10-K 1 a06-6854_210k.htm ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 AND 15(D)

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                    to

 

Commission File Number 1-32315


NEW YORK & COMPANY, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE

 

33-1031445

(State or other jurisdiction of

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

incorporation or organization)

 

 

450 West 33rd Street, 5th Floor,

 

 

NEW YORK, NEW YORK

 

10001

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

(212) 884-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

 

New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None.

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o   No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o   No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x   No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer x

 

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o   No x

The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates as of July 29, 2005 was approximately $344.7 million, using the closing price per share of $23.54, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange as of such date.

The number of shares of registrant’s common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2006 was 55,321,873.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Part III incorporates certain information by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 




ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K INDEX

 

 

 

Page

PART I.

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

 

Business

 

3

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

 

10

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

 

18

Item 2.

 

Properties

 

18

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

18

Item 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

18

PART II.

 

 

 

 

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

19

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

 

19

Item 7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

22

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

36

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

36

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

36

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

36

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

 

37

PART III.

 

 

 

 

Item 10.

 

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

38

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

 

38

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

38

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

38

Item 14.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

38

PART IV.

 

 

 

 

Item 15.

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

39

 

2




Part I

Item 1.   Business

Overview

New York & Company, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, collectively the “Company”) is a leading specialty retailer of fashion-oriented, moderately-priced women’s apparel. The Company designs and sources its proprietary branded New York & Company™ merchandise sold exclusively through its national network of retail stores. The target customers for New York & Companymerchandise are fashion-conscious, value-sensitive women between the ages of 25 and 45. On July 19, 2005, the Company acquired Jasmine Company, Inc. (“JasmineSola”), a Boston-based, privately held women’s retailer of upscale and contemporary apparel, footwear and accessories sold through its chain of JasmineSola branded retail stores. As of January 28, 2006, the Company operated 519 retail stores with 3.3 million selling square feet in 45 states, including 14 stores acquired from JasmineSola and two new JasmineSola stores. Trademarks referenced in this Annual Report on Form 10-K appear in italic type and are the property of the Company. Unless otherwise noted, the description of the Company’s business in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refers to the New York & Company business.

The Company offers a merchandise assortment consisting of casual and wear-to-work apparel and accessories, including pants, jackets, knit tops, blouses, sweaters, denim, t-shirts, activewear, handbags and jewelry. The Company’s merchandise reflects current fashions and fulfills a broad spectrum of its customers’ lifestyle and wardrobe requirements.

The Company positions its stores as a source of fashion, quality and value by providing its customers with an appealing merchandise assortment at attractive price points, generally below those of department stores and other specialty retailers. The Company believes its stores create an exciting shopping experience through the use of compelling window displays, creative and coordinated merchandise presentations and in-store promotional signage. The Company’s stores are typically concentrated in large population centers of the United States and are located in shopping malls, lifestyle centers and off-mall locations, including urban street locations.

The Company was founded in 1918 and operated as a subsidiary of Limited Brands from 1985 to 2002. Beginning in 1996, the Company undertook a series of significant strategic initiatives intended to improve its profitability and position it for future growth. These initiatives included:

·       Real Estate Portfolio Rationalization. Starting in 1996, the Company began a thorough evaluation of its store real estate portfolio in an effort to rationalize its store base through the closing of underperforming locations. The Company concluded that a significant number of its stores were either too large or located in undesirable locations. Since 1996, the Company closed 442 stores that were collectively only marginally profitable. These stores had an average size of approximately 8,300 gross square feet compared to approximately 5,500 gross square feet for the Company’s new store model. The Company’s real estate rationalization is substantially complete.

·       In-House Design and Sourcing Model Implementation. Beginning in 1997, the Company implemented an in-house flexible, cost-effective design and sourcing model that allowed it to bring a broader range of merchandise to market more rapidly and efficiently and to capitalize on current trends and fast-selling items. Concurrent with this change, all merchandise in the New York & Company stores was converted to carry the New York & Company label.

·       Brand Repositioning. During 2000, the Company completed a comprehensive brand evaluation and began a transition from the Lerner New York store name to the New York & Company brand. The Company made significant changes across the marketing and merchandising elements of its business, including storefront signage, packaging, in-store visuals and promotional materials.

3




Currently, all of the Company’s stores operate under New York & Company storefront signage. Over the next several years, the Company intends to further modernize its brand image by remodeling a significant portion of its current New York & Company store base to create an environment that reinforces a consistent brand image, including changing the interior of these stores from the previous format to the current New York & Company design.

New York & Company, Inc., formerly known as NY & Co. Group, Inc., was incorporated in the state of Delaware on November 8, 2002. It was formed to acquire all of the outstanding stock of Lerner New York Holding, Inc. (“Lerner Holding”) and its subsidiaries from Limited Brands, Inc. (“Limited Brands”), an unrelated company. On November 27, 2002, several limited partnerships controlled by Bear Stearns Merchant Capital II, L.P. (together with any affiliates through which such partnerships invest, “Bear Stearns Merchant Banking”) acquired Lerner Holding and its subsidiaries from Limited Brands (the “acquisition of Lerner Holding”).

On October 6, 2004, the Company completed an initial public offering of 11,500,000 shares of common stock, including the underwriters’ over-allotment option, of which 6,666,667 shares were offered by the Company and 4,833,333 shares were offered by certain selling stockholders at a price to the public of $17.00 per share.

On January 25, 2006, the Company completed a public offering of 8,050,000 shares of common stock, including the underwriters’ over-allotment option, of which 130,000 shares were offered by the Company and 7,920,000 shares were offered by certain selling stockholders at a price to the public of $18.50 per share.

The Company’s Growth Strategies

Expand the Company’s Store Base

Increasing market penetration by opening new stores is an important component of the Company’s growth strategies. The Company is also remodeling its existing stores to improve sales productivity and the consistency of the customers’ brand experience. The Company opened 46 stores, including two JasmineSola stores, in fiscal year 2005, adding 203,302 selling square feet, ending the fiscal year operating 519 stores with 3.3 million selling square feet. The Company intends to open an additional 50 to 60 stores, including eight to 10 JasmineSola stores, in fiscal year 2006. During fiscal year 2005, the Company remodeled 41 stores and closed 17 stores, resulting in a reduction of 177,367 selling square feet. The reduction in non-productive selling square feet is an integral component of the Company’s program to improve productivity and profitability.

