10-K 1 d10k.htm FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 1, 2006 Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 


FORM 10-K

 

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

     for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2006

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 0-32233

PEET’S COFFEE & TEA, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Washington   91-0863396
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

1400 Park Avenue

Emeryville, California 94608-3520

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)

(510) 594-2100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, no par value

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is well-known, seasoned filer (as defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Large Accelerated Filer  ¨        Accelerated Filer  x        Non-Accelerated Filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes  ¨    No  x

The approximate aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing price and shares of the Common Stock outstanding on July 3, 2005 (the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter) and February 24, 2006, as reported by the Nasdaq National Market, was $472,404,296 and $421,454,810, respectively. Shares of Common Stock held by each officer, director and each person known to the Company to hold 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded as such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the Company. Such determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of February 24, 2006, 13,923,185 shares of registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the proxy statement related to the registrant’s 2006 annual meeting of shareholders, which proxy statement will be filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 120 days of the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended January 1, 2006, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.

 



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

          Page
   PART I   

Item 1.

  

Business

   1

Item 1A.

  

Risk Factors

   6

Item 1B.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

   11

Item 2.

  

Properties

   11

Item 3.

  

Legal Proceedings

   12

Item 4.

  

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

   12
   PART II   

Item 5.

  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   13

Item 6.

  

Selected Financial Data

   14

Item 7.

  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   15

Item 7A.

  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

   24

Item 8.

  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   25

Item 9.

  

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure

   25

Item 9A.

  

Controls and Procedures

   25

Item 9B.

  

Other Information

   25
   PART III   

Item 10.

  

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

   26

Item 11.

  

Executive Compensation

   26

Item 12.

  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   26

Item 13.

  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

   26

Item 14.

  

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

   26
   PART IV   

Item 15.

  

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

   27
  

Signatures

   29


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the matters discussed under the captions “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation,” “Business” and elsewhere in this report include forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and assumptions about future events, including, among other things:

 

    Implementing our business strategy;

 

    Attracting and retaining customers;

 

    Obtaining and expanding our market presence in new geographic regions;

 

    The availability and pricing of high quality Arabica coffee beans;

 

    Consumers’ tastes and preferences; and

 

    Competition in our market.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “future,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” and similar expressions (or the negative of such expressions). These statements are based on our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results, levels of activity, performance, achievements and events may vary significantly from those implied by the forward-looking statements. A description of risks that could cause our results to vary appears under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K (“report”). Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report.

PART I

 

Item 1. Business

Peet’s Coffee & Tea (“Peet’s” or the “Company”) is a specialty coffee roaster and marketer of fresh roasted whole bean coffee. We sell our coffee under strict freshness standards through multiple channels of distribution including grocery stores, home delivery, office, restaurant and food service accounts and Company-owned and operated stores in six states.

We believe that roasted coffee is a perishable product and we pursue distribution channels that are consistent with our strict freshness standards. For instance, our distribution to grocery stores emphasizes the use of a direct store delivery (“DSD”) system where our employees or agents deliver fresh goods to our grocery partners. We roast to order and ship coffee directly from our roasting facility to our home delivery customers. Our goal is to ensure that customers receive coffee within days of roasting.

We have expanded from a retailer that operates its own outlets to a premium coffee brand available through multiple channels of distribution. We signed our first office coffee distribution agreement in 1997 and have since added a number of restaurants, food service accounts and office coffee distributors in select markets. We added online ordering capability to our website in 1997 to complement our existing mail order home delivery business and have since invested in marketing programs designed to support our home delivery channel. In 1998, we initiated a strategic expansion into specialty grocery and gourmet food stores. This expansion was further developed to include distribution to mainstream grocers as we expanded our grocery accounts from 130 to approximately 4,000 stores. We believe our expansion strategy emphasizes disciplined growth and enhancement of our brand’s image and quality reputation. We operate our business through two reportable segments: retail and specialty sales. See Note 13, “Segment Information” to the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included elsewhere in this report.

 

1


Table of Contents

Our website is located at www.peets.com. Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments or exhibits to those reports, are available free of charge through our website at http://peets.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them with, or furnish them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Company was organized as a Washington corporation in 1971.

