10-K 1 h21250e10vk.htm ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION - DECEMBER 31, 2004 e10vk
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Year Ended December 31, 2004

Commission File No. 1-8968

ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION

1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380-1046
(832) 636-1000
     
Incorporated in the State of Delaware
  Employer Identification No. 76-0146568

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share

Preferred Stock Purchase Rights

The above Securities are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  ü      No           .

     Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K  ü.

     Indicate by check mark whether registrant is an accelerated filer.     Yes  ü      No           .

     The aggregate market value of the Company’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2004 was $14.5 billion.

     The number of shares outstanding of the Company’s common stock as of January 31, 2005 is shown below:

     
Title of Class Number of Shares Outstanding
Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share   236,834,572
         
Part of
Form 10-K Documents Incorporated By Reference
  Part II     Portions of the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders.
  Part  III     Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation to be held May 12, 2005 (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to April 1, 2005).


TABLE OF CONTENTS

               
Page
           
        2  
        2  
        2  
        3  
        3  
        4  
        5  
        10  
        12  
        12  
        13  
        14  
        15  
        15  
        16  
        17  
        17  
        17  
        17  
        17  
        18  
           
   
     Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
    18  
        18  
        18  
        20  
        20  
           
        21  
        22  
        23  
        46  
        48  
        109  
        109  
        109  
           
        110  
        110  
        110  
        110  
        110  
           
        111  
 Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 Portions of 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders
 List of Significant Subsidiaries
 Consent of KPMG LLP
 Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.
 Power of Attorney
 Rule 13a-14a/15d-14a Certification--CEO
 Rule 13a-14a/15d-14a Certification--CFO
 Section 1350 Certifications
 2004 Report of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.

1


Table of Contents

PART I

 
Item 1.  Business

General

      Anadarko Petroleum Corporation is among the largest independent oil and gas exploration and production companies in the world, with 2.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) of proved reserves as of December 31, 2004. The Company’s major areas of operations are located in the United States, primarily in Texas, Louisiana, the mid-continent region and the western states, Alaska and in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, as well as in Canada and Algeria. Anadarko also has production in Venezuela and Qatar and is executing strategic exploration programs in several other countries. The Company actively markets natural gas, oil and natural gas liquids (NGLs) and owns and operates gas gathering systems in its core producing areas. In addition, the Company engages in the hard minerals business through non-operated joint ventures and royalty arrangements in several coal, trona (natural soda ash) and industrial mineral mines located on lands within and adjacent to its Land Grant holdings. The Land Grant is an 8 million acre strip running through portions of Colorado, Wyoming and Utah where the Company owns most of its fee mineral rights. Anadarko is committed to minimizing the environmental impact of exploration and production activities in its worldwide operations through programs such as carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration and the reduction of surface area used for production facilities.

      Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Anadarko” or “Company” refer to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries. The Company’s corporate headquarters are located at 1201 Lake Robbins Drive, The Woodlands, Texas 77380, where the telephone number is (832) 636-1000.

Available Information The Company files Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, registration statements and other items with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Anadarko provides access free of charge to all of these SEC filings, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing, on its internet site located at www.anadarko.com. The Company will also make available to any stockholder, without charge, copies of its Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC. For copies of this, or any other filings, please contact: Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Public Affairs Department, P.O. Box 1330, Houston, Texas 77251-1330 or call (832) 636-1219.

      In addition, the public may read and copy any materials Anadarko files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers, like Anadarko, that file electronically with the SEC.

Refocused Strategy

      Anadarko announced a refocused strategy in June 2004. Strategy execution included an asset realignment that resulted in the Company completing over $3 billion in pretax asset sales during 2004 through a series of separate unrelated transactions. Combined, the divested properties represented about 11% of Anadarko’s year-end 2003 proved reserves and about 20% of 2004 oil and gas production. The Company used proceeds from asset sales to reduce debt, repurchase Anadarko common stock and otherwise to have funds available for reinvestment in other strategic options. For additional information see Refocused Strategy under Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

2


Table of Contents

Oil and Gas Properties and Activities

Proved Reserves

      As of December 31, 2004, Anadarko had proved reserves of 7.5 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas and 1.1 billion barrels of crude oil, condensate and NGLs. Combined, these proved reserves are equivalent to 2.4 billion barrels of oil or 14.2 Tcf of gas. During 2004, the Company’s reserves decreased 6% due to the divestiture of non-core properties in the United States and Canada in conjunction with the refocused strategy, partially offset by proved reserve additions related to successful exploration and development drilling in North America. The Company’s reserves have grown 3% over the past three years primarily due to successful exploration and development drilling in the United States and Canada, the acquisition of Howell Corporation (Howell) in 2002 and the acquisition of producing properties, partially offset by the effect of the disposition of non-core producing properties during 2004. As of December 31, 2004, Anadarko had proved developed reserves of 5.5 Tcf of natural gas and 606 million barrels (MMBbls) of crude oil, condensate and NGLs. Proved developed reserves comprise 64% of total proved reserves.

      Proved reserve estimates are made by the Company’s engineers. Beginning in 2003, Anadarko bolstered its internal control of these estimates by using a corporate review team comprised of five technical experts: four members from within Anadarko who are independent of the operating groups responsible for the reserve estimates, and one member from Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (NSAI), an independent worldwide reserves consultant. The procedures and methods used by Anadarko in preparing its estimates of proved reserves and future revenues, as of December 31, 2004, were reviewed by the team. Through participation on the team, NSAI reviewed 75% of the Company’s 2004 reserve additions, as well as specific major properties representing 84% of Anadarko’s total worldwide reserves. NSAI determined that the general methods and procedures used by Anadarko in the reserve estimation process were reasonable and the estimates for those properties reviewed appeared reasonable and were prepared in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a) and generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation principles. A copy of the NSAI report is attached as Exhibit 99.1 of this Form 10-K.
      The Company’s estimates of proved reserves, proved developed reserves and proved undeveloped reserves at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and changes in proved reserves during the last three years are contained in the Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Activities — Unaudited (Supplemental Information) in the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2004 Consolidated Financial Statements (Consolidated Financial Statements) under Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Company files annual estimates of certain proved oil and gas reserves with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), which are within 5% of the amounts included in the above estimates.
      Also contained in the Supplemental Information in the Consolidated Financial Statements are the Company’s estimates of future net cash flows, discounted future net cash flows before income taxes and discounted future net cash flows after income taxes from proved reserves. See Operating Results and Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates under Item 7 of this Form 10-K for additional information on the Company’s proved reserves.

3


Table of Contents

Sales Volumes and Prices

      The following table shows the Company’s annual sales volumes. Volumes for natural gas are in billion cubic feet (Bcf) at a pressure base of 14.73 pounds per square inch. For the computation of million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBOE), six thousand cubic feet (Mcf) of gas is the energy equivalent of one barrel of oil, condensate or NGLs.

                           
2004 2003 2002



United States
                       
 
Natural gas (Bcf)
    499       503       507  
 
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
    32       34       31  
 
Natural gas liquids (MMBbls)
    16       16       14  
 
Total (MMBOE)
    131       135       130  
Canada
                       
 
Natural gas (Bcf)
    138       140       135  
 
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
    5       6       12  
 
Natural gas liquids (MMBbls)
    1       1       1  
 
Total (MMBOE)
    29       30       35  
Algeria
                       
 
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
    22       19       24  
 
Total (MMBOE)
    22       19       24  
Other International
                       
 
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
    8       8       8  
 
Total (MMBOE)
    8       8       8  
Total
                       
 
Natural gas (Bcf)
    637       643       642  
 
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
    67       67       75  
 
Natural gas liquids (MMBbls)
    17       17       15  
 
Total (MMBOE)
    190       192       197  

4


Table of Contents

      The following table shows the Company’s annual average sales prices and average production costs. The average sales prices include gains and losses for derivative contracts the Company utilizes to manage price risk related to the Company’s sales volumes. Production costs are costs incurred to operate and maintain the Company’s wells and related equipment and include cost of labor, well service and repair, location maintenance, power and fuel, transportation, cost of product, property taxes, production and severance taxes and production related general and administrative costs. Additional information on volumes, prices and markets is contained in Financial Results and Marketing Strategies under Item 7 of this Form 10-K. Additional detail of production costs is contained in the Supplemental Information under Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Information on major customers is contained in Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

