UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Asset Acceptance Capital Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

28405 Van Dyke Avenue

Warren, Michigan 48093

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(586)939-9600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

      Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.      o

      Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).     Yes o          No þ

      The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on March 21, 2005 (based on the March 21, 2005 closing sales price of $19.485 of the Registrant’s Common Stock, as reported on The Nasdaq National Market on such date) was approximately $725,334,483.38.

      Number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock at March 21, 2005:

37,225,275 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

      Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed for its 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 17, 2005 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.

ASSET ACCEPTANCE CAPITAL CORP.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Annual Report on Form 10-K

This Form 10-K and all other Company filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission are also accessible at no charge on the Company’s website at www.assetacceptance.com as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with the Commission.

PART I

General

      We have been purchasing and collecting defaulted or charged-off accounts receivable portfolios from consumer credit originators since the formation of our predecessor company in 1962. Charged-off receivables are the unpaid obligations of individuals to credit originators, such as credit card issuers, consumer finance companies, retail merchants and telecommunications and other utility providers as well as from resellers and other holders of consumer debt. Since these receivables generally have been subject to multiple collection efforts, we are able to purchase them at a substantial discount to their face value. Unlike many of our competitors, we currently do not collect on a commission or contingent fee basis. Rather, we purchase and collect charged-off accounts receivable portfolios for our own account as we believe this affords us the best opportunity to use long-term strategies to maximize our profits. Since January 1, 1990, we have purchased 759 consumer debt portfolios through December 31, 2004, with an original charged-off face value of $18.8 billion for a purchase price of $355.2 million, or 1.89% of face value, net of buybacks. On average, we have been able to collect more than three times the amount paid for a portfolio, as measured over a five-year period from the date of purchase.

      When considering whether to purchase a portfolio, we conduct a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the portfolio to appropriately price the debt and determine whether the portfolio will yield collections consistent with our goals. This analysis includes the use of our pricing and collection probability model and draws upon our extensive experience in the industry. We have developed experience across a wide range of asset types at various stages of delinquency, having made purchases across more than 20 different asset types from over 150 different debt sellers. We selectively deploy our capital in the primary, secondary and tertiary markets where typically between one and three collection agencies have already tried to collect the debt. We believe we are well positioned to acquire charged-off accounts receivable portfolios as a result of our being price competitive, long-standing history in the industry, relationships with debt sellers, consistency of performance and attention to post-sale service.

      Unlike many third party collection agencies that typically attempt to collect the debt only for a period of three to six months, we generally take a long-term approach, in excess of five years, to the collection effort as we are the owners of the debt. We apply an approach that encourages cooperation with the debtors to make a lump sum settlement payment in full or to formulate a repayment plan. In part, through our strategy of holding the debt for the long-term, we have established a methodology of converting debtors into paying customers. In addition, our approach allows us to invest in various collection management and analysis tools that may be too costly for traditional, more short-term oriented, collection agencies, as well as to pursue legal collection strategies as appropriate. In many cases, we continue to receive collections on individual portfolios beyond the tenth anniversary of its purchase.

History and Reorganization

      Our Chairman’s expertise and experience in purchasing and collecting charged-off consumer receivables dates back to 1962 when he formed Lee Acceptance Company as a sole proprietorship. Our Chief Executive Officer joined Lee Acceptance Company in 1979. In 1982, Lee Acceptance Company was incorporated as Lee Acceptance Corp. The business of purchasing and collecting charged-off consumer receivables was subsequently conducted by our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer through several successor companies.

      In 1994, in an effort to take advantage of tax planning opportunities available for S corporations, our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer formed Asset Acceptance Corp. for the purpose of purchasing and collecting charged-off consumer receivables and formed Consumer Credit Corp. for the purpose of financing sales of consumer product retailers located primarily in Michigan.

      Subsequently, our Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer formed Financial Credit Corp. in 1997 for the purpose of purchasing and collecting portfolios of charged-off consumer receivables of health clubs and CFC Financial Corp. in 1998 for the purpose of purchasing and collecting portfolios of charged-off consumer receivables of utility companies and small balance portfolios, both of which were affiliate corporations of Asset Acceptance Corp. and Consumer Credit Corp.

