-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
U0AVpeCIlVEqx/3G7FuK5SYHjpGrz8pq9tZaKxfBzgHRwbmIKI2W36BGclXHNYFp
P3Nmkfg2VxeHAmLTsd8P7w==
<SEC-DOCUMENT>0001017062-01-000119.txt : 20010130
<SEC-HEADER>0001017062-01-000119.hdr.sgml : 20010130
ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001017062-01-000119
CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K
PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 5
CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20001031
FILED AS OF DATE: 20010129
FILER:
COMPANY DATA:
COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: FLUOR CORP
CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001124198
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-ENGINEERING, ACCOUNTING, RESEARCH, MANAGEMENT [8700]
IRS NUMBER: 330927079
STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE
FISCAL YEAR END: 1231
FILING VALUES:
FORM TYPE: 10-K
SEC ACT:
SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-16129
FILM NUMBER: 1517925
BUSINESS ADDRESS:
STREET 1: ONE ENTERPRISE DR
CITY: ALISO VIEJO
STATE: CA
ZIP: 92656
BUSINESS PHONE: 9493492000
MAIL ADDRESS:
STREET 1: ONE ENTERPRISE DR
CITY: ALISO VIEJO
STATE: CA
ZIP: 92656
</SEC-HEADER>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>10-K
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>0001.txt
<DESCRIPTION>FLUOR CORP. - FORM 10-K
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
----------------
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2000
OR
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________ to _________
Commission File No. 1-16129
----------------
FLUOR CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Delaware 33-0927079
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
One Enterprise Drive, Aliso Viejo, California 92656
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
</TABLE>
(949) 349-2000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
----------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name of Each Exchange on
Title of each class which Registered
------------------- ------------------------
<S> <C>
Common stock, $.01 par value New York Stock Exchange
</TABLE>
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [_]
The aggregate market value of the registrant's voting stock held by non-
affiliates was $2,502,652,250 on January 17, 2001 based upon the average
between the highest and lowest sales prices of the registrant's Common Stock
as reported in the consolidated transactions reporting system.
Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of January 17, 2001--
75,701,211 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Parts I, II and IV incorporate certain information by reference from the
registrant's Annual Report to shareholders for the fiscal year ended October
31, 2000.
Part III incorporates certain information by reference from the
registrant's definitive proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders
to be held on March 14, 2001, which proxy statement will be filed no later
than 120 days after the close of the registrant's fiscal year ended October
31, 2000.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
From time to time, Fluor(R) Corporation ("Fluor" or the "Company") makes
certain comments and disclosures in reports and statements, including this
report or statements made by its officers or directors which may be forward-
looking in nature. Examples include statements related to Company growth, the
adequacy of funds to service debt and the Company's opinions about trends and
factors which may impact future operating results. These forward-looking
statements could also involve, among other things, statements regarding the
Company's intent, belief or expectation with respect to (i) the Company's
results of operations and financial condition, (ii) the consummation of
acquisition, disposition or financing transactions and the effect thereof on
the Company's business, and (iii) the Company's plans and objectives for
future operations and expansion or consolidation.
Any forward-looking statements are subject to the risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results of operations, financial condition, cost
reductions, acquisitions, dispositions, financing transactions, operations,
expansion, consolidation and other events to differ materially from those
expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking
statements are also subject to a number of assumptions regarding, among other
things, future economic, competitive and market conditions generally. These
assumptions would be based on facts and conditions as they exist at the time
such statements are made as well as predictions as to future facts and
conditions, the accurate prediction of which may be difficult and involve the
assessment of events beyond the Company's control. As a result, the reader is
cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements.
The Company wishes to caution readers that forward-looking statements,
including disclosures which use words such as the Company "believes,"
"anticipates," "expects," "estimates" and similar statements, are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results of operations
to differ materially from expectations. Any forward-looking statements should
be considered in context with the various disclosures made by the Company
about its businesses, including without limitation the risk factors more
specifically described below in Item 1. Business, under the heading "Company
Risks Factors."
PART I
Item 1. Business
Fluor Corporation was incorporated in Delaware on September 11, 2000. Its
executive offices are located at One Enterprise Drive, Aliso Viejo, California
92656, telephone number (949) 349-2000. The Company is basically a holding
company which owns the stock of numerous subsidiary corporations. Except as
the context otherwise requires, the terms "Fluor" or the "Company" as used
herein shall include Fluor Corporation, its subsidiaries and divisions
thereof.
The Distribution
On November 30, 2000 (the "Distribution Date"), Fluor Corporation ("Old
Fluor") announced that it had completed a reverse spin-off transaction wherein
the Coal segment, previously operated under the A. T. Massey Coal Company,
Inc. subsidiary, was separated from the other business segments of Old Fluor.
As a result, two publicly-traded companies were created: Massey Energy Company
and a "new" Fluor Corporation referred to as the Company herein.
The separation of the two companies was accomplished through a tax-free
dividend (the "Distribution") by Old Fluor of the Company, which is a new
entity comprised of all of Old Fluor's business segments, other than those
involving the Coal segment, including the Fluor Daniel, Fluor Global Services
and Fluor Signature Services business segments (the "New Fluor Businesses").
Old Fluor, the continuing entity consisting of the Coal segment of Old Fluor,
changed its name to Massey Energy Company ("Massey"). The tax-free dividend
was declared on the Distribution Date to shareholders of record at the close
of business on November 30, 2000. Due to the relative significance of the New
Fluor Businesses, the New Fluor Businesses have been treated as the
"accounting successor" for financial reporting purposes and the Coal segment
has been classified as discontinued operations despite the legal form of the
separation resulting from the Distribution. Wherever
1
<PAGE>
references to officers and directors of the Company are made herein, these
references are deemed to mean references to Old Fluor for disclosures made for
and relevant to periods prior to the Distribution, and the Company as "new"
Fluor Corporation following the Distribution.
For purposes of effecting the Distribution and of governing certain
relationships between the Company and Massey after the Distribution, the two
companies have entered into various agreements, including a Distribution
Agreement (the "Distribution Agreement") and a Tax Sharing Agreement (the "Tax
Sharing Agreement"). The following descriptions summarize the material terms
of such agreements, but are qualified by reference to the texts of such
agreements, which are incorporated herein by this reference.
The Distribution Agreement
The Distribution Agreement entered into between Massey and the Company
provides for the transactions required to effect the Distribution, including
defining the assets and liabilities which were allocated to and assumed by the
Company and those that will remain with Massey.
In general, pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, all assets of Old Fluor
prior to the Distribution Date, other than those relating to the Coal segment,
became assets of the Company. The Distribution Agreement also provides for
assumptions of liabilities and cross-indemnities designed to allocate
financial responsibility for all liabilities arising out of or in connection
with New Fluor Businesses to the Company and all liabilities arising out of or
in connection with the Coal segment to Massey. The Company further assumed
responsibility for certain liabilities and expenses incurred by the parties in
connection with the Distribution and will indemnify Massey for liabilities
relating to past divestitures made by Old Fluor and for liabilities relating
to certain litigation in which Old Fluor is involved.
In addition, in the event that the transfers contemplated by the
Distribution Agreement are not effected on or prior to the Distribution Date,
the parties agreed to reasonably cooperate with one another to effect such
transfers in the future. Each party also agrees, subject to certain
conditions, to provide access to certain records and information to one
another.
Finally, the Distribution Agreement provides for the basis for separating
the assets of pension benefit plans of Massey and the Company that were held
in a single master trust, and transfers sponsorship of those welfare and
pension benefit plans which cover employees of the New Fluor Businesses to the
Company.
The Tax Sharing Agreement
The Tax Sharing Agreement sets forth the rights and obligations of the
Company and Massey with respect to tax matters for periods before and after
the Distribution Date. Commencing with the federal income tax return for the
year ending October 31, 2001, Old Fluor's subsidiary, A. T. Massey Coal
Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries will join Old Fluor in a single
consolidated federal income tax return.
The Tax Sharing Agreement provides that if the Company and A. T. Massey
Coal Company, Inc, and their subsidiaries are included in the same
consolidated federal income tax return for the year ending October 31, 2001,
Massey will be responsible for the tax that would have been incurred had the
Company and its subsidiaries not been so included, and the Company will be
responsible for the balance of the tax.
The Tax Sharing Agreement further details the Company and Massey's
responsibilities relating to the tax payments and refunds, the filing of
returns and the conduct of audits. The Tax Sharing Agreement also provides for
cooperation with respect to certain tax matters and for the exchange of
information and retention of records which may affect the tax liability of the
other party.
With regard to any federal income tax liability which might arise if the
distribution of the Company's stock is found to be a taxable transaction, the
Tax Sharing Agreement allocates liability between the parties. Generally,
2
<PAGE>
the Company will bear 60% of any such corporate tax liability and Massey will
bear 40% of any such corporate tax liability except where the liability is
attributable to one party's breach of a covenant or a change of ownership, as
described in Section 355(e) of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to one
party's stock.
Business Segments
The Company is aligned into three principal operating segments which the
Company refers to as Strategic Business Enterprises (each, an "SBE"), each
with clear performance accountability: the Fluor Daniel SM segment which
provides design, engineering, procurement and construction services on a
worldwide basis to an extensive range of industrial, commercial, utility,
natural resources and energy clients; the Fluor Global Services SM segment
which provides outsourcing and asset management solutions to its customers;
and the Fluor Signature Services SM segment which provides integrated business
administration and support services to the Company and external parties. In
addition and as noted above, a fourth segment, the Coal segment which
produces, processes and sells high-quality, low-sulfur steam coal for the
utility industry as well as industrial customers, and metallurgical coal for
the steel industry, is being reported as a discontinued operation as a result
of the Distribution. The Company also operates through Fluor Constructors
International, Inc. ("Fluor Constructors") which is organized and operates
separately from Fluor Daniel. Fluor Constructors provides unionized
management, construction and management services in the United States and
Canada, both independently and as a subcontractor to Fluor Daniel, and global
support to all Fluor Daniel business units.
A summary of the Company's operations and activities by business segment
and geographical area is set forth below.
FLUOR DANIEL
The Fluor Daniel SBE ("Fluor Daniel") provides a full range of design,
engineering, procurement, construction and other services to clients in a
broad range of industrial and geographic markets on a worldwide basis. Fluor
Daniel's operations are organized into four business units responsible for
identifying and capitalizing on opportunities in their market segments on a
global basis. The operations of Fluor Daniel are detailed below by business
unit:
Energy and Chemicals: Fluor Daniel's Energy and Chemicals business unit is
an integrated service supplier providing a full range of design, engineering,
procurement, construction and project management services in a broad spectrum
of energy and chemical industries. Specific industries served include upstream
oil and gas production, refining, petrochemical, power generation and
specialty and fine chemicals. Typical oil and gas projects include new
facilities, upgrades, revamps and expansions for refineries, pipeline
installations, offshore facilities and oil sands development projects. Current
projects include development of an offshore oil field in the Timor Sea,
various pipeline projects in the Caspian Sea region, a major oil sands project
in Alberta, Canada and a heavy oil upgrader in Venezuela. In power generation,
this business unit designs, engineers and constructs power generation
facilities predominantly in the fossil fuel power industry through Duke/Fluor
Daniel, a partnership with Duke Energy Corp. The Energy and Chemicals unit
also has responsibility for execution of the Company's work in Mexico and
Central America through ICA Fluor Daniel, a partnership between Fluor Daniel
and Grupo ICA. With regard to Chemicals, a representative sample of projects
include film processing plants throughout China and a major petrochemical
complex in the western province of Saudi Arabia.
Mining: The Mining business unit operates internationally in a wide range
of mineral markets providing services ranging from feasibility studies,
project management, materials management and logistics, technical and
engineering services, equipment selection, permitting, construction,
operations and maintenance and remediation. Projects being performed include
the engineering, procurement and construction of bitumen extraction facilities
related to the oil sands project in Alberta, Canada, a magnesium production
facility in Australia, a copper extraction facility in Arizona, a gold
production facility in South Africa and a diamond extraction plant in South
Africa.
3
<PAGE>
Manufacturing and Life Sciences: The Manufacturing and Life Sciences
business unit provides comprehensive engineering, architectural, construction,
design and program management services to the general manufacturing,
electronics, food, beverage and consumer products industries along with
specialized construction management expertise for the pharmaceutical and
biotechnology industries. Current projects in the manufacturing area include
wafer fabrication and processing facilities in Malaysia, a major electronics
facility in the Philippines and a research and development and headquarters
facility for a major pharmaceutical company in the northeastern United States.
In the life sciences area, this unit continues to focus on clients who
concentrate their manufacturing capabilities in certain tax-advantaged
locations including Puerto Rico, Ireland and Singapore, where Fluor Daniel has
an existing and expanding presence.
Infrastructure: The Infrastructure business unit provides design,
engineering, procurement, construction and construction management and
financial services for the transportation industry. In highway construction,
this business unit has completed numerous projects including the E470 Toll
Road in Colorado. The anticipated growth of public-private ventures should
serve as a platform to increase its role in this area. This business unit was
recently selected by a southeastern state's Department of Transportation to
provide construction and management support for the statewide highway
development program. Other localities are emulating this innovative approach
in concert with United States government funding of over $200-plus billion
from the TEA-21 transportation bill resulting in numerous new transportation
opportunities domestically. In the area of railroad construction, the
Infrastructure unit is expanding into the public/private venture arena where
many projects are now under development in Europe. This is exemplified by this
unit's recent joint venture with a major contractor in the United Kingdom
which will supply program management services to Britain's Railtrack for a
multi-billion pound sterling improvement project. Finally, the need for
improvement and expansion of major airports is apparent due to global
increases in air traffic. In this area, the Infrastructure business unit has
managed numerous projects including its present involvement in a major
expansion project at an international airport in New York and a recently
completed international airport in South Korea.
Competition
Fluor Daniel is one of the world's larger providers of engineering,
procurement and construction services. The markets served by the business are
highly competitive and for the most part require substantial resources,
particularly highly skilled and experienced technical personnel. A large
number of companies are competing in the markets served by the business,
including the Bechtel Group, the Washington Group and Jacobs Engineering
Group. Competition is primarily centered on performance and the ability to
provide the design, engineering, planning, management and project execution
skills required to complete complex projects in a safe, timely and cost-
efficient manner. The Company's engineering, procurement and construction
business derives its competitive strength from its diversity, reputation for
quality, technology, cost-effectiveness, worldwide procurement capability,
project management expertise, geographic coverage, ability to meet client
requirements by performing construction on either a union or an open shop
basis, ability to execute projects of varying sizes, strong safety record and
lengthy experience with a wide range of services and technologies.
FLUOR GLOBAL SERVICES
The Fluor Global Services SBE ("Fluor Global Services") brings together a
variety of customized service capabilities that significantly broaden the
Company's participation in the total spending across the entire life cycle of
clients' asset base. In today's competitive markets, clients are focusing on
their core competencies, such as research and product development, and seeking
new and better ways to maximize the financial benefit from their non-core
assets. Working in concert with its clients, the strategic focus of Fluor
Global Services is to assist its clients in achieving a sustainable advantage
and profit growth by providing customized and integrated services that better
optimize the total life-cycle of their assets relative to their competitors.
4
<PAGE>
Fluor Global Services' operations are organized into the following seven
strategic business units:
American Equipment Company: American Equipment Company ("AMECO(R)") is a
leading full-service equipment supplier. The unit provides integrated
construction equipment, tool and fleet outsourcing solutions on a global basis
for construction projects and plant sites. AMECO has more than 50 years of
experience in the construction equipment business with one of the broadest
service offerings in the industry. With locations throughout North and South
America, AMECO supports some of the largest construction projects and plant
locations in the world.
Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance provides facility
management, maintenance, operations and asset management services to the oil
and gas, chemicals and life sciences, fossil and nuclear power, and
manufacturing industries. The unit is a leading supplier of integrated
facility management services, including on-site maintenance and operation
support services. Operations and Maintenance combines advanced management
techniques with its value-added solutions to lower operating costs and enhance
returns on its clients' plant and facilities investments. The unit is
presently providing value-added services to nearly 200 facilities and project
sites worldwide.
Fluor Federal Services: Fluor Federal Services SM is a leading provider of
project management services to the United States government, particularly to
the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense. Fluor Federal Services
presently is providing environmental restoration, engineering, construction,
site operations and maintenance services at two major Department of Energy
project sites. These sites are the Fernald Environmental Management Project,
located near Cincinnati, Ohio, and the Hanford Environmental Management
Project, located in Richland, Washington. Despite the complexity of these
projects, both sites have achieved exemplary safety and project performance
records.
Telecommunications: The Telecommunications business unit is a leading
provider of systems integration and project management services for the global
telecommunications market. Growth of domestic fiber optic and wireless
networks and the liberalization of overseas markets are escalating the demand
for the services provided by this unit. The Telecommunications unit has
organized its market focus along four distinct business lines: Wireline
Networks; Wireless Networks; Enterprise Networks; and Installation and
Maintenance. These business lines complement recognized industry segments
which collectively represent the full scope of the telecommunications market.
Building on its successful account management approach, the Telecommunications
unit is focused on expanding its base of well-capitalized target clients with
long-term programs in each of its four business lines.
Asset Management Services: Asset Management Services addresses a growing
and predominantly unmet need of companies to outsource non-core, non-
differentiating activities, and to redeploy capital into higher return
investments which directly support the companies' strategic objectives. Asset
Management Services integrates existing Company capabilities with those of the
unit's strategic partners to provide clients with full-service asset
management solutions. These solutions can include innovative off-balance sheet
asset structuring as well as state-of-the-art engineering and technology
services to maximize the performance and productivity of non-core assets.
Property Services: Property Services is positioned to capitalize on rapid
growth in the global outsourcing and telecommunications markets. The unit is
comprised of three complementary lines of business. Global Location Strategies
provides professional expertise to negotiate maximum economic incentives for
site location clients. Site Acquisition, which is presently focused on the
telecommunications market, provides a complete range of services required to
acquire sites and space for equipment and systems. Commercial Services
provides outsourcing for a comprehensive set of services for commercial
buildings. These services include provisions for building maintenance,
reception and security, reproduction, distribution, mail services and
telecommunications support.
TRS Staffing Solutions: TRS Staffing Solutions is a global enterprise of
staffing specialists that provides clients with assistance in temporary,
contract and direct hire positions. The temporary staffing unit specializes in
information technology, accounting and financing, and engineering personnel.
It provides clients flexibility and
5
<PAGE>
economies in meeting fluctuations in staffing requirements. The contract and
direct hire line of business is focused on assisting clients to more
effectively recruit and retain professional staff. To expand TRS Staffing
Solution's value proposition to clients, commencing in fiscal 2001, the unit
will be combined with Fluor Signature Services.
Competition
The markets served by each Fluor Global Services business unit, while
containing some similarities, tend also to have discrete issues particularly
impacting that unit. Each business unit has a large number of companies
competing in its markets. With respect to AMECO, which operates in numerous
markets, the equipment rental industry is highly fragmented and very
competitive, with most competitors operating in specific geographic areas. The
competition for larger capital project services is more narrow and limited to
only those capable of providing comprehensive equipment, tool and management
services. Key competitive factors in both Fluor Federal Services and
Telecommunications are primarily centered on performance and the ability to
provide the design, engineering, planning, management and project execution
skills required to complete complex projects in a safe, timely and cost-
efficient manner. With respect to TRS Staffing Solutions, this is a highly
fragmented industry with over 1,000 companies competing nationally. The key
competitive factors in this business line are price, service, quality, breadth
of service, the ability to retain qualified personnel and geographical
coverage. In Operations & Maintenance, Asset Management Services and Property
Services, the barrier to entry to in these areas are both financially and
logistically low with the result that the industry is highly fragmented with
no single company being dominant. Competition is generally driven by
reputation, price and capacity to perform.
FLUOR SIGNATURE SERVICES
Fluor Signature Services SBE ("Fluor Signature Services") provides
integrated business services and business infrastructure support in the areas
of human resources, finance, accounting, safety, information technology,
knowledge management and office support services. Fluor Signature Services
brings a new approach to doing business. By streamlining operations through
web-enabled enterprise technology and assuming responsibility for the delivery
of business administration and support services, Fluor Signature Services
allows the Company's operating units to focus on their core businesses. The
individual operating units define and choose to purchase price competitive
services from Fluor Signature Services. Consolidation of these services into
one organization has resulted in reduced costs and improved quality and
customer service standards.
Competition
With respect to Fluor Signatures Services' support services that are
provided to internal business units, there is no competition which impacts its
operations except to the extent that third party vendors can provide these
support services on a more efficient basis. With respect to the support
services provided externally, this is a highly fragmented industry with
thousands of companies competing nationally. The key competitive factors in
this segment are price, service, quality, breadth of service and geographical
coverage.