                             
2004 2003 2002



United States
                       
 
Sales price
                       
   
Natural gas (per Mcf)
  $ 5.14     $ 4.36     $ 2.83  
   
Oil and condensate (per barrel)
    31.87       26.16       22.90  
   
Natural gas liquids (per barrel)
    27.84       21.19       14.98  
   
Total (per BOE)
    30.75       25.55       18.18  
 
Production cost (per BOE)
  $ 6.41     $ 5.49     $ 4.66  
Canada
                       
 
Sales price
                       
   
Natural gas (per Mcf)
  $ 5.17     $ 4.71     $ 2.91  
   
Oil and condensate (per barrel)
    37.37       27.33       19.09  
   
Natural gas liquids (per barrel)
    26.21       21.04       12.11  
   
Total (per BOE)
    31.98       27.87       17.89  
 
Production cost (per BOE)
  $ 8.75     $ 8.01     $ 6.40  
Algeria
                       
 
Sales price
                       
   
Oil and condensate (per barrel)
  $ 34.78     $ 28.43     $ 24.38  
 
Production cost (per BOE)
  $ 2.94     $ 2.44     $ 1.78  
Other International
                       
 
Sales price
                       
   
Oil and condensate (per barrel)
  $ 27.91     $ 23.15     $ 19.92  
 
Production cost (per BOE)
  $ 7.93     $ 8.90     $ 8.48  
Total
                       
 
Sales price
                       
   
Natural gas (per Mcf)
  $ 5.15     $ 4.43     $ 2.85  
   
Oil and condensate (per barrel)
    32.76       26.55       22.44  
   
Natural gas liquids (per barrel)
    27.76       21.18       14.80  
   
Total (per BOE)
    31.28       26.10       18.94  
 
Production cost (per BOE)
  $ 6.43     $ 5.71     $ 4.79  

Properties and Activities — United States

Overview Anadarko’s active areas in the United States include the Lower 48 states, Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico. Reserves in the United States comprised 69% of Anadarko’s total proved reserves at year-end 2004. During 2004, the Company’s drilling efforts in the United States resulted in 548 gas wells, 193 oil wells and 17 dry holes. During 2004, the Company sold its interests in certain non-core properties located in the United States representing an estimated 226 MMBOE of proved reserves on the date of sale. The majority of these properties were located in the shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico and the mid-continent region. The accompanying maps illustrate by state Anadarko’s net undeveloped and developed lease and fee mineral acreage, number of net producing wells and other data relevant to its domestic onshore and offshore oil and gas operations.

5


Table of Contents

      The following table presents selected 2004 U.S. operating data by area.

                                                 
Sales Volumes

Drilling Statistics
Oil and
Natural Gas NGLs Total Producing Wells Success
(MMcf/d) (MBbls/d) (MBOE/d) Wells(1) Drilled(2) Rate






North Louisiana-Vernon
    202             33       232       94       99 %
East Texas-Bossier
    221             38       736       91       99 %
         -Carthage
    104       5       22       1,239       54       100 %
Central Texas-Austin Chalk
    112       19       38       1,200       45       98 %
West Texas
    104       11       28       4,221       191       98 %
Mid-Continent- Hugoton
    117       14       33       1,240       24       60 %
Western States- Conventional
    194       16       49       2,007       42       98 %
             -Coalbed Methane
    66             11       428       120       100 %
             -EOR and other
    36       14       19       2,142       23       100 %
Other
    46       11       19       1,414       40       98 %
     
     
     
     
     
         
Total Onshore — Lower 48 States
    1,202       90       290       14,859       724       98 %
Alaska(3)
          19       19       54       11          
Gulf of Mexico
    161       22       49       9       23       91 %
     
     
     
     
     
         
Total United States
    1,363       131       358       14,922       758       98 %
     
     
     
     
     
         


(1)  Gross number of wells in which Anadarko has an interest.
(2)  Includes 714 gross development wells with a 99% success rate and 44 gross exploration wells with a 77% success rate.
(3)  The results of these wells are held confidential for competitive reasons.

Onshore — Lower 48 States At the end of 2004, about 57% of the Company’s proved reserves were located onshore in the Lower 48 states. During 2004, the Company sold certain properties from this area representing about 119 MMBOE of proved reserves on the date of sale. At the end of 2004, net production from the retained properties in the Lower 48 states averaged 1,149 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of gas and 71 thousand barrels per day (MBbls/d) of oil, condensate and NGLs. The Company’s 2005 capital budget for this area ranges from $1.1 billion to $1.3 billion and provides for drilling an expected 940 development and 60 exploration wells.

North Louisiana During 2004, an additional gas treating plant was built at the Vernon field in order to facilitate the increase in production resulting from the Company’s successful drilling and to provide greater marketing flexibility. Anadarko’s tight gas drilling program in the Vernon field remains focused on extending the boundaries and developing the field areas with the highest production rates, recoverable reserves and economic returns.

East Texas The Dowdy Ranch, Dew/ Mimms Creek, Bald Prairie and Marquez fields continue to be the primary focus in the east Texas tight gas Bossier play. Anadarko also continues to be active in its Cotton Valley infill drilling program in the Carthage area.

Central Texas Anadarko’s horizontal drilling program continues to be the focus in central Texas where the objective is to exploit the multiple pay zones in the Austin Chalk formation of the Giddings and Brookeland fields. In addition, a successful reentry program is in place. In 2005, Anadarko expects to continue its horizontal drilling and reentry programs, focusing on building inventory while sustaining production volumes.

West Texas Operations in west Texas are primarily concentrated on tight gas, conventional exploration and production and waterflood projects in the Permian basin.

Mid-Continent In 2004, the Company sold its producing interests in the deep Hugoton area and retained properties producing from the shallow formations. At the end of 2004, net production from the retained properties averaged 60 MMcf/d of gas and 6 MBbls/d of oil, condensate and NGLs. During 2005, the Company’s focus will be on production operations, gathering and facility maintenance.

6


Table of Contents

(ONSHORE PROPERTY MAP)

Onshore US map
                                     
Net Net Net Fee Net
Undeveloped Developed Acres Producing
Acres Acres Wells
Onshore:
                               
 
United States
                               
   
Alabama
    223       2,275       11,473       12  
   
Alaska*
    1,730,400       4,944       7,978       13  
   
Arkansas
    658       1,100       344,604       2  
   
California
    216       318       2,678        
   
Colorado
    7,663       22,700       2,890,673       15  
   
Florida
                5,342        
   
Georgia
                2,838        
   
Idaho
                846        
   
Illinois
                1,934        
   
Indiana
                9,912        
   
Iowa
                151        
   
Kansas*
    344,909       348,611       29,834       1,035  
   
Louisiana*
    94,452       35,710       13,131       226  
   
Mississippi
    6,895       1,950       63,880       7  
   
Missouri
                419        
   
Montana
    129,268       2,096       8       64  
   
Nebraska
    4,608       926       27,852       1  
   
Nevada
                433        
   
New Mexico
    2,498       13,114       417       2  
   
North Dakota
    20       1,828             5  
   
Oklahoma*
    58,954       186,784       48,295       515  
   
Oregon
                741        
   
South Carolina
                2,734        
   
Tennessee
                894        
   
Texas*
    487,786       1,055,742       100,226       6,090  
   
Utah
    6,997       23,010       690,322       161  
   
Washington
                2,524        
   
West Virginia
    330                    
   
Wyoming*
    375,002       96,462       4,164,227       2,234  
Office Locations:
                               
 
United States
                               
   
Anchorage, Alaska
                               
   
The Woodlands, Texas
                               

*  Drilling activities were conducted in these areas in 2004.

7


Table of Contents

Western States The majority of the activity in the western states area is associated with conventional drilling in the Wamsutter area, coalbed methane (CBM) and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects. The western states area includes the Company’s oil and gas properties in the Land Grant area of Wyoming, Colorado and Utah. Anadarko’s operations on the Land Grant are concentrated in the greater Green River basin.

      The Company operates multiple full-scale CBM properties, as well as active pilot programs. The Company also continues to evaluate new CBM exploration opportunities on the Land Grant. Primary areas of concentration include development of the Big George coal at the Company’s County Line property in Wyoming, the Helper and Drunkard’s Wash fields in Utah and the Atlantic Rim field in Wyoming.
      The Company’s operations at the Salt Creek, Monell and Sussex EOR projects (98%-100% working interest (WI)) in Wyoming continue to show increased oil response due to CO2 injection. EOR projects are longer term projects that typically take several years to come to full fruition. Combined, the three projects are expected to result in an increase in net production from 8 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (MBOE/d) at year-end 2004 to about 42 MBOE/d by 2012.

Alaska Anadarko’s activity in Alaska is concentrated primarily on the North Slope. About 4% of the Company’s proved reserves at year-end 2004 were in Alaska. The Company’s capital budget is expected to range from $70 million to $90 million for Alaska in 2005, which includes drilling about 14 development wells and three exploration wells.

      At the Alpine field (22% WI) on Alaska’s North Slope, a capacity expansion project, designed to increase both oil handling and seawater injection capabilities, is expected to be completed by mid-year 2005 and boost capacity of the Alpine oil processing facility to 140 MBbls/d gross.
      Plans for development of the Nanuq and Fiord satellite fields (both 22% WI) are underway. First production is scheduled for late 2006, with expected peak production of approximately 35 MBbls/d in 2008. Anadarko and the operator are continuing to pursue the state, local and federal permits for three additional Alpine satellites. During the 2003-2004 winter drilling season, the Company participated in exploration wells located in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. Commerciality and potential development scenarios are currently being evaluated.

