10-K 1 d10k.htm FORM 10-K FORM 10-K
Table of Contents

FORM 10-K

 


 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

x Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

 

OR

 

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the transition period from              to             

 

Commission file number 1-13100

 


 

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

Maryland   56-1871668

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 600

Raleigh, N.C. 27604

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

919-872-4924

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 


 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class


 

Name of Each Exchange on

Which Registered


Common Stock, $.01 par value   New York Stock Exchange
8 5/8% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares   New York Stock Exchange
8% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares   New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

NONE

 


 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Exchange Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K.  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

The aggregate market value of the shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, held by non-affiliates (based upon the closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange) on June 30, 2005 was approximately $1.6 billion. As of November 30, 2005, there were 54,030,309 shares of common stock outstanding.

 



Table of Contents

HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item No.


       Page No.

   

PART I

    

1.      

  Business    4

1A.      

  Risk Factors    7

1B.      

  Unresolved Staff Comments    11

2.      

  Properties    12

3.      

  Legal Proceedings    17

4.      

  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders    17

X.      

  Executive Officers of the Registrant    18
   

PART II

    

5.      

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   20

6.      

 

Selected Financial Data

   21

7.      

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   22

7A.      

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   52

8.      

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   52

9.      

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   53

9A.      

 

Controls and Procedures

   53

9B.      

 

Other Information

   58
   

PART III

    

10.      

 

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

   59

11.      

 

Executive Compensation

   63

12.      

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   72

13.      

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

   73

14.      

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   74
   

PART IV

    

15.      

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

   77

 

2


Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE

 

This 2004 Annual Report of Highwoods Properties, Inc. is being mailed to stockholders on or about December 29, 2005. Unlike in prior years, this mailing does not include an accompanying proxy statement or proxy card relating to an annual meeting of stockholders. As a result, substantially all of the information that has historically been incorporated by reference from an accompanying proxy statement has been included directly in this Annual Report. This information is set forth in Part II, Item 5, and Part III, Items 9B, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this Annual Report.

 

As discussed more fully in “ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION,” we expect that our next annual meeting will be held during May 2006, although the exact date will be determined by our Board of Directors in the future. Prior to that meeting, we will mail to stockholders a proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the meeting together with our 2005 Annual Report.

 

If you have any questions, please contact us as follows:

 

Highwoods Properties, Inc.

Investor Relations

3100 Smoketree Court

Suite 600

Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

Phone: (919) 872-4924

 

3


Table of Contents

PART I

 

We refer to (1) Highwoods Properties, Inc. as the “Company,” (2) Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership as the “Operating Partnership,” (3) the Company’s common stock as “Common Stock,” (4) the Company’s preferred stock as “Preferred Stock,” (5) the Operating Partnership’s common partnership interests as “Common Units,” (6) the Operating Partnership’s preferred partnership interests as “Preferred Units” and (7) in-service properties (excluding apartment units) to which the Company has title and 100.0% ownership rights as the “Wholly Owned Properties.”

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

 

General

 

The Company is a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed equity REIT that began operations through a predecessor in 1978. We are one of the largest owners and operators of suburban office, industrial and retail properties in the southeastern and midwestern United States. At December 31, 2004, we:

 

    wholly owned 444 in-service office, industrial and retail properties, encompassing approximately 33.9 million rentable square feet, and 125 apartment units;

 

    owned an interest (50.0% or less) in 66 in-service office and industrial properties, encompassing approximately 6.9 million rentable square feet, and 418 apartment units. One of these in-service properties has been sold but is consolidated at December 31, 2004 as a result of our continuing involvement in accordance with SFAS No. 66. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the Company’s accounting policy for investments in joint ventures;

 

    wholly owned 1,115 acres of undeveloped land that is suitable to develop approximately 14 million rentable square feet of office, industrial and retail space;

 

    were developing an additional eight properties, which will encompass approximately 1.1 million rentable square feet (including four properties encompassing 430,000 rentable square feet that we are developing with 50.0% joint venture partners); and

 

    owned a 50.0% interest in a joint venture that is developing a multi-family property, consisting of 156 apartment units on 7.8 acres of land, and that is consolidated under provisions of FIN 46.

 

The Company conducts substantially all of its activities through, and substantially all of its interests in the properties are held directly or indirectly by, the Operating Partnership. The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. At December 31, 2004, the Company owned 100.0% of the Preferred Units and 89.8% of the Common Units in the Operating Partnership. Limited partners (including certain officers and directors of the Company) own the remaining Common Units. Each Common Unit is redeemable by the holder for the cash value of one share of Common Stock or, at the Company’s option, one share of Common Stock. The Preferred Units in the Operating Partnership were issued to the Company in connection with the Company’s Preferred Stock offerings that occurred in 1997 and 1998.

 

The Company was incorporated in Maryland in 1994. The Operating Partnership was formed in North Carolina in 1994. Our executive offices are located at 3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 600, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 and our telephone number is (919) 872-4924. We maintain offices in each of our primary markets.

 

The business of the Company is the acquisition, development and operation of rental real estate properties. The Company operates office, industrial and retail properties and apartment units. There are no material inter-segment transactions. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of the rental income, net operating income and assets for each reportable segment.

 

In addition to this Annual Report, we file or furnish quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. All documents that we file or furnish with the SEC are made available as soon as reasonably practicable free of charge on our corporate website, which is http://www.highwoods.com. The information on this website is not and should not be considered part of this Annual Report and is not incorporated by reference in this document. This website is only intended to be an inactive textual reference. You may also read and

 

4


Table of Contents

copy any document that we file or furnish at the public reference facilities of the SEC at 100 F. Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at (800) 732-0330 for further information about the public reference facilities. These documents also may be accessed through the SEC’s electronic data gathering, analysis and retrieval system (“EDGAR”) via electronic means, including the SEC’s home page on the Internet (http://www.sec.gov). In addition, since some of our securities are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, you can read similar information about us at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange at 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.

 

Customers

 

The following table sets forth information concerning the 20 largest customers of our Wholly Owned Properties as of December 31, 2004:

 

Customer


   Rental
Square Feet


   Annualized
Rental Revenue (1)


   Percent of Total
Annualized
Rental Revenue (1)


    Weighted Average
Remaining Lease
Term in Years


          (in thousands)           

Federal Government

   789,696    $ 16,466    3.87 %   6.7

AT&T (2)

   537,529      10,008    2.35     4.1

PricewaterhouseCoopers

   297,795      7,385    1.74     5.3

State of Georgia

   361,687      7,070    1.66     4.2

T-Mobile USA

   205,394      4,757    1.12     4.5

Sara Lee

   1,195,383      4,682    1.10     2.7

IBM

   194,649      4,100    0.96     1.2

Northern Telecom

   246,000      3,651    0.86     3.2

Volvo

   270,774      3,483    0.82     4.6

US Airways (3)

   295,046      3,376    0.79     3.0

Lockton Companies

   132,718      3,303    0.78     10.2

BB&T

   229,459      3,252    0.77     6.7

CHS Professional Services

   168,436      2,994    0.70     2.1

ITC Deltacom (4)

   147,379      2,989    0.70     0.4

Ford Motor Company

   125,989      2,729    0.64     5.1

IKON

   181,361      2,610    0.61     1.7

MCI (5)

   127,268      2,533    0.60     1.5

Hartford Insurance

   116,010      2,508    0.59     1.8

Aspect Communications

   116,692      2,343    0.55     1.9

Jacob’s Engineering

   229,626      2,258    0.53     11.3
    
  

  

 

Total (6)

   5,968,891    $ 92,497    21.74 %   4.5
    
  

  

 

(1) Annualized Rental Revenue is rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass-throughs) for the month of December 2004 multiplied by 12.
(2) According to recently published information, the merger of AT&T and SBC Communications, Inc. was completed on November 18, 2005. At December 31, 2004, SBC Communications, Inc. leased 5,119 square feet from us with $0.1 million in annualized revenue.
(3) On September 12, 2004, US Airways filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11. US Airways’ plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 was approved by the US Bankruptcy Court on September 16, 2005, and US Airways completed a merger with America West Airlines on September 27, 2005.
(4) ITC Deltacom (formerly Business Telecom) leased space in a property that was under contract for sale as of December 31, 2004 and which sale occurred in March 2005.
(5) According to recently published information, the acquisition of MCI, Inc. by Verizon Communications Inc. is expected to be completed later in 2005 or early in 2006.
(6) Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as financings under SFAS No. 66. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

Operating Strategy

 

Efficient, Customer Service-Oriented Organization. We provide a complete line of real estate services to our customers and third parties. We believe that our in-house development, acquisition, construction management, leasing and property management services allow us to respond to the many demands of our existing and potential customer base. We provide our customers with cost-effective services such as build-to-suit construction and space modification, including tenant improvements and expansions. In addition, the breadth of our capabilities and resources provides us with market information not generally available. We believe that the operating efficiencies achieved through our fully integrated organization also provide a competitive advantage in setting our lease rates and pricing other services.

