10-K 1 form10_k03.htm M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC. 2003 FORM 10-K M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. Form 10-K 2003

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________

FORM 10-K

|X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
                                                                                 ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003

OR

|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
                                                                      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition period from               to            

Commission file number 1-8951
______________

M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 84-0622967
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
   
3600 South Yosemite Street, Suite 900 80237
Denver, Colorado (Zip code)
(Address of principal executive offices)  


(303) 773-1100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.01 par value New York Stock Exchange/The Pacific Stock Exchange
7% Senior Notes due December 2012 New York Stock Exchange
5½% Senior Notes due May 2013 New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

        Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No  

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part   III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. |X|

        Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). |X|

        The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $976,207,000. Computation is based on the closing sales price of $48.28 per share of such stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2003 the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second quarter.

        As of February 6, 2004, the number of shares outstanding of Registrant’s common stock was 29,555,000.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s 2004 definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s fiscal year.


M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

FORM 10-K

For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
____________

Table of Contents


Page
No.
PART I
    ITEM 1.     BUSINESS  
                         (a) General Development of Business
                         (b) Available Information
                         (c) Financial Information About Industry Segments
                         (d) Narrative Description of Business
   
    ITEM 2.     PROPERTIES
   
    ITEM 3.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
   
    ITEM 4.     SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
   
PART II
    ITEM 5.    MARKET PRICE OF COMMON STOCK AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER
                          MATTERS
   
    ITEM 6.     SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA 10 
   
    ITEM 7.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
                           RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
12 
   
    ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 27 
   
    ITEM 8.     CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS F-1
   
    ITEM 9.     CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
                          AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
28 
   
    ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 28 
   
PART III
    ITEM 10.     DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT 28 
   
    ITEM 11.     EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 28 
   
    ITEM 12.     SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
                            MANAGEMENT
29 
   
    ITEM 13.     CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS 29 
   
    ITEM 14.     PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 29 
   
PART IV
    ITEM 15.     EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K 30 
   
SIGNATURES 36 
   

(i)


M.D.C. HOLDINGS, INC.

FORM 10-K

PART I

Item 1.  Business.

         (a) General Development of Business

        M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. is a Delaware Corporation. We refer to M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. as the “Company” or as “MDC” in this Form 10-K. The “Company” or “MDC” includes our subsidiaries unless we state otherwise. MDC’s primary business is owning and managing subsidiary companies that build and sell homes under the name “Richmond American Homes.” We also own and manage HomeAmerican Mortgage Corporation (“HomeAmerican”), which originates mortgage loans primarily for MDC’s homebuyers. In addition, MDC provides title agency services through American Home Title and Escrow Company (“American Home Title”) to MDC homebuyers in Virginia, Maryland and Colorado and offers third party insurance products through American Home Insurance Agency, Inc. (“American Home Insurance”) to MDC’s homebuyers.

        The following is a summary of our history:

               1972 - We were founded as Mizel Development Corporation and completed initial public offering.
               1977 - Created Richmond Homes Limited and entered the Colorado homebuilding market.
               1983 - Created HomeAmerican Mortgage Corporation, entered the Arizona homebuilding market
through the acquisition of Cavalier Homes of Arizona and entered the Florida* homebuilding market through the acquisition of Olin American of Florida.
               1985 - Entered the Northern and Southern California homebuilding markets and expanded these
operations through the acquisition of Ponderosa Homes of Southern California.
               1986 - Entered the Texas* and suburban Washington D.C., including Maryland and Virginia, homebuilding markets through the acquisition of Wood Bros. Homes, Inc.
               1987 - Entered the Nevada homebuilding market.
               1995 - Expanded our Southern California operations through the purchase of the assets of Mesa Homes, thereby significantly increasing our presence in the Inland Empire.
               1996 - Expanded our Nevada operations through the purchase of the assets of Longford Homes.
               2002 - Entered the Utah homebuilding market through the purchase of the assets of John Laing Homes in Salt Lake City and re-entered the Texas homebuilding markets.
               2003 - Entered the Pennsylvania and Illinois homebuilding markets, and re-entered the Florida homebuilding market through the purchase of the assets of Crawford Homes, Inc.
     
    * We ceased homebuilding operations in Florida and Texas in 1988 and 1990, respectively and re-entered in 2002 and 2003, respectively.

         (b) Available Information

        The Company’s website is located at www.richmondamerican.com. This Form 10-K and all other reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) can be accessed, free of charge, through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after the report is electronically filed with the SEC, at http://www.investorrelations.richmondamerican.com/edgar.cfm.

         (c) Financial Information About Industry Segments

        Note  B to the consolidated financial statements contains information regarding the Company’s business segments for each of the three years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.

         (d) Narrative Description of Business

        MDC’s business consists of two segments, homebuilding and financial services. In our homebuilding segment, our homebuilding subsidiaries build and sell primarily single-family detached homes, although we build some townhomes in Virginia and Maryland. Our financial services segment consists of the operations of HomeAmerican and American Home Insurance.

1


        The base prices for our homes generally range from $100,000 to $600,000, although we also build homes with base prices above $1,300,000. The average sales price of our homes closed in 2003 and 2002 was $254,300 and $254,000, respectively. We maintain a balanced product offering in each of our markets, focusing on high quality design and construction of homes in most price points, targeting the largest homebuyer segments within a given market, which generally is the first-time and first-time move-up buyer. As a result, more than 80% of our homebuyers fall into these two categories.

        When opening a new homebuilding project, we generally acquire no more than a two-year supply of lots to avoid overexposure to any single sub-market. When we acquire finished lots, we prefer using option contracts or in phases for cash. We also acquire entitled land for development into finished lots when we determine that the risk is justified. The Company’s Asset Management Committees, composed of members of the Company’s senior management, generally meet weekly to review all proposed land acquisitions and takedowns of lots under option. Additional information about our land acquisition practices may be found in the Homebuilding Segment, Land Acquisition and Development section.

        Homes are designed and built to meet local customer preferences. The Company is the general contractor for all of its projects and retains subcontractors for site development and home construction. The Company builds single-family detached homes and, in Virginia and Maryland, we also build townhomes.

        HomeAmerican is a full service mortgage lender with offices located in each of MDC’s markets and originates or brokers mortgage loans for approximately 80% of MDC’s homebuyers. As a result, HomeAmerican is an integral part of MDC's business.

Homebuilding Segment.

         General.  MDC, whose subsidiaries build homes under the name “Richmond American Homes,” is one of the largest homebuilders in the United States. MDC is a major regional homebuilder with a significant presence in some of the country’s best housing markets. The Company is the largest homebuilder in Colorado; among the top five homebuilders in Northern Virginia, suburban Maryland, Phoenix, Tucson, Las Vegas and Salt Lake City; and among the top ten homebuilders in Northern and Southern California. MDC also has a growing presence in Dallas/Fort Worth and has recently entered the Houston, San Antonio, Philadelphia/Delaware Valley, West Florida, Jacksonville and Chicago markets. MDC believes a significant presence in its markets enables it to compete effectively for homebuyers, land acquisitions and subcontractor labor.

        The Company’s operations are diversified geographically, as shown in the following table of home sales revenues by state for the years 2001 through 2003 (dollars in thousands).


Total Home Sales Revenues
Percent of Total
2003
2002
2001
2003
2002
2001
Colorado     $ 675,236   $ 731,211   $ 716,313    24%    32%    35%  
California    748,337    645,700    611,899    26%    29%    30%  
Nevada    383,659    227,319    133,548    13%    10%    6%  
Arizona    547,697    370,367    346,582    19%    16%    17%  
Utah    48,331    16,936    --    2%    1%    --  
Texas    26,143    177    --    1%    0%    --  
Virginia    293,295    183,668    196,656    10%    8%    9%  
Maryland    112,975    84,913    71,809    4%    4%    3%  
Florida    15,655    --    --    1%    --    --  






      Total   $ 2,851,328   $ 2,260,291   $ 2,076,807    100%    100%    100%  







        The financial information required by Item 1 is contained in Note B to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

         Housing.   MDC builds homes in a number of basic series, each designed to appeal to a different segment of the homebuyer market. Within each series, MDC builds several models, each with a different floor plan, elevation and standard and optional features. Differences in sales prices of similar models in any series depend primarily upon

2


location, optional features and design specifications. The series of homes offered at a particular location are based on customer preference, lot size, the area’s demographics and, in certain cases, the requirements of major land sellers and local municipalities.

        Design centers are located in most of the Company’s homebuilding markets. Homebuyers are able to customize certain features of their homes by selecting options and upgrades on display at the design centers. Homebuyers can select finishes and upgrades soon after they decide to purchase a Richmond American home. The design centers not only provide MDC’s customers with a convenient way to select upgrades and options for their new homes, but also provide the Company with an additional source of revenue and profit.

        The Company maintains limited levels of inventories of unsold homes in its markets. Unsold homes in various stages of completion allow the Company to meet the immediate and near-term demands of prospective homebuyers. In order to mitigate the risk of carrying excess inventory, the Company has strict controls and limits on the number of its unsold homes under construction.