Increase Sales of Apparel and Further Penetrate Existing Accessories Product Categories

The Company intends to continue to grow sales of both apparel and accessories products. The Company believes that it can increase sales of apparel by providing its customers fashion, quality and value with an appealing merchandise assortment at attractive price points. The Company believes expansion of the accessories product categories represents an opportunity to increase the productivity of its store base and thereby increase sales and profits. The Company has successfully launched a new accessories merchandise area in several of its existing stores. The Company has been encouraged by the results and plans on incorporating accessories merchandise areas in connection with a portion of its new and remodeled stores. The Company had 60 such stores in operation as of January 28, 2006.

Enhance Brand Image and Increase Customer Loyalty

The Company seeks to build and enhance the recognition, appeal and reach of its New York & Company brand through its merchandise assortment, customer service, direct marketing and advertising.

4




The Company’s brand has gained strong recognition and endorsement by its target customers. The Company believes a nationally recognized brand will further drive brand awareness, merchandise sales and customer loyalty.

Further Improve Profitability

As the Company continues to grow its business, it intends to maximize economies of scale and increase operational efficiencies to improve profitability.

Design and Merchandising

The Company’s product development group, led by its merchant buyers and designers, is dedicated to consistently delivering to its customers high-quality fashion apparel and accessories at competitive prices. In 1997, the Company’s product development process was reconfigured to support internal design rather than market purchase of designs. Consistent with that philosophy, New York & Company stores carry only internally designed New York & Company brand merchandise. The Company also refined its product development cycle to reduce development time and increase consumer testing prior to the completion of major purchase orders. The Company seeks to provide its customers with key fashion items of the season, as well as a broad assortment of coordinating apparel items and accessories that will complete their wardrobe. The Company’s merchandising, marketing and promotional efforts encourage multiple unit and outfit purchases.

New product lines are introduced into the Company’s stores in six major deliveries each year (spring, summer, transition, fall, holiday and pre-spring) that are updated with selected new items every four to six weeks to keep the merchandise current. Product line development begins with the introduction of design concepts, key styles and the initial assortment selection for the product line. The Company’s designers focus on overall concepts and identify and interpret the fashion trends for the season, identifying those particular apparel items that will appeal to its target customer, designing the product line and presenting it to the Company’s merchants for review. The Company’s merchants are responsible for developing seasonal strategies and a detailed list of desired apparel pieces to guide the designers, as well as buying, testing and editing the line during the season on an ongoing basis.

Sourcing

The Company’s sourcing approach focuses on quality, speed and cost in order to provide timely delivery of quality goods. This is accomplished by closely managing the product development cycle, from raw materials and garment production to store-ready packaging, logistics and customs clearance.

Sourcing Relationships.   The Company purchases apparel and accessories both from importers and directly from manufacturers. The Company’s relationships with its direct manufacturers are supported by independent buying agents, who help coordinate the Company’s purchasing requirements with the factories. The Company’s unit volumes, long-established vendor relationships and its knowledge of fabric and production costs, combined with a flexible, diversified sourcing base, enable it to buy high-quality, low-cost goods. The Company sources from approximately 22 countries and it is not subject to long-term production contracts with any of its vendors, manufacturers or buying agents. The Company’s broad sourcing network allows it to meet its objectives of quality, cost, speed to market, and inventory efficiency by shifting merchandise purchases as required, and allows it to react quickly to changing market or regulatory conditions. In fiscal year 2005, the Company sourced nearly 100% of its merchandise from China, Indonesia, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, Saipan, Guatemala, Vietnam, Sri Lanka, Philippines, United States, Cambodia, India, Dominican Republic, and the Republic of Korea. The Company’s largest country sources are China, Macau and Hong Kong, which represented approximately 49% of purchases in fiscal year 2005.

5




Quality Assurance and Compliance Monitoring.   As part of the Company’s transition services agreement with Limited Brands, the Company uses Independent Production Services (“IPS”), a unit of Limited Brands, to provide the Company with monitoring of country of origin, point of fabrication compliance, code of business conduct and labor standards compliance, and supply chain security. In addition, all of the factories that manufacture merchandise for the Company sign a master sourcing agreement that details their obligations with respect to quality and ethical business practices. The Company’s quality assurance field inspectors or IPS representatives visit each apparel factory prior to its first bulk garment production to ensure that the factory quality control associates understand and comply with the Company’s requirements. The Company’s independent buying agents and importers also conduct in-line factory and final quality audits. Under the transition services agreement with Limited Brands, the Company’s inbound shipments are further audited by Limited Brands for visual appearance and measurement. Monthly audit reports are sent to all buying agents and factories, and any factories not performing at expected levels are either put on IPS’s continuous improvement plan designed to improve their quality statistics or are removed from the approved factory list.

Distribution and Logistics

Limited Brands provides the Company with certain warehousing and distribution services under the transition services agreement. All of the Company’s merchandise is received, inspected, processed, warehoused and distributed through Limited Brands’ distribution center in Columbus, Ohio. Details about each receipt are supplied to the Company’s store inventory planners, who determine how the product should be distributed among the Company’s stores based on current inventory levels, sales trends and specific product characteristics. Advance shipping notices are electronically communicated to the stores. The Company believes its costs related to distribution are competitive for the apparel industry. For further information regarding the transition services agreement with Limited Brands, see Item 13 “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Real Estate

As of January 28, 2006, the Company operated 519 stores in 45 states with an average of 6,271 selling square feet per store as compared to 6,701 selling square feet per store as of January 29, 2005. This reduction in average selling square footage is an integral component of the Company’s program to improve productivity and profitability. All of the Company’s stores are leased and are located in large population centers of the United States in shopping malls, lifestyle centers and off-mall locations, including urban street locations.

Historical Store Count

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

Total stores open
at beginning of
fiscal year

 

Number of stores
opened/acquired during
fiscal year

 

Number of stores
closed during
fiscal year

 

Number of stores
remodeled during
fiscal year

 

Total stores
open at end of
fiscal year

 

2001

 

 

560

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

(44

)

 

 

23

 

 

 

522

 

 

2002

 

 

522

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

(31

)

 

 

9

 

 

 

493

 

 

2003

 

 

493

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

(30

)

 

 

15

 

 

 

468

 

 

2004

 

 

468

 

 

 

26

 

 

 

(18

)

 

 

40

 

 

 

476

 

 

2005

 

 

476

 

 

 

60

(a)

 

 

(17

)

 

 

41

 

 

 

519

 

 

 

6




Historical Selling Square Footage

Fiscal Year

 

Total selling square
feet at beginning of
fiscal year

 

Increase in selling
square feet for stores
opened/acquired
during fiscal year

 

Reduction of selling
square feet for stores
closed during
fiscal year

 

Reduction of selling
square feet for
stores remodeled
during fiscal year

 

Total selling square
feet at end of
fiscal year

 

2001

 

 

4,166,769

 

 

 

30,567

 

 

 

(317,746

)

 

 

(56,377

)

 

 

3,823,213

 

 

2002

 

 

3,823,213

 

 

 

10,136

 

 

 

(212,607

)

 

 

(26,370

)

 

 

3,594,372

 

 

2003

 

 

3,594,372

 

 

 

21,321

 

 

 

(236,394

)

 

 

(60,833

)

 

 

3,318,466

 

 

2004

 

 

3,318,466

 

 

 

115,487

 

 

 

(131,253

)

 

 

(112,930

)

 

 

3,189,770

 

 

2005

 

 

3,189,770

 

 

 

242,062

(a)

 

 

(125,422

)

 

 

(51,945

)

 

 

3,254,465

 

 

 


(a)           Includes 16 JasmineSola stores with 46,838 selling square feet, of which 14 stores with 38,760 selling square feet were acquired in the JasmineSola acquisition on July 19, 2005.