Gulf of Mexico In 2004, the Company sold all of its interests in properties located on the continental shelf of the Gulf of Mexico. The properties sold included about 107 MMBOE of proved reserves on the date of sale. At the end of 2004, net production from the retained deepwater properties averaged 25 MMcf/d of gas and 23 MBbls/d of oil, condensate and NGLs. At year-end 2004, about 8% of the Company’s proved reserves were located offshore in the deepwater of the Gulf of Mexico where Anadarko owns an average 73% interest in 190 blocks. Anadarko has budgeted about $700 million for capital spending in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico for 2005, which includes drilling about 19 wells.

      Marco Polo (100% WI), Anadarko’s first deepwater development project, achieved first production in July 2004. Anadarko operates, and a third party owns, the platform and production facilities for Marco Polo. Production rates and reservoir pressures on several wells are declining faster than predicted because the field is more compartmentalized than originally thought. The K2 (52% WI) and the K2 North (100% WI) fields are both proceeding as subsea tiebacks to the Marco Polo platform, with production expected to commence in mid-2005. During 2004, drilling in the K2 North field continued to explore the northern and western limits of the field. The Company began drilling the Genghis Khan exploration prospect (100% WI) in the area in early 2005.
      Development plans for a gas processing hub, Independence Hub, and gas export pipeline in the eastern Gulf of Mexico were approved in late 2004. The Company, along with a group of other producers, contracted with a third party to design, construct and own the facility. Anadarko will operate Independence Hub. The facility, capable of processing 850 MMcf/d of gas, will serve several ultra-deepwater natural gas fields including Anadarko’s six discoveries in the area. During 2004, the Company finalized development plans and made progress on the design, fabrication and installation of equipment required for the subsea infrastructure to connect the six fields with Independence Hub. During 2005, Anadarko plans to continue drilling a combination of exploration and delineation wells in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Production is expected to commence in 2007.
      Anadarko has participation agreements to explore deepwater blocks in the western Gulf of Mexico. During 2004, the Company completed reprocessing seismic and identified potential prospects within the area. In 2005, the Company will continue to analyze the data and expects to drill at least two prospects.

8


Table of Contents

(OFFSHORE PROPERTY MAP)

Offshore map
                             
Net Net Net
Undeveloped Developed Producing
Acres Acres Wells
Offshore:
                       
 
Gulf of Mexico
                       
   
Western*
    328,589              
   
Central*
    273,466       11,866       7  
   
Eastern*
    172,224              
 
California
    2,785              
*  Drilling activities were conducted in these areas in 2004.

9


Table of Contents

Gas Processing The Company processes gas at various third-party plants under agreements generally structured to provide for the extraction and sale of NGLs in cost efficient plants with flexible volume commitments. The Company has agreements with four plants in the western states area, 13 plants in the mid-continent area and one plant in the gulf coast area. Anadarko also processes gas and has interests in two Company-operated plants in the western states. Anadarko’s strategy to aggregate gas through Company-owned and third-party gathering systems allows Anadarko to secure processing arrangements in each of the regions where the Company has significant production.

Properties and Activities — Canada

Overview In late 2004, the Company sold Canadian properties, primarily in the Western Canadian Sedimentary basin, representing an estimated 64 MMBOE of proved reserves on the date of sale. At the end of 2004, about 11% of the Company’s proved reserves were located in Canada with average net production of 265 MMcf/d of gas and 9 MBbls/d of oil, condensate and NGLs. The Company’s 2005 capital budget for Canada ranges from $350 million to $400 million and provides for drilling an expected 192 development and 50 exploration wells. The accompanying map illustrates the Company’s net developed and undeveloped lease and fee mineral acreage, number of net producing wells and other data relevant to its Canadian properties.

      The following table presents selected 2004 Canadian operating data by area.

                                                 
Sales Volumes

Drilling Statistics
Oil and
Natural Gas NGLs Total Producing Wells Success
(MMcf/d) (MBbls/d) (MBOE/d) Wells(1) Drilled(2) Rate






Fort St. John
    87       1       16       149       26       77 %
Medicine Hat
    72       6       18       2,673       71       96 %
Grande Prairie
    71       5       17       342       52       85 %
Edson
    136       4       26       467       126       95 %
Other
    12             2             1       100 %
     
     
     
     
     
         
Total Canada
    378       16       79       3,631       276       92 %
     
     
     
     
     
         


(1)  Gross number of wells in which Anadarko has an interest.
(2)  Includes 221 gross development wells with a 96% success rate and 55 gross exploration wells with a 75% success rate.

Fort St. John During 2004, the Company completed a complex natural gas transportation project beneath the Buckinghorse River in northeastern British Columbia. The Company believes that this technical success, combined with its broad land base, provides extensive opportunity in the region. The Company is pursuing multi-zone, deep natural gas targets in the area that are expected to add growth to the foundation asset base.

Medicine Hat In southern Alberta, Anadarko initiated its first CO2 project in Canada and expects increased oil production and recovery from the Nisku Enchant field as a result. The Company expects the shallow gas program in southwest Saskatchewan to continue to provide steady production and exploitation opportunities with cost effective programs that can be brought on stream quickly.

Grande Prairie In 2004, Anadarko entered into a multi-year joint venture agreement to explore several high potential plays in the Western Canadian Sedimentary basin. Anadarko participated in three exploration wells with a 100% success rate. In 2005, the Company anticipates participating in drilling several additional wells and acquiring additional lease acreage and seismic data in the area.

Edson A third facility expansion in 2004 and successful drilling activity continue to make the Wild River area the most active development area for the Company in Canada. An additional plant expansion is expected to be complete in early 2005 that should increase capacity to 130 MMcf/d of gas.

Other During the 2004 winter drilling season, a Burnt Lake exploratory prospect was drilled in the Mackenzie Delta. An appraisal well will begin drilling in 2005 and the Company expects to participate in a testing program in the area throughout the year.

10


Table of Contents

(CANADA PROPERTY MAP)

Canada map
                                     
Net Net Net Net
Undeveloped Developed Fee Producing
Acres Acres Acres Wells
Canada:
                               
 
Alberta*
    756,999       529,338       518,526       640  
 
British Columbia*
    1,002,458       186,743             115  
 
Northwest Territories
    944,867       4,635             2  
 
Saskatchewan*
    128,080       291,006       108,906       2,159  
 
Scotian Shelf
    231,975                    
Office Locations:
                               
 
Canada
                               
   
Calgary, Alberta
                               
   
Edson, Alberta
                               
   
Fort St. John, British Columbia
                               
   
Grande Prairie, Alberta
                               
   
Medicine Hat, Alberta
                               
*  Drilling activities were conducted in these areas in 2004.

11


Table of Contents

Properties and Activities — Algeria

Overview Anadarko is engaged in exploration, development and production activities in Algeria’s Sahara Desert. At the end of 2004, seven fields discovered by the Company were on production. At the end of 2004, about 15% of the Company’s proved reserves were located in Algeria. In 2004, net sales volumes from the Company’s properties in Algeria totaled 22 MMBbls of crude oil, or 11% of the Company’s total sales volumes. In 2004, Anadarko participated in 17 wells with a success rate of 82%. In addition, the Company participated in 11 injection or service wells during the year. The Company’s 2005 capital budget for Algeria ranges from $80 million to $90 million and provides for drilling an expected 27 development and service wells and six exploration wells.

Contracts and Partners Anadarko’s interest in the Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) for Blocks 404, 208 and 211 is 50% before participation at the exploitation stage by Sonatrach, the national oil and gas enterprise of Algeria. The Company has two partners, each with a 25% interest, also prior to participation by Sonatrach. Under the terms of the PSA, oil reserves that are discovered, developed and produced are shared by Sonatrach, Anadarko and its two partners. Sonatrach is responsible for 51% of development and production costs. Anadarko and its partners also have an exploration program underway on Blocks 404, 208 and 211 and have exploration licenses, under separate PSAs, for Block 406b (60% interest) and Block 403c/e (67% interest). Anadarko and its joint venture partners fund Sonatrach’s share of exploration costs and are entitled to recover these exploration costs out of production in the exploitation phase. Sonatrach has owned shares of the Company’s common stock since 1986 and at year-end 2004 was the registered owner of 5.1% of Anadarko’s outstanding common stock.

Production and Development On Block 404, production from the HBNS field averaged 126 MBbls/d of oil (gross) and production from four of the satellite fields averaged 29 MBbls/d of oil (gross) in 2004. Production from the HBN field, which extends from Block 404 into Block 403 and is unitized with other companies, averaged 71 MBbls/d of oil (gross) in 2004. Anadarko is also actively involved in the unitized Ourhoud field which is located in the southern portion of Block 404 and extends into Block 406a and Block 405. Production from the Ourhoud field averaged 224 MBbls/d of oil (gross) in 2004. Anadarko has several fields farther south on Block 208. Development of the EMK field on Block 208 is progressing and is expected to be operational in late 2007 with about 100 MBbls/d of production capacity.

