Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 1-12378

NVR, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

7601 Lewinsville Road, Suite 300

McLean, Virginia 22102

(703) 761-2000

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as described in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).    Yes  x    No  ¨

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of NVR, Inc. on June 30, 2004, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $2.7 billion.

As of February 24, 2005 there were 6,717,418 total shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Proxy Statement of NVR, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on or prior to April 30, 2005 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

Table of Contents

INDEX

1

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements in this Form 10-K, as well as statements made by NVR, Inc. (“NVR”) in periodic press releases or other public communications, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Certain, but not necessarily all, of such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. All statements other than of historical facts are forward looking statements. Forward looking statements contained in this document include those regarding market trends, NVR’s financial position, business strategy, projected plans and objectives of management for future operations. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results or performance of NVR to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such risk factors include, but are not limited to the following: general economic and business conditions (on both a national and regional level); interest rate changes; access to suitable financing; competition; the availability and cost of land and other raw materials used by NVR in its homebuilding operations; shortages of labor; weather related slow-downs; building moratoriums; governmental regulation; the ability of NVR to integrate any acquired business; fluctuation and volatility of stock and other financial markets; and other factors over which NVR has little or no control.

RISK FACTORS

Our business is affected by the risks generally incident to the residential construction business, including, but not limited to:

Interest rate movements, inflation and other economic factors can negatively impact our business.

High rates of inflation generally affect the homebuilding industry adversely because of their adverse impact on interest rates. High interest rates not only increase the cost of borrowed funds to homebuilders but also have a significant effect on housing demand and on the affordability of permanent mortgage financing to prospective purchasers. We are also subject to potential volatility in the price of commodities that impact costs of materials used in our homebuilding business. Increases in prevailing interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

Our financial results also are affected by the risks generally incident to our mortgage banking business, including interest rate levels, the impact of government regulation on mortgage loan originations and servicing and the need to issue forward commitments to fund and sell mortgage loans. Our homebuilding customers accounted for almost all of our mortgage banking business in 2004. The volume of our continuing homebuilding operations therefore affects our mortgage banking business.

Our mortgage banking business also is affected by interest rate fluctuations. We also may experience marketing losses resulting from daily increases in interest rates to the extent we are unable to match interest rates and amounts on loans we have committed to originate with forward commitments from third parties to purchase such loans. Increases in interest rates may have a material adverse effect on our mortgage banking revenue, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

2

Table of Contents

These factors (and thus the homebuilding business) have tended to be cyclical in nature. Any downturn in the national economy or the local economies of the markets in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations. In particular, approximately 42% of our home settlements during 2004 occurred in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD metropolitan areas, which accounted for 54% of our 2004 homebuilding revenues. Thus, we are dependent to a significant extent on the economy and demand for housing in those areas.

Our inability to secure and control an adequate inventory of lots could adversely impact our operations.

The results of our homebuilding operations are dependent upon our continuing ability to control an adequate number of homebuilding lots in desirable locations. There can be no assurance that an adequate supply of building lots will continue to be available to us on terms similar to those available in the past, or that we will not be required to devote a greater amount of capital to controlling building lots than we have historically. An insufficient supply of building lots in one or more of our markets or our inability to purchase or finance building lots on reasonable terms could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

Inventory risk can be substantial for homebuilders. The market value of building lots and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions. In addition, inventory carrying costs can be significant and can result in losses in a poorly performing project or market. We must, in the ordinary course of our business, continuously seek and make acquisitions of lots for expansion into new markets as well as for replacement and expansion within our current markets. In the event of significant changes in economic or market conditions, we may dispose of certain subdivision inventories on a bulk or other basis which may result in a loss which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

Our current indebtedness may impact our future operations and our ability to access necessary financing.

Our homebuilding operations are dependent in part on the availability and cost of working capital financing, and may be adversely affected by a shortage or an increase in the cost of such financing. If we require working capital greater than that provided by our operations and our credit facility, we may be required to seek to increase the amount available under the facility or to obtain alternative financing. No assurance can be given that additional or replacement financing will be available on terms that are favorable or acceptable. If we are at any time unsuccessful in obtaining sufficient capital to fund our planned homebuilding expenditures, we may experience a substantial delay in the completion of any homes then under construction. Any delay could result in cost increases and could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance, ability to service our debt obligations and future cash flows.

Our existing indebtedness contains financial and other restrictive covenants and any future indebtedness may also contain covenants. These covenants include limitations on our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, pay cash dividends and make distributions, make loans and investments, enter into transactions with affiliates, effect certain asset sales, incur certain liens, merge or consolidate with any other person, or transfer all or substantially all of our properties and assets. Substantial losses by us or other action or inaction by us or our subsidiaries could result in the violation of one or more of these covenants which could result in decreased liquidity or a default on our indebtedness, thereby having a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

Our mortgage banking operations are dependent on the availability, cost and other terms of mortgage warehouse financing, and may be adversely affected by any shortage or increased cost of such financing. No assurance can be given that any additional or replacement financing will be available on terms that are favorable or acceptable. Our mortgage banking operations are also dependent upon the securitization market for mortgage-backed securities, and could be materially adversely affected by any fluctuation or downturn in such market.

3

Table of Contents

Government regulations and environmental matters can negatively affect our operations.

We are subject to various local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, building design, construction and similar matters, including local regulations that impose restrictive zoning and density requirements in order to limit the number of homes that can eventually be built within the boundaries of a particular area. We have from time to time been subject to, and may also be subject in the future to, periodic delays in our homebuilding projects due to building moratoriums in the areas in which we operate. Changes in regulations that restrict homebuilding activities in one or more of our principal markets could have a material adverse effect on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

We are also subject to a variety of local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the protection of health and the environment. We are subject to a variety of environmental conditions that can affect our business and our homebuilding projects. The particular environmental laws that apply to any given homebuilding site vary greatly according to the location and environmental condition of the site and the present and former uses of the site and adjoining properties. Environmental laws and conditions may result in delays, cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs, or prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding activity in certain environmentally sensitive regions or areas, thereby adversely affecting our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

We are an approved seller/servicer of FNMA, GNMA, FHLMC, FHA and VA mortgage loans, and are subject to all of those agencies’ rules and regulations. Any significant impairment of our eligibility to sell/service these loans could have a material adverse impact on our mortgage operations. In addition, we are subject to regulation at the state and federal level with respect to specific origination, selling and servicing practices. Adverse changes in governmental regulation may have a negative impact on our mortgage loan origination business.

We face competition in our housing and mortgage banking operations.

The homebuilding industry is highly competitive. We compete with numerous homebuilders of varying size, ranging from local to national in scope, some of whom have greater financial resources than we do. We face competition:

Our homebuilding operations compete primarily on the basis of price, location, design, quality, service and reputation. Historically we have been one of the leading homebuilders in each of the markets where we operate.

The mortgage banking industry is also competitive. Our main competition comes from national, regional and local mortgage bankers, thrifts, banks and mortgage brokers in each of these markets. Our mortgage banking operations compete primarily on the basis of customer service, variety of products offered, interest rates offered, prices of ancillary services and relative financing availability and costs.

There can be no assurance that we will continue to compete successfully in our homebuilding or mortgage banking operations. An inability to effectively compete may have an adverse impact on our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

4

Table of Contents

A shortage of building materials or labor may adversely impact our operations.

The homebuilding business has from time to time experienced building material and labor shortages, including shortages in insulation, drywall, certain carpentry work and concrete, as well as fluctuating lumber prices and supply. In addition, high employment levels and strong construction market conditions could restrict the labor force available to our subcontractors and us in one or more of our markets. Significant increases in costs resulting from these shortages, or delays in construction of homes, could have a material adverse effect upon our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

Weather-related and other events beyond our control may adversely impact our operations.

Extreme weather or other events, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, forest fires, floods, terrorist attacks or war, may affect our markets, our operations and our profitability. These events may impact our physical facilities or those of our suppliers or subcontractors, causing us material increases in costs, or delays in construction of homes, which could have a material adverse effect upon our sales, profitability, stock performance and ability to service our debt obligations.

5

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business.

General

NVR, Inc. (“NVR”) was formed in 1980 as NVHomes, Inc. NVR operates in two business segments, homebuilding and mortgage banking. NVR conducts its homebuilding activities directly and its mortgage banking operations primarily through a wholly owned subsidiary, NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (“NVRM”). Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “NVR”, “we”, “us” or “our” include NVR and its subsidiaries.

We are one of the largest homebuilders in the United States and in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD metropolitan areas. While we operate in multiple locations in eleven states, primarily in the eastern part of the United States, approximately 42% of our home settlements in 2004 occurred in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD metropolitan areas, which accounted for 54% of our 2004 homebuilding revenues. Our homebuilding operations include the construction and sale of single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominium buildings under three trade names: Ryan Homes, NVHomes and Fox Ridge Homes. The Ryan Homes and Fox Ridge Homes products are moderately priced and marketed primarily to first-time homeowners and first-time move-up buyers. The Ryan Homes product is built in eighteen metropolitan areas located in Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Ohio, New Jersey, and Delaware. The Fox Ridge Homes product is built solely in the Nashville, TN metropolitan area. The NVHomes product is marketed primarily to move-up and upscale buyers and is built in the Washington, D.C., Baltimore, MD and Philadelphia, PA metropolitan areas. In 2004, our average price of a unit settled was approximately $332,200.

We do not engage in the land development business. Instead, we acquire finished building lots at market prices from various development entities under fixed-price purchase agreements that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the agreement. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage, typically ranging up to 10%, of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots.

Our lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and land development. We may, at our option, choose for any reason and at any time not to perform under these purchase agreements by delivering notice of our intent not to acquire the finished lots under contract. Our sole legal obligation and economic loss for failure to perform under these purchase agreements is limited to the amount of the deposit pursuant to the liquidating damage provision contained within the purchase agreements. We do not have any financial guarantees or completion obligations and, with the exception of one specific performance contract for 20 lots existing at December 31, 2004, do not guarantee specific performance under these purchase agreements. We generally seek to maintain control over a supply of lots believed to be suitable to meet our sales objectives for the next 24 to 36 months.

In addition to building and selling homes, we provide a number of mortgage-related services through our mortgage banking operations, which operate in 11 states. Through office locations in each of our homebuilding markets, NVRM originates mortgage loans exclusively for our homebuyers. NVRM generates revenues primarily from origination fees, gains on sales of loans and title fees. NVRM sells substantially all of the mortgage loans it closes into the secondary markets on a servicing released basis.

Segment information for our homebuilding and mortgage banking businesses is included in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

Homebuilding

Products

We offer single-family detached homes, townhomes, and condominium buildings with many different basic home designs. These home designs have a variety of elevations and numerous other options. Our homes combine traditional or colonial exterior designs with contemporary interior designs and amenities, generally include two to four bedrooms, and range from approximately 1,000 to 7,300 square feet and are priced from approximately $90,000 to $1,700,000.

Markets

We operate in the following geographic regions:

Further discussion of settlements, new orders and backlog activity by region for each of the last three years can be found in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (see Item 7 of this report).

Backlog

Backlog totaled 7,372 units and approximately $2.9 billion at December 31, 2004 compared to backlog of 6,890 units and approximately $2.3 billion at December 31, 2003. Based on historical trends, we anticipate that approximately 15% of the units in backlog at December 31, 2004 will cancel prior to settlement. The remaining 85% of the units are expected to settle in 2005.

Construction

We utilize independent subcontractors under fixed-price contracts to perform construction work on our homes. The subcontractors’ work is performed under the supervision of our employees who monitor quality control. We use many independent subcontractors in our various markets and we are not dependent on any single subcontractor or on a small number of subcontractors.

Land Development

We are not in the land development business. We purchase finished lots from various land developers under fixed-price purchase agreements that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the agreement. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage, typically ranging up to 10%, of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots. We are not dependent on any single developer or on a small number of developers.

Sales and Marketing

Our preferred marketing method is for customers to visit a furnished model home featuring many built-in options and a landscaped lot. The garages of these model homes are usually converted into temporary sales centers where alternative facades and floor plans are displayed and designs for other models are available for review. Sales representatives are compensated predominantly on a commission basis.

7

Table of Contents

Regulation

NVR and its subcontractors must comply with various federal, state and local zoning, building, environmental, advertising and consumer credit statutes, rules and regulations, as well as other regulations and requirements in connection with our construction and sales activities. All of these regulations have increased the cost to produce and market our products. Counties and cities in which we build homes have at times declared moratoriums on the issuance of building permits and imposed other restrictions in the areas in which sewage treatment facilities and other public facilities do not reach minimum standards. To date, restrictive zoning laws and the imposition of moratoriums have not had a material adverse effect on our construction activities.

Competition and Market Factors

The housing industry is highly competitive. We compete with numerous homebuilders of varying size, ranging from local to national in scope, some of which have greater financial resources than we do. We also face competition from the home resale market. Our homebuilding operations compete primarily on the basis of price, location, design, quality, service and reputation. We historically have been one of the market leaders in each of the markets where we build homes.

The housing industry is cyclical and is affected by consumer confidence levels, prevailing economic conditions and interest rates. Other factors that affect the housing industry and the demand for new homes include the availability and increases in the cost of land, labor and materials; changes in consumer preferences; demographic trends and the availability of mortgage finance programs.

We are dependent upon building material suppliers for a continuous flow of raw materials. Whenever possible, we utilize standard products available from multiple sources. In the past, such raw materials have been generally available to us in adequate supply.

Mortgage Banking

We provide a number of mortgage related services to our homebuilding customers through our mortgage banking operations. Our mortgage banking operations also include separate subsidiaries that broker title insurance and perform title searches in connection with mortgage loan closings for which they receive commissions and fees. Because NVRM originates mortgage loans predominately for our homebuilding customers, NVRM is dependent on our homebuilding segment. In 2004, NVRM closed approximately 10,400 loans with an aggregate principal amount of approximately $2.7 billion.

NVRM sells substantially all of the mortgage loans it closes to investors in the secondary markets on a servicing released basis. NVRM is an approved seller/servicer for FNMA, GNMA, FHLMC, VA and FHA mortgage loans.

Competition and Market Factors

NVRM operates through 16 branches in 11 states. NVRM’s main competition comes from national, regional, and local mortgage bankers, mortgage brokers, thrifts and banks in each of these markets. NVRM competes primarily on the basis of customer service, variety of products offered, interest rates offered, prices of ancillary services and relative financing availability and costs.

Regulation

NVRM is an approved seller/servicer of FNMA, GNMA, FHLMC, FHA and VA mortgage loans, and is subject to all of those agencies’ rules and regulations. These rules and regulations restrict certain activities of NVRM. NVRM is currently eligible and expects to remain eligible to participate in such programs. In addition, NVRM is subject to regulation at the state and federal level with respect to specific origination, selling and servicing practices.

8

Table of Contents

Pipeline

NVRM’s mortgage loans in process that have not closed (“Pipeline”) at December 31, 2004 and 2003, had an aggregate principal balance of $1.9 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively. NVRM anticipates that approximately 25% of its Pipeline at December 31, 2004 will cancel prior to closing. The remaining 75% of the Pipeline is expected to close in 2005.

Employees

At December 31, 2004, we employed 4,407 full-time persons, of whom 1,746 were officers and management personnel, 232 were technical and construction personnel, 847 were sales personnel, 672 were administrative personnel and 910 were engaged in various other service and labor activities. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement and we have never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our employee relations are good.

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). These filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document we file at the SEC’s public reference room located at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room.

Our principal Internet website can be found at www.nvrinc.com. We make available free of charge on or through our website, access to our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed, or furnished, to the SEC.

Our website also includes a corporate governance section which contains the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics, Board of Directors’ Committee Charters for the Audit, Nominating, Compensation, Corporate Governance and Qualified Legal Compliance Committees, Policies and Procedures for the Consideration of Board of Director Candidates and Policies and Procedures on Securityholder Communications with the Board of Directors. Additionally, amendments to and waivers from a provision of the Code of Ethics that apply to NVR’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions will be disclosed on our website.

In addition, you may request a copy of the foregoing filings (excluding exhibits), charters, guidelines and codes, and any waivers or amendments to such codes which are applicable to our executive officers, senior financial officers or directors, at no cost by writing to us at NVR, Inc., 7601 Lewinsville Road, Suite 300, McLean, VA 22102, Attention: Investor Relations Department or by telephoning us at (703) 761-2000.

Item 2. Properties.

Our corporate offices are located in McLean, Virginia, where we currently lease approximately 39,000 square feet of office space. The current executive office leases expire on various dates through December 2009. In 2005, we plan to relocate our corporate offices to Reston, Virginia where we have entered into a lease agreement for approximately 50,000 square feet of office space, expiring in 2015.

We lease manufacturing facilities in the following six locations: Thurmont, Maryland; Burlington County, New Jersey; Farmington, New York; Kings Mountain, North Carolina; Darlington, Pennsylvania; and Portland, Tennessee. These facilities range in size from approximately 40,000 square feet to 400,000 square feet and combined total approximately 1,000,000 square feet of manufacturing space. All of our

9

Table of Contents

manufacturing facilities are leased. Each of these leases contain various options for extensions of the lease and for the purchase of the facility. The Darlington lease expires in 2005. We expect to renew this lease under comparable terms to the current lease agreement. The Portland lease expires 2009. The Thurmont and Farmington plant leases expire in 2014, and the Kings Mountain and Burlington County leases expire in 2023 and 2024, respectively.

We also lease office space in 81 locations in 10 states for homebuilding divisional offices and mortgage banking and title services branches under leases expiring at various times through 2011. We anticipate that, upon expiration of existing leases, we will be able to renew them or obtain comparable facilities on acceptable terms.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We are involved in various claims and litigation arising principally in the ordinary course of business. At this time, we are not involved in any legal proceedings that we believe are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the quarter ended December 31, 2004.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Dwight C. Schar has been chairman of the board, president and chief executive officer of NVR since September 30, 1993.

William J. Inman has been president of NVRM since January 1992.

Paul C. Saville had been senior vice president finance, chief financial officer and treasurer of NVR since September 30, 1993. Effective January 1, 2002, Mr. Saville was named an executive vice president.

Dennis M. Seremet had been vice president and controller of NVR since April 1, 1995. Effective January 1, 2005, Mr. Seremet was named a Senior Vice President.

10

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our shares of common stock are listed and principally traded on the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”). The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales prices per share for each fiscal quarter during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:

As of the close of business on February 18, 2005, there were 508 shareholders of record.

We did not pay any cash dividends on our shares of common stock during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. In addition, we do not expect to pay a cash dividend in the foreseeable future as we continue with our objective of increasing shareholder value by using earnings to fund continued growth in our homebuilding and mortgage banking operations. We may from time to time repurchase shares of our common stock to also further that objective. Our bank indebtedness contains certain restrictive covenants, which limit our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock. As of December 31, 2004, the most restrictive of these bank provisions would have limited us to paying a maximum of approximately $250 million in cash dividends.

On May 3, 2004 (the “May Authorization”) and December 16, 2004 (the “December Authorization”), we publicly announced the Board of Director’s approval for us to purchase up to an aggregate of $200 million and $400 million, respectively, of our common stock in one or more open market and/or privately negotiated transactions. Neither the May Authorization nor the December Authorization has an expiration date. As of December 31, 2004, no repurchases were made under the December authorization. The following table provides information regarding common stock repurchases for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, all of which were made under the May Authorization:

11

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data. (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following tables set forth selected consolidated financial data. The selected income statement and balance sheet data have been extracted from our consolidated financial statements for each of the periods presented. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002

Overview

Our primary business is the construction and sale of single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominium buildings. To fully serve our homebuilding customers, we also operate a mortgage banking and title services business. We operate in the following markets:

We believe we operate our business with a conservative operating strategy. We do not engage in land development and primarily construct homes on a pre-sold basis. This strategy allows us to maximize

12

Table of Contents

inventory turnover, which enables us to minimize market risk and to operate with less capital, thereby enhancing rates of return on equity and total capital. In addition, we focus on obtaining and maintaining a leading market position in each market we serve. This strategy allows us to gain valuable efficiencies and competitive advantages in our markets which we believe contributes to minimizing the adverse effects of regional economic cycles and provides growth opportunities within these markets.

Because we are not active in the land development business, our continued success is contingent upon our ability to control an adequate supply of finished lots on which to build, and on our developers’ ability to deliver finished lots to timely meet the sales demands of our customers. We acquire finished building lots at market prices from various development entities under fixed-price purchase agreements (“purchase agreements”). These purchase agreements require deposits in the form of cash or letters of credit that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the purchase agreement. However, this lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and development. As of December 31, 2004, we controlled approximately 83,500 lots with deposits in cash and letters of credit totaling approximately $404,000 and $13,000, respectively. We also controlled approximately 950 lots through investments in joint venture limited liability corporations.

Consolidated revenues and net income for 2004 increased 17% and 25%, respectively, from 2003. The increase in net income coupled with our continuing share repurchase program resulted in a 37% increase in diluted earnings per share in 2004 compared to 2003.

Homebuilding Segment

The following tables summarizes homebuilding settlements, new orders and backlog activity by region for each of the last three years:

13

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the results of operations for each of the last three years for our homebuilding segment:

Homebuilding Segment

Homebuilding revenues for 2004 increased 18% from 2003, primarily as a result of a 12% increase in the average settlement price to $332.2 in 2004 from $297.9 in 2003 and to an increase of 6% in the number of homes settled to 12,749 in 2004 from 12,050 in 2003. The increase in average settlement prices is primarily attributable to a 9% higher average price of homes in backlog entering 2004 as compared to 2003 and to a 16% increase in the average price of homes sold during the first six months of 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in the number of homes settled is primarily attributable to an 8% higher backlog at the beginning of 2004 as compared to the beginning of 2003.

Homebuilding revenues for 2003 increased 18% as compared to revenues in 2002. The increase in revenues resulted primarily from an 11% increase in the average settlement price to $297.9 in 2003 from $268.5 in 2002 and to an increase of 6% in the number of homes settled to 12,050 in 2003 from 11,368 in 2002. The increase in average settlement prices is primarily attributable to favorable market conditions resulting in increased sales prices in a majority of NVR’s markets. The increase in the number of homes settled is primarily attributable to a 14% higher backlog at the beginning of 2003 as compared to the beginning of 2002 and a 6% increase in new orders during the first six months of 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002.

The number of new orders for 2004 increased 5% from 2003, while the value of new orders for 2004 increased 22% to $4,817,780 from $3,950,413 in 2003. The increase in the number of new orders was attributable to an overall increase in the average number of active communities to 450 in 2004 as compared to 433 in 2003. Increases year over year in new orders in the Washington, North and South regions were offset partially by a 9% decrease in new orders for the Baltimore region. This decrease resulted primarily from a 7% decrease in the average number of active communities in the Baltimore region year over year, attributable primarily to development delays. The 22% increase in the value of new orders is primarily attributable to the aforementioned increase in the number of new orders and strong housing demand which provided us the opportunity to raise selling prices, resulting in a 16% increase in the average selling price in 2004 as compared to 2003.

New orders for the full year ended 2003 increased 3% to 12,583 units from 12,167 units in 2002. The value of new orders increased 13% to $3,950,413 in 2003 from $3,501,793 in 2002. The increase in new orders occurred predominately in the North region as a result of a 5% increase in the average number of active communities within this region. The decrease in new orders in the Washington region was primarily due to a 2% reduction in the average number of active communities within that region.

The increase in gross profit margins in 2004 from 2003 is primarily attributable to favorable market conditions which allowed us to increase sales prices in a majority of our markets leading to the aforementioned 12% increase in average settlement prices year over year. These increases were partially offset by higher land, lumber and other commodity prices in 2004 as compared to 2003. Gross profit margins in future periods may be negatively impacted by the trend of higher land, lumber and other commodity prices if we are unable to pass these increases through to our homebuyers on new orders. Gross profit margins for 2003 increased to 24.7% compared to 23.7% for 2002. The increase in profit margins was attributable to the favorable market conditions allowing NVR to raise sales prices on new orders in a majority of the markets NVR serves.

14

Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) for 2004 increased 12% from 2003, but as a percentage of revenues, decreased to 6.1% in 2004 from 6.4% in 2003. The increase in SG&A costs is primarily attributable to increased personnel costs and selling and marketing costs of approximately $11,500 and $10,400, respectively, due to our continued growth strategy. SG&A expenses for 2003 increased approximately 3% from 2002 and as a percentage of revenues decreased to approximately 6.4% in 2003 from 7.4% in 2002. The increase in SG&A costs in 2003 is primarily attributable to increases in personnel costs and selling and marketing costs of approximately $13,000 and $8,000, respectively, to facilitate continued growth objectives in existing markets, and to an approximate $9,000 increase in other general and administrative costs incidental to the aforementioned increase in revenues. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $24,000 in 2003 from 2002 related to the termination of certain management incentive compensation plans at the end of 2002.

Backlog units and dollars were 7,372 and $2,906,041, respectively, at December 31, 2004 compared to backlog units of 6,890 and dollars of $2,323,703 at December 31, 2003. The increase in backlog units is due primarily to a 6% increase in the number of new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2004 as compared to the same period ended December 31, 2003. The 25% increase in backlog dollars is attributable to the 7% increase in backlog units and a 16% increase in the average price of new orders for the six-month period ended December 31, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003. Backlog units and dollars were 6,890 and $2,323,703, respectively, at December 31, 2003 compared to backlog units of 6,357 and dollars of $1,962,115 at December 31, 2002. The increase in backlog units is due primarily to a 14% higher backlog at the beginning of 2003 as compared to the beginning of 2002. The 18% increase in backlog dollars is attributable to an 8% increase in backlog units and a 12% increase in the average price of new orders for the six months ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002.

Mortgage Banking Segment

NVR conducts its mortgage banking activity through NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (“NVRM”), a wholly owned subsidiary. NVRM focuses almost exclusively on serving the homebuilding segment’s customer base. Following is a table of financial and statistical data for the three years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:

Loan closing volume for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased 14% from 2003. The 2004 increase is primarily attributable to a 12% increase in the average loan amount, and a year over year 2% increase in the number of units closed. The increase in the average loan amount reflects the aforementioned increase in the homebuilding segment’s average selling prices. The unit increase for the year ended December 31, 2004 reflects an increase in the number of settlements by the homebuilding segment and a slight increase in the percentage of the number of loans closed for NVR’s homebuyers who obtain a mortgage to purchase the home (“Capture Rate”).

15

Table of Contents

Segment income for the year ended December 31, 2004 decreased approximately $6,900 from 2003. The decrease is primarily due to a product mix shift during 2004 from fixed rate mortgages to adjustable rate mortgages and brokered mortgages, both of which are generally less profitable products than fixed rate mortgages. The decrease is also due to higher costs incurred of approximately $3,400 related to the contractual repayment of loan sale income to investors for loans that were paid in full within a set number of days following the sale of the loan. The decreases due to the product mix shift and contractual repayments was partially offset by the higher 2004 loan volume. General and administrative expenses have also increased during the 2004 year compared to 2003 by approximately $1,800, which is largely due to a 15% increase in the total number of NVRM employees in 2004 versus 2003. The increased staffing level is to position NVRM for future growth and to increase the Capture Rate.

Mortgage loans held for sale increased approximately $42,000 at December 31, 2004 compared to December 31, 2003. NVRM’s product mix shift into adjustable rate mortgages, which are delivered into sales channels on a whole loan basis, has lengthened the average sale and funding cycle from third-party investors. Even with the lengthened sale and funding cycle, mortgage loans held for sale are typically sold to third-party investors in less than 30 days from date of closing.

Loan closing volume for the year ended December 31, 2003 increased 10% over 2002. The 2003 increase compared to 2002 is solely attributable to a 10% increase in the average loan amount due to the homebuilding segment’s higher average selling prices. The number of units closed was flat in 2003 compared to 2002.

Segment income for the year ended December 31, 2003 increased approximately $11,100 over 2002. The 2003 increase is primarily due to an increase in mortgage banking fees attributable to the aforementioned 10% increase in closed loan volume, increased secondary marketing gains, and higher revenues per loan. Secondary marketing gains for 2003 increased approximately $2,000 over 2002. Average revenues per loan (including origination fees, ancillary fees and discount points) for 2003 increased by approximately 7%.

Seasonality

Overall, we do not experience material seasonal fluctuations in sales, settlements or loan closings.

Effective Tax Rate

Our consolidated effective tax rates were 40.0%, 39.7% and 38.2% in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The lower effective tax rate in 2002 was primarily due to the amendment of a long-term cash incentive plan requiring executive officers to defer receipt of payments due under the plan until separation of service with NVR. The effect of this amendment converted compensation expensed prior to January 1, 2002 from a permanent tax difference to a temporary tax difference, producing an approximate $7,800 deferred tax benefit.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, Inventory Cost – an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, (“SFAS 151”). SFAS 151 clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material, requiring all such costs to be recognized as current-period charges. SFAS 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not expect that the adoption of SFAS 151 will have material impact on our financial position and results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payments, (“SFAS 123R”). SFAS 123R is a revision of SFAS 123 and supersedes APB No. 25. SFAS 123R requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized

16

Table of Contents

in the financial statements and establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment arrangements. SFAS 123R is effective as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005, and applies to all awards granted, modified, repurchased or cancelled after the effective date, and all outstanding portions of awards granted prior to the effective date which are unvested as the effective date of the pronouncement. Entities may adopt the provisions of SFAS 123R using either the modified prospective or modified retrospective application. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized on or after the required effective date for the portion of outstanding awards for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered, based on the grant-date fair value of those awards calculated under SFAS 123 for either recognition or pro forma disclosure. For periods before the required effective date, the modified retrospective application may be applied to either (a) all prior years for which SFAS 123 was effective or (b) only to prior interim periods in the year of initial adoption, on a basis consistent with the pro forma disclosures required for those periods by SFAS 123. SFAS 123R becomes effective for us beginning in the third quarter of 2005. We are currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS 123R and although we expect the effect of adopting SFAS 123R to be consistent with our pro forma financial results presented in our disclosure currently required by SFAS 123, the granting of additional equity awards prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R could materially increase the compensation expense recognized under SFAS 123R.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Lines of Credit and Notes Payable

Our homebuilding segment generally provides for its working capital cash requirements using cash generated from operations and a short-term unsecured working capital revolving credit facility (the “Facility”). The Facility provides for borrowings of up to $150,000, subject to certain borrowing base limitations and expires in August 2007. The Facility bears interest at a variable rate based on the type of borrowing and other criteria set forth in the Facility. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings outstanding during 2004 was 4.0%. Up to $50,000 of the Facility is currently available for issuance in the form of letters of credit, of which $21,794 was outstanding at December 31, 2004. There were no direct borrowings outstanding under the Facility as of December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2004, there were no borrowing base limitations reducing the amount available to us for borrowings.

NVR’s mortgage banking segment provides for its mortgage origination and other operating activities using cash generated from operations as well as various short-term credit facilities. NVRM has available an annually renewable mortgage warehouse facility (the “Revolving Credit Agreement”) with an aggregate borrowing limit of $175,000 to fund its mortgage origination activities, under which $9,726 was outstanding at December 31, 2004. As of December 31, 2004, borrowing base limitations reduced the amount available to NVRM for borrowings to approximately $131,000. The Revolving Credit Agreement expires in August 2005. The interest rate under the Revolving Credit Agreement is either: (i) the London Interbank Offering Rate (“Libor”) plus 1.25%, or (ii) 1.25% to the extent that NVRM provides compensating balances. The weighted average interest rate for amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Agreement was 1.9% during 2004. NVRM’s mortgage warehouse facility limits the ability of NVRM to transfer funds to NVR in the form of dividends, loans or advances. In addition, NVRM is required to maintain a minimum net worth of $14,000. NVRM also currently has available an aggregate of $50,000 of borrowing capacity in an uncommitted gestation and repurchase agreement. Amounts outstanding under the uncommitted gestation and repurchase agreement accrue interest at various rates tied to the Libor rate and are collateralized by gestation mortgage-backed securities and whole loans. There were no borrowings under this uncommitted facility during 2004.

On January 20, 1998, we filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the issuance of up to $400,000 of debt securities (the “1998 Shelf Registration”). The 1998 Shelf Registration statement was declared effective on February 27, 1998 and provides that securities may be offered from time to time in one or more series, and in the form of senior or subordinated debt.

On June 17, 2003, we completed an offering, at par, for $200,000 of 5% Senior Notes due 2010 (the

17

Table of Contents

“Notes”) under the 1998 Shelf Registration. The offering of the Notes resulted in aggregate net proceeds of approximately $199,400, after deducting offering expenses. The Notes mature on June 15, 2010 and bear interest at 5%, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15, commencing on December 15, 2003. The Notes are general unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness and indebtedness under our existing credit facility. The Notes are senior in right of payment to any future subordinated indebtedness that we may incur. We may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at any time upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days notice at a redemption price equal to the greater of (a) 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, or (b) the discounted present value of the remaining scheduled payments of the Notes to be redeemed, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest.

On July 14, 2003, we used approximately $120,700 of the proceeds received from the sale of the Notes to redeem all of the $115,000 outstanding 8% Senior Notes due 2005 at a price of 104% of the principal amount outstanding, including the payment of accrued interest. The redemption resulted in a charge to pre-tax homebuilding income of $8,503.

On May 27, 2004, we filed a shelf registration statement (the “2004 Shelf Registration”) with the SEC to register up to $1,000,000 for future offer and sale of debt securities, common shares, preferred shares, depositary shares representing preferred shares and warrants. The SEC declared the 2004 Shelf Registration effective on June 15, 2004. NVR expects to use the proceeds received from future offerings issued under the 2004 Shelf Registration for general corporate purposes. In addition, we have $55,000 remaining available for issuance under the 1998 Shelf Registration. This discussion of our shelf registration capacity does not constitute an offer of any securities for sale.

Equity Repurchases

In addition to funding growth in our homebuilding and mortgage banking operations, we historically have used a substantial portion of our excess liquidity to repurchase outstanding shares of our common stock in open market and privately negotiated transactions. This ongoing repurchase activity is conducted pursuant to publicly announced Board authorizations, and is typically executed in accordance with the safe-harbor provisions of Rule 10(b)-18 of the 1933 Securities Act. The repurchase program assists us in accomplishing our primary objective, creating increases in shareholder value. See Part II, Item 5 of the Form 10-K for disclosure of amounts repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we repurchased approximately 675,000 shares of our common stock at an aggregate purchase price of $307,603.

Cash Flows

As shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004, our operating activities provided cash of $463,928. Cash was provided primarily by homebuilding operations and by the realization of a tax benefit of $92,661 from employee stock-based compensation activities, primarily employee stock option exercises. These tax benefits were recorded directly to equity and reduced estimated tax payments during the year. Cash was also provided by a $46,830 increase in customer deposits resulting primarily from the increase in backlog units in 2004 as compared to 2003. Cash was used primarily to fund increases in homebuilding inventory of $64,767 and to make deposits on fixed-price purchase agreements with developers to acquire control of finished lots. The increase in contract land deposits of $118,680 resulted in an increase in the number of lots under control to approximately 83,500 lots at December 31, 2004 from approximately 70,000 lots at December 31, 2003.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $3,581 for the year ended December 31, 2004, primarily due to principal payments received on mortgage loans held for sale, partially offset by capital spending.

Net cash used for financing activities was $332,363 for the year ended December 31, 2004, primarily as a result of our ongoing common stock repurchase program. We repurchased approximately 675,000 shares of our common stock in 2004 for an aggregate purchase price of $307,603.

18

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2004, the homebuilding and mortgage banking segments had restricted cash of $19,473 and $4,115, respectively, which includes certain customer deposits, mortgagor tax escrows, insurance escrows, completion escrows and other amounts collected at closing which relates to mortgage loans held for sale and to home sales.

We believe that internally generated cash and borrowings available under our credit facilities and the public debt markets will be sufficient to satisfy near and longer term cash requirements for working capital and debt service in both our homebuilding and mortgage banking operations.

Off –Balance Sheet Arrangements

Lot Acquisition Strategy

We do not engage in the land development business. Instead, we acquire finished building lots at market prices from various development entities under fixed-price purchase agreements that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the agreement. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage, typically ranging up to 10%, of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots.

Our lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and land development. We may, at our option, choose for any reason and at any time not to perform under these purchase agreements by delivering notice of our intent not to acquire the finished lots under contract. Our sole legal obligation and economic loss for failure to perform under these purchase agreements is limited to the amount of the deposit pursuant to the liquidating damage provision contained within the purchase agreements. We do not have any financial guarantees or completion obligations and, with the exception of one specific performance contract for 20 lots existing at December 31, 2004, do not guarantee specific performance under these purchase agreements.

At December 31, 2004, we controlled approximately 83,500 lots with an aggregate purchase price of approximately $7,500,000, by making or committing to make deposits of approximately $551,000 in the form of cash and letters of credit. Our entire risk of loss pertaining to the aggregate $7,500,000 contractual commitment resulting from our non-performance under the contracts is limited to the $551,000 deposit amount. Of the $551,000 deposit total, approximately $404,000 in cash and approximately $13,000 in letters of credit have been issued as of December 31, 2004, and $134,000 will be paid subsequent to December 31, 2004 assuming that contractual development milestones are met by the developers (see contractual obligations section below).

Bonds and Letters of Credit

We enter into bond or letter of credit arrangements with local municipalities, government agencies, or land developers to collateralize our obligations under various contracts. We had $27,791 of contingent obligations under such agreements as of December 31, 2004 (inclusive of the $13,000 of lot acquisition deposits discussed above). We believe we will fulfill our obligations under the related contracts and do not anticipate any losses under these bonds or letters of credit.

Mortgage Commitments and Forward Sales

In the normal course of business, our mortgage banking segment enters into contractual commitments to extend credit to buyers of single-family homes with fixed expiration dates. The commitments become effective when the borrowers “lock-in” a specified interest rate within time frames established by us. All mortgagors are evaluated for credit worthiness prior to the extension of the commitment. To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments to borrowers, we enter into optional or mandatory delivery forward sale contracts to sell whole loans and mortgage-backed securities to broker/dealers. The forward sale contracts lock in an interest rate and price for the sale of loans similar to the specific rate lock commitments classified as derivatives. Both the rate lock commitments to borrowers and the forward sale contracts to broker/dealers are undesignated derivatives, and accordingly are marked to market through earnings. At December 31, 2004, there were contractual commitments to extend credit to borrowers aggregating approximately $181,500, and open forward delivery sale contracts aggregating approximately $300,000.

19

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

Our fixed, non-cancelable obligations as of December 31, 2004, were as follows:

Critical Accounting Policies

General

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We continually evaluate the estimates we use to prepare the consolidated financial statements, and update those estimates as necessary. In general, our estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and other various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates made by management.

Variable Interest Entities

In December 2003, the FASB issued Revised Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46R”), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which was effective for us as of March 31, 2004. FIN 46R requires the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity to consolidate that entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the party that absorbs a majority of the variable interest entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual interests, or other financial interests in the entity. Expected losses are the expected negative variability in the fair value of an entity’s net assets exclusive of its variable interests, and expected residual returns are the expected positive variability in the fair value of an entity’s net assets, exclusive of its variable interests.

20

Table of Contents

Forward contracts, such as the fixed-price purchase agreements utilized by us to acquire finished lot inventory, are deemed to be “variable interests” under FIN 46R. Therefore, the development entities with which we enter fixed-price purchase agreements are examined under FIN 46R for possible consolidation by us, including the joint venture limited liability corporations (“LLC’s”) utilized by us on a limited basis. We have developed a methodology to determine whether we or the owner(s) of the applicable development entity are the primary beneficiary of a development entity. The methodology used to evaluate our primary beneficiary status requires substantial judgment and estimation. These judgments and estimates involve assigning probabilities to various estimated cash flow possibilities relative to the development entity’s expected profits and losses and the cash flows associated with changes in the fair value of finished lots under contract. Because we do not have any contractual or ownership interests in the development entities with which we contract to buy finished lots (other than our limited use of the LLC’s), we generally do not have the ability to compel these development entities to provide financial or other data to assist us in the performance of the primary beneficiary evaluation. In many instances, these development entities provide little, if any, financial information. This lack of direct information from the development entities may result in our evaluation being conducted solely based on the aforementioned judgments and estimates. Further, where we deem ourselves to be the primary beneficiary of a development entity created after December 31, 2003 and that development entity refuses to provide financial statements, we utilize estimation techniques to perform the consolidation. While we believe that our estimation techniques provide a reasonable basis of providing the financial condition of a development entity that refuses to provide financial statements, the actual financial condition of the development entity could differ from that reported. Although we believe that our accounting policy is designed to properly assess our primary beneficiary status relative to our involvement with the development entities from which we acquire finished lots, changes to the probabilities and the cash flow possibilities used in our evaluation could produce widely different conclusions regarding our status or non-status as a development entity’s primary beneficiary.

Homebuilding Inventory

The carrying value of inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost of lots and completed and uncompleted housing units represent the accumulated actual cost of the units. Field construction supervisors’ salaries and related direct overhead expenses are included in inventory costs. Interest costs are not capitalized into inventory. Upon settlement, the cost of the unit is expensed on a specific identification basis. Cost of manufacturing materials is determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Recoverability and impairment, if any, is primarily evaluated by analyzing sales of comparable assets. We believe that our accounting policy is designed to properly assess the carrying value of homebuilding inventory.

Contract Land Deposits

We purchase finished lots under fixed-price purchase agreements that require deposits that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the contract. The deposits are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts and represent a percentage of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots. We maintain an allowance for losses on contract land deposits that we believe is sufficient to provide for losses in the existing contract land deposit portfolio. The allowance reflects our judgment of the present loss exposure at the end of the reporting period, considering market and economic conditions, sales absorption and profitability within specific communities and terms of the various contracts. Although we consider the allowance for losses on contract land deposits reflected on the December 31, 2004 balance sheet to be adequate, there can be no assurance that this allowance will prove to be adequate over time to cover losses due to unanticipated adverse changes in the economy or other events adversely affecting specific markets or the homebuilding industry.

Intangible Assets

Reorganization value in excess of identifiable assets (“excess reorganization value”) and goodwill are no longer subject to amortization upon the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Rather, excess reorganization value and goodwill are subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value based test. We continually evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate that the remaining value of excess reorganization value and goodwill may not be recoverable. At December 31, 2004, we believe that excess reorganization value and

21

Table of Contents

goodwill were not impaired. This conclusion is based on our judgment, considering such factors as our history of operating success, our well recognized brand names and the significant positions held in the markets in which we operate. However, changes in strategy or adverse changes in market conditions could impact this judgment and require an impairment loss to be recognized for the amount that the carrying value of excess reorganization value and/or goodwill exceeds their fair value.

Warranty/Product Liability Accruals

Warranty and product liability accruals are established to provide for estimated future costs as a result of construction and product defects, product recalls and litigation incidental to our business. Liability estimates are determined based on our judgment considering such factors as historical experience, the likely current cost of corrective action, manufacturers’ and subcontractors’ participation in sharing the cost of corrective action, consultations with third party experts such as engineers, and discussions with our General Counsel and other outside counsel retained to handle specific product liability cases. Although we consider the warranty and product liability accrual reflected on the December 31, 2004 balance sheet (see note 10 to the consolidated financial statements) to be adequate, there can be no assurance that this accrual will prove to be adequate over time to cover losses due to increased costs for material and labor, the inability or refusal of manufacturers or subcontractors to financially participate in corrective action, unanticipated adverse legal settlements, or other unanticipated changes to the assumptions used to estimate the warranty and product liability accrual.

Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices and Economic Conditions

See Risk Factors previously discussed.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our market risk arises from interest rate risk inherent in our financial instruments. Interest rate risk is the possibility that changes in interest rates will cause unfavorable changes in net income or in the value of interest rate-sensitive assets, liabilities and commitments. Lower interest rates tend to increase demand for mortgage loans for home purchasers, while higher interest rates make it more difficult for potential borrowers to purchase residential properties and to qualify for mortgage loans. We have no market rate sensitive instruments held for speculative or trading purposes.

Our mortgage banking segment is exposed to interest rate risk as it relates to its lending activities. The mortgage banking segment originates mortgage loans, which are either sold through optional or mandatory forward delivery contracts into the secondary markets. All of the mortgage banking segment’s loan portfolio is held for sale and subject to forward sale commitments. NVRM also sells substantially all of its mortgage servicing rights on a servicing released basis.

Our homebuilding segment generates operating liquidity and acquires capital assets through fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. The homebuilding segment’s primary variable-rate debt is a working capital revolving credit facility that currently provides for unsecured borrowings up to $150,000, subject to certain borrowing base limitations. The working capital credit facility expires in August 2007 and outstanding amounts bear interest at our election based on the type of borrowing and other criteria set forth in the Facility. The weighted average interest rate for the amounts outstanding under the Facility was 4.0% during 2004. There were no amounts outstanding under the working capital revolving credit facility at December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2004, there were no borrowing base limitations reducing the amount available to us for borrowings.

NVRM generates operating liquidity primarily through the mortgage warehouse facility, which currently has a borrowing limit of $175,000. The interest rate under the mortgage warehouse facility is either: (i) the London Interbank Offering Rate (“Libor”) plus 1.25%, or (ii) 1.25% to the extent that NVRM provides compensating balances. The weighted-average interest rate for amounts outstanding under the mortgage warehouse facility was 1.9% during 2004. Mortgage loans and gestation mortgage-backed

22

Table of Contents

securities collateralize the mortgage warehouse facility borrowings. The mortgage warehouse facility is annually renewable and currently expires in August 2005. There was $9,726 outstanding under the mortgage warehouse facility at December 31, 2004. The mortgage warehouse facility agreement includes, among other items, restrictions on NVRM incurring additional borrowings and making intercompany dividends and tax payments. In addition, NVRM is required to maintain a minimum net worth of $14,000. At December 31, 2004, borrowing base limitations reduced the amount available to NVRM for borrowings to approximately $131,000.

The following table represents the contractual balances of our on-balance sheet financial instruments in dollars at the expected maturity dates, as well as the fair values of those on-balance sheet financial instruments, at December 31, 2004. The expected maturity categories take into consideration historical and anticipated prepayment speeds, as well as actual amortization of principal and do not take into consideration the reinvestment of cash or the refinancing of existing indebtedness. Because we sell all of the mortgage loans we originate into the secondary markets, we have made the assumption that the portfolio of mortgage loans held for sale will mature in the first year. Consequently, outstanding warehouse borrowings and repurchase facilities are also assumed to mature in the first year.

23

Table of Contents

24

Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The financial statements listed in Item 15 are filed as part of this report and are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2004 were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation referred to above that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004. Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

25

Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.

Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2005. Reference is also made regarding the executive officers of the registrant to “Executive Officers of the Registrant” following Item 4 of Part I of this report.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2005.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2005.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The table below sets forth information as of the end of our 2004 fiscal year for (i) all equity compensation plans previously approved by our shareholders and (ii) all equity compensation plans not previously approved by our shareholders:

Equity compensation plans approved by our shareholders include the NVR, Inc. Management Equity Incentive Plan, the NVR, Inc. Management Long-Term Stock Option Plan, the NVR, Inc. 1998

26

Table of Contents

Management Long-Term Stock Option Plan, the NVR, Inc. Directors’ Long-Term Stock Option Plan, and the 1998 Directors’ Long-Term Stock Option Plan. Equity compensation plans that have not been approved by our shareholders include the NVR, Inc. 1994 Management Equity Incentive Plan and the NVR, Inc. 2000 Broadly-Based Stock Option Plan. See note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of each of NVR’s equity compensation plans.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2005.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to April 30, 2005.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

NVR, Inc. - Consolidated Financial Statements

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Income

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

27

Table of Contents

28

Table of Contents

29

Table of Contents

30

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: February 28, 2005

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

31

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

NVR, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries adopted the provisions of FIN No. 46, “Consolidated of Variable Interest Entities” effective February 1, 2003 and the provisions of the revised FIN No. 46 effective March 31, 2004.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 24, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia

February 24, 2005

32

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

NVR, Inc.:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, included in Item 9A to the Company’s 2004 Form 10-K, that NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also, in our opinion, NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

33

Table of Contents

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of NVR, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and our report dated February 24, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia

February 24, 2005

34

Table of Contents

NVR, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands, except share data)

(Continued)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

35

Table of Contents

NVR, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Continued)

(dollars in thousands, except share data)