10-K405 1 k68272e10-k405.htm ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED 12/31/01 e10-k405
Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

Commission file number 1-11607

DTE ENERGY COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Michigan
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
  38-3217752
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
2000 2nd Avenue, Detroit, Michigan
(Address of principal executive offices)
  48226-1279
(Zip Code)
313-235-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     
Title of each class   Name of each exchange on which registered

 
Common Stock, without par value, with contingent
preferred stock purchase rights
 
New York and Chicago Stock Exchanges
 
 
8 5/8% Trust Preferred Securities*
 
New York Stock Exchange
 
 
7.8% Trust Preferred Securities **
 
New York Stock Exchange


*   Issued by MCN Financing II. The payments of dividends and payments on liquidation or redemption are guaranteed by DTE Energy.
**   Issued by DTE Energy Trust I

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes xbox   No box

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. xbox

At February 28, 2002, 161,133,959 shares of DTE Energy’s Common Stock, substantially all held by non-affiliates, were outstanding, with an aggregate market value of approximately $6.7 billion based upon the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain information in DTE Energy Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2002 Annual Meeting of Common Shareholders to be held April 24, 2002, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, not later than 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s fiscal year covered by this report on Form 10-K, is incorporated herein by reference to Part III (Items 10, 11, 12 and 13) of this Form 10-K.



 


DEFINITIONS
PART I
Item 1. Business
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Part IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule and Reports on Form 8-K
Signatures
Annual Report for Fiscal Year Ended 12/31/01
Guarantee Agreement
Fourth Supplemental Indenture
Amended & Restated Trust Agreement
Consulting Agreement w/A.R. Glancy, III
2002 Measures & Targets for Stock Incentive Plan
2002 Measures & Target for Annual Incentive Plan
Computation of Ratio of Earnings
Subsidiaries of the Company & Detroit Edison
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
Power of Attorney


Table of Contents

DTE Energy Company

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

TABLE OF CONTENTS

                 
            PAGE
           
DEFINITIONS  
 
    3  
PART I
  Item 1.  
Business
    5  
  Item 2.  
Properties
    13  
  Item 3.  
Legal Proceedings
    16  
  Item 4.  
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
    16  
     
PART II
  Item 5.  
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
    17  
  Item 6.  
Selected Financial Data
    18  
  Item 7.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
    19  
  Item 7A.  
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
    37  
  Item 8.  
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
    39  
  Item 9.  
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
    87  
     
PART III
  Item 10.  
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
    87  
  Item 11.  
Executive Compensation
    87  
  Item 12.  
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
    87  
  Item 13.  
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
    87  
     
PART IV
  Item 14.  
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule and Reports on Form 8-K
    88  
     
SIGNATURES  
 
    94  

2


Table of Contents

DEFINITIONS

     
Company   DTE Energy Company and Subsidiary Companies
     
Consumers Energy   Consumers Energy Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of CMS Energy Corporation)
     
Customer Choice   The choice programs are statewide initiatives giving customers in Michigan the option to choose alternative suppliers for electricity and gas.
     
Detroit Edison   The Detroit Edison Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of DTE Energy Company) and Subsidiary Companies
     
Enterprises   DTE Enterprises Inc. (successor to MCN Energy)
     
EPA   United States Environmental Protection Agency
     
FERC   Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
     
GCR   A gas cost recovery mechanism authorized by the MPSC that was reinstated by MichCon in January 2002 that permits MichCon to pass the cost of natural gas to its customers.
     
ITC   International Transmission Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of DTE Energy Company)
     
kWh   Kilowatthour
     
Ludington   Ludington Hydroelectric Pumped Storage Plant (owned jointly with Consumers Energy)
     
MCN Energy   MCN Energy Group Inc.
     
MDEQ   Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
     
MichCon   Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
     
MPSC   Michigan Public Service Commission
     
MW   Megawatt
     
MWh   Megawatthour
     
Note(s)   Note(s) to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company
     
NRC   Nuclear Regulatory Commission
     
PSCR   A power supply cost recovery mechanism authorized by the MPSC that allowed Detroit Edison to recover through rates its fuel, fuel-related and purchased power electric expenses. The clause was suspended under Michigan’s restructuring legislation signed into law June 5, 2000, which lowered and froze electric customer rates.
     
Registrant   Company or DTE Energy Company
     
SEC   Securities and Exchange Commission

3


Table of Contents

     
Securitization   A mechanism used by Detroit Edison to refinance specific stranded costs at lower interest rates through the sale of rate reduction bonds.
     
SFAS   Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
     
Stranded Costs   Costs incurred by utilities in order to serve customers in a regulated environment, but some of which may not be recoverable if customers switch to alternative suppliers of electricity and gas.

4


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain information presented herein includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual future results to differ materially from those contemplated, projected, estimated or budgeted in such forward-looking statements. Factors that may impact forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, interest rates, access to the capital markets, the level of borrowings, weather, actual sales, changes in the cost of fuel and purchased power due to the suspension of the Power Supply Cost Recovery mechanism, changes in the cost of natural gas, the effects of competition and the implementation of Electric and Gas Choice Programs, the implementation of electric and gas utility restructuring in Michigan, environmental and nuclear requirements, the impact of FERC proceedings and regulations, the timing of the accretive effects of DTE Energy’s merger with MCN Energy, and the contributions to earnings by non-regulated businesses.

PART I

Item 1. Business

GENERAL

DTE Energy Company (DTE Energy or the Company), a Michigan corporation incorporated in 1995, is an exempt holding company under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935. The Company is the parent holding company of The Detroit Edison Company (Detroit Edison), the International Transmission Company (ITC), DTE Enterprises Inc. (Enterprises), and other subsidiaries engaged in energy trading, energy services and other energy-related businesses.

On May 31, 2001, DTE Energy completed the acquisition of MCN Energy Group Inc. (MCN Energy). At that time, MCN Energy merged with Enterprises, with Enterprises being the surviving corporation. The operations of Enterprises are included in the Company’s consolidated results from the date of acquisition. Enterprises, a Michigan corporation, is an exempt holding company under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935. Enterprises is primarily involved in natural gas production, gathering, processing, transmission, storage, distribution and energy marketing. Enterprises’ largest subsidiary, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (MichCon), is a natural gas utility serving 1.2 million customers in a 14,700 square-mile area in Michigan.

SEGMENTS

The Company currently operates its businesses through six segments: Electric Utility; Gas Utility; Wholesale Marketing & Trading; Energy Services; Other Non-regulated Operations; and Corporate & Other.

5


Table of Contents

                         
(in Millions)   2001   2000   1999
   
 
 
Operating Revenues
                       
Electric Utility
  $ 4,051     $ 4,129     $ 4,047  
Gas Utility
    603              
Wholesale Marketing & Trading
    2,580       985       251  
Energy Services
    577       472       418  
Non-regulated other
    137       92       39  
Eliminations
    (99 )     (81 )     (27 )
 
   
     
     
 
Consolidated
  $ 7,849     $ 5,597     $ 4,728  
 
   
     
     
 

ELECTRIC UTILITY

Electric Utility is comprised of the operations of Detroit Edison and the International Transmission Company. Detroit Edison is a public utility regulated by the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and is engaged in the generation and distribution of electricity to 2.1 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in a 7,600 square-mile Southeastern Michigan service area. The International Transmission Company is regulated by the FERC and owns transmission assets that are operated by the Midwest Independent System Operator, a regional transmission operator. Prior to June 2001, Detroit Edison owned these transmission assets. As a result of the continued restructuring of the electric industry, the Company is currently contemplating the sale of ITC. Any divestiture will be independently evaluated to maximize shareholder value.

Operating revenues, sales and customer data by rate class are as follows:

                         
    2001   2000   1999
   
 
 
Operating Revenues (in Millions)
                       
Residential
  $ 1,298     $ 1,265     $ 1,300  
Commercial
    1,533       1,670       1,629  
Industrial
    773       848       809  
Wholesale
    196       130       130  
Other
    251       216       179  
 
   
     
     
 
 
  $ 4,051     $ 4,129     $ 4,047  
 
   
     
     
 
Sales (in Thousands of MWh)
                       
Residential
    14,503       13,903       14,064  
Commercial
    18,777       19,762       19,546  
Industrial
    14,430       16,090       15,647  
Wholesale
    868       2,592       3,672  
Other
    2,538       2,653       2,595  
 
   
     
     
 
 
    51,116       55,000       55,524  
 
   
     
     
 
Customers (in Thousands)
                       
Residential
    1,938       1,922       1,904  
Commercial
    184       185       182  
Industrial
    1       1       1  
Other
    2       2       2  
 
   
     
     
 
 
    2,125       2,110       2,089  
 
   
     
     
 

6


Table of Contents

Detroit Edison’s sales and revenues are impacted by weather. Its peak load and highest total system sales generally occur during the third quarter of the year due to air conditioning and cooling-related loads.

During 2001, sales to automotive and automotive-related customers accounted for approximately 8.5 percent of total Detroit Edison operating revenues. Detroit Edison’s 30 largest industrial customers accounted for approximately 17 percent of total operating revenues in 2001, 2000 and 1999, and no one customer accounted for more than 5 percent of total operating revenues. Detroit Edison's operations are not dependent upon a limited number of customers and the loss of any one or a few customers is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Detroit Edison.

Detroit Edison’s generating capability is primarily dependent upon coal. Detroit Edison expects to obtain the majority of its coal requirements through long-term contracts with the balance to be obtained through short-term agreements and spot purchases. Detroit Edison has contracts with four coal suppliers for a total purchase of up to 34 million tons of low-sulfur western coal to be delivered during the period from 2002 through 2005. Detroit Edison also has four contracts for the purchase of approximately 16.8 million tons of Appalachian coal to be delivered during the period from 2002 through 2007. These existing long-term coal contracts include provisions for price escalation as well as de-escalation.

Detroit Edison continues to bill and collect transmission revenue as currently authorized in its bundled distribution rates approved by the MPSC. ITC provides transmission services to customers of Detroit Edison and other non-affiliated customers. ITC billed Detroit Edison approximately $57 million since June 1, 2001, for the costs of providing transmission services to utility customers.

