivery Operation, General Manager, Exeter Computer Manufacturing Operation and others. Mr. Catte holds an M.B.A in Finance from Ecole Superieure De Commerce de Lyon in France.

Ms. Crusco joined us in January 2002 as Vice President, Worldwide Controller. In August 2002, Ms. Crusco was appointed Principal Accounting Officer. Before joining us, Ms. Crusco was Vice President, Worldwide Controller at Documentum Inc. from April 1999 to January 2001 and Director of Finance at Adaptec, Inc. from June 1997 to April 1999. Ms. Crusco also had various positions over ten years at Price Waterhouse, LLP, including Senior Audit Manager. Ms. Crusco holds a B.S. in Accounting from California State University of Chico.

Mr. Ellett joined us in February 2003 as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Video Communications. Before joining us, Mr. Ellett served as Vice President and General Manager of the Client Business Unit of Advanced Micro Devices. Prior to Advanced Micro Devices, Mr. Ellett held various general manager positions at Compaq Computer Corporation from November 1996 through February 2001. In addition, Mr. Ellett held positions at Cyrix Corporation, Digital Equipment Corporation and spent six years at Dell Computer Corporation, in various positions in the Desktop Systems, Consumer Products and Portable Systems groups. Mr. Ellett holds a bachelor's degree in electronic engineering from University of Texas.

Mr. Keenan served as our Senior Vice President and General Manager, Network Systems, from March 2001 to January 2002. From January 2002 to January 2003, Mr. Keenan served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Marketing. In January 2003, Mr. Keenan was named Senior Vice President and General Manager, Network Systems. Prior to joining us, Mr. Keenan served as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Marketing of Accord Networks Ltd. from April 1998 until February 2001. Mr. Keenan served as the Vice President of International Sales for VideoServer, Inc. from May 1994 until February 1998. Mr. Keenan holds an honours degree in Mining Geology from Cardiff University in the United Kingdom.

Mr. Niederman joined us in January 2003, as Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales. Prior to joining Polycom, Mr. Niederman served as President, CEO and founder of LongBoard, Inc., the leader in software-based IP Services Platforms. Mr. Niederman also served as President and CEO of Magellan Network Systems during 1999, Vice President, Worldwide Sales with start-up RadioLAN, Inc. from 1997 through 1999, Vice President of Sales with FORE Systems, Inc. from 1995 through 1997. Mr. Niederman also held various positions at Cisco Systems from 1990 through 1995, including Director, Worldwide Sales of Cisco's first business unit, Director, Central Operations and Region Manager, Central Area. Mr. Niederman holds a B.A. in Political Science from the University of Denver.

We are currently headquartered in an approximately 50,000 square foot facility in Pleasanton, California pursuant to a lease which expires in May 2012. This facility accommodates our executive and administrative operations. Our former headquarters in Milpitas, California continues to house research and development, manufacturing, marketing, sales and customer support operations for our voice business. This facility is approximately 102,000 square feet and is leased through January 2007.

The majority of our video and service operations are located in approximately 321,000 square feet in Andover, Massachusetts pursuant to a lease that expires in September 2014 and approximately

64,000 square feet in Austin, Texas pursuant to a lease that expires in December 2004. Our network systems operations occupy approximately 40,000 square feet in Petach Tikva, Israel and 32,000 square feet in Atlanta, Georgia, which is also shared with our installed voice business. In addition, we lease space in North Vancouver, Canada for our VoIP development operation and in Burlington, Massachusetts for our advanced voice development operations. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

We lease an approximately 55,000 square foot facility in Tracy, California for our North American and Latin American distribution center. Further, we utilize space at our manufacturing contractor in Thailand and our European distribution contractor in the United Kingdom and Netherlands to provide Asian and European distribution and repair centers, respectively.

Within the U.S., we lease office space, primarily for sales offices in various metropolitan locations, including: New York, New York; Atlanta, Georgia; Chicago, Illinois; Coral Gables, Florida; Irvine, California; Dallas, Texas and Silver Spring, Maryland. Outside of the U.S, we lease offices in several countries, including France, Germany, Israel, Netherlands, Spain, U.K., Australia, China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore, Mexico and Peru.

As a result of the acquisition of PictureTel completed in October 2001, we have identified redundant facilities that the company intends to terminate or sublease or has terminated or subleased. For example, the Company has an approximately 152,000 square foot building which is fully subleased to a third party for which the sublease runs concurrent with the Company's lease obligation. As a result the Company is not currently showing a lease obligation related to this facility. See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

We believe that our current facilities are adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future, and that suitable additional or alternative space will be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms as needed.

From time to time, we are subject to various legal proceedings that arise from the normal course of business activities. In addition, from time to time, third parties assert patent or trademark infringement claims against us in the form of letters and other forms of communication. We do not believe that any of these legal proceedings or claims are likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

On September 23, 2002, a suit captioned Collaboration Properties, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc. was filed in the United States Court in the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges that our ViewStation, ViaVideo, iPower, WebOffice and Path Navigator products infringe 4 U.S. Patents owned by plaintiff. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory and exemplary damages for past and present infringement and to permanently enjoin us from infringing on the patents in the future. On November 14, 2002 we filed an answer asserting, among other things, no infringement and that plaintiff's patents are invalid and unenforceable. We believe that we have meritorious defenses and counterclaims and intend to vigorously defend this action.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table presents the high and low sale prices per share for our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market, under the symbol PLCM, for the periods indicated.

	High		Low
Year Ended December 31, 2001:
First Quarter	$	37.81	$	10.75
Second Quarter		29.88		10.88
Third Quarter		30.00		17.91
Fourth Quarter		42.59		23.88
Year Ended December 31, 2002:
First Quarter	$	39.09	$	21.23
Second Quarter		26.50		11.37
Third Quarter		12.80		6.44
Fourth Quarter		12.04		6.84
Year Ending December 31, 2003:
First Quarter (through February 28, 2003)	$	11.95	$	9.18

On February 28, 2003, the last reported sale price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market was $10.03 per share. As of December 31, 2002, there were approximately 1,954 holders of record of our common stock. Because many of our shares of common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividend on our capital stock and do not anticipate, at this time, paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, for use in our business.

The information required by this item regarding equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in Item 12 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Polycom's audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and the consolidated balance sheet data at December 31, 2002 and 2001, are derived from, and are qualified by reference to, the audited consolidated financial statements that are included in this Form 10-K. The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the consolidated balance sheet data at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements which are not included in this Form 10-K. This data gives retroactive effect to our acquisitions of Accord on February 28, 2001, and Atlas on December 1, 1999, which were treated as a pooling of interests. For 2001, 2000, 1999 and 1998 we used

a 52 or 53-week fiscal year. As a result, our fiscal year may not have ended as of the calendar period. For 2002, we changed to a fiscal year ending on December 31. For convenience of presentation, the consolidated financial statements have been shown as ending on December 31 of each applicable period.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

YOU SHOULD READ THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES. EXCEPT FOR HISTORICAL INFORMATION, THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND SECTION 21E OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, INCLUDING, AMONG OTHER THINGS, STATEMENTS REGARDING OUR ANTICIPATED PRODUCTS, CUSTOMER AND GEOGRAPHIC REVENUE LEVELS AND MIX, GROSS MARGINS AND OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES, INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. OUR ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THOSE PROJECTED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. FACTORS THAT MIGHT CAUSE FUTURE RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE DISCUSSED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE DISCUSSED IN "OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE OPERATIONS" IN THIS DOCUMENT AS WELL AS OTHER INFORMATION FOUND ELSEWHERE IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.

We were incorporated in December 1990. We were engaged principally in research and development from inception through September 1992 when we began volume shipments of our first voice communications product, the SoundStation. In the second quarter of 2001 and the fourth quarter of 2001, we completed our acquisitions of Circa Communications, Ltd., or Circa, and Atlanta Signal Processors, Incorporated, or ASPI, respectively. These acquisitions added to our voice communications product line which currently consists of the SoundStation, VoiceStation, SoundPoint, Vortex and VoIP product families. In January 1998, we completed the acquisition of ViaVideo Communications, Inc., or ViaVideo, a development stage company that designed and developed high quality, low cost, easy-to-use, group video communications systems. In February 1998, we began customer shipments of our ViewStation products. In the fourth quarter of 2001, we completed our acquisition of PictureTel Corporation, adding to our video communications product line which currently consists of the ViewStation, iPower, Visual Concert, GMS and ViaVideo product families. In December 1999, we acquired Atlas Communication Engines, Inc., or Atlas, a privately held OEM supplier of integrated access devices, or IADs, and an emerging supplier of digital subscriber line, or DSL, routers which provide voice and data over DSL networks. In January 2003, we sold this product line to Verilink Corporation (See "Recent Developments" above). Our network access product offerings were comprised of our NetEngine line of IADs and DSL routers. In February 2001, we acquired Accord Networks Ltd., or Accord, a leading provider of next generation, rich-media network products that enable Internet Protocol and other network voice and video communications in both the customer premises and service provider markets. Accord's products were our initial network systems product offerings. In the second quarter of 2002, we completed our acquisition of MeetU.com, Inc., or MeetU, adding to our network systems product line which currently consists of the MGC and GW, Voice Bridge, PathNavigator and WebOffice product families which provide multipoint video connectivity and gateway capability through disparate networks.

Our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 include the effects of the PictureTel, Circa and ASPI acquisitions. MeetU is included in our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows from June 20, 2002, the date of acquisition.

In fiscal 2002, we derived a substantial majority of our net revenues from sales of our ViewStation, iPower, network systems and SoundStation products and iPower-related services. We anticipate that our video communications products, network systems, voice communications products and iPower-related services will account for a substantial majority of our net revenues for at least the next twelve months.

Any factor adversely affecting the demand or supply for these products would harm our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. In fiscal 2002, our Network Systems segment contributed more to our profitability, as a percentage of net revenues, than our Communications segment due principally to higher gross margins on the network systems products. The Network Access segment had negative gross margins. See Note 18 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table sets forth, as a percentage of net revenues, consolidated statements of operations data for the periods indicated.

			Year Ended December 31,
			2002		2001		2000
Net revenues			100	%	100	%	100	%
Cost of net revenues			44	%	44	%	44	%

		Gross profit	56	%	56	%	56	%
Operating expenses:
	Sales and marketing		21	%	19	%	19	%
	Research and development		17	%	15	%	12	%
	General and administrative		6	%	6	%	5	%
	Acquisition-related costs		1	%	6	%	1	%
	Purchased in-process research and development		0	%	14	%	0	%
	Amortization of purchased intangibles		4	%	1	%	0	%
	Amortization of goodwill		0	%	1	%	0	%
	Restructure costs		0	%	0	%	0	%
	Grant repayment		0	%	0	%	2	%
	Litigation settlement		0	%	0	%	2	%
	Litigation reserve release		0	%	0	%	(1	)%

		Total operating expenses	49	%	62	%	40	%

Operating income (loss)			7	%	(6	)%	16	%
Interest income, net			2	%	4	%	2	%
Loss on strategic investments			(1	)%	(1	)%	(2	)%
Other income (expense), net			0	%	0	%	0	%

Income (loss) before provision for income taxes			8	%	(3	)%	16	%
Provision for income taxes			2	%	4	%	6	%

Net income (loss)			6	%	(7	)%	10	%

Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2002 increased 22% over the same period of 2001. Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2002, in the Communications and Network Systems segments, increased 29% and 4%, respectively, while the Network Access segment decreased 16% over the same period in 2001. The increase in Communications was due primarily to increased sales volume of our video communications products and iPower-related services. The video communications products net revenues increased to $261.6 million for 2002 from $205.0 million in 2001. Although the ViewStation product line contributed to the increase in video communications net revenues, this growth was primarily due to the addition of the iPower video product line added through the acquisition of PictureTel in October 2001. Due to the timing of this acquisition, iPower product revenue is reflected in the prior year numbers only for the fourth quarter of 2001. Although overall in 2002, video revenue

grew, we experienced sequential quarterly revenue decreases in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2002, primarily related to declines in our video communications product revenue in both the Viewstation and iPower product lines. The iPower-related services net revenues was $29.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $5.9 million reported in the same period of 2001, as this revenue stream was also added through the acquisition of PictureTel. Also contributing to the increase in net revenues was an increase in the service revenue related to our network systems products and an increase in sales of our voice over IP and installed voice products, offset by decreases in sales volumes of our circuit switch voice communications products and decreases in sales in the network access product line for 2002 when compared to 2001. The installed voice products were added through the acquisition of ASPI in the fourth quarter of 2001. In 2002, we began to implement a new direct-touch strategy in concert with a realignment of our channel partner strategy. As part of this new channel partner strategy, the channel inventory model is changing to reduce channel inventories to a more optimal level or to a drop-shipment method to certain channel partners' end user customers. During the third quarter and fourth quarter of 2002 we believe our channel partners' video and voice inventory decreased over the second and third quarter of 2002, respectively. This decrease was due in part to this shift in channel partner strategy resulting in us shipping fewer video and voice units to channel partners in the third and fourth quarter of 2002. The decreased channel inventory levels had less impact on sales of iPower units, which are not typically carried in inventory by our channel partners. On a regional basis, North America, Europe, Asia and Latin America revenues increased 10%, 40%, 44% and 67%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2002 over the year ended December 31, 2001. Included in product revenues for voice, non-iPower video and network systems products are immaterial amounts of related service revenue.

Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2001 increased 3% over the same period of 2000. Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2001, in the Communications, Network Systems and Network Access segments, decreased 6%, increased 97% and decreased 45%, respectively, over the same period in 2000. The increase in overall revenue was due to increased sales volume of our network systems products which increased from $42.3 million in 2000 to $83.1 million in 2001, and to iPower-related service revenue of $5.9 million resulting from our acquisition of PictureTel in October 2001. These increases were offset by decreases in volume of our network access, voice communications and video communications product revenue which decreased 45%, 15% and 5%, respectively, year over year. The decrease in ViewStation product sales was largely offset by iPower product sales in the fourth quarter of 2001. We believe that lower sales of our video, voice and network access products for 2001over 2000 were due principally to a reduction in capital spending in the United States due to the downturn in economic activity during 2001, which resulted in our channel partners reducing the level of inventory that they typically hold. On a regional basis, Asia and Europe revenues increased 39% and 3% respectively, in 2001 over 2000 while North America and Latin America revenues decreased slightly in 2001 over 2000. Included in product revenues for voice, non-iPower video and network systems products are immaterial amounts of related service revenue.

A major contributor to the expected growth of the broadband market has been the deployment of DSL. Beginning in the second half of 2000, the market for broadband services experienced a severe downturn, characterized by financial troubles for many telecommunications service providers and delays in delivering broadband services. This downturn continued through 2002 and negatively impacted sales of our network access products. These DSL providers were customers of our network access products through OEM providers that we used as channel partners. These service delays slowed the expected growth in this market which in turn slowed sales volumes of our network access products. As a result, network access product revenues decreased 15% in 2002 over 2001. In January 2003, we made the decision that this business was no longer strategic to our overall product offerings, and sold to Verilink Corporation certain fixed assets and intellectual property rights relating to our network access product line, including our line of NetEngine integrated devices, for a total of up to $3.0 million in cash, of which (i) $1.0 million was paid to us at closing, (ii) $0.25 million will be paid to us on the first

anniversary of the closing, and (iii) up to $1.75 million will be paid to us quarterly based on ten percent of Verilink's revenues related to sale of NetEngine products. As a result of the sale of the network access product line to Verilink Corporation, we will have no future revenue associated with this product line.

In 2002, 2001, and 2000, we derived a substantial majority of our net revenues from sales of our video communication, voice communication and network systems products. No customer accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. For the year ended December 31, 2002, our network systems segment had two channel partners that represented approximately 20% of Network Systems Segment revenues. We believe it is unlikely that the loss of one or both of these channel partners would have a material adverse affect on the net revenues of this segment as we believe end-users would likely purchase our network systems products from a different channel partner. See Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for business segment information.

Our business is subject to the risks arising from domestic and global economic conditions. During 2001 and 2002, the economic downturn in the United States slowed overall spending to the point where industries delayed or reduced technology purchases. If this economic downturn and uncertainty in technology spending continues through 2003, as it currently appears to be, it will likely have an adverse effect on our results of operations for 2003. If our channel partners delay or reduce orders for our products, we may fall short of our revenue expectations for 2003, as we did in the second and third quarters of 2002, and for the entire year. Further, if these conditions persist, our business and financial performance will continue to be negatively affected as they were in 2002 and 2001. For example, in the third quarter of 2002, these conditions resulted in sequentially weaker video communications, voice communications, network systems and network access product revenues from the second quarter of 2002. The extent of adverse economic conditions in 2003 is difficult to predict at this time, which represents a significant uncertainty with respect to our 2003 operating results. In addition, weakness in the end-user market for our products could negatively affect the revenue and cash flow of our channel partners who could, in turn, delay orders and delay paying their obligations to us. This could harm our revenues, profitability, financial condition and cash flow. Further, we believe that our plans to further reduce our channel inventories to a more optimal level may limit revenue growth and may cause a decrease in revenue in the near term, as they did in the fourth quarter of 2002. In addition, we plan to continue to implement changes to our channel partner strategy which will result in a smaller number of channel partners, a change in the mix of our channel partners and a shift to a model with more direct interaction between us and our direct end-user customers. These changes may cause additional disruptions in our channels and negatively impact revenue growth in the near term.

International net revenues, or revenues outside of the U.S. and Canada, accounted for 42%, 36%, and 32% of total net revenues for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. See Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The absolute dollar increase in the international component of our revenues for 2002 over 2001 was primarily driven by increased sales volume of our video communications and network systems products in Europe, Asia and Latin America and an increase in network access products in Europe and Asia. Additionally, international, iPower-related services net revenues were $11.1 million and $2.5 in 2002 and 2001, respectively, as this revenue stream was added through the acquisition of PictureTel. The improvement in international revenues in 2001 over 2000 was due to growth in Asia of sales of our video communications products, growth in Asia and Europe of sales of our network systems products and by reductions in sales of video, voice and network access products in North America. In fiscal year 2000, we made investments in Europe, Asia and, to a lesser degree, in Latin America. This expansion of resources was the main reason for the increase in the international percentage of total net revenues in 2001 from 2000 despite the increase in net revenue from sales of our network systems products which were sold primarily in North America.

We anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of total net revenues for the foreseeable future, and we plan to continue our expansion in Asia and Europe. International sales, however, are subject to certain inherent risks, including potential economic weakness in international markets, political instability, any adverse economic impact of terrorist attacks and incidents and any military response to those attacks, war or other hostilities, changes in foreign government regulations and telecommunications standards, export license requirements, tariffs and taxes, other trade barriers, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, difficulty in staffing and managing foreign operations, longer payment cycles, and difficulty in collecting accounts receivable. Significant adverse changes in currency exchange rates, as happened in the European market in 2000 and in the Asian market in late 1997, could cause our products to become relatively more expensive to customers in a particular country, leading to a reduction in revenue or profitability in that country. Additionally, international net revenues may fluctuate as a percentage of net revenues in the future as we introduce new products since we expect to initially introduce these products in North America, and also, because of the additional time required for product homologation and regulatory approvals of new products in international markets. To the extent we are unable to expand international sales in a timely and cost-effective manner our business could be harmed. We cannot make assurances that we will be able to maintain or increase international market demand for our products. Additionally, to date, a substantial majority of our international sales have been denominated in U.S. currency. However, if our international sales were denominated in local currencies in the future, these transactions would be subject to currency fluctuation.

										Increase From Prior Year
	Year End December 31,
$ in thousands	Year End December 31,
$ in thousands	2002			2001			2000			2002		2001
Cost	$	202,712		$	166,747		$	164,099		22	%	2	%
% of Net Revenues		44	%		44	%		44	%	0	%	0	%

Cost of net revenues consists primarily of contract manufacturer costs, including material and direct labor, our manufacturing organization, tooling depreciation, warranty expense, freight expense, royalty payments and an allocation of overhead expenses. The cost of net revenues as a percentage of total net revenues for fiscal 2002 was 44% which is consistent with fiscal 2001. Overall, margins remained flat as a result of a more favorable product mix generated from increased shipments of higher margin video products and more favorable network access margins due to less write-downs of inventory in 2002 over 2001, offset by higher service revenue at lower margins. As a result of the sale of the network access product line to Verilink Corporation, we will have no future cost of sales associated with this product line. In fiscal 2002, our Network Systems segment, as a percentage of net revenues, contributed more to our profitability than our Communications segment due principally to higher gross margins on the network systems products. The Network Access segment had negative gross margins. See Note 18 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

When comparing the cost of net revenues as a percentage of net revenues in 2001 to 2000, the percentage was again the same at 44%. Overall, a more favorable product mix generated from increased shipments of higher margin network systems products was offset by a write-down of network access inventory to net realizable value.

Forecasting future gross margin percentages is difficult, and there are a number of risks associated with maintaining our current gross margin levels. For example, uncertainties surrounding revenue levels and related production level variances, competition, changes in technology, changes in product mix, manufacturing efficiencies of subcontractors, manufacturing and purchased part variances, warranty

costs and timing of sales over the next few quarters can cause our cost of net revenues percentage to fluctuate significantly. Additionally, our iPower products, VoIP products and other desktop products have a significantly higher cost of net revenue percentage than our network systems, ViewStation and SoundStation products. Accordingly, any significant revenue growth in our iPower, VoIP and other desktop products will have a negative effect on our cost of net revenues percentages. Also, we may reduce prices on our products in the future for competitive reasons, as a result of a difficult economy or to stimulate demand which could increase our cost of net revenues percentage, and there is the risk that any of these potential price reductions would not offset competitive pressures or stimulate demand. In addition, cost variances associated with the manufacturing ramp of new products, or the write-off of initial inventory purchases due to product launch delays or the lack of market acceptance of our new products such as our iPower 9000 series, VoicePlus bridging solution, VoIP telephony products, VTX 1000, ViewStation EC, Viewstation EX, MGC 25 or any other new product under development could occur, which would increase our cost of net revenues percentage in any quarter. In addition to the uncertainties listed above, cost of net revenues as a percentage of net revenues may increase due to a change in our mix of distribution channels and the mix of international versus North American revenues, or revenues from Canada and the United States.

										Increase From Prior Year
	Year End December 31,
$ in thousands	Year End December 31,
$ in thousands	2002			2001			2000			2002		2001
Expenses	$	98,998		$	74,653		$	70,745		33	%	6	%
% of Net Revenues		21	%		19	%		19	%	2	%	0	%

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and commissions for our sales force, advertising and promotional expenses, product marketing, and an allocation of overhead expenses, including facilities and IT costs. The 33% increase in absolute dollars in 2002 over 2001 was due primarily to the increase in headcount in our sales force and increased product sales driven largely by the PictureTel acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2001 and to a lesser extent our focus on the public sector market. As a result, we had increases in salaries, commissions and headcount-related expenses, such as travel. Also contributing to the absolute dollar increase was our overall efforts to expand our marketing efforts, including the addition of a Chief Marketing Officer and related staffing, increased spending on promotional materials, trade shows, and outside consultants. This increase was partially offset by cost containment measures and expense controls implemented in the second half of 2002 due to the continued economic downturn and uncertainty in technology spending. The 6% increase in absolute dollars in 2001 over 2000 was due primarily to increased marketing efforts related to our network systems products and to an increase in our investment in our worldwide sales effort. The sale of the network access product line will not have a significant impact on our sales and marketing expense.

We expect to continue to increase our sales and marketing expenses in absolute dollar amounts as we expand North American and international markets, market new products and expand the public sector market. Further, our acquisitions of PictureTel, Accord, Circa, MeetU and ASPI expanded our product portfolio into new products and markets which require significant additional marketing expenditures to communicate the value of the new product offerings as well as significant additional sales expenditures to develop our sales organization to market these products. Due to the innovative nature of our products, such as ViaVideo, ViewStation, iPower, MGC, GW, WebOffice, PathNavigator, Vortex and VoIP products, we believe we will incur additional expenses for sales and marketing, especially advertising, to expand the overall market for, to drive penetration of, and increase the

adoption rate of this technology and our products, and to educate potential end-users as to the desirability of these products over competing products.

										Increase From Prior Year
	Year End December 31,
$ in thousands	Year End December 31,
$ in thousands	2002			2001			2000			2002		2001
Expenses	$	76,812		$	59,416		$	43,570		29	%	36	%
% of Net Revenues		17	%		15	%		12	%	2	%	3	%

Research and development expenses consist primarily of compensation costs, outside services, expensed materials, depreciation and an allocation of overhead expenses, including facilities and IT costs. Increases in research and development expenses occurred for all product lines in both 2002 and 2001 except network access products, which declined by 39% in 2002 over 2001 and declined slightly in 2001 compared with 2000. The 2% and 3% increase in research and development expense as a percentage of net revenues in 2002 and 2001, respectively, reflects our continued investments in our existing products as well as new investments in our iPower products, which were acquired through the PictureTel acquisition, investments in integrating all of our existing and acquired products and developing new products which were launched in the first quarter of 2003. This increase was partially offset by cost containment measures and expense controls implemented in the second half of 2002 due to the continued economic downturn and uncertainty in technology spending. In 2002, individually, video product development expenditures accounted for 93% of the total increase due to the addition of the PictureTel research and development team for the full year versus just part of the fourth quarter in 2001, voice product development expenditures accounted for 15% of the total increase, network systems product development expenditures accounted for 9% of the total increase, corporate product development expenses accounted for 1% of the change and the decrease in network access product development expenses accounted for 18% of the change. In 2001, individually, the increase in network systems product development expenditures accounted for 43% of the total increase, video product development expenditures accounted for 52% of the total increase, voice product development expenditures accounted for 6% of the total increase and the decrease in network access product development accounted for 1% of the change. We are currently devoting a significant portion of our research and development expenses toward the product lines gained through the PictureTel, Accord, Circa, ASPI and MeetU acquisitions. In addition, we are investing research and development resources to enhance and upgrade our Polycom Office suite of products which provides a complete end-to-end communications solution. Such products include our ViewStation, iPower, GMS, MGC, WebOffice, PathNavigator, SoundStation, VoiceStation and Vortex which provide multipoint video and voice connectivity and gateway capability through disparate networks. In all years presented, all research and development costs have been expensed as incurred.

We believe that technological leadership is critical to our success and we are committed to continuing a high level of research and development to develop new technologies and combat competitive pressures. Also, continued investment in new product initiatives will require significant research and development spending. Consequently, we intend to increase research and development expenses in absolute dollars in the future. As a result of the sale of the network access product line, we will have no future research and development expense associated with this product line.

										Increase From Prior Year
	Year End December 31,
$ in thousands	Year End December 31,
$ in thousands	2002			2001			2000			2002		2001
Expenses	$	29,947		$	21,564		$	20,702		39	%	4	%
% of Net Revenues		6	%		6	%		5	%	0	%	1	%

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation costs, professional service fees, allocation of overhead expenses, including facilities and IT costs, and bad debt expense. The increase in absolute dollars spending in general and administrative in 2002 over 2001 was primarily the result of higher costs associated with increased infrastructure costs, outside services, including increased costs associated with regulatory requirements, and an increase in bad debt expense. This increase was partially offset by cost containment measures and expense controls implemented in the second half of 2002 due to the continued economic downturn and uncertainty in technology spending. Individually, the increase in infrastructure costs accounted for 24% of the total increase, outside services accounted for 38% of the total increase, bad debt expense accounted for 27% of the total increase, with the remaining increase related to numerous smaller items. The increase in general and administrative expenses in the year ended December 31, 2001 over the same period of 2000 was due to higher costs associated with increased staffing and other infrastructure costs offset slightly by lower expenditures associated with the implementation of our enterprise resource planning system implemented in 2000 and expense controls initiated in 2001.

