10-K 1 d18327e10vk.htm FORM 10-K e10vk
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

     
[X]   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004

OR

     
[   ]     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                    to                    

Commission File Number 0-20774

ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Texas   75-2142963
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (IRS Employer Identification No.)
     
1231 Greenway Drive, Suite 600 Irving, Texas   75038
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) (972) 550-5000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     
  Name of each exchange
Title of each class

  on which registered

None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.01 par value

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [   ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes [ X ] No [   ]

As of September 7, 2004, 13,401,089 shares of Common Stock were outstanding. As of such date the aggregate market value of voting stock (based upon the last reported sales price in The Nasdaq Stock Market) held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was approximately $316,046,208.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The information required by Part III is incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

 


ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC.
FORM 10-K
For the Year Ended June 30, 2004

Table of Contents

         
    Page #
       
    3  
    19  
    19  
    21  
       
    21  
    22  
    25  
    46  
    46  
    46  
    46  
    47  
       
    47  
    47  
    47  
    47  
    47  
       
    47  
    52  
    83  
 Subsidiaries of the Company
 Consent of Grant Thornton LLP
 Certifications of CEO & CFO Pursuant to Section 302
 Certifications of CEO & CFO Pursuant to Section 906

2


Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

     We are a leading retailer of financial services, including check cashing, short-term consumer loans and bill payment services. As of June 30, 2004, we had a total network of 1,230 stores in 36 states and the District of Columbia, consisting of 1,026 company-owned stores and 204 franchised stores. This makes us the largest owner, operator and franchisor of check cashing stores in the United States and one of the largest providers of short-term consumer loans, also known as payday loans. We focus on serving unbanked and underbanked consumers, many of whom seek alternatives to traditional banking relationships in order to gain convenient and immediate access to check cashing services and short-term consumer loans. We seek to develop and maintain the largest network of stores in each of the markets where we operate. Our growth strategy is to open new stores, franchise stores in new and existing markets, opportunistically acquire stores, and introduce new services into our store network.

     Our stores offer check cashing, loans and other retail financial services at competitive rates in clean settings during hours convenient for our customers. Our stores are located in highly visible, accessible locations, usually in strip shopping centers, free-standing buildings and kiosks located inside retail stores.

Industry Overview

     Check Cashing. We operate primarily in the check cashing industry. We believe there are approximately 11,000 check cashing stores nationally, with five other check cashing companies operating or franchising over 100 stores and five companies operating or franchising between 50 and 100 locations.

     Check cashing companies focus on and offer services to a customer segment that banks generally do not service and operate at locations and during hours that are typically more convenient than those traditionally offered by banks. In addition, unlike many banks, check cashing stores are willing, for a fee, to assume the risk that checks they cash will “bounce.” For instance, some banks will refuse to cash a check for a person who does not maintain an account with the bank. For account holders, some banks will require an account holder to maintain sufficient funds to cover a check to be cashed or to wait several days for the check to clear. As a result, we believe check cashing stores provide an attractive alternative to customers with relatively small account balances or without bank accounts. Although these customers might save money by depositing their checks in a bank and waiting for them to clear, many prefer paying a fee to take advantage of the convenience and availability of immediate cash offered by check cashing stores.

     The fees charged for this service are intended to provide the check casher with a profit after covering operating expenses, including any interest expense incurred by the check casher on the funds advanced to customers, and for the risk assumed by the check cashing store. A check cashing store assumes the risk that the check will not be collected because of insufficient funds, stop payment orders or fraud. In order to minimize this risk and the losses associated with uncollected checks, many check cashing stores cash only payroll or government entitlement checks, or charge higher fees and have stricter approval procedures for cashing personal checks.

     Short-Term Consumer Loans. Short-term consumer loans provide a customer cash in exchange for the customer’s check or an authorization to debit the customer’s bank account, along with an agreement to defer the deposit of that check or initiation of that debit to the customer’s bank account, as the case may be, until the customer’s next payday, typically two to four weeks later. If the customer returns to the store and repays the loan within that time period, the check is returned to the customer.

     Short-term consumer loans provide a simple, quick and confidential way for consumers to meet short-term cash needs between paydays while avoiding the high cost of penalties associated with writing checks with insufficient funds and other penalties and fees associated with making a late payment. Until the development of the short-term consumer loan industry in the early 1990s, customers often resorted to writing bad checks as a short-term solution to meet immediate cash needs.

     We believe there are currently 22,000 short-term consumer loan stores operating in the United States. While the majority of these stores offer only the short-term consumer loan service, some of these stores also offer other services such as check cashing or pawn loans.

     Other financial services. In addition to check cashing and short-term consumer loan services, some stores offer customers a range of other services, including bill payments, money orders and money transfers. Some stores also offer public transportation passes, photocopying, fax transmission services and postage stamps.

3


Table of Contents

Competitive Strengths

     We offer a menu of retail financial services delivered through our growing network of 1,230 stores conveniently located in close proximity to where our customers live and work. We believe that our store employees provide a professional experience that our customers value, which allows us to better understand their present and future financial service needs. We intend to capitalize on the following competitive strengths in order to grow our company:

     Focus on Customer Service. Treating our customers with respect is an integral part of our organizational culture. Unlike many of our competitors, all of our stores display an easy-to-read menu of our services, with costs and fees clearly stated, in order to help our customers make an informed purchasing decision. Additionally, many of our stores located in markets with large Hispanic populations display our services in both English and Spanish. Our customers also receive a receipt with each transaction that details the fees paid. Our store employees are trained to greet customers as they enter the store, assist them in an efficient and helpful manner and thank them for their business. Many of our employees have long-standing relationships with customers who use our services multiple times a year. We believe that providing prompt, friendly and knowledgeable service helps us achieve higher levels of customer satisfaction and generate higher visit frequency. We measure and track our customer service quality at the store and employee levels through customer calls made to our toll-free service line and our annual customer service survey.

     Efficient Operating Model. We believe that our operating model and business practices position us to grow our revenues and increase profitability. In our fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, we introduced our Operational Goals program, a standardized set of best practices, to help ensure a clear and consistent benchmark would be used to evaluate the performance of our store employees. Our regional vice presidents, district managers and store employees continue to be focused on their achievement of these goals. We measure their performance on a daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly basis. Each year, we adjust our Operational Goals and our measurement targets to encourage continued improvement across our store base and maximize profitability.

     Our Operational Goals for fiscal 2005 are to:

  provide quality customer service and take pride in our store appearance;
 
  reduce cash shortages in our stores;
 
  reduce forgeries;
 
  increase our in-store loan payoffs;
 
  reduce the number of times our stores open late or close early;
 
  properly staff our stores for peak schedules;
 
  increase the number of daily loan transactions
 
  reduce overtime hours;
 
  increase number of good checks cashed; and
 
  provide more customers with the ACE Prepaid Mastercard®.

     Since implementing our Operational Goals, we have increased comparable store revenue and decreased store operating expenses, resulting in increased gross margin.

     Proprietary Information Systems. To better service our customers and manage our stores in the most profitable manner, we have developed proprietary information systems, including a point-of-sale system and a management information system, designed for the efficient delivery of our financial services with the proper balance of corporate management. Our in-house information systems team has built a reliable and scalable technology infrastructure that will allow us to grow our business without significant additional capital expenditures. Our investment in information systems has allowed us to improve functionality, including:

  moving customers in and out of the store more quickly due to faster connectivity to our centralized risk management system;

4


Table of Contents

  evaluating customer transaction patterns to improve our check cashing approval process;
 
  utilizing automated decision-making technology to reduce check cashing risk;
 
  monitoring daily revenue by service on a regional, store and employee basis;
 
  detecting and preventing fraud and other losses, including cash differences, forgery and employee theft;
 
  planning and managing optimal store cash levels and store personnel scheduling; and
 
  facilitating compliance with regulatory requirements.

     By maintaining interactive and flexible information systems, we provide more services in a standardized and efficient manner, which we believe allows us to operate our stores with fewer personnel than many of our competitors.

     Proven Acquisition Strategy. From 1991 to present, we grew from 181 to 1,026 company-owned stores, in large part, as a result of a disciplined acquisition strategy. Of our 1,026 stores, 399 were acquired in 100 separate transactions. Acquired stores are quickly integrated into our existing store base following the deployment of our proprietary point-of-sale system. By implementing our Operational Goals and information systems, we are typically able to increase revenue and gross margin in our acquired stores and to enhance the acquired stores’ service offerings. The average cost of converting an acquired store to an ACE store consists primarily of expenditures related to new signage, implementation of our point-of-sale system and minor store remodeling. We believe there are opportunities to continue to improve the results in some of our recently acquired stores.

     Experienced Management Team. Our executive management team is a blend of company veterans and recent key additions that have experience in the check cashing industry as well as other retail-based businesses. These employees have demonstrated an ability to grow retail businesses profitably through new store openings, acquisitions and franchising. Jay Shipowitz, our Chief Executive Officer, who was promoted from President and Chief Operating Officer to Chief Executive Officer on July 1, 2004, has been with us since 1997 and has managed all areas of operations and finance during his tenure. Barry Barron, our Executive Vice President of Operations, has been with us since 2001 and has extensive experience operating company-owned and franchised restaurant locations. In addition, since June 2003, we added three senior managers in finance and operations, with more than 50 combined years of experience in their respective areas of expertise. The additions included William McCalmont as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Walter Evans as our Senior Vice President and General Counsel and Gerard Schroepfer as our Chief Marketing Officer. We believe that our executive management team’s experience has allowed us to deliver a consistent service offering to our customers, which in turn has generated higher levels of customer loyalty and positioned us to capitalize on future growth opportunities.

Growth Strategy

     A key objective of our growth strategy is to have the most locations in each market and to offer the broadest selection of financial services in our industry. We believe that by offering the convenience of high-density store locations, exceptional customer service and a broad suite of retail financial services, we will achieve a high level of customer satisfaction. The key elements of our growth strategy are as follows:

     Open Company-Owned Stores. We opened 53 company-owned stores in fiscal 2004 (including 11 ACE Cash Advance stores), compared to 14 stores in fiscal 2003 and 39 stores in fiscal 2002. Our company-owned store growth in fiscal 2003 was less than our historical new store growth primarily due to limitations on capital expenditures imposed by our bank credit agreement through March 31, 2003. Our current bank credit agreement enables us to pursue our company-owned store growth strategy more aggressively. We expect to open approximately 60 new company-owned stores, with a net gain of approximately 40 to 45 company-owned stores after store closures, in fiscal 2005. We are still targeting an aggregate net gain of approximately 300 company-owned stores for the five-year period ending June 30, 2008.

     Accelerate Franchise Store Development. We opened 32 franchised stores in fiscal 2004, compared to 26 stores in fiscal 2003 and 22 stores in fiscal 2002. Our goal is to be the industry leader in offering quality franchising opportunities and exceptional support systems and services to existing and potential franchisees. We believe that by offering attractive investment opportunities and exceptional franchisee support systems and services, we will attract potential franchisees to partner with us rather than other franchisors. As of June 30, 2004, we had 204 franchised stores and we believe our targeted markets could potentially support an additional 1,800 ACE franchise stores across the United States. We expect to open approximately 50 new franchised stores, with a net gain of approximately 40 franchised stores after store closures, in fiscal 2005. Currently, we have franchise agreements for the development of over 100 new franchise stores and we are still targeting an aggregate net gain of approximately 200 franchise stores for the five year period ending June 30, 2008.

5


Table of Contents

     Pursue Opportunistic Acquisitions. Since 1991, we have acquired over 500 stores. We believe that our extensive experience with acquisitions allows us to successfully integrate acquired stores into our network. We believe that growth through acquisitions is attractive because:

  acquiring stores provides access to an existing customer base and source of revenue and cash flow;
 
  introducing our proprietary information systems and Operational Goals generates operating efficiencies;
 
  offering our additional services in the acquired stores drives revenue growth; and
 
  acquiring stores allows us to enter new markets with scale or increase our share in existing markets.

     In evaluating potential acquisition candidates, we consider a number of factors, including:

  strategic fit and desirability of location in both new and existing markets;
 
  existing customer base, revenue history and rent;
 
  ability to improve productivity and profitability; and
 
  anticipated returns on investment.

     Introduce New Services. In addition to our current broad service offering, we continuously evaluate new services for possible introduction into our stores. For example, in fiscal 2002, we introduced prepaid debit cards into our stores through a relationship with NetSpend Corporation, a prepaid payments company. NetSpend’s All-Access® MasterCard® Debit Card allows our customers to “load” cash onto a MasterCard debit card and use it wherever MasterCard debit cards are accepted. We receive a fee when customers purchase the card, load cash on the card, use it for a purchase, or use it at an automated teller machine for a cash withdrawal. During fiscal 2004, we and our franchisees sold approximately 149,000 cards and loaded a total face value of more than $268 million. We believe that our distribution network, with 1,230 network stores in 36 states and the District of Columbia, makes us an ideal partner for financial service companies seeking to gain immediate access to our customer base. Our distribution network allows us to offer our customers new services through third parties, without incurring the costs associated with a proprietary research and development process.

     Continue Comparable Store Revenue Growth. We believe we have an opportunity to continue comparable store revenue growth. To increase comparable store revenues, we employ a variety of advertising and marketing programs, with a focus on in-store programs that allow us to combine the selling efforts of store personnel with various selling messages displayed on point-of-purchase material. We also employ seasonal marketing campaigns around specific annual events, such as a loan program around the holidays and a tax season promotion at the beginning of the calendar year. In addition to adding new services, we seek to attract additional customers. For example, we recognize the importance of the growing Hispanic demographic and have designed specific advertising and point-of-purchase materials to meet their needs.

     Improve Operating Efficiency. As our business grows, we seek to further improve our operating efficiency. We have outlined a list of Operational Goals to maximize the profitability potential of our stores. Our employees are evaluated and compensated, in part, based on their achievement of these goals, which we adjust each year to account for the continued improvement in our business. We believe that by focusing on these specific goals and tying them to employee compensation, we can further enhance the operating efficiency of our stores as well as overall operating margins. As a result of continued improvement in our operating model, we increased our gross margin by over 50 basis points during fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003.

Our Customers

     We primarily serve the nation’s approximately 60 million unbanked and underbanked individuals with services to help them manage their day-to-day financial needs. Our customers generally do not participate in the traditional banking and financial services system and require alternative solutions to gain convenient and immediate access to cash, short-term consumer loans, bill payments, money transfers and prepaid debit cards.

     Our customer profile is diverse. Based on a recent survey of our customers, we believe the demographic composition of our customer base to be as follows:

  approximately 50% Caucasian; 25% Hispanic; 20% African American; 5% Other;

6


Table of Contents

  a majority ranging in age from 25 to 45;
 
  an average household annual income of approximately $30,000, with approximately 40% above $40,000;
 
  approximately half are male and half are female, with our check cashing customers skewed towards younger males and our short-term consumer loan customers skewed towards older females;
 
  generally rent their housing and move more frequently than the national average; and
 
  pay bills with walk-in payments or money orders.

     We believe that the Hispanic population, while an estimated 25% of our customer base today, offers significant growth potential for us. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Hispanics are the largest minority group in the United States, numbering approximately 39 million and representing the fastest growing demographic segment in the United States, with 58% population growth between 1990 and 2000.

Our Services

     We offer convenient, fee-based services to meet the needs of our customers, including check cashing, short-term consumer loans, bill payment, money transfer and money order services and other retail financial services. The following table reflects the major categories of services that we currently offer and the revenues (in thousands) from these services for the indicated fiscal years:

                         
    Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
Revenue Category
  2004
  2003
  2002
Check cashing
  $ 129,194     $ 125,703     $ 118,907  
Short-term consumer loans
    77,029       70,806       74,197  
Bill payments
    16,961       13,507       10,156  
Money transfers
    11,136       10,898       10,998  
Money orders
    6,330       6,960       7,554  
Franchising
    2,774       2,346       2,199  
Other fees
    3,235       4,069       5,255  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total revenue
  $ 246,659     $ 234,289     $ 229,266  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

     Check cashing. Our primary business is cashing checks for a fee. We primarily cash payroll checks, but we also cash government assistance, tax refund and insurance checks or drafts. Subject to market conditions at different locations, our check cashing fees for payroll checks are approximately 2.3% of the face amount of the check. We may charge higher rates for cashing out-of-state checks, handwritten checks, money orders and insurance checks or drafts, depending on risk and market factors. Unlike many of our competitors, we display our check cashing fees in full view of our customers on a menu board in each store and provide a detailed receipt for each transaction. Although we have established guidelines for approving check cashing transactions, we have no preset limit on the size of the checks we will cash.

     During fiscal 2004, we cashed approximately 13.2 million checks with an aggregate face amount of approximately $5.1 billion. The face amount of the average check was $388 and our average fee per check was $9.91, or 2.6%, of the average check.

     If a check cashed by us is not paid for any reason, we account for the amount of the check as a loss in the period in which it is returned. We then transfer the check to our collection department, which contacts the maker and payee of each returned check to initiate the collection process. Our collection department utilizes a proprietary automated tracking system to monitor the status of all returned items. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, our net write-off as a percentage of the face amount of checks cashed was 0.15%, 0.14% and 0.16%, respectively.

     Short-term consumer loans. We are engaged in the short-term consumer loan business because we believe that many consumers have limited access to other sources of consumer credit. In general, the short-term consumer loans offered at our stores involve providing a customer with cash in exchange for the customer’s check or an authorization to debit the customer’s bank account, along with an agreement to defer the deposit of that check or the initiation of that debit on the customer’s account, as the case may be, until the customer’s next payday, typically two to four weeks later. If the customer returns to the store and repays the loan, we return the check to the customer. If the customer fails to repay the loan, we deposit the check or debit the customer’s checking account. If the check is returned or the debit is rejected for insufficient funds or any other reason, we contact the customer and initiate collection efforts. Customers must have a checking account in

7


Table of Contents

order to apply for a short-term consumer loan.

     The amount of the customer’s check or debit authorization is the amount of the cash provided to the customer plus our fee. Our short-term consumer loans are authorized by statute or rule in the states in which we offer them and are subject to extensive regulation. The scope of that regulation, including the terms on which short-term consumer loans may be made, by the states is not consistent. All states in which we offer short-term consumer loans establish maximum allowable fees and other charges to consumers for these short-term consumer loans. In addition, many of the states regulate the maximum amount, maturity and renewal or extension of these short-term consumer loans. To comply with the laws and regulations of the states in which short-term consumer loans are offered at our stores, the terms of our short-term consumer loans must vary from state to state. As required, we are licensed to offer short-term consumer loans under the laws and regulations of the states.

