10-K 1 d10k.htm HERSHEY CO--FORM 10-K Hershey Co--Form 10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 


FORM 10-K

 


 

x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

OR

 

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 1-183

Registrant, State of Incorporation, Address and Telephone Number

 


THE HERSHEY COMPANY

(a Delaware corporation)

100 Crystal A Drive

Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033

(717) 534-4200

I.R.S. Employer Identification Number 23-0691590

 


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class:

 

Name of each exchange on which registered:

Common Stock, one dollar par value   New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  

Class B Common Stock, one dollar par value

  (Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

Common Stock, one dollar par value—$8,815,306,129 as of July 2, 2006.

Class B Common Stock, one dollar par value—$11,237,915 as of July 2, 2006. While the Class B Common Stock is not listed for public trading on any exchange or market system, shares of that class are convertible into shares of Common Stock at any time on a share-for-share basis. The market value indicated is calculated based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on July 2, 2006.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, one dollar par value—169,942,295 shares, as of February 14, 2007.

Class B Common Stock, one dollar par value—60,816,078 shares, as of February 14, 2007.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

 



PART I

 

Item 1. BUSINESS

Company Overview

The Hershey Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on October 24, 1927 as a successor to a business founded in 1894 by Milton S. Hershey. In this report, the terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” mean The Hershey Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and entities in which it has a controlling financial interest, unless the context indicates otherwise.

We are the largest North American manufacturer of quality chocolate and confectionery products and a leading snack food company. Our principal product groups include confectionery and snack products; gum and mint refreshment products; and food and beverage enhancers such as baking ingredients, peanut butter, toppings and beverages. In addition to our traditional confectionery products, we offer a range of products specifically developed to address the nutritional interests of health-conscious consumers.

Reportable Segment

We operate as a single reportable segment in manufacturing, marketing, selling and distributing various package types of chocolate candy, sugar confectionery, refreshment and snack products, and food and beverage enhancers under more than 50 brand names. Our five operating segments comprise geographic regions including the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil and other international locations, such as Japan, Korea, the Philippines and China. We market confectionery products in over 50 countries worldwide.

For segment reporting purposes, we aggregate our operations in the Americas, which comprise the United States, Canada, Mexico and Brazil. We base this aggregation on similar economic characteristics, and similar products and services, production processes, types or classes of customers, distribution methods, and the similar nature of the regulatory environment in each location. We aggregate our other international operations with the Americas to form one reportable segment. When combined, our other international operations share most of the aggregation criteria and represent less than 10% of consolidated revenues, operating profits and assets.

Selling and Marketing Organization

Our selling and marketing organization is comprised of the North American Commercial Group, the International Commercial Group and the Global Growth and Innovation Group. This organization is designed to:

 

   

Leverage our marketing and sales leadership in the United States and Canada;

 

   

Focus on key strategic growth areas in global markets; and

 

   

Build capabilities that capitalize on unique consumer and customer trends.

North American Commercial Group

Our North American Commercial Group has responsibility for continuing to build our confectionery leadership, while capitalizing on our scale in the U.S. and Canada. This organization leverages our ability to capitalize on the unique consumer and customer trends within each country. This includes developing and growing our business in our chocolate, sugar confectionery, snacks, refreshment, food and beverage enhancers, and food service product lines.

A component of the North American Commercial Group, The Hershey Experience, manages our catalog sales and our retail operations within the United States that include Hershey’s Chocolate World in Hershey, Pennsylvania, Hershey’s Times Square in New York, New York and Hershey’s Chicago in Chicago, Illinois.

 

1


International Commercial Group

Our International Commercial Group markets confectionery products and food and beverage enhancers worldwide and has responsibility for pursuing profitable growth opportunities in key markets primarily in Latin America and Asia. This group is responsible for international subsidiaries that manufacture, import, market, sell and distribute chocolate, confectionery and beverage products in Mexico and Brazil.

Global Growth and Innovation Group

Our Global Growth and Innovation Group has responsibility for building global brands, developing benefit-driven growth platforms for the short-term and long-term, and strengthening marketing capabilities worldwide. This organization develops superior capabilities in consumer insights, product development, and innovative marketing communications. The Global Growth and Innovation Group is also responsible for brand positioning, portfolio strategy, integrated business intelligence, and our health and wellness initiatives.

Products

United States

The primary chocolate and confectionery products we sell in the United States include the following:

 

Under the HERSHEY’S brand franchise:

 

HERSHEY’S milk chocolate bar

  HERSHEY’S COOKIES ‘N’ CRÈME candy bar

HERSHEY’S milk chocolate bar with almonds

  HERSHEY’S POT OF GOLD boxed confections

HERSHEY’S Extra Dark chocolates

  HERSHEY’S SUGAR FREE chocolate candy

HERSHEY’S MINIATURES chocolate bars

  HERSHEY’S S’MORES candy bar

HERSHEY’S NUGGETS chocolates

  HERSHEY’S HUGS chocolates

Under the REESE’S brand franchise:

 

REESE’S peanut butter cups

  REESE’S sugar free peanut butter cups

REESE’S PIECES candy

  REESESTICKS wafer bars

REESE’S BIG CUP peanut butter cups

  FAST BREAK candy bar

REESE’S NUTRAGEOUS candy bar

 

Under the KISSES brand franchise:

 

HERSHEY’S KISSES brand milk chocolates

  HERSHEY’S KISSES brand milk chocolates

HERSHEY’S KISSES brand milk chocolates filled

  filled with caramel

with peanut butter

  HERSHEY’S KISSABLES brand chocolate

HERSHEY’S KISSES brand milk chocolates filled

 

candies

with almonds

 

Our other chocolate and confectionery products in the United States include the following:

 

5th AVENUE candy bar

ALMOND JOY candy bar

CADBURY chocolates

CARAMELLO candy bar

  

KIT KAT BIG KAT wafer bar

KRACKEL chocolate bar

MAUNA LOA candy bars

MILK DUDS candy

  

SPECIAL DARK chocolate bar

SYMPHONY milk chocolate bar

TAKE5 candy bar

TWIZZLERS candy

     
     
     

 

2


GOOD & PLENTY candy

HEATH toffee bar

JOLLY RANCHER candy

JOLLY RANCHER sugar free hard candy

KIT KAT wafer bar

  

MOUNDS candy bar

MR. GOODBAR chocolate bar

PAYDAY peanut caramel bar

ROLO caramels in milk chocolate

SKOR toffee bar

   WHATCHAMACALLIT
candy bar

WHOPPERS malted milk
balls

YORK peppermint pattie
YORK sugar free
peppermint pattie

ZAGNUT candy bar
ZERO candy bar
     
     
     
     
     

We also sell products in the United States under the following product lines:

Premium products

Our line of premium chocolate and confectionery offerings includes CACAO RESERVE by HERSHEY’S chocolate bars and drinking cocoa mixes. Artisan Confections Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Hershey Company, markets SCHARFFEN BERGER high-cacao dark chocolate products, JOSEPH SCHMIDT handcrafted chocolate gifts and DAGOBA organic chocolate products.

Snack products

Our snack products include HERSHEY’S, ALMOND JOY, REESE’S, and YORK cookies, HERSHEY’S, REESE’S and HERSHEY’S S’MORES rice and marshmallow bars, HERSHEY’S and REESE’S granola bars, HERSHEY’S REALLY NUTS milk chocolate cocoa peanuts and almonds, and trail mix, REESE’S REALLY NUTS honey glazed and roasted peanuts, and trail mix and MAUNA LOA macadamia snack nuts and cookies in several varieties.

Refreshment products

Our line of refreshment products includes ICE BREAKERS mints and chewing gum, BREATH SAVERS mints, BUBBLE YUM bubble gum and YORK mints.

Food and beverage enhancers

Food and beverage enhancers include HERSHEY’S BAKE SHOPPE, HERSHEY’S, REESE’S, HEATH, and SCHARFFEN BERGER baking products. Our toppings and sundae syrups include HEATH and HERSHEY’S. We sell hot cocoa mix under the HERSHEY’S, HERSHEY’S GOODNIGHT HUGS and HERSHEY’S GOODNIGHT KISSES brand names.

Canada

Principal products we manufacture and sell in Canada are HERSHEY’S milk chocolate bars and milk chocolate bars with almonds, OH HENRY! candy bars, REESE PEANUT BUTTER CUPS candy, HERSHEY’S KISSES candy bar, KISSABLES brand chocolate candies, MAX5 candy bar, TWIZZLERS candy, GLOSETTE chocolate-covered raisins, peanuts and almonds, JOLLY RANCHER candy, WHOPPERS malted milk balls, SKOR toffee bars, EAT MORE candy bars, POT OF GOLD boxed confections and CHIPITS chocolate chips.

Mexico

We manufacture, import, market, sell and distribute chocolate and confectionery products in Mexico including HERSHEY’S, KISSES, JOLLY RANCHER, and PELÓN PELO RICO chocolate, confectionery and beverage items.

 

3


Brazil

We manufacture, import, market, sell and distribute chocolate and confectionery products in Brazil including HERSHEY’S and KISSES chocolate and confectionery items, and IO-IO hazelnut crème items.

Customers

Full-time sales representatives and food brokers sell our products to our customers. Our customers are mainly wholesale distributors, chain grocery stores, mass merchandisers, chain drug stores, vending companies, wholesale clubs, convenience stores, dollar stores, concessionaires, department stores and natural food stores. Our customers then resell our products to end-consumers in over 2 million retail outlets in North America and other locations worldwide. In 2006, sales to McLane Company, Inc., one of the largest wholesale distributors in the United States to convenience stores, drug stores, wholesale clubs and mass merchandisers, amounted to more than 25% of our total net sales. McLane Company, Inc. is the primary distributor of our products to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Marketing Strategy and Seasonality

The foundation of our marketing strategy is our strong brand equities, product innovation, the consistently superior quality of our products, our manufacturing expertise and mass distribution capabilities. We also devote considerable resources to the identification, development, testing, manufacturing and marketing of new products. We have a variety of promotional programs for our customers as well as advertising and promotional programs for consumers of our products. We stimulate sales of certain products with promotional programs at various times throughout the year. Our sales are typically higher during the third and fourth quarters of the year, representing seasonal and holiday-related sales patterns.

