Form 10-K

Commission file number: 001-32136

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(516) 832-8002

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

      Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known, seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     Yes o          No þ

      Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.     o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the proceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in the definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Large accelerated filer o          Accelerated filer þ          Non-accelerated filer o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes o          No þ

      The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2005 (computed based on the closing price on such date as reported on the NYSE) was $459.4 million. As of March 10, 2006, the registrant had issued and outstanding 17,112,761 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

      Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the registrant’s 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2006 Proxy Statement”), to be filed within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

INDEX

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

      The information contained in this annual report on Form 10-K is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report.

      This report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the operating performance of our investments and financing needs. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “potential,” “intend,” “expect,” “endeavor,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “overestimate,” “underestimate,” “believe,” “could,” “project,” “predict,” “continue” or other similar words or expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions, discuss future expectations, describe future plans and strategies, contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition or state other forward-looking information. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate market specifically; adverse changes in the financing markets we access affecting our ability to finance our loan and investment portfolio; changes in interest rates; the quality and size of the investment pipeline and the rate at which we can invest our cash; impairments in the value of the collateral underlying our loans and investments; changes in the markets; legislative/regulatory changes; completion of pending investments; the availability and cost of capital for future investments; competition within the finance and real estate industries; and other risks detailed from time to time in our SEC reports. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s views as of the date of this report. The factors noted above could cause our actual results to differ significantly from those contained in any forward-looking statement. For a discussion of our critical accounting policies, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries — Significant Accounting Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies” under Item 7 of this report.

      Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results.

PART I

Overview

      We are a specialized real estate finance company which invests in a diversified portfolio of structured finance assets in the multi-family and commercial real estate markets. We invest primarily in real estate-related bridge and mezzanine loans, including junior participating interests in first mortgages, preferred and direct equity, and in limited cases, discounted mortgage notes and other real estate-related assets, which we refer to collectively as structured finance investments. We also invest in mortgage-related securities. Our principal business objective is to maximize the difference between the yield on our investments and the cost of financing these investments to generate cash available for distribution, facilitate capital appreciation and maximize total return to our stockholders.

      We are organized to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. We commenced operations in July 2003 and conduct substantially all of our operations and investing activities through our operating partnership, Arbor Realty Limited Partnership, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. We serve as the general partner of our operating partnership, and own an approximately 82% partnership interest in our operating partnership as of December 31, 2005.

      We are externally managed and advised by Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC (“ACM”), a national commercial real estate finance company which specializes in debt and equity financing for multi-family and commercial real estate, pursuant to the terms of a management agreement described below. We believe ACM’s experience and reputation positions it to originate attractive investment opportunities for us. Our management agreement with ACM was developed to capitalize on synergies with ACM’s origination infrastructure, existing business relationships and management expertise.

      We believe the financing of multi-family and commercial real estate offers significant growth opportunities that demand customized financing solutions. ACM has granted us a right of first refusal to pursue all domestic structured finance investment opportunities identified by ACM. ACM continues to originate and service multi-family and commercial mortgage loans under Fannie Mae, Federal Housing Administration and conduit commercial lending programs. We believe that the customer relationships established from these lines of business may generate additional real estate investment opportunities for our business.

Our Corporate History

      On July 1, 2003, ACM contributed a portfolio of structured finance investments to our operating partnership. Concurrently with this contribution, we and our operating partnership entered into a management agreement with ACM pursuant to which ACM manages our investments for a base management fee and incentive compensation, and the nine person asset management group of ACM became our employees.

      In exchange for ACM’s contribution of structured finance investments, our operating partnership issued approximately 3.1 million units of limited partnership interest, or operating partnership units, and approximately 0.6 million warrants to purchase additional operating partnership units at an initial exercise price of $15.00 per operating partnership unit to ACM. Concurrently, we, our operating partnership and ACM entered into a pairing agreement. Pursuant to the pairing agreement, each operating partnership unit issued to ACM and issuable to ACM upon exercise of its warrants for additional operating partnership units in connection with the contribution of initial assets was paired with one share of the Company’s special voting preferred stock. In October 2004, ACM exercised these warrants and currently holds approximately 3.8 million operating partnership units, constituting an approximately 18% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership. ACM may redeem each of these operating partnership units for cash or, at our election, one share of our common stock. We granted ACM certain demand and other registration rights with respect to the shares of common stock that may be issued upon redemption of these operating partnership units. Each of these operating partnership units is also paired with one share of our special voting preferred stock entitling ACM to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. ACM currently holds approximately

18% of the voting power of our outstanding stock. If ACM redeems these operating partnership units, an equivalent number of shares of our special voting preferred stock will be redeemed and cancelled.

      Concurrently with ACM’s contribution of investments to our operating partnership, we sold approximately 1.6 million of our units, each consisting of five shares of our common stock and one warrant to purchase an additional share of common stock at an initial exercise price of $15.00 per share, for $75.00 per unit in a private placement and agreed to register the shares of common stock underlying these units and warrants for resale under the Securities Act of 1933. In July 2004, we registered approximately 9.6 million shares of common stock underlying these units and warrants. As of December 31, 2005, approximately 1.6 million warrants were exercised, of which 0.5 million were exercised “cashless”, for a total of 1.3 million common shares issued pursuant to their exercise.

      In April 2004, we closed our initial public offering in which we issued and sold 6.3 million shares of common stock and a selling stockholder sold 22,500 shares of common stock, each at $20.00 per share. Concurrently with the initial public offering, we sold 0.5 million shares of common stock at the initial public offering price directly to an entity wholly-owned by one of our directors. The underwriters of our initial public offering exercised their overallotment option and, in May 2004, we issued and sold an additional 0.5 million shares of our common stock pursuant to such exercise.

      In January 2005, we completed a non-recourse collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) transaction, whereby $469 million of real estate related and other assets were contributed to a newly-formed consolidated subsidiary, which issued $305 million of investment grade-rated floating-rate notes in a private placement. These proceeds were used to repay outstanding debt and resulted in a decreased cost of funds relating to the CDO assets.

      Subsequently, in January 2006, we completed our second non-recourse collateralized debt obligation (“CDO II”) transaction, whereby $412 million of real estate related and other assets were contributed to a newly-formed consolidated subsidiary, which issued $356 million of investment grade-rated floating-rate notes in a private placement. These proceeds were used to repay outstanding debt and resulted in a decreased cost of funds relating to the CDO II assets.

Our Investment Strategy

      Our principal business objectives are to invest in bridge and mezzanine loans, including junior participating interests in first mortgages, preferred and direct equity and other real estate related assets in the multifamily and commercial real estate markets and actively manage our investment portfolio in order to generate cash available for distribution, facilitate capital appreciation and maximize total return to our stockholders. We believe we can achieve these objectives through the following business and growth strategies:

Our Targeted Investments

      We actively pursue lending and investment opportunities with property owners and developers who need interim financing until permanent financing can be obtained. We primarily target transactions under $40 million where we believe we have competitive advantages, particularly our lower cost structure and in-house underwriting capabilities. Our structured finance investments generally have maturities of two to five years, depending on type, have extension options when appropriate, and generally require a balloon payment of principal at maturity. Borrowers in the market for these types of loans include, but are not limited to, owners or developers seeking either to acquire or refurbish real estate or to pay down debt and reposition a property for permanent financing.

      Our investment program emphasizes the following general categories of real estate related activities:

      The rate of prepayments on the underlying mortgage loans affect the price and volatility of mortgage-related securities and may have the effect of shortening or extending the effective maturity of the security beyond what was anticipated at the time of our investment in such securities. The yield and maturity characteristics of mortgage-related securities differ from conventional fixed-income securities in that the principal amount of mortgage-related securities may be prepaid at any time because the underlying mortgage loans may be prepaid at any time. Therefore, some mortgage-related securities may have less potential for growth in value than conventional fixed-income securities with comparable maturities. In addition, the rate of prepayments tends to increase in periods of falling interest rates. During such periods, the reinvestment of prepayment proceeds by us will generally be at lower rates than the rates that were carried by the obligations that have been prepaid. To the extent that we purchase mortgage-related securities at a premium, prepayments (which may be made without penalty) may result in loss of our principal investment to the extent of the premium paid.

Our Structured Finance Investments

      We own a diversified portfolio of structured finance investments consisting primarily of real estate-related bridge and mezzanine loans as well as preferred equity investments and mortgage-backed securities.

      At December 31, 2005, we had 72 loans and investments in our portfolio, totaling $1.3 billion. These loans and investments were for 14 multi-family properties, 15 condominium properties, 21 office properties, eight hotels, six commercial properties, four retail properties, and four other properties. There are no loans or investments in the portfolio that are non-performing. We continue to actively manage all loans and investments in the portfolio and believe that our strict underwriting and active asset management enable us to maintain the credit quality of our portfolio.

      The overall yield on our portfolio in 2005 was 10.40%, excluding the impact from a second quarter distribution that was recorded as interest income totaling approximately $17.2 million, on average assets of $979 million. This yield was computed by dividing the interest income earned during the year by the average assets during the year. Our cost of funds in 2005 was 6.20% on average borrowings of $718 million. This cost of funds was computed by dividing the interest expense incurred during the year by the average borrowings during the year.

      Our average net investment (average assets less average borrowings) in 2005 was $261 million, resulting in average leverage (average borrowings divided by average assets) of 73%. The net interest income earned in 2005 yielded a 21.92% return on our average net investment during the year. This yield was computed by dividing the net interest (interest income less interest expense) earned in 2005 by the average equity (computed as average assets minus average borrowings) invested during the year. Our business plan contemplates that our leverage ratio will be approximately 65% to 75%. However, our leverage will not exceed 80% of the value of our assets in the aggregate unless approval to exceed the 80% limit is obtained from our board of directors.

STRUCTURED FINANCE INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO

As of December 31, 2005

      The following tables set forth information regarding our bridge and mezzanine loans, preferred equity investments and other real estate-related assets as of December 31, 2005.

Our Investments in Mortgage-Related Securities

      In 2004, we invested $57.4 million (including $0.1 million of purchased interest) in agency-sponsored whole pool certificates. $20.6 million of these securities were issued by FNMA and $36.7 million were issued by FHLMC. Pools of FNMA and FHLMC adjustable rate residential mortgage loans underlie these securities. The underlying mortgage loans bear interest at a weighted average fixed rate for three years and adjusts annually thereafter and have a weighted average coupon rate of 3.8%. We receive monthly payments of interest and principal on these securities based on the monthly interest and principal payments that are made on the underlying mortgage loans. At December 31, 2005, these securities were financed under a $100 million repurchase agreement, maturing July 2006, at a rate of one-month LIBOR plus 0.20%. At December 31, 2005, the amortized cost of these securities was $30.5 million and the amount outstanding on the repurchase agreement related to the financing of these securities was $28.4 million. These investments had a weighted average balance of $38.7 million for the year with an average yield of 2.14%, net of amortization of premiums. These assets were financed by borrowings with a weighted average balance of $36.6 million and an average cost of funds of 3.46%.

      The table below sets forth information regarding our investments in mortgage-related securities as of December 31, 2005. These securities have a fixed interest rate until March 2007, and adjust annually thereafter.

Regulatory Aspects of Our Investment Strategy

      Real Estate Exemption from Investment Company Act. We believe that we conduct and we intend to conduct our business at all times in a manner that avoids registration as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. There is an exemption from registration for entities that are primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring “mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate.” This exemption generally requires us to maintain at least 55% of our assets directly in qualifying real estate assets. Assets that qualify for purposes of this 55% test include, among other things, real estate, mortgage loans and agency-sponsored whole loan pool certificates. Our bridge loans secured by first mortgage liens on the underlying properties, loans secured by second mortgage liens on the underlying properties and agency-sponsored whole loan pool certificates generally qualify for purposes of this 55% test. We believe that these assets and certain of our mezzanine loans are in excess of 55% of our assets as of December 31, 2005 and qualify for purposes of the 55% test. The percentage of our assets that we invest in agency-sponsored whole loan pool certificates may decrease if we determine that we do not need to purchase such certificates for purposes of meeting the 55% test. If the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) takes a position or makes an interpretation more favorable to us, we may have greater flexibility in the investments we make. Our investments in mortgage-related securities are limited to agency-sponsored whole loan pool certificates which qualify for purposes of the 55% test. Our investment guidelines provide that no more than 15% of our assets may consist of any type of the mortgage-related securities and that the percentage of our investments in mortgage-related securities as compared to our structured finance investments be monitored on a regular basis.

Management Agreement

      On July 1, 2003, we and our operating partnership entered into a management agreement with ACM. On January 19, 2005, we, our operating partnership, Arbor Realty SR, Inc., one of our subsidiaries and ACM entered into an amended and restated management agreement with substantially the same terms as the original management agreement in order to add Arbor Realty SR, Inc. as a beneficiary of ACM’s services. Pursuant to the terms of the management agreement, our manager has agreed to service and manage our investments and to provide us with structured finance investment opportunities, finance and other services necessary to operate our business. Our manager is required to provide a dedicated management team to provide these services to us, the members of which will devote such of their time to our management as our independent directors reasonably deem necessary and appropriate, commensurate with our level of activity from time to time. We rely to a significant extent on the facilities and resources of our manager to conduct our operations. For performing services under the management agreement, ACM receives a base management fee and incentive compensation calculated as described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Arbor Realty Trust Inc. and Subsidiaries” under Item 7 of this report.

Operations

      Our Manager’s Investment Services. Under the management agreement, ACM is responsible for sourcing originations, providing underwriting services and processing approvals for all loans and other investments in our portfolio. ACM also provides certain administrative loan servicing functions with respect to our loans and investments. We are able to capitalize on ACM’s well established operations and services in each area described below.

      Origination. Our manager sources the origination of most of our investments. ACM has a network of ten sales offices located in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan; Boston, Massachusetts; Charlotte, North Carolina; Chicago, Illinois; Dallas, Texas; Kinderhook, New York; Los Angeles, California; New York, New York; Uniondale, New York; and Woodland Hills, California. These offices are staffed by approximately 16 loan originators who solicit property owners, developers and mortgage loan brokers. In some instances, the originators accept loan applications meeting our underwriting criteria from a select group of mortgage loan brokers. While a large portion of ACM’s marketing effort occurs at the branch level, ACM also markets its products in industry publications and targeted direct mailings. ACM markets structured finance products and our product offerings using the same methods. Once potential borrowers have been identified, ACM determines which financing products best meet the borrower’s needs. Loan originators in every branch office are able to offer borrowers the full array of ACM’s and our structured finance products. After identifying a suitable product, ACM works with the borrower to prepare a loan application. Upon completion by the borrower, the application is forwarded to ACM’s underwriters for due diligence.