We believe that our general and administrative expenses will likely continue to increase in absolute dollar amounts in the future primarily as a result of expansion of our administrative staff and costs related to supporting a larger company, increased costs associated with regulatory requirements and our continued investments in international regions. These additional expenses principally relate to expansion of our information system and infrastructure charges related to the significant investments being made in international regions. Additionally, predicting the timing of bad debt expense associated with uncollectible receivables is difficult, particularly during the current economic environment, and material charges due to uncollectability of our receivables could increase our general and administrative expenses and negatively affect our profitability in the quarter they are recorded. The sale of the network access product line will not have any impact on our general and administrative expense.

We recorded a charge to operations of $3.7 million in 2002, $24.1 million in 2001, and $4.8 million in 2000 for acquisition-related costs. For 2002, the acquisition-related charges related primarily to the acquisition of PictureTel and consisted primarily of professional services costs to complete the integration of the companies. In 2001, these costs were associated with the acquisitions of Accord, Circa, PictureTel and ASPI. The 2001 costs were made up of $3.7 million of restructuring charges related to facility closings and severance costs, $6.7 million of asset impairment charges and $13.7 million of other acquisition costs including outside financial advisory, legal, accounting and consulting services. In 2000, these costs were related to the acquisition of Accord completed in February 2001. These charges include the cost of actions designed to improve our combined competitiveness, productivity, and future profitability, and primarily relate to the elimination of redundant and excess facilities and workforce in our combined businesses and the elimination of redundant assets. If we acquire another business in the future, we may incur material acquisition expenses related to such transactions. See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, we incurred charges totaling $0.9 million and $52.6 million, respectively, for in-process research and development. This research and development was acquired in 2002 as part of the acquisition of MeetU.com, Inc. and in 2001 as part of the acquisitions of PictureTel, Circa and ASPI, and comprised $49.3 million, $2.4 million and $0.9 million for each of these respective acquisitions. See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The amounts allocated to purchased in-process research and development were determined by management, after considering among other factors, the results of an independent appraisal based on established valuation techniques in the high-technology communications industry and were expensed upon acquisition because technological feasibility had not been established and no future alternative uses existed for these in-process research and development projects. The cost approach, which uses the concept that replacement cost is an indicator of fair value, was the primary technique utilized in valuing the in-process research and development acquired in the MeetU transaction. The cost approach is based on the premise that a prudent investor would pay no more for an asset than the cost to replace that asset with a new one. Replacement cost was based on total costs, net of the unrealized income tax deduction benefit, spent developing the in-process technology from MeetU's inception through the date the valuation was performed. The income approach, which includes an analysis of the markets, cash flows and risks associated with achieving such cash flows, was the primary technique utilized in valuing the developed technology and in-process research and development in 2001. The estimated net cash flows from the products are based upon estimates of revenue, cost of revenue, research and development costs, sales and marketing costs and income taxes from such projects and were discounted at rates ranging from 30 to 40 percent in relation to the stage of completion and the technical risks associated with achieving technological feasibility. Our efforts to develop the purchased in-process research and development into commercially viable products principally relate to the completion of all planning, designing, prototyping and testing activities that are necessary to establish that the products can be produced to meet its design specifications including function, features and technical performance requirements. It is reasonably possible that the development of this technology could fail because of either prohibitive cost, inability to perform the required efforts to complete the technology or other factors outside of our control such as a change in the market for the resulting developed products. In addition, at such time that the project is completed it is reasonably possible that the completed products do not receive market acceptance or that we are unable to produce and market the product effectively.

The following are the values assigned to each acquired PictureTel in-process research and development project at the time of acquisition and the estimated completion percentages, expected technology lives and estimated time and costs to complete as of December 31, 2002 (in thousands):

During 2002, the Company completed and shipped product associated with Projects A, B and two of the Other projects. The costs to complete these projects were in line with our expectations. The Company terminated one of the Other projects and is continuing to develop Project C and some smaller Other projects. The remaining projects are for next generation products to enhance PC based voice and video conferencing features.

In year ended December 31, 2002, we recorded $17.1 million in amortization of purchased intangibles acquired in the PictureTel, Circa, ASPI and MeetU acquisitions and in the year ended December 31, 2001, we recorded $3.9 million in amortization of purchased intangibles acquired in the PictureTel, Circa and ASPI acquisitions. Purchased intangible assets are being amortized to expense over their estimated useful lives of three years. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," (SFAS 142), purchased intangibles no longer meeting the criteria to be recorded separately from goodwill must be reclassified to goodwill, and purchased intangibles deemed to have indefinite lives must no longer be amortized. In the first quarter of 2002, we reclassified approximately $0.5 million of unamortized acquired workforce recorded as part of the purchase price allocation of the Circa acquisition as it did not meet the criteria to be recorded separately from goodwill. This resulted in a permanent reduction in amortization expense of $58,300 per quarter through the first quarter of 2004. Also under SFAS 142, intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized. As a result, we determined that a previously recorded trade name intangible has an indefinite life. Consequently, the trade name intangible is no longer amortized, resulting in a permanent reduction in amortization expense of $25,000 per quarter through April 2011. In June 2002, we completed the transitional purchased intangible impairment test outlined under SFAS 142 which required the assessment of purchased intangibles for impairment as of January 1, 2002 and in October 2002, we completed our annual impairment test. Both of these tests were conducted by determining and comparing the fair value of our reporting units, as defined in SFAS 142, to the reporting unit's carrying value as of that date. Based on the results of these impairment tests, we determined that our purchased intangible assets were not impaired as of January 1, 2002 or during 2002.

In the year ended December 31, 2001, we recorded $2.1 million of amortization of goodwill related to the Circa acquisition. Beginning January 1, 2002, under SFAS 142 we no longer amortize goodwill related to the Circa acquisition. This resulted in a permanent decrease in goodwill amortization expense of approximately $0.7 million per quarter through the first quarter of 2004. Under the transition rules of SFAS 142, business combinations completed after July 1, 2001, but prior to January 1, 2002, were accounted for in accordance with SFAS 142, and consequently, goodwill balances from the PictureTel and ASPI acquisitions have never been amortized. In June 2002, we completed the transitional goodwill impairment test outlined under SFAS 142 which required the assessment of goodwill for impairment as of January 1, 2002 and in October 2002, we completed our annual impairment test. Both of these tests were conducted by determining and comparing the fair value of our reporting units, as defined in SFAS 142, to the reporting unit's carrying value as of that date. Based on the results of these impairment tests, we determined that our goodwill assets were not impaired as of January 1, 2002 or during 2002. We plan to conduct our annual impairment tests in the fourth quarter of every year, unless impairment indicators exist sooner. Screening for and assessing whether impairment indicators exist or if events or changes in circumstances have occurred, including market conditions, operating fundamentals, competition and general economic conditions, requires significant judgment. Additionally, changes in the high-technology industry occur frequently and quickly. Therefore, there can be no assurance that a charge to operations will not occur as a result of future goodwill impairment tests.

In the third and fourth quarters of 2002, we approved restructuring actions in response to the continued global economic downturn and to improve our overall cost structure by prioritizing resources in strategic areas of the business and reducing operating expenses. We recorded a restructuring charge

of $1.7 million in 2002 as a result of these actions. This charge consisted of severance and other employee termination benefits related to a workforce reduction of approximately six percent of our employees worldwide. As of December 31, 2002, we had paid approximately $1.2 million of the $1.7 million charge. A liability has been recorded in "Other accrued liabilities" in the consolidated balance sheet for the remaining amount which is to be paid through fiscal 2003. We expect that, due to these restructuring actions, operating expenses will grow at a much smaller rate than what otherwise would have been, as the headcount affected by the restructuring will be added back over time as our operations expand in connection with the growth of our business. If the current economic downturn and uncertainty in technology spending continues, we may take additional restructuring actions to reduce our operating expenses, while simultaneously implementing additional cost containment measures and expense control programs. Such restructuring actions are subject to significant risks, including delays in implementing expense control programs or workforce reductions and the failure to meet operational targets due to the loss of employees or a decrease in employee morale, all of which would impair our ability to achieve anticipated cost reductions. If we do not achieve the anticipated cost reductions our business could be harmed.

In the fourth quarter of 2000, Accord incurred a charge of $5.9 million relating to the repayment of all outstanding grants from the Office of the Chief Scientist in Israel, or OCS, and the Israel-U.S. Binational Industrial Research and Development foundation, or BIRD. The payments to OCS and BIRD were derived directly from the commercial success of Accord products resulting from research and development funding received from those organizations.

We reached a favorable settlement with a former PictureTel customer during the first quarter of 2002. The dispute involved certain services provided by PictureTel in 2001 and amounts owed to us for providing these services. The amount received was approximately $0.3 million, net of legal fees incurred to litigate and settle the case.

On November 20, 1998, a patent infringement claim was filed against Accord's U.S. subsidiary, Accord Networks, Inc., in the United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, alleging that the U.S. subsidiary had and was willfully and deliberately infringing on one of Ezenia!'s patents. The complaint was later amended to allege that the U.S. subsidiary also had and was willfully and deliberately infringing on other patents. On June 10, 1999, Accord was added as a defendant in the lawsuit. On June 16, 2000, Accord and its U.S. subsidiary entered into a written settlement agreement, and the Court entered an order dismissing the case. The lawsuit settlement cost of $6.5 million, which final payment was made on December 28, 2000, represents a one-time charge resulting from this settlement and was reported under "Litigation settlement" in the consolidated statement of operations in June 2000.

On September 3, 1997, VTEL Corporation, or VTEL, filed a lawsuit in the State District Court in Travis County, Texas against ViaVideo Communications, Inc. and its founders, who were formerly employed by VTEL. On May 27, 1998, following our acquisition of ViaVideo, VTEL amended its suit to add Polycom as a defendant. In the lawsuit, VTEL alleged breach of contract, breach of confidential relationship, disclosure of proprietary information and related allegations. ViaVideo, its founders and Polycom answered the suit, denying in their entirety VTEL's allegations. On March 3, 2000, VTEL voluntarily dismissed the allegations against Polycom and ViaVideo with prejudice for no consideration. As a one-time item in the first quarter of 2000, the excess accrual associated with the expenses we estimated we would incur in connection with this lawsuit totaling $1.8 million was released since no

further material expenses were to be incurred. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest income, net consists of interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents and investments less bank charges resulting from the use of our bank accounts and imputed interest expense related to the present value of costs associated with closing facilities as part of the PictureTel acquisition and related integration plan. Imputed interest expense for 2002 and 2001 was $1.8 million and $40,000, respectively. Interest income, net of interest expense, was $9.5 million, $12.8 million and $8.4 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Interest income decreased in 2002 over the comparable period in the prior year due primarily to the imputed interest expense related to facility closings and interest rate reductions resulting from the monetary policy actions taken by the United States Federal Reserve Board to stimulate economic growth in the United States during 2001 and 2002. Partially offsetting these negative effects was an increase in our average cash and investment balances, which was due primarily to our common stock offering which raised $237.5 million in the first quarter of 2002. The average interest rate return on our cash and cash equivalents was 1.86% and on our investments was 3.01% in 2002 compared to 3.07% and 4.80%, respectively, for 2001. The increases in interest income, net, in 2001 and 2000 are due primarily to changes in average cash and investment balances throughout the year, the most significant of which relates to our common stock offering in 2000 and Accord's initial public offering which together raised $203.2 million in the third quarter of 2000. Interest income, net could fluctuate in 2003 due to movement in our cash balances and changes in interest rates in 2003 related to monetary policy actions taken by the United States Federal Reserve Board to stimulate economic growth in the United States.

For strategic reasons we have made various investments in public and private companies in 2002, 2001 and 2000. The private company investments are carried at cost less any impairment write-downs and are recorded in "Other assets" in our consolidated balance sheets. We review these investments for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may exist and make appropriate reductions in carrying value, if necessary. These private company investments had no carrying value as of December 31, 2002 and a carrying value of $4.3 million as of December 31, 2001. These investments have been permanently written down a total of $12.0 million from original cost, including $3.0 million, $3.1 million and $5.9 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, which is reflected in "Loss on strategic investments" in the consolidated statements of operations.

Our strategic public company investments are recorded at fair value in "Short-term investments" and "Long-term investments" in our consolidated balance sheets and are marked to market each period through unrealized gains and losses recorded as a component of stockholders' equity, except our warrants to purchase publicly traded equity securities which are marked to market through the statement of operations. If these investments are sold at a loss or have permanently declined in value, a charge to operations is recorded. Realized gains and losses on these strategic investments are reflected in "Loss on strategic investments" in the consolidated statements of operations. During 2002 and 2001, the Company recorded a loss totaling $4.4 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to the sale of its strategic investments in equity securities of publicly traded companies, impairment of equity securities of publicly traded companies and the write-down of its warrants to purchase publicly traded equity securities.

The provision for income taxes was $10.2 million, $14.7 million, and $24.2 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The decrease in the provision for income taxes in 2002 over 2001 was

attributable to a decrease in nondeductible acquisition-related costs and an increase in foreign earnings subject to relatively lower tax rates. The decrease in the provision for income taxes in 2001 over 2000 was attributable to a decrease in U.S. tax and an increase in foreign tax due to an increase in foreign income.

As of December 31, 2002, we had approximately $61.0 million in net operating loss carryforwards, $13.1 million in tax credit carryovers and $3.8 million in capital loss carryforwards as well as other deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences. See Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

As of December 31, 2002, our principal sources of liquidity included cash and cash equivalents of $155.2 million, short-term investments of $38.7 million and long-term investments of $319.1 million. Short-term and long-term investments consisted primarily of U.S. government securities, state and local government securities and corporate debt and equity securities of which $0.4 million was invested in equity securities of publicly traded companies. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, we have a $25.0 million line of credit with a bank which was unused at December 31, 2002.