GAS UTILITY

Gas Utility represents the operations of MichCon, which is regulated by the MPSC. MichCon is a public utility engaged in the purchase, distribution, storage and transmission of natural gas throughout Michigan to 1.2 million residential, commercial and industrial customers. As previously discussed, the Company acquired MichCon on May 31, 2001, as part of the MCN Energy merger. Accordingly, the operating results of MichCon are included in the Company’s consolidated results from the acquisition date.

MichCon’s sales and revenues are impacted by weather and are concentrated in the first and fourth quarters of the year due to heating-related demands.

MichCon’s operations are not dependent upon a limited number of customers, and the loss of any one or a few customers is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on MichCon.

MichCon obtains its natural gas supply from various sources in different geographic areas under agreements that vary in both pricing and terms. MichCon has entered into fixed-price contracts for approximately 155 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of its expected 2002 supply requirements of 200 Bcf. The balance of the gas supply requirements will be met through the utilization of existing gas in inventory and purchasing gas at market prices. MichCon owns and operates four natural gas storage fields in Michigan with a capacity of approximately 124 Bcf. MichCon has long-term firm transportation agreements expiring on various dates through 2011.

WHOLESALE MARKETING & TRADING

Wholesale Marketing & Trading consists primarily of the electric, gas and coal trading and marketing operations of DTE Energy Trading Company and the natural gas trading and marketing operations of Enterprises. Wholesale Marketing & Trading enters into forwards, futures, swaps and option contracts as part of its trading strategy. Wholesale Marketing & Trading also purchases and sells electricity and gas to marketers and brokerage companies.

7


Table of Contents

Wholesale Marketing & Trading is an asset-based business that enters into structured back-to-back financial and physical transactions to minimize its risk to commodity prices and enhance returns from its pipeline and storage assets.

ENERGY SERVICES

Energy Services is comprised of various businesses that develop and manage energy-related assets and services. Such projects include coke production, synfuels production, independent power plants, on-site powerhouses and cogeneration facilities, coal services and landfill gas recovery. The economic viability of the synfuels projects is tied to their generation of alternate fuels tax credits.

OTHER NON-REGULATED OPERATIONS

Other Non-Regulated Operations represent the operations of energy businesses primarily involved in emerging technologies, and various other energy operations acquired with the MCN Energy merger, including the exploration and production of gas, the gathering, processing and storing of gas, and the production of methanol. Certain pipeline and storage assets are used to support the Wholesale Marketing & Trading segment.

CORPORATE & OTHER

Corporate & Other includes administrative and general expenses, and interest cost of DTE Energy corporate that have not been allocated to the regulated and non-regulated businesses.

See Note 17 — Segment and Related Information, for financial information by segment for the last three fiscal years.

REGULATION

Detroit Edison and MichCon are subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the MPSC, which issues orders pertaining to rates, recovery of certain costs, including the costs of generating facilities and regulatory assets, conditions of service, accounting and operating related matters. Detroit Edison is regulated by the FERC with respect to financing authorization. ITC is regulated by the FERC for the transmission of electric energy. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has regulatory jurisdiction over all phases of the operation, construction (including plant modification), licensing and decommission of Detroit Edison’s Fermi 2 nuclear plant.

ELECTRIC UTILITY

In June 2000, the Michigan Legislature enacted legislation that established January 2002 as the date for full implementation of the electric Customer Choice program and reduced electric rates by 5%. The legislation also contains provisions preventing rate increases for residential customers through 2005, for small business customers through 2004, and remaining business customers through 2003. In December 2001, the MPSC issued orders designed to increase customer participation in the electric Customer Choice program and to allow Detroit Edison to recover costs not previously securitized related to its generation operations that may not otherwise be recoverable due to Electric Choice related lost sales and margins. Detroit Edison

8


Table of Contents

has requested rehearing, clarification and changes to certain aspects of the December 2001 orders.

Due to MPSC orders issued in 1997 and 1998, which altered the regulatory process in Michigan and provided a plan for transition to competition for the generation business of Detroit Edison, effective December 1998, Detroit Edison’s generation business no longer met the criteria of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation.”

GAS UTILITY

In December 2001, the MPSC issued orders that continue MichCon’s gas Customer Choice program on a permanent and expanding basis and reinstated MichCon’s gas cost recovery (GCR) mechanism in January 2002 upon termination of its three-year experimental Gas Sales Program in which its sales rates included a gas commodity component that was fixed at $2.95 per thousand cubic feet (Mcf).

Please see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 4 – Regulatory Matters for further discussion of regulation and electric and gas industry restructuring.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

The Company is subject to extensive environmental regulation. Additional costs may result as the effects of various chemicals on the environment are studied and governmental regulations are developed and implemented. The Company expects that it will continue to recover environmental costs through rates charged to customers.

ELECTRIC UTILITY

Detroit Edison is subject to applicable permit requirements, and to increasingly stringent federal, state and local standards covering among other things, particulate and gaseous stack emission limitations, the discharge of effluents into lakes and streams and the handling and disposal of waste material.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued ozone transport regulations and air quality standards relating to ozone and particulate air pollution. The new rules have led to additional controls on fossil-fueled power plants to reduce nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide and particulate emissions. The EPA initiated enforcement actions against several major electric utilities citing violations of new source provisions of the Clean Air Act. Detroit Edison received and responded to information requests from the EPA on this subject. The Company cannot predict the future impact of this issue upon Detroit Edison.

Detroit Edison is required to demonstrate that the cooling water intake structures at all of its facilities minimize adverse environmental impact. Detroit Edison filed such demonstrations and

9


Table of Contents

in the event of a final adverse decision, may be required to install additional control technologies to further minimize the impact.

Various state and federal laws regulate Detroit Edison’s handling, storage and disposal of its waste materials. The EPA and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) have aggressive programs regarding the clean up of contaminated property. Detroit Edison has extensive land holdings and, from time to time, must investigate claims of improperly disposed of contaminants. Detroit Edison anticipates it will be periodically included in these types of environmental proceedings.

GAS UTILITY

Prior to the construction of major natural gas pipelines, gas for heating and other uses was manufactured from processes involving coal, coke or oil. Enterprises owns, or previously owned, 17 such former manufactured gas plant (MGP) sites. Investigations have revealed contamination related to the by-products of gas manufacturing at each site. Enterprises is remediating eight of the former MGP sites and is conducting more extensive investigations at three of the sites. Enterprises has received MDEQ closure of one site and a determination that it is not a responsible party for two other sites. The Company believes that a cost deferral and rate recovery mechanism approved by the MPSC will prevent these costs from having a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations.

OTHER

The Company’s non-regulated affiliates are subject to a number of environmental laws and regulations dealing with the protection of the environment from various pollutants. These non-regulated affiliates are in substantial compliance with all environmental requirements.

Please see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies for further discussion of environmental matters.

COMPETITION

The state of Michigan continues its initiatives to restructure the electric and gas industries by expanding the existing Customer Choice programs to allow customers the opportunity to benefit from lower electric generation and gas costs resulting from competition.

ELECTRIC UTILITY

Competition in the electric business is provided by alternative suppliers of generation services in the wholesale and retail markets. Effective January 1, 2002, the electric Customer Choice program was expanded whereby all electric customers can choose to purchase the electricity from alternative suppliers. It is estimated that approximately 5% to 8% of Detroit Edison’s generation sales could be lost as a result of customers participating in the electric Customer Choice program in 2002. Detroit Edison does not earn margins on generation from customers who purchase from alternative suppliers of generation under the electric Customer Choice program. ITC and Detroit

10


Table of Contents

Edison continue to earn margins from providing transmission and distribution services to customers. MPSC orders issued in December 2001 could result in higher numbers of retail customers being lost to Customer Choice.

GAS UTILITY

Competition in the gas business primarily involves alternate fuels and energy sources and alternative suppliers of natural gas. Under the expanded gas Customer Choice program, beginning April 1, 2002, up to approximately 40% of MichCon’s customers could purchase gas from alternative suppliers. Beginning April 1, 2003, up to approximately 60% could participate and beginning April 2004, all of MichCon’s gas customers could participate in the gas Customer Choice program. As of December 2001, approximately 30,000 customers were participating under the temporary choice program. Due to the reinstatement of the GCR mechanism in January 2002, MichCon’s gas sales rates will now include a gas commodity component designed to recover its actual gas costs. MichCon will continue to transport and deliver the gas to participating customers at prices that generate favorable margins.

OTHER

The Company’s non-regulated subsidiaries primarily compete with other utilities and energy companies, utility-affiliated and independent developers, power and natural gas marketers, distributed generation developers and venture investment companies.

Please see Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 4 - Regulatory Matters for further discussion of competition and the impact on rates.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2001, the Company and its subsidiaries had 11,030 employees.

11


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

                 
                Present
                Position
Name   Age (a)   Present Position   Held Since

 
 
 
Anthony F. Earley, Jr.     52     Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Operating Officer   8-1-98
Gerard M. Anderson     43     Group President   5-31-01
Robert J. Buckler     52     Group President   5-31-01
Stephen E. Ewing     57     Group President   5-31-01
Howard L. Dow     46     Senior Vice President   5-31-01
S. Martin Taylor     61     Senior Vice President   4-28-99
Eric H. Peterson (b)     41     Senior Vice President and General Counsel   9-5-00
David E. Meador     44     Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   5-31-01
Susan M. Beale     53     Vice President and Corporate Secretary   12-11-95
Daniel G. Brudzynski     41     Vice President and Controller   2-8-01


(a)   As of December 31, 2001
(b)   Effective April 1, 2002, Thomas A. Hughes, age 58, will serve as acting General Counsel

Under the Company’s By-Laws, the officers of the Company are elected annually by the Board of Directors at a meeting held for such purpose, each to serve until the next annual meeting of directors or until their respective successors are chosen and qualified. With the exception of Messrs. Peterson, Dow and Ewing, all of the above officers have been employed by the Company in one or more management capacities during the past five years.