 

Capital Recycling Program. Our strategy has been to focus our real estate activities in markets where we believe our extensive local knowledge gives us a competitive advantage over other real estate developers and operators. Through our capital recycling program, we generally seek to:

 

    selectively dispose of non-core properties in order to use the net proceeds to improve our balance sheet by reducing outstanding debt and preferred stock balances, for new investments or other purposes;

 

    engage in the development of office and industrial projects in our existing geographic markets, primarily in suburban in-fill business parks; and

 

    acquire selective suburban office and industrial properties in our existing geographic markets at prices below replacement cost that offer attractive returns.

 

Our capital recycling activities benefit from our local market presence and knowledge. Our division officers have significant real estate experience in their respective markets. Based on this experience, we believe that we are in a better position to evaluate capital recycling opportunities than many of our competitors. In addition, our relationships with our customers and those tenants at properties for which we conduct third-party fee-based services may lead to development projects when these tenants seek new space.

 

The following summarizes the changes in square footage in our Wholly Owned Properties during each of the three years ended December 31, 2004:

 

     2004

    2003

    2002

 
     (rentable square feet in thousands)  

Office, Industrial and Retail Properties:

                  

Dispositions (includes 225 in 2002 related to the Eastshore transaction)

   (1,263 )   (3,298 )   (2,270 )

Contributions to Joint Ventures (includes 205 related to SF-HIW Harborview, LLP in 2002)

   (1,270 )(1)   (291 )   (205 )

Developments Placed In-Service

   141     191     2,214  

Redevelopment/Other

   (21 )   (221 )   (52 )

Acquisitions (1)

   1,357     1,429     205  
    

 

 

Net Change of In-Service Wholly Owned Properties

   (1,056 )   (2,190 )   (108 )
    

 

 


(1) Includes 1,270,000 square feet of properties in Orlando, Florida acquired from MG-HIW, LLP in March 2004 and contributed to HIW-KC Orlando, LLC in June 2004.

 

In addition, we sold 88 apartment units during 2004.

 

Conservative and Flexible Balance Sheet. We are committed to maintaining a conservative and flexible balance sheet that allows us to capitalize on favorable development and acquisition opportunities as they arise. Accordingly, we expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements through a combination of any one or more of:

 

    cash flow from operating activities;

 

    borrowings under our $250.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Loan”);

 

6


Table of Contents
    the issuance of unsecured debt;

 

    the issuance of secured debt;

 

    the issuance of equity securities by both the Company and the Operating Partnership;

 

    the selective disposition of non-core land and other assets; and

 

    private equity capital raised from unrelated joint venture partners that may involve the sale or contribution of our Wholly Owned Properties, development projects or development land to joint ventures formed with such partners.

 

Geographic Diversification. We do not believe that our operations are significantly dependent upon any particular geographic market. Today, including our various joint ventures, our portfolio consists primarily of office properties throughout the Southeast and retail and office properties in Kansas City, Missouri, including one significant mixed retail and office property, and office properties in Des Moines, Iowa (joint venture).

 

Competition

 

Our properties compete for tenants with similar properties located in our markets primarily on the basis of location, rent, services provided and the design and condition of the facilities. We also compete with other REITs, financial institutions, pension funds, partnerships, individual investors and others when attempting to acquire, develop and operate properties.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2004, the Company employed 553 persons.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in our equity and debt securities involves various risks. All investors should carefully consider the following risk factors in conjunction with the other information contained in this Annual Report before trading in our securities. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, operating results, prospects and financial condition could be harmed.

 

Our performance is subject to risks associated with real estate investment. We are a real estate company that derives most of our income from the ownership and operation of our properties. There are a number of factors that may adversely affect the income that our properties generate, including the following:

 

    Economic Downturns. Downturns in the national economy, particularly in the Southeast, generally will negatively impact the demand and rental rates for our properties.

 

    Oversupply of Space. An oversupply of space in our markets would typically cause rental rates and occupancies to decline, making it more difficult for us to lease space at attractive rental rates.

 

    Competitive Properties. If our properties are not as attractive to tenants (in terms of rents, services, condition or location) as other properties that are competitive with ours, we could lose tenants to those properties or receive lower rental rates.

 

    Renovation Costs. In order to maintain the quality of our properties and successfully compete against other properties, we periodically have to spend money to maintain, repair and renovate our properties.

 

    Customer Risk. Our performance depends on our ability to collect rent from our customers. While our top customer accounted for less than 4.0% of our total revenue at December 31, 2004, our financial condition could nonetheless be adversely affected by financial difficulties experienced by a major customer, or by a number of smaller customers, including bankruptcies, insolvencies or general downturns in business.

 

7


Table of Contents
    Reletting Costs. As leases expire, we try to either relet the space to the existing customer or attract a new customer to occupy the space. In either case, we likely will incur significant costs in the process, including potentially substantial tenant improvement expense or lease incentives. In addition, if market rents have declined since the time the expiring lease was executed, the terms of any new lease signed likely will not be as favorable to us as the terms of the expiring lease, thereby reducing the rental revenue earned from that space.

 

    Regulatory Costs. There are a number of government regulations, including zoning, tax and accessibility laws that apply to the ownership and operation of real estate properties. Compliance with existing and newly adopted regulations may require us to incur significant costs on our properties.

 

    Fixed Nature of Costs. Most of the costs associated with owning and operating our properties are not necessarily reduced when circumstances such as market factors and competition cause a reduction in rental revenues from the property. Increases in such fixed operating expenses, such as increased real estate taxes, would reduce our net income.

 

    Environmental Problems. Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require a current or previous owner or operator of real property to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at the property. The clean up can be costly. The presence of or failure to clean up contamination may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease a property or to borrow funds using a property as collateral.

 

    Competition. A number of other major real estate investors with significant capital compete with us. These competitors include publicly-traded REITs, private REITs, private real estate investors and private institutional investment funds.

 

Future acquisitions and development properties may fail to perform in accordance with our expectations and may require development and renovation costs exceeding our estimates. In the normal course of business, we typically evaluate potential acquisitions, enter into non-binding letters of intent, and may, at any time, enter into contracts to acquire additional properties. However, changing market conditions, including competition from others, may diminish our opportunities for making attractive acquisitions. Once made, our investments may fail to perform in accordance with our expectations. In addition, the renovation and improvement costs we incur in bringing an acquired property up to market standards may exceed our estimates. Although we anticipate financing future acquisitions and renovations through a combination of advances under the Revolving Loan and other forms of secured or unsecured financing, no assurance can be given that we will have the financial resources to make suitable acquisitions or renovations on favorable terms or at all.

 

In addition to acquisitions, we periodically consider developing and constructing properties. Risks associated with development and construction activities include:

 

    the unavailability of favorable financing;

 

    construction costs exceeding original estimates;

 

    construction and lease-up delays resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs; and

 

    insufficient occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property causing a property to be unprofitable.

 

If new developments are financed through construction loans, there is a risk that, upon completion of construction, permanent financing for newly developed properties will not be available or will be available only on disadvantageous terms. Development activities are also subject to risks relating to our inability to obtain, or delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other required governmental and utility company authorizations.