Product Distribution

In conjunction with our sales and marketing efforts, our efficient product distribution network helps us maintain sales growth and provide superior customer service. We plan optimum stock levels and work with our customers to set reasonable delivery times. Our distribution network provides for the efficient shipment of our products from our manufacturing plants to distribution centers and field warehouses strategically located throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico. We primarily use contract carriers to deliver our products from these distribution points to our customers.

Price Changes

We change prices and weights of our products when necessary to accommodate changes in manufacturing costs, the competitive environment and profit objectives, while at the same time maintaining consumer value. Price increases and weight changes help to offset increases in our input costs, including raw and packaging materials, fuel, utilities, and transportation, and employee benefits.

We announced a combination of price increases and weight changes on certain JOLLY RANCHER and TWIZZLERS candy and chocolate packaged candy items in November 2005. These changes went into effect in December 2005 and early 2006 and represented a weighted-average price increase of approximately one percent over the entire domestic product line when fully effective in the second quarter of 2006. We did not implement any other significant increases to the list prices of our domestic product line during 2006.

In December 2004, we announced an increase in the wholesale prices of approximately half of our domestic confectionery line. Changes that were effective in January 2005 represented a weighted-average increase of approximately six percent on our standard bar, king-size bar, 6-pack and vending lines. Changes that were effective in February 2005 represented a weighted-average price increase of approximately four percent on packaged candy. The price increases announced in December 2004 represented an average increase of three percent over the entire domestic product line.

 

4


Raw Materials

Cocoa is the most significant raw material we use to produce our chocolate products. We buy a mix of cocoa beans and cocoa products, such as cocoa butter, cocoa liquor and cocoa powder, to meet manufacturing requirements. Cocoa beans are grown principally in Far Eastern, West African and South American equatorial regions. West Africa accounts for approximately 70 percent of the world’s crop of cocoa beans. Cocoa beans are not uniform, and the various grades and varieties reflect the diverse agricultural practices and natural conditions found in many growing areas.

Civil unrest in the world’s largest cocoa-producing country, the Ivory Coast, has resulted in volatile prices. However, we believe a significant disruption of cocoa supplies from the Ivory Coast is unlikely. In the event such disruption would occur, we believe cocoa from other producing countries and from current physical cocoa stocks in consuming countries would provide a significant supply buffer. Historically there have been instances of weather catastrophes, crop disease, civil disruptions, embargoes and other problems in cocoa-producing countries that have caused price fluctuations, but have never resulted in total loss of a particular producing country’s cocoa crop and/or exports.

During 2006, cocoa prices traded in a range between 67¢ and 75¢ per pound, based on the New York Board of Trade futures contract. The table below shows annual average cocoa prices, and the highest and lowest monthly averages for each of the calendar years indicated. The prices are the monthly average of the quotations at noon of the three active futures trading contracts closest to maturity on the New York Board of Trade.

 

    

Cocoa Futures Contract Prices

(cents per pound)

     2006    2005    2004    2003    2002

Annual Average

   70.0    68.3    68.7    77.8    76.9

High

   74.9    78.7    76.8    99.8    96.7

Low

   67.1    63.5    62.1    65.6    60.3

Source: International Cocoa Organization Quarterly Bulletin of Cocoa Statistics

Our costs will not necessarily reflect market price fluctuations because of our forward purchasing and hedging practices, premiums and discounts reflective of varying delivery times, and supply and demand for our specific varieties and grades of cocoa beans. As a result, the average futures contract prices are not necessarily indicative of our average cost of cocoa beans or cocoa products.

The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, which is a six-year farm bill, impacts the prices of sugar, corn, peanuts and milk because it sets price support levels for these commodities. The price of sugar, one of our most important commodities, is subject to price supports under this farm legislation. This legislation establishes import quotas and duties to support the price of sugar. As a result, sugar prices paid by United States users are currently substantially higher than prices on the world sugar market.

In 2006, sugar crops and sugar refiners recovered from the hurricane impact of 2005. As a result, refined sugar prices declined from 38¢ to 31¢ per pound. Our costs for sugar will not necessarily reflect market price fluctuations primarily because of our forward purchasing and hedging practices.

United States peanut prices began the year around 37¢ per pound but gradually increased during the year to 42¢ per pound. Almond prices began the year at $3.40 per pound and declined to $2.50 per pound. During 2006, milk prices moderated slightly from the high price levels of 2005. We believe that our raw materials supply is adequate to meet our manufacturing requirements.

We attempt to minimize the effect of future price fluctuations related to the purchase of major raw materials and certain energy requirements primarily through forward purchasing to cover our future requirements,

 

5


generally for periods from 3 to 24 months. We enter into futures contracts to manage price risks for cocoa, sugar, corn sweeteners, natural gas, fuel oil and certain dairy products. Currently, active futures contracts are not available for use in pricing our other major raw material requirements. For more information on price risks associated with our major raw material requirements, see Commodities—Price Risk Management and Futures Contracts on page 34.

Competition

Many of our brands enjoy wide consumer acceptance and are among the leading brands sold in the marketplace. We sell our brands in a highly competitive market with many other multinational, national, regional and local firms. Some of our competitors are much larger than our Company and have greater resources.

Trademarks, Service Marks and License Agreements

We own various registered and unregistered trademarks and service marks and have rights under licenses to use various trademarks that are of material importance to our business.

We have license agreements with several companies to manufacture and/or sell certain products. Our rights under these agreements are extendible on a long-term basis at our option. Our most significant licensing agreements are as follows:

 

         
Company   Type   Brand   Location   Requirements

Cadbury Schweppes p.l.c.
and affiliates

 

License to manufacture and/or sell and distribute confectionery products

 

 

YORK

PETER PAUL ALMOND JOY

PETER PAUL MOUNDS

  Worldwide   None
     

CADBURY

CARAMELLO

  United States   Minimum sales requirement exceeded in 2006

Societe des
Produits Nestle SA

  License to manufacture and distribute confectionery products  

KIT KAT

ROLO

  United States   Minimum unit volume sales exceeded in 2006

Huhtamäki Oy affiliate

  Certain trademark licenses for confectionery products  

GOOD & PLENTY

HEATH

JOLLY RANCHER

MILK DUDS

PAYDAY

WHOPPERS

  Worldwide   None

Various dairies throughout the United States produce and sell HERSHEY’S chocolate and strawberry flavored milks under license. We also grant trademark licenses to third parties to produce and sell baking and various other products primarily under the HERSHEY’S and REESE’S brand names.

 

6


Backlog of Orders

We manufacture primarily for stock and fill customer orders from finished goods inventories. While at any given time there may be some backlog of orders, this backlog is not material in respect to our total annual sales, nor are the changes from time to time significant.

Research and Development

We engage in a variety of research and development activities. We develop new products, improve the quality of existing products, improve and modernize production processes, and develop and implement new technologies to enhance the quality and value of both current and proposed product lines. Information concerning our research and development expense is contained in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data).

Food Quality and Safety Regulation

The manufacture and sale of consumer food products is highly regulated. In the United States, our activities are subject to regulation by various government agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Agriculture, the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Commerce and the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as various state and local agencies. Similar agencies also regulate our businesses outside of the United States.

Environmental Considerations

Investments were made in 2006 to comply with environmental laws and regulations. These investments were not material with respect to our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

Employees

As of December 31, 2006, we employed approximately 12,800 full-time and 2,200 part-time employees worldwide. Collective bargaining agreements covered approximately 5,500 of these employees. We believe that our employee relations are good.

Financial Information by Geographic Area

Our principal operations and markets are located in the United States. The percentage of total consolidated net sales for our businesses outside of the United States was 10.9% for 2006, 10.9% for 2005 and 9.8% for 2004. The percentage of total consolidated assets outside of the United States as of December 31, 2006 was 13.8% and as of December 31, 2005 was 12.4%. Operating profit margins vary among individual products and product groups.

Available Information

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We file or furnish annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). You may obtain a copy of any of these reports, free of charge, from the Investor Relations section of our website, www.hersheys.com shortly after we file or furnish the information to the SEC.

You may also obtain a copy of any of these reports directly from the SEC. You may read and copy any material we file or furnish with the SEC at their Public Reference Room, located at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The phone number for information about the operation of the SEC Public Reference Room is 1-800-732-0330 (if you are calling from within the United States), or +202-551-8090. Because we electronically file our reports, you may also obtain this information from the SEC internet website at www.sec.gov. You can obtain additional contact information for the SEC on their website.

 

7


Our Company has a Code of Ethical Business Conduct that applies to our Board of Directors, all company officers and employees, including, without limitation, our Chief Executive Officer and “senior financial officers” (including the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and persons performing similar functions). You can obtain a copy of our Code of Ethical Business Conduct from the Investor Relations section of our website, www.hersheys.com. If we change or waive any portion of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct that applies to any of our directors, executive officers or senior financial officers, we will post that information on our website within four business days. In the case of a waiver, such information will include the name of the person to whom the waiver applied, along with the date and type of waiver.

We also post our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Charters for each of the Board’s standing committees in the Investor Relations section of our website, www.hersheys.com. The Board of Directors adopted each of these guidelines and charters. If you are a beneficial owner of Common Stock or Class B Common Stock (“Class B Stock”), we will provide you with a free copy of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct, the Corporate Governance Guidelines or the Charter of any standing committee of the Board of Directors, upon request. We will also give any stockholder a copy of one or more of the Exhibits listed in Part IV of this report, upon request. We charge a small copying fee for these exhibits to cover our costs. To request a copy of any of these documents, you can contact us at—The Hershey Company, Attn: Investor Relations Department, 100 Crystal A Drive, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033-0810.

 

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

We are subject to changing economic, competitive, regulatory and technological conditions, risks and uncertainties because of the nature of our operations. In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we note the following factors that, among others, could cause future results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements, expectations and assumptions expressed or implied in this report. Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this document may be identified by the use of words such as “intend,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “planned,” “projected,” “estimated” and “potential,” among others. Among the factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results projected in our forward-looking statements are the risk factors described below.

Annual savings from initiatives to advance our value-enhancing strategy may be less than we expect.