We generated cash from operating activities totaling $81.5 million in 2002, $76.7 million in 2001 and $38.1 million in 2000. The increase in cash provided from operating activities in 2002 over 2001 was due primarily to larger decreases in trade receivables over the prior period, larger increases in taxes payable and a smaller increase in prepaids and other current assets offset partially by smaller reductions in inventories, increases in deferred taxes and larger decreases in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities over the comparable period. When comparing the increase in cash from operating activities in 2001 over 2000, improvements were a result of a net reduction in trade receivables, inventories and deferred taxes in 2001 compared to increases for these items in 2000 and a smaller increase in prepaid and other current assets compared to 2000, offset by a net reduction in total liabilities such as accounts payable, taxes payable and other liabilities and lower net income before non-cash items.

The total net change in cash and cash equivalents for the year ended 2002 was an increase of $28.4 million. The primary uses of cash during this period were $268.6 million of net purchases of investments, $12.9 million for purchases of property and equipment and $15.9 million for repurchases of our common stock. The primary sources of cash were $81.5 million from operating activities, $237.5 million of proceeds from our offering, net of issuance costs and $6.7 million associated with the exercise of stock options and purchases under the employee stock purchase plan. The positive cash from operating activities was primarily the result of net income before considering non-cash expenses, such as depreciation, amortization, the provision for doubtful accounts, loss on strategic investments, the write-off of purchased in-process research and development and the tax benefits from the exercise of employee stock options, lower trade receivables and inventories, offset by a net decrease in total liabilities, including accounts payable, taxes payable and other liabilities, and an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets and deferred taxes. The positive cash impact due to net trade receivables and inventory reductions may not occur in 2003 as it did in 2002.

In February 2002, we completed a public offering in which we sold 8,050,000 shares of our common stock, including an over-allotment option of 1,050,000 shares exercised by the underwriters, at a price of $31.20 per share. Our net proceeds from this offering were approximately $237.5 million after taking into account underwriting discounts and commissions and our expenses. We intend to use the net proceeds from this sale primarily for general corporate purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures, as well as for acquisitions of complementary businesses or technologies.

In June 2002, the Board of Directors approved a plan to repurchase up to 3.5 million shares of our common stock and as of December 31, 2002, we had repurchased approximately 1,483,000 shares for cash of $15.9 million. In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company retired and reclassified these shares of common stock as authorized and unissued. In 2003, we plan to continue to repurchase shares in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.

At December 31, 2002, we had open purchase orders related to our contract manufacturers and other contractual obligations of approximately $21.1 million primarily related to inventory purchases. We also have material commitments that consist of obligations under our operating leases. In the event that we decided to cease using a facility and seek to sublease such facility or terminate a lease obligation through a lease buyout or other means, we may incur a material cash outflow at the time of such transaction, which will negatively impact our operating results and overall cash flows. In addition, if facilities rental rates decrease or if it takes longer than expected to sublease these facilities, we could incur a significant further charge to operations and our operating and overall cash flows could be negatively impacted in the period that these changes or events occur. These commitments and obligations are reflected in our consolidated financial statements once goods or services have been received or at such time when we are obligated to make payments related to these requested goods or services. In addition, our bank has issued letters of credit to secure the leases on some of our offices. These letters of credit total approximately $0.8 million and are secured by our credit facilities or cash deposits with our banks.

As of December 31, 2002, the following future minimum lease payments, net of sublease income are due under our current lease obligations. For example, the Company has an approximately 152,000 square foot building which is fully subleased to a third party for which the sublease runs concurrent with the Company's lease obligation. As a result the Company is not currently showing a lease obligation related to this facility. In addition to these minimum lease payments, we are contractually obligated under the majority of our operating leases to pay certain operating expenses during the term of the lease such as maintenance, taxes and insurance. This table excludes leases subject to cancellation within twelve months of December 31, 2002 (in thousands):

	Minimum Lease Payments		Projected Annual Operating Costs
Year ending December 31,
2003	$	13,392	$	4,272
2004		13,343		4,644
2005		11,750		4,011
2006		11,578		4,032
2007		8,636		3,249
Thereafter		35,416		13,575

Minimum future lease payments	$	94,115	$	33,783

We believe that our available cash, cash equivalents, investments, and bank line of credit will be sufficient to meet our operating expenses and capital requirements for the foreseeable future. However, we may require or desire additional funds to support our operating expenses and capital requirements or for other purposes, such as acquisitions or competitive reasons and may seek to raise such additional funds through public or private equity financing or from other sources. We cannot assure you that additional financing will be available at all or that, if available, such financing will be obtainable on terms favorable to us and would not be dilutive. Our future liquidity and cash requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the introduction of new products and potential acquisitions of related businesses or technology.

Management's discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We review the accounting policies used in reporting our financial results on a regular basis. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our process used to develop estimates, including those related to product returns, accounts receivable, inventories, investments, intangible assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates due to actual outcomes being different from those on which we based our assumptions. These estimates and judgments are reviewed by management on an ongoing basis and by the Audit Committee at the end of each quarter prior to the public release of our financial results. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

We recognize hardware product revenue using the guidance from SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements" and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 48, "Revenue Recognition When Right of Return Exists." We recognize software revenue in accordance with the AICPA Statement of Position No. 97-2, or SOP 97-2, "Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions." Under these guidelines, we defer revenue recognition on transactions where persuasive evidence of an arrangement does not exist, title has not transferred, product payment is contingent upon performance of installation or service obligations, the price is not fixed or determinable or payment is not reasonably assured. In addition, we estimate what future product returns may occur based upon actual historical return rates and reduce our revenues by these estimated future returns. If the historical data we use to calculate these estimates does not properly reflect future returns, these estimates could be revised. In addition, we defer revenue associated with long-term customer maintenance contracts. The value of these contracts is recognized ratably over the length of the customer contract.

We record estimated reductions to revenues for channel partner programs and incentive offerings including special pricing agreements, trade-in credits, promotions and other volume-based incentives. If market conditions were to decline further, we may take actions to increase channel partner incentive offerings possibly resulting in an incremental reduction of revenues at the time the incentive is offered.

We provide for the estimated cost of hardware product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. While we engage in product quality programs and processes, our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Should actual product failure rates, material usage or service delivery costs differ from our estimates, revision of the estimated warranty liability would be required.

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers or channel partners were to deteriorate, particularly in the current economic environment, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required as was the case with Global Crossing and WorldCom in 2002.

We write down our excess and obsolete inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated fair value based upon assumptions about future product life-cycles, product demand and market conditions. If actual product life-cycles, product demand and market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

We estimate our actual current tax exposure together with our temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as deferred revenue, for tax and accounting purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance against these tax assets. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance in a period, we must include and expense the allowance within the tax provision in the consolidated statements of operations. At December 31, 2002, we had no valuation allowance established against our deferred tax assets.

Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in Purchase Combinations

The purchase combinations completed require us to identify and estimate the fair value of the assets acquired, including intangible assets other than goodwill, and liabilities assumed in the combinations. These estimates of fair value are based on our business plan for the entities acquired including planned redundancies, restructuring, use of assets acquired and assumptions as to the ultimate resolution of obligations assumed for which no future benefit will be received. For example, in the PictureTel acquisition, we identified vacated or redundant facilities that we intended to sublease or negotiate a lease termination settlement. For all material acquisitions the allocation period, as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 38, "Accounting for Preacquisition Contingencies of Purchased Enterprises", has been completed. Therefore, if actual costs exceed our estimates these charges would be recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. If actual costs are less than our estimates, these charges would continue to be recognized as an adjustment to goodwill.

We assess the impairment of goodwill and other identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Some factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

If we determine that the carrying value of goodwill and other identified intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we would typically measure any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. In accordance with SFAS 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," we accounted for the PictureTel, ASPI and MeetU acquisitions, all of which were completed after July 1, 2001, under the new guidance, and on January 1, 2002, we ceased to amortize goodwill arising from the Circa acquisition which was completed prior to July 1, 2001. We were required to perform a transitional impairment review of our goodwill prior to June 30, 2002 and an impairment review at least annually thereafter.

In June 2002, we completed our transitional goodwill and purchased intangibles impairment tests outlined under SFAS 142 which required the assessment of goodwill and purchased intangibles for impairment as of January 1, 2002 and in October 2002, we completed our annual impairment tests. These tests were conducted by determining and comparing the fair value of our reporting units, as defined in SFAS 142, to the reporting unit's carrying value as of that date. Based on the results of these impairment tests, we determined that our goodwill assets and purchased intangible assets were not impaired as of January 1, 2002 or during 2002. We plan to conduct our annual impairment tests in the fourth quarter of every year, unless impairment indicators exist sooner. Screening for and assessing whether impairment indicators exist or if events or changes in circumstances have occurred, including market conditions, operating fundamentals, competition and general economic conditions, requires significant judgment. Additionally, changes in the high-technology industry occur frequently and quickly. Therefore, there can be no assurance that a charge to operations will not occur as a result of future goodwill impairment tests.

We periodically make strategic investments, or have acquired these investments through business acquisitions, in companies whose stock is not currently traded on any stock exchange and for which no quoted price exists. The cost method of accounting is used to account for these investments as we hold a non-material ownership percentage. We review these investments for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets might not be recoverable. Examples of events or changes in circumstances that may indicate to management that an impairment exists may be a significant decrease in the market value of the company, poor or deteriorating market conditions in the public and private equity capital markets, significant adverse changes in legal factors or within the business climate the company operates, and current period operating or cash flow losses combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or projections and forecasts that demonstrate continuing losses associated with the company's future business plans. Impairment indicators identified during the reporting period could result in a significant write down in the carrying value of the investment if we believe an investment has experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary. These investments had no carrying value as of December 31, 2002, and have been permanently written down a total of $12.0 million from original cost in 2002, 2002 and 2000.

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, (SFAS 144)"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS 144 amends existing accounting guidance on asset impairment and provides a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of. Among other provisions, the new rules change the criteria for classifying an asset as held-for-sale. The standard also broadens the scope of businesses to be disposed of that qualify for reporting as discontinued operations, and changes the timing of recognizing losses on such operations. We adopted SFAS 144 effective January 1,

2003 and do not expect the adoption to have a material effect on our results of consolidated operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, (SFAS 145) "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." Among other provisions, SFAS 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, (SFAS 4) "Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt." Accordingly, gains or losses from extinguishment of debt shall not be reported as extraordinary items unless the extinguishment qualifies as an extraordinary item under the criteria of Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions." Gains or losses from extinguishment of debt that do not meet the criteria of APB No. 30 should be reclassified to income from continuing operations in all prior periods presented. We adopted SFAS 145 effective January 1, 2003 and do not expect the adoption to have a material effect on our results of consolidated operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, (SFAS 146) "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." SFAS 146 provides guidance related to accounting for costs associated with disposal activities covered by SFAS 144 or with exit or restructuring activities previously covered by EITF Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS 146 supercedes EITF Issue No. 94-3 in its entirety. SFAS 146 requires that costs related to exiting an activity or to a restructuring not be recognized until the liability is incurred. SFAS 146 will be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 146 to have a material effect on our results of consolidated operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN 45"), "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others." FIN 45 requires that a liability be recorded in the guarantor's balance sheet upon issuance of a guarantee. In addition, FIN 45 requires disclosures about the guarantees that an entity has issued, including a rollforward of the entity's product warranty liabilities. We will apply the recognition provisions of FIN 45 prospectively to guarantees issued after December 31, 2002. The disclosure provisions of FIN 45 are effective for financial statements for fiscal year 2002. As is customary in our industry, as provided for in local law in the U.S. and other jurisdictions, our standard contracts provide remedies to our customers, such as defense, settlement, or payment of judgment for intellectual property claims related to the use of our products. From time to time, we indemnify customers against combinations of loss, expense, or liability arising from various trigger events related to the sale and the use of our products and services. In addition, from time to time we also provide protection to customers against claims related to undiscovered liabilities, additional product liability or environmental obligations. In our experience, claims made under such indemnifications are rare. We believe that the adoption of this standard will have no material impact on our results of consolidated operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In November 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21, "Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables." EITF Issue No. 00-21 provides guidance on how to account for arrangements that involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The provisions of EITF Issue No. 00-21 will apply to revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of EITF Issue No. 00-21 will have on our results of consolidated operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, (SFAS 148) "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, Transition and Disclosure." SFAS 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS 148 also requires that disclosures of the pro forma effect of using the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation be displayed more prominently and in a tabular format. Additionally, SFAS 148 requires disclosure of the pro forma effect in interim financial statements. The annual disclosure requirements of SFAS 148 are included in these notes while the transition disclosure requirements are effective for our fiscal 2003. We do not expect SFAS 148 to have a material effect on our results of consolidated operations, financial condition or cash flows.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51." FIN 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN 46 is effective for all new variable interest entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period beginning after June 15, 2003. We do not expect FIN 46 to have a material effect on our results of consolidated operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Investors should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks we are not presently aware of or that we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations. Our business could be harmed by any or all of these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and investors may lose all or part of their investment. In assessing these risks, investors should also refer to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly and are not a good indicator of future performance.

Our quarterly operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and may vary significantly in the future as a result of a number of factors, many of which are out of our control. These factors include:

We experienced sequential quarterly revenue growth from 1998 through 2000. Since that time we have experienced fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to these or other factors. These and other factors could further prevent us from attaining or sustaining sequential quarterly growth or meeting our expectations, and investors should not use our past results to predict future operating margins and results. For example, we experienced sequential quarterly revenue decreases in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2002, primarily related to declines in our video communications product revenue. In addition, we incurred a significant net loss in 2001 due to charges related to acquisitions completed in that year.

As a result of these and other factors, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our historical results of operations are not a good predictor of our future performance. If our future operating results are below the expectations of stock market securities analysts or investors, our stock price will likely decline.