 

Illiquidity of real estate investments and the tax effect of dispositions could significantly impede our ability to sell assets or to respond to favorable or adverse changes in the performance of our properties. Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, our ability to promptly sell one or more properties in our

 

8


Table of Contents

portfolio in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions is limited. In addition, approximately $1.3 billion of our real assets (undepreciated book value) are encumbered by $822.6 million in mortgage loans as of December 31, 2004 under which we could incur significant prepayment penalties if such loans were paid off in connection with the sale of the underlying real estate assets. Such loans, even if assumed by a buyer rather than being paid off, could reduce the sale proceeds if we decided to sell such assets.

 

We intend to continue to sell some of our properties in the future. However, we cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We also cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property.

 

Certain of our properties have low tax bases relative to their fair value, and accordingly, the sale of such assets would generate significant taxable gains unless we sold such properties in a tax-free exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code or another tax-free or tax-deferred transaction. For an exchange to qualify for tax-deferred treatment under Section 1031, the net proceeds from the sale of a property must be held by an escrow agent until applied toward the purchase of real estate qualifying for gain deferral. Given the competition for properties meeting our investment criteria, there could be a delay in reinvesting such proceeds. Any delay in using the reinvestment proceeds to acquire additional income producing assets would reduce our income from operations.

 

In addition, the sale of certain properties acquired in the J.C. Nichols Company merger in July 1998 would require us to pay corporate-level tax under Section 1374 of the Internal Revenue Code on the built-in gain relating to such properties unless we sold such properties in a tax-free exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code or another tax-free or tax-deferred transaction. This tax will no longer apply after we have owned the assets for ten years or more. As a result, we may be limited or restricted in our ability to sell any of these properties even if management determines that such a sale would otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. Although we have no current plans to dispose of any properties in a manner that would require us to pay corporate-level tax under Section 1374, we would consider doing so if our management determines that a sale of a property would be in our best interests based on consideration of a number of factors, including the price being offered for the property, the operating performance of the property, the tax consequences of the sale and other factors and circumstances surrounding the proposed sale.

 

Because holders of our Common Units, including some of our officers and directors, may suffer adverse tax consequences upon the sale of some of our properties, it is possible that the Company may sometimes make decisions that are not in your best interest. Holders of Common Units may suffer adverse tax consequences upon the Company’s sale of certain properties. Therefore, holders of Common Units, including certain of our officers and directors, may have different objectives than our stockholders regarding the appropriate pricing and timing of a property’s sale. Although we are the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and have the exclusive authority to sell all of our individual Wholly Owned Properties, officers and directors who hold Common Units may seek to influence us not to sell certain properties even if such sale might be financially advantageous to stockholders or influence us to enter into tax deferred exchanges with the proceeds of such sales when such a reinvestment might not otherwise be in the best interests of the Company.

 

The success of our joint venture activity depends upon our ability to work effectively with financially sound partners. Instead of owning properties directly, we have in some cases invested, and may continue to invest, as a partner or a co-venturer with one or more third parties. Under certain circumstances, this type of investment may involve risks not otherwise present, including the possibility that a partner or co-venturer might become bankrupt or that a partner or co-venturer might have business interests or goals inconsistent with ours. Also, such a partner or co-venturer may take action contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to provisions in our joint venture agreements that could harm us, including jeopardizing our qualification as a REIT.

 

Our insurance coverage on our properties may be inadequate. We carry comprehensive insurance on all of our properties, including insurance for liability, fire and flood. Insurance companies, however, limit coverage against certain types of losses, such as losses due to terrorist acts, named windstorms and toxic mold. Thus, we may not have insurance coverage, or sufficient insurance coverage, against certain types of losses and/or there may be decreases in the limits of insurance available. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of our insured limits occur, we could lose all or a portion of the capital we have invested in a property or properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the property or properties. If any of our properties were to experience a catastrophic loss, it could disrupt our operations, delay revenue and result in large expenses to repair or rebuild the property. Such events could adversely affect our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders. Our existing property and casualty insurance policies have been renewed through June 30, 2006.

 

9


Table of Contents

Our use of debt to finance our operations could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and ability to make distributions. We are subject to risks normally associated with debt financing, such as the insufficiency of cash flow to meet required payment obligations, difficulty in complying with financial ratios and other covenants and the inability to refinance existing indebtedness. Increases in interest rates on our variable rate debt would increase our interest expense. If we fail to comply with the financial ratios and other covenants under our Revolving Loan, we would likely not be able to borrow any further amounts under the Revolving Loan, which could adversely affect our ability to fund our operations, and our lenders could accelerate outstanding debt. Unwaived defaults, if any, under our debt instruments could result in an acceleration of some of our outstanding debt. If our debt cannot be paid, refinanced or extended at maturity, in addition to our failure to repay our debt, we may not be able to pay dividends to stockholders at expected levels or at all. Furthermore, if any refinancing is done at higher interest rates, the increased interest expense could adversely affect our cash flow and ability to pay dividends to stockholders. Any such refinancing could also impose tighter financial ratios and other covenants that could restrict our ability to take actions that could otherwise be in our stockholders’ best interest, such as funding new development activity, making opportunistic acquisitions, repurchasing our securities or paying distributions. If we do not meet our mortgage financing obligations, any properties securing such indebtedness could be foreclosed on, which would have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and ability to make distributions.

 

We may be subject to taxation as a regular corporation if we fail to maintain our REIT status. Our failure to qualify as a REIT would have serious adverse consequences to our stockholders. Many of the requirements for taxation as a REIT are highly technical and complex and depend upon various factual matters and circumstances that may not be totally within our control. For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95.0% of our gross income must come from certain sources that are itemized in the REIT tax laws. We are also required to distribute to stockholders at least 90.0% of our REIT taxable income, excluding capital gains. The fact that we hold our assets through the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. Furthermore, Congress and the IRS might change the tax laws and regulations and the courts might issue new rulings that make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to remain qualified as a REIT.

 

If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. Also, unless the IRS granted us relief under certain statutory provisions, we would remain disqualified as a REIT for four years following the year we first failed to qualify. If we failed to qualify as a REIT, we would have to pay significant income taxes and would, therefore, have less cash available for investments or to pay dividends to stockholders. This would likely have a significant adverse effect on the value of our securities. In addition, we would no longer be required to pay dividends to stockholders if we lost our REIT status.

 

Because provisions contained in Maryland law, our charter and our bylaws may have an anti-takeover effect, investors may be prevented from receiving a “control premium” for their shares. Provisions contained in our charter and bylaws as well as Maryland general corporation law may have anti-takeover effects that delay, defer or prevent a takeover attempt, and thereby prevent stockholders from receiving a “control premium” for their shares. For example, these provisions may defer or prevent tender offers for our Common Stock or purchases of large blocks of our Common Stock, thus limiting the opportunities for our stockholders to receive a premium for their Common Stock over then-prevailing market prices. These provisions include the following:

 

    Ownership limit. Our charter prohibits direct or constructive ownership by any person of more than 9.8% of our outstanding capital stock. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of our capital stock in excess of the ownership limit without the consent of our Board of Directors will be void.

 

    Preferred Stock. Our charter authorizes our Board of Directors to issue Preferred Stock in one or more classes and to establish the preferences and rights of any class of Preferred Stock issued. These actions can be taken without soliciting stockholder approval. The issuance of Preferred Stock could have the effect of delaying or preventing someone from taking control of us, even if a change in control were in our stockholders’ best interest.

 

10


Table of Contents
    Staggered board. Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes. As a result, each director generally serves for a three-year term. This staggering of our Board may discourage offers for us or make an acquisition of us more difficult, even when an acquisition is in the best interest of our stockholders.

 

    Maryland control share acquisition statute. Maryland law limits the voting rights of “control shares” of a corporation in the event of a “control share acquisition.”

 

    Maryland unsolicited takeover statute. Under Maryland law, our Board of Directors could adopt various anti-takeover provisions without the consent of stockholders. The adoption of such measures could discourage offers for us or make an acquisition of us more difficult, even when an acquisition is in the best interest of our stockholders.