In February 2007, we announced a comprehensive, supply chain transformation program which includes a phased three-year plan to enhance our manufacturing, sourcing and customer service capabilities. We expect ongoing annual savings from this program and previous initiatives to generate significant savings to invest in our growth initiatives and to advance our value-enhancing strategy. If ongoing annual savings do not meet our expectations, we may not obtain the anticipated future benefits.

Increases in raw material and energy costs could affect future financial results.

We use many different commodities for our business, including cocoa, sugar, milk, peanuts, almonds, corn sweeteners, natural gas and fuel oil.

Commodities are subject to price volatility and changes in supply caused by:

 

   

Commodity market fluctuations;

 

   

Currency exchange rates;

 

   

Imbalances between supply and demand;

 

   

The effect of weather on crop yield;

 

8


   

Speculative influences;

 

   

Trade agreements among producing and consuming nations;

 

   

Political unrest in producing countries; and

 

   

Changes in governmental agricultural programs.

Although we use forward contracts and commodity futures contracts, where possible, to hedge commodity prices, commodity price increases ultimately result in corresponding increases in our raw material and energy costs. If we are unable to offset cost increases for major raw materials and energy, there could be a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Price increases may not be sufficient to offset cost increases and maintain profitability.

We may be able to pass some or all raw material, energy and other input cost increases to customers by increasing the selling prices of our products or decreasing the size of our products; however, higher product prices or decreased product size may also result in a reduction in sales volume. If we are not able to increase our selling prices sufficiently to offset increased raw material, energy or other input costs, including packaging, direct labor, overhead and employee benefits, or if our sales volume decreases significantly, there could be a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Implementation of our supply chain transformation program may not occur within the anticipated timeframe and/or may exceed our cost estimates.

We announced a supply chain transformation program in February 2007 which is expected to be completed by December 2009. We estimate that this program will incur pre-tax charges and non-recurring project implementation costs of $525 million to $575 million over the three-year period. Completion of this program is subject to multiple operating and executional risks, including coordination of manufacturing changes, production line startups, cross-border legal, regulatory and political issues, and foreign currency exchange risks, among others. If we are not able to complete the program initiatives within the anticipated timeframe and within our cost estimates, our results of operations and financial condition could be negatively impacted.

Pension costs could increase at a higher than anticipated rate.

Changes in interest rates or in the market value of plan assets could affect the funded status of our pension plans. This could cause volatility in our benefits costs and increase future funding requirements of our pension plans. Additionally, we could incur pension settlement losses if a significant number of our retired employees decide to withdraw substantial lump sums from their pension accounts. The fair value of our pension plan assets exceeded pension benefits obligations as of December 31, 2006. However, a significant increase in future funding requirements could have a negative impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Increases in our stock price could increase expenses.

Changes in the price of our Common Stock expose us to market risks. Expenses for incentive compensation could increase due to an increase in the price of our Common Stock.

Market demand for new and existing products could decline.

We operate in highly competitive markets and rely on continued demand for our products. To generate revenues and profits, we must sell products that appeal to our customers and to consumers. Continued success is dependent on product innovation, including maintaining a strong pipeline of new products, effective retail execution, appropriate advertising campaigns and marketing programs, and the ability to secure adequate shelf space at retail locations. In addition, success depends on our response to consumer trends, consumer health concerns, including obesity and the consumption of certain ingredients, and changes in product category consumption and consumer demographics.

 

9


Our largest customer, McLane Company, Inc., accounted for more than 25% of total net sales in 2006 reflecting the continuing consolidation of our customer base. In this environment, there continue to be competitive product and pricing pressures, as well as challenges in maintaining profit margins. We must maintain mutually beneficial relationships with our key customers, including retailers and distributors, to compete effectively. McLane Company, Inc. is one of the largest wholesale distributors in the United States to convenience stores, drug stores, wholesale clubs and mass merchandisers, including Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Increased marketplace competition could hurt our business.

The global confectionery packaged goods industry is intensely competitive, as is the broader snack market. In order to protect our existing market share or capture increased market share in this highly competitive retail environment, we may be required to increase expenditures for promotions and advertising, and continue to introduce and establish new products. Due to inherent risks in the marketplace associated with advertising and new product introductions, including uncertainties about trade and consumer acceptance, increased expenditures may not prove successful in maintaining or enhancing our market share and could result in lower sales and profits. In addition, we may incur increased credit and other business risks because we operate in a highly competitive retail environment.

Changes in governmental laws and regulations could increase our costs and liabilities or impact demand for our products.

Changes in laws and regulations and the manner in which they are interpreted or applied may alter our business environment. This could affect our results of operations or increase our liabilities. These negative impacts could result from changes in food and drug laws, laws related to advertising and marketing practices, accounting standards, taxation requirements, competition laws, employment laws and environmental laws, among others. It is possible that we could become subject to additional liabilities in the future resulting from changes in laws and regulations that could result in an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

International operations could fluctuate unexpectedly and adversely impact our business.

In 2006, we derived approximately 10.9% of our net sales from customers located outside the United States. In addition, portions of our total assets are located outside of the United States. As a result, we are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties relating to international sales and operations, including:

 

   

Unforeseen global economic and environmental changes resulting in business interruption, supply constraints, inflation, deflation or decreased demand;

 

   

Difficulties and costs associated with complying with, and enforcing remedies under a wide variety of complex laws, treaties and regulations;

 

   

Different regulatory structures and unexpected changes in regulatory environments;

 

   

Political and economic instability, including the possibility of civil unrest;

 

   

Nationalization of our properties by foreign governments;

 

   

Tax rates that may exceed those in the United States and earnings that may be subject to withholding requirements and incremental taxes upon repatriation;

 

   

Potentially negative consequences from changes in tax laws;

 

   

The imposition of tariffs, quotas, trade barriers, other trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;

 

   

Increased costs, disruptions in shipping or reduced availability of freight transportation; and

 

   

The impact of currency exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies.

 

10


Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

 

Item 2. PROPERTIES

Our principal properties include the following:

 

Country

  

Location

  

Type

  

Status

(Own/Lease)

United States   

Hershey, Pennsylvania

(3 principal plants)

   Manufacturing—confectionery products, and food and beverage enhancers    Own
   Lancaster, Pennsylvania    Manufacturing—confectionery products    Own
   Oakdale, California    Manufacturing—confectionery products, and food and beverage enhancers    Own
   Robinson, Illinois    Manufacturing—confectionery and snack products, and food and beverage enhancers    Own
   Stuarts Draft, Virginia    Manufacturing—confectionery products, and food and beverage enhancers    Own
   Edwardsville, Illinois    Distribution    Own
   Palmyra, Pennsylvania    Distribution    Own
   Redlands, California    Distribution    Lease*
Canada    Smiths Falls, Ontario    Manufacturing—confectionery products, and food and beverage enhancers    Own
   Mississauga, Ontario    Distribution    Lease

* We purchased this facility in January 2007.

In addition to the locations indicated above, we own or lease several other properties and buildings worldwide which we use for manufacturing and for sales, distribution and administrative functions. Our facilities are efficient and well maintained. These facilities generally have adequate capacity and can accommodate seasonal demands, changing product mixes and certain additional growth. The largest facilities are located in Hershey, Pennsylvania. Many additions and improvements have been made to these facilities over the years and they include equipment of the latest type and technology.

 

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We have no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to our business.

 

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Not applicable.

 

11


PART II

 

Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

We paid $235.1 million in cash dividends on our Common Stock and Class B Stock in 2006 and $221.2 million in 2005. The annual dividend rate on our Common Stock in 2006 was $1.08 per share, an increase of 10.2% over the 2005 rate of $.98 per share. The 2006 dividend increase represented the 32nd consecutive year of Common Stock dividend increases.

On February 13, 2007, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $.27 per share of Common Stock payable on March 15, 2007, to stockholders of record as of February 23, 2007. It is the Company’s 309th consecutive Common Stock dividend. A quarterly dividend of $.2425 per share of Class B Stock also was declared.

Our Common Stock is listed and traded principally on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “HSY.” Approximately 292.0 million shares of our Common Stock were traded during 2006. The Class B Stock is not publicly traded.

The closing price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2006, was $49.80. There were 41,076 stockholders of record of our Common Stock and our Class B Stock as of December 31, 2006.

The following table shows the dividends paid per share of Common Stock and Class B Stock and the price range of the Common Stock for each quarter of the past two years:

 

     Dividends Paid Per
Share
   Common Stock
Price Range*
     Common
Stock
   Class B
Stock
   High    Low

2006

           

1st Quarter

   $ .2450    $ .2200    $ 55.44    $ 50.62

2nd Quarter

     .2450      .2200      57.65      48.20

3rd Quarter

     .2700      .2425      57.30      50.48

4th Quarter

     .2700      .2425      53.60      48.96
                   

Total

   $ 1.0300    $ .9250      
                   
     Dividends Paid Per
Share
   Common Stock
Price Range*
     Common
Stock
   Class B
Stock
   High    Low

2005

           

1st Quarter

   $ .2200    $ .2000    $ 64.72    $ 53.15

2nd Quarter

     .2200      .2000      67.37      59.40

3rd Quarter

     .2450      .2200      64.80      54.85

4th Quarter

     .2450      .2200      60.23      52.49
                   

Total

   $ .9300    $ .8400      
                   

* NYSE-Composite Quotations for Common Stock by calendar quarter.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

 

12


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006:

 

Period

  

(a) Total

Number of

Shares

Purchased

  

(b) Average

Price Paid per

Share

  

(c) Total Number of

Shares Purchased

as Part of Publicly

Announced Plans or

Programs

  

(d) Approximate Dollar

Value of Shares that

May Yet Be Purchased

Under the Plans or

Programs(1)

                    (in thousands of dollars)

October 2 through

October 29, 2006

   867,988    $ 52.33    720,700    $ 77,235

October 30 through

November 26, 2006

   793,717    $ 52.69    715,100    $ 39,551

November 27 through

December 31, 2006

   852,484    $ 51.52    769,878    $ 250,000
               

Total

   2,514,189    $ 52.17    2,205,678   
               

(1) In April 2005, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing the repurchase of up to $250 million of the Company’s Common Stock in the open market, or through privately negotiated transactions. This program was completed in February 2006. In December 2005, our Board of Directors approved an additional $500 million share repurchase program. This program was completed in December 2006. Also in December 2006, our Board of Directors approved an additional $250 million share repurchase program.

