-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
AUBvx0zBcIp/GbtJ7hZ3lxculta02+AJNswdnTPCxtJYiWPIxAVVC5lPuRXnLyxj
CQrwME9XLjWAGsRmoFtoew==
<SEC-DOCUMENT>0000907687-02-000023.txt : 20020415
<SEC-HEADER>0000907687-02-000023.hdr.sgml : 20020415
ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000907687-02-000023
CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K
PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3
CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20020106
FILED AS OF DATE: 20020408
FILER:
COMPANY DATA:
COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: ACTEL CORP
CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000907687
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SEMICONDUCTORS & RELATED DEVICES [3674]
IRS NUMBER: 770097724
STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA
FISCAL YEAR END: 0102
FILING VALUES:
FORM TYPE: 10-K
SEC ACT: 1934 Act
SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-21970
FILM NUMBER: 02604028
BUSINESS ADDRESS:
STREET 1: 955 EAST ARQUES AVE
CITY: SUNNYVALE
STATE: CA
ZIP: 94086
BUSINESS PHONE: 4087391010
MAIL ADDRESS:
STREET 1: 955 EAST ARQUES AVE
STREET 2: 955 EAST ARQUES AVE
CITY: SUNNYVALE
STATE: CA
ZIP: 94086
</SEC-HEADER>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>10-K
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>edgar10k.txt
<DESCRIPTION>ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
<TEXT>
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
--------------------------------------
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended January 6, 2002
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 0-21970
--------------------------------------
ACTEL CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
California 77-0097724
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employee
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
955 East Arques Avenue
Sunnyvale, California 94086-4533
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(408) 739-1010
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
--------------------------------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.001 par value
(Title of class)
--------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant, based upon the closing price for shares of the Registrant's
Common Stock on April 3, 2002, as reported by the National Market System of the
National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System, was
approximately $368,000,000. In calculating such aggregate market value, shares
of Common Stock owned of record or beneficially by all officers, directors, and
persons known to the Registrant to own more than five percent of any class of
the Registrant's voting securities were excluded because such persons may be
deemed to be affiliates. The Registrant disclaims the existence of control or
any admission thereof for any purpose.
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of April 3, 2002:
24,231,482.
--------------------------------------
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The following documents are incorporated by reference in Parts II, III, and
IV of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: (i) portions of Registrant's annual
report to security holders for the fiscal year ended January 6, 2002 (Parts II
and IV), and (ii) portions of Registrant's proxy statement for its annual
meeting of shareholders to be held on May 24, 2002 (Part III).
<PAGE>
All information contained or incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with and in the context of the
Risk Factors set forth at the end of Part I. Unless otherwise indicated, the
statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are made as of April 4,
2002, and Actel undertakes no obligation to update such statements, including
forward-looking statements. The {bracketed statements} contained in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or forecast
in forward-looking statements due to the Risk Factors or for other reasons.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Actel designs, develops, and markets field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs)
and associated development tools, intellectual property (IP) cores, and
services. FPGAs are used by designers of communications, computer, consumer,
industrial, military and aerospace, and other electronic systems to
differentiate their products and get them to market faster. Actel is the leading
supplier of FPGAs based on flash and antifuse technologies. Actel's strategy is
to add value for application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) users and serve
markets in which Actel's technologies have an advantage, including the ASIC
replacement, high reliability, and high-speed communications markets.
Actel shipped its first products in 1988 and thousands of its development
tools are in the hands of customers, including Alcatel; The Boeing Company
(Boeing); Cisco Systems, Inc. (Cisco); Compaq Computer Corporation (Compaq);
General Electric Company (GE); Honeywell International Inc. (Honeywell);
Lockheed Martin Corporation (Lockheed Martin); Marconi Corporation plc
(Marconi); Nortel Networks Corporation (Nortel); Samsung; Sanyo; and Siemens AG
(Siemens). Actel has foundry relationships with BAE Systems (BAE) in the United
States; Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Pte Ltd (Chartered) in Singapore;
Infineon Technologies AG (Infineon) in Germany; Matsushita Electronics Company
(MEC) in Japan; United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) in Taiwan; and Winbond
Electronics Corp. (Winbond) in Taiwan.
Actel markets its products through a worldwide, multi-tiered sales and
distribution network. In 2001, sales made through distributors accounted for 68%
of Actel's net revenues. Two of Actel's distributors, Pioneer-Standard
Electronics, Inc. (Pioneer) and Unique Technologies, Inc. (Unique), accounted
for 20% and 19%, respectively, of Actel's net revenues in 2001. In addition to
the two distributors, the North American sales network includes 22 sales offices
and 20 sales representative firms. Actel's European, Pan-Asia, and International
sales networks include nine sales offices and 24 distributors and sales
representative firms. In 2001, sales to customers outside the United States
accounted for 38% of net revenues.
Actel was incorporated in California in 1985. Actel's principal facilities
and executive offices are located at 955 East Arques Avenue, Sunnyvale,
California 94086-4533, and its telephone number at that address is (408)
739-1010. Actel's World Wide Web address is http://www.actel.com. As used in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K, "Actel" means Actel Corporation and its
consolidated subsidiaries. The Actel name and logo and ProASIC are registered
trademarks of Actel. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also includes unregistered
trademarks of Actel and registered and unregistered trademarks of other
companies.
Industry Background
The three principal types of integrated circuits used in most digital
electronic systems are microprocessor, memory, and logic circuits.
Microprocessors are used for control and computing tasks; memory devices are
used to store program instructions and data; and logic devices are used to adapt
these processing and storage capabilities to a specific application. Logic
circuits are found in virtually every electronic system.
The logic design of competing electronic systems is often a principal area
of differentiation. Unlike the microprocessor and memory markets, which are
dominated by a relatively few standard designs, the logic market is highly
fragmented and includes, among many other segments, low-capacity standard
transistor-transistor logic circuits (TTLs) and custom-designed ASICs. TTLs are
standard logic circuits that can be purchased "off the shelf" and interconnected
on a printed circuit board (PCB), but they tend to limit system performance and
increase system size and cost compared with logic functions integrated at the
circuit (rather than the board) level. ASICs are customized circuits that offer
electronic system manufacturers the benefits of increased circuit integration:
improved system performance, reduced system size, and lower system cost.
ASICs include conventional gate arrays, standard cells, and programmable
logic devices (PLDs). Conventional gate arrays and standard cell circuits are
customized to perform desired logical functions at the time the device is
manufactured. Since they are "hard wired" at the wafer foundry, conventional
gate arrays and standard cells are subject to the time and expense risks
associated with any development cycle involving a foundry. Typically,
conventional gate arrays and standard cells are first delivered in production
volumes months after the successful production of acceptable prototypes. In
addition, conventional gate arrays and standard cells cannot be modified after
they are manufactured, which subjects them to the risk of inventory obsolescence
and constrains the system manufacturer's ability to change the logic design.
PLDs, on the other hand, are manufactured as standard devices and customized "in
the field" by electronic system manufacturers using computer-aided engineering
(CAE) design and programming systems. PLDs are being used by a growing number of
electronic system manufacturers as a solution to their increasing demands for
differentiation, rapid time to market, and manufacturing flexibility.
PLDs include simple PLDs, complex PLDs (CPLDs), and FPGA. The market for
CPLDs and FPGAs has grown rapidly because they generally offer greater capacity,
lower total cost per usable logic gate, and lower power consumption than TTLs
and simple PLDs, and faster time to market and lower development costs than
conventional gate arrays and standard cells. For many electronic system
manufacturers, the time-to-market and manufacturing-flexibility benefits of
CPLDs and FPGAs outweigh their price premium over conventional gate arrays or
standard cells of comparable capacity.
Before a CPLD or FPGA can be programmed, there are various steps that must
be accomplished by a designer using CAE design software. These steps include
defining the function of the circuit, verifying the design, and laying out the
circuit. Traditionally, logic functions were defined using schematic capture
software, which essentially permit the designer to construct a circuit diagram
on the computer. As CPLD and FPGA have increased in capacity, the time required
to create schematic diagrams using schematic capture tools has often become
prohibitive. To address this problem, designers are increasingly turning to
hardware description languages (HDLs), also known as high-level description
(HLD). VHDL and Verilog are the most common HDLs, which permit the designer to
describe the circuit functions at an abstract level and to verify the
performance of logic functions at that level. The HDL can then be fed into logic
synthesis software that automatically converts the abstract description to a
gate-level representation equivalent to that produced by schematic capture
tools. After a gate-level representation of the logic function has been created
and verified, it must be translated or "layed out" onto the generic logic
modules of the CPLD or FPGA. This is achieved by placing the logic gates and
routing their interconnections, a process referred to as "place and route."
After the layout of the device has been verified by timing simulation, the CPLD
or FPGA can be programmed.
Electronic system manufacturers program a CPLD or FPGA to perform the
desired logical functions by using a device programmer to change the state of
the device's programming elements (such as antifuses or memory cells) through
the application of an electrical signal. Most CPLDs are programmed with erasable
programmable read only memories or other "floating gate" technologies. Many
FPGAs are programmed with static random access memory (SRAM) technology. Actel's
FPGAs use flash and antifuse programming elements. After programming, the
functionality and performance of the programmed CPLD or FPGA in the electronic
system must be verified.
To a large extent, the characteristics of a CPLD or FPGA are dictated by
the technology used to make the device programmable. CPLDs and FPGAs based on
programming elements controlled by floating gates or SRAMs must be configured by
a separate boot device, such as the serial programmable read only memory
commonly used with SRAM FPGAs. The need to boot these devices makes them less
reliable and secure and means they are not functional immediately on power-up,
lose their circuit configurations in the absence of power, and often require a
separate boot device. In addition, SRAM FPGAs and CPLDs based on look-up tables
tend to consume more power. FPGAs based on flash and antifuse programming
elements do not need to be booted-up and are reliable, secure,
"live-at-power-up," nonvolatile, single-chip solutions that operate at low
power. These are all characteristics shared by conventional "hard-wired" ASICs.
The technology used to make a CPLD or FPGA programmable dictates whether
the device is reprogrammable as well whether it's volatile. CPLDs and FPGAs
based on programming elements controlled by floating gates or SRAMs are
reprogrammable but lose their circuit configuration in the absence of electrical
power. FPGAs based on antifuse programming elements are one-time programmable
(OTP) and retain their circuit configuration permanently, even in the absence of
power. FPGAs based on programming elements controlled by flash memory are
reprogrammable and retain their circuit configuration in the absence of power.
Actel Strategy
Actel's flash and antifuse technologies are differentiated from, and have
certain advantages over, the SRAM and other technologies used in competing PLDs.
Actel's strategy is to add value for ASIC users and serve markets in which
Actel's technologies have an advantage, including the ASIC replacement, high
reliability, and high-speed communications markets.
ASIC Replacement
The ASIC replacement market, which is driven primarily by cost, is
addressed by Actel's general purpose FPGAs. Like ASICs, Actel's flash and
antifuse FPGAs are nonvolatile, "live-at-power-up," low-power, single-chip
solutions. Like other programmable devices, Actel's FPGAs reduce design risk,
inventory investment, and time to market. In addition, logic designers can
choose to use either ASIC or FPGA software tools and design methodologies, and
the architectures of Actel's FPGAs enable the utilization of predefined IP
cores, which can be reused across multiple designs or product versions.
High Reliability
The high reliability market, which is driven primarily by nonvolatility,
security, and resistance to radiation effects, is addressed by Actel's military,
avionics, and space-grade FPGAs. Actel is the world's leading supplier of high
reliability PLDs. Actel's antifuse and flash FPGAs are nonvolatile, offer levels
of design security beyond SRAM-based FPGAs and even conventional ASICs, and are
not susceptible to configuration corruption caused by radiation. During 2001,
Actel began shipping RTSX-S FPGAs, the second family of PLDs developed
specifically to address radiation effects. Actel's RadHard family was the first.
High-Speed Communications
Much of the communications market is driven by speed, which has been the
strength of Actel's antifuse FPGAs. To leverage this strength, Actel launched a
"BridgeFPGA" initiative in 2001 to address the input-output (I/O) problems
created within the high-speed communications market by the proliferation of
interface standards. The adoption of these interface standards has created the
need for designers to implement interface bridging functions to connect
incompatible interface standards. {The first BridgeFPGA product will be a
high-speed antifuse FPGA with dedicated high-speed I/O circuits that can support
multiple interface standards. Subsequent BridgeFPGA products are expected to
include embedded high-speed interface protocol controllers.}
Products and Services
Actel's product line consists of FPGAs, including general purpose FPGAs,
high reliability FPGAs, and the recently-announced BridgeFPGA programmable
interface products. {Actel expects to introduce the initial BridgeFPGA product
in 2002.} In support of its FPGAs, Actel offers development tools, including
design software, device programmers, verification and debugging tools, and
prototyping sockets. In addition, Actel makes VariCore embedded programmable
gate array (EPGA) and other IP cores available for licensing and offers design
and programming services.
FPGAs
The capacity of FPGAs is measured in "gates," which traditionally meant
four transistors. As FPGAs grew larger and their architectures more complex,
counting gates became more challenging and no standard counting technique
emerged. The appearance of FPGAs with memory further complicated matters because
memory gates cannot be counted in the same way as logic gates. Unless otherwise
indicated, "gate" or "gates" means "maximum system equivalent gates" when used
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to describe the capacity of FPGAs.
To meet the diverse customer requirements in the broad programmable logic
market, all Actel FPGAs (except the two RadHard devices) are offered in a
variety of speed grades, package types, and/or ambient temperature tolerances.
Commercial devices are guaranteed to operate at ambient temperatures ranging
from 0(degree)C to +70(0)C. Industrial devices are guaranteed to operate at
ambient temperatures ranging from -40(degree)C to +85(degree)C. Military devices
are guaranteed to operate at ambient temperatures ranging from -55(degree)C to
+125(0)C.
General Purpose FPGAs
Actel's general purpose FPGAs include the flash-based ProASIC Plus and
ProASIC families and the antifuse-based eX, SX-A, SX, MX, and legacy
families.
ProASIC Plus
On January 7, 2002, Actel announced the launch of ProASIC Plus,
the second-generation family of flash-based FPGAs. Based on a
0.22-micron process, the single-chip, nonvolatile, in-system
programmable (ISP) ProASIC Plus family consists of six devices ranging
in capacity from 150,000 to 1,000,000 gates. ProASIC Plus devices are
"live at power up," highly secure, and require no separate
configuration memory, all characteristics shared by ASICs. The first
members of the ProASIC Plus family are currently available as
engineering samples.
ProASIC
The ProASIC family of FPGAs, which was first shipped for revenue
in 1999, consists of four products: the 98,000-gate A500K050, the
287,000-gate A500K130, the 369,000-gate A500K180, and the 473,000-gate
A500K270. On April 10, 2001, Actel announced that it had begun
sampling the A500K180 and A500K270 devices. The family is currently
manufactured on a 0.25-micron embedded flash process at Infineon and
offered in three packages. Actel announced the shipment of A500K050
and A500K130 devices qualified to industrial specifications on April
10, 2001, and the shipment of A500K180 and A500K270 devices qualified
to industrial specifications on September 10, 2001.
The flash-based ProASIC family brings the advantages of ASICs and
the benefits of PLDs to designers of high-density logic. Like ASICs,
ProASIC devices are single-chip and live at power up, eliminating the
need for a separate boot device, and operate at low power. Like other
PLDs, ProASIC devices reduce time to market and minimize design risk
and investment, requiring no mask sets or silicon re-spins. Unlike
other PLDs available on the market today, which are either volatile or
non-reprogrammable, ProASIC devices are nonvolatile and
reprogrammable.
ProASIC devices also exhibit a high level of portability between
PLD and ASIC design flows. Actel's ProASIC solutions make it possible
to create high-density systems using existing ASIC or FPGA design
flows and tools, shortening time to production. Conversion to a
standard ASIC is also facilitated by ProASIC's ASIC-like design flow.
In addition, the design methodology enables designers to use IP cores
from proprietary and third-party sources, eliminating much of the
architecture-specific re-engineering required by other PLDs.
eX
The eX family of FPGAs, which was first shipped for revenue in
2001, consists of three devices: the 3,000-gate eX64, the 6,000-gate
eX128, and the 12,000-gate eX256. The family is currently manufactured
on a 0.25-micron antifuse process at UMC. The eX family can be ordered
in approximately 55 speed, package, and temperature variations.
The eX family was designed for the e-appliance market of
internet-related consumer electronics and includes a sleep mode to
conserve battery power. eX devices also provide a small form factor,
high design security, and an undemanding design process. The eX family
is currently positioned as a single-chip programmable replacement for
low-capacity ASICs.
SX-A and SX
The SX-A family of FPGAs, which was first shipped for revenue in
1999, consists of four products: the 12,000-gate A54SX08A, the
24,000-gate A54SX16A, the 48,000-gate A54SX32A, and the 108,000-gate
A54SX72A. The family is currently manufactured on a 0.22-micron
antifuse process at UMC and on a 0.25-micron antifuse process at MEC.
The SX-A family can be ordered in approximately 215 speed, package,
and temperature variations.
The SX family of FPGAs, which was first shipped for revenue in
1998, consists of four products: the 12,000-gate A54SX08, the
24,000-gate A54SX16 and A54SX16P, and the 48,000-gate A54SX32. The SX
family is currently manufactured on a 0.35-micron antifuse process at
Chartered. The SX family can be ordered in approximately 180 speed,
package, and temperature variations.
SX was the first family to be built on Actel's fine-grained, "sea
of modules" architecture, which delivers performance without the power
penalty common to SRAM-based FPGAs. The SX-A and SX families are
currently positioned as programmable devices with ASIC-like speed,
power consumption, and pricing in volume production. In addition, the
SX-A family offers I/O capabilities that provide full support for
"hot-swapping." Hot swapping allows system boards to be exchanged
while systems are running, a capability important to many portable,
consumer, networking, telecommunication, and fault-tolerant computing
applications.
MX
The MX family of FPGAs, which was first shipped for revenue in
1997, consists of six products: the 3,000-gate A40MX02, the 6,000-gate
A40MX04, the 14,000-gate A42MX09, the 24,000-gate A42MX16, the
36,000-gate A42MX24, and the 54,000-gate A42MX36. The family is
currently manufactured on 0.45-micron antifuse processes at Chartered
and Winbond. The MX family can be ordered in approximately 300 speed,
package, and temperature variations.
The MX family was Actel's first line of ASIC-alternative FPGAs
and ramped to volume the fastest of any product in Actel's history.
The largest MX devices include system logic integration functions. The
MX family is currently positioned as a line of low-cost, single-chip,
mixed-voltage programmable ASICs for 5.0-volt applications.
Legacy Products
The MX family includes the best features of Actel's legacy FPGAs
and over time ought to replace those earlier products in new 5.0-volt
commercial designs. Legacy products include the DX, XL, ACT 3, ACT 2,
and ACT 1 families.
DX and XL
The 3200DX family of FPGAs, which was first shipped for
revenue in 1995, consists of five products: the 12,000-gate
A3265DX, the 20,000-gate A32100DX, the 24,000-gate A32140DX, the
36,000-gate A32200DX, and the 52,000-gate A32300DX. The DX family
is currently manufactured on a 0.6-micron antifuse process at
Chartered and can be ordered in approximately 180 speed, package,
and temperature variations.
The 1200XL family of FPGAs, which was first shipped for
revenue in 1995, consists of three products: the 6,000-gate
A1225XL, the 9,000-gate A1240XL, and the 16,000-gate A1280XL. The
XL family is currently manufactured on a 0.6-micron antifuse
process at Chartered and can be ordered in approximately 125
speed, package, and temperature variations.
The DX and XL families were designed to integrate system
logic previously implemented in multiple programmable logic
circuits. The DX family also offers fast dual-port SRAM, which is
typically used for high-speed buffering.
ACT 3
The ACT 3 family of FPGAs, which was first shipped for
revenue in 1993, consists of five products: the 3,000-gate A1415,
the 6,000-gate A1425, the 9,000-gate A1440, the 11,000-gate
A1460, and the 20,000-gate A14100. The family is currently
manufactured on a 0.6-micron antifuse process at Chartered and a
0.8-micron antifuse process at Winbond. The ACT 3 family can be
ordered in approximately 215 speed, package, and temperature
variations. The family was designed for applications requiring
high speed and a high number of I/Os.
ACT 2
The ACT 2 family of FPGAs, which was first shipped for
revenue in 1991, consists of three products: the 6,000-gate
A1225, the 9,000-gate A1240, and the 16,000-gate A1280. The
family is currently manufactured on 1.0- and 0.9-micron antifuse
processes at MEC and can be ordered in approximately 80 speed,
package, and temperature variations. ACT 2 was Actel's
second-generation FPGA family and featured a two-module
architecture optimized for combinatorial and sequential logic
designs.
ACT 1
The ACT 1 family of FPGAs, which was first shipped for
revenue in 1988, consists of two products: the 2,000-gate A1010
and the 4,000-gate A1020. The family is currently manufactured on
1.0- and 0.9-micron antifuse processes at MEC and can be ordered
in approximately 115 speed, package, and temperature variations.
ACT 1 was the original family of antifuse FPGAs.
High Reliability FPGAs
Actel is the world's largest supplier of high reliability PLDs.
Actel's military, avionics, and space-grade FPGAs have advantages over
ASICs that are significant to complex, multi-national and cost-sensitive
military and aerospace programs, including increased flexibility to make
design changes after board layout is complete, shorter lead times, and
lower cost of ownership with fewer vendors to qualify and no up-front
engineering expenses. Since 1990, Actel FPGAs have been designed into
numerous military and aerospace applications, including command and data
handling, attitude reference and control, command and communications
processors, and scientific instrument interfaces. Actel space-qualified
FPGAs have been on board more than 100 launches and flight-unit
applications on more than 300 satellites.
All Actel antifuse FPGAs (except for the three eX devices) are offered
in plastic packages qualified to military temperature specifications. Actel
has received complete Qualified Manufacturers Listing (QML) certification
for the full line of plastic-packaged antifuse FPGAs, which can be
integrated into design applications that would otherwise require
higher-cost ceramic-packaged devices. The QML plastic certification also
permits customers to integrate commercial and military production without
compromising quality or reliability. Actel's MIL/Av, RadTolerant, and
RadHard families are offered in hermetic packages.
MIL/Av
The MIL/Av family of FPGAs consists of fifteen products: the
2,000-gate A1010B, the 4,000-gate A1020B, the 6,000-gate A1425A, the
11,000-gate A1460A, the 16,000-gate A1280A and A1280XL, the
20,000-gate A14100A and A32100DX, the 24,000-gate A32140DX and
A54SX16, the 36,000-gate A32200DX, the 48,000-gate A54SX32 and
A54SX32A, the 54,000-gate A42MX36, and the 108,000-gate A54SX72A.
MIL/Av FPGAs are shipped with Class B (MIL-STD-883) qualification.
RadTolerant
The RadTolerant family of FPGAs consists of nine products: the
4,000-gate RT1020, the 6,000-gate RT1425A, the 11,000-gate RT1460A,
the 16,000-gate RT1280A, the 20,000-gate RT14100A, the 24,000-gate
RT54SX16, the 48,000-gate RT54SX32 and RT54SX32S, and the 108,000-gate
RT54SX72S. RadTolerant FPGAs are offered with Class B through Class E
(extended flow/space) qualification, and total dose radiation test
reports are provided on each segregated lot of devices.
RadTolerant FPGAs are designed to meet the logic requirements for
all types of military, commercial, and civilian space applications,
including satellites, launch vehicles, and deep-space probes. They
provide cost-effective alternatives to radiation-hardened devices. In
addition, RadTolerant devices have design- and pin-compatible
commercial versions for prototyping.
On July 17, 2001, Actel announced the qualification and shipment
of RT54SX32S, the first member of the radiation-tolerant RTSX-S
family, which was specifically designed to address heavy ion-induced
single-event upsets (SEUs) in space. The RTSX-S family is the
industry's first qualified FPGA solution built using SEU-hardened
latches, eliminating the need for user-instantiated triple module
redundancy (TMR). To implement TMR in a traditional FPGA,
approximately two-thirds of the device's available logic (or capacity)
is consumed by redundancy and therefore unavailable for the user's
design. The largest member of the RTSX-S family, the 108,000-gate
RT54SX72S FPGA, more than quadrupled the amount of programmable logic
previously available for applications requiring high SEU resistance.
RadHard
The RadHard family of FPGAs, which was first shipped for revenue
in 1996, consists of two products: the 4,000-gate RH1020 and the
16,000-gate RH1280. The family is manufactured on a radiation-hardened
0.8-micron antifuse process by BAE at its QML facility in Manassas,
Virginia. RadHard devices are shipped with full QML Class V screening.
The RadHard family was designed to meet the demands of applications
requiring guaranteed levels of radiation survivability. Applications
for RadHard FPGAs include military and civilian satellites, deep space
probes, and planetary missions.
BridgeFPGAs
On May 14, 2001, Actel announced its BridgeFPGA initiative, a strategy
to address the interoperability problems created by the proliferation of
high-performance interface standards. Traditionally, interface and
interoperability issues have been solved by FPGAs that are custom designed
for each new system. This, in combination with a proliferation in interface
standards, has resulted in a growing bottleneck. To help alleviate the
bottleneck, Actel is creating a family of devices that bridge multiple
interface protocols.
Exploding system bandwidth requirements have left system designers
with the difficult problem of moving vast quantities of data quickly and
reliably within and between systems. A multitude of high-speed interface
standards have evolved to solve the problem. Each of these new interface
standards has its own features and benefits, addressing the issues of
reliability, bandwidth, cost, and operating distance in different ways to
suit different target applications. Consequently, the adoption of these
interface standards has created the need for designers to implement
interface bridging functions to connect incompatible interface standards.
Actel's BridgeFPGA initiative is aimed at giving designers cost-effective
and easy-to-use solutions to these interfacing problems.
As part of its BridgeFPGA initiative, Actel intends to partner with
key IP providers and application specific standard product (ASSP) vendors
to provide next-generation technology for interfaces. The first of these
partnerships was also announced on May 14, 2001. Tality, a leading provider
of IP, has teamed with Actel to develop FPGAs incorporating versatile,
high-performance physical layer (PHY) communication interfaces. In
addition, Actel has increased its participation in key interface standards
associations.
{BridgeFPGA products will provide designers with access to
high-performance communications interfaces capable of supporting many
standards due to the flexibility of the programmable logic. The initial
BridgeFPGA device, which Actel expects to introduce in 2002, will
incorporate Tality's 3.125 Gbps LVDS transceiver and a high-speed multimode
serializer/deserializer, capabilities critical for many communications
systems. Actel's BridgeFPGA programmable interface products are expected to
also include a handful of highly flexible user-programmable devices that
support multiple I/O capabilities (such as HSTL, LVPECL, and GTL+ in
addition to 3.125 Gbps LVDS) and various embedded interface protocols (such
as Ethernet, Fibre Channel, Infiniband, and RapidI/O)}.
Development Tools
The development tools offered by Actel include design software, device
programmers, verification and debugging tools, and prototyping sockets. These
tools are used in the Actel design flow, which includes design creation, design
implementation, device programming, and system verification. Design software is
used for design creation and implementation; programmers are used to program
devices; and verification and debugging tools and prototyping sockets may be
used for design and system verification.
Actel's Libero design environment integrates the design tools needed to
provide schematic, HDL, and mixed schematic-HDL design flows. Actel's Designer
tool is integrated with third-party schematic and HDL tools to implement and
simulate Actel devices. Programmers execute instructions included in files
obtained from Designer to program Actel FPGAs. Actel's Silicon Explorer II
debugging and verification tool permits real-time probing of a programmed FPGA
as it performs its functions at speed within a system, removing the guesswork
typically associated with the process of system verification. Sockets allow
designers to use antifuse FPGAs in prototype boards without the risk of damaging
the board when replacing a chip.
Design Software
Actel is committed to providing design software integrated with
existing electronic design automation (EDA) software and design flows.
Actel works closely with its EDA partners through the Actel Alliance
program to provide early technical information on new Actel releases so
that Alliance members can offer timely support. The Alliance includes
Aldec, Inc.; Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (Cadence); Innoveda, Inc.
(Innoveda); Mentor Graphics Corp. (Mentor Graphics); SynaptiCAD, Inc.
(SynaptiCAD); Synopsys, Inc. (Synopsys); and Synplicity, Inc. (Synplicity).
Libero
On June 18, 2001, Actel introduced Libero, its next-generation
integrated design environment for FPGA development and design. A
comprehensive design management environment, Libero integrates
industry-leading design tools through a robust, easy-to-navigate
graphical user interface; streamlines the design flow; manages all
design, run, and report files; and passes necessary design data
between tools. Actel's Libero design software includes Innoveda's
DxViewDraw schematic capture tool; SynaptiCAD's WaveFormer Lite test
bench generation system; Model Technology's ModelSim simulation and
design verification software; Synplicity's Synplify synthesis
software; and Actel's Designer place-and-route software.
The Libero tool suite supports all currently released Actel
devices and is available in three versions: Platinum, Gold, and
Silver. The Libero Platinum version is a complete tool suite with
unlimited design capacity and customer support. A Libero Platinum
evaluation version may be used for 45 days free of charge. It includes
all the integrated tools, functionality, and power of Platinum without
the programming capability. The Libero Gold version provides tool
support for users designing system-level devices of 50,000 gates or
less. The Libero Silver version offers tool support from entry to
programming for Actel devices of 10,000 gates or less. The Libero
Silver version does not include simulation, but designers may use
their own simulator without restrictions or compatibility problems.
Libero Silver is offered at no charge to qualified designers for one
year.
On October 31, 2001, Actel announced that Libero had been
enhanced to include support for mixed-mode design entry input, giving
designers the choice of mixing either high-level VHDL or Verilog HDL
language blocks with schematic modules within a design. This
mixed-mode capability has become important as programmable logic
design capacity increases and IP utilization and design reuse become
essential.
On February 25, 2002, Actel announced that Libero supports
Actel's ASIC-replacement ProASIC Plus flash-based FPGA family. Actel
also announced the availability for the first time of the Libero
Silver and Platinum evaluation versions as free downloads from the
Actel Web site.
Designer
Designer is an interactive design implementation tool that allows
designers to import a netlist generated from a third-party CAE tool,
place and route (layout) the design, perform static timing analysis,
extract timing information, and generate a programming file to program
an Actel FPGA. The Designer tool supports all the established EDA
standards and the industry's most popular synthesis, schematic, and
simulation tools. The Designer tool is available in the same Platinum,
Platinum evaluation, Gold, and Silver versions as Libero. Designer
software allows user registration and automatic software updates
through the Actel Web site.
After a design is imported by Designer and the device, package,
and other operating conditions are specified, the design is compiled
to check for design legality, optimize the netlist, and verify that
the design fits into the selected device. If necessary, the designer
can then optimize and customize the design with the User Tools before
running layout. The User Tools include PinEdit, ChipEdit, ProASIC
Layout Viewer, Timer, and Back-Annotate. PinEdit is a graphical
interface that allows designers to view pin locations; manually
assign, edit, and fix pin locations; and customize I/O attributes.