Store Count by State as of January 28, 2006

State

 

 

 

# of
Stores

 

State

 

 

 

# of
Stores

 

State

 

 

 

# of
Stores

Alabama

 

 

9

 

 

Louisiana

 

 

9

 

 

North Dakota

 

 

1

 

Arizona

 

 

9

 

 

Maine

 

 

2

 

 

Ohio

 

 

23

 

Arkansas

 

 

1

 

 

Maryland

 

 

16

 

 

Oklahoma

 

 

4

 

California

 

 

48

 

 

Massachusetts

 

 

20

 

 

Oregon

 

 

1

 

Colorado

 

 

4

 

 

Michigan

 

 

17

 

 

Pennsylvania

 

 

29

 

Connecticut

 

 

10

 

 

Minnesota

 

 

9

 

 

Rhode Island

 

 

3

 

Delaware

 

 

1

 

 

Mississippi

 

 

7

 

 

South Carolina

 

 

11

 

Florida

 

 

27

 

 

Missouri

 

 

13

 

 

South Dakota

 

 

1

 

Georgia

 

 

19

 

 

Nebraska

 

 

3

 

 

Tennessee

 

 

8

 

Idaho

 

 

1

 

 

Nevada

 

 

3

 

 

Texas

 

 

43

 

Illinois

 

 

28

 

 

New Hampshire

 

 

1

 

 

Utah

 

 

2

 

Indiana

 

 

9

 

 

New Jersey

 

 

24

 

 

Virginia

 

 

18

 

Iowa

 

 

2

 

 

New Mexico

 

 

3

 

 

Washington

 

 

2

 

Kansas

 

 

1

 

 

New York

 

 

47

 

 

West Virginia

 

 

5

 

Kentucky

 

 

5

 

 

North Carolina

 

 

17

 

 

Wisconsin

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grand Total

 

 

519

 

 

Site Selection.   Since the acquisition of Lerner Holding by Bear Stearns Merchant Banking from Limited Brands in 2002, the Company established its own dedicated real estate management team. The Company’s real estate team is responsible for new store site selection. In selecting a specific location for a new store, the Company targets high-traffic, prime real estate in locations with demographics reflecting concentrations of the Company’s target customers and a complementary tenant mix. The Company’s real estate management team has currently identified a significant number of target sites in existing malls and off-mall locations with appropriate market characteristics. The Company plans to open approximately 50 to 60 stores, including eight to 10 JasmineSola stores, in fiscal year 2006. The Company expects to fund its store openings with cash flow from operations and, if necessary, borrowings under its revolving credit facilities.

Store Display and Merchandising.   The Company’s stores are designed to effectively display its merchandise and create an upbeat atmosphere. Expansive front windows allow potential customers to see easily into the store and are used as a vehicle to highlight major merchandising and promotional events. The open floor design allows customers to readily view the majority of the merchandise on display, while store fixtures allow for the efficient display of garments and accessories. Merchandise displays are modified on a weekly basis based on sales trends and inventory receipts. The Company’s in-store product

7




presentation utilizes a variety of different fixtures to highlight the product line’s breadth and versatility. Complete outfits are displayed throughout the store using garments from a variety of product categories. The Company displays complete outfits to demonstrate how its customers can combine different pieces in order to increase unit sales.

Pricing and Promotional Strategy.   The Company’s in-store pricing and promotional strategy is designed to drive customer traffic and promote brand loyalty. The promotional pricing strategy is designed to encourage multiple unit sales. Select key items are also prominently displayed in store windows at competitive prices to drive traffic into the stores.

Inventory Management.   The Company’s inventory management systems are designed to maximize merchandise profitability and increase inventory turns. The Company constantly monitors inventory turns on the selling floor and uses pricing and promotions to maximize sales and profitability and to achieve inventory turn goals. The Company has a refined inventory loss prevention program that is integrated with the store operations and finance departments of its business. This program includes electronic article surveillance systems in a majority of stores as well as the monitoring of merchandise returns, merchandise voids, employee sales and deposits, and educating store personnel on loss prevention.

Field Sales Organization.   Store operations are organized into seven regions and 51 districts. Each region is managed by either a regional vice president or a regional sales manager, depending upon the size of the region. The Company staffs approximately 51 district managers, with each typically responsible for the sales and operations of 10 stores on average. Each store is typically staffed with a store manager, a co-sales manager and an assistant sales manager, as required, in addition to hourly sales associates. The Company has approximately 1,900 in-store managers. The Company seeks to instill enthusiasm and dedication in its store management personnel by maintaining an incentive/bonus plan for its field managers. The program is based on monthly sales performance, effective labor management and seasonal inventory loss targets. The Company believes that this program effectively creates incentives for its senior field professionals and aligns their interests with the financial goals of the Company. The Company conducts independent surveys of customer satisfaction in all major stores on a recurring basis. The Company evaluates merchandise fill, fitting room service, checkout service, and store appearance. Stores are required to meet or exceed established corporate standards to ensure the quality of the Company’s customers’ shopping experience.

Brand Building and Marketing

The Company believes that its New York & Company brand is among its most important assets. The Company’s ability to continuously evolve its brand to appeal to the changing needs and priorities of its target customer is a key source of its competitive advantage. The Company believes that its combination of fashion-oriented apparel, accessories and attractive price points differentiates its brand from its competitors. The Company consistently communicates its brand image across all aspects of its business, including product design, store merchandising and shopping environments, channels of distribution, and marketing and advertising. The Company continues to invest in the development of this brand through, among other things, advertising, in-store marketing, direct mail marketing, and email communications. The Company also makes investments to enhance the overall client experience through the opening of new stores, the expansion and remodeling of existing stores, and a focus on client service.