Exploration During 2004, the Company participated in four exploration wells on Blocks 404, 208 and 211, one of which was successful. The first exploration well on Block 406b was also drilled and found natural gas and condensate. During 2005, the Company plans to continue exploratory drilling on Blocks 404, 208 and 211, evaluate the prospect on Block 406b for commerciality and drill its first exploration well on Block 403c/e.

      Anadarko continually monitors the political situation in Algeria and has taken steps to help ensure the safety of employees and the security of its facilities in the remote regions of the Sahara Desert. Anadarko is unable to predict with certainty any effect the current situation may have on activity planned for 2005 and beyond. However, the situation has had no material effect to date on the Company’s operations in Algeria, where the Company has had activities since 1989. For additional information on certain factors and risks associated with the Company’s foreign operations see Regulatory Matters and Additional Factors Affecting Business — Foreign Operations Risk under Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

Properties and Activities — Other International

Overview The Company’s other international oil and gas production and development operations are located primarily in Venezuela and Qatar. The Company currently has exploration acreage in Qatar, Tunisia, West Africa, Indonesia, off the coast of Georgia in the Black Sea and other selected areas. About 5% of the Company’s total proved reserves were located in other international locations at year-end 2004. During 2004, net sales volumes from the Company’s other international properties averaged 22 MBbls/d of crude oil, condensate and NGLs, or 4% of the Company’s total volumes. In 2005, the Company’s capital budget is expected to range from $160 million to $180 million in other international projects and provides for drilling an expected 21 development and nine exploration wells.

12


Table of Contents

Venezuela The Company’s Venezuelan operation consists of the Oritupano-Leona contract area, a risk service contract in which the Company has a non-operated 45% participating interest. The Company’s net oil sales volumes from this 395,000 acre area averaged 12 MBbls/d during 2004. The development program in 2004 included drilling 18 wells with a 100% success rate, converting 29 idle wells to producing wells and workover activity. During 2005, the Company expects to continue with the development of the Oritupano-Leona contract area, focusing on additional drilling and workover activity. The Venezuelan government has issued several statements recently indicating its intention to reevaluate the contractual terms of existing contracts with foreign oil companies. Anadarko is unable to predict with certainty any effect the current situation may have on activity planned for 2005 and beyond. However, the situation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations or financial position of the Company.

Qatar The Company had interests in 1,458,000 undeveloped lease acres and 14,000 developed acres in Qatar at year-end 2004. Anadarko is the operator and has a 92.5% interest in the Al Rayyan field, which is part of an Exploration and Production Sharing Agreement covering Blocks 12 and 13. Production from the Al Rayyan field, located on Block 12, averaged 8 MBbls/d of oil (net) in 2004. During 2004, the Company recorded a ceiling test impairment of $62 million for Qatar as a result of lower production estimates and unsuccessful exploration activity. On Block 4 (100% interest), the Company was awarded a five-year exploration work program under which it plans to acquire seismic data in 2005. Anadarko also has an Exploration and Production Sharing Agreement covering offshore Block 11 (49% interest). The Company expects to drill an exploration well in this area in 2005.

Other The Company operates two blocks (55% interest) in the Ghadames basin of Tunisia, which cover 1,220,000 acres. In 2005, the Company’s focus in the area will be delineation and testing to determine commerciality of a previous natural gas and condensate discovery.

      Anadarko is the operator and holds a 50% interest in the 994,000 acre Agali Block, offshore Gabon in West Africa. The Company has completed its initial evaluation of the block and future activity is pending resolution of a boundary dispute between Gabon and its northern neighbor, Equatorial Guinea, which is under United Nations sponsored mediation. The Company also continues to look for additional opportunities to pursue in West Africa.
      During 2004, the Company was awarded exploration and production rights to the nearly 1,000,000 acre North East Madura III Block (100% interest) offshore Indonesia. Under the terms of the Production Sharing Contract, Anadarko will undertake a six-year exploration phase and a 20-year production phase. During the initial three-year work program, Anadarko plans to purchase a minimum of 988 square miles of 3-D seismic data and drill six exploration wells.
      Anadarko has a Production Sharing Contract with the State of Georgia. The agreement gives Anadarko exploration rights to three blocks, covering 2,035,000 acres, which extend about 50 miles offshore. During 2005, Anadarko plans to complete the evaluation of Block III.

Drilling Programs

      The Company’s 2004 drilling program focused on known oil and gas provinces in the United States (Lower 48, Alaska and Gulf of Mexico), Canada and Algeria. Exploration activity consisted of 104 wells, including 34 wells in the Lower 48, three wells in Alaska, seven wells offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, 55 wells in Canada and five wells in Algeria. Development activity consisted of 965 wells, which included 690 wells in the Lower 48, eight wells in Alaska, 16 wells offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, 221 wells in Canada, 12 wells in Algeria and 18 wells in other international locations.

13


Table of Contents

Drilling Statistics

      The following table shows the results of the oil and gas wells drilled and tested:

                                                         
Net Exploratory Net Development


Productive Dry Holes Total Productive Dry Holes Total Total







2004
                                                       
United States
    25.2       9.4       34.6       484.2       4.7       488.9       523.5  
Canada
    25.5       6.0       31.5       159.9       3.6       163.5       195.0  
Algeria
    1.1       1.5       2.6       2.1             2.1       4.7  
Other International
                      8.1             8.1       8.1  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Total
    51.8       16.9       68.7       654.3       8.3       662.6       731.3  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
2003
                                                       
United States
    22.2       16.3       38.5       452.1       14.4       466.5       505.0  
Canada
    64.6       7.3       71.9       183.7       5.5       189.2       261.1  
Algeria
    1.5       1.5       3.0       4.0       0.3       4.3       7.3  
Other International
    1.0       2.2       3.2       3.5       1.0       4.5       7.7  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Total
    89.3       27.3       116.6       643.3       21.2       664.5       781.1  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
2002
                                                       
United States
    34.0       13.8       47.8       275.2       5.1       280.3       328.1  
Canada
    30.6       6.8       37.4       305.6       4.0       309.6       347.0  
Algeria
    0.5       1.0       1.5       7.3       0.7       8.0       9.5  
Other International
          3.7       3.7       3.7       0.9       4.6       8.3  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Total
    65.1       25.3       90.4       591.8       10.7       602.5       692.9  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

      The following table shows the number of wells in the process of drilling or in active completion stages and the number of wells suspended or waiting on completion as of December 31, 2004:

                                   
Wells in the process
of drilling or Wells suspended or
in active completion waiting on completion


Exploration Development Exploration Development




United States
                               
 
Gross
    3       68       2       21  
 
Net
    2.5       56.9       2.0       17.1  
Canada
                               
 
Gross
    6       16       15       8  
 
Net
    3.1       7.0       3.4       2.0  
Algeria
                               
 
Gross
    1       2             1  
 
Net
    0.5       0.3             0.2  
Other International
                               
 
Gross
          1       2        
 
Net
          0.5       1.1        
Total
                               
 
Gross
    10       87       19       30  
 
Net
    6.1       64.7       6.5       19.3  

14


Table of Contents

Productive Wells

      As of December 31, 2004, the Company had a working interest ownership in productive wells as follows:

                   
Oil Wells* Gas Wells*


United States
               
 
Gross
    5,870       9,052  
 
Net
    4,307.0       6,082.4  
Canada
               
 
Gross
    404       3,227  
 
Net
    240.0       2,676.0  
Algeria
               
 
Gross
    135        
 
Net
    27.2        
Other International
               
 
Gross
    286        
 
Net
    133.3        
Total
               
 
Gross
    6,695       12,279  
 
Net
    4,707.5       8,758.4  


Includes wells containing multiple completions as follows:

                 
Gross
    89       1,399  
Net
    70.9       1,125.1  

Properties and Leases

      The following schedule shows the number of developed lease, undeveloped lease and fee mineral acres in which Anadarko held interests at December 31, 2004:

                                                                   
Developed Undeveloped
Lease Lease Fee Minerals Total




Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net Gross Net
thousands







United States
                                                               
 
Onshore — Lower 48
    2,662       1,793       2,137       1,521       9,395       8,416       14,194       11,730  
 
Offshore
    23       12       1,085       777                   1,108       789  
 
Alaska
    23       5       3,441       1,730       16       8       3,480       1,743  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Total
    2,708       1,810       6,663       4,028       9,411       8,424       18,782       14,262  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Canada
    1,762       1,012       8,257       3,065       627       627       10,646       4,704  
Algeria*
    221       54       3,561       1,071                   3,782       1,125  
Other International
    218       103       7,815       6,110                   8,033       6,213  


Developed acreage in Algeria relates only to areas with an Exploitation License. A portion of the undeveloped acreage in Algeria will be relinquished in the future upon finalization of Exploitation License boundaries.