         Land Acquisition and Development.  MDC purchases finished lots using option contracts, in phases or in bulk for cash. The Company also acquires entitled land for development into finished lots when the risk is justified. In making land purchases, MDC considers a number of factors, including projected rates of return, sales prices of the homes to be built, population and employment growth patterns, proximity to developed areas, estimated costs of development and demographic trends. Generally, MDC acquires finished lots and land for development only in areas that will have, among other things, available building permits, utilities and suitable zoning. The Company attempts to maintain a supply of finished lots sufficient to enable it to start homes promptly after a contract for a home sale is executed. This approach is intended to minimize the Company’s investment in inventories and reduce the risk of shortages of labor and building materials. Increases in the cost of finished lots may reduce Home Gross Margins (as defined below) in the future to the extent that market conditions would not allow the Company to recover the higher cost of land through higher sales prices. We define “Home Gross Margins” to mean home sales revenues less cost of goods sold (which primarily includes land and construction costs, capitalized interest, a reserve for warranty expense and financing and closing costs) as a percent of home sales revenues. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

        MDC has the right to acquire a portion of the land it will require in the future utilizing option contracts, in some cases on a “rolling” basis. Generally, in an option contract, the Company obtains the right to purchase lots in consideration for an option deposit. In the event the Company elects not to purchase the lots within a specified period of time, the Company forfeits the option deposit. The Company’s option contracts do not contain provisions requiring specific performance by the Company. This practice limits the Company’s risk and avoids a greater demand on its liquidity. At December 31, 2003, MDC had the right to acquire 12,251 lots under option agreements with approximately $17,089,000 in non-refundable cash option deposits and $8,225,000 in letters of credit at risk. Because of increased demand for finished lots in certain of its markets, the Company’s ability to acquire lots using rolling options has been reduced or has become significantly more expensive.

        MDC owns and has the right under option contracts to acquire undeveloped parcels of real estate that it intends to develop into finished lots. MDC develops its land in phases (generally fewer than 100 lots at a time for each home series in a subdivision) in order to limit the Company’s risk in a particular project and to efficiently employ available liquidity. Building permits and utilities are available and zoning is suitable for the current intended use of substantially all of MDC’s undeveloped land. When developed, these lots generally will be used in the Company’s homebuilding activities. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

3


        The table below shows the carrying value of land and land under development, by state, as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands).


December 31,
2003
2002
2001
Colorado     $ 105,223   $ 140,930   $ 165,228  
California    239,714    154,980    110,010  
Nevada    129,554    114,142    44,103  
Arizona    89,950    92,639    70,602  
Utah    22,548    12,984    --  
Texas    16,420    5,559    --  
Virginia    94,561    113,717    49,929  
Maryland    53,483    21,892    10,630  
Florida    12,116    --    --  



    Total   $ 763,569   $ 656,843   $ 450,502  




        The table below shows the number of lots owned and under option (excluding lots in housing completed or under construction), by state, as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.

December 31,
2003
2002
2001
Lots Owned                
  Colorado    3,392    4,733    5,777  
  California    2,733    2,473    1,632  
  Nevada    3,634    3,254    1,380  
  Arizona    2,902    3,356    3,099  
  Utah    867    730    --  
  Texas    534    170    --  
  Virginia    1,411    2,018    1,511  
  Maryland    532    228    125  
  Florida    346    --    --  



      Total    16,351    16,962    13,524  



Lots Under Option  
  Colorado    1,814    1,027    1,163  
  California    779    983    1,374  
  Nevada    1,725    1,137    517  
  Arizona    2,356    584    1,558  
  Utah    353    131    --  
  Texas    1,669    671    --  
  Virginia    1,791    1,239    911  
  Maryland    1,235    1,223    536  
  Florida    529    --    --  



      Total    12,251    6,995    6,059  




        Labor and Raw Materials.  Generally, the materials used in MDC’s homebuilding operations are standard items carried by major suppliers. The Company generally contracts for most of its materials and labor at a fixed price during the anticipated construction period of its homes. This allows the Company to mitigate the risks associated with increases in building materials and labor costs between the time construction begins on a home and the time it is closed. Increases in the cost of building materials, particularly lumber, and subcontracted labor may reduce Home Gross Margins to the extent that market conditions prevent the recovery of increased costs through higher sales prices. From time to time and to varying degrees, the Company may experience shortages in the availability of building materials and/or labor in each of its markets. These shortages and delays may result in delays in the delivery of homes under construction, reduced Home Gross Margins, or both. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

        Seasonal Nature of Business.   MDC’s homebuilding business is seasonal to the extent that certain of its operations, especially in the northernmost markets, are subject to weather-related slowdowns. Delays in development and construction activities resulting from adverse weather conditions could increase the Company’s risk of buyer cancellations and contribute to higher costs for interest, materials and labor. In addition, homebuyer

4


preferences and demographics influence the seasonal nature of MDC's business. See "Forward-Looking Statements" below.

         Backlog.  As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, homes under contract but not yet delivered (“Backlog”) totaled 5,593 and 4,035, respectively, with estimated sales values of $1,600,000,000 and $1,120,000,000, respectively. Based on its past experience, assuming no significant change in market conditions and mortgage interest rates, MDC anticipates that approximately 70% to 75% of its December 31, 2003 Backlog will close under existing sales contracts during the first nine months of 2004. The remaining 25% to 30% of the homes in Backlog are not expected to close under existing contracts due to cancellations. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

        Marketing and Sales.   MDC’s homes are sold under various commission arrangements by its own sales personnel and by cooperating brokers and referrals in the realtor community. In marketing its homes, MDC primarily uses on-site model homes, advertisements in local newspapers, radio, billboards and other signage, magazines and illustrated brochures. We also market our homes on our internet website, www.richmondamerican.com, and utilize a variety of other internet sites to advertise our homes and communities. All of MDC’s homes are sold with a ten-year limited warranty issued by an unaffiliated warranty company.

        Title Operations.  American Home Title provides title agency services to MDC homebuyers in Virginia, Maryland and Colorado. The Company is evaluating opportunities to provide title agency services in its other markets.

         Competition.  The homebuilding industry is fragmented and highly competitive. MDC competes with numerous homebuilders, including a number that are larger and have greater financial resources. Homebuilders compete for customers, desirable financing, land, building materials and subcontractor labor. Competition for home orders primarily is based upon price, style, financing provided to prospective purchasers, location of property, quality of homes built, customer service and general reputation in the community. The Company also competes with subdivision developers and land development companies when acquiring land.

        Mortgage Interest Rates.   The Company’s homebuilding operations are dependent upon the availability and cost of mortgage financing. Increases in home mortgage interest rates may reduce the demand for homes and home mortgages and, generally, will reduce home mortgage refinancing activity. The Company is unable to predict future changes in home mortgage interest rates or the impact such changes may have on the Company’s operating activities and results of operations. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

         Regulation.  The Company’s homebuilding operations are subject to continuing compliance requirements mandated by applicable federal, state and local statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, including zoning and land use ordinances, building codes, contractors’ licensing laws, state insurance laws, federal and state human resources laws and regulations and health and safety regulations and laws (including, but not limited to, those of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration). Various localities in which the Company operates have imposed (or may impose in the future) fees on developers to fund schools, road improvements and low and moderate-income housing. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

        From time to time, various municipalities in which the Company operates restrict or place moratoriums on the availability of utilities, including water and sewer taps. Additionally, certain jurisdictions in which the Company operates have proposed or enacted growth initiatives that may restrict the number of building permits available in any given year. Although no assurances can be given as to future conditions or governmental actions, MDC believes that it has, or can obtain, water and sewer taps and building permits for its land inventory and land held for development. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

        The Company’s homebuilding operations also are affected by environmental laws and regulations pertaining to availability of water, municipal sewage treatment capacity, land use, hazardous waste disposal, naturally occurring radioactive materials, building materials, population density and preservation of endangered species, natural terrain and vegetation. Due to these considerations, the Company generally obtains an environmental site assessment for parcels of land that it acquires. The particular environmental laws and regulations that apply to any given homebuilding project vary greatly according to the site’s location, the site’s environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site. These environmental laws and regulations may result in project delays, cause the Company to incur substantial compliance and other costs, and/or prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding activity in certain environmentally sensitive regions or areas. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

5


        Bonds and Letters of Credit.   The Company is often required to obtain bonds and letters of credit in support of its related obligations with respect to subdivision improvement, homeowners association dues and start-up expenses, warranty work, contractors license fees, earnest money deposits, etc. At December 31, 2003, MDC had outstanding approximately $26,771,000 of letters of credit and $236,545,000 of performance bonds. In the event any such bonds or letters of credit are called, MDC would be obligated to reimburse the issuer of the bond or letter of credit. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

Financial Services Segment.

      Mortgage Lending Operations.

         General.  HomeAmerican is a full-service mortgage lender. Through office locations in each of the Company’s markets and a centralized loan origination center, HomeAmerican originates mortgage loans primarily for MDC’s homebuyers. HomeAmerican also brokers mortgage loans for origination by outside lending institutions for MDC's homebuyers. HomeAmerican is the principal originator of mortgage loans for MDC’s homebuyers.

        HomeAmerican is authorized to originate Federal Housing Administration-insured (“FHA”), Veterans Administration-guaranteed (“VA”), Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) and conventional mortgage loans. HomeAmerican also is an authorized loan servicer for FNMA, FHLMC and the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) and, as such, is subject to the rules and regulations of such organizations.

        Substantially all of the mortgage loans originated by HomeAmerican are sold to investors within 45 days of origination. The Company uses HomeAmerican’s secured warehouse line of credit, other borrowings and internally generated Company funds to finance these mortgage loans until they are sold.