Eric H. Peterson was a partner with Worsham Forsythe Wooldridge LLP of Dallas, Texas prior to joining the Company. Effective September 2000, he was elected Senior Vice President and General Counsel. Mr. Peterson resigned from the Company, effective March 31, 2002.

Howard L. Dow was elected senior vice president, strategic planning and development at DTE Energy on May 31, 2001. He joined DTE Energy having previously served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of MCN Energy during the previous five years.

Stephen E. Ewing was elected group president for DTE Energy Gas on May 31, 2001. He joined DTE Energy having previously served as president and chief operating officer of MCN Energy and president and chief executive officer of MichCon during the previous five years.

Pursuant to Article VI of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, directors of the Company will not be personally liable to the Company or its shareholders in the performance of their duties to the full extent permitted by law.

Article VII of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation provides that each current or former director or officer of the Company, or each current and former employee or agent of the Company or a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise (including the heirs, executors, administrators or estate of such person), shall be indemnified by the Company to the full extent permitted by the Michigan Business Corporation Act or any other applicable laws as presently or hereafter in effect. In addition, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with all of its officers and directors, which agreements set

12


Table of Contents

forth procedures for claims for indemnification as well as contractually obligating the Company to provide indemnification to the maximum extent permissible by law.

The Company and its directors and officers in their capacities as such are insured against liability for alleged wrongful acts (to the extent defined) under three insurance policies providing aggregate coverage in the amount of $100 million.

Item 2. Properties

DTE Energy, through its operating segments, has property investments primarily associated with the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity; the distribution, transmission, production and storage of natural gas; and other non-regulated property.

Substantially all of the net utility properties of Detroit Edison and MichCon are pledged as security for the payment of outstanding mortgage bonds and other secured debt.

ELECTRIC UTILITY

Detroit Edison and ITC own generating, transmission and distribution properties and facilities that are all located in the state of Michigan.

13


Table of Contents

Detroit Edison maintains the following generating facilities:

                                   
              Summer Net        
      Location by   Rated Capability (1) (2)        
      Michigan  
       
Plant Name   County   (MW)   (%)   Year in Service

 
 
 
 
Fossil-fueled Steam-Electric
                               
 
Belle River (3)
  St. Clair     1,026       9.3 %   1984 and 1985
 
Conners Creek
  Wayne     200       1.8     1999  
 
Greenwood
  St. Clair     785       7.1     1979  
 
Harbor Beach
  Huron     103       0.9     1968  
 
Marysville
  St. Clair     167       1.5     1930, 1943 and 1947
 
Monroe (4)
  Monroe     3,000       27.1     1971, 1973 and 1974
 
River Rouge
  Wayne     510       4.6     1957 and 1958
 
St. Clair
  St. Clair     1,402       12.7     1953, 1954, 1961 and 1969
 
Trenton Channel
  Wayne     730       6.6     1949, 1968 and 1999
 
           
     
         
 
            7,923       71.6          
Oil or Gas-fueled Peaking Units
  Various     1,102       10.0     1966-1971, 1981 and 1999
Nuclear-fueled Steam-Electric Fermi 2 (5)
  Monroe     1,111       10.1     1988  
Hydroelectric Pumped Storage Ludington (6)
  Mason     917       8.3     1973  
 
           
     
         
 
            11,053       100 %        
 
           
     
         


(1)   Summer net rated capabilities of generating units in service are based on periodic load tests and are changed depending on operating experience, the physical condition of units, environmental control limitations and customer requirements for steam, which otherwise would be used for electric generation.
(2)   Excludes one oil-fueled unit, St. Clair Unit No. 5 (250 MW), in economy reserve status.
(3)   The Belle River capability represents Detroit Edison’s entitlement to 81.39% of the capacity and energy of the plant. See Note 6 – Jointly Owned Utility Plant.
(4)   The Monroe Power Plant provided 36.62% of Detroit Edison’s total 2001 power plant generation.
(5)   Fermi 2 has a design electrical rating (net) of 1,150 MW.
(6)   Represents Detroit Edison’s 49% interest in Ludington with a total capability of 1,872 MW. Detroit Edison is leasing 306 MW to First Energy for the six-year period June 1, 1996 through May 31, 2002.

Detroit Edison and Consumers Energy interchange energy through nine interconnections currently owned and operated by their respective affiliates, ITC and Michigan Electric Transmission Company (METC). Detroit Edison and Consumers Energy also have interchange agreements that permit the exchange of electric energy through 12 ITC and METC owned interconnections with First Energy, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Northern Indiana Public Service Company and Ontario Hydro Services Company. In addition, Detroit Edison has interchange agreements for the exchange of electric energy with Michigan South Central Power Agency and the City of Wyandotte.

14


Table of Contents

ITC owns and operates 446,903 line transformers with a capacity of 21,742,832 kilovolt (KV) amperes. Electric transmission lines owned and in service as of December 31, 2001 are as follows:

                           
      Overhead Lines   Underground Lines
     
 
Design Line Voltage - KV   Pole Miles   Circuit Miles   Cable Miles

 
 
 
Transmission
                       
 
120 KV
    1,110       1,625       166  
 
140 KV
    31       31        
 
230 KV
    77       87        
 
345 KV
    525       956       7  
 
   
     
     
 
 
    1,743       2,699       173  
 
   
     
     
 

Detroit Edison owns and operates 619 distribution substations with a capacity of 18,623,000 kilovolt amperes. Electric distribution lines owned and in service as of December 31, 2001 are as follows:

                           
      Overhead Lines   Underground Lines
     
 
Design Line Voltage - KV   Pole Miles   Conduit Bank Miles   Cable Miles

 
 
 
Distribution
                       
 
Under 4.8 KV
          65       659  
 
4.8 KV and 13.2 KV
    32,973       459       15,163  
 
24 KV
    105       258       1,047  
 
40 KV
    2,846       91       338  
 
120 KV
    54             16  
 
   
     
     
 
 
    35,978       873       17,223  
 
   
     
     
 

GAS UTILITY

MichCon owns distribution, transmission, production and storage properties and facilities that are all located in the state of Michigan.

At December 31, 2001, MichCon’s distribution system included 17,570 miles of distribution mains, 1,124,258 service lines and 1,220,623 active meters. MichCon owns 2,590 miles of transmission and production lines that deliver natural gas to the distribution districts and interconnect its storage fields with the sources of supply and the market areas. MichCon owns properties relating to four underground natural gas storage fields with an aggregate working gas storage capacity of approximately 124 Bcf.

15


Table of Contents

OTHER

Non-regulated property consists primarily of coke oven battery facilities in Michigan and Indiana, coal processing facilities in Michigan and Maryland, merchant natural gas turbine facilities in Indiana and Michigan, numerous landfill gas projects located throughout the United States, and natural gas and oil exploration, development and production facilities.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in certain legal (including commercial matters), administrative and environmental proceedings before various courts, arbitration panels and governmental agencies concerning claims arising in the ordinary course of business. These proceedings include certain contract disputes, environmental reviews and investigations, and pending judicial matters. Management cannot predict the final disposition of such proceedings. Management regularly reviews legal matters and records provisions for claims that are considered probable of loss. The resolution of pending proceedings is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements in the period they are resolved.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None during the fourth quarter of 2001.

16


Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

The Company’s Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, which is the principal market for such stock, and the Chicago Stock Exchange. The following table indicates the reported high and low sales prices of the Company’s Common Stock on the Composite Tape of the New York Stock Exchange and dividends paid per share for each quarterly period during the past two years:

                                 
                            Dividends
                            Paid
Calendar   Quarter   High   Low   Per Share

 
 
 
 
2001
                               
 
  First   $ 40.200     $ 33.125     $ 0.515  
 
  Second   $ 47.130     $ 39.790     $ 0.515  
 
  Third   $ 47.040     $ 41.300     $ 0.515  
 
  Fourth   $ 45.000     $ 39.900     $ 0.515  
2000
                               
 
  First   $ 41.250     $ 28.438     $ 0.515  
 
  Second   $ 35.938     $ 28.875     $ 0.515  
 
  Third   $ 40.250     $ 30.438     $ 0.515  
 
  Fourth   $ 39.313     $ 34.938     $ 0.515  

At December 31, 2001, there were 161,133,959 shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding. These shares were held by a total of 114,556 shareholders of record.

The Company’s By-Laws provide that Chapter 7B of the Michigan Business Corporation Act (Act) does not apply to the Company. The Act regulates shareholder rights when an individual’s stock ownership reaches 20 percent of a Michigan corporation’s outstanding shares. A shareholder seeking control of the Company cannot require the Company’s Board of Directors to call a meeting to vote on issues related to corporate control within 10 days, as stipulated by the Act. See Note 8 – Common Stock and Earnings Per Share for additional information, including information concerning the Shareholders’ Rights Plan.

The amount of future dividends will depend on the Company’s earnings, financial condition and other factors each of which is periodically reviewed by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Pursuant to Article I, Section 8. (c) and Article II, Section 3.(c) of the Company’s By-laws, as amended through September 1, 1999, notice is given that the 2003 Annual Meeting of the Company’s Common Shareholders will be held on Wednesday, April 23, 2003.