The Company believes that it is strategically important to communicate on a regular basis directly with its current client base and with potential clients, through national and regional advertising, as well as through direct mail marketing, e-mail communications and in-store presentation. The Company uses its customer database, which includes in excess of 6 million customers who have made purchases within the last twelve months, to design marketing programs to its core customers. The Company hosts pictures of its current merchandise offerings as well as promotional advertising on its website at www.nyandcompany.com.

8




Customer Credit

The Company has a credit card processing agreement with a third party (the ‘‘administration company’’) that provides the services of the Company’s proprietary credit card program. The Company allows payments on this credit card to be made in its stores as a service to its customers. The administration company owns the credit card account, with no recourse to the Company. All of the Company’s proprietary credit cards carry the New York & Company brand. These cards provide purchasing power to customers and additional vehicles for the Company to communicate product offerings. Sales on these cards comprised approximately 28% of total net sales in both fiscal year 2005 and fiscal year 2004.

Management Information Systems

Management information systems are a key component of the Company’s business strategy and the Company is committed to utilizing technology to enhance its competitive position. The Company’s information systems integrate data from the field sales, design, merchandising, planning and distribution, and financial reporting functions. The Company’s core business systems consist of both purchased and internally developed software, operating on UNIX and AS400 platforms. These systems are accessed over a company-wide network and provide corporate employees with access to key business applications.

Sales and cash deposit information are electronically collected from the stores’ point-of-sale terminals on a daily basis. During this process, the Company also obtains information concerning inventory receipts and transmits pricing, markdown and shipment notification data. In addition, the Company collects customer transaction data to update its customer database. The merchandising staff and merchandise planning staff evaluate the sales and inventory information collected from the stores to make key merchandise planning decisions, including orders and markdowns. These systems enhance the Company’s ability to optimize sales while limiting markdowns, achieve planned inventory turns, reorder successful styles, and effectively distribute new inventory to the stores.

Competition

The retail and apparel industries are highly competitive. The Company has positioned its stores as a source of fashion, quality and value by providing its customers with an appealing merchandise assortment at attractive price points generally below those of department stores and other specialty retailers. The Company competes with traditional department stores, specialty store retailers, discount apparel stores and direct marketers for, among other things, raw materials, market share, retail space, finished goods, sourcing and personnel. The Company believes its competitors include Express, The Limited, Gap, Ann Taylor LOFT, Old Navy and JCPenney, among others. The Company differentiates itself from its competitors on the basis of its fashion and proprietary merchandise designs, value pricing, merchandise quality, in-store merchandise display and store service.

Intellectual Property

The Company believes that it has all of the registered trademarks it needs to protect its New York & Company, Lerner, Lerner New York, City Crepe, City Spa, City Stretch, New York Jeans and JasmineSola brands and it vigorously enforces all of its trademark rights.

Brylane Agreement.   In 1993, Limited Brands granted Brylane, a catalog and internet sales company, a license to use various trademarks of Lerner New York, Inc. in connection with the design, manufacture, distribution and sale of apparel and accessories through mail order catalogues and on the internet. The Company retains all other rights to the Lerner New York trademark. The license agreement does not provide Brylane any rights to the New York & Company brand or New York & Company-branded merchandise. The Brylane license will terminate on January 11, 2007.

9




Employees and Labor Relations

The Company’s collective bargaining agreement with Local 1102 unit of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (RWDSU) AFL-CIO that was set to expire in August 2005 is under renegotiation. A signed extension agreement is in effect until June 30, 2006. Employees covered by collective bargaining agreements are primarily non-management store associates, representing approximately 10% of the Company’s total employees.

Government Regulation

The Company is subject to customs, truth-in-advertising and other laws, including consumer protection regulations and zoning and occupancy ordinances that regulate retailers generally and/or govern the promotion and sale of merchandise and the operation of retail stores and warehouse facilities. The Company undertakes to monitor changes in these laws and believes that it is in material compliance with applicable laws with respect to these practices.

A substantial portion of the Company’s merchandise is manufactured by factories located outside of the United States. These products are imported and are subject to U.S. customs laws, which impose tariffs as well as import quota restrictions for textiles and apparel. In addition, some of the Company’s imported products are eligible for certain duty-advantaged programs; for example, the North American Free Trade Agreement, the African Growth and Opportunity Act, the U.S. Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act and the Caribbean Basin Initiative. While importation of goods from some countries from which the Company buys its products may be subject to embargo by U.S. customs authorities if shipments exceed quota limits, the Company closely monitors import quotas and believes that it has the sourcing network to efficiently shift production to factories located in countries with available quotas. The existence of import quotas has, therefore, not had a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

Available Information

The Company makes available free of charge on its website, http://www.nyandcompany.com, copies of its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after filing, or furnishing, such material electronically with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of the charters of each of the Company’s Audit Committee, Ethics Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nomination & Governance Committee, as well as the Company’s Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct for Associates, and Code of Conduct for Suppliers, are also available on the website or in print upon written request by any stockholder to the Corporate Secretary at 450 West 33rd Street, Fifth Floor, New York, New York 10001.

Item 1A.   Risk Factors

The Company’s growth strategy includes the addition of a significant number of new stores each year. The Company may not be able to successfully implement this strategy on a timely basis or at all. In addition, the Company’s growth strategy may strain its resources and cause the performance of its existing stores to suffer.

The Company’s growth will largely depend on its ability to open and operate new stores successfully. The Company intends to continue to open a significant number of new stores in future years while remodeling a portion of its existing store base annually. The Company opened 46 stores, including two JasmineSola stores, in fiscal year 2005. The Company intends to open an additional 50 to 60 stores, including eight to 10 JasmineSola stores, in fiscal year 2006. The success of this strategy is dependent upon, among other things, the identification of suitable markets and sites for store locations, the negotiation of acceptable lease terms, the hiring, training and retention of competent sales personnel, and the effective

10




management of inventory to meet the needs of new and existing stores on a timely basis. The Company’s proposed expansion also will place increased demands on its operational, managerial and administrative resources. These increased demands could cause the Company to operate its business less effectively, which in turn could cause deterioration in the financial performance of its existing stores. In addition, to the extent that the Company’s new store openings are in existing markets, the Company may experience reduced net sales volumes in existing stores in those markets. The Company expects to fund its expansion through cash flow from operations and, if necessary, by borrowings under its revolving credit facility; however, if the Company experiences a decline in performance, the Company may slow or discontinue store openings. The Company may not be able to successfully execute any of these strategies on a timely basis. If the Company fails to successfully implement these strategies, its financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

The Company’s net sales, operating income and inventory levels fluctuate on a seasonal basis and decreases in sales or margins during the Company’s peak seasons could have a disproportionate effect on its overall financial condition and results of operations. The Company’s business experiences seasonal fluctuations in net sales and operating income, with a significant portion of its operating income typically realized during its first and fourth quarters. You should refer to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Quarterly Results and Seasonality” for more information.