DISCONTINUED COAL SEGMENT
During fiscal 2000, the Coal segment, which operated through A. T. Massey
Coal Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries, was headquartered in Richmond,
Virginia. As a result of the Distribution, on November 30, 2000, the Coal
segment ceased to be part of the Company's continuing operations and reported
results, and is now reported as a discontinued operation. The Coal segment is
now operated by Massey, is a publicly-traded company listed on the New York
Stock Exchange and files reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
6
<PAGE>
OTHER MATTERS
Backlog
The following table sets forth the consolidated backlog of Fluor Daniel and
Fluor Global Services segments at October 31, 2000 and 1999.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999
------------ ------------
(In Millions of Dollars)
<S> <C> <C>
Fluor Daniel....................................... $ 6,730 $ 6,770
Fluor Global Services.............................. 3,282 2,372
------------ -----------
$ 10,012 $ 9,142
============ ===========
The following table sets forth the consolidated backlog of Fluor Daniel and
Fluor Global Services segments at October 31, 2000 and 1999 by region:
<CAPTION>
2000 1999
------------ ------------
(In Millions of Dollars)
<S> <C> <C>
United States...................................... $ 5,680 $ 5,008
Asia Pacific (Including Australia)................. 682 998
Europe, Africa And Middle East..................... 862 1,074
The Americas....................................... 2,788 2,062
------------ -----------
$ 10,012 $ 9,142
============ ===========
</TABLE>
Estimated portion not to be performed during 2001: 28%
For purposes of the preceding tables, Fluor Global Services backlog figures
are not provided for AMECO or TRS Staffing Solutions, or for the Fluor
Signature Services segment since there is no way to meaningfully measure
backlog for these business units due to the nature of the services they
provide.
The dollar amount of the backlog is not necessarily indicative of the
future earnings of Fluor related to the performance of such work. Although
backlog represents only business which is considered to be firm, there can be
no assurance that cancellations or scope adjustments will not occur. Due to
additional factors outside of Fluor's control, such as changes in project
schedules, Fluor cannot predict with certainty the portion of its October 31,
2000 backlog estimated to be performed subsequent to 2001.
For additional information with respect to the Company's backlog, please
see Management's Discussion and Analysis contained in Fluor's 2000 Annual
Report to shareholders, which information is incorporated herein by this
reference (and except for this section and other sections specifically
incorporated herein by this reference in Items 1 through 8 of this report,
Fluor's 2000 Annual Report to shareholders is not deemed to be filed as part
of this report).
Government Contracts
Fluor Global Services, predominantly through the Fluor Federal Services
business unit, is a prime contractor or a major subcontractor for a number of
United States government programs. Generally, the programs in question may
take many years to complete and may be implemented by the award of many
different contracts. Despite the fact that these programs are generally
awarded on a multi-year basis, the funding for the programs is generally
approved on an annual basis by Congress. The government is under no obligation
to maintain funding at any specific level, or funds for a program may even be
eliminated thereby significantly curtailing or stopping a program. The
government also has the right to terminate its contracts at any time for
convenience. However, the government is required to equitably adjust a
contract for additions or reduction in scope and, in the event of termination,
a contractor may also receive some allowance for profit on work performed.
7
<PAGE>
Contracts and business with the government are also subject to a number of
socio-economic and other requirements as well as certain procurement
regulations. If a contractor fails to comply with the requirements and
regulations, it could lead to suspension or even debarment from government
contracting. Finally, government contracting and the continued funding of
programs is also subject to a variety of factors beyond the Company's control
such as political developments both domestically and internationally, budget
considerations and changes in procurement policies.
Raw Materials
Raw Materials and the components necessary for the conduct of the Company's
businesses are generally available from numerous sources. The Company does not
foresee any unavailability of raw materials and components which would have a
material adverse effect on its businesses in the near term.
Research and Development
While the Company engages in research and development efforts both on
current projects and in the development of new products and services, the
Company believes that during the past three fiscal years, it has not incurred
costs for Company-sponsored research and development activities which would be
material, special or unusual in any of the Company's business segments, other
than research and development activities associated with the Company's
Knowledge@Work initiative. The Knowledge@Work initiative is focused on
revamping the Company's work processes and management services. Its primary
goals include improved access to and use of Company knowledge coupled with an
improved ability to obtain up-to-date and timely information across all
aspects of the Company's business operations. The Company plans to complete
implementation of the Knowledge@Work initiative in calendar 2001.
Environmental, Safety and Health Matters
The Company believes, based upon present information available to it, that
its accruals with respect to future environmental costs are adequate and such
future costs will not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated
financial position, results of operations or liquidity. However, the
imposition of more stringent requirements under environmental laws or
regulations, new developments or changes regarding site cleanup costs or the
allocation of such costs among potentially responsible parties, or a
determination that the Company is potentially responsible for the release of
hazardous substances at sites other than those currently identified, could
result in additional expenditures or the provision of additional accruals in
expectation of such expenditures.
Number of Employees
The following table sets forth the number of salaried and craft/hourly
employees of Fluor and its subsidiaries engaged in Fluor's continuing business
segments as of October 31, 2000:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Salaried Craft/hourly Total
-------- ------------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Fluor Daniel.................................... 12,347 16,680 29,027
Fluor Global Services........................... 7,563 8,228 15,791
Fluor Signature Services........................ 1,558 0 1,558
Corporate....................................... 737 0 737
------ ------ ------
TOTAL........................................... 22,205 24,908 47,113
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>
Operations by Business Segment and Geographical Area
The financial information for business segments and geographic areas is
included in the Operations by Business Segment and Geographical Area section
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Fluor's 2000 Annual
Report to shareholders, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
8
<PAGE>
Company Risk Factors
Some of the Company's Contracts Create Significant Cost Overrun Risks. The
Company conducts its business under various types of contractual arrangements.
In terms of dollar amount, the majority of contracts are of the cost-
reimbursable type where the risk of cost increase belongs to the client.
However, approximately forty percent of the Company's contracts are guaranteed
maximum, lump sum or unit priced contracts, where the Company bears all or a
significant portion of the risk for cost overruns. Contract prices are
established in part on estimates which are subject to a number of assumptions,
such as assumptions regarding future economic conditions, price, availability
of labor, equipment and materials and other exigencies which may affect
project schedule or cost. If these estimates prove inaccurate, or
circumstances change, cost overruns may occur. The Company's results of
operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected by
cost overruns.
Project Performance Problems Could Result in Additional Costs. In certain
instances, the Company guarantees to a customer that it will complete a
project by a scheduled date or that the facility will achieve certain
performance standards. If the project or facility subsequently fails to meet
the schedule or performance standards, the Company could incur additional
costs. Depending on the nature of the project performance problem, the Company
may not be able to recover the additional costs, which could exceed revenues
realized from a project. Therefore, if the Company experiences a project
performance problem, the Company's results of operations and financial
condition could be materially adversely affected.
The Receipt of Future Contract Awards is Uncertain. Estimates of future
performance depend on, among other matters, the Company's estimates as to
whether and when it will receive certain new contract awards. While these
estimates are based upon good faith judgment, these estimates can be
unreliable and may frequently change based on new facts as they become
available. In the case of large-scale domestic and international projects
where timing is often uncertain, it is particularly difficult to predict
whether and when the Company will receive a contract award. The uncertainty of
contract award timing can present difficulties in matching workforce size with
contract needs. In some cases, the Company maintains and bears the cost of a
ready workforce that is larger than called for under existing contracts in
anticipation of future workforce needs under expected contract awards. If an
expected contract award is delayed or not received, the Company would incur
costs that could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of
operations and financial condition.
Timing of Receipt of Project Revenues Is Uncertain. A number of factors
outside of the Company's control can affect the time at which the Company
receives revenue from projects. Depending upon external conditions, a client
may either cancel a project, put it on hold or extend the schedule. Also,
future economic conditions, price and availability of labor, equipment and
materials, applicable law, weather delays, civil unrest or labor disruptions
may impact the realization of revenue. If revenue that the Company expects to
receive from a project is either delayed or not received, there could be a
material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and financial
condition.
The Distribution Could Impact Future Results. As a result of the
Distribution, the Coal segment will no longer be included in the Company's
operations and reported results. A significant portion of Old Fluor's revenues
and profits were derived from the Coal segment from which the Company will no
longer benefit. In addition, under the Distribution Agreement and the Tax
Sharing Agreement, the Company has agreed to indemnify Massey for claims and
liabilities relating to the New Fluor Businesses which arose before or after
the Distribution and claims and liabilities relating to Old Fluor (exclusive
of those relating to the Coal segment) which arose prior to the Distribution.
In the event that significant claims and liabilities arise, and if the Company
has the responsibility for such claims and liabilities, there could be a
material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and financial
condition.
The Distribution Could Impact Shareholder Value. Upon completion of the
Distribution, an adjustment was made to the vested and unvested stock options,
and unvested restricted stock grants previously granted to Company employees
(collectively, the "Grants") as well as stock appreciation rights ("SARs") in
order to preserve the intrinsic value of the Grants and SARs. These
adjustments retained the ratio of the exercise price to the market price
immediately before and after the Distribution and resulted in increasing the
number of Grants
9
<PAGE>
and SARs. At fiscal year end, there were approximately 6,807,710 Grants
outstanding, including those granted to employees, officers and others who
remained affiliated with Massey after the Distribution. Effective December 1,
2000, the day after the Distribution Date, after taking into account the
adjustments described in this paragraph and exclusive of Massey employees,
officers and others solely affiliated with Massey, there were approximately
10,596,349 Grants outstanding to employees, directors and officers of, and
others affiliated with Fluor. Similarly, at fiscal year end, there were
approximately 1,565,201 SARs outstanding, including those granted to employees
of and others affiliated with Massey. Effective December 1, 2000, the day
after the Distribution Date, after taking into account the adjustments
described in this paragraph and exclusive of Massey employees, officers and
others affiliated solely with Massey, there were approximately 2,169,951 SARs
outstanding to employees, directors and officers of, and others affiliated
with Fluor. The increase in the number of SARs outstanding may impact the
earnings of the Company and the increase in the number of Grants outstanding
may potentially result in a dilution in the ownership interests of current
shareholders.
The Distribution Could Result in Significant Tax Risks to the
Company. Prior to the Distribution, Old Fluor received a ruling (the "Ruling")
from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") that the Distribution qualified
as a tax-free spin-off under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the "Code"). The Ruling was granted based upon certain
representations made by Old Fluor. While the Company is not aware of any facts
or circumstances that would cause those representations to be incorrect or
incomplete, if those representations were incomplete or incorrect in a
material respect, it is possible that the Ruling would no longer be valid. In
such event, the potential corporate tax resulting therefrom could be
substantial and could have a material adverse effect on the financial position
of the Company. In addition, under the Ruling, neither the Company nor Massey
may, for up to two years following the Distribution Date, engage in certain
business combinations that would constitute a change of more than 50% of the
equity interest in either company. If either Massey or the Company fails to
conform to the requirements of the Ruling and, if pursuant to the Tax Sharing
Agreement, the Company is responsible for the liability related thereto, a
substantial tax liability to the Company would result, which could have a
material adverse impact on the Company's results of operations and financial
condition.
Government Contracts Expose the Company to Uncertainties. A number of the
Company's contracts are government contracts, including those described above
for the Fernald Environmental Management Project and the Hanford Environmental
Management Project. Typically, government contracts are subject to various
restrictions and uncertainties such as oversight audits by government
representatives and profit and cost controls. In some cases, government
contracts are exposed to the uncertainties associated with Congressional
funding. In addition, government contracts are subject to specific procurement
regulations and a variety of other socio-economic requirements. The Company
must comply with these government regulations and requirements, as well as,
various statutes related to employment practices, environmental protection,
recordkeeping and accounting. The Company's failure to comply with any of
these regulations, requirements and statutes could lead to suspension from
government contracting or subcontracting for a period of time. If one of the
Company's government contracts is terminated for any reason, or if the Company
is suspended from government contract work, there could be a material adverse
effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
The Amount of Backlog is Not Indicative of Future Earnings. The dollar
amount of the Company's backlog, as stated at any given time, is not
necessarily indicative of future earnings. Project cancellations or scope
adjustments may occur with respect to contracts reflected in the Company's
backlog. In the event that the Company experiences significant cancellations
or scope adjustments in backlog contracts, there could be a material adverse
effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
Future Environmental, Safety and Health Requirements Could Affect Financial
Condition. It is impossible to reliably predict the full nature and impact of
future judicial, legislative or regulatory developments relating to the
environmental protection, safety and health requirements applicable to the
Company's operations. The requirements to be met, as well as the technology
and length of time available to meet those requirements,
10
<PAGE>
continue to develop and change. To the extent that the costs associated with
meeting those requirements are substantial, there could be a material adverse
effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
Global Economic and Political Conditions Create Uncertainties. The
Company's businesses are subject to fluctuations in demand and to changing
economic and political conditions, not only domestically, but internationally,
which are beyond the Company's control. In particular, the Company's
engineering and construction and coal businesses are global and are affected
by market conditions outside of the United States. These businesses are often
subject to, among other matters, foreign government policies and regulations,
embargoes, United States government policies and international hostilities.
Although the Company tries to reduce exposure to uncertain international
market conditions, the Company is unable to completely predict or control the
amount and mix of business and sales. To the extent that international
businesses are affected by unexpected international market conditions, there
could be a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and
financial condition.
Foreign Currency Fluctuations Could Adversely Affect Company's Operating
Results. Because the Company's functional currency is the U.S. dollar, non-
U.S. operations sometimes face the additional risk of fluctuating currency
values and exchange rates, hard currency shortages and controls on currency
exchange. The Company attempts to limit its exposure to foreign currency
fluctuations in contracts by requiring client payments in U.S. dollars or
other currencies that correspond to the currency in which project costs are
incurred. Changes in the value of foreign currencies could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
Intense Competition Poses Challenges to Profitability. The Company serves
markets that are highly competitive and in which a large number of
multinational companies compete such as the Bechtel Group, the Washington
Group and Jacobs Engineering Group. In particular, the engineering and
construction markets are highly competitive and require substantial resources
and capital investment in equipment, technology and skilled personnel.
Competition also impacts the Company's contract prices and profit margins.
Intense competition is expected to continue in these markets, presenting the
Company with significant challenges in its ability to maintain strong growth
rates and acceptable profit margins. In the event that the Company is unable
to meet these competitive challenges, there could be a material adverse effect
on the Company's results of operations and financial condition.
Competition and Other Factors in AMECO's Equipment Business Could Impact
the Company's Operating Results: AMECO, one of the subsidiaries in the Fluor
Global Services strategic business enterprise, derives its revenues from
equipment rental and sales. This industry is highly fragmented, competitive
and is rapidly consolidating. Many of AMECO's competitors are more
geographically diverse and have greater name recognition than AMECO. There can
be no assurance that AMECO will not encounter increased competition from
existing competitors or new market entrants that will be significantly larger
or have greater marketing and other resources than AMECO. In addition, to the
extent existing or future competitors seek to gain or retain market share by
reducing prices, AMECO may be required to lower its prices and rates, thereby
adversely affecting operating results. The Company has also announced its
intention to transact the dealership activities of AMECO. In the event such a
transaction occurred, and if the sales price was less than the book value for
the dealerships, the Company might be required to report a loss resulting from
the transaction. The Company's results of operations and financial condition
could be materially adversely affected by such events.
11
<PAGE>
Item 2. Properties
Major Facilities
Operations of Fluor and its subsidiaries are conducted in both owned and
leased properties totaling approximately 7.0 million square feet. In addition,
certain owned or leased properties of Fluor and its subsidiaries are leased or
subleased to third party tenants. The following table describes the location
and general character of the major existing facilities:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Location Interest Purpose
-------- -------- -------
<C> <C> <S>
United States and Canada:
Aliso Viejo, California Leased Fluor Corporate
Headquarters and Fluor
Daniel and Fluor Global
Services Operations
Calgary, Canada Leased Fluor Daniel Canada
Operations
Charlotte, North Carolina Leased Duke/Fluor Daniel
Operations
Cincinnati, Ohio Leased Fluor Daniel Operations
Greenville, South Carolina Owned and Leased Fluor Daniel, Fluor
Global Services and
AMECO Operations
Houston (Sugar Land office), Texas Owned Fluor Daniel and Fluor
Global Services
Operations
Irvine, California Leased Fluor Signature Services
Operations
Pasadena, Texas Owned AMECO Offices and Yard
Richland, Washington Leased Fluor Federal Services
Operations
Rumford, Rhode Island Leased Fluor Daniel Operations
San Juan, Puerto Rico Leased Fluor Daniel Operations
Tucson, Arizona Leased Fluor Daniel Operations
Vancouver, Canada Leased Fluor Daniel Wright
Operations
The Americas:
Caracas, Venezuela Leased Fluor Daniel Operations
Mexico City, Mexico Leased ICA Fluor Daniel
Operations
Monterey, Mexico Owned AMECO Offices and Yard
Santiago, Chile Owned and Leased Fluor Daniel Chile and
AMECO Operations
Europe, Africa and Middle East:
Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia (Dhahran area) Owned Fluor Daniel Arabia
Operations
Asturias, Spain Owned Fluor Daniel Espana
Operations
Camberley, England Leased Fluor Daniel Limited
Operations
Haarlem, Netherlands Owned and Leased Fluor Daniel Operations
Sandton, South Africa Leased Fluor Daniel Southern
Africa Operations
Asia and Asia Pacific:
Jakarta, Indonesia Leased Fluor Daniel Eastern,
Inc. Operations
Manila, Philippines Owned and Leased Fluor Daniel Inc.
Philippines Operations
Melbourne, Australia Leased Fluor Daniel Pty Ltd.
Operations
New Dehli, India Leased Fluor Daniel India
Private Ltd. Operations
</TABLE>
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Disputes have arisen between a subsidiary of Fluor Daniel and its client,
Anaconda Nickel, over the Murrin Murrin Nickel Cobalt project located in
Western Australia. Both parties have initiated the dispute resolution process
under the contract. Anaconda's primary contention is that the process design,
through which pressurized and super heated metal slurry flows through a series
of depressurization flash vessels, is defective and incapable of proper
operation. Anaconda also contends that the plant suffers from numerous other
defects and that it has suffered consequential losses, such as loss of profit,
for which it seeks payment from the Company. Anaconda contends that Old Fluor
is liable to Anaconda in the total amount of A$1billion, A$600 million of
which is
12
<PAGE>
alleged consequential damages. Under the Distribution Agreement, if Old Fluor
is found liable, the Company would be responsible for any liability resulting
therefrom.
The Company vigorously disputes and denies Anaconda's allegations. Among
other things, the Company contends that Anaconda has and continues to
improperly operate the facility causing the flash vessels to fail. When
Anaconda complied with the written operating procedures, the flash vessels
operated properly and continuously. Moreover, the Company contends that
Anaconda has failed to supply the contractually guaranteed feedstock, adversely
affecting the performance of the facility. With respect to the alleged loss of
insurance coverage, the Company contends that it made no representations
whatsoever regarding the flash tank process design, and that, in any event,
Anaconda has not, in fact, lost any insurance coverage, inasmuch as coverage is
being determined by arbitration currently underway in London between Anaconda
and Lloyds of London. The Company rejects Anaconda's claim of loss of profit,
inasmuch as the Company has complied with the applicable standards of care in
the industry and irrespective of this, the contract between the Company and
Anaconda contains a waiver of consequential damages, such as loss of profit.
Old Fluor has provided notice to all applicable insurance carriers of the
disputes between the parties. If and to the extent that these problems are
ultimately determined to be the responsibility of the Company, the Company
anticipates recovering a substantial portion of this amount from available
insurance previously maintained by Old Fluor. For additional discussion, see
Contingencies and Commitments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
in Fluor's 2000 Annual Report to shareholders, which section is incorporated
herein by this reference.
In addition, Fluor and its subsidiaries, incident to their normal business
activities, are parties to a number of other legal proceedings and other
matters in various stages of development. While the Company cannot predict the
outcome of these proceedings, in the opinion of the Company and based on
reports of counsel, any liability arising from these matters individually and
in the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect upon the consolidated
financial position or results of operations of Fluor after giving effect to
provisions already recorded.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Company did not submit any matters to a vote of security holders during
the fourth quarter of 2000.
Executive Officers of the Registrant(1)
Philip J. Carroll, Jr., age 63
Director since July 1998; Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
since July 1998; formerly President and Chief Executive Officer of Shell Oil
Company from 1993.
Alan L. Boeckmann, age 52
President and Chief Executive Officer, Fluor Daniel, since March 1999;
formerly Group President, Energy and Chemicals from 1996; formerly President,
Chemicals, Plastics and Fibers from 1994; joined the Company in 1979 with
previous service from 1974 to 1977.
Lawrence N. Fisher, age 56
Senior Vice President, Law and Secretary, since 1996; formerly Vice
President, Corporate Law and Assistant Secretary from 1984; joined the Company
in 1974.
Lisa Glatch, age 38
Senior Vice President, Human Resources & Administration, since November
2000; formerly Los Angeles Operations Manager, Jacobs Engineering Group since
April 2000; formerly Vice President and Corporate Account Manager, Fluor
Corporation since August 1999; formerly Vice President and Top Aide to Fluor
Daniel
13
<PAGE>
Chief Executive since January 1999; formerly Vice President of Global
Automation since 1997; formerly Project Director/Manager since 1993; joined
the Company in 1986.
Ralph F. Hake, age 51
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, since June 1999;
formerly Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Whirlpool Corporation from 1997; formerly Senior Executive Vice President of
Global Operations of Whirlpool Corporation from 1996; formerly Executive Vice
President, North American Appliance Group of Whirlpool Corporation from 1992;
joined the Company in 1999.
Stephen M. Johnson, age 49
Senior Vice President, Global Development, Marketing and Strategy since
March 2000; formerly, Vice President Global Development from November 1999;
formerly, Vice President, Sales of Fluor Daniel from 1995; joined the Company
in 1973.