        Portfolio of Mortgage Loan Servicing.   Mortgage loan servicing involves the collection of principal, interest, taxes and insurance premiums from the borrower and the remittance of such funds to the mortgage loan investor, local taxing authorities and insurance companies. The servicer is paid a fee to perform these services. HomeAmerican obtains the servicing rights related to the mortgage loans it originates. Certain mortgage loans are sold “servicing released” (the servicing rights are included with the sale of the corresponding mortgage loans). In 2003, 32% of the mortgage loans were sold “servicing released”. The servicing rights on the remainder of the mortgage loans generally are sold under minibulk contracts within two months of the sale of the mortgage loan. HomeAmerican intends to sell servicing on all mortgage loans originated in the future. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

        HomeAmerican’s portfolio of mortgage loan servicing at December 31, 2003 consisted of servicing rights with respect to 2,990 single-family loans, 99% of which were less than one year old. This includes 2,155 single-family loans for which the servicing rights had been sold but not transferred to the purchasers as of December 31, 2003. The Company anticipates transferring these servicing rights in the first quarter of 2004. These loans are secured by mortgages on properties in ten states, with interest rates on the loans ranging from approximately 1.6% to 11.4% and averaging 5.8%. The underlying value of a servicing portfolio generally is determined based on the interest rates and the annual servicing fee rates, gross of guarantee fees (currently .44% for FHA/VA loans and .25% for conventional loans) applicable to the loans comprising the portfolio.

         Pipeline.  HomeAmerican’s mortgage loans in process that had not closed (the “Pipeline”) at December 31, 2003 had aggregate principal balances of $990,535,000. An estimated 70% to 75% of the Pipeline at December 31, 2003 is anticipated to close during the first nine months of 2004. If mortgage interest rates decline, a smaller percentage of these loans would be expected to close. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

        Forward Sales Commitments.   HomeAmerican is exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on its mortgage loan inventory. Derivative instruments utilized in the normal course of business by HomeAmerican include forward sales securities commitments, private investor sales commitments and commitments to originate mortgage loans. The Company utilizes these commitments to manage the price risk on fluctuations in interest rates on its mortgage loans owned and commitments to originate mortgage loans. Such contracts are the only significant financial derivative instruments utilized by the Company.

6


        HomeAmerican provides mortgage loans that generally are sold forward and subsequently delivered to a third-party purchaser within approximately 45 days. Forward commitments are used for non-trading purposes to sell mortgage loans and hedge price risk due to fluctuations in interest rates on rate-locked mortgage loans in process that have not closed. Due to this hedging philosophy, the market risk associated with these mortgages is limited.

         Competition.  The mortgage industry is fragmented and highly competitive. In each of the locations in which it originates loans, HomeAmerican competes with numerous banks, thrifts and other mortgage bankers, many of which are larger and have greater financial resources. Competitive factors include pricing, loan terms, underwriting criteria and customer service.

      Insurance Operations.

        American Home Insurance provides third party homeowners, auto and other types of casualty insurance to MDC's homebuyers.

Employees.

        At December 31, 2003, MDC employed approximately 2,800 persons. MDC considers its employee relations to be very good.

Item 2.   Properties.

        Our corporate headquarters is located at 3600 South Yosemite Street, Denver, Colorado 80237, where we lease approximately 134,000 square feet of office space. We also lease office space at our homebuilding divisions and our financial services locations. All operations currently are either satisfied with the suitability and capacity of their properties or are in the process of locating additional space suitable for expanding operations.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.

        The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various claims, complaints and other legal actions arising in the normal course of business, including moisture intrusion and related mold claims. In the opinion of management, the outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

        The Company previously purchased 63 lots within the former Lowry Air Force Base, in an area known as the Northwest Neighborhood, in Denver, Colorado. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had sold homes on all 63 lots, completed construction of homes on 48 of these lots, closed 47 of the homes, and commenced construction on four of the remaining 15 lots. Asbestos, believed to have resulted from historic activities of the United States Air Force, has been discovered in this area. In August 2003, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment issued a Final Response Plan imposing requirements to remediate the asbestos. Through December 31, 2003, the Company had expended approximately $2,250,000 in sampling and remediation costs and currently projects the total costs of these efforts to be approximately $3,900,000. The Company has an accrual of $1,650,000 for the expected remaining costs as of December 31, 2003. Remediation of 57 of the 63 lots had been completed by the Company as of December 31, 2003. The Company has notified the Air Force and United States Department of Defense of their responsibility to reimburse the Company for all costs associated with the asbestos. Those agencies currently dispute their responsibility to reimburse the Company and the other land owners. The Company is evaluating available legal remedies to recover costs associated with the asbestos.

        The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) filed an administrative action against Richmond American Homes of Colorado, Inc. (“Richmond”), alleging that Richmond violated the terms of Colorado’s general permit for discharges of stormwater from construction activities at two of Richmond’s development sites. In its complaint, the EPA seeks civil penalties against Richmond in the amount of $122,000. On November 11, 2003, the EPA filed a motion to withdraw the administrative action so that it could refile the matter in United States District Court as part of a consolidated action against Richmond for alleged stormwater violations at not only the original two sites, but also two additional sites. Richmond filed an objection to the EPA’s motion to withdraw. The EPA’s motion to withdraw was granted by the Administrative Law Judge on February 9, 2004. Richmond has substantial defenses to the allegations made by the EPA and also is exploring methods of resolving this matter with the EPA.

7


        Because of the nature of the homebuilding business, and in the ordinary course of its operations, the Company from time to time may be subject to product liability claims.

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

        No meetings of the Company’s stockholders were held during the fourth quarter of 2003.

PART II

Item 5.   Market Price of Common Stock and Related Security Holder Matters.

        On February 6, 2004, MDC had 973 shareowners of record. The shares of MDC common stock are traded on the New York and the Pacific Stock Exchanges. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the price ranges of MDC’s common stock.


Three Months Ended
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31
2003                    
High   $ 37.95   $ 53.15   $ 55.09   $ 70.90  
Low   $ 32.40   $ 34.22   $ 47.26   $ 53.60  
2002  
High   $ 44.50   $ 48.17   $ 48.27   $ 36.86  
Low   $ 30.95   $ 37.32   $ 31.27   $ 27.05  

        The following table sets forth the cash dividends declared and paid in 2003 and 2002. Amounts have been adjusted for the effects of the 10% stock dividend distributed on May 27, 2003 (dollars in thousands except per share amounts).



Date of
Declaration

Date of
Payment

Dividend
per Share

Dollars
2003                        
First quarter   January 21, 2003   February 21, 2003   $ 0.073   $ 2,121  
Second quarter   April 28, 2003   May 27, 2003    0.082    2,341  
Third quarter   August 4, 2003   August 28, 2003    0.125    3,629  
Fourth quarter   October 20, 2003   November 19, 2003    0.125    3,721  


            $ 0.405   $ 11,812  


2002  
First quarter   January 21, 2002   February 21, 2002   $ 0.064   $ 1,868  
Second quarter   April 25, 2002   May 23, 2002    0.073    2,163  
Third quarter   July 22, 2002   August 21, 2002    0.073    2,137  
Fourth quarter   October 18, 2002   November 15, 2002    0.073    2,124  


            $ 0.283   $ 8,292  



        On January 26, 2004, MDC’s board of directors approved the payment of a cash dividend of 12.5 cents per share payable February 26, 2004 to shareowners of record on February 11, 2004.

        On April 28, 2003, MDC’s board of directors declared a 10% stock dividend that was distributed on May 27, 2003 to shareowners of record on May 12, 2003.

        In connection with the declaration and payment of dividends, the Company is required to comply with certain covenants contained in its $600,000,000 unsecured revolving line of credit agreement. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, dividends may be declared or paid if the Company is in compliance with certain stockholders’ equity and debt coverage tests. At December 31, 2003, the Company had a permitted dividend capacity of approximately $281,000,000 pursuant to the most restrictive of these covenants.

8


        The following table provides information as of December 31, 2003 with respect to the shares of MDC common stock that may be issued under existing equity compensation plans, all of which have been approved by the shareowners.


Common Shares to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options
Common Shares Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
    Employee Equity Incentive Plan      2,129,618   $ 24.69    none  
    Equity Incentive Plan    2,128,137   $ 40.94    1,819,595  
    Director Stock Option Plan    241,750   $ 43.93    318,300  


    Total equity compensation plans  
      approved by shareowners    4,499,505   $ 33.41    2,137,895  



        Please refer to the discussion of the Company’s equity incentive plans in Note G to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for a description of the plans and the types of grants, in addition to options, that may be made under the plans. The referenced discussion also describes the formula by which the number of securities available for issuance under those plans automatically increases.

9


Item 6.  Selected Financial and Other Data.

        The data in this table should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Weighted-average shares and per share amounts have been adjusted for the effects of the 10% stock dividend distributed on May 27, 2003 (in thousands, except per share and unit amounts).