Company Retail Stores

At January 1, 2006, we operated 111 retail stores in six states through which we sell whole bean coffee, beverages and pastries, tea, and other related items. Our stores are designed to facilitate the sale of fresh whole bean coffee and to encourage customer trial of our coffee through coffee beverages. Each store has a dedicated staff person at the bean counter to take orders and assist customers with questions on coffee origins and on home brewing. Upon order, beans are scooped and ground to the customer’s specific requirements. At our beverage counter, we rotate and sell freshly-brewed coffees and coffee-based beverages to promote customer familiarity, sampling, and sales of whole-bean coffees. To ensure that our freshness standards are consistently met, it is our policy not to serve brewed coffee that is more than 30 minutes old and every espresso based drink is made to order using freshly pulled shots of espresso and freshly steamed milk. See “Item 2. Properties” for further discussion about our retail stores.

Specialty Sales

Grocery

In addition to sales through our retail stores, we have expanded the availability of our products through a network of grocery stores, including Safeway, Albertson’s, Ralph’s and Whole Foods Market. To support this expansion, we have developed a DSD sales and distribution system. Peet’s DSD route sales representatives deliver to their stores weekly, properly shelve the product, resolve pricing discrepancies, rotate to ensure freshness, sell and erect free-standing displays and forge store-level selling relationships. We currently have 135 DSD route sales representatives, of which approximately 37 are full-time Peet’s employees, to continue to support the expansion into new grocery accounts in the western United States and our existing grocery customers.

Home Delivery

In the home delivery channel, we have a dedicated website and customer service representatives that provide points of contact to our customers for coffee ordering and coffee knowledge. Our website, peets.com, features an Express Buy function for registered customers for speed and ease, special coffee and tea programs and a coffee and tea selector to assist the customer in choosing a product based upon certain characteristics. Peets.com also features a proprietary tool that allows customers to manage the timing and delivery of their recurring orders. In 2004, we implemented our Peetnik Loyalty Program to reward our most loyal home delivery customers who maintain regular, ongoing deliveries of coffee or tea. This program has proven to be successful in growing our home delivery business online by engaging our most loyal customers to establish regular deliveries of fresh roasted coffee or tea. In addition to our website, we have a team of mail order customer service representatives who assist customers in placing customer orders, choosing a gift item, providing product information and resolving customer issues. Customer service representatives are regularly trained on Peet’s product offerings through weekly coffee and tea tastings.

Food Service and Office

In the food service and office business, we have a staff of sales and account managers who make sales calls to potential and existing accounts and manage our distributor network. Additionally, we have established relationships with office, restaurant and food service distributors to expand our account base in select markets. These distributors have their own sales and account management resources.

 

2


Table of Contents

Our Coffee

Coffee Beans

Coffee is an agricultural crop that undergoes price fluctuation and quality changes depending on weather, economic and political conditions in coffee producing countries. We purchase only Arabica coffee beans, which are considered superior to beans traded in the commodity market. Thus, the Arabica beans purchased by us tend to trade on a negotiated basis at a substantial premium above commodity coffee prices, depending upon the supply and demand at the time of purchase. Our access to high quality Arabica beans depends on our relationships with coffee brokers, exporters and growers, with whom we have built long-term relationships to ensure a steady supply of coffee beans. We believe that, as a result of our reputation that has been built over 39 years, we have access to some of the highest quality coffee beans from the finest estates and growing regions around the world and we are occasionally presented with opportunities to purchase unique and special coffees.

Unlike roasted coffee beans, green coffee beans are not highly perishable. We generally turn our inventory of green coffee beans two to three times per year. We typically carry approximately $7 million to $15 million worth of green coffee beans in our inventory. We mitigate the risks associated with fluctuations in coffee prices by entering into fixed price commitments and in the past, hedging agreements, for a portion of our green coffee bean requirements.

Our Roasting Method

Our roasting method was first developed by Alfred Peet and further honed by our talented and skilled roasting personnel who make a long-term commitment to our artisan craft. We roast by hand in small batches, and we rely on the skills and training of each roaster to maximize the flavor and potential in our beans. Our roasters undergo an extensive apprenticeship program to learn our roasting method and to gain the skills necessary to roast coffee at Peet’s.

Coffee Types and Blends

Beyond sourcing and roasting, we have developed a reputation for expert coffee blending. Our blends, such as Major Dickason’s Blend®, are well regarded by our customers for their uniqueness, consistency and special flavor characteristics. We sell approximately 32 types of coffee as regular menu items, Including approximately 21 blends and 11 single origin coffees such as Colombia, Guatemala, Sumatra and Kenya. We also offer a line of high-end reserve coffees including JR Reserve Blend® and Kona, and we have also featured seasonal reserve coffees such as Jamaica Blue Mountain and Aged Sulawesi Peaberry. We are active in seeking, roasting and selling unique special lot and one-time coffees. On average, we offer four to six such coffees every year, including our Anniversary Blend and Holiday Blend.