Any decrease in sales or margins during either of these periods could have a disproportionate effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Seasonal fluctuations also affect the Company’s inventory levels. The Company must carry a significant amount of inventory, especially before the holiday season selling period. If the Company is not successful in selling its inventory, it may have to write down the value of its inventory or sell it at significantly reduced prices or the Company may not be able to sell such inventory at all, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Fluctuations in comparable store sales and results of operations could cause the price of the Company’s common stock to decline substantially.

The Company’s results of operations for its individual stores have fluctuated in the past and can be expected to fluctuate in the future. Since the beginning of fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2005, the Company’s quarterly comparable store sales have ranged from an increase of 14.1% to a decrease of 3.1%. The Company cannot ensure that it will be able to achieve a high level of comparable store sales in the future.

The Company’s comparable store sales and results of operations are affected by a variety of factors, including:

·       fashion trends;

·       mall traffic;

·       calendar shifts of holiday or seasonal periods;

·       the effectiveness of the Company’s inventory management;

·       changes in the Company’s merchandise mix;

·       the timing of promotional events;

·       weather conditions;

·       changes in general economic conditions and consumer spending patterns; and

·       actions of competitors or mall anchor tenants.

11




If the Company’s future comparable store sales fail to meet expectations, then the market price of the Company’s common stock could decline substantially. You should refer to the section entitled ‘‘Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ for more information.

If the Company is not able to respond to fashion trends in a timely manner or launch new product lines successfully, it may be left with unsold inventory, experience decreased profits or incur losses or suffer reputational harm to its brand image.

The Company’s success depends in part on management’s ability to anticipate and respond to changing fashion tastes and consumer demands and to translate market trends into appropriate, saleable product offerings. Customer tastes and fashion trends change rapidly. If the Company is unable to successfully identify or react to changing styles or trends and misjudges the market for its products or any new product lines, its sales may be lower, gross margins may be lower and the Company may be faced with a significant amount of unsold finished goods inventory. In response, the Company may be forced to increase its marketing promotions or price markdowns, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. The Company’s brand image may also suffer if customers believe that it is no longer able to offer the latest fashions.

A reduction in the volume of mall traffic could significantly reduce the Company’s sales and leave it with unsold inventory, reducing the Company’s profits or creating losses.

Many of the Company’s stores are located in shopping malls. Sales at these stores are derived, in part, from the volume of traffic in those malls. The Company’s stores benefit from the ability of the mall’s other tenants and other area attractions to generate consumer traffic in the vicinity of its stores and the continuing popularity of malls as shopping destinations. Sales volume and mall traffic may be adversely affected by economic downturns in a particular area, competition from internet retailers, non-mall retailers and other malls where the Company does not have stores and the closing of other stores in the malls in which the Company’s stores are located. A reduction in mall traffic as a result of these or any other factors could materially adversely affect the Company’s business.

Because of the Company’s focus on keeping its inventory at the forefront of fashion trends, extreme and/or unseasonable weather conditions could have a disproportionately large effect on the Company’s business, financial conditions and results of operations because it would be forced to mark down inventory.

Extreme weather conditions in the areas in which the Company’s stores are located could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, heavy snowfall or other extreme weather conditions over a prolonged period might make it difficult for the Company’s customers to travel to its stores. The Company’s business is also susceptible to unseasonable weather conditions. For example, extended periods of unseasonably warm temperatures during the winter season or cool weather during the summer season could render a portion of the Company’s inventory incompatible with those unseasonable conditions. These prolonged unseasonable weather conditions could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

If third parties who manage some aspects of the Company’s business do not adequately perform their functions, the Company might experience disruptions in its business, leaving it with inadequate or excess inventories resulting in decreased profits or losses.

Limited Brands handles the distribution of the Company’s merchandise through its distribution facility in Columbus, Ohio pursuant to a transition services agreement. The efficient operation of the Company’s stores is dependent on its ability to distribute merchandise to locations throughout the United States in a timely manner. The Company depends on Limited Brands to receive, sort, pack and distribute substantially all of the Company’s merchandise. As part of the transition services agreement, Limited

12




Brands contracts with third-party transportation companies to deliver the Company’s merchandise from foreign ports to their warehouses and to the Company’s stores. Any failure by any of these third parties to respond adequately to the Company’s warehousing and distribution needs would disrupt the Company’s operations and negatively impact its profitability.

Additional services are also provided by Limited Brands and its subsidiaries and affiliates pursuant to the transition services agreement. IPS assists the Company with its monitoring of country of origin and point of fabrication compliance for U.S. Customs. IPS also monitors compliance with the Company’s code of business conduct and labor standards and its supply chain security. Any failure of Limited Brands or IPS to fulfill their obligations under the transition services agreement would disrupt the Company’s operations and negatively impact its profitability.

Limited Brands may terminate those portions of the transition services agreement which provide for the distribution of the Company’s merchandise and the compliance monitoring provided by IPS, upon the earlier of November 2007, the occurrence of certain types of changes of control, or the Company’s failure to perform any of its material obligations under the transition services agreement. If Limited Brands terminates a portion or all of the Company’s transition services agreement, the Company may not be able to replace the services on terms acceptable to it or at all. The Company’s failure to successfully replace the services could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and prospects.

The Company may rely on third parties for the implementation and/or management of certain aspects of its information systems infrastructure. Failure by any of these third parties to implement and/or manage the Company’s information systems infrastructure effectively could disrupt its operations and negatively impact its profitability.

The raw materials used to manufacture the Company’s products and its distribution and labor costs are subject to availability constraints and price volatility, which could result in increased costs.

The raw materials used to manufacture the Company’s products are subject to availability constraints and price volatility caused by high demand for petroleum-based synthetic fabrics, weather, supply conditions, government regulations, economic climate and other unpredictable factors. In addition, the Company’s transportation and labor costs are subject to price volatility caused by the price of oil, supply of labor, governmental regulations, economic climate and other unpredictable factors. Increases in demand for, or the price of, raw materials, distribution services and labor could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Since the Company relies significantly on foreign sources of production, it is at risk from a variety of factors that could leave it with inadequate or excess inventories, resulting in decreased profits or losses.

The Company purchases apparel and accessories in foreign markets, with a significant portion coming from China, Macau and Hong Kong. The Company does not have any long-term merchandise supply contracts and many of its imports are subject to existing or potential duties, tariffs or quotas. The Company competes with other companies for production facilities and rights to import merchandise under quota limitations.