James O. Rollans, age 58
Director since 1997; President and Chief Executive Officer of Fluor
Signature Services since March 1999; formerly Chief Financial Officer from
1998; formerly Chief Administrative Officer from 1994; formerly Senior Vice
President from 1992; joined the Company in 1982.
James C. Stein, age 57
Director since 1997; President and Chief Executive Officer of Fluor Global
Services since March 1999; formerly President and Chief Operating Officer,
Fluor Daniel, Inc.(2) from 1997; formerly Group President, Diversified
Services, of Fluor Daniel, Inc.(2) from 1994; joined the Company in 1964.
- --------
(1) Except where otherwise indicated, all references are to positions held
with Fluor Corporation.
(2) Fluor Daniel, Inc. by virtue of name change filed in October 1999 is now
known as Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
14
<PAGE>
PART II
Information for Items 5, 6, 7 and 7A is contained in Fluor's 2000 Annual
Report to shareholders, which information is incorporated herein by reference:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Annual Report to Shareholders
Item No. Title Section
-------- ----- -----------------------------
<C> <S> <C>
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common
Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters........................ Shareholders' Reference
Item 6. Selected Financial Data........ Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations...... Management's Discussion and Analysis
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative
Discussions about Market Risk.. Management's Discussion and Analysis
</TABLE>
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Information for Item 8 is included in Fluor's consolidated financial
statements as of October 31, 2000 and 1999 and for each of the three years in
the period ended October 31, 2000 and Fluor's unaudited quarterly financial
data for the two year period ended October 31, 2000, in the Consolidated
Financial Statements (including the Consolidated Balance Sheet, Consolidated
Statement of Earnings, Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, Consolidated
Statement of Shareholders' Equity and Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements) and unaudited Quarterly Financial Data sections of Fluor's 2000
Annual Report to shareholders, which are incorporated herein by reference. The
report of independent auditors on Fluor's consolidated financial statements is
in the Management's and Independent Auditors' Reports section of Fluor's 2000
Annual Report to shareholders and is also incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
There have been no changes in, or disagreements with, accountants on
accounting and financial disclosure.
15
<PAGE>
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information concerning Fluor's executive officers is included under the
caption "Executive Officers of the Registrant" in Part I, following Item 4.
Other information required by this item is included in the Biographical
section of the Election of Directors portion of the definitive proxy statement
pursuant to Regulation 14A, involving the election of directors, which is
incorporated herein by reference and will be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Commission") not later than 120 days after the close
of Fluor's fiscal year ended October 31, 2000.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Fluor maintains certain employee benefit plans and programs in which its
executive officers and directors are participants. Copies of these plans and
programs are set forth or incorporated by reference as Exhibits 10.3 through
10.18 inclusive to this report. Certain of these plans and programs provide
for payment of benefits or for acceleration of vesting of benefits upon the
occurrence of a change of control of Fluor as that term is defined in such
plans and programs. The amounts payable thereunder would represent an
increased cost to be paid by Fluor (and indirectly by its shareholders) in the
event of a change in control of Fluor. This increased cost would be a factor
to be taken into account by a prospective purchaser of the Company in
determining whether and at what price, it would seek control of the Company
and whether it would seek the removal of then existing management.
If a change of control were to have occurred on October 31, 2000, based on
plans and programs then in effect, the additional amounts payable by Fluor,
either in cash or in stock, if each of the five most highly compensated
executive officers and all executive officers as a group were thereupon
involuntarily terminated without cause would be as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Restricted Supplemental
Individual or Group Stock Plans (1) Benefit Plan (2)
------------------- --------------- ----------------
<S> <C> <C>
Philip J. Carroll, Jr. .................. $ 880,983 $1,739,750
Alan L. Boeckmann........................ 2,336,411 347,237
Ralph F. Hake............................ 247,180 227,491
James C. Stein........................... 509,088 691,971
James O. Rollans......................... 591,765 691,791
All Executive Officers (8) including the
above................................... $4,837,018 $3,798,374
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Value at October 31, 2000 of previously awarded restricted stock which
would vest upon change of control.
(2) Lump sum entitlement of previously awarded benefits which would vest upon
change of control. Lump sum benefit based on age except for Mr. Hake and
Mr. Boeckmann, where age 55 was used.
Further disclosure required by this item is included in the Organization
and Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation and Executive
Compensation and Other Information sections of the definitive proxy statement
pursuant to Regulation 14A, involving the election of directors, which is
incorporated herein by reference and will be filed not later than 120 days
after the close of Fluor's fiscal year ended October 31, 2000.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Information required by this item is included in the Stock Ownership
section of the Election of Directors portion of the definitive proxy statement
pursuant to Regulation 14A, involving the election of directors, which is
incorporated herein by reference and will be filed not later than 120 days
after the close of Fluor's fiscal year ended October 31, 2000.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Information required by this item is included in the Other Matters section
of the Election of Directors portion of the definitive proxy statement
pursuant to Regulation 14A, involving the election of directors, which is
incorporated herein by reference and will be filed not later than 120 days
after the close of Fluor's fiscal year ended October 31, 2000.
16
<PAGE>
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibit, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Documents filed as part of this report:
1. Financial Statements: The following financial statements are contained in
the Company's 2000 Annual Report to shareholders:
Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the years ended October 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Consolidated Balance Sheet at October 31, 2000 and 1999
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended October 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended October
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
See Part II, Item 8 of this report for information regarding the
incorporation by reference herein of such financial statements.
2. Financial Statement Schedules: All schedules have been omitted since the
required information is not present or not present in amounts sufficient
to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required
is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
3. Exhibits:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit Description
------- -----------
<C> <S>
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
registrant (1)
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the registrant (1)
10.1 Distribution Agreement between the registrant, Fluor Corporation, and
Fluor Corporation (2)
10.2 Tax Sharing Agreement between the Fluor Corporation and A.T. Massey
Coal Company, Inc. (3)
10.3 Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1998, between Fluor
Corporation and Philip J. Carroll (1)
10.4 Special Retention Program, dated September 24, 1999, between Fluor
Corporation and James O. Rollans (1)
10.5 Special Retention Program, dated September 24, 1999, between Fluor
Corporation and James C. Stein (1)
10.6 Special Retention Program, dated March 7, 2000, between Fluor
Corporation and Alan L. Boeckmann (1)
10.7 Fluor Corporation 2000 Executive Performance Incentive Plan (4)
10.8 Fluor Corporation 2000 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (5)
10.9 Fluor Corporation Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (1)
10.10 Fluor Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (1)
10.11 Fluor Executive's Supplemental Medical Plan (1)
10.12 Directors' Life Insurance Summary (1)
10.13 Fluor Executives' Supplemental Benefit Plan (1)
10.14 Fluor Special Executive Incentive Plan (1)
10.15 Fluor Corporation Retirement Plan for Outside Directors (1)
10.16 Executive Severance Plan (1)
</TABLE>
17
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit Description
------- -----------
<C> <S>
10.17 1982 Fluor Shadow Stock Plan (1)
10.18 1997 Fluor Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (1)
13 Certain portions of 2000 Annual Report to shareholders (with the
exception of the information incorporated by reference into Items 1,
5, 6, 7, 7A and 8 of this report, Fluor's 2000 Annual Report to
shareholders is not deemed to be filed as a part of this report)
21 Subsidiaries of the registrant
23 Consent of Independent Auditors
24 Manually signed Powers of Attorney executed by certain Fluor directors
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Filed as the same numbered exhibit to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form 10/A (Amendment No. 1) filed on November 30, 2000 and
incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's report on Form 8-K filed on
December 7, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's report on Form 8-K filed on
December 7, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
(4) Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's report on Form 8-K filed on
December 29, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
(5) Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's report on Form 8-K filed on
December 29, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K filed during fiscal 2000: (None)
18
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FLUOR CORPORATION
January 29, 2001
/s/ R. F. Hake
By: _________________________________
R. F. Hake,
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Principal Executive Officer and
Director:
/s/ P. J. Carroll, Jr. Chief Executive Officer January 29, 2001
____________________________________
P. J. Carroll, Jr.
Principal Financial Officer:
/s/ R. F. Hake Executive Vice President and January 29, 2001
____________________________________ Chief Financial Officer
R. F. Hake
Principal Accounting Officer:
/s/ V. L. Prechtl Vice President and January 29, 2001
____________________________________ Controller
V. L. Prechtl
Other Directors:
* Director January 29, 2001
____________________________________
C. A. Campbell, Jr.
* Director January 29, 2001
____________________________________
P. J. Fluor
* Director January 29, 2001
____________________________________
D. P. Gardner
* Director January 29, 2001
____________________________________
T. L. Gossage
* Director January 29, 2001
____________________________________
B. R. Inman
* Director January 29, 2001
____________________________________
V. S. Martinez
* Director January 29, 2001
____________________________________
D. R. O'Hare
</TABLE>
19
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
<S> <C> <C>
* Director January 29, 2001
____________________________________
Lord Renwick, K.C.M.G.
* Director January 29, 2001
____________________________________
M. R. Seger
* Director January 29, 2001
____________________________________
J. O. Rollans
* Director January 29, 2001
____________________________________
J. C. Stein
/s/ L. N. Fisher January 29, 2001
*By: _______________________________
L. N. Fisher
Attorney-in-fact
</TABLE>
Manually signed Powers of Attorney authorizing L. N. Fisher and E. P. Helm
and each of them, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2000 and any amendments thereto as attorneys-in-fact for
certain directors and officers of the registrant are included herein as Exhibit
24.
20
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT INDEX
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit Description
------- -----------
<C> <S>
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
registrant (1)
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the registrant (1)
10.1 Distribution Agreement between the registrant, Fluor Corporation, and
Fluor Corporation (2)
10.2 Tax Sharing Agreement between the Fluor Corporation and A.T. Massey
Coal Company, Inc. (3)
10.3 Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1998, between Fluor
Corporation and Philip J. Carroll (1)
10.4 Special Retention Program, dated September 24, 1999, between Fluor
Corporation and James O. Rollans (1)
10.5 Special Retention Program, dated September 24, 1999, between Fluor
Corporation and James C. Stein (1)
10.6 Special Retention Program, dated March 7, 2000, between Fluor
Corporation and Alan L. Boeckmann (1)
10.7 Fluor Corporation 2000 Executive Performance Incentive Plan (4)
10.8 Fluor Corporation 2000 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (5)
10.9 Fluor Corporation Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (1)
10.10 Fluor Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (1)
10.11 Fluor Executive's Supplemental Medical Plan (1)
10.12 Directors' Life Insurance Summary (1)
10.13 Fluor Executives' Supplemental Benefit Plan (1)
10.14 Fluor Special Executive Incentive Plan (1)
10.15 Fluor Corporation Retirement Plan for Outside Directors (1)
10.16 Executive Severance Plan (1)
10.17 1982 Fluor Shadow Stock Plan (1)
10.18 1997 Fluor Stock Appreciation Rights Plan (1)
13 Certain portions of 2000 Annual Report to shareholders (with the
exception of the information incorporated by reference into Items 1,
5, 6, 7, 7A and 8 of this report, Fluor's 2000 Annual Report to
shareholders is not deemed to be filed as a part of this report)
21 Subsidiaries of the registrant
23 Consent of Independent Auditors
24 Manually signed Powers of Attorney executed by certain Fluor directors
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Filed as the same numbered exhibit to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form 10/A (Amendment No. 1) filed on November 30, 2000 and
incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's report on Form 8-K filed on
December 7, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
(3) Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's report on Form 8-K filed on
December 7, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
(4) Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's report on Form 8-K filed on
December 29, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
(5) Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's report on Form 8-K filed on
December 29, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-13
<SEQUENCE>2
<FILENAME>0002.txt
<DESCRIPTION>CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 13
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
FLUOR DANIEL OPERATING STATISTICS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended October 31, (in millions) 2000 1999 1998
------------------------------------ ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 6,998 $ 8,403 $ 9,736
Customer-furnished material included in revenues 2,009 3,125 3,916
Work performed $ 6,998 $ 8,403 $ 9,736
Gross margin percent 5.1% 5.7% 4.8%
Operating profit $ 128 $ 160 $ 161
New awards $ 6,075 $ 4,757 $ 8,173
New awards gross margin percent 6.9% 7.2% 6.0%
Backlog $ 6,730 $ 6,770 $10,403
Backlog gross margin percent 6.1% 4.6% 4.0%
Salaried employees 12,347 18,147 24,060
</TABLE>
Backlog by Strategic Business Unit (SBU)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
Year ended October 31, (in millions) Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars Percent
------------------------------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Energy & Chemicals $ 4,356 65% $ 4,124 60% $ 5,752 55%
Manufacturing & Life Sciences 1,078 16% 1,592 24% 2,261 22%
Mining 964 14% 658 10% 1,890 18%
Infrastructure 332 5% 396 6% 500 5%
------- --- ------- --- -------- ---
Total backlog $ 6,730 100% $ 6,770 100% $ 10,403 100%
======= === ======= === ======== ===
</TABLE>
Backlog by Region
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
Year ended October 31, (in millions) Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars Percent
------------------------------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
United States $ 2,968 44% $ 2,870 42% $ 3,942 38%
Asia Pacific (includes Australia) 526 8% 780 12% 2,018 19%
EAME* 448 7% 1,062 16% 2,003 19%
Americas 2,788 41% 2,058 30% 2,440 24%
------- --- ------- --- -------- ---
Total backlog $ 6,730 100% $ 6,770 100% $ 10,403 100%
======= === ======= === ======== ===
</TABLE>
____________
* EAME represents Europe, Africa and the Middle East.
PAGE 14
<PAGE>
FLUOR GLOBAL SERVICES OPERATING STATISTICS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended October 31, (in millions) 2000 1999 1998
------------------------------------ ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 2,953 $ 2,931 $ 2,641
Work performed $ 2,232 $ 2,055 $ 1,857
Gross margin percent 9.9% 9.4% 11.2%
Operating profit $ 77 $ 92 $ 81
New awards $ 3,569 $ 2,032 $ 1,819
New awards gross margin percent 6.8% 7.8% 7.6%
Backlog $ 3,282 $ 2,372 $ 2,242
Backlog gross margin percent 6.3% 6.1% 6.4%
Salaried employees 7,563 6,011 5,554
</TABLE>
Backlog by Strategic Business Unit (SBU)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
Year ended October 31, (in millions) Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars Percent
------------------------------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operations & Maintenance $ 1,571 48% $ 1,127 48% $ 1,217 54%
Telecommunications 946 29% 525 22% 135 6%
Fluor Federal Services 765 23% 710 30% 781 35%
Consulting Services and Other -- --% 10 --% 109 5%
------- --- ------- --- -------- ---
Total backlog $ 3,282 100% $ 2,372 100% $ 2,242 100%
======= === ======= === ======= ===
</TABLE>
Backlog by Region
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
Year ended October 31, (in millions) Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars Percent
------------------------------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
United States $ 2,712 83% $ 2,137 90% $ 1,979 88%
Asia Pacific (includes Australia) 156 5% 218 9% 243 11%
EAME* 414 12% 12 1% 9 0%
Americas 0 0% 5 0% 11 1%
------- --- ------- --- ------- ---
Total backlog $ 3,282 100% $ 2,372 100% $ 2,242 100%
======= === ======= === ======= ===
</TABLE>
____________
* EAME represents Europe, Africa and the Middle East.
PAGE 18
<PAGE>
Selected Financial Data
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions, except per share amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Consolidated Operating Results
Revenues $ 9,970.2 $ 11,334.4 $ 12,377.5 $ 13,217.5 $ 10,054.4
Earnings from continuing operations before taxes 142.2 76.6 222.7 119.4 280.4
Earnings from continuing operations, net 99.8 26.7 135.9 50.5 173.4
Discontinued operations, net 24.1 77.5 99.4 95.7 94.7
Net earnings 123.9 104.2 235.3 146.2 268.1
Basic earnings per share
Continuing operations 1.33 0.35 1.73 0.61 2.10
Discontinued operations 0.32 1.03 1.26 1.15 1.14
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic earnings per share 1.65 1.38 2.99 1.76 3.24
Diluted earnings per share
Continuing operations 1.31 0.35 1.72 0.60 2.08
Discontinued operations 0.31 1.02 1.25 1.15 1.13
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diluted earnings per share $ 1.62 $ 1.37 $ 2.97 $ 1.75 $ 3.21
Return on average shareholders' equity 7.7% 6.8% 14.5% 8.7% 17.4%
Cash dividends per common share $ 1.00 $ 0.80 $ 0.80 $ 0.76 $ 0.68
Consolidated Financial Position
Current assets $ 1,447.8 $ 1,910.2 $ 2,277.2 $ 2,213.4 $ 1,796.8
Current liabilities 1,620.4 2,204.3 2,495.6 1,978.2 1,645.5
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Working capital (172.6) (294.1) (218.4) 235.2 151.3
Net assets of discontinued operations 866.2 -- -- -- --
Property, plant and equipment, net 756.8 2,223.0 2,147.3 1,938.8 1,677.7
Total assets 3,652.7 4,886.1 5,019.2 4,685.3 3,951.7
Capitalization
Short-term debt* 253.5 247.9 430.7 88.8 67.2
Long-term debt 17.6 317.5 300.4 300.5 3.0
Shareholders' equity 1,609.2 1,581.4 1,525.6 1,741.1 1,669.7
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total capitalization $ 1,880.3 $ 2,146.8 $ 2,256.7 $ 2,130.4 $ 1,739.9
Total debt as a percent of total capitalization 14.4% 26.3% 32.4% 18.3% 4.0%
Pro forma total debt as a percent of
total capitalization** 36.7% -- -- -- --
Shareholders' equity per common share $ 21.24 $ 20.80 $ 20.19 $ 20.79 $ 19.93
Common shares outstanding at October 31 75.7 76.0 75.6 83.7 83.8
Other Data
New awards $ 9,644.2 $ 6,789.4 $ 9,991.9 $ 12,122.1 $ 12,487.8
Backlog at year end 10,012.2 9,142.0 12,645.3 14,370.0 15,757.4
Capital expenditures and acquisitions -
continuing operations 284.1 277.0 304.5 340.8 258.7
Cash provided by operating activities $ 141.8 $ 464.9 $ 702.5 $ 328.6 $ 406.9
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
*Includes commercial paper, loan notes, a note payable to affiliate,
miscellaneous trade notes payable and the current portion of long-term debt.
**As if the spin-off distribution had occurred on October 31, 2000.
As discussed in the first note to the accompanying financial statements, on
November 30, 2000 the shareholders approved a spin-off distribution that will
separate the company into two publicly traded companies - a "new" Fluor and
Massey Energy Company. The net assets of Massey Energy Company at October 31,
2000 and its results of operations for all periods presented have been
reclassified and are presented as discontinued operations.
See Management's Discussion and Analysis on pages 23 to 28 and Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 33 to 44 for information relating to
significant items affecting the results of operations.
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Management's Discussion and Analysis
Overview
On June 7, 2000, the Board of Directors of Fluor Corporation ("Old Fluor")
announced a plan to separate the company into two publicly traded companies, a
"new" Fluor Corporation ("New Fluor" or the "company") and Massey Energy Company
("Massey"). The plan was approved by the shareholders and the Board of Directors
of Old Fluor on November 30, 2000. The separation of the two companies was
accomplished through a distribution of 100% of the common stock of New Fluor to
shareholders of Old Fluor (the "Distribution"), which will represent a
continuing interest in businesses to be conducted by New Fluor. As a result of
the Distribution, each Old Fluor shareholder received one share of New Fluor
common stock for each share of Old Fluor common stock while retaining their
shares in Old Fluor, whose name was changed to Massey. As a result of the
Distribution, the shares of Massey represent a continuing interest only in the
coal business and other operations formerly conducted by Old Fluor's coal
subsidiary, A.T. Massey Coal Company, Inc.
Prior to the Distribution, Old Fluor received a ruling from the Internal
Revenue Service to the effect that the Distribution would be considered to be
tax-free for Federal income tax purposes. For purposes of effecting the
Distribution and governing certain of the ongoing relationships among New Fluor
and Massey after the Distribution and to provide for an orderly transition, the
companies entered into various agreements including, without limitation, a
Distribution Agreement and a Tax Sharing Agreement. Because of the relative
significance of the company's operations to Old Fluor, the company will be
treated as the "accounting successor" for financial reporting purposes.
Accordingly, pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 30,
"Reporting the Results of Operations -- Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a
Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring
Events and Transactions," the consolidated financial statements have been
adjusted to reflect the distribution. Massey's results of operations for all
periods presented and its net assets as of October 31, 2000 have been
reclassified and are presented as discontinued operations.
In connection with the separation of New Fluor and Massey, New Fluor will
change to a calendar-year basis of reporting financial results. As a requirement
of this change, the company will report results for November and December 2000
as a separate transition period.
The following discussion and analysis is provided to increase understanding
of, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. For purposes of reviewing this document,
"operating profit" is calculated as revenues less cost of revenues excluding:
special provision; corporate administrative and general expense; interest
expense; interest income; domestic and foreign income taxes; gain or loss on
discontinued operations; and certain other miscellaneous non-operating income
and expense items which are immaterial.