Tea, Food and Merchandise

Peet’s offers a line of hand selected whole leaf and bagged tea. Our quality standards for tea are very high. We purchase tea directly from importers and brokers and store and pack the tea at our facility in Emeryville. We offer a limited line of specialty food items, such as jellies, jams and candies. These products are carefully selected for quality and uniqueness.

Our merchandise program consists of items such as brewing equipment for coffee and tea, paper filters and brewing accessories and branded and non-branded cups, saucers, travel mugs and serveware. We do not emphasize these items, but we carry them in retail stores and offer them through home delivery as a means to reinforce our commitment to premium home-brewed coffee and tea.

 

3


Table of Contents

Competitive Positioning

The specialty coffee market can be characterized as highly fragmented. Our primary competitors in whole bean specialty coffee sales include Gevalia (Kraft Foods), Green Mountain Coffee, Illy Caffé, Millstone (Procter & Gamble), Seattle’s Best (Starbucks) and Starbucks. There are numerous smaller, regional brands that also compete in this category. Premium coffee brands may serve as substitutes for our whole bean coffee and we also compete indirectly against all other coffee brands on the market.

In addition to competing with other distributors of whole bean coffee, we compete with retailers of prepared beverages, including coffee house chains, particularly Starbucks, numerous convenience stores, restaurants, coffee shops and street vendors.

We believe that our customers choose among specialty coffee brands based upon quality, variety, convenience, and to a lesser extent, price. Although consumers may differentiate coffee brands based on freshness (as an element of coffee quality), to our knowledge, few significant competitors focus on product freshness and roast-dating in the same manner as Peet’s. We believe that our market share in the specialty category is based on a solidly differentiated position built on our freshness standards and artisan-roasting style. Because of the fragmented nature of the specialty coffee market, we cannot accurately estimate our market share. However, many of our existing competitors have significantly greater financial, marketing and operating resources.

Our roasted coffee is priced in tiers. Our regular menu coffees are currently priced in our retail locations within a range of $9.95 to $17.95 per pound. Our line of high-end reserve coffees introduced in 2001 are priced between $49.90 and $79.90 per pound. In the grocery channel, we sell our coffee in 12 ounce packages at prices established by the grocery store. Most grocery stores sell our product at a price between $9.99 and $10.99 for a 12 ounce bag.

Intellectual Property

We regard intellectual property and other proprietary rights as important to our success. We place high value on our Peet’s trade name, and we own several trademarks and service marks that have been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including Peet’s®, Peet’s Coffee & Tea®, peets.com®, Blend 101®, Espresso Forte®, Fresh Fridays®, Gaia Organic Blend®, Garuda Blend®, JR Reserve Blend®, Maduro Blend®, Major Dickason’s Blend®, Pride of the Port®, Pumphrey’s Blend®, Sierra Dorada Blend®, Summer House®, Snow Leopard®, Top Blend® and Vine Street Blend®. We also have registered trademarks on our stylized logo. In addition, we have applications pending with the United States Patent and Trademark Office for a number of additional marks including eCup and A Cup Is Worth A Thousand Words.

We own registered trademarks for our name and logo in Argentina, Australia, Canada, Chile, China, the European Union, Hong Kong, Japan, Paraguay, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand. We have filed additional applications for trademark protection in Brazil and the Philippines. In addition to peets.com and coffee.com, we own several other domain names relating to coffee, Peet’s and our roasting process.

In addition to registered and pending trademarks, we consider the packaging for our coffee beans (consisting of dark brown coloring with African-style motif and lettering with a white band running around the lower quarter of the bag) and the design of the interior of our stores (consisting of dark wood fixtures, classic lighting, granite countertops and understated color) to be strong identifiers of our brand. Although we consider our packaging and store design to be essential to our brand identity, we have not applied to register these trademarks and trade dress, and thus cannot rely on the legal protections afforded by trademark registration.

Our ability to differentiate our brand from those of our competitors depends, in part, on the strength and enforcement of our trademarks. We must constantly protect against any infringement by competitors. If a competitor infringes on our trademark rights, we may have to litigate to protect our rights, in which case, we may incur significant expenses and divert significant attention from our business operations.