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
INCOME STATEMENT DATA                        
Revenues   $ 2,920,070   $ 2,318,524   $ 2,125,874   $ 1,751,545   $ 1,567,638  





Income before income taxes  
   Homebuilding   $ 393,879   $ 295,604   $ 279,267   $ 227,319   $ 162,258  
   Financial services  
     Mortgage lending    26,983    24,194    21,116    14,282    13,169  
     Insurance    1,294    --    --    --    --  





         Total financial services    28,277    24,194    21,116    14,282    13,169  





   Net corporate expenses (1)    (73,933 )  (45,754 )  (44,996 )  (38,400 )  (26,974 )





         Total   $ 348,223   $ 274,044   $ 255,387   $ 203,201   $ 148,453  





Net income   $ 212,229   $ 167,305   $ 155,715   $ 123,303   $ 89,392  
   Basic per common share   $ 7.31   $ 5.68   $ 5.36   $ 4.32   $ 3.02  
   Diluted per common share   $ 7.00   $ 5.48   $ 5.20   $ 4.22   $ 2.96  
Weighted-average shares outstanding  
   Basic    29,035    29,443    29,063    28,572    29,611  
   Diluted    30,303    30,529    29,955    29,212    30,156  
Dividends declared per share   $ 0.405   $ 0.283   $ 0.219   $ 0.180   $ 0.150  

December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
BALANCE SHEET DATA                        
Assets  
   Cash and cash equivalents   $ 173,565   $ 28,942   $ 36,600   $ 14,115   $ 38,930  
   Housing completed or under construction   $ 732,744   $ 578,475   $ 456,752   $ 443,512   $ 337,029  
   Land and land under development   $ 763,569   $ 656,843   $ 450,502   $ 388,711   $ 308,680  
   Total assets   $ 1,969,800   $ 1,595,180   $ 1,190,956   $ 1,061,598   $ 877,008  
Homebuilding and Corporate Debt  
   Homebuilding line of credit   $ --   $ --   $ --   $ 90,000   $ 40,000  
   Senior notes   $ 497,700   $ 322,990   $ 174,503   $ 174,444   $ 174,389  
   Notes payable   $ 2,479   $ --   $ --   $ --   $ --  
   Total homebuilding and corporate debt   $ 500,179   $ 322,990   $ 174,503   $ 264,444   $ 214,389  
Stockholders' Equity   $ 1,015,920   $ 800,567   $ 653,831   $ 482,230   $ 389,023  
Stockholders' Equity per Outstanding Share    $ 34.40   $ 27.54   $ 22.36   $ 17.10   $ 13.10  
Ratio of Debt to Stockholders' Equity (2)    .49    .40    .27    .55    .55  
Ratio of Net Debt to Stockholders' Equity (2)    .32    .37    .21    .52    .45  
Ratio of Debt to Capital (2)    .33    .29    .21    .35    .36  
Ratio of Net Debt to Capital (2)    .24    .27    .17    .34    .31  

10



Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
OPERATING DATA                        
   Home sales revenues   $ 2,851,328   $ 2,260,291   $ 2,076,807   $ 1,701,108   $ 1,526,519  
   Orders for homes, net (units)    12,630    9,899    7,701    7,835    7,232  
   Homes closed (units)    11,211    8,900    8,174    7,484    7,221  
   Homes in Backlog at year-end    5,593    4,035    2,882    3,292    2,941  
   Backlog sales value at year-end   $ 1,600,000   $ 1,120,000   $ 760,000   $ 775,000   $ 600,000  
   Average selling price per home closed   $ 254.3   $ 254.0   $ 254.1   $ 227.3   $ 211.4  
   Home Gross Margins    24.1%    23.0%    23.2%    22.3%    19.3%  
     Excluding interest in home cost of sales    25.0%    23.9%    24.4%    23.6%    21.2%  
Cash Flows From  
   Operating activities   $ 83,927   $ (166,429 ) $ 93,251   $ (63,457 ) $ (3,845 )
   Investing activities   $ (6,785 ) $ (12,441 ) $ (3,219 ) $ (3,160 ) $ (1,878 )
   Financing activities   $ 67,481   $ 171,212   $ (67,547 ) $ 41,802   $ 34,574  
Corporate and Homebuilding SG&A as   
   a % of Home Sales Revenues    12.8%    12.3%    12.1%    11.9%    10.8%  

  (1) Net corporate expenses represent (a) net realized gains and losses on corporate investments and marketable securities; (b) interest, dividend and other income; and (c) corporate general and administrative expense.

  (2) Excludes mortgage lending debt from the calculation.

11


Item 7.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

         M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. is a Delaware Corporation. We refer to M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. as the “Company,” “MDC,” "We" or "Our," in this Form 10-K. The “Company” or “MDC” includes our subsidiaries unless we state otherwise. MDC’s primary business is owning and managing subsidiary companies that build and sell homes under the name “Richmond American Homes.” We also own and manage HomeAmerican Mortgage Corporation (“HomeAmerican”), which originates mortgage loans primarily for our homebuyers. In addition, we provide title agency services through American Home Title and Escrow Company (“American Home Title”) to our homebuyers in Virginia, Maryland and Colorado and offers third party insurance products through American Home Insurance Agency, Inc. (“American Home Insurance”) to our homebuyers.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

        We achieved record home closings, revenues, net income and earnings per share in 2003. Aided by record low mortgage interest rates and the strong demand for new homes in most of our markets, our home orders increased 28% over 2002. In addition, we made significant progress in 2003 toward our stated goals of geographically diversifying and growing our homebuilding operations. Our entry into six new markets (Houston, San Antonio, Philadelphia/Delaware Valley, West Florida, Jacksonville and Chicago), our expansion in Salt Lake City and Dallas/Fort Worth, and our continued growth in most of our existing markets, enabled us to increase substantially our active subdivisions and inventory of controlled lots.

         Our financial position continued to strengthen throughout 2003. Our stockholders’ equity increased by 27% year-over-year to $1,015,920,000, or $34.40 per outstanding share, at December 31, 2003. This stockholders’ equity amount also reflects 2003 repurchases of 727,100 shares of MDC common stock, prior to the adjustment for the May 27, 2003 10% stock dividend, for an aggregate purchase price of $26,731,000. Homebuilding inventories grew by 21% in support of our increasing homebuilding operations. To finance our growth, we issued $350,000,000 of 5½% senior notes due in May 2013 (the "5½% Senior Notes") and maintained the capacity of our homebuilding line of credit at $600,000,000. Additionally, we redeemed our $175,000,000 8 3/8% senior notes due 2008 (the "8 3/8% Senior Notes"). Despite a $177,189,000 year-over-year increase in our corporate and homebuilding debt, we reported a decline in our year-end ratio of corporate and homebuilding debt-to-capital, net of cash, to 0.24. Finally, we ended the year with $779,000,000 in unrestricted cash and available borrowing capacity, which can be used to fund our growth in existing markets and expansion into new markets. The major credit rating agencies took notice of our strengthened financial position, with Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and Fitch Ratings upgrading the rating of our senior notes in 2003, all at the investment grade level. As a result, we have joined a group of only five homebuilding companies with investment grade ratings from all three agencies.

         We are a merchant homebuilder that is focused on maximizing risk-adjusted returns. While we will complete some level of development work on lots when the returns justify the risk, generally we will not develop master-planned communities. We attempt to operate within the highest demanded price points and product offerings in every market in which we build. We maintain a balance of products in each of our markets, offering homes in most price points, but focusing on the largest segments within a given market, which generally is the first-time and first-time move-up buyer. As a result, more than 80% of our homebuyers fall into these two categories.

         We also seek to achieve a major market share in each of our markets. The markets in which we operate have been selected because of their potential for population and employment growth, and stability from a home-start standpoint. We attempt to establish homebuilding operations in the best markets in the country. When we enter a market, our goal is to be one of the top builders in that market. We have accomplished this goal in most of the markets entered since the mid-1980‘s, and we maintain the same objective in the new markets we have entered over the past two years.

         Our land strategy when opening a new homebuilding project generally is to acquire no more than a two-year supply of lots to avoid overexposure to any single sub-market. We prefer to acquire finished lots using rolling options or in phases for cash. However, we will acquire entitled land for development into finished lots when we determine that the risk is justified. Our Asset Management Committees, composed of members of our senior management, generally meet weekly to review all proposed land acquisitions and takedowns of lots under option. We are focused on increasing our land under option while reducing the percentage of land owned.

12


Consolidated Results.

        The following discussion for both consolidated results of operations and segment results refers to the year ended December 31, 2003, compared with the same period in 2002, and the year ended December 31, 2002, compared with the same period in 2001. The table below summarizes our results of operations (in thousands, except per share amounts). Earnings per share for prior periods have been restated to reflect the effect of a 10% stock dividend distributed on May 27, 2003.


Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
Revenues     $ 2,920,070   $ 2,318,524   $ 2,125,874  
Income Before Income Taxes   $ 348,223   $ 274,044   $ 255,387  
Net Income   $ 212,229   $ 167,305   $ 155,715  
Earnings Per Share:  
     Basic   $ 7.31   $ 5.68   $ 5.36  
     Diluted   $ 7.00   $ 5.48   $ 5.20  

        2003 Compared With 2002.   The 26% increase in revenues primarily resulted from a 26% increase in the number of homes closed to 11,211, the most for any year in the our history.

        Income before income taxes increased 27% in 2003. The increase primarily was due to a 33% increase in homebuilding segment operating profit and a 17% increase in financial services segment operating profit. The homebuilding segment profit increase principally was the result of the home closing increases described above and a 110 basis point increase in Home Gross Margins (as defined below). The financial services segment profit increase primarily was due to a 46% increase in gains on sales of mortgage loans and a 19% increase in loan origination fees, partially offset by higher general and administrative expenses resulting from HomeAmerican’s expanded loan origination activity. These improvements in homebuilding and financial services operating profits more than offset a 40% increase in corporate general and administrative expenses and a $9,315,000 charge for expenses related to the redemption of our $175,000,000 8 3/8% senior notes due 2008.

        2002 Compared With 2001.  Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2002 increased by 9% over 2001. The increase primarily resulted from a 9% increase in the number of homes closed to 8,900.

        Income before income taxes increased 7% in 2002. The increase primarily was due to a 6% increase in homebuilding segment operating profit and a 15% increase in financial services segment operating profit. The homebuilding segment profit increase principally was a result of the home closing increase described above. In addition, no asset impairment charges were taken in 2002, while operating profits in 2001 were reduced by non-cash, pre-tax asset impairment charges of $7,041,000. The financial services segment profit increase primarily was due to a 41% increase in gains on sales of mortgage loans and a 7% increase in loan origination fees.

13


Homebuilding Activities — 2003 Compared With 2002.