The Company also faces a variety of other risks generally associated with doing business in foreign markets and importing merchandise from abroad, such as:

·       political or labor instability in countries where suppliers are located;

·       political or military conflict involving the United States, which could cause a delay in the transportation of the Company’s products and an increase in transportation costs;

13




·       heightened terrorism security concerns, which could subject imported goods to additional, more frequent or more thorough inspections, leading to delays in deliveries or impoundment of goods for extended periods or could result in decreased scrutiny by customs officials for counterfeit goods, leading to lost sales and damage to the reputation of the Company’s brand;

·       disease epidemics and health related concerns, which could result in closed factories, reduced workforces, scarcity of raw materials and scrutiny or embargoing of goods produced in infected areas;

·       the migration and development of manufacturers, which can affect where the Company’s products are or will be produced;

·       imposition of regulations and quotas relating to imports and the Company’s ability to adjust in a timely manner to changes in trade regulations, which among other things, could limit the Company’s ability to source products from countries that have the labor and expertise needed to manufacture its products on a cost-effective basis;

·       imposition of duties, taxes and other charges on imports; and

·       currency volatility.

Any of the foregoing factors, or a combination thereof, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

The Company’s manufacturers may be unable to manufacture and deliver products in a timely manner or meet its quality standards, which could result in lost sales, cancellation charges or excessive markdowns.

The Company purchases apparel and accessories from importers and directly from third-party manufacturers. Similar to most other specialty retailers, the Company has short selling seasons for much of its inventory. Factors outside of the Company’s control, such as manufacturing or shipping delays or quality problems, could disrupt merchandise deliveries and result in lost sales, cancellation charges or excessive markdowns.

The Company’s ability to successfully integrate newly acquired businesses into its existing business, to the extent it consummates acquisitions in the future, will affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The process of integrating acquired businesses into the Company’s existing operations may result in unforeseen difficulties and liabilities and may require a disproportionate amount of resources and management attention. Difficulties that the Company may encounter in integrating the operations of acquired businesses could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, the Company may not realize any of the anticipated benefits of an acquisition and integration costs may exceed anticipated amounts. In addition, future acquisitions of businesses may require the Company to assume or incur additional debt financing, resulting in additional leverage.

The Company relies on its manufacturers to use acceptable ethical business practices, and if they fail to do so, the New York & Company brand name could suffer reputational harm and the Company’s sales could decline or its inventory supply could be interrupted.

The Company requires its manufacturers to operate in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations regarding working conditions, employment practices and environmental compliance. Additionally, the Company imposes upon its business partners operating guidelines that require additional obligations in order to promote ethical business practices. The Company’s staff, the staff of IPS and the staff of the Company’s non-exclusive buying agents and importers periodically visit and monitor the operations of the Company’s manufacturers to determine compliance. However, the Company does not control its manufacturers or their labor and other business practices. If one of the Company’s manufacturers violates labor or other laws or implements labor or other business practices that are

14




generally regarded as unethical in the United States, the shipment of finished products to the Company could be interrupted, orders could be canceled, relationships could be terminated and the Company’s reputation could be damaged. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s revenues and, consequently, its results of operations.

The Company may be unable to protect its trademarks, which could diminish the value of its brand.

The Company’s trademarks are important to its success and competitive position. The Company’s major trademarks are New York & Company, Lerner, Lerner New York, City Crepe, City Spa, City Stretch, New York Jeans and JasmineSola and are protected in the United States and internationally. The Company engages in the following steps to protect and enforce its trademarks: file and prosecute trademark applications for registration in those countries where the marks are not yet registered; response to office actions and examining attorneys in those countries where the marks are not yet registered; maintenance of its trademark portfolio in the United States and foreign countries; filings of statements of use, renewal documents, assignments, change of name and address forms; policing of marks and third party infringements; initiation and defense of opposition and/or cancellation proceedings, including discovery and preparation of evidence; and litigation, including filing enforcement lawsuits against third party infringers. The Company is susceptible to others imitating the Company’s products and infringing on the Company’s intellectual property rights. Imitation or counterfeiting of the Company’s products or other infringement of the Company’s intellectual property rights could diminish the value of its brand or otherwise adversely affect its revenues. The actions the Company has taken to establish and protect its trademarks may not be adequate to prevent imitation of its products by others or to prevent others from seeking to invalidate its trademarks or block sales of its products as a violation of the trademarks and intellectual property rights of others. In addition, others may assert rights in, or ownership of, trademarks and other intellectual property rights of the Company or in marks that are similar to the Company’s or marks that the Company licenses and/or markets and the Company may not be able to successfully resolve these types of conflicts to its satisfaction. In some cases, there may be trademark owners who have prior rights to the Company’s marks because the laws of certain foreign countries may not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. In other cases, there may be holders who have prior rights to similar marks. Failure to protect the Company’s trademarks could result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

The Company relies on its information systems infrastructure, which includes third party and internally developed software, and purchased or leased hardware that support the Company’s information systems and various business processes. The Company’s business and reputation could suffer if its infrastructure fails to perform as intended.

The Company relies on purchased or leased hardware and software licensed from third parties or internally developed in order to manage its business. The Company’s ability to maintain and upgrade its information systems infrastructure is critical to the success of its business. This hardware and software may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Any disruptions to the Company’s infrastructure or loss of the right to use any of this hardware or software could affect the Company’s operations, which could negatively affect the Company’s business until corrected or until equivalent technology is either developed by the Company or, if available, is identified, obtained and integrated. In addition, the software underlying the Company’s operations can contain undetected errors. The Company may be forced to modify its operations until such problems are corrected and, in some cases, may need to implement enhancements to correct errors that it does not detect. Problems with the software underlying the Company’s operations could result in loss of revenue, unexpected expenses and capital costs, diversion of resources, loss of market share and damage to the Company’s reputation which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

15




Because the Company’s brand is associated with all of its New York & Company merchandise in addition to its stores, the Company’s success depends heavily on the value associated with its brand. If the value associated with the Company’s brand were to diminish, the Company’s sales could decrease, causing lower profits or losses.

The Company’s success depends on the New York & Company brand and its value. The New York & Company name is integral to the Company’s existing business, as well as to the implementation of its strategy for growing and expanding its business. The New York & Company brand could be adversely affected if the Company’s public image or reputation were to be tarnished, which could result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.

The Company may be unable to compete favorably in the highly competitive retail industry, and if it loses customers to its competitors, its sales could decrease causing a decrease in profits or losses.