 

4


Table of Contents

Information Systems

The information systems installed at Peet’s are used to manage our operations and increase the productivity of our workforce. We believe our point-of-sale system increases store productivity, provides a higher level of service to our customers and maintains timely information for performance evaluation. Our registers have touch screen components and full point-of-sale capability. In 2002, during the rollout of our DSD system in the grocery channel, we implemented a grocery order entry and invoice system with handheld capability that allows our route sales representatives to provide service and information on the spot. In 2003, we implemented business intelligence software to better support and analyze our business in all channels. In 2004, we deployed an integrated labor and scheduling system in our retail stores to improve productivity and customer service.

Our website, www.peets.com, is hosted at our corporate headquarters in Emeryville, California. All website applications are built on Microsoft ASP with in-house development. We offer full-functioning e-commerce and our website is integrated with our call center for access to orders placed at both locations. Online delivery confirmation is provided by United Parcel Service and the United States Postal Service. Our website contains several customer-centered functions. Manage Deliveries is an application which enables consumers to schedule recurring deliveries including choosing specific coffees and teas to be delivered at the frequency of their choice. Other important customer functions include a coffee and tea selector, Express Buy and multiple “ship-to” capability on a single bill. Additionally, customers with Peet’s cards can check their balance as well as reload their card online. We designed our website to provide fast, easy and effective operation when navigating and shopping on our website. We have dedicated information technology employees and marketing staffers for website maintenance, improvement, development and performance.

Employees

As of February 24, 2006, we employ a workforce of 2,813 people, approximately 478 of whom work approximately 40 hours per week and are considered full-time employees. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good. Since 1979, we have provided full benefits to all employees who work at least 21 hours per week and have worked at least 500 total hours for the Company. We continue to offer competitive benefits packages to attract and retain valuable employees.

Government Regulation

Our coffee roasting operations and our retail stores are subject to various governmental laws, regulations, and licenses relating to customs, health and safety, building and land use, and environmental protection. Our roasting facility is subject to state and local air-quality and emissions regulations. If we encounter difficulties in obtaining any necessary licenses or complying with these laws and regulations, then:

 

    The opening of new retail locations could be delayed;

 

    The operation of existing retail locations or our coffee roasting operations could be interrupted; or

 

    Our product offerings could be limited.

We believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with all such laws and regulations and that we have obtained all material licenses that are required for the operation of our business. We are not aware of any environmental regulations that have or that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our operations.

 

5


Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Set forth below is information with respect to the names, ages, positions and offices of our executive officers as of February 24, 2006.

 

Name

   Age   

Position

Patrick J. O’Dea

   44    Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Thomas P. Cawley

   45    Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Secretary

James E. Grimes

   50    Vice President, Operations and Information Systems

Bruce E. Schroder

   46    Vice President, General Manager Retail

Patrick J. O’Dea has served as Chief Executive Officer, President and as a director since May 2002. From April 1997 to March 2001, he was CEO of Archway/Mother’s Cookies and Mother’s Cake & Cookie Company. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. O’Dea was the Vice President and General Manager of the Specialty Cheese Division of Stella Foods. From 1984 to 1995, he was with Procter & Gamble, where he marketed several of the company’s snack and beverage brands.

Thomas P. Cawley has served as Chief Financial Officer since July 2003. From August 2000 to June 2003, he was at Gap, Inc. serving as Chief Financial Officer, Gap Brand. From 1986 to August 2000, Mr. Cawley was at PepsiCo/Yum Brands (formerly Tricon Global Restaurants), holding various positions such as Director of Finance, Vice President—Controller, and Chief Financial Officer; Pizza Hut. Previous to 1986, Mr. Cawley was with The Quaker Oats Company and General Foods.

James E. Grimes has served as Vice President of Operations and Information Systems since July 2002. In August 2001, Mr. Grimes founded Supply Chain Consulting, where he provided supply chain management expertise. From 1998 to 2001, he was Senior Vice President of Operations at Archway/Mother’s Cookies. Previously, Mr. Grimes held various positions at Mother’s Cake and Cookie Company, Frito Lay and Procter & Gamble.

Bruce E. Schroder has served as Vice President since June 2003. He is currently serving as Vice President, General Manager Retail and was our Vice President of Specialty from June 2003 to January 2005. From December 2001 through May 2003, he was CEO for HomeGain.com, Inc. an Internet based real estate company. Prior to that, Mr. Schroder spent a combined total of nearly 16 years with PepsiCo, in finance, sales, marketing and general management roles for Pepsi Bottling Group, Taco Bell, Pepsi Fountain Beverage, The North American Coffee Partnership and SoBe. Mr. Schroder began his career as a CPA with Arthur Andersen & Co. and also served as Executive Vice President of Retail Marketing for Wells Fargo Bank.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We may not be successful in the implementation of our business strategy or our business strategy may not be successful, either of which will impede our growth and operating results.