Year Ended December 31,
2003 Increase (Decrease)
2003
2002
Amount
%
Home Sales Revenues     $ 2,851,328   $ 2,260,291   $ 591,037    26%  
Operating Profits   $ 393,879   $ 295,604   $ 98,275    33%  
Average Selling Price Per Home Closed   $ 254.3   $ 254.0   $ 0.3    N/A  
Home Gross Margins    24.1%  23.0%  1.1%  5%  
     Excluding Interest in Home Cost of Sales    25.0%  23.9%  1.1%  5%  
Orders For Homes, Net (Units)  
     Colorado    2,433    2,681    (248 )  -9%  
     California    2,116    2,086    30    1%  
     Nevada    2,595    1,260    1,335    106%  
     Arizona    3,229    2,669    560    21%  
     Utah    378    111    267    241%  
     Texas    289    17    272    N/A  
     Virginia    1,160    798    362    45%  
     Maryland    372    277    95    34%  
     Florida    58    0    58    N/A  



       Total    12,630    9,899    2,731    28%  



Homes Closed (Units)  
     Colorado    2,656    2,919    (263 )  -9%  
     California    1,919    1,654    265    16%  
     Nevada    2,059    1,204    855    71%  
     Arizona    2,972    2,218    754    34%  
     Utah    277    102    175    172%  
     Texas    162    1    161    N/A  
     Virginia    782    556    226    41%  
     Maryland    291    246    45    18%  
     Florida    93    0    93    N/A  



       Total    11,211    8,900    2,311    26%  




December 31,
2003 Increase (Decrease)
2003
2002
Amount
%
Backlog (Units)                    
     Colorado    734    957    (223 )  -23%  
     California    1,119    922    197    21%  
     Nevada    886    350    536    153%  
     Arizona    1,333    1,076    257    24%  
     Utah    151    50    101    202%  
     Texas    143    16    127    794%  
     Virginia    854    476    378    79%  
     Maryland    269    188    81    43%  
     Florida    104    0    104    N/A  



       Total    5,593    4,035    1,558    39%  



       Backlog Estimated Sales Value   $ 1,600,000   $ 1,120,000   $ 480,000    43%  



       Average Sales Price in Backlog   $ 286,000   $ 278,000   $ 8,000    3%  



Active Subdivisions  
     Colorado    49    61    (12 )  -20%  
     California    26    24    2    8%  
     Nevada    17    18    (1 )  -6%  
     Arizona    38    44    (6 )  -14%  
     Utah    11    4    7    175%  
     Texas    11    1    10    N/A  
     Virginia    28    20    8    40%  
     Maryland    9    6    3    50%  
     Florida    9    0    9    N/A  



       Total    198    178    20    11%  




14


        Home Sales Revenues and Homes Closed.   Home sales revenues in 2003 were the highest in our history, increasing 26% compared with 2002. The increase resulted from record home closings which reached 11,211 for the full year 2003, 26% higher than 2002.

        Our home closings were higher in 2003, compared with 2002, in all of our markets except Colorado. Home closings particularly were strong in Las Vegas and Arizona, primarily due to the strong demand for new homes in these markets. In addition, the newly entered Utah, Texas, and Florida markets contributed an increase of 429 home closings in 2003. We closed fewer homes in 2003, compared with 2002, in Colorado, primarily due to lower home orders in this market, resulting from fewer active subdivisions and the more challenging economic conditions experienced in this market.

        Average Selling Price Per Home Closed.  The average selling price per home closed remained relatively consistent at $254,300 in 2003, compared with $254,000 in 2002. Average selling prices increased in Maryland, Virginia and Arizona, primarily resulting from the ability to increase sales prices due to the strong demand for new homes in these markets throughout 2003. Also, a greater number of homes were closed in relatively higher-priced subdivisions in the above noted markets, as well as in Colorado and Utah. These increases were partially offset by the impact of increased home closings in Nevada, Utah, Texas and Florida, where selling prices are lower than the Company average. The following table displays our average selling price per home closed by market for the years indicated below (in thousands).


Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
             
Colorado   $ 254.2   $ 250.5  
California    390.0    390.4  
Nevada    186.3    188.8  
Arizona    184.3    167.0  
Utah    174.5    166.0  
Texas    161.4    176.8  
Virginia    375.1    330.3  
Maryland    388.2    345.2  
Florida    168.3    N/A  

        Home Gross Margins.   We define “Home Gross Margins” to mean home sales revenues less cost of goods sold (which primarily includes land and construction costs, capitalized interest, a reserve for warranty expense and financing and closing costs) as a percent of home sales revenues. Home Gross Margins were 24.1% for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared with 23.0% in 2002. The increase in Home Gross Margins primarily was attributable to our ability to raise home selling prices in many of our markets, as well as the impact of corporate initiatives directed at reducing construction costs. Additionally, insurance recoveries relating to warranty expenses incurred in prior periods for water intrusion issues in Colorado and reductions in previous estimates to complete land development and construction in certain markets contributed to this increase. These Home Gross Margin increases were offset partially by the impact of higher incentives in Colorado as well as a greater number of homes closed in 2003 in Florida, Utah and Texas, where Home Gross Margins were lower than the Company average.

        Future Home Gross Margins may be impacted adversely by (1) increased competition, thereby decreasing our ability to increase prices; (2) increases in the costs of subcontracted labor, finished lots, building materials and other resources, to the extent that market conditions prevent the recovery of increased costs through higher selling prices; (3) adverse weather; (4) shortages of subcontractor labor, finished lots and other resources, which can result in delays in the delivery of homes under construction; and (5) other general risk factors. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

        Orders for Homes and Backlog.   Home orders during 2003 particularly were strong in Nevada and Arizona, aided by the continued strong demand for new homes in these markets. Also, we received a combined 725 home orders in 2003 from our new markets in Utah, Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston and Florida. Colorado home orders were lower for 2003, compared with 2002, primarily resulting from the reduced number of active subdivisions and the challenging economic environment discussed above. We received net orders for 2,690 homes during the fourth quarter of 2003, 39% higher than net orders for 1,931 homes for the same period in 2002.

15


        Record home orders received during 2003 contributed to the 39% increase in homes under contract but not yet delivered (“Backlog”) at December 31, 2003 to 5,593 homes with an estimated sales value of $1,600,000,000, compared with the Backlog of 4,035 homes with an estimated sales value of $1,120,000,000 at December 31, 2002. Assuming no significant change in market conditions or mortgage interest rates, we expect approximately 70% to 75% of our Backlog to close under existing sales contracts during the first nine months of 2004. The remaining 25% to 30% of the homes in Backlog are not expected to close under existing contracts due to cancellations. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

         Marketing.  Marketing expenses (which include sales commissions, advertising, amortization of deferred marketing costs, model home expenses and other costs) totaled $162,148,000 in 2003, compared with $125,060,000 in 2002. The increase in 2003 primarily was due to (1) increased sales commissions resulting from our increased home sales revenues; (2) higher product advertising and deferred marketing amortization in connection with the increased number of active subdivisions and greater number of home closings in 2003; (3) increased sales overhead resulting from our expanding home sales activities; and (4) higher salaries and benefits attributable to our expanding homebuilding operations in new and existing markets.

        General and Administrative.   General and administrative expenses totaled $138,521,000 in 2003, compared with $105,482,000 in 2002. The increase in 2003 primarily was due to increased compensation and other administrative costs associated with the expanded operations in many of our markets, most notably Phoenix, Nevada, California and Virginia, and in our new markets of Salt Lake City, Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio, Jacksonville, West Florida, Philadelphia/Delaware Valley and Chicago.

16


Homebuilding Activities - 2002 Compared With 2001.


Year Ended December 31,
2002 Increase (Decrease)
2002
2001
Amount
%
Home Sales Revenues     $ 2,260,291   $ 2,076,807   $ 183,484    9%  
Operating Profits   $ 295,604   $ 279,267   $ 16,337    6%  
Average Selling Price Per Home Closed   $ 254.0   $ 254.1   $ (0.1 )  N/A  
Home Gross Margins    23.0%  23.2%  -0.2%    -1%  
     Excluding Interest in Home Cost of Sales    23.9%  24.4%  -0.5%    -2%  
Orders For Homes, Net (Units)  
     Colorado    2,681    2,616    65    2%  
     California    2,086    1,519    567    37%  
     Nevada    1,260    687    573    83%  
     Arizona    2,669    2,038    631    31%  
     Utah    111    0    111    N/A  
     Texas    17    0    17    N/A  
     Virginia    798    551    247    45%  
     Maryland    277    290    (13 )  -4%  



       Total    9,899    7,701    2,198    29%  



Homes Closed (Units)  
     Colorado    2,919    2,806    113    4%  
     California    1,654    1,537    117    8%  
     Nevada    1,204    704    500    71%  
     Arizona    2,218    2,223    (5 )  N/A  
     Utah    102    0    102    N/A  
     Texas    1    0    1    N/A  
     Virginia    556    645    (89 )  -14%  
     Maryland    246    259    (13 )  -5%  



       Total    8,900    8,174    726    9%  




December 31,
2002 Increase (Decrease)
2002
2001
Amount
%
Backlog (Units)                    
     Colorado    957    1,195    (238 )  -20%  
     California    922    490    432    88%  
     Nevada    350    181    169    93%  
     Arizona    1,076    625    451    72%  
     Utah    50    0    50    N/A  
     Texas    16    0    16    N/A  
     Virginia    476    234    242    103%  
     Maryland    188    157    31    20%  



       Total    4,035    2,882    1,153    40%  



       Backlog Estimated Sales Value   $ 1,120,000   $ 760,000   $ 360,000    47%  



       Average Sales Price in Backlog   $ 278,000   $ 264,000   $ 14,000    5%  



Active Subdivisions  
     Colorado    61    61    --    --  
     California    24    26    (2 )  -8%  
     Nevada    18    7    11    157%  
     Arizona    44    27    17    63%  
     Utah    4    0    4    N/A  
     Texas    1    0    1    N/A  
     Virginia    20    11    9    82%  
     Maryland    6    5    1    20%  



       Total    178    137    41    30%  




17


         Home Sales Revenues and Homes Closed.   Home sales revenues in 2002 increased 9%, compared with home sales revenues in 2001, primarily due to a 9% increase in home closings. Home closings particularly were strong in (1) Las Vegas, primarily due to the strong demand for new homes and increased active subdivisions in this market, including subdivisions acquired from John Laing Homes in April 2002; and (2) Tucson and Southern California, as a result of the strong home orders received in these markets in the fourth quarter of 2001 and first half of 2002. We closed fewer homes in 2002, compared with 2001, in Virginia and Phoenix, primarily due to lower home orders in these markets in the second half of 2001, resulting from fewer active subdivisions and a significant number of active subdivisions approaching close-out during this time period.