 

    Anti-takeover protections of Operating Partnership agreement. Upon a change in control of the Company, the limited partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership requires certain acquirors to maintain an UPREIT structure with terms at least as favorable to the limited partners as are currently in place. For instance, the acquiror would be required to preserve the limited partner’s right to continue to hold tax-deferred partnership interests that are redeemable for capital stock of the acquirer. Some change of control transactions involving the Company could require the approval of two-thirds of the limited partners of the Operating Partnership (other than the Company). These provisions may make a change of control transaction involving the Company more complicated and therefore might limit the possibility of such a transaction occurring, even if such a transaction would be in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders.

 

    Dilutive effect of stockholder rights plan. We currently have in effect a stockholder rights plan pursuant to which our existing stockholders would have the ability to acquire additional Common Stock at a significant discount in the event a person or group attempts to acquire us on terms of which our Board of Directors does not approve. These rights are designed to deter a hostile takeover by increasing the takeover cost. As a result, such rights could discourage offers for us or make an acquisition of us more difficult, even when an acquisition is in the best interest of our stockholders. The rights plan should not interfere with any merger or other business combination the Board of Directors approves since we may generally terminate the plan at any time at nominal cost.

 

SEC investigation. As previously disclosed, the SEC’s Division of Enforcement has issued a confidential formal order of investigation in connection with the Company’s previous restatement of its financial results. Even though we are cooperating fully, we cannot assure you that the SEC’s Division of Enforcement will not take any action that would adversely affect us.

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

11


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

Wholly Owned Properties

 

As of December 31, 2004, we owned 100.0% interests in 444 in-service office, industrial and retail properties, encompassing approximately 33.9 million rentable square feet, and 125 apartment units. The following table sets forth information about our Wholly Owned Properties at December 31, 2004:

 

Market


  

Rentable

Square Feet


   

Occupancy


    Percentage of Annualized Rental Revenue (1)

 
       Office

    Industrial

    Retail

    Total

 

Raleigh (2)

   4,597,000     83.8 %   15.7 %   0.2 %   —       15.9 %

Atlanta

   6,826,000     83.7     11.7     3.1     —       14.8  

Tampa

   4,196,000     71.0     13.4     —       —       13.4  

Kansas City

   2,308,000 (3)   94.1     4.2     —       8.5 %   12.7  

Nashville

   2,870,000     93.3     11.9     —       —       11.9  

Piedmont Triad (4)

   6,651,000     92.5     6.3     4.2     —       10.5  

Richmond

   1,835,000     94.1     7.0     —       —       7.0  

Memphis

   1,216,000     83.2     4.5     —       —       4.5  

Charlotte

   1,492,000     72.9     3.9     —       —       3.9  

Greenville

   1,127,000     80.5     3.1     0.1     —       3.2  

Columbia

   426,000     60.4     1.0     —       —       1.0  

Orlando

   222,000     93.3     0.9     —       —       0.9  

Other

   100,000     61.3     0.3     —       —       0.3  
    

 

 

 

 

 

Total (5)

   33,866,000     85.0 %   83.9 %   7.6 %   8.5 %   100.0 %
    

 

 

 

 

 


(1) Annualized Rental Revenue is rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass-throughs) for the month of December 2004 multiplied by 12.
(2) Raleigh market encompasses the Raleigh, Cary and Durham metropolitan area.
(3) Excludes basement space in the Country Club Plaza property of 430,000 square feet.
(4) Piedmont Triad market encompasses the Greensboro and Winston-Salem metropolitan area.
(5) Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as financings under SFAS No. 66.

 

12


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information about our Wholly Owned Properties and our development properties as of December 31, 2004 and 2003:

 

     December 31, 2004

    December 31, 2003

 
     Rentable
Square Feet


  

Percent
Leased/

Pre-Leased


    Rentable
Square Feet


   Percent
Leased/
Pre-Leased


 

In-Service:

                      

Office (1)

   24,628,000    82.7 %   25,303,000    79.2 %

Industrial

   7,829,000    90.2     8,092,000    85.7  

Retail (2)

   1,409,000    97.3     1,527,000    96.3  
    
  

 
  

Total or Weighted Average

   33,866,000    85.0 %   34,922,000    81.5 %
    
  

 
  

Development:

                      

Completed—Not Stabilized (3)

                      

Office (1)

   —      —       140,000    36.0 %

Industrial

   353,000    100.0 %   —      —    
    
  

 
  

Total or Weighted Average

   353,000    100.0 %   140,000    36.0 %
    
  

 
  

In Process (4)

                      

Office (1)

   358,000    100.0 %   112,000    100.0 %

Industrial

   —      —       350,000    100.0  

Retail

   9,600    44.0     —      —    
    
  

 
  

Total or Weighted Average

   367,600    98.5 %   462,000    100.0 %
    
  

 
  

Total:

                      

Office (1)

   24,986,000          25,555,000       

Industrial

   8,182,000          8,442,000       

Retail (2)

   1,418,600          1,527,000       
    
        
      

Total or Weighted Average (4) (5)

   34,586,600          35,524,000       
    
        
      

(1) Substantially all of our office properties are located in suburban markets.
(2) Excludes basement space in the Country Club Plaza property of 430,000 square feet.
(3) Not stabilized is defined as less than 95.0% occupied or less than a year from completion.
(4) Excludes a 156-unit multi-family residential development that is 50.0% owned and which is consolidated under the provisions of FIN 46. This development commenced in late 2004.
(5) Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as financings or profit sharing arrangements under SFAS No. 66.

 

Development Land

 

We estimate that we can develop approximately 14 million square feet of office, industrial and retail space on our 1,115 acres of development land that was wholly owned as of December 31, 2004. All of this development land is zoned and available for office, industrial or retail development, substantially all of which has utility infrastructure already in place. We believe that our commercially zoned and unencumbered land in existing business parks gives us a development advantage over other commercial real estate development companies in many of our markets. Any future development, however, is dependent on the demand for office, industrial or retail space in the area, the availability of favorable financing and other factors, and no assurance can be given that any construction will take place on the development land. In addition, if construction is undertaken on the development land, we will be subject to the risks associated with construction activities, including the risks that occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property may not be sufficient to make the property profitable, construction costs may exceed original estimates and construction and lease-up may not be completed on schedule, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction expense. We may also develop properties other than office, industrial and retail on certain parcels with unrelated joint venture partners. We consider slightly less than half of our development land to be non-core assets as such excess land is not necessary for our foreseeable future development needs. We are actively working to dispose of such non-core development land through sales to other parties or contributions to joint ventures.

 

13


Table of Contents

Other Properties

 

As of December 31, 2004, we owned an interest (50.0% or less) in 66 in-service office and industrial properties, one of which we have a 20.0% joint venture interest, but such property is consolidated as a result of our continuing involvement with the property. The properties encompass approximately 6.9 million rentable square feet and 418 apartment units. These properties exclude approximately 431,000 square feet of properties under development that have not yet achieved stabilization. The following table sets forth information about these properties at December 31, 2004:

 

Market


  

Rentable

Square Feet


   

Occupancy


    Percentage of Annualized Rental Revenue (1)

 
       Office

    Industrial

    Retail

    Multi-Family

    Total

 

Des Moines

   2,253,000 (2)   91.4 %(3)   28.6 %   3.6 %   1.0 %   3.5 %   36.7 %

Orlando

   1,683,000     89.7     25.7     —       —       —       25.7  

Atlanta

   835,000     92.5     12.9     —       —       —       12.9  

Raleigh (4)

   455,000     99.5     3.7     —       —       —       3.7  

Kansas City

   428,000     86.4     8.4     —       —       —       8.4  

Piedmont Triad (5)

   364,000     100.0     4.0     —       —       —       4.0  

Tampa

   205,000     99.1     2.1     —       —       —       2.1  

Charlotte

   148,000     100.0     0.8     —       —       —       0.8  

Richmond

   413,000     99.7     5.2     —       —       —       5.2  

Other

   110,000     100.0     0.5     —       —       —       0.5  
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

   6,894,000     92.9 %   91.9 %   3.6 %   1.0 %   3.5 %   100.0 %
    

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1) Annualized Rental Revenue is rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass-throughs) for the month of December 2004 multiplied by 12.
(2) Excludes Des Moines’ apartment units.
(3) Excludes Des Moines’ apartment occupancy percentage of 95.7%.
(4) Raleigh market encompasses the Raleigh, Cary and Durham metropolitan area.
(5) Piedmont Triad market encompasses the Greensboro and Winston-Salem metropolitan area.