Our business strategy emphasizes expansion through multiple channels of distribution. Currently, our retail stores, which generated over 67% of our 2005 net revenue, continue to be an important element of our business. We do not know whether we will be able to successfully implement our business strategy or whether our business strategy will be successful. Our ability to implement this business strategy is dependent on our ability to:

 

    Market our products on a national scale and over the internet;

 

    Enter into distribution and other strategic arrangements with third party retailers and other potential distributors of our coffee;

 

    Increase our brand recognition on a national scale;

 

6


Table of Contents
    Identify and lease strategic locations suitable for new stores; and

 

    Manage growth in administrative overhead and distribution costs likely to result from the planned expansion of our retail and non-retail distribution channels.

Our revenue may be adversely affected if we fail to implement our business strategy or if we divert resources to a business strategy that ultimately proves unsuccessful.

Because our business is highly dependent on a single product, specialty coffee, if the demand for specialty coffee decreases, our business could suffer.

Sales of specialty coffee constituted nearly 84% of our 2005 net revenue. Demand for specialty coffee is affected by many factors, including:

 

    Consumer tastes and preferences;

 

    National, regional and local economic conditions;

 

    Demographic trends; and

 

    Perceived or actual health benefits or risks.

Because we are highly dependent on consumer demand for specialty coffee, a shift in consumer preferences away from specialty coffee would harm our business more than if we had more diversified product offerings. If customer demand for specialty coffee decreases, our sales would decrease accordingly.

If we fail to continue to develop and maintain our brand, our business could suffer.

We believe that maintaining and developing our brand is critical to our success and that the importance of brand recognition may increase as a result of competitors offering products similar to ours. Because the majority of our retail stores are located on the West Coast, primarily in California, our brand recognition remains largely regional. Our brand building initiative involves increasing the availability of our products and opening new stores to increase awareness of our brand and create and maintain brand loyalty. If our brand building initiative is unsuccessful, we may never recover the expenses incurred in connection with these efforts and we may be unable to increase our future revenue or implement our business strategy.

Our success in promoting and enhancing the Peet’s brand will also depend on our ability to provide customers with high quality products and customer service. Although we take measures to ensure that we sell only fresh roasted whole bean coffee and that our retail employees properly prepare our coffee beverages, we have no control over our whole bean coffee products once purchased by customers. Accordingly, customers may prepare coffee from our whole bean coffee inconsistent with our standards, store our whole bean coffee for long periods of time or resell our whole bean coffee without our consent, which in each case, potentially affects the quality of the coffee prepared from our products. If customers do not perceive our products and service to be of high quality, then the value of our brand may be diminished and, consequently, our ability to implement our business strategy may be adversely affected.

Because our business is based primarily in California, a worsening of economic conditions, a decrease in consumer spending or a change in the competitive conditions in this market may substantially decrease our revenue and may adversely impact our ability to implement our business strategy.

Our California retail stores generated 59% of our 2005 net revenue and a substantial portion of the revenue from our other distribution channels is generated in California. We expect that our California operations will continue to generate a substantial portion of our revenue. In addition, our California retail stores provide us with means for increasing brand awareness, building customer loyalty and creating a premium specialty coffee brand.

 

7


Table of Contents

As a result, an economic downturn or other decrease in consumer spending in California may not only lead to a substantial decrease in revenue, but may also adversely impact our ability to market our brand, build customer loyalty, or otherwise implement our business strategy.

Labor conditions in the grocery business could negatively impact our grocery business.

There have been grocery strikes in the past that have negatively impacted our grocery business and it is possible that future grocery strikes in places where we have large distribution may adversely impact our grocery business.

Government mandatory healthcare requirements could adversely affect our profits.

The Company offers healthcare benefits to all employees who work at least 21 hours a week and meet service eligibility requirements. In the past, some states, including California, have unsuccessfully proposed legislation mandating that employers pay healthcare premiums into a state run fund for all employees immediately upon hiring. If legislation similar to this were to be enacted in the states we do business, it could have an adverse affect on the company’s profits.