Because a disproportionate amount of our sales occur at the end of a quarter, our operating results are unpredictable.

Our quarterly revenues and operating results depend upon the volume and timing of channel partner orders received during a given quarter and the percentage of each order that we are able to ship and recognize as revenue during each quarter, each of which is extremely difficult to forecast. Moreover, the majority of our orders in a given quarter historically have been shipped in the last month of that quarter and sometimes in the last few weeks of the quarter. This trend is likely to continue, and any failure or delay in the closing of orders during the last part of a quarter would materially harm our operating results, as occurred in the second and third quarter of 2002. Furthermore, due to this trend, we may be unable to ship products in the period we receive the order, which would have an adverse impact on our operating results. In such events, the price of our common stock would decline.

We typically ship products within a short time after we receive an order and historically have had no material backlog. Therefore, backlog is not a good indicator of future net revenues. As a result, net revenues for any particular quarter are extremely difficult to predict. Additionally, orders from our channel partners are based on the level of demand from end-users. The uncertainty of end-user demand means that any quarter could be significantly negatively impacted by lower end-user orders which could in turn negatively affect orders we receive from our channel partners. Accordingly, our expectations for both short and long-term future net revenues are based almost exclusively on our own estimate of future demand and not on firm channel partner orders. Our expense levels are based largely on these estimates. Because we receive a majority of our channel partner orders in the last month of a quarter and often in the last few weeks of the quarter, we are limited in our ability to reduce expenses quickly if for any reason orders and net revenues do not meet our expectations in a particular period. Accordingly, any significant shortfall in demand for our products in relation to our expectations would have an adverse impact on our operating results.

As our business has grown, we have become increasingly exposed to adverse changes in general economic conditions which can result in reductions in capital expenditures by end-user customers for our products, longer sales cycles, deferral or delay of purchase commitments for our products and increased competition. These factors adversely impacted our operating results in 2001, where we experienced a sequential revenue decrease in each of the first three quarters. We also experienced a sequential revenue decreases in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2002 due in part to these factors. All of 2003 is subject to similar risks, particularly if the current economic downturn and uncertainty in technology spending continues.

In addition, we also face the risk that some of our channel partners have inventory levels in excess of future anticipated sales growth. If such sales growth does not occur in the time frame anticipated by these channel partners for any reason, including the continuation of the current economic downturn and uncertainty in technology spending throughout 2003, these channel partners may substantially decrease the amount of product they order from us in subsequent periods, or product returns may exceed historical or predicted levels which would harm our business. For example, our channel partners reduced their inventory levels during 2001 in anticipation of lower end-user demand. Also, in 2002, we began to implement a new direct-touch strategy in concert with a realignment of our channel partner strategy. As part of this new channel partner strategy, the channel inventory model is changing to reduce channel inventories to a more optimal level or to a drop shipment method to certain channel partners' end user customers. During the third quarter and fourth quarter of 2002 we believe our channel partners' video and voice inventory decreased over the second and third quarter of 2002, respectively. This decrease was due in part to this shift in channel partner strategy resulting in us shipping fewer video and voice units to channel partners in the third and fourth quarter of 2002. The decreased channel inventory levels had less impact on sales of iPower units, which are not typically carried in inventory by our channel partners. Our channel partners are likely to further reduce their inventory levels in 2003 based on a continuation of this distribution strategy to move to reduce channel inventory levels. In addition, any softness in end-user demand, which is likely in the current economic environment, could cause our channel partners to reduce their inventory levels even further.

We face risks related to our dependence on channel partners to sell our products.

We sell a significant amount of our products to channel partners who maintain their own inventory of our products for sale to dealers and end-users. We often provide special cost or early payment incentives for channel partners to purchase the minimum or more than the minimum quantities contemplated under their agreements with us. If these channel partners are unable to sell an adequate amount of their inventory of our products in a given quarter to dealers and end-users or if channel partners decide to decrease their inventories for any reason, such as the current economic downturn and uncertainty in technology industries, the volume of our sales to these channel partners and our net revenues would be negatively affected. For example, the economic downturn negatively affected our business and operating results in 2001 and in 2002. If these conditions continue in the future, our business and operating results will continue to be negatively affected. Moreover, if we choose to eliminate or reduce stocking incentive programs, quarterly revenues may fail to meet our expectations or be lower than historical levels. Further, we believe that our plans to reduce our channel inventories to a more optimal level may limit revenue growth and may cause a decrease in revenue in the near term. In addition, we plan to continue to implement changes to our channel partner strategy which will continue to result in a smaller number of channel partners, a change in the mix of our channel partners and a shift to a model with more direct interaction between us and our direct end-user customers.

These changes may continue to cause disruptions in our channels and negatively impact revenue growth in the near term.

Our revenue estimates are based largely on end-user sales reports that our channel partners provide to us on a monthly basis. To date, we believe this data has been accurate. To the extent that this sales-out and channel inventory data is inaccurate, we may not be able to make revenue estimates for future periods.

Many of our channel partners that carry multiple Polycom products, and from whom we derive significant revenues, are undercapitalized. The failure of these businesses to establish and sustain profitability or obtain financing could have a significant negative effect on our future revenue levels and profitability and our ability to collect our receivables. Further, the current economic downturn and uncertainty in technology spending in the United States and other regions could cause more of our channel partners' businesses to suffer or fail, which would harm our business.

Our business would also be harmed if our large channel partners were affected by the current economic downturn and uncertainty in technology spending. For example, we have experienced a decline in revenues from WorldCom and Global Crossing due to their financial troubles. This drop in the amount of orders we have received from these two channel partners has negatively affected our revenues and profitability.

To avoid confusion among our channel partners regarding our product offerings, we need to devote significant resources to educating and training them.

When we take any significant actions regarding our product offerings, it is important to educate and train our channel partners to avoid any confusion. For example, when we began shipping the ViewStation FX product, the timing of this delivery date likely created confusion in our channel partner customer base and the end-user customer market as these groups waited to see if this new ViewStation product was more desirable than the existing products. Therefore, the timing of this new product release likely had a negative effect on our sales-in to channel partners and sales-out to end-users. We cannot assure you that a similar situation will not happen again. In the first quarter of 2003 we launched new products. This new product launch could cause confusion amongst our channel partners as we educate and train them on, and as they take time to evaluate, these new product offerings.

In addition, we acquired PictureTel Corporation, or PictureTel, in October 2001, and integrating PictureTel's product offerings with ours has created confusion among our channel partners. We will need to continue to devote significant resources to educate and train our channel partners about our combined product offerings. Ongoing confusion may lead to delays in ordering our products which would negatively affect our revenues.

We have various OEM agreements with major telecommunications equipment manufacturers, such as Avaya, Cisco Systems and Nortel Networks, whereby we manufacture our products to work with the equipment of the OEM. These relationships can create conflicts with our other channel partners who directly compete with our OEM partners which could adversely affect revenues from these other channel partners. Because many of our channel partners also sell equipment that competes with our products, these channel partners could devote more attention to these other products which could harm our business. For example, a significant amount of our network systems revenues in 2001 were generated from sales to Tandberg, Sony and VCON, which compete with us in the video communications product market. We believe that because of this conflict, they significantly reduced

their orders of our network systems products in 2002, which has impacted our sales of this product line. Further, other channel conflicts could arise which cause channel partners to devote resources to other non-Polycom communications equipment which would negatively affect our business or results of operations.

Some of our current and future products are directly competitive with the products of our channel and strategic partners. For example, we have an agreement with Cisco Systems under which we ship SoundStation IP phones for resale by Cisco Systems. During the first quarter of 2002, we introduced a VoIP end-point under the Polycom brand that incorporates technology we license from Cisco Systems. This product competes directly with the VoIP products sold by Cisco Systems. As a consequence of conflicts such as these, competition with our partners in all of the markets in which we operate is likely to increase, potentially resulting in strains on our existing relationships with these companies. Any such strain could limit the potential contribution of our strategic relationships to our business, restrict our ability to form strategic relationships with these companies in the future and create additional competitive pressures on us, any of which could harm our business.

Our channel partner contracts are typically short-term and early termination of these contracts may harm our results of operations.

We do not typically enter into long-term contracts with our channel partners, and we cannot be certain as to future order levels from our channel partners. When we do enter into a long-term contract, the contract is generally terminable at the convenience of the channel partner. In the event of an early termination by or loss of one of our major channel partners, it is unlikely that we will be able to rapidly replace that revenue source which would harm our results of operations.

Sales of some of our products have experienced seasonal fluctuations which have affected sequential growth rates for these products, particularly in our third and first quarters. For example, there was a slowdown in the third quarter of 2001 for sales of our products in the European region. In addition, sales of our video communications products have typically declined in the first quarter of the year compared to the fourth quarter of the prior year. Even though our revenues sequentially increased in the first quarter of 2002 from the fourth quarter of 2001, seasonal fluctuations could negatively affect our business which could cause our operating results to fall short of anticipated results for such quarters.

Difficulties in integrating our acquisitions could adversely impact our business.

We completed the acquisition of PictureTel in October 2001. The PictureTel acquisition is the largest acquisition we have completed, and the complex process of integrating PictureTel has required significant resources. We continue to face ongoing business challenges that include principally the geographic dispersion of our operations and generating market demand for an expanded product line that includes PC-based systems and collaboration-intensive applications.

In addition, we have incurred significant costs and committed significant management time integrating PictureTel's operations, technology, development programs, products, information systems, customers and personnel. Although the integration of PictureTel is complete, we will continue to incur cash outflows and additional costs in completing the integration process, such as:

Further, we have a significant liability of approximately $36.5 million at December 31, 2002 related to vacant and redundant facilities in connection with our acquisition of PictureTel which is net of estimated sublease income we expect to generate. Our estimate of sublease income is based on current comparable rates for leases in the respective markets. If actual sublease income is lower than our estimates for any reason, if it takes us longer than we estimated to sublease these facilities, or if the associated cost of subleasing or terminating our lease obligations for these facilities is greater than we estimated, we would incur additional charges to operations which would harm our business, results of operations and cash flows. For example, the Company has an approximately 152,000 square foot building which is fully subleased to a third party for which the sublease runs concurrent with the Company's lease obligation. If this tenant is unable to fulfill, for any reason, their contractual obligations under the sublease, we would incur additional charges to operations which would harm our business. In addition, until our vacated and redundant facilities are subleased or the lease obligations for these facilities are terminated, we will continue to pay the contractual lease and facility operating expense obligations without any sublease income to offset these costs. Further, in the event that we agree to sublease a facility or terminate a lease obligation through a lease buyout or other means, we may incur a material cash outflow up to and potentially exceeding our recorded liability at the time of such transaction, which would harm our operating cash flows. To the extent that any such cash outflows or additional costs exceed the amount of our recorded liability related to the sublease or termination of these lease obligations, we could incur a charge to operations which would harm our business and adversely impact our results of operations.

We have spent and will continue to spend significant resources identifying and acquiring businesses. The efficient and effective integration of our acquired businesses into our organization is critical to our growth. In addition to PictureTel, we acquired the following businesses in our prior fiscal year: Accord Networks Ltd., or Accord, in February 2001, Circa Communications, Ltd., or Circa, in April 2001 and Atlanta Signal Processors, Incorporated, or ASPI, in November 2001. Further, we acquired MeetU.com, Inc., or MeetU, in June 2002. These and any future acquisitions involve numerous risks including difficulties in integrating the operations, technologies and products of the acquired companies, the diversion of our management's attention from other business concerns and the potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies. Failure to achieve the anticipated benefits of these and any future acquisitions or to successfully integrate the operations of the companies we acquire could also harm our business, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, we cannot assure you that we will not incur material charges in future quarters to reflect additional costs associated with past acquisitions or any future acquisitions we may make.

Difficulties we may encounter managing a substantially larger business could adversely affect our operating results.

We experienced significant growth in our business and operations due to internal expansion and business acquisitions during the last five years, and if we do not appropriately manage this growth and any future growth, our operating results will be negatively affected.

Our business has grown in recent years through both internal expansion and business acquisitions, and continued growth may cause a significant strain on our infrastructure, internal systems and managerial resources. For example, our annual revenues increased from $52 million in 1997 to $466 million in 2002, and during the past eight fiscal quarters, we acquired Accord, Circa, PictureTel, ASPI and MeetU. Further, our headcount increased from 175 employees at December 31, 1997 to 526 employees at December 31, 1999 and to 1,271 employees at December 31, 2002. To manage our growth effectively, we must continue to improve and expand our infrastructure, including operating and administrative systems and controls, and continue managing headcount, capital and processes in an efficient manner. Our productivity and the quality of our products may be adversely affected if we do not integrate and train our new employees quickly and effectively and coordinate among our executive, engineering, finance, marketing, sales, operations and customer support organizations, all of which add to the complexity of our organization and increase our operating expenses. In addition, our revenues may not grow at a sufficient rate to absorb the costs associated with a larger overall headcount. In addition, because of our acquisition of PictureTel, our video communications product development group is now located in multiple locations, and we have limited experience coordinating a large, geographically separated product development group.

Our future growth may require significant additional resources. We cannot assure you that resources will be available when we need them or that we will have sufficient capital to fund these potential resource needs. Also, as we assess our resources following our acquisitions, we will likely determine that redundancy in certain areas will require consolidation of these resources. Any organizational disruptions associated with the consolidation process could require further management attention and financial expenditures. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, if we experience a shortfall in resources or if we must take additional restructuring charges, our results of operations will be harmed.

Some of our officers and key personnel have worked together for only a short period of time or have only recently joined us.

Some of our officers and key personnel have worked together for only a short period of time. For example, our Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales and our Senior Vice President and General Manager, Video Communications joined us within the past three months. In addition, some of our executive officers have recently assumed significant new responsibilities, and they may require some time to transition into these new roles.