The sale of apparel and accessories is highly competitive. Increased competition could result in price reductions, increased marketing expenditures and loss of market share; all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company competes for sales with a broad range of other retailers, including individual and chain fashion specialty stores and department stores. The Company’s competitors include Express, The Limited, Gap, Ann Taylor LOFT, Old Navy and JCPenney, among others. In addition to the traditional store-based retailers, the Company also competes with direct marketers that sell similar lines of merchandise and target customers through catalogs and e-commerce.

Some of the Company’s competitors may have greater financial, marketing and other resources available to them. In many cases, the Company’s competitors sell their products in stores that are located in the same shopping malls as the Company’s stores. In addition to competing for sales, the Company competes for favorable site locations and lease terms in shopping malls.

The Company’s marketing efforts rely upon the effective use of customer information. Restrictions on the availability or use of customer information could adversely affect the Company’s marketing program, which could result in lost sales and a decrease in profits.

The Company uses its customer database to market to its customers. Any limitations imposed on the use of such consumer data, whether imposed by federal or state governments or business partners, could have an adverse effect on the Company’s future marketing activity. In addition, to the extent the Company’s security procedures and protection of customer information prove to be insufficient or inadequate, the Company may become subject to litigation, which could expose it to liability and cause damage to its reputation or brand.

The Company is subject to numerous regulations that could affect its operations. Changes in such regulations could impact the operation of its business through delayed shipments of its goods, fines or penalties that could affect its profitability.

The Company is subject to customs, truth-in-advertising, truth-in-lending and other laws, including consumer protection regulations and zoning and occupancy ordinances that regulate retailers generally and/or govern the importation, promotion and sale of merchandise, the use of the Company’s proprietary credit cards and the operation of retail stores and warehouse facilities. Although the Company undertakes to monitor changes in these laws, if these laws change without the Company’s knowledge, or are violated by the Company’s employees, importers, buying agents, manufacturers or distributors, the Company could experience delays in shipments and receipt of goods or be subject to fines or other penalties under the controlling regulations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

16




The covenants in the Company’s credit facilities impose restrictions that may limit its operating and financial flexibility.

The Company’s credit facilities contain a number of significant restrictions and covenants that limit its ability to:

·       incur additional indebtedness;

·       declare dividends, make distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock, including the Company’s common stock, or to make certain other restricted payments or investments;

·       sell assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries;

·       agree to payment restrictions affecting the Company’s restricted subsidiaries;

·       consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets;

·       incur liens;

·       alter the nature of the Company’s business;

·       enter into sale/leaseback transactions;

·       conduct transactions with affiliates; or

·       designate the Company’s subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries.

In addition, the Company’s credit facilities include other and more restrictive covenants and prohibit it from prepaying its other indebtedness while indebtedness under its credit facilities is outstanding. The agreement governing the Company’s credit facilities also requires it to achieve specified financial and operating results and maintain compliance with specified financial ratios. The Company’s ability to comply with these ratios may be affected by events beyond the Company’s control.

The restrictions contained in the agreement governing the Company’s credit facilities could:

·       limit the Company’s ability to plan for or react to market conditions or meet capital needs or otherwise restrict its activities or business plans; and

·       adversely affect the Company’s ability to finance its operations, strategic acquisitions, investments or other capital needs or to engage in other business activities that would be in the Company’s interest.

A breach of any of these restrictive covenants or the Company’s inability to comply with the required financial ratios could result in a default under the agreement governing its credit facilities. If a default occurs, the lenders under the credit facilities may elect to declare all borrowings outstanding, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable.

The lenders also have the right in these circumstances to terminate any commitments they have to provide further borrowings. If the Company is unable to repay outstanding borrowings when due, the lenders under the credit facilities also have the right to proceed against the collateral, including the Company’s available cash, granted to them to secure the indebtedness.

The Company is a ‘‘controlled company,’’ and the interests in its business of its controlling stockholders may be different from yours.

Pursuant to a stockholders agreement among certain stockholders of the Company, Bear Stearns Merchant Banking is able to, subject to applicable law, designate a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of the Company and control actions to be taken by the Company and its Board of Directors, including amendments to the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and approval of significant corporate transactions, including mergers and sales of substantially all of the Company’s assets. The directors so elected will have the authority, subject to the terms of the Company’s indebtedness and the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange, to issue additional stock, implement stock repurchase programs, declare dividends and make other decisions. Because Bear Stearns Merchant Banking owns more than 50% of the voting power of the Company, the Company is considered a ‘‘controlled company’’ for the purposes of the New York Stock Exchange listing

17




requirements. As such, the Company is permitted to, and has opted out of, the New York Stock Exchange corporate governance requirements that: its Board of Directors, its Compensation Committee and its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meet the standard of independence established by those corporate governance requirements. As a result, the Company’s Board of Directors and those committees may have more directors who do not meet the New York Stock Exchange independence standards than they would if those independence standards were to apply. The New York Stock Exchange independence standards are intended to ensure that directors who meet the independence standard are free of any conflicting interest that could influence their actions as directors. Four of the Company’s directors are employees of the merchant banking group of Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. and manage the investments of Bear Stearns Merchant Banking, the Company’s largest stockholder. It is possible that the interests of Bear Stearns Merchant Banking may in some circumstances conflict with the Company’s interests and the interests of its other stockholders.

Provisions in the Company’s restated certificate of incorporation and Delaware law may delay or prevent the Company’s acquisition by a third party.

The Company’s restated certificate of incorporation contains a ‘‘blank check’’ preferred stock provision. Blank check preferred stock enables the Company’s Board of Directors, without stockholders approval, to designate and issue additional series of preferred stock with such dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights, including the right to issue convertible securities with no limitation on conversion, as the Company’s Board of Directors may determine, including rights to dividends and proceeds in a liquidation that are senior to the common stock.

These provisions may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire a majority of the Company’s outstanding voting common stock. The Company is also subject to certain provisions of Delaware law which could delay, deter or prevent the Company from entering into a merger, acquisition, tender offer, proxy contest or other transaction that might otherwise result in the Company’s stockholders receiving a premium over the market price for their stock.

Item 1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.   Properties

All of the Company’s stores, encompassing approximately 4.1 million total gross square feet as of January 28, 2006, are leased under operating leases. The typical store lease is for a ten-year term and requires the Company to pay property taxes and utilities, as well as common area maintenance and marketing fees. The Company also leases approximately 164,083 square feet of space at its headquarters located at 450 West 33rd Street, New York, New York under a lease which expires in 2015. Additionally, the Company owns a parcel of land located in Brooklyn, New York on which it operates one of its leased stores.