        Average Selling Price Per Home Closed.  The average selling price per home closed was $254,000 in 2002, compared with $254,100 in 2001. Average selling prices increased in Maryland, Virginia, Phoenix and Northern California, primarily due to (1) the ability to increase sales prices due to the strong demand for new homes in these markets throughout 2002; and (2) a greater number of homes closed in relatively higher-priced subdivisions. Average selling prices were lower in Tucson, Southern California and Colorado due to our increased emphasis on providing more affordable homes in these markets.

        Orders for Homes and Backlog.   We received orders for 9,899 homes, net of cancellations, during 2002, compared with net orders for 7,701 homes during 2001. Our active subdivisions increased 30% to 178 at December 31, 2002 from 137 at December 31, 2001, including an additional 20 in Phoenix, 11 in Nevada and nine in Virginia. These additional subdivisions, combined with the strong demand for new homes in these markets, contributed to year-over-year increases in home orders in Nevada, Virginia and Phoenix. An improved demand for new homes contributed to year-over-year increases in home orders in Southern and Northern California from a consistent level of active subdivisions. We ended 2002 with a Backlog of 4,035 homes with an estimated sales value of $1,120,000,000, compared with the Backlog of 2,882 homes with an estimated sales value of $760,000,000 at December 31, 2001.

        Marketing.  Marketing expenses totaled $125,060,000 in 2002, compared with $114,129,000 in 2001. The increase in 2002 primarily was due to (1) more product advertising and deferred marketing amortization in connection with the increased number of active subdivisions and greater number of home closings in 2002; (2) higher sales commissions resulting from our increased home sales revenues; and (3) increased sales overhead resulting from our expanding home sales activities.

        General and Administrative.   General and administrative expenses totaled $105,482,000 in 2002, compared with $90,390,000 in 2001. The increase primarily was due to increased compensation and other administrative costs associated with the expanding operations in certain of our markets, most notably Phoenix, Virginia, Nevada and Texas. General and administrative expenses in 2002 also increased in Utah and Nevada as a result of our acquisition of most of the homebuilding assets, and the hiring of former employees, of John Laing Homes in these markets.

      Title Operations.

        American Home Title provides title agency services to our homebuyers in Virginia, Maryland and Colorado. We are evaluating opportunities to provide title agency services in our other markets. Income before income taxes from title operations totaled $3,099,000, $2,415,000 and $2,401,000, respectively, in 2003, 2002 and 2001.

      Land Sales.

        Revenue from land sales totaled $1,298,000, $6,022,000 and $2,909,000 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The land sales in 2003 were in Virginia, Utah and Northern California. Land sales in 2002 primarily were in Colorado and Utah. Land sales in 2001 primarily were in Colorado. Gross profits from these sales were $456,000, $1,422,000 and $1,804,000 in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

      Asset Impairment Charges.

        No homebuilding asset impairment charges were recorded by the Company in 2003 or 2002. Homebuilding operating results were reduced by asset impairment charges totaling $7,041,000 in 2001, comprised of a $1,075,000 charge for completed homes and homes under construction and a charge of $5,966,000 for land under development

18


and other. The 2001 asset impairment charges resulted from the write-down to fair market value of one homebuilding project in Southern California and three homebuilding projects in the San Francisco Bay area.

      New Homebuilding Divisions.

        In February 2002, we expanded into the Dallas/Fort Worth market by hiring a division president to manage the start-up operation. We now control approximately 1,650 lots in this market. During the year ended December 31, 2003, this division received 274 home orders and closed 162 homes.

        In April 2002, one of our subsidiaries acquired most of the homebuilding assets, and hired former employees, of John Laing Homes in Salt Lake City, marking our entry into this market. The assets acquired included approximately 750 lots and 24 homes under construction in five subdivisions. We now control 1,220 lots in this market. During 2003, this division received 378 home orders and closed 277 homes.

        In September 2003, one of our subsidiaries acquired substantially all of the assets of Crawford Homes, Inc. in Jacksonville, Florida and hired approximately 40 of its former employees. The assets acquired included approximately 550 lots and 165 homes under construction in 15 subdivisions. We now control 525 lots in this market. During 2003, this division received 58 home orders and closed 93 homes.

        We expanded into the Houston and Philadelphia/Delaware Valley markets in the 2003 second quarter and into the West Florida, Chicago and San Antonio markets in the third quarter of 2003. Each of these expansion efforts was initiated by hiring a division president to manage start-up operations. As of December 31, 2003, we controlled 552 lots in the Houston market.

Financial Services Activities — 2003 Compared With 2002.

        The table below sets forth selected financial data relating to HomeAmerican’s operations (dollars in thousands).


Year Ended December 31,
2003 Increase (Decrease)
2003
2002
Amount
%
Mortgage loan origination fees     $ 22,245   $ 18,771   $ 3,474    19%  
Gains on sales of mortgage servicing, net   $ 1,972   $ 1,773   $ 199    11%  
Gains on sales of mortgage loans, net   $ 28,622   $ 19,587   $ 9,035    46%  
Operating Profit   $ 28,277   $ 24,194   $ 4,083    17%  
Principal amount of loan originations  
     MDC homebuyers   $ 1,463,465   $ 1,290,650   $ 172,815    13%  
     Spot    14,869    31,587    (16,718 )  -53%  



         Total   $ 1,478,334   $ 1,322,237   $ 156,097    12%  



Principal amount of loans brokered  
     MDC homebuyers   $ 415,725   $ 215,228   $ 200,497    93%  
     Spot    3,274    5,862    (2,588 )  -44%  



         Total   $ 418,999   $ 221,090   $ 197,909    90%  



 Capture Rate    63%    71%    -8%



     Including brokered loans    79%    81%    -2%




        The increase in operating profit primarily was due to higher gains on sales of mortgage loans, as well as higher origination fees received from record levels of mortgage loans originated and brokered for our homebuyers. Record revenues from mortgage loan origination fees in 2003, driven by the record home closings from the homebuilding segment, were offset partially by higher general and administrative expenses incurred to handle the higher volume of mortgage loans. Our homebuyers were the source of approximately 99% of the principal amount of the mortgage loans originated and brokered by HomeAmerican in 2003.

        Mortgage loans originated by HomeAmerican for our homebuyers as a percentage of total MDC home closings (“Capture Rate”) was 63% for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared with 71% for the same period in 2002. This decline in the Capture Rate primarily resulted from HomeAmerican brokering out a higher percentage of mortgage loans to outside lending institutions for our homebuyers due to the competitive pricing environment for mortgage loans that resulted from a significant decline in refinancing activity in the marketplace toward the end

19


of 2003. These brokered loans, for which HomeAmerican receives a fee, have been excluded from the computation of the Capture Rate. If brokered loans were included, the Capture Rate would have been 79% for 2003, compared with 81% for 2002. The decrease in the Capture Rate including brokered loans in 2003 partially was due to the impact of starting HomeAmerican operations in new markets we have entered over the last two years.

        Forward Sales Commitments - HomeAmerican’s operations are affected by changes in mortgage interest rates. HomeAmerican utilizes forward mortgage securities contracts to manage price risk related to fluctuations in interest rates on our fixed-rate mortgage loans held in inventory and rate-locked mortgage loans in the pipeline. Reported gains on sales of mortgage loans may vary significantly from period to period depending on the volatility in the interest rate market.

        Insurance Operations - American Home Insurance provides third party homeowners, auto and other types of casualty insurance to MDC's homebuyers. The results of our insurance operations were not material for any of the periods presented.

Financial Services Activities — 2002 Compared With 2001.

        The table below sets forth selected financial data relating to HomeAmerican's operations (dollars in thousands).


Year Ended December 31,
2002 Increase (Decrease)
2002
2001
Amount
%
Mortgage loan origination fees     $ 18,771   $ 17,572   $ 1,199    7%  
Gains on sales of mortgage servicing, net   $ 1,773   $ 3,288   $ (1,515 )  -46%  
Gains on sales of mortgage loans, net   $ 19,587   $ 13,923   $ 5,664    41%  
Operating Profit   $ 24,194   $ 21,116   $ 3,078    15%  
Principal amount of loan originations  
     MDC homebuyers   $ 1,290,650   $ 1,195,579   $ 95,071    8%  
     Spot    31,587    55,775    (24,188 )  -43%  



         Total   $ 1,322,237   $ 1,251,354   $ 70,883    6%  



Principal amount of loans brokered  
     MDC homebuyers   $ 215,228   $ 237,389   $ (22,161 )  -9%  
     Spot    5,862    10,169    (4,307 )  -42%  



         Total   $ 221,090   $ 247,558   $ (26,468 )  -11%  



 Capture Rate    71%    73%    -2%



     Including brokered loans    81%    85%    -4%




        HomeAmerican’s operating profits in 2002 exceeded 2001 operating profits by 15%. This increase primarily was due to higher gains on sales of mortgage loans, as well as higher origination fees received from record levels of mortgage loans originated and brokered for our homebuyers. This increase partially was offset by higher general and administrative expenses resulting from increased mortgage loan origination and related activities in 2002.