15


Table of Contents

Marketing, Gathering and Liquefied Natural Gas Properties and Activities

Marketing The Company’s marketing department actively manages the sales of its natural gas, crude oil and NGLs. The Company markets its production to customers at competitive prices, maximizing realized prices while managing credit exposure. The Company also purchases natural gas, crude oil and NGLs volumes for resale primarily from partners and producers near Anadarko’s production. These purchases allow the Company to aggregate larger volumes and attract larger, creditworthy customers, which in turn enhance the value of the Company’s production.

      The Company sells natural gas under a variety of contracts and may also receive a service fee related to the level of reliability and service required by the customer. The Company has the marketing capability to move large volumes of gas into and out of the “daily” gas market to take advantage of any price volatility. The Company may also engage in trading activities for the purpose of generating profits from exposure to changes in market prices of natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs. The Company’s marketing strategy includes the use of leased natural gas storage facilities and various derivative instruments. However, the Company does not engage in market-making practices nor does it trade in any non-energy-related commodities. The Company’s marketing function does not participate in any energy marketing-related partnerships.

Gas Gathering Anadarko owns and operates six major gas gathering systems in the United States, where the Company has substantial gas production. The systems are: Antioch Gathering System in the Southwest Antioch field of Oklahoma; Hugoton Gathering System in southwest Kansas; Dew Gathering System in east Texas; Pinnacle Gathering System in east Texas; CJV/ SEC Gathering System in the Carthage field of east Texas; and, Vernon Gathering System in the Vernon field of north Louisiana.

      The Company’s major gathering systems have more than 3,250 miles of pipeline connecting about 3,650 wells and averaged nearly 900 MMcf/d of gas throughput in 2004. In addition, Anadarko operates numerous other smaller gas gathering systems.

Liquefied Natural Gas During 2004, the Company acquired a private Canadian company whose sole project was a proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving terminal at Bear Head, Point Tupper in Nova Scotia. The Bear Head facility is expected to give Anadarko leverage to negotiate for stranded gas production and marketing opportunities from national oil companies and other parties by offering them access to premium North American gas markets. An Environmental Assessment Approval was obtained and industrial permits for ground work have been approved. Front-end engineering design is complete for a terminal capable of processing up to 1 billion cubic feet per day of regasified LNG. The Company began construction planning, clearing and leveling the land and building access roads in late 2004. Construction activities are scheduled to begin in 2005 with commercial operations expected to commence in 2008.

16


Table of Contents

Minerals Properties and Activities

      The Company’s minerals properties contribute to operating income through non-operated joint venture and royalty arrangements in coal, trona and industrial mineral mines across the Company’s extensive fee mineral interest in the Land Grant. The Company reinvests the cash flow from its hard minerals operations primarily into its oil and gas operations.

      The Company’s low sulfur coal deposits, located primarily in southern Wyoming, compete with other western coal producers for industrial and utility boiler markets, which burn the coal to produce steam used to generate electricity. The Company’s coal interests use the surface mining method of extraction. Because of the high extraction and transportation costs, additional development of the Company’s reserves is dependent on increased coal usage in local markets. In addition to fee mineral ownership of and royalty interests in coal reserves, the Company owns a 50% non-operating interest in Black Butte Coal Company. Black Butte Coal Company produces approximately 4 million tons of coal per year.
      The world’s largest known deposit of trona, comprising 90% of the world’s trona resources, is located in the Green River basin in southwestern Wyoming. Natural soda ash, which is produced by refining trona ore, is used primarily in the production of glass, in the paper and water treatment industries and in the manufacturing of certain chemicals and detergents. The Company owns interests in lands containing approximately 50% of these reserves and has leased a portion of those lands to companies that mine and refine trona. In addition to fee mineral ownership of and royalty interest in trona reserves, the Company owns a 49% non-operating interest in the OCI Wyoming LP (OCI) soda ash refining facility near Green River, Wyoming. The OCI facility typically produces about 2 million tons of soda ash per year.
      During 2004, the Company entered into an agreement whereby it sold a portion of its future royalties associated with existing coal and trona leases to a third party for $158 million, net of transaction costs. The Company conveyed a limited-term nonparticipating royalty interest which was carved out of the Company’s royalty interests that entitles the third party to receive certain amounts in future coal and trona royalty revenue over an 11-year period. For additional information, see Note 10 — Sale of Future Hard Minerals Royalty Revenues of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Segment and Geographic Information

      Information on operations by segment and geographic location is contained in Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Employees

      As of December 31, 2004, the Company had about 3,300 employees. Anadarko considers its relations with its employees to be satisfactory. The Company has had no significant work stoppages or strikes pertaining to its employees.

Regulatory Matters and Additional Factors Affecting Business

      See Regulatory Matters and Additional Factors Affecting Business under Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

Title to Properties

      As is customary in the oil and gas industry, only a preliminary title examination is conducted at the time properties believed to be suitable for drilling operations are acquired by the Company. Prior to the commencement of drilling operations, a thorough title examination of the drill site tract is conducted and curative work is performed with respect to significant defects, if any, before proceeding with operations. A thorough title examination has been performed with respect to substantially all leasehold producing properties owned by the Company. Anadarko believes the title to its leasehold properties is good and defensible in accordance with standards generally acceptable in the oil and gas industry subject to such exceptions that, in the opinion of counsel employed in the various areas in which the Company has conducted exploration activities, are not so material as to detract substantially from the use of such properties.

17


Table of Contents

      The leasehold properties owned by the Company are subject to royalty, overriding royalty and other outstanding interests customary in the industry. The properties may be subject to burdens such as liens incident to operating agreements and current taxes, development obligations under oil and gas leases and other encumbrances, easements and restrictions. Anadarko does not believe any of these burdens will materially interfere with its use of these properties.

Capital Spending

      See Capital Resources and Liquidity under Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends

                         
2004 2003 2002



Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    6.31       5.83       3.83  
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    6.20       5.71       3.74  

      These ratios were computed by dividing earnings by either fixed charges or combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends. For this purpose, earnings include income before income taxes and fixed charges. Fixed charges include interest and amortization of debt expenses and the estimated interest component of rentals. Preferred stock dividends are adjusted to reflect the amount of pretax earnings required for payment.

 
Item 2.  Properties

      Information on Properties is contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K and in Note 21 — Commitments of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

 
Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

General The Company is a defendant in a number of lawsuits and is involved in governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including, but not limited to, royalty claims, contract claims and environmental claims. The Company has also been named as a defendant in various personal injury claims, including claims by employees of third-party contractors alleging exposure to asbestos, silica and benzene while working at refineries located in Texas, California and Oklahoma. Two companies Anadarko acquired in 2000 and 2002 sold the refineries prior to being acquired by Anadarko. While the ultimate outcome and impact on the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, Management believes that the resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Company, although results of operations and cash flow could be significantly impacted in the reporting periods in which such matters are resolved. Discussed below are several specific proceedings.

Royalty Litigation The Company is subject to various claims from its royalty owners in the regular course of its business as an oil and gas producer, including disputes regarding measurement, costs and expenses beyond the wellhead and basis valuations. Among such claims, the Company was named as a defendant in a case styled U.S. of America ex rel. Harold E. Wright v. AGIP Company, et al. (the “Gas Qui Tam case”) filed in September 2000 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division. This lawsuit generally alleges that the Company and 118 other defendants undervalued natural gas in connection with a payment of royalties on production from federal and Indian lands. Based on the Company’s present understanding of the various governmental and False Claims Act proceedings described above, the Company believes that it has substantial defenses to these claims and intends to vigorously assert such defenses. However, if the Company is found to have violated the Civil False Claims Act, the Company could be subject to a variety of sanctions, including treble damages and substantial monetary fines. All defendants jointly filed a motion to dismiss the action on jurisdictional grounds based on Mr. Wright’s failure to qualify as the original source of the information underlying his fraud claims, and the Company filed additional motions to dismiss on separate grounds. The trial court denied the defendants’ motions in January 2005 and the Company is reviewing the orders to determine whether an appeal is appropriate. Meanwhile, the court set a preliminary trial date in 2007.