17


Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

                                           
      2001   2000   1999   1998   1997
     
 
 
 
 
(in Millions, except per share amounts)                                        
Operating Revenues
  $ 7,849     $ 5,597     $ 4,728     $ 4,221     $ 3,764  
Net Income Before Accounting Change
  $ 329     $ 468     $ 483     $ 443     $ 417  
Net Income
  $ 332     $ 468     $ 483     $ 443     $ 417  
Basic Earnings Per Share Before Accounting Change
  $ 2.15     $ 3.27     $ 3.33     $ 3.05     $ 2.88  
Diluted Earnings Per Share Before Accounting Change
  $ 2.14     $ 3.27     $ 3.33     $ 3.05     $ 2.88  
Dividends Declared Per Share of Common Stock
  $ 2.06     $ 2.06     $ 2.06     $ 2.06     $ 2.06  
At year end:
                                       
 
Total Assets
  $ 19,228     $ 12,656     $ 12,316     $ 12,088     $ 11,223  
 
Long-Term Debt Obligations (including capital leases) and Redeemable Preferred and Preference Stock Outstanding
  $ 7,928     $ 4,039     $ 4,091     $ 4,323     $ 3,914  

18


Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Merger Completed - On May 31, 2001, DTE Energy Company (DTE Energy or the Company) completed the acquisition of MCN Energy Group Inc. (MCN Energy). As discussed further in Note 2, MCN Energy merged with DTE Enterprises Inc., (Enterprises), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, with Enterprises being the surviving corporation. The operations of Enterprises are included in the Company’s consolidated results from the date of acquisition. Enterprises, a Michigan corporation, is an exempt holding company under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935. Enterprises is primarily involved in natural gas production, gathering, processing, transmission, storage, distribution and energy marketing. Enterprises’ largest subsidiary, Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (MichCon), is a natural gas utility serving 1.2 million customers in a 14,700 square-mile area in Michigan.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

DTE Energy’s earnings in 2001 were $332 million or $2.16 per diluted share, compared to earnings of $468 million, or $3.27 per diluted share in 2000. As subsequently discussed, the comparability of earnings was affected by merger and restructuring charges and goodwill amortization associated with the MCN Energy merger that reduced after-tax earnings by $204 million, or $1.32 per diluted share in 2001. The Company also recorded merger-related charges in 2000 that reduced earnings by $16 million, or $.12 per diluted share. See Note 3 – Merger and Restructuring Charges included herein for additional information. Excluding the merger and restructuring charges and goodwill amortization, DTE Energy had 2001 earnings of $536 million, or $3.48 per diluted share, compared to 2000 earnings of $484 million, or $3.39 per diluted share. The significant improvement in earnings primarily reflects contributions from gas operations acquired in the MCN Energy merger and lower income taxes resulting from the generation of additional alternate fuels tax credits by non-regulated businesses. Partially offsetting these improvements were increased interest on long-term debt that was incurred to finance the merger and lower margins from regulated electricity operations.

DTE Energy’s earnings in 2000, before merger-related charges, were up $1 million or $.06 per share from 1999 earnings of $483 million, or $3.33 per share. The slight increase was due to additional tax credits partially offset by a 5% residential rate reduction provided for in the June 2000 Michigan electric industry restructuring legislation (Note 4).

19


Table of Contents

                                 
            2001   2000   1999
           
 
 
(in Millions, except per share data)                        
Net Income (Loss)
                       
Before Reconciling Items:
                       
 
Regulated Operations
                       
     
Electric Utility
  $ 369     $ 427     $ 434  
     
Gas Utility
    23              
 
   
     
     
 
 
    392       427       434  
 
   
     
     
 
 
Non-regulated Operations
                       
     
Wholesale Marketing & Trading
    44       10       8  
     
Energy Services
    124       109       84  
     
Other
    (6 )     (35 )     (23 )
 
   
     
     
 
 
    162       84       69  
 
   
     
     
 
 
Corporate & Other
    (18 )     (27 )     (20 )
 
   
     
     
 
 
    536       484       483  
Merger and Restructuring Charges
    (175 )     (16 )      
MCN Energy Goodwill Amortization
    (29 )            
 
   
     
     
 
 
  $ 332     $ 468     $ 483  
 
   
     
     
 
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
                       
Before Reconciling Items:
                       
   
Regulated Operations
                       
       
Electric Utility
  $ 2.40     $ 2.99     $ 2.99  
       
Gas Utility
    .15              
 
   
     
     
 
 
    2.55       2.99       2.99  
 
   
     
     
 
   
Non-regulated Operations
                       
       
Wholesale Marketing & Trading
    .29       .07       .06  
       
Energy Services
    .80       .76       .58  
       
Other
    (.04 )     (.24 )     (.16 )
 
   
     
     
 
 
    1.05       .59       .48  
 
   
     
     
 
 
Corporate & Other
    (.12 )     (.19 )     (.14 )
 
   
     
     
 
 
    3.48       3.39       3.33  
Merger and Restructuring Charges
    (1.13 )     (.12 )      
MCN Energy Goodwill Amortization
    (.19 )            
 
   
     
     
 
 
  $ 2.16     $ 3.27     $ 3.33  
 
   
     
     
 

Strategic direction – The Company remains committed to increasing its earnings growth rate from the current 6% annual level to 8% by 2005. The growth strategy continues to be focused on strengthening the Company’s core electric and gas utilities, building its portfolio of non-regulated businesses and leveraging investments in energy technology. There is no assurance that the level of earnings growth will be achieved for 2002 and later years as the growth projections assume, among other things, the realization of anticipated cost savings related to the MCN Energy acquisition, continued growth in non-regulated earnings and a midyear 2002 economic recovery. The Company expects the acquisition to provide pretax cost savings of over $100 million annually, totaling more than $650 million in savings over the next five years, primarily in the electric and gas utilities.

Non-regulated growth is expected to shift over the next few years from DTE Energy’s current reliance on profits from coal-based fuel businesses that generate alternate fuels tax credits to

20


Table of Contents

growth from energy technologies, on-site energy projects, merchant generation and energy trading.

The Company currently operates its businesses through six segments: Electric Utility; Gas Utility; Wholesale Marketing & Trading; Energy Services; Other Non-regulated Operations; and Corporate & Other.

Electric Utility is comprised of the operations of Detroit Edison and the International Transmission Company. Detroit Edison generates and distributes electricity throughout Southeastern Michigan to 2.1 million residential, commercial and industrial customers. The International Transmission Company owns transmission assets that are operated by the Midwest Independent System Operator, a regional transmission operator. Prior to June 2001, Detroit Edison owned these transmission assets.

Gas Utility represents the operations of MichCon, which purchases, stores and distributes natural gas throughout Michigan to 1.2 million residential, commercial and industrial customers.

Wholesale Marketing & Trading consists primarily of the electric, gas and coal trading and marketing operations of DTE Energy Trading Company and the natural gas trading and marketing operations of Enterprises. Wholesale Marketing & Trading enters into forwards, futures, swaps and option contracts as part of its trading strategy. Wholesale Marketing & Trading also purchases and sells electricity and gas to marketers and brokerage companies.

Energy Services is comprised of various businesses that develop and manage energy-related assets and services. Such projects include coke production, synfuels production, independent power plants, on-site powerhouses and cogeneration facilities, coal services and landfill gas recovery. The economic viability of synfuels projects is tied to their generation of alternate fuels tax credits.

Other Non-regulated Operations represents the operations of energy businesses primarily involved in emerging technologies, and various other energy operations acquired with the MCN Energy merger, including the exploration and production of gas, the gathering, processing and storing of gas, and the production of methanol. Certain pipeline and storage assets are used to support the Wholesale Marketing & Trading segment.

Corporate & Other includes administrative and general expenses, and interest cost of DTE Energy corporate that have not been allocated to the regulated and non-regulated businesses.

21


Table of Contents

Electric Utility

Electric Utility net income before merger and restructuring charges decreased $58 million in 2001 and decreased $7 million in 2000, compared to the prior year. As subsequently discussed, the decline in 2001 is primarily attributable to lower commercial and industrial sales reflecting the impact of the current economic recession and customers participating in the Electric Choice Program, as well as higher operation and maintenance costs and the impact of securitization (Note 4).

                   
      2001   2000
     
 
Electric Utility                
Increase (Decrease) in Income Compared to Prior Year                
(in Millions)                
Operating revenues
               
 
Rate reduction
  $ (116 )   $ (43 )
 
PSCR rate change
          82  
 
System sales volume and mix
    (69 )     24  
 
Wholesale sales
    66        
 
Other — net
    41       19  
 
   
     
 
 
    (78 )     82  
Fuel and purchased power
    30       (165 )
Operation and maintenance
    (96 )     76  
Depreciation and amortization
    75       (16 )
Taxes, other than income
    15       (14 )
Interest expense and other
    (24 )      
Income taxes
    23       30  
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
    (3 )      
 
   
     
 
Total change before merger and restructuring charges
  $ (58 )   $ (7 )
 
   
     
 

Operating revenues decreased $78 million in 2001 due to a decline in sales rates and electric sales for commercial and industrial customers. Sales rates for commercial and industrial customers were lowered by a 5% legislatively mandated rate reduction that began in April 2001. Commercial sales decreased primarily due to increased participation of customers in the Electric Choice Program. Under this program, participating customers choose to purchase their electricity from suppliers other than Detroit Edison. However, the Electric Utility continues to provide transmission and distribution services for these customers retaining margins from such services. Industrial sales reflect reduced auto and steel production, the impact of Electric Choice participation and the end of a special energy sales agreement with a large steel manufacturer in March of 2001. Partially offsetting these declines were increased revenues from residential and wholesale customers as well as higher revenues from providing other energy related services. Residential customer revenues reflect higher demand resulting from weather, partially offset by the impact of a 5% rate reduction that began in June 2000. Revenues from wholesale customers increased due to gains from settling forward sales contracts. The sales contracts were entered into to effectively close forward purchase contracts that hedged Detroit Edison’s power supply costs. Accordingly, the gains from forward sales contracts were substantially offset by losses from forward purchase contracts which are recorded as part of fuel and purchased power costs.

Operating revenues in 2000 increased $82 million over 1999 due to higher sales to commercial and industrial customers, partially offset by lower residential customer sales. Additionally, under the

22


Table of Contents

Power Supply Cost Recovery (PSCR) mechanism which was in effect through June 2000, Detroit Edison increased rates in January 2000 to recover higher power costs. The increased commercial and industrial sales reflected favorable economic conditions in Michigan. Industrial sales also increased due to the special sales agreement with a large steel manufacturer. The decline in residential revenues reflects reduced demand resulting from a cooler summer in 2000 and the impact of the 5% rate reduction. Wholesale sales decreased due to lower demand for energy and less availability of energy for sale. Also impacting revenues in 2000 were higher revenues from other energy-related services.