        HomeAmerican’s Capture Rate was 71% for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared with 73% for the same period in 2001. Including brokered loans, the Capture Rate would have been 81% for 2002, compared with 85% for 2001. The decrease in Capture Rate in 2002 primarily was due to homes closed in Nevada and Utah that were purchased from John Laing Homes with mortgage loans already contracted for by other mortgage companies.

20


Other Operating Results.

        Interest Expense.   We capitalize interest on our homebuilding inventories during the period of active development and through the completion of construction. Corporate and homebuilding interest incurred but not capitalized is reflected as interest expense. All corporate and homebuilding interest incurred in 2003, 2002 and 2001 was capitalized. Interest incurred by the financial services segment is charged to interest expense, which is deducted from interest income and reported as net interest income in Note B to our consolidated financial statements. Corporate and homebuilding interest incurred increased to $26,779,000 in 2003, compared with $21,116,000 in 2002 and $22,498,000 in 2001. The increase in 2003 compared with 2002 primarily was due to an increase in the average debt balance, as we issued ten-year senior notes to fund our long-term growth, partially offset by a decline in the average effective interest rate. For a reconciliation of interest incurred, capitalized and expensed, see Note I to the our consolidated financial statements.

        Expenses Related to Debt Redemption.   In May 2003, we redeemed $175,000,000 principal amount of our 8 3/8% Senior Notes. The 8 3/8% Senior Notes were redeemed at 104.188% of their principal amount, or $182,329,000, plus accrued and unpaid interest through the date of redemption. Expenses for 2003 related to this debt redemption of $9,315,000 include the above redemption premium of $7,329,000 and the related unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $1,986,000. In compliance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 145, the expenses related to this debt redemption are no longer treated as an extraordinary loss.

        Corporate General and Administrative Expenses.  Corporate general and administrative expenses totaled $65,386,000 for 2003, compared with $46,727,000 and $45,960,000, respectively, for 2002 and 2001. The increase in 2003 primarily was due to greater compensation-related costs principally resulting from our higher profitability and increased compensation and other expenses for information technology, as we are focusing on improving our systems in preparation for the growth of our homebuilding and financial services operations. Additionally, we contributed $4,000,000 to the M.D.C. Holdings, Inc. Charitable Foundation in 2003, compared with no contributions in 2002 and $2,000,000 in 2001.

        Income Taxes.   Our overall effective income tax rate of 39.0% for 2003, 2002 and 2001, differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the impact of state income taxes.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

        We use our liquidity and capital resources to (1) support our operations, including our homebuilding inventories; (2) provide working capital; and (3) provide mortgage loans for our homebuyers. Liquidity and capital resources are generated internally from operations and from external sources. During the 2003 third quarter, we filed a registration statement, which has been declared effective, increasing our capacity to issue equity, debt or hybrid securities to $750,000,000 from $450,000,000. In December 2003, we issued $200,000,000 principal amount of our 5 ½% Senior Notes, thereby reducing our capacity to issue equity, debt or hybrid securities to $550,000,000.

Capital Resources.

        Our capital structure is a combination of (1) permanent financing, represented by stockholders’ equity; (2) long-term financing, represented by our publicly traded 7% senior notes due 2012 (the “7% Senior Notes”), 5 ½% Senior Notes and our homebuilding line of credit (the “Homebuilding Line”); and (3) current financing, primarily our mortgage lending line of credit (the “Mortgage Line”). Based upon our current capital resources and additional capacity available under existing credit agreements, we believe that our current financial condition is both balanced to fit our current operating structure and adequate to satisfy our current and near-term capital requirements, including the acquisition of land and expansion into new markets. We believe that we can meet our long-term capital needs (including meeting future debt payments and refinancing or paying off other long-term debt as it becomes due) from operations and external financing sources, assuming that no significant adverse changes in our business or capital and credit markets occur as a result of the various risk factors described elsewhere in this report. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

21


Lines of Credit and Notes Payable.

        Homebuilding - Our Homebuilding Line is an unsecured revolving line of credit with a group of lenders for support of our homebuilding operations. Lender commitments under the Homebuilding Line total $600,000,000 with a maturity date of July 29, 2006. Pursuant to the terms of the Homebuilding Line, a term-out of this credit may commence prior to July 29, 2006 under certain circumstances. At December 31, 2003, there were no borrowings and $20,817,000 in letters of credit outstanding under the Homebuilding Line, but we could have borrowed funds at interest rates ranging from 2.4% to 4.0%.

        Mortgage Lending - Prior to September 29, 2003, our Mortgage Line had a borrowing limit of $125,000,000 with terms that allowed for an increase in the borrowing limit up to $175,000,000, subject to concurrence by the participating banks. As of September 29, 2003, the Mortgage Line was amended to provide for a borrowing limit of $175,000,000 with terms that allowed for an increase in the borrowing limit up to $225,000,000, subject to concurrence by the participating banks. As of December 31, 2003, the borrowing limit of the Mortgage Line was $175,000,000. The terms of the Mortgage Line are set forth in the Third Amended and Restated Warehousing Credit Agreement dated as of October 23, 2003. Available borrowings under the Mortgage Line are collateralized by mortgage loans and mortgage-backed certificates and are limited to the value of eligible collateral as defined. At December 31, 2003, $79,240,000 was borrowed and an additional $33,522,000 was collateralized and available to be borrowed. The Mortgage Line is cancelable upon 120 days notice. At December 31, 2003, and 2002, the interest rates on our Mortgage Line were 2.3% and 2.7%, respectively.

         General - The agreements for our bank lines of credit and the indentures for our senior notes require compliance with certain representations, warranties and covenants. We believe that we are in compliance with these representations, warranties and covenants. The agreements for the bank lines of credit and the indentures for our senior notes are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are listed in the Exhibit Table in Part IV of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

        The financial covenants contained in the Homebuilding Line of credit agreement include a leverage test and a consolidated tangible net worth test. Under the leverage test, generally, our consolidated indebtedness is not permitted to exceed 2.15 times (subject to downward adjustment in certain circumstances) our “adjusted consolidated tangible net worth,” as defined. Under the adjusted consolidated tangible net worth test, our “adjusted consolidated tangible net worth,” as defined, must not be less than the sum of (1) $491,382,000; (2) 50% of “consolidated net income,” as defined, of the “borrower,” as defined, and the “guarantors,” as defined, after December 31, 2001; and (3) 50% of the net proceeds or other consideration received for the issuance of capital stock. In addition, “adjusted consolidated tangible net worth,” as defined, must not be less than $307,114,000.

        Our senior notes are not secured and the senior notes indentures do not contain financial covenants. Our senior notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured basis, jointly and severally, by most of the our homebuilding segment subsidiaries.

        As of December 31, 2003, the maximum amount of additional homebuilding and corporate indebtedness that we could have incurred under the most restrictive of the debt limitations described above was approximately $1,585,000,000.

MDC Common Stock Repurchase Program.

        On March 24, 2003, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 1,350,000 shares of MDC common stock, bringing the total authorization under our stock repurchase program to 4,350,000 shares. We repurchased 727,100 shares of MDC common stock in 2003, prior to the May 27, 2003 10% stock dividend, bringing the total shares repurchased to 2,580,400 and leaving 1,769,600 shares available to be repurchased as of December 31, 2003 under this program. The per share prices, including commissions, for the 727,100 shares repurchased ranged from $35.96 to $39.03 with an average cost of $36.76, unadjusted for the 10% stock dividend. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, we held 3,082,000 shares and 5,373,000 shares of treasury stock with average purchase prices of $16.32 and $13.46 per share, respectively.

22


Consolidated Cash Flow.

        During 2003, we generated cash of $83,927,000 from our operating activities. The 2003 operating cash flow primarily was generated by income before deferred taxes, depreciation and amortization and debt redemption expenses of $251,105,000, an increase in accounts payable and other accrued expenses of $77,551,000 and a decrease in mortgage loans held in inventory of $67,898,000, which partially was offset by increases in homebuilding inventories and other assets of $310,309,000 in conjunction with our expanded homebuilding operations. We continued to expand our homebuilding operations in new markets to complement our strategic expansion in existing markets through increased active subdivisions and controlled lot inventory, thereby expending cash to acquire additional homebuilding assets.

        Financing activities generated cash of $67,481,000 in 2003. The 2003 cash provided by financing activities primarily was due to the issuance of $350,000,000 principal amount of 5 ½% Senior Notes, partially offset by the redemption of the $175,000,000 8 3/8% Senior Notes, including a premium of $7,329,000 on the redemption, and the net repayment of our lines of credit of $74,834,000. Additionally, we repurchased 727,100 shares of MDC common stock for $26,731,000, paid $11,812,000 of dividends and received $17,039,000 in proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

        Operating activities used cash of $166,429,000 in 2002 and provided cash of $93,251,000 in 2001. The 2002 cash decrease primarily was the result of a significant increase in homebuilding and mortgage lending inventories in conjunction with our expanded homebuilding operations. The 2001 cash increase primarily resulted from the increase in income before income taxes, partially offset by increases in homebuilding and mortgage loan inventories.