If we are unable to continue leasing our retail locations or obtain leases for new stores, our existing operations and our ability to expand may be adversely affected.

All of our 111 retail locations at year-end are on leased premises. If we are unable to renew these leases, our revenue and profits could suffer. In addition, we intend to lease other premises in connection with the planned expansion of our retail operations. Because we compete with other retailers and restaurants for store sites and some landlords may grant exclusive locations to our competitors, we may not be able to obtain new leases or renew existing leases on acceptable terms. This could adversely impact our revenue growth and brand building initiatives.

Because we rely heavily on common carriers to ship our coffee on a daily basis, any disruption in their services or increase in shipping costs could adversely affect our business.

We rely on a number of common carriers to deliver coffee to our customers and retail stores. We consider roasted coffee a perishable product and we rely on these common carriers to deliver fresh roasted coffee on a daily basis. We have no control over these common carriers and the services provided by them may be interrupted as a result of labor shortages, contract disputes or other factors. If we experience an interruption in these services, we may be unable to ship our coffee in a timely manner. A delay in shipping could:

 

    Have an adverse impact on the quality of the coffee shipped, and thereby adversely affect our brand and reputation;

 

    Result in the disposal of an amount of coffee that could not be shipped in a timely manner; and

 

    Require us to contract with alternative, and possibly more expensive, common carriers.

Any significant increase in shipping costs could lower our profit margins or force us to raise prices, which could cause our revenue and profits to suffer.

We depend on the expertise of key personnel. If these individuals leave or change their role within our Company without effective replacements, our operations may suffer.

The success of our business is dependent to a large degree on our management and our coffee roasters and purchasers. If members of our management leave without effective replacements, our ability to implement our business strategy could be impaired. If we lost the services of our coffee roasters and purchasers, our ability to source and purchase a sufficient supply of high quality coffee beans and roast coffee beans consistent with our quality standards could suffer. In either case, our business and operations could be adversely affected.

 

8


Table of Contents

We may not be able to hire or retain additional management and other personnel and our recruiting and training costs may increase as a result of turnover, both of which may increase our costs and reduce our profits and may adversely impact our ability to implement our business strategy.

The success of our business depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly motivated, well-qualified management and other personnel, including technical personnel and retail employees. We face significant competition in the recruitment of qualified employees. Our ability to execute our business strategy may suffer if:

 

    We are unable to recruit or retain a sufficient number of qualified employees;

 

    The costs of employee compensation or benefits increase substantially; or

 

    The costs of outsourcing certain tasks to third party providers increase substantially.

Because we have only one roasting facility, a significant interruption in the operation of this facility could potentially disrupt our operations.

We have only one coffee roasting and distribution facility. A significant interruption in the operation of this facility, whether as a result of a natural disaster or other causes, could significantly impair our ability to operate our business. Since we only roast our coffee to order, we do not carry inventory of roasted coffee in our roasting plant. Therefore, a disruption in service in our roasting facility would impact our sales in our retail and specialty channels almost immediately. Moreover, our roasting and distribution facility and most of our stores are located near several major earthquake faults. The impact of a major earthquake on our facilities, infrastructure and overall operations is difficult to predict and an earthquake could seriously disrupt our entire business.

Our earthquake insurance covers net income, continuing normal operating expenses and extra expenses incurred during the period of restoration. However, in the event of a catastrophic earthquake, our coverage is limited and we would incur additional expenses.

We have a high deductible workers’ compensation insurance program and more claims and higher costs from these claims may adversely affect our profits.

Our current workers’ compensation insurance program is a modified self-insured program with a high deductible with an overall program ceiling to limit exposure. The California workers’ compensation environment has been unpredictable with continually increasing costs in the past five years. The majority of our business is in California; therefore, we are exposed to the same increased costs. Additionally, we have had to estimate our liability for existing claims whose outcome is uncertain. While we believe our reserve methodology on these claims is appropriate today, unfavorable development in this area will also affect any open claims that were filed beginning March 2002, the date we transitioned to a high deductible program. Should a greater amount of claims occur or the settlement costs increase beyond what was anticipated, our expenses could increase and our profitability may decrease.

Increases in the cost and decreases in availability of high quality Arabica coffee beans could impact our profitability and growth of our business.