     Since January 1, 2003, all of the short-term consumer loans offered at our company-owned stores have consisted of either short-term consumer loans made by us or short-term consumer loans made by Republic Bank & Trust Company, a Kentucky state-chartered bank. As of June 30, 2004, we were offering short-term consumer loans in 561 of our owned stores and Republic Bank was offering short-term consumer loans in 359 of our company-owned stores in Texas, Pennsylvania and Arkansas. As of June 30, 2004, we did not offer short-term consumer loans in 106 of our company-owned stores in Alabama, Georgia, Maryland and North Carolina due to an unfavorable regulatory environment in those states. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, we made approximately 1.4 million short-term consumer loans and Republic Bank made approximately 541,000 short-term consumer loans through our stores. The average advance provided to a customer in our short-term consumer loan transactions was $269 and the average finance charge paid to us was $39.40. The average advance provided to a customer by Republic Bank loan made through our stores was $296 and the average finance charge was $52.11. As of June 30, 2004, the gross receivable for short-term consumer loans made by us was approximately $27.7 million. In addition, we are obligated to pay Republic Bank for loan losses in an amount up to the total outstanding amount of Republic Bank loans recorded on Republic Bank’s financial statements, which was $9.4 million as of June 30, 2004.

     For the short-term consumer loans we offer, the customer’s application data is electronically transmitted to our centralized computer system, which scores the loan with a proprietary loan-scoring system. An approval or denial is communicated back to the store, where the required loan documentation or adverse action form is printed for the customer. Loans made by Republic Bank are scored in a similar process, but Republic Bank is responsible for reviewing each loan application and determining whether such application is approved for a loan. We are not involved in the loan approval process or the determination of the Republic Bank loan approval procedures or criteria. For our fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, our provision for loan losses as a percentage of matured loan volume for our loans and for Republic Bank loans combined was 4.7%.

     Bill payments. Our stores serve as payment locations for customers to pay many of their utility, telephone and other bills to third parties and also serve as a distribution point for bank-issued prepaid debit cards.

     Upon acceptance of the customer’s bill payment in cash, we remit the amount owed to the third party under an agreement with that payee and either receive a service fee from the payee or collect a fee from the consumer. We offer these services primarily through agreements directly with various product and service providers, such as Verizon, Sprint, TXU (a Texas utility company), and Baltimore Gas & Electric. In fiscal 2004 and 2003, we processed approximately 8.6 million and 6.8 million bill payment transactions, respectively.

     Our stores also offer NetSpend’s ACE MasterCard debit card, which allows customers to “load” cash onto a MasterCard debit card and use it wherever MasterCard debit cards are accepted. We receive a fee when customers purchase the card, load cash on the card, use it for a purchase or use it at an automated teller machine for a cash withdrawal. During fiscal 2004, we and our franchisees sold more than 149,000 cards and loaded more than $268 million onto these cards, compared to fiscal 2003, when we and our franchisees sold more than 34,000 cards and loaded more than $59 million onto these cards.

     Money transfers. We are an agent for the transmission and receipt of wire transfers through the MoneyGram® network, the second largest wire transfer provider after Western Union. Through this network, our customers can transfer funds electronically to any of approximately 60,000 MoneyGram agent locations worldwide, including our stores. MoneyGram establishes the fees for this service and pays us a commission.

     Money orders. We sell money orders issued by Travelers Express in any amount up to $1,000. These money orders are generally used by our customers for bill payments, rent payments and other general disbursements. We sold approximately 8.8 million money orders during fiscal 2004. The fees charged for money orders depend on local market conditions and the size of the money order. We remit the face amount of each money order sold to Travelers Express. Our money order revenues include the fee paid by our customers and the recognition of deferred revenue related to contract incentive payments.

8


Table of Contents

     Franchising. We sell several types of ACE franchises, including: a standard store franchise; a store-within-a-store or kiosk franchise; a small market franchise for market areas with a population under 15,000; and a conversion franchise that permits an existing check cashing business to convert to an ACE franchisee. Our franchise revenues consist of an initial franchise fee of up to $30,000 and monthly royalties of up to 6% of revenue. There were 204 company-franchised stores in operation as of June 30, 2004, compared to 200 as of June 30, 2003, and we currently have franchise agreements with franchisees to develop over 100 new franchise stores.

     We franchise our stores in order to complement our company-owned growth and network expansion plans in a cost effective manner. By expanding into new geographic markets, we increase our brand awareness and create further purchasing power with our vendors and a pipeline for future acquisition opportunities. Typically, we have a right of first refusal to purchase the franchised store. Since fiscal 1996, we have acquired over 100 franchised stores from franchisees.

     Other services. In many company-owned stores, we offer a variety of other retail financial services to our customers, such as public transportation passes, photocopying, fax transmission services, postage stamps and various prepaid services, including long-distance telephone cards.

     We have developed self-service machines, which are able to cash checks, sell prepaid long-distance telephone cards, sell money orders and process third-party bill payments. As June 30, 2004, we had eight machines in company-owned locations, and we placed 219 self-service machines in H&R Block retail locations for use during the 2004 tax season (i.e., January through March.) The machines in H&R Block locations only cash refund anticipation loan checks issued to customers of H&R Block. As of June 30, 2004, we had 61 bill payment self-service machines located at a third-party service provider’s locations.

New Store Economics

     The capital cost of opening a new store varies depending on the size and type of store, but is typically in the range of $65,000 to $75,000, before the Moneygram incentive. This capital cost includes leasehold improvements, signage, computer equipment and security systems. MoneyGram pays us an incentive for each new location opened, which is accounted for as deferred revenue that is recognized over the remaining life of the MoneyGram contract. During fiscal 2004, we opened 53 company-owned stores, including 11 ACE Cash Advance stores. In addition, the typical store requires working capital of $80,000 to $100,000 to fund operating cash and the store’s loan portfolio. It typically takes approximately one year for a store to break even on a store margin basis. First-year losses typically average $15,000 to $25,000 per store.

9


Table of Contents

     The following tables show the average annual store revenues and the average gross margin for company-owned stores (excluding acquired stores) which were opened in the year indicated and were open as of June 30, 2004:

                                                         
            Average Store Revenues        
    Number of   Year Ended June 30,
       
    Stores Open at                            
Year Opened:
  June 30, 2004
  2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
       
            (in thousands)
1995 and earlier
    252     $ 286.3     $ 272.4     $ 275.7     $ 242.6     $ 199.8          
1996
    25       274.6       269.2       264.4       246.1       194.4          
1997
    34       268.2       245.3       239.6       206.1       159.6          
1998
    46       250.0       240.7       226.5       189.7       132.1          
1999
    63       211.5       204.1       199.4       162.9       93.1          
2000
    61       206.7       188.6       178.0       125.3       26.7          
2001
    41       215.3       187.9       143.2       34.3                
2002
    39       175.3       123.6       32.7                      
2003
    13       154.2       33.8                            
2004
    53       27.4                                  
 
   
 
                                                 
 
    627                                                  
Acquired stores
    399                                                  
 
   
 
                                                 
 
    1,026                                                  
 
   
 
                                                 
                                                         
            Average Store Gross Margin        
    Number of   Year Ended June 30,
       
    Stores Open at                            
Year Opened:
  June 30, 2004
  2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
       
            (in thousands)
1995 and earlier
    252     $ 119.4     $ 111.9     $ 116.2     $ 80.7     $ 86.6          
1996
    25       108.9       106.2       107.9       91.1       82.0          
1997
    34       98.2       88.1       87.8       55.2       41.9          
1998
    46       77.7       82.4       79.7       43.4       27.0          
1999
    63       59.3       59.1       56.5       16.9       (11.3 )        
2000
    61       52.3       45.9       43.2       (7.9 )     (12.9 )        
2001
    41       52.0       39.4       8.4       (21.3 )              
2002
    39       32.1       (5.3 )     (24.9 )                    
2003
    13       13.8       (17.6 )                          
2004
    53       (30.8 )                                
 
   
 
                                                 
 
    627                                                  
Acquired stores
    399                                                  
 
   
 
                                                 
 
    1,026                                                  
 
   
 
                                                 

     Our store construction and facilities planning staff reviews and negotiates leases for store locations, supervises the construction of new stores and the remodeling of existing stores and performs lease management services once the leases are executed. Since many of our stores are built within existing retail space, the work area of each store is a modular-designed unit that can be customized to meet the varying size and other requirements of each location while giving it a consistent appearance.

     We close stores in the normal course of business for various reasons, including inadequate operating performance, lease expirations and shopping center closings. During fiscal 2004 and 2003, we closed 24 and 28 company-owned stores, respectively.

10


Table of Contents

Company-Owned Store Locations and Operations

     The following map illustrates the number and location of company-owned stores in operation as of June 30, 2004:

(MAP)                      

     The following table illustrates the development of company-owned stores since June 30, 2000:

                                         
    Company-Owned Stores
    As of June 30,
Market Area
  2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
Texas
    340       328       329       326       309  
California
    87       85       88       90       30  
Arizona
    72       75       72       75       73  
Colorado
    66       53       56       53       52  
Florida
    63       68       91       91       90  
Georgia
    44       46       50       50       54  
Tennessee
    39       18       18       19       26  
Maryland
    38       39       39       40       48  
Louisiana
    35       27       27       25       25  
Virginia
    32       29       29       29       27  
Indiana
    28       26       25       25       25  
Ohio
    27       25       24       18       11  
Oklahoma
    20       21       23       23       12  
North Carolina
    18       16       16       16       17  
Pennsylvania
    16       16       16       9       3  
Washington, D.C.
    16       16       16       16       18  
Nevada
    15       14       14       14       14  
Washington
    14       13       13       13       14  
New Mexico
    13       11       10       10       8  
Missouri
    11       11       11       11       11  
South Carolina
    10       10       13       13       17  
Arkansas
    8       8       8       8       8  
Oregon
    7       8       8       7       9  
Kansas
    6       4       4       4       4  
Alabama
    1       1       3       3       3  
Kentucky
                            2  
Utah
                            5  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
    1,026       968       1,003       988       915  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

     We typically locate our company-owned stores in highly visible, accessible locations and operate during convenient hours for our customers. We locate stores on high traffic streets or intersections. Our stores occupy approximately 1,200 square feet on average and are located in strip shopping centers and free-standing buildings. As of June 30, 2004, we also operate 80 smaller kiosks located inside retail stores. We are focused on increasing the customer’s awareness of ACE by using consistent signage and store design at each location. All but two of our company-owned stores are leased.

11


Table of Contents

     Normal business hours of our company-owned stores are from 9:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday, 9:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. on Friday and 9:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. on Saturday. Approximately 190 stores are also open on Sunday, generally from 10:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. The business hours of any store may be changed due to local market conditions. We are open on all holidays except for Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year’s Day.

Franchised Store Locations

     The following map illustrates the states in which our franchisees operate stores and the number of stores in operation as of June 30, 2004:

(MAP)                      

     We are the largest franchisor of check cashing stores in the United States. Our franchises are marketed through a dedicated sales force, supplemented by advertising in newspapers, trade journals and other media.

12


Table of Contents

     The following table illustrates the development of franchised stores since June 30, 2000:

                                         
    Franchised Stores
    As of June 30,
Market Area
  2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
Texas
    51       55       56       55       48  
Ohio
    20       18       16       14       9  
South Carolina
    14       13       8       8       7  
Florida
    13       16       14       13       12  
Oklahoma
    11       11       11       9       11  
Arizona
    9       5       3       2       2  
California
    9       10       11       12       15  
North Carolina
    8       6       7       7       5  
Tennessee
    8       7       7       7       2  
Colorado
    7       6       4       3       3  
Kansas
    6       5       4       1        
Louisiana
    6       12       12       12       13  
Missouri
    6       4       3       3       3  
Oregon
    5       4       4       4       3  
Georgia
    4       6       6       7       6  
Kentucky
    3       3       2       2       2  
Alabama
    2                   1       1  
Arkansas
    2       1       1       1       2  
Delaware
    2       2       1       1       1  
Idaho
    2       2       2       1       1  
Indiana
    2       2       2       2       2  
Maine
    2       1       1       1       1  
Minnesota
    2       2       2       2       2  
Wisconsin
    2       1       1              
Hawaii
    1       1                    
Michigan
    1       1       1       1        
Mississippi
    1       2       1       1        
New Jersey
    1       1       1       1       1  
Pennsylvania
    1                          
South Dakota
    1       1       1       1        
Virginia
    1       1       1              
Wyoming
    1       1       1       1       1  
Connecticut
                      2       2  
Massachusetts
                             
Utah
                             
Washington
                            2  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
    204       200       184       175       157  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

     We are planning to accelerate our expansion through the sale of new franchises and the opening of additional stores under existing franchise agreements.

Advertising and Marketing

     Our marketing efforts are designed to grow revenues by creating customer loyalty and introducing new customers to the ACE brand. We achieve this by developing services and promotions that create high perceived value, supported by excellent customer service.

     We have been effective in marketing our services through in-store programs with high-impact, consumer relevant point-of-purchase materials. We implement additional promotions to maximize key seasonal revenue opportunities, including holidays and tax season.

     In fiscal 1996, we introduced a loyalty and retention program called ACE Plus, which rewards customers with free phone cards or free check cashing based on a customer’s check cashing transactions. Since inception, approximately 6.6 million customers have joined the ACE Plus program. Approximately 2 million customers have used their ACE Plus card in the last 12 months. By the end of calendar 2004, we plan on introducing a significantly enhanced loyalty program encompassing all customer transactions.

     We are currently testing the effectiveness of a new advertising campaign that includes mass media (primarily radio) in English and Spanish, and enhanced bilingual in-store communications.

13


Table of Contents

Information Systems

     Our information systems include a proprietary point-of-sale system in our stores and a management information system that together form the foundation of our operating model.

     The point-of-sale system is fully operational in all stores and is licensed to our franchisees. It is designed to facilitate customer service and risk management in a logical and straight-forward manner for our store employees. The point-of-sale system:

  records and monitors the details of every transaction, including the service type, amount, fees, employee, time, actions taken and duration;
 
  integrates a proprietary and extensive customer/maker risk management database with an automated decision methodology to guide our employees through the transaction and to better manage risk in check cashing transactions;
 
  provides services in a standardized and efficient manner, which we believe allows us to operate our stores with fewer personnel than many of our competitors (many of our stores are operated by only one person);
 
  reduces the risk of transaction errors by automatically recalling customer data and calculating fees; and
 
  provides fully automated, immediate and statistically validated loan application decisions that help ensure standardization and compliance with state and federal lending regulations.

     On at least a daily basis, and in many cases on a real-time basis, all transaction data are transmitted to our centralized database at our headquarters and are integrated into our management information system. This system is designed to provide summary and detailed information to district managers, regional vice presidents and corporate managers at any time through internet connectivity. The system allows us to:

  monitor daily revenue by service on a company, regional, store and employee basis;
 
  monitor and manage daily store exception reports, which record, for example, any cash shortages and late store opening times;
 
  identify cash differences between bank statements and our records, such as differences resulting from missing checks and deposits;
 
  determine, on a daily basis, the amount of cash needed at each store location, allowing centralized cash management personnel to maintain the optimal amount of cash inventory in each store;
 
  electronically transmit information and documents to third-party providers of services offered at our stores;
 
  develop a standardized labor scheduling methodology by store, by day;
 
  facilitate compliance with regulatory requirements; and
 
  post revenue and some expenses to our general ledger system.

     Our information systems department has a staff of approximately 55 employees. Our development staff primarily focuses on designing and testing new point-of-sale enhancements as well as ongoing development of the management information systems infrastructure. Our store and customer help desk staff provides assistance to our store managers related to transaction procedures, as well as directly answering customer questions.

     We operate a wide area data communications network for our stores that has reduced customer waiting times, increased reliability and allowed the implementation of new service enhancements. Each of our stores has from two to four networked PCs that run the Windows NT® operating system on standard Intel-based PCs. We run our proprietary point-of-sale software on each of the PCs in order to control and record all retail transactions at the store. Connected to each PC are several peripherals, including a money order dispenser, receipt printer, laser printer, check scanner, cash drawer and debit card PIN pad.

     Each store is connected to our host system using either a DSL or frame relay connection that allows the store to quickly access our centralized corporate databases and risk management resources. All transaction posting, processing and storage is

14


Table of Contents

performed on the host system, an IBM iSeries™ (previously known as an AS/400) mid-range computer with over two terabytes of disk storage.

     We maintain and test a comprehensive disaster recovery plan for all critical host systems. The disaster recovery plan is routinely updated to reflect new requirements and business systems and, as part of the plan, we have a contract with a third party at an off-site location to provide us immediate access to needed technologies, if necessary.

Security

     Employee safety is critical to us. Almost all company-owned store employees work behind bullet-resistant Plexiglas® and steel-reinforced partitions. Each company-owned store’s security measures include safes, alarm systems monitored by third parties, teller area entry control, perimeter opening entry detection and tracking of all employee movement in and out of secured areas. All stores are currently using a centralized security system through a third-party provider. The centralized security system includes identical alarm systems in all stores, remote control activated alarms, arming/disarming and changing user codes and mechanically and electronically controlled time-delay safes.

     Our business requires our stores to maintain a significant supply of cash. We are therefore subject to the risk of cash shortages resulting from employee and non-employee theft and employee errors. Although we have implemented various programs to reduce these risks and provide security for our facilities and employees, there can be no assurance that these problems will be eliminated. During fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, cash shortages from employee errors and from theft were approximately $0.9 million (0.4% of revenues), $1.3 million (0.6% of revenues) and $2.1 million (0.9% of revenues), respectively.

     Our point-of-sale system allows management to detect cash shortages on a daily basis. In addition to other procedures, district managers conduct audits of each company-owned store’s cash position and inventories on an unannounced, random basis. Daily transportation of currency and checks is provided by professional armored carriers. Our employees generally do not transport currency or checks.

Human Resources

     Our operations are organized into regions. Each region has a regional vice president who reports to one of two division vice presidents of operations and is responsible for the operations, administration, training and supervision of company-owned stores in his or her region. We currently have 12 regional vice presidents (including the vice president responsible for ACE Cash Advance stores) who are responsible for the operations of approximately 85 stores each. We currently have 78 district managers, each of whom reports to the regional vice president for his or her region and is directly responsible for the general management of up to 20 stores within his or her territory. These district managers are responsible for hiring, scheduling, store operations, local marketing and employee relations. Each store manager reports to a district manager and has direct responsibility over his or her store’s operations.