        Financing activities generated cash of $171,212,000 in 2002 and used cash of $67,547,000 in 2001. The 2002 increase, compared with 2001, primarily was due to the issuance of $150,000,000 principal amount of 7% Senior Notes, as well as an increase in our mortgage lending line of credit, partially offset by a use of $29,403,000 in cash to repurchase MDC common stock.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.

        In the ordinary course of business, we enter into lot option purchase contracts in order to procure lots for the construction of homes. Lot option contracts enable us to control significant lot positions with a minimal capital investment and substantially reduce the risks associated with land ownership and development. At December 31, 2003, we had refundable and non-refundable deposits of $19,574,000 in the form of cash and $26,771,000 in the form of letters of credit to purchase lots.

        At December 31, 2003, we had outstanding performance bonds of $236,545,000 issued by third parties to secure our performance under various contracts. We expect that the obligations secured by these performance bonds generally will be performed in the ordinary course of business and in accordance with the applicable contractual terms. To the extent that the obligations are performed, the related performance bonds will be released and we will not have any continuing obligations.

         We have made no material guarantees with respect to third-party obligations.

Contractual Obligations.

        Our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2003 are as follows (in thousands).


Payments due by Period
Total
Less than
1 Year

1 - 3 Years
4 - 5 Years
After
5 Years

Long-term debt     $ 500,000   $ --   $ --   $ --   $ 500,000  
Operating leases    38,515    9,688    16,266    10,744    1,817  
Purchase obligations (1)     86,900    86,900    --    --    --  





   Total   $ 625,415   $ 96,588   $ 16,266   $ 10,744   $ 501,817  






  (1) Our purchase obligations relate to open work orders and estimates for land to be developed and homes under construction for which we have not received an invoice for work to be completed.

23


IMPACT OF INFLATION, CHANGING PRICES AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

         Real estate and residential housing prices are affected by inflation, which can cause increases in the price of land, raw materials and subcontracted labor. Unless these increased costs are recovered through higher sales prices, Home Gross Margins would decrease. If interest rates increase, construction and financing costs, as well as the cost of borrowings, also would increase, which can result in lower Home Gross Margins. Increases in home mortgage interest rates make it more difficult for MDC’s customers to qualify for home mortgage loans, potentially decreasing home sales revenue. Increases in interest rates also may affect adversely the volume of mortgage loan originations.

        The volatility of interest rates could have an adverse effect on MDC’s future operations and liquidity. Reported gains on sales of mortgage loans may vary significantly from period to period depending on the volatility in the interest rate market. Derivative instruments utilized in the normal course of business by HomeAmerican include forward sales securities commitments, private investor sales commitments and commitments to originate mortgage loans. The Company utilizes these commitments to manage the price risk on fluctuations in interest rates on its mortgage loans held in inventory and commitments to originate mortgage loans. Such contracts are the only significant financial derivative instruments utilized by MDC.

        Among other things, an increase in interest rates may affect adversely the demand for housing and the availability of mortgage financing and may reduce the credit facilities offered to MDC by banks, investment bankers and mortgage bankers. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

        MDC’s business also is affected significantly by, among other things, general economic conditions and, particularly, the demand for new homes in the markets in which it builds.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting policies generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management evaluates such estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and makes adjustments as deemed necessary. Actual results could differ from these estimates using different estimates and assumptions, or if conditions are significantly different in the future. See “Forward-Looking Statements” below.

        Listed below are those policies that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in their application. The Company’s critical accounting policies are those related to (1) homebuilding inventory valuation; (2) estimates to complete land development and home construction; (3) warranty costs; and (4) litigation reserves.

        Homebuilding Inventory Valuation - Homebuilding inventories under development and construction are carried at cost unless facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the underlying projects may be impaired, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." Impairment is determined by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) from an individual project to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the project’s carrying value, the carrying value of the project is written down to its fair value. Homebuilding inventories held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less selling costs, and are evaluated on an individual asset basis. Fair value is determined by management estimate and incorporates anticipated future revenues and costs. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, it is at least reasonably possible that actual results could differ from those estimates. We continue to evaluate the carrying value of our inventory and, based on historical results, believe that our existing estimation process is accurate and do not anticipate the process to materially change in the future.

        Estimates to Complete Land Development and Home Construction - Home sales revenue is recognized when a home is closed. In order to properly match revenues with expenses, an estimation must be made by the Company as to certain construction and land development costs incurred but not yet paid at the time of closing. Estimated costs to complete a home are determined for each closed home based upon historical data with respect to similar product types and geographical areas. We monitor the accuracy of each monthly estimate by comparing actual costs incurred subsequent to closing to the estimate made at the time of closing. We have made slight

24


modifications to the estimates based on these comparisons and will continue to monitor actual results in the future. We do not expect the estimation process to materially change in the future. Actual results could differ from such estimates.

                   Warranty Costs - The Company's homes are sold with limited warranties that generally provide for ten years of structural coverage ("structural warranty"), two years of coverage for plumbing, electrical and heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, and one year of coverage for workmanship and materials ("general warranty"). Warranty reserves are established as homes close on a per-unit basis in an amount estimated to be adequate to cover expected costs of materials and outside labor during warranty periods. Reserves are determined based upon historical experience with respect to similar product types and geographical areas. Certain factors are given consideration in determining the per-house reserve amount, including 1) the historical range of amounts paid per house; 2) the historical average amount paid per house; 3) any warranty expenditures included in the above not considered to be normal and recurring; 4) improvements in quality control and construction techniques expected to impact future warranty expenditures; and 5) conditions that may affect certain projects and require higher per-house reserves for those specific projects.

        Warranty expenditures are tracked on a house-by-house basis and are charged against the warranty reserve established for the house. Any expenditures incurred within 120 days of closing a home are recorded against the "estimate-to-complete" amount accrued in the house job at the closing of the house unless it is clear that the expense is a warranty expense. Expenses incurred after 120 days of closing a home are considered warranty expenditures. Additional reserves are established for known unusual warranty-related expenditures not covered by the regular warranty reserves. General warranty reserves not utilized for a particular house are written off between 15 and 36 months after the date of closing. The historical experience of the product type and geographical area are taken into consideration when determining the write-off period. Once established, this time frame is kept consistent from month to month. If warranty expenditures for an individual house exceed the related reserve, then costs in excess of the reserve are expensed as an adjustment to housing cost of sales in the month incurred.

         Warranty reserves are reviewed quarterly, using historical data and other relevant information, to determine the reasonableness and adequacy of both the reserve and the per unit reserve amount originally included in cost of sales, as well as the timing of the reversal of the reserve. Warranty reserves are included in corporate and homebuilding accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets and totaled $51,068,000 and $44,743,000, respectively, at December 31, 2003 and 2002. Reserves carried over from prior years primarily are the result of the Company's volume of homes closed increasing by over 300% in the last ten years, giving rise to continuing warranty reserves that exceed current expenditures. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, it is at least reasonably possible that actual results could differ from those estimates. We continue to evaluate warranty reserves and, based on historical results, believe that our existing estimation process is accurate and do not anticipate the process to materially change in the future.

        Litigation Reserves - The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various cases arising in the normal course of business. The Company has reserved for costs to be incurred with respect to these cases based upon information provided by its legal counsel. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, it is at least reasonably possible that actual results could differ from those estimates. We continue to evaluate litigation reserves and, based on historical results, believe that our existing estimation process is accurate and do not anticipate the process to materially change in the future.

ISSUANCE OF STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

        In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for classifying and measuring as liabilities certain financial instruments that embody obligations of the issuer and have characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The application of SFAS No. 150 has been deferred indefinitely for noncontrolling interests in limited-life subsidiaries. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 150 to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

        In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 149 provides for more consistent reporting of contracts as either freestanding derivative instruments subject to SFAS No. 133 in its entirety, or as hybrid instruments with debt host contracts and embedded derivative features. SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003,

25


and hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

        In January 2003, the FASB issued its Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46”). A variable interest entity (“VIE”) is an entity that has (1) an insufficient amount of equity to absorb the entity’s expected losses; or (2) equity owners as a group that are not able to make decisions about the entity’s activities, do not have the obligation to absorb the entity’s expected losses or do not have the right to receive the entity’s expected residual returns. FIN 46 requires the consolidation of a VIE by the Company when the Company will absorb a majority of the VIE's expected losses, receive a majority of the VIE's expected residual returns, or both. FIN 46 applies immediately to VIEs created after January 31, 2003, and applies to all VIEs created prior to February 1, 2003 for reporting periods ending after March 15, 2004.

        In the normal course of business, MDC enters into lot option purchase contracts, generally through a deposit of cash, for the right to purchase land or lots at a future point in time with predetermined terms. The Company’s liability with respect to option contracts generally is limited to forfeiture of the related non-refundable deposits and letters of credit, which aggregated approximately $25,314,000 at December 31, 2003. Under the regulations of FIN 46, certain of these contracts create a variable interest for the Company, with the land seller being the VIE. The Company has evaluated, based on the provisions of FIN 46, all lot option purchase contracts created after January 31, 2003, which represent over 75% of the lots controlled by the Company under option purchase contracts as of December 31, 2003. Through this evaluation, the Company requests financial information from these VIEs, assesses the market conditions where we have contracted with these VIEs, and evaluates whether we retain the risk of loss from the VIEs activities or are entitled to receive a majority of the VIEs residual returns or both. Based on this evaluation, MDC has determined that its interests in these VIEs do not result in significant variable interests or