 

As of December 31, 2004, we owned 50.0% interests in two joint ventures that are developing 430,000 rentable square feet of office properties. The following table sets forth information about these properties at December 31, 2004 ($ in thousands):

 

Property


   %
Ownership


  Market

   Rentable
Square
Feet


   Anticipated
Total
Investment


    Investment
at
12/31/2004


    Pre-leasing

    Actual
Completion
Date


   Actual or
Estimated
Stabilization
Date


Plaza Colonnade, LLC

   50.0%   Kansas City    285,000    $ 71,500 (1)   $ 65,099 (1)   76.0 %   4Q04    3Q05

Summit

   50.0%   Des Moines    35,000      3,559       3,435     75.0     3Q04    3Q05

Pinehurst

   50.0%   Des Moines    35,000      3,559       3,497     79.0     3Q04    3Q05

Sonoma

   50.0%   Des Moines    75,000      9,364       202     —        2Q05    2Q06
             
  


 


 

        

Total or Weighted Average

            430,000    $ 87,982     $ 72,233     63.0 %         
             
  


 


 

        

(1) Includes $16.2 million in investment cost that has been funded by tax increment financing.

 

14


Table of Contents

Lease Expirations

 

The following tables set forth scheduled lease expirations for existing leases at our Wholly Owned Properties (excluding apartment units) as of December 31, 2004. The table includes the effects of any early renewals exercised by tenants as of December 31, 2004.

 

Office Properties (1):

 

Lease Expiring


   Rentable
Square Feet
Subject to
Expiring
Leases


   Percentage of
Leased
Square Footage
Represented by
Expiring Leases


    Annualized
Rental Revenue
Under Expiring
Leases (2)


  

Average
Annual

Rental Rate
Per Square
Foot for
Expirations


   Percent of
Annualized
Rental Revenue
Represented by
Expiring
Leases (2)


 
                ($ in thousands)            

2005 (3)

   3,114,226    15.2 %   $ 56,694    $ 18.20    15.9 %

2006

   3,179,399    15.5       59,037      18.57    16.6  

2007

   2,069,793    10.2       35,202      17.01    9.9  

2008

   3,111,840    15.3       50,196      16.13    14.1  

2009

   2,838,459    13.9       49,006      17.27    13.7  

2010

   1,913,500    9.4       34,812      18.19    9.8  

2011

   1,389,886    6.8       25,769      18.54    7.2  

2012

   766,121    3.8       14,066      18.36    3.9  

2013

   480,340    2.4       8,087      16.84    2.3  

2014

   419,418    2.1       7,868      18.76    2.2  

Thereafter

   1,099,229    5.4       15,834      14.40    4.4  
    
  

 

  

  

     20,382,211    100.0 %   $ 356,571    $ 17.49    100.0 %
    
  

 

  

  

Industrial Properties:

 

Lease Expiring


   Rentable
Square Feet
Subject to
Expiring
Leases


  

Percentage of
Leased

Square Footage
Represented by
Expiring Leases


    Annualized
Rental Revenue
Under Expiring
Leases (2)


   Average
Annual
Rental Rate
Per Square
Foot for
Expirations


   Percent of
Annualized
Rental Revenue
Represented by
Expiring
Leases (2)


 
                ($ in thousands)            

2005 (4)

   1,981,682    28.2 %   $ 8,377    $ 4.23    25.9 %

2006

   964,023    13.7       4,821      5.00    14.9  

2007

   1,897,292    26.9       8,746      4.61    27.1  

2008

   627,041    8.9       2,851      4.55    8.8  

2009

   644,325    9.1       3,598      5.58    11.1  

2010

   159,418    2.3       795      4.99    2.5  

2011

   150,822    2.1       713      4.73    2.2  

2012

   171,340    2.4       435      2.54    1.3  

2013

   102,384    1.5       621      6.07    1.9  

2014

   206,731    2.9       799      3.86    2.5  

Thereafter

   142,170    2.0       596      4.19    1.8  
    
  

 

  

  

     7,047,228    100.0 %   $ 32,352    $ 4.59    100.0 %
    
  

 

  

  


(1) Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as financings under SFAS No. 66.
(2) Annualized Rental Revenue is rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass-throughs) for the month of December 2004 multiplied by 12.
(3) Includes 104,000 square feet of leases that are on a month-to-month basis or 0.4% of total annualized rental revenue.
(4) Includes 212,000 square feet of leases that are on a month-to-month basis or 0.2% of total annualized rental revenue.

 

15


Table of Contents

Retail Properties:

 

Lease Expiring


   Rentable
Square Feet
Subject to
Expiring
Leases


   Percentage of
Leased
Square Footage
Represented by
Expiring Leases


    Annualized
Rental Revenue
Under Expiring
Leases (1)


  

Average
Annual

Rental Rate
Per Square
Foot for
Expirations


   Percent of
Annualized
Rental Revenue
Represented by
Expiring
Leases (1)


 
                ($ in thousands)            

2005 (2)

   64,184    4.7 %   $ 1,747    $ 27.22    4.8 %

2006

   101,607    7.4       2,498      24.58    6.9  

2007

   79,810    5.8       2,197      27.53    6.1  

2008

   131,003    9.6       3,711      28.33    10.3  

2009

   190,401    13.9       4,735      24.87    13.1  

2010

   88,790    6.5       2,989      33.66    8.3  

2011

   58,071    4.2       1,867      32.15    5.2  

2012

   140,336    10.2       3,923      27.95    10.9  

2013

   108,866    7.9       2,681      24.63    7.4  

2014

   83,349    6.1       1,570      18.84    4.3  

Thereafter

   324,988    23.7       8,212      25.27    22.7  
    
  

 

  

  

     1,371,405    100.0 %   $ 36,130    $ 26.35    100.0 %
    
  

 

  

  

Total (3):

                               

Lease Expiring


   Rentable
Square Feet
Subject to
Expiring
Leases


  

Percentage of
Leased

Square Footage
Represented by
Expiring Leases


    Annualized
Rental Revenue
Under Expiring
Leases (1)


   Average
Annual
Rental Rate
Per Square
Foot for
Expirations


   Percent of
Annualized
Rental Revenue
Represented by
Expiring
Leases (1)


 
                ($ in thousands)            

2005 (4)

   5,160,092    17.9 %   $ 66,818    $ 12.95    15.6 %

2006

   4,245,029    14.7       66,356      15.63    15.6  

2007

   4,046,895    14.1       46,145      11.40    10.9  

2008

   3,869,884    13.4       56,758      14.67    13.4  

2009

   3,673,185    12.8       57,339      15.61    13.5  

2010

   2,161,708    7.5       38,596      17.85    9.1  

2011

   1,598,779    5.6       28,349      17.73    6.7  

2012

   1,077,797    3.7       18,424      17.09    4.3  

2013

   691,590    2.4       11,389      16.47    2.7  

2014

   709,498    2.5       10,237      14.43    2.4  

Thereafter

   1,566,387    5.4       24,642      15.73    5.8  
    
  

 

  

  

     28,800,844    100.0 %   $ 425,053    $ 14.76    100.0 %
    
  

 

  

  


(1) Annualized Rental Revenue is rental revenue (base rent plus operating expense pass-throughs) for the month of December 2004 multiplied by 12.
(2) Includes 10,000 square feet of leases that are on a month-to-month basis or 0.1% of total annualized rental revenue.
(3) Excludes properties recorded on our Balance Sheet that were sold but accounted for as financings under SFAS No. 66.
(4) Includes 326,000 square feet of leases that are on a month-to-month basis or 0.7% of total annualized rental revenue.