Revenue and sales data follow:

                                 
    2001           2000   1999
   
         
 
(in Millions)
                               
Residential
  $ 1,298     $         1,265     $ 1,300  
Commercial
    1,533               1,670       1,629  
Industrial
    773               848       809  
Wholesale
    196               130       130  
Other
    251               216       179  
 
   
             
     
 
 
  $ 4,051     $         4,129     $ 4,047  
 
   
             
     
 
(in Thousands of MWh)
                               
Residential
    14,503               13,903       14,064  
Commercial
    18,777               19,762       19,546  
Industrial
    14,430               16,090       15,647  
Wholesale
    868               2,592       3,672  
Other
    2,538               2,653       2,595  
 
   
             
     
 
 
    51,116               55,000       55,524  
 
   
             
     
 

Fuel and purchased power expense decreased $30 million in 2001 and increased $165 million in 2000. The decline in 2001 is due to lower system output resulting from reduced electric sales, as well as the result of using a more favorable power supply mix reflecting increased usage of lower-cost power from the Company’s generating plants and reduced usage of higher-cost purchased power. Also favorably impacting the 2001 comparison was an adjustment of a reserve associated with a contract to purchase steam at above market prices (Note 14). Additionally, losses on the settlement of forward and option contracts to hedge purchase power prices increased purchased power expense in 2001. The 2000 fuel and purchased power expense increase resulted primarily from greater reliance on higher-cost purchased power and higher purchase power prices.

23


Table of Contents

System output and average fuel and purchased power costs for Detroit Edison were as follows:

                           
      2001   2000   1999
     
 
 
(in Thousands of MWh)
                       
Power generated and purchased
                       
Power plant generation
                       
 
Fossil
    39,711       42,100       43,016  
 
Nuclear
    8,555       8,239       9,484  
Purchased power
    7,482       8,877       6,959  
 
   
     
     
 
System output
    55,748       59,216       59,459  
 
   
     
     
 
Average unit cost ($/MWh)
                       
 
Generation (1)
  $ 12.31     $ 12.78     $ 12.51  
 
   
     
     
 
 
Purchased power (2)
  $ 78.24     $ 62.57     $ 54.80  
 
   
     
     
 


(1)   Represents fuel costs associated with power plants.
(2)   The average purchased power amounts include gains and losses from hedging activities.

Operating and maintenance expenses increased $96 million in 2001 and decreased $76 million in 2000. The increase in 2001 was primarily due to expenses related to maintenance and reliability work for power generation facilities, which reduces random outages at power plants and Detroit Edison’s reliance on purchased power. Additionally, the higher 2001 expenses include the cost of funding the low income and energy efficiency fund required by Michigan legislation which is recovered in current sales rates and costs allocated from DTE Energy corporate for various corporate support services. The increase was partially offset by synergy cost savings related to the MCN Energy merger.

The decrease in 2000 operation and maintenance expenses resulted primarily from lower costs associated with restoring power to customers who lost service during severe storms, as well as the elimination of computer system related costs associated with year 2000 (Y2K) initiatives.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $75 million in 2001 and increased $16 million in 2000. The 2001 decline reflects the extension of the amortization period from seven years to 15 years for certain regulatory assets that were securitized in March 2001 (Note 4), partially offset by depreciation on higher levels of plant in service. The increase in 2000 was due to increased levels of plant in service and the accelerated amortization of unamortized nuclear costs.

Taxes other than income decreased $15 million in 2001 and increased $14 million in 2000. The improvement in 2001 is attributed to an adjustment in property tax expense reflecting a change in method of calculating the taxable value of personal property subject to taxation by local taxing jurisdictions. New valuation tables approved by the Michigan State Tax Commission more accurately recognize the impact of regulation on the value of a utility’s personal property based on the property’s age. Partially offsetting the 2001 decline and resulting in the 2000 increase were property taxes associated with higher property balances. Lower Michigan Single Business Taxes also affected both years.

Interest expense and other increased $24 million in 2001 due primarily to debt issued for securitization, partially offset by redemptions of higher cost debt with the proceeds of the

24


Table of Contents

securitization bonds (Note 10). Detroit Edison completed the redemption of debt with securitization proceeds in 2001.

Outlook – The Electric Utility segment expects electric system sales to remain relatively flat in 2002 due to the current economic recession and to grow modestly beginning in 2003. The state of Michigan continues its initiatives to restructure the electric industry by increasing competition among alternative suppliers of electric generation services. Effective January 1, 2002, the Electric Choice Program was expanded whereby all electric customers can choose to purchase their electricity from suppliers other than their local utility (Note 4). Prior to January 2002, electric restructuring legislation limited customer participation in the Electric Choice Program.

Detroit Edison does not earn generation margins on electricity sales to customers who choose to participate in the Electric Choice Program. However, the Electric Utility segment will continue to earn margins from providing transmission and distribution delivery services to participating customers. Detroit Edison expects to lose 5% to 8% of its sales as a result of customers choosing to participate in Electric Choice during 2002. As subsequently discussed, Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) orders issued in December 2001 could result in higher numbers of retail customers being lost to Electric Choice. Detroit Edison expects to sell more electricity in the wholesale market as a result of the available capacity left by customers participating in Electric Choice. The additional wholesale revenues are expected to partially offset any decline in revenues from retail customers.

The MPSC issued orders in December 2001 which are designed to increase customer participation in the Electric Choice Program and allow Detroit Edison to recover costs related to its generation operations that may not otherwise be recoverable (stranded costs) due to Electric Choice related lost sales and margins. The MPSC essentially determined that Electric Choice customers should not pay a securitization and tax surcharge that other customers are required to pay and will continue to be credited with an additional 5% rate reduction which is funded by savings from securitization. These provisions will likely result in Detroit Edison’s power costs being higher than that of alternative suppliers, encouraging additional customer participation in the Electric Choice Program.

As a result of the MPSC orders, Detroit Edison would recover the net stranded costs associated with its electric generation operations. Specifically there would be an annual filing with the MPSC comparing actual revenues from generation services to the revenue requirements, including an allowance for the cost of capital, to recover the costs of generation operations. The MPSC in its orders determined that Detroit Edison had no stranded costs using 2000 data, established a zero 2002 transition charge and deferred the issues of refining the net stranded costs methodology and the recalculating of net stranded costs to 2002. Detroit Edison has substantive issues with the MPSC’s methodology of calculating stranded costs and has asked for rehearing, clarification and substantial changes on certain aspects of the order. For further information concerning the Electric Choice Program and industry restructuring, see Note 4-Regulatory Matters-Electric Industry Restructuring-Michigan Legislation.

Electric Utility future operating results will also vary with a variety of other external factors such as weather, the cost of fuel and purchased power, and changes in economic conditions. The current

25


Table of Contents

economic recession has lowered margins from commercial and industrial customers in the latter half of 2001 and is expected to unfavorably impact margins through the first half of 2002.

Management expects to meet the challenges of the recession, Electric Choice and the imposed retail rate freezes by, among other actions, reducing costs at Detroit Edison as a result of the acquisition of MCN Energy and its wholly owned gas utility, MichCon. Approximately 35% of Detroit Edison’s 2.1 million customers are also customers of MichCon. Detroit Edison and MichCon have begun and expect to continue realizing synergies from integrated common, duplicative functions.

As a result of the continued restructuring of the electric industry, the Company is currently contemplating the sale of ITC. Any divestiture will be independently evaluated to maximize shareholder value.

Gas Utility

The Gas Utility, before merger and restructuring charges, had net income of $23 million for the seven months in 2001. As previously discussed, DTE Energy acquired MichCon on May 31, 2001, as part of the MCN Energy merger. Accordingly, the operating results of MichCon are included in the Company’s consolidated results from the acquisition date. The pro forma impact of MCN Energy on the Company is included in Note 2 – MCN Energy Acquisition.

                   
      2001
     
(Dollars in Millions)   $   Bcf
   
 
Gas Statistics
               
Operating revenues
               
 
Gas sales
    491       95  
 
End user transportation
    50       81  
 
Intermediate transportation
    26       304  
 
Other
    36       -  
 
   
     
 
 
    603       480  
Cost of Gas Sold
    296       n/a  
   
 
Gross Margin – Actual
    307       n/a  
Impact of weather – warmer than normal
    20       14  
 
   
     
 
Gross Margin – Weather Normalized
    327       494  
 
   
     
 

Gas sales and end user transportation services generated 80% of total gross margins for the Gas Utility segment. Margins from providing gas sales and end user transportation services are seasonal and weather dependent with the majority of profits generated in the colder first and fourth quarters. Mild weather, which was 20% warmer than normal in the fourth quarter of 2001, reduced gross margins by $20 million ($13 million after taxes) and reduced gas sales by 14 billion cubic feet (Bcf).

Gas sales represent the sale and delivery of natural gas primarily to residential and small-volume commercial and industrial customers. Through December 2001, MichCon operated under a Gas Sales Program in which its sales rates included a gas commodity component that was fixed at $2.95 per thousand cubic feet (Mcf). Under this program, MichCon had commodity price risk associated with its ability to secure gas supplies at prices less than $2.95 per Mcf. As discussed in the “Outlook” section that follows, MichCon returned to a Gas Cost Recovery (GCR) mechanism

26


Table of Contents

in January 2002 and no longer has commodity price risk. End user transportation represents a gas delivery service for customers, including customer choice customers, who purchase natural gas directly from producers or brokerage companies and contract with MichCon to deliver that gas to their premises.

Intermediate transportation services represents a gas delivery service for producers, brokers and other gas companies that own the natural gas but are not the ultimate consumers. Although intermediate transportation volumes are a significant part of total deliveries, profit margins on this service are considerably less than margins on gas sales and end user transportation services. Intermediate transportation deliveries include volumes associated with fixed-fee customers. Transportation volumes for fixed-fee customers may fluctuate, however revenues from such customers are not affected.