Results of Operations
As a result of a strategic reorganization initiated during 1999, the company
realigned its operating units into four business segments (which the company
refers to as Strategic Business Enterprises): Fluor Daniel, Fluor Global
Services, Fluor Signature Services and Coal. The Fluor Daniel segment provides
design, engineering, procurement and construction services on a worldwide basis
to an extensive range of industrial, commercial, utility, natural resources and
energy clients. The Fluor Global Services segment, which includes American
Equipment Company, TRS Staffing Solutions, Fluor Federal Services,
Telecommunications and Operations & Maintenance, provides outsourcing and asset
management solutions to its customers. Fluor Signature Services, which commenced
operations on November 1, 1999, was created to provide business administration
and support services for the benefit of the company and ultimately, to
unaffiliated customers. Commencing in November 2000, the operations of TRS
Staffing Solutions were transferred to Fluor Signature Services. The Coal
segment, which is reported as discontinued operations and is now part of Massey,
produces, processes and sells high-quality, low-sulfur steam coal for the
utility industry as well as industrial customers, and metallurgical coal for the
steel industry.
To implement the 1999 strategic reorganization, the company recorded a
special provision of $117.2 million in 1999 and reversed $17.9 million of that
provision in 2000 - see Strategic Reorganization Costs elsewhere in Management's
Discussion and Analysis. The provision and subsequent adjustment were not
allocated to the business segments.
Fluor Daniel Segment
The business units of Fluor Daniel were reorganized during 2000 and are
presented on the new basis for each of the three years ended October 31, 2000.
Total 2000 new awards were $6.1 billion compared with $4.8 billion in 1999
and $8.2 billion in 1998. The following table sets forth new awards for each of
the segment's business units:
2000 1999 1998
Year ended October 31, Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars Percent
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Energy & Chemicals $ 3,923 65% $ 3,363 70% $ 4,756 58%
Manufacturing &
Life Sciences 1,292 21% 1,232 26% 2,455 30%
Mining 691 11% 26 1% 464 6%
Infrastructure 169 3% 136 3% 498 6%
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total new awards $ 6,075 100% $ 4,757 100% $ 8,173 100%
=======================================================
United States $ 2,983 49% $ 2,267 47% $ 4,112 37%
International 3,092 51% 2,490 53% 4,061 63%
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total new awards $ 6,075 100% $ 4,757 100% $ 8,173 100%
=======================================================
PAGE 23
<PAGE>
New awards in 2000 were higher compared with 1999 as the principal result
of a strengthening business environment. New awards in 1999 were lower compared
with 1998, reflecting both the lingering impact of deferred capital spending by
clients, primarily in the petrochemical and mining industries, and the company's
emphasis on greater project selectivity. The large size and uncertain timing of
complex, international projects can create variability in the company's award
pattern; consequently, future award trends are difficult to predict with
certainty. However, given the continuing strength of the global economic
environment, including higher oil prices and increasing commodity prices, as
well as a regulatory environment that continues to support increased investment
in areas such as clean fuels, the company is optimistic about the level of new
awards in 2001.
Since 1998 the trend in new awards activity within each business unit
reflects the impact of the economic conditions and operating strategies noted
above. New awards for 2000 include the $800 million Hamaca crude oil upgrading
project in Venezuela. There were no individual new awards in excess of $600
million in either of the years 1999 or 1998. In the fourth quarter of 2000,
growth in new awards was concentrated in the Energy & Chemicals and
Manufacturing & Life Sciences business units. The Mining business unit's new
awards in 1999 and 1998 had been reduced by depressed commodity prices, thereby
limiting new projects, as well as this unit's focus on project selectivity. The
trend began to reverse during 2000, with a substantial increase in new awards.
The decrease in new awards in 1999 compared with 1998 for the Manufacturing &
Life Sciences business unit is primarily the result of an increased focus on
project selectivity.
Backlog at October 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $6.7 billion, $6.8 billion
and $10.4 billion, respectively. (See page 14 in this annual report for
information relating to backlog by business unit.) The backlog level has
stabilized during 2000 as a result of the higher level of new awards compared
with 1999. The decrease in total backlog at the end of 1999 was consistent with
substantially lower new awards during that year. Work performed on existing
projects has exceeded new awards in each of the years 2000, 1999 and 1998,
although the disparity was much less in 2000. The decrease in backlog from
projects located outside the United States during 1999 resulted from work
performed on international projects such as a copper and gold mine in Indonesia
and a petrochemical project in Saudi Arabia, in addition to a 39 percent
decrease in international-related new awards. Domestic backlog was also impacted
during 1999 by lower new awards and work performed on existing projects. The
relationship of domestic versus international backlog has remained relatively
stable during all of the years 1998 through 2000, with international backlog
constituting approximately one-half of total backlog. Although backlog reflects
business which is considered to be firm, cancellations or scope adjustments may
occur. Backlog is adjusted to reflect any known project cancellations, deferrals
and revised project scope and cost, both upward and downward.
Fluor Daniel revenues decreased to $7.0 billion in 2000 compared with $8.4
billion in 1999 and $9.7 billion in 1998, reflecting the impact of lower new
awards in 1999 and the company's focus on project selectivity. Fluor Daniel
operating profit was $128 million (1.83% of revenues) in 2000, $160 million
(1.91% of revenues) in 1999 and $161 million (1.65% of revenues) in 1998.
Margins have increased in response to greater project selectivity and execution,
as well as improved overhead cost management. However, such margin improvements
have been offset (in fiscal year 2000) or reduced (in fiscal year 1999) by loss
provisions on specific projects.
Operating profit during 2000 was adversely impacted by a provision totaling
$60 million, or 0.86% of the segment's revenues for the year, on a Duke/Fluor
Daniel joint venture project that is located in Dearborn, Michigan. The
provision represents the company's equal share of the cost overruns on the
project that were incurred due to a number of adverse factors, including labor
productivity and substantial owner delays and scope of work changes. Results for
the year ended October 31, 1999 for Fluor Daniel include a provision totaling
$84 million for process design problems which arose on its Murrin Murrin Nickel
Cobalt project located in Western Australia. The company anticipates recovering
a portion of this amount and, accordingly, has recorded $64 million in expected
insurance recoveries. The result on operating profit was a negative $20 million
impact, or 0.24% of the segment's revenues for 1999, reflecting costs in excess
of contract maximums and which are not otherwise recoverable from any insurance
coverage.
The majority of Fluor Daniel's engineering and construction contracts
provide for reimbursement of costs plus a fixed or percentage fee. In the highly
competitive markets served by this segment, there is an increasing trend for
cost-reimbursable contracts with incentive-fee arrangements and fixed or unit
price contracts. In certain instances, Fluor Daniel has provided guaranteed
completion dates and/or achievement of other performance criteria. Failure to
meet schedule or performance guarantees or increases in contract costs can
result in non-recoverable costs, which could exceed revenues realized from the
project. Fluor Daniel continues to focus on improving operating margins by
enhancing selectivity in the projects it pursues, lowering overhead costs and
improving project execution.
PAGE 24
<PAGE>
FLOUR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Fluor Global Services Segment
Total 2000 new awards were $3.6 billion compared with $2.0 billion in 1999 and
$1.8 billion in 1998. The following table sets forth new awards for each of the
segment's business units:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
Year ended October 31, Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars Percent
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operations &
Maintenance $ 1,660 47% $ 772 38% $ 1,106 61%
Telecommunications 1,099 31% 646 32% 30 2%
Fluor Federal Services 800 22% 582 29% 451 25%
Consulting Services
and Other 10 --% 32 1% 232 12%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total new awards $ 3,569 100% $ 2,032 100% $ 1,819 100%
===================================================================================
United States $ 2,961 83% $ 1,928 95% $ 1,523 84%
International 608 17% 104 5% 296 16%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total new awards $ 3,569 100% $ 2,032 100% $ 1,819 100%
===================================================================================
</TABLE>
New awards were dramatically higher in 2000, evidencing a strong first full
year of operations for Fluor Global Services as a separate Strategic Business
Enterprise of Fluor. The Operations & Maintenance business unit has capitalized
on the growing trend toward outsourcing of non-core activities, offering its
customers improved performance at a lower cost. The Telecommunications unit
supports the continuing evolution of that industry and has been selected to
manage a number of large domestic and international projects. New awards in 1999
were higher compared with 1998, principally as a result of an increase in
telecommunications projects. Because of the nature of the services performed by
Fluor Global Services, primarily related to American Equipment Company (AMECO)
and TRS Staffing Solutions, a significant portion of this segment's activities
are not includable in backlog.
Backlog at October 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 was $3.3 billion, $2.4 billion
and $2.2 billion, respectively. (See page 18 in this annual report for
information relating to backlog by business unit.) The increase in total backlog
is consistent with the increasing trend in new awards. Although backlog reflects
business that is considered to be firm, cancellations or scope adjustments may
occur. Backlog is adjusted to reflect any known project cancellations, deferrals
and revised project scope and cost, both upward and downward.
Fluor Global Services revenues increased to $3.0 billion in 2000 compared
with $2.9 billion in 1999 and $2.6 billion in 1998. Revenue gains by the
Telecommunications and Operations & Maintenance business units during 2000 more
than offset declines experienced by the other business units. The increase in
revenues during 1999 resulted from higher revenues in its AMECO, Fluor Federal
Services and Telecommunications business units. Operating profit for the segment
was $77 million in 2000 (2.61% of revenues), $92 million in 1999 (3.14% of
revenues) and $81 million in 1998 (3.07% of revenues). The 2000 operating profit
includes a $25 million charge relating to an adjustment of the fair value of
accounts receivable, equipment inventory and certain other assets of AMECO's
dealership operations and a $19 million charge relating to the write-off of
certain assets and a loss on the sale of a European-based consulting business.
Excluding these 2000 impacts, operating profit increased to $121 million (4.10%
of revenues), reflecting higher project gross margins and reductions in overhead
compared with the $92 million operating profit for 1999. Operating profit
increased in 1999 compared with 1998 primarily due to the elimination of certain
unprofitable operations which negatively impacted 1998 results.
The majority of Fluor Global Services' contracts provide for reimbursement
of costs plus a fixed or percentage fee. Due to intense competitive market
conditions, there is an increasing trend for contracts with incentive-fee
arrangements or fixed or unit price contracts. In certain instances, contracts
provide guaranteed completion dates and/or achievement of other performance
criteria. Failure to meet schedule or performance guarantees or increases in
contract costs can result in non-recoverable costs, which could exceed revenues
realized from the project.
In October 1998, the company entered into an agreement to sell its
ownership interest in Fluor Daniel GTI, Inc. ("FD/GTI"), an environmental
services company. Under terms of the agreement, the company sold its 4,400,000
shares in FD/GTI for $8.25 per share, or $36.3 million in cash, on December 3,
1998. This transaction did not have a material impact on the company's results
of operations or financial position.
Fluor Signature Services Segment
The Fluor Signature Services segment, which was created to provide business and
administrative support services to the operating units with distinct profit-and-
loss accountability, officially began operations at the start of fiscal 2000.
External revenues during the year totaled $18.9 million. The segment surpassed
its goal of break-even performance during its first year of operations,
reporting a modest operating profit of $1.4 million.
Strategic Reorganization Costs
As noted above, during 1999 the company reorganized its engineering and
construction operations. The company recorded a special provision of $117.2
million ($100.5 million after-tax) to cover direct and other reorganization
related costs, primarily for personnel, facilities and asset impairment
adjustments. The provision was initially recorded during the second quarter of
1999 at the then estimated amount of $136.5 million ($119.8 million after-tax).
Total estimated personnel costs associated with the reorganization were reduced
during the fourth quarter of 1999 as both the actual number of employee
terminations as well as the cost per employee termination were lower than
originally estimated. In the second quarter of 2000, $17.9 million of the
special provision was reversed into earnings as a result of the
PAGE 25
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
company's decision to retain ownership and remain in its current office location
in Camberley, U.K.
Under the reorganization plan, approximately 5,000 jobs were eliminated.
The provision included amounts for personnel costs for certain affected
employees that were entitled to receive severance benefits under established
severance policies or by government regulations. Additionally, outplacement
services were provided on a limited basis to some affected employees. The
provision also included amounts for asset impairment, primarily for property,
plant and equipment; intangible assets (goodwill); and certain investments. The
asset impairments were recorded primarily because of the company's decision to
exit certain non-strategic geographic locations and businesses. The carrying
values of impaired assets were adjusted to their current market values based on
estimated sale proceeds, using either discounted cash flows or contractual
amounts. Lease termination costs were also included in the special provision.
The company closed 15 non-strategic offices worldwide and downsized other office
locations.
The special provision liability as of October 31, 2000 totaled $12.6
million. The remaining liability for personnel costs ($9.7 million) relates to
non-U.S. operations and is expected to be substantially utilized by December 31,
2000. The remaining liability associated with abandoned lease space ($2.9
million) is being amortized as an offset to lease expense over the remaining
life of the respective leases starting on the dates of abandonment.
Other
Net interest expense for continuing operations in 2000 increased by $12.5
million compared with 1999 as the combined result of higher interest rates for
commercial paper, lower cash balances and higher debt balances to support
working capital needs. Net interest expense for 1999 increased by $8.3 million
compared with 1998 due to an increase in interest expense resulting from higher
average outstanding short-term borrowings used to fund the company's 1998 share
repurchase program, combined with lower average cash balances outstanding during
the year.
Corporate administrative and general expense for the year ended October 31,
2000 was $65.3 million compared with $55.4 million for 1999 and $22.6 million
for 1998. The 2000 increase is the net result of several factors. Development
costs associated with the company's knowledge management and global sales
development programs increased expenses significantly. Costs related to the
company's Enterprise Resource Management System, Knowledge@Work(SM), totaled
$25.8 million in 2000 compared with $7.8 million during 1999, when the project
was started. The Global Business Development Organization had expenditures
during 2000 of $18.8 million. Higher expenses in these areas were partially
offset by the reversal of previously recorded long-term (stock-based) incentive
compensation expense as a result of declines in trading prices of Fluor
Corporation stock during the year. Corporate administrative and general expense
increased in 1999 compared with 1998 due to the commencement of the
Knowledge@Work implementation, costs associated with the company's strategic
business planning effort, and higher executive severance and recruiting costs.
In addition, expenses for 1998 included a credit of approximately $10 million
related to a reversal of a previously accrued long-term incentive plan for which
the performance target was not met.
The effective tax rates of the company's continuing operations, exclusive
of the impact of the special provision in each year and the non-recurring
charges in 2000 for the disposition of the European-based consulting business
and the $25 million loss provision recorded with respect to the AMECO
dealerships, were 29.8 percent, 34.4 percent and 39.0 percent, for the years
2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The 2000 tax rate benefited from a favorable
tax settlement which represents approximately 1.8 percent of pretax earnings
from continuing operations exclusive of special non-recurring items.
Coal Segment -- Discontinued Operations
Revenues and operating profit from Coal operations in 2000 were $1.09 billion
and $105 million, respectively, compared with $1.08 billion and $147 million,
respectively, in 1999. Revenues and operating profit in 1998 were $1.13 billion
and $173 million, respectively.
Revenues remained essentially unchanged in 2000 compared with 1999. The
volume of steam coal sold increased 14 percent during the year. However, the
volume of the higher priced metallurgical coal decreased 6 percent during that
same period. Additionally, the realized prices for both steam and metallurgical
coal declined during 2000, by approximately 5 percent each. The metallurgical
coal market continues to be adversely affected by a weak coal export market and
the slow recovery of the domestic steel market. The market for steam coal, which
is used to fire electric-generating plants, continues to be adversely impacted
by high customer inventory levels resulting from recent mild weather and
competition from western coals, which is increasing its penetration of the
traditional eastern coal market areas. Operating profit declined by $42 million
in 2000 compared with 1999. This decline resulted from a number of factors,
including the declines in realized prices discussed above, operational problems
and adverse geologic conditions encountered at several mines, a $10 million
impairment charge relating to development cost of a longwall panel at the Upper
Cedar Grove operation, a $46.5 million charge for estimated costs, net of $43.5
million in probable insurance recoveries, to remediate a slurry spill at the
Martin County operations, and a $7.1 million bad debt expense associated with
the bankruptcy of a major steel industry customer. Partially offsetting those
factors that have reduced operating profit was an increase
PAGE 26
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
in gains from the sale or exchange of coal reserves in place. As the Coal
segment manages its coal reserves, it regularly sells or exchanges non-strategic
reserves for reserves located in more synergistic locations. During 2000, the
Coal segment realized gains of $26.5 million from such transactions, compared
with gains of $10.0 million during 1999. Additionally, during 2000 a $12.0
million credit for excise taxes paid on coal export sales tonnage was recorded.
The payment of excise taxes on export coal was determined to be unconstitutional
by a 1998 federal district court decision and the Internal Revenue Service has
issued procedures for obtaining refunds related to such excise taxes.
Revenues decreased $44 million in 1999 compared with 1998 primarily due to the
combination of a reduction in volume of the higher priced metallurgical coal and
a decline in prices. Metallurgical coal volume decreased nearly 18 percent
during 1999 compared with 1998. This decrease was more than offset by an
increase in lower priced steam coal volume. Also contributing to the decline in
coal revenues were lower realized prices for both steam and metallurgical coal.
Steam coal prices declined 4 percent while metallurgical coal prices declined 2
percent. The factors impacting the metallurgical and steam coal market discussed
in the previous paragraph also impacted the 1999 operating results. Operating
profit for 1999 was lower than 1998 due to higher fixed costs, primarily
depreciation, depletion and amortization, as volume levels remained relatively
flat.
Other expense includes the results of operations for the Appalachian Synfuel,
LLC synthetic fuel plant that is being combined with the Coal segment in
conjunction with Massey's separation from Fluor.
Interest expense has been allocated to discontinued operations, representing
actual interest expense for debt obligations (including the 6.95% Senior Notes
and up to $230 million of commercial paper) attributed to the Coal segment.
Although the allocated interest was fairly constant in 1998 and 1999, it
increased during 2000 as the combined result of higher commercial paper interest
rates during that year and an increase in outstanding commercial paper
borrowings.
Effective tax rates for discontinued operations have remained constant at
approximately 29 percent for each of the years ended October 31, 2000, 1999 and
1998. That rate is lower than the rates reported for continuing operations
primarily due to favorable tax effects of percentage depletion.
Coal segment acquisitions during the three years ended October 31, 2000 were
primarily focused on the purchase of additional low-sulfur coal reserves in
areas adjacent to existing mine and plant operations. All acquisitions have been
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and their results of
operations have been included in the company's consolidated financial statements
from the respective acquisition dates. If these acquisitions had been made at
the beginning of the respective year acquired, pro forma consolidated results of
operations would not have differed materially from actual results.
Financial Position and Liquidity
The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2000, compared with
1999, is primarily due to the substantial increase in net operating assets and
liabilities associated with engineering and construction activities. The
decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 1999, compared with 1998,
is primarily due to lower net earnings (adjusted for the non-cash and unexpended
amounts of the special provision in 1999) and an increase in net operating
assets and liabilities associated with engineering and construction activities.
Also contributing to the 1999 decline were increases in equipment and coal
inventories, as the result of slowing markets. The receipt of a $30 million tax
refund positively impacted operating cash flow in 1998. The levels of operating
assets and liabilities vary from year to year and are affected by the mix, stage
of completion and commercial terms of engineering and construction projects.
Cash utilized by investing activities totaled $386.9 million in 2000 compared
with $375.2 million in 1999. Capital expenditures in total were of comparable
amounts for the two years; however, the capital investment in construction
equipment by Fluor Global Services declined, while the company's increased
investment in the Knowledge@Work system largely replaced those expenditures.
During 2000, the company received $28.4 million of distributions from its equity
investments compared with net investments of $4.7 million in 1999. In 1999, the
company completed the sale of its ownership interest in FD/GTI and received
proceeds of $36.3 million. The decrease in cash utilized by investing activities
in 1999 compared with 1998 of $188.1 million resulted primarily from lower
capital expenditures and acquisitions, net of proceeds from the sale of
property, plant and equipment, as well as the proceeds from the FD/GTI sale
during 1999. Capital expenditures in 1999 were primarily for the Fluor Global
Services segment, specifically for AMECO and directed toward acquiring machinery
and equipment for its rental business, and for the Coal segment, which were
directed toward developing existing reserves. In addition, capital expenditures
in 1999 include costs associated with Knowledge@Work.
Cash provided by financing activities totaled $104.9 million in 2000 compared
with cash utilized of $220.6 million in 1999. Operating liquidity during 2000
was provided by short-term borrowings, including increases in commercial paper
of $137.1 million and bank borrowings of $13.0 million, and increases in a note
payable to affiliate of $51.4 million. During 1999, the company reduced its
short-term borrowings by $299.2 million, partially offset by the issuance of a
$113.4 million note payable to an affiliate and $17.6 million in long-term
municipal bonds. In connection with a stock buyback program
PAGE 27
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
approved by the Board of Directors on March 8, 2000, the company purchased
747,000 shares of its outstanding common stock for $23.0 million during 2000,
compared with no purchases during 1999. Cash utilized by financing activities
totaled $98.0 million in 1998. During that year, the company utilized short-term
borrowings of $341.8 million primarily to fund its 1997/1998 share repurchase
program. Under this program, the company repurchased 8.3 million shares of its
common stock for a total of $379.0 million.
Cash dividends increased in 2000 to $76.0 million ($1.00 per share) from
$60.7 million ($0.80 per share) in 1999 and $63.5 million ($0.80 per share) in
1998. The 1999 decline was a consequence of the reduced number of shares
outstanding that resulted from the company's share repurchasing program.
The total debt to capitalization ratio at October 31, 2000 was 14.4 percent
compared with 26.3 percent at October 31, 1999. On a pro forma basis at October
31, 2000, assuming that the spin-off distribution had occurred on that date, the
total debt to capitalization ratio would have been 36.7 percent.