 

16


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

We are from time to time a party to a variety of legal proceedings, claims and assessments arising in the ordinary course of our business. We regularly assess the liabilities and contingencies in connection with these matters based on the latest information available. For those matters where it is probable that we have incurred or will incur a loss and the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated, reserves are recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements. In other instances, because of the uncertainties related to both the probable outcome and amount or range of loss, a reasonable estimate of liability, if any, cannot be made. Based on the current expected outcome of any such matters, none of these proceedings, claims or assessments is expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Notwithstanding the above, as previously disclosed, the SEC’s Division of Enforcement has issued a confidential formal order of investigation in connection with the Company’s previous restatement of its financial results. Even though we are cooperating fully, we cannot assure you that the SEC’s Division of Enforcement will not take any action that would adversely affect us.

 

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

None.

 

17


Table of Contents

ITEM X. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to our executive officers:

 

Name


   Age

  

Position and Background


Edward J. Fritsch

   46    Director, President and Chief Executive Officer.
          Mr. Fritsch became our chief executive officer on July 1, 2004 and our president in December 2003. Prior to that, Mr. Fritsch was our chief operating officer from January 1998 to July 2004 and was a vice president and secretary from June 1994 to January 1998. Mr. Fritsch joined our predecessor in 1982 and was a partner of that entity at the time of our initial public offering in June 1994. Mr. Fritsch serves on the University of North Carolina’s Board of Visitors, the Board of Trustees of St. Timothy’s Episcopal School and the Board of Directors of the YMCA of the Triangle.

Michael E. Harris

   56    Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.
          Mr. Harris became chief operating officer in July 2004. Prior to that, Mr. Harris was a senior vice president and was responsible for our operations in Tennessee, Missouri, Kansas and Charlotte. Mr. Harris was executive vice president of Crocker Realty Trust prior to its merger with us in 1996. Before joining Crocker Realty Trust, Mr. Harris served as senior vice president, general counsel and chief financial officer of Towermarc Corporation, a privately owned real estate development firm. Mr. Harris is a member of the Advisory Board of Directors of SouthTrust Bank of Memphis and Allen & Hoshall, Inc.

Terry L. Stevens

   57    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
          Prior to joining us in December 2003, Mr. Stevens was executive vice president, chief financial officer and trustee for Crown American Realty Trust, a public company. Before joining Crown American Realty Trust, Mr. Stevens was director of financial systems development at AlliedSignal, Inc., a large multi-national manufacturer. Mr. Stevens was also an audit partner with Price Waterhouse for approximately seven years. Mr. Stevens currently serves as trustee, chairman of the Audit Committee and member of the Compensation and the Finance Committees of First Potomac Realty Trust, a public company.

Gene H. Anderson

   60    Director, Senior Vice President and Regional Manager.
          Mr. Anderson has been a senior vice president since our combination with Anderson Properties, Inc. in February 1997. Mr. Anderson manages our Atlanta and oversees our Triad operations. Mr. Anderson served as president of Anderson Properties, Inc. from 1978 to February 1997. Mr. Anderson was past president of the Georgia chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties and is a national board member of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties.

Michael F. Beale

   52    Senior Vice President and Regional Manager.
          Mr. Beale manages our Orlando and oversees our Tampa operations. Prior to joining us in 2000, Mr. Beale served as vice president of Koger Equity, Inc., where he was responsible for Koger’s acquisitions and developments throughout the Southeast. Mr. Beale is currently the president of the Central Florida Chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties and also serves on various committees for the Mid-Florida Economic Development Commission. Mr. Beale is a Certified Commercial Investment Member (CCIM).

 

18


Table of Contents

Name


   Age

  

Position and Background


Robert G. Cutlip

   56    Senior Vice President and Regional Manager.
          Mr. Cutlip manages our Raleigh and oversees our Richmond operations. Prior to joining us in September 2003, Mr. Cutlip was vice president of real estate for Progress Energy, a public company, where he was responsible for the development and facilities management in North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida. Before joining Progress Energy in 2001, Mr. Cutlip was executive vice president for the Carolinas and Tennessee Region of Duke Realty Corporation. Mr. Cutlip is chairman of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties.

Mack D. Pridgen III

   56    Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.
          Prior to joining us in 1997, Mr. Pridgen was a partner with Smith Helms Mulliss & Moore, L.L.P. and prior to that a partner with Arthur Andersen & Co. Mr. Pridgen is an attorney and a certified public accountant.

W. Brian Reames

   42    Senior Vice President and Regional Manager.
          Mr. Reames became senior vice president and regional manager in August 2004. Mr. Reames manages our Nashville and oversees our Memphis, Greenville and Columbia operations. Prior to that, Mr. Reames was vice president responsible for the Nashville division, a position he held since 1996. Mr. Reames was a partner and owner at Eakin & Smith, Inc., a Nashville-based office real estate firm, from 1989 until its merger with us in 1996.

 

19


Table of Contents

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

The Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “HIW.” The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low stock prices per share reported on the NYSE for the quarters indicated and the dividends paid per share during such quarter.

 

     2004

   2003

Quarter Ended


   High

   Low

   Dividend

   High

   Low

   Dividend

March 31

   $ 27.64    $ 25.40    $ .425    $ 22.38    $ 20.00    $ .585

June 30

     26.25      20.85      .425      22.77      20.17      .425

September 30

     25.08      22.67      .425      23.97      22.31      .425

December 31

     27.95      24.81      .425      26.02      24.32      .425

 

On November 30, 2005, the last reported stock price of the Common Stock on the NYSE was $28.83 per share and the Company had 1,567 stockholders of record.

 

The Company intends to continue to pay quarterly dividends to holders of shares of Common Stock and make distributions to holders of Common Units. Future dividends and distributions will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the actual funds from operations of the Company, its financial condition, capital requirements, the annual dividend requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources –Stockholder Dividends.”

 

During 2004, the Company’s Common Stock dividends totaled $1.70 per share, $1.30 of which represented return of capital for income tax purposes. The minimum dividend per share of Common Stock required for the Company to maintain its REIT status (excluding any net capital gains) was $0.00 in 2004 and $0.07 per share in 2003.

 

The Company did not issue any Common Stock during the fourth quarter of 2004 that was not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 nor did the Company repurchase any Common Stock or Preferred Stock during such period.

 

The Company has a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan under which holders of Common Stock may elect to automatically reinvest their dividends in additional shares of Common Stock and may make optional cash payments for additional shares of Common Stock. The administrator of the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan has been instructed by the Company to purchase Common Stock in the open market for purposes of satisfying the Company’s obligations thereunder. However, the Company may in the future elect to satisfy such obligations by issuing additional shares of Common Stock.

 

The Company has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan for all active employees. Generally, at the end of each three-month offering period, each participant’s account balance is applied to acquire shares of Common Stock at a cost that is calculated at 85.0% of the lower of the average closing price on the NYSE on the five consecutive days preceding the first day of the quarter or the five days preceding the last day of the quarter. Participants may contribute up to 25.0% of their pay. The Company issued 33,693 shares of Common Stock to employees under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan during 2004.

 

For information about our equity compensation plans, see “ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.”

 

20


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

The following selected financial data as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004 is derived from the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein. The selected financial data as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the two years ended December 31, 2001 is derived from previously issued financial statements adjusted for matters related to the restatement discussed below.