Our future success will depend in part on our continued ability to hire, assimilate and retain qualified personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting or retaining such personnel. The loss of any key employee, the failure of any key employee to perform in his or her current position or our inability to attract and retain skilled employees, particularly technical and management, as needed, could harm our business. In addition, many of our key employees in Israel, who are responsible for development of our network systems products, are obligated to perform annual military reserve duty and may be called to active duty at any time under emergency conditions. The loss of the services of any executive officer or other key technical or management personnel could harm our business.

If we fail to compete successfully, our business and results of operations would be significantly harmed.

We face significant competition in the communications industry which is subject to rapid technological change. In video communications, our major competitors include Tandberg and a number of other companies including Aethra, ClearOne, Huawei, NEC, Panasonic, Philips, Sony, VCON and VTEL, as well as various smaller or new industry entrants. Some of these companies have substantial financial resources and production, marketing, engineering and other capabilities with which to develop, manufacture, market and sell their products. In addition, with advances in telecommunications standards, connectivity and video processing technology and the increasing market acceptance of video communications, other established or new companies may develop or market products competitive with our video communications products. We believe we will face increasing competition from alternative video communications solutions that employ new technologies or new combinations of technologies from companies such as 3Com, Cisco Systems, Hewlett-Packard, Dell, Microsoft, Nortel Networks, RealNetworks and WebEx, that enable web-based or network-based video and collaboration communications. The market for voice communications equipment, including voice conferencing and desktop equipment, is highly competitive and also subject to rapid technological change, regulatory developments and emerging industry standards. We expect competition to persist and increase in the future in this area. In voice communications, our major competitors include Aethra, Cisco Systems, ClearOne Communications, Konftel, Mitel, Soundgear and other companies that have in the past offered lower cost, full-duplex speakerphones. In the VoIP desktop space, there are several low cost manufacturers in Asia and Europe that are emerging. In addition, there are notable PBX and IP Call Manager manufacturers that compete on the standards based IP space including Cisco, Mitel and Siemens. Furthermore, all major telephony manufacturers produce hands-free speakerphone units that are lower cost than our voice communications products. Our network systems business has significant competition from RADVISION, and a number of other companies, including Avaya, Cisco Systems, First Virtual and Tandberg.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against our current or future competitors. We expect our competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and to introduce new products or new technologies that provide improved performance characteristics. New product introductions by our competitors could cause a significant decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of our existing products and future products. We believe that the possible effects from ongoing competition may be the reduction in the prices of our products and our competitors' products or the introduction of additional lower priced competitive products. We expect this increased competitive pressure may lead to intensified price-based competition, resulting in lower prices and gross margins which would significantly harm our results of operations.

Because of our significant operations in Israel, we are subject to risks associated with the military, political and regulatory environment in Israel and the Middle East region.

The principal research and development and manufacturing facilities of our network systems group and many of that group's suppliers are located in Israel. Additionally, our acquisition of MeetU further concentrates our research and development activities for our network systems product line in Israel. Political, economic and military conditions in Israel and the Middle East region directly affect our network systems group's operations. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its geographic neighbors. Current and future-armed conflicts or political instability in the region may impair our ability to produce and sell our network systems products and could disrupt research or developmental activities. A state of hostility, varying in degree and intensity, has led to security and economic problems for Israel. The future of peace efforts between Israel and its geographic neighbors remains uncertain and there has been a

marked increase in civil unrest and hostility and military action between Israelis and Palestinians. This hostility could have an adverse impact on our results of operations. Further, a war with Iraq or other countries in the region perceived as a threat by the United States government could result in additional unrest or cause Israel to be attacked which would adversely affect our results of operations and harm our business.

The technology used to develop our current network systems products was developed in part with grants from the Israeli Office of the Chief Scientist. Under Israeli law, technology developed pursuant to grants from the Office of the Chief Scientist cannot be transferred to any person without the prior written consent of the Office of the Chief Scientist. The grants also contain restrictions on the ability to manufacture products developed with these grants outside of Israel. Approval to manufacture such products outside of Israel, if granted, is generally subject to an increase in the total amount to be repaid to the Office of the Chief Scientist of between 120% to 300% of the amount granted, depending on the extent of the manufacturing to be conducted outside of Israel. These restrictions on the ability to transfer certain of our technology to third parties or manufacture products outside Israel may adversely affect our operating results and the development of additional network systems products and significantly reduce the value of the technology.

International sales represent an increasing portion of our net revenues and risks inherent in international sales could harm our business.

International sales represent an increasing portion of our net revenues, and we anticipate that international sales will continue to account for a significant portion of our net revenues for the foreseeable future. International sales are subject to certain inherent risks, including the following:

International net revenues may fluctuate as a percentage of total net revenues in the future as we introduce new products. These fluctuations are primarily the result of our practice of introducing new products in North America first and the additional time required for product homologation and regulatory approvals of new products in international markets. To the extent we are unable to expand international sales in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business could be harmed. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or increase international market demand for our products.

Although, to date, a substantial majority of our international sales has been denominated in U.S. currency, we expect that a growing number of sales could be denominated in non-U.S. currencies as more international customers request billing in their currency. As a result, we expect our business will be significantly more vulnerable to currency fluctuations which could adversely impact our results of operations. While we do not hedge for speculative purposes, as a result of our increased exposure to currency fluctuations, we from time to time engage in currency hedging activities solely to mitigate temporary currency fluctuation exposure. However, we have limited experience with these hedging activities, and they may not be successful which could harm our operating results and financial

condition. In addition, significant adverse changes in currency exchange rates, as happened in the European market in 2000 and in the Asian market in late 1997, could cause our products to become relatively more expensive to customers in a particular country, leading to a reduction in revenue or profitability in that country.

We have limited supply sources for some key components of our products, and our operations could be harmed by supply interruptions, component defects or unavailability of these components.

Some key components used in our products are currently available from only one source and others are available from only a limited number of sources, including some key integrated circuits and optical elements. We also obtain certain plastic housings, metal castings and other components from suppliers located in China and other Asian countries, and any political or economic instability in that region in the future, or future import restrictions, may cause delays or an inability to obtain these supplies. Further, we have suppliers in Israel and a war with Iraq or other Middle Eastern countries perceived as a threat by the United States government may cause delays or an inability to obtain supplies for our network systems products. We have no raw material supply commitments from our suppliers and generally purchase components on a purchase order basis either directly or through our contract manufacturers. We have had limited experience purchasing supplies of various components for our products, and some of the components included in our products, such as microprocessors and other integrated circuits, have from time to time been subject to limited allocations by suppliers. In addition, companies with limited or uncertain financial resources manufacture some of these components. In the event that we, or our contract manufacturers, are unable to obtain sufficient supplies of components, develop alternative sources as needed, or companies with limited financial resources go out of business, our operating results could be seriously harmed. Moreover, our operating results would be seriously harmed by receipt of a significant number of defective components, an increase in component prices or our inability to obtain lower component prices in response to competitive price reductions. Additionally, our video communications products are designed based on integrated circuits produced by Philips Semiconductor, or Philips, and cameras produced by Sony. If we could no longer obtain integrated circuits or cameras from these suppliers, we would incur substantial expense and take substantial time in redesigning our products to be compatible with components from other manufacturers, and we cannot assure you that we would be successful in obtaining these components from alternative sources in a timely or cost-effective manner. Additionally, both Sony and Philips compete with us in the video communications industry which may adversely affect our ability to obtain necessary components. The failure to obtain adequate supplies of vital components could prevent or delay product shipments which could harm our business. We also rely on the introduction schedules of some key components in the development or launch of new products. Any delays in the availability of these key components could harm our business.

We subcontract the manufacture of our voice and video product lines to Celestica, a third-party contract manufacturer. We use Celestica's Thailand facilities, and should there be any disruption in services due to natural disaster or economic or political difficulties in Thailand or Asia or any other reason, such disruption would harm our business and results of operations. Also, Celestica's Thailand facility is currently the sole source manufacturer of these products, and if Celestica experiences an interruption in operations or otherwise suffers from capacity constraints, we would experience a delay in shipping these products which would have an immediate negative impact on our revenues. As a result, we may not be able to meet any demand for our products which could negatively affect revenues in the quarter of the disruption and harm our reputation. In addition, operating in the international environment exposes us to certain inherent risks, including unexpected changes in regulatory requirements and tariffs, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations and potentially adverse tax consequences, all of which could harm our business and results of operations.

Further, our network systems products are manufactured in Israel which is currently experiencing internal and external conflicts that include terrorist acts and military action. Also, a war with Iraq or other Middle Eastern countries perceived as a threat by the United States government could cause us to experience a manufacturing disruption due to acts associated with these conflicts which could harm our business. In addition, certain technology used in our network systems products was developed through grants from the Office of the Chief Scientist in Israel. Under Israeli law, it is prohibited to transfer technology developed pursuant to these grants to any person without the prior written consent of the Office of the Chief Scientist. The grants also contain restrictions on the ability to manufacture products developed with these grants outside of Israel. Approval to manufacture such products outside of Israel, if granted, is generally subject to an increase in the total amount to be repaid to the Office of the Chief Scientist of between 120% to 300% of the amount granted, depending on the extent of the manufacturing to be conducted outside of Israel. These restrictions on the ability to transfer technology to third parties or manufacture products outside Israel may adversely affect our operating results and significantly reduce the value of the technology developed under these grants.

We may experience delays in product introductions and our products may contain defects which could adversely affect market acceptance for these products and our reputation and seriously harm our results of operations.

From 1998 through 2002, our revenue was due in large part to sales of new video communications products. Although we intend to continue to introduce new video and voice products, such as our Visual Concert products, SoundSation VTX 1000, ViewStation EC, ViewStation EX, MGC 25, Vortex EF2241, PathNavigator and WebOffice products, we cannot assure you that new product releases will be timely or that they will be made at all. For example, the ViewStation FX and ViaVideo were delayed from their original release dates which we believe negatively affected our net revenues in 2000. Additionally, any new or existing product introductions may contain defects and may not produce the revenue growth we experienced from 1998 through 2002.

With our acquisition of PictureTel, our video communications product development group is now located in Massachusetts and Texas. Since we do not have significant experience coordinating a large geographically separated product development group, we may experience product delays in the future, due to communications, logistics or other issues. Similarly, our acquisition of ASPI may contribute to voice communications product delays, as our voice communications product development group is now dispersed among California, Georgia and Canada.

In the past, we have experienced other delays in the introduction of certain new products and enhancements, and we believe that such delays may occur in the future. For instance, we experienced delays in introducing the ViewStation MP and WebStation from their original expected release dates due to unforeseen technology and manufacturing ramping issues. Similar delays occurred during the introduction of the ShowStation, ShowStation IP and SoundStation Premier which affected the first customer ship dates of these products. We also had delays in introducing our SoundStation IP product which we believe negatively impacted our sales revenue in the first quarter of 2001. Further, our SoundPoint IP product introduction was delayed which we believe negatively impacted our sales in the third and fourth quarters of 2001. Any similar delays in the future for other new product offerings currently under development could adversely affect market acceptance for these products and our reputation, and seriously harm our results of operations.

We have invested significant resources developing products that are dependent on the adoption rate of new technologies. For example, our SoundStation IP and SoundPoint IP products are dependent

on the roll out of voice-over-IP, or VoIP, technologies. The success of our ViaVideo product depends on the increased use of desktop video collaboration technologies. The success of our WebOffice product is dependent on the increased use and acceptance of web collaboration technologies in concert with audio and video conferencing. If the use of new technologies that our current and future products are based on does not occur, or occurs more slowly than expected, we may not be able to sell certain of our products in significant volumes and our business may be harmed.

Lower than expected market acceptance of our products, price competition and other price decreases would negatively impact our business.

If the market does not accept our products, including the new products launched in the first quarter of 2003, our profitability could be harmed.

Our profitability could also be negatively affected in the future as a result of continuing competitive price pressures in the sale of video and voice conferencing equipment and network systems which could cause us to reduce the prices for any of these products. Further, we have reduced prices in the past in order to expand the market for our products, and in the future, we may further reduce prices or introduce new products that carry lower margins in order to expand the market or stimulate demand for our products. While we cannot assure you that these actions would have the desired result, any of these actions could have an adverse impact on our product margins and profitability.

Our success depends on our ability to assimilate new technologies in our products and to properly train our channel partners in the use of those products.

The markets for video and voice communications products and network systems products are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and frequent new product introductions. The success of our new products depends on several factors, including proper new product definition, product cost, timely completion and introduction of new products, differentiation of new products from those of our competitors and market acceptance of these products. Additionally, properly addressing the complexities associated with compatibility issues, channel partner training, technical and sales support as well as field support are also factors that may affect our success in this market. Further, the shift in communications from circuit-switched to IP-based technologies over time may require us to add new channel partners and gain new core technological competencies. We are attempting to address these needs and the need to develop new products through our internal development efforts, joint developments with other companies and through acquisitions. We may not identify successful new product opportunities and develop and bring products to market in a timely manner. Additionally, we cannot assure you that competing technologies developed by others will not render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive. The failure of our new product development efforts and any inability to service or maintain the necessary third-party interoperability licenses would harm our business and results of operations.

We operate in a high technology industry which is subject to rapid and frequent technology and market demand changes. These changes can often render existing technologies obsolete. These obsolescence issues can require write-downs in inventory value when it is determined that the recorded value of existing inventory is greater than its fair market value. For example, this situation occurred in 2001, and again in the first six months of 2002, when we recorded material excess and obsolescence charges associated with our inventory of network access products. This situation also occurred during the first quarter of 2000 for the ShowStation IP. Also, our ViewStation product and iPower products offer certain comparable functionality and may compete with each other for customers. In addition, we launched several new products in the first quarter of 2003. If sales of one of these products have a negative effect on sales of the other product, it could significantly increase the inventory levels of the

negatively impacted product. The potential for new products to render existing products obsolete, cause inventories of existing products to increase or reduce the demand for existing products exists for every one of our products.