The company has on hand and access to sufficient sources of funds to meet its
anticipated operating needs. Significant short-term and long-term lines of
credit are maintained with banks which, along with cash on hand, provided
adequate operating liquidity. Liquidity is also provided by the company's
commercial paper program. In December 1998, the company expanded both its
revolving credit facility and its commercial paper program from $400 million to
$600 million and has subsequently increased its revolving credit facility to
$690 million during 2000. In connection with the spin-off transaction, committed
lines of credit was reduced to $490 million, effective November 30, 2000.
Although the company is affected by inflation and the cyclical nature of the
industry, its engineering and construction operations are generally protected by
the ability to fix costs at the time of bidding or to recover cost increases in
most contracts. Although the company has taken actions to reduce its dependence
on external economic conditions, management is unable to predict with certainty
the amount and mix of future business.
Financial Instruments
In connection with its 1997/1998 share repurchase program, the company entered
into a forward purchase contract for 1,850,000 shares of its common stock at a
price of $49 per share. The contract was settled on November 30, 2000, resulting
in the repurchase and retirement of the shares for a cash payment of $101.2
million ($54.72 per share). As of October 31, 2000, the contract settlement cost
per share exceeded the current market price per share by $19.35.
The company's investment securities and substantially all of its debt
instruments carry fixed rates of interest over their respective maturity terms.
The company does not currently use derivatives, such as swaps, to alter the
interest characteristics of its investment securities or its debt instruments.
The company's exposure to interest rate risk on its $17.6 million municipal
bonds, due in 2019, is not material given the company's strong balance sheet and
creditworthiness which provides the ability to refinance.
The company utilizes forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency
transactions entered into in the ordinary course of business and not to engage
in currency speculation. At October 31, 2000 and 1999, the company had forward
foreign exchange contracts of less than eighteen months duration, to exchange
principally Euros, Australian dollars, British pounds, Canadian dollars, Czech
koronas, Dutch guilders, German marks and Spanish pesetas for U.S. dollars. The
total gross notional amount of these contracts at October 31, 2000 and 1999 was
$71 million and $124 million, respectively. Forward contracts to purchase
foreign currency represented $66 million and $122 million, and forward contracts
to sell foreign currency represented $5 million and $2 million, at october 31,
2000 and 1999, respectively.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities" (SFAS No. 133). SFAS No. 133 establishes new standards
for recording derivatives in interim and annual financial statements. This
statement, as amended, will be adopted by the company on November 1, 2000 and
will not have a significant impact on the results of operations, financial
position or cash of the company.
PAGE 28
<PAGE>
FLOUR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Consolidated Statement of Earnings
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended October 31, 2000 1999 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Total Revenues $ 9,970,154 $ 11,334,355 $ 12,377,476
Total Cost of Revenues 9,765,807 11,083,041 12,138,279
Other (Income) and Expenses
Special provision (17,919) 117,200 --
Corporate administrative and general expense 65,349 55,350 22,598
Interest expense 26,315 18,972 13,120
Interest income (11,619) (16,789) (19,269)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost and expenses 9,827,933 11,257,774 12,154,728
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings from Continuing Operations Before Taxes 142,221 76,581 222,748
Income Tax Expense 42,375 49,898 86,834
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings from Continuing Operations 99,846 26,683 135,914
Earnings from Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes 49,103 77,504 99,430
Loss on Disposal, Net of Taxes (25,000) -- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Earnings $ 123,949 $ 104,187 $ 235,344
==============================================
Basic Earnings Per Share
Continuing operations $ 1.33 $ 0.35 $ 1.73
Discontinued operations 0.32 1.03 1.26
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net earnings $ 1.65 $ 1.38 $ 2.99
==============================================
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Continuing operations $ 1.31 $ 0.35 $ 1.72
Discontinued operations 0.31 1.02 1.25
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net earnings $ 1.62 $ 1.37 $ 2.97
==============================================
Shares Used to Calculate Earnings Per Share
Basic 75,256 75,228 78,801
Diluted 76,365 75,929 79,135
==============================================
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
PAGE 29
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Consolidated Balance Sheet
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At October 31, 2000 1999
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands, except share amounts)
<S> <C> <C>
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 69,426 $ 209,614
Accounts and notes receivable 665,117 850,557
Contract work in progress 439,208 416,285
Inventories 106,711 248,118
Deferred taxes 112,156 105,502
Other current assets 55,175 80,095
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current assets 1,447,793 1,910,171
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net assets of discontinued operations 866,199 --
Property, Plant and Equipment
Land 61,035 71,664
Buildings and improvements 319,114 352,883
Machinery and equipment 718,011 2,103,663
Mining properties and mineral rights -- 858,965
Construction in progress 100,023 81,422
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,198,183 3,468,597
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization 441,418 1,245,644
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net property, plant and equipment 756,765 2,222,953
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Assets
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $42,591 and $32,458, respectively 97,531 116,045
Investments 92,872 167,891
Deferred taxes 86,056 --
Other 305,518 469,057
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total other assets 581,977 752,993
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 3,652,734 $ 4,886,117
==========================
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current Liabilities
Trade accounts payable $ 530,332 $ 793,465
Short-term debt 253,512 247,911
Advance billings on contracts 395,872 565,373
Accrued salaries, wages and benefit plan liabilities 242,311 321,148
Other accrued liabilities 198,348 276,413
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current liabilities 1,620,375 2,204,310
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-Term Debt Due After One Year 17,573 317,555
Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred taxes -- 162,210
Other 405,529 620,670
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total noncurrent liabilities 405,529 782,880
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contingencies and Commitments
Shareholders' Equity
Capital stock
Preferred - authorized 20,000,000 shares without par value, none issued
Common - authorized 150,000,000 shares of $0.625 par value; issued and
outstanding
in 2000 - 75,743,345 shares and in 1999 - 76,034,296 shares 47,339 47,521
Additional capital 212,107 217,844
Unamortized executive stock plan expense (27,093) (21,579)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (46,400) (37,752)
Retained earnings 1,423,304 1,375,338
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total shareholders' equity 1,609,257 1,581,372
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 3,652,734 $ 4,886,117
===========================
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
PAGE 30
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended October 31, 2000 1999 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net earnings $ 123,949 $ 104,187 $ 235,344
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 311,688 318,204 288,870
Deferred taxes (2,651) 29,268 28,780
Special provision, net of cash payments (36,619) 85,410 --
Provisions for impairment/abandonment of joint ventures
and investments 42,793 -- --
Provision for spin-off transaction expenses, net of cash payments 21,762 -- --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects of
business acquisitions/dispositions (339,514) (22,551) 168,576
Equity in (earnings) losses of investees 14,800 (44,651) (12,035)
Other, net 5,592 (4,991) (7,016)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided by operating activities 141,800 464,876 702,519
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Capital expenditures - continuing operations (284,079) (277,033) (304,533)
Capital expenditures and acquisitions - Coal segment (211,487) (227,301) (308,404)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities -- -- 10,089
Investments, net 28,384 (4,688) (20,745)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 92,966 105,154 125,493
Contributions to deferred compensation trusts -- (8,160) (21,365)
Net assets held for sale, including cash -- 36,300 (26,375)
Other, net (12,681) 549 (17,477)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash utilized by investing activities (386,897) (375,179) (563,317)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Cash dividends paid (75,983) (60,692) (63,497)
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings, net 150,116 (299,212) 341,809
Proceeds from issuance of note payable to affiliate 51,433 113,379 --
Proceeds from (payments on) long-term debt, net -- 16,951 (285)
Stock options exercised 5,829 10,760 9,935
Purchases of common stock (23,003) -- (378,979)
Other, net (3,483) (1,813) (6,965)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided (utilized) by financing activities 104,909 (220,627) (97,982)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (140,188) (130,930) 41,220
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 209,614 340,544 299,324
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 69,426 $ 209,614 $ 340,544
==========================================
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
PAGE 31
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Unamortized Accumulated
Executive Other
Common Stock Additional Stock Plan Comprehensive Retained
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) Shares Amount Capital Expense Income Earnings Total
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at October 31, 1997 83,748 $52,343 $ 569,356 $ (33,441) $ (7,204) $1,159,996 $1,741,050
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive income
Net earnings -- -- -- -- -- 235,344 235,344
Foreign currency translation
adjustment (net of deferred
taxes of $14,439) -- -- -- -- (22,707) -- (22,707)
---------
Comprehensive income 212,637
Cash dividends ($0.80 per share) -- -- -- -- -- (63,497) (63,497)
Exercise of stock options, net 268 167 9,768 -- -- -- 9,935
Stock option tax benefit -- -- 2,425 -- -- -- 2,425
Amortization of executive
stock plan expense -- -- -- 7,343 -- -- 7,343
Issuance of restricted stock, net (144) (90) (8,680) 3,465 -- -- (5,305)
Purchases of common stock (8,299) (5,187) (373,792) -- -- -- (378,979)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at October 31, 1998 75,573 47,233 199,077 (22,633) (29,911) 1,331,843 1,525,609
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive income
Net earnings -- -- -- -- -- 104,187 104,187
Foreign currency translation
adjustment (net of deferred
taxes of $4,910) -- -- -- -- (7,841) -- (7,841)
---------
Comprehensive income 96,346
Cash dividends ($0.80 per share) -- -- -- -- -- (60,692) (60,692)
Exercise of stock options, net 304 190 10,570 -- -- -- 10,760
Stock option tax benefit -- -- 1,989 -- -- -- 1,989
Amortization of executive
stock plan expense -- -- -- 7,517 -- -- 7,517
Issuance of restricted stock, net 157 98 6,208 (6,463) -- -- (157)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at October 31, 1999 76,034 47,521 217,844 (21,579) (37,752) 1,375,338 1,581,372
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive income
Net earnings -- -- -- -- -- 123,949 123,949
Foreign currency translation
adjustment (net of deferred
taxes of $5,931) -- -- -- -- (8,648) -- (8,648)
---------
Comprehensive income 115,301
Cash dividends ($1.00 per share) -- -- -- -- -- (75,983) (75,983)
Exercise of stock options, net 148 92 5,737 -- -- -- 5,829
Stock option tax benefit -- -- 334 -- -- -- 334
Amortization of executive
stock plan expense -- -- -- 5,597 -- -- 5,597
Purchases of common stock (747) (467) (22,536) -- -- -- (23,003)
Issuance of restricted stock, net 308 193 10,728 (11,111) -- -- (190)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at October 31, 2000 75,743 $47,339 $ 212,107 $ (27,093) $ (46,400) $1,423,304 $1,609,257
===============================================================================
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
PAGE 32
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Major Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The financial statements include the accounts of the company and its
subsidiaries. The equity method of accounting is used for investment ownership
ranging from 20 percent to 50 percent. Investment ownership of less than 20
percent is accounted for on the cost method. As more fully described in the
following Note, on November 30, 2000, shareholders approved a spin-off
distribution that will separate the company into two publicly traded companies.
As a result of this action, the company's Coal related business is presented as
discontinued operations. All significant intercompany transactions of
consolidated subsidiaries are eliminated. Certain 1999 and 1998 amounts have
been reclassified to conform with the 2000 presentation.
In connection with the spin-off, the company will change its fiscal year
end from October 31 to December 31. As a requirement of this change, the company
will report results for November and December 2000 as a separate transition
period.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements of the company requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts. These estimates
are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements.
Therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Engineering and Construction Contracts
The company recognizes engineering and construction contract revenues using the
percentage-of-completion method, based primarily on contract costs incurred to
date compared with total estimated contract costs. Customer-furnished materials,
labor and equipment, and in certain cases subcontractor materials, labor and
equipment, are included in revenues and cost of revenues when management
believes that the company is responsible for the ultimate acceptability of the
project. Contracts are segmented between types of services, such as engineering
and construction, and accordingly, gross margin related to each activity is
recognized as those separate services are rendered. Changes to total estimated
contract costs or losses, if any, are recognized in the period in which they are
determined. Revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed are classified as
current assets under contract work in progress. Amounts billed to clients in
excess of revenues recognized to date are classified as current liabilities
under advance billings on contracts. The company anticipates that substantially
all incurred costs associated with contract work in progress at October 31, 2000
will be billed and collected in 2001.
Depreciation and Amortization
Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Assets are
depreciated principally using the straight-line method over the following
estimated useful lives: buildings and improvements--three to 50 years and
machinery and equipment--two to 30 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized
over the lives of the respective leases. Goodwill is amortized on the straight-
line method over periods not longer than 40 years.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax
consequences of events that have been recognized in the company's financial
statements or tax returns.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by dividing income from continuing
operations, income from discontinued operations (including the loss on disposal)
and net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for
the period. Diluted EPS reflects the assumed conversion of all dilutive
securities, consisting of employee stock options and restricted stock, and
equity forward contracts.
The impact of dilutive securities on the company's EPS calculation is as
follows:
Year ended October 31, 2000 1999 1998
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Employee stock options/
restricted stock 54,000 107,000 231,000
Equity forward contract 1,055,000 594,000 103,000
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,109,000 701,000 334,000
=========================================
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using specific
identification or the average cost method. Inventories comprise:
At October 31, 2000 1999
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
Equipment for sale/rental $ 80,785 $131,781
Coal -- 72,070
Supplies and other 25,926 44,267
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$106,711 $248,118
=======================
Internal Use Software
The company capitalizes certain costs incurred in the development of internal-
use software, including external direct material and service costs, employee
payroll and payroll-related costs.
PAGE 33
<PAGE>
Foreign Currency
The company uses forward exchange contracts to hedge certain foreign currency
transactions entered into in the ordinary course of business. The company does
not engage in currency speculation. The company's forward exchange contracts do
not subject the company to significant risk from exchange rate movements because
gains and losses on such contracts offset losses and gains, respectively, on the
assets, liabilities or transactions being hedged. Accordingly, the unrealized
gains and losses are deferred and included in the measurement of the related
foreign currency transaction. At October 31, 2000, the company had approximately
$71 million of foreign exchange contracts outstanding relating to contract
obligations. The forward exchange contracts generally require the company to
exchange U.S. dollars for foreign currencies at maturity, at rates agreed to at
inception of the contracts. If the counterparties to the exchange contracts (AA
or A+ rated banks) do not fulfill their obligations to deliver the contracted
currencies, the company could be at risk for any currency related fluctuations.
The amount of any gain or loss on these contracts in 2000, 1999 and 1998 was
immaterial. The contracts are of varying duration, none of which extend beyond
January 2002. The company limits exposure to foreign currency fluctuations in
most of its engineering and construction contracts through provisions that
require client payments in U.S. dollars or other currencies corresponding to the
currency in which costs are incurred. As a result, the company generally does
not need to hedge foreign currency cash flows for contract work performed. The
functional currency of all significant foreign operations is the local currency.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities" (SFAS No. 133). SFAS No. 133 establishes new standards
for recording derivatives in interim and annual financial statements. This
statement, as amended, will be adopted by the company on November 1, 2000 and
will not have a significant impact on the results of operations, financial
position or cash flows of the company.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
The majority of accounts receivable and all contract work in progress are from
engineering and construction clients in various industries and locations
throughout the world. Most contracts require payments as the projects progress
or in certain cases advance payments. The company generally does not require
collateral, but in most cases can place liens against the property, plant or
equipment constructed or terminate the contract if a material default occurs.
The company maintains adequate reserves for potential credit losses and such
losses have been minimal and within management's estimates.
Stock Plans
The company accounts for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value
method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related Interpretations.
Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if
any, of the quoted market price of the company's stock at the date of the grant
over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Compensation cost for
stock appreciation rights and performance equity units is recorded based on the
quoted market price of the company's stock at the end of the period.
Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income represents the net change in shareholders' equity
during a period from sources other than transactions with shareholders and as
such, includes net earnings. For the company, the only other component of total
comprehensive income is the change in the cumulative foreign currency
translation adjustments recorded in shareholders' equity.
Discontinued Operations
On November 30, 2000, a spin-off distribution to shareholders was effected which
separated Fluor Corporation (Fluor) into two publicly-traded companies - a "new"
Fluor ("New Fluor" or the "company") and Massey Energy Company ("Massey"). The
spin-off was accomplished through the distribution of 100% of the common stock
of New Fluor to shareholders of existing Fluor. As a result, each existing Fluor
shareholder received one share of New Fluor common stock for each share of
existing Fluor common stock and retained their shares in existing Fluor, whose
name was changed to Massey Energy Company. The company has received a ruling
from the Internal Revenue Service that the spin-off will be tax-free to its
shareholders. Because of the relative significance of the company's operations
to Fluor, the company will be treated as the "accounting successor" for
financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, Massey's results of operations for
all periods presented and its net assets as of October 31, 2000 have been
reclassified and are presented as discontinued operations.
PAGE 34
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
In connection with the spin-off, the company's 6.95% Senior Notes due March
1, 2007 will remain an obligation of Massey. In addition, Massey will issue $230
million of commercial paper (adjusted upward for funds advanced to Massey by
Fluor or downward for funds advanced to Fluor by Massey from August 1, 2000 to
the distribution date), the proceeds of which will be transferred to the
company. As of October 31, 2000, the adjusted commercial paper commitment was
$213 million.
The net assets of Massey consisted of the following at October 31, 2000:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(in thousands)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,081
Accounts and notes receivable 218,591
Inventories 104,014
Other current assets 68,996
Net property, plant and equipment 1,552,270
Other assets 226,946
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets 2,171,898
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trade accounts payable 158,045
Short-term debt 214,170
Other current liabilities 142,568
Long-term debt due after one year 300,000
Noncurrent liabilities 490,916
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total liabilities 1,305,699
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net assets of Massey $ 866,199
============
</TABLE>
Accounts receivable from customers of Massey are primarily concentrated in
the steel and utility industries. In October 2000 a provision for bad debts of
$7.1 million was recognized due to the bankruptcy of a major steel industry
customer.
Summarized results of Massey are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended October 31, 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $1,085,833 $1,083,030 $1,127,297
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating costs
Cost of sales 838,876 774,582 810,416
Depreciation, depletion
and amortization 170,977 166,419 150,062
Selling, general and administrative 29,754 32,696 27,584
Other operating income, net (58,689) (37,524) (33,527)
- ------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating costs 980,918 936,173 954,535
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating profit 104,915 146,857 172,762
Other expense, net (8,015) (7,479) (2,622)
Interest expense (35,327) (31,946) (32,157)
Interest income 7,470 1,640 1,895
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings before taxes 69,043 109,072 139,878
Income tax expense 19,940 31,568 40,448
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net earnings $ 49,103 $ 77,504 $ 99,430
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>
Interest expense has been allocated to discontinued operations,
representing actual interest expense for Massey obligations (including the 6.95%
Senior Notes and up to $230 million of commercial paper).
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Cash flows and changes in operating assets and liabilities include the effects
from Massey, without separate identification and classification of discontinued
operations.
Securities with maturities of 90 days or less at the date of purchase are
classified as cash equivalents. Securities with maturities beyond 90 days, when
present, are classified as marketable securities and are carried at fair value.
The changes in operating assets and liabilities as shown in the Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows comprise:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended October 31, 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts and notes receivable $ (3,009) $ 25,972 $ (84,394)
Contract work in progress (22,923) 180,698 73,575
Inventories 35,876 (49,473) (23,197)
Other current assets (43,376) (16,054) (192)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable (108,616) (173,345) 127,229
Advance billings on contracts (169,501) 18,557 21,298
Accrued liabilities (27,965) (8,906) 54,257
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Increase) decrease in operating
assets and liabilities $(339,514) $ (22,551) $ 168,576
========== ========== ==========
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest expense $ 60,455 $ 47,558 $ 44,057
Income tax payments, net $ 58,637 $ 52,025 $ 52,346
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
Business Acquisitions
From time to time, the company enters into investment arrangements, including
joint ventures, that are related to its engineering and construction business.
During 1998 through 2000, the majority of these expenditures related to ongoing
investments in an equity fund that focuses on energy related projects and a
number of smaller, diversified ventures.
Business Dispositions
During 2000, the company recorded a nonrecurring charge of $19.3 million
relating to the write-off of certain assets and the loss on the sale of a
European-based consulting business by the Fluor Global Services segment.
On October 28, 1998, the company entered into an agreement to sell its
ownership interest in Fluor Daniel GTI, Inc. (FD/GTI). Under terms of the
agreement, the company sold its 4,400,000 shares in FD/GTI for $8.25 per share,
or $36.3 million in cash, on December 3, 1998. The net assets of FD/GTI included
$26.4 million in cash and cash equivalents. This transaction did not have a
material impact on the company's results of operations or financial position.
PAGE 35
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Special Provision and Cost Reduction Initiatives
In March 1999, the company announced a new strategic direction, including a
reorganization of the operating units and administrative functions of its
engineering and construction segment. In connection with this reorganization,
the company recorded in the second quarter of fiscal year 1999 a special
provision of $136.5 million pre-tax to cover direct and other reorganization
related costs, primarily for personnel, facilities and asset impairment
adjustments.
Under the reorganization plan, approximately 5,000 jobs were eliminated.
The provision included amounts for personnel costs for certain affected
employees that were entitled to receive severance benefits under established
severance policies or by government regulations. Additionally, outplacement
services were provided on a limited basis to some affected employees. The
provision also included amounts for asset impairment, primarily for property,
plant and equipment; intangible assets (goodwill); and certain investments. The
asset impairments were recorded primarily because of the company's decision to
exit certain non-strategic geographic locations and businesses. The carrying
values of impaired assets were adjusted to their current market values based on
estimated sale proceeds, using either discounted cash flows or contractual
amounts. Lease termination costs were also included in the special provision.