      Underwriting. ACM’s loan originators work in conjunction with its underwriters who perform due diligence on all proposed transactions prior to loan approval and commitment. The underwriters analyze each loan application in accordance with the guidelines set forth below in order to determine the loan’s conformity with respect to such guidelines. In general, ACM’s underwriting guidelines require it to evaluate the following: the historic and in place property revenues and expenses; the potential for near-term revenue growth and opportunity for expense reduction and increased operating efficiencies; the property’s location, its attributes and competitive position within its market; the proposed ownership structure, financial strength and real estate experience of the borrower and property management; third party appraisal, environmental and engineering studies; market assessment, including property inspection, review of tenant lease files, surveys of property comparables and an analysis of area economic and demographic trends; review of an acceptable mortgagee’s title policy and an “as built” survey; construction quality of the property to determine future maintenance and capital expenditure requirements; and the requirements for any reserves, including those for immediate repairs or rehabilitation, replacement reserves, tenant improvement and leasing commission costs, real estate taxes and property casualty and liability insurance. Key factors considered in credit decisions include, but are not limited to, debt service coverage, loan to value ratios and property, financial and operating performance. Consideration is also given to other factors, such as additional forms of collateral and identifying likely

strategies to effect repayment. ACM will refine its underwriting criteria based upon actual loan portfolio experience and as market conditions and investor requirements evolve.

      Investment Approval Process. ACM applies its established investment approval process to all loans and other investments proposed for our portfolio before submitting each proposal to us for final approval. A written report is generated for every loan or other investment that is submitted to ACM’s credit committee for approval. The report includes a description of the prospective borrower and any guarantors, the collateral and the proposed use of investment proceeds, as well as borrower and property consolidated financial statements and analysis. In addition, the report includes an analysis of borrower liquidity, net worth, cash investment, income, credit history and operating experience. If the transaction is approved by a majority of ACM’s credit committee, it is presented for approval to our credit committee, which consists of our chief executive officer, chief credit officer, and executive vice president of structured finance. All transactions require the approval of a majority of the members of our credit committee. Following the approval of any such transaction, ACM’s underwriting and servicing departments, together with our asset management group, assure that all loan approval terms have been satisfied and that they conform with lending requirements established for that particular transaction. If our credit committee rejects the loan and our independent directors allow ACM or one of its affiliates to pursue it, ACM will have the opportunity to execute the transaction.

      Servicing. ACM services our loans and investments through its internal servicing operations. Our manager currently services an expanding portfolio, consisting of approximately 513 loans with outstanding balances of $3.2 billion through its loan administration department in Buffalo, New York. ACM’s loan servicing operations are designed to provide prompt customer service and accurate and timely information for account follow up, financial reporting and management review. Following the funding of an approved loan, all pertinent loan data is entered into ACM’s data processing system, which provides monthly billing statements, tracks payment performance and processes contractual interest rate adjustments on variable rate loans. Our manager utilizes the operations of its loan administration department to service our portfolio with the same efficiency, accuracy and promptness. ACM also works closely with our asset management group to ensure the appropriate level of customer service and monitoring of these loans.

      Our Asset Management Operations. Our asset management group is comprised of 16 of our employees. Prior to our formation, the asset management group successfully managed numerous transactions, including complex restructurings, refinancings and asset dispositions for ACM.

      Effective asset and portfolio management is essential to maximizing the performance and value of a real estate investment. The asset management group customizes an asset management plan with the loan originators and underwriters to track each investment from origination through disposition. This group monitors each investment’s operating history, local economic trends and rental and occupancy rates and evaluates the underlying property’s competitiveness within its market. This group assesses ongoing and potential operational and financial performance of each investment in order to evaluate and ultimately improve its operations and financial viability. The asset management group performs frequent onsite inspections, conducts meetings with borrowers and evaluates and participates in the budgeting process, financial and operational review and renovation plans of each of the underlying properties. As an asset and portfolio manager, the asset management group focuses on increasing the productivity of onsite property managers and leasing brokers. This group communicates the status of each transaction against its established asset management plan to senior management in order to enhance and preserve capital, as well as to avoid litigation and potential exposure.

      Timely and accurate identification of an investment’s operational and financial issues and each borrower’s objectives is essential to implementing an executable loan workout and restructuring process, if required. Since existing property management may not have the requisite expertise to manage the workout process effectively, the asset management group determines current operating and financial status of an asset or portfolio and performs liquidity analysis of properties and ownership entities and then, if appropriate, identifies and evaluates alternatives in order to maximize the value of an investment.

      Our asset management group continues to provide its services to ACM on a limited basis pursuant to an asset management services agreement between ACM and us. The asset management services agreement will

be effective throughout the term of our management agreement and during the origination period described in the management agreement. In the event the services provided by our asset management group pursuant to this agreement exceed by more than 15% per quarter the level anticipated by our board of directors, we will negotiate in good faith with our manager an adjustment to our manager’s base management fee under the management agreement, to reduce the scope of the services, the quantity of serviced assets or the time required to be devoted to the services by our asset management group.

Operating Policies and Strategies

      Investment Guidelines. Our board of directors has adopted general guidelines for our investments and borrowings to the effect that: (1) no investment will be made that would cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT; (2) no investment will be made that would cause us to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act; (3) no more than 25% of our equity, determined as of the date of such investment, will be invested in any single asset; (4) our leverage will generally not exceed 80% of the value of our assets, in the aggregate; (5) we will not co-invest with our manager or any of its affiliates unless such co-investment is otherwise in accordance with these guidelines and its terms are at least as favorable to us as to our manager or the affiliate making such co-investment; (6) no more than 15% of our gross assets may consist of mortgage-related securities.

      Financing Policies. We finance the acquisition of our structured finance investments primarily by borrowing against or “leveraging” our existing portfolio and using the proceeds to acquire additional mortgage assets. We expect to incur debt such that we will maintain an equity to assets ratio no less than 20%, although the actual ratio may be lower from time to time depending on market conditions and other factors deemed relevant by our manager. Our charter and bylaws do not limit the amount of indebtedness we can incur, and the board of directors has discretion to deviate from or change our indebtedness policy at any time. However, we intend to maintain an adequate capital base to protect against various business environments in which our financing and hedging costs might exceed the interest income from our investments.

      Our investments are financed primarily by collateralized debt obligations, our variable rate junior subordinate notes, and through our floating rate warehouse lines of credit, loan repurchase agreements and other financing facilities with institutional lenders. Although we expect that these will be the principal means of leveraging our investments, we may issue preferred stock or secured or unsecured notes of any maturity if it appears advantageous to do so.

      Credit Risk Management Policy. We are exposed to various levels of credit and special hazard risk depending on the nature of our underlying assets and the nature and level of credit enhancements supporting our assets. We originate or purchase mortgage loans that meet our minimum debt service coverage standards. ACM, as our manager, our chief credit officer, and our asset management group, reviews and monitors credit risk and other risks of loss associated with each investment. In addition, ACM seeks to diversify our portfolio of assets to avoid undue geographic, issuer, industry and certain other types of concentrations. Our board of directors monitors the overall portfolio risk and reviews levels of provision for loss.

      Interest Rate Risk Management Policy. To the extent consistent with our election to qualify as a REIT, we follow an interest rate risk management policy intended to mitigate the negative effects of major interest rate changes. We minimize our interest rate risk from borrowings by attempting to structure the key terms of our borrowings to generally correspond to the interest rate term of our assets.

      We may enter into hedging transactions to protect our investment portfolio from interest rate fluctuations and other changes in market conditions. These transactions may include interest rate swaps, the purchase or sale of interest rate collars, caps or floors, options, mortgage derivatives and other hedging instruments. These instruments may be used to hedge as much of the interest rate risk as ACM determines is in the best interest of our stockholders, given the cost of such hedges and the need to maintain our status as a REIT. In general, income from hedging transactions does not constitute qualifying income for purposes of the REIT gross income requirements. To the extent, however, that a hedging contract reduces interest rate risk on indebtedness incurred to acquire or carry real estate assets, any income that is derived from the hedging contract, while comprising non-qualifying income for purposes of the REIT 75% gross income test, would not

give rise to non-qualifying income for purposes of the 95% gross income test. ACM may elect to have us bear a level of interest rate risk that could otherwise be hedged when it believes, based on all relevant facts, that bearing such risk is advisable.

      To date, we have entered into various interest rate swaps in connection with the issuance of floating rate secured notes, the issuance of variable rate junior subordinate notes, and to hedge the interest risk on forecasted outstanding Libor based debt. The notional amount of each interest rate swap agreement and the related terms have been designed to protect our investment portfolio from interest rate risk and to match the payment and receipts of interest on the underlying debt instruments, where applicable.

      Disposition Policies. Although there are no current plans to dispose of properties or other assets within our portfolio, ACM evaluates our asset portfolio on a regular basis to determine if it continues to satisfy our investment criteria. Subject to certain restrictions applicable to REITs, ACM may cause us to sell our investments opportunistically and use the proceeds of any such sale for debt reduction, additional acquisitions or working capital purposes.

      Equity Capital Policies. Subject to applicable law, our board of directors has the authority, without further stockholder approval, to issue additional authorized common stock and preferred stock or otherwise raise capital, including through the issuance of senior securities, in any manner and on the terms and for the consideration it deems appropriate, including in exchange for property. We may in the future issue common stock in connection with acquisitions. We also may issue units of partnership interest in our operating partnership in connection with acquisitions of property. We may, under certain circumstances, repurchase our common stock in private transactions with our stockholders, if those purchases are approved by our board of directors. Our board of directors currently has no intention of causing us to repurchase any shares, and any action would only be taken in conformity with applicable federal and state laws and the applicable requirements for qualifying as a REIT, for so long as the board of directors concludes that we should continue to qualify as a REIT.

      Conflicts of Interest Policies. We, our executive officers and ACM face conflicts of interests because of our relationships with each other. Mr. Kaufman is our chief executive officer and the chief executive officer of ACM. Mr. Ivan Kaufman and entities controlled by him own approximately 90% of the outstanding membership interests of ACM. In addition, Mr. Weber, our executive vice president of structured finance, Mr. Kilgore, our executive vice president of securitization, Mr. Fogel, our senior vice president of asset management, and two of our directors, Mr. Joseph Martello and Mr. Walter Horn, have minority ownership interests in ACM. Mr. Horn also serves as our secretary, general counsel, and director of compliance. Mr. Martello serves as the trustee and co-trustee of two separate trusts through which Mr. Kaufman owns an equity interest in ACM.

      We have implemented several policies, through board action and through the terms of our constituent documents and of our agreements with ACM, to help address these conflicts of interest:

      Our board of directors has approved the operating policies and the strategies set forth above. The board of directors has the power to modify or waive these policies and strategies, or amend our agreements with ACM, without the consent of our stockholders to the extent that the board of directors (including a majority of our independent directors) determines that such modification or waiver is in the best interest of our stockholders. Among other factors, developments in the market that either affect the policies and strategies mentioned herein or that change our assessment of the market may cause our board of directors to revise its policies and strategies. However, if such modification or waiver involves the relationship of, or any transaction between, us and our manager or any affiliate of our manager, the approval of a majority of our independent directors is also required. We may not, however, amend our charter to change the requirement that a majority of our board consist of independent directors or the requirement that our independent directors approve related party transactions without the approval of two thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by our stockholders.

Compliance with Federal, State and Local Environmental Laws

      Properties that we may acquire directly or indirectly through partnerships, and the properties underlying our structured finance investments and mortgage-related securities, are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations. Under these laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner of real estate (including, in certain circumstances, a secured lender that succeeds to ownership or control of a property) may become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at, on, under or in its property. These laws typically impose cleanup responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or control party knew of or was responsible for the release or presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of investigation, remediation or removal of these substances may be substantial and could exceed the value of the property. An owner or control party of a site may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from a site. Certain environmental laws also impose liability in connection with the handling of or exposure to materials containing asbestos. These laws allow third parties to seek recovery from owners of real properties for personal injuries associated with materials containing asbestos. Our operating costs and the values of these assets may be adversely affected by the obligation to pay for the cost of complying with existing environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, as well as the cost of complying with future legislation, and our income and ability to make distributions to our stockholders could be affected adversely by the existence of an environmental liability with respect to properties we may acquire. We will endeavor to ensure that these properties are in compliance in all material respects with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations regarding hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products.

Competition

      Our net income depends, in large part, on our manager’s ability to originate structured finance investments with spreads over our borrowing costs. In originating these investments, our manager competes with other mortgage REITs, specialty finance companies, savings and loan associations, banks, mortgage bankers, insurance companies, mutual funds, institutional investors, investment banking firms, other lenders, governmental bodies and other entities, some of which may have greater financial resources and lower costs of capital available to them. In addition, there are numerous mortgage REITs with asset acquisition objectives similar to ours, and others may be organized in the future. The effect of the existence of additional REITs may be to increase competition for the available supply of structured finance assets suitable for purchase by us. Competitive variables include market presence and visibility, size of loans offered and underwriting standards. To the extent that a competitor is willing to risk larger amounts of capital in a particular transaction or to

employ more liberal underwriting standards when evaluating potential loans, our origination volume and profit margins for our investment portfolio could be impacted. Our competitors may also be willing to accept lower returns on their investments and may succeed in buying the assets that we have targeted for acquisition. Although management believes that we are well positioned to continue to compete effectively in each facet of our business, there can be no assurance that we will do so or that we will not encounter further increased competition in the future that could limit its ability to compete effectively.

Employees

      We currently have 23 employees, including Mr. Kovarik, our chief credit officer, Mr. Weber, our executive vice president of structured finance, Mr. Horn, our secretary, general counsel, and director of compliance, Mr. Fogel, our senior vice president of asset management and Mr. Kilgore, our executive vice president of securitization. In addition, Mr. Kaufman, our chief executive officer and Mr. Elenio, our chief financial officer are full time employees of our manager, who perform the duties required pursuant to the management agreement with our manager.

Corporate Governance and Internet Address

      We have adopted corporate governance guidelines and a code of business conduct and ethics, which delineate our standards for our officers and directors, and employees of our manager. We emphasize the importance of professional business conduct and ethics through our corporate governance initiatives.

      As a result of the resignation of Mr. Bernstein, one of our independent directors, on February 8, 2006, our board of directors does not presently consist of a majority of independent directors. We are currently in the process of replacing Mr. Bernstein and anticipate that our board of directors will again consist of a majority of independent directors in the near future. The audit, nominating/corporate governance, and compensation committees of our board of directors are composed exclusively of independent directors.

      Our internet address is www.arborrealtytrust.com. We make available, free of charge through a link on our site, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to such reports, if any, as filed with the SEC as soon as reasonably practicable after such filing. Our site also contains our code of business conduct and ethics, code of ethics for senior financial officers, corporate governance guidelines, and the charters of the audit committee, nominating/corporate governance committee and compensation committee of our board of directors.

      Our business is subject to various risks, including the risks listed below. If any of these risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected and the value of our common stock could decline.

Risks Related to Our Business

      We may not be able to identify investments that meet our investment criteria and we may not be successful in closing the investments that we identify. Unless and until we identify structured finance and mortgage-related security investments consistent with our investment criteria, any excess equity capital may be used to repay borrowings under our warehouse credit facility, bridge loan warehouse facility and repurchase agreements, which would not produce a return on capital. In addition, the investments that we acquire with our equity capital may not produce a return on capital. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify attractive opportunities to invest our equity capital which would adversely affect our results of operations.

      Our future success depends, to a significant extent, upon the continued services of our manager and our employees. In particular, the mortgage lending experience of Mr. Ivan Kaufman and Mr. Fred Weber and the extent and nature of the relationships they have developed with developers of multi-family and commercial properties and other financial institutions are critical to the success of our business. We cannot assure you of their continued employment with Arbor Commercial Mortgage or us. The loss of services of one or more members of our manager’s officers or our officers could harm our business and our prospects.