     Each region also has a human resources manager that coordinates recruiting, hiring and training (initial and on-going) within the region. In 2002, we committed to hiring only nationally certified human resources managers. Currently, nine of our 12 managers are certified and the remaining three are preparing for the certification tests in 2004 and 2005. All human resources managers attend an annual three-day conference at the corporate office and must complete 60 hours of continuing education every three years to maintain their national certification.

     Training. Service associates, store managers, district managers and regional vice presidents must complete formal training programs. Those training programs include:

  an annual management training program with all regional vice presidents, district managers and human resource managers which covers employee hiring, progressive discipline, retention, sexual harassment, compensation, equal employment opportunity compliance and leadership;
 
  an annual three-day district manager conference at our corporate headquarters which covers topics such as customer service, loss reduction, safety and security, better delivery of services and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
 
  quarterly regional vice president meetings that focus on operational goal achievement and human resource issues; and
 
  store employee training which consists of classroom and on-the-job training with experienced store employees for a minimum of three weeks.

15


Table of Contents

     The regional human resources manager also coordinates on-going training for store employees to review customer service, compliance and service-focused issues.

     Hiring and Retention. District managers, human resource managers and team leaders, who are experienced store managers, are responsible for store employee recruitment. To facilitate this process, we use an internet-based automated recruitment system that pre-screens all applicants to ensure they meet our position requirements. We believe the automated recruitment system also allows us to identify employee characteristics and recruiting sources that can lead to long-term, successful employees.

     All store employees undergo a thorough criminal background check, social security check, credit check, employment verification, drug screening and two-step interview process before employment. In 2001, we created a compensation and career path program to provide employees with a competitive pay rates and opportunities for advancement. We offer a complete and competitive benefits package to attract and retain employees.

Employees

     At June 30, 2004, we had 2,387 employees, including 920 service associates at company-owned stores, 1,090 store managers, 78 district managers, 12 regional vice presidents, 185 regional support personnel (located in regional offices and the corporate headquarters), 95 corporate employees and seven franchise personnel. We use third-party firms to conduct background checks, credit checks and drug tests of all of our prospective employees.

     We consider our employee relations to be good. Our employees are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and we have never experienced any organized work stoppage, strike, or labor dispute.

Competition

     We believe that the principal competitive factors in the check cashing and short-term consumer loan (also known as payday loan) industry are location, customer service, fees, convenience, range of services offered, speed and confidentiality. We face intense competition and believe that the check cashing and short-term consumer lending markets are becoming more competitive as these industries mature and consolidate. We compete with other check cashing stores, grocery stores, banks, savings and loan institutions, short-term consumer lenders, other financial services entities and any retail businesses that cash checks, sell money orders, provide money transfer services, or offer other similar financial services. Some retailers cash checks without charging a fee under limited circumstances. Some of our competitors have larger and more established customer bases and substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources. Our stores have also recently been facing competition from automated check cashing machines deployed in supermarkets, convenience stores and other public venues by large financial services organizations, as well as retail financial services that our competitors offer over the internet. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully with our competitors.

Relationship with Republic Bank

     We are party to a marketing and servicing agreement with Republic Bank. Under this agreement, we provide various services to Republic Bank in connection with our marketing and servicing of Republic Bank’s short-term consumer loans in exchange for which we are paid fees by Republic Bank. As of June 30, 2004, Republic Bank was offering its loans in 359 of our company-owned stores in Arkansas, Pennsylvania and Texas. Approximately 9.7% and 3.9% of our total revenues in fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively, were derived from fees paid to us by Republic Bank.

     Although we market and service these Republic Bank loans, Republic Bank is responsible for reviewing each loan application and determining whether such application is approved for a loan. We are not involved in the loan approval process or the determination of the loan approval procedures or criteria, nor do we acquire or own any participation interest in these loans. Consequently, Republic Bank loans are not included in our loan portfolio or in our loans receivable.

     Under our agreement with Republic Bank we are obligated to reimburse Republic Bank by paying it an amount equal to the net amount charged off by Republic Bank, less Republic Bank’s established reserves. We could be obligated to pay Republic Bank for loan losses in an amount up to the total outstanding amount of Republic Bank loans recorded on Republic Bank’s financial statements, which was $9.4 million as of June 30, 2004.

     Because of our economic exposure for losses related to the Republic Bank loans, we maintain a payable to Republic Bank at levels to cover the anticipated liability for Republic Bank loan losses. We determine our allowance for loan losses and our payable to Republic Bank based upon a review of historical and recent loan losses and the loan portfolio. For the year ended June 30, 2004, we provided approximately $7.4 million for losses on Republic Bank loans and charged-off $6.5 million related to these loans. The balance of the liability for Republic Loan losses reported in accrued liabilities as of June 30, 2004

16


Table of Contents

was $0.7 million.

Regulation

     General. We are subject to regulation in some jurisdictions in which we operate, including jurisdictions that regulate check cashing fees or require the registration of check cashing companies or money transmission agents. We are also subject to federal and state regulation relating to the recording and reporting of certain financial transactions and relating to the privacy of customer information. Further, our loan-related activities are subject to state regulation and, in certain respects, federal regulation.

     State Regulations. In some states, check cashing companies or money transmission agents are required to meet minimum bonding or capital requirements and are subject to record-keeping requirements. We operate in 18 states or jurisdictions that have licensing and/or fee regulations regarding check cashing: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Washington and the District of Columbia. We are licensed in each of the states or jurisdictions in which a license is currently required for us to operate as a check cashing company. To the extent these states have adopted ceilings on check cashing fees, those ceilings are in excess of or equal to the fees we charge.

     In those states in which we operate as a short-term consumer or payday lender, we are licensed as such and are subject to the various state regulations governing the terms of short-term consumer loans. Typically, the state regulations limit the amount that a lender or service-provider may lend or provide and, in some cases, the number of loans or transactions that a lender or service-provider may make, to any customer at one time, restrict the amount of finance or service charges or fees that the lender or service provider may assess in connection with any loan or transaction and limit a customer’s ability to renew any loans or transactions. The lender or service provider must also comply with various consumer disclosure requirements, which are typically similar or equivalent to the federal Truth in Lending Act and corresponding federal regulations, in connection with the loans or transactions. Collection activities regarding past due loans or similar transactions may also be subject to consumer-debt-collection laws and regulations adopted by the various states.

     We are subject to franchising laws and regulations in the states in which we offer and sell franchises. Those laws and regulations vary by state, but generally include filing or registration requirements, record-keeping requirements and mandated disclosures to prospective franchisees.

     Federal Regulations. Under the Bank Secrecy Act regulations of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, we must report transactions involving currency in an amount greater than $10,000, and we must retain records for five years for purchases of monetary instruments for cash in amounts from $3,000 to $10,000. In general, every financial institution, including us, must report each deposit, withdrawal, exchange of currency or other payment or transfer, whether by, through or to the financial institution, that involves currency in an amount greater than $10,000. In addition, multiple currency transactions must be treated as single transactions if the financial institution has knowledge that the transactions are by, or on behalf of, any person and result in either cash in or cash out totaling more than $10,000 during any one business day. Management believes that our point-of-sale system and employee-training programs permit us to comply with these requirements.

     The Bank Secrecy Act also requires us to register as a money services business with the Treasury Department. This registration is intended to enable governmental authorities to better enforce laws prohibiting money laundering and other illegal activities. We are registered as a money services business with the Treasury Department and must re-register with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Treasury Department, or FinCEN, by December 31, 2005, and at least every two years thereafter. We must also maintain a list of names and addresses of, and other information about, our stores and must make that list available to any requesting law enforcement agency (through FinCEN). That store list must be updated at least annually. We do not believe that compliance with these existing requirements has had or will have any material impact on our operations.

     In addition, federal regulations require us to report suspicious transactions involving at least $2,000 to FinCEN. The regulations generally describe three classes of reportable suspicious transactions—one or more related transactions that the money services business knows, suspects, or has reason to suspect (1) involve funds derived from illegal activity or are intended to hide or disguise such funds, (2) are designed to evade the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act, or (3) appear to serve no business or lawful purpose. Because of our point-of-sale system and employee-training programs, we do not believe that compliance with the existing reporting requirement and the corresponding record keeping requirements, has had or will have any material impact on our operations.

     The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and its implementing federal regulations require us to generally protect the confidentiality of our customers’ nonpublic personal information and to disclose to our customers our privacy policy and practices, including those regarding sharing the customers’ nonpublic personal information with third parties. That disclosure must be made to

17


Table of Contents

customers at the time that the customer relationship is established and at least annually thereafter.

     Federal anti-money-laundering laws make it a criminal offense to own or operate a money transmitting business without the appropriate state licenses. In addition, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and its implementing federal regulations require us, as a “financial institution,” to establish and maintain an anti-money-laundering program. Such a program must include (1) internal policies, procedures and controls designed to identify and report money laundering, (2) a designated compliance officer, (3) an ongoing employee-training program and (4) an independent audit function to test the program. Because of our compliance with other federal regulations having essentially a similar purpose, we do not believe that compliance with these requirements has had or will have any material impact on our operations.

     Short-term Consumer Loans. Short-term consumer loans, also known as payday loans, are strictly regulated by federal guidance and state laws and regulations. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which supervises national banks, took action in 2002 to effectively prohibit certain national banks from offering and making short-term consumer loans because of various risks it believes short-term consumer lending poses to those banks. Also, during the last few years, legislation has been introduced in the U.S. Congress and in certain state legislatures, and regulatory authorities have proposed or publicly addressed the possibility of proposing regulations, that would prohibit or severely restrict short-term consumer loans. For example, in December 2002, we ceased offering short-term consumer loans at our stores in Alabama, Georgia and North Carolina as a result of laws enacted restricting short-term consumer loans in those states. As a result of more recently enacted laws in Alabama permitting short-term consumer loans, beginning July 2004, we have resumed offering short-term consumer loans at our store in that state. More recently, the Georgia state legislature passed a proposed law banning short-term consumer loans in that state. We intend to continue, with others in the short-term consumer loan industry, to inform and educate legislators and to oppose legislative or regulatory action that would prohibit or severely restrict short-term consumer loans. Nevertheless, if legislative or regulatory action with that effect were taken on the federal level or in states in which we have a significant number of stores, that action would have a material adverse effect on our loan-related activities and revenues. Moreover, similar action by states where we are not currently conducting business could result in us having fewer opportunities to pursue our growth strategy.

     Since January 1, 2003, all of the short-term consumer loans offered at our stores have consisted of either (1) short-term consumer loans we made, or (2) short-term consumer loans Republic Bank made. Our activities as a short-term consumer lender obligate us to comply with the consumer-disclosure requirements of the federal Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z adopted under that act. Our activities as a collection agent for our past-due loans and past-due Republic Bank loans obligate us to comply with the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and corresponding regulations and to register as a collection agency in certain states.

     Republic Bank is subject to supervision and regular examinations by the Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions and the FDIC. In July 2003, the FDIC issued guidelines governing permissible arrangements between a state-chartered bank and a marketer and servicer of its short-term consumer loans, also know as payday loans. Those guidelines apply to our marketing and servicing agreement with Republic Bank regarding the offering of Republic Bank loans at our stores in Arkansas, Pennsylvania and Texas and our servicing activities regarding those loans. The guidelines describe the FDIC’s expectations for a bank’s prudent risk-management practices regarding short-term consumer loan marketing and servicing relationships. They address bank capital requirements, allowances for loan losses and loan classifications as well as income recognition, collection-recovery practices and compliance with consumer protection laws when a bank engages in short-term consumer lending. We do not believe that the FDIC’s guidelines will have a material impact on our existing relationship with Republic Bank. Nevertheless, if the FDIC’s implementation of those guidelines or the promulgation of any additional guidelines were to ultimately restrict the ability of all or certain state-chartered banks, including Republic Bank, to maintain relationships with short-term consumer loan servicers like us, it could have a material adverse impact on our loan-related activities and revenues.

     As a result of our agreement with Republic Bank, our activities regarding the Republic Bank loans are also subject to examination by the FDIC and the other regulatory authorities to which Republic Bank is subject. To the extent an examination involves review of the Republic Bank loans and related processes, the regulatory authority may require us to provide requested information and to grant access to our pertinent locations, personnel and records.

Relationships with the Money Order and MoneyGram Suppliers

     Money Order Agreement. We are a party to a money order agreement with Travelers Express Company, Inc., which became effective December 17, 1998 and expires December 31, 2007. Under this agreement, we exclusively sell Travelers Express money orders that bear our logo. The money order agreement obligates us to make prompt remittances of money order proceeds. Our payment and other obligations to Travelers Express under the money order agreement and the MoneyGram Agreement (described below) are secured by a subordinated lien on our assets in accordance with security agreements described in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financials Statements.

18


Table of Contents

     In conjunction with the money order agreement, we received $3 million from Travelers Express in April 1998, and $400,000 in each of 1999 through 2003, for a total of $5 million. When the term of the money order agreement was extended in October 2003, we received a signing bonus of approximately $2 million and have and will receive annual incentive bonuses of $350,000 on January 1 each of 2004 through 2007. The signing bonus and each annual incentive bonus will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the period for and during which that bonus is paid. If the money order agreement is terminated before its expiration under certain circumstances, we will be obligated to repay Travelers Express a portion of the amendment signing bonus (without interest). See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

     MoneyGram Agreement. We act as an agent for the receipt and transmission of wire transfers of money through the MoneyGram network in accordance with a money transfer agreement with Travelers Express and MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc., an affiliate of Travelers Express, that became effective on January 1, 2001 and expires on December 31, 2007. We agreed to offer and sell only MoneyGram wire transfer services during the seven-year term of this MoneyGram Agreement. Under the MoneyGram Agreement, we earn commissions for each transmission and receipt of money through the MoneyGram network effected at a company-owned location; those commissions equal varying percentages of the fees charged by MoneyGram Payment Systems to consumers for the MoneyGram services.

     Under the MoneyGram Agreement, we are also entitled to receive a total of approximately $12.5 million in bonuses, payable in equal monthly installments (without interest) over the seven-year term. The amount of those monthly installments will be subject to reduction if we close or sell a significant number of those locations at which MoneyGram services were offered at the beginning of the MoneyGram Agreement. In addition, we will be entitled to receive certain incentive payments regarding new MoneyGram service locations that we open or acquire during the term of the MoneyGram Agreement.

Relationship with H&R Block/SSM Arrangements

     We are a party to a multi-year license agreement with H&R Block Tax Services, Inc. under which we may place our self-service machines (“SSMs”) in various H&R Block retail offices during the tax season (i.e., January through March) of each year. Those SSMs are available to cash only tax refund and tax refund anticipation loan checks for H&R Block’s customers. We receive check-cashing fees from customers who use those SSMs, and we pay H&R Block fees that vary according to the value of the checks cashed in those SSMs. We placed over 200 SSMs in H&R Block retail offices during the 2004 tax season, and anticipate placing between 50 and 150 SSMs at H&R Block retail offices during the 2005 tax season.

     The arrangements by which we obtained cash or currency for the SSMs in the H&R Block retail offices are described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Self-Service Machine Funding Arrangements.”

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

     Our average store size is approximately 1,200 square feet. Our stores are located in strip shopping centers, free-standing buildings and kiosks located inside retail stores. All but two of our stores are leased, generally under leases providing for an initial term of three years and optional renewal terms of three to six years. We own the land and building at one store in Indianapolis, Indiana and one store in Tampa, Florida. Our corporate headquarters in Irving, Texas, a suburb of Dallas, occupies approximately 56,000 square feet under a lease that expires in 2008.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Settlement of Goleta Loan-Related Proceedings

     We have been a defendant in a number of lawsuits regarding our former arrangements with Goleta National Bank under which Goleta offered short-term consumer loans to our customers at or through most of our owned stores before January 1, 2003. These lawsuits alleged that we, rather than Goleta, should have been properly regarded as the lender for the loans because of our services in connection with the loans and our purchase of participation interests in those loans and that the loans, including the interest charge, should be governed by the laws of the respective states in which the borrowers reside. On May 12, 2003, however, we entered into a settlement agreement to settle and terminate the nationwide class-action Goleta loan-related lawsuit, Purdie v. Ace Cash Express, Inc. et al., that was pending in the United States District Court in Dallas, Texas, and on December 15, 2003, the federal court entered a final judgment and order granting final approval of the settlement agreement. Because of the broad nature of the class described in the settlement agreement approved by the court, we believe that the settlement not only disposes of those claims brought against us in the Purdie lawsuit, but also disposes of those claims brought in the other Goleta loan-related lawsuits, as well as any future claims brought on the same grounds.

19


Table of Contents

     In the settlement agreement, we agreed to pay:

    at least $2.5 million as refunds to former borrowers who have repaid all of their Goleta loans and who timely submit claims for refunds or, if the refunds and certain other amounts paid by us total less than $2.5 million, the amount of the shortfall to certain consumer-advocacy organizations;
   
    up to $2.1 million as attorneys’ fees to the plaintiffs’ counsel in the Purdie and other Goleta loan-related lawsuits being settled and terminated; and
   
    notice and other administrative costs in connection with the settlement.

     In the settlement agreement, we also agreed:

    To ensure that any of our short-term consumer loans or deferred-deposit transactions made under state law during the two years ended December 31, 2004 are made only in compliance with any applicable state short-term consumer-lending laws, except that we may rely on federal-preemption rules in connection with acting as marketing and servicing agent for the Republic Bank deferred-deposit loans made at or through certain of our stores; and
   
    For the two years following the date on which we made the settlement payments, to make specified disclosures to borrowers of our short-term consumer loans regarding the expense of those loans and regarding certain collection-related expenses to which borrowers might become subject and to abide by specified restrictions on activities to collect our short-term consumer loans through automated clearinghouse debits and on credit reporting regarding borrowers of our short-term consumer loans.

     The refund payable by us to each eligible former borrower who filed a refund claim is approximately five percent of the interest or finance charges paid by that borrower, but not less than $7.50 or more than $45.00.

     Based on estimates of anticipated claims by eligible borrowers and of administrative and other costs related to the settlement, we recorded a $5.0 million charge for our settlement payment obligations in our financial statements in the third quarter of fiscal 2003. During the quarter ended September 30, 2003, we expensed an additional $0.1 million for administrative costs related to the settlement. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, we recovered $4.7 million from liability insurance coverage for claims related to various Goleta loan-related lawsuits.