      In January 2000, Asset Acceptance Corp., Financial Credit Corp. and CFC Financial Corp. were joined as wholly-owned subsidiaries of AAC Holding Corp. for tax planning purposes. Set forth below is a diagram depicting our predecessor corporations in operation for the period of January 2000 through September 30, 2002, their dates of formation and their ownership:

      In September 2002, we formed Asset Acceptance Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for the purpose of consummating an equity recapitalization, with Consumer Credit Corp. and AAC Holding Corp. (which was renamed RBR Holding Corp. in October 2002), as the initial equity members of Asset Acceptance Holdings LLC. Effective September 30, 2002, AAC Investors, Inc. acquired a 60% equity interest in Asset Acceptance Holdings LLC from RBR Holding Corp. and Consumer Credit Corp. which collectively retained a 40% equity interest. In connection with this recapitalization, RBR Holding Corp. and Consumer Credit Corp. received 39% and 1%, respectively, of the equity membership interests of Asset Acceptance Holdings LLC and $45,550,000 and $250,000, respectively, in cash. The majority of the cash proceeds were subsequently distributed to the owners of RBR Holding Corp. and Consumer Credit Corp. At the time of this

recapitalization, Rufus H. Reitzel, Jr., our Chairman, Nathaniel F. Bradley IV, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Mark A. Redman, our Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer, beneficially owned 57%, 38% and 5%, respectively, of RBR Holding Corp. and 60%, 40% and 0%, respectively, of Consumer Credit Corp. Through this recapitalization, the businesses of Asset Acceptance Corp., Financial Credit Corp., CFC Financial Corp., Consumer Credit Corp. and the portfolio assets of Lee Acceptance Corp. were contributed to the subsidiaries of Asset Acceptance Holdings LLC. After September 30, 2002, the business of purchasing and collecting portfolios of charged-off consumer receivables previously conducted by AAC Holding Corp. and its subsidiaries and the business of financing sales of consumer product retailers previously conducted by Consumer Credit Corp. were effected through this newly formed company and its subsidiaries. Consumer Credit Corp. was merged into RBR Holding Corp. in January 2003.

      Set forth below is a diagram depicting our successor entities in operation for the period from September 30, 2002, up to the effective date of the Reorganization (as defined below), their dates of formation and their ownership:

      On February 4, 2004, immediately prior to the commencement of our initial public offering, all of the shares of capital stock of AAC Investors, Inc., an affiliate of Quad-C Management, Inc., a private equity firm based in Charlottesville, Virginia, and RBR Holding Corp., which held 60% and 40%, respectively, of the equity membership interests in Asset Acceptance Holdings LLC, were contributed to Asset Acceptance Capital Corp. in exchange for shares of common stock of Asset Acceptance Capital Corp. The total number of shares issued to the stockholders of AAC Investors, Inc. and RBR Holding Corp. in such exchange was 28,448,449 with 16,004,017 shares and 12,444,432 shares issued to the stockholders of AAC Investors, Inc. and the stockholders of RBR Holding Corp., respectively. As a result of this reorganization, Asset Acceptance Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries became indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Asset Acceptance Capital Corp. The foregoing is referred to herein as the “Reorganization”. Immediately prior to the Reorganization, all of the shares of AAC Investors, Inc. were held by AAC Quad-C Investors LLC, an affiliate of Terrence D. Daniels and Anthony R. Ignaczak, both of whom serve on our board of directors, and substantially all of the shares of RBR Holding Corp. were held by Rufus H. Reitzel, Jr., our Chairman, Nathaniel F. Bradley IV, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mark A. Redman, our Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer, and their affiliates.

      Set forth below is a diagram depicting our successor entities as of the effective date of the Reorganization, their dates of formation and their ownership:

      Upon the consummation of our February 2004 initial public offering, our then-current officers, directors and principal stockholders, together with their affiliates (including Messrs. Reitzel, Bradley and Redman and AAC Quad-C Investors LLC), beneficially owned approximately 75.8% of our issued and outstanding common stock.

      On December 31, 2004, Financial Credit, LLC and CFC Financial, LLC were merged with and into Asset Acceptance, LLC, with the result that, by operation of law, all assets of Financial Credit, LLC and CFC Financial, LLC were vested in Asset Acceptance, LLC and all obligations of Financial Credit, LLC and CFC Financial, LLC were assumed by Asset Acceptance, LLC. Subsequent to the merger, all ownership interests in Asset Acceptance, LLC continue to be owned by Asset Acceptance Holdings LLC.