      We invest in mezzanine loans that take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests of either the entity owning the property or a pledge of the ownership interests of the entity that owns the interest in the entity owning the property. These types of investments involve a higher degree of risk than long term senior mortgage lending secured by income producing real property because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of such entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan to value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the property and increasing the risk of loss of principal.

      Our investments include multi-family and commercial real estate loans that are considered to involve a higher degree of risk than single family residential lending because of a variety of factors, including generally larger loan balances, dependency for repayment on successful operation of the mortgaged property and tenant businesses operating therein, and loan terms that include amortization schedules longer than the stated maturity and provide for balloon payments at stated maturity rather than periodic principal payments. In addition, the value of commercial real estate can be affected significantly by the supply and demand in the market for that type of property.

      Multi-family and commercial property values and net operating income derived from such properties are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, national, regional and local economic conditions (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors); local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of housing, retail, industrial, office or other commercial space); changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments; construction quality, age and design; demographic factors; retroactive changes to building or similar codes; and increases in operating expenses (such as energy costs). In the event a property’s net operating income decreases, a borrower may have difficulty paying our loan, which could result in losses to us. In addition, decreases in property values reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to a borrower to repay our loans, which could also cause us to suffer losses.

      As a REIT, we are generally required to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income each year to our stockholders. In order to qualify for the tax benefits accorded to REITs, we intend to pay quarterly dividends and to make distributions to our stockholders in amounts such that we distribute all or substantially all of our taxable income each year, subject to certain adjustments. However, our ability to make distributions may be adversely affected by the risk factors described in this form 10-K. In the event of a downturn in our operating results and financial performance or unanticipated declines in the value of our asset portfolio, we may be unable to declare or pay quarterly dividends or make distributions to our stockholders. The timing and amount of dividends are in the sole discretion of our board of directors, which considers, among other factors, our earnings, financial condition, debt service obligations and applicable debt covenants, REIT qualification requirements and other tax considerations and capital expenditure requirements as our board may deem relevant from time to time.

      Among the factors that could adversely affect our results of operations and impair our ability to make distributions to our stockholders are:

      A change in any one of these factors could affect our ability to make distributions. If we are not able to comply with the restrictive covenants and financial ratios contained in our credit facilities, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders may also be impaired. We cannot assure you that we will be able to make distributions to our stockholders in the future or that the level of any distributions we make will increase over time.

      In addition, distributions to stockholders are generally taxable to our stockholders as ordinary income, but a portion of these distributions may be designated by us as long-term capital gains to the extent they are attributable to capital gain income recognized by us, or may constitute a return of capital to the extent they exceed our earnings and profits as determined for tax purposes.

      We may need to borrow funds to meet the REIT requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our taxable income each year to our stockholders if our cash flows from operations are not sufficient to cover the distribution requirements or because there are differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of income in cash. Our warehouse credit facility, bridge loan warehouse facility and master repurchase agreements allow us to borrow up to a maximum amount against each of our investments financed under these credit facilities. If we have not borrowed the maximum allowable amount against any of these investments, we may borrow funds under our credit facilities up to these maximum amounts in order to satisfy REIT distribution requirements. Any required debt service will reduce cash and net income available for operations or distribution to our stockholders.

      In order to maximize the return on our funds, cash generated from operations is generally used to temporarily pay down borrowings under credit facilities whose primary purpose is to fund our new loans and investments. When making distributions, we borrow the required funds by drawing on credit capacity available under our credit facilities. To date, all distributions have been funded in this manner. If distributions exceed

cash available in the future, we may be required to borrow additional funds, which would reduce the amount of cash available for other purposes, or sell assets in order to meet our REIT distribution requirements.

      We believe that we conduct and we intend to conduct our business in a manner that allows us to avoid being regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the Investment Company Act. Under Section 3(c) (5) (C), the Investment Company Act exempts entities that are primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring “mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate.” The staff of the SEC has provided guidance on the availability of this exemption. Specifically, the staff’s position generally requires us to maintain at least 55% of our assets directly in qualifying real estate interests. To constitute a qualifying real estate interest under this 55% requirement, a real estate interest must meet various criteria. Loans that are secured by equity interests in entities that directly or indirectly own the underlying real property, rather than a mortgage on the underlying property itself, and ownership of equity interests in owners of real property may not qualify for purposes of the 55% test depending on the type of entity. Mortgage-related securities that do not represent all of the certificates issued with respect to an underlying pool of mortgages may also not qualify for purposes of the 55% test. Therefore, our ownership of these types of debt instruments and equity interests may be limited by the provisions of the Investment Company Act. To the extent that we do not comply with the SEC staff’s 55% test or another exemption or exclusion from registration under the Investment Company Act or other interpretations under the Investment Company Act, we may be deemed to be an investment company. If we fail to maintain an exemption or other exclusion from registration as an investment company we could, among other things, be required either (a) to substantially change the manner in which we conduct our operations to avoid being required to register as an investment company or (b) to register as an investment company, either of which could have an adverse effect on us and the market price of our common stock. If we were required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we would become subject to substantial regulation with respect to our capital structure (including our ability to use leverage), management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act), portfolio composition, including restrictions with respect to diversification and industry concentration and other matters.

      Mr. Ivan Kaufman is our chairman and chief executive officer and the president and chief executive officer of our manager. Further, Mr. Kaufman and the Kaufman entities together beneficially own approximately 90% of the outstanding membership interests of Arbor Commercial Mortgage. Arbor Commercial Mortgage owns approximately 3.8 million operating partnership units, representing a 18% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership and we own the remaining 82%. The operating partnership units are redeemable for cash or, at our election, for shares of our common stock generally on a one-for-one basis. Each of the operating partnership units Arbor Commercial Mortgage owns is paired with one share of our special voting preferred stock, each of which entitle Arbor Commercial Mortgage to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. Arbor Commercial Mortgage is currently entitled to approximately 3.8 million votes, or 18% of the voting power of our outstanding stock. We granted Arbor Commercial Mortgage and Mr. Kaufman, as its controlling equity owner, an exemption from the ownership limitation contained in our charter, in connection with Arbor Commercial Mortgage’s acquisition of approximately 3.1 million shares of our special voting preferred stock on July  1, 2003. Because of his position with us and our manager and his ability to effectively vote a substantial minority of our outstanding voting stock, Mr. Kaufman has significant influence over our policies and strategy.

      For the purpose of preserving our REIT qualification, our charter generally prohibits direct or constructive ownership by any person of more than 8.3% (by value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding shares of our common stock or 8.3% (by value) of our outstanding shares of capital stock. For purposes of this calculation, warrants held by such person will be deemed to have been exercised if such exercise would result in a violation. Our charter’s constructive ownership rules are complex and may cause the outstanding stock owned by a group of related individuals or entities to be deemed to be constructively owned by one individual or entity. As a result, the acquisition of less than these percentages of the outstanding stock by an individual or entity could cause that individual or entity to own constructively in excess of these percentages of the outstanding stock and thus be subject to our charter’s ownership limit. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of our common or preferred stock in excess of the ownership limit without the consent of the board of directors will result in the shares being automatically transferred to a charitable trust or otherwise be void.

Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest

      We have only 23 employees, including Mr. Fred Weber, Mr. Mark Fogel, Mr. John C. Kovarik, Mr. Walter Horn, Mr. Gene Kilgore, a two-person securitization group and a 16-person asset management group, and are dependent upon our manager, Arbor Commercial Mortgage, to provide services to us that are vital to our operations. Our chairman, chief executive officer and president, Mr. Ivan Kaufman, is also the chief executive officer and president of our manager. Our chief financial officer, Mr. Paul Elenio, is the chief financial officer of our manager, and our secretary, general counsel, and director of compliance, Mr. Walter Horn, is the general counsel of our manager. In addition, Mr. Kaufman and the Kaufman entities together beneficially own approximately 90% of the outstanding membership interests of Arbor Commercial Mortgage and Messrs. Elenio, Weber, Fogel, Martello and Horn, also hold an ownership interest in Arbor Commercial Mortgage. Mr. Martello also serves as the trustee of one of the Kaufman entities that holds a majority of the outstanding membership interests in Arbor Commercial Mortgage and co-trustee of another Kaufman entity that owns an equity interest in our manager. Arbor Commercial Mortgage holds an 18% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership which as a result has 18% of the voting power of our outstanding stock.

      We may enter into transactions with Arbor Commercial Mortgage outside the terms of the management agreement with the approval of majority vote of the independent members of our board of directors. Transactions required to be approved by a majority of our independent directors include, but are not limited to, our ability to purchase securities and mortgage and other assets from Arbor Commercial Mortgage or to sell securities and assets to Arbor Commercial Mortgage. Arbor Commercial Mortgage may from time to time provide permanent mortgage loan financing to clients of ours, which will be used to refinance bridge financing provided by us. We and Arbor Commercial Mortgage may also make loans to the same borrower or to borrowers that are under common control. Additionally, our policies and those of Arbor Commercial Mortgage may require us to enter into intercreditor agreements in situations where loans are made by us and Arbor Commercial Mortgage to the same borrower.

      We have entered into a management agreement with our manager under which our manager provides us with all of the services vital to our operations other than asset management services. However, the management agreement was not negotiated at arm’s length and its terms, including fees payable, may not be as favorable to us as if it had been negotiated with an unaffiliated third party. Certain matters relating to our organization also were not approved at arm’s length and the terms of the contribution of assets to us may not be as favorable to us as if the contribution was with an unaffiliated third party.

      The results of our operations is dependent upon the availability of, and our manager’s ability to identify and capitalize on, investment opportunities. Our manager’s officers and employees are also responsible for

providing the same services for Arbor Commercial Mortgage’s portfolio of investments. As a result, they may not be able to devote sufficient time to the management of our business operations.

      Our manager is authorized to follow very broad investment guidelines. Our directors will periodically review our investment guidelines and our investment portfolio. However, our board does not review each proposed investment. In addition, in conducting periodic reviews, the directors rely primarily on information provided to them by our manager. Furthermore, transactions entered into by our manager may be difficult or impossible to unwind by the time they are reviewed by the directors. Our manager has great latitude within the broad investment guidelines in determining the types of assets it may decide are proper investments for us.

      Our manager has broad discretion, within the general investment criteria established by our board of directors, to allocate the proceeds of the concurrent offerings and to determine the timing of investment of such proceeds. Such discretion could result in allocation of proceeds to assets where the investment returns are substantially below expectations or that result in net operating losses, which would materially and adversely affect our business, operations and results.

      The management compensation structure that we have agreed to with our manager may cause our manager to invest in high risk investments. Our manager is entitled to a base management fee, which is based on the equity of our operating partnership. The amount of the base management fee does not depend on the performance of the services provided by our manager or the types of assets it selects for our investment, but the value of our operating partnership’s equity will be affected by the performance of these assets. Our manager is also entitled to receive incentive compensation based in part upon our achievement of targeted levels of funds from operations. In evaluating investments and other management strategies, the opportunity to earn incentive compensation based on funds from operations may lead our manager to place undue emphasis on the maximization of funds from operations at the expense of other criteria, such as preservation of capital, in order to achieve higher incentive compensation. Investments with higher yield potential are generally riskier or more speculative. This could result in increased risk to the value of our invested portfolio.

Risk Related to Our Status as a REIT

      We conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. However, qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which only limited judicial and administrative authorities exist. Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. Our continued qualification as a REIT will depend on our satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, distribution, stockholder ownership and other requirements on a continuing basis. In particular, our ability to qualify as a REIT depends in part on the relative values of our common and special voting preferred stock, which have not been determined by independent appraisal, are susceptible to fluctuation, and could, if successfully challenged by the IRS, cause us to fail to meet the ownership requirements. In addition, our ability to satisfy the requirements to qualify as a REIT depends in part on the actions of third parties over which we have no control or only limited influence, including in cases where we own an equity interest in an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

      Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, then:

      Not applicable.

      Arbor Commercial Mortgage, our manager, leases our shared principal executive and administrative offices, located at 333 Earle Ovington Boulevard in Uniondale, New York.

      We are not involved in any litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any litigation threatened against us.

      No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of 2005.

PART II

Market Information

      Our common stock has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ABR” since our initial public offering in April 2004. The following table sets forth for the indicated periods the high, low and

last sales prices for our common stock, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, and the dividends declared and paid with respect to such periods:

      We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or a REIT, which requires that we distribute at least 90% of taxable income. Therefore, we intend to continue to declare quarterly distributions on our common stock. No assurance, however, can be given as to the amounts or timing of future distributions as such distributions are subject to our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant.

      On March 10, 2006, the closing sale price for our common stock, as reported on the NYSE, was $26.70. As of March 10, 2006, there were 5,500 record holders of our common stock. This figure does not reflect the beneficial ownership of shares held in nominee name.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

      Information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans which are set forth under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” of the 2006 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Recent Issuances of Unregistered Securities

      In 2005, we issued a total of 282,776 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 287,141 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock and received a total of approximately $4.2 million in proceeds as a result of the exercise of such warrants. These warrants were originally issued and sold as part of units, each consisting of five shares of common stock and one warrant. Pursuant to the terms of the warrant agreement, dated as of July 1, 2003, each of the warrants were exercisable from July 13, 2004 to July 1, 2005 for one share of common stock at an initial exercise price of $15 in cash or a number of shares of common stock or warrants

deemed to have a fair market value equivalent to the cash exercise price. Of the total number of shares of common stock issued upon the exercise of such warrants, 279,457 shares were issued in consideration of the payment of the cash exercise price and 3,319 shares were issued in consideration of the holder of the related warrant surrendering shares of common stock or additional warrants in lieu of the cash exercise price. Funds received from the exercise of warrants were initially used to pay down debt outstanding under our credit facilities.

      The issuance and sale of the shares of common stock issued upon the exercise of these warrants was not registered under the Securities Act in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) thereof. These transactions did not involve any public offering of common stock, the holders of the warrants had adequate access to information about us through our public filings with the SEC, and an appropriate legend was placed on the certificates evidencing the shares of common stock issued to the exercising holders of the warrants.

      In 2005, we issued 191,342 shares of common stock to ACM as payment of the incentive compensation earned by ACM for the quarters ending December 31, 2004, March 31, 2005, June 30, 2005, and September 30, 2005. The issuance of these 191,342 shares as payment for ACM’s incentive compensation was not registered under the Securities Act in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) thereof.