 

13


Performance Graph

The following graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return (Common Stock price appreciation plus dividends, on a reinvested basis) over the last five fiscal years with the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the Standard & Poor’s Packaged Foods Index.

Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Return*

The Hershey Company, S&P 500 Index and

S&P Packaged Foods Index

LOGO


* Hypothetical $100 invested on December 31, 2001 in Hershey Common Stock, S&P 500 Index and S&P Packaged Foods Index, assuming reinvestment of dividends.

 

14


Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

SIX-YEAR CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL SUMMARY

All dollar and share amounts in thousands except market price

and per share statistics

 

    5-Year
Compound
Growth Rate
    2006     2005     2004     2003     2002     2001  

Summary of Operations

             

Net Sales(a)(b)

  3.6 %   $ 4,944,230     4,819,827     4,416,389     4,162,987     4,131,647     4,143,003  
                                       

Cost of Sales(a)(c)

  2.9 %   $ 3,076,718     2,956,682     2,672,716     2,539,469     2,568,017     2,672,472  

Selling, Marketing and Administrative(b)(c)

  %   $ 860,378     912,986     867,104     841,105     853,048     859,967  

Business Realignment and Asset Impairments Charge

    $ 14,576     96,537     —       23,357     27,552     228,314  

Gain on Sale of Business(d)

    $ —       —       —       8,330     —       19,237  

Interest Expense, Net

  10.9 %   $ 116,056     87,985     66,533     63,529     60,722     69,093  

Provision for Income Taxes(a)(c)

  19.2 %   $ 317,441     277,090     235,399     257,268     228,427     132,041  
                                       

Income before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change(a)(c)

  22.8 %   $ 559,061     488,547     574,637     446,589     393,881     200,353  

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change

    $ —       —       —       7,368     —       —    
                                       

Net Income(a)(c)

  22.8 %   $ 559,061     488,547     574,637     439,221     393,881     200,353  
                                       

Net Income Per Share(a)(c):

             

—Basic—Common Stock

  26.6 %   $ 2.44     2.05     2.31     1.71     1.47     .75  

—Basic—Class B Stock

  26.4 %   $ 2.19     1.85     2.11     1.55     1.33     .68  

—Diluted

  26.2 %   $ 2.34     1.97     2.24     1.66     1.43     .73  

Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding:

             

—Basic—Common Stock

      174,722     183,747     193,037     201,768     212,219     211,612  

—Basic—Class B Stock

      60,817     60,821     60,844     60,844     60,856     60,878  

—Diluted(c)

      239,071     248,292     256,934     264,532     275,429     275,391  

Dividends Paid on Common Stock

  7.8 %   $ 178,873     170,147     159,658     144,985     133,285     122,790  

Per Share

  12.1 %   $ 1.03     .93     .835     .7226     .63     .5825  

Dividends Paid on Class B Stock

  12.0 %   $ 56,256     51,088     46,089     39,701     34,536     31,960  

Per Share

  12.0 %   $ .925     .84     .7576     .6526     .5675     .525  

Net Income as a Percent of Net Sales, GAAP Basis(a)(b)(c)

      11.3 %   10.1 %   13.0 %   10.6 %   9.5 %   4.8 %

Non-GAAP Income as a Percent of Net Sales(a)(b)(c)(e)

      11.5 %   11.7 %   11.6 %   11.0 %   10.3 %   9.3 %

Depreciation

  3.4 %   $ 181,038     200,132     171,229     158,933     155,384     153,493  

Advertising(b)

  (10.4 )%   $ 108,327     125,023     137,931     145,387     162,874     187,244  

Payroll

  1.0 %   $ 645,480     647,825     614,037     585,419     594,372     614,197  

Year-end Position and Statistics

             

Capital Additions

  2.8 %   $ 183,496     181,069     181,728     218,650     132,736     160,105  

Capitalized Software Additions

  8.8 %   $ 15,016     13,236     14,158     18,404     11,836     9,845  

Total Assets(a)(c)

  5.1 %   $ 4,157,565     4,262,699     3,794,750     3,577,026     3,483,442     3,238,775  

Short-term Debt and Current Portion of Long-term Debt

  154.4 %   $ 843,998     819,115     622,320     12,509     28,124     7,926  

Long-term Portion of Debt

  7.3 %   $ 1,248,128     942,755     690,602     968,499     851,800     876,972  

Stockholders’ Equity(a)(c)

  (10.4 )%   $ 683,423     1,016,380     1,137,103     1,328,975     1,416,434     1,186,364  

Operating Return on Average Stockholders’ Equity, GAAP Basis(a)(c)(f)

      65.8 %   45.4 %   46.6 %   32.0 %   30.3 %   16.7 %

Non-GAAP Operating Return on Average Stockholders’ Equity(a)(c)(f)

      66.7 %   52.2 %   41.6 %   33.2 %   32.8 %   32.1 %

Operating Return on Average Invested Capital, GAAP
Basis(a)(c)(f)

      26.4 %   23.6 %   25.7 %   18.3 %   17.6 %   10.3 %

Non-GAAP Operating Return on Average Invested
Capital(a)(c)(f)

      26.8 %   26.8 %   23.2 %   18.9 %   18.9 %   18.1 %

Full-time Employees

      12,800     13,750     13,700     13,100     13,700     14,400  

Stockholders’ Data

             

Outstanding Shares of Common Stock and Class B Stock at Year-end

      230,264     240,524     246,588     259,059     268,440     271,278  

Market Price of Common Stock at Year-end

  8.0 %   $ 49.80     55.25     55.54     38.50     33.72     33.85  

Range During Year

    $ 57.65–48.20     67.37–52.49     56.75–37.28     39.33–30.35     39.75–28.23     35.08–27.57  

 

15



(a) We adjusted all years for the impact of certain immaterial adjustments relating to the timing of recognition of revenue and the correction of certain liabilities as permitted in 2006 by Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.
(b) We adjusted all years in accordance with final Financial Accounting Standards Board Emerging Issues Task Force consensuses reached in 2002 on various issues regarding the reporting of certain sales incentives.
(c) We adjusted all years to reflect the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, in 2005 using the modified retrospective application method.
(d) Includes the gain on the sale of gum brands in 2003 and the gain on the sale of the Luden’s throat drops business in 2001.
(e) Non-GAAP Income as a Percent of Net Sales is calculated by dividing Non-GAAP Income excluding Items Affecting Comparability by Net Sales. A reconciliation of Net Income presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to Non-GAAP Income excluding items affecting comparability is provided on pages 17 and 18, along with the reasons why we believe that the use of Non-GAAP Income provides useful information to investors.
(f) The calculation method for these measures is described on page 43 under RETURN MEASURES. The Non-GAAP Operating Return measures are calculated using Non-GAAP Income excluding items affecting comparability. A reconciliation of Net Income presented in accordance with GAAP to Non-GAAP Income excluding items affecting comparability is provided on pages 17 and 18, along with the reasons why we believe the use of Non-GAAP Income provides useful information to investors.

 

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

We concluded a difficult year in 2006. Following a strong first half, we experienced a slow-down in retail performance resulting from a shift from limited edition line extensions to more sustainable new product platforms which took longer than expected. In addition, our base business sales were negatively impacted in the second half of the year by poor merchandising activity. Results for 2006, excluding items affecting comparability as indicated below, fell short of our long-term goals and were below expectations.

Net sales were impacted by slower retail takeaway and a decline in market share during the second half of the year, primarily in our North American chocolate business. Income per share-diluted was impacted by the lower than expected sales growth, increased costs for product obsolescence associated with the shift to new product platforms and increased expenses for advertising and consumer programs during the fourth quarter to regain marketplace momentum. A product recall and temporary plant closure in Canada also negatively impacted our results for the year. We plan to accelerate growth in 2007 by focusing on increasing sales of our core confectionery products, revitalizing our iconic brands through increased advertising and increased consumer and customer support, and by expanding our innovative new product platforms based on consumer preferences.

Adoption of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108

Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (“SAB No. 108”), required companies to change the accounting principle used for evaluating the effect of possible prior year misstatements when quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements. As a result, we changed one of the five criteria of our revenue recognition policy to delay the recognition of revenue on goods in-transit until they are received by our customers. We also made adjustments to correct certain liabilities as of December 31, 2006, along with a corresponding adjustment to retained earnings for all years presented in this report. Adjustments were made to liabilities primarily associated with business acquisitions and divestitures occurring prior to 2002. As permitted by SAB No. 108, we adjusted our financial statements for all prior periods to provide comparability. These adjustments were not material to our results of operations or financial condition in any period presented in this report.

 

16


Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Items Affecting Comparability

Our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section includes certain measures of financial performance that are not defined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). For each of these non-GAAP financial measures, we are providing below (1) the most directly comparable GAAP measure; (2) a reconciliation of the differences between the non-GAAP measure and the most directly comparable GAAP measure; (3) an explanation of why our management believes these non-GAAP measures provide useful information to investors; and (4) additional purposes for which we use these non-GAAP measures.

We believe that the disclosure of these non-GAAP measures provides investors with a better comparison of our year-to-year operating results. We exclude the effects of certain items from Income before Interest and Income Taxes (“EBIT”), Net Income and Income per Share-Diluted when we evaluate key measures of our performance internally, and in assessing the impact of known trends and uncertainties on our business. We also believe that excluding the effects of these items provides a more balanced view of the underlying dynamics of our business.

Items affecting comparability include the impacts of charges or credits in 2006, 2005, 2003, 2002 and 2001 associated with our business realignment initiatives and a reduction of the income tax provision in 2004 resulting from adjustments to income tax contingency reserves. Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contains information regarding the business realignment initiatives and Note 11 contains information about the income tax provision adjustment.