      Currently, Asset Acceptance, LLC purchases and holds portfolios in all asset types except for healthcare and Rx Acquisitions, LLC purchases and holds portfolios solely in healthcare.

      Set forth below is a diagram depicting our current structure:

      As used in this Annual Report, all references to us mean:

Purchasing

      Typically, we purchase our portfolios in response to a request to bid received via e-mail or telephone. In addition to these requests, we have developed a marketing and acquisitions team that contacts and cultivates relationships with known and prospective sellers of portfolios in our core markets and in new markets for different asset types. We have purchased portfolios from over 150 different debt sellers since 1990, including many of the largest consumer lenders in the United States. Although 10% or more of the money we spend on our purchases in a year may be paid to a single debt seller, historically, we have not purchased more than 10% from the same debt seller in consecutive years. We had one portfolio purchased in 2003 that accounted for approximately 5% of our revenues in 2004, which we believe will account for a declining percentage of our revenues in 2005 and beyond. While we have no policy limiting purchases from single debt sellers, we purchase from a diverse set of suppliers and our purchasing decisions are based upon constantly changing economic and competitive environments as opposed to long-term relationships with particular suppliers. During 2004, we entered into five forward flow contracts and purchased portfolios for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $8.1 million, or 9% of the total invested. These contracts commit a debt seller to sell a steady flow of charged-off receivables to us and commit us to purchase receivables for a fixed percentage of the face amount. We have entered into such contracts in the past and will do so in the future depending on market conditions. One of the forward flow contracts entered into in 2004 has expired. The remaining four forward flow contracts have terms of between three to twelve months.

      We purchase our portfolios through a variety of sources, including consumer credit originators, private brokers or agents and debt resellers. Debt resellers are debt purchasers that sell some or all of the debt they purchase. Generally, the portfolios are purchased either in competitive bids through a sealed bid or, in some cases, through an on-line process or through privately-negotiated transactions between the credit originator or other holder of consumer debt and us.

      Each potential acquisition begins with a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the portfolio. In the initial stages of the due diligence process, we typically review basic data on the portfolio’s accounts. This data typically includes the account number, the consumer’s name, address, social security number, phone numbers, outstanding balance, date of charge-off, last payment and account origination. We analyze this information based on quantitative and qualitative factors and summarize into a format based on certain key metrics, such as state of debtor’s last known residence, type of debt and age of the receivable. In addition, we typically provide the seller with a questionnaire designed to help us understand important qualitative factors relating to the portfolio.

      As part of our due diligence evaluation, we run the portfolio through our pricing and collection probability model. This model uses certain characteristics of the portfolio, such as the type of product, age and level of delinquency and the locations of the debtors, to calculate an estimate of collectibility for the portfolio and to determine a base value for the purchase. Pricing adjustments are factored into the model reflecting issuer considerations, demographic attributes and other account criteria. In those circumstances where the type or pricing of the portfolio is unusual, we consult with management from our collection operations to help ascertain collectibility, potential collection strategies and our ability to integrate the new portfolio into our collection platform. Our analysis also compares the charged-off consumer receivables in the prospective portfolio with our collection history on portfolios with similar attributes.

      Once we have compiled and analyzed available data, we factor in market conditions and determine an appropriate bid price or bid range. The recommended bid price or bid range, along with a summary of our due diligence, is submitted to our investment committee and, for purchases in excess of a certain corporate threshold, to our audit committee for review and approval. After appropriate approvals and acceptance of our offer by the seller of the portfolio, a purchase agreement is negotiated. Provisions are generally incorporated for bankrupt, disputed, fraudulent or deceased accounts and, typically, the credit originator either agrees to repurchase these accounts or replace them with acceptable replacement accounts within certain time frames, generally within 60 days to 365 days. Upon execution of the agreement, the transaction is funded.

      The following chart categorizes our purchased receivable portfolios for the period from January 1, 1990 through December 31, 2004 into the major asset types represented:

      The age of a charged-off consumer receivables portfolio, or the time since an account has been charged-off, is an important factor in determining the value at which we will offer to purchase a receivables portfolio. Generally, there is an inverse relationship between the age of a portfolio and the price at which we will purchase the portfolio. This relationship is due to the fact that older receivables typically are more difficult to collect. The accounts receivable management industry places receivables into the following categories depending on the number of collection agencies that have previously attempted to collect on the receivables:

      We specialize in the primary, secondary and tertiary markets, but we will purchase accounts at any point in the delinquency cycle. We deploy our capital within these markets based upon the relative values of the available debt portfolios.