Item 3.   Legal Proceedings

On February 21, 2006, a consent judgment was approved by the California Superior Court for the County of Alameda, thus resolving the previously disclosed issue concerning allegations of excessive lead in one of Lerner New York, Inc.’s jewelry products. Under the terms of the Consent Judgment and related settlement agreement, Lerner New York, Inc. contributed a nominal amount to the pool of settling defendants’ settlement funds and paid nothing in civil penalties.

There are other various claims, lawsuits and pending actions against the Company arising in the normal course of the Company’s business. It is the opinion of management that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended January 28, 2006.

18




Part II

Item 5.   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s common stock has been listed and publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “NWY” since October 7, 2004. The number of holders of record of common stock at March 31, 2006 was 170. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the periods indicated:

 

 

Market Price

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Fiscal Year 2005

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

22.63

 

$

12.75

 

Third quarter

 

$

23.50

 

$

11.78

 

Second quarter

 

$

24.28

 

$

17.80

 

First quarter

 

$

20.85

 

$

16.35

 

Fiscal Year 2004

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth quarter

 

$

24.41

 

$

14.76

 

Third quarter (commencing October 7, 2004)

 

$

21.10

 

$

18.40

 

 

The Company has not declared or paid any dividends on its common stock since the acquisition of the Company by Bear Stearns Merchant Banking in November 2002. The Company currently expects to retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of its business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The Company’s ability to pay dividends on its common stock is limited by the covenants of its amended and restated credit facilities and may be further restricted by the terms of any of its future debt or preferred securities.

Item 6.   Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data for Lerner Holding for the periods presented prior to the acquisition of Lerner Holding by Bear Stearns Merchant Banking from Limited Brands on November 27, 2002 and consolidated financial data for New York & Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries for each of the periods presented after such acquisition. The consolidated financial data for the year ended January 28, 2006, referred to as “fiscal year 2005,” the year ended January 29, 2005, referred to as ‘‘fiscal year 2004,’’ the year ended January 31, 2004, referred to as ‘‘fiscal year 2003,’’ and the period from November 27, 2002 to February 1, 2003, referred to as ‘‘successor 2002,’’ have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of New York & Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The consolidated financial data for the period from February 3, 2002 to November 26, 2002, referred to as ‘‘predecessor 2002,’’ has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements for Lerner Holding. The consolidated financial data for the year ended February 2, 2002, referred to as ‘‘fiscal year 2001,’’ has been derived from the audited consolidated financial data of Lerner Holding.

19




The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with ‘‘Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ and the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto.

(amounts in thousands,
except per share data)

 

 

 

Fiscal Year
2005

 

Fiscal Year
2004

 

Fiscal Year
2003

 

Successor
2002

 

 

 

Predecessor
2002

 

Fiscal Year
2001

 

 

 

(Successor)

 

 

 

(Predecessor)

 

Statements of operations data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

 

$

1,130,544

 

 

 

$

1,040,028

 

 

 

$

961,780

 

 

 

$

225,321

 

 

 

 

 

$

706,512

 

 

 

$

940,230

 

 

Cost of goods sold, buying and occupancy costs(1)

 

 

764,042

 

 

 

682,939

 

 

 

673,896

 

 

 

182,167

 

 

 

 

 

516,230

 

 

 

705,526

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

366,502

 

 

 

357,089

 

 

 

287,884

 

 

 

43,154

 

 

 

 

 

190,282

 

 

 

234,704

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

262,441

 

 

 

262,201

 

 

 

232,379

 

 

 

42,986

 

 

 

 

 

191,091

 

 

 

230,874

 

 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

104,061

 

 

 

94,888

 

 

 

55,505

 

 

 

168

 

 

 

 

 

(809

)

 

 

3,830

 

 

Interest expense (income), net

 

 

5,726

 

 

 

9,256

 

 

 

10,728

 

 

 

2,016

 

 

 

 

 

(5

)

 

 

(55

)

 

Accrued dividends—redeemable preferred stock(2)

 

 

 

 

 

2,703

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss on modification and extinguishment of debt(3)

 

 

933

 

 

 

2,034

 

 

 

1,194

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss on derivative instrument(4)

 

 

 

 

 

29,398

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

97,402

 

 

 

51,497

 

 

 

43,583

 

 

 

(1,848

)

 

 

 

 

(804

)

 

 

3,885

 

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

38,914

 

 

 

34,059

 

 

 

18,557

 

 

 

(758

)

 

 

 

 

(189

)

 

 

1,730

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

58,488

 

 

 

17,438

 

 

 

25,026

 

 

 

(1,090

)

 

 

 

 

(615

)

 

 

2,155

 

 

Accrued dividends - redeemable preferred stock(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,363

 

 

 

1,419

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) available for common stockholders

 

 

$

58,488

 

 

 

$

17,438

 

 

 

$

16,663

 

 

 

$

(2,509

)

 

 

 

 

$

(615

)

 

 

$

2,155

 

 

Net earnings (loss) per share of common stock:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

$

1.08

 

 

 

$

0.37

 

 

 

$

0.38

 

 

 

$

(0.06

)

 

 

 

 

$

(0.01

)

 

 

$

0.05

 

 

Diluted

 

 

$

1.02

 

 

 

$

0.33

 

 

 

$

0.31

 

 

 

$

(0.06

)

 

 

 

 

$

(0.01

)

 

 

$

0.05

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic shares of common stock

 

 

53,923

 

 

 

47,323

 

 

 

43,761

 

 

 

43,760

 

 

 

 

 

43,760

 

 

 

43,760

 

 

Diluted shares of common stock

 

 

57,316

 

 

 

52,726

 

 

 

53,792

 

 

 

43,760

 

 

 

 

 

43,760

 

 

 

43,760

 

 

 

(amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

Fiscal Year
2005

 

Fiscal Year
2004

 

Fiscal Year
2003

 

Successor
2002

 

 

 

Predecessor
2002

 

Fiscal Year
2001

 

 

 

(Successor)

 

 

 

(Predecessor)

 

Balance sheet data (at period end):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

$

57,436

 

 

 

$

85,161

 

 

 

$

98,798

 

 

 

$

79,824

 

 

 

 

 

$

4,248

 

 

 

$

7,488

 

 

Working capital

 

 

47,701

 

 

 

83,105

 

 

 

93,693

 

 

 

84,596

 

 

 

 

 

89,959

 

 

 

59,186

 

 

Total assets

 

 

406,275

 

 

 

330,188

 

 

 

292,409

 

 

 

288,571

 

 

 

 

 

267,462

 

 

 

235,924

 

 

Total debt(4)

 

 

37,500

 

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

82,500

 

 

 

95,029

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<