Green coffee is our largest single cost of sales. We do not purchase coffee on the commodity markets, but price movements in the trading of coffee do impact the price we pay. Over the past fifteen months, the commodity cost for coffee has risen above the range it was trading in for the prior three to four years. Coffee is a trade commodity and, in general, its price can fluctuate depending on:

 

    Weather patterns in coffee-producing countries;

 

    Economic and political conditions affecting coffee-producing countries;

 

    Foreign currency fluctuations;

 

9


Table of Contents
    The ability of coffee-producing countries to agree to export quotas; and

 

    General economic conditions that make commodities more or less attractive investment options.

If the cost of our green coffee beans increases due to any of these or other factors impacting us negatively, we many not be able to pass along those costs to our customers because of the competitive nature of the specialty coffee industry. If we are unable to pass along increased coffee costs, our margin will decrease and our profitability will suffer accordingly. If we are not able to purchase sufficient quantities of high quality Arabica beans due to any of the above factors, we many not be able to fulfill the demand for our coffee, our revenue may decrease and our ability to expand our business may also suffer.

Our roasting methods are not proprietary, so competitors may be able to duplicate them, which could harm our competitive position.

We consider our roasting methods essential to the flavor and richness of our roasted whole bean coffee and, therefore, essential to our brand. Because we do not hold any patents for our roasting methods, it may be difficult for us to prevent competitors from copying our roasting methods. If our competitors copy our roasting methods, the value of our brand may be diminished, and we may lose customers to our competitors. In addition, competitors may be able to develop roasting methods that are more advanced than our roasting methods, which may also harm our competitive position.

Competition in the specialty coffee market is intense and could affect our profits.

Competition in the specialty coffee market is becoming increasingly intense as relatively low barriers to entry encourage new competitors to enter the specialty coffee market. Our whole bean specialty coffee competes with several major national brands, such as Gevalia (Kraft Foods), Green Mountain Coffee, Illy Caffé, Millstone (Procter & Gamble), Seattle’s Best (Starbucks) and Starbucks, as well as numerous smaller, regional brands. In addition, we compete indirectly against all other coffee brands on the market. A number of nationwide coffee marketers, such as Kraft Foods, Procter & Gamble and Nestlé, are distributing premium coffee brands in supermarkets. These premium coffee brands may serve as substitutes for our whole bean coffee. In addition to competing with other distributors of whole bean coffee, we compete with retailers of prepared beverages, including coffee house chains, such as Starbucks and The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf, numerous convenience stores, restaurants, coffee shops and street vendors. If we do not succeed in effectively differentiating ourselves from our competitors or our competitors adopt our strategies, then our competitive position will be weakened.

Despite competing in a fragmented product category, whole bean specialty coffee brands are being established across multiple distribution channels. Several competitors have been aggressive in obtaining distribution in specialty grocery and gourmet food stores, through online and mail order and in office, restaurant and food service locations. Other competitors may have an advantage over us based on their earlier entry into these distribution channels.

Many of these new market entrants may have substantially greater financial, marketing and operating resources than we do. In addition, many of our existing competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing and operating resources than Peet’s.

Lawsuits and other claims against the Company may adversely affect our profits.

We may from time to time become involved in certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, such as the two lawsuits filed in 2003 against us entitled Brian Taraz, et al. vs. Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc., and Tracy Coffee, et al. vs. Peet’s Coffee & Tea, Inc. In investigating any claims against the Company or defending any allegations, we may incur legal fees, settlement fees, damages or remediation expenses that may harm our business, reducing our sales and adversely affecting our profitability.

 

10


Table of Contents

Adverse public or medical opinion about caffeine may harm our business.

Our specialty coffee contains significant amounts of caffeine and other active compounds, the health effects of some of which are not fully understood. A number of research studies conclude or suggest that excessive consumption of caffeine may lead to increased heart rate, nausea and vomiting, restlessness and anxiety, depression, headaches, tremors, sleeplessness and other adverse health effects. An unfavorable report on the health effects of caffeine or other compounds present in coffee could significantly reduce the demand for coffee, which could harm our business and reduce our sales and profits.

Adverse publicity regarding customer complaints may harm our business.

We may be the subject of complaints or litigation from customers alleging beverage and food-related illnesses, injuries suffered on the premises or other quality, health or operational concerns. Adverse publicity resulting from such allegations may materially adversely affect us, regardless of whether such allegations are true or whether we are ultimately held liable.

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

 

Item 2. Properties

Peet’s headquarters are located in Emeryville, California, where the Company leases approximately 103,000 square feet of office and production space in multiple locations, including roasting and direct delivery fulfillment facilities. Within these facilities, we have 29,000 square feet devoted to general corporate and retail overhead and a call center for the home delivery business. In August 2005, in anticipation of converting our existing plant to office space, we exercised our option to extend our current lease for an additional ten years through October 2015 with two five year options and the ability to terminate early if needed during the first two years of the lease.