The company closed 15 non-strategic offices worldwide and consolidated and
downsized other office locations.
In October 1999, $19.3 million of the special provision was reversed into
earnings as a result of lower than anticipated severance costs for personnel
reductions in certain overseas offices. Both the actual number of employee
terminations as well as the cost per employee termination were lower than
originally estimated. In the second quarter of 2000, $17.9 million of the
special provision was reversed into earnings as a result of the company's
decision to retain ownership and remain in its current office location in
Camberley, U.K.
The following table summarizes the status of the company's reorganization
plan as of October 31, 2000 and 1999:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Lease
Personnel Asset Termination
Costs Impairment Costs Other Total
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(in thousands)
Special provision $ 72,200 $ 48,800 $14,500 $1,000 $136,500
Cash expenditures (25,089) (1,094) (4,793) (814) (31,790)
Non-cash activities (2,576) (24,360) -- -- (26,936)
Provision reversal (19,300) -- -- -- (19,300)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at
October 31, 1999 25,235 23,346 9,707 186 58,474
Cash expenditures (11,763) -- (6,853) -- (18,616)
Non-cash activities (3,732) (5,427) -- (186) (9,345)
Provision reversal -- (17,919) -- -- (17,919)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at
October 31, 2000 $ 9,740 $ -- $ 2,854 $ -- $ 12,594
================================================================
</TABLE>
The special provision liability as of October 31, 2000 and 1999 is included
in other accrued liabilities. The liability for personnel costs relates to non-
U.S. operations and is expected to be substantially utilized by December 31,
2000. The liability associated with abandoned lease space is being amortized as
an offset to lease expense over the remaining life of the respective leases
starting on the dates of abandonment.
Income Taxes
The income tax expense (benefit) included in the Consolidated Statement of
Earnings is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended October 31, 2000 1999 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(in thousands)
Current:
Federal $ 17,864 $ 5,931 $ 38,700
Foreign 42,736 43,012 52,021
State and local 4,366 3,255 7,781
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current 64,966 52,198 98,502
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferred:
Federal (12,082) 26,872 43,369
Foreign 7,829 (2,641) (19,295)
State and local 1,602 5,037 4,706
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deferred (2,651) 29,268 28,780
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total income tax expense $ 62,315 $ 81,466 $127,282
=======================================
</TABLE>
The income tax expense (benefit) applicable to continuing operations and
discontinued operations is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year ended October 31, 2000 1999 1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(in thousands)
Provision for continuing operations:
Current $ 71,105 $ 63,926 $ 90,737
Deferred (28,730) (14,028) (3,903)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total provision for continuing
operations 42,375 49,898 86,834
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Provision for discontinued operations:
Current (6,139) (11,728) 7,765
Deferred 26,079 43,296 32,683
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total provision for discontinued
operations 19,940 31,568 40,448
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total income tax expense $ 62,315 $ 81,466 $127,282
==================================
</TABLE>
PAGE 36
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
A reconciliation of U.S. statutory federal income tax expense to income tax
expense on earnings from continuing operations is as follows:
Year ended October 31, 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
U.S. statutory federal tax expense $49,777 $26,803 $77,962
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
Items without tax effect, net 5,813 32,500 11,423
Effect of non-U.S. tax rates 969 (396) 3,433
State and local income taxes 920 2,603 4,532
Foreign Sales Corporation tax benefit (5,975) (6,342) (8,250)
Utilization of prior year tax credits (4,657) (635) --
Favorable tax settlement (3,075) (2,269) (1,418)
Other, net (1,397) (2,366) (848)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total income tax expense--
continuing operations $42,375 $49,898 $86,834
=============================
Deferred taxes reflect the tax effects of differences between the amounts
recorded as assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the
amounts recorded for income tax purposes. The tax effects of significant
temporary differences giving rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities are as
follows:
At October 31, 2000 1999
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Accrued liabilities not currently deductible $214,011 $206,028
Translation adjustments 29,886 23,955
Tax basis in partnership in excess of book 29,670 10,622
Net operating loss carryforwards of non-U.S. companies 17,044 19,664
Tax basis of building in excess of book basis 15,728 16,408
Tax credit carryforwards 12,228 10,673
Net operating loss carryforwards of acquired companies 4,461 6,503
Other 25,395 19,807
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deferred tax assets 348,423 313,660
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets (74,747) (79,418)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferred tax assets, net 273,676 234,242
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Book basis of property, equipment and other
capital costs in excess of tax basis (26,765) (41,894)
Tax on unremitted non-U.S. earnings (22,047) (16,361)
Other (26,652) (15,298)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deferred tax liabilities (75,464) (73,553)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net deferred tax assets $198,212 $160,689
====================
Amounts reflected above exclude net deferred tax liabilities associated
with the coal business operated by Massey of $243 million and $217 million at
October 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
The company has net operating loss carryforwards from non-U.S. operations
of approximately $49 million which can be carried forward indefinitely until
fully utilized. These losses primarily relate to the company's operations in
Australia, Germany and the United Kingdom. Deferred tax assets established for
these losses aggregate $17 million and $20 million at October 31, 2000 and 1999,
respectively.
In 1997, the company acquired the SMA Companies which had net operating
loss carryforwards of approximately $47 million. The company has utilized
approximately $11 million of the loss carryforwards, and made an election in its
1997 consolidated federal tax return to waive approximately $23 million of
losses which otherwise would have expired without future tax benefit. The
remaining loss carryforwards of approximately $13 million expire in the years
2003 through 2005. The utilization of such loss carryforwards is subject to
stringent limitations under the Internal Revenue Code. Deferred tax assets
established for these losses aggregate $4 million and $7 million for 2000 and
1999, respectively.
The company maintains a valuation allowance to reduce certain deferred tax
assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. This allowance
primarily relates to the deferred tax assets established for the special
provision, net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. In 2000, decreases
in the valuation allowance are principally the result of the reversal of $17.9
million of the special provision which did not previously receive tax benefit.
Any reductions in the allowance resulting from realization of the loss
carryforwards of acquired companies will result in a reduction of goodwill.
Residual income taxes of approximately $8 million have not been provided on
approximately $20 million of undistributed earnings of certain foreign
subsidiaries at October 31, 2000, because the company intends to keep those
earnings reinvested indefinitely.
United States and foreign earnings (loss) from continuing operations before
taxes are as follows:
Year ended October 31, 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
United States $(13,184) $65,875 $100,767
Foreign 155,405 10,706 121,981
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total $142,221 $76,581 $222,748
================================
Retirement Benefits
The company sponsors contributory and non-contributory defined contribution
retirement and defined benefit pension plans for eligible employees.
Contributions to defined contribution retirement plans are based on a percentage
of the employee's compensation. Expense recognized for these plans of
approximately $46 million in 2000, $48 million in 1999, and $69 million in 1998,
is primarily related to domestic engineering and construction operations.
Effective January 1, 1999, the company replaced its domestic defined
contribution retirement plan with a defined benefit cash balance plan.
Contributions to defined
PAGE 37
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
benefit pension plans are generally at the minimum annual amount required by
applicable regulations. Payments to retired employees under these plans are
generally based upon length of service, age and/or a percentage of qualifying
compensation. The defined benefit pension plans are primarily related to
international engineering and construction operations, U.S. craft employees and
coal operations.
Net periodic pension expense (income) for continuing operations defined
benefit pension plans includes the following components:
Year ended October 31, 2000 1999 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
Service cost $ 35,168 $ 31,919 $ 12,420
Interest cost 18,612 16,101 15,751
Expected return on assets (33,603) (30,751) (30,439)
Amortization of transition asset (1,917) (2,132) (2,196)
Amortization of prior service cost 46 281 299
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) (541) 922 (563)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net periodic pension expense
(income) $ 17,765 $ 16,340 $ (4,728)
===============================
The ranges of assumptions indicated below cover defined benefit pension
plans in Australia, Germany, the United Kingdom, The Netherlands and the United
States. These assumptions are as of each respective fiscal year-end based on the
then current economic environment in each host country.
At October 31, 2000 1999
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discount rates 6.0-7.75% 6.0-7.75%
Rates of increase in compensation levels 3.5-3.75% 3.5-3.75%
Expected long-term rates of return on assets 5.0-9.50% 5.0-9.50%
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table sets forth the change in benefit obligation, plan
assets and funded status of the company's defined benefit pension plans for
continuing operations:
At October 31, 2000 1999
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
Change in pension benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $307,891 $302,839
Service cost 35,168 31,919
Interest cost 18,612 16,101
Employee contributions 1,441 1,626
Currency translation (46,482) (19,068)
Actuarial (gain) loss 23,992 (3,232)
Benefits paid (24,830) (22,294)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefit obligation at end of year $315,792 $307,891
===================
Change in plan assets
Fair value at beginning of year $417,587 $380,883
Actual return on plan assets 35,265 72,829
Company contributions 7,152 5,642
Employee contributions 1,441 1,626
Currency translation (54,780) (17,154)
Benefits paid (24,830) (22,294)
Plan amendments -- (3,945)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair value at end of year $381,835 $417,587
===================
At October 31, 2000 1999
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
Funded status $66,043 $109,696
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss 4,822 (17,544)
Unrecognized prior service cost (183) (401)
Unrecognized net asset (4,802) (8,002)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pension assets $65,880 $83,749
==================
Amounts shown above at October 31, 2000 and 1999 exclude the projected
benefit obligation of approximately $236.1 million and $224.6 million,
respectively, and associated plan assets of $347.0 million and $322.0 million,
respectively, relating to discontinued operations (including the Massey Coal
segment).
In addition to the company's defined benefit pension plans, the company and
certain of its subsidiaries provide health care and life insurance benefits for
certain retired employees. The health care and life insurance plans are
generally contributory, with retiree contributions adjusted annually. Service
costs are accrued currently. The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
at October 31, 2000 and 1999 was determined in accordance with the current terms
of the company's health care plans, together with relevant actuarial assumptions
and health care cost trend rates projected at annual rates ranging from 12
percent in 2001 down to 5 percent in 2005 and beyond. The effect of a one
percent annual increase in these assumed cost trend rates would increase the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and the aggregate of the annual
service and interest costs by approximately $1.3 million and $0.1 million,
respectively. The effect of a one percent annual decrease in these assumed cost
trend rates would decrease the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and
the aggregate of the annual service and interest costs by approximately $1.2
million and $0.1 million, respectively.
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for continuing operations includes
the following components:
Year ended October 31, 2000 1999 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
Service cost $ -- $ -- $ --
Interest cost 1,865 1,632 1,765
Expected return on assets -- -- --
Amortization of prior service cost -- -- --
Recognized net actuarial gain (329) (458) (595)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost $ 1,536 $ 1,174 $ 1,170
==============================
The following table sets forth the change in benefit obligation of the
company's postretirement benefit plans for continuing operations:
PAGE 38
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At October 31, 2000 1999
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
(in thousands)
Change in postretirement benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year $ 25,658 $ 25,554
Service cost -- --
Interest cost 1,865 1,632
Employee contributions 309 270
Actuarial loss 4,974 1,212
Benefits paid (3,490) (3,010)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefit obligation at end of year $ 29,316 $ 25,658
======================
Funded status $(29,316) $(25,658)
Unrecognized net actuarial gain (51) (5,354)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accrued postretirement benefit obligation $(29,367) $(31,012)
======================
</TABLE>
The discount rate used in determining the postretirement benefit obligation
was 7.75 percent at both October 31, 2000 and 1999.
Amounts shown above at October 31, 2000 and 1999 exclude the accrued
benefit obligation of approximately $68.6 million and $62.7 million,
respectively, relating to discontinued operations.
The preceding information does not include amounts related to benefit plans
applicable to employees associated with certain contracts with the U.S.
Department of Energy because the company is not responsible for the current or
future funded status of these plans.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair value of the company's financial instruments are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Year ended October 31, Amount Value Amount Value
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 69,426 $ 69,426 $209,614 $209,614
Notes receivable including noncurrent portion 30,739 39,494 47,444 54,387
Long-term investments 57,481 64,809 60,609 72,667
Liabilities:
Commercial paper, loan notes and notes payable 253,512 253,512 247,911 247,911
Long-term debt including current portion 17,573 16,504 317,555 312,580
Other noncurrent financial liabilities 11,921 11,921 9,789 9,789
Off-balance sheet financial instruments:
Forward contract to purchase common stock -- (35,792) -- (21,170)
Foreign currency contract obligations -- (363) -- (1,311)
Letters of credit -- 973 -- 546
Lines of credit -- 705 -- 965
</TABLE>
Fair values were determined as follows:
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short-term notes
receivable, commercial paper, loan notes and notes payable approximate fair
value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Long-term investments are based on quoted market prices for these or
similar instruments. Long-term notes receivable are estimated by discounting
future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made
to borrowers with similar credit ratings.
The fair value of long-term debt, including current portion, is estimated
based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current
rates offered to the company for debt of the same maturities.
Other noncurrent financial liabilities consist primarily of deferred
payments, for which cost approximates fair value.
Forward contract to purchase common stock is based on the estimated cost to
terminate or settle the obligation.
Foreign currency contract obligations are estimated by obtaining quotes
from brokers.
Letters of credit and lines of credit amounts are based on fees currently
charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or settle
the obligations.
Financing Arrangements
The company has unsecured committed revolving short- and long-term lines of
credit with banks from which it may borrow for general corporate purposes up to
a maximum of $690 million. Commitment and facility fees are paid on these lines.
In connection with the spin-off transaction, committed lines of credit were
reduced to $490 million, effective November 30, 2000. In addition, the company
has $630 million in short-term uncommitted lines of credit to support letters of
credit and foreign currency contracts. Borrowings under both committed and
uncommitted lines of credit bear interest at prime or rates based on the London
Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"), domestic certificates of deposit or other
rates which are mutually acceptable to the banks and the company. At October 31,
2000, amounts outstanding under the committed lines of credit were $29 million.
As of that date, $218 million of the short-term uncommitted lines of credit were
used to support undrawn letters of credit and foreign currency contracts issued
in the ordinary course of business.
Short-term debt comprises:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
At October 31, 2000 1999
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
(in thousands)
Note payable to affiliate $164,812 $113,379
Commercial paper 59,442 113,746
Bank borrowings 28,517 15,500
Trade notes payable 741 5,286
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$253,512 $247,911
======== ========
</TABLE>
PAGE 39
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
The company's commercial paper was issued at a discount with a weighted-
average effective interest rate of 6.7 percent at October 31, 2000 and 5.9
percent at October 31, 1999. The note payable to an affiliate is due on demand
and bears interest at the rate of 6.1 percent as of October 31, 2000 and 5.41
percent as of October 31, 1999.
Long-term debt comprises:
At October 31, 2000 1999
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
6.95% Senior Notes due March 1, 2007 $ -- $300,000
5.625% municipal bonds 17,573 17,555
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
17,573 317,555
Less: Current portion -- --
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-term debt due after one year $17,573 $317,555
==================
In March 1997, the company issued $300 million of 6.95% Senior Notes (the
Notes) due March 1, 2007 with interest payable semiannually on March 1 and
September 1 of each year, commencing September 1, 1997. The Notes were sold at a
discount for an aggregate price of $296.7 million. In connection with the spin-
off, the Notes became an obligation of Massey and accordingly have been included
in net assets of discontinued operations.
The municipal bonds are due June 1, 2019 with interest payable semiannually
on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing December 1, 1999. The bonds
are redeemable, in whole or in part, at the option of the company at a
redemption price ranging from 100 percent to 102 percent of the principal amount
of the bonds on or after June 1, 2009. In addition, the bonds are subject to
other redemption clauses, at the option of the holder, should certain events
occur, as defined in the offering prospectus.
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
The company maintains appropriate levels of insurance for business risks.
Insurance coverages contain various deductible amounts for which the company
provides accruals based on the aggregate of the liability for reported claims
and an actuarially determined estimated liability for claims incurred but not
reported. Other noncurrent liabilities include $63 million and $61 million at
October 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, relating to these liabilities.
Stock Plans
The company's executive stock plans, approved by the shareholders, provide for
grants of nonqualified or incentive stock options, restricted stock awards and
stock appreciation rights ("SARS"). All executive stock plans are administered
by the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
("Committee") comprised of outside directors, none of whom are eligible to
participate in the plans. Option grant prices are determined by the Committee
and are established at the fair value of the company's common stock at the date
of grant. Options and SARS normally extend for 10 years and become exercisable
over a vesting period determined by the Committee, which can include accelerated
vesting for achievement of performance or stock price objectives. During 2000,
the company issued 1,581,790 nonqualified stock options and 58,880 SARS that
vest 100 percent at the end of four years, with accelerated vesting based upon
the price of the company's stock, and also issued 52,660 stock options with
annual vesting of 25%. During 1999, the company issued 1,021,810 nonqualified
stock options and 122,900 SARS that vest over four years and 58,000 nonqualified
stock options, with 25 percent vesting upon issuance and the remaining awards
vesting in installments of 25 percent per year commencing one year from the date
of grant.
Restricted stock awards issued under the plans provide that shares awarded
may not be sold or otherwise transferred until restrictions have lapsed or
performance objectives have been attained as established by the Committee. Upon
termination of employment, shares upon which restrictions have not lapsed must
be returned to the company. Restricted stock issued under the plans totaled
351,630 shares, 197,257 shares and 4,500 shares in 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.
As permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (SFAS No. 123), the company has
elected to continue following the guidance of APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees," for measurement and recognition of stock-based
transactions with employees. Recorded compensation cost for these plans totaled
$3 million and $8 million in 2000 and 1999, respectively. During 1998, the
company recognized a net credit of $9 million for performance-based stock plans.
This amount includes $10 million of expenses accrued in prior years which were
reversed in 1998 as a result of not achieving prescribed performance targets.
Under APB Opinion No. 25, no compensation cost is recognized for the option
plans where vesting provisions are based only on the passage of time. Had the
company recorded compensation expense using the accounting method recommended by
SFAS No. 123, net earnings and diluted earnings per share would have been
reduced to the pro forma amounts as follows:
PAGE 40
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Year ended October 31, 2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net earnings
As reported $123,949 $104,187 $235,344
Pro forma 115,098 95,297 218,958
Diluted net earnings per share
As reported $ 1.62 $ 1.37 $ 2.97
Pro forma 1.51 1.26 2.77
==========================================================================
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant by
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following weighted-average
assumptions were used for new grants:
2000 1999 1998
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expected option lives (years) 6 6 5
Risk-free interest rates 6.03% 4.51% 5.83%
Expected dividend yield 1.74% 1.38% 1.19%
Expected volatility 39.81% 33.76% 29.85%
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
The weighted-average fair value of options granted during 2000, 1999 and
1998 was $18, $15 and $12, respectively.
The following table summarizes stock option activity:
Weighted Average
Stock Exercise Price
Options Per Share
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at October 31, 1997 3,921,303 $51
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Granted 1,898,420 36
Expired or canceled (844,664) 47
Exercised (267,602) 37
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at October 31, 1998 4,707,457 47
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Granted 1,079,810 43
Expired or canceled (256,145) 47
Exercised (303,736) 35
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at October 31, 1999 5,227,386 47
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Granted 1,634,450 44
Expired or canceled (617,624) 47
Exercised (147,751) 39
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at October 31, 2000 6,096,461 $46
=======================================
Exercisable at:
October 31, 2000 3,352,234
October 31, 1999 3,407,398
October 31, 1998 3,210,580
At October 31, 2000, there are 3,269,199 shares available for future grant.
Available for grant includes shares which may be granted as either stock options
or restricted stock, as determined by the Committee under the company's various
stock plans.
At October 31, 2000, there are 6,096,461 options outstanding with exercise
prices between $30 and $68, with a weighted-average exercise price of $46 and a
weighted-average remaining contractual life of 5.8 years; 3,352,234 of these
options are exercisable with a weighted-average exercise price of $49. Of the
options outstanding, 4,533,611 have exercise prices between $30 and $45, with a
weighted-average exercise price of $42 and a weighted-average remaining
contractual life of 5.9 years; 1,873,871 of these options are exercisable with a
weighted-average exercise price of $41. The remaining 1,562,850 outstanding
options have exercise prices between $46 and $68, with a weighted-average
exercise price of $59 and a weighted-average remaining contractual life of 5.7
years; 1,478,363 of these options are exercisable with a weighted-average
exercise price of $60.
In connection with the separation of Massey from Fluor, all outstanding
options will be adjusted to preserve the value of such options on the date of
the distribution, including the conversion of options held by Massey employees
to options for shares of Massey.
Lease Obligations
Net rental expense for continuing operations amounted to approximately $80
million, $77 million and $84 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The
company's lease obligations relate primarily to office facilities, equipment
used in connection with long-term construction contracts and other personal
property.
During 1998, the company entered into a $100 million operating lease
facility to fund the construction cost of its corporate headquarters and
engineering center. The facility expires in 2004. Lease payments are calculated
based on LIBOR plus approximately 0.35 percent. The lease contains an option to
purchase these properties during the term of the lease and contains a residual
value guarantee of $82 million. In addition, during 1999 the company entered
into a similar transaction to fund construction of its Calgary office. The total
commitment under this transaction is approximately $25 million.