      In February 2005, 1,000 restricted shares were issued to each of four independent members of the board of directors under the stock incentive plan. One third of the restricted stock granted to each of these directors were vested as of the date of grant, another one third vested on January 31, 2006 and the remaining third will vest on January 31, 2007. In May 2005, we issued 41,000 shares of restricted common stock under the stock incentive plan to certain of our employees and employees of our manager, ACM. One fifth of the restricted stock granted to each of these employees were vested as of the date of grant and recognized currently in earnings, the second one-fifth will vest in May 2006, the third one-fifth will vest in May 2007, the fourth one-fifth will vest in May 2008, and the remaining one-fifth will vest in May 2009. In July 2005, we issued 77,500 shares of restricted common stock under the stock incentive plan to certain of our employees and employees of ACM. One fifth of the restricted stock granted to each of these employees were vested as of the date of grant and is recognized currently in earnings, the second one-fifth will vest in May 2006, the third one-fifth will vest in May 2007, the fourth one-fifth will vest in May 2008, and the remaining one-fifth will vest in May 2009. In August 2005, the Company issued 2,000 shares of restricted common stock under the stock incentive plan to two of our directors. One third of the restricted stock granted to each of these employees were vested as of the date of grant and is recognized currently in earnings, the second one-third will vest in August 2006, the third one-third will vest in August 2007. The issuance of these 124,500 shares was not registered under the Securities Act in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) thereof.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF

ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

      The following tables present selected historical consolidated financial information as of December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and for the period from June 24, 2003 (inception) to December 31, 2003. The selected historical consolidated financial information presented below under the captions “Consolidated Income Statement Data” and “Consolidated Balance Sheet Data” have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, which management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the historical consolidated financial statements for such period. The information presented under the caption “Consolidated Income Statement Data” for the period ended December 31, 2003 is not necessarily indicative of any other interim period. In addition, since the information presented below is only a summary and does not provide all of the information contained in our historical consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, you should read it in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries” and our historical consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, included elsewhere in this report.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE

STRUCTURED FINANCE BUSINESS OF ARBOR COMMERCIAL

MORTGAGE, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

      On July 1, 2003, Arbor Commercial Mortgage contributed a portfolio of structured finance investments and related liabilities to our operating partnership. In addition, certain employees of Arbor Commercial Mortgage became our employees. These assets, liabilities and employees represented a substantial portion of Arbor Commercial Mortgage’s structured finance business.

      The tables on the following page present selected historical consolidated financial information of the structured finance business of Arbor Commercial Mortgage at the dates and for the periods indicated. The structured finance business did not operate as a separate legal entity or business division or segment of Arbor Commercial Mortgage but as an integrated part of Arbor Commercial Mortgage’s consolidated business. Accordingly, the statements of revenue and direct operating expenses do not include charges from Arbor Commercial Mortgage for corporate general and administrative expense because Arbor Commercial Mortgage considered such items to be corporate expenses and did not allocate them to individual business units. These expenses included costs for Arbor Commercial Mortgage’s executive management, corporate facilities and overhead costs, corporate accounting and treasury functions, corporate legal matters and other similar costs. The selected consolidated financial information presented under the caption “Consolidated Statement of Revenue and Direct Operating Expenses Data” for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the six months ended June 30, 2003 and under the caption “Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities Data” as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the structured finance business of Arbor Commercial Mortgage. The selected consolidated financial information presented under the caption “Consolidated Statement of Revenue and Direct Operating Expenses Data” for the six months ended June 30, 2003 is not necessarily indicative of the results of any other interim period or the year ended December 31, 2003.

      The selected consolidated financial information presented under the caption “Consolidated Statement of Revenue and Direct Operating Expenses Data” for the six months ended June 30, 2002 have been derived from the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Arbor Commercial Mortgage’s structured finance business and include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, which management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the historical consolidated financial information for such periods. The selected consolidated financial information presented under the caption “Consolidated Statement of Revenue and Direct Operating Expenses Data” for the six-month period ended June 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results of any other interim period or the year ended December 31, 2002.

      The consolidated financial statements of Arbor Commercial Mortgage’s structured finance business included in this report represent the consolidated financial position and results of operations of Arbor Commercial Mortgage’s structured finance business during certain periods and at certain dates when Arbor Commercial Mortgage previously held our initial assets, as well as several other structured finance investments that we did not acquire in connection with our formation transactions. See “Selected Consolidated Financial Information of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries.” Accordingly, the historical financial results of Arbor Commercial Mortgage’s structured finance business are not indicative of our future performance. In addition, since the information presented is only a summary and does not provide all of the information contained in the consolidated financial statements of Arbor Commercial Mortgage’s structured finance business, including related notes, you should read it in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Structured Finance Business of Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC and Subsidiaries” and the consolidated financial statements of Arbor Commercial Mortgage’s structured finance business, including related notes, contained elsewhere in this report.

Consolidated Statement of Revenue and Direct Operating Expenses Data:

Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities Data:

Other Data (Unaudited):

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

      You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the sections of this report entitled “Risk Factors”, “Forward-Looking Statements”, and “Selected Consolidated Financial Information of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries” and the historical consolidated financial statements of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries, including related notes, included elsewhere in this report.

Overview

      We are a Maryland corporation that was formed in June 2003 to invest in real estate-related bridge and mezzanine loans, including junior participating interests in first mortgages, preferred and direct equity and, in limited cases, discounted mortgage notes and other real estate-related assets, which we refer to collectively as structured finance investments. We also invest in mortgage-related securities. We conduct substantially all of our operations through our operating partnership and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

      Our operating performance is primarily driven by the following factors:

      We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or a REIT and to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code with respect thereto. A REIT is generally not subject to federal income tax on that portion of its REIT-taxable income which is distributed to its stockholders provided that at least 90% of its REIT-taxable income is distributed and provided that certain other requirements are met. Certain of our assets that produce non-qualifying income may be held in taxable REIT subsidiaries. Unlike other subsidiaries of a REIT, the income of a taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to Federal and state income taxes. The provision for income taxes related to these taxable subsidiaries has not been material as they have had minimal activity.

      On July 1, 2003, Arbor Commercial Mortgage (“ACM”), our manager, contributed $213.1 million of structured finance assets, encumbered by $169.2 million of borrowings in exchange for an equity interest in our operating partnership represented by 3,146,724 units of limited partnership interest and 629,345 warrants to acquire additional units of limited partnership interest. In addition, certain employees of ACM became our employees. We are externally managed and advised by ACM and pay ACM a management fee in accordance with a management agreement. ACM originates, underwrites and services all structured finance assets on behalf of our operating partnership.

      Concurrently with ACM’s asset contribution, we consummated a private placement of 1.6 million units, each consisting of five shares of our common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of common stock, for $75.00 per unit, resulting in gross proceeds of $120.2 million. Gross proceeds from the private placement

combined with the concurrent equity contribution by ACM totaled approximately $164.1 million in equity capital.

      On April 13, 2004, we sold 6,750,000 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $20.00 per share, for net proceeds of approximately $124.4 million after deducting the underwriting discount and the other estimated offering expenses. On May 11, 2004, we issued and sold 524,200 additional shares of common stock, for net proceeds of approximately $9.8 million after deducting the underwriting discount pursuant to the exercise of a portion of the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters of our initial public offering. Additionally, as of December 31, 2005, we issued 1,256,130 shares of common stock from the exercise of warrants originally issued as a component of units on July 1, 2003, for proceeds of $17.1 million.

Changes in Financial Condition

      In 2005, we originated 54 loans and investments totaling $1.0 billion (net of a $59.4 million participation in one of our loans), of which $792.1 million was funded as of December 31, 2005. Of the new loans and investments, 24 were mezzanine loans totaling $431.1 million, 15 were bridge loans totaling $322.9 million, nine were junior participating interests totaling $168.0 million, three were preferred equity loans totaling $18.8 million, and three were other loans totaling $13.0 million. We have received full satisfaction of 38 loans totaling $549.4 million and partial repayment on seven loans totaling $25.0 million. Also, we had $5.4 million of capital returned to us on three of our equity investments.

      Since December 31, 2005, we have originated ten loans totaling approximately $108.1 million. In addition, we have received $75.1 million for the repayment in full of three loans and $14.0 million for the partial repayment of five loans.

      Our loan portfolio balance at December 31, 2005 was $1.3 billion, with a weighted average current interest pay rate of 9.24%, as compared to $842.5 million, with a weighted average current interest pay rate of 8.87%, at December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2005, advances on financing facilities totaled $1.0 billion, with a weighted average funding cost of 6.57% (6.36% excluding a $59.4 million participation in one of our loans), as compared to $530.7 million, with a weighted average funding cost of 5.05%, at December 31, 2004. Additionally, our joint venture investment portfolio at December 31, 2005 was $18.1 million as compared to $5.3 million at December 31, 2004.

      In January 2005, we completed a non-recourse collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) transaction, whereby a portfolio of real estate-related assets were contributed to a consolidated subsidiary which issued $305 million of investment grade-rated floating-rate notes in a private placement. The subsidiary retained the equity interest in the portfolio with a value of approximately $164 million. The notes are secured by a portfolio of real estate-related assets with a face value of approximately $441 million, consisting primarily of bridge loans, mezzanine loans and junior participating interests in first mortgages, and by approximately $28 million of cash available for acquisitions of loans and other permitted investments. The notes have an initial weighted average spread of approximately 77 basis points over three-month LIBOR. The facility has a four-year replenishment period that allows the principal proceeds from repayments of the collateral assets to be reinvested in qualifying replacement assets, subject to certain conditions. We intend to own the portfolio of real estate-related assets until its maturity and have accounted for this transaction on our balance sheet as a financing. These proceeds were used to repay outstanding debt with higher costs of funds. In connection with the CDO, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge its exposure to the risk of changes in the difference between three-month LIBOR and one-month LIBOR.

      On January 11, 2006, we completed our second non-recourse collateralized debt obligation (“CDO II”) transaction, whereby a portfolio of real estate-related assets were contributed to a consolidated subsidiary which issued $356 million of investment grade-rated floating-rate notes in a private placement. The subsidiary retained an equity interest in the portfolio with a value of approximately $119 million. The notes are secured by a portfolio of real estate-related assets with a face value of approximately $412 million, consisting primarily of bridge loans, mezzanine loans and junior participating interests in first mortgages, and by approximately $63 million of cash available for acquisitions of loans and other permitted investments. The notes have an initial weighted average spread of approximately 74 basis points over three-month LIBOR. The facility has a

five-year replenishment period that allows the principal proceeds from repayments of the collateral assets to be reinvested in qualifying replacement assets, subject to certain conditions. We intend to own the portfolio of real estate-related assets until its maturity and will account for this transaction on our balance sheet as a financing. These proceeds were used to repay outstanding debt with higher costs of funds. In connection with CDO II, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge our exposure to the risk of changes in the difference between three-month LIBOR and one-month LIBOR as well as interest rate swaps on current and future projected LIBOR-based debt relating to certain fixed rate loans in our portfolio.

Sources of Operating Revenues

      We derive our operating revenues primarily through interest received from making real estate-related bridge and mezzanine loans and preferred equity investments. Interest income earned on these loans and investments represented approximately 83%, 96% and 98% of our total revenues in 2005, 2004, and for the period ended December 31, 2003, respectively.

      Interest income is also derived from profits of equity participation interests. In 2005 and 2004, interest income from participation interests represented approximately $19.7 million and $1.2 million, or 16% and 2% of total revenues, respectively. No income was derived from this source in 2003.

      We also derive interest income from our investments in mortgage related securities. In 2005 and 2004, interest on these investments represented approximately 1% and 2% of our total revenues, respectively. No income was derived from this source in 2003.

      Additionally, we derive operating revenues from other income that represents loan structuring and miscellaneous asset management fees associated with our loans and investments portfolio. Revenue from other income represented less than 1%, less than 1% and 2% of our total revenues in 2005, 2004 and the period ended December 31, 2003, respectively.

Income from Equity Affiliates and Gain on Sale of Loans and Real Estate

      We derive income from equity affiliates relating to joint ventures that were formed with equity partners to acquire, develop and/or sell real estate assets. These joint ventures are not majority owned or controlled by us, and are not consolidated in our financial statements. These investments are recorded under the equity method of accounting. We record our share of the net income and losses from the underlying properties on a single line item in the consolidated income statements as income from equity affiliates. The Company is not required to fund losses incurred by the joint venture. Therefore, the Company only recognizes its share of losses to the extent of its capital investment. In 2005 and 2004, income from equity affiliates totaled $8.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

      We also may derive income from the gain on sale of loans and real estate. We may acquire (1) real estate for our own investment and, upon stabilization, disposition at an anticipated return and (2) real estate notes generally at a discount from lenders in situations where the borrower wishes to restructure and reposition its short term debt and the lender wishes to divest certain assets from its portfolio. No such income has been recorded to date.

Significant Accounting Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies

      Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts in our consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. A summary of our significant accounting policies is presented in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, which appear in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements included in this report. Certain of the accounting policies used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are

particularly important for an understanding of the financial position and results of operations presented in the historical consolidated financial statements included in this report and require the application of significant judgment by management and, as a result, are subject to a degree of uncertainty.

Loans and Investments

      Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115 requires that at the time of purchase, we designate a security as held to maturity, available for sale, or trading depending on ability and intent. Securities held for sale are reported at fair value, while securities and investments held to maturity are reported at amortized cost. We do not have any trading securities at this time.

      Loans held for investment are intended to be held to maturity and, accordingly, are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan origination costs and fees, unless such loan or investment is deemed to be impaired. We invest in preferred equity interests that allow us to participate in a percentage of the underlying property’s cash flows from operations and proceeds from a sale or refinancing. At the inception of each such investment, management must determine whether such investment should be accounted for as a loan, joint venture or as real estate. To date, management has determined that all such investments are properly accounted for and reported as loans.

      Specific valuation allowances are established for impaired loans based on the fair value of collateral on an individual loan basis. The fair value of the collateral is determined by an evaluation of operating cash flow from the property during the projected holding period, and estimated sales value computed by applying an expected capitalization rate to the stabilized net operating income of the specific property, less selling costs, discounted at market discount rates. If upon completion of the valuation, the fair value of the underlying collateral securing the impaired loan is less than the net carrying value of the loan, an allowance is created with a corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses. An allowance for each loan would be maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable losses. As of December 31, 2005, and 2004, no impairment has been identified and no valuation allowances have been established.

Repurchase Obligations

      In certain circumstances, we have financed the purchase of investments from counterparty through a repurchase agreement with that same counterparty. We currently record these investments in the same manner as other investments financed with repurchase agreements, with the investment recorded as an asset and the related borrowing under any repurchase agreement as a liability on our consolidated balance sheet. Interest income earned on the investments and interest expense incurred on the repurchase obligations are reported separately on the consolidated income statement. There is discussion, based upon a technical interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125” (“SFAS 140”), that these transactions may not qualify as a purchase by us. We believe, and it is industry practice, that we are accounting for these transactions in an appropriate manner, however, if these investments do not qualify as a purchase under SFAS 140, we would be required to present the net investment on our balance sheet as a derivative with the corresponding change in fair value of the derivative being recorded in the income statement. The value of the derivative would reflect not only changes in the value of the underlying investment, but also changes in the value of the underlying credit provided by the counterparty. As of December 31, 2005 we had entered into eight such transactions, with a book value of the associated assets of $176.7 million financed with repurchase obligations of $124.6 million. As of December 31, 2004, we had entered into eleven such transactions, with a book value of the associated assets of $310.4 million financed with repurchase obligations of $180.4 million. Adoption of the aforementioned treatment would result in these assets and liabilities being recorded net on our balance sheets.

Available-For-Sale Securities

      We invest in agency-sponsored whole pool mortgage related securities. Pools of Federal National Mortgage Association, or FNMA, and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or FHLMC, adjustable

rate residential mortgage loans underlie these mortgage related securities. We receive payments from the payments that are made on these underlying mortgage loans, which have a fixed rate of interest for three years and adjust annually thereafter. These securities are carried at their estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income pursuant to SFAS No. 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” Unrealized losses other than temporary losses are recognized currently in income.