We purchased several businesses in 2001 and 2002 which included goodwill valued at approximately $300 million and other purchased intangible assets valued at approximately $33 million as of December 31, 2002. This represents a significant portion of our recorded assets. Generally accepted accounting principles related to goodwill and other intangibles changed with the issuance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, or SFAS 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" which we adopted effective January 1, 2002. Under SFAS 142, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortized, but must be reviewed for impairment at least annually or sooner under certain circumstances. Other intangible assets that are deemed to have finite useful lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives, but must be reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Screening for and assessing whether impairment indicators exist, or if events or changes in circumstances have occurred, including market conditions, operating fundamentals, competition and general economic conditions, requires significant judgment. Additionally, changes in the high-technology industry occur frequently and quickly. Therefore, we cannot assure you that a charge to operations will not occur as a result of future goodwill impairment tests. If impairment is deemed to exist, we would write down the recorded value of these intangible assets to their fair values which could result in a full write-off of their book value. If these write-downs do occur, they could harm our business and results of operations.

In addition, we have made investments in private companies which we classify as "Other assets" in our balance sheet. The value of these investments is influenced by many factors, including the operating effectiveness of these companies, the overall health of these companies' industries, the strength of the private equity markets and general market conditions. Due to these and other factors, we have recorded charges against earnings totaling $12.0 million from fiscal 2000 through 2002 associated with the impairment of these investments, which has been reflected in "Loss on strategic investments" in the statements of operations. These investments have been fully written-off as of December 31, 2002. We may make additional investments in private companies which would be subject to similar impairment risks, and which may cause us to write down the recorded value of any such investments. Further, we cannot assure you that future inventory, investment, license, fixed asset or other asset write-downs will not happen. If future write-downs do occur, they could harm our business and results of operations.

Our recent growth has been due in large part to an expansion into products with more complex technologies, including our network systems products and our iPower products. This has increased the need for product warranty and service capabilities. If we cannot develop and train our internal support organization or maintain our relationship with our outside technical support, it could harm our business.

If we have insufficient proprietary rights or if we fail to protect those rights we have, our business would be materially impaired.

We rely on third-party license agreements and termination or impairment of these agreements may cause delays or reductions in product introductions or shipments which would harm our business.

development source code from Cisco Systems and Philips Semiconductor, audio algorithms from Lucent Technologies, Nortel Networks and Texas Instruments, communication software from DataBeam and Windows software from Microsoft. These third-party software licenses may not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The termination or impairment of these licenses could result in delays or reductions in new product introductions or current product shipments until equivalent software could be developed, licensed and integrated, if at all possible which would harm our business and results of operations.

We rely on patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets to protect our proprietary rights which may not be sufficient to protect our intellectual property.

We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and confidentiality procedures to protect our proprietary rights. Others may independently develop similar proprietary information and techniques or gain access to our intellectual property rights or disclose such technology. In addition, we cannot assure you that any patent or registered trademark owned by us will not be invalidated, circumvented or challenged in the U.S. or foreign countries or that the rights granted thereunder will provide competitive advantages to us or that any of our pending or future patent applications will be issued with the scope of the claims sought by us, if at all. Furthermore, others may develop similar products, duplicate our products or design around our patents. In addition, foreign intellectual property laws may not protect our intellectual property rights. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity of and scope of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources which could harm our business, and could ultimately be unsuccessful in protecting our intellectual property rights.

We have from time to time received, and may in the future receive, communications from third parties asserting patent or other intellectual property rights covering our products. For example, on September 23, 2002, a suit captioned Collaboration Properties, Inc. v. Polycom, Inc. was filed in the United States Court in the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges that our ViewStation, ViaVideo, iPower, WebOffice and Path Navigator products infringe 4 U.S. Patents owned by plaintiff. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory and exemplary damages for past and present infringement and to permanently enjoin us from infringing on the patents in the future, On November 14, 2002 we filed an answer asserting, among other things, no infringement and that plaintiff's patents are invalid and unenforceable. We believe that we have meritorious defenses and counterclaims, and intend to vigorously defend this action. However, litigation involves significant inherent risks and uncertainties, and if an adverse outcome was to occur it could significantly harm our business.

In addition, our industry is characterized by uncertain and conflicting intellectual property claims and vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights or positions which have resulted in significant and protracted and expensive litigation. In the past, we have been involved in such litigation which adversely affected our operating results. For example, in November 1998, Videoserver, Inc., now known as Ezenia! Inc., filed a patent infringement claim against Accord's U.S. subsidiary, and Accord was subsequently added as a defendant. In September 2000, Accord and its U.S. subsidiary entered into a settlement agreement with Ezenia! under which the case was dismissed and Accord paid $6.5 million to Ezenia!. We cannot assure you that we will prevail in any such litigation, that intellectual property claims will not be made against us in the future or that we will not be prohibited from using the technologies subject to any such claims or be required to obtain licenses and make corresponding

royalty payments. In addition, the necessary management attention to, and legal costs associated with, litigation can have a significant adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Our cash flow could fluctuate due to the potential difficulty of collecting our receivables.

Over the past few years, we initiated significant investments in Europe and Asia to expand our business in these regions. In Europe and Asia, as with other international regions, credit terms are typically longer than in the United States. Therefore, as Europe, Asia and other international regions grow as a percentage of our net revenues, as happened from 1999 through 2002, accounts receivable balances will likely increase as compared to previous years. Additionally, sales in the network systems and video communications industries typically have longer payment periods as compared to the voice communications market. Therefore, if network systems and video products constitute a greater percentage of net revenues, accounts receivable balances will likely increase. These increases would cause our days sales outstanding to increase as compared to prior years and will negatively affect future cash flows. Although we have been able to largely offset the effects of these influences through additional incentives offered to channel partners at the end of each quarter in the form of prepaid discounts, these additional incentives have lowered our profitability and, given the continued downturn in the United States economy and uncertainty in technology spending, many companies are opting to not take advantage of our incentives and instead preserve their liquidity. In addition, the continued economic downturn in the United States may restrict the availability of capital which may delay our collections from our channel partners beyond our historical experience or may cause companies to file for bankruptcy, which occurred with Global Crossing and WorldCom. Either of these conditions would harm our cash flow and days sales outstanding performance. Although in recent quarters our experience in collecting receivables has been good and we expect this trend to continue, there can be assurance that it will continue.

Our stock price fluctuates as a result of the conduct of our business and stock market fluctuations.

The market price of our common stock has experienced significant fluctuations and may continue to fluctuate significantly. The market price of our common stock may be significantly affected by a variety of factors, including:

In addition, the stock market continues to experience extreme price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations have had a substantial effect on the market prices for many high technology companies like us. These fluctuations are often unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies.

Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio and bank borrowings. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio which only includes highly liquid, high quality instruments, with the exception of the $0.4 million invested in equity securities of publicly traded companies. We may occasionally use forward contracts as a hedge against currency exchange rate fluctuations which may affect the value of trade receivables billed in currencies other than the United States dollar. As of December 31, 2002, we have no open foreign currency hedging contracts.

The estimated fair value of our cash and cash equivalents approximates the principal amounts reflected above based on the short maturities of these financial instruments. Short-term and long-term investments consist of U.S., state and municipal government obligations and foreign and domestic public corporate debt and equity securities, of which a total of $0.4 million was strategically invested in certain equity securities of publicly traded companies at December 31, 2002. These investments are subject to market price fluctuations which are primarily influenced by changes in interest rates and credit quality and are marked to market each period by recording an unrealized gain or loss in stockholders' equity, except for our warrants to purchase publicly traded equity securities which are marked to market through the consolidated statement of operations. If we sell our short-term or long-term investments prior to their maturity, we may incur a charge to operations in the period the sale took place. For 2002, we realized $4.4 million in losses related to the sale or write-down of our strategic investments in certain equity securities of publicly traded companies, which is reflected in "Loss on strategic investments" in the consolidated statements of operations.

The following tables present the hypothetical changes in fair values in the securities, excluding cash and cash equivalents and investments in equity securities of publicly traded companies, held at December 31, 2002 that are sensitive to the changes in interest rates. The modeling technique used measures the change in fair values arising from hypothetical parallel shifts in the yield curve of plus or minus 50 basis points (BPS) and 100 BPS over six and twelve-month time horizons.

The following table estimates the fair value of the portfolio at a twelve-month time horizon (in thousands):

The following table estimates the fair value of the portfolio at a six-month time horizon (in thousands):

A substantial majority of our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. Only a minor amount of foreign invoices are paid in currencies other than the US dollar and these invoices are funded at the time of payment. However, in connection with the acquisition of PictureTel, we are selling iPower products and related services in some local currencies, primarily Euros, British Pounds, Hong Kong Dollars, Singapore Dollars and Japanese Yen, which have increased our foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation risk. We may also decide to expand the type of products we sell in foreign currencies thereby further increasing our foreign exchange risk. While we do not hedge for speculative purposes, in the event of a significant transaction due in a foreign currency, we may enter into a foreign currency forward exchange contract for hedging purposes.

In connection with the acquisition of PictureTel completed in October 2001, we assumed PictureTel's existing hedging program to hedge intercompany receivables between PictureTel and its foreign subsidiaries. Two forward contracts were entered during the month of December 2001 for $1.7 million and matured during the first quarter of 2002 and did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. There were no forward contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2002.

The financial statements required by Item 8 and the financial statement schedules required by Item 14(d) are included in pages F-1 to F-34 and S-2, respectively. The supplemental data called for by Item 8 is presented on page S-1.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

The information regarding our directors required by this item is included under the caption "Election of Directors" in our Proxy Statement for our 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated in this Item 10 by this reference. The information regarding our current executive officers found under the caption "Executive Officers of the Registrant" in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is also incorporated by reference in this Item 10. The information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is included under the caption "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Proxy Statement for our 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated in this Item 10 by this reference.

The information required by this item is included under the caption "Management" in the Proxy Statement for our 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated in this Item 11 by this reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item is included under the caption "Management Ownership of Securities" and "Equity Compensation Plan Information" in the Proxy Statement for our 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated in this Item 12 by this reference.

The information required by this item is included under the caption "Management—Employment Contracts, Change of Control Arrangements and Certain Transactions" in the Proxy Statement for our 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated in this Item 13 by this reference.

Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, after evaluating our "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") Rules 13a-14(c) and 15-d-14(c)) as of a date (the "Evaluation Date") within 90 days before the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Our review of our internal controls was made within the context of the relevant professional auditing standards defining "internal controls," "reportable conditions," and "material weaknesses." "Internal controls" are processes designed to provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are properly authorized, our assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use, and our transactions are properly recorded and reported, all to permit the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. "Significant deficiencies" are referred to as "reportable conditions," or control issues that could have a significant adverse effect on our ability to properly authorize transactions, safeguard our assets, or record, process, summarize or report financial data in the condensed consolidated financial statements. A "material weakness" is a particularly serious reportable condition where the

internal control does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud may occur in amounts that would be material in relation to the condensed consolidated financial statements and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. As part of our internal controls procedures, we also address other, less significant control matters that we or our auditors identify, and we determine what revision or improvement to make, if any, in accordance with our on-going procedures.

Subsequent to the Evaluation Date, there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect our internal controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Schedules not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

The following Exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Report:

Exhibit No.		Description
2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization dated December 5, 2000, by and among the Registrant, Merger Sub Ltd. and Accord Networks Ltd. (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on December 12, 2000).
2.2		Agreement and Plan of Merger dated May 24, 2001, by and among the Registrant, Pharaoh Acquisition Corp. and PictureTel Corporation (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-63252) filed with the Commission on June 18, 2001).
2.3		Addendum to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated May 24, 2001, by and among the Registrant, Pharaoh Acquisition Corp. and PictureTel Corporation (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 12(d)(4) to Amendment No. 6 to the Schedule TO filed with the Commission on October 3, 2001).
2.4		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 28, 2003, by and between Polycom, Inc. and Verilink Corporation (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 12, 2002.
3.1	(1)	Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Polycom, Inc.
3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Polycom, Inc. (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 12, 2001).
4.1		Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Pleasanton, State of California, on this 17th day of March, 2003.

That the undersigned officers and directors of Polycom, Inc., a Delaware corporation, do hereby constitute and appoint Michael R. Kourey the lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney as of the date indicated.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ ROBERT C. HAGERTY Robert C. Hagerty	Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)	March 17, 2003
/s/ MICHAEL R. KOUREY Michael R. Kourey	Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director (Principal Financial Officer)	March 17, 2003
/s/ KATHLEEN M. CRUSCO Kathleen M. Crusco	Vice President, Worldwide Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)	March 17, 2003
/s/ BETSY S. ATKINS Betsy S. Atkins	Director	March 17, 2003
/s/ JOHN SEELY BROWN John Seely Brown	Director	March 17, 2003
/s/ DURK JAGER Durk Jager	Director	March 17, 2003
/s/ JOHN A. KELLEY John A. Kelley	Director	March 17, 2003

Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification by the Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of Polycom, Inc. pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert C. Hagerty, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Polycom, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Polycom, Inc.

Certification of the Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael R. Kourey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Polycom, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Polycom, Inc.