On November 29, 2005, we entered into an agreement with Harbor Bay Acquisition LLC to purchase property in Alameda, California for the purpose of operating a new roasting facility. The agreement specifies that, upon completion of construction, the Company will acquire approximately 460,000 square feet of land and a 135,000 square foot building with related site improvements as specified. Harbor Bay Acquisition LLC will manage the construction of the facility, which has been specifically designed for the Company and upon successful completion, the Company is obligated to purchase the facility and the land. The Company anticipates the plant to be at full production capability by April 2007. See “Item 7. Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further discussion.

In 2005, we opened 20 new stores and closed 1 store. Our retail locations are all company-owned and operated in leased facilities. Our stores are typically located in urban neighborhoods, suburban shopping centers (usually consisting of grocery, specialty and service stores) and on high-traffic streets.

The following table lists the number of retail locations as of January 1, 2006:

 

                Location    Number

Northern California

   71

Southern California

   24

Illinois

   2

Oregon

   5

Massachusetts

   6

Washington

   2

Colorado

   1
    

Total

   111
    

 

11


Table of Contents
Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We may from time to time become involved in certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Currently, the Company is not a party to any legal proceedings that management believes would have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the quarter ended January 1, 2006.

 

12


Table of Contents

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market for the Registrant’s Stock

The Company’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “PEET”. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices for our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market for each quarter during the last two fiscal years.

 

     High    Low

Fiscal Year Ended January 1, 2006

     

Fourth Quarter

   $ 33.27    $ 28.12

Third Quarter

     36.80      29.40

Second Quarter

     34.00      25.13

First Quarter

     26.40      23.26

Fiscal Year Ended January 2, 2005

     

Fourth Quarter

   $ 27.15    $ 22.70

Third Quarter

     25.66      21.66

Second Quarter

     24.34      21.00

First Quarter

     21.41      16.25

As of February 24, 2006, there were approximately 323 registered holders of record of the Company’s common stock. On February 24, 2006, the last sale price reported on the Nasdaq National Market for the common stock was $30.27 per share.

Dividend Policy

We have not declared or paid any dividends on our capital stock since 1990. We expect to retain any future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our business. Therefore, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

Use of Proceeds from Sales of Registered Securities

We completed our initial public offering of our common stock in January and February 2001 pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-1 initially filed on October 13, 2000, as subsequently amended (File No. 333-47597). As of February 24, 2006, the total net proceeds of $17.8 million from the offering had been used for debt reduction.

We completed our secondary public offering of our common stock in April 2002 pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-3 initially filed on March 27, 2002, as subsequently amended (File No. 333-85085). Net proceeds from the offering were $41.0 million. As of February 24, 2006, all of the net proceeds were invested in interest-bearing, U.S. government, agency and municipal obligations. We expect that our use of proceeds from our secondary offering will conform to the intended use of proceeds as described in our prospectus dated April 19, 2002, except that a portion of the proceeds is expected to be used to purchase a new roasting facility and underlying land (see “Item 7. Liquidity and Capital Resources”) and the proceeds have been invested in interest-bearing, U.S. government, agency, municipal and guaranteed student loan obligations until required for that purpose or for working capital purposes.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table sets forth all purchases made by us or any “affiliated purchaser” as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) of the Exchange Act of the Company’s common stock during 2005.

 

Period

  

(a)

Total Number of
Shares Purchased (1)

  

(b)

Average Price
Paid per Share (1)

  

(c)

Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs (1)

  

(d)

Maximum Number
of Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs (1)

November 7 – December 5, 2005

   174,000    $ 28.30    174,000    589,504
                     

Total

   174,000    $ 28.30    174,000    589,504
                     

 

13


Table of Contents

(1) Represents purchases made by the Company pursuant to its stock purchase program. On February 11, 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to 1.0 million shares of Peet’s common stock, with no expiration, and the Company announced its plan on February 12, 2004 on Form 8-K. As of February 24, 2006, 410,496 shares have been purchased. The Company expects to make purchases from time to time on the open market at prevailing market prices or in negotiated transactions off the market.

 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The table below shows selected consolidated financial data for our last five fiscal years. Our fiscal year is based on a 52 or 53 week year and ends on the Sunday closest to the last day in December.

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related not