      The following chart categorizes our purchased receivable portfolios for the period from January 1, 1990 through December 31, 2004 into the major account types represented:

      We also review the geographic distribution of accounts within a portfolio because collection laws differ from state to state. The following chart illustrates for the period from January 1, 1990 through December 31, 2004 our purchased receivable portfolios based on geographic location of debtor:

Collection Operations

      Our collection operations seek to maximize the recovery of our purchased charged-off receivables in a cost-effective manner. We have organized our collection platform into a number of specialized departments which include collection, legal collection and bankruptcy and probate recovery.

      Generally, our collection efforts begin in our collection department and, if warranted, move to our legal collection department. If the collection account involves a bankrupt debtor or a deceased debtor, our bankruptcy and probate recovery department will review and manage the account. If the collection account merits outsourcing to a third party collection agency, our agency forwarding department handles the matter. Finally, our information acquisition department utilizes a network of data providers to increase recovery rates and promote collector efficiency in all of our departments.

      Our collection department accounts for the majority of our collections. Once a portfolio is purchased, we perform a portfolio review in order to formulate and apply what we believe to be an effective collection strategy. This review includes a series of data preparation and information acquisition steps to provide the necessary information to begin collection efforts. Portfolio accounts are assigned, sorted and prioritized to collector queues based on product type, account status, various internal and external collectibility predictors, account demographics, balance sizes and other attributes.

      Although we prefer to collect the majority of our charged-off receivables portfolio through our internal collection operations, in some cases, we believe it can be more effective and cost-efficient to outsource collections. We will consider outsourcing collections involving states with unfavorable legal or regulatory climates for collections. In addition, we may also consider outsourcing relatively small balance accounts so that our collectors can focus on relatively larger balance accounts. We have developed a network of third party collection agencies to service accounts when we believe the accounts would be better served by outsourcing to an outside collection agency.

      We train our collectors to be full service collectors who handle substantially all collection activity related to their accounts, including manual and automated dialer outbound calling activity, inbound call management, skip tracing or debtor location efforts, referrals to pursue legal action and settlement and payment plan negotiation. In order to increase collections on accounts, non-paying accounts are typically reassigned to new collectors every six months. Our performance based collection model is driven by a bonus program that allows collectors to earn bonuses based on their personal collection goals. In addition, we monitor our collectors for compliance with the federal and state debt collection laws.

      When an initial telephone contact is made with a debtor, the collector is trained to go through a series of questions in an effort to obtain accurate location and financial information on the debtor, the reason the debtor may have defaulted on the account, the debtor’s willingness to pay and other relevant information that may be helpful in securing satisfactory settlement or payment arrangements. Collectors are encouraged to attempt to collect the balance in full in one lump sum payment prior to the end of the month. If full payment is not available, the collector will attempt to negotiate a settlement on the balance in the highest amount within the shortest time frame. We maintain settlement guidelines that collectors, supervisors and managers must follow in an effort to maximize recoveries. Exceptions are handled by management on an account by account basis. If the debtor is unable to pay the balance in full or settle within allowed guidelines, monthly installment plans are encouraged in order to have the debtor resume a regular payment habit. Our experience has shown that debtors are more likely to respond to this approach which can result in a payment plan or settlement in full in the future.

      If a collector is unable to establish contact with a debtor, we require the collector to undertake skip tracing procedures to locate, initiate contact and collect from the debtor. Skip tracing efforts are performed at the collector level and by third party information providers on a larger scale. Each collector has access to internal and external information databases that interface with our collection system at the desktop level. In addition, we have several information providers from whom we acquire information that is either systematically or manually validated and used in our collection and location efforts. Using these methods, we periodically refresh and supply updated account information to our collectors to increase contact with debtors.

      If voluntary payments cannot be established with the debtor, we have trained our collectors to identify opportunities to pursue legal action against those debtors with an ability, but not the willingness, to pay. Using our lawsuit guidelines, our collectors recommend debtors for us to commence litigation in an effort to stimulate collections.

      In the event collection has not been obtained through our collection department and the opportunity for legal action is verified through our internal process, we pursue a legal judgment against the debtor. Our legal collection department is comprised of an in-house legal department, including collection attorneys and non-attorney legal collectors, and a legal forwarding department.