Capitalized Interest

      The Company capitalizes interest in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 58 “Capitalization of Interest Costs in Financial Statements that Include Investments Accounted for by the Equity Method.” This statement amended SFAS No. 34 “Capitalization of Interest Costs” to include investments (equity, loans and advances) accounted for by the equity method as qualifying assets of the investor while the investee has activities in progress necessary to commence its planned principal operations, provided that the investee’s activities include the use of funds to acquire qualifying assets for its operations. An investee, in one of the Company’s joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, is in the process of using funds to acquire qualifying assets for its planned principal operations. During the year ended December 31, 2005 the Company capitalized $0.5 million of interest relating to this investment, there was no capitalization of interest during the year ended December 31, 2004, or in the period June 24, 2003 to December 31, 2003.

Revenue Recognition

      Interest Income. Interest income is recognized on the accrual basis as it is earned from loans, investments and available-for-sale securities. In many instances, the borrower pays an additional amount of interest at the time the loan is closed, an origination fee, and deferred interest upon maturity. In some cases interest income may also include the amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts arising at the purchase or origination. This additional income, net of any direct loan origination costs incurred, is deferred and accreted into interest income on an effective yield or “interest” method adjusted for actual prepayment activity over the life of the related loan or available-for-sale security as a yield adjustment. Income recognition is suspended for loans when in the opinion of management a full recovery of income and principal becomes doubtful. Income recognition is resumed when the loan becomes contractually current and performance is demonstrated to be resumed. Several of the loans provide for accrual of interest at specified rates, which differ from current payment terms. Interest is recognized on such loans at the accrual rate subject to management’s determination that accrued interest and outstanding principal are ultimately collectible, based on the underlying collateral and operations of the borrower. If management cannot make this determination regarding collectibility, interest income above the current pay rate is recognized only upon actual receipt. Additionally, interest income is recorded when earned from equity participation interests, referred to as equity kickers. These equity kickers have the potential to generate additional revenues to us as a result of excess cash flows being distributed and/or as appreciated properties are sold or refinanced.

Variable Interest Entities

      In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46R”) as a revision to FIN No. 46, which requires a variable interest entity (“VIE”) to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary (“PB”). The PB is the party that absorbs a majority of the VIE’s anticipated losses and/or a majority of the expected returns.

      We have evaluated our loans and investments and investments in equity affiliates to determine whether they are variable interests in a VIE. This evaluation resulted in us determining that our mezzanine loans, preferred equity investments and investments in equity affiliates were potential variable interests. For each of these investments, we have evaluated (1) the sufficiency of the fair value of the entities’ equity investments at risk to absorb losses, (2) that as a group the holders of the equity investments at risk have (a) the direct or indirect ability through voting rights to make decisions about the entities’ significant activities, (b) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity and their obligations are not protected directly or

indirectly, (c) the right to receive the expected residual return of the entity and their rights are not capped, (3) the voting rights of some of these investors are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity, their rights to receive the expected returns of the equity, or both, and that substantially all of the entities’ activities do not involve or are not conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights. As of December 31, 2005, we have identified thirteen loans and investments which were made to entities determined to be VIE’s. A summary of our identified VIE’s is presented in Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements, which appear in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”. However, for the thirteen VIE’s identified, we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiaries and as such the VIE’s should not be consolidated in our financial statements. For all other investments, we have determined they are not VIE’s. As such, we have continued to account for these loans and investments as a loan or joint venture, as appropriate.

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

      In accordance with Financial Accounting Statement (“FAS”) 133, the carrying values of interest rate swaps and the underlying hedged liabilities are reflected at their fair value. We rely on quotations from a third party to determine these fair values. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are either offset against the change in the fair value of the hedged liability through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. Derivatives that do not qualify for cash flow hedge accounting treatment are adjusted to fair value through income.

      Because the valuations of our hedging activities are based on estimates, the fair value may change if our estimates are inaccurate. For the effect of hypothetical changes in market interest rates on our interest rate swaps, see the Market Risk section.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

      In December 2004, the FASB published SFAS 123(R) entitled “Share-Based Payment.” It requires all public companies to report share-based compensation expense at the grant date fair value of the related share-based awards. We are required to adopt the provisions of the standard effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We believe that our current method of accounting for share-based payments is consistent with SFAS 123(R).

      In June 2005, the FASB ratified the consensus in EITF Issue No. 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights” (“Issue 04-5”), which provides guidance in determining whether a general partner controls a limited partnership. Issue 04-5 states that the general partner in a limited partnership is presumed to control that limited partnership. The presumption may be overcome if the limited partners have either (1) the substantive ability to dissolve the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partner without cause or (2) substantive participating rights, which provide the limited partners with the ability to effectively participate in significant decisions that would be expected to be made in the ordinary course of the limited partnership’s business and thereby preclude the general partner from exercising unilateral control over the partnership. The adoption of Issue 04-5 by us for new or modified limited partnership arrangements is effective June 30, 2005 and for existing limited partnership arrangements effective January 1, 2006. We do not expect that we will be required to consolidate our current unconsolidated joint venture investments nor do we expect Issue 04-5 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

      In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. The FASB addresses the determination of when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. The FSP also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The FSP amends FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, FASB

Statement No. 124, Accounting for Certain Investments Held by Not-for-Profit Organizations and APB Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock. The FSP nullifies certain requirements of EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments and supersedes EITF Abstracts, Topics D-44, Recognition of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment upon the Planned Sale of a Security Whose Cost Exceeds Fair Value. The FSP is required to be applied to reporting periods beginning after December  15, 2005. We do not expect adoption to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

      The following table sets forth our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004:

      Interest income increased $63.2 million, or 109%, to $121.1 million in 2005 from $57.9 million in 2004. This increase was due in part to a distribution of $17.2 million in 2005 representing a 16.7% carried profits interest in a $30.1 million mezzanine loan that we have outstanding. This distribution was a result of excess proceeds from the refinance of a portfolio of properties securing the loan. Excluding this transaction, interest income increased $46.0 million, or 79%, over the same period. This increase was due to a 50% increase in the average balance of the loan and investment portfolio from $653.1 million in 2004 to $978.8 million in 2005 due to increased loan and investment originations, as well as an 18% increase in the average yield on the assets from 8.8% in 2004 to 10.4% in 2005 primarily due to increased market interest rates, partially offset by an increased average balance of our fixed rate loan portfolio. Interest income from available for sale securities decreased $0.3 million, or 25%, to $0.8 million in 2005 from $1.1 million in 2004. This decrease is due to a lower average balance in 2005 as a result of prepayments received on our investment.

      Other income totaled $0.5 million in 2005, up from $42,265 in 2004. This is primarily due to increased structuring fees received for services rendered in arranging loan facilities in 2005.

      Interest expense increased $26.4 million, or 136%, to $45.7 million in 2005 from $19.4 million in 2004. This increase was due to an 87% increase in the average debt financing on our loan and investment portfolio from $383.8 million in 2004 to $717.5 million in 2005 due to increased loan and portfolio originations, a 29% increase in the average cost of borrowings from 4.8% to 6.2% as a result of increased market interest rates, as well as the cost of interest rate swaps on our variable rate debt associated with certain of our fixed rate loans. In addition, interest expense on debt financing of our available-for-sale securities portfolio increased $0.6 million, or 100%, to $1.3 million in 2005 from $0.6 million in 2004. This increase is due to a higher cost of borrowings in 2005 as a result of increased market interest rates, partially offset by a lower average balance in 2005 as a result of prepayments received on our investment.

      Employee compensation and benefits expense increased $1.9 million or 84%, to $4.3 million in 2005 from $2.3 million in 2004. This increase was primarily due to the expansion of staffing needs associated with the growth of the business and increased size of our portfolio. These expenses represent salaries, benefits, and incentive compensation for those employed by us during these periods.

      Stock-based compensation expense totaled $1.6 million in 2005, up from $0.3 million in 2004. These expenses represent the cost of restricted stock granted to certain of our employees, directors and executive officers, and employees of our manager. The increase was primarily due to the initial one-fifth vesting of 118,500 shares granted in 2005 combined with the initial one-third vesting of 6,000 shares granted in 2005, partially offset by a decrease in the ratable portion of the 2003 unvested restricted stock grants in 2005 as compared to 2004.

      Selling and administrative expense increased $2.4 million, or 128%, to $4.4 million in 2005 from $1.9 million in 2004. This increase is directly attributable to professional fees, including legal, accounting services, and consulting fees relating to investor relations and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, marketing costs, insurance expense and director’s fees.

      Management fees totaled $12.4 million in 2005, up from $3.6 million in 2004. These amounts represent compensation in the form of base management fees and incentive management fees as provided for in the management agreement with our manager. The base management fees increased by $0.5 million, or 27%, to $2.5 million in 2005 from $2.0 million in 2004. This increase was primarily due to increased stockholder’s equity directly attributable to increased profits and contributed capital over the same period in 2004. The incentive management fees totaled $9.9 million in 2005, up from $1.6 million in 2004. This increase was primarily due to increased profitability.

      Income from equity affiliates totaled $8.5 million in 2005, up from $0.5 million in 2004. This increase was primarily due to excess proceeds received from the refinance of properties in the portfolio of one of our investments in equity affiliates in 2005.

      Income allocated to minority interest increased $5.4 million, or 92%, to $11.3 million in 2005 from $5.9 million in 2004. These amounts represent the portion of our income allocated to our manager. This increase was due to a 99% increase in income before minority interest, partially offset by a decrease in our manager’s limited partnership interest in us. Our manager had a weighted average limited partnership interest of 18.3% and 20.1% in our operating partnership in 2005 and 2004, respectively.

      The following table sets forth our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the period from June 24, 2003 (Inception) to December 31, 2003:

      Interest income totaled $57.9 million in 2004, up from $10.0 million for the period ended December 31, 2003. This increase was due to a full year’s results in 2004 as compared to a partial year’s results in 2003, a 149% increase in the average balance of the loan and investment portfolio from $254.9 million for the period ended December 31, 2003 to $635.1 million in 2004 due to increased loan and investment originations, as well as a 14% increase in the average yield on the assets from 7.7% to 8.8% as a result of increased market interest rates. In addition, interest income in 2004 included a $1.2 million participation interest earned and received on one of our loans as compared to no participation interest recorded during the period ending December 31, 2003. Interest income from available for sale securities in 2004 was $1.1 million, with an average available for sale securities balance of $51.9 million and an average yield of 2.1%. There was no interest income recorded from available for sale securities during the period ended December 31, 2003.

      Other income decreased $114,000, or 73%, to $42,000 in 2004 from $157,000 for the period ended December 31, 2003. This income represents loan structuring and miscellaneous asset management fees associated with our loan and investment portfolio.

      Interest expense totaled $19.4 million in 2004, up from $1.7 million for the period ended December 31, 2003. This increase was due to a full year’s results in 2004 as compared to a partial year’s results in 2003, a 315% increase in the average debt financing on our loan and investment portfolio from $92.5 million for the period ended December 31, 2003 to $383.8 million in 2004 due to increased loan and portfolio originations, as well as a 37% increase in the average cost of these borrowings from 3.5% to 4.8% as a result of increased market interest rates. In addition, interest expense on debt financing of our available-for-sale securities

portfolio in 2004 was $0.6 million, with an average debt financing on our available for sale securities balance of $50.3 million and an average yield of 1.24%. There was no interest expense recorded from available for sale securities during the period ended December 31, 2003.

      Employee compensation and benefits expense increased $1.4 million, or 147%, to $2.3 million in 2004 from $0.9 million for the period ended December 31, 2003. This increase was due to a full year’s results in 2004 as compared to a partial year’s results in 2003 combined with the expansion of staffing needs associated with strengthening our organization as a publicly traded company in 2004. These expenses represent salaries, benefits, and incentive compensation for those employed by us during these periods.

      Stock-based compensation expense decreased $1.4 million, or 82%, to $0.3 million in 2004 from $1.7 million for the period ended December 31, 2003. This decrease was primarily due to a greater portion of the restricted stock grants vesting for the period ended December 31, 2003 partially offset by a full year’s results in 2004 as compared to a partial year’s results in 2003. This expense represents the cost of restricted stock granted to certain of our employees, executive officers and directors and certain executive officers and employees of our manager. Of the total shares granted, two-thirds of the shares granted vested immediately and the remaining one-third vests over three years. The amount of compensation expense recorded for the period ended December 31, 2003 represents the full expense of the initial two-thirds vesting and a ratable portion of the expense of the unvested shares. The amount of expense in 2004 represents a ratable portion of the expense of the unvested shares.

      Selling and administrative expense totaled $1.9 million in 2004, up from $0.5 million for the period ended December 31, 2003. This increase was directly attributable to a full year’s results in 2004 as compared to a partial year’s results in 2003 combined with an increase in professional fees, including legal and accounting services, insurance expense and director’s fees associated with operating a public company since our IPO in 2004.

      Management fees totaled $3.6 million in 2004, up from $0.6 million for the period ended December 31, 2003. This increase was directly attributable to a full year’s results in 2004 as compared to a partial year’s results in 2003, combined with $1.6 million in incentive management fees recorded in 2004 not earned during the period ended December 31, 2003 due to the requirements for incentive compensation not satisfied, as well as an increase in the average base management fees associated with increased stockholder’s equity directly attributable to greater profits and contributed capital.

      Income from equity affiliates was $525,000 in 2004. This amount represents an allocation of income from one of our joint venture interests. For the period ended December 31, 2003, no income from equity affiliates was recorded.

      Income allocated to minority interest totaled $5.9 million in 2004, up from $1.3 million for the period ended December 31, 2003. These amounts represent the portion of our income allocated to our manager. This increase was due to a full year’s results in 2004 as compared to a partial year’s results in 2003, combined with an increase in income before minority interest, partially offset by a decrease in our manager’s limited partnership interest in us. Our manager owned an 18.7% and 27.7% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Liquidity is a measurement of the ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, pay dividends, fund loans and investments and other general business needs. Our primary sources of funds for liquidity consist of funds raised from our private equity offering in July 2003, net proceeds from our initial public offering of our common stock in April 2004, the issuance of floating

rate notes resulting from our CDO’s (described below) in January 2005 and January 2006, the issuance of junior subordinated notes to subsidiary trusts issuing preferred securities (described below) in 2005, borrowings under credit agreements, net cash provided by operating activities including cash from equity participation interests, repayments of outstanding loans and investments, funds from junior loan participation arrangements and the future issuance of common, convertible and/or preferred equity securities.

      In 2003, we received gross proceeds from the private placement totaling $120.2 million, which combined with ACM’s equity contribution of $43.9 million, resulted in total contributed capital of $164.1 million. These proceeds were used to pay down borrowings under our existing credit facilities.

      In 2004, we sold 6,750,000 shares of our common stock in a public offering on April 13, 2004 for net proceeds of approximately $125.4 million. We used the proceeds to pay down indebtedness. In addition, in May 2004 the underwriters exercised a portion of their over allotment option, which resulted in the issuance of 524,200 additional shares for net proceeds of approximately $9.8 million. Additionally, in 2004, 1.3 million common stock warrants were exercised which resulted in proceeds of $12.9 million. Also, Arbor Realty Limited Partnership (“ARLP”), the operating partnership of Arbor Realty Trust received proceeds of $9.4 million from the exercise of ACM’s warrants for a total of 629,345 operating partnership units.