 

17


For the years ended December 31,

   2006     2005
     EBIT     Net
Income
    Income
Per
Share-
Diluted
    EBIT    Net
Income
   Income
Per
Share-
Diluted
In millions of dollars except per share amounts                                 

Results in accordance with GAAP

   $ 992.6     $ 559.1     $ 2.34     $ 853.6    $ 488.5    $ 1.97

Items affecting comparability:

              

Business realignment and asset impairments included in cost of sales

     (3.2 )     (2.0 )     (.01 )     22.5      13.4      .05

Business realignment charges included in selling, marketing and administrative (“SM&A”)

     .3       .2       —         —        —        —  

Business realignment and asset impairments, net

     14.5       9.3       .04       96.5      60.7      .25
                                            

Non-GAAP results excluding items affecting comparability

   $ 1,004.2     $ 566.6     $ 2.37     $ 972.6    $ 562.6    $ 2.27
                                            

 

For the years ended December 31,

   2004     2003  
   EBIT   

Net

Income

   

Income

Per

Share-

Diluted

    EBIT    

Net

Income

    Income
Per
Share-
Diluted
 
In millions of dollars except per share amounts                                    

Results in accordance with GAAP

   $ 876.6    $ 574.6     $ 2.24     $ 767.4     $ 439.2     $ 1.66  

Items affecting comparability:

             

Business realignment and asset impairments included in cost of sales

     —        —         —         2.1       1.3       —    

Business realignment and asset impairments, net

     —        —         —         23.4       14.2       .05  

Gain on sale of business

     —        —         —         (8.3 )     (5.7 )     (.02 )

Tax provision adjustment

     —        (61.1 )     (.24 )     —         —         —    

Cumulative effect of accounting change

     —        —         —         —         7.4       .03  
                                               

Non-GAAP results excluding items affecting comparability

   $ 876.6    $ 513.5     $ 2.00     $ 784.6     $ 456.4     $ 1.72  
                                               

 

For the years ended December 31,

   2002    2001
   EBIT    Net
Income
   Income
Per
Share-
Diluted
   EBIT     Net
Income
   

Income

Per
Share-
Diluted

In millions of dollars except per share amounts                                

Results in accordance with GAAP

   $ 683.0    $ 393.9    $ 1.43    $ 401.5     $ 200.4     $ .73

Items affecting comparability:

               

Business realignment and asset impairments included in cost of sales

     6.4      4.1      .01      50.1       31.8       .11

Costs to explore the sale of the Company included in SM&A

     17.2      10.9      .04      —         —         —  

Gain on sale of business

     —        —        —        (19.2 )     (1.1 )     —  

Elimination of amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets

     —        —        —        14.7       13.5       .05

Business realignment and asset impairments, net

     27.6      17.4      .06      228.3       140.1       .51
                                           

Non-GAAP results excluding items affecting comparability

   $ 734.2    $ 426.3    $ 1.54    $ 675.4     $ 384.7     $ 1.40
                                           

 

18


 

         

Actual Results Excluding Items

            Affecting Comparability           

Key Annual Performance Measures

   Long-term Goal      2006      2005      2004  

Increase in Net Sales

   3% to 4%    2.6%    9.1%    6.1%

Increase in EBIT

   7% to 9%    3.2%    11.0%    11.7%

Improvement in EBIT Margin in basis points (“bps”)

   70 to 90 bps    10 bps    40 bps    100 bps

Increase in Income Per Share-Diluted (“EPS”)

   9% to 11%    4.4%    13.5%    16.3%

SUMMARY OF OPERATING RESULTS

Analysis of Selected Items from Our Income Statement

 

                 Percent Change  
                 Increase (Decrease)  

For the years ended December 31,

   2006     2005     2004     2006-2005     2005-2004  
In millions of dollars except per share amounts  

Net Sales

   $ 4,944.2     $ 4,819.8     $ 4,416.4     2.6 %   9.1 %

Cost of Sales

     3,076.7       2,956.7       2,672.7     4.1     10.6  
                            

Gross Profit

     1,867.5       1,863.1       1,743.7     0.2     6.9  
                            

Gross Margin

     37.8 %     38.7 %     39.5 %    

SM&A Expense

     860.3       913.0       867.1     (5.8 )   5.3  
                            

SM&A Expense as a percent of sales

     17.4 %     18.9 %     19.6 %    

Business Realignment and Asset Impairments Charge

     14.6       96.5       —       (84.9 )   N/A  
                            

EBIT

     992.6       853.6       876.6     16.3     (2.6 )

EBIT Margin

     20.1 %     17.7 %     19.8 %    

Interest Expense, Net

     116.1       88.0       66.6     31.9     32.2  

Provision for Income Taxes

     317.4       277.1       235.4     14.6     17.7  
                            

Effective Income Tax Rate

     36.2 %     36.2 %     29.1 %    

Net Income

   $ 559.1     $ 488.5     $ 574.6     14.4     (15.0 )
                            

Net Income Per Share—Diluted

   $ 2.34     $ 1.97     $ 2.24     18.8     (12.1 )
                            

Net Sales

2006 compared with 2005

U.S. confectionery sales volume increases contributed over three quarters of the total increase in net sales. Sales of new products and higher seasonal sales contributed the majority of the volume increase. Sales in 2006 also benefited from improved price realization resulting from higher list prices in the United States implemented in 2005, substantially offset by a higher rate of promotional allowances. Favorable foreign currency exchange rates and higher sales volume in Mexico also contributed to the sales increase. These increases were offset somewhat by lower sales in Canada, partly due to the impact of a product recall during the fourth quarter caused by a contaminated ingredient purchased from an outside supplier.

2005 compared with 2004

Business acquisitions, primarily Mauna Loa Macadamia Nut Corporation (“Mauna Loa”) and Grupo Lorena, contributed approximately 2.9% of the increase in net sales from 2004. Approximately two-thirds of the additional sales increase of 6.2% resulted from unit volume growth, primarily reflecting the introduction of new

 

19


products and limited edition items. Improved performance by our Canadian and Mexican businesses and exports to Asia and Latin America also contributed to this increase. The remaining sales increase resulted from selling price increases, a lower rate of promotional spending, and favorable foreign currency exchange rates for our international businesses.

Key Marketplace Metrics

 

For the 52 weeks ended December 31,

   2006     2005     2004  

Consumer Takeaway Increase

   4.0 %   4.2 %   7.0 %

Market Share (Decrease) Increase

   (0.2 )   0.7     0.5  

Consumer takeaway is provided for channels of distribution accounting for approximately 80% of our U.S. confectionery retail business. These channels of distribution include food, drug, mass merchandisers, including Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and convenience stores. The change in market share is provided for measured channels which include sales in the food, drug, convenience store and mass merchandiser classes of trade, excluding sales of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Cost of Sales and Gross Margin

2006 compared with 2005

The sales volume increase, higher energy, raw material and other input costs were the primary contributors to the cost of sales increase for 2006. Higher costs associated with obsolete, aged and unsaleable products also contributed to the increase. These increases were offset somewhat by reductions in U.S. manufacturing costs and a decrease in cost of sales of $3.2 million in 2006 resulting from the adjustment of liabilities associated with business realignment initiatives. Business realignment charges of $22.5 million were included in cost of sales in 2005 reflecting accelerated depreciation resulting from the closure of a manufacturing facility located in Las Piedras, Puerto Rico.

Gross margin in 2006 was negatively impacted by higher costs for energy and raw materials, increased costs related to product obsolescence and an unfavorable sales mix. These were partially offset by improved price realization and supply chain productivity. Our business realignment initiatives improved gross margin 0.1 percentage point in 2006 and reduced gross margin by 0.4 percentage points in 2005.

2005 compared with 2004

Business realignment charges increased cost of sales by $22.5 million. Higher sales volume, business acquisitions and higher raw material costs, in addition to higher labor, overhead and distribution costs primarily caused the remainder of the increase.

A less favorable product mix, primarily associated with the lower-margin Mauna Loa and Grupo Lorena businesses, and the impact of business realignment charges reduced our gross margin by 1.1 percentage points. Improved price realization, primarily from selling price increases and improved profitability for our international businesses, more than offset the impact of higher raw material, labor and overhead costs, and sales of certain new products which had lower margins.

Selling, Marketing and Administrative

2006 compared with 2005

Selling, marketing and administrative expenses decreased primarily due to reduced administrative costs reflecting lower incentive compensation expense and savings resulting from our 2005 business realignment initiatives. Reduced advertising expense in 2006 was substantially offset by higher consumer promotion expenses.

 

20


2005 compared with 2004

Selling, marketing and administrative expenses increased during this period primarily due to increased performance-based employee compensation costs, including stock-based compensation. Business acquisition expenses and consumer promotions expenses also increased, but were offset somewhat by lower advertising expenses.

Business Realignment Initiatives

In July 2005, we announced initiatives intended to advance our value-enhancing strategy (the “2005 business realignment initiatives”). We also announced that we would record a total pre-tax charge of approximately $140 million to $150 million, or $.41 to $.44 per share-diluted in connection with the 2005 business realignment initiatives. Our 2005 business realignment initiatives were complete as of December 31, 2006.

Charges (credits) associated with business realignment initiatives recorded during 2006 and 2005 were as follows:

 

For the years ended December 31,

   2006     2005
In thousands of dollars           

Cost of sales

    

2005 business realignment initiatives

   $ (1,599 )   $ 22,459

Previous business realignment initiatives

     (1,600 )     —  
              

Total cost of sales

     (3,199 )     22,459
              

Selling, marketing and administrative

    

2005 business realignment initiatives

     266       —  

Business realignment and asset impairments, net
2005 business realignment initiatives:

    

U.S. voluntary workforce reduction program

     9,972       69,472

U.S. facility rationalization (Las Piedras, Puerto Rico plant)

     1,567       12,771

Streamline international operations (primarily Canada)

     2,524       14,294

Previous business realignment initiatives

     513       —  
              

Total business realignment and asset impairments, net

     14,576       96,537
              

Total net charges associated with business realignment initiatives

   $ 11,643     $ 118,996
              

The credit of $1.6 million recorded in cost of sales during 2006 for the 2005 business realignment initiatives related to higher than expected proceeds from the sale of equipment from the Las Piedras, Puerto Rico plant. The charge recorded in selling, marketing and administrative expenses resulted from accelerated depreciation relating to the termination of an office building lease. The net business realignment and asset impairments charges recorded during 2006 included $7.3 million for involuntary terminations relating to organizational changes.