		Page
Report of Independent Accountants		F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets		F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity		F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-7
Supplementary Financial Data (unaudited)		S-1
Financial Statement Schedule—Schedule II		S-2

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, of stockholders' equity and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Polycom, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material aspects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

POLYCOM, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

POLYCOM, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

POLYCOM, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except share data)

ý	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		94-3128324 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
4750 Willow Road, Pleasanton, California (Address of principal executive offices)		94588 (Zip Code)
(925) 924-6000 Registrant's telephone number, including area code

Product	Key Features		Typical US List Price
ViewStation Series	•	High-quality, enhanced video and voice delivered at 30 frames per second and up to 60 fields per second	$3,999-$18,999
	•	Easy to use graphical interface and hand-held remote control
	•	Embedded Web functionality and data sharing
	•	IP and ISDN connectivity
	•	Up to 4-site multipoint capability with cascading (IP, ISDN and mixed)
iPower Series	•	Multi-purpose videoconferencing and collaborations	$7,999-$29,990
	•	H.264 advanced video compression for highest quality video at lower call data rates
	•	High-quality, enhanced video delivered at 30 frames per second and up to 60 fields, and Siren™ 14 CD-like audio
	•	Embedded Intel-based PC capable of running stand-alone PC applications (such as MS Office, Web access, database access)
	•	IP and ISDN connectivity
	•	Up to 4-site multipoint capability (IP); optional 12-site multipoint capability (IP)
ViaVideo	•	Business-quality video communications appliance for the desktop personal computer	$599
	•	Full screen video delivered at up to 30 frames per second and 512k bps
	•	Easy integration with existing IP networks
	•	Simple installation through a standard universal serial bus, or USB, port
Visual Concert series	•	Visual Concert video peripherals used to incorporate live PC data, documents and visual effects into a videoconferencing session	$799-$7,499
	•	Dynamic dual stream capability, People + Content, allows user to present content while maintaining face-to-face contact
Polycom Executive Collection†	•	High performance video system	Prices vary by configuration
	•	Integrated high fidelity audio
	•	Premium plasma displays
Global Management System	•	Real-time, Web-based monitoring and management of video equipment enables cost-effective support for IT managers	Approximately $250 per site
	•	Centralized address book server application provides easy access for users

Product	Key Features		Typical US List Price
SoundStation VTX 1000†	•	Simultaneous natural conversation	$1,799
	•	Extensive room coverage
	•	Download new software remotely through the telephone line
	•	Independent input and output, Bass/Treble controls and internal microphone and speaker control for configuration flexibility
	•	Wideband high-fidelity audio
SoundStation and SoundStation EX	•	High-quality voice conferencing speakerphone	$499-$1,099
	•	Full duplex and echo cancellation capabilities that facilitate natural conversations without clipping or distortion
	•	Optional extended microphones for additional room coverage
SoundStation Premier and	•	All the features of the SoundStation	$999-$2,499
SoundStation Premier EX	•	High-fidelity speaker for larger rooms
	•	Intelligent microphones that track the person speaking
	•	Active noise reduction and automatic gain control to remove background noise from PC's, projectors and HVAC systems
	•	Direct connectivity with digital PBX protocols
SoundStation IP	•	VoIP-enabled version of the SoundStation	$999
	•	Supports multiple IP protocols
	•	Graphical LCD display for ease-of-use
VoiceStation 100	•	High-quality voice conferencing product for smaller offices	$299
Vortex EF2280	•	Multi-channel acoustic echo and noise cancellation for installed conferencing applications	$4,615-$5,910
	•	Integrated, automatic mixing of up to 8 microphones and 4 auxiliary audio sources
Vortex EF 2241	•	Multi-channel acoustic echo and noise cancellation for installed conferencing applications	$3,995
	•	Built in "phone add" to bring telephone calls into the conference room
	•	Integrated, automatic mixing of up to 4 microphones and 4 auxiliary audio sources
SoundPoint Pro	•	Integrated, high-quality speakerphone with handset feature	$199-$249
	•	Multi-functional handset, with professional hands free communication capabilities
SoundPoint IP	•	Full-featured, standards based Voice over IP desktop telephone, with professional full duplex hands free communication and handset capabilities	$259-$435
	•	Supports multiple IP protocols
	•	High resolution graphical LCD display for applications and ease of use

Product	Key Features		Typical US List Price
MGC-50 and MGC-100	•	Multipoint control units for service providers, enterprises, education and government institutions and workgroups	$29,950-$500,799
	•	Voice, video and data conferencing bridge
	•	Embedded multi-network, multi-protocol gateway
	•	Supports multiple standards for video, voice and data
	•	Supports end-points at up to 2 Mbps and can connect up to 650 sites for 325 simultaneous sessions
	•	Interfaces with 10/100 Ethernet, E-1 or T-1 lines
MGC-25†	•	Supports IP and ISDN video conferencing, video gateway applications, PSTN and IP voice conferencing as well as Polycom's new unified conferencing	$22,000-$59,500
	•	Supports Polycom Office^TM features such as H264, People + Content, Pro-Motion Video, and Siren 14^TM wideband audio
GW-25 and GW-45	•	Multi-network, multi-protocol gateway	$59,950-$251,300
	•	Supports IP-to-IP and IP-to-ISDN sessions
	•	Up to 48 simultaneous sessions
	•	Upgradeable to multipoint control-unit
	•	24 IP-to-IP connections
	•	Checkmark certified firewall solution
PathNavigator	•	Call processing server for IP and ISDN video calls	$4,999-$49,999
	•	Intelligent routing engine which combines provisioning, advanced gatekeeper functionality and addressing making video applications more useable
	•	Polycom OneDial™ makes video calls easier for end-users
WebOffice	•	Web-based collaborative virtual office software with browser interface	$750 per user
	•	Enables anytime, online meetings or application sharing in a secure environment
	•	Allows users to start voice and video conferences on MGC
	•	Allows users to Instant Message with colleagues from their virtual office

In process research and development project	Value assigned to in process project		Percentage complete		Expected life of technology	Estimated time to complete	Estimated cost to complete
Project A	$	5,161	100	%	4 years	Complete	$	—
Project B		12,250	100	%	5 years	Complete		—
Project C		24,750	60	%	5 years	12-15 months		4,000
Other projects		7,131	74	%	3-5 years	9-12 months		2,500

Total	$	49,292					$	6,500

	Valuation of Securities Given an Interest Rate Increase of X Basis Points						Valuation of Securities Given an Interest Rate Increase of X Basis Points
Issuer					Current Fair Market Value
Issuer	100 BPS		50 BPS		Current Fair Market Value		50 BPS		100 BPS
U.S. Government Securities	$	208,480	$	208,060	$	206,693	$	205,790	$	204,850
State and local governments		2,940		2,920		2,906		2,890		2,880
Corporate debt securities		149,200		148,490		147,783		147,080		146,380

Total	$	360,620	$	359,470	$	357,382	$	355,760	$	354,110

4.2		Specimen Common Stock certificate (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-02296) filed with the Commission on March 12, 1996 (the "1996 S-1")).
4.3		Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement, dated May 17, 1995, among the Registrant and the Investors named therein (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant's 1996 S-1).
4.4		Preferred Shares Rights Agreement dated as of July 15, 1998 and as amended March 2, 2001, between Polycom, Inc. and Fleet Bank, N.A. F/K/A BankBoston N.A., including the Certificate of Designation, the form of Rights Certificate and the Summary of Rights Attached thereto as Exhibits A, B and C, respectively (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Registrant's Form 8-A/A filed with the Commission on March 2, 2001).
10.1	*	Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and officers (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's 1996 S-1).
10.2	(1)*	The Registrant's 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, and forms of agreements thereunder.
10.3	*	The Registrant's 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and forms of agreements thereunder (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's 1996 S-1).
10.4	*	ViaVideo Communications, Inc. 1996 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan and related agreements (which are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-45351).
10.5		Lease Agreement by and between the Registrant and Trinet Essential Facilities XXVI, dated December 1, 1999, regarding the space located at 1565 Barber Lane, Milpitas, California (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 29, 2000).
10.6		Lease Agreement by and between the Registrant and WJT, LLC, dated February 19, 2001, regarding the space located at 4750 Willow Road, Pleasanton, California (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 12, 2001).
10.7	*	Accord Networks Ltd. 1995 Employee Share Ownership and Option Plan and form of agreement thereunder (which are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-57778) filed with the Commission on March 28, 2001).
10.8	*	Accord Networks Ltd. Share Ownership and Option Plan (2000) and form of agreement thereunder (which are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-57778) filed with the Commission on March 28, 2001).
10.9	*	Accord Networks Ltd. 2000 Share Option Plan and form of agreement thereunder (which are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-57778) filed with the Commission on March 28, 2001).
10.10		Accord Networks Ltd. 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and form of agreement thereunder (which are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-57778) filed with the Commission on March 28, 2001).
10.11		Circa Communications, Ltd Stock Option Plan and related agreements (which are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-59820) filed with the Commission on April 30, 2001).

10.12	*	Form of Change of Control Severance Agreement with the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, effective as of March 28, 2001 (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 16, 2001).
10.13	*	Form of Change of Control Severance Agreement with management of the Registrant other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, effective as of March 28, 2001 (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 16, 2001).
10.14		Amendment No. 1 to Lease by and between the Registrant and WJT, LLC, dated October 5, 2001, regarding the space located at 4750 Willow Road, Pleasanton, California (which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 1, 2002).
10.15		PictureTel Corporation 1998 Acquisition Stock Option Plan and form of Non-Statutory Stock Option (which are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-72544) filed with the Commission on October 31, 2001).
10.16	*	Polycom, Inc. 2001 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan and form of agreement thereunder (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on form 10-Q filed with the Commission on November 13, 2001.
10.17		Atlanta Signal Processors, Incorporated 1997 Incentive Stock Plan and forms of Stock Option Grant, Exercise Agreement and Employee Shareholder Agreement (which are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-76312) filed with the Commission on January 4, 2002).
10.18		Lease Agreement by and between PictureTel Corporation and 100 Minuteman Limited Partnership, dated October 10, 1995, as amended, regarding the space located at 100 Minuteman Rd., Andover, Massachusetts (which is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 1, 2002).
10.19	(1)*	Amended Summary and Rescission of Arrangement between the Registrant and Robert C. Hagerty.
21.1	(1)	Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1	(1)	Consent of Independent Accountants.
24.1	(1)	Power of Attorney (included on page 64 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

POLYCOM, INC.
/s/ ROBERT C. HAGERTY Robert C. Hagerty Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President

/s/ STANLEY J. MERESMAN Stanley J. Meresman	Director	March 17, 2003
/s/ WILLIAM A. OWENS William A. Owens	Director	March 17, 2003
/s/ THOMAS G. STEMBERG Thomas G. Stemberg	Director	March 17, 2003

March 17, 2003	By:	/s/ ROBERT C. HAGERTY
	Name:	Robert C. Hagerty
	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer

March 17, 2003	By:	/s/ MICHAEL R. KOUREY
	Name:	Michael R. Kourey
	Title:	Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer

					December 31,
					2002			2001
ASSETS
	Current assets:
		Cash and cash equivalents			$	155,191		$	126,832
		Short-term investments				38,670			23,348
		Trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,440 and $4,816 in 2002 and 2001, respectively				65,470			89,309
		Inventories				32,308			48,173
		Deferred taxes				29,787			49,941
		Prepaid expenses and other current assets				16,622			14,646

			Total current assets			338,048			352,249
	Property and equipment, net					28,428			28,945
	Long-term investments					319,147			68,682
	Goodwill					300,039			299,445
	Purchased intangibles, net					32,827			47,618
	Deferred taxes					53,446			15,184
	Other assets					4,939			9,042

			Total assets		$	1,076,874		$	821,165

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
	Current liabilities:
		Accounts payable			$	29,788		$	31,418
		Accrued payroll and related liabilities				7,540			9,864
		Taxes payable				44,338			24,053
		Deferred revenue				16,950			20,878
		Other accrued liabilities				36,519			64,387

			Total current liabilities			135,135			150,600
	Long-term liabilities					37,996			26,579

			Total liabilities			173,131			177,179

	Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
	Stockholders' equity:
		Preferred stock, $0.001 par value:
				Authorized: 5,000,000 shares in 2002 and 2001 Issued and outstanding: one share in 2002 and 2001		—			—
		Common stock, $0.0005 par value:
				Authorized: 175,000,000 shares
				Issued: 98,987,386 shares in 2002 and 91,475,974 shares in 2001; outstanding 98,987,386 shares in 2002 and 91,112,417 shares in 2001		50			46
		Additional paid-in capital				866,044			641,298
		Cumulative other comprehensive income				2,152			328
		Unearned stock-based compensation				(573	)		(1,244	)
		Treasury stock, at cost, none in 2002 and 363,557 in 2001				—			(11,182	)
		Retained earnings				36,070			14,740

			Total stockholders' equity			903,743			643,986

				Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,076,874		$	821,165

			Common Stock											Cumulative Other Comprehensive Income (loss)
			Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital			Unearned Stock-based Compensation			Treasury Stock					Retained Earnings (Deficit)
			Shares	Amount		Additional Paid-In Capital			Unearned Stock-based Compensation			Treasury Stock					Retained Earnings (Deficit)		Total
Balances, December 31, 1999			69,254,118	$	34	$	97,837		$	(1,953	)	$	—	$	(85	)	$	4,977	$	100,810
Comprehensive income:
	Change in unrealized loss on marketable securities		—		—		—			—			—		22			—		22
	Net income		—		—		—			—			—		—			37,463		37,463

		Total comprehensive income																		37,485

Issuance of stock, net of issuance costs			5,184,323		3		203,235			—			—		—			—		203,238
Conversion of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock into common stock			3,693,761		2		27,079			—			—		—			—		27,081
Issuance of stock related to exercise of warrants			324,833		—		—			—			—		—			—		—
Exercise of stock options under stock option plan			3,288,859		2		12,531			—			—		—			—		12,533
Shares purchased under employee stock purchase plan			223,094		—		2,433			—			—		—			—		2,433
Cost of registration statements			—		—		(85	)		—			—		—			—		(85	)
Valuation of options granted to outside consultants			—		—		122			—			—		—			—		122
Reversal of unearned stock-based compensation upon termination of employment			—		—		(498	)		498			—		—			—		—
Amortization of stock-based compensation			—		—		—			845			—		—			—		845
Tax benefit from stock option activity			—		—		38,321			—			—		—			—		38,321

Balances, December 31, 2000			81,968,988	$	41	$	380,975		$	(610	)	$	—	$	(63	)	$	42,440	$	422,783

Comprehensive loss:
	Change in unrealized gain on marketable securities		—		—