      We also maintain liquidity through four master repurchase agreements, one warehouse credit facility and one bridge loan warehousing credit agreement with five different financial institutions. In addition, we have issued two collateralized debt obligations and five separate junior subordinated notes. London interbank offered rate, or LIBOR, refers to one-month LIBOR unless specifically stated.

      We have a $350.0 million master repurchase agreement with Wachovia Bank National Association, dated as of December 23, 2003, with a term of three years and bears interest at LIBOR plus pricing of 0.94% to 3.50%, varying on the type of asset financed. In July 2004, this repurchase agreement was amended increasing the amount of available financing from $250 million to $350 million and amending certain terms of this agreement. In December 2005, we amended this facility on a temporary basis which provided for an increase in the amount of financing available under this facility from $350 million to $500 million. This increase expired in January of 2006 in conjunction with the close of CDO II. At December 31, 2005, the outstanding balance under this facility was $380.5 million with a current weighted average note rate of 6.37%. Subsequent to December 31, 2005, $203 million of this facility was paid down in connection with the CDO II closing (see below). In addition, we have a $100 million repurchase agreement with the same financial institution that we entered into for the purpose of financing our securities available for sale. This agreement expires in July 2006 and has an interest rate of LIBOR plus 0.20%. At December 31, 2005, the outstanding balance under this facility was $28.4 million with a current weighted average note rate of 4.48%.

      We have a $100.0 million master repurchase agreement with a second financial institution, effective in December 2005, that has a term expiring in December 2006 and bears interest at LIBOR plus pricing of 1.00% to 3.00%, varying on the type of asset financed. At December 31, 2005, the outstanding balance under this facility was $4.7 million with a current weighted average note rate of 5.37%.

      We have a $50.0 million master repurchase agreement with a third financial institution, dated as of July 1, 2003, which matures in July 2006 and bears interest at LIBOR plus pricing of 1.75% to 3.50%, varying on the type of asset financed. This facility has not yet been utilized.

      We have a $50.0 million bridge loan warehousing credit agreement with a fourth financial institution, to provide financing for bridge loans. This agreement expires in June 2006 and bears a variable rate of interest, payable monthly, based on Prime plus 0% or 1,2,3 or 6-month LIBOR plus 1.75%, at the Company’s option. At December 31, 2005, the outstanding balance under this facility was $46.5 million with a current weighted average note rate of 6.32%.

      We have a $50.0 million warehousing credit facility with a fifth financial institution, effective in December 2005, that has a term expiring in December 2007 and bears interest at LIBOR plus pricing of 2.00% to 2.50%, varying on the type of asset financed. At December 31, 2005, the outstanding balance under this facility was $2.6 million with a current weighted average note rate of 6.68%.

      We had a $50.0 million warehouse credit facility with a sixth financial institution, who beneficially owned approximately 2% of our outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2005 which was subsequently terminated in January 2006. This agreement had a term of one year with two six-month extension periods and bore interest at LIBOR plus 6.00%. At December 31, 2005, the outstanding balance under this facility was $30.0 million with a current weighted average note rate of 10.29%.

      We had a $50.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement with a seventh financial institution, which was terminated in December 2005. This agreement had a term of one year with two one-year extension options and an interest rate of LIBOR plus 7.00%.

      We have a non-recourse collateralized debt obligation transaction or CDO, which closed on January 19, 2005, whereby $469 million of real estate related and other assets were contributed to a newly-formed consolidated subsidiary which issued $305 million of investment grade-rated floating-rate notes in a private placement. These notes are secured by the portfolio of assets and pay interest quarterly at a weighted average rate of approximately 77 basis points over a floating rate of interest based on three-month LIBOR. The CDO may be replenished with substitute collateral for loans that are repaid during the first four years. Thereafter, the outstanding debt balance will be reduced as loans are repaid. Proceeds from the CDO were used to repay outstanding debt under our existing facilities totaling $267 million. By contributing these real estate assets to the CDO, this transaction resulted in a decreased cost of funds relating to the CDO assets and created capacity in our existing credit facilities. At December 31, 2005, the outstanding balance under this facility was $299.3 million with a weighted average current note rate of 4.93%. Proceeds from the repayment of assets which serve as collateral for our CDO must be retained in the CDO structure until such collateral can be replaced or used to paydown the secured notes and therefore not available to fund current cash needs. If such cash is not used to replenish collateral, it could have a negative impact on our anticipated returns. For accounting purposes, CDO is consolidated in our financial statements.

      On January 11, 2006, we completed our second non-recourse collateralized debt obligation transaction, or CDO II, whereby $475 million of real estate related and other assets were contributed to a newly-formed consolidated subsidiary which issued $356 million of investment grade-rated floating-rate notes in a private placement. These notes are secured by the portfolio of assets and pay interest quarterly at a weighted average rate of approximately 74 basis points over a floating rate of interest based on three-month LIBOR. CDO II may be replenished with substitute collateral for loans that are repaid during the first five years. Thereafter, the outstanding debt balance will be reduced as loans are repaid. Proceeds from CDO II were used to repay outstanding debt under our existing facilities totaling $301 million. By contributing these real estate assets to CDO II, this transaction resulted in a decreased cost of funds relating to CDO II’s assets and created capacity in our existing credit facilities. Proceeds from the repayment of assets which serve as collateral for CDO II must be retained in its structure until such collateral can be replaced and therefore not available to fund current cash needs. If such cash is not used to replenish collateral, it could have a negative impact on our anticipated returns. For accounting purposes, CDO II is consolidated in our financial statements.

      In 2005, we, through newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiaries of our operating partnership, issued a total of $155.9 million of junior subordinated notes in five separate private placements, described in Note 6 “Debt Obligations” of our consolidated financial statements, which appears in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Consolidated Financial Statements of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries.” These securities are unsecured, have a maturity of 29 to 30 years, pay interest quarterly at a floating rate of interest based on three-month LIBOR and, absent the occurrence of special events, are not redeemable during the first five years. At December 31, 2005, the outstanding balance under these facilities was $155.9 million with a current weighted average note rate of 7.53%.

      The warehouse credit agreement, bridge loan warehousing credit agreement, and the master repurchase agreements require that we pay interest monthly, based on pricing over LIBOR. The amount of our pricing over LIBOR varies depending upon the structure of the loan or investment financed pursuant to the specific agreement.

      The warehouse credit agreement, bridge loan warehousing credit agreement, and the master repurchase agreements require that we pay down borrowings under these facilities pro-rata as principal payments on our

loans and investments are received. In addition, if upon maturity of a loan or investment we decide to grant the borrower an extension option, the financial institutions have the option to extend the borrowings or request payment in full on the outstanding borrowings of the loan or investment extended. The financial institutions also have the right to request immediate payment of any outstanding borrowings on any loan or investment that is at least 60 days delinquent.

      As of December 31, 2005, these facilities had an aggregate capacity of $1.4 billion and borrowings were approximately $1.0 billion.

      Each of the credit facilities contains various financials covenants and restrictions, including minimum net worth and debt-to-equity ratios. In addition to the financial terms and capacities described above, our credit facilities generally contain covenants that prohibit us from effecting a change in control, disposing of or encumbering assets being financed and restrict us from making any material amendment to our underwriting guidelines without approval of the lender. If we violate these covenants in any of our credit facilities, we could be required to repay all or a portion of our indebtedness before maturity at a time when we might be unable to arrange financing for such repayment on attractive terms, if at all. Violations of these covenants may result in our being unable to borrow unused amounts under our credit facilities, even if repayment of some or all borrowings is not required. As of December 31, 2005, we are in compliance with all covenants and restrictions under these credit facilities.

      We have a junior loan participation with a total outstanding balance at December 31, 2005 of $6.8 million. This participation borrowing has a maturity date equal to the corresponding mortgage loan and is secured by the participant’s interest in the mortgage loan. Interest expense is based on a portion of the interest received from the loan.

      In 2005, we have entered into two junior loan participations with a total outstanding balance at December 31, 2005 of $59.5 million. These participation borrowings have maturity dates equal to the corresponding mortgage loan and are secured by the participant’s interest in the mortgage loan. Interest expense is based on a portion of the interest received from the loan.

      We believe our existing sources of funds will be adequate for purposes of meeting our short-term liquidity (within one year) and long-term liquidity needs. Our short-term and long-term liquidity needs include ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund future investments, fund operating costs and fund distributions to our stockholders. Our loans and investments are financed under existing credit facilities and their credit status is continuously monitored; therefore, these loans and investments are expected to generate a generally stable return. Our ability to meet our long-term liquidity and capital resource requirements is subject to obtaining additional debt and equity financing. If we are unable to renew our sources of financing on substantially similar terms or at all, it would have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Any decision by our lenders and investors to enter into such transactions with us will depend upon a number of factors, such as our financial performance, compliance with the terms of our existing credit arrangements, industry or market trends, the general availability of and rates applicable to financing transactions, such lenders’ and investors’ resources and policies concerning the terms under which they make such capital commitments and the relative attractiveness of alternative investment or lending opportunities.

      To maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we must distribute annually at least 90% of our taxable income. These distribution requirements limit our ability to retain earnings and thereby replenish or increase capital for operations. However, we believe that our significant capital resources and access to financing will provide us with financial flexibility and market responsiveness at levels sufficient to meet current and anticipated capital requirements, including expected new lending and investment opportunities.

      In order to maximize the return on our funds, cash generated from operations is generally used to temporarily pay down borrowings under credit facilities whose primary purpose is to fund our new loans and investments. When making distributions, we borrow the required funds by drawing on credit capacity available under our credit facilities. To date, all distributions have been funded in this manner. All funds borrowed to make distributions have been repaid by funds generated from operations.

Contractual Commitments

      As of December 31, 2005, we had the following material contractual obligations (payments in thousands):

      Base Management Fees. In exchange for the services that ACM provides us pursuant to the management agreement, we pay our manager a monthly base management fee in an amount equal to:

      The base management fee is not calculated based on the manager’s performance or the types of assets its selects for investment on our behalf, but it is affected by the performance of these assets because it is based on the value of our operating partnership’s equity. We incurred $2.5 million and $2.0 million in base management fees for services rendered in 2005 and 2004, respectively.

      Incentive Compensation. Pursuant to the management agreement, our manager is also entitled to receive incentive compensation in an amount equal to:

      In 2005, our manager earned a total of $9.9 million of incentive compensation and elected to receive it partially in cash totaling $4.4 million and partially in 205,069 shares of common stock. In 2004, our manager earned $1.6 million of incentive compensation which was paid in 66,141 shares of common stock.

      We pay the annual incentive compensation in four installments, each within 60 days of the end of each fiscal quarter. The calculation of each installment is based on results for the 12 months ending on the last day of the fiscal quarter for which the installment is payable. These installments of the annual incentive compensation are subject to recalculation and potential reconciliation at the end of such fiscal year. Subject to the ownership limitations in our charter, at least 25% of this incentive compensation is payable to our manager in shares of our common stock having a value equal to the average closing price per share for the last 20 days of the fiscal quarter for which the incentive compensation is being paid.

      The incentive compensation is accrued as it is earned. In accordance with Issue 4(b) of EITF 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services,” the expense incurred for incentive compensation paid in common stock is determined using the valuation method described above and the quoted market price of our common stock on the last day of each quarter. At December 31 of each year, we remeasure the incentive compensation paid to our manager in the form of common stock in accordance with Issue 4(a) of EITF 96-18 which discusses how to measure at the measurement date when certain terms are not known prior to the measurement date. Accordingly, the expense recorded for such common stock is adjusted to reflect the fair value of the common stock on the measurement date when the final calculation of the annual incentive compensation is determined. In the event that the annual incentive compensation calculated as of the measurement date is less than the four quarterly installments of the annual incentive compensation paid in advance, our manager will refund the amount of such overpayment in cash and we would record a negative incentive compensation expense in the quarter when such overpayment is determined.

      Origination Fees. Our manager is entitled to 100% of the origination fees paid by borrowers under each of our bridge loan and mezzanine loans that do not exceed 1% of the loan’s principal amount. We retain 100% of the origination fee that exceeds 1% of the loan’s principal amount.

      Term and Termination. The management agreement has an initial term of two years and is renewable automatically for an additional one year period every year thereafter, unless terminated with six months’ prior written notice. If we terminate or elect not to renew the management agreement in order to manage our portfolio internally, we are required to pay a termination fee equal to the base management fee and incentive

compensation for the 12-month period preceding the termination. If, without cause, we terminate or elect not to renew the management agreement for any other reason, including a change of control of us, we are required to pay a termination fee equal to two times the base management fee and incentive compensation paid for the 12-month period preceding the termination.

Inflation

      In our two most recent fiscal years, inflation and changing prices have not had a material effect on our net income and revenue. Changes in the general level of interest rates prevailing in the economy in response to changes in the rate of inflation generally have little effect on our income because the majority of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have floating rates of interest. Additionally, we also have various fixed rate loans in our portfolio which are financed with variable rate LIBOR borrowings. In connection with these loans, we have entered into various interest swaps to hedge our exposure to the interest rate risk on our variable rate LIBOR borrowings as it relates to certain fixed rate loans in our portfolio. However, the value of our interest-earning assets, our ability to realize gains from the sale of assets, and the average life of our interest-earning assets, among other things, may be effected. See Item 7A — “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”

Related Party Transactions

      As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, we had a $7.75 million first mortgage loan receivable that bore interest at a variable rate of one month LIBOR plus 4.25% and was scheduled to mature in March 2005. In March 2005, this loan was extended for one year with no other change in terms. This loan was made to a not-for-profit corporation that holds and manages investment property from the endowment of a private academic institution. Two of our directors are members of the board of trustees of the borrower and the private academic institution. Interest income recorded from this loan for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, was approximately $0.6 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

      ACM had a 50% non-controlling interest in a joint venture, which was formed to acquire, develop and/or sell real estate assets. In 2005, ACM received all of the invested capital and retained its interest in the joint venture. All loans outstanding to this joint venture were repaid in full in 2004. In 2003, we had a $16.0 million bridge loan outstanding to the joint venture, which was collateralized by a first lien position on a commercial real estate property. This loan was funded by ACM in June 2003 and was purchased by us in July 2003. The loan required monthly interest payments based on one month LIBOR and was repaid in full in 2004. We had agreed to provide the borrower with additional mezzanine financing in the amount of up to $8.0 million. The mezzanine financing required interest payments based on one month LIBOR and was repaid in full in 2004.

      Our $16.0 million bridge loan to the joint venture was contributed by ACM as one of the structured finance assets contributed to us on July 1, 2003 at book value, which approximates fair value. At the time of contribution, ACM also agreed to provide a limited guarantee of the loan’s principal amount based on any profits realized on its retained 50% interest in the joint venture with the borrower and ACM’s participating interests in borrowers under three other contributed structured finance assets.

