Nike, Inc. Form 10-K Year Ended May 31, 2002

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

As of July 25, 2002, the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Class A Common Stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant was $170,452,457 and the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Class B Common Stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant was $8,037,948,759.

As of July 25, 2002, the number of shares of the Registrant’s Class A Common Stock outstanding was 98,095,361 and the number of shares of the Registrant’s Class B Common Stock outstanding was 168,763,188.

Parts of Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on September 18, 2002 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

NIKE, Inc. was incorporated in 1968 under the laws of the state of Oregon. As used in this report, the terms “we”, “us”, “NIKE” and the “Company” refer to NIKE, Inc. and its predecessors, subsidiaries and affiliates, unless the context indicates otherwise.

Our principal business activity involves the design, development and worldwide marketing of high quality footwear, apparel, equipment, and accessory products. NIKE is the largest seller of athletic footwear and athletic apparel in the world. We sell our products to approximately 18,000 retail accounts in the United States and through a mix of independent distributors, licensees and subsidiaries in approximately 140 countries around the world. Virtually all of our products are manufactured by independent contractors. Virtually all footwear products are produced outside the United States, while apparel products are produced both in the United States and abroad.

NIKE’s athletic footwear products are designed primarily for specific athletic use, although a large percentage of the products are worn for casual or leisure purposes. We place considerable emphasis on high quality construction and innovative design. Running, basketball, children’s, cross-training and women’s shoes are currently our top-selling product categories and we expect them to continue to lead in product sales in the near future. However, we also market shoes designed for outdoor activities, tennis, golf, soccer, baseball, football, bicycling, volleyball, wrestling, cheerleading, aquatic activities, hiking, and other athletic and recreational uses.

We sell active sports apparel covering most of the above categories, athletically inspired lifestyle apparel, as well as athletic bags and accessory items. NIKE apparel and accessories are designed to complement our athletic footwear products, feature the same trademarks and are sold through the same marketing and distribution channels. We often market footwear, apparel and accessories in “collections” of similar design or for specific purposes. We also market apparel with licensed college and professional team and league logos.

We sell a line of performance equipment under the NIKE brand name, including sport balls, timepieces, eyewear, skates, bats, gloves, and other equipment designed for sports activities. We also have agreements for licensees to produce and sell NIKE brand swimwear, women’s sports bras, cycling apparel, children’s clothing, posters, school supplies, timepieces, and electronic media devices. We also sell small amounts of various plastic products to other manufacturers through our wholly-owned subsidiary, NIKE IHM, Inc.

We sell a line of dress and casual footwear and accessories for men, women and children under the brand name Cole Haan® through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Cole Haan Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Yarmouth, Maine.

Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Bauer NIKE Hockey Inc., headquartered in Greenland, New Hampshire, manufactures and distributes ice skates, skate blades, in-line roller skates, protective gear, hockey sticks, and hockey jerseys and accessories under the Bauer® and NIKE® brand names. Bauer also offers a full selection of products for street, roller and field hockey.

In April 2002, we acquired Hurley International LLC, headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, which designs and distributes a line of action sports apparel (for surfing, skateboarding, and snowboarding) and youth lifestyle apparel under the Hurley brand name.

The table below shows certain information regarding NIKE’s United States and international (non-U.S.) revenues for the last three fiscal years.

Financial information about geographic and segment operations appears in Note 16 of the consolidated financial statements on page 51.

We experience moderate fluctuations in aggregate sales volume during the year. However, the mix of product sales may vary considerably from time to time as a result of changes in seasonal and geographic demand for particular types of footwear, apparel, and equipment.

Because NIKE is a consumer products company, the relative popularity of various sports and fitness activities and changing design trends affect the demand for our products. We must therefore respond to trends and shifts in consumer preferences by adjusting the mix of existing product offerings, developing new products, styles and categories, and influencing sports and fitness preferences through aggressive marketing. This is a continuing risk. Failure to timely and adequately respond could have a material adverse affect on our sales and profitability.

During fiscal 2002, sales in the United States accounted for approximately 53 percent of total revenues, compared to 54 percent in fiscal 2001 and 56 percent in fiscal 2000. We sell to approximately 18,000 retail accounts in the United States. The NIKE brand domestic retail account base includes a mix of footwear stores, sporting goods stores, athletic specialty stores, department stores, skate, tennis and golf shops, and other retail accounts. During fiscal year 2002, our three largest customers accounted for approximately 28 percent of NIKE brand sales in the United States, and 26 percent of total sales in the United States.

We make substantial use of our “futures” ordering program, which allows retailers to order five to six months in advance of delivery with the guarantee that 90 percent of their orders will be delivered within a set time period at a fixed price. In fiscal year 2002, 92 percent of our U.S. footwear shipments (excluding Cole Haan, Bauer and Hurley) were made under the futures program, compared to 86 percent in fiscal 2001 and 90 percent in fiscal 2000. In fiscal 2002, 77 percent of our U.S. apparel shipments were made under the futures program, compared to 78 percent in fiscal 2001, and 82 percent in 2000.

We utilize 18 NIKE sales offices to solicit sales in the United States. We also utilize 15 independent sales representatives to sell specialty products for golf, cycling, water sports and outdoor activities. In addition, we operate the following retail outlets in the United States:

NIKE’s domestic distribution centers for footwear are located in Beaverton, Oregon, Wilsonville, Oregon, Memphis, Tennessee, and Greenland, New Hampshire. Apparel products are shipped from our Memphis distribution center. Cole Haan footwear and Bauer NIKE Hockey products are distributed primarily from Greenland, New Hampshire, and Hurley products are shipped from Costa Mesa, California.

We currently market our products in approximately 140 countries outside of the United States through independent distributors, licensees, subsidiaries and branch offices. Non-U.S. sales accounted for 47 percent of total revenues in fiscal 2002, compared to 46 percent in fiscal 2001 and 44 percent in fiscal 2000. We operate 19 distribution centers in Europe, Asia, Australia, Latin America, and Canada, and also distribute through independent distributors and licensees. We estimate that our products are sold through more than 30,000 retail accounts outside the United States. In many countries and regions, including Japan, Canada, Asia, Latin America, and Europe, we have a futures ordering program for retailers similar to the United States futures program described above. NIKE’s three largest customers outside of the U.S. accounted for approximately 9 percent of non-U.S. sales.

We operate 162 retail outlets outside the United States, which are comprised of NIKETOWNs, factory stores, employee stores, and Cole Haan stores.

International branch offices and subsidiaries of NIKE are located in Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Indonesia, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, The Netherlands, Norway, Peoples Republic of China, The Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and Vietnam.

Foot Locker, Inc., which operates a chain of retail stores specializing in athletic footwear and apparel, accounted for approximately 11 percent of global net sales of NIKE brand products during fiscal 2002. No other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our net sales during fiscal 2002.

As of May 31, 2002, our worldwide futures orders for NIKE brand athletic footwear and apparel totaled $4.6 billion, compared to $4.4 billion as of May 31, 2001. These orders are scheduled for delivery from June through November of 2002. Based upon historical data, we expect that approximately 95 percent of these orders will be filled in that time period, although the orders may be cancelable.

We believe that our research and development efforts are a key factor in our past and future success. Technical innovation in the design of footwear, apparel, and athletic equipment receive continued emphasis as NIKE strives to produce products that reduce or eliminate injury, aid athletic performance and maximize comfort.

In addition to NIKE’s own staff of specialists in the areas of biomechanics, exercise physiology, engineering, industrial design and related fields, we also utilize research committees and advisory boards made up of athletes, coaches, trainers, equipment managers, orthopedists, podiatrists and other experts who consult with us and review designs, materials and concepts for product improvement. Employee athletes wear-test and evaluate products during the design and development process.

In fiscal 2002, approximately 5 percent of total NIKE brand apparel production for sale to the United States market was manufactured in the United States by independent contract manufacturers, most of which are located in the southern states. The remainder was manufactured by independent contractors located in 28 countries. Most of this apparel production occurred in Bangladesh, Bulgaria, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Pakistan, The Philippines, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey. Substantially all of our apparel production for sale to the international market was manufactured outside the U.S. Our largest single apparel supplier accounted for approximately 8 percent of total fiscal 2002 apparel production.

Virtually all of our footwear is produced outside of the United States. In fiscal 2002, contract suppliers in the following countries manufactured the following percentages of total NIKE brand footwear:

We also have manufacturing agreements with independent factories in Argentina, Brazil, India, Mexico, South Africa, and Zimbabwe, to manufacture footwear for sale within those countries. Our largest single footwear supplier accounted for approximately 6 percent of total fiscal 2002 footwear production.

The principal materials used in our footwear products are natural and synthetic rubber, plastic compounds, foam cushioning materials, nylon, leather, canvas, and polyurethane films used to make AIR-SOLE cushioning components. NIKE IHM, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of NIKE, is our sole supplier of the AIR-SOLE cushioning components used in footwear. The principal materials used in our

apparel products are natural and synthetic fabrics and threads, plastic and metal hardware, and specialized performance fabrics designed to repel rain, retain heat, or efficiently transport body moisture. NIKE and its contractors and suppliers buy raw materials in bulk. Most raw materials are available in the countries where manufacturing takes place. We have thus far experienced little difficulty in satisfying our raw material requirements.

Our international operations are subject to the usual risks of doing business abroad, such as possible revaluation of currencies, export duties, quotas, restrictions on the transfer of funds and, in certain parts of the world, political instability. See “Trade Legislation” below. We have not, to date, been materially affected by any such risk, but cannot predict the likelihood of such developments occurring. We believe that we have the ability to develop, over a period of time, adequate alternative sources of supply for the products obtained from our present suppliers outside of the United States. If events prevented us from acquiring products from our suppliers in a particular country, our footwear operations could be temporarily disrupted and we could experience an adverse financial impact. However, we believe that we could eliminate any such disruption within a period of no more than 12 months, and that any adverse impact would, therefore, be of a short-term nature. We believe that our principal competitors are subject to similar risks.

All of our products manufactured overseas and imported into the United States and other countries are subject to customs duties collected by customs authorities. Customs information submitted by us is routinely subject to review by customs authorities. We are unable to predict whether additional customs duties, quotas or other restrictions may be imposed on the importation of our products in the future. The enactment of any such duties, quotas or restrictions could result in increases in the cost of our products generally and might adversely affect the sales or profitability of NIKE and the imported footwear and apparel industry as a whole.

Since 1972, Nissho Iwai American Corporation (“NIAC”), a subsidiary of Nissho Iwai Corporation, a large Japanese trading company, has performed significant import-export financing services for us. Currently, NIAC provides such financing services with respect to at least 80 percent of the NIKE products sold outside of the United States, Europe and Japan. Any failure of NIAC to provide these services could disrupt our ability to acquire products from our suppliers and to deliver products to our customers outside of the United States, Europe and Japan. Such a disruption could result in cancelled orders that would adversely affect sales and profitability. However, we believe that any such disruption would be short term in duration due to the ready availability of alternative sources of financing at competitive rates. Our current agreements with NIAC expire on May 31, 2003.

Our non-U.S. operations are subject to the usual risks of doing business abroad, such as the imposition of import quotas or anti-dumping duties. In 1994, the European Union (“EU”) Commission imposed quotas on certain types of footwear manufactured in China. These quotas replaced national quotas that had previously been in effect in several Member States. Footwear designed for use in sporting activities, meeting certain technical criteria and having a CIF (cost, insurance and freight) price above 9 euros (“Special Technology Athletic Footwear” or “STAF”), is excluded from the quotas. As a result of the STAF exclusion, and the amount of quota made available to us, the quotas have not, to date, had a material effect on our business.

In 1995, the EU Commission, at the request of European footwear manufacturers, initiated two anti-dumping investigations covering footwear imported from the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia and Thailand. As a result, in 1997 the Commission imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on certain textile upper footwear imported from China and Indonesia. In 1998, the Commission imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on certain synthetic and leather upper footwear originating in China, Indonesia and Thailand. In the case of textile upper footwear, the anti-dumping duties do not cover sports footwear. In the case of synthetic and leather upper footwear, the anti-dumping duties do not cover footwear meeting the STAF technical criteria nor footwear with a CIF price above 5.7 euros. As the anti-dumping duties for synthetic and leather uppers only affect some low cost footwear, these measures have no impact for us. While the exclusions are subject to some interpretation by customs authorities, we believe that most of our footwear sourced in the target countries for sale in the EU fits within the exclusions. We have also shifted the production of these types

of footwear to other countries. Accordingly, the anti-dumping duties have not had a material effect on our business. The EU Commission has announced the impending expiration of these anti-dumping cases, subject to possible review requests by the European footwear manufacturers. Such reviews may result in the renewal of the anti-dumping regulations.

The EU Commission in June 2000 issued an amendment to the explanatory notes to the EU’s customs nomenclature (“CN”). The amendment, which is not legally binding, interprets some of the technical criteria for the STAF exclusion and the footwear types that can be classified as for use in sporting activity. The amendment restricts somewhat the scope of the STAF exclusion from the quotas and also the sports footwear exclusions from the two EU anti-dumping measures. To date, the large majority of our footwear models fall within the exclusions provided for under the CN. Our innovative footwear designs may stretch the traditional concepts of athletic or sports footwear reflected in the technical criteria. We anticipate that the majority of these new designs will fall within the exclusions. NIKE is an active participant in discussions to revise the technical criteria to reflect technologically advanced designs.

If the EU trade measures become substantially more restrictive we would consider shifting the production of such footwear to other countries in order to maintain competitive pricing. We believe that we are prepared to deal effectively with any such change of circumstances and that any adverse impact would be of a temporary nature. We continue to closely monitor international restrictions and maintain our multi-country sourcing strategy and contingency plans. We believe that our major competitors stand in much the same position regarding these trade measures.

We currently source footwear and apparel products from factories in Vietnam. In July 2000, the United States and Vietnam signed an historic, comprehensive bilateral trade agreement, which, among other things, provides reciprocal, non-discriminatory Normal Trade Relations (“NTR”) between the two countries. In September 2001, that agreement was approved by Congress and then ratified by the Vietnamese National Assembly. Once approved, the United States granted an annual extension of NTR to Vietnam. Under current U.S. law, the President must renew this grant annually with the opportunity for review by the Congress. In June 2002, President Bush renewed NTR for Vietnam for an additional year and in July 2002, the Congress supported the President’s decision. We currently believe that, absent unforeseen circumstances, the President will continue his annual extensions of NTR to Vietnam and that Congress will support the President’s decisions. Ongoing NTR trading status for Vietnam will allow us to expand our production and marketing opportunities in Vietnam and allow for Vietnamese-sourced product to enter the United States at NTR tariff rates.

The athletic footwear, apparel and equipment industry is keenly competitive in the United States and on a worldwide basis. We compete internationally with an increasing number of athletic and leisure shoe companies, athletic and leisure apparel companies, sports equipment companies, and large companies having diversified lines of athletic and leisure shoes, apparel and equipment, including Reebok, Adidas and others. The intense competition and the rapid changes in technology and consumer preferences in the markets for athletic and leisure footwear and apparel, and athletic equipment, constitute significant risk factors in our operations.

NIKE is the largest seller of athletic footwear and athletic apparel in the world. Performance and reliability of shoes, apparel, and equipment, new product development, price, product identity through marketing and promotion, and customer support and service are important aspects of competition in the athletic footwear, apparel and equipment industry. To help market our products, we contract with prominent and influential athletes, coaches, teams, colleges, and sports leagues to endorse our brands and use our products, and we actively sponsor sporting events and clinics. We believe that we are competitive in all of these areas.

We utilize trademarks on nearly all of our products and believe that having distinctive marks that are readily identifiable is an important factor in creating a market for our goods, in identifying the Company, and in distinguishing our goods from the goods of others. We consider our NIKE® and Swoosh Design® trademarks to be among our most valuable assets and we have registered these trademarks in over 100 countries. In addition, we own many other trademarks which we utilize in marketing our products. We continue to vigorously protect our trademarks against infringement.

NIKE has an exclusive, worldwide license to make and sell footwear using patented “Air” technology. The process utilizes pressurized gas encapsulated in polyurethane. Some of the early NIKE AIR® patents have expired, which may enable competitors to use certain types of like technology. Subsequent NIKE AIR patents will not expire for several years. We also have a number of patents covering components and features used in various athletic and leisure shoes. We believe that our success depends primarily upon skills in design, research and development, production and marketing rather than upon our patent position. However, we have followed a policy of filing applications for United States and foreign patents on inventions, designs and improvements that we deem valuable.

We had approximately 22,700 employees at May 31, 2002. Management considers its relationship with employees to be excellent. With the exception of Bauer NIKE Hockey Inc., our employees are not represented by a union. Of Bauer NIKE Hockey’s North American employees, approximately 65 percent, or fewer than 450, are covered by three union collective bargaining agreements with three separate bargaining units, and all of Bauer NIKE Hockey’s approximately 150 non-immigrant employees in Italy are covered by three collective bargaining agreements. The collective bargaining agreements expire on various dates from 2002 through 2003. There has never been a material interruption of operations due to labor disagreements.

Philip H. Knight, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board, and President — Mr. Knight, 64, a director since 1968, is a co-founder of NIKE and, except for the period from June 1983 through September 1984, served as its President from 1968 to 1990, and from June 2000 to present. Prior to 1968, Mr. Knight was a certified public accountant with Price Waterhouse and Coopers & Lybrand and was an Assistant Professor of Business Administration at Portland State University.

Donald W. Blair, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer — Mr. Blair, 44, joined NIKE in November 1999. Prior to joining NIKE, he held a number of financial management positions with Pepsico, Inc., including Vice President, Finance of Pepsi-Cola Asia, Vice President, Planning of PepsiCo’s Pizza Hut Division, and Senior Vice President, Finance of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. Prior to joining Pepsico, Mr. Blair was a certified public accountant with Deloitte, Haskins, and Sells.

Thomas E. Clarke, President of New Ventures — Dr. Clarke, 51, a director since 1994, joined the Company in 1980. He was appointed divisional Vice President in charge of marketing in 1987, elected corporate Vice President in 1989, appointed General Manager in 1990, and served as President and Chief Operating Officer from 1994 to 2000. Dr. Clarke previously held various positions with the Company, primarily in research, design, development and marketing. Dr. Clarke holds a doctorate degree in biomechanics.

Charles D. Denson, President of the NIKE Brand — Mr. Denson, 46, has been employed by NIKE since February 1979. Mr. Denson held several positions within the Company, including his appointments as Director of USA Apparel Sales in 1994, divisional Vice President, US Sales in 1994, divisional Vice President European Sales in 1997, divisional Vice President and General Manager, NIKE Europe in 1998, Vice President and General Manager of NIKE USA in June 2000, and President of the NIKE Brand in March 2001.

Gary M. DeStefano, President of USA Operations — Mr. DeStefano, 45, has been employed by NIKE since 1982, with primary responsibilities in sales and regional administration. Mr. DeStefano was appointed Director of Domestic Sales in 1990, divisional Vice President in charge of domestic sales in 1992, Vice President of Global Sales in 1996, Vice President and General Manager of Asia Pacific in March 1997, and President of USA Operations in March 2001.

Mindy F. Grossman, Vice President of Global Apparel — Ms. Grossman, 44, joined NIKE in October 2000. Prior to joining NIKE, she was President and Chief Executive Officer of Polo Jeans Company/ Ralph Lauren, a division of Jones Apparel Group, Inc. from 1995 to 2000. Prior to that, Ms. Grossman was Vice President of New Business Development at Polo Ralph Lauren Corp. from 1994 to 1995, President of The Warnaco Group Inc. Chaps Ralph Lauren division, and Senior Vice President of The Warnaco Group Inc. Menswear division from 1991 to 1994.

P. Eunan McLaughlin, Vice President, Asia Pacific — Mr. McLaughlin, 44, joined NIKE as Vice President, Sales, NIKE Europe in February 1999, was appointed Vice President Commercial Sales and Retail in February 2000, and became Vice President, Asia Pacific in June 2001. Prior to joining NIKE, he was Partner and Vice President of Consumer & Retail Practices Division, Korn/ Ferry International from 1996 to 1999. From 1985 to 1996 Mr. McLaughlin held the following positions with Mars, Inc.: Finance Director, Sales Director, and Managing Director of Germany Drink Division; Operations Director of Pedigree Pet Foods; and European Sales & Marketing Director. Mr. McLaughlin also worked for Reynolds McCarron (formerly Ernst & Young) in Ireland.

D. Scott Olivet, Vice President, NIKE Subsidiaries and New Business Development — Mr Olivet, 40, joined NIKE in August 2001. Prior to joining NIKE, he was a Senior Vice President of Gap Inc., responsible for real estate, store design, and construction across Gap, Banana Republic, and Old Navy brands from 1998 to 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Olivet was employed by Bain & Company, an international strategic consulting firm from 1984 to 1998 (a Partner from 1993 to 1998). In addition to direct client work, Mr. Olivet was the leader of the firm’s worldwide practice in organizational effectiveness and change management.

Mark G. Parker, President of the NIKE Brand — Mr. Parker, 45, has been employed by NIKE since 1979 with primary responsibilities in product research, design and development. Mr. Parker was appointed divisional Vice President in charge of development in 1987, corporate Vice President in 1989, General Manager in 1993, Vice President of Global Footwear in 1998, and President of the NIKE Brand in March 2001.

Eric D. Sprunk, Vice President, Global Footwear — Mr. Sprunk, 38, joined the Company in 1993. He was appointed Finance Director and General Manager of the Americas in 1994, Finance Director, NIKE Europe in 1995, Regional General Manager, NIKE Europe Footwear in 1998, and Vice President & General Manager of the Americas in 2000. Mr. Sprunk was appointed corporate Vice President, Global Footwear in June 2001.

Lindsay D. Stewart, Vice President and Chief of Staff, and Assistant Secretary — Mr. Stewart, 55, joined NIKE as Assistant Corporate Counsel in 1981. Mr. Stewart became Corporate Counsel in 1983. He was appointed Vice President and General Counsel in 1991, and Chief of Staff in March 2001. Prior to joining NIKE, Mr. Stewart was in private practice and an attorney for Georgia-Pacific Corporation.

Frits D. van Paasschen, Vice President and General Manager, NIKE Europe — Mr. van Paasschen, 42, has been employed by NIKE since 1997. He served as Vice President, Strategic Planning, and was appointed Vice President and General Manager, The Americas and Africa in 1998, and corporate Vice President and General Manager, NIKE Europe in 2000. Mr. van Paasschen was formerly Vice President, Finance & Planning, Disney Consumer Products, The Walt Disney Company.

Roland P. Wolfram, Vice President, Global Operations & Technology — Mr. Wolfram, 42, joined NIKE as Vice President, Strategic Planning in November 1998, and was appointed Vice President, Global Operations & Technology in February 2002. Prior to NIKE, Mr. Wolfram was Vice President and General Manager of Pacific Bell Video Services. From 1992 to 1993 he was director of the desktop products group for Compression Labs, Inc.

Following is a summary of principal properties owned or leased by NIKE. Our leases expire at various dates through the year 2017.

Except as described below, there are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business, to which we are a party or of which any of our property is the subject.

The Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in four substantially identical securities class actions filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon on March 9, 14, 20, and April 4, 2001. On July 23, 2001, the cases were consolidated as In re NIKE, Inc. Securities Litigation, CV-01-332-K. The consolidated amended complaint sought unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class consisting of purchasers of the Company’s stock during the period December 20, 2000 through February 26, 2001. Plaintiffs allege that the defendants made false and misleading statements about the Company’s actual and expected business and financial performance in violation of federal securities laws. Plaintiffs further allege that certain individual defendants sold Company stock while in possession of material non-public information. In January 2002, the Court dismissed this action with leave to amend. On February 25, 2002, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint extending the purported class period to June 29, 2000 through February 26, 2001 and containing the same allegations. Based on the available information we do not currently anticipate that the action will have a material financial impact. We believe the claims are without merit, and we intend to vigorously defend against them.

A related shareholder derivative lawsuit, Metivier v. Denunzio, et al., 0104-04339, was filed in the Multnomah County Circuit Court of the State of Oregon on April 26, 2001. The state derivative suit was brought by certain Company shareholders, allegedly on behalf of the Company, against certain directors and officers of the Company. The derivative plaintiffs allege that these officers and directors breached their

fiduciary duties to the Company by making or causing to be made alleged misstatements about the Company’s actual and expected financial performance while certain officers and directors sold Company stock and by allowing the Company to be sued in the shareholder class action. The derivative plaintiffs seek compensatory and other damages, and disgorgement of compensation received. On July 25, 2001, the Court entered a stipulation and order abating the action until further notice.

Another related shareholder derivative lawsuit, Lendman v. Knight, et al., CV-01-1153-AS, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon on July 26, 2001. The federal derivative suit is not materially different from the state derivative action. It alleges substantially similar causes of action and seeks substantially similar remedies. The federal derivative action was served on the Company and the individual defendants on December 13, 2001 and was also stayed pending the outcome of In re NIKE, Inc. Securities Litigation on December 13, 2001.

In accordance with the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, and in accordance with indemnity agreements between the Company and the directors and officers named in the above legal actions, the Company has agreed to indemnify these individuals and assume their defense in the actions.

The Company and certain of its officers were named as defendants in an lawsuit, Kasky v. NIKE, Inc. et al., No. 994446, filed in 1998 in San Francisco County Superior Court. Plaintiff brought the action under the California Business and Professions Code alleging that statements made by the Company in response to criticism about labor practices in factories making its products were false or misleading. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and restitution of profits earned from the alleged violations of the California Code. The claims were dismissed by the Superior Court, with the court concluding that the alleged statements, if made, were protected speech as part of a public debate under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Plaintiff appealed the Superior Court ruling to the California Court of Appeals, which court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. Plaintiff sought review in the California Supreme Court, which, on May 2, 2002, overturned the lower court rulings by a four to three vote. The California Supreme Court made no ruling on the merits of plaintiff’s contention that the Company had made false or misleading statements, but concluded that the alleged statements were commercial speech and not entitled to the full protection of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Company filed a petition for rehearing before the California Supreme Court, which was denied on July 31, 2002. The case has been remanded to the lower California state courts for further proceedings. We have announced our intention to seek review by the United States Supreme Court and have engaged additional counsel for that specific purpose. Since the litigation is in a preliminary stage, we do not currently anticipate that the action will have a material financial impact. We believe that the claims are without merit and we intend to vigorously defend against them.

No matter was submitted during the fourth quarter of the 2002 fiscal year to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

NIKE’s Class B Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Pacific Stock Exchange and trades under the symbol NKE. At July 25, 2002, there were approximately 19,200 holders of record of our Class B Common Stock and 26 holders of record of our Class A Common Stock. These figures do not include beneficial owners who hold shares in nominee name. The Class A Common Stock is not publicly traded but each share is convertible upon request of the holder into one share of Class B Common Stock.

We refer to the table entitled “Selected Quarterly Financial Data” in Item 6, which lists, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low closing sales prices on the New York Stock Exchange. That table also describes the amount and frequency of all cash dividends declared on our common stock for the 2002 and 2001 fiscal years.

All per common share data has been adjusted to reflect the 2-for-1 stock splits paid October 23, 1996 and October 30, 1995. The Company’s Class B Common Stock is listed on the New York and Pacific Exchanges and trades under the symbol NKE. At May 31, 2002, there were approximately 126,000 shareholders of Class A and Class B common stock.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations following are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles

generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies described below have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements, so we consider these to be our critical accounting policies. Because of the uncertainty inherent in these matters, actual results could differ from the estimates we use in applying the critical accounting policies. Certain of these critical accounting policies affect working capital account balances, including the policies for revenue recognition, the reserve for uncollectible accounts receivable, inventory reserves, and contingent payments under endorsement contracts. These policies require that we make estimates in the preparation of our financial statements as of a given date. However, since our business cycle is relatively short, actual results related to these estimates are generally known within the six-month period following the financial statement date. Thus, these policies generally affect only the timing of reported amounts across two to three quarters.

Within the context of these critical accounting policies, we are not currently aware of any reasonably likely events or circumstances which would result in materially different amounts being reported.

We record wholesale revenues when title passes and the risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the customer, based on the terms of sale. Title passes generally upon shipment or upon receipt by the customer depending on the country of the sale and the agreement with the customer. Retail store revenues are recorded at the time of sale.

In some instances, we ship product directly from our supplier to the customer. In these cases, we recognize revenue when the product is delivered to the customer. Our revenues may fluctuate in cases when our customers delay accepting shipment of product for periods up to several weeks.

In certain countries outside of the U.S., precise information regarding the date of receipt by the customer is not readily available. In these cases, we estimate the date of receipt by the customer based upon historical delivery times by geographic location. On the basis of our tests of actual transactions, we have no indication that these estimates have been materially inaccurate historically.

As part of our revenue recognition policy, we record estimated sales returns and miscellaneous claims from customers as reductions to revenues at the time revenues are recorded. We base our estimates on historical rates of product returns and claims, and specific identification of outstanding claims and outstanding returns not yet received from customers. In the past, actual returns and claims have not exceeded our reserves. However, actual returns and claims in any future period are inherently uncertain and thus may differ from our estimates. If actual or expected future returns and claims were significantly greater or lower than the reserves we had established, we would record a reduction or increase to net revenues in the period in which we made such determination.

We make ongoing estimates relating to the collectibility of our accounts receivable and maintain a reserve for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. In determining the amount of the reserve, we consider our historical level of credit losses and make judgments about the creditworthiness of significant customers based on ongoing credit evaluations. Historically, losses from uncollectible accounts have not exceeded our reserves. Since we cannot predict future changes in the financial stability of our customers, actual future losses from uncollectible accounts may differ from our estimates. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in their inability to make payments, a larger reserve might be required. In the event we determined that a smaller or larger reserve was appropriate, we would record a credit or a charge to selling and administrative expense in the period in which we made such a determination.

We also make ongoing estimates relating to the market value of inventories, based upon our assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If we estimate that the net realizable value of our inventory is less than the cost of the inventory recorded on our books, we record a reserve equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and the estimated market value. This reserve is recorded as a charge to cost of sales. If changes in market conditions result in reductions in the estimated market value of our inventory below our previous estimate, we would increase our reserve in the period in which we made such a determination and record a charge to cost of sales.

A significant portion of our demand creation (advertising and promotion) expense relates to payments under endorsement contracts. In general, endorsement payments are expensed uniformly over the term of the contract. However, certain contract elements may be accounted for differently, based upon the facts and circumstances of each individual contract.

Certain contracts provide for contingent payments to endorsers based upon specific achievements in their sports (e.g. winning a championship). We record selling and administrative expense for these amounts when the endorser achieves the specific goal.

Certain contracts provide for payments based upon endorsers maintaining a level of performance in their sport over an extended period of time (e.g. maintaining a top ranking in a sport for a year). These amounts are reported in selling and administrative expense when we determine that it is probable that the specified level of performance will be maintained throughout the period. In these instances, to the extent that actual payments to the endorser differ from our estimate due to changes in the endorser’s athletic performance, increased or decreased selling and administrative expense may be reported in a future period.

Certain contracts provide for royalty payments to endorsers based upon a predetermined percentage of sales of particular products. We expense these payments in cost of sales as the related sales are made. In certain contracts, we offer minimum guaranteed royalty payments. For contractual obligations for which we estimate that we will not meet the minimum guaranteed amount of royalty fees through sales of product, we record in selling and administrative expense the minimum guaranteed payment amount uniformly over the remaining royalty term.

Property, plant and equipment, including buildings, equipment, and computer hardware and software is recorded at cost (including, in some cases, the cost of internal labor) and is depreciated over its estimated useful life. Changes in circumstances (such as technological advances or changes to our business operations) can result in differences between the actual and estimated useful lives. In those cases where we determine that the useful life of a long-lived asset should be shortened, we increase depreciation expense over the remaining useful life to depreciate the asset’s net book value to its salvage value.

Under current accounting standards, when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a long-lived asset may be impaired, we estimate the future undiscounted cash flows to be derived from the asset to determine whether or not a potential impairment exists. If the carrying value exceeds our estimate of future undiscounted cash flows, we then calculate the impairment as the excess of the carrying value of the asset over our estimate of its fair market value. Any impairment charges are recorded as other expense. We estimate future undiscounted cash flows using assumptions about our expected future operating performance. Our estimates of undiscounted cash flows may differ from actual cash flows due to, among other things, technological changes, economic conditions, or changes to our business operations. For fiscal 2002, no significant impairment related to the carrying value of our long-lived assets (including property, plant, and equipment, goodwill, and other intangible assets) has been recorded under current accounting standards. However, as of June 1, 2002, we will adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” We expect to record an impairment charge related to the goodwill

and other intangible assets of our subsidiaries Bauer NIKE Hockey, Inc. and Cole-Haan Holdings, Inc. in the first quarter of fiscal 2003. See “Recently Issued Accounting Standards” below.

We use forward exchange contracts and option contracts to hedge certain anticipated foreign currency exchange transactions, as well as any resulting receivable or payable balance. When specific criteria required by SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” have been met, changes in fair values of hedge contracts relating to anticipated transactions are recorded in other comprehensive income rather than current earnings until the underlying hedged transaction affects current earnings. In most cases, this results in gains and losses on hedge derivatives being released from other comprehensive income into current earnings some time after the maturity of the derivative. One of the criteria for this accounting treatment is that the forward exchange contract amount should not be in excess of specifically identified anticipated transactions. By their very nature, our estimates of anticipated transactions may fluctuate over time and may ultimately vary from actual transactions. When anticipated transaction estimates or actual transaction amounts decrease below hedged levels, or when the timing of transactions changes significantly, we are required to reclassify at least a portion of the cumulative changes in fair values of the related hedge contracts from other comprehensive income to other income/ expense during the quarter in which such changes occur. Once an anticipated transaction estimate or actual transaction amount decreases below hedged levels, we make adjustments to the related hedge contract in order to reduce the amount of the hedge contract to that of the revised anticipated transaction.

We record valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets, when necessary, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Realization of deferred tax assets (such as net operating loss carryforwards) is dependent on future taxable earnings and is therefore uncertain. At least quarterly, we assess the likelihood that our deferred tax asset balance will be recovered from future taxable income. To the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax asset, increasing our income tax expense in the period such determination is made.

In addition, we have not recorded U.S. income tax expense for foreign earnings that we have declared as indefinitely reinvested offshore, thus reducing our overall income tax expense. The amount of earnings designated as indefinitely reinvested offshore is based upon the actual deployment of such earnings in our offshore assets and our expectations of the future cash needs of our U.S. and foreign entities. Income tax considerations are also a factor in determining the amount of foreign earnings to be repatriated.

In the event actual cash needs of our U.S. entities exceed our current expectations or the actual cash needs of our foreign entities are less than expected, we may need to repatriate foreign earnings which have been designated as indefinitely reinvested offshore. This would result in additional income tax expense being recorded.

We take a conservative approach in determining the amount of foreign earnings to declare as reinvested offshore. As required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, the presumption is that such earnings will be repatriated in the future. In order to overcome this presumption, we carefully review all factors which drive the ultimate disposition of such foreign earnings, and apply stringent standards to overcoming the presumption of repatriation. Despite this conservative approach, because the determination involves our future plans and expectations of future events, there is a possibility that amounts declared as indefinitely reinvested offshore may ultimately be repatriated. Conversely, this conservative approach may result in accumulated foreign earnings (for which U.S. income taxes have been provided) being determined in the future to be indefinitely reinvested offshore. In this latter case, our income tax expense would be reduced in the year of such determination.

On an interim basis, we estimate what our effective tax rate will be for the full fiscal year and record a quarterly income tax provision in accordance with the anticipated annual rate. As the fiscal year progresses, we continually refine our estimate based upon actual events and earnings by jurisdiction during the year. This

continual estimation process periodically results in a change to our expected effective tax rate for the fiscal year. When this occurs, we adjust the income tax provision during the quarter in which the change in estimate occurs so that the year-to-date provision equals the expected annual rate.

In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in legal proceedings involving contractual and employment relationships, product liability claims, trademark rights, and a variety of other matters. We record contingent liabilities resulting from claims against us when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. We disclose contingent liabilities when there is a reasonable possibility that the ultimate loss will exceed the recorded liability. Estimating probable losses requires analysis of multiple factors, in some cases including judgments about the potential actions of third party claimants and courts. Therefore, actual losses in any future period are inherently uncertain. Currently, we do not believe that any of our pending legal proceedings or claims will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. However, if actual or estimated probable future losses exceed our recorded liability for such claims, we would record additional charges as other expense during the period in which the actual loss or change in estimate occurred.


	•	Revenues increased 4.3% to $9.9 billion, compared to $9.5 billion in fiscal 2001.

	•	Income before the cumulative effect of an accounting change increased to $668.3 million from $589.7 million in the prior year, an increase of 13.3%. After the effect of the accounting change, net income rose 12.5%.

	•	Diluted earnings per share before the effect of the accounting change increased by 13.9%, from $2.16 to $2.46. After the effect of the accounting change, diluted earnings per share rose 13.0%.

	•	Gross margins increased as a percentage of revenues to 39.3% from 39.0% in fiscal 2001.

	•	Selling and administrative expenses increased as a percentage of revenues to 28.5% from 28.3% in fiscal 2001.

Net income increased 13.3% over fiscal 2001, from $589.7 million to $668.3 million (excluding an after-tax loss of $5.0 million related to the cumulative effect of the adoption of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”). Diluted earnings per share before the effect of the accounting change improved 13.9%, from $2.16 to $2.46. These increases reflected a 10.4% increase in income before income taxes and a 1.7 point decrease in our effective income tax rate. The increase in income before income taxes was due to increased revenues, improved gross margins and lower interest and other expenses, partially offset by a slight increase in selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues.

Fiscal 2002 revenues were the highest in our history, reflecting increased NIKE brand sales in all of our geographic regions. In the U.S., NIKE brand revenues increased 2.0% for the fiscal year, driven by increased sales of apparel and equipment. The increased sales in apparel reflected higher demand for in-line products, particularly for NIKE brand and Brand Jordan basketball apparel, more than offsetting the effect of the expiration of our apparel license agreement with the National Football League last year. In equipment, our rapidly growing golf business drove a 21.7% increase for the year.

U.S. footwear revenues declined 0.7% versus fiscal 2001. While in-line sales of footwear increased compared to last year, particularly in the mid-range price segment, close-out sales decreased significantly. The reduction in close-out sales reflected both our efforts to limit the availability of close-out products in the marketplace (in order to build overall profitability) and relatively high levels of close-out sales in the last half of fiscal 2001 due to supply chain system disruptions discussed further below in the Fiscal 2001 Compared to

Fiscal 2000 section. As in the apparel business, sales of NIKE brand and Brand Jordan basketball footwear products were the primary drivers of increased wholesale sales of in-line footwear during the year.

In fiscal 2002, NIKE brand revenues from our international regions continued to grow versus the prior year, both as a percentage of total company revenues and in total dollars. These revenues represented 45.6% of total company revenues as compared to 44.6% in fiscal 2001. Revenues from our international regions were $4.5 billion as compared to $4.2 billion in fiscal 2001, a 6.6% increase. Had the U.S. dollar remained constant with the prior year, these international revenues would have increased 12.4%, and consolidated revenues would have increased 6.9% (compared to 4.3% growth as reported).

Increased revenues in each of our international regions resulted from higher demand for products in all NIKE brand businesses: footwear, apparel, and equipment. Revenues in our Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) region increased for the eighth consecutive year. Fiscal 2002 reported revenues in EMEA increased by 5.7% over fiscal 2001, a 9.6% increase in constant dollars. In our Asia Pacific region, reported revenues grew 9.2%, a 19.3% increase in constant dollars. The Americas region grew reported revenues 5.4%, an 11.9% increase in constant dollars, despite a drop-off in sales in Argentina during the second half of the year due to that country’s economic crisis.

In fiscal 2002, other revenue, which primarily includes revenues from Bauer NIKE Hockey, Cole Haan, and Hurley, increased 6.8% to $465.7 million.

Foot Locker, Inc. is our largest single customer and represented 10.9% of our worldwide revenues in fiscal 2002. Foot Locker has expressed its intention to reduce the emphasis of its U.S. business on higher-priced, premium footwear and place more focus on moderately-priced offerings. Due to this change in strategy, Foot Locker’s futures orders in the U.S. for the holiday season (scheduled for delivery from September through November 2002) decreased significantly versus the same period in the previous year. In spite of the reduction in orders from Foot Locker, total U.S. futures orders for the September to November period are down only 2.3% versus the prior year and worldwide futures orders for the same period increased 3.0% versus fiscal 2002.

The impact of lower orders from Foot Locker for the September to November period was largely included in the June to November futures orders reported in our June 27, 2002 press release. However, additional changes in November orders from Foot Locker reduced the overall growth of worldwide futures for the six-month period by approximately 30 basis points to 6.3%.

Although we expect Foot Locker to continue to be an important retail partner for NIKE, second half U.S. footwear orders from this customer will likely be significantly below the prior year. We are aggressively pursuing incremental sales across our business as we work to offset these declines and achieve our worldwide revenue growth goals for the year. We believe there continues to be strong consumer demand for high-end, performance footwear; this segment has always been central to the success of the NIKE brand. Therefore, we will continue to work aggressively with those retailers who are focused on serving this market. While the success of these efforts over the next few quarters is uncertain, we remain confident in the long-term strength of our brand and our business.

Worldwide futures (advance) orders for NIKE brand athletic footwear and apparel scheduled for delivery from June through November 2002 were 6.3% higher than such orders booked in the comparable period of fiscal 2002. The percentage growth in futures orders is not necessarily indicative of our expectation of revenue growth in subsequent periods. This is because the mix of orders can shift between advance/futures and at-once orders. In addition, exchange rate fluctuations as well as differing levels of order cancellations can cause differences in the comparisons between future orders and actual revenues. Finally, a significant portion of our revenues are not derived from futures orders, including wholesale sales of equipment, U.S. licensed team apparel, Bauer NIKE Hockey, Cole Haan, Hurley, and retail sales across all brands. In the first quarter of fiscal 2003, we expect that revenue growth will lag futures order growth, reflecting lower close-out sales versus the first quarter of fiscal 2002 and lower retail sales versus the same period last year as U.S. retail sales have remained at relatively low levels since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

Our gross margin percentage improved 30 basis points, from 39.0% in fiscal 2001 to 39.3% in fiscal 2002. Factors contributing to the improved gross margin percentage versus the prior year were as follows:


	(1)	Higher in-line pricing margins in EMEA, due to the effect of higher prices effective at the beginning of the fiscal year and sourcing and warehousing efficiencies, partially offset by the effect of weaker euro/U.S. dollar currency hedge rates relative to fiscal 2001.

	(2)	Higher footwear margins in the U.S. due in part to lower product costs and lower transportation costs, as a result of both effective negotiations with shippers and lower air freight costs incurred. Relatively higher air freight costs were incurred in fiscal 2001 due to supply chain problems discussed following.

	(3)	A higher mix of in-line sales versus close-out sales of U.S. footwear, reflecting increased demand for in-line footwear and lower close-out sales as compared to fiscal 2001 as discussed above.

Selling and administrative expenses increased as a percentage of revenues from 28.3% in fiscal 2001 to 28.5% in fiscal 2002. Operating overhead increased 6.0% during fiscal 2002 largely as a result of our continued investment in initiatives intended to generate future revenues and profits. Significant drivers of the increased operating overhead included increased investment in our supply chain initiative, additional headcount to support our growing golf and European businesses, additional expense for compensation programs tied to our

The supply chain initiative refers to our on-going development of systems and processes supporting our worldwide supply chain. This initiative is intended to improve revenue (by increasing our ability to respond to market conditions), margins (by lowering close-outs and distribution costs) and cash flow (by reducing inventories). The ultimate level of benefit to revenues, margins, and cash flows, if any, will not be known until the new systems and processes have been implemented worldwide over the next few years. During fiscal 2002, we implemented new systems and processes for certain global functions and for our U.S. business, and we plan on implementing new systems and processes in EMEA during fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2003, we will continue to invest in the implementation of the new systems worldwide and support our existing system infrastructure for those businesses where we have not yet implemented the new systems.

Demand creation expense was $1,027.9 million in fiscal 2002 versus $998.2 million in fiscal 2001, which was consistent between years as a percentage of revenues. Our fiscal 2002 demand creation expense reflected incremental spending for our World Cup 2002 marketing campaign, which occurred primarily in our international regions. In fiscal 2003, we expect demand creation expense to grow slightly faster than revenues, reflecting the continuation of the World Cup 2002 campaign into the first quarter of fiscal 2003. In addition, we have entered into a long-term license and endorsement agreement with Manchester United, one of the premier soccer clubs in the world, which begins in August 2002. Payments under this contract will result in additional demand creation expense.

Interest expense decreased 18.9%, from $58.7 million to $47.6 million in fiscal 2002, due to lower interest rates in the current year and lower average debt levels, as we used operating free cash flow to reduce debt.

Other income/ expense was a net expense of $3.0 million versus a net expense of $34.1 million in fiscal 2001. Consistent with previous years, other income/expense included interest income, profit sharing expense, goodwill amortization, certain foreign currency conversion gains and losses, and asset disposal gains/ losses. Net other expense decreased between years as the fiscal 2001 amount included charges for contractual settlements that did not recur in fiscal 2002. In addition, fiscal 2002 other income/ expense included credits related to the favorable resolution of some outstanding claims.

Our fiscal 2002 effective tax rate was 34.3% as compared to 36.0% in fiscal 2001. As required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, we do not accrue for U.S. tax liability on foreign earnings permanently invested offshore. The lower effective tax rate in fiscal 2002 is primarily the result of a larger amount of foreign earnings permanently invested offshore in fiscal 2002 than in fiscal 2001.

Net income increased 1.8% over fiscal 2000, from $579.1 million to $589.7 million. Although consolidated revenues increased 5.5% over fiscal 2000, income before income taxes was essentially flat as pretax profit margins decreased due to a lower gross margin percentage, higher interest expense, and increased other expenses, partially offset by lower selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues. Despite flat income before income taxes, net income increased due to a lower effective tax rate. Diluted earnings per share increased 4.3%, from $2.07 to $2.16. The percentage increase in earnings per share was higher than that of net income primarily due to share repurchases in fiscal years 2000 and 2001.

NIKE brand revenues in the U.S. region increased 1.8% as compared to fiscal 2000, while NIKE brand revenues in our international regions increased 9.8%. Had the U.S. dollar remained constant with the prior year, these international revenues would have increased 18.6%, and consolidated revenues would have advanced 9.3%. In the U.S. region, our largest market segment, the 1.8% increase in revenues reflected a 9.2% increase in apparel sales and a 54.4% increase in equipment sales, offset by a 4.2% decrease in footwear sales. The increases in apparel and equipment reflected stronger demand for in-line products. The increase in the equipment product line reflected increases in a variety of sports equipment categories, including golf, football, and baseball products as well as socks, bags and eyewear. The decrease in footwear reflected lower demand, particularly in the mid-range price segment, and supply chain disruptions resulting from the implementation of

a new global demand and supply planning system. The supply chain disruptions resulted in product excesses as well as product shortages and late deliveries in the second half of the fiscal 2001.

Revenues from our international regions were $4.2 billion as compared to $3.9 billion in fiscal 2000. Fiscal 2001 revenues in EMEA increased over fiscal 2000 by 7.4% to $2,584.8 million, a 19.3% increase in constant dollars. In our Asia Pacific region, revenues grew 16.2%, a 20.8% increase in constant dollars. The Americas region grew revenues 9.1%, an 11.4% increase in constant dollars.

Our gross margin percentage declined 90 basis points, from 39.9% in fiscal 2000 to 39.0% in fiscal 2001. Factors contributing to the lower gross margin percentage were as follows:


	(1)	The effect of the change in foreign exchange rates, most notably the weakening of the euro against the U.S. dollar relative to fiscal 2000.

	(2)	A higher mix of close-out sales as well as lower margins achieved on close-outs, primarily in footwear and licensed team apparel in the U.S. In footwear, the higher mix of close-outs and lower close-out margins were due in part to the supply chain disruptions discussed above. Higher close-outs and lower margins in U.S. licensed team apparel resulted primarily from the liquidation of National Football League (“NFL”) team apparel, due to the termination of our NFL license agreement.

	(3)	Product recalls of certain footwear models in the United States, which resulted in product returns and write-offs.

Selling and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of revenues from 29.0% to 28.3%. Demand creation expense decreased as a percentage of revenues from 10.8% to 10.5%. Fiscal 2001 demand creation expense was $998.2 million versus $974.1 million in fiscal 2000. The overall decrease in selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues reflected cost containment measures, both in marketing and operational areas. While implementing these measures to control selling and administrative expense growth, we also continued to invest in operational initiatives designed to create future revenues and profits. These initiatives included the expansion of NIKE-owned retail outlets, the development of e-commerce applications, and systems and processes supporting our worldwide supply chain. Our level of investment in these areas in fiscal 2001 was comparable to our level of investment in fiscal 2000.

Interest expense increased 30.4%, from $45.0 million to $58.7 million, due to higher average debt levels in fiscal 2001 versus fiscal 2000. During fiscal 2000, we increased debt to fund capital expenditures and higher working capital requirements, and to repurchase common stock. Although our debt balance decreased during fiscal 2001, the average debt balance for fiscal 2001 remained above the prior year.

Other income/ expense was a net expense of $34.1 million versus a net expense of $20.7 million in fiscal 2000. Significant amounts included in other income/ expense were interest income, profit sharing expense, goodwill amortization, certain foreign currency conversion gains and losses, asset disposal gains and losses, and charges for contractual settlements.

Our fiscal 2001 effective tax rate was 36.0% as compared to 37.0% in fiscal 2000. As discussed above, we do not accrue for U.S. tax liability on foreign earnings permanently invested offshore. The lower effective tax rate in fiscal 2001 was primarily the result of lower taxes on a larger amount of foreign earnings that were permanently invested offshore in fiscal 2001 than in fiscal 2000 as well as additional research tax credits.

In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (FAS 141) and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (FAS 142). FAS 141 requires the purchase method of accounting to be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. FAS 141 also requires a more rigorous identification of intangible assets which must be

recognized and reported separately from goodwill. The adoption of FAS 141 will not have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position.

FAS 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives no longer be amortized but instead be measured for impairment at least annually, or when events indicate that an impairment exists. Our adoption date is June 1, 2002. As of that date, amortization of outstanding goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets will cease. As a result of the elimination of this amortization, other expense will decrease by approximately $13 million annually beginning in fiscal 2003.

As required by FAS 142, we will perform impairment tests on goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets as of the adoption date. Thereafter, we will perform impairment tests annually and whenever events or circumstances indicate that the value of goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets might be impaired. In connection with the FAS 142 indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment test, we will utilize the required one-step method to determine whether an impairment exists as of the adoption date. The test will consist of a comparison of the estimated fair values of indefinite-lived assets with the carrying amounts. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds our estimate of its fair value, we will recognize an impairment loss in an amount equal to that excess.

In connection with the FAS 142 transitional goodwill impairment test, we will utilize the required two-step method for determining goodwill impairment as of the adoption date. To accomplish this, we will identify our reporting units and determine the carrying value of each reporting unit by assigning our assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those reporting units as of the adoption date. We will then estimate the fair value of each reporting unit and compare it to the carrying amount of the reporting unit. To the extent the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds our estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit, we then will perform the second step of the transitional impairment test.

Where necessary, in the second step, we will compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill, both of which will be measured as of the adoption date. The implied fair value of goodwill will be determined by allocating the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets (recognized and unrecognized) and liabilities of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in accordance with FAS 141. The residual fair value after this allocation will be the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. We will record a transitional impairment loss for any excess of the carrying value of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit over the implied fair value.

We have estimated that we will likely incur a transitional impairment loss of approximately $270 million related to our Bauer NIKE Hockey and Cole Haan subsidiaries, reflecting that the fair values we have estimated for these subsidiaries are less than the carrying values including goodwill. This expected transitional impairment loss will be recognized as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in our consolidated statement of income during the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (FAS 144). This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of” (FAS 121), and amends Accounting Principles Board Statement No. 30, “Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions” (APB 30). FAS 144 requires that long-lived assets that are to be disposed of by sale be measured at the lower of book value or fair value less costs to sell. FAS 144 retains the fundamental provisions of FAS 121 for (a) recognition and measurement of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used and (b) measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. This statement also retains APB 30’s requirement that companies report discontinued operations separately from continuing operations. All provisions of this statement will be effective for us on June 1, 2003. We do not expect that the adoption of FAS 144 will have any impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Cash provided by operations was $1,081.5 million in fiscal 2002, compared to $656.5 million in fiscal 2001. Our primary source of operating cash flow was net income earned during the year of $663.3 million. Operating cash flow increased significantly over the prior year due to reduced investment in certain working capital components during fiscal 2002, which generated positive operating cash flow.

Cash used by investing activities during fiscal 2002 was $302.8 million, compared to $342.3 million invested during fiscal 2001. The total for fiscal 2002 related primarily to capital expenditures for computer equipment and software, driven by our supply chain initiative, and investments in new retail outlets. In addition, we acquired all of the assets and substantially all of the liabilities of Hurley International LLC, a teen lifestyle brand company. During fiscal 2003, we will continue to incur expenditures related to systems improvements (most notably the supply chain initiative), retail expansion, and investments in our worldwide warehouse facilities.

Cash used by financing activities in fiscal 2002 was $478.2 million, up from $349.9 million in the prior year. This amount included uses of cash for dividends to shareholders, a net reduction in debt, and share repurchases. These uses of cash were partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options.

The share repurchases were part of a $1.0 billion share repurchase program that began in fiscal 2001, after completion of a four-year, $1.0 billion program in fiscal 2000. In fiscal 2002, we repurchased 4.3 million shares of NIKE’s Class B common stock for $237.7 million. To date, under the current program, we have purchased a total of 8.3 million shares of NIKE’s Class B common stock for $394.7 million. We expect to fund the current program from operating cash flow. The timing and the amount of shares purchased will be dictated by our capital needs and stock market conditions.

Our significant long-term contractual obligations as of May 31, 2002 are as follows:

The amounts listed for endorsement contracts represent approximate amounts of base compensation and minimum guaranteed royalty fees we are obligated to pay athlete and sport team endorsers of our products. Actual payments under some contracts are likely be higher than the amounts listed as these contracts provide for bonuses to be paid to the endorsers based upon athletic achievements in future periods. Actual payments under some contracts may also be lower as a limited number of contracts include provisions for reduced payments if athlete performance declines in future periods.

In addition to the cash payments disclosed above, we are obligated to furnish the endorsers with NIKE products for their use. It is not possible to determine how much we will spend on this product on an annual basis as the contracts do not stipulate a specific amount of cash to be spent on the product. The amount of product provided to the endorsers will depend on many factors including general playing conditions, the number of sporting events in which they participate, and our own decisions regarding product and marketing initiatives. In addition, the costs to design, develop, source, and purchase the products furnished to the endorsers are incurred over a period of time and are not necessarily tracked separately from similar costs incurred for products sold to customers.

An outsourcing contractor provides us with information technology operations management services through 2006. The amount of the payments in future years depends on our level of monthly use of the different elements of the contractor’s services. If we were to terminate the entire contract as of May 31, 2002, we would

be required to provide the contractor with four months notice and pay a termination liability of $22.6 million. Our monthly payments to the contractor currently are approximately $6 million.

We also have the following outstanding short-term debt obligations as of May 31, 2002. Please refer to the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Note 4 — Short-term Borrowings and Credit Lines) for further description and interest rates related to the below short-term debt obligations.

As of May 31, 2002, letters of credit of $808.4 million were outstanding for the purchase of inventories. All letters of credit generally expire within one year.

We have an effective shelf registration statement on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under which $1.0 billion in debt securities are available to be issued. On May 29, 2002, we commenced a medium-term note program under the shelf registration that allows us to issue up to $500.0 million in medium-term notes, as our capital needs dictate. We entered into this program to provide additional liquidity to meet our working capital and general corporate cash requirements. As of May 31, 2002, we had not issued any debt securities under the shelf registration.

Subsequent to May 31, 2002, we issued a total of $90 million in notes under the medium-term note program. The notes have coupon rates that range from 4.80% to 5.66%. The maturities range from July 9, 2007 to August 7, 2012. For $75 million of the notes, we simultaneously entered into interest rate swap agreements whereby we receive fixed interest payments at the same rate as the notes and pay variable interest payments based on the six-month London Inter Bank Offering Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread. Each swap has the same notional amount and maturity date as its respective note. After issuance of these notes, $910.0 million remains available to be issued under our shelf registration. We may issue additional notes under the shelf registration in fiscal 2003 depending on working capital and general corporate needs.

As of May 31, 2001, we had a $750.0 million, 364-day committed credit facility and a $500.0 million, multi-year committed credit facility in place with a group of banks. In November 2001, we renewed the 364-day facility in the amount of $600.0 million. Thus, our current total availability under these two bank facilities is $1.1 billion. We currently have no amounts outstanding under these facilities. The $600.0 million facility matures on November 15, 2002 and can be extended 364 days on each maturity date. The $500.0 million facility matures on November 17, 2005, and once a year, it can be extended for one additional year. Based on our current long-term senior unsecured debt ratings of A and A2 from Standard and Poor’s Corporation and Moody’s Investor Services, respectively, the interest rate charged on any outstanding borrowings on the $600.0 million facility would be the prevailing LIBOR plus 0.24%, and the interest rate charged on any outstanding borrowings on the $500.0 million facility would be the prevailing LIBOR plus 0.22%. The facility fees for the $600.0 million and the $500.0 million facilities are 0.06% and 0.08%, respectively, of the total commitment.

If our long-term debt rating were to decline, the facility fees and interest rates under our committed credit facilities would increase. Conversely, if our long-term debt rating improves, the facility fees and interest rates would decrease. Changes in our long-term debt rating would not trigger acceleration of maturity of any then outstanding borrowings or any future borrowings under the committed credit facilities. However, under

these committed credit facilities, we have agreed to various covenants. These covenants include limits on our disposal of fixed assets and the amount of debt secured by liens we may incur, and set a minimum ratio of net worth to indebtedness. In the event we were to have any borrowings outstanding under these facilities, failed to meet any covenant, and were unable to obtain a waiver from a majority of the banks, any borrowings would become immediately due and payable. As of May 31, 2002, we were in full compliance with each of these covenants and believe it is unlikely we will fail to meet any of these covenants in the future.

Liquidity is also provided by our commercial paper program, under which there was $338.3 million and $710.0 million outstanding at May 31, 2002 and May 31, 2001, respectively. We currently have short-term debt ratings of A1 and P1 from Standard and Poor’s Corporation and Moody’s Investor Services, respectively.

We currently believe that cash generated by operations, together with access to external sources of funds as described above, will be sufficient to meet our operating and capital needs.

Dividends per share of common stock for fiscal 2002 were $0.48, the same as in fiscal 2001. We have paid a dividend every quarter since February 1984. We review our dividend policy from time to time; however, based upon current projected earnings and cash flow requirements, we anticipate continuing to pay a quarterly dividend.

In the normal course of business and consistent with established policies and procedures, we employ a variety of financial instruments to manage exposure to fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies and interest rates. It is our policy to utilize these financial instruments only where necessary to finance our business and manage such exposures; we do not enter into these transactions for speculative purposes.

We are exposed to foreign currency fluctuation as a result of our international sales, production and funding activities. Our foreign currency risk management objective is to reduce the variability of local entity cash flows as a result of exchange rate movements. We use forward exchange contracts and options to hedge certain anticipated but not yet firmly committed transactions as well as certain firm commitments and the related receivables and payables, including third party or intercompany transactions.

When we begin hedging exposures depends on the nature of the exposure and market conditions. Generally, all anticipated and firmly committed transactions that are hedged are to be recognized within twelve months, although at May 31, 2002 we had forward contracts hedging anticipated transactions that will be recognized in as many as 24 months. The majority of the contracts expiring in more than twelve months relate to the anticipated purchase of inventory by our Japanese subsidiary. We use forward contracts and cross-currency swaps to hedge foreign currency denominated payments under intercompany loan agreements. When intercompany loans are hedged, it is typically for their expected duration, which in some circumstances may be in excess of five years. Hedged transactions are principally denominated in European currencies, Japanese yen, Canadian dollars, Korean won, Mexican pesos, Australian dollars and new Taiwan dollars.

Our earnings are also exposed to movements in short and long-term market interest rates. Our objective in managing this interest rate exposure is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows, and to reduce overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we maintain a mix of medium and long-term fixed rate debt, commercial paper, and bank loans and have entered into interest rate swaps under which we receive fixed interest and pay variable interest.

We monitor foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk and related derivatives using a variety of techniques including a review of market value, sensitivity analysis, and Value-at-Risk (VaR). Our market-sensitive derivative and other financial instruments, as defined by the SEC, are foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency option contracts, cross-currency swaps, interest rate swaps, intercompany loans denominated in foreign currencies, fixed interest rate U.S. dollar denominated debt, and fixed interest rate Japanese yen denominated debt.

We use VaR to monitor the foreign exchange risk of our foreign currency forward and foreign currency option derivative instruments only. The VaR determines the maximum potential one-day loss in the fair value of these foreign exchange rate-sensitive financial instruments. The VaR model estimates assume normal market conditions and a 95% confidence level. There are various modeling techniques that can be used in the VaR computation. Our computations are based on interrelationships between currencies and interest rates (a “variance/ co-variance” technique). These interrelationships are a function of foreign exchange currency market changes and interest rate changes over the preceding one year. The value of foreign currency options does not change on a one-to-one basis with changes in the underlying currency rate. We adjusted the potential loss in option value for the estimated sensitivity (the “delta” and “gamma”) to changes in the underlying currency rate. This calculation reflects the impact of foreign currency rate fluctuations on the derivative instruments only, and hence does not include the impact of such rate fluctuations on the underlying based transactions that are anticipated transactions, firm commitments, cash balances and accounts and loans receivable and payable denominated in foreign currencies from the VaR calculation, including those which are hedged by these instruments.

The VaR model is a risk analysis tool and does not purport to represent actual losses in fair value that we will incur, nor does it consider the potential effect of favorable changes in market rates. It also does not represent the full extent of the possible loss that may occur. Actual future gains and losses will differ from those estimated because of changes or differences in market rates and interrelationships, hedging instruments and hedge percentages, timing and other factors.

The estimated maximum one-day loss in fair value on our foreign currency sensitive financial instruments, derived using the VaR model, was $13.7 million and $18.9 million at May 31, 2002 and May 31, 2001, respectively. The reduction in VaR as of May 31, 2002 occurred due to the effect of currency volatility on existing trades on the May 31, 2002 VaR computation versus the effect of currency volatility on existing trades on the May 31, 2001 VaR computation. Such a hypothetical loss in fair value of our derivatives would be offset by increases in the value of the underlying transactions being hedged. The average monthly change in the fair values of foreign currency forward and foreign currency option derivative instruments was $42.9 million and $22.4 million for fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001, respectively.

Details of other market-sensitive financial instruments and derivative financial instruments not included in the VaR calculation above, are provided in the table below except the interest rate swaps which are described in the last paragraph of this section. These instruments include intercompany loans denominated in foreign currencies, fixed interest rate Japanese yen denominated debt, fixed interest rate U.S. dollar denominated debt, cross-currency swaps, and interest rate swaps. For debt obligations, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates. We have excluded the cross-currency swaps from the foreign exchange risk category because these instruments eliminate all foreign currency exposure in the cash flows of a euro denominated intercompany loan. We have included these cross-currency swaps in the interest rate risk category but excluded the related intercompany loan from this category because the intercompany interest eliminates in consolidation. For the cross-currency swaps the table presents both the euro swap payable and U.S. dollar swap receivable and the respective pay and receive interest rates. All information is presented in U.S. dollar equivalents, in millions, except interest rates.

Intercompany loans and related interest amounts eliminate in consolidation. Intercompany loans are generally hedged against foreign exchange risk through the use of forward contracts and swaps with third parties.

The fixed interest rate Japanese yen denominated debts were issued by and are accounted for by two of our Japanese subsidiaries. Accordingly, the monthly remeasurement of these instruments due to changes in foreign exchange rates is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss upon the consolidation of these subsidiaries.

There was not a significant change in debt or cross-currency swap market risks during fiscal 2002. The U.S. dollar fair values of intercompany loans denominated in foreign currencies was $647.2 million at May 31, 2001, which is the same as the carrying values of the loans prior to their elimination. The U.S. dollar fair value of the fixed rate Japanese yen denominated debt that was outstanding at May 31, 2001 was $181.1 million

versus a carrying value of $191.0 million at that date. The U.S. dollar fair values of the fixed rate U.S. dollar denominated debt, the euro swap payable and the U.S. dollar swap receivable as of May 31, 2001 were $256.2 million, $179.4 million and $266.4 million, respectively, versus carrying values of $249.6 million, $172.6 million and $250.0 million, respectively, at that date.

In August 2001, we issued a $250 million corporate bond maturing in August 2006, with a fixed interest rate of 5.5%. In November 2001, we entered into receive-fixed pay-variable interest rate swap agreements to hedge the interest rate exposure related to this bond. The interest rate swaps have an aggregate notional amount of $250 million maturing in August 2006. The receive-fixed rates on the swaps match the fixed rate on the bond, and the pay-variable rates are based on the three-month LIBOR rates plus a spread. As a result of the interest rate swap agreements, our effective interest rate on the $250 million corporate bond was 3.3% as of May 31, 2002. The difference between the carrying amounts and fair value of the corporate bond and related interest rate swaps was $1.8 million at May 31, 2002.

Certain written and oral statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to NIKE’s business plans, objectives and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, made or incorporated by reference from time to time by NIKE or its representatives in this report, other reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases, conferences, or otherwise, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance, or achievements, and may contain the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” or words or phrases of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties are detailed from time to time in reports filed by NIKE with the SEC, including Forms 8-K, 10-Q, and 10-K, and include, among others, the following: international, national and local general economic and market conditions; the size and growth of the overall athletic footwear, apparel, and equipment markets; intense competition among designers, marketers, distributors and sellers of athletic footwear, apparel, and equipment for consumers and endorsers; demographic changes; changes in consumer preferences; popularity of particular designs, categories of products, and sports; seasonal and geographic demand for NIKE products; difficulties in anticipating or forecasting changes in consumer preferences, consumer demand for NIKE products, and the various market factors described above; difficulties in implementing, operating, and maintaining NIKE’s increasingly complex information systems and controls, including, without limitation, the systems related to demand and supply planning, and inventory control; interruptions in data and communications systems; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results, including, without limitation, the fact that advance “futures” orders may not be indicative of future revenues due to the changing mix of futures and at-once orders; the ability of NIKE to sustain, manage or forecast its growth and inventories; the size, timing and mix of purchases of NIKE’s products; new product development and introduction; the ability to secure and protect trademarks, patents, and other intellectual property; performance and reliability of products; customer service; adverse publicity; the loss of significant customers or suppliers; dependence on distributors; business disruptions; increased costs of freight and transportation to meet delivery deadlines; increases in borrowing costs due to any decline in our debt ratings; changes in business strategy or development plans; general risks associated with doing business outside the United States, including without limitation, import duties, tariffs, quotas and political and economic instability; changes in government regulations; liability and other claims asserted against NIKE; the ability to

attract and retain qualified personnel; and other factors referenced or incorporated by reference in this report and other reports.

The risks included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include additional factors which could adversely affect NIKE’s business and financial performance. Moreover, NIKE operates in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on NIKE’s business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

Investors should also be aware that while NIKE does, from time to time, communicate with securities analysts, it is against NIKE’s policy to disclose to them any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information. Accordingly, shareholders should not assume that NIKE agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of the statement or report. Furthermore, NIKE has a policy against issuing or confirming financial forecasts or projections issued by others. Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts or opinions, such reports are not the responsibility of NIKE.

Management of NIKE, Inc. is responsible for the information and representations contained in this report. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with the generally accepted accounting principles we considered appropriate in the circumstances and include some amounts based on our best estimates and judgments. Other financial information in this report is consistent with these financial statements.

Our accounting systems include controls designed to reasonably assure that assets are safeguarded from unauthorized use or disposition and which provide for the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. These systems are supplemented by the selection and training of qualified financial personnel and an organizational structure providing for appropriate segregation of duties.

An Internal Audit department reviews the results of its work with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, presently consisting of three outside directors. The Audit Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors the appointment of the independent accountants and reviews with the independent accountants, management and the internal audit staff, the scope and the results of the annual examination, the effectiveness of the accounting control system and other matters relating to the financial affairs of NIKE as they deem appropriate. The independent accountants and the internal auditors have full access to the Committee, with and without the presence of management, to discuss any appropriate matters.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 14(A)(1) on page 55 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of NIKE, Inc. and its subsidiaries at May 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended May 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 14(A)(2) on page 55 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective June 1, 2001, the Company changed its method of accounting for derivative instruments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities.”

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of this statement.


(Mark One)
þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002

or

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the transition period from to .


Oregon		93-0584541
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

One Bowerman Drive Beaverton, Oregon 97005-6453 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)		(503) 671-6453 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)


PART I
	Item 1. Business
	Item 2. Properties
	Item 3. Legal Proceedings
	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
	Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
	Item 6. Selected Financial Data
	Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
	Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplemental Data
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
	Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
	Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
	Item 11. Executive Compensation
	Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
PART IV
	Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule, and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT 10.5
EXHIBIT 10.12
EXHIBIT 12.1
EXHIBIT 21


		Page

PART I
Item 1.	Business		2
	General		2
	Products		2
	Sales and Marketing		3
	United States Market		4
	International Markets		4
	Significant Customers		5
	Orders		5
	Product Research and Development		5
	Manufacturing		5
	Trade Legislation		6
	Competition		7
	Trademarks and Patents		8
	Employees		8
	Executive Officers of the Registrant		8
Item 2.	Properties		10
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings		10
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		11
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters		11
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		12
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		25
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplemental Data		29
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		54
PART III
	(Except for the information set forth under “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Item 1 above, Part III is incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement for the NIKE, Inc. 2002 annual meeting of shareholders.)
Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant		54
Item 11.	Executive Compensation		54
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management		54
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions		54
PART IV
Item 14.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K		55
	Signatures		S-1


							FY02 vs.					FY01 vs.
			Fiscal		Fiscal		FY01			Fiscal		FY00
May 31,			2002		2001		% CHG			2000		% CHG


			(In millions)
USA Region
	Footwear		$	3,185.0	$	3,208.9		(0.7	)%	$	3,351.2		(4.2	)%
	Apparel			1,305.3		1,260.3		3.6	%		1,154.4		9.2	%
	Equipment and other			425.7		349.8		21.7	%		226.5		54.4	%

		Total USA		4,916.0		4,819.0		2.0	%		4,732.1		1.8	%

Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) Region
	Footwear			1,551.8		1,422.8		9.1	%		1,309.4		8.7	%
	Apparel			989.5		976.3		1.4	%		933.9		4.5	%
	Equipment and other			190.2		185.7		2.4	%		163.7		13.4	%

		Total EMEA		2,731.5		2,584.8		5.7	%		2,407.0		7.4	%

Asia Pacific Region
	Footwear			657.7		632.4		4.0	%		557.0		13.5	%
	Apparel			431.0		374.8		15.0	%		321.0		16.8	%
	Equipment and other			123.0		102.8		19.6	%		77.1		33.3	%

		Total Asia Pacific		1,211.7		1,110.0		9.2	%		955.1		16.2	%

Americas Region
	Footwear			359.2		355.2		1.1	%		343.9		3.3	%
	Apparel			167.1		152.2		9.8	%		137.7		10.5	%
	Equipment and other			41.8		31.7		31.9	%		12.5		153.6	%

		Total Americas		568.1		539.1		5.4	%		494.1		9.1	%

Total NIKE brand				9,427.3		9,052.9		4.1	%		8,588.3		5.4	%

Other brands				465.7		435.9		6.8	%		406.8		7.2	%

Total Revenues			$	9,893.0	$	9,488.8		4.3	%	$	8,995.1		5.5	%

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents


Class B Common Stock (Title of each class)		New York Stock Exchange (Name of each exchange on which registered)


Retail Stores		Number

NIKE factory stores (which carry primarily B-grade and close-out merchandise)			78
NIKE stores (including NIKE Goddess Stores)			4
NIKETOWNs (designed to showcase NIKE products)			13
Employee-only stores			4
Cole Haan stores (including factory and employee stores)			61

	Total		160


Country	Percent

People’s Republic of China		38
Indonesia		30
Vietnam		15
Thailand		14
Italy		1
Taiwan		1
South Korea		1


U.S. Administrative Offices: Beaverton, Oregon (10 locations) — 9 leased Memphis, Tennessee (2 locations) — 1 leased Yarmouth, Maine Charlotte, North Carolina — leased Greenland, New Hampshire — leased Costa Mesa, California — leased International Administrative Offices: Europe (23 locations) — leased Africa (1 location) — leased Asia Pacific (16 locations) — leased Canada (2 locations) — leased Latin America (2 locations) — leased Sales Offices and Showrooms: United States (22 locations) — leased Europe (63 locations) — leased Africa (1 location) — leased Asia Pacific (24 locations) — leased Canada (3 locations) — leased Latin America (2 locations) — leased		Distribution Facilities: Greenland, New Hampshire — leased Wilsonville, Oregon Forest Park, Georgia Memphis, Tennessee (2 locations) — 1 leased Costa Mesa, California — leased Europe (5 locations) — 4 leased Asia Pacific (11 locations) — 9 leased Canada (2 locations) — leased Latin America (2 locations) — leased International Production Offices: Europe (3 locations) — leased Latin America (2 locations) — leased Asia Pacific (24 locations) — leased Manufacturing Facilities: United States (3 locations) — 1 leased Canada (3 locations) — 2 leased Europe (2 locations) — leased Asia Pacific (1 location) Retail Outlets: United States (160 locations) — 157 leased Europe (40 locations) — leased Asia Pacific (99 locations) — leased Latin America (16 locations) — leased Canada (7 locations) — leased



		Financial History
		2002			2001			2000			1999			1998			1997			1996			1995			1994			1993			1992


		(In millions, except per share data, financial ratios and number of shareholders)
Year Ended May 31,
Revenues		$	9,893.0		$	9,488.8		$	8,995.1		$	8,776.9		$	9,553.1		$	9,186.5		$	6,470.6		$	4,760.8		$	3,789.7		$	3,931.0		$	3,405.2
Gross margin			3,888.3			3,703.9			3,591.3			3,283.4			3,487.6			3,683.5			2,563.9			1,895.6			1,488.2			1,544.0			1,316.1
Gross margin %			39.3	%		39.0	%		39.9	%		37.4	%		36.5	%		40.1	%		39.6	%		39.8	%		39.3	%		39.3	%		38.7	%
Restructuring charge, net			—			0.1			(2.5	)		45.1			129.9			—			—			—			—			—			—
Income before accounting change			668.3			589.7			579.1			451.4			399.6			795.8			553.2			399.7			298.8			365.0			329.2
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle			5.0			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Net income			663.3			589.7			579.1			451.4			399.6			795.8			553.2			399.7			298.8			365.0			329.2
Basic earnings per common share:
	Income before accounting change		2.50			2.18			2.10			1.59			1.38			2.76			1.93			1.38			1.00			1.20			1.09
	Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		0.02			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
	Net income		2.48			2.18			2.10			1.59			1.38			2.76			1.93			1.38			1.00			1.20			1.09
Diluted earnings per common share:
	Income before accounting change		2.46			2.16			2.07			1.57			1.35			2.68			1.88			1.36			0.99			1.18			1.07
	Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		0.02			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
	Net income		2.44			2.16			2.07			1.57			1.35			2.68			1.88			1.36			0.99			1.18			1.07
Average common shares outstanding			267.7			270.0			275.7			283.3			288.7			288.4			286.6			289.6			298.6			302.9			301.7
Diluted average common shares outstanding			272.2			273.3			279.4			288.3			295.0			297.0			293.6			294.0			301.8			308.3			306.4
Cash dividends declared per common share			0.48			0.48			0.48			0.48			0.46			0.38			0.29			0.24			0.20			0.19			0.15
Cash flow from operations			1,081.5			656.5			699.6			941.4			517.5			323.1			339.7			254.9			576.5			265.3			435.8
Price range of common stock
	High		63.99			59.438			64.125			65.500			64.125			76.375			52.063			20.156			18.688			22.563			19.344
	Low		40.81			35.188			26.563			31.750			37.750			47.875			19.531			14.063			10.781			13.750			8.781
At May 31,
Cash and equivalents		$	575.5		$	304.0		$	254.3		$	198.1		$	108.6		$	445.4		$	262.1		$	216.1		$	518.8		$	291.3		$	260.1
Inventories			1,373.8			1,424.1			1,446.0			1,170.6			1,396.6			1,338.6			931.2			629.7			470.0			593.0			471.2
Working capital			2,321.5			1,838.6			1,456.4			1,818.0			1,828.8			1,964.0			1,259.9			938.4			1,208.4			1,165.2			964.3
Total assets			6,443.0			5,819.6			5,856.9			5,247.7			5,397.4			5,361.2			3,951.6			3,142.7			2,373.8			2,186.3			1,871.7
Long-term debt			625.9			435.9			470.3			386.1			379.4			296.0			9.6			10.6			12.4			15.0			69.5
Redeemable Preferred Stock			0.3			0.3			0.3			0.3			0.3			0.3			0.3			0.3			0.3			0.3			0.3
Shareholders’ equity			3,839.0			3,494.5			3,136.0			3,334.6			3,261.6			3,155.9			2,431.4			1,964.7			1,740.9			1,642.8			1,328.5
Year-end stock price			53.75			41.100			42.875			60.938			46.000			57.500			50.188			19.719			14.750			18.125			14.500
Market capitalization			14,302.5			11,039.5			11,559.1			17,202.2			13,201.1			16,633.0			14,416.8			5,635.2			4,318.8			5,499.3			4,379.6
Financial Ratios:
Return on equity			18.2	%		17.8	%		17.9	%		13.7	%		12.5	%		28.5	%		25.2	%		21.6	%		17.7	%		24.5	%		27.9	%
Return on assets			10.9	%		10.1	%		10.4	%		8.5	%		7.4	%		17.1	%		15.6	%		14.5	%		13.1	%		18.0	%		18.4	%
Inventory turns			4.3			4.0			4.1			4.3			4.4			4.8			5.0			5.2			4.3			4.5			3.9
Current ratio at May 31			2.3			2.0			1.7			2.3			2.1			2.1			1.9			1.8			3.2			3.6			3.3
Price/ Earnings ratio at May 31
	(Diluted)		21.8			19.0			20.7			38.8			34.1			21.5			26.6			14.5			14.9			15.3			13.5
Geographic Revenues:
United States		$	5,258.8		$	5,144.2		$	5,017.4		$	5,042.6		$	5,460.0		$	5,538.2		$	3,964.7		$	2,997.9		$	2,432.7		$	2,528.8		$	2,270.9
Europe			2,731.5			2,584.8			2,407.0			2,293.8			2,096.1			1,789.8			1,334.3			980.4			927.3			1,085.7			919.8
Asia/ Pacific			1,211.7			1,110.0			955.1			844.5			1,253.9			1,241.9			735.1			515.6			283.4			178.2			75.7
Americas (exclusive of United States)			691.0			649.8			615.6			596.0			743.1			616.6			436.5			266.9			146.3			138.3			138.8

Total Revenues		$	9,893.0		$	9,488.8		$	8,995.1		$	8,776.9		$	9,553.1		$	9,186.5		$	6,470.6		$	4,760.8		$	3,789.7		$	3,931.0		$	3,405.2



		1st Quarter						2nd Quarter						3rd Quarter						4th Quarter

		2002			2001			2002			2001			2002			2001			2002			2001


		(Unaudited)
		(In millions, except per share data and financial ratios)
Revenues		$	2,613.7		$	2,636.7		$	2,336.8		$	2,198.7		$	2,260.3		$	2,170.1		$	2,682.2		$	2,483.3
Gross margin			1,028.9			1,067.5			895.4			871.4			883.5			828.6			1,080.5			936.4
Gross margin %			39.4	%		40.5	%		38.3	%		39.6	%		39.1	%		38.2	%		40.3	%		37.7	%
Income before accounting change			204.2			210.2			129.3			119.4			126.3			97.4			208.5			162.7
Basic earnings per common share before accounting change			0.74			0.78			0.48			0.44			0.47			0.36			0.78			0.60
Diluted earnings per common share before accounting change			0.73			0.77			0.48			0.44			0.46			0.35			0.77			0.60
Net income			199.2			210.2			129.3			119.4			126.3			97.4			208.5			162.7
Average common shares outstanding			268.6			269.9			268.1			269.8			268.4			270.9			266.9			269.3
Diluted average common shares outstanding			271.6			273.8			271.6			273.2			273.4			274.6			272.0			271.5
Cash dividends declared per common share			0.12			0.12			0.12			0.12			0.12			0.12			0.12			0.12
Price range of common stock
	High		51.28			48.00			53.55			44.50			61.00			59.44			63.99			45.09
	Low		40.81			35.19			42.26			36.38			52.31			39.05			52.75			36.30


	*Long-term Financial Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments*



	Cash Payments Due During the Year Ended May 31,

Description of Commitment	2003		2004		2005		2006		2007		Thereafter		Total


	(In millions)
Operating Leases	$	158.2		143.4		119.1		95.3		98.2		288.0	$	902.2
Long-term Debt		55.3		205.3		5.5		5.5		254.7		154.9		681.2
Endorsement Contracts		274.2		220.3		166.1		133.5		92.7		208.1		1,094.9


	Outstanding as of
	May 31,
	2002

	(In millions)
Commercial paper outstanding and other notes payable for U.S. operations, all original maturities ninety-five days or less	$	339.2
Notes payable for non-U.S. operations, due at a mutually agreed-upon dates, generally ninety days from issuance or on demand		86.0
Payable to Nissho Iwai American Company (NIAC) for the purchase of inventories, generally due sixty days after shipment of goods from a foreign port		36.3



			Expected Maturity Date

			Year Ended May 31,

			2003			2004			2005			2006			2007			Thereafter			Total			Fair Value


			(In millions, except interest rates)
Foreign Exchange Risk
Euro Functional Currency
	Intercompany loan — U.S. dollar denominated — Fixed rate Principal payments		$	131.4			—			—			—			—			—		$	131.4		$	131.4
		Average interest rate		2.2	%		—			—			—			—			—			2.2	%
U.S. Dollar Functional Currency
	Intercompany loans — Euro denominated — Fixed rate Principal payments		$	135.1			147.4			—			—			—			—		$	282.5		$	282.5
		Average interest rate		5.5	%		5.6	%		—			—			—			—			5.6	%
	Intercompany loan — Japanese yen denominated — Fixed rate Principal payments		$	161.3			—			—			—			—			—		$	161.3		$	161.3
		Average interest rate		0.4	%		—			—			—			—			—			0.4	%
	Intercompany loan — Canadian dollar denominated — Fixed rate Principal payments		$	29.3			—			—			—			—			—		$	29.3		$	29.3
		Average interest rate		2.6	%		—			—			—			—			—			2.6	%
Argentine peso Functional Currency
	Intercompany loan — U.S. dollar denominated — Fixed rate Principal payments		$	44.9			—			—			—			—			—		$	44.9		$	44.9
		Average interest rate		2.3	%		—			—			—			—			—			2.3	%
Japanese Yen Functional Currency
	Long-term Japanese yen debt-Fixed rate Principal payments		$	5.3			5.3			5.3			5.3			5.3		$	154.9		$	181.4		$	207.4
		Average interest rate		3.3	%		3.3	%		3.3	%		3.4	%		3.4	%		3.7	%		3.6	%


Item 1.	*Business*


Item 2.	*Properties*


	*Fiscal 2002 Highlights*


	*Fiscal 2002 Cash Flow Activity*