During 2006, we recorded charges (credits) related to previous business realignment initiatives that began in 2003 and 2001. These charges (credits) were recorded to finalize the sale of certain properties, adjust previously recorded liabilities, and reflect the impact of an employment complaint arising from the 2003 business realignment initiatives. During 2004, eight former employees filed a complaint in federal court in Colorado alleging we discriminated against them based on age. We do not expect any significant impact as a result of this case.

The $22.5 million recorded in cost of sales in 2005 resulted from accelerated depreciation related to the closure of the Las Piedras manufacturing facility. The business realignment and asset impairments charge in 2005 included $8.3 million for involuntary termination benefits primarily for Las Piedras plant employees.

 

21


Changes in liabilities recorded for the business realignment initiatives were as follows:

 

Accrued Liabilities

   Balance
12/31/05
   Utilization
during 2006
    New charges
during 2006
   Balance
12/31/06
In thousands of dollars                     

Voluntary workforce reduction

   $ 31,883    $ (19,727 )   $ 5,531    $ 17,687

Facility rationalization

     —        (1,562 )     1,562      —  

Streamline international operations

     5,888      (6,723 )     1,896      1,061
                            

Total

   $ 37,771    $ (28,012 )   $ 8,989    $ 18,748
                            

Income Before Interest and Income Taxes and EBIT Margin

2006 compared with 2005

EBIT increased in 2006 compared with 2005, primarily as a result of lower net business realignment charges associated primarily with the 2005 business realignment initiatives. Net pre-tax business realignment charges of $11.6 million were recorded in 2006 compared with $119.0 million recorded in 2005, a decrease of $107.4 million. The remainder of the increase in EBIT was attributable to lower selling, marketing and administrative expenses which were partially offset by lower gross profit resulting from higher input costs and the impact of product obsolescence.

Net business realignment charges reduced EBIT margin by 0.2 percentage points in 2006 and 2.5 percentage points in 2005. The remainder of the improvement in EBIT margin reflected lower selling, marketing and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales.

2005 compared with 2004

EBIT decreased from 2004 to 2005 as a result of net charges of $119.0 million related to the 2005 business realignment initiatives recorded in 2005. The impact of the business realignment charges was substantially offset by an increase in EBIT of $96.0 million resulting from the sales volume growth and net price realization which more than offset higher input costs and an increase in selling, marketing and administrative expenses.

EBIT margin declined in 2005 primarily due to our Mauna Loa and Grupo Lorena businesses, which had lower margins, and the impact of business realignment charges which together reduced EBIT margin by 3.1 percentage points. Also contributing to the EBIT margin decline were higher raw material, labor and overhead costs, and sales of certain new products that had lower margins. Improved price realization, improved profitability from our international businesses and lower selling, marketing and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales offset 1.0 percentage point of the EBIT margin decline.

Interest Expense, Net

2006 compared with 2005

Net interest expense was higher in 2006 than the comparable period of 2005, primarily reflecting higher interest expense resulting from commercial paper borrowings to fund repurchases of Common Stock and working capital requirements, along with significant contributions to our pension plans in late 2005. Higher interest rates in 2006 also contributed to the increase in interest expense.

2005 compared with 2004

Net interest expense was higher in 2005 primarily due to higher short-term interest expense and decreased capitalized interest. The increase in interest expense was primarily associated with commercial paper borrowings to finance stock repurchases and contributions to our pension plans, in addition to higher interest rates.

 

22


Income Taxes and Effective Tax Rate

2006 compared with 2005

Our effective income tax rate was 36.2% for 2006 and 2005.

2005 compared with 2004

The effective income tax rate for 2005 benefited by 0.2 percentage points from the impact of tax rates associated with business realignment charges. Our effective income tax rate for 2004 was not comparable to 2005 because in 2004 we settled Federal tax audits for the 1999 and 2000 tax years and resolved several state tax audit issues. Our provision for income taxes was reduced by $61.1 million from adjustments to income tax contingency reserves related to those years. The income tax contingency reserve adjustments related primarily to the deductibility of certain expenses, interest on potential assessments, and acquisition and divestiture matters. The reduction in the 2004 provision for income taxes resulting from the adjustment to income tax contingency reserves reduced the effective income tax rate by 7.3 percentage points.

Net Income and Net Income Per Share

2006 compared with 2005

Net Income in 2006 was reduced by $7.6 million, or $.03 per share-diluted, and in 2005 was reduced by $74.0 million, or $.30 per share-diluted, as a result of net charges associated with our 2005 business realignment initiatives which were recorded in each year. In addition to the impact of the business realignment initiatives, earnings per share-diluted in 2006 increased primarily as a result of lower selling, marketing and administrative expenses which more than offset the impact of reduced gross profit. The impact of lower weighted-average shares outstanding, net of higher interest expense, also contributed to the increase in earnings per share-diluted in 2006.

2005 compared with 2004

Net income for 2005 was unfavorably impacted by total charges associated with the 2005 business realignment initiatives of $119.0 million before tax, $74.0 million after tax or $.30 per share-diluted. Net income for 2004 was favorably impacted by $61.1 million, or $.24 per share-diluted, because of the adjustment to the Federal and state income tax contingency reserves.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Our financial condition remained strong during 2006. Solid cash flow from operations and our liquidity, leverage and capital structure contributed to our continued investment grade credit rating by recognized rating agencies.

Acquisitions and Divestitures

In October 2006, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Artisan Confections Company, purchased the assets of Dagoba Organic Chocolates, LLC based in Ashland, Oregon, for $17.0 million. Dagoba is known for its high-quality organic chocolate bars, drinking chocolates and baking products that are primarily sold in natural food and gourmet stores across the United States. Dagoba has annual sales of approximately $8 million.

In August 2005, Artisan Confections Company completed the acquisition of Scharffen Berger Chocolate Maker, Inc. Based in San Francisco, California, Scharffen Berger is known for its high-cacao content, signature dark chocolate bars and baking products sold online and in a broad range of outlets, including specialty retailers, natural food stores and gourmet centers across the United States. Scharffen Berger also owns and operates three specialty stores located in New York City, Berkeley, and San Francisco.

 

23


Also, in August 2005, Artisan Confections Company acquired the assets of Joseph Schmidt Confections, Inc., a premium chocolate maker located in San Francisco, California. Distinctive products created by Joseph Schmidt include artistic and innovative truffles, colorful chocolate mosaics, specialty cookies, and handcrafted chocolates. We sell these products in select department stores and other specialty outlets nationwide as well as in Joseph Schmidt stores located in San Jose and San Francisco, California. The combined purchase price for Scharffen Berger and Joseph Schmidt was $47.1 million, with the final amount subject to upward adjustment. The final purchase price, which will not exceed $61.1 million, will be determined based upon actual sales growth through 2007. Together, these companies have combined annual sales of approximately $25 million.

In December 2004, Artisan Confections Company acquired Mauna Loa for $127.8 million. Mauna Loa is the leading processor and marketer of macadamia snacks with annual sales of approximately $80 million.

In October 2004, our wholly-owned Mexican subsidiary, Hershey Mexico, acquired Grupo Lorena, one of Mexico’s top sugar confectionery companies, for $39.0 million. This business has annual sales of over $30 million. Included in the acquisition was the Pelón Pelo Rico brand.

Results subsequent to the dates of acquisition were included in the consolidated financial statements. Had the results of the acquisitions been included in the consolidated financial statements for each of the periods presented, the effect would not have been material.

In October 2005, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Hershey Canada Inc., completed the sale of its Mr. Freeze freeze pops business for $2.7 million.

Assets

A summary of our assets is as follows:

 

December 31,

   2006    2005
In thousands of dollars          

Current assets

   $ 1,417,812    $ 1,376,403

Property, plant and equipment, net

     1,651,300      1,659,138

Goodwill and other intangibles

     642,269      629,964

Other assets

     446,184      597,194
             

Total assets

   $ 4,157,565    $ 4,262,699
             

 

   

The change in current assets from 2005 to 2006 was primarily due to the following:

 

   

Higher cash and cash equivalents in 2006 due to the timing of cash collections;

 

   

An increase in accounts receivable in 2006 resulting from the timing of sales in December;

 

   

An increase in inventories reflecting higher raw material inventories to support manufacturing requirements; and

 

   

A decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets reflecting the implementation of SFAS No. 158 and lower prepaid selling and marketing expenses, partially offset by a receivable of approximately $14.0 million related to the recovery of damages resulting from the product recall in Canada.

 

   

Property, plant and equipment was lower in 2006 primarily due to depreciation expense of $181.0 million and asset retirements, partially offset by capital additions.

 

   

The change in other assets in 2006 was primarily due to the implementation of SFAS No. 158 which resulted in the reclassification of $143.9 million of assets related to our pension plans to accumulated other comprehensive loss.

 

24


Liabilities

A summary of our liabilities is as follows:

 

December 31,

   2006    2005
In thousands of dollars          

Current liabilities

   $ 1,453,538    $ 1,490,382

Long-term debt

     1,248,128      942,755

Other long-term liabilities

     486,473      412,929

Deferred income taxes

     286,003      400,253
             

Total liabilities

   $ 3,474,142    $ 3,246,319
             

 

   

Changes in current liabilities from 2005 to 2006 were primarily the result of the following:

 

   

Lower accounts payable reflecting the timing of payments in December;

 

   

Reduced accrued liabilities associated with business realignment initiatives, incentive compensation and marketing programs; and

 

   

Higher current portion of long-term debt, substantially offset by the refinancing of commercial paper borrowings upon the issuance of long-term debt.

 

   

The increase in long-term debt in 2006 resulted from the issuance of $500 million of Notes in August 2006, discussed further in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section. This increase was reduced by the reclassification of 6.95% Notes and certain lease obligations to current portion of long-term debt.

 

   

The increase in other long-term liabilities in 2006 was principally associated with the recording of liabilities for post-retirement benefits upon adoption of SFAS No. 158.

 

   

The decrease in deferred taxes in 2006 was primarily associated with the tax effect of the reclassification of assets related to our pension plans and liabilities recorded for our post-retirement benefit plans upon adoption of SFAS No. 158.