      For accounts in states where we have a local presence, and in some cases, adjacent states, we prefer to pursue an in-house legal strategy as it provides us with a greater ability to manage the process. We currently have in-house capability in Michigan, Ohio, Florida, Maryland, Arizona, Texas, Illinois and New Jersey. In each of these states, we have designed our legal policies and procedures to maintain compliance with state and federal laws while pursuing available legal opportunities. We will continue to pursue selective and opportunistic expansion in various geographic regions.

      Our legal forwarding department is organized to address the legal recovery function for accounts principally located in states where we do not have a local or, in some cases, adjacent presence, or for accounts that we believe can be better served by a third party law firm. To that end, we have developed a nationwide network of independent law firms in all 50 states, as well as the District of Columbia, who work for us on a contingent fee basis. The legal forwarding department actively manages and monitors this network.

      Once a judgment is obtained, our legal department pursues voluntary and involuntary collection strategies to secure payment, including wage and bank account garnishments.

      Our bankruptcy and probate recovery department handles bankruptcy and estate probate processing. This department files proofs of claims for recoveries on receivables which are included in consumer bankruptcies filed under Chapter 7 (resulting in liquidation and discharge of a debtor’s debts) and Chapter 13 (resulting in repayment plans based on the financial wherewithal of the debtor) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In addition, this department submits claims against estates involving deceased debtors having assets that may become available to us through a probate claim.

Competition

      The consumer debt collection industry is highly competitive and fragmented. We compete with a wide range of other purchasers of charged-off consumer receivables, third party collection agencies, other financial service companies and credit originators that manage their own consumer receivables. Some of these companies may have substantially greater personnel and financial resources and may experience lower collector and employee turnover rates than we do. We believe that increasing amounts of capital are being invested in the debt collection industry, which could lead to further increases in prices for portfolios of charged-off accounts receivables, the enhanced ability of third parties to collect debt and the reduction in the number of portfolios of charged-off accounts receivables available for purchase. In addition, companies with greater financial resources may elect at a future date to enter the consumer debt collection business. Furthermore, current debt sellers may change strategies and cease selling debt portfolios in the future.

      Competitive pressures affect the availability and pricing of receivables portfolios, as well as the availability and cost of qualified debt collectors. In addition, some of our competitors may have entered into forward flow contracts under which consumer credit originators have agreed to transfer a steady flow of charged-off receivables to them in the future, which could restrict those credit originators from selling receivables to us.

      We face bidding competition in our acquisition of charged-off consumer receivables. We believe successful bids generally are awarded based on a combination of price, service and relationships with the individual debt sellers. In addition, there continues to be a consolidation of issuers of credit cards, which have

been a principal source of our receivable purchases. This consolidation has decreased the number of sellers in the market and, consequently, could over time, give the remaining sellers increasing market strength in the price and terms of the sale of charged-off credit card accounts.

Technology Platform

      We believe that information technology is critical to our success. Our key systems have been purchased from outside vendors and, with our input, have been tailored to meet our particular business needs. We have a staff of over 25 full-time employees who monitor and maintain our information technology and communications structure. Additionally, we believe we have relationships with many of our key vendors that will allow any system failure to be remedied in an expeditious manner. Our centralized data center is in our Warren, Michigan headquarters and all offices are connected to this data center. This provides for one standard system in every one of our offices with all employees accessing the same database.

      We license our collection software and complementary products from Ontario Systems LLC, a leading provider to the collection industry. This software has enabled us to:

      Our collection software resides on a Hewlett-Packard® system that was most recently upgraded in August 2003 and is scheduled to be upgraded again in March 2005. This platform currently handles our 18 million accounts and we believe it is scalable to handle our anticipated growth for the near future.

      We maintain a Microsoft Windows® 2003 based network that supports our back office functions including time and attendance systems, payroll and MAS200® accounting software.

      In order to minimize the potential for a disaster or other interruption of data or telephone communications that are critical to our business, we have:

Regulation and Legal Compliance — Collection Activities

      Federal and state statutes establish specific guidelines and procedures which debt collectors must follow when collecting consumer accounts. It is our policy to comply with the provisions of all applicable federal laws and comparable state statutes in all of our recovery activities, even in circumstances in which we may not be specifically subject to these laws. As part of this policy, we monitor our collectors and other activities for compliance with federal and state collection laws. Our failure to comply with these laws could lead to fines on us and on our collectors and could have a material adverse effect on us in the event and to the extent that they apply to some or all of our recovery activities. Court rulings in various jurisdictions also impact our ability to collect.