The company's obligations for minimum rentals under noncancelable leases
are as follows:
Year ended October 31,
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
2001 $29,837
2002 27,451
2003 22,994
2004 14,999
2005 7,556
Thereafter 35,912
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PAGE 41
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Contingencies and Commitments
The company and certain of its subsidiaries are involved in litigation in the
ordinary course of business. The company and certain of its subsidiaries are
contingently liable for commitments and performance guarantees arising in the
ordinary course of business. Claims arising from engineering and construction
contracts have been made against the company by clients, and the company has
made certain claims against clients for costs incurred in excess of the current
contract provisions. The company does not expect that the foregoing matters will
have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or results
of operations.
Disputes have arisen between a Fluor Daniel subsidiary and its client,
Anaconda Nickel, which primarily relate to the process design of the Murrin
Murrin Nickel Cobalt project located in Western Australia. Both parties have
initiated the dispute resolution process under the contract. Results for the
year ended October 31, 1999 for the Fluor Daniel segment include a provision
totaling $84 million for the alleged process design problems. If and to the
extent that these problems are ultimately determined to be the responsibility of
the company, the company anticipates recovering a substantial portion of this
amount from available insurance and, accordingly, has also recorded $64 million
in expected insurance recoveries. The company vigorously disputes and denies
Anaconda's allegations of inadequate process design.
Financial guarantees, made in the ordinary course of business on behalf of
clients and others in certain limited circumstances, are entered into with
financial institutions and other credit grantors and generally obligate the
company to make payment in the event of a default by the borrower. Most
arrangements require the borrower to pledge collateral in the form of property,
plant and equipment which is deemed adequate to recover amounts the company
might be required to pay. As of October 31, 2000, the company had extended
financial guarantees on behalf of certain clients and other unrelated third
parties totaling approximately $26 million.
In connection with its 1997/1998 share repurchase program, the company
entered into a forward purchase contract for 1,850,000 shares of its common
stock at a price of $49 per share. The contract was settled for cash of $101.2
million ($54.72 per share) on November 30, 2000. As of October 31, 2000, the
contract settlement cost per share exceeded the current market price per share
by $19.35.
The company's operations are subject to and affected by federal, state and
local laws and regulations regarding the protection of the environment. The
company maintains reserves for potential future environmental costs where such
obligations are either known or considered probable, and can be reasonably
estimated.
The company believes, based upon present information available to it, that
its reserves with respect to future environmental costs are adequate and such
future costs will not have a material effect on the company's consolidated
financial position, results of operations or liquidity. However, the imposition
of more stringent requirements under environmental laws or regulations, new
developments or changes regarding site cleanup costs or the allocation of such
costs among potentially responsible parties, or a determination that the company
is potentially responsible for the release of hazardous substances at sites
other than those currently identified, could result in additional expenditures,
or the provision of additional reserves in expectation of such expenditures.
In connection with the Massey spin-off, Massey will retain all contingent
liabilities related to its business, including environmental matters.
Operations by Business Segment and Geographical Area
The company provides services on a global basis in the fields of engineering,
procurement, construction, maintenance, operations, project management and
business services. These services are grouped into three operating segments:
Fluor Daniel, Fluor Global Services and Fluor Signature Services. The Massey
Coal business is now a separate public company as a result of the recent
spin-off and is reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated
Statement of Earnings.
Fluor Daniel consists of four business units: Energy & Chemicals;
Manufacturing & Life Sciences; Mining; and Infrastructure. These units provide
design, engineering, procurement and construction services on a worldwide basis
to an extensive range of industrial, commercial, utility, natural resources and
energy clients. The types of services provided by Fluor Daniel include:
feasibility studies, conceptual design, detail engineering, procurement, project
and construction management and construction.
PAGE 42
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Fluor Global Services consists of five business units: American Equipment
Company; TRS Staffing Solutions; Fluor Federal Services; Telecommunications; and
Operations & Maintenance. These units provide a variety of services to clients
in a wide range of industries. The types of services provided by Fluor Global
Services include: equipment sales, leasing, services and outsourcing for
construction and industrial needs; temporary technical and non-technical
staffing specializing in technical, professional and administrative personnel;
services to the United States government; repair, renovation, replacement,
predictive and preventative services to commercial and industrial facilities;
and productivity consulting services and maintenance management to the
manufacturing and process industries.
Fluor Signature Services is a single business unit established primarily to
provide traditional business services and business infrastructure support to the
company. Ultimately, such services may be marketed to external customers.
Although operations for this segment did not start until November 1, 1999,
historical total asset data has been presented for information purposes only.
The reportable segments follow the same accounting policies as those
described in the summary of major accounting policies. Management evaluates a
segment's performance based upon operating profit and operating return on
assets. Intersegment revenues are insignificant. The company incurs costs and
expenses and holds certain assets at the corporate level which relate to its
business as a whole. Certain of these amounts have been charged to the company's
business segments by various methods, largely on the basis of usage.
Engineering services for international projects are often performed within
the United States or a country other than where the project is located. Revenues
associated with these services have been classified within the geographic area
where the work was performed.
Operating Information by Segment
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fluor Fluor Subtotal
Fluor Global Signature Continuing Massey
Daniel Services Services Operations Coal Total
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(in millions)
2000
External revenues $ 6,998 $ 2,953 $ 19 $ 9,970 $ 1,086 $11,056
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 3 99 39 141 171 312
Operating profit before special provision 128 77 1 206 105 311
Total assets (net assets for Massey Coal) 956 971 448 2,375 866 3,241
Capital expenditures $ - $ 166 $ 51 $ 217 $ 211 $ 428*
1999
External revenues $ 8,403 $ 2,931 - $11,334 $ 1,083 $12,417
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 61 90 - 151 167 318
Operating profit before special provision 160 92 - 252 147 399
Total assets 1,017 1,041 $ 454 2,512 1,956 4,468
Capital expenditures $ 25 $ 226 - $ 251 $ 227 $ 478*
1998
External revenues $ 9,736 $ 2,641 - $12,377 $ 1,127 $13,504
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 67 72 - 139 150 289
Operating profit 161 81 - 242 173 415
Total assets 1,270 968 $ 465 2,703 1,801 4,504
Capital expenditures $ 91 $ 214 - $ 305 $ 296 $ 601*
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
*Does not include Knowledge@Work expenditures of $68 million in 2000, $26
million in 1999 and none in 1998.
PAGE 43
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Reconciliation of Segment Information to Consolidated Amounts
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
(in millions)
Continuing Operations
Total segment operating profit before special provision $ 206 $ 252 $ 242
Special provision 18 (117) --
Corporate administrative and general expense (65) (55) (23)
Interest (expense) income, net (15) (2) 6
Other items, net (2) (1) (2)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings from continuing operations before taxes $ 142 $ 77 $ 223
=============================
Discontinued Operations
Total segment operating profit before special provision $ 105 $ 147 $ 173
Interest expense, net (28) (30) (30)
Other items, net (8) (8) (3)
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings from discontinued operations before taxes $ 69 $ 109 $ 140
=============================
Total Assets
Total assets for reportable segments $3,241 $4,468 $4,504
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities 69 210 341
Other items, net 343 208 174
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total assets $3,653 $4,886 $5,019
=============================
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Enterprise-Wide Disclosures
Revenues from
Continuing Operations Total Assets
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
(in millions)
United States* $6,347 $ 6,643 $ 7,196 $1,984 $3,995 $4,082
Canada 1,421 855 315 151 141 97
Asia Pacific (includes Australia) 832 1,575 1,435 215 265 252
Europe 714 1,210 1,196 160 196 255
Central and South America 505 808 1,242 207 221 256
Middle East and Africa 151 243 993 70 68 77
Net assets of discontinued operations -- -- -- 866 -- --
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$9,970 $11,334 $12,377 $3,653 $4,886 $5,019
===========================================================
</TABLE>
*Includes export revenues to unaffiliated customers of $0.4 billion in 2000,
$1.4 billion in 1999 and $1.3 billion in 1998.
PAGE 44
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Management's and Independent Auditors' Reports
Management
The company is responsible for preparation of the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet and the related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows
and shareholders' equity. These statements have been prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles and management believes that they
present fairly the company's consolidated financial position and results of
operations. The integrity of the information presented in the financial
statements, including estimates and judgments relating to matters not concluded
by fiscal year end, is the responsibility of management. To fulfill this
responsibility, an internal control structure designed to protect the company's
assets and properly record transactions and events as they occur has been
developed, placed in operation and maintained. The internal control structure is
supported by an extensive program of internal audits and is tested and evaluated
by the independent auditors in connection with their annual audit. The Board of
Directors pursues its responsibility for financial information through an Audit
Committee of Directors who are not employees. The internal auditors and the
independent auditors have full and free access to the Committee. Periodically,
the Committee meets with the independent auditors without management present to
discuss the results of their audits, the adequacy of the internal control
structure and the quality of financial reporting.
/s/ Philip J. Carroll Jr /s/ Ralph F. Hake
Philip J. Carroll, Jr. Ralph F. Hake
Chairman of the Board and Executive Vice President
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
Report of Independent Auditors
Board of Directors and Shareholders Fluor Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Fluor Corporation
as of October 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
earnings, cash flows, and shareholders' equity for each of the three years in
the period ended October 31, 2000. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Fluor
Corporation at October 31, 2000 and 1999, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
October 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Orange County, California
November 30, 2000
PAGE 45
<PAGE>
FLUOR CORPORATION 2000 ANNUAL REPORT
Quarterly Financial Data
The following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
First Quarter Second Quarter/(2)/ Third Quarter Fourth Quarter/(2)/
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands, except per share amounts)/(1)/
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
2000
Revenues $ 2,738,387 $ 2,295,662 $ 2,627,544 $ 2,308,561
Cost of revenues 2,667,345 2,246,054 2,592,694 2,259,714
Special provision -- (17,919) -- --
Earnings from continuing operations before taxes 52,641 53,187 12,494 23,899
Earnings from continuing operations 37,071 36,726 9,168 16,881
Net earnings (loss) 52,252 51,042 33,338 (12,683)
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations 0.49 0.49 0.12 0.22
Net earnings (loss) 0.69 0.68 0.44 (0.17)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations 0.49 0.48 0.12 0.22
Net earnings (loss) $ 0.69 $ 0.66 $ 0.44 $ (0.17)
====================================================================
1999
Revenues $ 3,109,434 $ 2,837,953 $ 2,803,174 $ 2,583,794
Cost of revenues 3,053,054 2,778,857 2,733,186 2,517,944
Special provision -- 136,500 -- (19,300)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before taxes 46,055 (87,899) 49,860 68,565
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations 29,996 (89,727) 33,521 52,893
Net earnings (loss) 51,081 (72,895) 50,152 75,849
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations 0.40 (1.19) 0.45 0.70
Net earnings (loss) 0.68 (0.97) 0.67 1.00
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
Continuing operations 0.40 (1.19) 0.44 0.70
Net earnings (loss) $ 0.68 $ (0.97) $ 0.66 $ 1.00
====================================================================
</TABLE>
/(1)/ All periods have been restated to present the Massey Coal business as a
discontinued operation.
/(2)/ In March 1999, Fluor announced a new strategic direction, including a
reorganization of the operating units and administrative functions of its
engineering and construction segment. In connection with this
reorganization, Fluor recorded a pre-tax charge of $136.5 million to cover
direct and other reorganization related costs. In October 1999 and April
2000, Fluor reversed into earnings $19.3 million and $17.9 million,
respectively, due to changes in its reorganization plans.
PAGE 46
<PAGE>
Shareholders' Reference
Common Stock Information
At December 31, 2000, there were 74,609,050 shares outstanding and approximately
11,725 shareholders of record of Fluor's common stock.
The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the cash dividends
paid per share of common stock and the high and low sales prices of such common
stock as reported in the Consolidated Transactions Reporting System.
Common Stock and Dividend Information
Dividends Price Range
Per Share High Low
- ----------------------------------------------------
Fiscal 2000
First Quarter $0.25 48 1/2 37 1/4
Second Quarter 0.25 39 15/16 24 3/16
Third Quarter 0.25 36 9/16 29 11/16
Fourth Quarter 0.25 35 29
=====
$1.00
Fiscal 1999
First Quarter $0.20 45 1/16 37 11/16
Second Quarter $0.20 37 7/16 26 1/4
Third Quarter $0.20 42 7/8 35 1/4
Fourth Quarter $0.20 42 5/16 37 1/2
=====
$0.80
- ----------------------------------------------------
Form 10-K
A copy of the Form 10-K, which is filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, is available upon request.
Write to:
Senior Vice President-Law
Fluor Corporation
One Enterprise Drive
Aliso Viejo, California 92656
(949)349-2000
Registrar and Transfer Agent
Mellon Investor Services LLC
4000 South Hope Street
Fourth Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
and
Mellon Investors Services LLC
85 Challenger Road
Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660
For changes of address, lost dividends, or lost stock certificates, write or
telephone:
Mellon Investor Services LLC
P.O. Box 3315
South Hackensack, NJ 07606-1915
Attn: Securityholder Relations
(877) 870-2366
Request may also be submitted via e-mail by visiting their web site at
www.chasemellon.com
Independent Auditors
Ernst & Young LLP
18111 Von Karman Avenue
Irvine, California 92612
Annual Shareholders' Meeting
Annual report and proxy statement are mailed about February 1. Fluor's annual
meeting of shareholders will be held at 9.00 a.m. on March 14, 2001 at the Fluor
Daniel Building, One Fluor Daniel Drive, Aliso Viejo, California 92656.
Duplicate Mailings
Shares owned by one person but held in different forms of the same result in
duplicate mailing of shareholder information at added expense to the company.
Such duplication can be eliminated only at the direction of the shareholder.
Please notify Mellon Investor Services in order to eliminate duplication.
PAGE 50
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-21
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>0003.txt
<DESCRIPTION>SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
Exhibit 21
FLUOR CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES(1)
[Note: Roman numerals below denote the level of the subsidiary. For
example, "I" represents a first tier subsidiary of Fluor Corporation; "II"
represents a second tier subsidiary, etc.]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Organized
Subsidiary Name Under Laws Of
- --------------- --------------
<S> <C>
I American Equipment Company, Inc. South Carolina
II American Construction Equipment Company, Inc. California
III American Equipamentos do Brasil Ltda.(20) Brazil
III AMECO Contractors Rentals, Inc.(16) Philippines
III AMECO Holdings, Inc. California
IV AMECO Caribbean, Inc. California
IV Ameco Mexico Administracion y Servicios, S. de R.L. de
C.V.(29) Mexico
IV Ameco Mining Services S.R.L.(20) Argentina
IV Ameco Peru S.A.C.(20) Peru
IV AMECO Project Services, Inc. Philippines
IV Ameco Pty Ltd. Australia
IV Ameco Services S.R.L.(20) Argentina
IV Ameco Services, S. de R.L. de C.V.(21) Mexico
IV American Equipamentos do Brasil Ltda.(21) Brazil
IV Maquinaria Panamericana, S.A. de C.V.(21) Mexico
III Ameco Mexico Administracion y Servicios, S. de R.L. de
C.V.(30) Mexico
III Ameco Mining Services S.R.L.(21) Argentina
III Ameco Services S.R.L.(21) Argentina
III Maquinaria Panamericana, S.A. de C.V.(20) Mexico
III Ameco Peru S.A.C.(21) Peru
III Shanghai GE Construction Equipment Engineering Co.
Ltd.(18) China
II Ameco Services, S. de R.L. de C.V.(20) Mexico
II AMECO Services Inc. Delaware
III AMEC Equipment Leasing SARL France
II J. W. Burress, Incorporated Virginia
II S & R Equipment Co., Inc. Ohio
II SMA Equipment Co., Inc. Delaware
III Stith Equipment Co., Inc. Delaware
II SMA Information Systems Inc. Delaware
I Fluor Constructors International, Inc. California
II Fluor Constructors Canada Ltd. New Brunswick
II Fluor Constructors Indonesia, Inc. California
II Fluor Management and Technical Services, Inc. California
I Fluor Enterprises, Inc. California
II ADP Marshall, Inc. Arizona
III ADP/FD of Nevada, Inc. Nevada
III ADP Marshall Contractors, Inc. Delaware
III ADP Marshall Limited Ireland
III ADPM, L.L.C. Delaware
II Caribbean Thermal Electric, LLC.(10) Delaware
II Cooper Bridge Constructors Limited Liability Company(19) Delaware
II Claiborne Fuels, Inc. California
II Daniel International Corporation South Carolina
III Daniel Navarra, S.A. Spain
III Fluor Daniel Engineering, Inc. Ohio
III Fluor Management Company L.P.(40) Delaware
II Duke/Fluor Daniel.(22) North Carolina
II Efdee Connecticut Architects, Inc. Connecticut
</TABLE>
1
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Organized
Subsidiary Name Under Laws Of
- --------------- --------------
<S> <C>
II Efdee Engineering Corporation North Carolina
II Efdee Mississippi Architects, A Professional Corporation Mississippi
II Efdee New York Engineers & Architects P.C. New York
II Encee Architecture Services, P.C. North Carolina
II eTech Solutions, Inc. Nevada
II Evergreen Equipment and Personnel Leasing, Inc. Rhode Island
II FD Architects & Engineers Corporation New Jersey
II FD Mexico, Inc. Delaware
II FDCM of Mississippi, Inc. Mississippi
II FDEE Consulting, Inc. California
II FDHM, Inc. California
II FD/MK Limited Liability Company(3) Delaware
II Fluor Abadan Limited Bermuda
II Fluor A&E Services, Inc. California
II Fluor Alaska, Inc. Alaska
II Fluor Ames Kraemer, LLC.(2) Delaware
II Fluor Atlantic Limited Bermuda
II Fluor Australia Pty Ltd Australia
III Civil and Mechanical Maintenance Pty. Ltd. Australia
III Fluor Daniel Constructors Pty. Ltd. Australia
III Fluor Daniel Diversified Plant Services Pty Ltd Australia
IV Fluor Daniel Gas Services Pty Ltd Australia
IV Fluor Daniel Process Plant Services Pty Ltd Australia
IV Maritime Maintenance Services Pty Ltd Australia
III Fluor Daniel (Qld) Pty. Ltd. Australia
III Karratha Engineering Services Pty Ltd Australia
III Signet Holdings Pty Ltd Australia
IV PT Signet Indonesia(15) Indonesia
IV Signet Engineering Pty Ltd Australia
V Signet Ingenieria S.A.(21) Chile
VI Constructora Lequena S.A. Chile
IV Signet Ingenieria S.A.(20) Chile
IV Signet International Holdings Pty. Ltd. Australia
IV Tengis Design Services Pty Ltd Australia
IV Westquip Australia Pty LtdAustralia Australia
III TRS Staffing Solutions (Australia) Pty Ltd Australia
IV AmBit Technology Pty Ltd. Australia
II Fluor Canada Ltd. New Brunswick
III Fluor Daniel International Services Inc.(14) Barbados
III Fluor Daniel Wright Ltd. New Brunswick
IV Wright Engineers (Chile) Limitada Chile
IV Wright Engineers Limitada Peru Peru
III TRS Staffing Solutions (Canada) Inc. Canada
II Fluor Chile, Inc. California
III Ameco Chile S.A.(20) Chile
III Fluor Daniel Chile Ingenieria y Construccion S.A.(20) Chile
III Ingenieria y Construcciones Fluor Daniel Chile Limitada Chile
II Fluor Colombia Limited Delaware
II Fluor Continental Limited Bermuda
II Fluor Daniel, a Professional Architectural Corporation Louisiana
II Fluor Daniel Alumatech, Inc. Delaware
II Fluor Daniel America, Ltda. California
II Fluor Daniel Brasil Engenharia e Servicos Ltda. Brazil
II Fluor Daniel Caribbean, Inc. Delaware
III DMIS, Inc. South Carolina
III Fluor Daniel Export Services, Inc. Delaware
</TABLE>
2
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Organized
Subsidiary Name Under Laws Of
- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C>
III Fluor Daniel International (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia
III Fluor Daniel Maintenance Services, Inc. Delaware
III Fluor Daniel Services Corporation Delaware
III Fluor Facility & Plant Services, Inc. South Carolina
II Fluor Daniel China, Inc. California
II Fluor Daniel China Services, Inc. California
II Fluor Daniel China Technology, Inc. California
II Fluor Daniel Coal Services International, Inc. Delaware
III Duke/Fluor Daniel International(22) Nevada
IV D/FD Foreign Sales Corporation(23) Barbados
III Duke/Fluor Daniel LLC(22) Nevada
III Duke/Fluor Daniel Pty Ltd.(22) Australia
II Fluor Daniel Construction Company California
II Fluor Daniel Development Corporation California
III Crown Energy Company New Jersey
III Fluor Daniel Modesto, Inc. California
IV Wilmore/Fluor Modesto LLC(5) California
III Fluor Daniel Temecula, Inc. California
III Fluor Daniel Tempe, Inc. California
IV Fluor Daniel Ada, Inc.(5) Idaho
III Gloucester Limited, Inc. California
III Gloucester Limited II, Inc. California
III Tarrant Energy, Inc. California
II Fluor Daniel Eastern, Inc. California
III P.T. Fluor Daniel Indonesia(17) Indonesia
IV PT. AMECO Servicindo(17) Indonesia
II Fluor Daniel Energy Investments, Inc. Delaware
II Fluor Daniel Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Delaware
III Fluor Daniel Project Consultants (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. P.R.C.