Other operating revenues include late payment fees, appliance maintenance services and other gas-related services.

Cost of gas is affected by variations in gas sales volumes, cost of purchased gas and related transportation costs, and the effects of any permanent liquidation of inventory gas which is accounted for under the “last-in first-out” (LIFO) method. The 2001 results benefited from a 2.1 Bcf liquidation in inventory gas that was priced at $0.39 per Mcf. The Gas Utility’s 2001 average gas purchase rate was $2.83 per Mcf higher than the average LIFO liquidation rate.

Outlook – The Gas Utility segment’s objective is to expand its role as the preferred provider of natural gas and high-value energy services within Michigan. Management expects to improve the Gas Utility’s cost competitiveness as a result of the merger. Approximately 60% of MichCon’s 1.2 million customers are also customers of Detroit Edison. Contributions from the Gas Utility segment are expected to increase significantly in 2002 when the financial results reflect a full 12 months of DTE Energy owning MichCon.

The MPSC is continuing its initiatives designed to give all of Michigan’s natural gas customers added choices and the opportunity to benefit from lower gas costs resulting from competition. In December 2001, the MPSC issued an order that continues the Gas Choice Program on a permanent and expanding basis beginning with the conclusion of the three-year temporary program on March 31, 2002. Under the expanded program, beginning April 1, 2002, up to approximately 40% of customers could elect to purchase gas from suppliers other than MichCon. Beginning in April 2003, up to approximately 60% of customers could participate and beginning April 2004, all 1.2 million of MichCon’s gas customers could choose to participate. MichCon will continue to transport and deliver the gas to the participating customers’ premises at prices that generate favorable margins. As of December 2001, approximately 30,000 customers were participating in the temporary Gas Choice Program.

Under the MPSC order, MichCon returned to a GCR mechanism upon termination of its three-year experimental Gas Sales Program in December 2001. MichCon’s gas sales rates will now include a gas commodity component designed to recover its actual gas costs. For further information concerning the Gas Choice and Gas Sales Programs, see Note 4-Regulatory Matters-Gas Industry Restructuring.

27


Table of Contents

Gas Utility future operating results will vary as a result of weather and changes in economic conditions. The current economic recession and the significantly warmer 2001-2002 winter lowered margins from residential, commercial and industrial customers in the latter half of 2001.

Wholesale Marketing & Trading

Wholesale Marketing & Trading’s income totaled $44 million in 2001, an increase of $34 million from 2000. Income in 2000 increased a slight $2 million from 1999. The electric marketing and trading portion of the segment contributed $8 million in 2001, representing realized margins primarily associated with short-term, back-to-back, physical power purchases and sales. The gas portion of the segment contributed the remaining $36 million, representing mark-to-market gains on long-term gas sales contracts with several cogeneration facilities.

Commodity price risk of the Wholesale Marketing & Trading segment are managed by utilizing derivative financial contracts to offset the risk inherent in its portfolio of electric and gas supply and sales agreements. The segment’s objective is to enter into new transactions that are hedgeable and profitable from an economic standpoint. Wholesale Marketing & Trading accounts for this risk minimization strategy by marking to market its commodity forwards, financial derivatives, and corresponding physical positions so there are substantial offsetting amounts. This fair value accounting better aligns financial reporting for the segment with the way management manages the business and measures its performance.

In 2001, Wholesale Marketing & Trading experienced earnings volatility as a result of its production-related gas supply as well as from open positions related to its long-term gas transportation and storage assets. The segment receives gas produced from DTE Energy’s exploration & production (E&P) operations which is used to meet its commitments under long- term contracts with cogeneration customers. The E&P gas does not qualify for mark-to-market accounting. Wholesale Marketing & Trading recorded a gain in 2001 totaling approximately $50 million, net of taxes, primarily attributable to marking to market sales contracts with power generation customers without recording an offsetting loss from marking to market the production-related gas supply. In December 2001, Wholesale Marketing & Trading entered into hedge transactions that substantially mitigate the earnings volatility related to the gas contracts with power generation customers.

Wholesale Marketing & Trading operates a storage trading strategy primarily utilizing the facilities owned and operated by DTE Energy. Employing a combination of physical and financial contracts, in conjunction with the injection and withdrawal capabilities of the storage fields, the segment is able to capture seasonal price spreads. As forward prices change, the timing of the physical flow of gas is optimized to obtain the highest margin. Trades under this strategy are marked to market against the forward curve. Physical gas in storage, however, is marked to the current spot price under fair value accounting rules. This difference in accounting for forward trades and gas in storage occasionally results in earnings volatility when price changes in the spot month do not correspond with those in future delivery months. Gas in storage in December 2001 was priced at a spot market rate of $2.77 per Mcf, compared to a May 31, 2001, merger date rate of $5.28 per Mcf. Significantly smaller changes in forward prices

28


Table of Contents

occurred during these same periods. As a result, the mark-to-market losses on gas inventory were only partially offset by mark-to-market gains on the storage-related derivatives.

Outlook – Wholesale Marketing & Trading will focus on expanding its coverage within existing markets in the northeast and midwest United States and eastern Canada. Gas storage and transportation capacity enhances its ability to provide reliable and custom-tailored, bundled services to large-volume end users and utilities. This capacity, coupled with the synergies from DTE Energy’s other businesses, positions the segment to capitalize on opportunities for expansion of its market base.

Wholesale Marketing & Trading manages commodity price risk by utilizing derivative financial contracts to more fully balance its portfolio of gas and electric supply and sales agreements. Wholesale Marketing & Trading attempts to maintain a balanced or flat book from an economic standpoint. However, Wholesale Marketing & Trading will experience earnings volatility as a result of open positions related to long-term gas transportation contracts with third parties and due to fluctuations in inventory valuations. The Company is currently evaluating various hedge strategies related to these assets.

Energy Services

Net income increased $15 million in 2001 and $25 million in 2000. The improvement in both periods is attributed to an increased generation of alternate fuels tax credits which totaled $165 million in 2001, compared to $130 million in 2000 and $116 million in 1999. The higher tax credits reflect an increased level of operations, and the addition of three new synfuels projects in 2001. Additionally, results reflect increased contributions from the coal services business and the biomass landfill gas recovery operation. Gains on the sale of minority interests in two coke battery projects in 2001 were offset by reduced levels of income generated by the projects. The improved earnings were partially offset by increased new project development costs.

Outlook - The Energy Services segment’s objective is to continue developing and relocating synfuel projects and to focus on on-site energy projects and independent power projects. Management expects three new synfuel sites, two electric generation projects and two industrial on-site energy projects to become operational in 2002. Contributions from new synfuel projects will be partially offset by reduced earnings from coke battery projects due to the expiration of related alternate fuels tax credits at the end of 2002. Additionally, tax credits from synfuel projects will expire at the end of 2007 with the possibility of being extended. The focus of this business, which had primarily been to develop, construct, own and operate projects, will shift for the near term to acquiring operating assets or existing projects under construction.

Other Non-regulated Operations

Net losses from Other Non-regulated Operations declined $29 million in 2001 and increased $12 million in 2000. Results reflect losses in 2000 from an electric marketing company that was participating in a Pennsylvania customer choice program. The Company has discontinued the operations of the electric marketing company.

29


Table of Contents

Outlook – The Company will continue to invest in emerging technologies, and various other energy operations. Growth in future years is expected from the successful development and marketing of various distributed generation products, including standby generators, external combustion engines, mini-turbines and fuel cells. Additionally, the Company will consider further developing its gas production properties in northern Michigan and its pipelines, processing and storage assets. Non-strategic operations acquired with the MCN Energy merger will be sold to partially fund non-regulated growth.

Corporate & Other

Results from Corporate & Other improved by $9 million in 2001 and declined by $7 million in 2000. The improvement in 2001 reflects the allocation of corporate support expenses to regulated and non-regulated operations as well as reduced interest expense resulting from the repayment of debt with proceeds received from Detroit Edison. Upon issuing $1.75 billion of securitization bonds, Detroit Edison distributed approximately 50% of such proceeds to DTE Energy corporate. DTE Energy used such proceeds to retire debt and repurchase common shares. The Corporate & Other decrease in 2000 reflects higher interest expense and corporate support expenses.

30


Table of Contents

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

                             
        2001   2000   1999
       
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
                       
(in Millions)
                       
Cash Flow From (Used For)
                       
 
Operating activities
  $ 811     $ 1,015     $ 1,084  
 
Investing activities
    (2,286 )     (674 )     (712 )
 
Financing activities
    1,679       (310 )     (469 )
 
 
   
     
     
 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
  $ 204     $ 31     $ (97 )
 
 
   
     
     
 

Operating Activities

DTE Energy’s consolidated net cash from operating activities decreased $204 million in 2001 and $69 million in 2000. The decline in 2001 resulted primarily from higher working capital requirements partially offset by higher net income, after adjusting for noncash items (depreciation, amortization, deferred taxes and certain restructuring charges). The higher working capital primarily reflects the seasonal requirements in the second half of 2001 of the gas business where cash is used to finance increases in gas inventories and customer accounts receivable. The Company uses its cash derived from operating activities primarily to maintain and expand its core electric and gas utility businesses and to build non-regulated businesses. In addition, the Company uses cash from operations to retire long-term debt and to pay dividends. The decline in 2000 resulted from lower net income, after adjusting for noncash items, partially offset by lower working capital requirements.

Investing Activities

DTE Energy’s consolidated net cash used for investing activities increased $1.6 billion in 2001 and decreased $38 million in 2000. The increase in 2001 was due primarily to the acquisition of MCN Energy in May 2001 and the capital expenditures in regulated and non-regulated businesses, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of non-strategic assets. The higher regulated capital expenditures at Detroit Edison are attributable to new air quality regulations, which require the reduction in nitrogen oxide levels as discussed in the “Environmental Matters” section that follows. The decline in 2000 is attributable to a reduction in restricted cash.