      Federal and state consumer protection, privacy and related laws and regulations extensively regulate the relationship between debt collectors and debtors. Significant federal laws and regulations applicable to our business as a debt collector include the following:

      Additionally, there are state statutes and regulations comparable to the above federal laws and other state-specific licensing requirements which affect our operations. State laws may also limit interest rates and fees, methods of collections, as well as the time frame in which judicial actions may be initiated to enforce the collection of consumer accounts.

      Although, generally, we are not a credit originator, some laws, such as the following, which apply typically to credit originators, may occasionally affect our operations because our receivables were originated through credit transactions:

      Federal laws which regulate credit originators require, among other things, that credit card issuers disclose to consumers the interest rates, fees, grace periods and balance calculation methods associated with their credit card accounts. Consumers are entitled under current laws to have payments and credits applied to their accounts promptly, to receive prescribed notices, and to require billing errors to be resolved promptly. Some laws prohibit discriminatory practices in connection with the extension of credit. Federal statutes further provide that, in some cases, consumers cannot be held liable for, or their liability is limited with respect to, charges to the credit card account that were a result of an unauthorized use of the credit card. These laws, among others, may give consumers a legal cause of action against us, or may limit our ability to recover amounts due on an account, whether or not we committed any wrongful act or omission in connection with the account. If the credit originator fails to comply with applicable statutes, rules and regulations, it could create claims and rights for consumers that could reduce or eliminate their obligations to repay the account, and have a possible material adverse effect on us. Accordingly, typically when we acquire charged-off consumer receivables, we contractually require credit originators to indemnify us against certain losses that may result from their failure to comply with applicable statutes, rules and regulations relating to the receivables before they are sold to us.

      The U.S. Congress and several states have enacted legislation concerning identity theft. Some of these provisions place restrictions on our ability to report information concerning receivables, which may be subject to identity theft, to consumer credit reporting agencies. Additional consumer protection and privacy protection laws may be enacted that would impose additional requirements on the recovery on consumer credit card or installment accounts. Any new laws, rules or regulations that may be adopted, as well as changes to or interpretations of existing consumer protection and privacy protection laws, may adversely affect our ability to recover the receivables. In addition, our failure to comply with these requirements could adversely affect our ability to recover the receivables.

      It is possible that some of the receivables were established as a result of identity theft or unauthorized use of a credit card. In such cases, we would not be able to recover the amount of the charged-off consumer receivables. As a purchaser of charged-off consumer receivables, we may acquire receivables subject to legitimate defenses on the part of the consumer. Most of our account purchase contracts allow us to return to the credit originators (within an agreed upon amount of time) certain charged-off consumer receivables that may not be collectible at the time of purchase, due to these and other circumstances. Upon return, the credit originators are required to replace the receivables with similar receivables or repurchase the receivables. These provisions limit to some extent our losses on such accounts.

      Internal Revenue Code Section 6050P and the related Treasury Regulations, in certain circumstances, require creditors to send out Form 1099-C information returns to those debtors whose debt, in an amount in excess of $600, has been deemed to have been forgiven for tax purposes, thereby alerting them to the amount of the forgiveness and the fact that such amount may be taxable income to them. Under these regulations, a debt is deemed to have been forgiven for tax purposes if (i) there has been no payment on the debt for

36 months and if there were no “bona fide collection activities” (as defined in the regulation) for the preceding 12 month period, (ii) the debt was settled for less than the full amount or (iii) other similar situations outlined in the regulations. U.S. Treasury Regulation Section 1.6050P-2 became final in 2004 and is effective for 2005 and forward and indicates that the rules apply to companies who acquire indebtedness and, therefore, we will need to comply with the reporting requirements. Our cost of compliance with these regulations is uncertain. In some instances, we may engage in additional monitoring activities of accounts and will send 1099-C information returns, which will increase our administrative costs. If we are required to send a 1099-C information return, despite the fact that we are continuing our collections efforts on an account, it may become more difficult to collect from those accounts because debtors may perceive the 1099-C as notice of debt relief rather than as tax information.