      At the time of ACM’s origination of three of the structured finance assets that it contributed to us on July 1, 2003 at book value, which approximates fair value, each of the property owners related to these contributed assets granted ACM participating interests that share in a percentage of the cash flows of the underlying properties. Upon contribution of the structured finance assets, ACM retained these participating interests and its 50% non-controlling interest in the joint venture to which it had made the $16.0 million bridge loan. ACM agreed that if any portion of the outstanding amount of any of these four contributed assets is not paid at its maturity or repurchase date, ACM will pay to us, subject to the limitation described below, the portion of the unpaid amount of the contributed asset up to the total amount then received by ACM due to the realization of any profits on its retained interests associated with any of the four contributed assets (which had an aggregate balance of $22.3 million and $48.3 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively). However, ACM will no longer be obligated to make such payments to us when the remaining accumulated

principal amount of the four contributed assets, collectively, falls below $5 million and none of the four contributed assets were in default. In 2004 and 2005, these four investments matured, the borrowers paid the amounts due in full and ACM’s guarantee on these investments have been satisfied.

      In 2005, ACM received a brokerage fee for services rendered in arranging a loan facility for a borrower. We provided a portion of the loan facility. We were credited $0.4 million of this brokerage fee, which was included in other income.

      As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively of escrows received at loan closings were due to ACM and included in due to related party. These payments were remitted in January 2005 and January 2006, respectively. In addition, as of December 31, 2005, approximately $0.1 million of net expenses due from ACM were included in due to related party. These payments were remitted in January 2006. Also, as of December 31, 2004, approximately $0.3 million of interest payments from borrowers due from ACM were included in due to related party. These payments were remitted in January 2005.

      ACM contributed the majority of its structured finance portfolio to our operating partnership pursuant to a contribution agreement. The contribution agreement contains representations and warranties concerning the ownership and terms of the structured finance assets it contributed and other customary matters. ACM has agreed to indemnify us and our operating partnership against breaches of those representations and warranties. In exchange for ACM’s asset contribution, we issued to ACM approximately 3.1 million operating partnership units, each of which ACM may redeem for one share of our common stock or an equivalent amount in cash, at our election, and approximately 629,000 warrants, each of which entitled ACM to purchase one additional operating partnership unit at an initial exercise price of $15.00. The operating partnership units and warrants for additional operating partnership units issued to ACM were valued at approximately $43.9 million at July 1, 2003, based on the price offered to investors in our units in the private placement, adjusted for the initial purchaser’s discount. We also granted ACM certain demand and other registration rights with respect to the shares of common stock issuable upon redemption of its operating partnership units. In 2004, ACM exercised all of its warrants for a total of 629,345 operating partnership units and proceeds of $9.4 million.

      Each of the approximately 3.8 million operating partnership units owned by ACM is paired with one share of our special voting preferred stock that entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. As operating partnership units are redeemed for shares of our common stock or cash an equivalent number of shares of special voting preferred stock will be redeemed and cancelled. As a result of the ACM asset contribution and the related formation transactions, ACM owns approximately an 18% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership and the remaining 82% interest in our operating partnership is owned by us. In addition, ACM has approximately 18% of the voting power of our outstanding stock.

      We and our operating partnership have entered into a management agreement with ACM pursuant to which ACM has agreed to provide us with structured finance investment opportunities and loan servicing as well as other services necessary to operate our business. As discussed above in “— Contractual Commitments,” we have agreed to pay our manager an annual base management fee and incentive compensation each fiscal quarter and share with ACM a portion of the origination fees that we receive on loans we originate with ACM pursuant to this agreement.

      Under the terms of the management agreement, ACM is also required to provide us with a right of first refusal with respect to all structured finance transactions identified by ACM or its affiliates. We have agreed not to pursue, and to allow ACM to pursue, any real estate opportunities other than structured finance transactions.

      In addition, Mr. Kaufman has entered into a non-competition agreement with us pursuant to which he has agreed not to pursue structured finance investment opportunities, except as approved by our board of directors.

      We are dependent upon our manager, ACM, to provide services to us that are vital to our operations with whom we have conflicts of interest. Our chairman, chief executive officer and president, Mr. Ivan Kaufman, is

also the chief executive officer and president of our manager, and, our chief financial officer, Mr. Paul Elenio, is the chief financial officer of our manager. In addition, Mr. Kaufman and the Kaufman entities together beneficially own approximately 90% of the outstanding membership interests of ACM and certain of our employees and directors, also hold an ownership interest in ACM. Furthermore, one of our directors also serves as the trustee of one of the Kaufman entities that holds a majority of the outstanding membership interests in ACM and co-trustee of another Kaufman entity that owns an equity interest in our manager. ACM currently holds an 18% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership and 18% of the voting power of our outstanding stock.

      We and our operating partnership have also entered into a services agreement with ACM pursuant to which our asset management group provides asset management services to ACM. In the event the services provided by our asset management group pursuant to the agreement exceed by more than 15% per quarter the level of activity anticipated by our board of directors, we will negotiate in good faith with our manager an adjustment to our manager’s base management fee under the management agreement, to reflect the scope of the services, the quantity of serviced assets or the time required to be devoted to the services by our asset management group.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE STRUCTURED FINANCE BUSINESS OF

ARBOR COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

      You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the sections of this report entitled “Risk Factors”, “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Selected Consolidated Financial Information of the Structured Finance Business of Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC and Subsidiaries” and the historical consolidated financial statements of the structured finance business of Arbor Commercial Mortgage, including related notes, included elsewhere in this report.

Overview and Basis of Presentation

      On July 1, 2003 ACM contributed a portfolio of structured finance investments and related liabilities to our operating partnership. In addition, certain employees of ACM related to its structured finance business became our employees. These assets, liabilities and employees represented a substantial portion of ACM’s structured finance business, which historically invested in real estate related bridge and mezzanine loans, preferred equity and other real estate related assets.

      The structured finance business of ACM is not a separate legal entity and the assets and liabilities associated with ACM’s structured finance business are components of a larger business. We obtained the information in the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report from ACM’s consolidated historical accounting records.

      The structured finance business of ACM never operated as a separate business segment or division of ACM, but as an integrated part of ACM’s consolidated business. Accordingly, the statements of revenue and direct operating expenses do not include charges from ACM for corporate general and administrative expense because ACM considered such items to be corporate expenses and did not allocate them to individual business units. These expenses included costs for ACM’s executive management, corporate facilities and overhead costs, corporate accounting and treasury functions, corporate legal matters and other similar costs.

      The information in the statements of revenue and direct operating expenses include the revenue and direct operating expenses that relate to the structured finance business. Direct operating expenses include interest expense applicable to the funding costs of the structured finance business loans and investments, salaries and related fringe benefit costs, provision for loan losses and other expenses directly associated with revenue-generating activities. Direct operating expenses also include allocations of certain expenses, such as telephone, office equipment rental and maintenance, office supplies and marketing, which were directly associated with the structured finance business and were allocated based on headcount of the structured finance business in relation to the total headcount of ACM. All of these allocations are based on assumptions that management believes are reasonable under the circumstances.

      The consolidated financial statements in this report do not include a statement of cash flows because the structured finance business did not maintain a separate cash balance. Other than the debt required to fund the loans and investments of the structured finance business, operating activities of the structured finance business were funded by ACM.

      Since the structured finance business never operated as a separate business division or segment of ACM, the consolidated financial statements included in this report are not intended to be a complete presentation of the historical financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the structured finance business. These consolidated financial statements were prepared for inclusion in this report and do not purport to reflect the financial position or results of operations that would have resulted if the structured finance business had operated as a separate company. The historical consolidated financial information included in this report is not likely to be indicative of our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for any future period.

Sources of Operating Revenues

      We derive our operating revenues primarily from interest received from making real estate related bridge and mezzanine loans and preferred equity investments. We provide bridge loans secured by first lien

mortgages on the property to borrowers who are typically seeking short term capital to be used in an acquisition of property. The bridge loans we make typically range in size from $1 million to $25 million and have terms of up to seven years. We provide real property owners with mezzanine loans that are secured by pledges of ownership interests in entities that directly or indirectly control the real property or second mortgages. These loans typically range in size from $2 million to $15 million and have terms of up to seven years. We also make preferred equity investments in entities that directly or indirectly own real property. Interest represented 83% and 93% of total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively.

      We also derive operating revenue from other income that includes several types of income that are recorded upon receipt. Certain of our loans and investments provide for additional payments based on the borrower’s operating cash flow, appreciation of the underlying collateral, payments calculated based on timing of when the loan pays off and changes in interest rates. Such amounts are not readily determinable and are recorded as other income upon receipt. Other income also includes the recognition of deferred revenue on loans that prepay, asset management fees related to our loans and investment portfolio and satisfactions on impaired loans in excess of carrying values. Other income represented 17% and 7% of total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively.

Gain on Sale of Loans and Real Estate and Income from Equity Affiliates

      We also derive income from the gain on sale of loans and real estate. We acquire (1) real estate for our own investment and, upon stabilization, disposition at an anticipated return and (2) real estate notes generally at a discount from lenders in situations where the borrower wishes to restructure and reposition its short term debt and the lender wishes to divest certain assets from its portfolio.

      In addition, we derive income from equity affiliates relating to joint ventures that ACM’s structured finance business formed with equity partners to lend to, acquire, develop and/or sell real estate assets. These investments are recorded under the equity method. We record our share of net income from the underlying properties invested in through these joint ventures.

Significant Accounting Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies

      Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements included in this report. Certain of the accounting policies used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are particularly important for an understanding of the financial position and results of operations presented in the historical consolidated financial statements included in this report and require the application of significant judgment by management and, as a result, are subject to a degree of uncertainty.

      Real estate owned represents commercial real estate property that the structured finance business of ACM owns and operates. Such assets are not depreciated and are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell. Management reviews its real estate assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

      Loans held for investment are intended to be held to maturity and, accordingly, are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan origination costs and fees, unless such loan or investment is deemed to be impaired.

      ACM’s structured finance business historically invested in preferred equity interests that allowed ACM to participate in a percentage of the underlying property’s cash flows from operations and proceeds from a sale or refinancing. At the inception of each such investment, management must determine whether such investment should be accounted for as a loan, joint venture or as real estate. To date, management has determined that all such investments are properly accounted for and reported as loans.

      Specific valuation allowances are established for impaired loans based on the fair value of collateral on an individual loan basis. The fair value of the collateral is determined by an evaluation of operating cash flow from the property during the projected holding period, and estimated sales value computed by applying an expected capitalization rate to the stabilized net operating income of the specific property, less selling costs, discounted at market discount rates. If upon completion of the valuation, the fair value of the underlying collateral securing the impaired loan is less than the net carrying value of the loan, an allowance is created with a corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses. The allowance for each loan is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable losses.

      The revenue recognition policies for ACM’s structured finance business are as follows:

Results of Operations

      Revenue. The following table sets forth the components of revenue:

      Interest income increased $0.2 million, or 3%, to $7.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $7.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. This increase was primarily due to a 21% increase in the weighted average balance of loans and investment partially offset by a 15% decrease in the weighted average effective interest rate of loans and investments primarily due to a decline in market interest rates. Most of our loans and investments are variable rate instruments based on LIBOR. The negative impact to interest income as a result of the decrease in market interest rates was partially offset by interest rate floors that were in effect on many of our loans and investments.

      Other income increased $1.0 million, or 180%, to $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. This increase was primarily attributable to (a) the partial satisfaction of an impaired loan for an amount $0.4 million in excess of the loan’s carrying value resulting in the recognition of other income for this amount (b) increased funds received on paid off loans of $0.3 million and (c) increased accelerated amortization of revenue of $0.4 million on loans with early payoffs.

      Expenses. The following table sets forth the components of direct operating expenses:

      Interest expense increased $0.1 million, or 3%, to $3.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $3.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. This increase is primarily attributable to a 26% increase in the weighted average borrowings partially offset by a 19% decrease in the weighted average effective financing rate primarily due to a decline in market interest rates.

      Employee compensation and benefits increased $0.3 million, or 24%, to $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. This increase reflects increased staffing levels associated with the increased loan and investments opportunities.

      Selling and administrative expenses increased $0.1 million, or 24%, to $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. This increase was primarily attributable to operating expenses incurred in 2003 for a real estate owned asset, and increased marketing expenses associated with the growth of the lending and investment activities.

      Provision for loan losses decreased $3.1 million, or 98%, to $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. This decrease was directly attributable to a $3.1 million provision for loan losses recorded in 2002 prior to this loan being foreclosed and reclassified to real estate owned. This provision was recorded to reflect this asset at its estimated fair value.

      Gain on Sale of Loans and Real Estate and Income from Equity Affiliates. The following table sets forth our gain on sale of loans and real estate and income from equity affiliates:

      Gain on sale of loans and real estate decreased $6.0 million, or 85%, to $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 from $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. This decrease was primarily attributable to a $6.8 million gain on the sale of a joint venture interest in March 2002 partially offset by a $0.9 million gain on the partial liquidation of a joint venture interest in 2003.

      Income from equity affiliates for the six months ended June 30, 2002 consist of net income from a joint venture interest recognized prior to the sale of that joint venture interest in March 2002.

Pro Forma Effect of Arbor Commercial Mortgage’s Asset Contribution on Results of Operations

      We were formed in June 2003 to operate as a real estate investment trust and to expand the structured finance business of ACM. On July 1, 2003, we completed a private placement of our units, each consisting of five shares of our common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of our common stock. Gross proceeds from the private placement totaled $120.2 million. In exchange for a commensurate equity ownership in our operating subsidiary, ACM contributed $213.1 million of structured finance assets subject to $169.2 million of borrowings supported by $43.9 million of equity. These assets and liabilities were contributed at book value,

which approximates fair value, and represent 88% of the assets and 98% of the liabilities of ACM’s structured finance business as of June 30, 2003. In addition, certain employees of ACM were transferred to us.

      We are externally managed and advised by ACM and pay ACM a management fee in accordance with the terms of the management agreement. ACM also sources originations, provides underwriting services and services all structured finance assets on our behalf. As a result, the operating expenses as presented in the historical consolidated financial statements of ACM’s structured finance business would have been affected had we been formed at an earlier time. Employee compensation and benefits expense would have decreased by $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 because these costs would have been borne by ACM under terms of the management agreement. Similarly, selling and administrative expense would have decreased by $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003.

      In accordance with the management agreement, we will pay ACM a management fee, composed of a base management fee and incentive compensation. The base management fee is 0.75% per annum of the first $400 million of equity. The incentive compensation is equal to (1) 25% of the amount that our funds from operations per operating partnership unit, adjusted for certain gains and losses, exceeds the product of (x) 9.5% per annum or the Ten Year U.S. Treasury Rate plus 3.5%, whichever is greater and (y) the weighted average of the book value of the net assets contributed by ACM to our operating partnership per operating partnership unit, the offering price per share in the private placement, the offering price per share of our common stock in subsequent offerings and the issue price per operating partnership unit for subsequent contributions to our operating partnership, multiplied by (2) the weighted average of our operating partnership’s outstanding units.

      This pro forma information does not reflect the results of the private placement. However, gross proceeds from the private placement totaled $120.2 million, which combined with ACM’s equity contribution of $43.9 million, resulted in total contributed capital of $164.1 million. Offering expenses of $10.1 million were paid or accrued by us, resulting in stockholders equity and minority interest of $154.0 million as a result of the private placement.