Capital Structure

We have two classes of stock outstanding, Common Stock and Class B Stock. Holders of the Common Stock and the Class B Stock generally vote together without regard to class on matters submitted to stockholders, including the election of directors. Holders of the Common Stock have one vote per share. Holders of the Class B Stock have ten votes per share. Holders of the Common Stock, voting separately as a class, are entitled to elect one-sixth of our Board of Directors. With respect to dividend rights, holders of the Common Stock are entitled to cash dividends 10% higher than those declared and paid on the Class B Stock.

Hershey Trust Company, as trustee for the benefit of Milton Hershey School (the “Milton Hershey School Trust”) maintains voting control over The Hershey Company. However, the Milton Hershey School Trust has not taken an active role in setting our policy, nor has it exercised influence with regard to the ongoing business decisions of our Board of Directors or management. The Milton Hershey School Trust decided to explore a sale of The Hershey Company in June 2002, but subsequently decided to terminate the sale process in September 2002. After terminating the sale process, the Trustee of the Milton Hershey School Trust advised the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General in September 2002 that it would not agree to any sale of its controlling interest in The Hershey Company without approval of the court having jurisdiction over the Milton Hershey School Trust following advance notice to the Office of Attorney General. Subsequently, Pennsylvania enacted legislation that requires that the Office of Attorney General be provided advance notice of any transaction that would result in the Milton Hershey School Trust no longer having voting control of the Company. The law provides specific statutory authority for the Attorney General to intercede, and petition the Court having jurisdiction over the Milton Hershey School Trust to stop such a transaction if the Attorney General can prove that the transaction is unnecessary for the future economic viability of the Company and is inconsistent with

 

25


investment and management considerations under fiduciary obligations. This legislation could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock and thereby delay or prevent a change in control of the Company.

In December 2000, our Board of Directors unanimously adopted a Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement (“Rights Agreement”). The Milton Hershey School Trust supported the Rights Agreement. This action was not in response to any specific effort to acquire control of The Hershey Company. Under the Rights Agreement, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of one right (“Right”) for each outstanding share of Common Stock and Class B Stock payable to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 26, 2000. The Rights will at no time have voting power or receive dividends. The issuance of the Rights has no dilutive effect, will not affect reported earnings per share, is not taxable and will not change the manner in which our Common Stock is traded. We discuss the Rights Agreement in more detail in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our principal source of liquidity is operating cash flows. Our net income and, consequently, our cash provided from operations are impacted by: sales volume, seasonal sales patterns, timing of new product introductions, profit margins and price changes. Sales are typically higher during the third and fourth quarters of the year due to seasonal and holiday-related sales patterns. Generally, working capital needs peak during the summer months. We meet these needs primarily by issuing commercial paper.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Our cash flows provided from (used by) operating activities were as follows:

 

For the years ended December 31,

   2006     2005     2004  
In thousands of dollars                   

Net income

   $ 559,061     $ 488,547     $ 574,637  

Depreciation and amortization

     199,911       218,032       189,665  

Stock-based compensation and excess tax benefits

     16,323       14,263       18,710  

Deferred income taxes

     4,173       71,038       (74,570 )

Business realignment initiatives, net of tax

     7,573       74,021       —    

Contributions to pension plans

     (23,570 )     (277,492 )     (8,020 )

Working capital

     (40,553 )     (174,010 )     (26,081 )

Changes in other assets and liabilities

     275       47,363       113,413  
                        

Net cash provided from operating activities

   $ 723,193     $ 461,762     $ 787,754  
                        

 

   

Over the past three years, cash from operating activities provided approximately $2.0 billion.

 

   

The change in cash (used by) provided from deferred income taxes primarily reflected the tax impact of higher pension plan contributions in 2005 and the adjustment of income tax contingency reserves in 2004.

 

   

In 2004, we adjusted deferred income taxes primarily to reflect the deferred tax benefit resulting from a $61.1 million adjustment to income tax contingency reserves recorded in the second quarter of 2004. Deferred income taxes in 2004 also reflected an increase resulting from the Mauna Loa acquisition. These adjustments represented non-cash items that impacted net income and are reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows to reconcile cash flows from operating activities.

 

   

We contributed $309.1 million to our pension plans over the past three years to improve the plans’ funded status. As of December 31, 2006, the fair value of our pension plan assets exceeded benefits obligations by $328.0 million.

 

   

Over the three-year period, cash provided from or used by working capital tended to fluctuate due to sales during December and inventory management practices.

 

26


   

During the three-year period, changes in other assets and liabilities primarily related to hedging transactions and the timing of payments for accrued liabilities associated with selling and marketing programs, incentive compensation and income taxes. The increase in income taxes paid in 2006 compared with 2005 primarily reflected significantly lower tax deductions in 2006 for pension plan contributions.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Our cash flows provided from (used by) investing activities were as follows:

 

For the years ended December 31,

   2006     2005     2004  
In thousands of dollars                   

Capital additions

   $ (183,496 )   $ (181,069 )   $ (181,728 )

Capitalized software additions

     (15,016 )     (13,236 )     (14,158 )

Business acquisitions

     (17,000 )     (47,074 )     (166,859 )

Proceeds from divestitures

     —         2,713       —    
                        

Net cash used by investing activities

   $ (215,512 )   $ (238,666 )   $ (362,745 )
                        

 

   

Capital additions primarily included capacity expansion, modernization of existing facilities and purchases of manufacturing equipment for new products.

 

   

Capitalized software additions were primarily for ongoing enhancement of our information systems.

 

   

We anticipate total capital expenditures of $250 million to $300 million in 2007 and $225 million to $250 million in 2008 and 2009.

 

   

In October 2006, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Artisan Confections Company, acquired the assets of Dagoba Organic Chocolates, LLC for $17.0 million.

 

   

In August 2005, Artisan Confections Company acquired the assets of Joseph Schmidt Confections, Inc. and completed the acquisition of Scharffen Berger Chocolate Maker, Inc. The combined purchase price for Joseph Schmidt and Scharffen Berger was $47.1 million, although the final amount may be adjusted upward based on actual sales growth through 2007. The adjustment may not increase the final amount to a total of more than $61.1 million.

 

   

In 2004, Artisan Confections Company acquired Mauna Loa for $127.8 million and our wholly-owned Mexican subsidiary, Hershey Mexico, acquired Grupo Lorena, a sugar confectionery company, for $39.0 million.

 

   

In October 2005, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Hershey Canada Inc., sold its Mr. Freeze freeze pops business for $2.7 million.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Our cash flows provided from (used by) financing activities were as follows:

 

For the years ended December 31,

   2006     2005     2004  
In thousands of dollars                   

Net change in short-term borrowings

   $ (163,826 )   $ 475,582     $ 331,245  

Long-term borrowings

     496,728       248,318       —    

Repayment of long-term debt

     (234 )     (278,236 )     (883 )

Cash dividends paid

     (235,129 )     (221,235 )     (205,747 )

Stock options exercises

     46,386       101,818       89,330  

Repurchase of Common Stock

     (621,648 )     (536,997 )     (698,910 )
                        

Net cash used by financing activities

   $ (477,723 )   $ (210,750 )   $ (484,965 )
                        

 

27


   

We use short-term borrowings (commercial paper and bank borrowings) to fund seasonal working capital requirements and finance share repurchase programs. Additional information on short-term borrowings is included under Borrowing Arrangements below.

 

   

In August 2006, we issued $250 million of 5.3% Notes due in 2011 and $250 million of 5.45% Notes due in 2016. The Notes were issued under a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed in May 2006 described under Registration Statements below.

 

   

In August 2005, we issued $250 million of 4.85% Notes due in 2015 under an August 1997 Form S-3 Registration Statement.

 

   

We paid cash dividends of $178.9 million on our Common Stock and $56.3 million on our Class B Stock in 2006.

 

   

Cash used for the repurchase of Common Stock was partially offset by cash received from the exercise of stock options.

Repurchases and Issuances of Common Stock

 

For the years ended December 31,

  2006     2005     2004  
In thousands   Shares     Dollars     Shares     Dollars     Shares     Dollars  

Shares repurchased under pre-approved share repurchase programs:

           

Open market repurchases

  9,912     $ 524,387     4,085     $ 238,157     2,633     $ 115,604  

Milton Hershey School Trust repurchases

  689       38,482     69       3,936     11,282       501,373  

Shares repurchased to replace Treasury Stock issued for stock options and employee benefits

  1,096       58,779     4,859       294,904     1,898       81,933  
                                         

Total share repurchases

  11,697     $ 621,648     9,013     $ 536,997     15,813     $ 698,910  

Shares issued for stock options and employee benefits

  (1,437 )     (44,564 )   (2,949 )     (74,438 )   (3,341 )     (84,047 )
                                         

Net change

  10,260     $ 577,084     6,064     $ 462,559     12,472     $ 614,863  
                                         

 

   

We intend to continue to repurchase shares of Common Stock in order to replace Treasury Stock shares issued for exercised stock options. The value of shares purchased in a given period will vary based on stock options exercised over time and market conditions.

 

   

During 2006, we completed share repurchase programs of $250 million approved in April 2005 and $500 million approved in December 2005. In December 2006, our Board of Directors approved an additional $250 million share repurchase program.

Cumulative Share Repurchases and Issuances

A summary of cumulative share repurchases and issuances is as follows:

 

    Shares     Dollars  
    (In thousands)  

Shares repurchased under authorized programs which began in 1993:

   

Open market repurchases

  54,520     $ 1,834,449  

Repurchases from the Milton Hershey School Trust

  11,918       245,550  

Shares retired

  (1,056 )     (12,820 )
             

Total repurchases under authorized programs

  65,382       2,067,179  

Privately negotiated purchases from the Milton Hershey School Trust

  67,282       1,501,373  

Shares reissued for stock option obligations, supplemental retirement contributions, and employee stock ownership trust obligations

  (25,747 )     (653,882 )

Shares repurchased to replace reissued shares

  22,721       887,277  
             

Total held as Treasury Stock as of December 31, 2006

  129,638     $ 3,801,947  
             

 

28


Borrowing Arrangements

We maintain debt levels we consider prudent based on our cash flow, interest coverage ratio and percentage of debt to capital. We use debt financing to lower our overall cost of capital which increases our return on stockholders’ equity.

 

   

In December 2006, we entered into a five-year agreement establishing an unsecured revolving credit facility to borrow up to $1.1 billion, with an option to increase borrowings to $1.5 billion with the consent of the lenders. We may use these funds for general corporate purposes, including commercial paper backstop and business acquisitions. The credit agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and a financial covenant. As of December 31, 2006, we complied with all of these covenants. This facility replaced our previous $900 million revolving credit facility entered into in November 2004.

 

   

In March 2006, we entered into a short-term credit agreement establishing an unsecured revolving credit facility to borrow up to $400 million through September 2006. In September 2006, we entered into an agreement amending the short-term facility. The amended agreement reduced the credit limit from $400 million to $200 million and expired on December 1, 2006. We used the funds for general corporate purposes, including commercial paper backstop. We entered into this agreement because we expected borrowings to exceed the $900 million credit limit available under the revolving credit agreement in effect at that time.

 

   

In September 2005, we entered into a short-term credit agreement establishing an unsecured revolving credit facility to borrow up to $300 million. The agreement expired in December 2005. We used the funds for general corporate purposes. We entered into this facility because we expected borrowings in late 2005 to exceed the $900 million credit limit available under the revolving credit agreement in effect at that time. Borrowing increased due to the retirement of $200 million of 6.7% Notes in October 2005, refinancing of certain consolidated lease arrangements, contributions to our pension plans, stock repurchases and seasonal working capital needs.

 

   

In November 2004, we entered into a five-year credit agreement under which we could borrow up to $900 million with an option to increase borrowings by an additional $600 million with concurrence by the lenders. This credit agreement was replaced by the new $1.1 billion revolving credit facility referred to in the first bullet above.

 

   

In addition to the revolving credit facility, we maintain lines of credit with domestic and international commercial banks. As of December 31, 2006, we could borrow up to approximately $54.2 million in various currencies under the lines of credit and as of December 31, 2005, we could borrow up to $71.1 million.

Registration Statements

 

   

In September 2005, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 that was declared effective in January 2006. Under this registration statement, we could offer on a delayed or continuous basis up to $750 million aggregate principal amount of additional debt securities (the “$750 Million Shelf Registration Statement”).

 

   

In May 2006, we filed a new shelf registration statement on Form S-3 that registered an indeterminate amount of debt securities. This registration statement was effective immediately upon filing under new Securities and Exchange Commission regulations governing “well-known seasoned issuers” (the “WKSI Registration Statement”). The WKSI Registration Statement replaces, and will be used in lieu of, the $750 Million Shelf Registration Statement for offerings of debt securities occurring subsequent to May 2006.

 

   

In August 2006, we issued $250 million of 5.3% Notes due September 1, 2011, and $250 million of 5.45% Notes due September 1, 2016. These Notes were issued under the WKSI Registration Statement.

 

29


   

Proceeds from the debt issuances and any other offerings under the WKSI Registration Statement may be used for general corporate requirements. These may include reducing existing borrowings, financing capital additions, funding contributions to our pension plans, future business acquisitions and working capital requirements.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS, CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS

As of December 31, 2006, our contractual cash obligations by year were as follows:

 

    Payments Due by Year
    (In thousands of dollars)

Contractual Obligations

  2007   2008   2009   2010   2011   Thereafter   Total

Unconditional Purchase Obligations

  $ 1,023,500   $ 271,800   $ 72,300   $ 25,100   $ —     $ —     $ 1,392,700

Non-cancelable Operating Leases

    14,334     12,969     9,124     6,511     5,892     16,091     64,921

Long-term Debt

    188,765     144     147     136     250,000     997,701     1,436,893
                                         

Total Obligations

  $ 1,226,599   $ 284,913   $ 81,571   $ 31,747   $ 255,892   $ 1,013,792   $ 2,894,514
                                         

In entering into contractual obligations, we have assumed the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. Our risk is limited to replacing the contracts at prevailing market rates. We do not expect any significant losses resulting from counterparty defaults.

Purchase Obligations

We enter into certain obligations for the purchase of raw materials. These obligations were primarily in the form of forward contracts for the purchase of raw materials from third-party brokers and dealers. These contracts minimize the effect of future price fluctuations by fixing the price of part or all of these purchase obligations. Total obligations for each year presented above consisted of fixed price contracts for the purchase of commodities and unpriced contracts that were valued using market prices as of December 31, 2006.

The cost of commodities associated with the unpriced contracts is variable as market prices change over future periods. We mitigate the variability of these costs to the extent we have entered into commodities futures contracts to hedge our costs for those periods. Increases or decreases in market prices are offset by gains or losses on commodities futures contracts. This applies to the extent that we have hedged the unpriced contracts as of December 31, 2006 and in future periods by entering into commodities futures contracts. Taking delivery of the specific commodities for use in the manufacture of finished goods satisfies these obligations. For each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, we satisfied these obligations by taking delivery of and making payment for the specific commodities.

Lease Arrangement with Special Purpose Trust

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51 (“Interpretation No. 46”). Interpretation No. 46 addresses consolidation by business enterprises of special-purpose entities (“SPEs”), such as special-purpose trusts (“SPTs”), to which the usual condition for consolidation described in Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, does not apply because the SPEs have no voting interests or otherwise are not subject to control through ownership of voting interests. We adopted Interpretation No. 46 as of June 30, 2003, resulting in the consolidation of off-balance sheet arrangements with SPTs. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

 

30


In December 2000, we entered into a lease agreement with the owner of a warehouse and distribution facility in Redlands, California. The lease term was approximately ten years, with occupancy to begin upon completion of the facility. The lease agreement contained an option for us to purchase the facility. In January 2002, we assigned our right to purchase the facility to an SPT that in turn purchased the completed facility and leased it to us under a new lease agreement. The term of this lease agreement was five years, with up to four renewal periods of five years each with the consent of the lessor. The cost incurred by the SPT to acquire the facility, including land, was $40.1 million. We exercised our option to purchase the facility at the original cost of $40.1 million at the end of the lease term in January 2007.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Our Company has a number of facilities that contain varying degrees of asbestos in certain locations within these facilities. Our asbestos management program is compliant with current regulations. Current regulations require that we handle or dispose of this type of asbestos in a special manner if such facilities undergo major renovations or are demolished. We believe we do not have sufficient information to estimate the fair value of any asset retirement obligations related to these facilities. We cannot specify the settlement date or range of potential settlement dates and, therefore, sufficient information is not available to apply an expected present value technique. We expect to maintain the facilities with repairs and maintenance activities that would not involve the removal of asbestos.

Income Tax Obligations

We base our deferred income taxes, accrued income taxes and provision for income taxes upon income, statutory tax rates, the legal structure of our Company and interpretation of tax laws. We are regularly audited by Federal, state and foreign tax authorities. From time to time, these audits result in assessments of additional tax. We maintain reserves for such assessments. We determine the reserves based upon our judgment of assessment risk. We adjust the reserves, from time to time, based upon changing facts and circumstances, such as receiving audit assessments or clearing of an item for which a reserve has been established.

A settlement of Federal tax audits for the 1999 and 2000 tax years, as well as the resolution of a number of state tax audit issues were concluded during the second quarter of 2004. Based upon the results of the audits, we reduced our income tax contingency reserves by $73.7 million. This reflected a reduction of the provision for income taxes by $61.1 million and a reduction to goodwill of $12.6 million. The reserve adjustment related primarily to the deductibility of certain expenses, interest on potential assessments, and acquisition and divestiture matters. Assessments of additional tax require cash payments. We are not aware of any significant income tax assessments.

ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND MARKET RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

We use certain derivative instruments, from time to time, including interest rate swaps, foreign currency forward exchange contracts and options, and commodities futures contracts, to manage interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate and commodity market price risk exposures. We enter into interest rate swap agreements and foreign currency contracts and options for periods consistent with related underlying exposures. These derivative instruments do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. We enter into commodities futures contracts for varying periods. These futures contracts are intended to be, and are effective as hedges of market price risks associated with anticipated raw material purchases, energy requirements and transportation costs. We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes and are not a party to any instruments with leverage or prepayment features. In entering into these contracts, we have assumed the risk that might arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. We do not expect any significant losses from counterparty defaults.

 

31


Accounting Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133

We account for derivative instruments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (“SFAS No. 133, as amended”). SFAS No. 133, as amended, provides that we report the effective portion of the gain or loss on a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as a cash flow hedging instrument as a component of other comprehensive income. We reclassify the effective portion of the gain or loss on these derivative instruments into income in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument resulting from hedge ineffectiveness, if any, must be recognized currently in earnings.

Fair value hedges pertain to derivative instruments that qualify as a hedge of exposures to changes in the fair value of a firm commitment or assets and liabilities recognized on the balance sheet. For fair value hedges, we reflect the gain or loss on the derivative instrument in earnings in the period of change together with the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item. The effect of that accounting is to reflect in earnings the extent to which the hedge is not effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value.

As of December 31, 2006, we designated and accounted for all derivative instruments, including foreign exchange contracts and options, and commodities futures contracts, as cash flow hedges.

We adopted SFAS No. 133, as amended, as of January 1, 2001. Additional information regarding accounting policies associated with derivative instruments is contained in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.

The information below summarizes our market risks associated with long-term debt and derivative instruments outstanding as of December 31, 2006. Note 1, Note 5 and Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provide additional information.

Long-Term Debt

The table below presents the principal cash flows and related interest rates by maturity date for long-term debt, including the current portion, as of December 31, 2006. We determined the fair value of long-term debt based upon quoted market prices for the same or similar debt issues.

 

     Maturity Date
     2007     2008     2009     2010     2011     Thereafter     Total     Fair Value
In thousands of dollars except for rates                              

Long-term Debt

   $ 188,765     $ 144     $ 147     $ 136     $ 250,000     $ 997,701     $ 1,436,893     $ 1,519,067

Interest Rate

     6.3 %     2.0 %     2.0 %     2.0 %     5.3 %     6.3 %     6.1 %  

We calculated the interest rates on variable rate obligations using the rates in effect as of December 31, 2006.

Interest Rate Swaps

In order to minimize financing costs and to manage interest rate exposure, from time to time, we enter into interest rate swap agreements.

In December 2005, we entered into forward swap agreements to hedge interest rate exposure related to $500 million of te