ChipEdit is a graphical interface that allows designers to view a
design's macro placement and edit the placement of both I/O and logic
modules. For the ProASIC family, the ProASIC Layout Viewer displays
the results of place-and-route. Timer is an interactive tool used for
timing verification and to enter timing constraints. Back Annotate is
used to extract timing delays from the post-layout data. These
extracted delays are put into a file to be used by a third-party
timing simulator.
Layout is the process of taking the netlist information and any
constraints and mapping this information into the selected Actel
device. Physical locations are assigned to unassigned I/O and logic
modules (placement), routing tracks are assigned to nets (routing),
and detailed delays are calculated for all paths (delay extraction).
Designer supports two modes of layout, standard and timing-driven.
Standard layout maximizes the average performance for all paths. With
timing-driven layout, the primary goal is to meet delay constraints
set in Timer or in a delay constraint file. Timing-driven layout is
more precise and typically results in higher performance. If layout
fails at any stage, Designer provides information that can be used to
determine and correct the problem. Following layout, Designer
generates the programming files.
Designer graphically displays the completed steps of the design
implementation process, keeps track of the information required to
begin each step, and prompts the designer through all of the necessary
steps of the flow. Designer's pin, timing, status, and other reports
provide frequently-used information in convenient formats. Designer
includes ACTgen, a graphical macro generation tool that creates
optimized logic elements that can be included in schematic and
synthesis designs. Architecture-specific rules control the generation
of the macros, so no logic verification is required. The Designer
software also allows designers to run scripts in Tcl (Tool Command
Language) for simple or complex tasks.
Device Programmers
All Actel FPGAs can be programmed by Silicon Sculptor programmers.
Actel's flash FPGAs can also be programmed by the Flash Pro Programmer. In
addition, Actel supports programmers offered by third parties, including BP
Microsystems Inc., Data I/O Corporation, and System General Corporation.
Flash Pro
On January 7, 2002, Actel announced the availability of the Flash
Pro programmer, which provides ISP for Actel's flash-based FPGA
families. Designers can configure Actel's ProASIC and ProASIC Plus
FPGAs using only the portable Flash Pro programmer and a cable
connected to either the parallel or USB port of a PC. The low-cost
Flash Pro programmer gives users access to the ISP capability of the
new ProASIC Plus devices for in-the-field upgrades to communications,
industrial, and avionics designs. The ISP feature uses the IEEE
standard 1149.1 Joint Test Action Group (JTAG) interface, which
permits devices to be programmed after they are mounted on a PCB,
simplifies the handling of high pin-count devices, eliminates sockets,
and allows higher board performance. Flash Pro also supports the JEDEC
Standard Test and Programming Language (STAPL), which makes the
programmer independent of any specific programming algorithms. The
Flash Pro programmer will support new devices immediately upon release
with a new STAPL file, eliminating the need to wait for programmer
algorithm upgrades.
Silicon Sculptor
Actel offers single- and six-site versions of the Silicon
Sculptor programmer. The compact size of the Silicon Sculptor permits
designers to program Actel FPGAs from their desktop PC rather than in
a lab. Up to 12 Actel devices can be concurrently programmed from a
single PC by daisy chaining two six-site Silicon Sculptors together
with an expansion cable. The six-site Silicon Sculptor, which is
designed to meet the demands of high-volume production environments,
programs devices independently to achieve the fastest possible
programming times. A single adapter module can be used to program all
Actel antifuse or flash devices within a package type, regardless of
pinout.
Verification and Debugging Tools
Actel's Silicon Explorer II diagnostic and verification tool kit
shortens the FPGA design verification process by rapidly isolating
functional and timing problems. Silicon Explorer II enables control of the
ActionProbe circuitry, a patented architectural feature built into all of
Actel's antifuse devices that allows access to any internal node from
selected external pins. Silicon Explorer II attaches to the standard COM
port of a PC and can be used by designers to view all of the observable
nets in a programmed FPGA, select specific nodes to probe, and observe
signal activity for both probe outputs and up to 16 additional signals on
the target system. Actel also offers Silicon Explorer II Lite, a less
expensive version of Silicon Explorer II for customers who have invested in
a logic analysis system. Silicon Explorer II Lite enables internal node
viewing and selection, but relies on an external scope or logic analyzer to
display signal activity.
Prototyping Sockets
Actel offers a range of surface-mount sockets, which make it easier
for designers to prototype their designs using Actel's antifuse FPGAs. By
using these sockets when prototyping designs, designers can avoid having to
desolder FPGAs from PCBs, which is time-consuming and can potentially
damage the PCBs. Sockets are available in prototype quantities from Actel
and in production quantities from Actel-qualified socket manufacturers.
VariCore EPGAs
On February 19, 2001, Actel introduced its new VariCore EPGA star IP cores
for system-on-a-chip (SoC) applications. The VariCore EPGA cores are the first
available commercial embeddable and reconfigurable "soft hardware" IP products
broadly offered to the ASIC and ASSP market. VariCore EPGA cores help reduce
design time and costs and increase SoC design flexibility, in part by enabling
version variants of the same product. VariCore EPGA logic is a versatile and
efficient embedded FPGA core architecture that provides scaleable
reprogrammability for ASICs and ASSPs. These EPGA blocks have been designed in
0.18-micron SRAM technology. VariCore programmable logic is proven in silicon
and three of the world's leading wafer foundries are supporting EPGA
reprogrammable cores: UMC and TSMC in Taiwan and Chartered in Singapore. Pricing
for VariCore EPGA cores will vary and follow the "star IP" sliding scale model
of license plus royalties.
On May 21, 2001, Actel announced a joint effort in the area of embedded IP
test with LogicVision, a leading provider of embedded test IP solutions. The
companies will work together to offer a complete embedded self-test solution to
users of Actel's VariCore EPGA IP cores. VariCore EPGA cores provide designers
with the ability to add reconfigurability to ASIC and ASSP SoC applications.
LogicVision's embedded test capability delivers testability throughout the
design, manufacturing, and system phases of the product application on both
conventional and low-cost testers.
On September 17, 2001, Actel announced that it had joined The Virtual
Component Exchange (VCX) and will use the VCX IP supply chain software solution
to market its VariCore EPGA cores. VCX TradeFloor tools link the engineering,
procurement, and legal functions of buyers and sellers by internet with a common
toolset and language. Alignment of data evaluation, access, and contracting
protocols between buyers and sellers accelerates the speed of semiconductor IP
transactions.
On December 3, 2001, Actel announced the creation of the VariCore Design
Alliance, a worldwide program to train, certify, and support independent ASIC
design services companies in the proficient use of Actel's VariCore EPGA IP
cores. The program's goal is to provide SoC designers with the background and
expertise necessary to integrate embedded FPGAs into complex system-level
designs. Tality, the world's largest independent SoC design services and IP
provider, signed on as the program's anchor member. On December 10, 2001, Actel
announced the addition of six new members to the VariCore Design Alliance.
I P Cores
Through third party strategic relationships and internally developed IP,
Actel offers cores targeted for the communications, consumer, industrial, and
aerospace markets. The IP cores currently offered to Actel customers includes
ten bus interface, fourteen communications, two peripheral component interface
(PCI), and six processor and peripheral cores, all of which are available in
either register transfer level (RTL) or netlist format. Currently, six cores are
available for evaluation or licensing from Actel, eleven cores are available
from Inicore AG (Inicore), and fifteen cores are available from Inventra, a
division of Mentor Graphics. IP developed by Inicore and Inventra are licensed
directly from them.
The architectures of Actel's flash- and antifuse-based FPGAs facilitate the
porting of high-level IP cores, enabling system level integration. The secure
nature of Actel's FPGAs means that IP can be safely integrated and guarded from
reverse engineering or piracy. ProASIC FPGAs are user programmed with a
multi-bit key that blocks external attempts to read or alter the configuration
settings. Decapping and stripping of the ProASIC device reveals only the
structure of the flash cell, not the contents. Antifuse FPGAs do not need a
start-up bitstream, eliminating the possibility of configuration data being
intercepted. The antifuses that form the interconnections within an Actel FPGA
do not leave an observable signature that can be electrically probed or visually
inspected. With these safeguards, Actel devices are almost impervious to copying
and reverse engineering.
Services
Actel offers design and volume programming services. With Actel's
acquisition of the Protocol Design Services Group from GateField in August 1998,
Actel became the first FPGA provider to offer system-level design expertise to
its customers. The Protocol Design Services organization operates out of a
secure facility located in Mt. Arlington, New Jersey, and is certified to handle
government, military, and proprietary designs. Actel also programs significant
volumes of FPGAs each month for its customers. This makes Actel devices "virtual
ASICs" from the customer's point of view.
Protocol Design Services
Actel's Protocol Design Services organization has a successful history
providing hardware and software design services for companies throughout
the world. It provides varying levels of design services to customers,
including FPGA, ASIC, and system design; software development and
implementation; and development of prototypes, first articles, and
production units. The Design Services team has participated in the
development of optical networks, routers, cellular phones, digital cameras,
embedded DSP systems, automotive electronics, navigation systems,
compilers, custom processors, and avionics systems.
Volume Programming
Actel offers high volume programming for all Actel device and package
types in its state-of-the-art-programming center, which is located at the
factory in Sunnyvale, California. Actel's facility is ISO-9002, PURE, QML,
and STACK certified (see "BUSINESS -- Manufacturing and Assembly"),
permitting Actel to meet customer requirements for high-quality programmed
devices. Complete documentation and tractability are provided throughout
the programming process, including first article approval. Volume
programming charges are based on the type of device and quantity per order.
Market and Applications
In 2001, FPGAs accounted for 97% of Actel's net revenues, virtually all of
which was derived from the sale of antifuse FPGAs. FPGAs can be used in a broad
range of applications across nearly all electronic system market segments. Most
customers use Actel's FPGAs in low to medium volumes in the final production
form of their products. Some high-volume electronic system manufacturers use
Actel FPGAs as a prototyping vehicle and convert production to lower-cost ASICs,
while others with time-to-market constraints use Actel FPGAs in the initial
production and then convert to lower-cost ASICs. As product life cycles continue
to shorten, foundry capacity becomes more expensive, and manufacturing
efficiencies for FPGAs increase, some high-volume electronic system
manufacturers are electing to retain FPGAs in volume production because
conversion to ASICs may not yield sufficiently attractive savings before the
electronic system reaches the end of its life.
In general, Actel's antifuse FPGAs are appropriate for high-speed
communications, military and space, computer, and consumer applications, and
Actel's flash FPGAs are better suited for general communications, avionics, and
industrial applications.
Communications
In 2001, communications accounted for an estimated 49% of Actel's net
revenues. Increasingly complex equipment must frequently be designed to fit in
the space occupied by previous product generations. In addition, the rapidly
changing communications environment rewards short development times and early
market entry. The high density, high performance, and low power consumption of
antifuse FPGAs make them appropriate for use in high-speed communications
equipment. The high capacity, low cost, low power consumption, and
reprogrammability of flash FPGAs make them suitable for use in other
communications applications. Representative customers of Actel in the
communications market include: Alcatel; Cisco; Marconi; and Nortel.
On August 27, 2001, Actel announced that Ipsil will implement its
IPMicro8932 chip within the eX family. Ipsil chose the eX family because of its
small packaging, flexibility, performance, reliability, and security. Ipsil's
IPMicro8932 chip also requires low power. IPMicro8932 is an enhanced
transmission-control protocol controller with a 10BaseT Ethernet interface.
Military and Aerospace
In 2001, military and aerospace accounted for an estimated 26% of Actel's
net revenues. Rigorous quality and reliability standards, stringent volume
requirements, and the need for design security are characteristics of the
military and aerospace market. Actel FPGAs have high quality and reliability and
are almost impervious to copying and reverse engineering, making them
appropriate for many military and aerospace applications. For these reasons,
Actel is the world's leading supplier of military and aerospace PLDs.
Representative customers of Actel in the military and aerospace market include:
BAE; Boeing; Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation; Honeywell; and Lockheed
Martin.
Actel's antifuse FPGAs are especially well suited for space applications,
due to the high radiation tolerance of the antifuse and the Actel FPGA
architecture. Actel's antifuse FPGAs were first designed into a space mission in
1991. Since then, thousands of Actel's programmable logic circuits have
performed flight-critical functions aboard manned space vehicles, earth
observation satellites, and deep-space probes. Actel's FPGAs often perform
mission-critical functions on important scientific missions in space. They have,
for example, been aboard numerous Mars exploration missions, were included in
the controlling electronics for the Mars Pathfinder Rover, and are performing
functions on the Hubbell Space Telescope. Actel participates in programs
administered by the National Aeronautics Space Administration's (NASA's)
Goddard, Johnson, and Marshall Space Flight Centers (including the Space Shuttle
and the International Space Station) as well as programs at California Institute
of Technology's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. However, Actel's success has not been
limited to the United States. Today, Actel's FPGAs can be found on board and in
spacecraft launched by virtually every civilian space agency around the world,
including the European Space Agency and the Japanese National Space Development
Agency.
On March 26, 2001, Actel announced that it had played a significant role in
the Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous (NEAR) Shoemaker mission, providing
programmable logic that enabled mission managers to navigate the spacecraft to
the surface of asteroid Eros and collect scientific data from the asteroid
surface and surrounding environment. NASA's NEAR Shoemaker spacecraft was the
first spacecraft ever to land, or even attempt to land, on an asteroid. Actel
high-reliability FPGAs played an important role in the command, telemetry, and
scientific data collection aspects of the mission.
Industrial
In 2001, industrial control and instrumentation applications accounted for
an estimated 19% of Actel's net revenues. Industrial control and instrumentation
applications often require complex electronic functions tailored to specific
needs. FPGAs offer programmability and high density, making them attractive to
this segment of the electronic equipment market. Representative customers of
Actel in the industrial market include: Abbott Laboratories; Agilent
Technologies, Inc.; GE Medical Systems; Siemens; Varian Medical Systems, Inc;
and VISTA Controls.
On March 14, 2002, Actel announced that Silicon Recognition has chosen to
implement a version of its zero instruction set computing (ZISC) solution with
Actel's A500K050 and A500K130 ProASIC devices. Silicon Recognition's ZISC
solution, a proprietary ASIC, is designed to provide the ultra-fast pattern
recognition, information classification, and matching performance required for
next-generation, real-time smart devices, such as security cameras and
health-monitoring equipment.
Computer
In 2001, computer systems and peripherals accounted for an estimated 3% of
Actel's net revenues. The computer systems market is intensely competitive,
placing a premium on early market entry for new products. FPGAs reduce the time
to market and facilitate early completion of production models so that
development of hardware and software can occur in parallel. Representative
customers of Actel in the computer market include: Analogic Corporation; Compaq;
Dialogic Corporation; Matrox Graphics Inc.; Sensis Corporation; and Sky
Computer.
On May 21, 2001, Actel announced that MARGI Systems, Inc., a leading
provider of multimedia products for mobile computing, selected Actel's A54SX08A
FPGA for the hardware module in its new "Presenter-to-Go" product.
Presenter-to-Go enables business professionals to make PowerPoint presentations
from a Handspring Visor without the use of a personal computer. Actel's SX-A
family was selected for the Presenter-to-Go application due to the hot-swap
compliant I/Os and the low-power features of the architecture.
On March 4, 2002, Actel announced that NetVision, a supplier of giant
light-emitting diode (LED) screens, selected Actel's A54SX72A FPGA for
NetVision's new Magitron range of giant color outdoor LEDs. The screens utilize
SX-A FPGAs for display circuit control and color correction management. The
Magitron circuit design specifications required a logic integration device that
offered high performance, design security, and low power consumption.
Consumer
In 2001, consumer applications accounted for an estimated 3% of Actel's net
revenues. The high performance, low power consumption, and low cost of antifuse
FPGAs make them appropriate for use in products enabling the portability of the
internet, or "e-appliances," and other high-volume electronic systems targeted
for consumers. E-appliance applications include MP3 "music-off-the-internet"
players, digital cable set-top boxes, DSL and cable modems, digital cameras,
digital film, multimedia products, and smart-card readers. Like the computer
market, the market for consumer and e-appliance products places a premium on
early market entry for new products and is characterized by short product life
cycles. Representative customers of Actel in the consumer market include: Datel,
Inc.; Samsung; Sanyo; and Shinyoung Precision Co., Ltd.
On October 16, 2001, Actel announced a technology relationship with
e.Digital Corp. that will allow e.Digital's proprietary design to be produced
within Actel's eX FPGAs. e.Digital's new solution is designed to increase
reliability and reduce the board space required for implementation of advanced
digital voice and music recorder/player functionality in small portable devices,
such as portable internet music players and personal digital jukeboxes.
Sales and Distribution
Actel maintains a worldwide, multi-tiered selling organization that
includes a direct sales force, independent sales representatives, and
electronics distributors. Actel's North American sales force consists of 50
sales and administrative personnel and field application engineers (FAEs)
operating from 22 sales offices located in major metropolitan areas. Direct
sales personnel call on target accounts and support direct original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs). Besides overseeing the activities of direct sales
personnel, Actel's sales managers also oversee the activities of 20 sales
representative firms that operate from approximately 50 office locations. The
sales representatives concentrate on selling to major industrial companies in
North America. To service smaller, geographically dispersed accounts in North
America, Actel has distributor agreements with Pioneer and Unique. Pioneer and
Unique have approximately 39 and 28 offices in North America, respectively.
Actel generates a significant portion of its revenues from international
sales. Sales to customers outside the United States accounted for 38% of net
revenues in 2001. Sales to European customers accounted for 28% of net revenues
in 2001. Actel's European sales organization consists of 22 employees operating
from four sales offices and 11 distributors and sales representatives having
approximately 23 offices (including Unique, which has seven offices in Europe).
Sales to Japan and other international customers accounted for 10% of net
revenues in 2001. Actel's Pan-Asia sales organization consists of seven
employees operating from three sales offices and nine distributors and sales
representatives having approximately 20 offices (including Unique, which has
nine offices in Pan-Asia). Actel's International sales organization consists of
two employees operating from two sales offices and four distributors and sales
representatives (including Unique).
Actel's sales cycle for the initial sale of a design system is generally
lengthy and often requires the ongoing participation of sales, engineering, and
managerial personnel. After a sales representative or distributor evaluates a
customer's logic design requirements and determines if there is an application
suitable for Actel's FPGAs, the next step typically is a visit to the qualified
customer by a regional sales manager or the FAE from Actel or its distributor.
The sales manager or FAE may then determine that additional analysis is required
by engineers based at Actel's headquarters.
Sales made through distributors accounted for 68% of Actel's net revenues
in 2001. Pioneer and Unique accounted for 20% and 19%, respectively, of Actel's
net revenues in 2001. Actel consolidated its distribution channel during 2001 by
terminating Arrow Electronics, Inc. (Arrow), which accounted for 13% of Actel's
net revenues in 2001. As is common in the semiconductor industry, Actel
generally grants price protection to distributors. Under this policy,
distributors are granted a credit upon a price reduction for the difference
between their original purchase price for products in inventory and the reduced
price. From time to time, distributors are also granted credit on an individual
basis for an approved price reductions on specific transactions to meet
competition. Actel also generally grants distributors limited rights to return
products. To date, product returns under this policy have not been material.
Actel maintains reserves against which these credits and returns are charged.
Because of its price protection and return policies, Actel does not recognize
revenue on products sold to distributors until the products are resold to end
customers.
Backlog
At January 6, 2002, Actel's backlog was approximately $22.3 million,
compared with approximately $44.4 million at December 31, 2000. Actel includes
in its backlog all OEM orders scheduled for delivery over the next nine months
and all distributor orders scheduled for delivery over the next six months.
Actel sells standard products that may be shipped from inventory within a short
time after receipt of an order. Actel's business, and to a large extent that of
the entire semiconductor industry, is characterized by short-term order and
shipment schedules rather than volume purchase contracts. In accordance with
industry practice, Actel's backlog may be cancelled or rescheduled by the
customer on short notice without significant penalty. As a result, Actel's
backlog may not be indicative of actual sales and therefore should not be used
as a measure of future revenues.
Customer Service and Support
Actel believes that superior customer service and technical support are
essential for success in the FPGA market. Actel facilitates service and support
through service team meetings that address particular aspects of the overall
service strategy and support. The most significant areas of customer service and
technical support are regularly measured. Actel's customer service organization
emphasizes prompt, accurate responses to questions about product delivery and
order status.
Actel's FAEs located in Canada, England, France, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan,
and the United States provide technical support to customers worldwide. This
network of experts is augmented by FAEs working for Actel's sales
representatives and distributors throughout the world. Customers in any stage of
design can also obtain assistance from Actel's technical support hotline or the
online interactive automated technical support system. In addition, Actel offers
technical seminars on its products and comprehensive training classes on its
software.
Actel generally warrants that its FPGAs will be free from defects in
material and workmanship for one year, and that its software will conform to
Actel's published specifications for 90 days. To date, Actel has not experienced
significant warranty returns.
Manufacturing and Assembly
Actel's strategy is to utilize third-party manufacturers for its wafer
requirements, which permits Actel to allocate its resources to product design,
development, and marketing. Wafers used in Actel's FPGAs are manufactured by BAE
in Manassas, Virginia; by Chartered in Singapore; by Infineon in Germany; by MEC
in Japan; by UMC in Taiwan; and by Winbond in Taiwan. Actel's FPGAs in
production are manufactured by BAE using 0.8-micron design rules; by Chartered
using 0.6-, 0.45-, and 0.35-micron design rules; by Infineon using 0.25-micron
design rules; by MEC using 1.0-, 0.9-, 0.8-, and 0.25-micron design rules; by
UMC using 0.22-micron design rules; and by Winbond using 0.8- and 0.45-micron
design rules.
Wafers purchased by Actel from its suppliers are assembled, tested, marked,
and inspected by Actel and/or a subcontractor of Actel before shipment to
customers. Actel assembles most of its plastic commercial products in Hong Kong,
Korea, and Singapore. Hermetic package assembly, which is often required for
military applications, is performed at one or more subcontractor manufacturing
facilities, some of which are in the United States.
Actel is committed to continuous improvement in its products, processes,
and systems and to conforming its quality and reliability systems to
internationally recognized standards and requirements. Actel is ISO 9002, QML,
STACK, and PURE certified. ISO 9002 and QML certification are granted by the
Defense Supply Center, Columbus, Ohio (DSCC). ISO certification provides a
globally recognized benchmark that Actel's devices have been certified for
integrity in the manufacturing and test process. QML certification confirms that
Actel has an approved quality system and control of its processes and procedures
according to the standards set forth in the MIL-PRF-38535. In addition, many
suppliers of microelectronic components have implemented QML as their primary
worldwide business standard. STACK International members consist of a
distinguished worldwide group of major electronic equipment manufacturers
serving the high-reliability and communications markets. Certification as a
STACK International supplier confirms that Actel's standard qualification
procedure and product monitor program and manufacturing process meet or exceed
the required specification. PURE, which stands for PEDs (plastic encapsulated
devices) Used in Rugged Environments, is an association of European equipment
makers dedicated to quality and reliability. Actel's PURE certification is for
plastic quad flat pack packages.
On May 29, 2001, Actel announced the availability of new chip-scale (CS)
packages for the eX family of FPGAs. The eX products were already utilized in
portable designs due to the family's small packaging and low power features. The
new CS packages provided the smallest footprint in the industry for devices of
comparable density. On January 28, 2002, Actel announced the availability of
lead-free packaging options for the ProASIC, eX, and SX-A FPGA families. The new
lead-free packages offer environment-friendly alternatives to standard
lead-based packages at the same prices.
Strategic Relationships
Actel enjoys ongoing strategic relationships with its customers,
distributors and sales representatives, and foundries, assembly houses, and
other suppliers of goods and services, including the following:
Chartered
On August 28, 2001, Actel announced the availability of its SRAM-based
VariCore EPGA IP cores on the 0.18-micron process from Chartered. VariCore EPGA
IP cores are targeted for use in ASIC and ASSP SoC devices to help speed
products to market and increase the life of those products once in the market.
See "BUSINESS -- Products and Services -- VariCore EPGAs." VariCore EPGAs are
available for license by Actel directly to Chartered customers.
Faraday Technology Corporation (Faraday)
On September 10, 2001, Actel and Faraday announced a low-risk,
cost-effective conversion path from current and future generations of Actel's
single-chip, flash-based ProASIC FPGAs to standard cell ASICs using a standard
cell CMOS process. Compared with a masked-PLD (MPLD) or conventional gate array
migration process, standard cell ASICs offer higher densities and reduced costs.
The new conversion path allows companies to take products to market quickly and
then lower the system cost without taking the risks typically associated with
ASIC design conversions.
First Silicon Solutions (FS2)
On January 7, 2002, Actel and FS2 announced the availability of the Flash
Pro programmer, which provides ISP for Actel's flash-based ProASIC FPGA
families, including the new ProASIC Plus family. See "BUSINESS -- Products and
Services -- Development Tools -- Programmers -- Flash Pro." FS2, working closely
with Actel, delivered a complete programming solution that gives designers
access to an ISP ASIC-alternative when designing complex applications for the
industrial, communications, networking, and avionics markets.
Mentor Graphics and Model Technology
On July 2, 2001, Actel and Model Technology, a Mentor Graphics company,
announced an OEM agreement to provide Actel customers with ModelSim, a leading
language-neutral simulation tool. Actel integrates ModelSim into Libero,
allowing customers to easily access the simulation tool when developing and
designing Actel FPGAs. See "BUSINESS -- Products and Services -- Development
Tools -- Design Software -- Libero." On January 7, 2002, Actel and Mentor
Graphics announced that Mentor's LeonardoSpectrum synthesis tool supports
Actel's new ProASIC Plus family of flash-based FPGAs. LeonardoSpectrum offers
optimization and technology mapping of HDL designs to architecture-specific
resources in ProASIC Plus devices.
Synopsys
On May 30, 2001, Actel announced that Synopsys' Design Compiler synthesis
tool supports Actel's ProASIC 500K devices. The addition of Design Compiler
libraries to the ProASIC design kit enables ASIC designers to work within
Synopsys' ASIC synthesis environment while leveraging the benefits of Actel's
reprogrammable ProASIC devices, including shorter and more efficient design
cycles. On January 7, 2002, Actel announced that Synopsys' Design Compiler
synthesis tool supports Actel's new ProASIC Plus family of flash-based FPGAs.
Synplicity
On April 12, 2000, Actel and Synplicity announced the renewal of their
long-term strategic alliance by signing a multi-year OEM agreement. Under the
terms of the five-year agreement, Actel will bundle Synplicity's Synplify FPGA
synthesis software into its development tools. See "BUSINESS -- Products and
Services -- Development Tools -- Design Software -- Libero." As a result,
designers using Actel devices will continue to have access to the performance
and quality of results offered by Synplicity's FPGA synthesis software. On
January 7, 2002, Actel and Synplicity announced optimized support in
Synplicity's Synplify software products for Actel's new ProASIC Plus family.
Synplicity's Synplify product performs technology mapping of HDL-based designs
directly into ProASIC Plus devices.
Tality
On May 14, 2001, Actel and Tality, a subsidiary of Cadence, announced a
strategic technology partnership that will result in the development of
technology aimed at the high-speed communications market. Actel and Tality, the
largest provider of IP and engineering services, are leveraging Actel's FPGA
devices to develop products incorporating versatile PHY communication
interfaces. {This agreement supports Actel's BridgeFPGA corporate initiative,
under which Actel will deliver next-generation communications interface
solutions optimized to meet designers' increasing bridging requirements. See
"BUSINESS -- Products and Services -- FPGAs -- BridgeFPGAs."}
UMC
On February 19, 2001, Actel announced that it had joined UMC's Gold IPSM
program with Actel's VariCore EPGA star IP cores. See "BUSINESS -- Products and
Services -- VariCore EPGAs." Concurrently, Actel taped out a VariCore EPGA IP
test chip in UMC's 0.18-micron fab in Taiwan. VariCore IP is the first complete
(front end to back end), commercially available product of its kind in
0.18-micron technology. VariCore EPGAs are available for license by Actel
directly to UMC customers.
Research and Development
In 2001, Actel spent $38.2 million on research and development, which
represented 29% of net revenues. Actel's research and development expenditures
are divided among circuit design, software development, and process technology
activities, all of which are involved in the development of new products based
on existing or emerging technologies. In the areas of circuit design and process
technology, Actel's research and development activities also involve continuing
efforts to reduce the cost and improve the performance of current products,
including "shrinks" of the design rules under which such products are
manufactured. Actel's software research and development activities include
enhancing the functionality, usability, and availability of high-level CAE tools
and IP cores in a complete and automated desktop design environment on popular
PC and workstation platforms.
During 2001, Actel introduced embeddable reprogrammable EPGA logic cores
based on SRAM technology. See "BUSINESS -- Products and Services -- VariCore
EPGAs." Actel also announced its next-generation antifuse products. See
"BUSINESS -- Products and Services -- FPGAs -- BridgeFPGAs" and "BUSINESS --
Strategic Partners -- Tality." Actel publicly disclosed in 2001 that it was also
working on next-generation flash and high reliability products, but provided no
details regarding those research and development projects.
Competition
The FPGA market is highly competitive, and Actel expects that competition
will continue to increase as the market grows. Actel's competitors include
suppliers of standard TTLs and custom-designed ASICs, including conventional
gate arrays, standard cells, simple PLDs, CPLDs, and FPGAs. Of these, Actel
competes principally with suppliers of conventional gate arrays, standard cells,
CPLDs, and FPGAs.
The primary advantages of conventional gate arrays and standard cells are
high capacity, high density, high speed, and low cost in production volumes.
Actel competes with conventional gate array and standard cell suppliers by
offering lower design costs, shorter design cycles, and reduced inventory risks.
However, some customers elect to design and prototype with Actel's products and
then convert to conventional gate arrays or standard cells to achieve lower
costs for volume production. For this reason, Actel also faces competition from
companies that specialize in converting CPLDs and FPGAs, including Actel
products, into conventional gate arrays or standard cells.
Actel also competes with suppliers of CPLDs. Suppliers of these devices
include Altera Corporation (Altera) and Lattice-Vantis Semiconductor Corporation
(Lattice). The circuit architecture of CPLDs may give them a performance
advantage in certain lower capacity applications, although Actel believes that
its FPGAs compete favorably with CPLDs. However, Altera and Lattice are larger
than Actel, offer broader product lines to more extensive customer bases, and
have significantly greater financial, technical, sales, and other resources. In
addition, many newer CPLDs are reprogrammable, which permits customers to reuse
a circuit multiple times during the design process. While Actel's flash FPGAs
are reprogrammable, antifuse FPGAs are OTP, permanently retaining their
programmed configuration. No assurance can be given that Actel will be able to
overcome these competitive disadvantages.
Actel competes most directly with established FPGA suppliers, such as
Xilinx, Inc. (Xilinx), Altera, and Lattice (which purchased the FPGA business of
Agere Systems, Inc. in 2002). While Actel believes its products and technologies
are superior to those of Xilinx (as well as Altera and Lattice) in many
applications requiring greater speed, lower cost, nonvolatility, lower power,
and/or greater security, Xilinx is significantly larger than Actel, offers a
broader product line to a more extensive customer base, and has substantially
greater financial, technical, sales, and other resources. In addition, the FPGAs
of Xilinx, Altera, and Lattice are reprogrammable. No assurance can be given
that Actel will be able to overcome these competitive disadvantages.
Several companies have marketed antifuse-based FPGAs, including QuickLogic
Corporation (QuickLogic). In 1995, Actel acquired the antifuse FPGA business of
TI, which was the only second-source supplier of Actel products. Xilinx, which
is a licensee of certain Actel patents, introduced antifuse-based FPGAs in 1995
and abandoned its antifuse FPGA business in 1996. Cypress Semiconductor
Corporation, which was a licensed second source of QuickLogic, sold its antifuse
FPGA business to QuickLogic in 1997. Actel believes that it compete favorably
with QuickLogic, which is also a licensee of certain Actel patents. See
"BUSINESS -- Patents and Licenses."
Actel believes that important competitive factors in its market are price;
performance; capacity (total number of usable gates); density (concentration of
usable gates); ease of use and functionality of development tools; installed
base of development tools; reprogrammability; strength of sales organization and
channels; adaptability of products to specific applications and IP; ease, speed,
cost, and consistency of programming; length of research and development cycle
(including migration to finer process geometries); number of I/Os; reliability;
security; wafer fabrication and assembly capacity; availability of packages,
adapters, sockets, programmers, and IP; technical service and support; and
utilization of intellectual property laws. Failure of Actel to compete
successfully in any of these or other areas could have a materially adverse
effect on its business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Patents and Licenses
As of March 31, 2002, Actel had 192 United States patents and applications
pending for an additional 56 United States patents. Actel also had 50 foreign
patents and applications pending for 122 patents outside the United States.
Actel's patents cover, among other things, Actel's basic circuit architecture,
antifuse structure, and programming method. Actel expects to continue filing
patent applications as appropriate to protect its proprietary technologies.
Actel believes that patents, along with such factors as innovation,
technological expertise, and experienced personnel, will become increasingly
important.
On March 29, 2001, Unisys Corporation (Unisys) brought suit in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division
(Court), against Actel seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. Actel and
Unisys orally agreed to settle the case on April 25, 2001, and executed a
definitive written settlement agreement on June 29, 2001. The Court dismissed
the case with prejudice on July 13, 2001. The settlement was immaterial to
Actel's business, financial condition, and operating results.
In connection with the settlement of patent litigation in 1993, Actel and
Xilinx entered into a Patent Cross License Agreement (Xilinx Agreement), under
which Xilinx was granted a license under certain Actel patents that permits
Xilinx to make and sell antifuse-based PLDs, and Actel was granted a license
under certain Xilinx patents to make and sell SRAM-based PLDs. In 1996, Xilinx
discontinued its antifuse-based FPGA product line.
In 1995, Actel and BTR, Inc. (BTR) entered into a License Agreement
pursuant to which BTR licensed its proprietary technology to Actel for
development and use in FPGAs and certain multichip modules. As partial
consideration for the grant of the license, Actel pays to BTR non-refundable
advance royalties. Actel has also employed the principals of BTR to assist Actel
in its development and implementation of the licensed technology.
In connection with the settlement of patent litigation in 1998, Actel and
QuickLogic entered into a Patent Cross License Agreement that protects the
products of both companies that were first offered for sale on or before
September 4, 2000, or that are future generations of such products reflecting
the evolution of such products in the ordinary course of business. In 1998,
Actel also entered into a patent litigation settlement agreement with the
Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation.
As is typical in the semiconductor industry, Actel has been and expects to
be notified from time to time of claims that it may be infringing patents owned
by others. During 2001, Actel held discussions regarding potential patent
infringement issues with several third parties, some of which have significantly
greater financial and intellectual property resources than Actel. When probable
and reasonably estimable, Actel has made provision for the estimated settlement
costs of claims for alleged infringement. The provision is based on an estimated
royalty rate applied to shipments made in the periods and to or from the
geographic areas under dispute. In the absence of facts or circumstances unique
to a particular dispute, the royalty rate is estimated based on Actel's
understanding of royalty rates other technology companies typically agree to pay
in similar types of disputes. As it has in the past, Actel may obtain licenses
under patents that it is alleged to infringe. While Actel believes that
reasonable resolution will occur, there can be no assurance that these claims
will be resolved or that the resolution of these claims will not have a
materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results
of operations. In addition, Actel's evaluation of the impact of these pending
disputes could change based upon new information learned by Actel. {Subject to
the foregoing, Actel does not believe that any pending patent dispute is likely
to have a materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or
results of operations.}
Employees
At the end of 2001, Actel had 521 regular employees, including 143 in
marketing, sales, and customer support; 167 in research and development; 157 in
operations; 17 in Protocol Design Services; and 37 in administration and
finance. Net revenues were approximately $279,000 per employee for 2001. Actel
has no employees represented by a labor union, has not experienced any work
stoppages, and believes that its employee relations are satisfactory.
On May 25, 2001, Actel announced that its Board of Directors had approved a
voluntary stock option exchange program. Under the program, eligible employees
were given the opportunity to cancel options outstanding on June 29, 2001, in
exchange for the grant of a new stock option six months and one day later.
Approximately 510,000 stock options were granted to employees under the stock
option exchange program at an exercise price of $19.91, the closing price of
Actel Common Stock on December 31, 2001. The weighted average exercise price of
the options cancelled in the exchange program was $35.23.
On August 7, 2001, Actel announced the promotion of Jon Anderson to Vice
President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Formerly the corporate
controller, Mr. Anderson joined Actel's executive management team and reports
directly to John East, Actel's President and CEO. Mr. Anderson replaced Hank
Perret, who accepted the CFO position with a private company located in Austin,
Texas. Mr. Perret has family in Austin and was employed there prior to joining
Actel in 1996.
Risk Factors
Shareholders of Actel and prospective investors should carefully consider,
along with the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the
following risk factors:
"Blank Check" Preferred Stock; Change in Control Arrangements
Actel's Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of up to 5,000,000
shares of "blank check" Preferred Stock (of which 4,000,000 shares remain
available for issuance) with such designations, rights, and preferences as may
be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. Accordingly, the
Board is empowered, without approval by holders of Actel's Common Stock, to
issue Preferred Stock with dividend, liquidation, redemption, conversion,
voting, or other rights that could adversely affect the voting power or other
rights of the holders of the Common Stock. Issuance of Preferred Stock could be
used as a method of discouraging, delaying, or preventing a change in control of
Actel. In addition, such issuance could adversely affect the market price of the
Common Stock. Although Actel does not currently intend to issue any additional
shares of its Preferred Stock, there can be no assurance that it will not do so
in the future.
Actel has adopted an Employee Retention Plan that provides for payment of a
benefit to Actel's employees who hold unvested stock options in the event of a
change of control of Actel. Payment is contingent upon the employee remaining
with Actel or its successor for six months after the change of control (unless
the employee is terminated other than for cause during such six-month period).
Actel and each of its executive officers have also entered into a Management
Continuity Agreement, which provides for the acceleration of stock options
unvested at the time of a change of control in the event the executive officer's
employment is actually or constructively terminated other than for cause
following the change of control. While these arrangements are intended to make
executive officers and other employees neutral toward a potential change of
control, they could have the effect of biasing some or all executive officers or
employees in favor of a change of control.
Competition
The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive and is characterized by
rapid rates of technological change, product obsolescence, and price erosion.
Actel's existing competitors include suppliers of conventional gate arrays,
standard cells, CPLDs, and FPGAs. Actel's principal competitors are Xilinx, a
supplier of SRAM-based FPGAs; Altera, a supplier of CPLDs and SRAM-based FPGAs;
Lattice, a supplier of CPLDs and SRAM-based FPGAs; and QuickLogic, a supplier of
antifuse-based FPGAs. Actel also faces competition from companies that
specialize in converting FPGAs, including Actel's products, into conventional
gate arrays or standard cells. See "BUSINESS -- Competition."
All existing FPGAs not based on antifuse technology and certain CPLDs are
reprogrammable, a feature that makes them more attractive to designers. See
"BUSINESS -- Risk Factors -- One-Time Programmability (OTP)." In addition,
Actel's antifuse FPGAs and (to a lesser extent) flash FPGAs are manufactured
using customized steps that are added to the otherwise standard manufacturing
processes of independent wafer suppliers. As a result, Actel's products
typically have been fabricated using processes one or two generations behind the
processes used by competing products. As a consequence, Actel generally has not
fully realized the benefits of its technologies. Actel is attempting to
accelerate the rate at which its products are migrated to finer process
geometries and is working with its wafer suppliers to obtain earlier access to
advanced processes, but no assurance can be given that Actel will be able to
overcome these competitive disadvantages.
Actel also believes that companies with broader product lines, more
extensive customer bases, and greater financial and other resources may be in a
stronger competitive position than Actel. Many of Actel's current competitors
have broader product lines, more extensive customer bases, and significantly
greater financial, technical, manufacturing, and marketing resources than Actel.
Additional competition is possible from major domestic and international
semiconductor suppliers. All such companies are larger and have broader product
lines, more extensive customer bases, and substantially greater financial and
other resources than Actel, including the capability to manufacture their own
wafers. Additional competition could adversely affect Actel's business,
financial condition, or results of operations.
Actel may also face competition from suppliers of logic products based on
new or emerging technologies. While Actel seeks to monitor developments in
existing and emerging technologies, no assurance can be given that Actel will be
able to compete successfully with suppliers offering products based on new or
emerging technologies. In any event, given the intensity of the competition and
the research and development efforts being conducted, no assurance can be given
that Actel's technologies will remain competitive.
Customer Concentration
A small number of customers are responsible for a significant portion
Actel's net revenues. Actel has experienced periods in which sales to its major
customers fluctuated as a percentage of net revenues due to push-outs or
cancellations of orders, or delays or failures to place expected orders. Actel
believes that sales to a limited number of customers will continue to account
for a substantial portion of net revenues in future periods. The loss of a major
customer, or decreases or delays in shipments to major customers, could have a
materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results
of operations.
Dependence on Communications Customers
Actel estimates that sales of its products to customers in the
communications market accounted for 49% of net revenues for 2001, compared with
56% of net revenues for 2000. At various times, the communications market has
experienced economic downturns, which have been characterized by diminished
product demand, accelerated erosion of average selling prices, and production
overcapacity. Since the fourth quarter of 2000, the communications market has
endured perhaps its worst downturn ever. As a result, Actel has experienced, and
may again in the future experience, substantial period-to-period fluctuations in
operating results due to conditions in the communications market or the general
economy.
Dependence on Customized Manufacturing Processes
Actel's antifuse-based FPGAs and, to a lesser extent, flash-based ProASIC
FPGAs are manufactured using customized steps that are added to otherwise
standard manufacturing processes of independent wafer suppliers. There is
considerably less operating history for the customized process steps than for
the foundries' standard manufacturing processes. The dependence of Actel on
customized processing steps means that, in contrast with competitors using
standard manufacturing processes, Actel generally has more difficulty
establishing relationships with independent wafer manufacturers; takes longer to
qualify a new wafer manufacturer; takes longer to achieve satisfactory,
sustainable wafer yields on new processes; may experience a higher incidence of
production yield problems; must pay more for wafers; and generally will not
obtain early access to the most advanced processes. Any of the above factors
could be a material disadvantage against competitors using standard
manufacturing processes. As a result of these factors, Actel's products
typically have been fabricated using processes one or two generations behind the
processes used by competing products. As a consequence, Actel generally has not
fully realized the benefits of its technologies. Actel is attempting to
accelerate the rate at which its products are reduced to finer geometries and is
working with its wafer suppliers to obtain earlier access to advanced processes,
but no assurance can be given that such efforts will be successful or that Actel
will be able to overcome these competitive disadvantages.
Dependence on Design Wins
In order for Actel to sell an FPGA to a customer, the customer must
incorporate the FPGA into the customer's product in the design phase. Actel
therefore devotes substantial resources, which it may not recover through
product sales, in support of potential customer design efforts (including, among
other things, providing development tools) and to persuade potential customers
to incorporate Actel's FPGAs into new or updated products. These efforts usually
precede by many months (and often a year or more) the generation of FPGA sales,
if any, by Actel. The value of any design win, moreover, will depend in large
part upon the ultimate success of the customer's product. No assurance can be
given that Actel will win sufficient designs or that any design win will result
in significant revenues.
Dependence on Independent Assembly Subcontractors
Actel relies primarily on foreign subcontractors for the assembly and
packaging of its products and, to a lesser extent, for the testing of its
finished products. Actel generally relies on one or two subcontractors to
provide particular services and has from time to time experienced difficulties
with the timeliness and quality of product deliveries. Actel has no long-term
contracts with its subcontractors and certain of those subcontractors sometimes
operate at or near full capacity. There can be no assurance that these
subcontractors will continue to be able or willing to meet Actel's requirements
for components or services. Any significant disruption in supplies from, or
degradation in the quality of components or services supplied by, these
subcontractors could delay shipments and result in the loss of customers or
revenues or otherwise have a materially adverse effect on Actel's business,
financial condition, or results of operations.
Dependence on Independent Software and Hardware Developers
Actel is dependent on independent software and hardware developers for the
development, maintenance, and support of certain elements of its development
tools, IP cores, debugging and verification tools, device programmers, and
sockets. Actel's reliance on independent software and hardware developers
involves certain risks, including lack of control over development and delivery
schedules and the availability of customer support. No assurance can be given
that Actel's independent developers will be able to complete software and/or
hardware under development, or provide updates or customer support in a timely
manner, which could delay future software or FPGA releases and disrupt Actel's
ability to provide customer support services. Any significant delays in the
availability of Actel's software and/or hardware could be detrimental to the
capability of Actel's new families of products to win designs, delay shipments
and result in the loss of customers or revenues, or otherwise have a materially
adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results of
operations.
Dependence on Independent Wafer Manufacturers
Actel does not manufacture any of the wafers used in the production of its
FPGAs. Such wafers are manufactured by BAE in the United States, Chartered in
Singapore, MEC in Japan, UMC in Taiwan, and Winbond in Taiwan. Actel's reliance
on independent wafer manufacturers to fabricate its wafers involves significant
risks, including the risk of events limiting production and reducing yields,
such as technical difficulties or damage to production facilities; lack of
control over capacity allocation and delivery schedules; and lack of adequate
capacity.
Actel has from time to time experienced delays in obtaining wafers from its
foundries, and no assurance can be given that Actel will not experience similar
or more severe delays in the future. In addition, although Actel has supply
agreements with several of its wafer manufacturers, a shortage of raw materials
or production capacity could lead any of Actel's wafer suppliers to allocate
available capacity to customers other than Actel, or to internal uses, which
could interrupt Actel's capability to meet its product delivery obligations. Any
inability or unwillingness of Actel's wafer suppliers to provide adequate
quantities of finished wafers to satisfy Actel's needs in a timely manner would
delay production and product shipments and could have a materially adverse
effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results of operations.
If Actel's current independent wafer manufacturers were unable or unwilling
to manufacture Actel's products as required, Actel would have to identify and
qualify additional foundries. The qualification process typically takes one year
or longer. No assurance can be given that any additional wafer foundries would
become available or be able to satisfy Actel's requirements on a timely basis or
that qualification would be successful. In addition, the semiconductor industry
has from time to time experienced shortages of manufacturing capacity. To secure
an adequate supply of wafers, Actel has considered, and continues to consider,
various possible transactions, including the use of substantial nonrefundable
deposits to secure commitments from foundries for specified levels of
manufacturing capacity over extended periods, equity investments in exchange for
guaranteed production, and the formation of joint ventures to own foundries. No
assurance can be given as to the effect of any such transaction on Actel's
business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Dependence on International Operations
Actel purchases almost all of its wafers from foreign foundries and has
almost all of its commercial products assembled, packaged, and tested by
subcontractors located outside the United States. These activities are subject
to the uncertainties associated with international business operations,
including trade barriers and other restrictions, changes in trade policies,
foreign governmental regulations, currency exchange fluctuations, reduced
protection for intellectual property, war and other military activities,
terrorism, changes in political or economic conditions, and other disruptions or
delays in production or shipments, any of which could have a materially adverse
effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results of operations.
In order to expand international sales and service, Actel will need to
maintain and expand existing foreign operations or establish new foreign
operations. This entails hiring additional personnel and maintaining or
expanding existing relationships with international distributors and sales
representatives. This will require significant managerial attention and
financial resources and could adversely affect Actel's financial condition and
operating results. No assurance can be given that Actel will be successful in
its maintenance or expansion of existing foreign operations, in its
establishment of new foreign operations, or in its efforts to maintain or expand
its relationships with international distributors or sales representatives.
Dependence on Key Personnel
The success of Actel is dependent in large part on the continued service of
its key managerial, engineering, marketing, sales, and support employees.
Competition for qualified personnel is intense in the semiconductor industry,
and the loss of Actel's key employees, or the inability of Actel to attract
other qualified personnel, could have a materially adverse effect on Actel.
Dependence on Military and Aerospace Customers
Actel estimates that sales of its products to customers in the military and
aerospace industries, which carry higher overall gross margins than sales of
products to other customers, accounted for 26% of net revenues for 2001. In
general, Actel believes that the military and aerospace industries have
accounted for a significantly greater percentage of Actel's net revenues since
the introduction of RadHard FPGAs in 1996 and of RadTolerant FPGAs in 1998. No
assurance can be given that future sales to customers in the military and
aerospace industries will continue at current volume or margin levels.
In 1994, Secretary of Defense William Perry directed the Department of
Defense to avoid government-unique requirements when making purchases and rely
more on the commercial marketplace. Under the "Perry initiative," the Department
of Defense must strive to increase access to commercial state-of-the-art
technology and facilitate the adoption by its suppliers of business processes
characteristic of world-class suppliers. Integration of commercial and military
development and manufacturing facilitates the development of "dual-use"
processes and products and contributes to an expanded industrial base that is
capable of meeting defense needs at lower costs. To that end, many of the
cost-driving specifications that have been part of military procurements for
many years were cancelled in the interest of buying best-available commercial
products. If this trend toward the use of commercial off-the-shelf products
continues, it may erode the revenues and/or margins that Actel derives from
sales to customers in the military and aerospace industries, which could have a
materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results
of operations.
The Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for 1999 required,
among other things, that communications satellites and related items (including
components) be controlled on the U.S. Munitions List. The effect of the Act was
to transfer jurisdiction over commercial communications satellites from the
Department of Commerce to the Department of State and to expand the scope of
export licensing applicable to commercial satellites. The need to obtain
additional export licenses has caused significant delays in the shipment of some
of Actel's FPGAs. Actel does not believe that this will have a long-term adverse
effect on its business, although significant delays might cause some customers
to seek an alternative solution.
Orders from the military and aerospace customers tend to be large and
irregular, which creates operational challenges and contributes to fluctuations
in Actel's net revenues and gross margins. These sales are also subject to more
extensive governmental regulations, including greater import and export
restrictions. In addition, products for military and aerospace applications
require processing and testing that is more lengthy and stringent than for
commercial applications, which increases the complexity of scheduling and
forecasting as well as the risk of failure. It is often not possible to
determine before the end of processing and testing whether products intended for
military or aerospace applications will fail and, if they do fail, a significant
period of time is often required to process and test replacements. This makes it
difficult to accurately estimate quarterly revenues and can have a materially
adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results of
operations.
Dividend Policy
Actel has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its capital stock.
Actel intends to retain any earnings for use in its business and does not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the future.
Fluctuations in Operating Results
Actel's quarterly and annual operating results are subject to fluctuations
resulting from general economic conditions and a variety of risks specific to
Actel or characteristic of the semiconductor industry, including booking and
shipment uncertainties, supply problems, and price erosion. Any of these factors
make it difficult to accurately project quarterly revenues and other operating
results and can have a materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial
condition, or results of operations.
Booking and Shipment Uncertainties
Actel typically generates a large percentage of its quarterly revenues
from orders received during the quarter and shipped in the final weeks of
the quarter, making it difficult to accurately project quarterly revenues.
Actel's backlog (which may be cancelled or deferred by customers on short
notice without significant penalty) at the beginning of a quarter accounts
for only a fraction of Actel's revenues during the quarter. This means that
Actel generates the rest of its quarterly revenues from orders received
during the quarter and "turned" for shipment within the quarter, and that
any shortfall in "turns" orders will have an immediate and adverse impact
on quarterly revenues. There are many factors that can cause a shortfall in
"turns" orders, including but not limited to a decline in general economic
conditions or the businesses of end users, excess inventory in the channel,
conversion to conventional gate arrays, or the loss of business to other
competitors for price or other reasons.
Historically, Actel shipped a disproportionately large percentage of
its quarterly revenues in the final weeks of the quarter. While quarterly
shipments have been more linear in recent years, any failure by Actel to
effect scheduled shipments by the end of the quarter can have a materially
adverse effect on revenues for such quarter. It is often impossible to
determine before the end of processing and testing whether products
intended for military or aerospace applications can be shipped and, if not,
a significant period of time is often required to process and test
replacements. Since Actel does not recognize revenue on the sale of a
product to a distributor until the distributor resells the product, Actel's
quarterly revenues are also dependent on, and subject to fluctuations in,
shipments by Actel's distributors. When there is a shortfall in revenues,
operating results are likely to be adversely affected because most of
Actel's expenses do not vary with revenues.
Supply Problems
In a typical semiconductor manufacturing process, silicon wafers
produced by a foundry are sorted and cut into individual die, which are
then assembled into individual packages and tested. The manufacture,
assembly, and testing of semiconductor products is highly complex and
subject to a wide variety of risks, including defects in masks, impurities
in the materials used, contaminants in the environment, and performance
failures by personnel and equipment. Semiconductor products intended for
military and aerospace applications are particularly susceptible to these
risks.
As is common in the semiconductor industry, Actel's independent wafer
suppliers from time to time experience lower than anticipated yields of
usable die. To the extent yields of usable die decrease, the average cost
to Actel of each usable die increases, which reduces gross margin. Wafer
yields can decline without warning and may take substantial time to analyze
and correct, particularly for a company such as Actel that does not operate
its own manufacturing facility, but instead utilizes independent
facilities, almost all of which are offshore. Yield problems may also
increase the time to market for Actel's products and create inventory
shortages and dissatisfied customers. No assurance can be given that Actel
will not experience wafer supply problems in the future.
In addition, Actel typically experiences difficulties and delays in
achieving satisfactory, sustainable yields on new processes or at new
foundries, particularly when new technologies are involved. For example,
Actel and GateField struggled for years to achieve acceptable yields on the
flash process for ProASIC devices at Infineon. Although Actel has been able
to overcome these difficulties in the past, no assurance can be given that
it will be able to do so with respect to any new process or foundry.
Price Erosion
The semiconductor industry is characterized by intense competition.
Historically in the semiconductor industry, the average selling price of a
product declined significantly over the life of the product. To win
designs, Actel generally must price new products on the assumption that
manufacturing cost reductions will be achieved, which often does not occur
as soon as expected. While Actel expects to reduce the average selling
prices of its products over time as it achieves manufacturing cost
reductions, Actel is sometimes required by competitive pressures to reduce
the prices of its new products more quickly than such cost reductions can
be achieved. In addition, Actel sometimes approves price reductions on
specific sales to meet competition. Declines in the average selling prices
of Actel's products reduce net revenues unless offset by greater unit sales
or a shift in the mix of products sold toward higher-priced products. In
addition, declines in the average selling prices of Actel's products reduce
gross margins unless offset by reductions in manufacturing costs or by a
shift in the mix of products sold toward higher-margin products.
Force Majeure
The performance of Actel and each of its foundries, suppliers,
subcontractors, distributors, agents, and customers is subject to events or
conditions beyond such party's control, including labor disputes, acts of public
enemies or terrorists, war or other military conflicts, blockades,
insurrections, riots, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, landslides, lightning,
earthquakes, fires, storms, floods, washouts, arrests, civil disturbances,
restraints by or actions of governmental bodies acting in a sovereign capacity
(including export or security restrictions on information, material, personnel,
equipment, or otherwise), breakdowns of plant or machinery, inability to obtain
transport or supplies, and the like. Actel's foundry partners in Japan and
Taiwan and its operations in California are located in areas that have been
seismically active in the recent past. In addition, the countries outside of the
United States in which Actel's foundry partners and assembly and other
subcontractors are located have unpredictable and potentially volatile economic,
social, or political conditions, including the risks of conflict between Taiwan
and the People's Republic of China or between North Korea and South Korea. The
occurrence of any of these circumstances could disrupt Actel's operations and
may have a materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition,
or results of operations.
Actel's corporate offices are located in California, which was subject to
power outages and shortages during 2001. More extensive power shortages in the
state could disrupt Actel's operations and interrupt its research and
development activities.
Forward-Looking Statements
All {bracketed statements} contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
including all {bracketed statements} contained in any document incorporated
herein by reference, are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All forward-looking statements
are made by Actel's management in the exercise of its best judgment based on the
information currently known by management, but they are not guarantees of future
performance. Thus, actual events and results may differ materially from those
expressed or forecast in the forward-looking statements due to the Risk Factors
identified herein or for other reasons. Actel undertakes no obligation to update
any forward-looking statement contained or incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Future Capital Needs
Actel must continue to make significant investments in research and
development as well as capital equipment and expansion of facilities. Actel's
future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including (among
others) product development, investments in working capital, and acquisitions of
complementary businesses, products, or technologies. Wafer manufacturers are
increasingly demanding financial support from customers in the form of equity
investments and advance purchase price deposits, which in some cases are
substantial. Should Actel require additional capacity, it may be required to
incur significant expenditures to secure such capacity.
To the extent that existing resources and future earnings are insufficient
to fund Actel's operations, Actel may need to raise additional funds through
public or private debt or equity financings. If additional funds are raised
through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage ownership of current
shareholders will be reduced and such equity securities may have rights,
preferences, or privileges senior to those of the holders of Actel's Common
Stock. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available or
that, if available, it can be obtained on terms favorable to Actel and its
shareholders. If adequate funds are not available, Actel may be required to
delay, limit, or eliminate some or all of its proposed operations.
Gross Margin
Actel's gross margin is the difference between the revenues it receives
from the sale of its products and the cost of those products. The price Actel
can charge for a product is constrained principally by its competitors. While
competition has always been intense, Actel believes price competition has become
more acute. This may be due in part to the transition toward high-level design
methodologies, which permit designers to wait until later in the design process
before selecting a programmable or masked silicon device and make it easier to
convert between PLDs or between a programmable and a masked silicon device.
These competitive pressures may cause Actel to reduce the prices of its products
more quickly than it can achieve cost reductions, which would reduce Actel's
gross margin and may have a materially adverse effect on its operating results.
One of the most important variables affecting the cost of Actel's products
is manufacturing yields. With its customized antifuse and flash manufacturing
process requirements, Actel almost invariably experiences difficulties and
delays in achieving satisfactory, sustainable yields on new processes or at new
foundries. Until satisfactory yields are achieved, gross margins on news
products will generally be lower than on mature products. Depending upon the
rate at which sales of these new products ramp and the extent to which they
displace mature products, the lower gross margins could have a materially
adverse effect on Actel's operating results.
Management of Growth
Actel has in the past experienced and expects to again experience growth in
the number of its employees and the scope of its operations, resulting in
increased responsibilities for management personnel. To manage future growth
effectively, Actel will need to continue to hire, train, motivate, and manage a
growing number of employees. The future success of Actel will also depend on its
ability to attract and retain qualified technical, marketing, and management
personnel. In particular, the availability of qualified silicon design, software
design, process, and test engineers is limited, and competition among companies
for skilled and experienced engineering personnel is often strong. Especially
during strong business cycles, Actel expects to experience difficulty in filling
its needs for qualified engineers and other personnel. No assurance can be given
that Actel will be able to achieve or manage effectively any such growth, and
failure to do so could delay product development and introductions or otherwise
have a materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or
results of operations.
Manufacturing Yields
Actel depends upon its independent wafer suppliers to produce wafers with
acceptable yields and to deliver them to Actel in a timely manner. Currently,
substantially all of Actel's revenues are derived from products based on Actel's
proprietary antifuse process technologies. Successful implementation of antifuse
process technology requires a high degree of coordination between Actel and its
foundry. Therefore, significant lead-time is required to reach volume production
on new processes and at new foundries. Accordingly, no assurance can be given
that volume production on Actel's new or next-generation families will be
achieved in the near term or at all.
Actel introduced the ProASIC family of devices in 1999 and the ProASIC Plus
family in 2002. While ProASIC products are based on a flash process technology
that is less customized than an antifuse process, it is also a technology less
familiar to Actel. In addition, it is generally more difficult to bring up an
advanced flash process than it is to bring up an advanced antifuse process.
Actel has always experienced difficulty achieving satisfactory, sustainable
yields on new process technologies at new foundries, and the flash process at
Infineon was no different. Although Actel believes that it has been able to
overcome these difficulties in the past, no assurance can be given that it will
be able to do so with respect to new flash products. In any event, until
satisfactory, sustainable yields are achieved on ProASIC Plus devices, they
generally will be sold at lower gross margins than Actel's mature product
families, which could have a materially adverse effect on operating results.
The fabrication of antifuse and flash wafers is a complex process that
requires a high degree of technical skill, state-of-the-art equipment, and
effective cooperation between Actel and the foundry to produce acceptable
yields. Minute impurities, errors in any step of the fabrication process,
defects in the masks used to print circuits on a wafer, and other factors can
cause a substantial percentage of wafers to be rejected or numerous die on each
wafer to be non-functional. As is common in the semiconductor industry, Actel
has experienced from time to time in the past, and expects to experience in the
future, production yield problems and delivery delays. Any prolonged inability
to obtain adequate yields or deliveries could have a materially adverse effect
on Actel's business, financial condition, or results of operations.
One-Time Programmability (OTP)
The nonvolatility of Actel's antifuse FPGAs is necessary or desirable in
some applications, but all other things being equal, logic designers generally
would prefer to prototype with a reprogrammable logic device. This is because
the designer can reuse the device if an error is made. The visibility associated
with discarding an OTP device often causes designers to select a reprogrammable
device even when the alternative OTP device offers significant advantages. This
bias in favor of designing with reprogrammable logic devices appears to increase
as the size of the design increases, and is a major reason Actel decided to
offer reprogrammable ProASIC devices. No assurance can be given that Actel will
be able to overcome this competitive disadvantage.
Patent Infringement
As is typical in the semiconductor industry, Actel has been and expects to
be notified from time to time of claims that it may be infringing patents owned
by others. During 2001, Actel held discussions regarding potential patent
infringement issues with several third parties, some of which significantly
greater financial and intellectual property resources than Actel. As it has in
the past, Actel may obtain licenses under patents that it is alleged to
infringe. Although patent holders commonly offer licenses to alleged infringers,
no assurance can be given that licenses will be offered or that the terms of any
offered licenses will be acceptable to Actel. Failure to obtain a license for
technology allegedly used by Actel could result in litigation. All litigation,
whether or not determined in favor of Actel, can result in significant expense
to Actel and can divert the efforts of Actel's technical and management
personnel from productive tasks. While Actel believes that reasonable resolution
will occur, there can be no assurance that these claims will be resolved or that
the resolution of these claims will not have a materially adverse effect on
Actel's business, financial condition, or results of operations. In addition,
Actel's evaluation of the impact of these pending disputes could change based on
new information learned by Actel.
In February 2001, Actel introduced SRAM-based VariCore EPGA IP cores. Since
Actel did not receive any sublicensing rights under the Xilinx Agreement, the
licensing of VariCore EPGAs by Actel would not be protected by the cross-license
contained in the Xilinx Agreement.
Actel has obtained patents covering aspects of its FPGA architecture and
logic modules and certain techniques for manufacturing its antifuse and flash
FPGAs, but no assurance can be given that Actel's patents will be determined to
be valid or that any assertions of infringement or invalidity by other parties
will not be successful. In addition, Actel has agreed to defend and indemnify
customers from and against claims that Actel products infringe the patent or
other intellectual rights of third parties. In the event of an adverse ruling in
any litigation involving intellectual property, Actel could suffer significant
(and possibly treble) monetary damages, which could have a materially adverse
effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results of operations. Actel
may also be required to discontinue the use of infringing processes; cease the
manufacture, use, and sale or licensing of infringing products; expend
significant resources to develop non-infringing technology; or obtain licenses
under patents that it is infringing. In the event of a successful claim against
Actel, Actel's failure to develop or license a substitute technology on
commercially reasonable terms could also have a materially adverse effect on
Actel's business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Potential Acquisitions
In pursuing its business strategy, Actel may acquire products,
technologies, or businesses from third parties. Identifying and negotiating
these acquisitions may divert substantial management time away from Actel's
operations. An acquisition could absorb substantial cash resources, require
Actel to incur or assume debt obligations, and/or involve the issuance of
additional Actel equity securities. The issuance of additional equity securities
may dilute, and could represent an interest senior to the rights of, the holders
of Actel's Common Stock. An acquisition could involve significant write-offs
(possibility resulting in a loss for the fiscal year(s) in which taken) and
would require the amortization of any identifiable intangibles over a number of
years, which would adversely affect earnings in those years. Any acquisition
would require attention from Actel's management to integrate the acquired entity
into Actel's operations, may require Actel to develop expertise outside its
existing business, and could result in departures of management from either
Actel or the acquired entity. An acquired entity may have unknown liabilities,
and its business may not achieve the results anticipated at the time it is
acquired by Actel. The occurrence of any of these circumstances could disrupt
Actel's operations and may have a materially adverse effect on Actel's business,
financial condition, or results of operations.
Protection of Intellectual Property
Actel has historically devoted significant resources to research and
development and believes that the intellectual property derived from such
research and development is a valuable asset that has been and will continue to
be important to the success of Actel's business. Actel relies primarily on a
combination of nondisclosure agreements, other contractual provisions, and
patent and copyright laws to protect its proprietary rights. No assurance can be
given that the steps taken by Actel will be adequate to protect its proprietary
rights. In addition, the laws of certain territories in which Actel's products
are or may be developed, manufactured, or sold, including Asia and Europe, may
not protect Actel products and intellectual property rights to the same extent
as the laws of the United States. Failure of Actel to enforce its patents or
copyrights or to protect its trade secrets could have a materially adverse
effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Reliance on Distributors
In 2001, sales made through distributors accounted for 68% of Actel's net
revenues. Two of Actel's distributors, Pioneer and Unique, accounted for 20% and
19%, respectively, of Actel's net revenues in 2001. No assurance can be given
that future sales by these or other distributors will continue at current levels
or that Actel will be able to retain its current distributors on terms that are
acceptable to Actel. During 2001, Actel consolidated its distribution channel by
terminating Arrow, which accounted for 13% of Actel's net revenues in 2001.
Actel's distributors generally offer products of several different
companies, including products that are competitive with Actel's products.
Accordingly, there is a risk that these distributors may give higher priority to
products of other suppliers, thus reducing their efforts to sell Actel's
products. In addition, Actel's agreements with its distributors are generally
terminable at the distributor's option. A reduction in sales efforts by one or
more of Actel's current distributors or a termination of any distributor's
relationship with Actel could have a materially adverse effect on Actel's
business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Actel defers recognition of revenue on shipments to distributors until the
product is resold by the distributor to the end user. Actel's distributors have
occasionally built inventories in anticipation of substantial growth in sales
and, when such growth did not occur as rapidly as anticipated, substantially
reduced the amount of product ordered from Actel in subsequent quarters. Such a
slowdown in orders would generally reduce Actel's profit margins on future sales
of higher cost products because Actel would be unable to take advantage of any
manufacturing cost reductions while the distributor depleted its inventory at
lower average selling prices. In addition, while Actel believes that its major
distributors are currently adequately capitalized, no assurance can be given
that one or more of Actel's distributors will not experience financial
difficulties. The failure of one or more of Actel's distributors to pay for
products ordered from Actel or to continue operations because of financial
difficulties or for other reasons could have a materially adverse effect on
Actel's business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Reliance on International Sales
Sales to customers outside the United States accounted for 38% of net
revenues in 2001. The largest portion of export sales is made to European
customers, which accounted for 28% of net revenues in 2001. Actel expects that
revenues derived from international sales will continue to represent a
significant portion of its total revenues. International sales are subject to a
variety of risks, including longer payment cycles, greater difficulty in
accounts receivable collection, currency exchange risks, currency restrictions,
tariffs, trade barriers, taxes, export license requirements, and the impact of
recessionary environments in economies outside the United States. All of Actel's
foreign sales are denominated in U.S. Dollars, so Actel's products become less
price competitive in countries with currencies that are declining in value
against the dollar. In addition, since a majority of Actel's foreign sales are
made through distributors, such sales are subject to the risks described above
in "Reliance on Distributors."
Semiconductor Industry Risks
The semiconductor industry has historically been cyclical and periodically
subject to significant economic downturns, which are characterized by diminished
product demand, accelerated price erosion, and overcapacity. Beginning in the
fourth quarter of 2000, Actel and the semiconductor industry in general
experienced reduced bookings and backlog cancellations due to excess inventories
at communications, computer, and consumer equipment manufacturers and a general
softening in the overall economy. The downturn, which has been severe and could
be prolonged, resulted in lower revenues, which in turn had a disproportionate
effect on profitability, including Actel's. Actel may in the future experience
substantial period-to-period fluctuations in business and results of operations
due to general semiconductor industry conditions, overall economic conditions,
or other factors, including legislation and regulations governing the import or
export of semiconductor products.
Strategic Investments
Actel occasionally makes equity investments in public or private companies
for the promotion of strategic objectives. The value of these equity investments
may experience significant volatility, and Actel monitors its equity investments
for impairment on a periodic basis. In the event that the carrying value of an
equity investment were to exceed its fair value, and the decline in value were
determined to be other than temporary, the carrying value would be reduced to
its current fair value, which would have an adverse effect on Actel's operating
results that might be material.
Technological Change and Dependence on New Product Development
The market for Actel's products is characterized by rapidly changing
technology, frequent new product introductions, and declining average selling
prices over product life cycles, each of which makes the timely introduction of
new products a critical objective of Actel. Actel's future success is highly
dependent upon the timely completion and introduction of new products at
competitive price and performance levels. In evaluating new product decisions,
Actel must anticipate well in advance both the future demand and the technology
that will be available to supply such demand. Failure to anticipate customer
demand, delays in developing new products with anticipated technological
advances, or failure to coordinate the design and development of silicon and
associated software products could have a materially adverse effect on Actel's
business, financial condition, or results of operation.
No assurance can be given that Actel's design and introduction schedules
for new products or the supporting software or hardware will be met, that any
new products will gain market acceptance, or that Actel will respond effectively
to new technological changes or new product announcements by others. Any failure
of Actel to successfully define, develop, market, manufacture, assemble, test,
or program competitive new products could have a materially adverse effect on
its business, financial condition, or results of operations.
In addition, there are greater technological and operational risks
associated with new products. The inability of Actel's wafer suppliers to
produce advanced products; delays in commencing or maintaining volume shipments
of new products; the discovery of product, process, software, or programming
failures; and any related product returns could each have a materially adverse
effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results of operation.
Actel must also continue to make significant investments in research and
development to develop new products and achieve market acceptance for such
products. Actel conducts most of its research and development activities at
facilities operated by its foundries. Although Actel to date has not experienced
any significant difficulty in obtaining access to such facilities, no assurance
can be given that access will not be limited or that such facilities will be
adequate to meet Actel's needs in the future.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting
principals generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues, and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. Actel bases its estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results invariably differ from these estimates, and such
differences could be material. In addition, if these estimates or their related
assumptions change in the future, it could have a materially adverse effect on
Actel's operating results.
Volatility of Stock
The price of Actel's Common Stock can fluctuate substantially on the basis
of such factors as announcements of new products by Actel or its competitors,
quarterly fluctuations in Actel's financial results or the financial results of
other semiconductor companies, or general conditions in the semiconductor
industry, financial markets, or economy. In addition, stock markets have
experienced extreme price and volume volatility in recent years. This volatility
has had a substantial effect on the market prices of the securities issued by
technology companies, at times for reasons unrelated to the operating
performance of the specific companies.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table identifies each executive officer of Actel as of March
31, 2002:
Name Age Position
- ---------------------- ----- ------------------------------------------------
John C. East.......... 57 President and Chief Executive Officer
Esmat Z. Hamdy........ 52 Senior Vice President of Technology & Operations
Jon A. Anderson....... 43 Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
Anthony Farinaro...... 39 Vice President & General Manager of Design
Services
Paul V. Indaco........ 51 Vice President of Worldwide Sales
Dennis G. Kish........ 38 Vice President of Marketing
Barbara L. McArthur... 51 Vice President of Human Resources
Fares N. Mubarak...... 40 Vice President of Engineering
David L. Van De Hey... 46 Vice President & General Counsel and Secretary
Mr. East has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Actel since
December 1988. From April 1979 until joining Actel, Mr. East served in various
positions with Advanced Micro Devices, a semiconductor manufacturer, including
Senior Vice President of Logic Products from November 1986 to November 1988.
From December 1976 to March 1979, he served as Operations Manager for Raytheon
Semiconductor. From September 1968 to December 1976, Mr. East served in various
marketing, manufacturing, and engineering positions for Fairchild Camera and
Instrument Corporation, a semiconductor manufacturer.
Dr. Hamdy is a founder of Actel, was Vice President of Technology from
August 1991 to March 1996 and Senior Vice President of Technology from March
1996 to September 1996, and has been Senior Vice President of Technology and
Operations since September 1996. From November 1985 to July 1991, he held a
number of management positions with Actel's technology and development group.
From January 1981 to November 1985, Dr. Hamdy held various positions at Intel
Corporation, a semiconductor manufacturer, lastly as project manager.
Mr. Anderson joined Actel in March 1998 as Controller and has been Vice
President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer since August 2001. From 1987
until joining Actel, he held various financial positions at National
Semiconductor, a semiconductor company, with the most recent position of
Director of Finance, Local Area Networks Division. From 1982 to 1986, he was an
auditor with Touche Ross & Co., a public accounting firm.
Mr. Farinaro joined Actel in August 1998 as Vice President & General
Manager of Design Services. From February 1990 until joining Actel, he held
various engineering and management positions with GateField (formally Zycad
Corporation until 1997), a semiconductor company, with the most recent position
of Vice President of Application & Design Services. From 1985 to 1990, Mr.
Farinaro held various engineering and management positions at Singer Kearfott,
an aerospace electronics company, and its spin-off, Plessey Electronic Systems
Corporation.
Mr. Indaco joined Actel in March 1999 as Vice President of Worldwide Sales.
From January 1996 until joining Actel, he served as Vice President of Sales for
Chip Express, a semiconductor manufacturer. From January September 1994 to
January 1996, Mr. Indaco was Vice President of Sales for Redwood Microsystems, a
semiconductor manufacturer. From February 1984 to September 1994, he held senior
sales management positions with LSI Logic, a semiconductor manufacturer. From
June 1978 to February 1984, Mr. Indaco held various field engineering sales and
marketing positions with Intel Corporation, a semiconductor manufacturer. From
June 1976 to June 1978, he held various marketing positions with Texas
Instruments, a semiconductor manufacturer.
Mr. Kish joined Actel in December 1999 as Vice President of Strategic
Product Marketing and became Vice President of Marketing in July 2000. Prior to
joining Actel, he held senior management positions at Synopsys, an EDA company,
and Atmel, a semiconductor manufacturer. Before that, Mr. Kish held sales and
engineering positions with Texas Instruments, a semiconductor manufacturer.
Ms. McArthur joined Actel in July of 2000 as Vice President of Human
Resources. From 1997 until joining Actel, she was Vice President of Human
Resources at Talus Solutions. Before that, Ms. McArthur held senior human
resource positions at Applied Materials from 1993 to 1997, 3Com Corporation from
1987 to 1993, and at Saga Corporation from 1978 to 1986.
Mr. Mubarak joined Actel in November 1992, was Director of Product and Test
Engineering until October 1997, and has been Vice President of Engineering since
October 1997. From 1989 until joining Actel, he held various engineering and
engineering management positions with Samsung Semiconductor Inc., a
semiconductor manufacturer, and its spin-off, IC Works, Inc. From 1984 to 1989,
Mr. Mubarak held various engineering, product planning, and engineering
management positions with Advanced Micro Devices, a semiconductor manufacturer.
Mr. Van De Hey joined Actel in July 1993 as Corporate Counsel, became
Secretary in May 1994, and has been Vice President & General Counsel since
August 1995. From November 1988 to September 1993, he was an associate with
Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, a law firm in Palo
Alto, California, and Actel's outside legal counsel. From August 1985 until
October 1988, he was an associate with the Cleveland office of Jones, Day,
Reavis & Pogue, a law firm.
Subject to their rights under any contract of employment or other
agreement, executive officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Actel's principal administrative, marketing, sales, customer support,
design, research and development, and testing facilities are located in
Sunnyvale, California, in three buildings that comprise approximately 138,000
square feet. These buildings are leased through June 2003, and Actel has a
renewal option for an additional five-year term. Actel also leases sales offices
in the metropolitan areas of Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Hong
Kong, Houston, London, Los Angeles, Milan, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Munich, New
York, Orlando, Paris, Ottawa (Ontario), Philadelphia, Raleigh, Seattle, Tokyo,
and Washington D.C., as well as the facilities of the Design Services Group in
Mt. Arlington, New Jersey, and the facility formerly occupied by GateField in
Fremont, California. {Actel believes its facilities will be adequate for its
needs in 2002.}
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no pending legal proceedings of a material nature to which Actel
is a party or of which any of its property is the subject. There are no such
legal proceedings known by Actel to be contemplated by any governmental
authority.
On March 29, 2001, Unisys Corporation (Unisys) brought suit in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division
(Court), against Actel seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. Actel and
Unisys orally agreed to settle the case on April 25, 2001, and executed a
definitive written settlement agreement on June 29, 2001. The Court dismissed
the case with prejudice on July 13, 2001. The settlement was immaterial to
Actel's business, financial condition, and operating results.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth
quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
Actel's Common Stock has been traded on the Nasdaq National Market under
the symbol "ACTL" since its initial public offering on August 2, 1993. On March
25, 2001, there were 212 shareholders of record. Since many shareholders have
their shares held of record in the name of their brokerage firm, the actual
number of shareholders is estimated by Actel to be about 8,300. The following
table set forth for the periods indicated the high and low sales prices per
share of Actel Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2001 2000
High Low High Low
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
First Quarter............................................. $ 31.81 $ 17.38 $ 36.50 $ 21.63
Second Quarter............................................ 26.90 16.69 46.88 22.00
Third Quarter............................................. 25.00 15.27 55.38 29.63
Fourth Quarter............................................ 22.14 15.54 39.00 20.00
</TABLE>
On April 3, 2002, the reported last sale of Actel Common Stock on the Nasdaq
National Market was $20.30.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On December 21, 1999, Actel acquired AutoGate Logic, Inc. (AGL) by merger.
The purchase price of $7.2 million included the issuance of 285,943 shares of
Actel Common Stock and the assumption of options to purchase 89,057 shares of
Actel Common Stock. The shares issued and delivered to AGL shareholders were
exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and/or
Regulation D promulgated thereunder because such shares were sold to investors
who were "accredited" and had access to financial and other relevant data
concerning Actel or were represented by a qualified "purchaser representative"
under Regulation D.
On June 2, 2000, Actel acquired Prosys by merger. The purchase price of
$24.5 million included the issuance of 220,518 shares of Actel Common Stock and
the assumption of options to purchase 294,000 shares of Actel Common Stock.
During 2001, an additional 54,290 shares of Actel Common Stock was issued to
Prosys security holders upon the achievement of certain technological milestones
specified in the June 2000 purchase agreement. The shares issued and delivered
to Prosys shareholders were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of
the Securities Act because such shares were sold to accredited investors who had
access to financial and other relevant data concerning Actel.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The information appearing under the caption "Selected Consolidated
Financial Data" in the 2001 Annual Report is incorporated herein by this
reference.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The information appearing under the caption "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations" of the 2001 Annual
Report is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information appearing under the caption "Market Risk" under the main
caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and
Results of Operations" in the 2001 Annual Report is incorporated herein by this
reference.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The information appearing under the captions "Consolidated Balance Sheets,"
"Consolidated Statements of Income," "Consolidated Statements of Shareholders'
Equity," "Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows," "Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements," and "Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors"
in the 2001 Annual Report is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
<PAGE>
PART III
Except for the information specifically incorporated by reference from
Actel's definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be
held on May 24, 2002, as filed on or about April 8, 2002, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (2002 Proxy Statement) in Part III of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K, the 2002 Proxy Statement shall not be deemed to be filed as part
of this Report. Without limiting the foregoing, the information under the
captions "Compensation Committee Report," "Audit Committee Report," and "Company
Stock Performance" under the main caption "OTHER INFORMATION" in the 2002 Proxy
Statement are not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information regarding the identification and business experience of
Actel's directors under the caption "Nominees" under the main caption "PROPOSAL
NO. 1 -- ELECTION OF DIRECTORS" in the 2002 Proxy Statement and the information
under the main caption "COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934" in the 2002 Proxy Statement are incorporated herein by this
reference. For information regarding the identification and business experience
of Actel's executive officers, see "Executive Officers of the Registrant" at the
end of Item 1 in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information under the caption "Director Compensation" under the main
caption "PROPOSAL NO. 1 -- ELECTION OF DIRECTORS" in the 2002 Proxy Statement
and the information under the caption "Executive Compensation" under the main
caption "OTHER INFORMATION" in the 2002 Proxy Statement are incorporated herein
by this reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information under the caption "Share Ownership" under the main caption
"INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING" in the 2002 Proxy Statement and
the information under the caption "Security Ownership of Management" under the
main caption "OTHER INFORMATION" in the 2002 Proxy Statement are incorporated
herein by this reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information under the caption "Certain Transactions" under the main
caption "OTHER INFORMATION" in the 2002 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein
by this reference.
<PAGE>
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form
10-K:
(1) Financial Statements. The following consolidated financial
statements of Actel Corporation included in the 2001 Annual Report are
incorporated by reference in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2001 and 2000
Consolidated statements of operations for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2001
Consolidated statements of shareholders' equity and other
comprehensive income/(loss) for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2001
Consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2001
Notes to consolidated financial statements
(2) Financial Statement Schedule. The financial statement schedule
listed under 14(d) hereof is filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(3) Exhibits. The exhibits listed under Item 14(c) hereof are filed
with, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K. None.
(c) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated
by reference into, this Report on Form 10-K:
Exhibit Number Description
--------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to
the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 33-64704), declared effective on August 2, 1993).
3.2 Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to
the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 33-64704), declared effective on August 2, 1993).
10.1 (2) Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers
(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-64704), declared
effective on August 2, 1993).
<PAGE>
Exhibit Number Description
---------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.2 (2) 1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated
(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K (File No. 0-21970) for the fiscal year ended
January 2, 2000).
10.3 (2) 1993 Directors' Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated
(filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K (File No. 0-21970) for the fiscal year ended
December 28, 1997).
10.4 (2) 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated
(filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K (File No. 0-21970) for the fiscal year ended
December 28, 1997).
10.5 (2) 1995 Employee and Consultant Stock Plan, as amended and
restated (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K (File No. 0-21970) for the fiscal year
ended December 29, 1996).
10.6 (2) Employee Retention Plan, as amended and restated.
10.7 (2) Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated (filed
as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K (File No. 0-21970) for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2000).
10.8 Form of Distribution Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to
the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 33-64704), declared effective on August 2, 1993).
10.9 (1) Patent Cross License Agreement dated April 22, 1993 between
the Registrant and Xilinx, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to
the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 33-64704), declared effective on August 2, 1993).
10.10 Manufacturing Agreement dated February 3, 1994 between the
Registrant and Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Pte Ltd
(filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant's Annual Report on
Form 10-K (File No. 0-21970) for the fiscal year ended
January 2, 1994).
10.11 (1) Product Development and Marketing Agreement dated August
1, 1994, between the Registrant and Loral Federal Systems
Company (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 0-21970) for the
quarterly period ended October 2, 1994).
10.12 (1) Foundry Agreement dated as of June 29, 1995, between the
Registrant and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd and
Matsushita Electronics Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.25
to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No.
0-21970) for the quarterly period ended July 2, 1995).
<PAGE>
Exhibit Number Description
-------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
10.13 Lease Agreement for the Registrant's offices in Sunnyvale,
California, dated May 10, 1995 (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to
the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No.
0-21970) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995).
10.14 (1) License Agreement dated as of March 6, 1995, between the
Registrant and BTR, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 0-21970)
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 1996).
10.15 Asset Purchase Agreement dated August 14, 1998, between
GateField Corporation and Actel Corporation (filed as
Exhibit 2.1 to GateField Corporation's Current Report on
Form 8-K (File No. 0-13244) on August 14, 1998, and
incorporated herein by this reference).
10.16 (1) Patent Cross License Agreement dated August 25, 1998,
between Actel Corporation and QuickLogic Corporation. (filed
as Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K (File No. 0-21970) for the fiscal year ended January 3,
1999).
10.17 Amended And Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger by and
among Actel Corporation, GateField Acquisition Corporation,
and GateField Corporation dated as of May 31, 2000 (filed as
Annex I to GateField Corporation's Definitive Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14A (File No. 0-13244) on June 9,
2000, and incorporated herein by this reference).
10.18 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and between Actel
Corporation and Prosys Technology, Inc., Jung-Cheun "Frank"
Lien, Sheng "Jason" Feng, Chung Sun, Eddy Huang, and Nan
Horng Yeh dated as of June 2, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No.
0-21970) on June 16, 2000, and incorporated herein by this
reference).
13 Portions of Registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for
the fiscal year ended January 6, 2002, incorporated by
reference into this Report on Form 10-K.
21 Subsidiaries of Registrant (see page 53)
23 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors (see page
51)
24 Power of Attorney (see page 50)
- ------------------------
(1) Confidential treatment requested as to a portion of this
Exhibit.
(2) This Exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan
or arrangement.
(d) Financial Statement Schedule. The following financial statement
schedule of Actel Corporation is filed as part of this Report on Form 10-K and
should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of
Actel Corporation, including the notes thereto, and the Report of Independent
Auditors with respect thereto:
Schedule Description Page
-------- ------------------------------------------ ------
II Valuation and qualifying accounts 52
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable
accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not
required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have
been omitted.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ACTEL CORPORATION
April 4, 2002 By: /s/ John C. East
--------------------
John C. East
President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 24
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below hereby constitutes and appoints John C. East, Jon A. Anderson, and
David L. Van De Hey, and each of them acting individually, as his
attorney-in-fact, each with full power of substitution, for him in any and all
capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K
and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or
substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
/s/ John C. East President and Chief Executive Officer
-------------------- (Principal Executive Officer)and
(John C. East) Director April 4, 2002
/s/ Jon A. Anderson Vice President of Finance and Chief
-------------------- Financial Officer (Principal Financial
(Jon A. Anderson) and Accounting Officer) April 4, 2002
/s/ James R. Fiebiger
---------------------
(James R. Fiebiger) Director April 4, 2002
/s/ Jos C. Henkens
------------------
(Jos C. Henkens) Director April 4, 2002
/s/ Jacob S. Jacobsson
----------------------
(Jacob S. Jacobsson) Director April 4, 2002
/s/ Frederic N. Schwettmann
- ---------------------------
(Frederic N. Schwettmann) Director April 4, 2002
/s/ Robert G. Spencer
---------------------
(Robert G. Spencer) Director April 4, 2002
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Actel Corporation of our report dated January 21, 2002, included in the
2001 Annual Report to Shareholders of Actel Corporation.
Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Actel
Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of Actel's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-74492, 333-3398, 333-71627, 333-36222, 333-43274,
333-54652, and 333-81926) of our report dated January 21, 2002, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Actel Corporation incorporated by
reference in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001,
and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Actel
Corporation.
/S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Jose, California
April 5, 2002
<PAGE>
SCHEDULE II
ACTEL CORPORATION
--------------------------------------
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Balance at Balance at
beginning end of
of period Provisions Write-Offs period
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
Year ended December 31, 1999.............................. $ 1,554 $ -- $ 475 $ 1,079
Year ended December 31, 2000.............................. 1,079 91 100 1,070
Year ended December 31, 2001.............................. $ 1,070 $ 572 $ 314 $ 1,328
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21
ACTEL CORPORATION
--------------------------------------
Subsidiaries
Actel Europe, Ltd., a U.K. corporation
Actel Europe SARL, a French corporation
Actel GmbH, a German corporation
Actel Pan-Asia Corporation, a Nevada corporation
Actel Pan-Asia, Hong Kong Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation
Actel Japan, KK, a Japanese corporation
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-13
<SEQUENCE>2
<FILENAME>edgarmdafinancials.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EXHIBIT 13
<TEXT>
ACTEL CORPORATION
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenues................................ $ 145,559 $ 226,419 $ 171,661 $ 154,427 $ 155,858
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues......................... 62,210 84,680 66,387 61,642 64,244
Research and development................. 38,172 36,599 32,338 31,220 26,465
Selling, general, and administrative..... 41,464 47,960 45,903 40,558 40,317
Amortization of goodwill and other
acquisition-related intangibles........ 14,757 8,056 2,226 1,185 877
Restructuring charge (1)................. -- -- 1,963 -- --
Purchased in-process research and
development (2)........................ -- 10,646 600 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total costs and expenses........... 156,603 187,941 149,417 134,605 131,903
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Income (loss) from operations............... (11,044) 38,478 22,244 19,822 23,955
Interest income and other, net of expense... 7,280 8,310 3,642 2,380 1,842
Gain on sale of Chartered common stock (3).. -- 28,329 -- -- --
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Income (loss) before tax provision and equity
interest in net (loss) of equity method
investee................................. (3,764) 75,117 25,886 22,202 25,797
Equity interest in net (loss) of equity method
investee (4)............................. -- (2,445) (193) -- --
Tax provision............................... 937 31,227 8,055 7,215 9,029
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss)........................... $ (4,701) $ 41,445 $ 17,638 $ 14,987 $ 16,768
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic.................................... $ (0.20) $ 1.77 $ 0.81 $ 0.71 $ 0.82
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Diluted.................................. $ (0.20) $ 1.58 $ 0.76 $ 0.68 $ 0.76
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:
Basic.................................... 23,743 23,447 21,664 21,251 20,370
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
Diluted.................................. 23,743 26,233 23,058 21,921 21,968
============ ============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACTEL CORPORATION
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA (Continued)
(in thousands, except per share data)
As of December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Working capital............................ $ 161,871 $ 146,952 $ 108,818 $ 85,858 $ 76,279
Total assets............................... 290,082 312,434 259,211 179,708 159,994
Total shareholders' equity................. 237,680 230,101 178,630 127,054 109,010
</TABLE>
- ------------------------------------------------------------
(1) During the second quarter of 1999, Actel completed a restructuring
plan that resulted in a reduction in force along with the elimination
of certain projects and non-critical activities. See Note 6 of Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of
components of this expense.
(2) The 2000 expenses represent charges for in-process research and
development arising from Actel's acquisitions of Prosys Technology,
Inc. and GateField Corporation. The 1999 expense represents a charge
for in-process research and development incurred in the fourth quarter
of 1999 in connection with Actel's acquisition of AutoGate Logic, Inc.
See Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion of these expenses.
(3) During the second quarter of 2000, Actel sold all of its shares of
Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd. common stock for proceeds
of $39.0 million, resulting in a one-time gain of $28.3 million before
tax. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
further discussion of this gain.
(4) Represents Actel's equity share of net losses of GateField Corporation
in accordance with the equity method of accounting prior to the
purchase acquisition completed on November 15, 2000. See Note 5 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of
this expense.
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Actel Corporation (Actel) designs, develops, and markets field programmable
gate arrays (FPGAs) and associated development tools, intellectual property (IP)
cores, and services. FPGAs are used by designers of communications, computer,
consumer, industrial, military and aerospace, and other electronic systems to
differentiate their products and get them to market faster. Actel is the leading
supplier of FPGAs based on flash and antifuse technologies.
The {bracketed statements} contained in this Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are forward-looking
statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual events and results may differ materially
from those expressed or forecast in the forward-looking statements due to the
Risk Factors identified in Part I of Actel's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
2001, which is incorporated herein by this reference, or for other reasons.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain financial data from the Consolidated
Statements of Operations expressed as a percentage of net revenues:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenues............................................................ 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of revenues........................................................ 42.7 37.4 38.7
------------ ------------ ------------
Gross margin............................................................ 57.3 62.6 61.3
Research and development................................................ 26.2 16.2 18.8
Selling, general, and administrative.................................... 28.6 21.2 26.7
Amortization of goodwill and other acquisition-related intangibles.... 10.1 3.6 1.3
Restructuring charge.................................................... -- -- 1.2
Purchased in-process research and development........................... -- 4.6 0.3
------------ ------------ ------------
Income (loss) from operations........................................... (7.6) 17.0 13.0
Interest income and other, net of expense............................... 5.0 3.7 2.1
Gain on sale of Chartered common stock.................................. -- 12.5 --
------------ ------------ ------------
Income (loss) before tax provision and equity interest in net (loss) of
equity method investee.............................................. (2.6) 33.2 15.1
Equity interest in net (loss) of equity method investee................. -- (1.1) (0.1)
Tax provision........................................................... 0.6 13.8 4.7
------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss)....................................................... (3.2%) 18.3% 10.3%
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
Actel's fiscal year ends on the first Sunday after December 30. Fiscal
2001, 2000, and 1999 ended on January 6, 2002, December 31, 2000, and January 2,
2000, respectively. Accordingly, fiscal 2001 was a fifty-three week fiscal year,
rather than a normal fifty-two week fiscal year. For ease of presentation,
December 31 has been indicated as the fiscal year-end for all years.
Net Revenues
Net revenues for 2001 were $145.6 million, a decline of 36% from 2000. This
compares with an increase in net revenues of 32% for 2000 from 1999. Actel
derives its revenues primarily from the sale of FPGAs, which accounted for 96%
of net revenues for 2001, 2000, and 1999. Non-FPGA revenues are derived from
Actel's Protocol Design Services organization, royalties, and the sale of
software, hardware, and maintenance.
The decline in net revenues for 2001 compared with 2000 was due principally
to a decrease of 11% in the overall average selling price (ASP) of FPGAs and a
decrease of 28% in unit shipments. ASP was lower because of a shift in the mix
of products shipped toward newer products, which in general have lower ASPs than
more mature products. Unit shipments were down due to lower customer demand
across all market segments and geographic regions as the result of a general
softening in the world economy, with the most notable decline in the
communications market.
The increase in net revenues for 2000 compared with 1999 was due
principally to an increase of 12% in the overall ASP of FPGAs and an increase of
18% in unit shipments. ASP was higher due mostly to increased sales of higher
ASP products to customers in the communications and satellite markets. Unit
shipments were higher primarily because of increased sales of MX product.
Actel generates a majority of its revenues from the sale of its products
through distributors. Actel's principal distributors are Unique Technologies,
Inc. (Unique) and Pioneer-Standard Electronics, Inc. (Pioneer). During 2001,
Actel consolidated its distribution channel by terminating its distributor
relationship with Arrow Electronics, Inc. (Arrow). The following table sets
forth, for each of the last three years, the percentage of revenues derived from
all customers accounting for 10% or more of net revenues in any of such years:
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
Pioneer.................... 20% 13% 12%
Unique..................... 19 15 13
Arrow...................... 13 17 16
Nortel Networks............ 2 11 9
Actel does not recognize revenue on product shipped to a distributor until
the distributor resells the product to its customer.
Sales to customers outside the United States accounted for 38%, 32%, and
29% of net revenues for 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. Export sales
increased as a percentage of total sales for 2001 compared with 2000 primarily
because sales to European customers dropped only 6% while sales to customers in
the United States declined by 42%. The largest portion of export sales is made
to European customers, which accounted for 28%, 19%, and 17% of net revenues for
2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
Gross Margin
Gross margin for 2001 was 57% of net revenues, compared with 63% for 2000
and 61% for 1999. Gross margin for 2001 fell from a year ago due primarily to
higher inventory write-offs in the second and third quarters of 2001, which were
taken as a result of lower forecasted customer demand. Excess capacity
associated with lower net revenues also contributed to the reduction. Gross
margin for 2000 improved from 1999 primarily as a result of a 12% increase in
ASP, improved sort yields (especially on the newer products), and better
utilization of manufacturing capacity associated with higher net revenues.
Actel seeks to reduce costs by improving wafer yields, negotiating price
reductions with suppliers, increasing the level and efficiency of its testing
and packaging operations, achieving economies of scale by means of higher
production levels, and increasing the number of die produced per wafer,
principally by shrinking the die size of its products. No assurance can be given
that these efforts will be successful. The capability of Actel to shrink the die
size of its FPGAs is dependent on the availability of more advanced
manufacturing processes. Due to the custom steps involved in manufacturing
antifuse and (to a lesser extent) flash FPGAs, Actel typically obtains access to
new manufacturing processes later than its competitors using standard
manufacturing processes.
Research and Development (R&D)
R&D expenditures for 2001 were $38.2 million, or 26% of net revenues,
compared with $36.6 million, or 16% of net revenues, for 2000 and $32.3 million,
or 19% of net revenues, for 1999. R&D expenditures increased primarily as a
result of spending on technologies acquired in Actel's acquisitions of GateField
Corporation (GateField), a developer of flash-based FPGA products, in November
2000 and of Prosys Technology (Prosys), an embedded FPGA IP developer, in June
2000. R&D spending on the acquired companies' technologies was included for all
of 2001, part of 2000, and none of 1999.
R&D expenditures for 2001 also increased due to $1.3 million of incremental
spending on a BridgeFPGA initiative that Actel announced during the second
quarter of 2001 to address interoperability problems created by the
proliferation of high-performance interface standards. In support of the
BridgeFPGA initiative, Actel also announced a plan to increase R&D spending from
second quarter 2001 levels by an aggregate of $8.0 to $10.0 million over a
period of approximately six quarters. {R&D spending as a percentage of sales is
expected to return to levels more consistent with Actel's historical experience
in 2003.}
Actel's R&D consists of circuit design, software development, and process
technology activities. Actel believes that continued substantial investment in
R&D is critical to maintaining a strong technological position in the industry.
Since Actel's antifuse and flash FPGAs are manufactured using customized
processes, Actel's R&D expenditures will probably always be higher as a
percentage of net revenues than that of its major competitors using standard
manufacturing processes.
Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A)
SG&A expenses for 2001 were $41.5 million, or 29% of net revenues, compared
with $48.0 million, or 21% of net revenues for 2000 and $45.9 million, or 27% of
net revenues, for 1999. SG&A expenses for 2001 declined by 14% compared with
2000 primarily as the result of lower selling expenses (primarily sales bonuses
and outside sales commissions) associated with the 36% decrease in net revenues.
The lower selling expenses were partially offset by an increase of 12 in SG&A
headcount during 2001, mostly in the second half of the year. Headcount
increased in sales and marketing to support Actel's new products. SG&A expenses
for 2000 increased by 4% compared with 1999, while Actel's net revenues
increased by 32%. Selling expenses increased in 2000 primarily due to the
increase in net revenues.
Amortization of Goodwill and Other Acquisition-Related Intangibles
Amortization of goodwill and other acquisition-related intangibles for 2001
was $14.8 million, compared with $8.1 million for 2000 and $2.2 million for
1999. The increases were due to the timing of the Prosys and GateField
acquisitions, which were completed on June 2, 2000, and November 15, 2000,
respectively. Amortization of goodwill and other acquisition-related intangibles
from the Prosys and GateField acquisitions were included for all of 2001, part
of 2000, and none of 1999. Amortization expense related to the goodwill and
other intangible assets acquired in the GateField and Prosys acquisitions was
$13.3 million in 2001, $4.1 million in 2000, and none in 1999. Amortization
expense for 2000 was also impacted by $2.4 million of amortization charges
through November 15, 2000, related to Actel's pre-acquisition equity investment
in GateField. Beginning in 2002, goodwill will no longer be amortized but will
be subject to annual impairment tests and written down only when impaired. All
other intangible assets with a finite useful life will continue to be amortized
over their estimated useful lives. See "Impact of Recently Issued Accounting
Standards" and Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion of these expenses.
Restructuring Charge
During the second quarter of 1999, Actel completed a restructuring plan
that resulted in a reduction in force as well as the elimination of certain
projects and non-critical activities. The total pretax restructuring charges for
these activities amounted to $2.0 million. These measures were taken to reduce
spending and sharpen Actel's focus on new product development. As of December
31, 1999, all restructuring reserves had been fully utilized. See Note 6 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the
restructuring charges.
Purchased In-Process Research and Development Expenses
GateField
In November 2000, Actel completed its acquisition of GateField in a
transaction accounted for as a purchase. The in-process research and
development (IPRD) expense associated with this purchase resulted in a
one-time charge of $5.1 million during the fourth quarter of 2000.
IPRD was identified and valued through extensive interviews and
analysis of data provided by GateField concerning developmental products,
their stage of development, the time, cost, and resources needed to
complete them, and associated risks. The income approach, which bases the
value of an asset on its future earnings capacity, was utilized in valuing
the IPRD. This approach values an asset based on the future cash flows
projected to be generated by the asset over its estimated useful life. To
estimate the value of the IPRD, the future cash flows were discounted to
their present value utilizing a discount rate (25%) that would provide
sufficient return to a potential investor. At the date of acquisition, the
in-process technology had no alternative future use and was not ready for
commercial production.
GateField commenced development efforts on the next-generation ProASIC
product beginning in 2000. The development efforts included adding
features, such as increased input-output speed, an improved programming
mechanism, increasing the number of routing tracks and the number of
available gates, and migrating the ProASIC technology from a 0.25-micron to
a 0.22-micron manufacturing process. GateField had invested significant
time and effort in developing this product family but, at the time of
acquisition, it had not yet reached technological feasibility. At the time
of the acquisition, GateField estimated the project was approximately 50%
complete and would be complete in the first quarter of 2001. The percentage
was based on GateField having expended 11.7 man-years prior to the
acquisition and the need to expend an estimated 11.5 man-years following
the acquisition to complete the product. Given that there was significant
technological risk relating to the development of the next-generation
ProASIC product and that not even the first-generation ProASIC product had
generated any revenue, this product family met the definition of in-process
technology and was classified as such.
The fair value of the estimated discounted cash flows of the
next-generation ProASIC was calculated to be $5.1 million on November 15,
2000. The fair value calculation was based on future cash flows anticipated
in the years 2001 through 2005, with associated gross margin and expense
levels as a percentage of revenues gradually improving to current Actel
operating levels by 2003.
Actel introduced the next-generation ProASIC product (ProASIC Plus) in
January 2002, approximately one year later than estimated at the time of
acquisition. The delay in introduction confirms the uncertainties that
existed at the time of acquisition and supports the initial classification
of the technology as IPRD. {Management does not believe the delay had a
material impact on the value attributed to the technology because no
similar competing products were introduced and the marketability of the
next-generation product was not materially diminished. Based on facts and
circumstances currently known, management believes the value attributed to
the IPRD is still materially valid.}
Prosys
In June 2000, Actel announced and completed its acquisition of Prosys
in a transaction accounted for as a purchase. The IPRD expense associated
with this purchase resulted in a one-time charge of $5.6 million during the
second quarter of 2000.
IPRD was identified and valued through extensive interviews and
analysis of data provided by Prosys concerning developmental products,
their stage of development, the time, cost, and resources needed to
complete them, and associated risks. The income approach, as discussed
above, and a discount rate of 25% was utilized in valuing the IPRD. At the
date of acquisition, the in-process technology had no alternative future
use and had not reached technological feasibility.
As of the valuation date, Prosys had no developed products in the
marketplace and was in the process of developing a 4x4 embedded block
SRAM-based FPGA core and had planned an 8x8 embedded block SRAM-based FPGA
core. These IP cores allow other semiconductor companies to embed
functional blocks of programmable logic into their silicon designs. Prosys
indicated that the 4x4 embedded block was expected to be completed in late
2000, following the development of key software features. The 8x8 embedded
block core was estimated to require approximately six- to nine-months of
additional development effort after the completion of the 4x4 embedded
block core. The planned development time of six- to nine-months was based
on leveraging the technology available from the 4x4 embedded block core. As
of the valuation date, Prosys had incurred development costs of
approximately $3.1 million related to the 4x4 embedded block core and
estimated that an additional $1.3 million of R&D was required to complete
the development of this product. Thus, the in-process 4x4 embedded block
core was estimated to be approximately 70% complete. Since the 8x8 embedded
block core will leverage technology from the 4x4 embedded block core in
process, the 8x8 embedded block core was estimated to be 35% complete in
its development. These products were in development at the time of
acquisition and there was significant technological risk at that time
related to completing development of these products. Accordingly, the 4x4
embedded block core and the 8x8 embedded block core were classified as
in-process technology.
The fair value of the estimated discounted cash flows of the Prosys
in-process technology was calculated to be $5.6 million on June 2, 2000.
The fair value calculation was based on future cash flows anticipated in
the years 2000 through 2005, with associated gross margin and expense
levels as a percentage of revenues gradually improving to current Actel
operating levels by 2002.
The 4x4 embedded block core was introduced in February 2001 as the
VariCore Embedded Programmable Gate Array (EPGA) IP core. Due to the recent
downturn in the semiconductor industry, revenues from VariCore EPGAs are
materializing slower than anticipated. Given the low level of demand during
2001 for embedded cores, the development effort on the 8x8 embedded core
was postponed. Development of the 8x8 embedded block core may resume when
demand for embedded cores increases. {Management does not believe that the
delay of one quarter in the completion of the 4x4 embedded block core, the
postponement of the development of the 8x8 embedded block core, or the
delay in the realization of significant revenues from the VariCore EPGA
technology are sufficient at this time to impact the values attributed to
the IPRD, goodwill, and intangible assets. Based on facts and circumstances
current known, the lack of any significant revenues is seen as a delay
rather than a reduction in expected revenues, so management believes the
value attributed to the IPRD is still materially valid.}
Interest Income and Other, Net of Expense
Interest and other income for 2001, 2000, and 1999 were $7.3 million, $8.3
million, and $3.6 million, respectively. The decrease in interest and other
income for 2001 was due mainly to lower interest rates that Actel earned on its
cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. The decrease was also due to
a drop in amounts available for investment by Actel during the year. The
increase in interest and other income for 2000 compared with 1999 was due
primarily to increased amounts available for investment by Actel during the
year. The combined balance of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments
was $128.8 million at the end of 2001 compared with $140.8 million at the end of
2000 and $107.1 million at the end of 1999. Moreover, the amount available for
investment during most of 2000 was significantly higher than the ending balance
due to cash usage in the fourth quarter for the purchase of GateField ($24.0
million) and stock repurchases ($21.0 million).
Gain on Sale of Chartered Common Stock
During the second quarter of 2000, Actel sold all 515,000 shares of
Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd. (Chartered) common stock that Actel
owned for a one-time gain of $28.3 million.
Equity Interest in Net Loss of Equity Method Investee
Prior to Actel's acquisition of GateField on November 15, 2000, Actel
accounted for its investments in and agreements with GateField under the equity
method of accounting. Actel began accounting for its equity interest in
GateField under the equity method of accounting during the third quarter of
1999. Actel incurred charges of $2.4 million in 2000 and $0.2 million in 1999
for its equity interest in the net loss of GateField.
Tax Provision
Excluding the effect of certain non-recurring acquisition-related charges
and investment gains, Actel's effective tax rates for 2001, 2000, and 1999 were
8.9%, 31.3%, and 31.4%, respectively. Significant components affecting this
effective tax rate include federal R&D credits, income from tax-exempt
securities, the state composite rate, and recognition of certain deferred tax
assets subject to valuation allowances as of December 31, 2000, and December 31,
1999, respectively. The effective tax rate for 2001 decreased primarily due to
reduced profitability, which increased the percentage benefit from R&D tax
credits, and to tax exempt income.
Financial Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources
Actel's total assets were $290.1 million at the end of 2001, compared
with $312.4 million at the end of 2000. The decrease in total assets was
attributable principally to decreases in cash, cash equivalents, short-term
investments, accounts receivable, and goodwill. The following table sets forth
certain financial data from the consolidated balance sheets expressed as
percentage change from December 31, 2000, to December 31, 2001:
Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments........... (8.5)%
Accounts receivable, net..................................... (42.7)
Inventories.................................................. 42.5
Property and equipment, net.................................. 20.8
Goodwill, net................................................ (20.6)
Other assets, net (primarily deferred income taxes
and purchased intangible assets other than goodwill)........ (2.7)
Total assets................................................. (7.2)
Total current liabilities.................................... (38.8)
Total liabilities............................................ (36.4)
Shareholders' equity......................................... 3.3
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Short-Term Investments
Actel's cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments were $128.8
million at the end of 2001, compared with $140.8 million at the end of 2000.
This decrease of $12.0 million, or 8.5%, from the end of 2000 was due primarily
to purchases of property and equipment of $9.5 million and net cash used in
operating activities of $10.3 million, which were partially offset by cash
provided from the issuance of common stock under employee stock plans of $7.7
million.
The significant components within operating activities that provided cash
during 2001 included $17.4 million from the net results for the year adjusted
for non-cash items ($21.8 million of which relates to depreciation and
amortization) and cash generated through decreases in accounts receivable of
$12.5 million. The significant components within operating activities that
resulted in a reduction of cash from operations in 2001 included cash used in
the reduction of accounts payable, accrued salaries and employee benefits, and
other accrued liabilities of $14.1 million, the reduction in deferred income of
$18.1 million, and an increase in inventories of $10.8 million.
Actel meets all of its funding needs for ongoing operations with internally
generated cash flows from operations and with existing cash and short-term
investment balances. Revenues declined and inventories grew during 2001,
resulting in a net use of cash from operations. As 2001 demonstrates, sales can
decline more rapidly than expenses, limiting the availability of cash generated
internally to fund ongoing operations.
The following represents contractual commitments associated with operating
leases and royalty and licensing agreements:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Payments Due by Period
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2005
Total 2002 2003 2004 and later
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating leases........................... $ 5,711 $ 3,575 $ 1,901 $ 235 $ --
Royalty/licensing agreements............... 11,097 2,747 2,575 2,575 3,200
Total...................................... $ 16,808 $ 6,322 $ 4,476 $ 2,810 $ 3,200
</TABLE>
Actel has entered into royalty/licensing agreements where Actel's contractual
commitments are dependent upon future contingencies, such as technological
development by software vendors. Management considers it reasonably likely that
the development will be successfully completed during 2002 resulting in the
following additional contingent obligations:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Payments Due by Period
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2005
Total 2002 2003 2004 and later
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Royalty/licensing agreements............... $ 11,611 $ 2,820 $ 2,999 $ 2,842 $ 2,950
</TABLE>
At December 31, 2001, Actel also had a number of purchase commitments from wafer
manufacturers for raw materials orders that were expected to be filled within
ninety days. The wafer purchase commitments represent a normal level of
outstanding orders and are not material.
{Actel believes that existing cash, cash equivalents, and short-term
investments, together with cash generated from operations, will be sufficient to
meet its cash requirements for 2002.} A portion of available cash may be used
for investment in or acquisition of complementary businesses, products, or
technologies. Wafer manufacturers are increasingly demanding financial support
from customers in the form of equity investments and advance purchase price
deposits, which in some cases are substantial. Should Actel require additional
capacity, it may be required to incur significant expenditures to secure such
capacity.
Actel believes that the availability of adequate financial resources is a
substantial competitive factor. To take advantage of opportunities as they
arise, or to withstand adverse business conditions when they occur, it may
become prudent or necessary for Actel to raise additional capital. Actel
monitors the availability and cost of potential capital resources, including
equity and debt with a view toward raising additional capital on terms that are
acceptable to Actel. No assurance can be given that additional capital will
become available on acceptable terms.
Accounts Receivable
Actel's net accounts receivable was $16.8 million at the end of 2001,
compared with $29.3 million at the end of 2000. This decrease was due primarily
to lower sales. Accounts receivable for 2001 decreased by 43% compared with
2000, while Actel's net revenues decreased by 36%. Days sales outstanding were
43 days at the end of 2001, compared with 41 days at the end of 2000.
Inventories
Actel's inventories were $36.3 million at the end of 2001, compared with
$25.5 million at the end of 2000. Inventories increased during 2001 because
sales declined at a more rapid rate than Actel's receipt of raw materials.
{Based on reductions in the orders for raw materials that Actel has implemented,
Actel believes that net inventory levels will be lower at end of 2002 than at
the end of 2001.} Inventory days of supply increased from 105 days in 2000 to
265 days in 2001. Since Actel's FPGAs are manufactured using customized steps
that are added to the standard manufacturing processes of its independent wafer
suppliers, Actel's manufacturing cycle is generally longer and hence more
difficult to adjust in response to changing demands or delivery schedules.
Accordingly, Actel's inventory model (120 days) will probably always be higher
than that of its major competitors using standard processes.
Property and Equipment
Actel's net property and equipment was $14.7 million at the end of 2001,
compared with $12.1 million at the end of 2000 due to higher capital spending in
2001. Actel invested $9.5 million in property and equipment in 2001, compared
with $6.2 million in 2000, to support the development and introduction of new
products. Capital expenditures during the past two years have been primarily for
engineering, manufacturing, and office equipment. Depreciation of property and
equipment was $7.0 million in 2001, compared with $7.4 million for 2000.
Goodwill
Actel's net goodwill decreased to $37.2 million at the end of 2001,
compared with $46.8 million at the end of 2000. Net goodwill declined primarily
because of amortization expense of $11.7 million recorded during 2001. Also
during 2001, $1.7 million in additional goodwill was recorded to reflect $1.1
million of stock issued and $0.6 million of cash paid to the former security
holders of Prosys upon the attainment of certain technological milestones
defined in the June 2000 purchase agreement. See "Impact of Recently Issued
Accounting Standards" and Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for further discussion of adjustments to goodwill.
Goodwill is recorded when the consideration paid in an acquisition exceeds
the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. Historically
and through 2001, goodwill and other acquisition-related intangibles have been
amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives. In accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121, "Accounting for the
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of,"
Actel recognizes impairment losses on long-lived assets when indicators of
impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated
by those assets are less than amounts at which the assets are carried on Actel's
books. The impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset
to its carrying value. Fair value is estimated based on discounted future cash
flows. Reviews have been regularly performed to determine whether facts or
circumstances exist indicating impairment. No impairment has been indicated to
date. Beginning in 2002, goodwill will no longer be amortized but will be
subject to annual impairment tests and written down only when impaired. All
other intangible assets with a finite useful life will continue to be amortized
over their estimated useful lives.
Other Assets
Actel's other assets decreased to $26.0 million at the end of 2001,
compared with $26.7 million at the end of 2000. The decrease was due primarily
to $3.1 million of amortization of intangible assets, which was partially offset
by the fair value of plan assets ($2.1 million) associated with Actel's deferred
compensation plan. The plan is funded with participant contributions through
payroll withholding.
Current Liabilities
Actel's total current liabilities were $50.4 million at the end of 2001,
compared with $82.3 million at the end of 2000. The decrease was due principally
to a reduction of $18.1 million in deferred income from lower shipments to
distributors and a reduction in accounts payable of $4.8 million associated with
lower inventory purchases. Accrued salaries and employee benefits fell by $10.0
million as a result of lower vacation accruals and management and sales bonus
accruals in 2001. During the year, vacation accruals were reduced by mandatory
vacation days implemented as a cost savings measure. Management and sales bonus
accruals were lower during 2001 due to the lower operating results.
Shareholders' Equity
Shareholders' equity was $237.7 million at the end of 2001, compared with
$230.1 million at the end of 2000. The increase included proceeds of $7.7
million from the sale of common stock under employee stock plans, $2.7 million
of tax benefits arising from employee stock plans, and $1.1 million of stock
issued to Prosys security holders pursuant to the achievement of certain
technological milestones specified in the Prosys purchase agreement. These
increases were partially offset by a net loss of $4.7 million.
Employees
At the end of 2001, Actel had 521 full-time employees, including 143 in
marketing, sales, and customer support; 167 in R&D; 157 in operations; 17 in
Protocol Design Services; and 37 in administration and finance. This compares
with 484 full-time employees at the end of 2000, an increase of 8%. Net revenues
were approximately $279,000 per employee for 2001, compared with approximately
$468,000 for 2000, which represents a decrease of 40%.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS
No. 141, "Business Combinations," and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets." These standards become effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2001. Beginning in Actel's 2002 fiscal year, goodwill will no
longer be amortized but will be subject to annual impairment tests and written
down only when impaired. All other intangible assets with a finite useful life
will continue to be amortized over their estimated useful lives. As of December
31, 2001, unamortized goodwill was $37.2 million. The amortization expense
related to goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2001, was $11.7 million. For
2002, goodwill will not be amortized, resulting in the elimination of
approximately $11.8 million of amortization expense that otherwise would have
been recognized as expense. Other intangible assets, with a net book value of
$10.0 million at December 31, 2001, will continue to be amortized over their
estimated useful lives. The amortization expense associated with other
intangible assets amounted to $3.1 million in 2001. Actel will carry out an
impairment review of goodwill and other intangible assets during the first half
of 2002, as required by SFAS 142. Accordingly, management is still evaluating
the impact that the adoption of SFAS 142 will have on Actel's financial
position, operating results, or cash flows.
In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." This standard supersedes SFAS 121.
Although retaining many of the fundamental recognition and measurement
provisions of SFAS 121, the new rules significantly change the criteria that
must be met to classify an asset as held-for-sale. The standard also supersedes
certain provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 30,
"Reporting the Results of Operations -- Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a
Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring
Events and Transactions." SFAS 144 will require expected future operating losses
from discontinued operations to be displayed in discontinued operations in the
period(s) in which the losses are incurred rather than as of the measurement
date, as presently required. SFAS 144 becomes effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2001. Actel will adopt SFAS 144 in the first
quarter of 2002 and does not expect the adoption of SFAS 144 to have a material
impact on Actel's financial position, operating results, or cash flows.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Actel's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of
operations are based upon Actel's consolidated financial statements, which have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires Actel to
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues, and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has defined
the most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the
portrayal of Actel's financial condition and results, and requires management to
make our most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need
to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based upon this
definition, Actel's most critical policies include: Inventories, Impairment of
Investments in Other Companies, Intangible Assets and Goodwill, Income Taxes,
and Legal Matters. These policies are discussed below, as well as the estimates
and judgments involved. Actel bases its estimates on historical experience and
on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates. Actel
also has other key accounting policies, such as policies for Revenue and
Accounts Receivable. These other policies either do not generally require
management to make estimates and judgments that are as difficult or as
subjective, or it is less likely that they would have a material impact on
Actel's reported results of operations for a given period.
Inventories
As of December 31, 2001, Actel had an inventory balance of $36.3 million.
Management believes that a certain level of inventory must be carried to
maintain an adequate supply of product for customers. This inventory level may
vary based upon either orders received from customers or internal forecasts of
demand for these products. Other considerations in determining inventory levels
include the stage of products in the product life cycle, design win activity,
manufacturing lead times, customer demands, strategic relationships with
foundries, and competitive situations in the marketplace. Should any of these
factors have a result other than anticipated, inventory levels may be adversely
and materially affected.
Actel writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable
inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the
estimated realizable value based upon assumptions about future demand and market
conditions. To address this difficult, subjective, and complex area of judgment,
Actel applies a methodology that includes assumptions and estimates to arrive at
the net realizable value. First, Actel identifies any inventory that has been
previously reserved in prior periods. This inventory remains reserved until
sold, destroyed, or otherwise dispositioned. Second, Actel's quality assurance
personnel examine inventory line items that may have some form of obsolescence
due to non-conformance with electrical and mechanical standards. Third, Actel
assesses the inventory not otherwise identified to be reserved against product
history and forecasted demand, typically six months. Finally, the result of this
methodology is analyzed by management in light of the product life cycle, design
win activity, and competitive situations in the marketplace to derive an outlook
for consumption of the inventory and the appropriateness of the resulting
inventory levels. If actual future demand or market conditions are less
favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs
may be required.
Impairment of Investments in Other Companies
Actel occasionally makes equity investments in public or private companies
for the promotion of business and strategic objectives. Actel monitors its
equity investments for impairment on a periodic basis. In the event that the
carrying value of the equity investment exceeds its fair value, and the decline
in value is determined to be other than temporary, the carrying value is reduced
to its current fair value.
At December 31, 2001, Actel held an investment in a publicly-traded equity
security with a market value of $4.6 million included in short-term investments
and an unrealized loss of $1.0 million included in other comprehensive
income/(loss). In accordance with SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," if the decline in value below cost
is determined to be other than temporary, the unrealized losses will be realized
as expense on the income statement in the period when that determination is
made. Actel determines a decline in market value to be other than temporary
when, in the absence of other mitigating factors, a stock has traded below cost
for a consecutive six-month period. If this investment continues to trade below
cost for more than six months, and other mitigating factors such as general
economic and industry specific trends were to adversely change, this investment
will be evaluated for impairment and written down to a balance equal to the fair
value at the time of impairment, with the amount of the write-down realized as
expense on the income statement. {Based on management's assessment of industry
trends, the volatility and trading volumes of this equity security, as well as
the fact that the investment has traded at below original cost for less than six
consecutive months, management concluded that the decline in value was temporary
and no impairment existed at December 31, 2001.}
At December 31, 2001, Actel held an equity investment that represented a
14% equity interest in a company located in the United Kingdom. This investment
is carried at its cost of $2.2 million on the balance sheet as part of other
assets. As this equity security is not publicly traded, determining the fair
value of this investment is judgmental in nature and dependant on management's
assessment of the performance of the company, which includes, among other
things, successfully developing and introducing a new technology into the market
as well as obtaining additional funding to finance these activities until the
company can generate positive cash flows from the sale of the new products. This
investment is subject to a multitude of risks, including but not limited to the
risks that the company may not be successful in developing the planned
technology, that the company may not be able to secure necessary funding to
continue operations, that a suitable market for such technology may not develop,
or that a competitor may develop a superior product. If any of these risks
materialize, or other indicators of possible impairment arise, the investment
will be evaluated for impairment and written down to a balance equal to the fair
value at the time of impairment, with the amount of the write-down realized as
an expense on the income statement. {Based on the progress made toward
technological goals and the expectation of future marketability of the
technology under development, Actel concluded no impairment of this investment
existed at December 31, 2001.}
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
During 1999 and 2000, Actel completed the acquisitions of AutoGate Logic,
Prosys, and GateField, resulting in a significant amount of goodwill and
identified intangible assets. Goodwill is recorded when the consideration paid
in an acquisition exceeds the fair value of the net tangible and intangible
assets acquired. At December 31, 2001, Actel had $37.2 million of remaining net
book value assigned to goodwill from those acquisitions and $10.0 million of
remaining net book value assigned to identified intangible assets such as
patents and completed technology. In accordance with SFAS No. 121, "Accounting
for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed
Of," reviews have been regularly performed to determine whether facts or
circumstances exist indicating that the assets are impaired. In assessing the
recoverability of goodwill and other intangibles, Actel must make assumptions
regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair
value of the respective assets, including industry growth rates, estimated gross
margin levels, and estimates of the market share Actel will achieve. If these
estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, it could result in
lower estimated future cash flows that would not support the current carrying
values of these assets, which would require Actel to record impairment charges
for these assets. {During the year ended December 31, 2001, Actel did not record
any impairment losses related to goodwill or other intangible assets.} Beginning
in 2002, Actel will adopt SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,"
which requires Actel to analyze goodwill for impairment during the first six
months of fiscal 2002 and on a periodic basis thereafter.
Income Taxes
Actel accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
"Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires that deferred tax assets and
liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary
differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities.
SFAS No. 109 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation
allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred
tax asset will not be realized. Actel evaluates annually the realizability of
its deferred tax assets by assessing its valuation allowance and by adjusting
the amount of such allowance, if necessary. The factors used to assess the
likelihood of realization are Actel's forecast of future taxable income and
available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net
deferred tax assets.
At December 31, 2001, Actel had deferred tax assets in excess of deferred
tax liabilities of $63.0 million. {For the reasons cited above, at December 31,
2001, management determined that it is more likely than not that $35.0 million
of such assets will be realized, resulting in a valuation allowance of $28.0
million.} Failure to achieve forecasted taxable income might affect the
realization of such net deferred tax assets. Factors that may affect Actel's
ability to achieve sufficient forecasted taxable income include, but are not
limited to, increased competition, a decline in sales or margins, loss of market
share, delays in product availability, and technological obsolescence.
Legal Matters
As is typical in the semiconductor industry, Actel has been and expects to
be notified from time to time of claims that it may be infringing patents owned
by others. During 2001, Actel held discussions regarding potential patent
infringement issues with several third parties, some of which have significantly
greater financial and intellectual property resources than Actel. When probable
and reasonably estimable, Actel has made provision for the estimated settlement
costs of claims for alleged infringement. The provision is based on an estimated
royalty rate applied to shipments made in the periods and to or from the
geographic areas under dispute. In the absence of facts or circumstances unique
to a particular dispute, the royalty rate is estimated based on Actel's
understanding of royalty rates other technology companies typically agree to pay
in similar types of disputes. As it has in the past, Actel may obtain licenses
under patents that it is alleged to infringe. While Actel believes that
reasonable resolution will occur, there can be no assurance that these claims
will be resolved or that the resolution of these claims will not have a
materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results
of operations. In addition, Actel's evaluation of the impact of these pending
disputes could change based upon new information learned by Actel. {Subject to
the foregoing, Actel does not believe that any pending patent dispute is likely
to have a materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or
results of operations.}
Revenues
A significant portion of Actel's revenue is derived from shipments to
distributors. Shipments to distributors are made under agreements allowing
certain rights of return and price adjustments on unsold merchandise. For that
reason, Actel defers recognition of revenues and related cost of revenues on
sales of products to distributors until such products are sold by the
distributor and title transfers to the end user.
Actel records a provision for price adjustments on unsold merchandise
shipped to distributors in the same period as the related revenues are recorded.
If market conditions were to decline, Actel may need to take action with its
distributors to ensure the sell-through of inventory already in the channel.
These actions during a market downturn could result in incrementally greater
reductions to net revenues than otherwise would be expected. Actel also records
a provision for estimated sales returns on products shipped to end customers in
the same period as the related revenues are recorded. The provision for sales
returns is based on historical sales returns, analysis of credit memo data, and
other known factors. If the historical data Actel uses to calculate these
estimates does not properly reflect future returns, net revenues could be
materially different.
Accounts Receivable
As of December 31, 2001, Actel had an accounts receivable balance of $16.8
million, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.3 million. If sales
levels were to increase, it is likely that the level of receivables would also
increase. In the event that customers delay their payments to Actel, the levels
of accounts receivable would also increase. Actel maintains allowances for
doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its
customers to make required payments. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
based on past payment history with the customer, analysis of the customer's
current financial condition, outstanding invoices older than 90 days, and other
known factors. If the financial condition of Actel's customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments,
additional allowances may be required.
Market Risk
As of December 31, 2001, Actel's investment portfolio consisted primarily
of corporate bonds, floating rate notes, and federal and municipal obligations.
The principal objectives of Actel's investment activities are to preserve
principal, meet liquidity needs, and maximize yields. To meet these objectives,
Actel invests excess liquidity only in high credit quality debt securities with
average maturities of less than two years. Actel also limits the percentage of
total investments that may be invested in any one issuer. Corporate investments
as a group are also limited to a maximum percentage of Actel's investment
portfolio.
Actel's debt security investments are subject to interest rate risk. An
increase in interest rates could subject Actel to a decline in the market value
of its investments. These risks are mitigated by the ability of Actel to hold
these investments to maturity. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in
interest rates would result in a reduction of approximately $1.3 million in the
fair value of Actel's available-for-sale debt securities held at December 31,
2001.
Actel's marketable equity securities are subject to equity price risk. At
December 31, 2001, there is an unrealized loss of $1.0 million on Actel's
marketable equity securities. A decrease in equity prices of 10% would subject
Actel to an additional decline in the market value of its marketable equity
securities of $0.5 million from the fair value at December 31, 2001.
The potential changes noted above are based upon sensitivity analyses
performed on Actel's financial position and expected operating levels at
December 31, 2001. Actual results may differ materially.
Other Risks
Actel's operating results are subject to general economic conditions and a
variety of risks characteristic of the semiconductor industry (including booking
and shipment uncertainties, wafer supply fluctuations, and price erosion) or
specific to Actel, any of which could cause Actel's operating results to differ
materially from past results. See the Risk Factors set forth at the end of Part
I of Actel's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 6,
2002.
Quarterly Information
The table on the next page presents certain unaudited quarterly results for
each of the eight quarters in the period ended December 31, 2001. In the opinion
of management, this information has been presented on the same basis as the
audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual
Report and all necessary adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
accruals) have been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly the
unaudited quarterly results when read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements of Actel and notes thereto. However, these
quarterly operating results are not indicative of the results for any future
period.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dec. 31, Sep. 30, July 1, Apr. 1, Dec. 31, Oct. 1, July 2, Apr. 2,
2001 2001 2001 2001 2000 2000 2000 2000
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenues .......................... $ 32,059 $ 32,006 $ 36,460 $ 45,034 $ 60,129 $ 60,080 $ 55,544 $ 50,666
Gross profit .......................... 19,567 16,734 18,888 28,160 38,060 37,626 34,595 31,458
Income (loss) from operations ......... (4,086) (6,188) (4,233) 3,463 7,497 13,648 6,778 10,555
Net income (loss) ..................... $ (2,531) $ (2,334) $ (2,631) $ 2,795 $ 3,455 $ 9,779 $ 20,112 $ 8,099
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic .............................. $ (0.11) $ (0.10) $ (0.11) $ 0.12 $ 0.14 $ 0.41 $ 0.86 $ 0.36
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Diluted* ........................... $ (0.11) $ (0.10) $ (0.11) $ 0.11 $ 0.13 $ 0.36 $ 0.77 $ 0.32
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Shares used in computing net income
(loss) per share:
Basic .............................. 23,987 23,852 23,642 23,472 23,890 23,869 23,263 22,767
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Diluted* ........................... 23,987 23,852 23,642 25,126 26,107 26,999 26,186 25,467
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>
- ------------------------------------------
* For the second through fourth quarters of 2001, Actel incurred
quarterly net losses and the inclusion of stock options in the shares
used for computing diluted earnings per share would have been
anti-dilutive and reduced the loss per share. Accordingly, all common
stock equivalents (such as stock options) have been excluded from the
shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share for these
respective periods.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dec. 31, Sep. 30, July 1, Apr. 1, Dec. 31, Oct. 1, July 2, Apr. 2,
2001 2001 2001 2001 2000 2000 2000 2000
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
As a Percentage of Net Revenues:
Net revenues........................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Gross profit........................... 61.0 52.3 51.8 62.5 63.3 62.6 62.3 62.1
Income (loss) from operations.......... (12.7) (19.3) (11.6) 7.7 12.5 22.7 12.2 20.8
Net income (loss)...................... (7.9) (7.3) (7.2) 6.2 5.7 16.3 36.2 16.0
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACTEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
December 31,
--------------------------
2001 2000
------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents........................................................... $ 7,912 $ 9,266
Short-term investments.............................................................. 120,923 131,544
Accounts receivable, net............................................................ 16,759 29,256
Inventories, net.................................................................... 36,338 25,503
Deferred income taxes............................................................... 26,096 26,118
Prepaid expenses and other current assets........................................... 4,251 5,098
------------ ------------
Total current assets.......................................................... 212,279 226,785
Property and equipment, net............................................................ 14,665 12,137
Goodwill, net.......................................................................... 37,180 46,820
Other assets, net...................................................................... 25,958 26,692
------------ ------------
$ 290,082 $ 312,434
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable.................................................................... $ 10,129 $ 14,921
Accrued salaries and employee benefits.............................................. 7,189 17,200
Other accrued liabilities........................................................... 6,332 5,354
Deferred income..................................................................... 26,758 44,858
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities..................................................... 50,408 82,333
Deferred compensation plan liability................................................ 1,994 --
------------ ------------
Total liabilities............................................................. 52,402 82,333
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 1,000,000 issued and
converted to common stock, and none outstanding................................... -- --
Common stock, $.001 par value; 55,000,000 shares authorized; 24,055,949 and
23,331,162 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2001 and 2000,
respectively ..................................................................... 24 23
Additional paid-in capital.......................................................... 162,324 150,709
Retained earnings .................................................................. 75,207 79,908
Note receivable from officer ....................................................... (368) (368)
Unearned compensation cost ......................................................... (314) (922)
Accumulated other comprehensive income ............................................. 807 751
------------ ------------
Total shareholders' equity.................................................... 237,680 230,101
------------ ------------
$ 290,082 $ 312,434
============ ============
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACTEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net revenues............................................................ $ 145,559 $ 226,419 $ 171,661
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues..................................................... 62,210 84,680 66,387
Research and development............................................. 38,172 36,599 32,338
Selling, general, and administrative................................. 41,464 47,960 45,903
Amortization of goodwill and other acquisition-related intangibles 14,757 8,056 2,226
Restructuring charge................................................. -- -- 1,963
Purchased in-process research and development........................ -- 10,646 600
------------ ------------ ------------
Total costs and expenses....................................... 156,603 187,941 149,417
------------ ------------ ------------
Income (loss) from operations........................................... (11,044) 38,478 22,244
Interest income and other, net of expense............................... 7,280 8,310 3,642
Gain on the sale of Chartered common stock.............................. -- 28,329 --
------------ ------------ ------------
Income (loss) before tax provision and equity interest in net (loss) of
equity method investee............................................... (3,764) 75,117 25,886
Equity interest in net (loss) of equity method investee................. -- (2,445) (193)
Tax provision........................................................... 937 31,227 8,055
------------ ------------ ------------
Net income (loss)....................................................... $ (4,701) $ 41,445 $ 17,638
============ ============ ============
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic................................................................ $ (0.20) $ 1.77 $ 0.81
============ ============ ============
Diluted.............................................................. $ (0.20) $ 1.58 $ 0.76
============ ============ ============
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:
Basic................................................................ 23,743 23,447 21,664
============ ============ ============
Diluted.............................................................. 23,743 26,233 23,058
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACTEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
(in thousands, except share amounts)
Notes Accumulated
Additional Receivable Unearned Other Total
Common Paid-In Retained From Compensation Comprehensive Shareholders'
Stock Capital Earnings Officer Cost Income Equity
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31, 1998 ...... $ 21 $ 92,092 $ 34,763 $ -- $ -- $ 178 $ 127,054
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Net income ........................ -- -- 17,638 -- -- -- 17,638
Other comprehensive income:
Change in unrealized gain on
investments ................... -- -- -- -- -- 15,883 15,883
Comprehensive income ........... 33,521
Issuance of 954,569 shares of
common stock under employee
stock plans ...................... 1 9,003 -- -- -- -- 9,004
Issuance of 285,943 shares of
common stock for purchase of
AutoGate Logic ................... -- 6,858 -- -- -- -- 6,858
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options .......................... -- 2,193 -- -- -- -- 2,193
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 1999 ...... $ 22 $ 110,146 $ 52,401 $ -- $ -- $ 16,061 $ 178,630
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Net income ........................ -- -- 41,445 -- -- -- 41,445
Other comprehensive income:
Change in unrealized gain on
investments ................... -- -- -- -- -- (15,310) (15,310)
Comprehensive income ........... 26,135
Issuance of 1,574,334 shares of
common stock under employee
stock plans ..................... 2 16,363 -- (368) -- -- 15,997
Repurchase of common stock ........ (1) (7,077) (13,938) -- -- -- (21,016)
Issuance of 220,518 shares of
common stock for purchase of
Prosys ........................... -- 7,525 -- -- -- -- 7,525
Assumption of stock options in
connection with acquisitions of
GateField and Prosys including
unearned compensation expense for
those options .................... -- 13,665 -- -- (922) -- 12,743
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options .......................... -- 10,087 -- -- -- -- 10,087
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 2000 ...... $ 23 $ 150,709 $ 79,908 $ (368) $ (922) $ 751 $ 230,101
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACTEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)(Continued)
(in thousands, except share amounts)
Notes Accumulated
Additional Receivable Unearned Other Total
Common Paid-In Retained From Compensation Comprehensive Shareholders'
Stock Capital Earnings Officer Cost Income Equity
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at December 31, 2000 ...... $ 23 $ 150,709 $ 79,908 $ (368) $ (922) $ 751 $ 230,101
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
Net loss .......................... -- -- (4,701) -- -- -- (4,701)
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
Change in unrealized gain on
investments ................... -- -- -- -- -- 56 56
Comprehensive income/(loss) .... (4,645)
Issuance of 670,499 shares of
common stock under employee
stock plans, net of repurchases .. 1 7,675 -- -- -- -- 7,676
Issuance of 54,290 shares to Prosys
security holders in connection
with achievement of technological
milestones ....................... -- 1,132 -- -- -- -- 1,132
Issuance of stock options to
consultant ....................... -- 116 -- -- -- -- 116
Amortization of unearned
compensation cost ................ -- -- -- -- 225 -- 225
Purchase price adjustment related
to GateField employees' unvested
stock options originally assumed
in connection with the GateField
acquisition ...................... -- -- -- -- 383 -- 383
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options .......................... -- 2,692 -- -- -- -- 2,692
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Balance at December 31, 2001 ...... $ 24 $ 162,324 $ 75,207 $ (368) $ (314) $ 807 $ 237,680
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACTEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)................................................... $ (4,701) $ 41,445 $ 17,638
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization.................................... 21,755 15,463 10,294
Stock compensation cost recognized............................... 341 -- --
Non-cash portion of restructuring and other charges.............. -- -- 2,695
Gain on sale of Chartered stock.................................. -- (28,329) --
Purchased in-process research and development.................... -- 10,646 600
Equity interest in net loss of equity method investee............ -- 2,445 193
Loss on disposal of fixed assets................................. -- -- 136
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable........................................... 12,497 (6,609) (1,933)
Inventories................................................... (10,835) (179) 345
Deferred income taxes......................................... (47) (384) (3,775)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets..................... 237 (5,466) 429
Accounts payable, accrued salaries and employee benefits, and
other accrued liabilities................................. (14,109) 6,573 9,769
Tax benefits from exercise of stock options................... 2,692 10,087 2,193
Deferred income............................................... (18,100) 4,464 7,925
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities................. (10,270) 50,156 46,509
Investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment................................. (9,526) (6,173) (6,407)
Purchases of available-for-sale securities.......................... (135,016) (396,325) (178,616)
Sales and maturities of available for sale securities............... 145,878 367,835 132,342
Cash paid in business acquisitions.................................. -- (30,853) 281
Issuance of notes receivable from GateField prior to acquisition ... -- (7,000) (8,000)
Cash received from sale of Chartered stock.......................... -- 39,009 --
Changes in other long term assets................................... (96) (7,303) (1,928)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities................. 1,240 (40,810) (62,328)
Financing activities:
Common stock issuance under employee stock plans.................... 7,676 15,997 6,811
Repurchase of common stock.......................................... -- (21,016) --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities................. 7,676 (5,019) 6,811
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents.................... (1,354) 4,327 (9,008)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year............................ 9,266 4,939 13,947
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year.................................. $ 7,912 $ 9,266 $ 4,939
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ACTEL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information and non-cash investing
and financing activities:
Cash paid during the year for taxes................................. $ 473 $ 32,989 $ 10,195
Issuance of common stock for acquisitions........................... 1,132 17,389 6,858
Receipt of note receivable from officer............................. -- 368 --
</TABLE>
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
<PAGE>
ACTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Actel Corporation (Actel) was incorporated under the laws of California on
October 16, 1985. Actel designs, develops, and markets field programmable gate
arrays (FPGAs) and associated development tools, intellectual property (IP)
cores, and services. Net revenues from the sale of FPGAs accounted for 96% of
Actel's net revenues for 2001, 2000, and 1999. The Protocol Design Services
organization, which Actel acquired from GateField Corporation (GateField) in the
third quarter of 1998, accounted for 1% of Actel's net revenues for 2001,
compared with 2% for 2000 and 1999. Royalties and sales of development tools
accounted for 3% of net revenues for 2001, compared with 2% for 2000 and 1999.
FPGAs are logic integrated circuits that adapt the processing and memory
capabilities of electronic systems to specific applications. FPGAs are used by
designers of communications, computer, consumer, industrial, military and
aerospace, and other electronic systems to differentiate their products and get
them to market faster. Actel is the leading supplier of FPGAs based on flash and
antifuse technologies. See Note 12 for information on Actel's sales by
geographic area.
Advertising and Promotion Costs
Actel's policy is to expense advertising and promotion costs as they are
incurred. Actel's advertising and promotion expenses were approximately $3.8
million, $3.9 million, and $3.3 million for 2001, 2000, and 1999 respectively.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Actel and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. Actel uses the U.S. Dollar as the functional currency
in its foreign operations. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Actel's fiscal year ends on the first Sunday after December 30. Fiscal
2001, 2000, and 1999 ended on January 6, 2002, December 31, 2000, and January 2,
2000, respectively. Accordingly, fiscal 2001 was a fifty-three week fiscal year,
rather than a normal fifty-two week fiscal year. For ease of presentation,
December 31 has been indicated as the fiscal year end for all years. Certain
prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to current year
presentation.
Cash Equivalents and Investments
For financial statement purposes, Actel considers all highly liquid debt
instruments with insignificant interest rate risk and a maturity of three months
or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist
primarily of cash deposits in money market funds that are available for
withdrawal without restriction. Short-term investments consist principally of
federal, state, and local municipal obligations. See Note 3 for further
information regarding short-term investments.
<PAGE>
ACTEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Actel accounts for its investments in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, "Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." Management determines the
appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase and
re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. At December 31,
2001, all debt securities are designated as available-for-sale. Actel also makes
equity investments for the promotion of business and strategic objectives. The
marketable portion of these strategic investments is included in short-term
investments at their market value on December 31, 2001, of $4.6 million and
designated as available-for-sale. Non-marketable equity investments with a cost
of $2.2 million are included in other assets and are valued at the lower of cost
or market. See Note 3 for further information regarding investments.
Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with the
unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of comprehensive
income/(loss) in shareholders' equity. The amortized cost of debt securities in
this category is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of
discounts to maturity. Such amortization is included in interest and other
income. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other than
temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in interest income and
other. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification
method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale
are included in interest income and other.
Actel maintains trading assets to generate returns that offset changes in
liabilities related to Actel's deferred compensation plan. The trading assets
consist of insurance contracts and Actel common stock and are stated at fair
value. Both realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in interest
income and other, net, and generally offset the change in the deferred
compensation liability, which is also included in interest income and other,
net. Net gains (losses) on the trading asset portfolio were not significant for
2001. The deferred compensation assets and liabilities were $2.1 million and
$2.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2001.
Actel monitors its equity investments for impairment on a periodic basis.
In the event that the carrying value of the equity investment exceeds its fair
value, and the decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, the
carrying value is reduced to its current fair value.
At December 31, 2001, Actel held an investment in a publicly-traded equity
security with a market value of $4.6 million included in short-term investments
and an unrealized loss of $1.0 million included in other comprehensive
income/(loss). In accordance with SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," if the decline in value below cost
is determined to be other than temporary, the unrealized losses will be realized
as expense on the income statement in the period when that determination is
made. Actel determines a decline in market value to be other than temporary
when, in the absence of other mitigating factors, a stock has traded below cost
for a consecutive six-month period. If this investment continues to trade below
cost for more than six months, and other mitigating factors such as general
economic and industry specific trends were to adversely change, this investment
will be evaluated for impairment and written down to a balance equal to the fair
value at the time of impairment, with the amount of the write-down realized as
expense on the income statement. Based on management's assessment of industry
trends, the volatility and trading volumes of this equity security, as well as
the fact that the investment has traded at below original cost for less than six
consecutive months, management concluded that the decline in value was temporary
and no impairment existed at December 31, 2001.
At December 31, 2001, Actel held an equity investment that represented a
14% equity interest in a company located in the United Kingdom. This investment
is carried at its cost of $2.2 million on the balance sheet as part of other
assets. As this equity security is not publicly traded, determining the fair
value of this investment is judgmental in nature and dependant on management's
assessment of the performance of the company, which includes, among other
things, successfully developing and introducing a new technology into the market
as well as obtaining additional funding to finance these activities until the
company can generate positive cash flows from the sale of the new products. This
investment is subject to a multitude of risks, including but not limited to the
risks that the company may not be successful in developing the planned
technology, that the company may not be able to secure necessary funding to
continue operations, that a suitable market for such technology may not develop,
or that a competitor may develop a superior product. If any of these risks
materialize, or other indicators of possible impairment arise, the investment
will be evaluated for impairment and written down to a balance equal to the fair
value at the time of impairment, with the amount of the write-down realized as
an expense on the income statement. Based on the progress made toward
technological goals and the expectation of future marketability of the
technology under development, Actel concluded no impairment of this investment
existed at December 31, 2001.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject Actel to concentrations of
credit risk consist principally of cash investments and trade receivables. Actel
limits its exposure to credit risk by investing excess liquidity only in
securities of A, A1, or P1 grade. Actel is exposed to credit risks in the event
of default by the financial institutions or issuers of investments to the extent
of amounts recorded on the balance sheet.
Actel sells its products to customers in diversified industries. Actel is
exposed to credit risks in the event of non-payment by customers to the extent
of amounts recorded on the balance sheet. Actel limits its exposure to credit
risk by performing ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial
condition but generally requires no collateral. Actel is exposed to credit risks
in the event of insolvency by its customers and limits such exposure to
accounting losses by limiting the amount of credit extended whenever deemed
necessary. Three of Actel's distributors accounted for approximately 52% of
Actel's net revenues for 2001. The same three distributors accounted in the
aggregate for approximately 45% of Actel's net revenues for 2000 and 41% for
1999. During 2001, Actel consolidated its distribution channel by terminating
one of the distributors. One of Actel's direct customers (Nortel Networks)
accounted for 2% of Actel's net revenues for 2001, compared with 11% and 9% of
net revenues for 2000 and 1999, respectively. The loss of any one of these
customers could have a materially adverse effect on Actel's results of
operations and financial position. See Note 12 for further information regarding
these customers.
As of December 31, 2001, Actel had an accounts receivable balance of $16.8
million, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.3 million. If sales
levels were to increase, it is likely that the level of receivables would also
increase. In the event that customers delay their payments to Actel, the levels
of accounts receivable would also increase. Actel maintains allowances for
doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its
customers to make required payments. The allowance for doubtful accounts is
based on past payment history with the customer, analysis of the customer's
current financial condition, outstanding invoices older than 90 days, and other
known factors. If the financial condition of Actel's customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments,
additional allowances may be required.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used by Actel in estimating its
fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Accounts Payable. The carrying amount reported in the balance sheets
for accounts payable approximates fair value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. The carrying amounts reported in the
balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value.
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts. The fair value of Actel's foreign
currency exchange forward contracts are estimated based on quoted market
prices of comparable contracts.
Insurance Contracts. The fair value of Actel's insurance contracts
(entered into in connection with Actel's deferred compensation plan) is
based upon cash surrender value.
Investment Securities. The fair values for marketable debt and equity
securities are based on quoted market prices. Strategic equity investments
in non-public companies with no readily available market value are carried
on the balance sheet at cost as adjusted for potential impairment. If
reductions in the market value of marketable equity securities to an amount
that is below cost are deemed by management to be other than temporary, the
reduction in market value will be realized, with the resulting loss in
market value reflected on the income statement.
Goodwill and other Acquisition-Related Intangibles
Goodwill is recorded when the consideration paid in an acquisition exceeds
the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. See Note 2
for further information on goodwill values. Through 2001, goodwill and other
acquisition-related intangibles have been amortized on a straight-line basis
over their useful lives.
During 1999 and 2000, Actel completed the acquisitions of AutoGate Logic,
Prosys, and GateField, resulting in a significant amount of goodwill and
identified intangible assets. Goodwill is recorded when the consideration paid
in an acquisition exceeds the fair value of the net tangible and intangible
assets acquired. At December 31, 2001, Actel had $37.2 million of remaining net
book value assigned to goodwill from those acquisitions and $10.0 million of
remaining net book value assigned to identified intangible assets such as
patents and completed technology. In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of," reviews have
been regularly performed to determine whether facts or circumstances exist
indicating that the assets are impaired. Actel recognizes impairment losses on
long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted
cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets'
carrying amounts. The impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of
the asset to its carrying amount. Fair value is estimated based on discounted
future cash flows. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill and other
intangibles, Actel must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows
and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets,
including industry growth rates, estimated gross margin levels, and estimates of
the market share Actel will achieve. If these estimates or their related
assumptions change in the future, it could result in lower estimated future cash
flows that would not support the current carrying values of these assets, which
would require Actel to record impairment charges for these assets. During the
year ended December 31, 2001, Actel did not record any impairment losses related
to goodwill or other intangible assets. Beginning in 2002, Actel will adopt SFAS
No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," which requires Actel to analyze
goodwill for impairment during the first six months of fiscal 2002 and on a
periodic basis thereafter.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," and
SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." These standards become
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Beginning in
Actel's 2002 fiscal year, goodwill will no longer be amortized but will be
subject to annual impairment tests and written down only when impaired. All
other intangible assets with a finite useful life will continue to be amortized
over their estimated useful lives. As of December 31, 2001, unamortized goodwill
was $37.2 million. The amortization expense related to goodwill for the year
ended December 31, 2001, was $11.7 million. For 2002, goodwill will not be
amortized, resulting in the elimination of approximately $11.8 million of
amortization expense that otherwise would have been recognized as expense. Other
intangible assets, with a net book value of $10.0 million at December 31, 2001,
will continue to be amortized over their estimated useful lives. The
amortization expense associated with other intangible assets amounted to $3.1
million in 2001. Actel will carry out an impairment review of goodwill and other
intangible assets during the first half of 2002, as required by SFAS 142.
Accordingly, management is still evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS
142 will have on Actel's financial position, operating results, or cash flows.
In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." This standard supersedes SFAS 121.
Although retaining many of the fundamental recognition and measurement
provisions of SFAS 121, the new rules significantly change the criteria that
must be met to classify an asset as held-for-sale. The standard also supersedes
certain provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 30,
"Reporting the Results of Operations -- Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a
Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring
Events and Transactions." SFAS 144 will require expected future operating losses
from discontinued operations to be displayed in discontinued operations in the
period(s) in which the losses are incurred rather than as of the measurement
date, as presently required. SFAS 144 becomes effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2001. Actel will adopt SFAS 144 in the first
quarter of 2002 and does not expect the adoption of SFAS 144 to have a material
impact on Actel's financial position, operating results, or cash flows.
Income Taxes
Actel accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
"Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires that deferred tax assets and
liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary
differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities.
Under SFAS No. 109, the liability method is used in accounting for income taxes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences
between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, and are
measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the
differences are expected to reverse. SFAS No. 109 also requires that deferred
tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Actel
evaluates annually the realizability of its deferred tax assets by assessing its
valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of such allowance, if necessary.
The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are Actel's forecast of
future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be
implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets.
At December 31, 2001, Actel had deferred tax assets in excess of deferred
tax liabilities of $63.0 million. For the reasons cited above, at December 31,
2001, management determined that it is more likely than not that $35.0 million
of such assets will be realized, resulting in a valuation allowance of $28.0
million. Failure to achieve forecasted taxable income might affect the
realization of such net deferred tax assets. Factors that may affect Actel's
ability to achieve sufficient forecasted taxable income include, but are not
limited to, increased competition, a decline in sales or margins, loss of market
share, delays in product availability, and technological obsolescence.
Inventories
As of December 31, 2001, Actel had an inventory balance of $36.3 million,
stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market (net realizable
value). Management believes that a certain level of inventory must be carried to
maintain an adequate supply of product for customers. This inventory level may
vary based upon either orders received from customers or internal forecasts of
demand for these products. Other considerations in determining inventory levels
include the stage of products in the product life cycle, design win activity,
manufacturing lead times, customer demands, strategic relationships with
foundries, and competitive situations in the marketplace. Should any of these
factors have a result other than anticipated, inventory levels may be adversely
and materially affected.
Actel writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable
inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the
estimated realizable value based upon assumptions about future demand and market
conditions. To address this difficult, subjective, and complex area of judgment,
Actel applies a methodology that includes assumptions and estimates to arrive at
the net realizable value. First, Actel identifies any inventory that has been
previously reserved in prior periods. This inventory remains reserved until
sold, destroyed, or otherwise dispositioned. Second, Actel's quality assurance
personnel examine inventory line items that may have some form of obsolescence
due to non-conformance with electrical and mechanical standards. Third, Actel
assesses the inventory not otherwise identified to be reserved against product
history and forecasted demand, typically six months. Finally, the result of this
methodology is analyzed by management in light of the product life cycle, design
win activity, and competitive situations in the marketplace to derive an outlook
for consumption of the inventory and the appropriateness of the resulting
inventory levels. If actual future demand or market conditions are less
favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs
may be required. See Note 2 for further information on Inventory amounts.
Legal Matters
As is typical in the semiconductor industry, Actel has been and expects to
be notified from time to time of claims that it may be infringing patents owned
by others. During 2001, Actel held discussions regarding potential patent
infringement issues with several third parties, some of which have significantly
greater financial and intellectual property resources than Actel. When probable
and reasonably estimable, Actel has made provision for the estimated settlement
costs of claims for alleged infringement. The provision is based on an estimated
royalty rate applied to shipments made in the periods and to or from the
geographic areas under dispute. In the absence of facts or circumstances unique
to a particular dispute, the royalty rate is estimated based on Actel's
understanding of royalty rates other technology companies typically agree to pay
in similar types of disputes. As it has in the past, Actel may obtain licenses
under patents that it is alleged to infringe. While Actel believes that
reasonable resolution will occur, there can be no assurance that these claims
will be resolved or that the resolution of these claims will not have a
materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results
of operations. In addition, Actel's evaluation of the impact of these pending
disputes could change based upon new information learned by Actel. Subject to
the foregoing, Actel does not believe that any pending patent dispute is likely
to have a materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or
results of operations.
Off-Balance-Sheet Risk
On January 1, 2001, Actel adopted SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS 133 requires that all derivatives be
recognized on the balance sheet at fair market value. Derivatives that are not
hedges must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. If the derivative is a
hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative are either offset against the
change in the fair value of the hedged item through earnings or, depending on
the nature of the hedge, recognized in other comprehensive income until the
hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's
change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. The adoption of SFAS
133 did not have a material impact on Actel's consolidated financial position or
operating results.
Actel purchases a portion of its wafers used in production from a Japanese
supplier denominated in Japanese Yen. The amount of U.S. Dollars that are
necessary to purchase wafers is subject to fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates between the U.S. Dollar and Yen. Actel enters into foreign
exchange forward contracts to reduce the variability in the amount of U.S.
Dollars that will be required to settle forecasted wafer purchases denominated
in Yen.
Actel's accounting policies for these forward contracts are based on
Actel's designation of the Yen forward contracts as foreign currency cash flow
hedges. The criteria Actel uses for designating an instrument as a hedge
includes its effectiveness in exposure reduction and one-to-one matching of the
derivative financial instrument with the underlying transaction being hedged.
Hedge effectiveness is assessed by comparing the change in fair value of the
forward contract with the change in fair value of the forecasted payments. Gains
and losses on these contracts are recognized upon usage of the contracts and are
included in cost of sales along with the offsetting gain or loss on the
underlying transactions being hedged. If the criteria for designation of these
instruments as hedging transactions are not met, then the instruments would be
marked to market, with gains and losses recognized on the income statement in
that period.
Actel limits the amount of forward foreign exchange contract to the amount
sufficient to hedge forecasted Yen-based payments for a maximum of three months.
Actel does not use forward foreign exchange contracts for speculative or trading
purposes.
During fiscal 2001, 2000, and 1999, all foreign exchange contracts entered
into by Actel met the criteria for designation as foreign currency cash flow
hedges. Amounts recognized on the income statement for hedge ineffectiveness
were not material in 2001, 2000, or 1999. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, Actel
had no forward foreign exchange contracts outstanding.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation
and amortization (see Note 2). Depreciation and amortization have been provided
on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives:
Equipment...................... 2 to 5 years
Furniture and fixtures......... 3 to 5 years
Leasehold improvements......... Estimated useful life or lease term,
whichever is shorter
Revenue Recognition
In accordance with SAB No. 101, revenue is recognized when there is
evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred or services have been
completed, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is assured.
Revenue from product shipped to end customers is recorded when risk of loss and
title passes to the customer. Revenue related to products shipped subject to
customers' evaluation is recognized upon final acceptance. Shipments to
distributors are made under agreements allowing certain rights of return and
price protection on unsold merchandise. For that reason, Actel defers
recognition of revenues and related cost of revenues on sales of products to
distributors until such products are sold by the distributor and title transfers
to the end user. Royalty income is recognized upon notice to Actel of the sale
by others of products subject to royalties. Revenues generated by the Protocol
Design Services organization are recognized as the services are performed.
Actel records a provision for price adjustments on unsold merchandise
shipped to distributors in the same period as the related revenues are recorded.
If market conditions were to decline, Actel may need to take action with its
distributors to ensure the sell-through of inventory already in the channel.
These actions during a market downturn could result in incrementally greater
reductions to net revenues than otherwise would be expected. Actel also records
a provision for estimated sales returns on products shipped to end customers in
the same period as the related revenues are recorded. The provision for sales
returns is based on historical sales returns, analysis of credit memo data, and
other known factors. If the historical data Actel uses to calculate these
estimates does not properly reflect future returns, net revenues could be
materially different.
Research and Development
Research and development expenditures are charged to expense as incurred.
SFAS No. 86, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to Be Sold, Leased
or Otherwise Marketed," requires the capitalization of certain software
development costs subsequent to the establishment of technological feasibility.
Through December 31, 2001, software development has been completed concurrently
with the establishment of technological feasibility and, as a result, Actel has
charged all costs to research and development expense in the periods incurred.
Stock-Based Compensation
Actel accounts for stock-based awards to employees using the intrinsic
value method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees" and Financial Standards Accounting Board (FASB) Interpretation
(FIN) No. 44, "Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock
Compensation." Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its
fixed-cost stock option plans or its stock purchase plan. In Note 9, Actel
provides additional pro forma disclosures as required under SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock Based Compensation." Actel accounts for equity
compensation issued to non-employees in accordance with EITF 96-18, "Accounting
for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or
in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services," and FASB Interpretation No. 44,
"Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation -- an
Interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25."
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting
principals generally accepted in the United States requires management to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues, and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. Actel bases its estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results invariably differ from these estimates, and such
differences could be material. In addition, if these estimates or their related
assumptions change in the future, it could have a materially adverse effect on
Actel's operating results.
2. Balance Sheet Detail
December 31,
-------------------------
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(in thousands)
Accounts receivable:
Trade accounts receivable.................... $ 16,388 $ 27,915
Interest receivable.......................... 1,699 2,411
Allowance for doubtful accounts.............. (1,328) (1,070)
----------- -----------
$ 16,759 $ 29,256
=========== ===========
Inventories:
Purchased parts and raw materials............ $ 6,972 $ 5,334
Work-in-process.............................. 26,670 11,443
Finished goods............................... 2,696 8,726
----------- -----------
$ 36,338 $ 25,503
=========== ===========
Property and equipment:
Equipment.................................... $ 57,888 $ 50,190
Furniture and fixtures....................... 2,431 2,371
Leasehold improvements....................... 5,658 5,593
----------- -----------
65,977 58,154
Accumulated depreciation and amortization.... (51,312) (46,017)
----------- -----------
$ 14,665 $ 12,137
=========== ===========
Depreciation expense was approximately $7.0 million, $7.4 million, and $8.1
million for 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively, and is included with
amortization expense in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
December 31,
-------------------------
2001 2000
----------- -----------
(in thousands)
Goodwill:
Goodwill....................................... $ 53,613 $ 51,561
Less accumulated amortization.................. (16,433) (4,741)
----------- -----------
$ 37,180 $ 46,820
=========== ===========
Other Assets:
Prepaid long-term license fees................. $ 1,999 $ 2,500
Deferred compensation plan assets.............. 2,082 --
AutoGate Logic identifiable intangible assets.. 2,950 2,950
Prosys identifiable intangible assets.......... 273 273
GateField identifiable intangible assets....... 9,505 9,505
Acquired patents............................... 1,842 1,692
Strategic equity investments................... 2,198 2,198
Non-current deferred tax asset (net of related
deferred tax liability of $3,927 in 2001 and
$5,067 in 2000)............................... 8,935 8,441
Other.......................................... 776 669
Accumulated amortization expenses.............. (4,602) (1,536)
----------- -----------
$ 25,958 $ 26,692
=========== ===========
Amortization expense for goodwill and other acquisition related intangibles
was approximately $14.8 million, $8.1 million, and $2.2 million for 2001, 2000,
and 1999, respectively. Amortization expense from goodwill acquired in
connection with the GateField, Prosys, and AutoGate Logic acquisitions was $11.7
million in 2001 compared with $4.2 million in 2000. Amortization expense from
other acquisition-related intangible assets was $3.1 million in 2001 compared
with $1.5 million in 2000. Additional goodwill was recognized during 2001 in
connection with consideration issued to Prosys security holders upon the
achievement of certain technological milestones specified in the Prosys purchase
agreement. See Note 5 for further discussion of intangible assets acquired in
connection with the GateField, Prosys, and AutoGate Logic acquisitions. From the
third quarter of 1999 and through November 15, 2000, Actel held certain
investments in GateField that were accounted for under the equity method of
accounting. Amortization expense related to equity accounting for those
investments was $2.4 million in 2000. On November 15, 2000, Actel acquired
GateField and accounted for the transaction as a purchase. As a result, these
previous investments in GateField were eliminated from "Other Assets" and
included in the purchase price.
3. Available-for-Sale Securities
The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities at December 31,
2001 and 2000:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Gross Gross
Unrealized Unrealized Estimated
Cost Gains Losses Fair Values
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 31, 2001
Corporate bonds........................................... $ 41,926 $ 1,085 $ (31) 42,980
Corporate preferred stock................................. 1,900 -- -- 1,900
U.S. government securities................................ 16,098 400 (37) 16,461
Floating rate notes....................................... 9,400 -- -- 9,400
Municipal obligations..................................... 45,628 976 (3) 46,601
Weekly floater............................................ -- -- -- --
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total available-for-sale securities....................... 114,952 2,461 (71) 117,342
Less amounts classified as cash equivalents............... (1,008) -- -- (1,008)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total short-term available-for-sale debt securities....... 113,944 2,461 (71) 116,334
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Short-term marketable strategic equity investment......... 5,634 -- (1,045) 4,589
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total available-for-sale securities....................... $ 119,578 $ 2,461 $ (1,116) $ 120,923
============ ============ ============ ============
December 31, 2000
Corporate bonds........................................... $ 54,139 $ 600 $ -- $ 54,739
U.S. government securities................................ 18,160 210 -- 18,370
Floating rate notes....................................... 10,600 -- -- 10,600
Municipal obligations..................................... 44,156 215 (4) 44,367
Weekly floater............................................ 3,000 -- -- 3,000
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total available-for-sale securities....................... 130,055 1,025 (4) 131,076
Less amounts classified as cash equivalents............... -- -- -- --
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total short-term available-for-sale debt securities....... 130,055 1,025 (4) 131,076
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Short-term marketable strategic equity investments........ 385 83 -- 468
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Total available-for-sale securities....................... $ 130,440 $ 1,108 $ (4) $ 131,544
============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
Actel also makes private equity investments for the promotion of business
and strategic objectives. Non-marketable private equity investments are included
in "Other Assets" and are valued at a cost of $2.2 million. See Note 1 for
discussion of Actel's policy on accounting for investments and the manner in
which fair values were determined. See Note 10 for discussion of Other
Comprehensive Income/(Loss).
The adjustments to net unrealized gains and (losses) on investments
included as a separate component of shareholders' equity totaled approximately
$0.1 million, ($15.3 million), and $15.9 million, net of taxes, for the years
ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. The $15.3 million
adjustment during 2000 was due to the liquidation of Actel's investment in
Chartered. Realized gains were $0.4 million and $28.3 million during 2001 and
2000, respectively. Realized gains and losses during 1999 were not material. The
realized gain of $28.3 million during 2000 was from the sale of Actel's
investment in Chartered.
The expected maturities of Actel's investments at December 31, 2001, are
shown below. Expected maturities can differ from contractual maturities because
the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without
prepayment penalties.
Available-for-sale debt securities (in thousands):
Due in less than one year................................... $ 43,343
Due in one to five years.................................... 59,581
Due in five to ten years.................................... 1,071
Due after ten years......................................... 12,339
------------
$ 116,334
============
A portion of Actel's securities represent investments in floating rate
municipal bonds with contractual maturities greater than ten years. However, the
interest rates on these debt securities generally reset every ninety days, at
which time Actel has the option to sell the security or roll over the investment
at the new interest rate. Since it is not Actel's intention to hold these
securities until their contractual maturities, these amounts have been
classified as short-term investments.
4. Gain on Sale of Chartered Stock
At December 31, 1999, Actel held an equity investment in Chartered
Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd. (Chartered), a semiconductor company located in
Singapore that completed an initial public offering in the fourth quarter of
1999. Actel's investment in Chartered was less than 1% of the total equity of
Chartered and was held as an available-for-sale investment. The Chartered
investment was valued at its market value of $37.6 million at the end of 1999.
During the second quarter of 2000, Actel sold all of its shares of Chartered
common stock for a one-time gain of $28.3 million.
5. Business Acquisitions
GateField
During 1998, Actel entered into a product marketing rights agreement with
GateField Corporation (GateField) and made investments in GateField common stock
and GateField convertible preferred stock, which were valued at cost. During
1999, Actel made additional investments in GateField, which resulted in Actel
accounting for its investments in GateField under the equity method, commencing
July 1, 1999. From July 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999, the impact of this
was a $1.1 million charge to Actel's pre-tax income ($0.9 million included in
amortization of goodwill and $0.2 million included in equity interest in net
losses of equity method investee).
On May 31, 2000, GateField and Actel announced the signing of a definitive
agreement to merge. On November 15, 2000, the acquisition was completed and
Actel paid cash consideration of $5.25 for each share of GateField common stock
not already owned by Actel. From January 1, 2000, to November 15, 2000, Actel
recorded charges of $4.8 million to pre-tax income under the equity method of
accounting ($2.4 million included in amortization of goodwill and $2.4 million
included in equity interest in net losses of equity method investee).
GateField's results of operations are included in Actel's income statement for
the period from November 15 to December 31, 2000, and succeeding years.
The GateField acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting and the total purchase price was approximately $45.7 million. Actel
paid total cash consideration of $24.0 million, or $5.25 per share, for the 4.6
million shares of GateField Common Stock not already owned by Actel. The net
book value of Actel investments in GateField at November 15, 2000, is also
included in the purchase price. These investments included 1.6 million shares of
GateField common stock that Actel already owned, which had a net book value of
$5.4 million; outstanding notes receivable from GateField, which had a net book
value of $6.5 million; and the capitalized value of Actel's product marketing
agreement with GateField, which had a net book value of $6.0 million. Actel also
incurred $0.1 million of acquisition expenses, including financial advisory and
direct transaction costs, which are included as a component of the purchase
price.
In accordance with FIN 44, all vested and unvested GateField employee stock
options assumed by Actel are included in the purchase price for accounting
purposes based on their fair value of $3.8 million as of the announcement date.
The portion of the intrinsic value of the unvested options that will be deemed
to be earned over the remaining vesting period (total value of $0.9 million) is
allocated as part of the purchase price to unearned compensation and is being
amortized to operating expenses over the remaining vesting period. The fair
value of the options assumed was calculated based on the Black-Scholes option
pricing model.
In accordance with the provisions of APB Opinion No. 16, "Business
Combinations," all identifiable assets and liabilities were assigned a portion
of the total consideration on the basis of their respective fair values as of
November 15, 2000. The consideration was allocated, based on the valuation
report of an independent valuation specialist, as follows (in thousands):
Net tangible assets (liabilities) of GateField................. $ (1,083)
In-process research and development............................ 5,088
Acquired work-force............................................ 475
Developed technology........................................... 5,808
Core Technology................................................ 2,896
Tradename...................................................... 326
Patents........................................................ 976
Goodwill....................................................... 26,680
Unearned compensation costs.................................... 922
Net deferred tax asset......................................... 3,647
------------
$ 45,735
============
The purchase price allocation is preliminary and subject to change pending
finalization of Actel's analysis regarding the realizability of the operating
losses acquired in the GateField acquisition. A valuation allowance of $27.2
million was reflected in the purchase price allocation above due to the
uncertainty surrounding the realizablity of these net operating loss
carryforwards. Upon completion of this study, which is expected to occur in the
first half of 2002, there could be material subsequent reclassification
adjustments between deferred tax assets and goodwill from the GateField
acquisition, if these acquired net operating losses become realizable.
IPRD was identified and valued through extensive interviews and analysis of
data provided by GateField concerning developmental products, their stage of
development, the time, cost, and resources needed to complete them, and
associated risks. The income approach, which bases the value of an asset on its
future earnings capacity, was utilized in valuing the IPRD. This approach values
an asset based on the future cash flows projected to be generated by the asset
over its estimated useful life. To estimate the value of the IPRD, the future
cash flows were discounted to their present value utilizing a discount rate
(25%) that would provide sufficient return to a potential investor. At the date
of acquisition, the in-process technology had no alternative future use and was
not ready for commercial production.
GateField commenced development efforts on the next-generation ProASIC
product beginning in 2000. The development efforts included adding features,
such as increased input-output speed, an improved programming mechanism,
increasing the number of routing tracks and the number of available gates, and
migrating the ProASIC technology from a 0.25-micron to a 0.22-micron
manufacturing process. GateField had invested significant time and effort in
developing this product family but, at the time of acquisition, it had not yet
reached technological feasibility. At the time of the acquisition, GateField
estimated the project was approximately 50% complete and would be complete in
the first quarter of 2001. The percentage was based on GateField having expended
11.7 man-years prior to the acquisition and the need to expend an estimated 11.5
man-years following the acquisition to complete the product. Given that there
was significant technological risk relating to the development of the
next-generation ProASIC product and that not even the first-generation ProASIC
product had generated any revenue, this product family met the definition of
in-process technology and was classified as such.
The fair value of the estimated discounted cash flows of the
next-generation ProASIC was calculated to be $5.1 million on November 15, 2000.
The fair value calculation was based on future cash flows anticipated in the
years 2001 through 2005, with associated gross margin and expense levels as a
percentage of revenues gradually improving to current Actel operating levels by
2003.
Actel introduced the next-generation ProASIC product (ProASIC Plus) in
January 2002, approximately one year later than estimated at the time of
acquisition. The delay in introduction confirms the uncertainties that existed
at the time of acquisition and supports the initial classification of the
technology as IPRD. Management does not believe the delay had a material impact
on the value attributed to the technology because no similar competing products
were introduced and the marketability of the next-generation product was not
materially diminished. Based on facts and circumstances currently known,
management believes the value attributed to the IPRD is still materially valid.
The value of the assembled workforce was estimated using a cost approach.
This approach identifies the employees that would require significant cost to
replace and train. This analysis then estimates the fully-burdened costs
(locating, interviewing, and hiring) attributed to each employee. These costs
are aggregated and tax-effected to estimate the value of the acquired workforce.
The value assigned to the acquired workforce was $0.5 million, which Actel fully
amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of six months.
The amounts attributed to developed technology and core technology were
valued using the income approach described above with discount rates of 15% for
developed technology and 20% for core technology. The value of core technology
represents technology from previously discontinued products that can be applied
to future revenue generating products. The value assigned to developed
technology is based on technology that has achieved technological feasibility.
The amounts assigned to developed and core technology, $5.8 million and $2.9
million, respectively, is being amortized on a straight-line basis over an
estimated useful life of five years.
The value assigned to tradename represents the value attributed to the
ProASIC tradename owned by GateField. The relief from royalty methodology was
utilized to value the tradename. This methodology assumes that the value of the
asset equals the amount a third party would pay for the asset. Therefore, a
revenue stream for the asset is estimated, and then an appropriate royalty rate
is applied to the forecasted revenue to estimate the pre-tax income associated
with the asset. The pre-tax income is then tax-effected to estimate the
after-tax net income associated with the asset. Finally, the after-tax net
income is discounted to the present value using an appropriate rate of return
(20%) that considers both the risk of the asset and the associated cash flow
estimates. Actel is amortizing the $0.3 million value assigned to the tradename
on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of five years.
To value the patent applications, the relief from royalty methodology
described above was utilized using a 25% rate of return for present value
discounting. Actel is amortizing the $1.0 million value assigned to the patent
applications on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of five
years.
Goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price of GateField
over the fair value of the underlying net identifiable assets, was amortized
during 2001 based on a straight-line basis and an estimated useful life of five
years. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, beginning with the first quarter of
2002, goodwill will no longer be amortized, but will instead be reviewed
annually for impairment and adjusted to the extent that impairment exists. See
Note 1 for further discussion of the impact of adopting SFAS No. 142.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities have been recorded to reflect the
future benefits and obligations associated with the deductibility of GateField
net operating loss carryforwards and the non-deductibility of amortization
related to acquired goodwill and intangible assets. Approximately $3.7 million
of net deferred tax assets were recorded as part of the purchase price.
Prosys
On June 2, 2000, Actel announced and completed the acquisition of Prosys
Technology, Inc. (Prosys), a developer of embedded FPGA cores, in a transaction
accounted for as a purchase. Total consideration for the Prosys acquisition was
$24.5 million. In connection with the acquisition, Actel paid $6.9 million in
cash and issued 220,518 shares of Actel common stock, at a value of $34.13 per
share, for all outstanding shares of Prosys stock. The price per share of common
stock was based on an average of five days closing market prices for Actel
common stock during the period of June 1 through June 7, 2000. Actel assumed
$0.1 million of liabilities and incurred $0.1 million of acquisition costs.
Actel also assumed all outstanding Prosys options, all of which were vested. The
outstanding options were estimated to have a fair value equal to $9.9 million
(using the Black-Scholes option pricing model) and are included in the purchase
price. Prosys's results of operations are included in Actel's income statement
for the period from June 2 to December 31, 2000, and succeeding years.
In accordance with the provisions of APB Opinion No. 16, all identifiable
assets and liabilities were assigned a portion of the total consideration on the
basis of their respective fair values. The consideration was allocated, based on
the valuation report of an independent valuation specialist, as follows (in
thousands):
In-process research and development............................ $ 5,558
Acquired work-force............................................ 273
Patent applications............................................ 349
Cash & other current assets.................................... 57
Deferred tax liability......................................... (249)
Goodwill....................................................... 18,534
------------
$ 24,522
============
IPRD was identified and valued through extensive interviews and analysis of
data provided by Prosys concerning developmental products, their stage of
development, the time, cost, and resources needed to complete them, and
associated risks. The income approach, as discussed above, and a discount rate
of 25% was utilized in valuing the IPRD. At the date of acquisition, the
in-process technology had no alternative future use and had not reached
technological feasibility.
As of the valuation date, Prosys had no developed products in the
marketplace and was in the process of developing a 4x4 embedded block SRAM-based
FPGA core and had planned an 8x8 embedded block SRAM-based FPGA core. These IP
cores allow other semiconductor companies to embed functional blocks of
programmable logic into their silicon designs. Prosys indicated that the 4x4
embedded block was expected to be completed in late 2000, following the
development of key software features. The 8x8 embedded block core was estimated
to require approximately six- to nine-months of additional development effort
after the completion of the 4x4 embedded block core. The planned development
time of six- to nine-months was based on leveraging the technology available
from the 4x4 embedded block core. As of the valuation date, Prosys had incurred
development costs of approximately $3.1 million related to the 4x4 embedded
block core and estimated that an additional $1.3 million of research and
development was required to complete the development of this product. Thus, the
in-process 4x4 embedded block core was estimated to be approximately 70%
complete. Since the 8x8 embedded block core will leverage technology from the
4x4 embedded block core in process, the 8x8 embedded block core was estimated to
be 35% complete in its development. These products were in development at the
time of acquisition and there was significant technological risk at that time
related to completing development of these products. Accordingly, the 4x4
embedded block core and the 8x8 embedded block core were classified as
in-process technology.
The fair value of the estimated discounted cash flows of the Prosys
in-process technology was calculated to be $5.6 million on June 2, 2000. The
fair value calculation was based on future cash flows anticipated in the years
2000 through 2005, with associated gross margin and expense levels as a
percentage of revenues gradually improving to current Actel operating levels by
2002.
The 4x4 embedded block core was introduced in February 2001 as the VariCore
Embedded Programmable Gate Array (EPGA) IP core. Due to the recent downturn in
the semiconductor industry, revenues from VariCore EPGAs are materializing
slower than anticipated. Given the low level of demand during 2001 for embedded
cores, the development effort on the 8x8 embedded core was postponed.
Development of the 8x8 embedded block core may resume when demand for embedded
cores increases. Management does not believe that the delay of one quarter in
the completion of the 4x4 embedded block core, the postponement of the
development of the 8x8 embedded block core, or the delay in the realization of
significant revenues from the VariCore EPGA technology are sufficient at this
time to impact the values attributed to the IPRD, goodwill, and intangible
assets. Based on facts and circumstances current known, the lack of any
significant revenues is seen as a delay rather than a reduction in expected
revenues, so management believes the value attributed to the IPRD is still
materially valid.
The value of the assembled workforce was estimated using a cost approach.
Actel amortized the $0.3 million value assigned to the acquired workforce on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of six months.
To value the patent applications, the relief from royalty methodology was
utilized with a discount rate of 25%. Actel is amortizing the $0.3 million value
assigned to the patent applications on a straight-line basis over an estimated
useful life of five years.
$18.5 million of goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase
price of Prosys over the fair value of the underlying net identifiable assets,
was amortized during 2001 based on a straight-line basis and an estimated useful
life of five years. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, beginning with the first
quarter of 2002, goodwill will no longer be amortized, but will instead be
reviewed annually for impairment and adjusted to the extent that impairment
exists. See Note 1 for further discussion of the impact of adopting SFAS No.
142.
During 2001, additional consideration of $1.7 million was issued to Prosys
security holders. The additional consideration, which consisted of 54,290 shares
of Actel common stock valued at $1.1 million and $0.6 million of cash, was
issued to Prosys security holders pursuant to the achievement of certain
technological milestones specified in the Prosys June 2000 purchase agreement,
and was distributed to all shareholders of Prosys based on their relative equity
interests at the date of acquisition. Accordingly, additional goodwill of $1.7
million was recorded during 2001.
AutoGate Logic
On December 21, 1999, Actel completed the acquisition of AutoGate Logic,
Inc. (AutoGate Logic) in a transaction accounted for as a purchase. AutoGate
Logic developed a wide range of very large scale integration development tools,
including FPGA and custom integrated circuit place and route and timing analysis
software. In connection with the acquisition, Actel issued 285,943 shares of
common stock valued at $18.29 per share and assumed options exercisable for
89,057 shares of Actel common stock. The price per share of common stock was
based on an average of five days closing market prices for Actel common stock
during the period of October 1 through October 7, 1999, when the Agreement to
acquire AutoGate Logic was announced. Amounts prepaid by Actel for a source code
license and accounts receivable held by AutoGate Logic from Actel were netted to
arrive at a total purchase price of $7.2 million.
In accordance with provisions of APB Opinion No. 16, all identifiable
assets and liabilities were assigned a portion of the total consideration on the
basis of their respective fair values. The consideration was allocated, based on
the valuation report of an independent valuation specialist, as follows (in
thousands):
In-process research and development............................ $ 600
Completed technology........................................... 2,100
Assembled work force........................................... 200
Cash........................................................... 281
Deferred tax liability......................................... (920)
Goodwill....................................................... 4,938
------------
$ 7,199
============
The acquired completed technology, comprised of products that were already
technologically feasible upon acquisition, includes product neutral software
tools for place and route and architecture evaluation. Actel expects to amortize
the acquired completed technology of approximately $2.1 million on a
straight-line basis over an average estimated useful life of five years.
The acquired assembled workforce consisted of employees from AutoGate
Logic's engineering group. Actel amortized the value assigned to the assembled
workforce of approximately $0.2 million on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful life of six months.
Goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price of AutoGate
Logic over the fair value of the underlying net identifiable assets, is being
amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated life of five years. In
accordance with SFAS No. 142, beginning with the first quarter of 2002, goodwill
will no longer be amortized, but will instead be reviewed annually for
impairment and adjusted to the extent that impairment exists. See Note 1 for
further discussion of the impact of adopting SFAS No. 142.
6. Restructuring Charges
During the second quarter of 1999, Actel completed a restructuring plan
that resulted in a reduction in force along with the elimination of certain
projects and non-critical activities. The total pretax restructuring charge for
these activities amounted to $2.0 million. These measures were taken to reduce
spending and sharpen Actel's focus on new product development.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Restruc- Balance at
Cash/ turing Dec. 31,
Description Non-Cash Charge Activity 1999
- ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Employee severance and outplacement....................... Cash $ 586 $ 586 $ --
Write-off of prepaid license.............................. Non-cash 734 734 --
Abandoned capital assets.................................. Non-cash 643 643 --
------------ ------------ ------------
$ 1,963 $ 1,963 $ --
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
Employee Severance and Outplacement Expenses were comprised primarily of
severance packages for 31 employees across all functions who were terminated as
part of a reduction in force. The severance was computed based upon severance
compensation, benefits, and related employer payroll taxes.
Write-Off of Prepaid License was associated with the cancellation of a
certain product and related development project. The product was eliminated from
Actel's future revenue stream and therefore the license for the product had no
future economic benefit to Actel.
Abandoned Capital Assets consisted of the write-off of capitalized costs
associated with a new building project that was abandoned and fixed assets no
longer utilized by Actel that were scrapped. The abandonment of the building
project and scrapping of the fixed assets were a direct result of the reduction
in force and elimination of certain non-critical activities.
7. Commitments
Actel leases its facilities under non-cancelable lease agreements. The
current primary facilities lease agreement expires in June 2003, with a
five-year renewal option. The equipment lease terms are month-to-month. Actel's
facilities and equipment leases are accounted for as operating leases and
require Actel to pay property taxes, insurance and maintenance and repair costs.
At December 31, 2001, Actel had no capital lease obligations. At December 31,
2000, Actel's capital lease obligations were not material.
Actel has entered into non-cancelable licensing agreements with external
software developers to enable Actel to include their proprietary technology in
Actel design and programming software. The following represents contractual
commitments associated with operating leases and royalty and licensing
agreements:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Payments Due by Period
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2005
Total 2002 2003 2004 and later
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Operating leases........................... $ 5,711 $ 3,575 $ 1,901 $ 235 $ --
Royalty/licensing agreements............... 11,097 2,747 2,575 2,575 3,200
Total....................................... $ 16,808 $ 6,322 $ 4,476 $ 2,810 $ 3,200
</TABLE>
At December 31, 2001, Actel also had a number of purchase commitments from wafer
manufacturers for raw materials orders that were expected to be filled within
ninety days. The wafer purchase commitments represent a normal level of
outstanding orders and are not material.
Rental expense under operating leases was approximately $4.4 million, $4.3
million, and $4.2 million for 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
8. Retirement Plan
Effective December 10, 1987, Actel adopted a tax deferred savings plan for
the benefit of qualified employees. The plan is designed to provide employees
with an accumulation of funds at retirement. Employees may elect at any time to
have salary reduction contributions made to the plan.
Actel may make contributions to the plan at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. Actel made no contributions to the plan for 2001 and made
contributions of $0.5 million and $0.4 million for 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Contributions were based on net revenues and net income for the fiscal years.
The contributions vest annually, retroactively from an eligible employee's date
of hire, at the rate of 25% per year. In addition, contributions become fully
vested upon retirement from Actel at age 65. There is no guarantee Actel will
make any contributions to the plan in the future, regardless of its financial
performance. If Actel, in its discretion, chooses to make a contribution again
in the future, the amount could be higher or lower.
9. Shareholders' Equity
Stock Option Exchange Program
Actel offered its United States employees the opportunity to cancel options
that were outstanding on June 29, 2001, in exchange for the grant of a new stock
option six months and one day later. Under the stock option exchange program,
approximately 510,000 stock options were granted to employees at an exercise
price of $19.91, the closing price of Actel common stock on December 31, 2001.
The weighted average exercise price of the options cancelled in the stock option
exchange program was $35.23.
Stock Repurchase
Actel authorized a stock repurchase program in September 1998 whereby up to
1,000,000 shares of Actel's common stock may be purchased from time to time in
the open market at the discretion of management. An additional 1,000,000 shares
were authorized for repurchase in 1999. During 2001 and 1999, Actel did not
repurchase any common stock. During 2000, Actel repurchased 886,108 shares of
common stock for $21.0 million. Actel reissues repurchased shares through its
employee stock option and purchase plans.
Stock Option Plans
Actel has adopted stock option plans under which officers, employees, and
consultants may be granted incentive stock options or nonqualified options to
purchase shares of Actel's common stock. In connection with the acquisition of
Prosys and GateField, Actel assumed the stock option plans of Prosys and
GateField and the related options are incorporated in the amounts below. At
December 31, 2001, 13,311,453 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance
under these plans, of which 478,628 were available for grant. Actel's stock
option plan provides that the aggregate number of shares that may be optioned
and sold under the plan is increased annually on the first day of each fiscal
year by such amount as is necessary to make the total number of shares available
for grant under the option plan equal to 5% of Actel Common Stock issued and
outstanding at the close of business on the last day of the immediately
preceding fiscal year (Annual Replenishment). Following the Annual Replenishment
on January 7, 2002, a total of 14,513,942 shares of Common Stock were reserved
for issuance under the option plan, of which 1,681,117 shares were available for
future option grants. Options granted to consultants in 2001, 2000, and 1999
were recorded at fair value using the Black-Scholes model in accordance with
EITF 96-18, "Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than
Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services," and
FASB Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock
Compensation -- an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25" and were not material.
Actel has also adopted a Directors' Stock Option Plan, under which
directors who are not employees of Actel may be granted nonqualified options to
purchase shares of Actel's common stock. At December 31, 2001, 292,500 shares of
common stock were reserved for issuance under such plan, of which 75,000 were
available for grant.
Actel grants stock options under its plans at a price equal to the fair
value of Actel's common stock on the date of grant. Subject to continued
service, options generally vest over a period of four years and expire ten years
from the date of grant.
The following table summarizes Actel's stock option activity and related
information for the three years ended December 31, 2001:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2001 2000 1999
-------------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Average Average
Number of Exercise Number of Exercise Number of Exercise
Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at January 1...... 6,840,991 $ 19.08 5,862,933 $ 12.62 5,051,840 $ 11.41
Granted....................... 2,472,715 21.21 3,264,468 26.44 2,339,561 14.34
Exercised..................... (514,574) 9.86 (1,189,898) 10.49 (620,226) 9.94
Cancelled..................... (1,290,840) 29.00 (1,096,512) 15.72 (908,242) 12.14
------------ ------------ ------------
Outstanding at December 31.... 7,508,292 $ 18.70 6,840,991 $ 19.08 5,862,933 $ 12.62
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at
December 31, 2001:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 2001
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
---------------------------------------- --------------------------
Weighted
Average
Remaining Weighted Weighted
Contract Average Average
Number of Life Exercise Number of Exercise
Range of Exercise Prices Shares (in years) Price Shares Price
- -------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 0.07 - 10.63............................ 975,934 5.05 $ 8.91 578,094 $ 8.66
10.88 - 13.06............................ 1,116,783 5.91 12.16 866,879 12.06
13.56 - 15.00............................ 799,682 7.18 14.06 477,969 14.11
15.13 - 19.91............................ 1,059,501 8.91 18.66 274,089 17.16
20.13 - 21.88............................ 618,775 8.81 20.81 146,112 20.69
21.90 - 21.90............................ 1,032,323 9.56 21.90 14,375 21.90
21.93 - 25.00............................ 739,717 8.99 23.60 119,286 23.70
26.06 - 27.13............................ 81,750 8.89 26.26 6,670 27.13
27.50.................................... 764,245 8.12 27.50 84,467 27.50
28.13 - 54.45............................ 319,582 8.44 34.54 66,590 32.95
------------ ------------
7,508,292 7.77 18.70 2,634,531 14.35
============ ============
</TABLE>
At December 31, 2000, 1,761,989 outstanding options were exercisable; and at
December 31, 1999, 1,701,538 outstanding options were exercisable.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Actel has adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), under which
eligible employees may designate not more than 15% of their cash compensation to
be deducted each pay period for the purchase of common stock (up to a maximum of
$25,000 worth of common stock in any year). At December 31, 2001, 3,019,680
shares of common stock were authorized for issuance under the ESPP. The ESPP is
administered in consecutive, overlapping offering periods of up to 24 months
each, with each offering period divided into four consecutive six-month purchase
periods beginning August 1 and February 1 of each year. On the last business day
of each purchase period, shares of common stock are purchased with employees'
payroll deductions accumulated during the prior six months at a price per share
equal to 85% of the market price of the common stock on the first day of the
applicable offering period or the last day of the purchase period, whichever is
lower. There were 223,311, 384,436, and 364,163 shares issued under the ESPP in
2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively, and 993,593 shares remained available for
issuance at December 31, 2001.
Pro Forma Disclosures
Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share is
required by SFAS 123, which also requires that the information be determined as
if Actel had accounted for its stock-based awards to employees granted
subsequent to December 31, 1994, under the fair value method. The stock based
awards consist of options and employee stock purchase rights. The fair value for
these stock-based awards to employees was estimated at the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions
for 2001, 2000, and 1999: risk-free interest rates of 4.06%, 6.13%, and 5.55%,
respectively; no dividend yield; volatility factor of the expected market price
of Actel's common stock of 67%, 65%, and 54%, respectively; and a
weighted-average expected life for the options and employee stock purchase
rights of four years and two years, respectively. The weighted-average fair
value of options granted during 2001, 2000, and 1999 were $10.49, $15.07, and
$7.17, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of employee stock purchase
rights granted during 2001, 2000, and 1999 were $8.14, $6.64, and $5.76,
respectively.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions
and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price
volatility. Because Actel's stock-based awards to employees have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the
subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in
management's opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable
single measure of the fair value of Actel's stock-based awards to employees.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of Actel's
stock-based awards to employees is amortized to expense over the vesting period
for options and during the purchase periods for employee stock purchase rights.
Actel's pro forma information is as follows:
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
----------- ------------ ------------
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Pro forma net income (loss)....... $ (19,712) $ 31,597 $ 9,186
Pro forma earnings per share:
Basic.......................... $ (0.83) $ 1.35 $ 0.42
Diluted........................ $ (0.83) $ 1.22 $ 0.41
The effects on pro forma disclosures of applying SFAS 123 are not likely to be
representative of the effects on pro forma disclosures in future years.
10. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net income (loss)....................................................... $ (4,701) $ 41,445 $ 17,638
Change in gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $185 in
2001, $172 in 2000, and $10,595 in 1999 ............................. 276 853 15,892
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income/(loss) (220) (16,163) (9)
------------ ------------ ------------
Other comprehensive income (loss)....................................... 56 (15,310) 15,883
------------ ------------ ------------
Total comprehensive income (loss)....................................... $ (4,645) $ 26,135 $ 33,521
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
Accumulated other comprehensive income for 2001, 2000, and 1999 is presented in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and consists of the accumulated
net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities.
11. Tax Provision
The tax provision/(benefit) consists of:
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
(in thousands)
Federal - current................. $ (146) $ 31,554 $ 11,709
Federal - deferred................ 1,917 (5,402) (5,073)
State - current................... (84) 5,078 1,720
State - deferred.................. (1,045) (299) (591)
Foreign - current................. 295 296 290
------------ ------------ ------------
$ 937 $ 31,227 $ 8,055
============ ============ ============
The tax provision reconciles to the amount computed by multiplying income before
tax by the U.S. statutory rate as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Provision/(benefit) at federal statutory rate $ (1,317) $ 25,435 $ 8,993
Change in valuation allowance........................................... (440) (440) (440)
Tax exempt interest income.............................................. (910) (1,050) (770)
Federal research credits................................................ (1,100) (1,600) (1,031)
State taxes, net of federal benefit..................................... (420) 3,106 734
Write-down of deferred tax asset due to state tax rate reduction........ 1,044 -- --
Non-deductible impact of amortization of intangibles/investments........ 4,092 3,183 341
Non-deductible impact of in-process research and development............ -- 3,726 210
Other................................................................... (12) (1,133) 18
------------ ------------ ------------
Tax provision........................................................... $ 937 $ 31,227 $ 8,055
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
Significant components of Actel's deferred tax assets and liabilities for
federal and state income taxes are as follows:
December 31,
--------------------------
2001 2000
------------ ------------
(in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Depreciation............................. $ 2,228 $ 1,968
Deferred income.......................... 10,243 17,159
Intangible assets........................ 4,422 4,994
Inventories.............................. 7,284 3,802
Net operating losses of acquired
companies............................... 34,139 34,714
Other, net............................... 8,645 5,432
------------ ------------
66,961 68,069
Valuation allowance...................... (28,003) (28,443)
------------ ------------
Net deferred tax assets.......... $ 38,958 $ 39,626
============ ============
Deferred tax liabilities:
Intangible assets....................... $ 3,927 $ 5,067
============ ============
The valuation allowance declined by approximately $0.4 million during 2001
and 2000. Approximately $27.2 million of the valuation allowance at December 31,
2001 will be allocated to reduce goodwill or other non-current intangible assets
from the acquisition of GateField when realized.
Actel has a net operating loss carryforward as a result of the GateField
acquisition of approximately $90 million, which will expire at various times
beginning in 2006 and ending in 2020. In addition, Actel has California research
and development and manufacturer's investment credits of approximately $0.8
million and $0.2 million, respectively, which will expire in 2006. Pre-tax
income from foreign subsidiaries is immaterial.
12. Segment Disclosures
Actel operates in a single operating segment: designing, developing, and
marketing FPGAs. FPGA sales accounted for 96% of net revenues for the end of the
years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999. Actel also derives revenues from
the sale of software and hardware systems, which are used to design and program
FPGAs. In addition, Actel derives revenues from the performance of design
services, including FPGA, ASIC, and system design; software development and
implementation; and development of prototypes, first articles and production
units. The Protocol Design Services organization, which Actel acquired from
GateField in the third quarter of 1998, accounted for 1%, 2%, and 2% of net
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
Actel markets its products in the United States and in foreign countries
through its sales personnel, independent sales representatives, and
distributors. Actel's geographic sales are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------------------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
(in thousands, except percentages)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
United States................. $ 89,847 62% $ 153,847 68% $ 121,819 71%
Export:
Europe................... 40,652 28 43,282 19 29,010 17
Japan.................... 6,630 4 16,561 7 9,562 6
Other international...... 8,430 6 12,729 6 11,270 6
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
$ 145,559 100% $ 226,419 100% $ 171,661 100%
============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
Actel generates a majority of its revenues from the sale of its products
through distributors. As of December 31, 2001, Actel's principal distributors
were Unique Technologies, Inc. (Unique) and Pioneer-Standard Electronics, Inc.
(Pioneer). During 2001, Actel consolidated its distribution channel by
terminating Arrow Electronics, Inc. (Arrow). The following table sets forth, for
each of the last three years, the percentage of revenues derived from all
customers accounting for 10% or more of net revenues in any of such years:
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
Pioneer........................... 20% 13% 12%
Unique............................ 19 15 13
Arrow............................. 13 17 16
Nortel Networks................... 2 11 9
Actel estimates that sales of its products to customers in the
communications market and the military and aerospace markets accounted for 49%
and 26% of net revenues for 2001, respectively. Actel has experienced, and may
again in the future experience, substantial period-to-period fluctuations in
operating results due to conditions in the communications market or the general
economy and no assurance can be given that future sales to customers in the
military and aerospace industries will continue at current volume.
Actel's property, plant and equipment are located primarily in the United
States. Property, plant and equipment located outside of the United States is
not material.
13. Patent Infringement
On March 29, 2000, Unisys Corporation (Unisys) brought suit in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division
(Court), against Actel seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. Actel and
Unisys orally agreed to settle the case on April 25, 2001, and executed a
definitive written settlement agreement on June 29, 2001. The Court dismissed
the case with prejudice on July 13, 2001. The settlement was immaterial to
Actel's business, financial condition, and operating results.
As is typical in the semiconductor industry, Actel has been and expects to
be notified from time to time of claims that it may be infringing patents owned
by others. During 2001, Actel held discussions regarding potential patent
infringement issues with several third parties, some of which have significantly
greater financial and intellectual property resources than Actel. When probable
and reasonably estimable, Actel has made provision for the estimated settlement
costs of claims for alleged infringement. The provision is based on an estimated
royalty rate applied to shipments made in the periods and to or from the
geographic areas under dispute. In the absence of facts or circumstances unique
to a particular dispute, the royalty rate is estimated based on Actel's
understanding of royalty rates other technology companies typically agree to pay
in similar types of disputes. As it has in the past, Actel may obtain licenses
under patents that it is alleged to infringe. While Actel believes that
reasonable resolution will occur, there can be no assurance that these claims
will be resolved or that the resolution of these claims will not have a
materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or results
of operations. In addition, Actel's evaluation of the impact of these pending
disputes could change based upon new information learned by Actel. Subject to
the foregoing, Actel does not believe that any pending patent dispute is likely
to have a materially adverse effect on Actel's business, financial condition, or
results of operations.
14. Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per share:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------ ------------ ------------
(in thousands,
except per share amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Basic:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding.............................. 23,743 23,447 21,664
------------ ------------ ------------
Shares used in computing net income per share........................... 23,743 23,447 21,664
============ ============ ============
Net income (loss)....................................................... $ (4,701) $ 41,445 $ 17,638
============ ============ ============
Net income (loss) per share............................................. $ (0.20) $ 1.77 $ 0.81
============ ============ ============
Diluted:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding.............................. 23,743 23,447 21,664
Net effect of dilutive stock options, warrants, and convertible preferred
stock - based on the treasury stock method........................... -- 2,786 1,394
------------ ------------ ------------
Shares used in computing net income per share........................... 23,743 26,233 23,058
============ ============ ============
Net income (loss)....................................................... $ (4,701) $ 41,445 $ 17,638
============ ============ ============
Net income (loss) per share............................................. $ (0.20) $ 1.58 $ 0.76
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>
For 2001, Actel was in a net loss position and the inclusion of any stock
options in the shares used for computing diluted net loss per share would have
been anti-dilutive (reduced the loss per share). Therefore, approximately
1,381,000 common stock equivalent shares which would have been included if Actel
had achieved a net income and 2,635,000 options which were excluded from the
calculation because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect were
excluded from the calculation to derive the net loss per share for 2001. Options
outstanding under Actel's stock option plans to purchase approximately 361,000
and 218,000 shares of Actel common stock were excluded from the calculation to
derive diluted income per share for the years 2000 and 1999, respectively,
because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect.
<PAGE>
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS
ACTEL CORPORATION
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Actel
Corporation as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and other comprehensive
income/(loss), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of Actel's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Actel Corporation
at December, 31 2001 and 2000 and the consolidated results of its operations and
its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Jose, California
January 21, 2002
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>EX-10
<SEQUENCE>3
<FILENAME>edgarexhibit.txt
<DESCRIPTION>EXHIBIT 10.6
<TEXT>
ACTEL CORPORATION
AMENDED AND RESTATED
EMPLOYEE RETENTION PLAN
JULY 21, 2000
Introduction
It is expected that Actel Corporation from time to time will consider the
possibility of an acquisition by another company or other change of control. The
Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") recognizes that such
consideration can be a distraction to employees and can cause such employees to
consider alternative employment opportunities. The Board has determined that it
is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to assure that the
Company will have the continued dedication and objectivity of these employees,
notwithstanding the possibility, threat or occurrence of a Change of Control (as
defined below) of the Company.
The Board believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders to provide these employees with an incentive to continue their
employment and to motivate these employees to maximize the value of the Company
upon a Change of Control for the benefit of its shareholders.
The Board believes that it is imperative to provide these employees with
certain benefits upon continued employment following a Change of Control, which
provides these employees with enhanced financial security and provides efficient
incentive and encouragement to these employees to remain with the Company
notwithstanding the possibility or occurrence of a Change of Control.
Accordingly, the following plan has been developed and adopted.
ARTICLE I.
ESTABLISHMENT OF PLAN
1. Establishment of Plan. As of the Effective Date, the Company hereby
establishes an employee retention plan to be known as the "Employee Retention
Plan" (the "Plan"), as set forth in this document. The purposes of the Plan are
set forth in the Introduction.
2. Contractual Right to Benefits. This Plan establishes and vests in each
Participant a contractual right to the benefits to which he or she is entitled
hereunder, enforceable by the Participant against the Company.
ARTICLE II.
DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION
1. Definitions. Whenever used in the Plan, the following terms shall have
the meanings set forth below and, when the meaning is intended, the initial
letter of the term is capitalized.
(a) Cause. "Cause" shall mean (i) any act of personal dishonesty taken
by the Participant in connection with his responsibilities as an employee
and intended to result in substantial personal enrichment of the
Participant, (ii) the conviction of a felony, (iii) a willful act by the
Participant which constitutes gross misconduct and which is injurious to
the Company, and (iv) continued substantial violations by the Participant
of the Participant's employment duties which are demonstrably willful and
deliberate on the Participant's part after there has been delivered to the
Participant a written demand for performance from the Company which
specifically sets forth the factual basis for the Company's belief that the
Participant has not substantially performed his duties.
(b) Change of Control. "Change of Control" shall mean the occurrence
of any of the following events:
(i) Any "person" (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and
14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) is or
becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under said
Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company
representing 30% or more of the total voting power represented by the
Company's then outstanding voting securities; or
(ii) A change in the composition of the Board of Directors of the
Company occurring within a two-year period, as a result of which fewer
than a majority of the directors are Incumbent Directors. "Incumbent
Directors" shall mean directors who either (A) are directors of the
Company as of the date hereof, or (B) are elected, or nominated for
election, to the Board of Directors of the Company with the
affirmative votes of at least a majority of the Incumbent Directors at
the time of such election or nomination (but shall not include an
individual whose election or nomination is in connection with an
actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the election of
directors to the Company); or
(iii) The date of the consummation of a merger or consolidation
of the Company with any other corporation that has been approved by
the shareholders of the Company, other than a merger or consolidation
which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding
immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining
outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the
surviving entity) at least fifty percent (50%) of the total voting
power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such
surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or
consolidation, or the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of
complete liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or
disposition by the Company of all or substantially all the Company's
assets.
(c) Change of Control Price. "Change of Control Price" shall mean the
closing sale price of Company common stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market on
the last trading day prior to the day upon which a change of control
occurs.
(d) Code. "Code" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.
(e) Company. "Company" shall mean Actel Corporation, a California
corporation, and any successor entities as provided in Article VI hereof.
(f) Disability. "Disability" shall mean that the Participant has been
unable to perform his duties as an Employee as the result of his incapacity
due to physical or mental illness, and such inability, at least 26 weeks
after its commencement, is determined to be total and permanent by a
physician selected by the Company or its insurers and acceptable to the
Participant or the Participant's legal representative (such agreement as to
acceptability not to be unreasonably withheld). Termination resulting from
Disability may only be effected after at least 30 days' written notice by
the Company of its intention to terminate the Participant's employment. In
the event that the Participant resumes the performance of substantially all
of his duties hereunder before the termination of his employment becomes
effective, the notice of intent to terminate shall automatically be deemed
to have been revoked.
(g) Effective Date. "Effective Date" shall mean October 6, 1995.
(h) Employee. "Employee" shall mean a Participant, with reference to
the period of his or her employment with the Company.
(i) ERISA. "ERISA" shall mean the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, as amended.
(j) Option. "Option shall mean an outstanding stock option under a
Stock Option Plan.
(k) Participant. "Participant" shall mean an individual who meets the
eligibility requirements of Article III.
(l) Plan. "Plan" shall mean this Actel Corporation Employee Retention
Plan.
(m) Retention Payment. "Retention Payment" shall mean the payment of
retention compensation as provided in Article IV hereof.
(n) Spread. "Spread" shall mean the dollar amount determined by
subtracting (x) the aggregate exercise price of all shares subject to
Options that are unvested on the date of a Change of Control, and only to
the extent that such Options are unvested, from (y) the Change of Control
Price multiplied by the number of shares that are subject to such unvested
Options, but only to the extent that such Options are unvested.
(o) Stock Option Plan. "Stock Option Plan" shall mean the Company's
1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan or 1995 Employee and Consultant Stock
Plan.
(p) Termination Date. "Termination Date" shall mean (i) if a
Participant's employment is terminated by the Company for Disability,
thirty (30) days after notice of termination is given to the Participant
(provided that the Participant shall not have returned to the performance
of the Participant's duties on a full-time basis during such thirty (30)
day period), (ii) if the Participant's employment is terminated by the
Company for any other reason, the date on which a notice of termination is
given, or (iii) if the employment is terminated by the Participant, the
date on which the Participant delivers the notice of termination to the
Company.
ARTICLE III.
ELIGIBILITY
Each employee of the Company who, as of the date of any Change of Control,
holds unvested stock options under a Stock Option Plan shall be a Participant in
the Plan. A Participant entitled to payment of a Retention Payment shall remain
a Participant in the Plan until the full amount of the Retention Payment has
been paid to the Participant.
ARTICLE IV.
RETENTION PAYMENTS
1. Right to Retention Payments. Any payments to which a Participant is
entitled pursuant to this Article IV shall be paid by the Company within ten
(10) business days. Payments hereunder shall be made in cash, common stock of
the Company or its acquirer, or a combination thereof, unless such payment would
subject a participant to liability under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, in
which case the payment shall be made in cash.
(a) Continued Employment Following A Change of Control. If a
Participant remains employed with the Company or its acquirer six (6)
months following a Change of Control, then the Participant shall be
entitled to receive retention pay that has a fair market value, on the date
of payment, equal to one-third of the Spread on such Participant's Options
that were unvested on the date of the Change of Control.
(b) Termination Following A Change of Control. If a Participant's
employment terminates at any time within six (6) months after a Change of
Control, then, subject to subsection IV.2. hereof, the Participant shall be
entitled to receive payments as follows:
(i) Involuntary Termination. If the Participant's employment is
terminated as a result of involuntary termination other than for
Cause, then the Participant shall be entitled to receive retention pay
that has a fair market value, on the date of payment, equal to
one-third of the Spread on such Participant's Options that were
unvested on the date of the Change of Control.
(ii) Voluntary Resignation; Termination For Cause. If the
Participant's employment terminates by reason of the Participant's
voluntary resignation, or if the Participant is terminated for Cause,
then the Participant shall not be entitled to receive benefits under
this Plan.
(iii) Disability; Death. If the Company terminates the
Participant's employment as a result of the Participant's Disability,
or such Participant's employment is terminated due to the death of the
Participant, then the Participant shall not be entitled to receive
severance or other benefits except for those (if any) as may then be
established under the Company's then existing severance and benefits
plans and policies or pursuant to individual agreements with the
Company at the time of such Disability or death.
(c) Termination Apart from Change of Control. In the event a
Participant's employment is terminated for any reason, either prior to the
occurrence of a Change of Control or after the six (6)-month period
following a Change of Control, then the Employee shall be entitled to
receive severance and any other benefits only as may then be established
under the Company's existing severance and benefit plans and policies or
pursuant to individual agreements with the Company other than this Plan.
2. Limitation on Severance Payment. In the event that the Severance Payment
under this Plan, when aggregated with any other payments or benefits received by
a Participant, would (i) constitute "parachute payments" within the meaning of
Section 280G of the Code and (ii) but for this Section, would be subject to the
excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, then the Participant's Severance
Payment under subsection IV.1. shall be reduced to such lesser amount that would
result in no portion of such severance benefits being subject to excise tax
under Section 4999 of the Code. Unless the Company and the Participant otherwise
agree in writing, any determination required under this subsection IV.2. shall
be made in writing by the Company's independent public accountants immediately
prior to Change of Control (the "Accountants"), whose determination shall be
conclusive and binding upon the Participant and the Company for all purposes.
For purposes of making the calculations required by this subsection IV.2., the
Accountants may make reasonable assumptions and approximations concerning
applicable taxes and may rely on reasonable, good faith interpretations
concerning the application of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code. The Company
and the Participant shall furnish to the Accountants such information and
documents as the Accountants may reasonably request in order to make a
determination under this Section. The Company shall bear all costs the
Accountants may reasonably incur in connection with any calculations
contemplated by this subsection IV.2.
ARTICLE V.
OTHER RIGHTS AND BENEFITS NOT AFFECTED
1. Other Benefits. Neither the provisions of this Plan nor the Severance
Payment provided for hereunder shall reduce any amounts otherwise payable, or in
any way diminish the Participant's rights as an Employee, whether existing now
or hereafter, under any benefit, incentive, retirement, stock option, stock
bonus, stock purchase plan, or any employment agreement or other plan, agreement
or arrangement.
2. Employment Status. This Plan does not constitute a contract of
employment or impose on the Participant or the Company any obligation to retain
the Participant as an Employee, to change the status of the Participant's
employment, or to change the Company's policies regarding termination of
employment. The Participant's employment is and shall continue to be at-will, as
defined under applicable law. If the Participant's employment with the Company
or a successor entity terminates for any reason, including (without limitation)
any termination prior to a Change of Control, the Participant shall not be
entitled to any payments, benefits, damages, awards or compensation other than
as provided by this Plan, or as may otherwise be available in accordance with
the Company's established employee plans and practices or other agreements with
the Company.
3. Taxation of Plan Payments. All Severance Payments paid pursuant to this
Plan shall be subject to regular withholding taxes.
ARTICLE VI.
SUCCESSORS TO COMPANY AND PARTICIPANTS
1. Company's Successors. Any successor to the Company (whether direct or
indirect and whether by purchase, lease, merger, consolidation, liquidation or
otherwise) to all or substantially all of the Company's business and/or assets
shall assume the obligations under this Plan and agree expressly to perform the
obligations under this Plan. For all purposes under this Plan, the term
"Company" shall include any successor to the Company's business and/or assets
which executes and delivers the assumption agreement described in this
subsection (a) or which becomes bound by the terms of this Plan by operation of
law.
2. Participant's Successors. All rights of the Participant hereunder shall
inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, the Participant's personal or
legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs,
distributees, devisees and legatees.
ARTICLE VII.
DURATION, AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION
1. Duration. This Plan shall terminate upon the earlier of (i) the date
that all obligations of the Company or successor entities hereunder have been
satisfied, or (ii) six (6) months after a Change of Control, unless sooner
terminated as provided in Section VII.2. A termination of this Plan pursuant to
the preceding sentence shall be effective for all purposes, except that such
termination shall not affect the payment or provision of compensation or
benefits on account of a termination of employment occurring prior to the
termination of this Plan.
2. Amendment and Termination. The Board of Directors of the Company shall
have the discretionary authority to amend the Plan in any respect by resolution
adopted by a two-thirds or greater majority of the Board of Directors of the
Company, unless a Change of Control has previously occurred. The Plan may be
terminated by resolution adopted by a two-thirds or greater majority of the
Board of Directors, provided that written notice is furnished to all
Participants at least sixty (60) days prior to such termination, unless a Change
of Control has previously occurred. If a Change of Control occurs, the Plan and
Exhibits A and B thereto shall no longer be subject to amendment, change,
substitution, deletion, revocation or termination in any respect whatsoever.
3. Form of Amendment. The form of any proper amendment or termination of
the Plan shall be a written instrument signed by a duly authorized officer or
officers of the Company, certifying that the amendment or termination has been
approved by the Board of Directors. A proper amendment of the Plan automatically
shall effect a corresponding amendment to all Participants' rights hereunder. A
proper termination of the Plan automatically shall effect a termination of all
Participants' rights and benefits hereunder.
ARTICLE VIII.
PLAN ADMINISTRATION
1. Appeal. A Participant or former Participant who disagrees with their
allotment of benefits under this Plan may file a written appeal with the
designated Human Resources representative. Any claim relating to this Plan shall
be subject to this appeal process. The written appeal must be filed within sixty
(60) days of the employee's Termination Date.
The appeal must state the reasons the Participant or former Participant
believes he or she is entitled to different benefits under the Plan. The
designated Human Resources representative shall review the claim. If the claim
is wholly or partially denied, the designated Human Resources representative
shall provide the Participant or former Participant a written notice of the
denial, specifying the reasons the claim was denied. Such notice shall be
provided within ninety (90) days of receiving the written appeal.
If the claim is denied, in whole or in part, the Participant may request a
review of the denial at any time within 90 days following the date the
Participant received written notice of the denial of his or her claim. For
purposes of this subsection, any action required or authorized to be taken by
the Participant may be taken by a representative authorized in writing by the
Participant to represent him or her. The designated Human Resources
representative shall afford the Participant a full and fair review of the
decision denying the claim and, if so requested, shall:
(a) Permit the Participant to review any documents that are pertinent to
the claim;
(b) Permit the Participant to submit to the designated Human Resources
representative issues and comments in writing; and
(c) The decision on review by the designated Human Resources representative
shall be in writing and shall be issued within 60 days following receipt of the
request for review. The decision on review shall include specific reasons for
the decision and specific references to the pertinent Plan provisions on which
the decision of the designated Human Resources representative is based.
2. Arbitration. If the appeal of a Participant or former Participant is
denied, or if the outcome of said appeal is unsatisfactory to the Participant or
former Participant, the sole remedy hereunder shall be arbitration as set forth
below. Any dispute or controversy arising under or in connection with the Plan
shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American
Arbitration Association then in effect, conducted before a panel of three
arbitrators sitting in a location selected by the employee within fifty (50)
miles from the location of his or her job with the Company. In consideration for
the Participant's or former Participant's waiver of their right to litigate any
such dispute or controversy in a court of law, and notwithstanding any contrary
provisions of California law regarding allocation of attorney fees, costs and
expenses in arbitration proceedings, the Company agrees to pay, on a monthly
basis, the reasonable attorney fees, costs and expenses (as determined by the
arbitrator) incurred in good faith by the Participant or former Participant in
connection with any such arbitration regardless of the outcome of the
arbitration. Judgment may be entered on the arbitrator's award in any court
having jurisdiction. Punitive damages shall not be awarded.
ARTICLE IX.
NOTICE
1. General. Notices and all other communications contemplated by this Plan
shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given when personally
delivered or when mailed by U.S. registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested and postage prepaid. In the case of the Participant, mailed notices
shall be addressed to him at the home address that he most recently communicated
to the Company in writing. In the case of the Company, mailed notices shall be
addressed to its corporate headquarters, and all notices shall be directed to
the attention of its Secretary.
2. Notice of Termination. Any termination by the Company for Cause or by
the Participant as a result of a voluntary resignation or an Involuntary
Termination shall be communicated by a notice of termination to the other party
hereto given in accordance with Article II of this Plan. Such notice shall
indicate the specific termination provision in the Plan relied upon, shall set
forth in reasonable detail the facts and circumstances claimed to provide a
basis for termination under the provision so indicated, and shall specify the
Termination Date. The failure by the Participant to include in the notice any
fact or circumstance which contributes to a showing of Involuntary Termination
shall not waive any right of the Participant hereunder or preclude the
Participant from asserting such fact or circumstance in enforcing his rights
hereunder.
ARTICLE X.
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
1. No Duty to Mitigate. The Participant shall not be required to mitigate
the amount of any payment contemplated by this Plan, nor shall any such payment
be reduced by any earnings that the Participant may receive from any other
source.
2. Severability. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision or
provisions of this Plan shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any
other provision hereof, which shall remain in full force and effect.
3. No Assignment of Benefits. The rights of any person to payments or
benefits under this Plan shall not be made subject to option or assignment,
either by voluntary or involuntary assignment or by operation of law, including
(without limitation) bankruptcy, garnishment, attachment or other creditor's
process, and any action in violation of this subsection shall be void.
4. Assignment by Company. The Company may assign its rights under this Plan
to an affiliate, and an affiliate may assign its rights under this Plan to
another affiliate of the Company or to the Company; provided, however, that no
assignment shall be made if the net worth of the assignee is less than the net
worth of the Company at the time of assignment. In the case of any such
assignment, the term "Company" when used in a section of this Plan shall mean
the corporation that actually employs the Participant.
ARTICLE XI.
ERISA REQUIRED INFORMATION
1. Plan Sponsor. The Plan sponsor and administrator is:
Actel Corporation
955 East Arques Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
(408) 739-1010
2. Designated Agent. Designated agent for service of process:
Secretary
955 East Arques Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
(408) 739-1010
3. Plan Records. Plan records are kept on a fiscal year basis.
4. Funding. The Plan shall be funded solely from the Company's general
assets.
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>
</SEC-DOCUMENT>
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----