III Davy Kinhill Fluor Daniel (PNG) Pty Ltd.(25) Papua N. Guinea
II Fluor Daniel Engineers & Constructors, Ltd. California
III Fluor Daniel Korea Ltd. Korea
II Fluor Daniel Engineers & Consultants Ltd. Mauritius
III Fluor Daniel India Private Limited(17) India
II Fluor Daniel Environmental Strategies, Inc. Delaware
II Fluor Daniel Espana, S.A. California
III Daniel International (Saudi Arabia) Ltd. Saudi Arabia
III Fluor Arabia Limited(5) Saudi Arabia
II Fluor Daniel Eurasia, Inc. California
II Fluor Daniel Europe B.V. Netherlands
III ASI Advanced Solutions International BV(34) Netherlands
IV ASI Consulting UK Limited U.K.
IV ASI International Services Ltd U.K.
IV ASI Scandanavia Avant(5) Sweden
IV Chemgineering Holding Company GmbH(7) Switzerland
V ASI GmbH Germany
V ASI Technologies Ltd. Ireland
V Chemgineering AG Switzerland
V Chemgineering GmbH Germany
V Chemgineering Planung GmbH Austria
V SCInformatik AG Switzerland
IV ODI Inc.(5) Delaware
IV TA Group Limited U.K.
V Business Systems Mapping Limited U.K.
V RTP Software Ltd. U.K.
V TA Consultancy Services Ltd. U.K.
V TA Group Trustees Ltd. U.K.
V Team-Sel International Ltd. U.K.
</TABLE>
3
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Organized
Subsidiary Name Under Laws Of
- --------------- --------------
<S> <C>
VI Spel Manpower Services Ltd. U.K.
VI TA Engineering Services Ltd. U.K.
VI TA Engineering Services (Tunisia) Ltd. U.K.
VI Team-Sel Engineering Ltd. U.K.
VI Team-Sel Technology Ltd. U.K.
V Technical Audit Ltd. U.K.
III Fluor Daniel Belgium, N.V. Belgium
III Fluor Daniel B.V. Netherlands
IV Fluor Daniel Consultants B.V. Netherlands
IV Fluor Daniel Engineering and Construction Services
Limited Turkey
IV Fluor Daniel Technology B.V. Netherlands
IV International Refinery Contractors C.V.(4) Netherlands
IV International Refinery Contractors B.V.(5) Netherlands
IV Prochem S.A.(6) Poland
IV TRS Staffing Solutions B.V. Netherlands
III Fluor Daniel E&C LLC(20) Russia
III Fluor Daniel Eastern Services B.V. Netherlands
III Fluor Daniel, S.A.(28) Spain
III Prosynchem Sp.z.o.o(26) Poland
II Fluor Daniel Florida Rail, Inc. Delaware
II Fluor Daniel Global Limited Guernsey
III Fluor Daniel Global Contracting Limited Guernsey
III Fluor Daniel Global Placement Limited Guernsey
III Fluor Daniel Global Placement Services Limited Guernsey
III Fluor Daniel Global Services Limited Guernsey
III Fluor Daniel Global Support Services Limited Guernsey
III Fluor Daniel Global TRS Limited Guernsey
III Fluor Daniel Global TRS Services Limited Guernsey
II Fluor Daniel GmbH Germany
II Fluor Daniel Holdings, Inc. California
III Fluor Daniel Global Services Private Limited India
II Fluor Daniel Illinois, Inc. Delaware
III Duke/Fluor Daniel(22) North Carolina
IV D/FD Enterprises, LLC Delaware
IV D/FD Equipment Company LLC Delaware
IV D/FD Kentucky Mountain Power, LLC Delaware
IV D/FD Ventures, LLC Delaware
IV DFD Operating Plant Services, LLC Delaware
IV DFD Plant Services, LLC Delaware
II Fluor Daniel, Inc. - Philippines Philippines
II Fluor Daniel India, Inc. California
II Fluor Daniel Intercontinental, Inc. California
III Dominican Republic Combined Cycle, LLC.(10) Delaware
III Fluor Daniel Nigeria Limited(13) Nigeria
III Grupo Alvica SCS(17) Venezuela
II Fluor Daniel International Services Inc.(15) Barbados
II Fluor Daniel Ireland Limited Ireland
III Fluor Daniel - E-E-L Limited(5) Ireland
II Fluor Daniel (Japan) Inc. Japan
II Fluor Daniel Latin America, Inc. California
III Grupo Alvica USA LLC(17) Delaware
III Grupo Empresarial Alvica, S.A.(17) Venezuela
II Fluor Daniel (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia
II Fluor Daniel Mexico S.A. California
III ICA-Fluor Daniel, S. de R.L. de C.V(10) Mexico
II Fluor Daniel Mining & Metals, Ltd. California
</TABLE>
4
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Organized
Subsidiary Name Under Laws Of
- --------------- --------------
<S> <C>
III Ameco Chile S.A.(21) Chile
III Fluor Daniel Chile Ingenieria y Construccion S.A.(21) Chile
II Fluor Daniel New Zealand Limited California
II Fluor Daniel (NPOSR), Inc. Delaware
II Fluor Daniel Overland Express, Inc. Delaware
II Fluor Daniel Overseas, Inc. California
III PFD International LLC(5) Delaware
II Fluor Daniel P.R.C., Ltd. California
II Fluor Daniel Pacific, Inc. California
II Fluor Daniel Power B.V. Netherlands
III Duke/Fluor Daniel B.V.(5) Netherlands
II Fluor Daniel Properties Limited U.K.
II Fluor Daniel Pulp & Paper, Inc. California
II Fluor Daniel Real Estate Services, Inc. South Carolina
II Fluor Daniel, S.A.(27) Spain
II Fluor Daniel Sales Corporation Barbados
II Fluor Daniel South America Limited California
II Fluor Daniel South East Asia, Ltd. California
II Fluor Daniel Technical Services, Inc. Texas
II Fluor Daniel Telecommunications Corporation California
II Fluor Daniel Thailand Holdings Corporation California
II Fluor Daniel Thailand, Ltd. California
II Fluor Daniel Venture Group, Inc. California
III Fluor Daniel Asia, Inc. California
IV Duke/Fluor Daniel International Services(22) Nevada
V D/FD Foreign Sales Corporation(12) Barbados
V Duke/Fluor Daniel International Services (Trinidad)
Limited Trinidad
IV PT Duke/Fluor Daniel(22) Indonesia
IV P.T. Fluor Daniel Indonesia(18) Indonesia
V P.T. AMECO Sevicindo(18) Indonesia
IV P.T. Nusantara Power Services(2) Indonesia
III Micogen Inc. California
III Micogen Limited I, Inc. California
III Micogen Limited II, Inc. California
III Soli-Flo LLC(12) Delaware
III Springfield Resource Recovery, Inc. Mass.
II Fluor Distribution Companies, Inc. California
II Fluor Egypt Egypt
II Fluor Engineering Corporation Michigan
II Fluor Engineers, Inc. Delaware
II Fluor Enterprises Group, Inc. Delaware
II Fluor Federal Services, Inc. Washington
II Fluor Federal Services, LLC Delaware
II Fluor Federal Services NWS, Inc. Washington
II Fluor Fernald, Inc. California
III Fluor Environmental Resources Management Services,
Inc. Delaware
II Fluor Gulf Communications, Inc. California
II Fluor Hanford Inc. Washington
II Fluor Indonesia Inc. California
III P.T. Panca Perintis Indonesia(6) Indonesia
II Fluor Industrial Services Inc. Delaware
II Fluor International, Inc. California
II Fluor International Limited Bermuda
II Fluor International Limited U.K.
III ASI Advanced Solutions International BV(35) Netherlands
IV ASI Consulting UK Limited U.K.
</TABLE>
5
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Organized
Subsidiary Name Under Laws Of
- --------------- -------------
<S> <C>
IV ASI International Services Ltd U.K.
IV ASI Scandanavia Avant(5) Sweden
IV Chemgineering Holding Company GmbH(7) Switzerland
V ASI GmbH Germany
V ASI Technologies Ltd. Ireland
V Chemgineering AG Switzerland
V Chemgineering GmbH Germany
V Chemgineering Planung GmbH Austria
V SCInformatik AG Switzerland
IV ODI Inc.(5) Delaware
IV TA Group Limited U.K.
V Business Systems Mapping Limited U.K.
V RTP Software Ltd. U.K.
V TA Consultancy Services Ltd. U.K.
V TA Group Trustees Ltd. U.K.
V Team-Sel International Ltd. U.K.
VI Spel Manpower Services Ltd. U.K.
VI TA Engineering Services Ltd. U.K.
VI TA Engineering Services (Tunisia) Ltd. U.K.
VI Team-Sel Engineering Ltd. U.K.
VI Team-Sel Technology Ltd. U.K.
V Technical Audit Ltd. U.K.
III First Legal Recruitment Limited U.K.
IV First Accountancy Limited U.K.
IV First Recruitment Limited U.K.
III Fluor Daniel Caspian Services Limited U.K.
III Fluor Limited U.K.
III Fluor Ocean Services Limited U.K.
III K Home Engineering Limited(19) U.K.
III Mathos Services Limited U.K.
III TRS Management Resources PLC U.K.
IV Ambit Technology Limited U.K.
IV Antony Dunlop Associates Limited U.K.
V David Chorley Associates Limited U.K.
V Hotel Accounts Resources Limited U.K.
V Times Group Limited U.K.
IV MRG Human Resources Limited U.K.
IV SAP Services Limited U.K.
IV Times Computer Services Limited U.K.
IV TRS Management Resources (Services) Ltd. U.K.
III TRS Staffing Solutions (U.K.) Limited U.K.
II Fluor Iran Iran
II Fluor Italia S.r.l. Italy
II Fluor Maintenance Services, Inc. California
III Norfolk Maintenance Corporation California
II Fluor Mideast Limited Bermuda
II Fluor Mideast Limited California
II Fluor (Nigeria) Limited Nigeria
II Fluor Nuclear Services, Inc. Ohio
II Fluor Plant Services International, Inc. California
II Fluor Plant Services International Ltd Bermuda
III Fluor International Nigeria Limited Nigeria
II Fluor Real Estate Services, Inc. Delaware
II Fluor Reinsurance Investments, Inc. Delaware
II Fluor Services International, Inc. Nevada
II Fluor Technical Services Limited California
</TABLE>
6
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Organized
Subsidiary Name Under Laws Of
- --------------- ---------------
<S> <C>
II Fluor Texas, Inc. Texas
II Fluor US Services, Inc. Delaware
II Fluor Venezuela S.A. Venezuela
II Fluor Vitrification Group, Inc. Washington
II GlobEquip LLC Delaware
II FMC Holding Company LLC Delaware
III Fluor Management Company L.P.(39) Delaware
II FRES, Inc. Delaware
II Indo-Mauritian Affiliates Limited Mauritius
III Fluor Daniel India Private Limited(18) India
II Micogen Limited III, Inc. California
II Middle East Fluor California
II Nutmeg Valley Resources, Inc. California
II Platte River Constructors, Ltd.(10) Ohio
II Power Maintenance Services, Inc. Delaware
III D/FD Bridgeport Operations, LLC(22) Delaware
III D/FD Cokenergy Operations, LLC(22) Delaware
III D/FD Operating Services, LLC(22) Delaware
II Signet Technology Inc. Colorado
II Soli-Flo LLC(12) Delaware
III Soli-Flo, Inc. California
IV Soli-Flo Material Transfer, LP California
IV Soli-Flo Partners, LP California
II Stanhope Management Services Limited U.K.
II Strategic Organizational Systems Enterprises, Inc. California
III Strategic Organizational Systems Construction
Division, Inc. California
III Strategic Organizational Systems Environmental
Division, Inc. Oklahoma
III Strategic Organizational Systems Environmental
Division, Inc. Louisiana
III Strategic Organizational Systems Environmental
Engineering Division, Inc. Texas
IV SOS International, Inc. Alabama
IV Strategic Organizational Systems Environmental
Engineering California Division, Inc. California
III Strategic Organizational Systems Southern California
Division Inc. California
II TDF, Inc. California
III Barringford Ltd. B. Virgin Isles
IV Bishopsford Engineering AG Switzerland
IV Buckleford Corp. N.V. Antilles
IV Buckleshell Engineering Services Ltd. Jersey
IV Fluor Daniel SA (PTY) Ltd. Liechtenstein
V Rhus Investments (PTY) Ltd. R. South Africa
IV Fluor Daniel Engineers SA (PTY) Ltd. Liechtenstein
V Trans-Africa Projects Ltd.(5) Mauritius
V Trans-Africa Projects (Pty) Ltd.(5) R. South Africa
IV Northern Project Services Ltd. B. Virgin Isles
IV Rama Engineering Services B.V. Netherlands
V Ramasa (PTY) Ltd. R. South Africa
IV TRS Staffing Solutions SA Ltd. B. Virgin Isles
III Fluor Properties (PTY) Ltd. R. South Africa
II TradeMC Inc.(5) Delaware
II Valley Infrastructure Group, LLC(2) Delaware
II Venezco, Inc. California
II Williams Brothers Engineering Company Delaware
III Fluor Daniel Argentina, Inc. Delaware
III Williams Brothers Engineering Limited U.K.
III Williams Brothers Engineering Pty Ltd Australia
III Williams Brothers Process Services, Inc. Delaware
</TABLE>
7
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Organized
Subsidiary Name Under Laws Of
- --------------- --------------
<S> <C>
II Wireless Engineering Services Group, LLC(5) Delaware
II WODECO Nigeria Limited Nigeria
I TRS Staffing Solutions, Inc. South Carolina
II Ambit Technology, Inc. N. Hampshire
II Corico Office Professionals, Inc. N. Hampshire
II TRS Contract Solutions, Inc. Delaware
II TRS International Group, Inc. Delaware
III TRS International Group, S. de. R.L. de C.V. Mexico
II TRS International Group Asia Pacific, Inc. California
II TRS Management Resources, Inc. South Carolina
II TRS International Payroll Co. Texas
I Fluor Holding Company LLC Delaware
II Compania Mineria San Jose Del Peru S.A.(20) Peru
II Coral Drilling, C.A. Venezuela
II Fluor Management Company L.P.(41) Delaware
II Mineral Resource Development Corporation Delaware
III Compania Mineria San Jose Del Peru S.A.(21) Peru
III Coral Empreendimentos e Participocoes Ltd.(38) Brazil
III St. Joe ErzbergbauGesellschaft GmbH(36) Austria
III St. Joe Minerals Corporation y Cia.(37) Brazil
II Pinnacle Insurance Company, Inc. Hawaii
II Robil International Corporation Delaware
II St. Joe Egypt Exploracion Corp. Delaware
II St. Joe ErzbergbauGesellschaft GmbH(31) Austria
II St. Joe Exploracion Minera, Inc. Delaware
II St. Joe Luisito de Oro, Inc. Delaware
II St. Joe Minerals Corporation y Cia.(32) Brazil
III Coral Empreendimentos e Participocoes Ltd.(33) Brazil
IV Commercial de Minerios do Sol do Para Ltda. Comipa(5) Brazil
V Mineracao Alabastro Ltda.(29) Brazil
IV Mineracao Sao Felix Ltda. Brazil
IV Mineracao Alabastro Ltda.(32) Brazil
</TABLE>
- --------
(1) Does not include certain subsidiaries which if considered in the aggregate
as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.
Reflects Fluor Corporation subsidiaries effective December 31, 2000 and
following completion of the Distribution discussed in this filing.
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
(2) 40% ownership (22) 49.9999% ownership
(3) 51% ownership (23) 75% ownership
(4) 49.5% ownership (24) 15% ownership
(5) 50% ownership (25) 38% ownership
(6) 35% ownership (26) 98.66% ownership
(7) 45% ownership (27) 96% ownership
(8) 27.8% ownership (28) 3.92% ownership
(9) 55% ownership (29) .2% ownership
(10) 49% ownership (30) 99.8% ownership
(11) 19.99% ownership (31) 83.3% ownership
(12) 25% ownership (32) 99.98% ownership
(13) 60% ownership (33) 99.99% ownership
(14) 10% ownership (34) 5% ownership
(15) 90% ownership (35) 95% ownership
(16) 70% ownership (36) 16.7% ownership
(17) 80% ownership (37) .02% ownership
(18) 20% ownership (38) .01% ownership
(19) 30% ownership (39) 20.5% ownership
(20) 99% ownership (40) 33.4% ownership
(21) 1% ownership (41) 46.1% ownership
</TABLE>
8
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-23
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>0004.txt
<DESCRIPTION>CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Fluor Corporation of our report dated November 30, 2000, included in
the 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders of Fluor Corporation.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-52992) pertaining to the Fluor Corporation 2000
Executive Performance Incentive Plan and the Fluor Corporation 2000 Restricted
Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of our report dated November 30, 2000,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Fluor Corporation
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
October 31, 2000.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Orange County, California
January 24, 2001
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-24
<SEQUENCE>5
<FILENAME>0005.txt
<DESCRIPTION>POWERS OF ATTORNEY OF CERTAIN FLUOR DIRECTORS
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 24
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Fluor"), does
hereby constitute and appoint L. N. FISHER and E. P. HELM and each of them,
with full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed by Fluor
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to file such annual report and
any amendments, with any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
information and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm as his own act and deed all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed his signature
as of the 4th day of January, 2001.
/s/ Carroll A. Campbell, Jr.
-----------------------------------
Carroll A. Campbell, Jr.
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Fluor"), does
hereby constitute and appoint L. N. FISHER and E. P. HELM and each of them,
with full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed by Fluor
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to file such annual report and
any amendments, with any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
information and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm as his own act and deed all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed his signature
as of the 4th day of January, 2001.
/s/ Philip J. Carroll, Jr.
-----------------------------------
Philip J. Carroll, Jr.
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Fluor"), does
hereby constitute and appoint L. N. FISHER and E. P. HELM and each of them,
with full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed by Fluor
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to file such annual report and
any amendments, with any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
information and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm as his own act and deed all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed his signature
as of the 2nd day of January, 2001.
/s/ Peter J. Fluor
-----------------------------------
Peter J. Fluor
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Fluor"), does
hereby constitute and appoint L. N. FISHER and E. P. HELM and each of them,
with full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed by Fluor
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to file such annual report and
any amendments, with any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
information and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm as his own act and deed all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed his signature
as of the 8th day of January, 2001.
/s/ David P. Gardner
-----------------------------------
David P. Gardner
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Fluor"), does
hereby constitute and appoint L. N. FISHER and E. P. HELM and each of them,
with full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed by Fluor
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to file such annual report and
any amendments, with any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
information and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm as his own act and deed all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed his signature
as of the 4th day of January, 2001.
/s/ Thomas L. Gossage
-----------------------------------
Thomas L. Gossage
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Fluor"), does
hereby constitute and appoint L. N. FISHER and E. P. HELM and each of them,
with full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed by Fluor
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to file such annual report and
any amendments, with any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
information and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm as his own act and deed all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed his signature
as of the 4th day of January, 2001.
/s/ Bobby R. Inman
-----------------------------------
Bobby R. Inman
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Fluor"), does
hereby constitute and appoint L. N. FISHER and E. P. HELM and each of them,
with full power to act without the other, as her true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents, for her and in her name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed by Fluor
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to file such annual report and
any amendments, with any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
information and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm as her own act and deed all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed her signature
as of the 2nd day of January, 2001.
/s/ Vilma S. Martinez
-----------------------------------
Vilma S. Martinez
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Fluor"), does
hereby constitute and appoint L. N. FISHER and E. P. HELM and each of them,
with full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed by Fluor
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to file such annual report and
any amendments, with any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
information and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm as his own act and deed all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed his signature
as of the 4th day of January, 2001.
/s/ Dean R. O'Hare
-----------------------------------
Dean R. O'Hare
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Fluor"), does
hereby constitute and appoint L. N. FISHER and E. P. HELM and each of them,
with full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed by Fluor
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to file such annual report and
any amendments, with any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
information and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm as his own act and deed all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed his signature
as of the 4th day of January, 2001.
/s/ Robin W. Renwick, KCMG
-----------------------------------
Robin W. Renwick, KCMG
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Fluor"), does
hereby constitute and appoint L. N. FISHER and E. P. HELM and each of them,
with full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed by Fluor
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to file such annual report and
any amendments, with any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
information and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm as his own act and deed all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed his signature
as of the 2nd day of January, 2001.
/s/ James O. Rollans
-----------------------------------
James O. Rollans
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Fluor"), does
hereby constitute and appoint L. N. FISHER and E. P. HELM and each of them,
with full power to act without the other, as her true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents, for her and in her name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed by Fluor
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to file such annual report and
any amendments, with any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
information and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm as her own act and deed all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed her signature
as of the 4th day of January, 2001.
/s/ Martha R. Seger
-----------------------------------
Martha R. Seger
<PAGE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned directors
and/or officers of FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Fluor"), does
hereby constitute and appoint L. N. FISHER and E. P. HELM and each of them,
with full power to act without the other, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-
fact and agents, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, to be filed by Fluor
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to file such annual report and
any amendments, with any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all other
information and documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and each of the undersigned does hereby ratify and
confirm as his own act and deed all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents,
and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed his signature
as of the 4th day of January, 2001.
/s/ James C. Stein
-----------------------------------
James C. Stein
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
</SEC-DOCUMENT>
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----