Financing Activities

DTE Energy’s consolidated net cash related to financing activities increased $2 billion in 2001 and decreased $159 million in 2000. The increase in 2001 was due primarily to the issuance of $1.75 billion of securitization bonds and the issuance of $1.35 billion of long-term debt to finance the cash consideration portion of the acquisition of MCN Energy. Proceeds from the securitization bonds were used to repay debt and repurchase approximately $424 million of DTE Energy common stock. In addition, Detroit Edison issued $840 million of long-term debt. These proceeds, coupled with proceeds from securitization, were used for general corporate purposes including the redemption of $1.27 billion of higher cost debt, of which $1.11 billion represented unscheduled redemptions. MichCon issued $200 million of long-term debt and used the proceeds for general corporate purposes, including the redempton of $40 million of unscheduled

31


Table of Contents

debt. Net cash used for financing activities was lower in 2000 due to decreased redemptions of long-term debt, partially offset by repurchases of common stock.

During 2001, the Company, Detroit Edison and MichCon entered into a bank facility arrangement used to support commercial paper in the amounts of $800 million, $300 million and $300 million, respectively. Commercial paper is usually issued in lieu of an equivalent amount of borrowings under these lines of credit. Amounts outstanding under this facility at December 31, 2001, were $423 million at the Company and $254 million at MichCon.

Outlook - DTE Energy’s strategic direction will result in capital investments and expenditures in 2002 totaling approximately $950 million, of which approximately $200 million will be in non-regulated businesses and the remaining $750 million in regulated electric and gas operations. Approximately $200 million of the regulated capital expenditures will be incurred by Detroit Edison to comply with new ozone and air quality regulations.

The proposed level of investments and expenditures in future years is expected to be financed primarily with internally generated funds, proceeds from the sale of non-strategic assets and debt. DTE Energy’s capitalization objective is to maintain its strong credit ratings through a strong balance sheet. Its capitalization objective is a 50% — 55% leverage target. Management believes that the Company and its subsidiaries will have sufficient capital resources to meet anticipated capital requirements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

DTE Energy has operations within six business segments. There are three key types of transactions presented in the consolidated financial statements that require considerable judgment and estimation. Such transactions relate to regulatory assets and liabilities, risk management and trading activities and alternate fuels tax credits.

Regulation

A significant portion of the Company’s business is subject to regulation. Detroit Edison’s electric distribution operations, MichCon’s gas distribution and transportation operations and the transmission operations of International Transmission Company (ITC) currently meet the criteria of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation,” which results in differences in the application of generally accepted accounting principles between regulated and non-regulated businesses. SFAS No. 71 requires the recording of regulatory assets and liabilities for certain transactions that would have been treated as revenue and expense in non-regulated businesses. Future regulatory changes or changes in the competitive environment could result in the Company discontinuing the application of SFAS No. 71 for some or all of its businesses and require the write-off of the portion of any regulatory asset or liability that was no longer probable of recovery or refund. If Detroit Edison (excluding its subsidiary, The Detroit Edison Securitization Funding LLC) were to have discontinued the application of SFAS No. 71 for all of its operations as of December 31, 2001, it would have had an extraordinary noncash charge to income of approximately $58 million. If MichCon were to have discontinued the application of SFAS No. 71, it would have had an extraordinary noncash increase to income of approximately $60 million. There would be no significant impact to earnings if ITC were to discontinue its application of SFAS No. 71. Management believes that

32


Table of Contents

currently available facts support the continued application of SFAS No. 71 and that all regulatory assets and liabilities are recoverable or refundable through the current rate environment.

Risk Management and Trading Activities

All derivatives are recorded at fair value and shown as “Assets or liabilities from risk management and trading activities” in the consolidated statement of financial position. Risk management activities are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” Trading activities are accounted for in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 98-10, “Accounting for Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities.” Except for the activities of the Wholesale Marketing & Trading segment, the Company does not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes.

The offsetting entry to “Assets or liabilities from risk management and trading activities” is to other comprehensive income or earnings depending on the use of the derivative and whether it is designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. The fair values of derivative contracts are adjusted each accounting period for changes in the market and are derived from: i) published exchange traded market data; ii) prices from external sources; and iii) prices based on valuation models. Market quotes are more readily available for short duration contracts. The Company has derivative contracts extending to 2016.

Alternate Fuels Tax Credits

DTE Energy generated $165 million in alternate fuels tax credits in 2001, up from $130 million in 2000 and $116 million in 1999. Outside firms assist the Company in calculating the tax credits and evaluating their realizability.

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS

Protecting the environment from damage, as well as correcting past environmental damage, continues to be a focus of state and federal regulators. Legislation and/or rulemaking could further impact the electric utility industry including Detroit Edison. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality have aggressive programs regarding the clean-up of contaminated property. The EPA initiated enforcement actions against several major electric utilities citing violations of new source provisions of the Clean Air Act. Detroit Edison received and responded to information requests from the EPA on this subject. The EPA has not initiated proceedings against Detroit Edison. The National Energy Policy Development Group has undertaken a review of the EPA’s interpretation of regulations applying to new source review requirements. The Company expects this review to focus on the ability of fossil-fueled plant owners to perform plant maintenance without additional significant environmentally related modifications. While the Company anticipates a continued ability to economically maintain its plants, the outcome of this governmental review cannot be predicted.

EPA ozone transport regulations and final new air quality standards relating to ozone and particulate air pollution will impact the Company. Detroit Edison has spent approximately $221

33


Table of Contents

million through December 2001 and estimates that it will incur approximately $400 million to $500 million of future capital expenditures over the next three years to comply.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities.

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” and No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The most significant change made by SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations. The most significant changes made by SFAS No. 142 are that the amortization of goodwill will cease, and goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets will be tested for impairment at least annually. In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” This statement requires that the fair value of an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred. In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” This statement establishes a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired.

See Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies for a further discussion of these pronouncements.

34


Table of Contents

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table reflects the payments due by period for the Company’s contractual obligations existing at December 31, 2001:

                                           
      Payments Due by Period
     
(in Millions)           Less                        
              Than                   After
Contractual Obligations   Total   1 Year   1-3 Years   4-5 Years   5 Years
   
 
 
 
 
Long-Term Debt:
                                       
 
Mortgage bonds, notes & other
  $ 6,321     $ 429     $ 668     $ 930     $ 4,294  
 
Securitization bonds
    1,746       73       177       201       1,295  
Capital Lease Obligations
    147       21       27       25       74  
Operating Leases
    102       19       34       22       27  
Unconditional Purchase Obligations
    2,405       552       753       315       785  
Other Long-Term Obligations
    671       15       293       29       334  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Total Obligations
  $ 11,392     $ 1,109     $ 1,952     $ 1,522     $ 6,809  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 

The Company expects that its 2002 capital expenditures will approximate $950 million. Certain commitments have been made in connection with such capital expenditures and are excluded from the above table.

FAIR VALUE OF CONTRACTS

The following table reflects the maturity and sources of the net fair value gain (loss) of contracts at December 31, 2001:

35


Table of Contents

                                             
        Maturity   Maturity   Maturity   Maturity   Total
(in Millions)   Less Than   1-3   4-5   Exceeding   Fair
    1 Year   Years   Years   5 Years   Value
       
 
 
 
 
Trading Activities
                                       
 
Prices From:
                                       
   
Quotes
  $ 32     $ 5     $ 4     $     $ 41  
   
External sources
    14                         14  
   
Other sources
          3       1             4  
       
 
 
 
   
 
  $ 46     $ 8     $ 5     $       59  
       
 
 
 
   
Risk Management Activities
                                    (248 )
 
                                   
 
Total Assets & Liabilities from Risk
Management and Trading Activities
                                  $ (189 )
 
                                   
 

The “Prices from quotes” category represents the Company’s positions for which forward price curves were developed using published NYMEX exchange prices and over the counter (OTC) gas and power quotes. The NYMEX currently publishes gas futures prices for the next six years.

The “Prices from external sources” category represents the Company’s forward positions in power at points for which OTC broker quotes are not always directly available. The Company values these positions against internally developed forward market price curves that are constantly validated and recalibrated against OTC broker quotes for closely correlated points. This category also includes “strip” transactions whose prices are obtained from external sources and then modeled to daily or monthly prices as appropriate.

The “Prices from other sources” category contains the value of transactions for which an internally developed price curve was constructed as a result of the long dated nature of the transaction or the illiquidity of the market point.

A reconciliation of the Company’s estimated net fair value of trading contracts follows:

         
(in Millions)
       
Fair value at January 1, 2001
  $ 17  
Plus: contracts acquired upon acquisition of MCN Energy
    12  
Less: contracts realized during 2001
    (33 )
Other changes in fair value
    63  
 
   
 
Fair value at December 31, 2001
  $ 59  
 
   
 

36


Table of Contents

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Commodity Price Risk

Risk Management Activities

Detroit Edison is subject to commodity price risk in conjunction with the anticipated purchase of electricity to meet reliability obligations during times of peak customer demand. Detroit Edison’s exposure to commodity price risk arises from market fluctuations in commodity prices.

To limit the sensitivity to commodity price fluctuations, Detroit Edison has entered into a series of forward electricity contracts and option contracts. See Note 13 – Financial and Other Derivative Instruments herein for a further discussion of these derivative instruments.

The Company is exposed to the risk of market price fluctuations on gas sale and purchase contracts, gas production and gas inventories. To manage this risk, the Company uses natural gas futures, options, forwards and swap agreements.

The Company performed a sensitivity analysis to calculate the impact of changes in fair values utilizing applicable forward commodity rates in effect at December 31, 2001. The Company estimates that if commodity prices were 10% higher or lower, the net fair value of commodity contracts would increase $24 million and decrease $35 million, respectively.

Trading Activities

Wholesale Marketing & Trading markets and trades electricity, gas and related fuels, in addition to providing price risk management services using energy commodity derivatives. Wholesale Marketing & Trading performed a sensitivity analysis to calculate the impact of changes in fair values utilizing applicable forward commodity rates in effect at December 31, 2001. The Company estimates that if commodity prices were 10% higher or lower, the fair value of commodity contracts would decrease $8.4 million and increase $8.0 million, respectively.