18


Table of Contents

      A group of royalty owners purporting to represent Anadarko’s gas royalty owners in Texas was granted class action certification styled Neinast, Russell, et al. v. Union Pacific Resources Company, et al. in December 1999, by the 21st Judicial District Court of Washington County, Texas, in connection with a gas royalty underpayment case against the Company. This certification did not constitute a review by the Court of the merits of the claims being asserted. The royalty owners’ pleadings did not specify the damages being claimed, although a demand for damages in the amount of $66 million was asserted. The Company appealed the class certification order. A favorable decision from the Houston Court of Appeals decertified the class. The decision from the Houston Court of Appeals became final in the second quarter of 2002. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the royalty owners filed a new petition alleging that the class may properly be brought so long as “sub-class” groups are broken out. The same attorneys who filed the Neinast lawsuit as a state-wide class action also filed a lawsuit, styled Hankins, Lowell F., et al. v. Union Pacific Resources Group Inc., et al., in the 112th Judicial District Court, Crockett County, Texas. The two lawsuits are substantially identical, except that the Hankins lawsuit is limited to royalty owners in Crockett and Sutton Counties. The Texas Supreme Court has reversed certification of this class; however, as with the Neinast case, the plaintiffs indicated that they would seek certification of sub-classes and continue to prosecute the claims. The Company subsequently settled these cases, the court entered a final judgment approving the settlements and the litigation was concluded in 2004.
      A royalty owner action styled Texas Osage Royalty Pool, Inc. v. UPRG, Inc., UP Fuels, Inc., et al. was filed in January 1997 in the 335th District Court of Lee County, Texas. The case involved allegations that a company Anadarko acquired by merger in 2000, UPRG, Inc., failed to properly pay royalties due Texas Osage. In addition, the plaintiff contended that the Company failed to comply with express and implied provisions of various leases since April 1993. The Company reached a settlement in this case, and the lawsuit was dismissed in 2004.
      Royalty litigation settlement agreement charges of $17 million, after income taxes, were expensed in 2004.

T-Bar X Lawsuit T-Bar X Limited Company v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, a case filed in the 82nd Judicial District Court of Robertson County, Texas, involves a dispute regarding a confidentiality agreement that Anadarko executed in August 1999. On January 28, 2004, based upon a jury verdict, the court entered a $145 million judgment in favor of the plaintiff as follows: $40 million in actual damages; $100 million in punitive damages; and, $5 million in pre-judgment interest. The court later signed an Amended Final Judgment on April 14, 2004, which reduced the punitive damages to $80 million, reducing the total judgment to approximately $125 million. Anadarko appealed the case to the Court of Appeals for the 10th District of Texas at Waco. The Company believed that it had strong arguments for a reversal on appeal and that it was not probable that the judgment would be affirmed. As of December 30, 2004, the parties executed a Settlement and Release Agreement to resolve all disputes for approximately $38 million. As a result of the settlement, the appellate court reversed the Amended Final Judgment and remanded the case to the trial court, with instructions for the trial court to enter a judgment in accord with the parties’ settlement. The trial court entered such a judgment in February 2005. Financial results for 2004 included a charge of $24 million, after income taxes, related to this settlement.

Other The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has alleged certain violations of the Clean Water Act with respect to the Company’s offshore operations. The Company met with the EPA and agreed to resolve these allegations through the payment of a $60,000 penalty and a Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP) valued at $50,000. The EPA is currently evaluating the Company’s SEP proposal.

      The EPA and the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) have indicated that they are considering a possible enforcement action under the Clean Water Act and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 against Howell Petroleum Corporation, one of the Company’s subsidiaries, for spills of produced water and oil from its northern Wyoming operations. A factual investigation is ongoing. Representatives of the Company met with the EPA and DOJ in March 2005 to discuss in detail the facts and circumstances surrounding the spills. The parties agreed that further investigation was warranted. Until the factual investigation is complete, the Company will be unable to make a reasonable estimate of potential sanctions related to this matter. However, Anadarko believes that the liability with respect to this matter will not have a material effect on the Company.
      The Company is also subject to other legal proceedings, claims and liabilities which arise in the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of Anadarko, the liability with respect to these actions will not have a material effect on the Company.

19


Table of Contents

 
Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

      There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2004.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

             
Age at End
Name of 2005 Position



James T. Hackett
    51    
President and Chief Executive Officer
Robert P. Daniels
    46    
Senior Vice President, Exploration and Production
James R. Larson
    55    
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Mark L. Pease
    49    
Senior Vice President, Exploration and Production
Robert K. Reeves
    48    
Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs & Law and Chief Governance Officer
Mario M. Coll, III
    43    
Vice President, Information Technology Services and Chief Information Officer
Diane L. Dickey
    49    
Vice President and Controller
Karl F. Kurz
    44    
Vice President, Marketing
David R. Larson
    48    
Vice President, Investor Relations
Richard A. Lewis
    61    
Vice President, Human Resources
Gregory M. Pensabene
    55    
Vice President, Government Relations and Public Affairs
Albert L. Richey
    56    
Vice President and Treasurer
Charlene A. Ripley
    41    
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Donald R. Willis
    55    
Vice President, Corporate Services

      In December 2003, Mr. Hackett was named President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining Anadarko, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Devon Energy Corporation since its merger with Ocean Energy, Inc. in April 2003. Mr. Hackett served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Ocean Energy, Inc. from March 1999 to April 2003 and as Chairman of the Board from January 2000 to April 2003. He served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Seagull Energy Corporation from September 1998 until March 1999 and as Chairman of the Board from January 1999 to March 1999, until its merger with Ocean Energy, Inc.

      Mr. Daniels was named Senior Vice President, Exploration and Production in 2004 and named Vice President, Canada in 2001. Prior to this position, he served in various managerial roles in the Exploration Department for Anadarko Algeria Company, LLC. He has worked for the Company since 1985.
      Mr. James Larson was named Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer in 2003. Prior to this position, he served as Senior Vice President, Finance since 2002 and as Vice President and Controller since 1995. He has worked for the Company since 1983.
      Mr. Pease was named Senior Vice President, Exploration and Production in 2004. Prior to this position, he served as Vice President, U.S. Onshore and Offshore since 2002, Vice President, International and Alaska Operations since September 2001, Vice President, Engineering and Technology since February 2001, Vice President, Algeria since 1998 and as President and General Manager, Anadarko Algeria Company, LLC since 1993. He has worked for the Company since 1979.
      Mr. Reeves was named Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs & Law and Chief Governance Officer in 2004. Prior to joining Anadarko, he served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Ocean Energy, Inc. and its predecessor companies from 1997 to 2003.
      Mr. Coll was named Vice President, Information Technology Services and Chief Information Officer in 2004. Prior to joining Anadarko, he served as Chief Information Officer and Vice President, Information Management for Devon Energy Corporation from 2003 to 2004, and as Vice President, Operational Planning and Chief Information Officer for Ocean Energy, Inc. and its predecessor companies from 1997 to 2003.
      Ms. Dickey was named Vice President and Controller in 2002. Prior to this position, she served as Assistant Controller since 1995. She has worked for the Company since 1978.

20


Table of Contents

      Mr. Kurz was named Vice President, Marketing in 2003. Prior to this position, he served as Manager, Energy Marketing since 2001. He has worked in Anadarko’s marketing department since 2000. Prior to joining the Company, he worked for Vastar Resources in the marketing department since 1995.
      Mr. David Larson was named Vice President, Investor Relations in 2003. Prior to this position, he served as Manager, Investor Relations since 2000. He worked in the investor relations and other departments at Union Pacific Resources Group Inc. since 1983.
      Mr. Lewis was named Vice President, Human Resources in 1995. He joined the Company as Manager, Human Resources in 1985.
      Mr. Pensabene was named Vice President, Government Relations and Public Affairs in 1999. Prior to this position, he served as Vice President, Government Relations since he joined the Company in 1997.
      Mr. Richey was named Vice President and Treasurer in 1995. He joined the Company as Treasurer in 1987.
      Ms. Ripley was named Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in 2004. Prior to this position, she served as Vice President and General Counsel since 2003 and Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Anadarko Canada Corporation and its predecessor companies since 1998. She served as Senior Counsel for Norcen Energy Resources Limited since 1997.
      Mr. Willis was named Vice President, Corporate Services in 2000. Prior to this position, he served as Manager, Corporate Administration. He has worked for the Company since 1979.

      Officers of Anadarko are elected at an organizational meeting of the Board of Directors following the annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to occur on May 12, 2005, and hold office until their successors are duly elected and shall have qualified. There are no family relationships between any directors or executive officers of Anadarko.

PART II

 
Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

      Information on the market price and cash dividends declared per share of common stock is included in Stockholder Information in the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2004 Annual Report (Annual Report) which is incorporated herein by reference.

      As of February 28, 2005, there were approximately 18,000 direct holders of Anadarko common stock. The following table sets forth the amount of dividends paid on Anadarko common stock during the two years ended December 31, 2004:
                                 
First Second Third Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
millions



2004
  $ 35     $ 36     $ 35     $ 33  
2003
  $ 24     $ 25     $ 25     $ 35  

      The amount of future common stock dividends will depend on earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors, and will be determined by the Directors on a quarterly basis. For additional information, see Dividends under Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

21


Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Table The following table sets forth information with respect to the equity compensation plans available to directors, officers and employees of the Company as of December 31, 2004:

                         
(c)
Number of securities
(a) (b) remaining available
Number of securities Weighted-average for future issuance
to be issued upon exercise price of under equity
exercise of outstanding compensation plans
outstanding options, options, warrants (excluding securities
Plan category warrants and rights and rights reflected in column(a))




Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
    8,137,361     $ 46.18       1,494,901  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
                 
     
     
     
 
Total
    8,137,361     $ 46.18       1,494,901  

Common Stock Repurchase Table The following table sets forth information with respect to repurchases by the Company of its shares of common stock during the fourth quarter of 2004.

                                 
Total number of Approximate dollar
Total shares purchased value of shares that
number of Average as part of publicly may yet be
shares price paid announced plans purchased under the
Period purchased(1) per share or programs plans or programs(2)





October
    1,421,271     $ 68.35       1,368,100          
November
    4,766,837     $ 67.70       4,766,212          
December
    6,539,470     $ 66.74       6,520,500          
     
             
         
Fourth Quarter 2004
    12,727,578     $ 67.28       12,654,812     $ 691,000,000  
     
             
     
 


(1)  During the fourth quarter of 2004, 12,654,812 shares were repurchased under the Company’s share repurchase programs. During the fourth quarter of 2004, 72,766 shares were related to restricted stock cancelled by the Company for the payment of withholding taxes due on restricted stock that vested under various employee restricted stock plans.
 
(2)  In June 2004, the Company announced a stock repurchase program to purchase up to $2 billion in shares of common stock. The Company intends to purchase additional shares under this program in 2005. However, the repurchase program does not obligate Anadarko to acquire any specific number of shares and may be discontinued at any time.

 
Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

      See Five Year Financial Highlights in the Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

22


Table of Contents

 
Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

General Anadarko Petroleum Corporation’s primary line of business is the exploration, development, production and marketing of natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs. The Company’s major areas of operations are located in the United States, Canada and Algeria. The Company is also active in Venezuela, Qatar and several other countries. The Company’s focus is on adding high-margin oil and natural gas reserves at competitive costs and continuing to develop more efficient and effective ways of exploring for and producing oil and gas. The primary factors that affect the Company’s results of operations include, among other things, commodity prices for natural gas, crude oil and NGLs, production volumes, the Company’s ability to find additional oil and gas reserves, as well as the cost of finding reserves and changes in the levels of costs and expenses required for continuing operations.

Refocused Strategy Anadarko announced a refocused strategy in June 2004. Strategy execution included an asset realignment that resulted in the Company completing over $3 billion in pretax asset sales during 2004 through a series of unrelated transactions. Combined, these divestitures represented about 11% of Anadarko’s year-end 2003 proved reserves and about 20% of 2004 oil and gas production. The Company used proceeds from asset sales to reduce debt, repurchase Anadarko common stock under a $2 billion program authorized by the Company’s Board of Directors and otherwise to have funds available for reinvestment in other strategic options.

      The strategy refocuses the Company’s efforts and capital on the areas where it has consistently produced its best results; institutionalizes a process to manage the Company’s assets differently; lowers the reinvestment required to maintain existing production levels; and strengthens Anadarko’s financial discipline and strategic flexibility. The Company’s properties are separated into two broad categories and managed to serve different roles within the overall portfolio. “Foundation” assets are those with efficient reinvestment features to hold production flat or to grow production modestly, and that generally have low underlying decline rates over a long period of time. Today, these assets are primarily onshore North America and are expected to generate significant free cash that can be reinvested into growth areas. “Growth platforms” are expected to become increasingly global in nature and currently include the Gulf of Mexico deepwater, Algeria and Qatar. Growth platform assets are expected to deliver differentiated growth rates by targeting high-potential, exploration-focused investments or new ventures that may include acquisitions as entry vehicles.
      Properties sold under the refocused strategy during 2004 included about 290 MMBOE of proved reserves on the date of sale. Most of the properties divested were located in the shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico, the Western Canadian Sedimentary basin and the mid-continent region of the United States.
      Under full cost accounting rules, gain or loss on the sale or other disposition of oil and gas properties is not recognized, unless the gain or loss would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and natural gas attributable to a country. The dispositions did not significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves; therefore, the proceeds from these transactions were recognized as an adjustment of capitalized costs in the respective country cost centers.

23


Table of Contents

Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2004

Selected Data

                         
2004 2003 2002
millions except per share amounts


Financial Results
                       
Revenues
  $ 6,067     $ 5,122     $ 3,845  
Costs and expenses
    3,186       2,914       2,435  
Interest expense and other (income) expense
    404       234       203  
Income tax expense
    871       729       376  
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 1,601     $ 1,287     $ 825  
Earnings per share — diluted
  $ 6.36     $ 5.09     $ 3.21  
Operating Results
                       
Total proved reserves (MMBOE)
    2,367       2,513       2,328  
Worldwide proved reserve additions (MMBOE)
    335       391       258  
Proved reserve sales in place (MMBOE)
    290       14       39  
Annual sales volumes (MMBOE)
    190       192       197  
Capital Resources and Liquidity
                       
Cash flow from operating activities
  $ 3,207     $ 3,043     $ 2,196  
Capital expenditures
    3,090       2,792       2,388  
Total debt
    3,840       5,058       5,471  
Stockholders’ equity
  $ 9,285     $ 8,599     $ 6,972  
Debt to total capitalization ratio
    29 %     37 %     44 %

Financial Results

Net Income Anadarko’s net income available to common stockholders for 2004 totaled $1.6 billion, or $6.36 per share (diluted), compared to net income available to common stockholders for 2003 of $1.3 billion, or $5.09 per share (diluted). Anadarko had net income available to common stockholders in 2002 of $825 million or $3.21 per share (diluted). The increases in net income in 2004 and 2003 were primarily due to higher commodity prices, partially offset by higher expenses.

      In 2003, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” and the related cumulative adjustment in the first quarter of 2003 was an increase of $47 million after income taxes, or $0.18 per share (diluted).

Revenues

                         
2004 2003 2002
millions


Gas sales
  $ 3,279     $ 2,851     $ 1,828  
Oil and condensate sales
    2,219       1,787       1,682  
Natural gas liquids sales
    460       365       222  
Other sales
    109       119       113  
     
     
     
 
Total
  $ 6,067     $ 5,122     $ 3,845  
     
     
     
 

      Anadarko’s total revenues for 2004 increased 18% compared to 2003 and total revenues for 2003 increased 33% compared to 2002. The increase in revenues for both periods is primarily due to significantly higher commodity prices, partially offset by slightly lower sales volumes.

      The impact of hedges and marketing activities resulted in lower realized prices of $0.27 per Mcf of gas and $4.27 per barrel of oil for 2004 compared to market prices, which decreased revenues $461 million. For 2003, the impact of hedges and marketing activities resulted in lower realized prices of $0.27 per Mcf of gas and $1.42 per barrel of oil compared to market prices, which decreased revenues $267 million. For 2002, the impact of hedges

24


Table of Contents

and marketing activities resulted in higher realized prices of $0.14 per Mcf of gas and lower realized prices of $0.32 per barrel of oil compared to market prices, which increased revenues $62 million.

Analysis of Sales Volumes

                           
2004 2003 2002



Barrels of Oil Equivalent (MMBOE)
                       
 
United States
    131       135       130  
 
Canada
    29       30       35  
 
Algeria
    22       19       24  
 
Other International
    8       8       8  
     
     
     
 
 
Total
    190       192       197  
     
     
     
 
Barrels of Oil Equivalent per Day (MBOE/d)
                       
 
United States
    358       368       355  
 
Canada
    79       83       97  
 
Algeria
    61       52       65  
 
Other International
    22       22       22  
     
     
     
 
 
Total
    520       525       539  
     
     
     
 

      During 2004, Anadarko’s daily sales volumes decreased slightly compared to 2003. The decrease was primarily due to slightly lower sales volumes in the United States and Canada due to the impact of divestitures in late 2004 and natural production declines in areas that were targeted for divestiture, partially offset by higher volumes associated with production startup in mid-2004 at the Marco Polo deepwater platform and successful drilling in Texas and Louisiana. Daily sales volumes in Algeria were up 17% due to the expansion of production facilities and the timing of cargo liftings.

      The Company’s daily sales volumes in 2003 were down 3% compared to 2002. The decrease for 2003 was due to lower volumes from operations in Canada, primarily related to the divestiture of heavy oil properties in late 2002 and from operations in Algeria primarily due to the substantial completion of cost recovery, whereby Anadarko was reimbursed for previous exploration spending with additional barrels of oil production. These decreases were partially offset by higher volumes from operations in the United States, primarily due to higher oil production in the western states as a result of the acquisition of Howell in late 2002.
      Sales volumes represent actual production volumes adjusted for changes in commodity inventories. Anadarko employs marketing strategies to help manage volumes and mitigate the effect of price volatility, which is likely to continue in the future. See Energy Price Risk under Item 7a of this Form 10-K.

Natural Gas Sales Volumes and Average Prices

                           
2004 2003 2002



United States (Bcf)
    499       503       507  
 
MMcf/d
    1,363       1,379       1,390  
 
Price per Mcf
  $ 5.14     $ 4.36     $ 2.83  
Canada (Bcf)
    138       140       135  
 
MMcf/d
    378       383       370  
 
Price per Mcf
  $ 5.17     $ 4.71     $ 2.91  
Total (Bcf)
    637       643       642  
 
MMcf/d
    1,741       1,762       1,760  
 
Price per Mcf
  $ 5.15     $ 4.43     $ 2.85  

      Anadarko’s daily natural gas sales volumes in 2004 were down slightly compared to 2003 primarily due to slightly lower sales volumes in the United States due to the impact of divestitures in late 2004 and natural production declines in areas that were targeted for divestiture, partially offset by higher volumes associated with successful drilling in Texas and Louisiana. The Company’s daily natural gas sales volumes for 2003 were

25


Table of Contents

essentially flat compared to 2002. An increase in natural gas sales volumes in Texas, Louisiana and Canada due to successful exploration and development activities was offset by a decrease in the Gulf of Mexico, as a result of temporary operational issues and natural production declines. Production of natural gas is generally not directly affected by seasonal swings in demand.
      The Company’s average realized natural gas price in 2004 increased 16% compared to 2003. Continued strong demand in North America contributed to higher natural gas prices. These higher prices include commodity price hedges on 36% of natural gas sales volumes during 2004 that reduced the Company’s exposure to low prices and limited participation in higher prices. The Company’s average realized natural gas price in 2003 increased 55% compared to 2002. The increase in prices in 2003 was attributed to strong demand in North America due to colder weather and declining gas supply. The higher prices in 2003 included commodity price hedges on 49% of natural gas sales volumes. As of December 31, 2004, the Company has hedged about 21% of its anticipated natural gas wellhead sales volumes for 2005. See Energy Price Risk under Item 7a of this Form 10-K.

Crude Oil and Condensate Sales Volumes and Average Prices

                           
2004 2003 2002



United States (MMBbls)
    32       34       31  
 
MBbls/d
    88       93       85  
 
Price per barrel
  $ 31.87     $ 26.16     $ 22.90  
Canada (MMBbls)
    5       6       12  
 
MBbls/d
    14       17       33  
 
Price per barrel
  $ 37.37     $ 27.33     $ 19.09  
Algeria (MMBbls)
    22       19       24  
 
MBbls/d
    61       52       65  
 
Price per barrel
  $ 34.78     $ 28.43     $ 24.38  
Other International (MMBbls)
    8       8       8  
 
MBbls/d
    22       22       22  
 
Price per barrel
  $ 27.91     $ 23.15     $ 19.92  
Total (MMBbls)
    67       67       75  
 
MBbls/d
    185       184       205  
 
Price per barrel
  $ 32.76     $ 26.55     $ 22.44  

      Anadarko’s daily crude oil and condensate sales volumes for 2004 were essentially flat with 2003. Higher sales volumes in Algeria and production startup in mid-2004 at the Marco Polo deepwater platform were mostly offset by lower sales volumes in the United States and Canada, due to the impact of divestitures in late 2004 and natural production declines in areas that were targeted for divestitures. Anadarko’s daily crude oil and condensate sales volumes for 2003 decreased 10% compared to 2002 due to lower volumes in Canada and in Algeria, partially offset by higher volumes in the United States. The lower Canada volumes were due largely to the sale of the Company’s heavy oil assets in late 2002. The lower Algeria volumes were primarily due to the substantial completion of cost recovery. The higher volumes in the United States were primarily in the western states as a result of the Howell acquisition in late 2002. Production of oil usually is not affected by seasonal swings in demand or in market prices.

      Anadarko’s average realized crude oil price in 2004 increased 23% compared to 2003. The higher crude oil prices in 2004 were attributed to continuing political unrest in the Middle East and increased worldwide demand. These higher prices include commodity price hedges on 36% of crude oil and condensate sales volumes during 2004 that reduced the Company’s exposure to low prices and limited participation in higher prices. The Company’s average realized crude oil price in 2003 increased 18% compared to 2002. The higher crude oil prices during 2003 were primarily attributed to political unrest in the Middle East, the oil workers’ strike in Venezuela, low oil inventory levels and increased demand. The higher prices in 2003 included commodity price hedges on 38% of crude oil and condensate sales volumes. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had hedged about 26% of its anticipated oil and condensate volumes for 2005.

26


Table of Contents

Natural Gas Liquids Sales Volumes and Average Prices

                           
2004 2003 2002



Total (MMBbls)
    17       17       15  
 
MBbls/d
    45       47       41  
 
Price per barrel
  $ 27.76     $ 21.18     $ 14.80  

      Anadarko’s daily NGLs sales volumes in 2004 were down slightly compared to 2003, primarily due to a decrease in volumes of natural gas processed. The Company’s 2003 daily NGLs sales volumes increased 15% compared to 2002 primarily due to additional natural gas volumes processed in central Texas.

      During 2004, average NGLs prices increased 31% compared to 2003. The 2003 average NGLs prices increased 43% compared to 2002. NGLs production is dependent on natural gas prices and the economics of processing the natural gas to extract NGLs.

Costs and Expenses

                         
2004 2003 2002
millions


Direct operating
  $ 682     $ 630     $ 577  
Transportation and cost of product
    250       198       170  
General and administrative
    423       392       314  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    1,447       1,297       1,121  
Other taxes
    312       294       214  
Impairments related to oil and gas properties
    72       103       39  
     
     
     
 
Total
  $ 3,186     $ 2,914     $ 2,435  
     
     
     
 

      During 2004, Anadarko’s costs and expenses increased 9% compared to 2003 due to the following factors:
  —  Direct operating expense, which was up 8% in 2004, includes $12 million in severance and other costs related to 2004 divestitures and reorganization efforts. Excluding these costs, direct operating expenses increased 6% primarily due to higher enhanced oil recovery activity in the western states, production beginning in mid-2004 at the Marco Polo platform, the acquisition of producing properties in mid-2003 and a general increase in service and gathering costs, partially offset by a decrease associated with property divestitures in late 2004.
  —  Transportation and cost of product expense increased 26%. The increase includes a $60 million increase in transportation expense due to higher transportation rates and marketing volumes. This increase was partially offset by a lower cost of product as a result of a decrease in gas volumes processed into NGLs.
  —  General and administrative (G&A) expense increased 8%. In 2004, G&A expense includes $19 million in severance and other costs related to 2004 divestitures and reorganization efforts. In 2003, G&A expense includes $40 million in restructuring costs related to a cost reduction plan implemented in July and $32 million in benefits and salaries expenses related to executive transitions. Excluding these costs, G&A expense increased 26% in 2004 primarily due to legal settlements of $37 million and an increase of $30 million in employee bonus plan expense primarily due to the Company exceeding internal performance goals.
  —  Depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) expense increased 12%. DD&A expense increases include about $145 million primarily due to higher costs associated with finding and developing oil and gas reserves (including the transfer of excluded costs to the DD&A pool) and $11 million due to higher depreciation of general properties and asset retirement obligation accretion expense, partially offset by a decrease of $6 million related to slightly lower production volumes.
  Other taxes increased 6% primarily due to higher commodity prices in 2004.
  —  Impairments of oil and gas properties in 2004 were due to a $62 million ceiling test impairment for Qatar as a result of lower future production estimates and unsuccessful exploration activities and $10 million related to other international activities.

27


Table of Contents

      During 2003, Anadarko’s costs and expenses increased 20% compared to 2002 due to the following factors:
  —  Direct operating expense increased 9% primarily due to the acquisition of producing properties in the western states in late 2002 and the Gulf of Mexico in 2003, an increase in electricity, fuel and other lease expenses attributed to the effect of increased commodity prices and the impact of an increase in the Canadian exchange rate. These increases were partially offset by the effect of the sale of heavy oil properties in Canada in late 2002.
  —  Transportation and cost of product expense increased 16% primarily due to an increase in volumes of NGLs processed and higher transportation rates.
  —  G&A expense increased 25%. G&A expense in 2003 included restructuring costs of $40 million and $32 million in benefits and salaries expenses related to executive transitions during 2003. Excluding restructuring costs and executive transition expenses, G&A expense increased $17 million for the first six months of 2003 and decreased $11 million in the last half of 2003 as a result of the cost reduction plan implemented in July 2003.
  —  DD&A expense increased 16%. DD&A increases include about $180 million primarily due to higher costs associated with finding and developing oil and gas reserves (including the transfer of excluded costs to the DD&A pool), $20 million due to asset retirement obligation accretion expense and $8 million related to higher depreciation of general properties. These increases were partially offset by a $32 million decrease due to lower production volumes.
  —  Other taxes increased 37% primarily due to significantly higher commodity prices.
  —  Impairments of oil and gas properties in 2003 were due to a $68 million ceiling test impairment for Qatar as a result of lower future production estimates and unsuccessful exploration activities and $35 million related to other international activities.

Interest Expense and Other (Income) Expense

                         
2004 2003 2002
millions


Interest Expense
                       
Gross interest expense
  $ 334     $ 366     $ 353