 

The Company has restated its results for the four-year period from 2000 to 2003 and the first three quarters of 2004. The restatement resulted from adjustments primarily related to the accounting for lease incentives, depreciation and amortization expense, straight-line ground lease expense on one ground lease, gain recognition on a 2003 land condemnation, accounting for an embedded derivative, land cost allocations, the write-off of undepreciated tenant improvements and commissions, capitalization of interest costs and internal leasing, construction and development costs on development properties, and purchase accounting for acquisitions completed in 1995 to 1998. Refer to Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the restatement adjustments. The information in the following table should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included herein ($ in thousands, except per share data):

 

     Year Ended December 31,

 
     2004

    2003

    2002

    2001

    2000

 
           (restated)     (restated)     (restated)     (restated)  

Rental and other revenues

   $ 464,724     $ 492,505     $ 510,415     $ 525,155     $ 515,892  

Operating expenses:

                                        

Rental property and other expenses

     168,431       172,838       166,255       165,178       153,635  

Depreciation and amortization

     132,417       139,101       136,451       123,989       112,193  

Impairment of assets held for use

     1,270       —         9,919       —         —    

General and administrative

     41,761       26,023       29,350       24,261       24,745  
    


 


 


 


 


Total operating expenses

     343,879       337,962       341,975       313,428       290,573  

Interest expense:

                                        

Contractual

     106,205       119,618       120,327       126,137       115,495  

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     3,698       4,398       3,646       4,030       2,660  

Financing obligations

     10,123       17,811       12,604       11,953       2,063  
    


 


 


 


 


Total interest expense

     120,026       141,827       136,577       142,120       120,218  

Other income/expense:

                                        

Interest and other income

     6,302       5,487       8,896       13,925       9,317  

Settlement of bankruptcy claim

     14,435       —         —         —         —    

Loss on debt extinguishments

     (12,457 )     (14,653 )     (360 )     —         (2,938 )

Gain on extinguishment of co-venture obligation

     —         16,301       —         2,463       —    
    


 


 


 


 


Total other income

     8,280       7,135       8,536       16,388       6,379  
    


 


 


 


 


Income before disposition of property, co-venture expense, minority interest and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

     9,099       19,851       40,399       85,995       111,480  

Gains on disposition of property, net

     21,636       9,552       22,772       16,560       1,533  

Co-venture expense

     —         (4,588 )     (7,730 )     (6,859 )     (158 )

Minority interest in the Operating Partnership

     (849 )     (3 )     (3,794 )     (9,027 )     (10,603 )

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

     7,398       4,760       5,422       7,162       2,623  
    


 


 


 


 


Income from continuing operations

     37,284       29,572       57,069       93,831       104,875  

Discontinued operations net of minority interest

     4,293       13,077       22,983       15,961       16,532  
    


 


 


 


 


Net income

     41,577       42,649       80,052       109,792       121,407  

Dividends on preferred stock

     (30,852 )     (30,852 )     (30,852 )     (31,500 )     (32,580 )

Excess of preferred stock carrying value over repurchase value

     —         —         —         1,012       —    
    


 


 


 


 


Net income available for common stockholders

   $ 10,725     $ 11,797     $ 49,200     $ 79,304     $ 88,827  
    


 


 


 


 


Net income per common share – basic:

                                        

Income/(loss) from continuing operations

   $ 0.12     $ (0.02 )   $ 0.50     $ 1.17     $ 1.22  
    


 


 


 


 


Net income

   $ 0.20     $ 0.22     $ 0.93     $ 1.47     $ 1.50  
    


 


 


 


 


Net income per common share – diluted:

                                        

Income/(loss) from continuing operations

   $ 0.12     $ (0.02 )   $ 0.50     $ 1.17     $ 1.22  
    


 


 


 


 


Net income

   $ 0.20     $ 0.22     $ 0.93     $ 1.46     $ 1.50  
    


 


 


 


 


Dividends declared per common share

   $ 1.70     $ 1.86     $ 2.34     $ 2.31     $ 2.25  
    


 


 


 


 


 

21


Table of Contents
     December 31,

     2004

   2003

   2002

   2001

   2000

          (restated)    (restated)    (restated)    (restated)

Balance Sheet Data:

                                  

Total assets

   $ 3,239,658    $ 3,513,224    $ 3,745,269    $ 3,950,918    $ 4,023,117

Total mortgages and notes payable

   $ 1,572,574    $ 1,718,274    $ 1,796,167    $ 1,964,312    $ 1,832,464

Financing obligations

   $ 65,309    $ 125,777    $ 122,666    $ 77,687    $ 75,166

Co-venture obligation

   $ —      $ —      $ 43,511    $ 40,482    $ 36,046

Cumulative redeemable preferred shares

   $ 377,445    $ 377,445    $ 377,445    $ 377,445    $ 397,500

Number of wholly owned in-service properties

     444      465      493      498      493

Total rentable square feet, in service - Wholly Owned Properties

     33,866,000      34,922,000      37,112,000      37,221,000      36,183,000

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.

 

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Some of the information in this Annual Report may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects under this section and under the heading “Business.” You can identify forward-looking statements by our use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue” or other similar words. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that our plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. When considering such forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the following important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement:

 

    speculative development activity by our competitors in our existing markets could result in an excessive supply of office, industrial and retail properties relative to tenant demand;

 

    the financial condition of our tenants could deteriorate;

 

    we may not be able to complete development, acquisition, reinvestment, disposition or joint venture projects as quickly or on as favorable terms as anticipated;

 

    we may not be able to lease or release space quickly or on as favorable terms as old leases;

 

    unexpected increases in interest rates would increase our debt service costs;

 

    we may not be able to meet our liquidity requirements on favorable terms;

 

    we could lose key executive officers; and

 

    our southeastern and midwestern markets may suffer unexpected declines in economic growth.

 

This list of risks and uncertainties, however, is not intended to be exhaustive. You should also review the other cautionary statements we make in “Business – Risk Factors” set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report.

 

Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect any future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

 

22


Table of Contents

OVERVIEW

 

We are a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed equity REIT that provides leasing, management, development, construction and other customer-related services for our properties and for third parties. As of December 31, 2004, we owned or had an interest in 510 in-service office, industrial and retail properties, encompassing approximately 40.8 million square feet and 543 apartment units. As of that date, we also owned 1,115 acres of development land, which is suitable to develop approximately 14 million rentable square feet of office, industrial and retail space. We are based in Raleigh, North Carolina, and our properties and development land are located in Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia.

 

As more fully described in Notes 19 and 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has restated its results for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for the first three quarters of 2004. The restatement resulted from adjustments primarily related to the accounting for lease incentives, depreciation and amortization expense, straight-line ground lease expense on one ground lease, gain recognition on a 2003 land condemnation, accounting for an embedded derivative, land cost allocations, the write-off of undepreciated tenant improvements and commissions, capitalization of interest costs and internal leasing, construction and development costs on development properties, and purchase accounting for acquisitions completed in 1995 to 1998.

 

Results of Operations

 

During 2004, approximately 84% of our rental and other revenue was derived from our office properties. As a result, while we own and operate a limited number of industrial and retail properties, our operating results depend heavily on successfully leasing our office properties. Furthermore, since most of our office properties are located in Florida, Georgia and North Carolina, economic growth in those states is and will continue to be an important determinative factor in predicting our future operating results.

 

The key components affecting our revenue stream are average occupancy and rental rates. Average occupancy generally increases during times of improving economic growth, as our ability to lease space outpaces vacancies that occur upon the expirations of existing leases, while average occupancy generally declines during times of slower economic growth, when new vacancies tend to outpace our ability to lease space. Asset acquisitions and dispositions also impact our rental revenues and could impact our average occupancy, depending upon the occupancy percentage of the properties that are acquired or sold. A further indicator of the predictability of future revenues is the expected lease expirations of our portfolio. As of September 30, 2005, leases representing 6.0% of our rentable square feet with respect to our Wholly Owned Properties were expiring on or before December 31, 2005, representing approximately 5.0% of our annualized revenue. As a result, in addition to seeking to increase our average occupancy by leasing current vacant space, we also must concentrate our leasing efforts on renewing leases on expiring space. For more information regarding our lease expirations, see “Properties – Lease Expirations.”

 

Whether or not our rental revenue tracks average occupancy proportionally depends upon whether rents under new leases signed are higher or lower than the rents under the previous leases. During 2004, the average rental rate per square foot on new leases signed in our Wholly Owned Properties was 1.5% lower than the rent under the previous leases (based on straight line rental rates).

 

At December 31, 2004, the occupancy rate for our Wholly Owned Properties was 85.0%. As of September 30, 2005, the occupancy rate for our Wholly Owned Properties increased to 85.8%.