Credit Risk

Electricity and gas is purchased from and sold to numerous companies operating in the steel, automotive, energy and retail industries. A number of customers have filed for bankruptcy in 2001, including certain Enron Corporation affiliates. Certain DTE Energy subsidiaries had open transactions under a variety of agreements with bankrupt Enron affiliates and such subsidiaries had an aggregate net liability of $24 million to Enron. There are various netting agreements with Enron affiliates. Internal and external counsel are working to determine the Company’s rights within these agreements. The Company has not reserved for any of its exposure, in addition to the net liabilities already recorded, as management cannot estimate a probable loss exposure and currently does not believe the resolution of this matter will have a material impact to the Company.

National Steel Company (NSC), customer of the Company, filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on March 6, 2002. The Company has pre-petition receivables of $35 million from NSC relating to electricity sales by Detroit Edison and coke and pulverized coal sales from its Energy Services segment. No formal motion to assume or reject the coke sales agreement or pulverized coal sales agreement has been filed by NSC with the Bankruptcy Court. The Company currently believes that the coke sales agreement and the pulverized coal sales agreement will be assumed by NSC and that all pre-petition amounts due, including regulated electricity sales, will be paid in full.

37


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk

The Company estimates that if interest rates were 10% higher or lower, the fair value of long-term debt at December 31, 2001 would decrease $234 million and increase $217 million, respectively.

38


Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The following consolidated financial statements and schedules are included herein.

         
    Page
   
Independent Auditors’ Report
    40  
Consolidated Statement of Operations
    41  
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
    42  
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
    44  
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
    45  
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    46  
Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
    93  

39


Table of Contents

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
DTE Energy Company

We have audited the consolidated statements of financial position of DTE Energy Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and changes in shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 8. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of DTE Energy Company and subsidiaries at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements of the Company taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities in 2001.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Detroit, Michigan
February 26, 2002

40


Table of Contents

DTE Energy Company
Consolidated Statement of Operations

                             
        Year Ended December 31
       
        2001   2000   1999
       
 
 
(in Millions, Except per Share Amounts)                        
Operating Revenues
  $ 7,849     $ 5,597     $ 4,728  
 
   
     
     
 
Operating Expenses
                       
 
Fuel, purchased power and gas
    3,950       2,233       1,335  
 
Operation and maintenance
    1,828       1,455       1,480  
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    795       758       735  
 
Taxes other than income
    312       296       277  
 
Merger and restructuring charges
    268       25        
 
   
     
     
 
   
Total Operating Expenses
    7,153       4,767       3,827  
 
   
     
     
 
Operating Income
    696       830       901  
 
   
     
     
 
Interest Expense and Other
                       
 
Interest expense
    468       336       340  
 
Other – net
    9       17       18  
 
   
     
     
 
   
Total Interest Expense and Other
    477       353       358  
 
   
     
     
 
Income Before Income Taxes
    219       477       543  
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
    (110 )     9       60  
 
   
     
     
 
Income Before Accounting Change
    329       468       483  
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
    3              
 
   
     
     
 
Net Income
  $ 332     $ 468     $ 483  
 
   
     
     
 
Basic Earnings per Common Share
                       
 
Before accounting change
  $ 2.15     $ 3.27     $ 3.33  
 
Cumulative effect of accounting change
    .02              
 
   
     
     
 
   
Total
  $ 2.17     $ 3.27     $ 3.33  
 
   
     
     
 
Diluted Earnings per Common Share
                       
 
Before accounting change
  $ 2.14     $ 3.27     $ 3.33  
 
Cumulative effect of accounting change
    .02              
 
   
     
     
 
   
Total
  $ 2.16     $ 3.27     $ 3.33  
 
   
     
     
 
Average Common Shares
                       
 
Basic
    153       143       145  
 
Diluted
    154       143       145  
Dividends Declared per Common Share
  $ 2.06     $ 2.06     $ 2.06  

(See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)

41


Table of Contents

DTE Energy Company
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

                     
        December 31
       
        2001   2000
       
 
(in Millions, Except Shares)                
ASSETS
               
Current Assets
               
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 268     $ 64  
 
Restricted cash
    157       88  
 
Accounts receivable
               
   
Customer (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $57 and $21, respectively)
    851       562  
   
Accrued unbilled revenues
    242       188  
   
Other
    259       88  
 
Inventories
           
   
Fuel and gas
    343       193  
   
Materials and supplies
    162       142  
 
Assets from risk management and trading activities
    400       289  
 
Deferred income taxes
    47        
 
Other
    97       38  
 
   
     
 
 
    2,826       1,652  
 
   
     
 
Investments
               
 
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds
    417       398  
 
Other
    615       269  
 
   
     
 
 
    1,032       667  
 
   
     
 
Property
               
 
Property, plant and equipment
    17,067       13,162  
 
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion
    (7,524 )     (5,775 )
 
   
     
 
 
    9,543       7,387  
 
   
     
 
Other Assets
               
 
Goodwill
    2,003       24  
 
Regulatory assets
    1,204       2,688  
 
Securitized regulatory assets
    1,692        
 
Assets from risk management and trading activities
    149        
 
Other
    779       238  
 
   
     
 
 
    5,827       2,950  
 
   
     
 
Total Assets
  $ 19,228     $ 12,656  
 
   
     
 

(See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)

42


Table of Contents

DTE Energy Company
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

                   
      December 31
     
      2001   2000
     
 
(in Millions, Except Shares)                
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current Liabilities
               
 
Accounts payable
  $ 697     $ 404  
 
Accrued interest
    118       59  
 
Dividends payable
    84       73  
 
Accrued payroll
    108       103  
 
Short-term borrowings
    681       503  
 
Income taxes
    54       116  
 
Current portion long-term debt, including capital leases
    516       297  
 
Liabilities from risk management and trading activities
    425       280  
 
Other
    495       212  
 
   
     
 
 
    3,178       2,047  
 
   
     
 
Other Liabilities
               
 
Deferred income taxes
    1,478       1,801  
 
Regulatory liabilities
    187       3  
 
Unamortized investment tax credit
    180       167  
 
Liabilities from risk management and trading activities
    313        
 
Other
    1,375       590  
 
   
     
 
 
    3,533       2,561  
 
   
     
 
Long-Term Debt
               
 
Mortgage bonds, notes and other
    5,892       3,894  
 
Securitization bonds
    1,673        
 
Capital lease obligations
    89       145  
 
   
     
 
 
    7,654       4,039  
 
   
     
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 1, 4, 5, 12-15)
               
Enterprises-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of
Subsidiaries Holding Solely Debentures of Enterprises
    274        
 
   
     
 
Shareholders’ Equity
               
 
Common stock, without par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized, 161,133,959
and 142,651,172 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
    2,811       1,912  
 
Retained earnings
    1,846       2,097  
 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (68 )      
 
   
     
 
 
    4,589       4,009  
 
   
     
 
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
  $ 19,228     $ 12,656  
 
   
     
 

(See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)

43


Table of Contents

DTE Energy Company
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

                               
          Year Ended December 31
         
          2001   2000   1999
         
 
 
(in Millions)                        
Operating Activities
                       
 
Net income
  $ 332     $ 468     $ 483  
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
                       
   
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    766       758       735  
   
Goodwill amortization
    29              
   
Merger and restructuring charges
    215              
   
Deferred income taxes
    (7 )     (133 )     26  
   
Changes in assets and liabilities:
                       
     
Accounts receivable
    (2 )     (140 )     (93 )
     
Inventories
    (76 )     8       (6 )
     
Prepaid pensions
    (14 )     65       (51 )
     
Payables
    (224 )     196       19  
     
Risk management and trading activities
    (80 )     8       (16 )
     
Other
    (128 )     (215 )     (13 )
 
   
     
     
 
   
Net cash from operating activities
    811       1,015       1,084  
 
   
     
     
 
Investing Activities
                       
 
Plant and equipment expenditures
    (1,096 )     (749 )     (739 )
 
Acquisition of MCN Energy, net of cash acquired
    (1,212 )            
 
Proceeds from sale of assets
    216              
 
Restricted cash for debt redemptions
    (70 )     43       (10 )
 
Other investments
    (124 )     32       37  
 
   
     
     
 
   
Net cash used for investing activities
    (2,286 )     (674 )     (712 )
 
   
     
     
 
Financing Activities
                       
 
Issuance of long-term debt
    4,254       273       265  
 
Redemption of long-term debt
    (1,423 )     (331 )     (548 )
 
Short-term borrowings, net
    (282 )     116       156  
 
Capital lease obligations
    (107 )     (2 )     (43 )
 
Repurchase of common stock
    (438 )     (70 )      
 
Dividends on common stock
    (325 )     (296 )     (299 )
 
   
     
     
 
   
Net cash from (used for) financing activities
    1,679       (310 )     (469 )
 
   
     
     
 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
    204       31       (97 )
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
    64       33       130  
 
   
     
     
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
  $ 268     $ 64     $ 33  
 
 
   
     
     
 
Supplementary Cash Flow Information
                       
 
Interest paid (excluding interest capitalized)
  $ 409     $ 334     $ 340  
 
Income taxes paid
    45       104       152  
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
                       
 
Issuance of common stock for acquisition of MCN Energy
    1,060              

(See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements)

44


Table of Contents

DTE Energy Company
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

                                           
                              Accumulated        
      Common Stock           Other        
     
  Retained   Comprehensive        
      Shares   Amount   Earnings   Loss   Total
     
 
 
 
 
(Dollars in Millions, Shares in Thousands)                                        
Balance, December 31, 1998
    145,071     $ 1,951     $ 1,747     $     $ 3,698  
 
Net income
                483             483  
 
Dividends declared on common stock
                (299 )           (299 )
 
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
    (30 )     (1 )                 (1 )
 
Unearned stock compensation
          (7 )                 (7 )
 
Other
                28             28  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Balance, December 31, 1999
    145,041       1,943       1,959