     In March 2004, we mailed to the former Goleta loan borrowers, and remitted to the consumer-advocacy organizations and plaintiffs’ counsel, the amounts required by the settlement agreement. Fewer than 80 persons did not participate in, or elected to opt out of, the settlement reached in Purdie. We believe that the claims of, or any legal proceedings involving, those persons will not result in a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Settlement of Acquisition Related Proceeding

On November 27, 2001, we filed a lawsuit in Texas state court in Travis County, Texas, against Valley Check Cashiers, Inc., Jeffrey Silverman and Morris Silverman seeking damages relating to the defendants’ misrepresentations and breaches of warranties in an Asset Purchase Agreement between us and the defendants, and certain other entities affiliated with the defendants dated as of November 10, 2000. Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, we acquired the assets of 107 check-cashing and retail financial services locations owned and managed by the defendants and their affiliated entities for a total purchase price of $29.7 million in cash. Eleven of the acquired locations were in third-party grocery stores, operated under the “Handy Andy” name, in and around San Antonio, Texas. Following the foreclosure and sale of those grocery stores by the secured creditor of the grocery store operator, we (in cooperation with the sellers under the Asset Purchase Agreement) instituted litigation against that creditor and its purchaser in January 2001 to maintain our right to operate in those locations. At a trial in April 2001, the court found that the lease agreement under which we claimed the right to occupy those eleven locations, which had been assigned to us by the defendants and their affiliated entities, was not enforceable under Texas law. The court therefore ordered us to vacate those eleven locations, which we did in June 2001. Because of the court’s finding, we filed this lawsuit to recover the damages suffered in connection with, and as a result of, the loss of those eleven locations. In May 2004, we settled the lawsuit with the defendants, and on June 3, 2004, the presiding judge entered an agreed order of dismissal with prejudice. As a result, in May 2004, we authorized payment of the note payable, which had been held in escrow and we received a settlement payment of $434,000, which is recorded in other (income expenses.

Other Incidental Proceedings

     We are also involved from time to time in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business. We believe that these legal proceedings will not result in any material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

20


Table of Contents

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

     Our Common Stock is quoted on The Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “AACE.” At September 7, 2004, there were approximately 131 holders of record of the Common Stock, and there were approximately 1,500 beneficial holders of the Common Stock held in nominee or street name.

     The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices of the Common Stock as reported by NASDAQ for the past two fiscal years:

                 
    High
  Low
Fiscal 2003
               
Quarter ended September 30, 2002
  $ 10.00     $ 7.80  
Quarter ended December 31, 2002
    9.25       7.48  
Quarter ended March 31, 2003
    10.04       8.70  
Quarter ended June 30, 2003
    11.65       9.09  
Fiscal 2004
               
Quarter ended September 30, 2003
  $ 14.99     $ 10.70  
Quarter ended December 31, 2003
    23.50       14.45  
Quarter ended March 31, 2004
    34.50       21.45  
Quarter ended June 30, 2004
    32.60       20.25  

     On September 7, 2004, the last reported sale price of the Common Stock on NASDAQ was $27.64 per share.

     We have never paid dividends on the Common Stock and have no plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

21


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

                                         
    Year Ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
    (in thousands, except per share and store data)
Statement of Earnings Data:
                                       
Revenue
  $ 246,659     $ 234,289     $ 229,266     $ 196,775     $ 140,636  
Store expenses:
                                       
Salaries and benefits
    59,593       58,170       57,864       51,969       38,639  
Occupancy
    30,563       29,194       28,207       26,439       21,507  
Provision for loan losses and doubtful accounts
    24,235       22,892       22,064       24,825       4,177  
Depreciation
    7,563       6,966       7,180       6,697       5,429  
Other
    40,066       38,192       36,512       35,085       24,916  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total store expenses
    162,020       155,414       151,827       145,015       94,668  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Gross margin
    84,639       78,875       77,439       51,760       45,968  
Region expenses
    19,251       17,056       17,495       14,127       11,119  
Headquarters expenses
    18,681       17,133       16,594       10,328       8,247  
Franchise expenses
    1,196       1,225       993       1,017       1,063  
Other depreciation and amortization
    3,893       5,423       7,570       5,087       3,798  
Interest expense
    10,231       16,004       14,934       12,016       6,123  
Other (income) expenses:
                                       
Restructuring
                (163 )     7,710        
Legal settlements
          1,050       1,984       350       584  
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
    4,858       270                    
Other (income) expense (including store closing expense)
    (1,893 )     264       1,006       108       371  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total other expenses
    2,965       1,584       2,827       8,168       955  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and Cumulative effect of accounting change (1)
    28,422       20,450       17,026       1,017       14,663  
Provision for income taxes
    11,370       8,174       6,913       406       5,797  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change
    17,052       12,276       10,113       611       8,866  
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of income tax (2)
          499                    
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of income tax (1)
                            (603 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income
  $ 17,052     $ 12,775     $ 10,113     $ 611     $ 8,263  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 1.49     $ 1.25     $ 1.00     $ 0.06     $ 0.82  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Weighted average number of diluted shares
    11,477       10,206       10,141       10,158       10,361  
Balance Sheet Data:
                                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 123,041     $ 108,110     $ 116,264     $ 129,186     $ 105,577  
Loans receivable, net
    17,047       13,000       17,356       14,386       18,695  
Total assets
    273,647       258,768       267,062       276,197       221,423  
Revolving advances
    60,000       83,900       97,500       109,800       95,000  
Term advances (current portion)
          3,833       48,350       1,125       3,469  
Term advances (noncurrent portion)
          34,436             51,875       15,031  
Shareholders’ equity
    166,430       78,984       66,139       54,726       55,159  

22


Table of Contents

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (continued)

                                         
    Year Ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
Operating Data:
                                       
Company-owned stores in operation:
                                       
Beginning of year
    968       1,003       988       915       798  
Acquired
    34       2       8       133       36  
Opened
    53       14       39       49       99  
Sold
    (5 )     (23 )           (4 )     (1 )
Closed (3)
    (24 )     (28 )     (32 )     (105 )     (17 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
End of year
    1,026       968       1,003       988       915  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Franchised stores in operations:
                                       
Beginning of year
    200       184       175       157       120  
Opened
    32       26       22       30       56  
Acquired by ACE
    (13 )     (2 )     (8 )     (4 )     (7 )
Closed
    (15 )     (8 )     (5 )     (8 )     (12 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
End of year
    204       200       184       175       157  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total store network
    1,230       1,168       1,187       1,163       1072  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Percentage increase in comparable company-owned store revenues from prior year: (4)
                                       
Total revenue
    5.0 %     1.9 %     17.2 %     25.5 %     7.2 %
Check fees excluding tax check fees
    5.2 %     8.0 %     6.0 %     2.3 %     7.3 %
Loan fees and interest
    7.8 %     (4.4 %)     36.1 %     176.9 %     16.0 %
Capital expenditures (in thousands)
  $ 7,950     $ 4,771     $ 7,127     $ 12,655     $ 12,255  
Cost of net assets acquired (in thousands)
  $ 6,403     $ 673     $ 1,177     $ 35,841     $ 11,359  
Check Cashing Data:
                                       
Face amount of checks cashed (in millions)
  $ 5,103     $ 5,040     $ 4,843     $ 4,498     $ 3,839  
Face amount of average check
  $ 388     $ 383     $ 378     $ 358     $ 339  
Average fee per check
  $ 9.91     $ 9.65     $ 9.36     $ 8.38     $ 7.92  
Fees as a percentage of average check
    2.55 %     2.52 %     2.48 %     2.34 %     2.33 %
Number of checks cashed (in thousands)
    13,151       13,148       12,821       12,580       11,317  
Collections Data:
                                       
Face amount of returned checks (in thousands)
  $ 21,705     $ 24,087     $ 23,637     $ 26,536     $ 16,548  
Collections (in thousands)
    13,947       16,935       16,090       17,717       10,788  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net write-offs (in thousands)
  $ 7,758     $ 7,152     $ 7,547     $ 8,819     $ 5,760  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Collections as a percentage of returned checks
    64.3 %     70.3 %     68.1 %     66.8 %     65.2 %
Net write-offs as a percentage of revenues
    3.1 %     3.1 %     3.3 %     4.5 %     4.1 %
Net write-offs as a percentage of the face amount of checks cashed
    0.15 %     0.14 %     0.16 %     0.20 %     0.15 %

23


Table of Contents

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (continued)

                                         
    Year Ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
Combined Small Consumer Loans Operating Data:
                                       
Volume – new loans and refinances
  $ 527,723     $ 484,026     $ 502,013     $ 396,783     $ 137,015  
Average advance
  $ 278     $ 274     $ 269     $ 269     $ 240  
Average finance charge
  $ 43.71     $ 44.55     $ 45.61     $ 42.30     $ 34.51  
Number of loan transactions – new loans and refinances
    1,909       1,798       1,866       1,477       557  
Matured loan volume
  $ 516,741     $ 488,940     $ 489,887     $ 370,559     $ 129,548  
Loan fees and interest
  $ 77,029     $ 70,806     $ 74,197     $ 54,771     $ 17,872  
Loan loss provision
  $ 24,280     $ 22,293     $ 21,924     $ 24,825        
Gross margin on loans
    68.5 %     68.5 %     70.5 %     54.7 %      
Loan loss provision as a percent of matured loan volume
    4.7 %     4.6 %     4.5 %     6.7 %      
ACE Loans (5):
                                       
Volume – new loans and refinances
  $ 368,031     $ 420,129     $ 502,013     $ 396,783     $ 137,015  
Average advance
  $ 269     $ 268     $ 269     $ 269     $ 240  
Average finance charge
  $ 39.40     $ 42.71     $ 45.61     $ 42.30     $ 34.51  
Number of loan transactions – new loans and refinances
    1,368       1,587       1,866       1,477       557  
Matured loan volume
  $ 359,723     $ 432,900     $ 489,887     $ 370,559     $ 129,548  
Loan fees and interest
  $ 52,993     $ 61,769     $ 74,197     $ 54,771     $ 17,872  
Loan loss provision
  $ 16,890     $ 19,361     $ 21,924     $ 24,825        
Loans Processed for Republic Bank (6):
                                       
Volume – new loans and refinances
  $ 159,692     $ 63,897                    
Average advance
  $ 296     $ 302                    
Average finance charge
  $ 52.11     $ 53.35                    
Number of loan transactions – new loans and refinances
    541       211                    
Matured loan volume
  $ 157,018     $ 56,040                    
Loan fees and interest
  $ 24,036     $ 9,037                    
Provision for loan losses payable to Republic Bank
  $ 7,390     $ 2,932                    
Balance Sheet Data (in thousands):
                                       
Gross loans receivable
  $ 27,663     $ 21,734     $ 29,569     $ 27,768     $ 18,695  
Less: Allowance for losses on loans receivable
    10,616       8,734       12,213       13,382        
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Loans receivable, net of allowance
  $ 17,047     $ 13,000     $ 17,356     $ 14,386     $ 18,695  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Allowance for losses on loans receivable:
                                       
Beginning of period
  $ 8,734     $ 12,213     $ 13,382     $     $  
Provision for loan losses
    16,890       19,361       21,924       26,429        
Charge-offs
    (15,295 )     (23,729 )     (24,519 )     (13,510 )      
Recoveries
    287       889       1,426       463        
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
End of period
  $ 10,616     $ 8,734     $ 12,213     $ 13,382     $  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Allowance as a percent of gross loans receivable
    38.3 %     40.2 %     41.3 %     48.2 %      
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

(1)   Before a cumulative effect of accounting change recorded in the three months ended September 30, 1999, of $0.6 million, net of a $0.4 million tax benefit, relating to the adoption of Statement of Position 98-5, “Reporting on the Costs of Start-up Activities.”

(2)   Discontinued operations related to our sale of 19 underperforming stores in Florida for a pre-tax gain of $0.8 million and an after-tax gain of $0.5 million recorded in the three months ended December 31, 2002.

(3)   Includes the 85 stores closed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2001 resulting from a plan established and executed by management during the third quarter of fiscal 2001.

(4)   Calculated based on changes in revenue for all company-owned stores open in both periods and open for at least 13 months.

(5)   Operating data for ACE loans include short-term consumer loans made by Goleta National Bank at our company-owned stores until we discontinued offering Goleta loans on December 31, 2002.

(6)   Republic Bank loans are short-term consumer loans made by Republic Bank & Trust Company at our company-owned stores in Arkansas, Pennsylvania and Texas since January 1, 2003.

24


Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Business Overview

     We are a leading retailer of financial services, including check cashing, short-term consumer loans and bill payment services. As of June 30, 2004, we had a total network of 1,230 stores in 36 states and the District of Columbia, consisting of 1,026 company-owned stores and 204 franchised stores. This makes us the largest owner, operator and franchisor of check cashing stores in the United States and one of the largest providers of short-term consumer loans, also known as payday loans. We focus on serving unbanked and underbanked consumers, many of whom seek alternatives to traditional banking relationships in order to gain convenient and immediate access to check cashing services and short-term consumer loans. We seek to develop and maintain the largest network of stores in each of the markets where we operate. Our growth strategy is to open new stores, franchise stores in new and existing markets, opportunistically acquire stores, increase our customer base and introduce new services into our store network.

     Our stores offer check cashing, loans and other retail financial services at competitive rates in clean settings during hours convenient for our customers. Our stores are located in highly visible, accessible locations, usually in strip shopping centers, free-standing buildings and kiosks located inside retail stores.

     For our check cashing services, we charge our customers fees that are usually equal to a percentage of the amount of the check being cashed and are deducted from the cash provided to the customer. For our short-term consumer loans we receive interest on the loans. For the Republic Bank loans offered at certain of our stores, we receive origination and servicing fees from Republic Bank.

     Our expenses primarily relate to the operations of our stores, including salaries and benefits for our employees, occupancy expense for our leased real estate, security expenses, returns and cash shortages, loan loss provisions, depreciation of our assets and corporate and other expenses, including costs related to store openings and closings.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions in determining the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from our estimates. We believe our application of accounting policies, and the estimates inherently required therein, are reasonable.

     Revenue Recognition. Approximately 97% of our revenue results from transactions at the point-of-sale with our customers, and approximately 66% of our revenue is effectively recognized when the transaction is completed at the point-of-sale. These transactions include check cashing, bill payment, money transfer, money order sales and other miscellaneous services grouped in “other fees.” We act in an agency capacity regarding some of the services offered and sold at our stores and therefore record as revenue the amounts received from customers less amounts remitted to the provider.

     For short-term consumer loans that we make, for the Republic Bank loans for which we act only as marketing agent and servicer for a fee from the lender and, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, for our participation interests in Goleta National Bank loans, revenue constituting loan fees and interest (whether paid by the customer or the lender) is recognized ratably over the term of each loan, which is generally 14 days.

     We recognize contractual revenue guarantees from product or service providers in accordance with the terms of the contracts under which they are paid. Any bonus or incentive payments from product or service providers are amortized over the term or duration of the contracts under which they are made.

     Franchise revenue consists of up-front franchise fees charged for opening the franchised store and on-going royalty fees. We recognize franchise fees, which are the initial fees paid by the franchisees, when the franchised location has been identified, the lease has been obtained, the training has occurred, the building has been built or leasehold improvements have been completed, the proprietary point-of-sale system has been installed and the store has been opened. Franchise royalty fees, which are based on a percentage of each franchisee’s revenues, are recognized and payable monthly.

     Loan Loss Provision. We believe that the most significant estimate made in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements relates to the determination of our allowance for loan losses. We maintain an allowance for loan losses and a payable to Republic Bank at levels we consider sufficient to cover the anticipated losses in the collection of our loan portfolio and our liability for Republic Bank loan losses. The allowance for loan losses and our payable to Republic

25


Table of Contents

Bank are determined based upon a review of historical and recent loan losses and the loan portfolio. Management periodically reviews the allowance for loan losses and payable to Republic Bank and any changes are reflected in current operations. Actual loan losses may be materially different from the recorded allowance for loan losses or recorded amount payable to Republic Bank.

Summary of Annual Results

     Our fiscal 2004 total revenue was approximately $12.4 million, or 5.3%, higher than our fiscal 2003 total revenue. This increase resulted primarily from an approximate $6.2 million, or 8.8%, increase in loan-related revenue, an approximate $3.5 million, or 2.8%, increase in check cashing fees, and an approximate $3.5 million, or 25.6%, increase in bill-payment (including debit card) revenue. Our 2004 net income was approximately $17.1 million, with diluted earnings per share of $1.49, compared to our 2003 net income of approximately $12.8 million, with diluted earnings per share of $1.25. Comparable store check-cashing fees (excluding tax check fees) and comparable store loan-related revenues, as well as comparable gross margin, increased in fiscal 2004 from fiscal 2003.

Results of Operations

Revenue Analysis

                                                 
    Year Ended June 30,
    (in thousands)   (percentage of revenue)
    2004
  2003
  2002
  2004
  2003
  2002
Check cashing fees
  $ 129,194     $ 125,703     $ 118,907       52.4 %     53.7 %     51.9 %
Loan fees and interest
    77,029       70,806       74,197       31.2       30.2       32.4  
Bill-payment services
    16,960       13,507       10,156       6.9       5.8       4.4  
Money transfer services
    11,136       10,898       10,998       4.5       4.6       4.8  
Money order fees
    6,330       6,960       7,554       2.6       3.0       3.3  
Franchise revenues
    2,774       2,346       2,199       1.1       1.0       0.9  
Other fees
    3,236       4,069       5,255       1.3       1.7       2.3  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total revenue
  $ 246,659     $ 234,289     $ 229,266       100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Average revenue per store (excluding franchise revenues)
  $ 247.8     $ 235.5     $ 227.3                          

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003. Our total revenue growth resulted from a $10.7 million, or 5.0%, increase in comparable company-owned store revenues (945 stores) and a $1.7 million increase from stores that were not open for both of the full periods compared. The number of company-owned stores increased by 58, or 6%, to 1,026 stores open at June 30, 2004 from 968 stores open at June 30, 2003. During fiscal 2004, we opened 53 newly constructed stores, acquired 34, sold 5, and closed 24 company-owned stores.

     Check cashing fees, including tax check fees, increased because of a 1% increase in the average size check and a 3% increase in the average fee per check. Same store check cashing fees increased 4.1% in fiscal 2004 from fiscal 2003. Tax check fees of $20.8 million for fiscal 2004 decreased by $0.7 million, from $21.5 million in fiscal 2003. We received $4.3 million of tax check fees from our over 200 self-service machines (“SSMs”) located in H&R Block offices in fiscal 2004, compared to $4.7 million of tax check fees from 240 SSMs in H&R Block offices in 2003.

     The increase in loan fees and interest in fiscal 2004 resulted from a 9% increase in loan volume in both the ACE loan product and the Republic loan product.

     Over half of the increase in bill payment fees in fiscal 2004 was a result of growth in revenues from our services related to prepaid debit cards ($1.9 million). Also, we continue to add new payees to the bill payment program and benefit from growth from existing payees. Money order fees decreased in fiscal 2004 primarily because of the sale of fewer money orders, which in turn was primarily because of increased customer usage of electronic bill-payment services. Other fees decreased in fiscal 2004 as a result of the discontinuation of certain miscellaneous products.

     Franchise revenues consist of royalties and initial franchise fees. Franchise revenues increased in fiscal 2004 as a result of the increased number of franchised store openings. During fiscal 2004, we opened 32 franchised stores, acquired 13 former franchised stores, and closed 15 franchised stores.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002. Our total revenue growth of $5.0 million, or 2%, in fiscal 2003 from fiscal 2002 resulted from a $4.1 million, or 1.9%, increase in comparable company-owned store revenues (952 stores) and a $0.9 million increase from stores that were not open for both of the full periods compared. The number of company-owned stores

26


Table of Contents

decreased by 35, or 3%, to 968 stores open at June 30, 2003 from 1,003 stores open at June 30, 2002. During fiscal 2003, we opened 14 newly constructed stores, acquired two, sold 23 (including 19 underperforming stores in Florida during the second fiscal quarter), and closed 28 company-owned stores.

     Check cashing fees, including tax check fees, increased $6.8 million, or 6%, in fiscal 2003 from fiscal 2002 because of a 1% increase in the average size check and a 2% increase in the number of checks cashed. Same store check cashing fees increased 5.4% in fiscal 2003 from fiscal 2002. Tax check fees of $21.5 million for fiscal 2003 increased by $0.2 million, from $21.3 million in fiscal 2002. We received $4.7 million of tax check fees from over 240 SSMs located in H&R Block offices in fiscal 2003, compared to $3.8 million of tax check fees from 100 SSMs in H&R Block offices in fiscal 2002.

     Loan fees and interest decreased by 5%, in fiscal 2003 from fiscal 2002 primarily from discontinuing our loan-related business in Georgia, North Carolina, and Alabama and from transitioning from offering short-term loans made by Goleta, which ended December 31, 2002, to offering state-regulated short-term loan products.

     Bill payment fees increased by 33%, from fiscal 2002, primarily as a result of the addition of 14 new payees to the bill-payment program and growth from existing payees. Money order fees decreased by 8% in fiscal 2003 from fiscal 2002, primarily because of the sale of fewer money orders, which in turn was primarily because of increased customer usage of electronic bill-payment services. Other fees decreased by 23% in fiscal 2003 from fiscal 2002 as a result of the discontinuation of certain products, such as lottery ticket sales and the sale of regional publications.

     Franchise revenues increased by 7% in fiscal 2003 from fiscal 2002, as a result of the increased number of franchised store openings. During fiscal 2003, we opened 26 franchised stores, acquired two former franchised stores, and closed eight franchised stores, resulting in a total of 200 franchised stores as of June 30, 2003, compared to 184 franchised stores as of June 30, 2002.

Store and SSM
Expense Analysis

                                                 
    Year Ended June 30,
    (in thousands)   (percentage of revenue)
    2004
  2003
  2002
  2004
  2003
  2002
Salaries and benefits
  $ 59,593     $ 58,170     $ 57,864       24.2 %     24.8 %     25.2 %
Occupancy
    30,563       29,194       28,207       12.4       12.5       12.3  
Provision for loan losses and doubtful accounts
    24,235       22,892       22,064       9.8       9.8       9.6  
Depreciation
    7,563       6,966       7,180       3.1       3.0       3.1  
Other:
                                               
Armored and security
    7,954       7,782       7,708       3.2       3.3       3.4  
Returns and cash shorts
    9,350       9,896       10,390       3.8       4.2       4.6  
Information services
    5,860       3,831       1,953       2.4       1.6       0.8  
Bank charges
    5,093       5,314       5,207       2.1       2.3       2.3  
Store supplies
    4,219       4,063       3,995       1.7       1.7       1.7  
Telecommunications
    2,211       3,027       3,845       0.9       1.3       1.7  
Advertising and marketing
    2,072       564       159       0.8       0.2       0.1  
Miscellaneous
    3,307       3,715       3,255       1.3       1.6       1.4  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Other
    40,066       38,192       36,512       16.2       16.2       16.0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total store expense
  $ 162,020     $ 155,414     $ 151,827       65.7 %     66.3 %     66.2 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Average per store expense (including SSM expenses)
  $ 164.6     $ 157.8     $ 152.0                          
Average per store gross margin (including SSM expenses)
  $ 83.2     $ 77.7     $ 75.3                          

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003. Total store and SSM expenses increased as a result of the expenses related to the increased number of stores, and additional loan provision related to the growth in the loan business.

     Salaries and benefits expenses increased because of an increase in employees corresponding with the growth in the number of stores and increased performance bonuses for store operations personnel. Occupancy costs and armored and security expenses combined increased because of the increase in the number stores. Returned checks, net of collections, and cash shortages decreased due to continued improvements in operational procedures and controls. Returned checks, net of

27


Table of Contents

collections, and cash shortages as a percentage of revenues also decreased, to 3.8% in fiscal 2004 from 4.2% in fiscal 2003. Loan loss provision increased primarily due to growth of both the ACE and Republic Bank loan business. The allowance for loan losses of $10.6 million at June 30, 2004, represented 38.3% of gross loans receivable, an increase from the allowance for loan losses of $8.7 million, representing 40.2% of gross loans receivable, at June 30, 2003. Loan losses are charged to this allowance, which is reviewed for adequacy (and may be adjusted) on a quarterly basis. Depreciation expense increased as a result of the increased number of stores and the replacement of store signage throughout Texas. Other store and SSM expenses increased due to incremental lease expense of $1.4 million related to the buyout of 105 self-service machine leases.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002. Total store and SSM expenses increased in fiscal 2003 over fiscal 2002 primarily as a result of increased lease expense related to the addition of over 100 SSMs placed in H&R Block retail offices during the 2003 tax season. Total store and SSM expenses increased slightly as a percentage of revenues in fiscal 2003 from fiscal 2002 due to a reduction in loan fees and interest.

     Salaries and benefits expenses increased due to slightly higher wages and bonuses, offset by improved personnel scheduling and fewer stores. Occupancy costs and armored and security expenses combined increased primarily as a result of maintenance expense related to the SSMs located in the H&R Block offices ($0.6 million) and scheduled increases in lease expense ($0.4 million). Returned checks, net of collections, and cash shortages decreased in fiscal 2003 as compared to fiscal 2002 due to continued improvements in operational procedures and controls. Returned checks, net of collections, and cash shortages as a percentage of revenues also decreased, to 4.2% in fiscal 2003 from 4.5% in fiscal 2002. Loan loss provision increased $0.8 million, or 4%, in fiscal 2003 from fiscal 2002 primarily due to the increase in the number of loans maturing as a result of the our discontinuing loan-related business in Georgia, North Carolina, and Alabama, and our transition from offering the Goleta loans, which ended December 31, 2002, to offering state-regulated short-term loan products. The overall collectability of the short-term loans improved slightly in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002. The allowance for loan losses of $8.7 million at June 30, 2003, represented 40.2% of gross loans receivable, a decrease from the allowance for loan losses of $12.2 million, representing 41.3% of gross loans receivable, at June 30, 2002. Loan losses are charged to this allowance, which is reviewed for adequacy (and may be adjusted) on a quarterly basis. Other store and SSM expenses increased primarily as a result of additional lease costs for the increased number of SSMs placed at H&R Block offices, increases in licensing fees related to the transition to a state-regulated short-term loan products, and increases in advertising expenses.

Other Expenses Analysis

                                                 
    Year Ended June 30,
    (in thousands)   (percentage of revenue)
    2004
  2003
  2002
  2004
  2003
  2002
Region expenses
  $ 19,251     $ 17,056     $ 17,495       7.8 %     7.3 %     7.6 %
Headquarters expenses
    18,681       17,133       16,594       7.6       7.3       7.2  
Franchise expenses
    1,196       1,225       993       0.5       0.5       0.4  
Other depreciation and amortization
    3,893       5,423       7,570       1.6       2.3       3.3  
Interest expense, net
    10,231       16,004       14,934       4.1       6.8       6.5  
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
    4,858       270             2.0       0.1        
Other (income) expenses, net
    (1,893 )     1,314       2,827       (0.8 )     0.6       1.2  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total other expenses
  $ 56,217     $ 58,425     $ 60,413       22.8 %     24.9 %     26.2 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

Region Expenses

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003. Region expenses increased primarily because of increases in salaries and benefits expense resulting from additional staffing in collections, facilities and real estate development related to supporting the growth in the number of stores.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002. Region expenses decreased because of a reduction in salaries and benefits expense resulting from a smaller average number of regional employees throughout the year.

Headquarters Expenses

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003. Headquarters expenses increased $1.5 million in fiscal 2004. Increased salaries and benefits related to the addition of professional personnel (including an assistant vice president of internal audit, a vice president of compliance, chief marketing officer, and general counsel) constituted approximately $1.5 million of the increase; employee-performance bonus expense constituted $0.5 million of the increase; increased professional fees constituted $0.6 million of the increase; and expense related to restricted stock granted under our 1997 Stock Incentive Plan constituted $0.5 million of the increase; and these increases were partially offset by a reduction in legal expenses regarding our prior litigation of $1.7 million.

28


Table of Contents

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002. Headquarters expenses increased $0.5 million in fiscal 2003. Increased salaries and benefits related to the addition of professional personnel near the end of the fiscal year (including an assistant vice president of internal audit, a compliance officer, and chief marketing officer) constituted $0.3 million of the expense increase; employee-performance bonus expense constituted $0.3 million of the increase; telephone expense constituted $0.3 million of the increase; and insurance expense constituted $0.1 million of the increase; and these increases were partially offset by a reduction in legal and professional expenses of $0.3 million.

Franchise Expenses

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003. Franchise expenses relate to the salaries, benefits, and other franchisee support costs for the sales and support personnel in our ACE Franchise Group. Franchise expenses in fiscal 2004 remained unchanged from fiscal 2003.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002. Franchise expenses increased $0.2 million, or 23%, in fiscal 2003 over fiscal 2002 as a result of changes in departmental staffing, and increased travel, legal, and professional expenses.

Other Depreciation and Amortization

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003. Other depreciation and amortization decreased because of the decrease in the amount of debt financing costs amortized in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002. Other depreciation and amortization decreased because of the decrease in the amount of debt financing costs amortized in fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002.

Interest Expense

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003. Interest expense decreased because of reductions in the effective interest rates on the term debt and revolving advances after the amendment of the credit agreement in March 2003 and the repayment of the term debt in May 2004, along with lower interest expense from lower average revolver advances and term note balances during fiscal 2004.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002. Interest expense increased because of an increase in the effective interest rate on the term debt ($2.5 million) and higher interest and cash usage fees for the increase of more than 100 SSMs at H&R Block offices ($1.5 million), which were partially offset by lower interest expense from lower average revolver advances and term note balances ($2.4 million) and lower interest paid on senior secured notes payable ($0.5 million).

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003. In May 2004, we used the net proceeds from our sale of shares of common stock to repay the entire principal amount outstanding of our term notes issued to American Capital Strategies, Ltd. We paid a cash prepayment fee of approximately $700,000 and incurred a non-cash charge of approximately $4.1 million related to the write-off of deferred financing fees associated with those notes. There was no expense or payment related to the termination of the interest rate swap agreement associated with those notes.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002. In March 2003, immediately before executing our amended credit agreement and note purchase agreement, we prepaid the remaining $4 million principal installment of our 9.03% Senior Secured Notes due November 15, 2003 that were issued to Principal Life Insurance Company in November 1996. The total of $4.3 million that we paid to discharge those notes included accrued and unpaid interest and a prepayment premium of $270,000 under the terms of the agreement with Principal Life Insurance Company.

29


Table of Contents

Other (Income) Expenses, Net

                         
    Year Ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
    (in thousands)
Gain on sale of warrants issued by Netspend Corporation
  $ (1,049 )   $     $  
Settlements (1)
    (138 )     5,750       1,984  
Insurance recovery resulting from claims related to the Goleta loan-related lawsuits
          (4,700 )      
Gain on sale of stores to franchisees
    (649 )     (888 )      
Store lease buyout (2)
    (450 )            
Store closing expense
    410       534       1,029  
Gain on sale of land in North Carolina
    (95 )            
Loss on liquidation of ePacific investment
          703        
Restructure provision
                (163 )
Other
    78       (85 )     (23 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total other (income) expenses, net
    ($1,893 )   $ 1,314     $ 2,827  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

(1)   Fiscal 2004 consists of $106,000 for additional administrative costs related to the settlement of substantially all claims in the Goleta loan-related lawsuits, $190,000 for a state regulatory settlement and the recovery of $434,000 resulting from the settlement of the Silverman lawsuit. Fiscal 2003 consists of a $5 million charge for settlement and release of substantially all claims in the Goleta loan-related lawsuits and payments of $500,000 and $250,000 to resolve state and federal regulatory matters, respectively.

(2)   We received payment to terminate a store lease in Arizona to allow another retailer to occupy the location.

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003. In each of fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003, we recognized a gain on sale of certain stores to franchisees and expense incurred in connection with closing certain other stores. The net amount of these two components in fiscal 2004 were less than the amounts in fiscal 2003. Otherwise, the components of Other (income) expense differed in those two fiscal years. Over half of the Other (income) in fiscal 2004 consisted of gain from the exercise of a warrant to purchase shares of common stock of NetSpend Corporation and the sale of those shares. We received that warrant in January 2004 in connection with entering into an agreement with NetSpend to distribute stored-value or debit cards at our stores. We exercised that warrant and sold the shares in May 2004. In addition, in fiscal 2004, we received a payment to terminate a store lease in Arizona to allow another retailer to occupy that location.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002. Other expenses decreased by $1.2 million in fiscal 2003 from fiscal 2002 due primarily to a decrease in the expenses of settling various lawsuits after giving effect to the insurance recovery related to the Goleta loan-related lawsuits, and a decrease in store closing expense.

Income Taxes

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003. A provision of $11.4 million was recorded for income taxes for fiscal 2004, compared to $8.5 million for fiscal 2003. The provision for income taxes was calculated based on a statutory federal income tax rate of 35%, plus a provision for state income taxes. The effective income tax rate was 40.0% for both fiscal 2004 and 2003.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002. A provision of $8.5 million was recorded for income taxes for fiscal 2003, compared to $6.9 million for fiscal 2002. The provision for income taxes was calculated based on a statutory federal income tax rate of 35%, plus a provision for state income taxes. The effective income tax rate was 40.0% for fiscal 2003 compared to 40.6% for fiscal 2002.

Gain on Sale of Discontinued Operations

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002. We sold 19 underperforming stores in Florida in late-November 2002 for a pre-tax gain of $0.8 million and an after-tax gain of $0.5 million. The operating results of the 19 stores had no material impact on current or historical net income or cash flow for or during the years ended June 30, 2003 or 2002.

Balance Sheet Variations

     Cash and cash equivalents, money orders payable and revolving advances vary because of seasonal and day-to-day requirements resulting primarily from maintaining cash for cashing checks and making small consumer loans, receipts of cash from the sale of money orders and remittances on money orders sold, receipts of cash for wire transfers, and remittances for wire transfers and receipts of cash for electronic bill payments and remittances for bill payments. During fiscal 2004, we also we completed a public offering of 2,411,622 shares of our common stock at an offering price of $27.00 per share. We

30


Table of Contents

used the net proceeds of approximately $61.4 million from our sale of shares in the offering to repay in full the outstanding amount (approximately $30.4 million of principal and interest) of our senior subordinated secured promissory notes issued to American Capital Strategies, Ltd. With that repayment, we also paid a cash prepayment fee of approximately $700,000. We also incurred non-cash charges in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 of approximately $4.1 million related to the write-off of deferred financing fees associated with those notes. After repayment of those notes, we used the remaining net proceeds to pay down our revolving credit facilities pending use for general corporate purposes, including potential acquisitions, capital expenditures and working capital. For the year ended June 30, 2004, cash and cash equivalents increased $14.9 million, compared to a decrease of $8.2 million for year ended June 30, 2003.

     Accounts receivable, net, at June 30, 2004 decreased $3.9 million from June 30, 2003 primarily due to collection of the $4.7 million receivable recorded in June 2003 related to the recovery of insurance claims regarding the Goleta loan-related lawsuits, partially offset by increases in receivables from Republic Bank related to growth in their loan product currently offered at certain of our stores.

     Loans receivable, net, at June 30, 2004 increased $4.0 million from June 30, 2003 due to the increased volume of our loan product. As of June 30, 2004, we offered our loan product in 561 of our company-owned stores, compared to 512 company-owned stores as of June 30, 2003. Loans receivable, net, does not include any of the Republic Bank deferred-deposit loans available through our stores in Arkansas, Pennsylvania and Texas, because we serve only as marketing and servicing agent for Republic Bank regarding those loans and do not acquire or own any participation interest in any of those loans. Our agreement with Republic Bank provides for us to receive agency fees from Republic Bank, though such fees are subject to reduction or offset by the losses from uncollected Republic Bank loans.

     Property and equipment, net, at June 30, 2004 decreased $1.6 million from June 30, 2003 as a result of depreciation expense ($8.8 million) and fixed asset retirements ($0.8 million), offset by fixed asset additions of $8.0 million (including $0.6 million for capitalized software development.) Goodwill, net, at June 30, 2004 increased $6.1 million from June 30, 2003 as a result of the 34 stores acquired during fiscal 2004.

     Other assets at June 30, 2004 decreased $4.6 million from June 30, 2003 as a result of the write-off of deferred financing costs related to the senior subordinated secured notes to American Capital Strategies, Ltd. that were paid in full in May 2004.

     Revolving advances at June 30, 2004 decreased by $23.9 million from June 30, 2003 due to reduced average daily usage of the revolving credit facility, which in turn resulted from continued improvements in cash forecasting and operational procedures regarding store cash deliveries and more efficient management of working capital during fiscal 2004, along with the use of the net proceeds from our sale of common stock.

     Accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and other current liabilities at June 30, 2004 decreased by $8.1 million from June 30, 2003, as indicated by the following:

                         
    For the Year Ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
  Change
    (in thousands)
Accrued salaries and benefits
  $ 9,782     $ 7,675     $ 2,107  
Accounts payable – trade
    8,911       10,857       (1,946 )
Money transfer payable
    2,132       4,223       (2,091 )
Deferred revenue
    1,900       1,322       578  
Income taxes payable
    1,621       106       1,515  
Payable to Republic Bank
    1,584       6,773       (5,189 )
Accrued self-service machine write-off
    1,400             1,400  
Interest-rate swap
          398       (398 )
Deferred gain on sale of stores
    159             159  
Interest payable
    138       423       (285 )
Accrued litigation
    104       5,139       (5,035 )
Restructuring accrual
    28       203       (175 )
Other
    4,919       3,637       1,282  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 32,678     $ 40,756       ($8,078 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

     Term advances decreased by a total of $38.3 million at June 30, 2004, as compared to June 30, 2003, as the result of the repayment of the notes to American Capital Strategies, Ltd. in May 2004 with net proceeds of our sale of shares and free cash flow.

31


Table of Contents

Loan Portfolio

     We have established a loan loss allowance for our loans receivable, consisting of our short-term consumer loans and, only until June 30, 2003, our participation interests in outstanding Goleta loans, at a level that our management believes to be adequate to absorb known or probable losses from short-term consumer loans made by us and from our participation interests in outstanding Goleta loans. In the first six months of fiscal 2003, we gradually ceased to offer Goleta loans and began to offer state-regulated short-term consumer loans at our owned stores. As of December 31, 2002, Goleta loans were no longer offered at any of our stores, though we continued to collect outstanding Goleta loans until June 30, 2003. Because our short-term consumer loans are substantially similar to the Goleta loans formerly offered, our method for determining our loan loss allowance for both types of loans is the same.

     Our current policy for determining the loan loss allowance is based on historical experience, as well as the results of management’s review and analysis of the payment and collection of the loans within the last fiscal quarter. We have determined, based on recent operating history, that we receive payment of approximately 94.5% (for loans maturing in the first, second and fourth fiscal quarters) or 95.5% (for loans maturing during tax refund season in the third fiscal quarter) of the loan volume, or principal amount of the loans. Therefore, the loan loss allowance is approximately 5.5% of the principal amount of the loans maturing in the first, second and fourth fiscal quarters and approximately 4.5% of the principal amount of the loans maturing in the third fiscal quarter. Our policy is to charge off all of our short-term consumer loans, or participation interests in Goleta loans, which are 180 days or more past due or delinquent. Charge-offs are applied as a reduction to the loan loss allowance, and any recoveries of previously charged-off loans or participation interests in Goleta loans are applied as an increase to the loan loss allowance.

     At the end of each fiscal quarter, we analyze the loan loss provision and the allowance that has been computed based on the activity described above to determine if the allowance is adequate based on our understanding of what is occurring in the stores with customers, past loan loss experience, current economic conditions, volume and growth of the loan portfolio, timing of maturity, as well as collections experience. For this purpose, we treat each renewal of a loan in which no additional principal is advanced as a continuation of the initial loan and we include only our participation interests in the Goleta loans instead of the entire amount of the Goleta loans. If necessary, we make adjustments to the provision and the allowance.

     An analysis of the loan loss allowance with reference to our gross loans receivable (which does not include any Republic Bank loans) is as follows:

                 
    Year Ended June 30,
    2004
  2003
    (in thousands)
Gross loans receivable
  $ 27,663     $ 21,734  
Less: Allowance for losses on loans receivable
    10,616       8,734  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Loans receivable, net of allowance
  $ 17,047     $ 13,000  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Allowance for losses on loans receivable:
               
Beginning of period
  $ 8,734     $ 12,213  
Provision for loan losses
    16,890       19,361  
Charge-offs
    (15,295 )     (23,729 )
Recoveries
    287       889  
 
   
 
     
 
 
End of period
  $ 10,616     $ 8,734  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net loan charge-offs as a percent of volume
    4.1 %     5.4 %
Allowance as a percent of gross loans receivable
    38.3 %     40.2 %

     The schedule below indicates the progression of receipts or collections of each “quarterly portfolio” of loans, consisting of both our short-term consumer loans and participation interests in Goleta loans. In this case, a “quarterly portfolio” is our interests in all of the loans that matured in a particular fiscal quarter. We can track the payment rates at different points of time for each quarterly portfolio.

     We have established the following targets regarding each quarterly portfolio:

  Receive or collect 91% (or 93% in our third fiscal quarter) of the total volume, or principal amount of loans, by the end of the current quarter (i.e., by December 31 for the short-term consumer loans maturing between October 1 and December 31).

  Receive or collect a cumulative 92.9% (or 94.5% in our third fiscal quarter) by 90 days out (i.e., by March 31 for the same quarterly portfolio).

32


Table of Contents

  Receive or collect a cumulative 94.5% (or 95.5% in our third fiscal quarter) by 180 days out (i.e., by June 30 for the same quarterly portfolio). We charge-off our short-term consumer loans when they become delinquent for 180 days.

     The assumed higher rate of payment in our third fiscal quarter is a result of improved collections during the annual tax season because of borrowers’ receipt of tax refunds.

Collection Progression for Quarterly Loan Portfolios

                                 
    Collection Percentage
            Actual
Days Following Quarter
  Target
  Fiscal 2004
  Fiscal 2003
  Fiscal 2002
    First Quarter
30
    91.0 %     92.8 %     92.4 %     91.4 %
90
    92.9 %     94.9 %     94.7 %     93.3 %
180
    94.5 %     95.1 %     95.1 %     94.5 %
    Second Quarter
30
    91.0 %     93.9 %     93.1 %     92.9 %
90
    92.9 %     95.5 %     95.9 %     95.0 %
180
    94.5 %     95.8 %     96.1 %     95.8 %
    Third Quarter
30
    93.0 %     94.7 %     93.5 %     94.4 %
90
    94.5 %     96.0 %     95.9 %     96.1 %
180
    95.5 %             96.1 %     96.5 %
    Fourth Quarter
30
    91.0 %     93.2 %     93.4 %     92.4 %
90
    92.9 %             95.4 %     95.1 %
180
    94.5 %             95.6 %     95.4 %

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement with Republic Bank

     We are party to a marketing and servicing agreement with Republic Bank. Under this agreement, we provide various services to Republic Bank in connection with our marketing and servicing of Republic Bank’s short-term consumer loans in exchange for which we are paid fees by Republic Bank. We also earn additional fees if Republic Bank’s quarterly loan loss rate for these short-term consumer loans is below specified levels. As of June 30, 2004, Republic Bank was offering its Republic Bank loans in 359 of our company-owned stores in Arkansas, Pennsylvania and Texas. Approximately $24.0 million, or 9.7% of our total revenues, in fiscal 2004 and approximately $9.0 million, or 3.9% of our total revenues, in fiscal 2003 were derived from fees paid to us by Republic Bank.

     Although we market and service these Republic Bank loans, Republic Bank is responsible for reviewing each loan application and determining whether such application is approved for a loan. We are not involved in the loan approval process, including with respect to determining the loan approval procedures or criteria, nor do we acquire or own any participation interest in these loans. Consequently, Republic Bank loans are not included in our loan portfolio or in our loans receivable and are not reflected on our balance sheet. Under our agreement, however, we are obligated to reimburse Republic Bank by paying it an amount equal to the net amount charged off by Republic Bank, less Republic Bank’s established reserves, regarding its loans in our stores. Therefore, we could be obligated to pay Republic Bank for loan losses in an amount up to the total outstanding amount of Republic Bank loans recorded on Republic Bank’s financial statements, which was $9.4 million as of June 30, 2004.

     Because of our economic exposure for losses related to the Republic Bank loans, we have established a payable to reflect our anticipated losses related to uncollected Republic Bank loans that are 180 days or more past due. Though we have not had any long-term experience with Republic Bank loans, we believe that the loss experience with Republic Bank loans will be similar to the loss experience with those other loans. Accordingly, the payable for amounts due to Republic Bank for losses regarding Republic Bank loans has been established at a level similar to the loan loss allowance for our other loan services. We cannot assure you, however, that our estimates will be accurate, and if the Republic Bank loan losses are materially greater than our recorded amount payable to Republic Bank, our financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

33


Table of Contents

     For the year ended June 30, 2004, we provided approximately $7.4 million for losses on Republic Bank loans and charged-off $6.5 million related to these loans. The balance of the liability for Republic Loan losses reported in accrued liabilities as of June 30, 2004 was $0.7 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

     During fiscal 2004, 2003, and 2002, we had net cash provided by operating activities of $25.6 million, $34.7 million, and $18.4 million, respectively. The decrease in cash flows provided from operating activities in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003 was due to a combination of payments of the settlement of the Goleta loan-related lawsuits at the end of fiscal 2003 and a reduction in the liabilities to various agents including MoneyGram and Republic Bank.

     During fiscal 2004, 2003, and 2002, we recognized $2.0 million, $2.2 million, and $2.2 million, respectively, in deferred revenue. The MoneyGram Agreement provides incentive bonuses for opening new locations at which MoneyGram services are offered as well as certain other performance incentives. Incentive bonuses are recognized as revenue over the term of the agreement. (See “Business – Relationships with the Money Order and MoneyGram Suppliers.”)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

     During fiscal 2004, 2003, and 2002, we used $8.0 million, $4.8 million, and $7.1 million, respectively, for purchases of property and equipment related principally to new store openings and remodeling existing stores. Expenditures related to acquisitions were $6.4 million, $0.7 million, and $1.2 million, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

     During fiscal 2004, we had net cash provided by financing activities of $3.6 million. During fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, we had net cash used by financing activities of $38.8 million and $23.0 million, respectively. Since June 30, 2003, we reduced the money orders payable by $2.4 million, reduced the balance of the revolving advances by $23.9 million, and reduced the balance of the term advances by $38.3 million. The average amount borrowed on our revolving line-of-credit facility was $81.0 million for fiscal 2004, compared to $96.3 million for fiscal 2003.

     In April 2004, we completed an underwritten registered public offering of 2,411,622 shares of our common stock at an offering price of $27.00 per share. We used the net proceeds from our sale of shares in the offering, totaling approximately $61.4 million, to repay in full the outstanding amount (approximately $30.4 million of principal and interest) of our senior subordinated secured promissory notes issued to American Capital Strategies, Ltd. With that repayment, we also paid a cash prepayment fee of approximately $700,000. There was no income or expense resulting from the termination of the interest-rate swap agreement associated with those notes. After repayment of those notes, we used the remaining net proceeds to pay down our revolving credit facilities pending use for general corporate purposes, including potential acquisitions, capital expenditures and working capital.

Certain Contractual Cash Commitments

     During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, we repaid approximately $30.4 million of principal and interest under our senior subordinated secured notes. The table below summarizes our cash obligations for certain leases and acquisition notes payable outstanding as of June 30, 2004:

                                         
            Payments Due by June 30,
                                    2008 and
    Total
  2005
  2006
  2007
  Thereafter
    (in thousands)
Operating leases
  $ 42,882     $ 17,767     $ 12,506     $ 7,644     $ 4,965  
Acquisition notes payable
    108       33       36       39        
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 42,990     $ 17,800     $ 12,542     $ 7,683     $ 4,965  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

     As part of our growth strategy, we intend to open new stores in existing and new markets. During fiscal 2004, we opened 53 company-owned stores, including 11 ACE Cash Advance stores. We expect to open approximately 60 new company-owned stores, resulting in a net gain of approximately 40 to 45 company-owned stores, in fiscal 2005.

34


Table of Contents

     The capital cost of opening a new store varies depending on the size and type of store, but is typically in the range of $65,000 to $75,000. This capital cost includes leasehold improvements, signage, computer equipment and security systems. MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. pays us a cash incentive for each new location opened, which is accounted for as deferred revenue that is recognized over the remaining life of the MoneyGram Agreement. In addition, the typical store requires working capital of $80,000 to $100,000 to fund operating cash and the store’s loan portfolio.

     For the year ended June 30, 2004, we spent $8.0 million on capital expenditures. Our total capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, are anticipated to be approximately $15.0 million during our fiscal year ending June 30, 2005, in connection with the opening of 60 new stores, the relocation or remodeling of certain existing stores, maintenance, and ongoing upgrades of our information system. The actual amount of capital expenditures will depend in part on the number of new stores opened, the number of stores acquired, and the number of existing stores that are relocated or remodeled. We believe that our existing resources, anticipated cash flows from operations, and credit facilities will be sufficient to finance its anticipated capital expenditures and operational requirements during fiscal 2005. The 60 new stores, after closings and dispositions, will require approximately $4.0 million of working capital to fund operating cash and additions to our loan portfolio.

Existing Credit Facilities

     Our existing credit facilities are provided under a First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with a syndicate of banks led by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent for itself and the other lenders thereunder. The existing credit agreement, which we entered into on July 30, 2004, amended and restated the credit agreement that we originally entered into on March 31, 2003 and that was effective (as amended) throughout fiscal 2004, as described under “— Fiscal 2004 Credit Facilities” below.

     The existing credit agreement provides two revolving line-of-credit facilities that expire June 30, 2008:

  a $140 million primary revolving credit facility that is available throughout the four-year term ; and

  a $60 million seasonal revolving credit facility that is available during each calendar-year-end holiday and tax season (i.e., December 15 through March 15) during the four-year term.

     The revolving line-of-credit facilities include, subject to certain conditions, a letter-of-credit facility from Wells Fargo Bank of up to $10 million.

     Borrowings under the existing credit agreement bear interest at a variable annual rate equal to, at our discretion, either:

  The sum of (a) the greatest of (i) the prime rate publicly announced by Wells Fargo Bank, (ii) one percent plus the rate of interest on the secondary market for three-month certificates of deposit reported by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Board of Governors”), multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is one and the denominator of which is one minus the maximum reserve percentages required by the Board of Governors to which Wells Fargo Bank is subject for new negotiable nonpersonal time deposits in dollars of over $100,000 with maturities of approximately three months plus the annual assessment rate that is payable by a member of the Bank Insurance Fund classified as “well capitalized,” and (iii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%; plus (b) a margin that varies from 1.25% to 2.25% per annum based on our debt-to- EBITDA ratio. (For this ratio, “EBITDA” is our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.) This interest rate adjusts on a daily basis.

  The sum of (a) the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) for (at our discretion) one-, two-, three- or six-month maturities, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is one and the denominator of which is one minus the maximum reserve percentages required by the Board of Governors to which Wells Fargo Bank is subject for Eurocurrency funding, plus (b) a margin that varies from 2.25% to 3.25% per annum based on our debt-to-EBITDA ratio. This interest rate adjusts, at our discretion, at one-, two-, three-, or six-month intervals, in accordance with the corresponding LIBOR.

  The sum of (a) LIBOR for one-month maturities, plus (b) a margin that varies from 2.25% to 3.25% per annum based on our debt-to-EBITDA ratio. This interest rate adjusts on a daily basis.

     We have initially selected the third alternative described above as the annual interest rate for our current borrowings, and as of the end of September 2004, that interest rate will be calculated using LIBOR plus 2.25%, which was the margin that the lenders agreed we could use when our debt-to-EBITDA ratio is calculated upon delivery of this Report. Upon an event of default under the existing credit agreement, the applicable annual interest rate is increased by three hundred basis points.

     Interest on the outstanding principal amount borrowed under the existing credit agreement is payable monthly. The

35


Table of Contents

outstanding principal amount borrowed and all interest accrued under the primary revolving line-of-credit facility is payable on June 30, 2008. The outstanding principal amount and all interest accrued under the seasonal revolving line-of-credit facility is payable on March 15 of each year. At the end of each fiscal quarter, beginning September 30, 2004, we must pay the lenders a commitment fee equal to 0.5% per annum of the average daily unused portion of the credit available under the existing credit agreement (which is the unused portion of the $140 million throughout the year and the unused portion of the $60 million seasonal facility from December 15 through March 15 each year). We must also pay Wells Fargo Bank an annual agency fee of $60,000 in advance on each July 30. We paid $1.2 million in arrangement fees and up-front fees relating to the existing credit agreement. We may (a) at any time reduce, in whole or in part (in $5 million increments), the available amount of the credit facilities provided in the existing credit agreement and (b) subject to certain conditions, prepay, in whole or in part, the revolving credit facilities provided by the existing credit agreement without penalty or premium.

     The existing credit agreement may be terminated before the stated expiration or maturity date of the revolving credit facilities — requiring all unpaid principal and accrued interest to be paid to the lenders — upon any “event of default” as defined in the existing credit agreement. The events of default in the existing credit agreement include (a) nonpayment of amounts due under the existing credit agreement, (b) the failure to observe or perform covenants set forth in the existing credit agreement and in the documents ancillary thereto that are not cured, (c) a change in control of us, and (d) any event or circumstance that has a material adverse effect on the collateral secured under the existing credit agreement or on our business, assets, liabilities, condition (financial or otherwise), or prospects.

     We are subject to various restrictive covenants stated in the existing credit agreement. Those restrictive covenants, which are typical of those found in credit agreements of these types, include restrictions on the incurrence of indebtedness from other sources, restrictions on advances to or investments in other persons or entities, restrictions on the payment of dividends to shareholders and on the repurchase of shares, and the requirement that various financial ratios be maintained. Certain of the covenants in the existing credit agreement require us:

  to limit our capital expenditures during each fiscal year to $20 million;

  to limit any single acquisition of assets or capital stock of an entity in the retail financial services business to a purchase price of no more than $10 million and to assets or entities that have a positive cash flow for the 12 months preceding such acquisition, unless otherwise agreed upon by the lenders;

  to reduce our risk of increases in interest rates by entering into one or more interest-rate swap agreements to convert to fixed-rate obligations our floating- or variable-rate interest obligations with respect to the lesser of (a) $30 million and (b) 50% of the average amount of the unpaid loans outstanding during the prior month; and

  to maintain the following financial coverage ratios:

-   our consolidated net worth at any time cannot be less than $133.7 million plus 75% of all net income earned in a calendar quarter, without deduction for any quarterly losses, plus 100% of the proceeds of any equity offering;
 
-   at the end of any fiscal quarter, our debt-to-EBITDA ratio cannot be more than 2.75-to-1.00 through December 31, 2005 and 2.50-to-1.00 thereafter;
 
-   at the end of each fiscal quarter, our cash flow coverage ratio cannot be less than 1.25-to-1.00.

     The payment and performance of our obligations under the existing credit agreement and the documents ancillary thereto are secured by liens on all or substantially all of our and its subsidiaries’ (other than Ace Funding, LLC’s) assets. All of our subsidiaries (other than Ace Funding, LLC) guaranteed our obligations under the existing credit agreement. The collateral arrangements entered into by us and our guarantor subsidiaries are substantially similar for each of Wells Fargo Bank, as administrative agent for the lenders, and Travelers Express Company, Inc., which has a subordinate lien to secure the payment and performance of our obligations under the money order agreement and under the MoneyGram Agreement. We and all of our secured creditors or agents for them entered into a First Amended and Restated Intercreditor Agreement dated as of July 30, 2004 that includes agreements regarding the priority of distributions to the lenders and Travelers Express upon foreclosure and liquidation of the collateral subject to the security agreements executed by us and our guarantor subsidiaries and certain other intercreditor arrangements. This intercreditor agreement replaced the Intercreditor Agreement dated as of March 31, 2003, as amended, that was in effect with our prior credit agreement.

Fiscal 2004 Credit Facilities

     During the year ended June 30, 2004, we were party to:

  a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks led by Wells Fargo Bank Texas, National Association, as administrative agent for itself and other lenders, that provided for revolving credit facilities of up to $175 million; and

36


Table of Contents

  a note purchase agreement with American Capital Financial Services, Inc., as agent for its affiliate American Capital Strategies, Ltd., in the amount of $40 million of our senior subordinated secured promissory notes.

     The terms of those agreements are described in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As described above, the bank credit agreement was amended and restated on July 30, 2004, and the notes issued to American Capital Strategies, Ltd. were fully repaid in May 2004.

     As of June 30, 2004, we had borrowed $60 million under our revolving line-of-credit facility. The average amount borrowed on our revolving line-of-credit facility was $81.0 million and $96.3 million for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The prime rate effective on June 30, 2004 was 4.25% and LIBOR effective on that date was 1.375%.

Swap Agreements

     To reduce our risk of greater interest expense because of interest-rate fluctuations, we enter into interest-rate swap agreements from time to time, which effectively convert a portion of our floating-rate interest obligations to fixed-rate interest obligations.

     On April 23, 2003, we entered into an interest-rate swap agreement with JP Morgan Chase Bank, regarding a notional amount of $60 million, associated with the revolving advance facility under our bank credit agreement, to be effective until March 31, 2006. On May 31, 2004, the notional amount was reduced from $60 million to $30 million and will increase to $45 million on January 1, 2005. The fixed rate effective on June 30, 2004, prior to adding the applicable margin, was 1.715%.

     On June 2, 2003, we entered into an interest-rate swap agreement with National City Bank regarding a notional amount of $20 million, corresponding to our term notes, to be effective until March 31, 2006. In May 2004, we paid the notes in full and terminated the swap agreement. There was no material gain or loss recorded as a result of the swap termination.

Self-Service Machine Funding Arrangements

     We placed 219 of our self-service check cashing machines in certain retail offices of H&R Block Tax Services, Inc. during the 2004 tax season. In accordance with our existing multi-year license agreement between with H&R Block, the self-service machines are made available to cash only tax refund anticipation loan checks of H&R Block customers.

     For the 2004 tax season, we had the right to obtain a maximum of $330 million of cash or currency for the self-service machines placed in the H&R Block retail offices through two arrangements. One of the arrangements, originally entered into on January 7, 2003 and amended on December 22, 2003, was with Ace Funding LLC, our wholly owned subsidiary, as borrower, DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank Frankfurt am Main, a German bank, as arranger and liquidity agent, and Autobahn Funding Company LLC, as lender. The other arrangement, which was entered into on December 30, 2003, was with Texas Capital Bank, National Association, a national bank that is a subsidiary of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.

     In accordance with the first amendment to the existing agreement among us, Ace Funding, DZ Bank and Autobahn Funding, up to a $190 million revolving line-of-credit facility was made available to Ace Funding to provide the cash or currency to certain of the self-service machines in H&R Block retail offices during the 2004 tax season. For financial reporting purposes, Ace Funding is our consolidated subsidiary and all borrowings by Ace Funding under this arrangement, all amounts paid by Ace Funding under this arrangement and all check cashing fees received by us from the self-service machines subject to this arrangement will be reflected in our consolidated financial statements.

     Under the cash services agreement with Texas Capital Bank for the 2004 tax season, we had available up to $140 million in cash or currency for certain of the self-service machines in H&R Block retail offices. For the use of Texas Capital Bank’s cash, as well as corresponding transportation and custodial services provided by the bank, we agreed to pay fees to the bank that vary depending on the volume of checks cashed in the self-service machines and our use of corresponding services. The cash in the self-service machines, as well as the cashed checks deposited in the self-service machines in exchange for that cash, are not our assets but assets of Texas Capital Bank. Under the cash services agreement, our access to the cash or currency was subject to any need of the bank for that property for its own business or purposes. We agreed to maintain, during the term of this agreement (i.e., the 2004 tax season), a deposit account at Texas Capital Bank of at least $1 million, pledged as assurance of our performance of our obligations under the cash services agreement. We are entitled to all of the check cashing fees earned from the self-service machines subject to this arrangement upon the expiration of this agreement, subject to and after the payment to the bank of all amounts to which it is entitled. This agreement expired on March 31, 2004.

37


Table of Contents

Effects of Financing Arrangements

     We believe that our long-term credit facilities under the existing credit agreement, our funding arrangements for the self-service machines in H&R Block offices during the tax season and our anticipated cash flows from operations will provide adequate working capital for our operations. Although the credit agreement places restrictions on capital expenditures and acquisitions, we believe that these restrictions do not prohibit us from pursuing our growth strategy as currently planned.

Stock Repurchase Program

     In fiscal 2000, our board of directors authorized the repurchase from time to time of up to approximately $5 million of our common stock in the open market or in negotiated transactions. During fiscal 2000 and 2001, we repurchased 211,400 shares at an average price of $12.81 per share. During fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, no shares were repurchased. This stock repurchase program will remain in effect, however, until discontinued by our board of directors.

Litigation Expenses

     We have been required in the past to defend ourselves and, in some matters, our directors, officers and others in various lawsuits and state regulatory proceedings regarding our current and past loan-related activities. We incurred significant legal expenses in conducting that defense. In accordance with our bylaws, we paid the expenses of defense for our directors, officers and other employees named as additional defendants in these lawsuits. We also paid, in accordance with our agreement with Goleta National Bank, all of the expenses of Goleta as a party in these proceedings. We expensed an additional $0.1 million during fiscal 2004 for administrative expenses related to the settlement of the Purdie lawsuit.

Critical Estimates, Uncertainties or Assessments in the Financial Statements

Critical Estimates, Uncertainties or Assessments in the Financial Statements

     The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. In applying the accounting principles, we must often make individual estimates and assumptions regarding expected outcomes or uncertainties. As might be expected, the actual results or outcomes are generally different than the estimated or assumed amounts. These differences are usually minor and are included in our consolidated financial statements as soon as they are known. Estimates, judgments and assumptions are continually evaluated based on available information and experience. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.

     Actual results related to the estimates and assumptions made in preparing our consolidated financial statements will emerge over periods of time, such as estimates and assumptions underlying the determination of allowance for loan losses and self-insurance liabilities. These estimates and assumptions are monitored and periodically adjusted as circumstances warrant. For instance, our liability for self-insurance related to workers’ compensation, general liability and medical liability may be adjusted based on higher or lower actual loss experience. Although there is greater risk with respect to the accuracy of these estimates and assumptions because of the period over which actual results may emerge, such risk is mitigated by the ability to make changes to these estimates and assumptions over the same period.

     We periodically review the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets when events and circumstances warrant such a review. One of the methods used for this review is performed using estimates of future cash flows. If the carrying value of goodwill or other intangible assets is considered impaired, an impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the goodwill or intangible assets exceeds its fair value. We believe that the estimates of future cash flows and fair value are reasonable. Changes in estimates of such cash flows and fair value, however, could affect the evaluation.

     Based on an assessment of our accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, we believe that our consolidated financial statements provide a meaningful and fair perspective of us. We do not suggest that other risk factors, such as those discussed elsewhere or incorporated by reference in this prospectus as well as changes in growth objectives, could not adversely impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in future periods.

38


Table of Contents

Seasonality

Our business is seasonal to the extent of the impact of cashing tax refund checks and tax refund anticipation loan checks. The impact of these services is in the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year. Our loan business declines slightly in the third fiscal quarter as a result of the customers’ receipt of tax refund checks and tax refund anticipation loans.

Impact of Inflation

We believe that our results of operations are not dependent upon the levels of inflation.

Forward-looking Statements

     This Report contains, and from time to time we or certain of our representatives may make, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are generally identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “should,” “would,” and terms with similar meanings.

     Although we believe that the current views and expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, those views and expectations, and the related statements, are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are not under our control and may not even be predictable. Those risks, uncertainties, and other factors could cause the actual results to differ materially from these in the forward-looking statements. Those factors are described under “Risk Factors” below.

     We expressly disclaim any obligation to update or revise any of these forward-looking statements, whether because of future events, new information, a change in our views or expectations, or otherwise. We make no prediction or statement about the performance of our common stock.

Risk Factors

     Our current business and future results may be affected by a number of risks and uncertainties, including those described below. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks and uncertainties we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could suffer. The risks discussed below also include forward-looking statements and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have significant existing debt, and the restrictive covenants under our debt agreements may limit our ability to expand or pursue our business strategy. In addition, if we are forced to pay some or all of this debt following an event of default, our financial condition and results of operations would be severely and adversely affected.

     Our business requires significant amounts of cash for services and inventory. Much of that cash is obtained through borrowing. Therefore, we have, and we expect to have, a significant amount of outstanding debt and may incur additional debt in the future as we seek to expand our business. As of June 30, 2004, our short-term debt was $60 million, and we had no material long-term debt.

     Our debt agreements require us to maintain compliance with numerous financial covenants. The covenants restrict our ability to take certain actions to some extent, including our ability to:

  incur additional indebtedness;

  pay dividends and make distributions in respect of our capital stock;

  repurchase our capital stock;

  make capital expenditures;

  make investments or other restricted payments;

39


Table of Contents

  engage in transactions with shareholders and affiliates;

  create liens;

  sell or otherwise dispose of assets;

  make payments on our debt, other than in the ordinary course; and

  engage in mergers and acquisitions.

     As long as our indebtedness remains outstanding, the restrictive covenants could impair our ability to expand or pursue our growth strategy. In addition, the breach of any covenants or any payment obligations in any of these debt agreements will result in an event of default under the applicable debt instrument. If there is an event of default under one of our debt agreements, the holders of the defaulted debt could cause all amounts outstanding with respect to that debt to be due and payable, subject to applicable grace periods. This could trigger cross-defaults under our other debt agreements. We cannot assure you that our assets or cash flow would be sufficient to repay fully borrowings under our outstanding debt agreements if accelerated upon an event of default, or that we would be able to refinance or restructure the payments on any of those debt agreements. Further, if we are unable to repay, refinance or restructure our indebtedness under our secured debt agreements, the lenders under such agreements could proceed against the collateral securing that indebtedness. Substantially all of our assets are pledged to secure the outstanding indebtedness. Forced repayment of some or all of our indebtedness would reduce our available cash and have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our existing and future debt obligations could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition as we may be required to secure additional financing to meet our future capital needs and cannot assure you that we will be able to do so on favorable terms, if at all.

     Our significant amount of debt could have important consequences. For example, it could:

  make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations to the holders of our outstanding debt;

  make us vulnerable to interest rate increases, because a significant portion of our borrowings is, and will continue to be, at variable rates of interest;

  require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt obligations, which will reduce our funds available for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate expenses;

  limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;

  place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors that have proportionately less debt;

  restrict our operational flexibility, because of restrictive covenants that will limit our ability to make acquisitions, explore certain business opportunities, dispose of assets and take other actions; and

  limit our ability to borrow additional funds in the future, if we need them, due to applicable financial and restrictive covenants in our debt agreements.

     If our debt levels increase, the related risks that we face will also increase. If we fail to generate sufficient cash flow from future operations to meet our debt service obligations, we may need to seek refinancing of all or a portion of our indebtedness or obtain additional financing in order to meet our obligations with respect to our indebtedness. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness or obtain additional financing on satisfactory terms or at all, particularly because of our high levels of debt and the debt-incurrence restrictions imposed by our current debt agreements.

If we do not generate a sufficient amount of cash, which depends on many factors beyond our control, our liquidity and our ability to service our indebtedness and fund our operations would be harmed.

     Based on our current level of operations and anticipated revenue growth, we believe our cash flow from operations, available cash, including from the net proceeds of our recent common stock offering, and available borrowings under our credit facilities will be adequate to meet our future liquidity needs. However, we have substantial working capital needs, contractual commitments and debt service obligations. We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that our anticipated revenue growth will be realized or that future borrowings will be available to us

40


Table of Contents

under credit facilities in amounts sufficient to enable us to pay our existing indebtedness or fund our other liquidity needs. In addition, if we undertake expansion efforts in the future, our cash requirements may increase significantly.

The industry in which we operate is strictly regulated at both the federal and state level. Changes in current laws and regulations, or the application of future laws and regulations, may have a significant negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

     Our business is subject to numerous state and certain federal laws and regulations which are subject to change and which may impose significant costs or limitations on the way we conduct or expand our business. These regulations govern or affect, among other things:

  check cashing fees;

  licensing and posting of fees;

  lending practices, such as truth in lending;

  interest rates and usury;

  currency reporting;

  recording and reporting of certain financial transactions;

  franchising in the states in which we offer and sell franchises;

  privacy of personal consumer information; and

  prompt remittance of proceeds for the sale of money orders.

     As we develop new services, we may become subject to additional federal and state regulations. In addition, changes in current laws and future laws or regulations may restrict our ability to continue our current methods of operation or expand our operations and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. States may also seek to impose new licensing requirements or interpret or enforce existing requirements in new ways.

Short-term consumer loan services have come under increased scrutiny and regulation. If the restrictions created by such regulations increase, or if short-term consumer loans become prohibited in the states where we offer these loans, our business would be materially adversely affected.

     A significant portion of our revenues is based on loan interest and fees from short-term consumer loans, also known as payday loans, that we offer in our owned stores. Short-term consumer loans have come under increased scrutiny and regulation in recent years. For example, in October 2002, the Federal Trade Commission sent an Information and Documentation Request to several national companies that offer short-term consumer loans, including us. This industry-wide review may result in recommendations regarding the short-term consumer loan industry or specific conclusions about us, either of which may negatively affect our operations.

     Also, during the last few years, legislation has been introduced in the United States Congress and in certain state legislatures, and regulatory authorities have proposed or publicly addressed the possibility of proposing regulations, that may prohibit or severely restrict short-term consumer loans. For example, in December 2002, we ceased offering short-term consumer loans at our stores in Alabama, Georgia and North Carolina as a result of laws enacted restricting short-term consumer loans in those states. As a result of more recently enacted laws in Alabama permitting short-term consumer loans, we have recently resumed offering short-term consumer loans at our store in that state. We intend to continue, with others in the short-term consumer loan industry, to inform and educate legislators and to oppose legislative or regulatory action that may prohibit or severely restrict short-term consumer loans. Nevertheless, if legislative or regulatory action with that effect were taken on the federal level or in states in which we have a significant number of stores, that action may have a material adverse effect on our loan-related activities and revenues. Moreover, similar action by states in which we are not currently offering short-term consumer loans could result in us having fewer opportunities to pursue our growth strategy.

     In 2002, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which supervises national banks, took action to effectively prohibit certain national banks from offering and making short-term consumer loans because of the agency’s view that they posed various risks to those banks. As a result, we discontinued offering Goleta loans in our stores on December 31, 2002.

41


Table of Contents

     In addition, Republic Bank & Trust Company, a Kentucky state-chartered bank for which we act as marketer and servicer of its short-term consumer loans, is subject to federal and state banking regulations. The State of Kentucky is the primary regulator of Republic Bank, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, is the back-up federal regulator of Republic Bank. If the State of Kentucky or the FDIC were to order Republic Bank to cease or significantly curtail its short-term consumer lending services, our revenues derived from fees from Republic Bank would be adversely affected, unless we could secure an agreement to provide similar services with another bank not subject to similar regulations. We cannot assure you that we would be successful in finding such a replacement bank, especially as arrangements like ours with Republic Bank are coming under increasing political and regulatory scrutiny. Lawsuits filed against banks offering these short-term consumer loans, such as one recently filed by the New York State Attorney General’s office discussed below, may hinder our ability to partner with a replacement bank or to establish relationships with new banks in other states as part of our growth strategy. Any agreement with a replacement bank or new bank may also not be on terms as favorable to us as our current agreement with Republic Bank.

     Republic Bank is also subject to FDIC inspection and authority, and as a result of our marketing servicing activities, we too are subject to such inspection and authority. We cannot assure you that the regulatory scheme affecting Republic Bank, or FDIC inspection or authority with respect to Republic Bank or us, will not negatively impact our operations.

Potential litigation and regulatory proceedings regarding our short-term consumer loans could materially adversely affect our financial condition.

     During the last few years, we and our competitors have been subject to regulatory proceedings, class action lawsuits and other litigation regarding the offering of short-term consumer loans. In our case, such litigation and regulatory proceedings primarily involved attempts by plaintiffs to recharacterize us as the true lender of short-term consumer loans made by Goleta National Bank through our stores, in part because we acquired participations in the Goleta loans. Although our relationship with Goleta has been terminated and we have settled the related class action lawsuit, we cannot assure you that we will not be subject to future lawsuits associated with our short-term consumer loan services.

     In particular, we may become subject to litigation or regulatory proceedings focusing on our relationship with Republic Bank. If we were to be recharacterized as the lender of these Republic Bank loans, then the interest charged for these loans would violate most of the applicable states’ usury laws which impose maximum rates of interest or finance charges that a non-bank lender may charge, and any resulting refunds or penalties we would likely incur would materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. While there are differences between the Goleta loans and the Republic Bank loans, principally that we do not acquire participations in Republic Bank loans, and while we believe we are not the lender under this arrangement with Republic Bank, we cannot assure you that a regulator or a borrower will not try to recharacterize us as the true lender. For example, although we do not offer short-term consumer loans in New York, recently the New York State Attorney General’s office filed a lawsuit against a Delaware state-chartered bank and the companies servicing its short-term consumer loans through a structure that is in some respects similar to our agreement with Republic Bank.

Media reports and public perception of short-term consumer loans as being predatory or abusive could materially adversely affect our business.

     Over the past few years, consumer advocacy groups and certain media reports have advocated governmental action to prohibit or severely restrict short-term consumer loans. The consumer groups and media reports typically focus on the cost to a consumer for this type of loan, which is higher than the interest typically charged by credit card issuers to a more creditworthy consumer. This difference in credit cost is more significant if a consumer does not promptly repay the loan, but renews, or rolls over, that loan for one or more additional short-term periods. The consumer groups and media reports typically characterize these short-term consumer loans as predatory or abusive toward consumers. If this negative characterization of our short-term consumer loan service becomes increasingly accepted by consumers, demand for our short-term consumer loans could significantly decrease, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

     Negative perception of our short-term consumer loans or other activities could also result in us being subject to more restrictive laws and regulations. For example, a short-term consumer loan prohibition law was recently passed by the Georgia state legislature. In addition, we may become subject to lawsuits against us for our short-term consumer loans or the Republic Bank loans. If changes in the laws affecting our short-term consumer loans or the Republic Bank loans are enacted, or if we become subject to such lawsuits, our financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

If our estimates of our loan losses are not adequate to absorb known or probable losses, our financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

42


Table of Contents

     We maintain an allowance for loan losses at levels to cover the anticipated losses in the collection of our loan portfolio. We determine our allowance for loan losses based upon a review of historical loan losses and the loan portfolio. Our allowance for loan losses is periodically reviewed by our management. For the year ended June 30, 2004, our loan loss provision was $16.9 million, and we charged-off $15.0 million related to our loans. Our loan loss provision, however, is an estimate, and if actual loan losses are materially greater than our loan loss provision, our financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

     With respect to the Republic Bank loans, we are obligated to reimburse Republic Bank for loan losses on a quarterly basis. As a result, we could be potentially obligated to pay Republic Bank for loan losses in an amount up to the total outstanding amount of Republic Bank loans recorded on Republic Bank’s financial statements, which was $9.4 million as of June 30, 2004. This amount is not included on our balance sheet. For the year ended June 30, 2004, we provided a payable of approximately $7.4 million for losses on Republic Bank loans and charged-off $6.5 million related to Republic Bank loans. The balance of the liability for Republic Loan losses reported in accrued liabilities as of June 30, 2004 was $0.7 million. The payable to Republic Bank is, however, an estimate. If actual loan losses are materially greater than our recorded amount payable to Republic Bank, our financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

A significant portion of our consumer lending business is derived from our relationship with Republic Bank, and a loss of that relationship could adversely affect our liquidity and profits.

     Under our marketing and servicing agreement with Republic Bank, we provide various services to the bank in connection with our marketing and servicing of Republic Bank’s short-term consumer loans in exchange for which we are compensated by Republic Bank through payment of fees. As of June 30, 2004, Republic Bank was offering its Republic Bank loans in 359 of our company-owned stores in Arkansas, Pennsylvania and Texas. Approximately 9.7% and 3.9% of our total revenues in fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively, were derived from fees paid to us by Republic Bank.

     The FDIC has set limits on the dollar amount of short-term consumer loans Republic Bank can have outstanding at any given time based on its capital. If the FDIC were to reduce these limits or other events involving Republic Bank outside of our control were to occur, our ability to grow this portion of our business could be materially adversely affected. In addition to customary termination provisions, our agreement with Republic Bank can be terminated by either party if the quarterly loan loss rate of Republic Bank loans exceeds a specified level.

     If a termination of or significant adverse change in our relationship with Republic Bank occurred, we could be required to seek replacement relationships with new financial institutions. We cannot assure you that we would be able to secure new relationships or that the terms of any such new relationships would be as favorable to us as those of our existing relationship with Republic Bank. As a result, any significant changes in our relationship with Republic Bank could cause us to change the way we conduct business in certain states or adversely affect our results of operations.

If Republic Bank’s loan approval process is flawed and more loans go uncollected, our revenues could be adversely affected.

     Our agreement with Republic Bank provides for us to market and service Republic Bank’s loans offered at our owned stores. Republic Bank is responsible for reviewing each loan application and determining whether such application is approved for a loan. We are not involved in the loan approval process, including with respect to determining the loan approval procedures or criteria. However, under our agreement with Republic Bank, we are required to reimburse Republic Bank for loan losses on a quarterly basis. If Republic Bank’s loan approval process is flawed and an increased number of loans that are made are uncollected, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

We are subject to franchise law and regulations that govern our status as a franchisor and regulate some aspects of our franchise relationships. Our ability to develop new franchised stores and to enforce contractual rights against franchisees may be adversely affected by these laws and regulations, which could cause our franchise revenues to decline and adversely affect our growth strategy.

     We are subject to federal and state laws and regulations, including the regulations of the Federal Trade Commission as well as similar authorities in individual states, in connection with the offer, sale and termination of franchises and the regulation of the franchisor-franchisee relationship. Our failure to comply with these laws could subject us to liability to franchisees and to fines or other penalties imposed by governmental authorities. In addition, we may become subject to litigation with, or other claims filed with state or federal authorities by, franchisees based on alleged unfair trade practices, implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing, payment of royalties, location of stores, advertising expenditures, franchise renewal criteria or express violations of franchise agreements. We cannot assure you that we will not encounter compliance problems from time to time, or that material disputes will not arise with one or more franchisees. Accordingly, our failure to

43


Table of Contents

comply with applicable franchise laws and regulations, or disputes with franchisees, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations financial condition and growth strategy.

Our current and future business growth strategy involves new store acquisitions and new store openings, and our failure to manage our growth or integrate or manage new store acquisitions may adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

     Our expansion strategy consists principally of combining acquisitions and new store openings (both company-owned and franchised stores) and increasing comparable store sales of existing services. Acquisitions may entail numerous integration risks and impose costs on us, including:

  difficulties in assimilating acquired operations or services, including the loss of key employees from acquired businesses;

  diversion of management’s attention from our core business;

  dilutive issuances of our equity securities (if necessary to finance acquisitions or new stores);

  incurrence of additional indebtedness (if necessary to finance acquisitions or new stores);

  assumption of contingent liabilities;

  the potential impairment of acquired assets; and

  incurrence of significant immediate write-offs.

     Our continued growth is dependent upon a number of factors, including the availability of adequate financing and suitable store locations, acquisition opportunities and experienced management employees, the ability to obtain any required government permits and licenses and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that we will be able to grow our business successfully through acquisitions and new store openings. Our failure to grow or complete the integration of any acquired business could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

If we lose key management or are unable to attract and retain the talent required for our business, our operating results and growth could suffer.

     Our future success depends to a significant degree upon the members of our senior management, particularly Jay Shipowitz, our President and Chief Executive Officer. The loss of the services of Mr. Shipowitz or other members of senior management could harm our business and development. Our continued growth also will depend upon our ability to attract and retain additional skilled management personnel. If we are unable to attract and retain personnel as needed in the future, our operating results and growth could suffer.

Competition in the retail financial services industry is intense and could cause us to lose market share and revenues.

     The industry in which we operate is highly fragmented and very competitive. In addition, we believe that the market will become more competitive as the industry matures and consolidates. We compete with other check cashing stores, short-term consumer lenders, grocery stores, banks, savings and loan institutions, other financial services entities and other retail businesses that also cash checks, offer short-term consumer loans, sell money orders, provide money transfer services, or other similar financial services. Some of our competitors that are not check cashing companies have larger and more established customer bases and substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources. Our stores have also recently been facing competition from automated check cashing machines deployed in supermarkets, convenience stores and other public venues by large financial services organizations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully. As a result, we could lose market share and our revenues could decline, thereby affecting our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to service our indebtedness and fund our operations.

Our revenues and net income from check cashing services may be materially adversely affected if the number of consumer check cashing transactions decreases or the amount of checks we cash that are uncollected significantly increases.

     Historically, over half of our revenues come from our check cashing business. Any changes in economic factors that materially adversely affect consumer transactions could reduce the volume of transactions that we process and have a

44


Table of Contents

material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Recently, there has been increasing penetration of electronic banking services into the check cashing and money transfer industry, including direct deposit of payroll checks and electronic transfer of government benefits. To the extent that checks are replaced with such electronic transfers, demand for our check cashing services could decrease.

     In addition, the risk that we assume upon cashing a check is that the check will be uncollected because of insufficient funds, stop payment orders, or fraud. If the amount of checks we cash that are uncollected increases significantly, our net income will be materially adversely affected.

Our money transfer and money order revenues are derived from a key third-party relationship and a loss of that relationship could adversely affect our liquidity and profits.

     We are a party to a money order agreement with Travelers Express under which we exclusively sell Travelers Express money orders that bear our logo. Under this agreement, we are obligated to make prompt remittances of money order proceeds. We are also an agent for the receipt and transmission of wire transfers of money through the MoneyGram network in accordance with an agreement with Travelers Express and MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc., an affiliate of Travelers Express. We receive significant revenues pursuant to these agreements. Approximately 7.1% and 7.6% of our total revenues in fiscal 2004 and 2003, respectively, were derived from these agreements. Our relationship with Travelers Express and its affiliates is therefore significant to our business. Accordingly, if any disruption in this relationship occurs, it could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and profits.

Any disruption in the availability of our information systems could adversely affect operations at our stores.

     Our information systems include a proprietary point-of-sale system in our stores and a management information system. The personal computer-based point-of-sale system is fully operational in all company-owned stores, is used by our self-service machines for cashing checks and accepting third-party bill payments and is licensed for use by our franchised stores. The management information system is designed to provide summary and detailed information to district managers, regional vice presidents and corporate managers at any time through internet connectivity. Any disruption in the availability of our information systems could affect our operations and could adversely affect our business.

Part of our business is seasonal, which causes our revenues to fluctuate and may adversely affect our ability to service our debt.

     Our business is seasonal to the extent of the impact of cashing tax refund checks and tax refund anticipation loan checks. The impact of these services is primarily in the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year. Also, our short-term loan business declines slightly in the third fiscal quarter as a result of customers’ receipt of tax refund checks and tax refund anticipation loans. This seasonality requires us to manage our cash flows over the course of the year. If our revenues were to fall substantially below what we would normally expect during certain periods, our annual financial results would be adversely impacted and our ability to service our debt may also be adversely affected.

Because we maintain a significant supply of cash in our stores, we may be subject to cash shortages due to employee error and theft.

     Since our business requires us to maintain a significant supply of cash in each of our stores and (during tax season) each of our self-service machines, we are subject to the risk of cash shortages resulting from employee errors and theft. Although we have implemented various procedures and programs to reduce these risks, maintain insurance coverage for theft and provide security for our employees and facilities, we cannot assure you that employee error and theft will not occur. Material occurrences of error and theft could lead to cash shortages and could adversely affect our results of operations.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

The price of our common stock may be volatile.

     In the past three years, stocks listed on the Nasdaq National Market, as our common stock is, have experienced high levels of volatility and significant declines in value from their historic highs. The trading price of our common stock has fluctuated, and may continue to fluctuate, substantially from time to time. The fluctuations could cause you to lose part or all of your investment in our shares of common stock. Those factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock include, but are not limited to, the following:

  price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time,

  significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of financial services companies,

45


Table of Contents

  actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or in the expectations of securities analysts,

  general economic conditions and trends,

  major catastrophic events,

  loss of a significant client or clients,

  sales of large blocks of our stock, or

  departures of key personnel.

     In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. Due to the potential volatility of our stock price, we may therefore be the target of securities litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our business.

Insiders have substantial control over us and could limit your ability to influence the outcome of key transactions, including a change of control.

     As of June 30, 2004, our principal shareholders, directors and executive officers, and entities affiliated with them, owned approximately 15% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. As a result, these shareholders, if acting together, are able to influence or control matters requiring approval by our shareholders, including the election of directors and the approval of mergers, acquisitions or other extraordinary transactions. They may also have interests that differ from yours and may vote in a way with which you disagree and which may be adverse to your interests. The concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change of control of our company, could deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium of their common stock as a party of a sale of our company and might ultimately affect the market price of our common stock.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to financial market risks, particularly including changes in interest rates that might affect the costs of our financing under our existing credit agreement. To mitigate the risks of changes in interest rates, we use derivative financial instruments. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. To reduce our risk of greater interest expense because of interest-rate fluctuations, we have entered into interest-rate swap agreements, which effectively converted a portion of our floating-rate interest obligations to fixed-rate interest obligations, as described in Note 3 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The fair value of our existing interest-rate swaps was ($283,000) as of June 30, 2004. The associated underlying debt has equaled or exceeded the notional amount for each swap throughout the existence of the swap, and we anticipate that it will continue to do so. Each existing swap is based on the same index as, and repriced on a consistent basis with its corresponding underlying debt.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See Part IV, Item 15(a)(1) for information required for this item.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no changes in our internal control over

46


Table of Contents

financial reporting during the year ended June 30, 2004, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the information provided under the caption “Directors and Executive Officers” in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on November 15, 2004 (“our 2004 Proxy Statement”).

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the information provided under the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Stock Performance Chart” in our 2004 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information provided under the captions “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our 2004 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information provided under the caption “Directors and Executive Officers Certain Relationships” in our 2004 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information provided under the caption “Relationships with Independent Certified Public Accountants” in our 2004 Proxy Statement.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

         
(1) Financial Statements.
       
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
    53  
Consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2004 and 2003
    54  
Consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002
    55  
Consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002
    56  
Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002
    57  
Notes to consolidated financial statements
    58  
(2) Financial Statement Schedules.
       
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
    81  
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
    82  

47


Table of Contents

(3) Exhibits.

     
Exhibit Number
  Exhibits
3.1
  Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended through January 31, 1998. (Included as Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q as of December 31, 1997 (Commission File Number 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
3.2
  Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as amended through January 31, 1998. (Included as Exhibit 3.7 to the Company’s Form 10-Q as of December 31, 1997 (Commission File Number 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
3.3
  Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Bylaws dated January 3, 2000. (Included as Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q as of December 31, 1999 (Commission File Number 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
4.1
  Form of Certificate representing shares of Registrant’s Common Stock. (Included as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 33-53286) (the “Registration Statement”) and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
10.1
  Lease Agreement dated October 1, 1987, between the Company and Greenway Tower Joint Venture, as amended by First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated April 29, 1988, Second Amendment to Lease Agreement dated August 24, 1988, Third Amendment to Lease Agreement dated December 29, 1988 and Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement dated January 29, 1991. (Included as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registration Statement and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
10.2
  Fifth Amendment to Lease Agreement dated June 13, 1994, between the Company and Greenway Tower Joint Venture. (Included as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Form 10-K as of June 30, 1994 (Commission File Number 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
10.3
  Ace Cash Express, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, adopted July 1, 1994. (Included as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Form 10-K as of June 30, 1994 (Commission File Number 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)#
 
   
10.4
  Ace Cash Express, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, adopted July 1, 1994. (Included as Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Form 10-K as of June 30, 1994 (Commission File Number 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)#
 
   
10.5
  Ace Cash Express, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan dated March 27, 1995. (Included as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-K as June 30, 1995 (Commission File Number 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)#
 
   
10.6
  Sixth Amendment to Lease Agreement dated February 1, 1996, between the Company and Greenway Tower Joint Venture. (Included as Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Form 10-Q as of March 31, 1996 (Commission File Number 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
10.7
  Amendment No.1 to the Ace Cash Express 401K Profit Sharing Plan effective January 1, 1998. (Included as Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Form 10-Q as of March 31, 1998 (Commission File Number 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)#
 
   
10.8
  Amendment No. 1 to Ace Cash Express, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan. (Included as Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Form 10-K as of June 30, 1998 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.) #
 
   
10.9
  Amendment No. 2 to Ace Cash Express, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan. (Included as Exhibit 10.35 to the Company’s Form 10-K as of June 30, 1998 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.) #
 
   
10.10
  Ace Cash Express, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan. (Included as Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)#

48


Table of Contents

     
Exhibit Number
  Exhibits
10.11
  Amendment No. 1 to Ace Cash Express, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan. (Included as Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Form 10-K as of June 30, 1998 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.) #
 
   
10.12
  Money Order Agreement dated as of April 16, 1998, but effective as of December 16, 1998, between the Company and Travelers Express Company, Inc. (Confidential treatment for a portion of this document has been granted by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). (Included as Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Form 10-K as of June 30, 1998 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
10.13
  Amendment No.3 to Ace Cash Express, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan. (Included as Exhibit 10.44 to the Company’s Form 10-Q as of December 31, 1998 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)#
 
   
10.14
  Amendment No. 2 to Ace Cash Express, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan. (Included as Exhibit 10.45 to the Company’s Form 10-Q as of December 31, 1999 (Commission File Number 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)#
 
   
10.15
  Money Transfer Agreement dated as of June 30, 2000, among the Company, Travelers Express Company, Inc., and MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc. (Confidential treatment for a portion of this document has been granted by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.) (Included as Exhibit 10.48 to the Company’s Form 10-K as of June 30, 2000 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
10.16
  Amendment No. 3 to Ace Cash Express, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan. (Included as Exhibit 10.50 to the Company’s Form 10-Q as of December 31, 2000 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)#
 
   
10.17
  Change-in-Control Executive Severance Agreement dated as of May 15, 2001, between the Company and Barry M. Barron. (Included as Exhibit 10.56 to the Company’s Form 10-K as of June 30, 2001 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)#
 
   
10.18
  Separation Agreement dated as of February 28, 2002, between the Company and R. Edward McCarty. (Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q as of March 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)#
 
   
10.19
  Consulting Agreement dated as of February 28, 2002, between the Company and R. Edward McCarty. (Included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q as of March 31, 2002 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)#
 
   
10.20
  Seventh Amendment to Lease Agreement dated December 20, 2000, between the Company and Greenway Tower Joint Venture. (Included as Exhibit 10.66 to the Company’s Form 10-K as of June 30, 2002 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
10.21
  Eighth Amendment to Lease Agreement dated May 10, 2001, between the Company and Greenway Tower Joint Venture. (Included as Exhibit 10.67 to the Company’s Form 10-K as of June 30, 2002 (Commission File No. 0- 20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
10.22
  Ace Cash Express, Inc. Executive Non-Qualified Excess Plan Adoption Agreement with the First Amendment to the Ace Cash Express, Inc. Executive Non-Qualified Excess Plan, dated as of October 1, 2001. (Included as Exhibit 10.68 to the Company’s Form 10-K as of June 30, 2002 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.) #
 
   
10.23
  Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order between Ace Cash Express, Inc. and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency dated October 25, 2002. (Included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2002 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)
 
   
10.24
  Consent Order issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency In the Matter of Ace Cash Express, Inc., Irving, Texas, as Agent and Bank Service Provider for Goleta National Bank, Goleta, California, dated October 25, 2002. (Included as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2002 (Commission File No. 0-20774) and incorporated herein by reference.)