 

Our expenses primarily consist of rental property expenses, depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses and interest expense. Rental property expenses are expenses associated with our ownership and operation of rental properties and include variable expenses, such as common area maintenance and utilities, and fixed expenses, such as property taxes and insurance. Some of these variable expenses may be lower when our average occupancy declines, while the fixed expenses remain constant regardless of average occupancy. Depreciation and amortization is a non-cash expense associated with the ownership of real property and generally remains relatively consistent each year, unless we buy or sell assets, since we depreciate our properties on a straight-line basis over a fixed life. General and administrative expenses, net of amounts capitalized, consist primarily of management and employee salaries and other personnel costs, corporate overhead and long-term incentive compensation. Interest expense depends upon the amount of our borrowings, the weighted average interest rates on our debt and the amount of interest capitalized on development projects.

 

23


Table of Contents

We also record income from our investments in unconsolidated affiliates. We record in “equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates” our proportionate share of the unconsolidated joint ventures’ net income or loss. During 2004, income earned from these unconsolidated joint ventures aggregated $7.4 million, which, net of minority interest, represented approximately 16.0% of our total net income.

 

Additionally, SFAS No. 144 requires us to record net income received from properties sold or held for sale that qualify as discontinued operations under SFAS No. 144 separately as “income from discontinued operations.” As a result, we separately record revenues and expenses from these qualifying properties. During 2004, income, including gains and losses from the sale of properties, from discontinued operations, net of minority interest, accounted for approximately 10.3% of our total net income.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We incur capital expenditures to lease space to our customers and to maintain the quality of our properties to successfully compete against other properties. Tenant improvements are the costs required to customize the space for the specific needs of the customer. Lease commissions are costs incurred to find the customer for the space. Lease incentives are costs paid to or on behalf of tenants to induce them to enter into leases and which do not relate to customizing the space for the tenant’s specific needs. Building improvements are recurring capital costs not related to a customer to maintain the buildings. As leases expire, we either attempt to relet the space to an existing customer or attract a new customer to occupy the space. Generally, customer renewals require lower leasing capital expenditures than reletting to new customers. However, market conditions such as supply of available space on the market, as well as demand for space, drive not only customer rental rates but also tenant improvement costs. Leasing capital expenditures are amortized over the term of the lease and building improvements are depreciated over the appropriate useful life of the assets acquired. Both are included in depreciation and amortization in results of operations.

 

Because we are a REIT, we are required under the federal tax laws to distribute at least 90.0% of our REIT taxable income, excluding capital gains, to our stockholders. We generally use rents received from customers to fund our operating expenses, recurring capital expenditures and stockholder dividends. To fund property acquisitions, development activity or building renovations, we incur debt from time to time. As of December 31, 2004, we had $822.6 million of secured debt outstanding and $750.0 million of unsecured debt outstanding. Our debt generally consists of mortgage debt, unsecured debt securities and borrowings under our Revolving Loan. As of November 30, 2005, we had approximately $90.2 million of additional borrowing availability under our Revolving Loan and $6.5 million in available cash and short-term investments.

 

Our Revolving Loan and the indenture governing our outstanding long-term unsecured debt securities require us to satisfy various operating and financial covenants and performance ratios. As a result, to ensure that we do not violate the provisions of these debt instruments, we may from time to time be limited in undertaking certain activities that may otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders, such as repurchasing capital stock, acquiring additional assets, increasing the total amount of our debt or increasing stockholder dividends. We review our current and expected operating results, financial condition and planned strategic actions on an ongoing basis for the purpose of monitoring our continued compliance with these covenants and ratios. Any unwaived event of default could result in an acceleration of some or all of our debt, severely restrict our ability to incur additional debt to fund short- and long-term cash needs or result in higher interest expense. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding certain amendments and waivers relating to covenants under our Revolving Loan.

 

To generate additional capital to fund our growth and other strategic initiatives and to lessen the ownership risks typically associated with owning 100.0% of a property, we may sell some of our properties or contribute them to joint ventures. When we create a joint venture with a strategic partner, we usually contribute one or more properties that we own and/or vacant land to a newly formed entity in which we retain an interest of 50.0% or less. In exchange for our equal or minority interest in the joint venture, we generally receive cash from the partner and retain some or all of the management income relating to the properties in the joint venture. The joint venture itself will frequently borrow money on its own behalf to finance the acquisition of, and/or leverage the return upon, the properties being acquired by the joint venture or to build or acquire additional buildings. Such borrowings are typically on a non-recourse or limited recourse basis. We generally are not liable for the debts of our joint ventures, except to the extent of our equity investment, unless we have directly guaranteed any of that debt. In most cases, we and/or our strategic partners are required to guarantee customary exceptions to non-recourse liability in non-recourse loans. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on certain debt guarantees.

 

24


Table of Contents

We have historically also sold additional Common Stock or Preferred Stock or issued Common Units to fund additional growth or to reduce our debt, but we have limited those efforts during the past five years because funds generated from our capital recycling program in recent years have provided sufficient funds to satisfy our liquidity needs. In addition, we used funds from our capital recycling program to redeem Preferred Stock in 2005 and repurchase Common Stock in 2003 and 2002. We have also redeemed Common Units for cash in 2002 through 2005.

 

Management’s Analysis

 

We believe that funds from operations (“FFO”) and FFO per share are beneficial to management and investors and are important indicators of the performance of any equity REIT. Because FFO and FFO per share calculations exclude such factors as depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and gains or losses from sales of real estate (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), they facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between other REITs. Our management believes that historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. As a result, management believes that the use of FFO and FFO per share, together with the required GAAP presentations, provide a more complete understanding of our performance relative to competitors and a more informed and appropriate basis on which to make decisions involving operating, financing and investing activities. See “Funds From Operations.”

 

25


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Comparison of 2004 to 2003

 

The following table sets forth information regarding our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 ($ in millions):

 

     Year Ended December 31,

   

2004

to 2003
$ Change


    %
Change


 
     2004

    2003

     
           (restated)              

Rental and other revenues

   $ 464.7     $ 492.5     $ (27.8 )   (5.6 )%

Operating expenses:

                              

Rental property and other expenses

     168.4       172.8       (4.4 )   (2.5 )

Depreciation and amortization

     132.4       139.1       (6.7 )   (4.8 )

Impairment of assets held for use

     1.3       —         1.3     100.0  

General and administrative

     41.8       26.0       15.8     60.8  
    


 


 


 

Total operating expenses

     343.9       337.9       6.0     1.8  
    


 


 


 

Interest expense:

                              

Contractual

     106.2       119.6       (13.4 )   (11.2 )

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     3.7       4.4       (0.7 )   (15.9 )

Financing obligations

     10.1       17.8       (7.7 )   (43.3 )
    


 


 


 

       120.0       141.8       (21.8 )   (15.4 )

Other income/expense:

                              

Interest and other income

     6.3       5.5       0.8     14.5  

Settlement of bankruptcy claim

     14.4       —         14.4     100.0  

Loss on debt extinguishments

     (12.4 )     (14.7 )     2.3     (15.6 )

Gain on extinguishment of co-venture obligation

     —         16.3       (16.3 )   (100.0 )
    


 


 


 

       8.3       7.1       1.2     16.9  
    


 


 


 

Income before disposition of property, co-venture expense, minority interest and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

     9.1       19.9       (10.8 )   (54.3 )

Gains on disposition of property, net

     21.6       9.6       12.0     125.0  

Co-venture expense

     —         (4.6 )     4.6     (100.0 )

Minority interest in the Operating Partnership

     (0.8 )     —         (0.8 )   100.0  

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

     7.4       4.7       2.7     57.4  
    


 


 


 

Income from continuing operations

     37.3       29.6       7.7     26.0  

Discontinued operations:

                              

Income from discontinued operations, net of minority interest

     1.5       3.3       (1.8 )   (54.5 )

Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of minority interest

     2.8       9.8       (7.0 )   (71.4 )
    


 


 


 

       4.3       13.1       (8.8 )   (67.2 )