      The pro forma consolidated financial information is limited to adjustments that are directly attributable to the private placement, expected to have a continuing impact on us and are factually supportable. These adjustments are based on the assumption that certain compensation and benefits expenses and certain selling and administrative expenses incurred by the structured finance business of ACM would not have been incurred if we had been in operation during the periods presented. The pro forma financial results do not include what the impact would have been had the gross proceeds from the private placement been available to the structured finance business of ACM during the entire period. Had these proceeds been available to the structured finance business of ACM during the entire period, there would have been an impact on certain revenues and expenses, including the management fees payable pursuant to the management agreement. The management fees are calculated based on such factors as funds from operations and equity of our operating partnership, each as defined in the management agreement. Such amounts represent speculative and forward-looking information that is not factually supportable.

      The financial statements of the structured finance business of ACM include the results of operations of the structured finance business segment of ACM and are not limited to the results of the structured finance assets that were transferred to Arbor Realty Trust. Accordingly, the results of certain investments in equity affiliates that were not transferred to Arbor Realty Trust have been included in the financial statements of the structured finance business of ACM because they were included in the structured finance business segment even though the operating results from these equity affiliates have not been material to the structured finance business segment as a whole. In addition, ACM retained certain transactions in its structured finance portfolio with a net book value of approximately $27.8 million, primarily because they were not deemed to be suitable investments for Arbor Realty Trust. Had these retained assets been excluded from the financial statements of the structured finance business of ACM, additional adjustments to the expense base would have been necessary to estimate what expenses would have been had these assets not been in the portfolio. Such adjustments would have been speculative. Lastly, operating results for assets that matured before the

contribution of structured finance assets to Arbor Realty Trust, but were in the portfolio of assets of the structured finance business of ACM during the reporting period are also included in these statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Liquidity is a measurement of the ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and maintain loans and investments and other general business needs. On July 1, 2003, ACM contributed a portfolio of structured finance investments and related liabilities to our operating partnership. In addition, certain employees of ACM became our employees. These assets, liabilities and employees represented a substantial portion of the structured finance business of ACM.

      On July 1, 2003 we completed the private placement, resulting in gross proceeds of $120.2 million. Gross proceeds from the private placement combined with the concurrent equity contribution by ACM totaled approximately $164.1 in equity capital.

      Subsequent to and as a result of the private placement, substantially all of the operations of the structured finance business of ACM have been conducted by us. Therefore, a description of the liquidity and capital resources of the structured finance business of ACM is not presented. A description of our liquidity and capital resources is presented in the section of this report entitled “Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Related Party Transactions

      ACM has a 50% non-controlling interest in a joint venture, which was formed to acquire, develop and/or sell real estate assets. At June 30, 2003, ACM’s structured finance business’ investments in this joint venture were approximately $2.6 million. This investment is accounted for under the equity method. At June 30, 2003, ACM had a $16.0 million bridge loan outstanding to the joint venture, which is collateralized by a first lien position on a commercial real estate property. There is a limited guarantee on the loan of 50% by the chief executive officer of ACM and 50% by the key principal of the joint venture. The loan requires monthly interest payments based on one month LIBOR and matures in May 2006. ACM agreed to provide the borrower with additional mezzanine financing in the amount of up to $8.0 million. The mezzanine financing requires interest payments based on one month LIBOR and matures in May 2006. The loan will be funded in two equal installments of $4.0 million. The funding will be drawn down as construction progresses. The interest on the first component, which was funded by ACM in June 2003, will be earned on the full $4.0 million, while the interest on the second component, which has yet to be funded, will be earned as the $4.0 million is drawn down. This additional financing is secured by a second mortgage lien on the property. In addition, an interest and renovation reserve totaling $2.5 million is in place to cover both the bridge and mezzanine loans. Interest income recorded from these loans was approximately $0.2 million for the period ended June 30, 2003.

      In June 2003, ACM invested approximately $0.8 million in exchange for a 12.5% non-controlling interest in a joint venture, which were formed to acquire, develop and/or sell real estate assets. This investment is accounted for under the equity method. In June, 2003, ACM made two mezzanine loans secured by a second lien position in the ownership interests of the borrower and the property to these joint ventures totaling $6.0 million outstanding. The loans require monthly interest payments based on one month LIBOR and mature in May 2006. Interest income recorded from these loans was approximately $8,000 for the period ended June 30, 2003.

      ACM contributed the majority of its structured finance portfolio to our operating partnership pursuant to a contribution agreement. The contribution agreement contains representations and warranties concerning the ownership and terms of the structured finance assets it contributed and other customary matters. ACM has agreed to indemnify us and our operating partnership against breaches of those representations and warranties.

      In exchange for ACM’s asset contribution, we issued to ACM approximately 3.1 million operating partnership units, each of which ACM may redeem for one share of our common stock or an equivalent amount in cash, at our election, and approximately 629,000 warrants, each of which entitles ACM to purchase one additional operating partnership unit at an initial exercise price of $15.00. The operating partnership units and warrants for additional operating partnership units issued to ACM were valued at approximately $43.9 million at July 1, 2003, based on the price offered to investors in our units in the private placement, adjusted for the initial purchaser’s discount. We have also granted ACM certain demand and other registration rights with respect to the shares of common stock issuable upon redemption of its operating partnership units.

      Each of the approximately 3.1 million operating partnership units received by ACM was paired with one share of our special voting preferred stock that entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. As operating partnership units were redeemed for shares of our common stock or cash an equivalent number of shares of special voting preferred stock was redeemed and cancelled. As a result of ACM’s asset contribution and the related formation transactions, ACM owns approximately a 28% limited partnership interest in our operating partnership and the remaining 72% interest in our operating partnership is owned by us. In addition, ACM has approximately 28% of the voting power of our outstanding stock (without giving effect to the exercise of ACM’s warrants for additional operating partnership units).

      We and our operating partnership have entered into a management agreement with ACM pursuant to which ACM has agreed to provide us with structured finance investment opportunities and loan servicing as well as other services necessary to operate our business. ACM is also required to provide us with a right of first refusal with respect to all structured finance identified by ACM or its affiliates. We have agreed not to pursue, and to allow ACM to pursue, any real estate opportunities other than structured finance transactions. As discussed above in “Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries — Contractual Commitments,” we have agreed to pay our manager an annual base management fee and incentive compensation each fiscal quarter and share with ACM a portion of the origination fees that we receive on loans we originate with ACM pursuant to this agreement.

      We and our operating partnership have also entered into a services agreement with ACM pursuant to which our asset management group provides asset management services to ACM. In the event the services provided by our asset management group pursuant to the agreement exceed by more than 15% per quarter the level of activity anticipated by our board of directors, we will negotiate in good faith with our manager an adjustment to our manager’s base management fee under the management agreement, to reflect the scope of the services, the quantity of serviced assets or the time required to be devoted to the services by our asset management group.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

      Since the consummation of the private placement and the related formation transactions, substantially all of the operations of the structured finance business of ACM have been conducted by us. Therefore, quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk relating to the structured finance business of ACM are not presented. A description of market risks relating to our business is presented in this Item 7A of this report under “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”

      Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and real estate values. The primary market risks that we are exposed to are real estate risk, interest rate risk, market value risk and prepayment risk.

Real Estate Risk

      Commercial mortgage assets may be viewed as exposing an investor to greater risk of loss than residential mortgage assets since such assets are typically secured by larger loans to fewer obligors than residential mortgage assets. Multi-family and commercial property values and net operating income derived from such properties are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, national, regional and local economic conditions (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors), local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of housing, retail, industrial, office or other commercial space); changes or continued weakness in specific industry segments; construction quality, construction cost, age and design; demographic factors; retroactive changes to building or similar codes; and increases in operating expenses (such as energy costs). In the event net operating income decreases, a borrower may have difficulty repaying our loans, which could result in losses to us. In addition, decreases in property values reduce the value of the collateral and the potential proceeds available to a borrower to repay our loans, which could also cause us to suffer losses. Even when the net operating income is sufficient to cover the related property’s debt service, there can be no assurance that this will continue to be the case in the future.

Interest Rate Risk

      Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond our control.

      Our operating results will depend in large part on differences between the income from our loans and our borrowing costs. Most of our loans and borrowings are variable-rate instruments, based on LIBOR. The objective of this strategy is to minimize the impact of interest rate changes on our net interest income. In addition, we have various fixed rate loans in our portfolio, which are financed with variable rate LIBOR borrowings. We have entered into various interest swaps (as discussed below) to hedge our exposure to interest rate risk on our variable rate LIBOR borrowings as it relates to our fixed rate loans. Many of our loans and borrowings are subject to various interest rate floors. As a result, the impact of a change in interest rates may be different on our interest income than it is on our interest expense.

      Based on the loans and liabilities as of December 31, 2005, and assuming the balances of these loans and liabilities remain unchanged for the subsequent twelve months, a 1% increase in LIBOR would increase our annual net income and cash flows by approximately $2.0 million primarily due to the fact that the principal amount of loans subject to interest rate adjustment exceeds the liabilities that would be subject to an interest rate adjustment. This is primarily due to our interest rate swaps that effectively convert a portion of the variable rate LIBOR based debt, as it relates to certain fixed rate assets, to a fixed basis that is not subject to a 1% increase. Based on the loans and liabilities as of December 31, 2005, and assuming the balances of these loans and liabilities remain unchanged for the subsequent twelve months, a 1% decrease in LIBOR would decrease our annual net income and cash flows by approximately $1.1 million. This is primarily due to our interest rate swaps that effectively convert a portion of the variable rate LIBOR based debt, as it relates to certain fixed rate assets, to a fixed basis that is not subject to a 1% decrease, partially offset by loans currently subject to interest rate floors (and, therefore, not be subject to the full downward interest rate adjustment).

      As of December 31, 2004, a 1% increase in LIBOR would have increased our annual net income and cash flows in the subsequent twelve months by approximately $2.3 million as the principal amount of loans subject to interest rate adjustment exceeds the liabilities that would be subject to an interest rate adjustment. As of December 31, 2004, a 1% decrease in LIBOR would have decreased our annual net income and cash flows in the subsequent twelve months by approximately $1.7 million as the principal amount of loans subject to interest rate adjustment exceeds the liabilities that would be subject to an interest rate adjustment, partially

offset by loans currently subject to interest rate floors (and, therefore, not be subject to the full downward interest rate adjustment).

      In the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or economic downturn, defaults could increase and result in credit losses to us, which could adversely affect our liquidity and operating results. Further, such delinquencies or defaults could have an adverse effect on the spreads between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

      We invest in securities, which are designated as available-for-sale. These securities are adjustable rate securities that have a fixed component for three years and, thereafter, generally reset annually. These securities are financed with a repurchase agreement that bears interest at a rate of one month LIBOR plus .20%. Since the repricing of the debt obligations occurs more quickly than the repricing of the securities, on average, our cost of borrowings will rise more quickly in response to an increase in market interest rates than the earnings rate on the securities. This will result in a reduction to our net interest income and cash flows related to these securities. Based on the securities and borrowings as of December 31, 2005, and assuming the balances of these securities and borrowings remain unchanged for the subsequent twelve months, a 1% increase in LIBOR would reduce our annual net income and cash flows by approximately $0.3 million. A 1% decrease in LIBOR would increase our annual net income and cash flows by approximately $0.3 million. As of December 31, 2004, assuming the balances of these securities and borrowings remained unchanged for the subsequent twelve months, a 1% increase in LIBOR would have reduced our annual net income and cash flows by approximately $0.4 million. A 1% decrease in LIBOR would have increased our annual net income and cash flows by approximately $0.4 million.

      In connection with our CDOs described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries”, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge its exposure to the risk of changes in the difference between three-month LIBOR and one-month LIBOR interest rates. These interest rate swaps became necessary due to the investor’s return being paid based on a three-month LIBOR index while the assets contributed to the CDOs are yielding interest based on a one-month LIBOR index.

      These swaps were executed on December 21, 2004 and December 22, 2005 having notional values of $469.0 million and $288.3 million, respectively, as described in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of our consolidated financial statements, which appears in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Consolidated Financial Statements of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries.” The market value of these interest rate swaps is dependent upon existing market interest rates and swap spreads, which change over time. As of December 31, 2005, if there were a 50 basis point increase in forward interest rates, the value of these interest rate swaps would have decreased by slightly more than $0.1 million, if there were a 50 basis point decrease in forward interest rates, the value of these interest rate swaps would have increased by slightly less than $0.1 million. As of December 31, 2004, if there had been a 50 basis point increase in forward interest rates, the value of these interest rate swaps would have decreased by approximately $25,000, if there had been a 50 basis point decrease in forward interest rates, the value of these interest rate swaps would have increased by approximately $21,000.

      In connection with the issuance of variable rate junior subordinate notes during 2005 as described in Note 6 “Debt Obligations” of ART’s consolidated financial statements, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements in June 2005 with total notional values of $50 million as described in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of our consolidated financial statements, which appears in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data — Consolidated Financial Statements of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries.” The market value of these interest rate swaps is dependent upon existing market interest rates and swap spreads, which change over time. As of December 31, 2005 if there had been a 50 basis point increase in forward interest rates, the fair market value of these interest rate swaps would have increased by approximately $0.9 million. If there were a 50 basis point decrease in forward interest rates, the fair market value of these interest rate swaps would have decreased by approximately $0.9 million.

      In December 2005, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements having notional values of $134.1 million and $6.0 million, as described in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of

ART’s consolidated financial statements, to hedge current and outstanding LIBOR based debt relating to certain fixed rate loans within our portfolio. The fair market value of these interest rate swaps is dependent upon existing market interest rates and swap spreads, which change over time. As of December 31, 2005 if there had been a 50 basis point increase in forward interest rates, the fair market value of these interest rate swaps would have increased by approximately $4.7 million. If there were a 50 basis point decrease in forward interest rates, the fair market value of these interest rate swaps would have decreased by approximately $4.7 million.

      Our hedging transactions using derivative instruments also involve certain additional risks such as counterparty credit risk, the enforceability of hedging contracts and the risk that unanticipated and significant changes in interest rates will cause a significant loss of basis in the contract. The counterparties to our derivative arrangements are major financial institutions with high credit ratings with which we and our affiliates may also have other financial relationships. As a result, we do not anticipate that any of these counterparties will fail to meet their obligations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to adequately protect against the foregoing risks and will ultimately realize an economic benefit that exceeds the related amounts incurred in connection with engaging in such hedging strategies.

      We utilize interest rate swaps to limit interest rate risk. Derivatives are used for hedging purposes rather than speculation. We do not enter into financial instruments for trading purposes.

Market Value Risk

      Our available-for-sale securities are reflected at their estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income pursuant to SFAS No. 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” The estimated fair value of these securities fluctuate primarily due to changes in interest rates and other factors; however, given that these securities are guaranteed as to principal and/or interest by an agency of the U.S. Government, such fluctuations are generally not based on the creditworthiness of the mortgages securing these securities. Generally, in a rising interest rate environment, the estimated fair value of these securities would be expected to decrease; conversely, in a decreasing interest rate environment, the estimated fair value of these securities would be expected to increase.

Prepayment Risk

      As we receive repayments of principal on these securities, premiums paid on such securities are amortized against interest income using the effective yield method through the expected maturity dates of the securities. In general, an increase in prepayment rates will accelerate the amortization of purchase premiums, thereby reducing the interest income earned on the securities.

INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF

ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

      All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005, and for the period from June 24, 2003 (Inception) to December 31, 2003. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005, and for the period from June 24, 2003 (Inception) to December 31, 2003, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

      We also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 15, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young

New York, New York

March 15, 2006

ARBOR REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS